Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
2004
V. DUBOV, J. KRI
ABSTRACT
KEY WORDS
The paper deals with corrosion tests performed on the Jelka - Galanta - Nitra water
pipeline. The corrosion of the steel pipes was tested during two periods the first period
from 1995-96, when the water was disinfected by gaseous Cl2, and the second from
200103, when the disinfectant used was ClO2. Tests were done on the samples
according to the Slovak Technical Standards as well as on samples with a 2.5 times
greater area. The tests are described, and the results of both test series compared
(especially the corrosion velocities).
1. INTRODUCTION
In the past as well as the present, water pipeline systems were
constructed of steel conduits that were, except for their good
mechanical attributes, liable to corrosion. The internal corrosion of
steel pipelines causes serious problems and financial losses, because
corrosion creates a progressive failure of pipelines, and the whole
water supply system becomes defective. All water supply providers
encounter the internal corrosion of pipelines, to a greater or lesser
extent. In order to know if anticorrosion measures are needed, it is
necessary to understand the interaction of transferred water and
pipeline material. Therefore, it is understandable that operators have
to monitor corrosion, especially when a change in the disinfection of
distributed water occurs.
Therefore, we have conducted corrosion tests on the Jelka Galanta
Nitra long-distance pipeline system, which is situated in southern
18
Steel pipeline,
corrosion,
corrosion velocity,
effect of gaseous Cl2 and ClO2
on corrosion
2004/1 PAGES 18 22
19
2004/1 PAGES 18 22
Jelka
2001-03
0 - 30
Galanta
95-96
2001-03
95.4-92.1 76.67
59
52.62
60.2
0 - 191 /177*
54
26.79
36.9*
44
29.28
0 - 554 /540*
36.2
23.5-26.8 28.00
30 - 60
30 - 191/177*
46.5
16.81
30 - 365
39.,7
24.98
30 - 554/540*
32.,9
2001-03
95-96
0 - 60
0 - 364
Nitra
29.73
30.63
27.15*
23.26
29
17.5
23.5 - 24.2*
27.3
Table 2 Comparison of the corrosive declines and sediments in the standard and large samples in %
Standard samples
Days
Ut (m)
2001-03 (100%)
Large samples
Sediments
Ut (m)
Sediments *
Ut
Sedim.
95-96
(g/sample) (100%)
(2001-03)
(g/standard.sample)
30.
7.58 - 7.84
6.30
0.2493 - 0.3054
6.16
0.2224
79/81
73/89
60.
9.77
8.63
0.3494
7.26
0.2473
74
71
191.
28.28
13.21
1.0556
364.
44
28.9
1.6056
18.68
0.6203
42
39
554.
55
2.2459
30.
6.33 - 7.38
0.3161 - 0.3730
5.16
0.1914
70/82
51-61
6.57
0.2633
62
51
15.71
0.7232
53
55
60.
10.55
0.5174
177.
17.90
0.8116
364.
29.73
1.3275
540.
40.16
1.698
30.
6.94 - 7.51
5.87
0.2284 - 0.2470
4.86
0.169
65-70
68-74
60.
8.81 - 9.96
8.84
0.3433 - 0.3572
6.33
0.2044
64-72
57-59
191.
16.44
14.69
0.6092
364.
23.26
0.8290
15.07
0.5309
65
64
554.
46.49
1.8262
* The sediment amount is calculated with regard to the size of the standard sample
20
2004/1 PAGES 18 22
Galanta
Nitra
21
2004/1 PAGES 18 22
3. CONCLUSIONS
We can conclude that a comparison of the present experiments with
the experiments from 1995-96 indicates no significant changes in
REFERENCES
22