Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
LIST OF SYMBOLS
Symbol
B
dm
D
f
F
Fc
Ff
g
H
J
K
l
m
M
Mg
M
n
nm
nR
Pd
q
Q
Qa
Qr
R
s
X1
Description
fi fo 1
Pitch diameter
Ball or roller diameter
r=D
Force
Centrifugal force
Friction force
Gravitational constant
Roller hollowness ratio
Mass moment of inertia
Loaddeflection constant
Roller length
Ball or roller mass
Moment
Gyroscopic moment
Applied moment
Rotational speed
Ball or roller orbital speed, cage speed
Ball or roller speed about its own axis
Radial or diametral clearance
Rollerraceway load per unit length
Ball or roller normal load
Axial direction load on ball or roller
Radial direction load on ball or roller
Radius to locus of raceway groove curvature centers
Distance between inner and outer groove
curvature center loci
Axial projection of distance between ball center and
outer raceway groove curvature center
Units
mm (in.)
mm (in.)
N (lb)
N (lb)
N (lb)
mm=sec2 (in.=sec2)
kg mm2 (in. lb sec2)
N=mmx (lb=in.x)
mm (in.)
kg (lb sec2=in.)
N mm (lb in.)
N mm (lb in.)
N mm (lb in.)
rpm
rpm
rpm
N (lb.)
N=mm (lb=in.)
N (lb)
N (lb)
N (lb)
mm (in.)
mm (in.)
mm (in.)
X2
a
b
g
d
u
r
f
c
v
vm
vR
Dc
mm (in.)
8, rad
8, rad
mm (in.)
8, rad
kg=mm3 (lb z sec2=in.4)
8, rad
8, rad
rad=sec
rad=sec
rad=sec
rad
Subscripts
a
e
f
i
j
m
o
r
R
x
z
Axial direction
Rotation about an eccentric axis
Roller guide flange
Inner raceway
Rolling element at angular location
Cage motion and orbital motion
Outer raceway
Radial direction
Rolling element
x direction
z direction
3.1 GENERAL
Dynamic (inertial) loading occurs between rolling elements and bearing raceways because of
rolling element orbital speeds and speeds about their own axes. At slow-to-moderate operating speeds, these dynamic loads are very small compared with the ball or roller loads caused
by the loading applied to the bearing. At high operating speeds, however, these rolling
element dynamic loads, centrifugal forces, and gyroscopic moments will alter the distribution
of the applied loading among the balls or rollers. In roller bearings, the increase in loading on
the outer raceway due to roller centrifugal forces causes larger contact deformations in that
member; this effect is similar to that of increasing clearance. Increase of clearance, as
demonstrated in Chapter 7 of the first volume of this handbook, causes increased maximum
roller load due to a decrease in the extent of the load zone. For relatively thin section bearings
supported at only a few points on the outer ring, for example, an aircraft gas turbine
mainshaft bearing, the centrifugal forces cause bending of the outer ring, also affecting the
distribution of loading among the rollers.
In high-speed ball bearings, depending on the contact angles, ball gyroscopic moments
and ball centrifugal forces can be of significant magnitude such that inner-ring contact angles
increase and outer-ring contact angles decrease. This affects the deflection vs. load characteristics of the bearing and therefore also affects the dynamics of the ball bearingsupported
rotor system.
High speed also affects the lubrication and friction characteristics in both ball and
roller bearings. This influences bearing internal speeds, and hence rolling element dynamic
loads. It is possible, however, to determine the internal load distribution and hence contact
stresses in many high-speed rolling bearing applications with sufficient accuracy while not
considering the frictional loading on the rolling elements. This will be demonstrated in
this chapter. The effects of friction on load distribution will be considered in a later
chapter.
TO
The development of equations in this section is based on the motions occurring in an angularcontact ball bearing because it is the most general form of rolling bearing. Subsequently, the
equations developed can be so restricted as to apply to other ball bearings and also to roller
bearings.
Figure 3.1 illustrates the instantaneous position of a particle of mass m in a ball of an
angular-contact ball bearing operating at a high rotational speed about an axis x. To simplify
the analysis, the following coordinate axes systems are introduced:
z'
dm
y'
b
r
wR
b
b'
x'
O'
h
tc
Pi cle
cir
Ball center
1
2dm
wm
y
1
2dm
w
Axis of rotation
O
x, y, z
x, y, z
U, V, W
U, r, f
A fixed set of Cartesian coordinates with the x axis coincident with the bearing rotational axis
A set of Cartesian coordinates with the x axis parallel to the x axis of the fixed set. This set of
coordinates has its origin O at the ball center and rotates at orbital speed about the fixed x axis
at radius 12 dm
A set of Cartesian coordinates with origin at the ball center O and rotating at orbital speed vm.
The U axis is collinear with the axis of rotation of the ball about its own center. The W axis is in the
plane of the U axis and z axis; the angle between the W axis and z axis is b
A set of polar coordinates rotating with the ball
b
c
The angle between the projection of the U axis on the xy plane and the x axis
The angle between the z axis and z axis, that is, the angular position of the ball on the pitch circle
Consider that an element of mass dm in the ball has the following instantaneous location in
the system of rotating coordinates: U, r, f. As
U U
V r sin f
W r cos f
3:1
and
x0 U cos b cos b0 V sin b0 W sin b cos b0
y0 U cos b sin b0 V cos b0 W sin b sin b0
z0 U sin b W cos b
3:2
and
x x0
y 12dm sin c y0 cos c z0 sin c
3:3
dm
sin c Ucos b sin b0 cos c sin b sin c
2
rcos b sin f cos c cos b cos f sin c
0
3:4
3:5
dm
cos c U cos b sin b0 sin c sin b cos c
2
r cos b0 sin f sin c cos b cos f cos c
3:6
3:7
dFy
y dm
3:8
dFz z dm
3:9
3:10
dMy0 f
xU sin b r cos b cos f
zU cos b cos b0 rsin b0 sin f sin b cos b0 cos fgdm
3:11
The net moment about the x axis must be zero for constant speed motion. At each ball
location (c, b), vR (rotational speed df=dt of the ball about its own axis U) and vm (orbital
speed dc=dt of the ball about the bearing axis x) are constant; therefore, at c 0,
d2 x
rv2R sin b0 sin f sin b cos b0 cos f
dt2
d2 y
2vR vm r cos b sin f
dt2
v2m U cos b sin b0 r cos b0 sin f sin b cos f sin b0
3:12
3:13
d2 z
2vR vm rcos b0 cos f sin b sin b0 sin f
dt2
2 dm
U sin b r cos b cos f
vm
2
3:14
rR
rR
F r
rR
r2R U 2 1=2
2p
r2R U 2 1=2
Fz0 r
rR
rR
yr dr dU df
3:16
zr dr dU df
3:17
3:15
2p
y0
rR
r dr dU df
x
0
r2R U 2 1=2
Z
0
2p
Mz0 r
r R
r R
r2R U 2 1=2
2p
f
xU cos b sin b0
3:18
rR
rR
r2R U 2 1=2
2p
f
xU sin b r cos b cos f
0
3:19
3:20
My0 J vR vm sin b
3:21
3:22
where m is the mass of the ball and J is the mass moment of inertia, and are defined as follows:
m 16 rpD3
3:23
1
rpD5
J 60
3:24
2pnm
60
3:25
p3 r
D3 n2m dm
10800g
3:26
3:27
For an applied thrust load per ball Qia and a ball centrifugal load Fc directed radially
outward, the ball loading is as shown in Figure 3.2. For conditions of equilibrium, assuming
the bearing rings are not flexible,
Qoa
Qor
Qo
ao
Fc
Qia
Qir
ai
Qi
Qia Qoa 0
3:28
Qir Fc Qor 0
3:29
Qia Qo sin ao 0
3:30
3:31
or
Equation 3.30 and Equation 3.31 must be solved simultaneously for unknowns Qo and ao.
Thus,
Fc
cot ai
ao cot
Qia
2 1=2
Fc
Qo 1 cot ai
Qia
Qia
1
3:32
3:33
Further,
Qi
Qia
sin ai
3:34
From Equation 3.32, because of centrifugal force Fc, it is apparent that ao < ai. ai is the
contact angle under thrust load, and ai > ao the free contact angle. This condition is discussed
in detail in Chapter 7 in the first volume of this handbook.
a
Qa
Axis of rotation
Fc
Q
Qa
a
Fc
2 cos a
3:35
and
a tan
1
2Qa
Fc
3:36
3:37
the centrifugal force for a steel roller orbiting at speed nm about a bearing axis is given by
Fc 3:39 1011 D2 lt dm n2m
3:38
For a tapered roller bearing, however, roller centrifugal force alters the distribution of load
between the outer raceway and inner-ring guide flange. Figure 3.4 demonstrates this condition for an applied thrust load Qia.
For equilibrium to exist,
Qia Qfa Qoa 0
3:39
ao
Fc
Qo
Qor
Qfr
af
Qf
Qoa
Qfa
ai
Qi
Qir
Qia
FIGURE 3.4 Tapered roller under thrust load and centrifugal force.
3:40
3:41
3:42
or
3:43
Qo
3:44
Qo cos ao Qi cos ai Fc 0
3:45
Qo sin ao Qi sin ai 0
3:46
ao
Qo
Qo cos o
Qo sin ao
Fc
Qo cos a i
ao
Qi
ai
FIGURE 3.5 Loading of a barrel-shaped roller subjected to applied and centrifugal forces.
Fc sin ai
sinai ao
3:47
Qi
Fc sin ao
sinai ao
3:48
3:49
Fcr Fc cos ao
3:50
where ao is the nominal contact angle. Equilibrium of forces acting in the radial plane of the
roller gives
Qo Qi Fc cos ao
3:51
and the component Fc sin ao causes the inner and outer raceway contact angles to shift slightly
from ao to accommodate the roller axial loading. In general, spherical roller bearings do not
operate at speeds that will cause significant change in the nominal contact angle. Also, consider a
double-row spherical roller bearing with barrel-shaped rollers subjected to a radial load while
rotating at high speed. The speed-induced roller axial loads are self-equilibrated within the
bearing; however, the outer raceways carry larger thrust components than do the inner raceways.
3:52
3:53
This force Fce is maximum at c 1808 and at that angle is algebraically additive to Fc. At
c 0, the total centrifugal force is Fc Fce. The angle between Fc and Fce as derived from the
law of cosines is
r
re
m
cos c
3:54
u cos1
r
r
Fce can be resolved into a radial force and a tangential force as follows:
Fcer Fce cos u
3:55
F ce
Fc
q
Rolling element
wm
rm
y
re
we
FIGURE 3.6 Rolling element centrifugal forces due to bearing rotation about an eccentric axis.
3:56
Hence, the total instantaneous radial centrifugal force acting on the rolling element is
Fcr mv2m rm mv2e rm re cos c
3:57
W
rm v2m v2e re v2e cos c
g
3:58
or
Fcr
where the positive direction is that taken by the constant component Fc. For steel ball and
roller elements, the following equations are, respectively, valid:
Fcr 2:26 1011 D3 dm n2m n2e de n2e cos c
3:59
3:60
3:61
For steel ball and roller elements, respectively, the following equations pertain:
Fct 2:26 1011 D3 de n2e sin c
3:62
3:63
This tangential force alternates direction and tends to produce sliding between the rolling
element and raceway. It is therefore resisted by a frictional force between the contacting
surfaces.
The bearing cage also undergoes this eccentric motion and if it is supported on the rolling
elements, it will impose an additional load on the individual rolling elements. This cage load
may be reduced by using a material of smaller mass density.
3.2.3
GYROSCOPIC MOMENT
It can usually be assumed with minimal loss of calculational accuracy that pivotal motion due
to gyroscopic moment is negligible; then, the angle b is zero and Equation 3.22 is of no
consequence. The gyroscopic moment as defined by Equation 3.21 is therefore resisted
successfully by friction forces at the bearing raceways for ball bearings and by normal forces
for roller bearings. Substituting Equation 3.25 into Equation 3.21, the following expression is
obtained for ball bearings:
1
rpD5 vR vm sin b
Mg 60
3:64
since
vR
2pnR
60
3:65
Z
Y
Z'
Y'
wR
X
X
Mg
wm
Y'
Z'
Y
Z
FIGURE 3.7 Gyroscopic moment due to simultaneous rotation about nonparallel axes.
and
vm
2pnm
60
3:66
3:67
Figure 3.7 shows the direction of the gyroscopic moment in a ball bearing. Accordingly,
Figure 3.8 shows the ball loading due to the action of gyroscopic moment and centrifugal
force on a thrust-loaded ball bearing.
See Example 3.4.
Gyroscopic moments also act on rollers in radial tapered and spherical roller bearings and
on the rollers in thrust roller bearings of all types. The rollers, however, are geometrically
constrained from rotating due to the induced gyroscopic moments. Therefore, a gyroscopic
moment of significant magnitude tends to alter the distribution of load across the roller
contour. For steel rollers, the gyroscopic moments are given by
Mg 8:37 1012 D4 lt nR nm sin b
3:68
Q oa
Q or
Qo
ao
Ffo
Fc
Q ia
Q ir
ai
Qi
Ffi
Mg
FIGURE 3.8 Forces acting on a ball in a high-speed ball bearing subjected to applied thrust load.
Under zero load, the centers of the raceway groove curvature radii are separated by a
distance A as shown in Figure 1.1a. In Chapter 2 of the first volume of this handbook, it was
shown that A BD where B fi fo 1. Under an applied static load, the distance between
the inner and outer raceway groove curvature centers will increase by the amount of the contact
y1 = 08
y2
j=1
j=
y3
j=3
yj
dm
FIGURE 3.9 Angular position of rolling elements in yz plane (radial). Dc 2p=Z, cj 2p=Z( j 1).
deformations di and do as shown in Figure 1.1b. The line of action between the centers is
collinear with BD (A). If, however, a centrifugal force acts on the ball, then because the ball
inner and ballouter raceway contact angles are dissimilar, the line of action between the
raceway groove curvature centers is not collinear with BD. Rather, it is discontinuous as
indicated in Figure 3.10. It is assumed in Figure 3.10 that the outer raceway groove curvature
center is fixed in space, and the inner raceway groove curvature center moves relative to that
fixed center. Moreover, the ball center shifts by virtue of the dissimilar contact angles.
The distance between the fixed outer raceway groove curvature center and the final
position of the ball center at any ball azimuth location j is
Doj ro
D
doj
2
3:69
Since
ro fo D
Doj fo 0:5D doj
3:70
3:71
Similarly,
A1j
Final position,
inner raceway groove
curvature center
)D
(f i
.5
0
+ d ij
d r cos y j
da +
cos yj
Initial position,
inner raceway groove
curvature center
a ij
X1j
+d
oj
A2j
0.
5) D
(f
BD
a oj
ao
FIGURE 3.10 Positions of ball center and raceway groove curvature centers at angular position cj with
and without applied load.
where doj and dij are the normal contact deformations at the outer and inner raceway contacts,
respectively.
In accordance with the relative axial displacement of the inner and outer rings da and the
relative angular displacements u, the axial distance between the loci of inner and outer
raceway groove curvature centers at any ball position is
A1j BD sin a da u <i cos cj
3:72
where <i is the radius of the locus of inner raceway groove curvature centers and a8 is the
initial contact angle before loading. Further, in accordance with a relative radial displacement
of the ring centers dr, the radial displacement between the loci of the groove curvature centers
at each ball location is
A2j BD cos a dr cos cj
3:73
X2j
fo 0:5D doj
3:74
sin aoj
X1j
fo 0:5D doj
3:75
cos aij
A2j X2j
fi 0:5D dij
3:76
sin aij
A1j X1j
fi 0:5D dij
3:77
Using the Pythagorean Theorem, it can be seen from Figure 3.10 that
A1j X1j 2 A2j X2j 2 fi 0:5D dij 2 0
3:78
3:79
Considering the plane passing through the bearing axis and the center of a ball located at
azimuth cj (see Figure 3.9), the load diagram in Figure 3.11 obtains if noncoplanar friction
forces are insignificant. Assuming that outer raceway control is approximated at a given
ball location, it can also be assumed with little effect on calculational accuracy that the ball
gyroscopic moment is resisted entirely by friction force at the ballouter raceway contact.
Otherwise, it is safe to assume that the ball gyroscopic moment is resisted equally at the ball
inner and ballouter raceway contacts. In Figure 3.11, therefore, lij 0 and loj 2 for outer
raceway control; otherwise, lij loj 1.
The normal ball loads are related to normal contact deformations as follows:
3:80
3:81
Qoj
loj Mgj
D
a oj
Fcj
M gj
a ij
Q ij
l ij M gj
D
From Figure 3.11, considering the equilibrium of forces in the horizontal and vertical
directions,
Mg j
lij cos aij loj cos aoj 0
D
3:82
Mg j
lij sin aij loj sin aoj Fcj 0
D
3:83
Substituting Equation 3.80, Equation 3.81, and Equation 3.74 through Equation 3.77 into
Equation 3.82 and Equation 3.83 yields
loj Mgj X2j
D
Koj d1:5
oj X1j
fo 0:5D doj
Kij d1:5
1j A1j X1j
lij Mgj
D
A2j X2j
fi 0:5D dij
3:84
l M
l M X
gj
oj
gj 1j
ij
Koj d1:5
Kij d1:5
oj X2j
ij A2j X2j D A1j X1j
D
Fcj 0
fo 0:5D doj
fi 0:5D dij
3:85
Equation 3.78, Equation 3.79, Equation 3.84, and Equation 3.85 may be solved simultaneously for X1j, X2j, dij, and doj at each ball angular location once values for da, dr, and u are
assumed. The most probable method of solution is the NewtonRaphson method for solution
of simultaneous nonlinear equations.
The centrifugal force acting on a ball is calculated as follows:
Fc 12 mdm v2m
3:20
2
(vm=v)2v2 in
where vm is the orbital speed of the ball. Substituting the identity vm
Equation 3.20, the following equation for centrifugal force is obtained:
v 2
1
m
Fcj mdm v2
v j
2
3:86
where v is the speed of the rotating ring and vm is the orbital speed of the ball at angular
position cj. It should be apparent that because orbital speed is a function of contact angle, it is
not constant for each ball location.
Moreover, it must be kept in mind that this analysis does not consider frictional forces
that tend to retard ball and hence cage motion. Therefore, in a high-speed bearing, it is to be
expected that vm will be less than that predicted by Equation 2.47 and greater than that
predicted by Equation 2.48. Unless the loading on the bearing is relatively light, however, the
cage speed differential is usually insignificant in affecting the accuracy of the calculations
ensuing in this chapter.
Gyroscopic moment at each ball location may be described as follows:
Mg j J
v v
R
m
v2 sin b
v j
v j
3:87
where b is given by Equation 2.43, vR=v by Equation 2.44, and vm=v by Equation 2.47 or
Equation 2.48.
Since Koj, Kij, and Mgj are functions of a contact angle, Equation 3.74 through Equation
3.77 may be used to establish these values during the iteration.
To find the values of dr, da, and u, it remains only to establish the conditions of
equilibrium applying to the entire bearing. These are
Fa
jZ
X
lij Mgj
cos aij 0
Qij sin aij
D
j1
3:88
or
Fa
"
#
lij Mgj
jZ
X
Kij A1j X1j d1:5
ij D A2j X2j
j1
or
M
fi 0:5D dij
3:89
jZ
X
lij Mgj
Fr
sin aij cos cj 0
Qij cos aij
D
j1
3:90
!
lij Mgj
jZ
X
Kij A2j X2j d1:5
ij D A1j X1j
Fr
0
fi 0:5D dij
j1
3:91
jZ
X
j1
lij Mgj
lij Mgj
cos aij <i
ri cos cj 0
D
D
3:92
or
M
jZ
X
j1
2
3
lij Mgj
Kij A1j X1j d1:5
ij D A2j X2j <i
4
lij fi Mgj 5 cos cj 0
fi 0:5D dij
3:93
1:3
Having calculated values of X1j, X2j, dij, and doj at each ball position, and knowing Fa, Fr, and
M as input conditions, the values da, dr, and u may be determined by Equation 3.89, Equation
3.91, and Equation 3.93. After obtaining the primary unknown quantities da, dr, and u, it is
then necessary to repeat the calculation of X1j, X2j, dij, doj, and so on, until compatible values
of the primary unknown quantities da, dr, and u are obtained.
Solution of the system of simultaneous equations, Equation 3.78, Equation 3.79, Equation 3.84, Equation 3.85, and Equation 3.89, requires the use of a digital computer. To
illustrate the results of such a calculation, the performance of a 218 angular-contact ball
bearing (408 free contact angle), was evaluated over an applied thrust load range 044,450 N
(010,000 lb) and shaft speed range 3,00015,000 rpm. Figure 3.12 through Figure 3.14 show
the results of the calculations.
N 103
70
10
30
20
40
60
15,0
Inner raceway a i
10,0
50
00 rp
6,00
0 rpm
3,00
0 rpm
Static
40
00
rpm
2,0
rp
6,
,0
00
rp
30
0
00
10
00 rp
20
0
,0
15
rp
Outer raceway ao
10
0
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
Thrust load, lb
8,000
10,000
FIGURE 3.12 Ballinner raceway and ballouter raceway contact angles ai and ao for a 218 angularcontact ball bearing (free contact angle ao 408).
N 103
20
10
30
40
1,000
Static loading
900
4,000
Qo 6000 rpm
800
Qo 10,000 rpm
700
3,000
Qo 15,000 rpm
600
Q i 6,000 rpm
500
Q i 10,000 rpm
2,000
400
Q i 15,000 rpm
300
1,000
200
100
0
6,000
4,000
8,000
Applied thrust load, lb
2,000
10,000
FIGURE 3.13 Ballinner raceway and ballouter raceway contact normal loads Qi and Qo for a 218
angular-contact ball bearing (free contact angle ao 408).
+0.003
N 103
20
10
30
40
+0.002
+0.05
tic
+0.001
Sta
rpm
rp
m
15
0.003
0.05
,0
00
10,
0.002
000
00
0.001
6,0
rpm
pm
0r
0
3,0
mm
0.004
0.10
0.005
0.15
0.006
0.007
0.008
0.009
0.20
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
FIGURE 3.14 Axial deflection da for a 218 angular-contact ball bearing (free contact angle ao 408).
1,200
Outer racewaysteel balls
Outer racewaysilicon nitride balls
Inner racewaysteel balls
Inner racewaysilicon nitride balls
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
FIGURE 3.15 Outer and inner racewayball loads vs. bearing applied thrust load for a 218 angularcontact ball bearing operating at 15,000 rpm with steel or silicon nitride balls.
3.4
Because of the high rate of heat generation accompanying relatively high friction torque,
tapered roller and spherical roller bearings have not historically been employed for high-speed
applications. Generally, cylindrical roller bearings have been used; however, improvements in
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
FIGURE 3.16 Outer and inner racewayball contact angle vs. bearing applied thrust load for a 218
angular-contact ball bearing operating at 15,000 rpm with steel or silicon nitride balls.
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.000
0.001
Steel balls
Silicon nitiride balls
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
0
2,000
6,000
4,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
FIGURE 3.17 Axial deflection vs. bearing applied thrust load for a 218 angular-contact ball bearing
operating at 15,000 rpm with steel or silicon nitride balls.
bearing internal design, accuracy of manufacture, and methods of removing generated heat
via circulating oil lubrication have gradually increased the allowable operating speeds for
both tapered roller and spherical roller bearings. The simplest case for analytical investigation
is still a radially loaded cylindrical roller bearing and this will be considered in the following
discussion.
Figure 3.18 indicates the forces acting on a roller of a high-speed cylindrical roller bearing
subjected to a radial load Fr. Thus, considering equilibrium of forces,
Q oj
Fc
Q ij
Qoj Qij Fc 0
3:94
Q Kd10=9
3:95
3:96
10=9
3:97
where
Therefore,
Kdoj
10=9
Kdij
Fc 0
Since
drj dij doj
3:98
3:99
Equilibrium of forces in the direction of applied radial load on the bearing dictates that
Fr
jZ
X
Qij cos cj 0
3:100
j1
or
Fr X 10=9
dij cos cj 0
K
j1
jZ
3:101
From the geometry of the loaded bearing, it can be determined that the total radial compression at any roller azimuth location cj is
drj dr cos cj
Pd
2
3:102
3:103
Equation 3.101 and Equations 3.103 represent a system of simultaneous nonlinear equations
with unknowns dr and dij. These equations may be solved for dr and dij using the Newton
Raphson method. Having calculated dr and dij, it is possible to calculate roller loads
as follows:
10=9
Qij K dij
10=9
Qoj K dij
Fc
3:104
3:105
3:106
Information on high-speed roller bearings that have flexibly supported rings is given by
Harris [3].
See Example 3.5.
Figure 3.19 illustrates the results of the analysis for a 209 cylindrical roller bearing with
zero mounted radial clearance and subjected to applied radial load. Figure 3.20 shows the
variation of bearing deflection dr with speed.
3:107
Figure 3.21 taken from Ref. [4] shows the effect of roller hollowness in a high-speed
cylindrical roller bearing on bearing radial deflection.
For the same bearing, Figure 3.22 illustrates the internal load distribution.
An added criterion for evaluation in a bearing with hollow rollers is the roller bending
stress. Figure 3.23 shows the effect of roller hollowness on maximum roller bending stress.
Practical limits for roller hollowness are indicated.
Great care must be given to the smooth finishing of the inside surface of a hollow roller
during manufacturing as the stress raisers that occur due to a poorly finished inside surface
will reduce the allowable roller hollowness ratios still further than indicated in Figure 3.22.
Lightweight rollers made from a ceramic material such as silicon nitride appear feasible to
reduce roller centrifugal forces.
15,000 rpm
10,000 rpm
300
1,000 rpm
1,000
200
500
100
1,000 rpm
10,000 rpm
15,000 rpm
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0
90
FIGURE 3.19 Distribution of load among the rollers of a 209 cylindrical roller bearing with Pd 0;
Fr 4450 N (1000 lb); and operating at 1,000, 10,000, and 15,000 rpm shaft speed.
Mgj J vmj vRj sin 12ai ao
3:108
3.9
0.0096
3.7
0.0092
3.6
3.5
0.0088
3.4
mm
3.8
0.0084
3.3
3.2
0.0080
3.1
3.0
5,000
15,000
10,000
Shaft speed, rpm
20,000
FIGURE 3.20 Radial deflection vs. speed for a 209 cylindrical roller bearing with Pd 0 and Fr 4450 N
(1000 lb).
Note the numerical notation of applied loads, that is, F1, . . . , F5, in lieu of Fa, Fr, and M.
Figure 3.26 shows the contact angles, deformations, and displacements for the ballraceway
contacts at azimuth cj. Figure 3.27 shows the ball speed vectors and inertial loading for a ball
with its center at azimuth cj. Note the numerical notations for raceways; 1 o and 2 i. This
is done for ease of digital programming.
Z 21
l c 15 mm (0.59 in.)
D 14 mm (0.55 in.)
102
103
0.2
0.4
0.6
Hollowness, %
0.8
12
10
8
10
8
1,800
1,400
1,000
Roller load, lb
2,200
4
2 2
Solid rollers
20% Hollow
80% Hollow
W = 57,850 N (13,000 Ib)
N = 5,000 rpm
Roller load (lb)
2,600
6
4
3,000
2,800
Solid rollers
20% Hollow
2,200
80% Hollow
1,800
W = 57,850 N
N = 15,000 rpm
1,400
Solid rollers
20% Hollow
1,000
600
Solid rollers
20% Hollow
600
W = 22,250 N
N = 15,000 rpm
80% Hollow
200
200
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Roller position
Roller position
80% Hollow
FIGURE 3.22 Roller load distribution vs. applied load, shaft speed, and hollowness.
3.7
CLOSURE
106
(6,898 N/mm2)
105
Recommended endurance
limit SAE 8620
104
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Hollowness, %
0.8
Q oj a
o
F cj
Q fj
y
er
Roll f
o
s
axi
tion
a
t
o
r
1 (a
2 1
e
2
af
M gj
rf
+ a2)
ai
Q ij
Bearing axis
of rotation
become even greater for ball bearings. In this chapter as well as Chapter 1 and Chapter 2, for
simplicity of explanation, most illustrations are confined to situations involving symmetry of
loading about an axis in the radial plane of the bearing and passing through the bearing axis
of rotation. The more general and complex applied loading system with five degrees of
freedom is, however, discussed.
The effect of lubrication has also been neglected in this discussion. For ball bearings, it has
been assumed that gyroscopic pivotal motion is minimal and can be neglected. This, of
F3
F4 (XZ-plane)
y
x
X
1 dm
2
y4
Y
F2
y3
F5 (XY-plane)
J=3
y2
J=2
J=z
J=1
F1
z-axis
(f 2
+ 2
2 sin yj + 3 cos yj
x-axis
Ball centeroperating location
0.5)
X2j
D+
1j
X1j
D
.5)
(f1
BD
1j
z
M gzj
M gyj
F cj
a1j
x
Y
a2j
Q2j
w zj
wj
bj
b'j
w mj
w yj
Z
w xj
course, depends on the friction forces in the contact zones, which are affected to a great extent
by lubrication. Bearing skidding is also a function of lubrication at high speeds of operation.
If the bearing skids, centrifugal forces will be lower in magnitude and the performance will
accordingly be different.
Notwithstanding the preceding conditions, the analytical methods presented in this
chapter are extremely useful in establishing optimum bearing designs for given high-speed
applications.
REFERENCES
1. Jones, A., General theory for elastically constrained ball and roller bearings under arbitrary load and
speed conditions, ASME Trans., J. Basic Eng., 82, 1960.
2. Harris, T., On the effectiveness of hollow balls in high-speed thrust bearings, ASLE Trans., 11,
209214, 1968.
3. Harris, T., Optimizing the fatigue life of flexibly mounted rolling bearings, Lub. Eng., 420428,
October 1965.
4. Harris, T. and Aaronson, S., An analytical investigation of cylindrical roller bearings having annular
rollers, ASLE Preprint No. 66LC-26, October 18, 1966.
5. Harris, T. and Mindel, M., Rolling element bearing dynamics, Wear, 23(3), 311337, February 1973.