Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 21

Paper No.

: 01 Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Module : 30 Forensic Anthropology

Development Team
Principal Investigator

Paper Coordinator

Prof. Anup Kumar Kapoor


Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi
Prof. Subho Roy
Department of Anthropology ,University Of Calcutta

Content Writer

Dr. Jyoti Ratan Ghosh


Visva-Bharti Santiniketan, West Bengal

Content Reviewer

Prof. Barun Mukhopadhyay


Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata

Anthropology

Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Forensic Anthropology

Description of Module
Subject Name

Anthropology

Paper Name

01 Physical/Biological Anthropological

Module Name/Title

Forensic Anthropology

Module Id

30

Anthropology

Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Forensic Anthropology

Contents of this unit


1.
Introduction
2.
Skeleton as a Forensic Evidence
A. Is it bone or not?
B. Is it human?
C. How long since death?
D. What is the race or ancestry?
E. What is the Sex?
i. The skull has many features that vary in the two sexes
ii. The pelvis has many features that vary in the two sexes
F. What is the Age?
i. Estimation of age from sutures of the skull
ii. Estimation of age from the ossification in the epiphysis and their fusion with diaphysis
iii. Estimation of age from pubic symphysis
iv. Estimation of age from teeth
a. Temporary or deciduous teeth
b. Permanent teeth
G. What is the stature?
H. Facial reconstruction
I. DNA from skeleton as personal identification
3.
Blood as a Forensic Evidence
A. Is the sample blood?
i. Presumptive tests
a. Phenolphthalein test
b. Luminol test
ii. Confirmatory Tests for Blood
a. Takayama test or hemochromogen test
B. Is the sample human blood?
i. Immunohematology
ii. Electrophoresis
iii. Molecular marker
C. What is the Sex?
D. Genetic Markers in Blood
E. DNA from blood for personal identification
F. Bloodstain Pattern Analysis
4.
Fingerprint as a Forensic Evidence
A. Classification of fingerprints patters
3

Anthropology

Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Forensic Anthropology

B. Minutiae
C. Types of fingerprint commonly found in crime scenes
i. Visible
ii. Plastic
iii. Latent
D. Latent fingerprints
i. Ninhydrin
ii. Iodine
E. Collection of fingerprint from a crime scene
F. Comparison of fingerprints for personal identification
5.
DNA as a Forensic Evidence
A. What are the sources of DNA?
B. Nuclear DNA
i. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP).
a. Visualization of VNTRs
b. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
ii. Short tandem repeats (STRs)
C. Identification of Sex from DNA
a. Amelogenin
b. Y-STRs
D. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)
E. Interpretation of DNA profile
Learning objectives

What is forensic anthropology?


What are the different types of evidences?
Importance of skeleton in personal identification
Importance of blood in personal identification
Importance of fingerprints in personal identification
Importance of DNA in personal identification

Anthropology

Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Forensic Anthropology

1. Introduction
Forensic science is the application of the techniques of science to legal matters, both criminal and civil
(Bell et al., 2008). Forensic science includes a number of disciplines and sub-disciplines such as
forensic anthropology, forensic engineering, forensic medicine, forensic ecology, forensic pathology,
forensic chemistry, etc.
Forensic anthropology is the application of knowledge and techniques of physical anthropology to
study questions of medicolegal importance. According to Houck and Siegel, 2010, forensic
anthropology is the application of the study of humans to situations of modern legal or public concern.
The objective of forensic anthropologists is to assist in the identification of human remains and
personal identification including age, sex, ethnicity, stature and unique features, if any.
There are different types of evidences including skeleton, body fluids like blood, fingerprints, etc., that
can be found in a crime scene and are used by forensic anthropologist for personal identification.
2. Skeleton as Forensic Evidence
It is easy to identify a skull, complete skeleton, bones as part of a complete skeleton or individual intact
bones, but becomes problematic if the bone is fragmented. Because, things such as plastic or pieces of
tree may look like bone and thus create confusion. So, unlike readily identifiable human bones,
indifferent bones, and especially for fragmented bone, the key question is, is it bone? Next a forensic
anthropologist tried to answer a number of questions like, is it human? Are the bones male or female?
What was the age at time of death? What is the race? etc. The answers to these questions are very
important, because this will lead to the personal identification of the remains and, possibly, to
determine the cause and manner of death.
A. Is it bone or not?
The presence of cortex (outer layer cortex) and cancellous (spongy interior part) tissue differentiate
bone from other materials.
B. Is it human?
Skull with rounded vault and flat face indicate that it is a human skull.
Randomly scattered osteons in cancellous tissue is indicative of human bone.
Dentition and some features of the teeth like filings or caps also indicate that they are of human.
Precipitin test is also used for identifying as to species.
C. How long since death?
It is very difficult to determine the time since death because number of factors including temperature,
soil type, whether preserved in a coffin or not, etc. affect the decomposition rate of a body.
5

Anthropology

Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Forensic Anthropology

Presence of flesh and odor are good indicator of recent death.


Recent bones will have a greasy feel.
Older bones will be lightweight and have a weakened surfaces or ends.
Severe tooth wear and erosion into the dentin is indicative of ancient remains.

D. What is the race or ancestry?


It is very difficult ascertain race or ancestry from skeletal remains because no pure race exist today.
However, forensic anthropologists are routinely called to assess the skeletal remains for clues as to that
persons ancestral affiliation to help investigator for personal identification.
Table 1. Racial characteristics of the Skull
Trait
Skull length
Skull breadth
Skull height
Sagittal contour
Face breadth
Face height
Orbital opening
Nasal opening
Nasal bones
Lower nasal margin
Facial profile
Palate shape
Shovel-shaped
incisors
General form

Mongoloid
Long
Broad
Middle
Arched
Very wide
High
Rounded
Narrow
wide, flat
Sharp
Straight
moderately wide
Broad U-shape
90%+

Caucasoid
Short
Broad
High
Arched
Wide
High
Rounded
Moderately wide
narrow, arched
Sharp
Straight
moderately wide
V-shape
<5%

Negroid
Long
Narrow
Low
Flat
Narrow
Low
Rectangular
Wide
Narrow
Troughed
Downward slant
Wide
U-shape
<5%

large, smooth

Rounded, large

Smooth, elongated

(Source: Pickering and Bachman, 2009; pp. 83)

E. What is the Sex?


Several elements of the skeleton can be used by a physical anthropologist for determination of sex in
adults, but the pelvis and skill are the most reliable elements for determination of sex. For example,

Anthropology

Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Forensic Anthropology

i. The skull has many features that vary in the two sexes:Table 2. Sexual characteristics of the Skull
Trait
Male
Supraorbital ridge (ridge above the eyes)
Robust
Occipital protuberance (base of skull)
Robust
Mastoid processes (bony process behind ear canal) Long, broad
Chin
U-shaped, square

Female
Gracile
Gracile
Short
V-shaped

(Source: Pickering and Bachman, 2009; pp. 89)

(Source: Juniordentist website)


Figure 1. Human skull; a,.male b, female

ii. The pelvis has many features that vary in the two sexes:Table 3. Sexual characteristics of the Pelvis
Trait
Symphysis
Sub pubic angle
Obdurate foramen
Sciatic notch
Sacroiliac articulation
Ilium
Sacrum
Pelvic inlet
Acetabulum

Male
High, narrow
V-shaped
Large, ovoid
Narrow, deep
Large, straight
High, vertical
Long, narrow, straight
Heart-shaped
Large

Female
Low, wide
U-shaped, round
Triangular
Wide, 7090 degrees
Small, oblique
Wide
Short, broad, curved
Circular, elliptical
Small

(Source: Pickering and Bachman, 2009; pp. 89)

Anthropology

Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Forensic Anthropology

a, female

b, male
Figure 2: Human pelvis; a, female b, male
(Source: Wikipedia website)

F. What is the Age?


There are no skeletal features that allow a specific age of the specimen, such as 30 years of age.
However, age determination can be done with a range, for example, 45 to 47 years, or 60+ years.
i. Estimation of age from sutures of the skull
Closer of suture gives an idea about the approximate age of the specimen. For example, the presence of
large fontanels and wide open sutures in skull indicated that it belongs to an infant. Fusion of the
sagittal suture is indicative of about 35 years of age. The Spheno-Parietal suture begins to close about
thirty years, but is not usually completely closed until about seventy years.
ii. Estimation of age from the ossification in the epiphysis and their fusion with diaphysis
An estimation of age can be possible by analyzing the times of appearance of ossification in the
epiphysis and their fusion with diaphysis of bone. For example, appearance of ossification at the
capitulum of humerus, distal radius, distal tibia and fibula indicate one year of age in both sexes. At
about twenty-one years of age ossification appears at the medial end of Clavicle in both sexes.
Fusion of the epiphyses of greater tubercle of the head of humerus indicates about four years of age in
female and about five years of age in male. Fusion of the epiphyses of the distal phalanges of second,
third, and fourth toes indicates about fifteen years of age in both sexes.
iii. Estimation of age from pubic symphysis
The morphological changes of the pubic symphysis are considered one of the most reliable estimators
of age at death. For example, in post-adolescent and early adult life, the sub-epiphysial symphysial face
presents a transversely billowed (wavy) surface with an increasing sharp dorsal margin and a beveled
ventral area. In the letter part of the third decade the billowed texture is lost and a typical ovoid
symphysial face results. Toward the end of the fifth decade a narrow beaded rim develops on the
8

Anthropology

Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Forensic Anthropology

margins. During the sixth decade erosion of surface and breakdown of ventral margin begin to modify
the configuration of the symphysial face.

Figure 3: Age changes in pubic symphysis in adult white males


(Source: Allthingsaafs website)

iv. Estimation of age from teeth


An examination of the state of eruption of the teeth in infants will offer a reliable indication of age in
most cases, since the respective periods of eruption of the different teeth are fairly constant.
Approximate period at which the different temporary and permanent teeth appear:a. Temporary or deciduous teeth
Table 4. Estimation of age from temporary teeth
Period
7-9 months
6-8 months
9-10 months
18 months
About 12 month
About 2 years

Teeth
Upper central incisor
Lower central incisor
Lateral incisor
Canine
First molar
Second molar

Anthropology

Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Forensic Anthropology

A, Temporary

B, Permanent Teeth
Figure 4. Human teeth; a, temporary b, permanent teeth
(Source: The University of Queensland website)

b. Permanent teeth
Table 5. Estimation of age from permanent teeth
Period
7th year
8th year
11th year
9th year
10th year
6th year
12th year
17th -21st year or later

Teeth
Central incisor
Lateral incisor
Canine
First premolar
Second premolar
First molar
Second molar
Third molar

G. What is the stature?


Living stature is directly related to the length of bone, specially, the long bone of the lower limbs.
However, to estimate stature, the only difficulty is that sex and ethnicity must be known to correctly,
because the prediction equations are dependent on sex and ethnicity. For example, a White male with a
femur length of 55.88 cm. would be estimated to have been between 189 cm and 196 cm tall. This can
be done by the following regression equation.
For white males: Stature = {(2.38 x Humerus length) + 61.41 +/ 3.27}
H. Facial reconstruction
One of the widely used practices in forensic anthropology for personal identification is facial
reconstruction based on the features of the skull. In this process, the soft tissues of a face are
reconstructed on a skull to create a likeness of that individual.
10

Anthropology

Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Forensic Anthropology

I. DNA from skeleton as personal identification


DNA profiling can play an important role in personal identification (details will be discuss later under
the subheading of DNA as forensic evidence), especially when the bones are very fragmentary and
other ways of personal identification is not possible.
3. Blood as Forensic Evidence
In crime of violence body fluids are routine encountered as viral evidence. Blood is the most common
form of biological material that is recovered from crime scenes. Along with other evidence, blood stain
analysis may be used to place a person at a crime scene, or possibly to completely exclude that person.
A. Is the sample blood?
There are many stains such as rust, paint, wine etc. which look like blood. Thus, chemical tests are
essential to confirm whether the sample is blood or not.
i. Presumptive tests
Presumptive tests are generally used at the crime scene and merely confirm that the substance in
question is most likely blood. For example,
a. Phenolphthalein test: At first a clean cotton swab dip in distilled water and then rubbed on the
suspected stain. A drop of phenolphthalein solution is then added to the swabs tip. A drop of hydrogen
peroxide is then added; if the tip turns pink, the test is presumptively positive for blood.

Figure 5: Phenolphthalein test for presence of blood


(Source: Centralia College website)

b. Luminol test: Luminol (3-aminophthalhydrazide) is sprayed in crime scene which reacts in the
presence of haemoglobin, when an oxidizer is applied. The reaction, however, results in a blue-white to
yellow-green luminescence (light emitted as a by-product of a chemical reaction) if blood is present.
11

Anthropology

Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Forensic Anthropology

Figure 6. A footwear impression in blood that has been enhanced with luminol reagent
(Source: Bureau of Criminal Apprehension website)

ii. Confirmatory Tests for Blood


a. Takayama test or hemochromogen test
The commonly used confirmatory test for blood is the Takayama test or hemochromogen test. In this
test a small sample of the presumptive stain is placed under a cover slip and heated lightly. Then
pyridine under alkaline conditions in the presence of a reducing sugar is added with a pipette in it. If
blood is present, salmon-colored crystals will form and can be viewed through a microscope.
B. Is the sample human blood?
There are a number of tests that can be used to identify human blood, for example,
i. Immunohematology: Antigen antibody agglutination test, precipitation test
ii. Electrophoresis: For identification of red cell enzyme, serum protein
iii. Molecular marker: Most stable DNA isolation and test for human kind RFLPs
C. What is the Sex?
Presence of drumstick in WBC indicates female sex and its absence indicate male sex.

12

Anthropology

Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Forensic Anthropology

Figure 7: Presence of drumstick in WBC


(Source: Stellenbosch University website)

D. Genetic Markers in Blood


Blood possess a number of genetic markers both in cell and serum including ABO blood group, Rh,
MNS, PGM, and HP etc. for personal identification.
E. DNA from blood for personal identification
Once it is confirmed as human blood, DNA can be extracted from WBC for DNA profiling and
personal identification (details will be discussed later under the sub-heading of DNA as forensic
evidence).
F. Bloodstain Pattern Analysis
Often found at the scenes of violent crimes, the analysis of bloodstains can provide vital clues as to the
occurrence of events. For example, Venus blood will show fine droplets with striking surface right
angled star like. Artery blood generally will show oblique pattern due to pressure.

Figure 8: Showing how bloodstain pattern analysis works


(Source: Howstuffworks website)

13

Anthropology

Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Forensic Anthropology

4. Fingerprint as Forensic Evidence


Fingerprints have long been considered as the backbone of forensic identification, even in the age of
DNA technology. This is because of the fact that fingerprints are matchless to the individual and thus,
assumed that a match between a suspect print and an evaluation print is sufficient to individualize the
evidence and link it to a common source.
A. Classification of fingerprints patters
There are four types of pattern namely, Arch, Loop, Whorl and Composite. The arches are either plain
arch or tented arch. Loops are further subdivided in two types depending on their openings as ulnar
loop and radial loop. Whorls are also further subdivided into plain whorl, central pocket loop, double
loop, and accidental.

A. Arch

B. Loop

C. Whorl

Figure 9: Fingerprint patterns, a. Arch, b. Loop, c. Whorl


(NIST scientific and technical databases website)

B. Minutiae
Along with fingerprint pattern, the ridge of each fingerprints also contain unique features which allow
them for personal identifications. These ridge characteristics are collectively known as minutiae. This
includes the patterns of the pores on fingerprints, bifurcations, island, short ridge, termination,
enclosure, etc.

Figure 10: Minutiaes


(Source: Center for imaging science website)

14

Anthropology

Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Forensic Anthropology

C. Types of fingerprint commonly found in crime scenes


Three types of fingerprints are commonly observed in crime scenes, namely,
i. Visible - it is clearly visible, does not require processing and can be found on substance such as
paint or blood.
ii. Plastic it is also clearly visible, does not require processing and can be found on soft surface,
such as tar, putty.
iii. Latent - it requires treatment to be visualized and can be found for example, on human skin.
D. Latent fingerprints
A latent fingerprints is one left on an objects surface when it is touched. The oldest and still most
common method to make visible latent fingerprint is to use fingerprint powder of contrasting colour by
a soft fiberglass brush to create contrast between the ridge pattern and the background. Once a latent
print becomes visible, it is photographed.

Figure 11: latent prints; a, use of fine powder to reveal latent fingerprints b, paper treated with Ninhydrin reagent c, site
treated with fluorescent dye stain
(Source: forensic science simplified website)

A number of chemical methods are also available for the visualization of latent prints, for example,
i. Ninhydrin: Ninhydrin is used to develop latent prints (purple colour) on porous surfaces like
paper by reacting with amino acids in latent print residue.
ii. Iodine: Fumes from iodine crystals develop latent prints on surfaces that are impractical for
traditional dusting or have residue such as grease. The print developed are visible only for
few hours and then become fade, so it should be photographed immediately once
observable.
E. Collection of fingerprint from a crime scene
Fingerprints that are clearly visible can be photographed and the print can be used for comparison.
However, for latent fingerprint photograph can be taken only after it become visible by physical or

15

Anthropology

Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Forensic Anthropology

chemical treatment. Sometimes it is possible to lift the latent fingerprint. This can be done by placing a
lifting tape on the fingerprint. The lifting tape is then placed on a latent lift card to preserve the print.

Figure 12: Use of lifting tape to lift fingerprint


(Source: CHIEF website)

F. Comparison of fingerprints for personal identification


The comparison of fingerprints collected from the suspect and from the crime scene for identification
is not only made by comparing the patterns or by merely the presence or absence of minutiae, but is
done by comparing the presence, kind, number and, especially, the arrangement of the pattern and
minutiae characteristics that create a unique pattern.

Figure 13. Comparison of minutiaes


(Source: SPIE website)

Now days this comparison can be done by automated fingerprint identification systems (AFIS). AFIS
is a computer programming which digitized the images of a fingerprint and then encode the details of
the minutiae for searching in the database. This system does not identify a person uniquely but rather
16

Anthropology

Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Forensic Anthropology

provide a list of potential matches for the fingerprint examiner to evaluate and make the final
determination.
5. DNA as Forensic Evidence
The development and application of human genetics has reformed forensic anthropology in the last two
decades. Now a days DNA profile makes it possible to associate a DNA sample to a specific person
with a high degree of confidence and thus providing a new, powerful identification tool that
supplements fingerprints and other methods of identification to the forensic investigation.
There are two types of DNA, namely the nuclear DNA (located in the nucleus) and mtDNA (located in
the mitochondria). However, both are used for DNA profiling in personal identification.
A. What are the sources of DNA?
DNA samples can be obtained from a number of biological materials including saliva, tissue, blood,
hair follicles, semen and bone from a scene of crime.

Figure 14: Nuclear DNA


(National Library of Medicine website)

B. Nuclear DNA
The humans nuclear DNA contains approximately 3.2 billion base pairs and organized into 23
chromosomes. A large portion of this DNA is similar and is required for the protein synthesis.
17

Anthropology

Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Forensic Anthropology

However, there are segments of DNA that vary from person to person and are called hyper variable
regions. These regions are commonly used as markers for personal identification. There are several
techniques that make DNA typing possible for forensic identification like restriction fragment length
polymorphism (RFLP).
i. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP).
In RFLP analysis a restriction enzyme is used to cut the DNA sample into a number of pieces of
variable size. The number and the size of the DNA fragment depend on the variation in the number of
times a sequence of base pairs in DNA is repeated. From a forensic anthropological viewpoint, these
fragments are extremely polymorphic since the number of repeat sequence varies from person to
person. Because the polymorphism comes from the number of repeats, this kind of DNA typing is
categorized as VNTR (variable number of tandem repeat). These are length polymorphisms with a core
sequence are between 10 and 100 base pairs in length and in one person, this sequence may be repeated
fifty times on a given chromosome, while in another person it may repeat ten times. In forensic
science, four to six of these highly polymorphic VNTR loci are analyzed, and the results are used to
generate DNA profiles for comparison and personal identification.
a. Visualization of VNTRs
The technique by which these VNTRs can be identified is called Southern blotting electrophoresis. In
order to visualized the VNTRs, the DNA fragments are loaded into a well at the base of a slab of
electrophoresis gel. An electrical current is then applied, which separates the VNTRs based on length
and charge of DNA fragment. After that the DNA fragments are stained with radioactive single-strand
DNA sequences for visualization and identification.

Figure 15: VNTR locus


(Source: University of Arizona website)

18

Anthropology

Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Forensic Anthropology

Figure 16: VNTR alleles


(Source: University of Arizona website)

b. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)


RFLP gives good result when there is large amount of high quality DNA. But, the DNA sample come
from a crime scene may not be large in amount and more frequently they are too fragmented to be
useful. In this situation PCR technique is used primarily to increase the amount of DNA by
amplification. PCR is based on the natural process of DNA replication. PCR uses DNA polymerase to
rapidly replicate a specific DNA sequence millions of times.

Figure 17: Polymerase chain reaction


(Source: National Center for Biotechnology Information website)

19

Anthropology

Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Forensic Anthropology

ii. Short tandem repeats (STRs)


STRs are currently the most commonly analyzed genetic polymorphism in forensic genetics. There are
thousands of STRs that can potentially be used for forensic analysis. STR loci are spread throughout
the genome including both Autosome and sex chromosomes. STRs have a core unit of between 2 and 6
base pairs and the repeats typically range from 50 to 300 base pairs. STRs have greater advantages
over VNTRs, which make STRs more attractive for forensic comparison purposes. For example, STR
markers have greater variability in a population, thus giving rise to high degrees of association of
evidence with a suspect. There are many STRs to choose from for forensic purposes. Moreover, STRs
are much less sensitive to degradation of the DNA due their smaller repeat size. Similar to that of
VNTRs, STRs are also identified by electrophoresis and the results are then used to generate DNA
profiles for comparison and personal identification.
C. Identification of Sex from DNA
There are two approaches to sex identification from a DNA sample.
a. Amelogenin: Presence of one electrophoresis band for Amelogenin locus indicate female sex
and presence of two electrophoresis band for Amelogenin locus indicate male sex.
b. Y-STRs: The presence of Y-STRs, a sex-specific DNA marker indicates male sex and its
absence indicates female sex.
D. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)
MtDNA located in mitochondria and inherited maternally. The human mtDNA is a circular molecule
and consisting of 16,569 nucleotides. There are a number of situations where mtDNA becomes a
valuable genetic marker, for example, it is very helpful when the amount of cellular material available
for analysis is very small or if the source does not contain nucleated cells. Moreover, mtDNA is also
advantageous for the study of highly degraded human remains where standard STR typing is not
possible. Due to its maternal inheritance, mtDNA is very useful for personal identification of missing
person or person in mass disasters, especially when there are no direct relatives to use as a reference
sample, because, all maternal relatives share the same type of mtDNA. Analysis of mtDNA is
generally performed by comparing the sequences of its hyper-variable regions.

20

Anthropology

Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Forensic Anthropology

Figure 18: mtDNA


(Source: Nature website)

E. Interpretation of DNA profile


Once it has been established that two DNA profiles are the same, the significance of the match has to
be estimated. This significance of the match or probability is calculated by the frequencies of each
allele using population data base and indicates the probability of a chance occurrence of a given DNA
profile within a chosen population. Thus, in order to reduce the chance occurrence of similar DNA
profile, forensic experts are commonly use multi-locus genotype using large number of STR loci for
identification. Because, this multi-locus genotype becomes so rare that it is improbable that two people
in the world would have the same exact type. This helps the forensic experts to conclude in DNA
profile cases that the match of the DNA type from the evidence and the suspect can be used for
identification, except in the case of identical twins.

21

Anthropology

Physical/ Biological Anthropology


Forensic Anthropology

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi