Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
UC 2016 Prague
EETC 2016 Prague
Contents
Contents :
1.
2.
3.
4.
Project location
Project data
Alternatives
Ventilation and safety
concept
5. Muck deposits
6. Project division
7. Cost breakdown
8. Project development
9. Conclusion
Accents
Part of EU corridors
Main structures
TBM option
For cargo and passenger traffic
Transport costs
Division in lots
Main costs as PPP
Organization and concepts
Time schedule + movie 130
1. Project location
Baltic Adriatic and Mediterranean corridors
1. Project location
Paneuropean and Austrian corridors
1. Project location
Slovenian and
Austrian parts of
corridors
1. Project location
Geography and topography
1. Project location
Slovenian railway network
2. Project data
Layout
2. Project data
Longitudinal section
2. Project data
Major project characteristics
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE NEW TRACK :
Length:
In Tunnel
Length with service tunnels :
Length of tunnels with serv.tun.
27.1 km
20.5 km (75%)
43.6 km
37.0 km (85 %)
17
160 km/h
Clearance:
Axle load:
Tracks:
Electrification :
Telecommunication system:
GC
255 KN or 80 KN/m,(categ. D4)
60 E1, mostly slab track
direct current 3kV
ERTMS/ETCS level 2
9
2. Project data
Major project structures
Tunnel T1:
Glinica I Bridge:
Glinica Gallery:
Glinica II Bridge:
Tunnel T2:
Tunnel T3:
Tunnel T4:
Tunnel T5:
Tunnel T6:
Tunnel T7:
Viaduct V1 Gabrovica:
Viaduct V2 Vinjan:
Tunnel T8:
6,714 m
74 m
41 m
104 m
6,017m
330 m
1,954 m
128 m
358 m
1,163 m
452 m
647 m
3,808 m
10
2. Project data
Tunnel cross sections
11
2. Project data
Bridges : viaduct1
12
2. Project data
Bridges : viaduct2
13
3. Alternatives
TBM option
as longest tunnels
14
3. Alternatives
HPP Plave IIDoblar II
Project from 1998-2002 (4 years) :
Water suply tun. HPP Plave II/ Doblar II
Tunnels 6.0 + 4.0 km
LImestone, breccia, karst
TBM 7.0 m dia, Robbins double shield
Construction price : 54.0 m
(together with caverns and other parts)
Lining : monoshell, hexagonal,
4 segments
Construction JV :
Primorje
36.7%
SCT
25,8%
SELI
14,3 %
JaEGER
14,3%
MONTI
7%
15
Risk distribution :
Recently risks of geologiy and karst phenomena including water.
16
Tunnel length
System
Evacuation routes
T1
6700 m
T2
5994 m
T3
330 m
T4
1947 m
T5
115 m
T6
335 m
T7
1150 m
T8
3760 m
Nr.
17
18
5. Muck deposits
Main design project development level in 03.2016
Muck deposits :
Volumes of muck calculated on thebasis of project documentation.
Excavted material distribution based on further usability.
Checking required of :
Location and capacity of muck storage areas and their capacities
Muck storage areas to be designed with impact of seismic, deawatering
measures to come to real volume capacity
Location check
Definition of transport routes and distances
Final check of excavted material usability for other purposes to be
performed.
19
5. Muck deposits
Main design project development level in 03.2016
Muck deposits :
Bekovec
Ankaranski Bonifiki,
Open usability of :locations :
Salonit Anhovo yard
ernue yard
20
5. Muck deposits
Main design project development level in 03.2016
In the sense of distribution and transport of excavated material to be stored
questionable is the volume of material estimated as :
Tunnels cross
seciton (m2)
Tunnel lenght
(m)
Excavated
material (m3)
Factor of
looseness
Loosed material
(m3)
78 m2
40.000
3.141.590
1.50
4.712.385
Faktor of looseness
2.100.000
1.5
2.730.000
1.310.000
1.5
1.972.000
3.410.000
1.5
4.672.000
Storage location
Flysch
Excavated material
(m3)
Limestone
Total
21
6. Project division
Main design project development level in 03.2016
Lot I
Lot II
22
7. Cost Breakdown
Construction costs and financing
Project part
Percentage of the
structural part (%)
()
Tunnels NATM
562.000.000,00
EM equipment tunnels
170.000.000,00
Bridges
35.000.000,00
3.17
Roads
20.000.000,00
1.83
13.000.000,00
1.21
100.000.000,00
9.14
Project managemet
10.000.000,00
0.91
Financing
190.000.000,00
TOTAL Netto
Brutto
1.100.000.000,00
51.21
15.37
17.10
100
(1.400.000.000,00)
23
8. Project development
Main design project development level in 03.2016
Concession type :
DBFOMT
24
8. Project development
Concession type :
DBFOM
25
8. Project development
no
1
Project
CTRL
Channel
tunnel rail link, UK
Oeresund road-rail
link, DanemarkSweden
HSL Zuid Amster.Belgium
Alice SpringsDarwin
(Adelaide) rail,
Australia
Taipei-Kaoihsung,
Taiwan,HS rail
3
4
Time for
design and
construction
19962003/2007
Concession
Length (km)
period (years)
Investment
volume
Public
funds
Contract type
90
109
GBP 2.01
mlrd.
DBFM
1991-2000
25-30
38
2.0 mlrd
100 % state
guarantee
DBFM
2000-2007
25
100
6.0 mlrd
DBFM
2000-2004
50
1420 km
AUS$ 1.2
mlrd.
110 mil/
year
AUS$ 559
mil.
(2790 total)
2000-2007
DBOFM
or BOOT ?
35
US$ 18 mlrd.
US$ 11.75
mlrd. (from
2010.)
DBOFM
1.1 mlrd
540 mil+
62 mil.
DBFM
Perpignan- Figueras,
HS rail France/Spain
2005-2009
50
55
45
2007-2012
35
540 mil
250 mil
for tracks
and
signalizat.
DBF
Liefkenshoek rail
link, Belgium
2008-2013
38
16
840 mil
50 mil/
year
DBFM
26
8. Project development
9
Tours- Bordoeaux,
Fra, HS rail
2010-2016
50
340
7.8 mlrd
3.0 mlrd
DBFM
10
GSM-R NETWORK;
Franc:
2009-2015
15
14000
1.0 mlrd
160 mil
DBOFM
11
Lisbon-Madrid, HS
rail
2009-2013
2011 stop
40
165
7.8 mlrd.
crisis
Portugal
DBFM
12
Nimes-Montpellier,
Fra, HS rail
2011-2017
25
80
2.06 mlrd
586 mil
DBFM
13
Brittany _Pays de la
Loire, Fra, HS rail
2011-2016
20
182
3.4 mlrd
990 mil
DBFM
14
2011-2017,
2013 delay
40
518
USD$ 18.7
mlrd.
No local
contractors
DBOF
15
Kokola/Ylivieska,
Finska rail link
2011-2014,
2011 stop
20-30
76 (drugi
kolosijek)
660 mil.
To high
construction
bids
DBFM
16
Divaa - Koper
2016-2021
30 ?
27
1.4 mlrd?
(brutto)
0?
DBFOMT ?
27
9. Conclusion
Time schedule :
07.-09.2016
10.-12.2016 Adoption of project documentation
03.2017 Start of tender phase
http://www.drugitir.si/en
28