Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1st quote inspired the title of Spike Lees Bamboozled: an insightful and incendiary
commentary on racial depiction in the contemporary American media.
2nd quote is from perhaps the most astute and important American writer on race, and
contextualizes what we see dramatized in the film
Protagonist: Pierre De La Croix (Damon Wayans)
Birth name is Peerless Dothan, but he adopts the name Pierre, along with a
stereotypically white speech style
Harvard educated
Under pressure to deliver a new show concept after his white boss, Dunwitty,
dismisses Ps ideas, which all concern characters of colour, as being too white
bread
Pierre says that he needs to come up with the most racist show possible in
order to get fired
It becomes a hit
Dunwitty: Michael Rapaport
Boasts to Pierre that hes blacker than him, since he has a black wife, biracial
children, and posters of black athletes on the wall of his office
Early in the film, he insults Pierre for showing up late to a meeting, degrading
him for running on CP time, or coloured peoples time
Dunwitty embraces Pierres idea enthusiastically, vows to get it on the air ASAP
and gets more excited the more Pierre describes racial stereotypes on the show
Sloan: Jada Pinkett Smith
Pierres assistant
University educated
Bothered by Pierres concept and skeptical of it, but she plays along due to
pressure from him and the possibility that maybe its not that harmful
Manray and Womack: Savion Glover and Tommy Davidson
Two street performers Pierre sees and gives money to on the way to work
Manray embraces Pierres concept immediately, saying that hell be happy as long
as he can tap dance and get paid for it
Womack is more skeptical, but he agrees due to the promise of money and new
clothes
Mantan refers to Mantan Morland, a black actor who made his name in the
30s and 40s playing demeaning caricatures of people of colour
He asks her to call him Big Black Africa, because he says that Julius is his slave
name
Leader of a left-wing rap group, the Mau Maus, who unsuccessfully audition for
Pierres show
They then decide that theyre offended by the content and decide to take
violent action
Four themes from this weeks readings that this film addresses:
Four main points from the reading I hope to address through the film: complexity
of the state, role of minstrelsy/media in general, particular issue of black
representation, thinking beyond race as a binary/class defining all (towards
intersectionality!)
To fully understand race in America, one must account for the complexity of the system
of racial discrimination (Slide of audience in blackface here)
Mantan may seem excessive or overtly satirical, but Lee sees this as reflective of
contemporary depiction of blacks in the media
BoaN, like Mantan, exemplifies the WoP being conducted against black people in
the media
Goes back as far as something like BoaN, and much longer, and
continues in the present day, over a century later
To be effective, philosophy must enter into, modify and transform the practical,
everyday consciousness or popular thought of the masses (432) (I.e. Common
sense)
Within CNS, Pierre is the only black voice whos allowed to speak (37:00)
Father makes jokes about black culture, that appeal to black people, in a
small club with an almost exclusively black audience
Father: I got too much pride, too much dignity, too much
integrity. I cant do that Hollywood stuff. I cant say that
stuff they want me to say
Lee emphasizes that Pierres path is far from the only choice for a
black artist
But when only one voice has the chance to speak, as Julien
and Mercer stress and as we see at CNS, that voice
reductively represents an entire group of people
Even though they share class and race, they have very different
ideas
Julius (slide)
Idea that having a black crew will makes this okay: doesnt
account for the conditions under which people agree to
participate in the show, or what anyone else from the group
they purportedly represent think
Past:
Present/future
This begins to explain how ethnic and racial difference can be constructed as a
set of economic, political or ideological antagonisms, within a class which is
subject to roughly similar forms of exploitation with respect to ownership of and
expropriation from the means of production (438)
Sloan v. Julius
Pierre v. Manray/Womack
Pierre/Peerless
Through his interaction w/ his father and his life at CNS, we see
how Ps experience changes whether hes Pierre or Peerless
10
Sloan wont take him seriously, refuses to call him what he wants
to be called
With the Mau Maus, where hes Big Black Africa, hes able to
express himself as he identifies
Mau Maus are rejected from Mantan by Pierre and Sloan, limiting
Julius ability to present himself as Big Black Africa
Through all these characters, we see the complexity of identity, and the
inadequacy of viewing race as a binary
Everything that weve seen illustrates the effect of the media in the WoP, but Lee is less
explicit about how it impacts the daily experience of race in America
11
Discussion questions:
What is the relationship between the caricatures shown in Lees film and daily
experience of race? Can we separate the two?
What are some other fronts in the war of position? How would a war of maneuver
model explain race in America? What does such a model exclude from our
discussion of race in contemporary life?
Who is ultimately most responsible for the bamboozling of the films title? How
do you assign responsibility for what we see between bosses like Dunwitty,
creators like Pierre, accomplices like Sloan, performers like Manray, and audience
members?
Does Lees critique discount the agency of black artists? Could Julien and
Mercers dismissal of the impetus to celebrate black cinema
risk unfairly degrading black artistic contributions?