ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

ACADEMIC SESSION:_____________
DEE2034 : DIGITAL ELECTRONICS
TITLE PRACTICAL
WORK :
PRACTICAL WORK
DATE :
LECTURERS NAME:
GROUP NO. :
STUDENT NAME

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)
DATE SUBMIT :

STUDENT ID

TOTAL
MARKS
(100%)

1.

PRACTICAL SKILL EVALUATION PSYCHOMOTOR EVALUATION

Competency Scale(CLO 3)

No

Aspect (Skill)

Apparatus Handling
1.

2.

System/Circuit
assembling
Calibrate equipment

3.
4.

Data Collection

Excellent

Good

Average

Weak

Excellent to use the

right equipment/
components
Excellent to connect/
construct all
equipment/
components correctly
Excellent to calibrate
the equipments
independently.
Excellent to collect all
the result correctly.

Able to use the right

equipment/ components

Able to partially use the

right equipment/
components

Unable to connect/ construct all

equipment/ components correctly

Able to connect/ construct

all equipment/ components
correctly

Able to partially connect/

construct equipment/
components correctly

Unable to connect/ construct all

equipment/ components correctly

Able to calibrate the

equipments
independently.

Able to calibrate the

equipments partially upon
request.

Unable calibrate the equipments

workstation in order at all.

Able to collect all the result

correctly.

Able to collect part of the

result correctly.

Unable to collect most of the result

correctly.

Student 1
_________

Student 2
________

Student 3
________

Student 4
________

F_______

F_______

F_______

F_______

TOTAL MARKS : /16%

Endorsed by :
2.
ITEM

TOTAL 80%

MARKING SCHEME FOR LAB REPORTS (NOTE: it is assumed that all lab reports will be word-processed)
4

Question (Refer to the

marks assigned)
Answer all the questions
correctly
Discussion
Very incomplete or
incorrect interpretation
and comparison of data
indicating a lack of
understanding of results
Conclusions

Conclusions missing or
missing the important
points

Answer most of the

questions correctly
Some of the results have
been correctly interpreted
and discussed; partial but
incomplete understanding
of results is still evident

Answer the correct

questions partially
Almost all of the results
have been correctly
interpreted and
discussed, only minor
improvements are needed

Not answer all the

questions correctly
All data comparisons
have been interpreted
correctly and discussed.
Good understanding of
results is conveyed.

Conclusions regarding
major points are drawn,
but many are misstated,
indicating a lack of
understanding

All-important conclusions
have been drawn, could
be better stated

All-important conclusions
have been clearly made,
student shows good
understanding
TOTAL MARKS : /12

STUDENT 1

STUDENT 2

STUDENT 3

STUDENT 4

Endorsed by:

TOTAL 20%

2
DEE2034_PW/JKE/PTSB