Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
art ic l e i nf o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 23 June 2014
Received in revised form
14 October 2014
Accepted 1 November 2014
Available online 5 December 2014
Microgrids are a suitable, reliable and clean solution to integrate distributed generation into the mains grid.
Microgrids can present both AC and DC distribution lines. The type of distribution conditions the performance
of distribution line and implies different features, advantages and disadvantages in each case. This paper
analyses, in detail, all this parameters for AC and DC microgrids in order to identify and describe the available
alternatives for building and conguring a microgrid. Elements and issues involved in the implementation
and development, such as protections, power converters, economic analysis, and availability are discussed and
described. This analysis constitutes a tool for selecting a suitable conguration of a microgrid adapted to the
needs in each situation. In addition, the paper provides a picture of the current situation of microgrids, and
identies and proposes future research lines.
& 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Distributed generation
Microgrids
AC technology
DC technology
Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Description of a microgrid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transmission system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Point of common coupling (PCC): interconnection between the mains grid and the microgrid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Protection schemes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Monitoring and measuring system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Power converters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9.1.
Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9.2.
Modelling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9.3.
Power quality. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9.4.
Optimisation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10. Regulatory issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11. Economic analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12. Future research areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13. Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1. Introduction
The penetration of distributed generation on the mains grid has
increased greatly during the last years due to its several advantages.
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: estefania.planas@ehu.es (E. Planas).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.067
1364-0321/& 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
726
727
730
732
733
734
735
735
735
736
736
736
738
739
740
742
743
746
746
WASHING
MACHINE
DISHWASHER
DRYER
VACUUM
CLEANER
PC
CONNECTION
5 KW
WITH
INVERTER
727
MICROWAVE
DC MICROGRID
v DC
v AC
FRIDGE
OVEN
INDUCTION
BURNER
TV
2. Description of a microgrid
Microgrids are integrated systems in which distributed energy
resources (DERs) create a grid that feeds a variable number of
types of DGs that can be based on either renewable or nonrenewable resources. This characteristic allows to adequately
exploit the available resources in each location (wind, sun,
biomass, etc.) (Fig. 2). Tables 1 and 2 summarise the main types
of distributed generators [1,1012]. This table highlights that
non-renewable based technologies provide yet higher efciencies. It also shows that wind and small hydro-power based
systems offer the highest efciencies among the renewable
based technologies. Ocean energy, although is a very promising
source of energy, still requires further research and development to become protable and reach the market with guarantees of success [10].
Storage systems (SS). The use of SSs improves the stability,
power quality, reliability of supply and the overall performance
of a microgrid [13,14]. Table 3 summarises some key energy
storage technologies available for microgrid applications
[1517]. It is interesting to underline that, even if superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES) provides high efciency, this technology is still in the demonstration stage.
Table 3 also shows that there are other technologies such as
pumped hydro storage (PHS) or compressed air energy storage
(CAES) that, in spite of their lower efciencies, have higher
capacities with longer lifetimes. There are different procedures
to estimate the amount of power that a SS requires. Parameters
and considerations for sizing the energy storage in stand alone
systems can be found in [18]. In addition, Ref. [19] provides
models for the same purpose, that also guarantee safe energy
supply and help to reach suitable power quality in the microgrid. For the particular case of lead-acid batteries in standalone photovoltaic systems, some guidelines and recommended practices for its sizing can also be found in [20].
728
1 Transmission
PCC
3 Distribution
4 Protections
5 Monitoring
Power
converters
Control
8 Regulatory
issues
Economic
analysis
Fig. 2. A general scheme of a microgrid. Elements that differ in AC microgrids (blue) and elements that differ in DC microgrids (green). (For interpretation of the references to
color in this gure caption, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Table 1
Main technologies of non-renewable DGs.
Energy based
technology
type
Primary energy
Output
type
Module
power
(kW)
Electrical
efciency
(%)
Overall
efciency
(%)
Reciprocating
engines
Diesel or gas
AC
36000
3043
8085
Advantages
Low cost
Disadvantages
Environmentally
unfriendly emissions
High efciency
Ability to use various
inputs
Gas turbine
Diesel or gas
AC
0.530,000 2140
8090
Environmentally friendly
Cost effective
Micro-turbine
AC
301000
1430
8085
Expensive technology
weight
Easy start-up and shutdown
Cost-effectiveness
sensitive to the price of fuel
Environmentally
unfriendly emissions
Fuel cell
120,000
0555
8090
Extracting hydrogen
is expensive
Expensive
infrastructure for hydrogen
729
Table 2
Main technologies of renewable DGs.
Energy based
technology
type
Primary
energy
Output
type
Module
power
(kW)
Electrical
efciency
(%)
Overall
efciency
(%)
Wind
Wind
AC
0.23000
5080
Advantages
Disadvantages
Still expensive
Storage mechanisms
technology
Photovoltaic
systems
Sun
DC
0.021000
4045
required
Emission free
Storage mechanisms
required
AC
100
20,000
1525
6075
Small hydro
power
Water
AC
5100,000
9098
Still expensive
A net loss of energy in
small scale
Suitable site characteristics
required
maintenance
Useful for providing peak power and spinning
Environmental impact
reserves
Geothermal
Hot
water
AC
5000
100,000
1032
3550
Non-availability of
geothermal spots in the land of
interest
Ocean
wave
AC
101000
Lack of commercial
projects
Solar thermal
Sun and
water
AC
1000
80,000
3040
5075
Mature technology
Limited scalability
No data available.
730
Table 3
Main technologies of SSs.
Technology
Efciency
(%)
Capacity
(MW)
Energy
density
(Wh/kg)
Capital
(/kW)
Lifetime
(years)
Maturity
Environmental
impact
Examples
TESa
3060
0300
80250
140220
540
Developed
Small
7585
0.51.5
4001500
4060
Mature
Negative
CAESc
Flywheel
5089
9395
100
5.000
3400
025
3060
1030
2501500
250
2060
15
Developed
Negative
Demonstration Almost
Pbacid batteryd
NiCd batterye
NaS batteryf
Li-ion batteryg
7090
6065
8090
8590
040
040
0.058
01
3050
5075
150240
75200
200
3501.100
7002.100
3.000
515
1020
1015
515
Mature
Commercial
Commercial
Demonstration
Negative
Negative
Negative
Negative
Fuel cells
2050
050
3501.100
515
Developing
Small
Flow battery
Capacitors
7585
6065
0.315
00.05
800
10.000
1050
0.055
4001.100
250
515
5
Developing
Developed
Negative
Small
Supercapacitors 9095
00.3
2.515
200
4 20
Developed
Small
SMESh
0.110
0.55
200
4 20
Demonstration Positive
PHS
9598
3. Transmission system
The main characteristic of microgrids is that they can work
both connected or disconnected from the mains grid (Fig. 2 - ).
Nowadays, the majority of power transmission lines use three
phase AC technology [24] (Fig. 2 - , 1a). However, in recent years,
DC high voltage direct current (HVDC) technology (Fig. 2 - , 1b)
has become more popular for power transmission due to the
advantages that offers, such as high power density, controlled
emergency support, no contribution to short circuit level and more
stability [2527]. Moreover, an upgrade of AC lines into DC ones
implies minor infrastructure changes and increases the transmission capacity [24]. In this sense, there are several examples of
HVDC installations in different countries (Table 4) [26,28]. Their
locations can be found in Fig. 3. There are remarkable ones like the
Rio Madeira in Brazil (Fig. 3, 3), which is the longest HVDC
installation built ever (2375 km) [29]. Jinping-Sunan 7 800 kV
ultrahigh voltage direct current (UHVDC) installation, in China
(Fig. 3, 33) is the most powerful transmission line in the world,
with a rated capacity of 7.27.6 GW [29]. More examples of HVDC
installations can be found in many other countries such as USA,
India and Canada, and their number is continuously increasing due
to, among other reasons, the multiple advantages that offers HVDC
for power transmission in long distances ( 4 800 km for overhead
lines and 4 50 km for cable systems).
Data collected about the amount of HVDC installed in last years,
shows an annual linear increase in number of installations and an
731
Table 4
Principle HVDC installations.
Continent
Location
Fig. 2
HVDC links
Continent
Location
Figs. 2 and 3
HVDC links
Africa
DR Congo
MozambiqueS. Africa
Brazil
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Inga-Shaba
Cahora Bassa
Itaipu I and II
Rio Madeira
Vancouver I and II
Nelson River I, II and bipole II
Eel River
Chateauguay
Madawaska
McNeill
Nicolet Tap
Des CantonsComerford
QuebecNew England
Acaray
Pacic Intertie and Pacic
Intertie upgrade
Square Butte
David A. Hamil
CU project
Eddy County
Oklaunion
Blackwater
Highgate
Miles City
Intermountain power project
Sidney (Virginia Smith)
WelchMonticello
Rapid City DC tie
Lamar
TSQ-Beijao
Three GorgesChangzhou
Three GorgesQuangdong
GuizhouGuangdong
Three GorgesShanghai
JinpingSunan
Asia
India
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
Vindhyachal
SileruBarsoor
RihandDelhi
ChandrapurRamagundum
ChandrapurPadghe
GazuwakaJeypore
East-South Intercon.
Vizag I and II
Sakuma
Shin-Shinano
Hokkaido Honshu
LeyteLuzun
HaenamCheju
ThailandMalaysia
Duernrohr
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
Vienna-South east
Kontek Interconnection
KontiSkan I and II
Estlink
FennoSkan
Les MandarinsSellindge
GalatinaArachthos
Moyle
Sardinia
Sacoi
Valhall offshore
Skagerrak I, II and III
NorNed
VolgogradDonbass
Vyborg
Gotland I, II and III
Baltic Cable Project
Kingsnorth
Broken Hill
Basslink
Inter-island
America
Canada
CanadaUSA
Paraguay
USA
Asia
China
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Japan
Europe
Philippines
South Korea
ThailandMalaysia
Austria
DenmarkGermany
DenmarkSweden
EstoniaFinland
FinlandSweden
FranceUnited Kingdom
GreeceItaly
IrelandScotland
Italy
Norway
NorwayDenmark
NorwayNetherlands
Russia
Oceania
Sweden
SwedenGermany
United Kingdom
Australia
AustraliaTasmania
New Zealand
Fig. 3. Principle HVDC installations all over the world. Note: Numbers referred to Table 3.
exponential growth of the installed power (Fig. 4). Table 5 compares the performance of the two transmission technologies [26].
The table also shows that DC transmission systems are more cost
effective than AC ones for long distances, and they overcome some
drawbacks presented in AC transmission systems, such as
732
200
180
160
Number of installations
u / GW
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
14
10
00
05
20
20
20
95
90
80
85
20
19
19
19
70
75
19
19
60
65
19
19
19
19
54
Year
Fig. 4. Evolution of the number and power of HVDC installations installed all
around the world.
Table 5
Comparison between AC and DC transmission systems.
Issue
Transmission costs
Investment costs
Right-of-way (ROW)
Towers
Insulators
Conductors
Terminal equipment
Operation costs
Losses
Skin effect
Dielectric losses
Corona effects
Compensation
AC
DC
Higher
Higher
Higher
Higher
Lower
Lower
Simpler and cheaper
Lower
Lower
Higher
Higher
Yes
Higher
Higher
By means of reactive power
Lower
No
Lower
Lower
Lower
Full
Better
Higher
No distance dependency
No reactive power (Q) control
No
Asynchronous connection
Low
Similar
Similar
Underground and underwater cables
Long distance bulk power transmission
Asynchronous interconnections of AC systems
Stability of power ows in integrated power systems
Technical considerations
733
Table 6
Power converters topologies for the PCC (Fig. 2): topologies in real and experimental microgrids (black) and proposed topologies (blue).
GRID
MG
MV
LV
AC
HV AC
DC
Transformer [62]
MV AC
Transformer [63]
DC
-b
-b
-b
-b
-b
-b
-b
AC
inverter
converter
Transformer
inverter
a
Transformer and
inverter
DC
Multilevel converter
AC
Transformer
Inverter [64]
Transformer and
37]
a
inverter
Transformer
[38,14,21,3950]
a
inverter [65,52]
[51,6668,53]
DC
Multilevel converter
Inverter
No power device
Isolated and
nonisolated DC DC power
converters
a
b
5. Distribution
Microgrids can be classied into AC and DC microgrids based
on the characteristics of the distribution line (Fig. 2 - ). There are
734
Table 7
Examples of DC distribution systems in USA.
Country
State
Location
USA
California
Michigan
Michigan
Pennsylvania
Texas
Washington
6. Protection schemes
The design of protection schemes for AC and DC microgrids
(Fig. 2 - ) is a challenging task because there are several
parameters involved, such as the dynamic structure of the microgrid and different levels of current of the devices. Protections must
be designed based on the following parameters: sensitivity,
selectivity, speed of response and security level [9]. Among all
these parameters and issues, the protection scheme is basically
derived from two: the number of the installed DGs, and the
availability of a sufcient level of short-circuit current in an
islanded operating mode of the microgrid [9,82].
Several protection schemes (Fig. 2 - ) have been developed
for AC microgrids [9,8387], they can be classied into centralised
and decentralised schemes. On decentralised schemes each DG
provides its own relay, which is an efcient technique against line-
Table 8
Examples of protection schemes for AC and DC microgrids.
Type Protection strategy
Operation
Communication
link
AC
Both
Both
Yes
Yes
Islanded
Islanded
Grid-connected
Both
Yes
Yes
No
No
Both
No
Both
Yes
DC
Adaptive
Based on communication-assisted
digital relays
Voltage
Harmonic content
Current travelling waves
Distance
Based on commercial DC
protections
Optimal unit and non-unit
protection
There are vendors that supply commercial solutions for monitoring and control of microgrids [103]. It is also possible to
monitor microgrids through phasor measurement units (PMU),
as it has been proposed in [104]. These PMUs are systems which
offer more accurate data about the power system, which allow to
manage the system more efciently and with a higher level of
response [105].
Therefore, the main difference between AC and DC microgrids
is that DC ones only require to monitor and control a reduced
number of variables. In fact, monitoring systems for DC microgrids
(Fig. 2 - , 5b) are simpler than AC microgrids (Fig. 2 - , 5a)
because they do not require to monitor the frequency nor the
reactive power.
9. Control
AC and DC microgrids require different control tasks (Fig. 2 - )
in order to guarantee a correct operation of the system. Normally,
a hierarchical control carries out these tasks. There are three levels
of controls are described from the outer to the inner level of
control as follows (Fig. 5) [22]:
8. Power converters
The three main components of a microgrid (DGs, SSs and loads)
are connected to it through power converters (Fig. 2 - ). These
power converters rely on the type of microgrid (AC or DC), as well
as on other features of the devices (voltage levels, power ow
direction, etc.). In addition, they usually include a transformer in
order to obtain galvanic isolation.
Tables 18 and 19 summarise the main topologies of isolated
power converters used in DGs and SSs for coupling to AC grids
(Fig. 2 - , 6a and 6b) [106,107]. Both tables show that power
converters usually require a controlled inverter, which is composed of insulated-gate bipolar transistors (IGBT) and capacitors
on the DC bus. Matrix converters can also be used, which
guarantee bidirectional power ow by means of bidirectional
switches and without any signicant reactive component [108].
Since DC grids are not yet widespread, there are no standard
topologies of power converters to couple DERs to them. Tables 18
and 19 present some feasible power converters architectures for
coupling DGs and SSs to DC microgrids (Fig. 2 - , 6c and 6d)
[59,107,109111]. Both tables show that power converters usually
require fewer components in DC lines than in three-phase AC
lines. Some of DC topologies can also use high-frequency transformers, which implies that they are smaller and lighter than the
low-frequency transformers of AC microgrids.
The efciency of the power converter is a key parameter.
It depends on many variables, such as power rate, load rate, core
volume and material when galvanic isolation is needed [112]. The
majority of power converters have optimal efciency when they
work at their nominal power. In [113] an approach for comparison
of system conversion efciencies for residences is presented. This
735
Grid level
DNO
MO
Management
level
MGCC
DG
SS
LC
Load
LC
LC
Field level
736
Both DNO and MO functions are done at the mains grid level,
while MGCC is located in a central computer, and the local
controllers are placed in power converters coupled to each
element of the microgrid (DGs, SSs or loads). This hierarchical
control can be carried out in a centralised or decentralised manner,
which is commonly called multi-agent based control (MAS). The
centralised control alternative offers the possibility of implementing a basic management system with low costs of installation and
operation. On the other hand, MAS control provides plug and play
performance at expense of a more complex control design [43].
DC microgrids present the advantage that there is no need for
controlling frequency nor reactive power. In this manner, the
control tasks are simplied since the devices can be connected
to the microgrid directly, without any process of synchronism.
Therefore the connection of the microgrid to the mains grid is
done asynchronously and only the ow of active power must be
controlled. On the other hand, in AC microgrids frequency must be
controlled and the devices must be synchronised before their
connection with the microgrid, and the microgrid must be
synchronised with the mains grid before its connection. A summary of the main synchronisation methods can be found in [137],
which are mostly based on phased-locked loops (PLL). Furthermore, reactive power ow must be also controlled in the PCC,
which adds complexity to the whole control. There are DC and AC
cases that also require voltage balancing. In three-phase AC
microgrids, voltage balancing can be carried out in several manners: introducing special control loops to converter based DGs and
SSs, using reactive support devices such as static var compesators
(SVC) or static synchronous compesators (D-STATCOM) with
appropriate control and using simple switched capacitors [138].
For DC microgrids with bipolar or homopolar distribution, voltage
balancing must also be carried out. For this purpose, voltage
balancers can be placed near the power converters in order to
balance the distribution lines [52]. In Table 9 a summary of the
737
Table 9
Control tasks in the hierarchical control for AC and DC microgrids.
Hierarchical level
Controller
Control tasks
Grid level
DNO
AC
DC
Control of the active power ow between the microgrid and the grid
Control of the reactive power ow between the microgrid and the grid
MO
Management level
MGCC
Field level
LC of DGs
LC for SSs
LC for loads
a
b
738
Table 10
Main stability issues and reasons and their corresponding possible improvement methods for AC microgrids.
Issues
Reasons
Improvement methods
Feedback controller
Small load change
System damping
Power limit for DGs
Transient stability
Islanding
Loss of DG
Large load step
Fault
Control of storage
Load shedding methods
Protection device setting
Control of power electronics
Voltage stability
Reactive compensation
Load shedding
Modied current limiter for microsources
Voltage regulations with DGs
Table 11
AC microgrid models proposed in the literature.
Model
Distribution DG
SS
Loads
Mode Control
Admittance matrix
DC source with non-linear equations
that are linearised
DC source with equations in statespace
State space in a common reference
frame and linearisation
State space in a common reference
frame and linearisation
Small signal analysis
No
No
Constant power
RLC circuit
Both
Both
No
RLC circuit
Island Droop
No
Constant power
Both
Droop
No
Constant power
Both
Droop
Constant power
Island a
Both
Two types:
constant
impedance and
motor loads
Coupled by inverter droop Coupled by inverter Both
droop
No
No
Both
Constant power
Droop
Droop
Droop
Droop
Droop
Island a
No control considered.
9.4. Optimisation
Optimal control of microgrids is an active eld of research
whose most common objective is to minimise the operating cost
[156]. Some of the solutions proposed only consider the electrical
generation of microgrids and include mathematical programming,
heuristics and priority rules [156]. However, there are also some
microgrids, most of them residential microgrids, that also include
thermal generation which must be also considered. In [157] there
are examples, most of them residential, of such models of microgrids in order to achieve an optimal thermal generation.
Optimisation of AC microgrids has been widely studied and
related works deal with different issues:
739
Table 12
Applicable standards to AC and DC microgrids.
Type
Standard
Description
Scopes
AC and
DC
IEEE 1547
EN 50160
IEC 61000
IEEE C37.95
DC
Voltage characteristics of electricity supplied Denitions and indicative values for a number of power quality
by public distribution networks
phenomena in LV and MV networks
Limits for power frequency, voltage variations, harmonics voltage,
voltage unbalance, icker and mains signalling
General conditions or rules necessary
Safety function and integrity requirements
for achieving
Electromagnetic compatibility
Compatibility levels
Emission and immunity limits
Measurement and testing techniques
Installation guidelines, mitigation methods and devices
Protective relaying of utility-consumer
Establishment of consumer service requirements and supply methods
interconnections
Protection system design considerations
740
Storage Systems
Installation
Operation
Costs of microgrids
Mantainance
Voltage regulation
DNO
costs
Voltage balance
Adaptation of fault levels
Overloading
Fig. 6. DC-Powered home example proposed in IEC SG4. Courtesy of Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI).
741
Table 13
Development costs in AC and DC microgrids.
Device
Localisation
Protections in PCC
Distribution
LV protections
Metering
Communication
Power converters
MCC
LC
Load controller
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
Fig.
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
AC
DC
Reasons
Lower
Higher
Lower
Higher
Similar
Higher
Higher
Higher
Similar
Higher
Lower
Higher
Lower
Similar
Lower
Lower
Lower
Similar
Table 14
R1.1 Power characteristics of the principal home appliances.
Appliance
Power stages
Topology I:
AC/DC
Fridge
Dishwasher
Washing machine
Dryer
Rectier with
Induction burner
Vacuum cleaner
Microwave
power factor
correction
a
b
Inverter
Oven
TVb
PCb
Loads
Power
AC
DC
Motor
Motors for the pump and blades
Motors for the pump and drum
Motor for the drum, motor for the fan and
resistance
Resistance and motor for the fan
0.11.0
1.02.2
0.33.0
0.22.0
Control electronics
and DC bus
Inductor
Motora
Magnetron and motor for fan
(kW)
0.54.0
1.2 to 2.2
0.5 to 2.0
1.0 to 1.5
0.02 to 0.5
0.02 to 0.4
Table 15
R1.1 Features of some commercial available inverters with a rated power output of 5 kW.
Manufacturer
Model
Efciency (%)
Price ()
Sunways
Fronius
Ingeteam
ABB
Schneider Electric
NT5000
IG TL 50
SUN 5TL
Power-One PVI
Xantrex GT 5.0 SP
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
97.8
97.7
97.0
97.0
96.0
1850
1990
1550
1800
1990
742
Fig. 8. Sendai microgrid in Fukushima, Japan. Courtesy of New Energy and Industrial
Technology Development Organisation (NEDO).
Table 16
Examples of microgrids in Africa and America.
Continent
Africa
America
Country
South-Africa
Morocco
Senegal
Brazil
Canada
Chile
Mexico
USA
Place
Lucingweni
Akkan
Diaka Madina
Campinas
Chico Mendes
Ilha Ferradura
Ascension island
Bella Cola
Boston Bar
Hartley Bar
Kasabonika Lake
Nemiah Valley
Ramea Island
Senneterre
Toronto
Tac island
Coyhaique
San Juanico
Xcalac
Kotzebue, Alaska
Wales, Alaska
California
Borrego Springs, California
Type
Fig. 9
AC
DC
Continent
Country
Place
Type
AC
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
America
USA
Dublin, California
Marin County, California
Palmdale, California
San Diego, California
Santa Cruz island, California
29 palms, California
Florida
Miami, Florida
Hawaii
Woodstock, Minnesota
New Jersey
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Los Alamos, New Mexico
Rochester, New York
Forth Bragg, North Caroline
Columbus, Ohio
Arlington, Texas
Austin, Texas
Colonias, Texas
Waitsield, Vermont
Washington DC
Madison, Wisconsin
Fig. 9
DC
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
85
86
United Kingdom
Spain
Greece
Holland
Ireland
Italy
Macedonia
Norway
Portugal
AC
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
Longtan
Ankara
Newcastle
Kings Canyon
Queensland
AC
Ulsteinen Nunatak
Hefei
Nanjing
Xinjiang
Tianjin
Xiamen
Town island
Maharashtra
Uttar Pradesh
Aichi
Hachinoche
Kuroshima island
Kyoto
Miyako island
Sendai
Changwon
Pulau Ubin
Place
Taiwan
Turkey
Australia
13. Conclusions
Oceania
Korea
Singapore
Japan
Hong Kong
India
Antarctica
China
Antarctica
Asia
Country
743
Continent
Table 17
Examples of microgrids in Antarctica, Asia, Europe and Oceania.
Type
DC
Place
Country
Continent
Fig. 9
Type
DC
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
Fig. 9
744
Table 18
Main power converters topologies for photovoltaic panels and wind turbines.
745
that has been commented and has been widely studied for AC and
DC microgrids. Similar control and hardware solutions have been
proposed for both AC and DC microgrids. Besides, islanding
detection methods for AC systems are widely studied but very
few works deal with this issue in DC systems.
Different proposals for modelling AC microgrids have been
found that generally consider single-phase distribution lines and
both modes of operation (connected and disconnected from
the main grid). Research efforts are needed in modelling DC
Table 19
Main power converters topologies for batteries and ywheels.
21 20
7
10
12
8 9
32
70
78
8485
69
74
86
68
75 71
72 76
80
77 64
79 81 82
73
2 83
11
14
45 15 43
25
33
24
4437
39
26 22
34
35
29
38
28 23 27 36 40
30
41
31
42
18
19
13
49
54
53
60
50
56
61
47 55 58
48
59
51
57
52 63
3
62
5
46
66
1
67
65
17
16
46
Fig. 10. AC (blue), DC (green) and hybrid AC/DC (black) microgrids all around the world. (For interpretation of the references to color in this gure caption, the reader is
referred to the web version of this article.)
746
300
250
u/MW
200
150
References
100
50
13
11
20
20
09
20
07
20
05
20
03
20
01
20
19
19
99
96
Year
14
12
Total number of installations
u/MW
10
Total power
8
6
4
2
13
20
11
12
20
20
09
10
20
20
08
20
07
06
20
20
04
05
20
20
03
02
20
20
01
00
20
20
19
92
Year
Fig. 11. Quantity and total power installed in AC and DC microgrids.
Acknowledgments
This work has been carried out inside the Research and
Education Unit UFI11/16 of the UPV/EHU and supported by the
Department of Education, Universities and Research of the Basque
747
[65] Martini L, Tornelli C, Bossi C, Tironi E, Superti-Furga G. Design and development of a LV test facility for DC active distribution system. In: International
conference and exhibition on electricity distribution (CIRED); 2009. p. 14.
[66] Morozumi S, Nakama H, Inoue N. Demonstration projects for gridconnection issues in Japan. Elektrotech Informationstechnik 2008;125
(12):42631.
[67] Majumder R. Aggregation of microgrids with DC system. Electr Power Syst
Res 2014;108:13443.
[68] Majumder R. A hybrid microgrid with DC connection at back to back
converters. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2014;5(1):2519.
[69] Jiang Z, Yu X. Power electronics interfaces for hybrid DC and AC-linked
microgrids. In: IEEE international power electronics and motion control
conference; 2009. p. 7306.
[70] Jiang Z, Yu X. Hybrid DC- and AC-linked microgrids: towards integration of
distributed energy resources. In: IEEE energy 2030 conference; 2008. p. 18.
[71] Liu X, Wang P, Loh PC. A hybrid AC/DC microgrid and its coordination
control. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2011;2(2):27886.
[72] Loh P, Li D, Chai YK, Blaabjerg F. Autonomous operation of hybrid microgrid
with AC and DC subgrids. IEEE Trans Power Electron 2013;28(5):221423.
[73] Balog R, Krein P. Bus selection in multibus DC microgrids. IEEE Trans Power
Electron 2011;26(3):8607.
[74] Andreu J, Fernandez-Navamuel A, Kortabarria I, Llaria A, Alzola JA. Denicion
de una microrred para la recarga de vehiculos electricos. Semin Anual de
Automtica y Electrn Ind (SAAEI) 2011;1:2816.
[75] Starke M, Li F, Tolbert L, Ozpineci B. AC vs. DC distribution: maximum
transfer capability. In: IEEE power and energy society general meeting; 2008.
p. 16.
[76] Borioli E, Brenna M, Faranda R, Simioli G. Comparison between the electrical
capabilities of the cables used in LV AC and DC power lines. In: International
conference on harmonics and quality of power; 2004. p. 40813.
[77] Baran M, Mahajan N. DC distribution for industrial systems: opportunities
and challenges. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 2003;39(6):1596601.
[78] Nilsson D. DC distribution systems [Master's thesis]. Department of Energy
and Environment. Chalmers University of Technology; 2005.
[79] Patterson BT. DCthe power to change the world. From data centers to
whole buildings. In: Microgrids RD & D workshop; 2012. p. 129.
[80] Ikebe H. Power systems for telecommunications in the it age. Int Telecommun Energy (INTELEC); 2003. p. 18.
[81] Kwasinski A. Quantitative evaluation of DC microgrids availability: effects of
system architecture and converter topology design choices. IEEE Trans
Power Electron 2011;26(3):83551.
[82] Jiayi H, Chuanwen J, Rong X. A review on distributed energy resources and
microgrid. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2008;12(9):246576.
[83] Sortomme E, Mapes G, Foster B, Venkata S. Fault analysis and protection of a
microgrid. In: North American Power symposium (NAPS); 2008. p. 16.
[84] Nikkhajoei H, Lasseter R. Microgrid protection. In: IEEE power engineering
society general meeting; 2007. p. 16.
[85] Islam M, Gabbar H. Analysis of microgrid protection strategies. In: IEEE
international conference on smart grid engineering (SGE); 2012. p. 16.
[86] Haron A, Mohamed A, Shareef H. A review on protection schemes and
coordination techniques in microgrid system. J Appl Sci 2012;12(2):10112.
[87] Voima S, Kauhaniemi K, Laaksonen H. Novel protection approach for MV
microgrid. In: International conference on electricity distribution (CIRED);
2011. p. 14.
[88] Cuzner R, Venkataramanan G. The status of DC micro-grid protection. In:
IEEE industry applications society annual meeting (IAS); 2008. p. 18.
[89] Salomonsson D, Sannino A. Low-voltage DC distribution system for commercial power systems with sensitive electronic loads. IEEE Trans Power
Deliv 2007;22(3):16207.
[90] Sannino A, Postiglione G, Bollen M. Feasibility of a DC network for
commercial facilities. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 2003;39(5):1499507.
[91] Fletcher S, Norman P, Galloway S, Crolla P, Burt G. Optimizing the roles of
unit and non-unit protection methods within DC microgrids. IEEE Trans
Smart Grid 2012;3(4):207987.
[92] Sortomme E, Venkata S, Mitra J. Microgrid protection using communicationassisted digital relays. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 2010;25(4):278996.
[93] Gopalan SA, Sreeram V, Iu HH. A review of coordination strategies and
protection schemes for microgrids. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2014;32
(0):2228.
[94] Das J, Osman R. Grounding of AC and DC low-voltage and medium-voltage
drive systems. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 1998;34(1):20516.
[95] Jingding R, Yanbo C, Lihua Z. Discussion on monitoring scheme of distributed
generation and micro-grid system. In: International conference on power
electronics systems and applications (PESA); 2011. p. 16.
[96] Zhichun Y, Jian L, Kaipei L, Wei C. Preliminary study on the technical
requirements of the grid-connected microgrid. In: International conference
on electric utility deregulation and restructuring and power technologies
(DRPT); 2011. p. 165662.
[97] Hai-xuan L. Studies on the monitoring and control platform of microgrids.
In: China international conference on electricity distribution (CICED); 2012.
p. 15.
[98] Vaccaro A, Popov M, Villacci D, Terzija V. An integrated framework for smart
microgrids modeling, monitoring, control, communication, and verication.
In: Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 99, no. 1; 2011. p. 11932.
748
[99] Shamshiri M, Gan CK, Tan CW. A review of recent development in smart grid
and micro-grid laboratories. In: 2012 IEEE international power engineering
and optimization conference; 2012. p. 36772.
[100] Ruiz-Alvarez A, Colet-Subirachs A, Gomis-Bellmunt O, Fernandez-Mola J,
Alvarez-Cuevas-Figuerola F, Lopez-Mestre J, et al. Design, management and
comissioning of a utility connected microgrid based on IEC 61850. In: IEEE
PES innovative smart grid technologies conference Europe (ISGT); 2010.
p. 17.
[101] Islam M, Lee H-H. IEC61850 based operation, control and management of
utility connected microgrid using wireless technology. Intell Comput Theor
Appl (ICIC); 2012. p. 25865.
[102] Mohamed A, Ghareeb A, Youssef T, Mohammed O. Wide area monitoring and
control for voltage assessment in smart grids with distributed generation. In:
IEEE PES innovative smart grid technologies conference (ISGT); 2013. p. 16.
[103] CERTS, Microgrid energy management system. Technical report, California
Energy Commission; 2003.
[104] Wells C. Solar microgrids to accommodate renewable intermittency. In: IEEE/
PES transmission & distribution conference & exposition (T & D); 2010.
p. 19.
[105] Chenine M, Nordstrom L. Modeling and simulation of wide-area communication for centralized PMU-based applications. IEEE Trans Power Deliv
2011;26(3):137280.
[106] Chakraborty S, Kramer B, Kroposki B. A review of power electronics
interfaces for distributes energy systems towards achieving low-cost modular design. Renew Sustain Energy Rev Elsevier 2009;13:232335.
[107] Tan X, Li Q, Wang H. Advances and trends of energy storage technology in
microgrid. Electr Power Energy Syst 2013;44(1):17991.
[108] Andreu J, de Diego JM, de Alegra IM, Kortabarria I, Martn JL, Ceballos S. New
protection circuit for high speed switching and start-up of a practical matrix
converter. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2008;55(8):310014.
[109] Venmathi M, Ramaprabha R. A comprehensive survey on multi-port bidirectional DCDC converters for renewable energy systems. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci
2013;8(5):34856.
[110] Taghvaee M, Radzi M, Moosavain S, Hizam H, Hamiruce Marhaban M.
A current and future study on non-isolated DCDC converters for photovoltaic applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013;17:21627.
[111] Du Y, Lukic S, Jacobson B, Huang A. Review of high power isolated bidirectional DC-DC converters for PHEV/EV DC charging infrastructure. IEEE
Energy Convers Congr Expo (ECCE) 2011:55360.
[112] Paajanen P, Kaipia T, Partanen J. DC supply of low-voltage electricity
appliances in residential buildings. In: International conference and exhibition on electricity distribution (CIRED); 2009. p. 14.
[113] Hammerstrom D. AC versus DC distribution systems. Did we get it right?.
IEEE Power Eng Soc Gen Meet; 2007, p. 15.
[114] Starke M, Tolbert L, Ozpineci B. AC vs. DC distribution: a loss comparison.
IEEE/PES transmission and distribution conference and exposition; 2008. p.
136773.
[115] Nilsson D, Sannino A. Efciency analysis of low- and medium- voltage DC
distribution systems. IEEE Power Eng Soc Gen Meet 2004;2:231521.
[116] Techakittiroj K, Wongpaibool V. Co-existence between AC-distribution and
DC-distribution: in the view of appliances. In: International conference on
computer and electrical engineering (ICCEE), vol. 1; 2009, p. 4215.
[117] Keyhani A, Marwali M. Smart power grids 2011. Germany: Springer; 2011.
[118] Tsikalakis A, Hatziargyriou N. Centralized control for optimizing microgrids
operation. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 2008;23(1):2418.
[119] Hatziargyriou N, Dimeas A, Tsikalakis A, Lopes J, Karniotakis G, Oyarzabal J.
Management of microgrids in market environment. In: International conference on future power systems; 2005. p. 17.
[120] Lopes J, Moreira C, Madureira A. Dening control strategies for microgrids
islanded operation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2006;21(2):91624.
[121] Zamora R, Srivastava A. Controls for microgrids with storage: review,
challenges, and research needs. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2010;14
(7):200918.
[122] Ustun T, Ozansoy C, Zayegh A. Recent developments in microgrids and
example cases around the worlda review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev
2011;15(8):403041.
[123] Lasseter R, Akhil A, Marnay K, Stevens J, Dagle J, Guttromson R, et al. White
paper on integration of distributed energy resources the microgrid concept.
Technical Report, CERTS; 2002.
[124] Vandoorn T, Meersman B, De Kooning J, Vandevelde L. Analogy between
conventional grid control and islanded microgrid control based on a global
DC-link voltage droop. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 2012;27(3):140514.
[125] Abusara M, Guerrero J, Sharkh S. Line-interactive UPS for microgrids. IEEE
Trans Ind Electron 2014;61(3):1292300.
[126] Bryan J, Duke R, Round S. Decentralized generator scheduling in a nanogrid
using DC bus signaling. IEEE Power Eng Soc Gen Meet 2004;1:97782.
[127] Schonberger J, Duke R, Round S. DC-bus signaling: a distributed control
strategy for a hybrid renewable nanogrid. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2006;53
(5):145360.
[128] Schonberger J, Round S, Duke R. Autonomous load shedding in a nanogrid
using DC bus signalling. In: Conference on IEEE industrial electronics
(IECON); 2006. p. 515560.
[129] Schonberger J, Duke R, Round S. Decentralised source scheduling in a model
nanogrid using DC bus signalling. Aust J Electr Electron Eng 2005;2
(3):18390.
749
[170] Patterson B. DC, come home: DC microgrids and the birth of the Enernet.
IEEE Power Energy Mag 2012;10(6):609.
[171] Symanski DP. DC distribution in buildings including homes, commercial
buildings, data centers and telecom central ofces. In: IEC SG4 low voltage
DC workshop; 2011. p. 132.
[172] Costa P, Matos M, Lopes J. Regulation of microgeneration and microgrids.
Energy Policy 2008;36(10):3893904.
[173] Pudjianto D, Strbac G, van Oberbeeke F, Androutsos A, Larrabe Z, Saraiva J.
Investigation of regulatory, commercial, economic and environmental issues
in microgrids. In: International conference on future power systems; 2005.
p. 16.
[174] Gil H, Joos G. Models for quantifying the economic benets of distributed
generation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2008;23(2):32735.
[175] Katsuma H, Kameya T, Suzuki G, Asai H. Soft energy will make light rail
vehicle run in the stricken area without a caternary system. In: Proceedings
of American solar energy society; 2013. p. 13.
[176] Jaffery SHI, Khan M, Ali L, Khan HA, Mufti RA, Khan A, et al. The potential of
solar powered transportation and the case for solar powered railway in
Pakistan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2014;39(0):2706.
[177] Costa P, Matos M. Economic analysis of microgrids including reliability
aspects. International conference on probabilistic methods applied to power
systems, vol. 1; 2006. p. 3129.
[178] http://www.antarcticstation.org/.
[179] Hossain E, Kabalci E, Bayindir R, Perez R. Microgrid testbeds around the
world: state of art. Energy Convers Manag 2014;86(0):13253.
[180] Ping J, Xin ZX, ShouYuan W. Review on sustainable development of island
microgrid. In: IEEE international conference on advanced power system
automation and protection (APAP), vol. 3; 2011. p. 180613.