Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
While the authors acknowledge the social and aesthetic goal of the International Style,
they point out that this style ignores the particular aspects from local culture, nature,
energy, and material flows (p. 29). Universal design solution wont work the same
anywhere and solution prepared for a worst-case scenario sometimes can exert negative
influence. For example, strong detergent can pollute spring water and poison aquatic life.
C. Outlining the Argument Structure (6 points total)
Complete the argument outline for the sections From Cradle to Grave and One Size Fits All.
The main claim/thesis is listed below. Please add specific warrants/reasons and evidence from
the text that support the main claim. A completed outline will include two reasons and 2 3
pieces of evidence for each reason. The second reason has been done for you.
Main Claim / Thesis: Cradle-to-grave designs and one-size-fits-all solutions are problematic
Evidence: Final products averagely contain only 5% of raw materials. Materials are
wasted during manufacturing and delivering phases.
Reason 2: One-size-fits-all solutions wont work because one size fits all solutions assume
that needs are the same everywhere.
Evidence: The one-size-fits-all design itself is not consumers friendly. For example, the
universalized office building styles (sealed windows, lack of daylight and fresh air,
constantly humming air conditioners, etc.) can be uninspiring and inhuman.
Evidence: The universal design to accommodate a worst-case scenario can exert negative
influence, such as the issue of detergent. Detergent working effectively for hard water
wont work for soft water. Contents of detergent can affect water quality, which can
affect the health of human and aquatic life. For example, it can cause mutations and
infertility for fish.
Directions: Read the section A Strategy of Tragedy, or a Strategy of Change (pp. 42 44) to
answer the questions below. For each question, circle (or highlight) the best answer to the
question.
D. Making Inferences (1 point each)
1. The authors attitude toward industrialists, engineers, designers, and developers
(p. 43) can best be described as:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
resentful
empathetic
optimistic
critical
cheerful
audience? Is the evidence credible and sufficient given the audience and the context
of the argument?)
The authors argue that designers and manufacturers need to be creative to find new
environment friendly solutions, which is convincing for me. First, the authors
background and stories added pathos and ethos to their argument. The authors both
devoted a great deal of efforts to find new solutions in their respective realm of
architecture and chemistry. And their stories let the readers to know the inspirations and
experience they had in this regard. For example, William McDonoughs experience in
Japan drew a vivid picture of energy-efficient designs (p. 7). Second, their arguments
include a fair counterargument. They do not deny all of the taken so far by manufacturing
industry; instead, they acknowledge that some environment friendly methods. However,
they point out that the so-called environment friendly methods are not sufficient enough.
Then they provided surprising numbers and cases to support their idea. According to
McDonough and Braungart (2002), more than 90 percent of materials extracted to make
durable goods in the United States become waste almost immediately. (p.27) Such an
astonishing number gives the readers an impression of the seriousness of environmental
issues. Third, the paper of this book itself is a proof of the authors ideas. The paper on
which the book is printed does not use wood pulp or cotton fiber at all, but uses plastic
resins and inorganic fillers. I borrowed the book from school library. Feeling the texture
of the paper by myself convinces me of the authors belief in creativity for environmental
protection. Therefore, I find the authors argument extremely convincing.