Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Preliminary- nikah in pre Islamic Arabia, meant different forms of sex relationship between a
man and a woman established on certain terms, in pre Islamic days, women were treated
as chattels, and were not given any right of inheritance and were absolutely dependent. it
was prophet mohammad who brought about a complete change in the position of
women.
Definition- The legal contract between a bride and bridegroom as part of an Islamic
marriage; the contract of Islamic marriage; Islamic marriage in general.
Nikah is an Arabic term used for marriage. It means "contract". The Quran specifically
refers to marriage as "mithaqun Ghalithun,". Which means "a strong agreement".
The original meaning of the work nikah is the physical relationship between man and
woman. It is also used secondarily to refer to the contract of marriage which makes that
relationship lawful.
"A contract that results in the man and woman living with each other and supporting
each other within the limits of what has been laid down for them in terms of rights and
obligations."
Ibn Uthaimeen takes an even more comprehensive view of the
institution of marriage in his definition of it as:
"It is a mutual contract between a man and a woman whose goal is for
each to enjoy the other, become a pious family and a sound society.
Essential Condition of Nikah
Nikah is based on few conditions. When these conditions are fulfilled, then
a man and a woman are proclaimed as husband and wife and can live
together and carry on their marital duties. These are:
Essentials of Marriage
The essentials of a valid marriage are as follows:(i) There should be a proposal made by or on behalf of one of the
parties to the marriage, and an acceptance of the proposal by or on
behalf of the other party. A Muslim marriage requires proposal Ijab
from one party and acceptance Qubul from the other side. This must
be done in one sitting.
Full Amount of Mahr: Record the total value of the agreed Mahr, e.g.,
5,000 in cash, or xyz weight in gold.
a) Muajjal (Immediate/Prompt): This means the total amount of Mahr
payable by the Husband at the time of signing of marriage contract.
b) Muwajjal (Deferred): This means the portion of the Mahr which is
payable to the wife at a specified point in the marriage or at the time
of dissolution of the marriage through divorce or death of the
husband. Any deferred Mahr that remains unpaid at the time of
dissolution becomes a debt against the former husbands assets.
Portion of the Mahr paid at the time of marriage: the amount of money
and/or goods received as Mahr at the time of marriage. This does not
include general gifts to the bride from the bridegroom and/or his
family unless these be expressly included in (a) above as part of the
amount of Mahr.
WitnessesAccording to Islamic law, a witness should be sane, adult and reliable.
This requirement is gender/faith neutral. Hence, the Muslim Marriage
Certificate requires to be witnessed by two adult witnesses of good
character.
# TWO men can be the witness
# ONE man and TWO women can be the witness
# ONLY women can not be the witness
INSANE and MINOR can not be the witness
DivorceAccording to Islamic law, marriage is the most sacred commitment in
life between two adults of opposite sex. It attempts to save it
wherever possible. As a consequence divorce is regarded by Allah as
the most hated thing. However, breakdown in marriage does take
place for a variety of reasons. If the divorce is initiated by husband he
has to pay the woman any Mahr that remains unpaid. If the divorce is
initiated by the wife,and the husband is found to be at fault by the
arbiters she does not lose her Mahr. But if she cannot prove his fault,
she has to return to her husband whatever Mahr amount she has
already received. If the wife initiates the divorce without any grounds,
this is called khula and she must return whatever the husband has
given her in consideration for the marriage.
Legal Disability
It means the existence of certain circumstances under which marriage
is not permitted. these Absolute Incapacity.
There is absolute prohibition of marriage in case or relationship of
consanguinity. In this case the situation is such that the relationship
(a) Polyandry- it means the fact of having more than one husband.it is
forbidden in the muslim system and a married women cannot marry
second time so long as the first marriage subsists.
(b) Muslim woman marrying a non-muslim- a marriage of a muslim
female with a non muslim male made whether he be Christian or jew
or an idolater or a fire worshipper is irregular in nature under sunni
law and void under shia law.
Directory Incapacity
# This may arise out of: Marrying a woman enciente
# Prohibition of divorce
# Marriage during pilgrimage
# Marriage with a sick man
Aspects of Marriage
Valid Marriage (Sahih)
Under the Muslim law, a valid marriage is that which has been constituted
in accordance with the essential conditioned prescribed earlier. It
confers upon the wife; the right of dower, maintenance and residence,
imposes on her obligation to be faithful and obedient to her husband,
admit sexual intercourse with him and observe Iddat.
Irregular Marriage (Fasid)
Those marriages which are outcome of failures on part of parties in non
fulfillment of prerequisites but then also are marriages; to be
terminated by one of the party is termed to be Irregular marriages.
They are outcome of(a) A marriage without witness (Not under Shia Law)
(b) Marriage with fifth wife.
(c) Marriage with a women undergoing Iddat.
(d) Marriage with a fire-worshipper.
(e) Marriage outcome of bar of unlawful conjunction.
An irregular marriage has no legal effect before consummation but
when consummated give rise to several rights & obligations.
Void Marriage (Batil)
A marriage which is unlawful from its beginning. It does not create any civil
rights or obligations between the parties. The offspring of a void
marriage is illegitimate. They are outcome of(a) Marriage through forced consent.
(b) Plurality of husband.
(c) Marriage prohibited on the ground of consanguinity.
(d) Marriage prohibited on the ground of affinity.
(e) Marriage prohibited on the ground of fosterage
Iddat
In Islam, iddah or iddat (Arabic: period of waiting) is a period after a
divorce, during which a woman may not marry another man. The
period is calculated on the number of menses that a woman has,
usually three. Iddah was intended to ensure that the male parent of
any offspring produced after the cessation of a nikah would be known.
Iddat after death of husband[4]Qur'an prohibits widows to engage themselves for four (4) lunar months
and ten (10) days after the death of their husbands. This is also to
ascertain whether a woman is pregnant or not, since four and a half
months is half the length of a normal pregnancy.
Husbands should make a will in favor of their wives for the provision of
one years residence and maintenance, unless the wives themselves
leave the house or take any other similar step.
The directive of the Qur'an regarding the waiting period of a widow,
are as under:
Whoever from amongst you dies and leaves behind wives, the wives
will hold themselves [from marriage] for four months and ten days.
Then, when they have expired this period, there is no blame upon you
in whatever they do regarding themselves, according to the
recognized traditions. And God is fully aware of whatever you are
doing. And there is no blame upon you in proposing [marriage] to
these women or in keeping such proposal to yourself - God is aware
that you would mention it to them - but do not make with them any
secret commitments, except that you say a noble word to them.
However, do not commit the marriage-contract with them, until the
law has reached its prescribed time.
Iddat after divorce[5]
Comparing this waiting period with the one prescribed for a divorced
woman (i.e. three menstrual periods of the divorced woman), we see
that the waiting period prescribed for a widow exceeds that, which is
prescribed for a divorced woman by at least a month and a half. It is
also clear from the stipulations of the Qur'an that the prescription of
the waiting period for a divorced woman is with the basic purpose of
ascertaining her condition with reference to pregnancy as well as to
provide the divorcing couple adequate time to review and, if possible,
to revise their decision. Thus, in view of the increased prescription of
waiting period in the case of a widow, it seems that the waiting period
prescribed for a widow entails other purposes, besides merely
ascertaining the woman's position with reference to pregnancy.
The Muslim jurists and thinkers have generally construed this
menstruation, it has been held by the privy council in shia case that
the age of the majority in the case of the girl is attained at the age of
nine years.
In pooja arya vs. state of UP[8]
Where a muslim girl married a hindu boy, which created a furore in
local communities, in cases like this law authorities buy peace at the
cost of constitutional rights and privileges.
Conclusion
After analyzing thoroughly the system of Islamic marriage a
reasonable and prudent way of thinking would always conclude that
the Islamic personal law with regards to marriage and divorce need to
be changed a lot so to maintain its status in modern society.
Marriage is a religious duty of every Muslim and it is considered to be
a moral safeguard and a social need. The Prophet has also said
Marriage is my tradition whosoever keeps away there from is not from
amongst me.
Unlike Hindu where the marriage is a sacrament, marriages in Muslims
have a nature of civil contract. Marriage is necessary for the
legitimization of a child. When the marriage is done in accordance to
the prescribed norms it creates various rights and obligations on both
the parties.
It appears that Islamic law of marriage and divorce is not identical to
the man made laws which are changed by man himself moment after
moment. It is evident that the position of man and woman in the
social set up of the community, is equal in every respect, but keeping
in view the mindset of both the genders, Islam segregates the rights,
duties and functions of both the gender and then declares their status
with regard to family matters.
If it is asked that are man and woman equal in Islamic way of life?
There would not be simple positive or negative way of answer rather,
one must scrutinize, examine and inspect closely and thoroughly their
respective rights, duties and functions. And then placing a complete
picture in front, it may be possible to answer the above question. In
other societies of the world, the state of affairs is not in concurrence
to Islamic way of life. Those other societies always try to claim that
man and woman are equal in every respect which is not a natural
phenomenon.
Endnotes:
[1] hijrah
[2] the religion which is consistent with the natural instincts and needs
of mankind
[3] Dower-amonut paid by bridegroom to bride
[4] Iddat e wafaat
[5] iddat of Talaaq
[6] (1886) 8 All. 149
[7] (1928) 30 bom. LR 134
[8] AIR 2006 All 60
The author can be reached at: harshit@legalserviceindia.com / ph no:
+91-9634007061 / Print This Article
Also Read:
Guardianship Under Muslim Law:
The source of law of guardianship and custody are certain verses in
the Koran and a few ahadis. The Koran, the alladis and other
authorities on Muslim law emphatically speak of the guardianship of
the property of the minor, the guardianship of the person is a mere
inference.
Custody Under Muslim Law:
The first and foremost right to have the custody of children belongs to
the mother and she cannot be deprived of her right so long as she is
not found guilty of misconduct. Mother has the right of custody so
long as she is not disqualified.
Islamic reforms
According to Ameer Ali, the reforms of Prophet Mohammad marked a new departure in the
history of eastern legislations. The prophet of islam is reported to have said with Allah,
the most detestable of all things permitted is divorce, and towards the end of his life he
practically forbade its exercise by men without intervention of an arbiter or a judge. The
Quran Ordains,if ye fear a breach between them twain(the husband and the wife),
appoints an arbiter from his folk and an arbiter from her folks. If they desire amendment,
Allah will make them of one mind. The Quran permits divorce partly because of some
countenance to the customs and partly to enable men get rid of an odious union.
Prophet Mohammad restrained the power of divorce and gave to the women the right of
obtaining the separation on reasonable grounds. The Prophet is reported to have said, if
a women be prejudiced by a marriage, let it be broken off.
People are governed simultaneously by many different laws: laws recognized by the
state i.e. codified and uncodified laws and informal laws such as customary practices
which vary according to the cultural, social and political context. A half-hearted attempt
was made in 1937 when the Shariat Application Act was passed with the intention to
apply the Shariat, and not the customary laws, on the Muslim population. The Act said
that in all personal matters, Shariat laws and not the customary laws would govern the
Muslims, though it did specify the specific details of what would comprise this Shariat
law. In reality, each sect in the Muslim community continued to follow its own traditions
and customs. Moreover, there was opposition to a codified law for all Muslims from
certain quarters who were benefiting from the customary practices. Thus, the first
attempts at enacting a uniform Muslim Personal Law was rendered unsuccessful. The
only advantage of this Act lay in its attempt to bring the Muslim community under one
law despite its heterogeneity. It also brings home the fact that Muslims in India, postIndependence, have not made any serious attempt to codify diverse practices of its
different schools of thought and jurisprudence.
Another attempt was made in 1939 with the Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act. It laid
down nine grounds on which a Muslim woman could seek divorce in the court. Islamic
law then allowed a man to divorce his wife at will but a wife did not have the right either
to give divorce or seek one. The only way out for them was to convert to another
religion to annul her marriage. Alarmed at this trend, the Ulemas coaxed the British
government to pass this Act. Although the Act allowed a woman approach the court for
divorce, it did not curb the mans right to divorce his wife orally and unilaterally. The
next step was the Muslim Women (Protection on Divorce) Act, which was enacted only
in 1986 after the Shah Bano controversy. This law prescribed the right to maintenance
for a Muslim woman after her divorce. Different courts interpreted the law differently
and some women even continued to take resort to the Cr. P.C 125 [Criminal Procedure
Code sec. 125] to demand maintenance.
The laws, passed in 1939 and 1986, were not the result of a concerted effort towards
reforms. They were more a result of reactions by the conservatives who saw reforms in
personal law as an infringement on their right to religion and a threat to their male
identity.
(iv) that the husband has failed to perform, without reasonable cause, his marital
obligations for a period of three years;
(v) that the husband was impotent at the time of the marriage and continues to be so;
(vi) that the husband has been insane for a period of two years or is suffering from
leprosy or a virulent venereal disease;
(vii) that she, having been given in marriage by her father or other guardian before she
attained the age of sixteen years, repudiated the marriage before attaining the age of
eighteen years:
Provided that the marriage has not been consummated;
(viii) that the husband treats her with cruelty, that is to say,
(a) habitually assaults her or makes her life miserable by cruelty of conduct even if such
conduct does not amount to physical ill-treatment, or
(b) associates with women of evil repute of leads an infamous life, or
(c) attempts to force her to lead an immoral life, or
(d) disposes of her property or prevents her exercising her legal rights over it, or
(e) obstructs her in the observance of her religious profession or practice, or
(f) if he has more wives than one, does not treat her equitably in accordance with the
injunctions of the Quran,
(ix) on any other ground which is recognized as valid for the dissolution of marriages
under Muslim Law,
Provided that:
(a) no decree passed on ground (i) shall take effect for a period of six months from the
date of such decree, and if the husband appears either in person or through an authorised
agent within that period and satisfies the Court he is prepared to perform his conjugal
duties the Court shall set aside the said decree; and
(b) before passing a decree on ground (v) the Court shall, on application by the husband,
make an order requiring the husband to satisfy the Court within a period of one year
from the date of such order that he has ceased to be impotent, and if the husband so
satisfied the Court within such period, no decree shall be passed on the said ground.
A husbands failure to provide for the maintenance of the wife for a period of 2 years
mentioned in Cl.(ii) of Section 2 entitles the wife to a decree for dissolution of marriage
whether or not the husband has reasonable cause for withholding such maintenance.
Cl.(ii) of section 2 should be read in contradistinction with Cl.(iv) as per which the wife
is entitled to to decree for dissolution of her marriage on the ground that the husband has
failed to perform without reasonable cause his marital obligations for a period of 3
years. The words without reasonable cause are significantly absent in Cl.(ii). The duty
to provide wife with maintenance is self imposed to keep the relationship intact and it is
ot a duty corresponding to the right of the wife to claim maintenance against the
husband. As against the arbitrary power of the husband yo liquidate the marriage the
wife gets a right to dissolution of maariage on the husbands neglect or failure to provide
for maintenance for a period of 2 years. This construction of Cl.(ii) of Sec.2 is in
consonance with the Islamic law on the subject. There is therefore no jurisdiction in
introducing the words without reasonable cause into Cl.(ii). The legislature in its
wisdom, by providing those words in Cl(iv) has not thought it necessary to provide this
restriction in Cl.(ii).[1]
In a suit brought by wife for dissolution of marriage on the ground that her husband was
impotent at the time of marriage and continued to be so that facts were as follows.
Marriage was celebrated on June 12, 1960 and the suit was brought on Oct 3, 1960. the
husband asked for and was granted one year to prove that he has ceased to be impotent.
On the expiry of the period the court granted a decree on the application of the wife.
The requirements of Sec.2(v) that the husband is not only impotent at the time of the
marriage but that he continues to be impotent when the suit is filed. The evidence in the
case was held to establish impotency at both the point of time. On the question raised
that during the period of grace, the husband was denied the company of his wife in his
own house, the court held that after the act the rule of Mohammedan Law about the duty
of the wife did not apply. The act requires an opportunity to satisfy the court about the
cessation of the condition and that the opportunity is available only on application to the
court. The provision of the act abrogated the Mohamrdan Law. It is not the rule that the
acquisition of virility can be proved only by sexual act with the wife. Such a procedure
is likely to subject the wife to some peril.
In case of Abdul Azeem v. Fahimunnisa Begum[2] the facts were: In this case the wife
sued the husband for dissolution of her marriage for failure to maintain her for 2 years.
She was married in 1952. in 1955 she went away to her parents. The husband then
performed the second marriage. The suit failed. It was held that under Mahomaden Law
polygamy was allowed and could not be a ground for living apart and claiming for the
maintenance in the absence of other grounds which would justify the wife to follow
other course.
In Munnawarbai v. Sabir Mohammad[3] case the wife left the marital house and
stayed away without any justifiable cause and then asked for dissolution of marriage on
the ground that husband was not maintaining her, it was held that the wife is not entitled
to relief under section 2 (ii) of Dissolution of Marriage Act, 1939.
Other than these situations Cl. (ix) of Section 2 states that on any other ground which is
recognised as valid for dissolution of marriage under Muslim Law. This clause covers
the divorces by ila, zihar, khula, mubarat and tafweez. Imputation of unchastity or false
charge of adultery against the wife (Lian) makes a good ground for dissolution of her
marriage. This ground falls under clause(ix) of section 2 of the act.
In Noor Jahan Bibi v. Kazim Ali[4], one Noor Jahan filed a suit against her husband
Kazim ali who charged her that she was of bad character and she was enamoured of one
Asghar Ali and committed adultery with him. It was held by the court that the doctrine
of Lian has not been absolute under the Muslim Law and therefore a muslim wife can
bring a suit for divorse against her husband on the ground that her husband has charged
her with adultery falsely under section 2(ix) of the act.
In M.B. Rahim v. Shamsoonnissa Begum[5], the privy council observed that wherin
the husband disposed of the property of her wife and confined her to a room as if she
was in a jai. He also misbehaved with his wife. In appeal Husband raised contention that
as far as Muslim Law is concerned a wife has no right to live seperatly even though the
conduct of the husband is not good. It was held by privy council that if under the muslim
law no wife can separate herself from her husband then such law is clearly contrary to
the principle of natural justice. This case was decided in favour of wife by the privy
council.
CRUELTY: The general notion of cruelty is very subjective- depending on time, place,
persons and other factors also. The legal concept of cruelty, which is not defined by
statute, is generally described as act or conduct of such a nature as to have caused to life,
limb or health- physical or mental or as to make a reasonable apprehension of such
danger.
Cruelty, no doubt, constitutes a pompous ground for dissolution of marriage, as the term
cruelty and love and affection are repugnant to each other. There is no strait jacket
formula to define cruelty. Even a gesture, an angry look, a sugar coated joke, an ironic
look may be more cruel than beating. Every act or conduct of one spouse which makes
the other spouse unhappy or miserable can not amount to cruelty. The mere fact is that
the erring spouse is moody, whimsical, mean, stingy, selfish, boorish, irritable,
inconsiderable, irascible etc. will not be sufficient to amount to cruelty.
Cruelty in marital relationship, is a course of conduct of one spouse which adversely
affecting the other. Cruelty may be mental or physical, intentional or unintentional. If it
is physical, it is an issue of fact and degree. If it is mental, the enquiry must begin as to
the nature of the cruel treatment and then as to the treatment of the mind of the spouse.
Whether it caused reasonable apprehension that it would be harmful or injurious to live
with the other, is ultimately a matter of inference to be drawn by taking into account the
nature of the conduct and its effect on the complaining spouse. Cruelty is a ground for
matrimonial relief.
In Islamic law, the concept of cruelty (zirar) is not limited. The cruelty provision is to be
interpreted in the light of the Prophets exhortations that women are as tender as glasses
(qawarir) and he is the best man who is kind to his wife. It is worth mentioned here that
under Muslim law cruel nature is a disqualification for eligibility to marry.
Section 2(viii)(a) of the concerned Act uses the words by cruel conduct even if such
conduct does not amount to physical ill treatment. This language is wide enough to
include all cases of cruelty, not merely this, it would cover all types of misconduct or
misbehaviour, serious and not very serious on the part of the husband calculated to break
spirit of the wife by physical or moral force which was systemically exerted on her to
such a degree and to such a length of time resulting in undermining her health, it will
amount to cruelty.
Regarding cruelty of conduct the general test should apply, since the conduct that is
cruel for one woman can not be civilized enough for another just because of the religion
of the parties. The point lies in the statutory words makes her life miserable and the
social status and standard of self-respect of the wife should be decisive to ascertain if the
mans conduct amounts to cruelty. A simple allegation of the wife, unsupported by
independent testimony, is not sufficient in law to establish any charges mentioned in the
law.
In case of inequitable treatment between the co-wives which amounts to cruelty, the
courts earlier providing maintenance to one wife only and ill-treatment forcing co-wife
to leave the husband as instances of unequal treatment. In Umat-Ul-Hafiz v. Talib
Hussain[6], husband went abroad leaving behind his two wives in India. He provided
maintenance to one wife and neglected the other. The court granted divorce to the
neglected wife.
The Allahabad High Court in Itawari v. Smt. Asghari[7] observed that a Muslim has
the legal right to take a second wife even during the subsistence of the first marriage, but
if he does so, and then seeks the assistance of the Civil court to compel the wife live
with him against her wishes on pain of severe penalties including attachment of
properties, she is entitled to ask whether the court, as a court of equity, ought to compel
her to submit to co-habitation with such a husband. In that case the circumstances in
which his second marriage took place are relevant and material in deciding whether his
conduct in taking a second wife was in itself an act of cruelty to the first.
The onus in these days would be on the husband who takes a second wife to explain his
action and prove that his taking a second wife involved no insult or cruelty to the first.
For example, he may refute the presumption of cruelty by proving that his second
marriage solemnized at the suggestion of the first wife or in order to gain some financial
benefit( may be through contract) the first wife may indulge or insist her husband or
reveal some other relevant circumstances will prove cruelty. But in the absence of a
strong and proper explanation the court will presume, under modern prevailing systems,
that the action of the husband in taking a second wife involved cruelty to the first and
that it would be inequitable for the court to compel her against her wishes to live with
such a husband.
It will amount to cruelty if the husband disposes of his wifes property or prevents her
from exercising her legal rights over it. In case Zubaidaa v. Sardar Shah[8], the view
expressed by Abdul Rahman J., that, it is not always easy to determine for what
purpose, husband sells or assigns his wifes property of any value. Property may be
used for the treatment of wife, for the benefit of the family members, for the education
of children, for the maintenance of any other liabilities. If the property disposed of not
for the selfish ends of the husband, not with the object of meeting a pressing needs but
more in the sense of waste and this done to deprive the wife of her property and without
the consent of wife then it shall constitute the offence of cruelty.
In Shamsunnissa Begums case, II. M.I. 551 the test of cruelty is based on universal and
humanitarian standards by the husband which would cause such bodily or mental pain as
to endanger the wifes safety of health.
In another case the Bombay High Court in Shakla Bano v. Ghulam Mustafa[9], has
observed that an unwilling wife cannot be compelled to live along with her husband.
Cruelty can be of various shapes. It depends on various factors like health, environment,
education, economic and social backgroung. It is settled position that persistent charges
of adultery and immorality may amount to cruelty[10].
It is clear that to constitute cruelty it is not necessary that there should be actual violence
or a reasonable apprehension of it. Likelihood of violence is a good ground for the grant
of relief[11]. Presently physical violence is not the only essential ingredient of cruelty.
Mental agony also amounts to cruelty.
It is to be noted that the term cruelty includes habitual assaults, concubinage, associated
with the women of ill repute or leads an infamous life, attempts to force her to live her
an immoral life, dispose of her property, or prevent her to exercise her legal rights,
obstructs her in the observance of her religious profession or practice and if Muslim
husband has more than one wives, he doesnt treat her equitably.
Today, there is a large volume of case laws on cruelty in India and abroad. Since human
nature and conduct are infinitely diverse. No hard and fast rules can be laid down as to
what acts or conducts will amount to cruelty in any given case. However, there is a sea
change in the attitudes of the courts. There is no difficulty in holding when physical
violence amounts to cruelty. However deciding some clear cases, questions do arise in
the sphere of mental cruelty or not. The reason is that mental cruelty may be of any kind
or of infinite variety, new concept of mental cruelty may reveal. It may be subtle or
brutal. It may be by words, gestures or even by mere silence.
Section 3: Notice to be served on heirs of the husband when the husbands whereabouts
are not known.
In a suit to which clause (i) of section 2 applies:
(a) the names and addresses of the persons who would have been heirs of the husband
under Muslim Law if he had died on the date of the filing of the plaint shall be stated in
the plaint.
(b) notice of the suit shall be served on such persons, and
(c) such persons shall have the right to be heard in the suit:
Provided that paternal-uncle and brother of the husband, if any, shall be cited as party
even if he or they are not heirs.
Provided further that the provisions of this section shall not apply to a woman converted
to Islam from some other faith who re-embraces her former faith.