TETTER OF ROGATO*Y

This writing will he submitted in the style of a letter of Rogatory after consultation advisement and
approval Chief Nanya Shabu el of the At-sik-hata nation of yamassee Moors We as members of the Anyyu-Wiya tribe of Cherokee Moors Declare the following United states code 28 usc 13 60 and who land

include (but not limited to) Georgia Nqrth Carolina South Carolina Alabama Florida Tennessee We are
the lndigenous peoples of the aforementioned land with geographic coondinates: 33degrees 36feet
36inches N. latitude; -S4degrees 17feet lTinches W. longitude
1715 Yamassee uprising and The trail of Tears which include Missouri is a historical event, which has
beert acknowledge by the U.S. congress passing the following resolutions HJR- 3 (HJ3 lH) HJR 194 S con

Resolution 25 in which the U.S- federal government under the command of U.S. president Andrew
Jackson rounded up our peoples be they: yamassee, Hichiti, Choctow, Cherokeg Moor olmagseminole,

Yuchi,Washitaw and force them to walk west to Oklahoma away from their traditional land which are
illegally and unlawfully usurped by the United States
prior to the passing of the aforementioned U.S. congressional bills and the united nations declarations
on the right of lndigenous peoples our people's have had the most resistance from the United States of
America in exercising our rigtrt to self determination this despite the fact that United states of American
have pass presidential executive orders 13107 lmplementation Human Right treaties and presidential
proclamation 7500 guaranteeing our right to exercise our tribal sovereignty and self determination
The 1857 U.S. supreme court decision Sanford vs Scott known as the Dred scott decision, which has
never been over turn has made it clear that no descents of Africans can be a Citizens of united states of
American this current state of affairs leads those descent of African/Moors who are unfurniliar with

international law united nations ?nd decade of the world's lndigenous people and the fact that they can
now self identify themselves as indigenous or tribal unable to have a nationality or the ability to identify
and clam their lndigenous inheritance in cord with HJR 194
The legal limbo geated by the Dred scott decision of 1857 coupled with the Jim crow laws and the
Christian Black codes of 1794 and the South Carolina negro act which are still use to this day has put the
descent of Africans living in American in a state less position this is cause these decent of Africans to rely

on united states courts which have a history of biased judgment and decision against not only Africans
but native American as well.
All over American many African people ciaim not only their African heritage but lndian ancestry as well.
Many as called African American families have lndian roots in any one of the various tribes in American
such as; cherokee Choctaw, yamassee, yuchi, seminole, yashitaw,Lumbee,creeks etc.
Hjr 194 110 congress Lst session on February 27 zf,f.T oongress acknowledges that African Americans
were silipped on their names and in heritage
July 8 2003 president George W Bush acknowledge in a

one of the greatest crime of

histof.

trip to Goree lsland, Senegalthat slavery "was

The northwest ordinance enacted by congress in 1787, which begins with the phrase "the utmost good

faith shall always be observed toward the lndians"

United States of American have consistently fault and resists, to this day also African Americans claiming
are lndigenous Status we have consult with chief Nanya shaabu from the At-sik-hata nation of yamassee
Moors in cord with the international law have declared proclaim our indigenous rights our
documentation has been legal recognize acknowledge certified authenticated and confirmed as correct
yet we still face persecution apartheid genocide rape and kidnapping for manifesting our lndigenous
rights as we are in title to by Law it is well know that Africans in American who claim their indigenous
status as native American/lndian are subjected to persecution ridicule discrimination genocide abuse
and scorn as if that is not possible that they could be native American/lndian yet modern history is now
unearthing and uncovering facts to prove the assumption by American to be contrary archaeological
evidence

Definition of the Unites states of America: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC Non profit Delaware
Corporation lncorporation Date 4//L9/89 File No 2793946 UNITED STATES Of AMERICA INC Non-profit
Delaware Corporation lncorporation Date 4lL9/89 File No. 2193946 Entity Name UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA INC Entity Kind CORPORATION Entity Type RELIGIOUS NONPROFIT Residency DOMESTIC State
DE Status VOID TAX INFORMATION Last

htt://www.state.

de.

Annual report Filed: 1991

us/corpldirectweb.shtm

We have declared our selves lndigenous in tribal and claim our indigenous rights as we are in title to in
cord with HJ resolutionlg4 and HJ resolution 3 we still face an up held battle by the Corporation United
States of America. We who have declared and claim our indigenous rights face skepticism ridicule and
scorn for daring to declare ourselves as Indigenous although the congressional records been apologies

from the U.S. congress allow us to do so, since in American's legalsystem we are look upon as not
having a legal or lawfully status/citizenship. We as lndigenous Cherokee Moors are not Citizens of the
United States of American (Religious Corporation) And as such we are entitled to protection accord with
the constitutional rights and the lnternational rights as well, Our Statutory Declaration of our
indigenous rights put us in conflict mostly and consistently with U.S courts U.S Government and the local
STATE and U.S Government agencies We are All native American and White we all have a valid treaty
with the governor who is the Chief Magistrate of the State of Missouri via Statutory Declaration. UNILOS
Article 19 right of safe passage we are seeking clarity and the validity of actions taking by STATE agents
which have violated the various treaty UNDRIP civil political economic social culture rights.
Under Missouri SUNSHINE LAW 610 we are submitting to the Judge Anne Marie Clark Judge Robin
Vannoy Ashley Laitmore Chris Brown Kathryn S Herman Terry Carter Dr. Linda Shaw all another Doctors
and agents who participated in the kidnapping Deprivation of rights under color of LAW title 18 section
242 and Genocide A list of lnterrogatories under supreme court rule 33. No question is to go under
answer and allfacts are the upmost priority in the determination of justice or injustice which would aide
in the prompt and safe return of our children to our care

L.

from the parents of Etheryah Haley

now known as Aleshanee Sha ul me elto be little there rights to have a say in the type of
treatment their daughter would receive?
2. What is time and date that the parents of Etheryah Haley now known as Aleshanee Sha ul me el
give up or waive their rights their wave their rights to self determination?
3, What is the time and date that the children or the parents there of came obligated or came
within the provision of section 211.031.1(1)RSMO?
4. What is time and date that any tribal member parents or children where in the city of ST.LOUIS
as it is a corporation with a charter establish in 1914?
5. Where is the city of ST.LOUIS geographically located?
5. What is the process of procedure to come into the city of ST.LOUIS?
7. Are you given a choice to be a CITIZEN SUBTECT CLIENT RESIDENCE or is it by force assimilation?
8. When was the protective custody hearing requested and were the parents given prior notice
with their consent?
9. Do the parents or children is matter have a valid CONTACT with the state of MISSOURI or the
city of ST.LOUIS that can be proven for the record?
10. Who were the witnesses of the alleged neglect and where did this take place?
11. Since this is the 3'd year for the international decade for the people of African descent can a of
persons be given of all members who provide assisted in the following area (a) development (b)
education (c) employment (d) health (e) housing in harmony with theme of lnternational
What

is

the date that Kathryn

S Herman received permission

decade?

12. What assist did Kathryn S Herman Ashley Latimore give to the parents and children in the aide
of the program of activities for the implementation of the international decade for people of
African descent before reporting abuse and neglect?
13. What are the facts which support the diagnosis from Dr. Linda Shaw about the condition of
Etheryah now known as Aleshanee which allegedly cause bye breast feeding and vegan diet?
14. ls Dr. Linda Shaw diagnosis facts or opinion and can proof claim be provided?
15. Could Etheryah now known as Aleshanee have been clause by a virus or something of than the

'-diet?
16. Why was Etheryah mother not test to see if she could give blood to her daughter if the blood
transfusion was necessary as was stated by Doctors?
17. Why were the parents denied the right to disgust the one year old chemical treatment to be
given to their daughter despite the fact that this information were told to doctors in advance

that she was to treated without the use of chemicals violating their lndigenous rights?
18. What was meant by the Statement from Karan S Hermann although the mother appears to be
African American the mother reportedly that she is white and Native American? which give her
SF 181 as a supported document
19. Was the true attention of Ashley Latimore and Kathryn Herman who racial discriminated profile
the mother to commit kidnapping and Genocide against the family?
20. Why did the Judge approve the order after it was clear that facts would clearly show the
complaint was the result of racial discrimination in violation of the international decade on
people of African descent

21. What facts can a judge and cornmissioner give proof of to show that they are not complicit in
racial discrimination Genocide and kidnapping?
22. Cana judge give all the facts as to why the case was allow to be dismissed without prejudice and
then re filed without the evidence showing racial discrimination and me stating that we were
are not clTlzENs?

jurisdiction
23. What authority does the judge have or to use to proceed and ignore the challenge of
as the parents and children are not CiTIZEN? As was stated via the Dred scott decision 1857
from the supreme court..-.. I voided out birth certificate for fraud via
https://www.scribd.com/user/306423924/PrivaSiran EL
24. Where can proof be found to give supporting evidence that the judge followed the mandate for
congressional records pg A3222O may 11 1955 with all decisions made in this matter?
25. When did the parents give permission to have son removed from their care and medically
experimented on?

Jurat
United Nations Declaration on the right of Indigenous PeoplesUnited Nations Convention on
vus
lp./ / YY YY vr. uurvrE\.,
E*"r*tq S*iut & cultural Rights, tfailedNations Charter; Article 55 &.56, Presidential
proclamation 7500,H.J.R. 194, S. Con. Res.26 S. 1200, HJR-3

Atrrmed to and subscribed before me this

0Uu,

of January 201
By:
Affrant UCC 1-308 without

Prodo"e Identification

rype and o

,, tr{ o J'*'r"f,on,',/ fr'rnrt s)-tlttb ba75

ail crl tpfi

Standing At Law White and American Indian VIA Http://www/scribd.com/user/306423924/PrivaSiranEL

Sionya Haley now known as priya Siran El lndigenous autochthonous flesh and blood female of the Aniyu-Wiya tribe of Cherokee Moors Michael Fullilove now known as Marshawn Shiloh W'rjaya Sha ul me el
lndigenous autochthonous flesh and blood man the of the Ani-yu-Wiya tribe of Cherokee Moors our

Children/tribal members are Michael Fullilove jr now known as Samon Wijaya Sha ul me el lndigenous
flesh in blood male child of the Ani-yu-w'rya of Cherokee moors Etheryah selene Haley Aleshanee
Kerensa Sha ul me el lndigenous Autochthonous flesh and blood female child of the Ani-yu-Wiya Tribe of
Cherokee moors on the tndigenous land of Cahokia Missouria Turtle Geographically location 38-60.2L77
North Latitude -90.205058 West Longitude
ln response to Offender numberT080122055 lncident nurnber 20t626@i342
We have as the members of the Ani -yu- wiya have a personal $eaty with Governor of the corporate
state of Mlssouri definition of Treaty A compact made between two or more independent nations with a

view to the public welhre Black law dictionary 4 pg 1673

This Constitution, and the Laws of the Unitd States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all
Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme
Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or
Laws of any State to the Contrary ilotwithstanding.

Treaty
A campact made

between twa

ar mare independent nations with a view ta the public Welfare.

A heaty is an agreement in written form between nationstates (or intemationalagencies, such as the United Nations, thathave been given treatymaking capacity by the s{ates thatcreated them) that is intended to establish a rclationshipgovemed by !

nternational
LaE. It may be contained in a single instrument or in two or more related instruments sucft as anexchang
ilfdiptomatic notes. Various terms have been used for such an aqreelnent, including treaty, convention,protoiol,declaration, charter, @g.!.e.d, pact, act, statute, exchange of notes, agreement, mdlus vivendi
particular designation does not affec
i"manner of living" orprac*el empromise), and understanding. The
t the agreemenfs legal character.
The actions of ASHLEY !{ L/RTI#ORE are in violations of the personal treatythatwe havewiBt
govern who is the chief itragistrate of the state of Missouri. Her actions also constitute

18 U.S. Code $ 1091 - Genocide

Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Conqress.)

o US Code
. NgS

democrary, respect for human rights, non-discrimination and good faith, Encouraging States to comply
with and effectively implement all their obligations as they apply to indigenous peoples under
international instruments, in particular those related to human rights, in consultation and cooperation

with the peoples concerned,

Recognizing and reaffirming that indigenous individuals are entitled without discrimination to all human

rights recognized in international law, and that indigenous peoples possess collective rights which are
indispensable for their existence, well-being and integral development as peoples, Recognizing that the
situation
Ashley Latimore violated our rights by NOT respecting our rights to decide on the medicaltreatment we

wanted to give to our children which is our right to UNDRIP Article 24 1. lndigenous peoples have the
right to their traditional medicines and to maintain their health practices, including the conservation of

their vital medicinal plants, animals and minerals. lndigenous individuals also have the right to access,
without any discrlmination, to all social and health services. 2. lndigenous individuals have an equal right
to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. States shall take the
necessary steps with a view to achieving progressively the full realization of this right.
Ashley Latimore Violated our rights after I give her that information and the authority behind it
provide our daughter with the medical treat that we decide on

to

Ashley use racial discrimination against me supersede her authority and use
propaganda and slander to make me seem to be a unfit mother

International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial

Discrimination
Article

1. In this Convention, the term "racial discrimination" shall mean any distinction, exclusion,
restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin which has
the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an
equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social,
cultural or any other field of public life.

2' This Convention shall not apply to distinctions, exclusions, restrictions or preferences made by
a State Pafi to this Convention between citizens and non-citizens. Pursuant to international
decade of the people of African descent which we are the 3"d year in the elimination of alt forms
of racial discrimination

Ashley Latimore use propaganda and slander to use medical experimentation on our daughter violated
our rights to participate in decision making affecting the rights of our children Article 1.8 lndigenous
peoples have the right to participate in decision-making in matters which would affect their rights,

(a)Basrc OFFEilsE.-Whoever, whether in time of peace or in time of war and with the
specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, racial, or
religious group as such-

(1)
kills members of that group;

(2)
causes serious bodily injury to members of that group;

(3)
causes the permanent impairment of the mental faculties of members of the group through
drugs, torture, or similar techniques;

(4)
subjects the group to conditions of life that are intended to cause the physical destruction of
the group in whole or in part;

(s)
imposes measures intended to prevent births within the group; or

(6)
transfers by force children of the group to another group;
shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).

(blPuursrHENT FoR BAsrc Ormrs=.-The punishment for an offense under subsection (a)

is(1)
in the case of an offense under subsection (aXl), where death results, by death or
imprisonment for life and a fine of not more than $1,000,000, or both; and

(2)
a fine of not more than $1,00O,0O0 or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or
both, in any other case.

(c)Incrreu=xr Orrexse.Whoever directly and publicly incites another to violate subsection (a) shall be fined not
more than $500,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
(d

)Arrrmer

AND CoilsPrRACY.

Any person who attempts or conspires to commit an offense under this section shall be
punished in the same manner as a person who completes the offense.

(e)Junrsorcnon.-There
and (d)

if-

is jurisdiction over the offenses described in subsections

(a), (c),

(1)
the offense is committed in whole or in part within the United States; or
(2)regardless of where the offense is committed, the alleged offender

is-

(A)
a national of the United States (as that term is defined in section 101 of the Immigration
and Nationality Act (8IJ,S.CJLO.L));

(B)
an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States (as that
defined in section 1O1 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8_U.SJLO:U);

tem

is

(c)
a stateless person whose habitual residence is in the United States; or

(D)
present in the United States.

38 U.S. Code S 1201 - K;dnapping

Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for thg current Conoress.)

. .US-.lEdg
. &tgs

(a)Whoever unlawfully seizes, confines, inveigles, decoys, kidnaps, abducts, or carries away
and holds for ransom or reward or otherwise any petson, except in the case of a minor by
the parent thereof, when-

(1)
the person is willfully transported in interstate or foreign commerce, regardless of whether
the person was alive when transported across a State boundary, or the offender travels in
interctate or foreign commerce or uses the mail or any means, facility, or instrumentality of
interstate or foreign commerce in committing or in furtherance of the commission of the
offense;

(2)

any such act against the person is done within the special maritime and territorial
jurisdiction of the United States;

(3)
any such act against the percon is done within the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United
States as defined in section 46501 of tiile 49;

(4)
the person is a foreign official, an internationally protected person, or an officiat guest as
those terms are defined in secilon 1116(b) of this title; or

(s)
the person is among those officerc and employees described in section 1.114 of this tiile and
any such act against the person is done while the person is engaged in, or on account of,
the performance of official duties,
shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for life and, if the death of any
person results, shall be punished by death or life imprisonment.

(b)
With respec[ to subsection (a)(1), above, the failure to release the victim within twenty-four
hours aftefhe shall have been unlawfully seized, confined, inveigled, decoyed, kidnapped,
abducted, or carried away shall create a rebuttable presumption that such person has been
transported in interstate or foreign commerce. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the
fact that the presumption under this section has not yet taken effect does not preclude a
Federal investigation of a possible violation of this section before the 24-hour period has
ended.

(c)
If two or more persons conspire to violate this section and one or more of such persons do
any overt act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shatl be punished by imprisonment
for any term of years or for life.

(d)
Whoever attempts to violate subsection (a) shall be punished by imprisonment for not more
than twenty years.

(e)
If the victim of an offense under subsection (a) is an internationally protected

penson

outside the United States, the United States may exercise jurisdiction over the offense if (1)
the victim is a representative, officer, employee, or agent of the United States, (2) an
offender is a national of the United States, or (3) an offender is afterwards found in the
United States. As used in this subsection, the United States includes all areas under the

jurisdiction of the United States including any of the places within the provisions of
sections 5 and 7 of this title and section 46501(2) of title 49. For purposes of this
subsection, the term "national of the United States" has the meaning prescribed in section
1O1(aX22) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (B U.S.C. 1101(aX22)).

(o
In the course of enforcement of subsection (aX4) and any other sections prohibiting a
conspiracy or attempt to violate subsection (aX4), the Attorney General may request
assistance from any Federal, State, or local agency, including the Army, Navy, and Air
Force, any statute, rule, or regulation to the contrary notwithstanding.

(glSrrcml
(

Rut-r ron Genrnrr OFFEHSES IilvoLvrNG

Crrronrn.-

1)To wHolr APPTTGABT-E.-If-

(A)
the victim of an offense under this section has not attained the age of eighteen years; and

(B)the offender-

(i)
has attained such age; and

(iilis not(D
a parent;

(u)
a grandparent;

(ilr)
a brother;

(n)
a sister;

(v)
an aunt;

(vI)
an uncle; or

(wr)

an individuat having legal custody of the victim;

for not less than
the sentence under this section for such offense shall include imprisonment
20 years.

t(2)
Repealed. Pub. L. 108-21. title

I, 5104(b), Apr. 30, 2003, 117 Stat. 653.I

(h)
*parcntz does not include a person whose parental rights
As used in this section, the terrn
final
with respect to the victim of an offense under this section have been terminated by a
court order.

tB U.S. Code S 242 Deprivation of nights under

color of law
Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress')

. E.lEds
. llsteg

willfully
Whoever, under ColOr Of any law, statute, ordinance, regulatiOn, Or CUStom,
to the
or
District
subjects any person in any State, Territory. Commonwealth, Possession,
Constitution
protected
by
the
dep?ivation oi any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or
of
or laws of the united states, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account
the
prescribed
for
such percon being an alien, or by reason of nis color, or race, than are
year,
punis'hment of citizens, shall be hned under this title or imprisoned not more than one
or if
this
section
or both; and if UoOily injury resutts from the acts committed in violation of
weapon'
such acts include the uie, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous
years, or
explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten
if
such acts
bo'th; and if Oeatn results from the acts committed in violation of this section or
to
include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt
title, or
commit agg.avatdd sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this
imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death'
UNDRIP
represent, are the
treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements, and the relationship they
Acknowledging that the
basis for a strengthened partnership between indigenous peoples and States,
Cultural Rights 2 and
Charter of the United Nations, the lnternational Covenant on Economic, Social and
and
the lnternational Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,2 as well as the Vienna Declaration
programme of Action,3 affirm the fundamental importance of the right to self-determination of all
pursue their economic,
peoples, by virtue of which they freely determine their political status and freely
may be used to deny
social and cultural development, Bearing in mind that nothing in this Declaration
law, Convinced
any peoples their right to self-determination, exercised in conformity with international
and
harmonious
that the recognition of the rights of indigenous peoples in this Declaration will enhance
principles of justice,
cooperative relations between the State and indigenous peoples, based on

through representatives chosen by themselves in accordance with their own procedures, as well as to
maintain and develop their own indigenous decision making institutions. Article 19 States shall consult
and cooperate in good faith with the indigenous peoples concerned through their own representative
institutions in order to obtain their free, prior and informed consent before adopting and implementing
legislative or administrative measures that may affect them. Article 20 1. lndigenous peoples have the
right to maintain and develop their political, economic and social systems or institutions, to be secure in

the enjoyment of their own means of subsistence and development, and to engage freely in all their
traditional and other economic activities.

Jurat
United Nations Declaration on the right of Indigenous Peoples(http://www.un.ore./esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRlPS en.pd0 United Nafions Convention on
Economic, Social & cultural Rights, UnitedNations Charter; Article 55 & 56, Presidential
proclamation 7500,H.J.R. 194, S. Con. Res.26 S. 1200, HJR-3

Atrrmed to and subscribed before me this J0-

*,

of

Jamary 20lT

By:
Affrant UCC 1-

Pr

odu"rldentifi cation

rypeand

*n

{htJ lnilrurLio' Pe'*'*

b7y',/a, ?
My Commission Expires

r"4o\,/RY
Notary Public - Notary Seai
STATE OF MISSOUBI

Commissioned for St. Lcuis County

My Commission Expires: ADril 8, 201I
Commission # In!:,4648

prejudice
E

llta^oat