g craim for release/ challenge the

Under the authority of Federal rure of civir produces rure

of con9311i$.ftl?tv#lS3l?8 Halev
Jurisdiction of the court Janau ry t3 2o17ln the matter
Michael Anthony
now known as Aleshanee Sha' ul'me'el case numb er L622-JU00600.a1d
of the'A1i-yu-Wiya
SftSf-t'J
f,t*",'l
Fullilove Jr case number 1622-JUOO599 now know as Samson
now as Sionya Haley lndigenous
Tribe of Cherokee Moors I priya Sha ul me elformally
bt this court who are acting
Autochthonous fresh and brood woman r chailenge the Jur:isdicti;;
to do business through the state of
agents for the city of sT.Louls and are contracting
st' which is bond rating agency
MlssouRlthese corporate entity are listed on DUN and Brad
to do business on the Land
for private corporatio nf organization.. ST-LOUIS have a charter
in 1820 as a slave state and have held
establish LgLA.The state of MISSOURI enter the union
tender to the Govern Jay Nixon that
this practice too this present day..via statutory Decraration
section 21i-.031.1(1) RsMo do Nor
contact has been voided out for fraud.. The provisions of
to the Land our geographical
apply to any of our member of our tribe as we are lndigenous
Longitude assumption of the law is a
location is 38 degrees North Latitude -90 degrees west
for the court to have any say in this
faction and is void for fraud this court is without authority..
grounds and tangible evidence
matter, They must prove on the record without deny allfactual
at once false imprisonment equates
regarding jurisdiction or release all members of our tribe
t7:ot a punishable offense of
the kidnapping and is a federal crime violating Title 18 U.S.code
all agents and offenders could be
no less than 20 years if the victim is under 18 years of age
subject to this penalties if their acts are outside of Law
be proved to exist stuck v medical
One Challenged jurisdiction cannot be assumed it must

examiners 94 ca 2d 75t2LL P2d 389

the court lacks Jurisdiction the court has no

The court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that
v. us 505 F2b
authority to reach merit but should dismiss the action Melo
function it is not a judicial function for a
Not every action by any judge is in exercise of his iudicial
when a iudge act as
judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse
the law the iudge loses subiect matter
a trespasser of the law when a iudge does not follow

Affirmed to and subscribed before

'""

*liL

day of JatruarY
By:.

AffiantUCC

Type and # ID.

Produceldentification

fYlo

rtuv-

1-

ln/'r/a /r,*/
6

/f,/utf

C orrrrnDJTaln
Publrc- Not:;rY Sc:il
tloiatv
srArE oF Mlssc'JIil

,-,^-,-rissioned'for St Lciris Ccunty'

Aorit o
ir. 20
2013
fxPrtes APrrr
--:,:^'^^ tr.niroq

, ,. .'
L

":",itti"a
-mission r 1i'f:'1il9

sia/t&az-'-

LETTER OF ROGATORY

This writing will be submitted in the style of a letter of Rogatory a*6$Tod$srftfitigga$vi2gment

and approval Chief Nanya Shabu el of the At-sik-hata nation of yamasTae. Mgot5 We as
members of the Any-yu-Wiya tribe of Cherokee Moors Declare the fdtlOiifffiit{ajtgd s[ates code
28 usc 13 60 and who land include (but not limited to) Georgia Nqrth SA*li,T South Carolina
Alabama Florida Tennessee We are the lndigenous peoples of the aforementioned land with
geographic coordinates: 33degrees 36feet 36inches N. latitude; -84degrees L7feet lTinches W.

longitude
1715 Yamassee uprising and The trail of Tears which include Missouri is a historical event,

which has been acknowledge by the U.S. congress passing the following resolutions HJR- 3 (HJ3
lH) HJR 194 S con Resolution 26 in which the U.S. federal government under the command of
U.S. president Andrew

Jackon rounded up our peoples be they: yamassee, Hichiti, Choctow,

Cherokee, Moor olmac,Seminole, Yuchi,Washitaw and force them to walk west to Oklahoma
away from their traditional ldnd which are illegally and unlawfully usurped by the United States
prior to the passing of the aforementioned U.S. congressional bills and the united nations
declarations on the right of lndigenous peoples our people's have had the most resistance from
the United States of America in exercising our right to self determination this despite the fact

that United states of American have pass presidential executive orders 13L07 lmplementation
Human Right treaties and presidential proclamation 7500 guaranteeing our right to exercise our
tribal sovereignty and self determination
The 1857 U.S. supreme court decision Sanford vs Scott known as the Dred scott decision, which
has never been over turn has made it clear that no descents of Africans can be a Citizens of

united states of American this current state of affairs leads those descent of Nrican/Moors who
are unfamitiar with international law united nations 2nd decade of the world's lndigenous
people and the fact that they can now self identify themselves as indigenous or tribal unable to
have a nationality or the ability to identify and clam their lndigenous inheritance in cord with
HJR 194
The legal limbo created by the Dred scott decision of 1857 coupled with the Jim crow laws and
the Christian Black codes of 1794 and the South Carolina negro act which are still use to this day
has put the descent of Africans living in American in a state less position this is cause these

decent of Africans to rely on united states courts which have a history of biased judgment and
decision against not only Africans but native American as well.
All over American many African people claim not only their African heritage but lndian ancestry
as well. Many as called African American families have lndian roots in any one of

the various

tribes in American such as; Cherokee Choctaw, yamassee, yuchi, Seminole,

Yash itaw, Lumbee,Creeks etc.

Hjr 194110 congress 1st session on February 27 2OO7 congress acknowledges that African
Americans were stripped on their names and in heritage
July 8 2003 president George W Bush acknowledge in a trip to Goree lsland, Senegalthat
slavery "was one of the greatest crime of histor/'.
The northwest ordinance enacted by congress in 1787, which begins with the phrase "the

utmost good faith shall always be observed toward the

lndians"

United States of American have consistently fault and resists, to this day also African Americans
claiming are lndigenous Status we have consult with chief Nanya shaabu from the At-sik-hata
nation of yamassee Moors in cord with the international law have declared proclaim our
indigenous rights our documentation has been legal recognize acknowledge certified
authenticated and confirmed as correct yet we still face persecution apartheid genocide rape

and kidnapping for manifesting our lndigenous rights as we are in title to by Law it is well know

that Africans in American who claim their indigenous status as native American/lndlan are
subjected to persecution ridicule discrimination genocide abuse and scorn as if that is not
possible that they could be native American/lndian yet modern history is now unearthing and
uncovering facts to prove the assumption by American to be contrary archaeological evidence
Definition of the Unites states of America : UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC Non profit
Delaware Corporation lncorporation Date 4l/t9189 File No 2L93946 UNITED STATES Of
AMERICA INC Non-profit Delaware Corporation lncorporation Date

4/79/89 File No. 2193946

Entity Name UNITED STATES OF AMERICA INC Entity Kind CORPORATION Entity Type RELIGIOUS
NONPROFIT Residency DOMESTIC State DE Status VOID TAX INFORMATION Last Annual report
Filed : L991. htt :/ /www.state.d e.us/ corp/directweb.shtml

We have declared our selves lndigenous in tribal and claim our indigenous rights as we are in

title to in cord with

resolutionlg4 and HJ resolution 3 we still face an up held battle by the

Corporation United States of America. We who have declared and claim our indigenous rights
face skepticism ridicule and scorn for daring to declare ourselves as lndigenous although the
congressional records been apologies from the U.S. congress allow us to do so, since in
American's legalsystem we are look upon as not having a legalor lawfully status/citizenship.
We as lndigenous Cherokee Moors are not Citizens of the United States of American (Religious
Corporation) And as such we are entitled to protection accord with the constitutional rights and
the lnternational rights as well. Our Statutory Declaration of our indigenous rights put us in
HJ

conflict mostly and consistently with U.S courts U.S Government and the localSTATE and U.S
Government agencies We are All native American and White we all have a valid treaty with the

governor who is the Chief Magistrate of the State of Missouri via Statutory Declaration. UNILOS
Article 19 right of safe passage we are seeking clarity and the validity of actions taking by STATE
agents which have violated the various treaty UNDRIP civil political economic social culture
rights.

Under Missouri SUNSHINE LAW 610 we are submitting to the Judge Anne Marie Clark Judge
Robin Vannoy Ashley Latimore Chris Brown Kathryn 5 Herman Terry Carter Dr. Linda Shaw all
another Doctors and agents who participated in the kidnapping Deprivation of rights under
color of LAW title 18 section 242and Genocide A list of Interrogatories under supreme court
rule 33. No question is to go under answer and allfacts are the upmost priority in the

determination of justice or injustice which would aide in the prompt and safe return of our
children to our care

Jurat
United Nations Declaration on the right of Indigenous Peoples(http://www.un.org./esa/socdel,/unpfii/documents/DRlPS-en.pd0 United Nations Convention on
Economic, Social & cultural Rights, United Nations Charter; Article 55 & 56, Presidential
proclamation 7500,H.J.R. 194, S. Con. Res.26 S. 1200, HJR-3

Atrirrned to aad subscribed before me this

Produce Identification

L-

4", of

Type and # ID

January-2017

t4{ ll) 5tlt6(taLr/,

at/uy'urf
My Commission Expires

TIMOTHY .1. t,lOWnv

Nol{yjjlqli",STATE

Notary Seal

Or nrssouRr

Commissioned for St. Louis County

My Commission Expires: April B,
20l ti
Commission + f SOa+O+A

t.

What is the date that Kathryn S Herman received permission from the parents of Etheryah Haley
ot
now known as Aleshanee sha ul me el to be little there rish!trH
f'vPHtS ?9"
SAYS ?

treatment their daughter would receive?

Sha ul me el
z. What is time and date that the parents of Etheryah Haley now [i,SIFi"l'"inu::i
'
'
'
give up or waive their rights their wave their rights to self detetitrlrration?
3. What is the time and date that the children or the parents thqrcrof Came-pbligated or came
within the provision of section 211.031.1(1)RSMO?
ST.LOUIS
4. What is time and date that any tribal member parents or children where in the city of

''

it is a corporation with a charter establish in 1914?

5. Where is the city of ST.LOUIS geographically located?
What is the process of procedure to come into the city of ST.LOUIS?
6.
7. Are you given a choice to be a CITIZEN SUBJECT CLIENT RESIDENCE or is it by force assimilation?
parents given prior notice
8. When was the protective custody hearing requested and were the
as

with their consent?

or the
9. Do the parents or children is matter have a valid CONTACT with the state of MISSOURI
city of ST.LOUIS that can be proven for the record?
10. Who were the witnesses of the alleged neglect and where did this take place?
LL. Since this is the 3'd year for the international decade for the people of African descent can a of
persons be given of all members who provide assisted in the following area (a) development (b)
education (c) employment (d) health (e) housing in harmony with theme of lnternational
decade?

12. What assist did Kathryn S Herman Ashley Latimore give to the parents and children in the aide
of the program of activities for the implementation of the international decade for people of
African descent before reporting abuse and neglect?
13. What are the facts which support the diagnosis from Dr. Linda Shaw about the condition of
Etheryah now known as Aleshanee which allegedly cause bye breast feeding and vegan diet?
14. ls Dr. Linda Shaw diagnosis facts or opinion and can proof claim be provided?
15. Could Etheryah now known as Aleshanee have been clause by a virus or something of than the
diet?
16. Why was Etheryah mother not test to see if she could give blood to her daughter if the blood
transfusion was necessary as was stated by Doctors?
to be
L7. Why were the parents denied the right to disgust the one year old chemical treatment
given to their daughter despite the fact that this information were told to doctors in advance
that she was to treated without the use of chemicals violating their lndigenous rights?
18. What was meant by the Statement from Karan S Hermann although the mother appears

to be

African American the mother reportedly that she is white and Native American? which give her
SF 181 as a supported document
profile
19. Was the true attention of Ashley Latimore and Kathryn Herman who racial discriminated
the mother to commit kidnapping and Genocide against the family?
20. Why did the Judge approve the order after it was clear that facts would clearly show the
complaint was the result of racial discrimination in violation of the international decade on
people of African descent

21. What facts can a judge and commissloner give proof of to show that they are not complicit in
racial discrimination Genocide and kidnapping?
22- Can a judge give all the facts as to why the case was allow to be dismissed without prejudice and
then re filed without the evidence showing racial discrimination and me stating that we were
are not CITIZENS?
23. What authority does the judge have or to use to proceed and ignore the challenge of jurisdiction
the parents and children are not CITIZEN? As was stated via the Dred scott decision 1857
from the supreme court..... I Voided out birth certificate for fraud via
https ://www.scribd.com/user/306423924/PrivaSira n EL
24. Where can proof be found to give supporting evidence that the judge followed the mandate for
congressional records pg A32220 may 11 1955 with all decisions made in this matter?
as

25. When did the parents give permission to have son removed from their care and medically
experimented on?

Jurat
United Nations Declaration on the right of lndigenous Peoples0rttp://rnr,wv.un.ors./esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRlPS_en.pd0 United Nations Convention on
Economic, Social & cultural Rights, United Nations Charter; Article 55 & 56, Presidential
proclamation 7500,H.J.R. 194, S. Con. Res.26 S. 1200, HJR-3

Affirmed to and subscribed before me this

UUut of January 2017

By:

Produce ldentification

I /ofirr,'t /1,^,J s/alo 6bLr

Type and # ID

//,,

My CommissionExpires
=_.-rntotrtv
*

"'.'+

lii'J

^^--;i.''..:ri
"";'b";;,;.i;n

J.

;' *

Ii4owRY

lL"r' 3'J

*l'"'

for St. Louis CountY

APril

ExPires:
'''' --Co,n-it3;96 ff 'l 5634648

2o1s