Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
In my previous Field Experience in a grade one and two split classroom, I took a step back
from what I was comfortable with and approached the water cycle from what could be
considered a humanities perspective. We considered the sounds that different kinds of water
make and wrote onomatopoeia poems. I hope that, in making that connection and giving
students a chance to think about their own experiences with water and imagine characteristics of
types of water phenomena that they had not encountered, students engaged with aspects of the
topic that they had not connected with when learning about the water cycle in science class.
Through connecting this scientific concept to their own experiences and considering it from
another perspective, I hope that a broader and deeper understanding was fostered and they could
The scientific pursuit is often considered dry and destructive of human perception of the
beauty of nature. This idea has been reflected in poetry, such as Walt Whitmans poem When I
Heard the Learned Astronomer (1867) and John Keats poem Lamia (1820), which both depict
the effect these poets perceived scientific study has on beauty: the formerly beautiful stars being
systematically quantified into dull sets of numbers, and a rainbow being unwoven. I would hope
that these sentiments were merely an artefact of Romanticist thought during that time period, a
backlash against Enlightenment thinkers who wished to explain the natural world through
reason, but unfortunately it seems that this sentiment persists in some circles. In recent years, the
wonder of science and its power of explaining the universe has made a resurgence in popular
culture and poets and scientists seem to have made peace, and in fact, have come together. To
honour the UKs National Poetry Day, theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking and poet Sarah
Howe collaborated to create a poem-film about relativity; Hawking stated Physicists and poets
may differ in discipline, but both seek to communicate the beauty of the world around us (New
Scientist, 2016), and Howe echoed this sentiment. However, a fear or dislike of or
indifference to science is not an affectation that has completely disappeared amongst the
general population, particularly those who are unlikely to pursue scientific concepts outside of
the classroom through personal research. I believe that this is an issue that can be remedied by
the teaching of science in a way that is more meaningful to all students and engages a fuller
range of human experience. Cold facts are easy to shy away from, while a way of thinking that
In many ways, scientific thinking is a way of seeing deeper into our reality and giving us
additional, previously hidden layers to ponder. Science education in the elementary classroom
should reflect this unfolding of nature and provide students with a means by which they are able
to see deeper into phenomena they encounter, or perhaps phenomena they are curious about and
intrigued by. As stated by Harlen, Science seen as the creation of understanding about the
world is more likely to excite learners than when seen as a set of mechanical procedures and
established right answers (2010, p. 12). Science, rather than being an unchanging source of
knowledge, is constantly evolving in response to new ideas and evidence; rather than something
to memorize, it is something to explore and to investigate, and anyone has the potential to make
a contribution to scientific understanding. It is seen as the result of human endeavour,
involving creativity and imagination as well as the careful collection of data and interpretation of
data to generate evidence (Harlen, 2010, pp. 11-12).
A turning point for me in my perception of scientific study was reading the works of the
astronomer and science communicator Carl Sagan. I already enjoyed science but I hadnt made a
strong emotional connection to what science can show us. Science cannot be labelled as a
worldview or a set of beliefs, but provides a framework for human beings to explore the universe
and our place in it. It is a way of thinking that illuminates the shadowed parts of the world that
we cannot see with our naked eye. It is science that allows us to see and wonder at those hidden
I am writing this on Carl Sagans birthday, which, incidentally, is also the morning after
we found out that the 45th president of the United States of America would be Donald Trump.
Sagan stressed the importance of scientific understandings, particularly with respect to the
environment and nuclear disarmament, topics that were crucial in the last years of his life. In an
interview with Psychology Today, he stated, The dangers of not thinking clearly are much
greater now than ever before. Its not that theres something new in our way of thinking, its that
credulous and confused thinking can be much more lethal in ways it was never before (1996).
There have been concerns about the president-elects perspective on science and his
understanding of scientific evidence; he has repeated the myth that vaccines cause autism and
claims that climate change is a hoax perpetrated by the Chinese government, and his
administration will mean politics that are based on short-term economic interests rather than
science (Kravets, 2016). The fact that someone with such beliefs is able to gain a place in the
Oval Office is reflective of the level of either indifference to or ignorance of science in the USA.
As Canadians we cannot deny that this kind of thinking is not also present within our nation;
Stephen Harpers conservative government removed the post of national science advisor and was
generally infamous for its disregard for science (Science in retreat, 2008). While scientific
perspectives have been promised a place in Trudeaus new government (Bhambra, 2016), this
perspective on science is still evident. Neil deGrasse Tyson has stated that You have not fully
expressed your power as a voter until you have a scientific literacy in topics that matter for
political issues (Moyers and Company, 2015, 7:50). Giving students guidance in developing
In additional to the critical thinking skills that are crucial to making informed decisions, a
scientific mindset also promotes the ability to embrace ambiguity and fosters the development of
a growth mindset. A growth mindset is advantageous in all aspects of life, promoting the
perspective that we can develop skills and talents with practice and effort, rather than the belief
that intelligence and skill are fixed traits. Through this perspective, failure or mistakes are not
reflective of an individuals self-worth but rather a learning opportunity. A perspective that
encourages being comfortable with ambiguity, rather than a dependence on the existence of
objective right and wrong answers, gives students the skills to operate in a society in which these
answers do not exist. Instead, students develop the skills required to make what they consider
the best decision based on a variety of factors. This will also involve considering the social and
economic aspects of a decision, and just as real science does not exist in isolation, I hope to tie in
other disciplines within the classroom in order to reflect the work that scientists and policy
makers do in a more realistic way.
Rather than providing the class with step-by-step procedures and instructing them to
observe results, I realize now that allowing students to create their own questions based on their
curiosity, and providing them with the guidance to explore these questions is crucial. Prior to
10
Firth, N.. (2016, January 20). Verse in the universe: The scientific power of poetry. New
Scientist. Retrieved from https://www.newscientist.com/article/2073697-verse-in-theuniverse-the-scientific-power-of-poetry/
Kravets, D.. (2016, November 9). What the Trump win means for tech, science, and beyond.
Ars Technica. Retrieved from http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/11/what-thetrump-win-means-for-tech-science-and-beyond/
Llewellyn, D.J. (2014). Inquire within: Implementing inquiry- and argument-based science
standards in grades 3-8. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin: A Sage Company.
11
Whitman, W.. (1867). When I heard the learned astronomer. Retrieved from
https://www.poets.org/poetsorg/poem/when-i-heard-learned-astronomer
Wilson, E. O.. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Knopf.
Psychology Today. (1996). Carl Sagan. Retrieved from
https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/199601/carl-sagan
12