Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
To test the hypothesis that rhinovirus (RV)-induced immune responses influence the outcome of RV infections, we inoculated 22
subjects with allergic rhinitis or asthma with RV16. Nasal secretions and induced sputum were repeatedly sampled over the next
14 d. RV16 infection increased nasal granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and interleukin (IL)-8, which was accompanied
by neutrophilia in blood and nasal secretions. Nasal G-CSF correlated closely with increased blood neutrophils (rs 0.69, p
0.005), whereas nasal neutrophils correlated with both G-CSF (rs
0.87, p 0.001) and IL-8 (rs 0.75, p 0.001). Although similar
relationships were present in sputum, changes in sputum neutrophils and G-CSF with RV16 infection were relatively modest. In addition, virus-induced changes in the sputum interferon--to-IL-5
messenger RNA ratio were inversely related to both peak cold
symptoms (rs 0.60, p 0.005) and the time to viral clearance
(undetectable picornavirus RNA). These results indicate that airway IL-8 and G-CSF are closely associated with virus-induced neutrophilic inflammation during an experimental RV infection in
atopic volunteers. In addition, the balance of airway T-helper cell
type 1 (Th1)- and Th2-like cytokines induced by RV infection may
help determine the clinical outcome of common cold infections,
raising the possibility that the individual subjects immune response, rather than atopic status per se, is important in this regard.
Respiratory infections with human rhinoviruses (RV) are frequent triggers of cough and wheezing in children and adults
with asthma. Soon after the onset of these illnesses, immune
responses are triggered that usually eradicate viral replication
within days. However, since RV does not destroy appreciable
amounts of airway epithelium, it is presumed that the immune
response to the virus also contributes to the pathogenesis of
respiratory symptoms, including dysfunction of the lower respiratory tract in asthma.
This hypothesis is supported by several observations in volunteers after experimental infection with RV. First, antiviral
medications are effective only if treatment is started in the
first 24 to 48 h after the onset of clinical illness (1), suggesting
that the immune response to the virus is thereafter responsible
for respiratory symptoms. In addition, many studies have
linked the intensity of the immune response to RV to the severity of cold symptoms. For example, neutrophil counts in
nasal secretions, as well as quantities of neutrophil chemoattractants such as interleukin (IL)-8, correlate with cold symptoms (2, 3) and, in subjects with asthma, correlate with changes
in airway responsiveness (4).
Lymphocyte responses have also been related to the outcome of RV infection. For example, the degree of T lymphopenia during the acute infection is inversely related to cold symp-
METHODS
(Received in original form March 2, 2000 and in revised form July 24, 2000)
Supported by grants AI40685 and AI34891 from the National Institutes of Health.
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to James E. Gern
M.D., H4/438 University of Wisconsin Hospital, Madison, WI 53792-4108. E-mail:
gern@medicine.wisc.edu
Am J Respir Crit Care Med Vol 162. pp 22262231, 2000
Internet address: www.atsjournals.org
Subjects
Twenty-two subjects with allergic rhinitis or mild allergic asthma participated in the study; the subjects characteristics are listed in Table I.
Only subjects with respiratory allergies or mild allergic asthma were
included in the study because these individuals are more likely to develop changes in lower airway physiology and/or lung function after
experimental or natural infections (10, 11). Subjects with moderate or
severe asthma, or those with a history of severe bronchospasm during
viral colds, were excluded from this initial trial because of safety concerns. Asthma was defined by a clinical history of (1) physician diagnosis; (2) prescription for asthma medication; (3) cough, wheezing or
shortness of breath and relief with appropriate asthma medication;
and (4) evidence of a 12% or greater improvement in FEV1 after inhalation of a -adrenergic agonist. In addition, methacholine testing
was performed (Table 1), and for the purposes of this study, subjects
with cumulative values for the provocative concentration of MCh
needed to reduce FEV1, by 20% (PC20) 64 mg/ml were classified as
having allergic rhinitis and not asthma.
At the screening visit, all subjects underwent a physical examination, skin prick tests to 12 common aeroallergens (including cat, house
dust mite, and an assortment of local pollens and molds), and spirometry. Atopy was defined as one or more positive skin tests (wheal size
histamine control). None of the subjects had neutralizing antibody
to RV16 at the time of the screening visit (1 to 3 mo before inoculation), although seven subjects had low titers (median: 1.4) of RV16neutralizing antibody detected in the serum obtained just before inoculation. Use of topical nasal corticosteroids was withheld for 30 d before
the study, and acetaminophen was the only medication allowed for
the treatment of cold symptoms during the study. The experimental
protocol was approved by the University of Wisconsin Hospital and
Clinics Human Subjects Committee, and informed consent was obtained from the study subjects before they were enrolled in the protocol. Data related to peripheral blood responses to viral infection in
the study subjects have previously been published (7).
2227
Sputum Induction
The method for obtaining sputum samples was based on that of Fahy
and colleagues (12). At the beginning of the sputum induction protocol, subjects were given 2 puffs (180 g) of albuterol, and spirometry
was performed after 10 min. The subjects were then given general instructions to produce a deep cough, to ignore the natural inclination
to swallow sputum, and to quickly blow the nose and rinse the mouth
before the sputum was collected. Subjects next breathed a 3% buffered saline solution mist from an DeVilbiss (Jackson, TN) 65 ultrasonic nebulizer for 20 min, with a deep breath taken once per minute.
After 5 and 10 min, spirometry was repeated to screen for bronchoconstrictive responses. The subjects were instructed to try to produce
sputum whenever they felt the need to expectorate and at the 10-, 15-,
and 20-min time points. To minimize contamination from the noses
and mouths, the subjects were asked to blow their noses, vigorously
rinse their mouths, and gargle with sterile water, followed by expectoration into a clean specimen container. If the subjects FEV1 fell beTABLE 1
SUBJECT CHARACTERISTICS
M
M
M
F
M
M
M
F
M
M
M
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
M
F
F
42
40
24
25
23
23
21
32
25
20
18
20
18
21
21
25
28
21
25
20
23
22
AR
AA
AA
AA
AR
AA
AR
AR
AR
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AA
AR
AA
AR
AA
AA
AA
AA
86
84
106
112
111
93
88
130
110
83
104
78
80
92
94
107
120
103
99
92
104
97
PD20
59
41
1.6
19
200
3.2
200
200
200
75
70
2.6
37
8.5
37
200
31
99
5.4
8.7
33
13
Antibody Titer
Peak
Cold SS Acute Convalescent
23
19
7
14
12
9
4
5
4
2
10
1
15
9
15
17
15
14
10
8
9
10
1.0
0
0
0
1.4
0
0
0
0
1.0
0
2.8
0
1.4
0
1.0
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
45
91
2.0
91
16
5.6
45
1.4
5.7
45
1.4
91
2.0
32
32
64
91
45
1.4
4.0
11
32
Definition of abbreviations: AA allergic asthma; AR allergic rhinitis; RV16 respiratory virus 16; PD20 provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% decrease in
FEV1; SS symptom score.
* Percent predicted.
None of the subjects had detectable neutralizing antibody to RV16 at the time of
the initial screening visit. Serum was also obtained on the day of inoculation, and the titers in this table reflect the values on this day.
low 80% of the postbronchodilator FEV1 at any time during the induction, the procedure was interrupted until the FEV1 returned to
within 20% of the postbronchodilator baseline value.
Nasal Lavage
Nasal lavage was performed on each subject both before RV16 inoculation and during RV infection, as previously described (8). Five milliliters
of prewarmed Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS) with 0.5% gelatin
was instilled into each nostril. The lavage fluid was then expelled consecutively from each nostril by having the subject blowing gently from one
nostril while the other nostril was closed by compression.
Detection of RV by RTPCR
Picornavirus RNA was detected with RTPCR (35 cycles) as previously described (15), using primers OL26 (5GCA CTT CTG TTT
CCC C3) and OL27 (5CGG ACA CCC AAA GTA G3) (16).
PCR products were resolved by gel electrophoresis, stained with
ethidium bromide, and photographed. The presence of a 380-bp band
was interpreted as a positive test for RV.
Statistical Analysis
Of the 22 subjects in the study, 15 had mild asthma. Subgroup analyses of subjects with allergic asthma versus those with allergic rhinitis
2228
VOL 162
2000
RESULTS
Clinical Effects of RV16 Inoculation
Figure 2. Relationship between cytokines and neutrophils in nasal lavage fluid after RV16 inoculation. Two days after inoculation with RV16,
the levels of (A) G-CSF and (B) IL-8 were compared with neutrophil
counts in nasal lavage fluid.
2229
Figure 5. Changes in (A) interferon (IFN)- and (B) IL-5 during acute
rhiovirus (RV) colds. Just before inoculation and 2 d and 7 d after inoculation, sputum cells were analyzed for IFN- and IL-5 mRNA. The horizontal
lines represent median values. *p 0.05 versus values before colds.
DISCUSSION
In this study of the immune response to induced colds, the severity of symptoms and amount of viral shedding were quite
variable, despite careful control of the inoculation procedure
and use of the same lot of virus for all subjects. Since the subjects were seronegative at the time of screening (although a few
individuals had low titers of neutralizing antibody at the time
of inoculation), the severity of the viral infection was largely
determined by host immune factors other than the quantity of
virus-specific antibody. Analysis of cells and cytokines in the
blood, nasal lavage fluid, and sputum suggested that two different types of immune responses were related to the clinical
and virologic outcome of the infection. First, our findings support previous studies suggesting that airway neutrophilia and
factors such as IL-8 and G-CSF, which regulate neutrophil recruitment and activation, may be important in the pathogenesis of virus-induced respiratory symptoms and changes in airway responsiveness (3, 4, 9, 17). In addition, a novel finding of
our study was the association between relatively weak Th1like responses (low IFN-/IL-5 ratio) and more severe respira-
2230
VOL 162
2000
2231
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
blood mononuclear cell interleukin-2 and interferon- gamma production, cytotoxicity, and antigen-stimulated blastogenesis during experimental rhinovirus infection. J Infect Dis 1990;162:591597.
Parry DE, Busse WW, Sukow KA, Dick CR, Swenson CA, Gern JE.
Rhinovirus-induced peripheral blood mononuclear cell responses and
outcome of experimental infection in allergic subjects. J Allergy Clin
Immunol 2000;105:692698.
Jarjour NN, Gern JE, Kelly EAB, Swenson CA, Dick CR, Busse WW.
The effect of an experimental rhinovirus 16 infection on bronchial lavage neutrophils. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000;105:11691177.
Fleming HE, Little FF, Schnurr D, Avila PC, Wong H, Liu J, Yagi S,
Boushey HA. Rhinovirus-16 colds in healthy and in asthmatic subjects: similar changes in upper and lower airways. Am J Respir Crit
Care Med 1999;160:100108.
Gern JE, Calhoun WJ, Swenson C, Shen G, Busse WW. Rhinovirus infection preferentially increases lower airway responsiveness in allergic
subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:18721876.
Folkerts G, Busse WW, Nijkamp FP, Sorkness R, Gern JE. State of the
art: virus-induced airway hyperresponsiveness and asthma. Am J Respir
Crit Care Med 1998;157:17081720.
Fahy JV, Liu J, Wong H, Boushey HA. Analysis of cellular and biochemical constituents of induced sputum after allergen challenge: a
method for studying allergic airway inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000;93:10311039.
Schroth MK, Grimm E, Frindt P, Galagan DM, Konno S, Love R, Gern
JE. Rhinovirus replication causes RANTES production in primary
bronchial epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1999;20:1220
1228.
Gern JE, Dick EC, Kelly EAB, Vrtis R, Klein B. Rhinovirus-specific T
cells recognize both shared and serotype-restricted viral epitopes. J
Infect Dis 1997;175:11081114.
Gern JE, Galagan DM, Jarjour NN, Dick EC, Busse WW. Detection of
rhinovirus RNA in lower airway cells during experimentally-induced
infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:11591161.
Gama RE, Horsnell PR, Hughes PJ, North C, Bruce CB, al-Nakib W,
Stanway G. Amplification of rhinovirus specific nucleic acids from
clinical samples using the polymerase chain reaction. J Med Virol 1989;
28:7377.
Turner RB, Weingand KW, Yeh CH, Leedy DW. Association between
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
interleukin-8 concentration in nasal secretions and severity of symptoms of experimental rhinovirus colds. Clin Infect Dis 1998;26:840846.
Grnberg K, Smits HH, Timmers MC, de Klerk EPA, Dolhain RJ, Dick
EC, Hiemstra PS, Sterk PJ. Experimental rhinovirus 16 infection: effects on cell differentials and soluble markers in sputum in asthmatic
subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156:609616.
Grnberg K, Timmers MC, De Klerk EPA, Dick EC, Sterk PJ. Experimental rhinovirus 16 infections causes variable airway obstruction in
subjects with atopic asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:
13751380.
Tishon A, Lewicki H, Rall G, VonherrathM, Oldstone MBA. An essential rote for type 1 interferon-gamma in terminating persistent viral infection. Virology 1995;212:244250.
Fiette L, Aubert C, Mller U, Huang S, Aguet M, Brahic M, Bureau J-F.
Theilers virus infection of 129Sv mice that lack the interferon / or
interferon receptors. J Exp Med 1995;181:20692076.
Sorkness RL, Castleman WL, Kumar A, Kaplan MR, Lemanske RF Jr.
Prevention of chronic postbronchiolitis airway sequelae with IFN-
treatment in rats. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:705710.
Coyle AJ, Erard F, Bertrand C, Walti S, Pircher H, Legros G. Virus-specific CD8(+) cells can switch to interleukin 5 production and induce
airway eosinophilia. J Exp Med 1995;181:12291233.
Gern JE, Vrtis R, Kelly EAB, Dick EC, Busse WW. Rhinovirus produces nonspecific activation of lymphocytes through a monocytedependent mechanism. J Immunol 1996;157:16051612.
Tough DF, Borrow P, Sprent J. Induction of bystander T cell proliferation by viruses and type I interferon in vivo. Science 1996;272:1947
1950.
Hansen G, Berry G, DeKruyff RH, Umetsu DT. Allergen-specific Th1
cells fail to counterbalance Th2 cell-induced airway hyperreactivity
but cause severe airway inflammation. J Clin Invest 1999;103:175183.
Rakes GP, Arruda E, Ingram JM, Hoover GE, Zambrano JC, Hayden
FG, Platts-Mills TA, Heymann PW. Rhinovirus and respiratory syncytial virus in wheezing children requiring emergency care: IgE and
eosinophil analyses. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159:785790.
Duff AL, Pomeranz ES, Gelber LE, Price HW, Farris H, Hayden FG,
Platts-Mills TAE, Heymann PW. Risk factors for acute wheezing in
infants in infants and children: viruses, passive smoke, and IgE antibodies to inhalant allergens. Pediatrics 1993;92:535540.