Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
While web application security has stolen most of the spotlight due to
the hacking and theft of information, there is an equally large problem that
is not getting the same attention. Web accessibility has made strides in the
last few years, but the reality is many individuals with disabilities are still
overlooked when it comes to web application functionality and design.
Although accessibility may seem like an issue of the past, we are really just
now scratching the surface on fixing accessibility and usability issues
across the web. Thanks to advances in technology, accessibility and
usability are becoming foundations for future web development, enhancing
the web experience for all users.
Although many have heard the term web accessibility, the meaning of
the terms seems to be misunderstood by a large majority of people. So what
is web accessibility, you may ask? Its ensuring all information and
functionality across the web can be achieved by all users, disabled or not. In
reality, web accessibility is more than that, as it is very closely tied to the
usability of a website. If a website is completely accessible, it has a greater
chance of being more user-friendly, as the time was most likely taken to
optimize the site for user experience. As technology and web know-how are
progressing, accessibility and usability have been taken into greater
3
require users to enter descriptive tags to better assist screen readers and
other tools that depend on that information (Brophy 2007, 952).
Unfortunately, businesses and educational institutions alike have ignored
the need to move to accessible code, and it has taken some drastic tactics
by key organizations and groups to bring the national spotlight to the need
for web accessibility.
One of the first and primary examples of bringing web accessibility to
the forefront was by the National Federation for the Blind (NFB), when they
sued the Target Corporation in 2006 for having an inaccessible; and nonassistive technology friendly website. Rather than work with the NFB, Target
made the claim that it was not responsible for making their website fully
accessible, as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) did not specifically
state that it applied to websites, especially those in the private sector. This
brought on an ugly lawsuit, in which Target ultimately lost. Not only did
Target spend money on legal fees for themselves and the National
Federation of the Blind, but also had to pay six million dollars in damages to
the individuals who brought on the lawsuit (Richman 2006, 1). Many saw
this as the legal case that would bring accessibility national media attention,
which would result in web developers and designers becoming better
educated on accommodating web accessibility needs. While it did work to a
certain degree, bringing one lawsuit after another is not only costly, but
does not provide for the best image from a public relations and marketing
7
standpoint. While this case did make a statement, especially being the first
of its kind, it did not have the impact the accessibility supporters wanted.
After the Target case, many in the public sector began to wonder how
long it would take before they became the target of a lawsuit for not being
compliant with web accessibility. While Section 508 compliancy was
instituted to ensure public sector institutions were compliant, many did not
accept web accessibility as a priority, while others were not educated on the
requirements of Section 508 compliancy. Fast forward to 2010, and the
National Federation of the Blind filed another lawsuit, this time against Penn
State University. In the complaint, it was alleged that Penn State had been
discriminatory against blind faculty and students alike, as many of their
department websites, course management system, and online library
catalog were all found to be inaccessible to those with visual impairments
(Penn State Discriminates Against Blind Students and Faculty 2010, 1).
While Penn State has still never admitted to any wrongdoing, in late 2011
they reached a deal with the NFB to have the lawsuit dropped. As a result,
Penn State must perform a full accessibility audit on all of their web
systems, must have a plan in place to repair/replace those that are found to
not be accessible, and must provide training to all faculty and staff involved
in managing such systems by the end of 2012 (National Federation of the
Blind and Penn State Resolve Accessibility Complaint 2011, 1).
developersfor free. Not only does the W3C offer best practices and
standards, it offers code validators that will check your code for any
compliancy violations (Centeno 2006, 95). To take it a step further, one of
my favorite tools is the Web Accessibility Toolbar provided by vision
Australia. The toolbar conveniently combines many validators and testers
into one location. Nonvisual Desktop Access, or the NVDA project, is an
open source screen-reader software that is available for anyone to
download and use. I just recently started using this software in my testing,
and it truly put a new perspective on accessibility, especially from a visually
impaired or disabled users point of view. As for becoming more involved,
many states offer web accessibility user groups, especially in the public
sector, on how to better prepare and develop websites using accessibility
best practices.
Web applications are another developing technology, which is helping
drive the creation of simpler, more user friendly web design and
development. As the world of web based applications has greatly expanded
with the introduction of the smartphone, a new era of user interfaces is
being created. As seen with the latest beta version of Windows 8, the
desktop operating system will use a tiled, web application style layout in
the software. Rather than downloading programs, users will be able to
download web applications; much like a consumer would do on a tablet
device or smartphone. How does this help accessibility and usability, you
10
may ask? While it may be a drastic change from what users are currently
used to, it is another step towards unification and universal accessibility and
usability. With Windows 8, no matter if youre using a Windows driven
smartphone, tablet device, or PC, the experience and user interface will be
largely the same. In many ways, Windows 8 seems to offer a sneak peek
into the future of web development and design, as web applications and
mobile websites are often driven by some form of HTML5. HTML5 is by far
the most mobile-friendly programming language currently in use, in addition
to the AJAX language (Murugesan 2011, 12-14). A move towards the future
is helping users to adjust to what will eventually be a more user-friendly
web based software environment.
In the beginning of the web boom, web accessibility was just an
afterthought by most, viewed more as a luxury than a necessity. Years of
designing and developing websites and web applications with no universal
standards or guidelines led to the creation of many non-web accessible
websites, in both the public and private sectors. As the e-commerce boom
continued, many services offered one click solutions to building websites,
again ignoring any standards and guidelines for proper web development, as
many users had no web development experience. These one-click services
set a dangerous tone, and one that still somewhat exists today. Many
individuals do not fully understand the requirements of proper web design
and development, as they grew accustomed to the idea that a website can
11
12
Reference List
Brophy, Peter and Jenny Craven. 2007. Web Accessibility. Library
Trends 55, no. 4, (April 1): 950-972. http://0www.proquest.com.bianca.penlib.du.edu/ (accessed February 21, 2012).
Centeno, Vicente Luque. Carlos Delgado Kloos, Jess Arias Fisteus, Luis
lvarez lvarez, Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools: A Survey and Some
Improvements, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, Volume
157, Issue 2, 22 May 2006, Pages 87-100. (http://0www.sciencedirect.com.bianca.penlib.du.edu/science/article/pii/S1571066
106002477)
13
Richman, Josh. 2006. Target Web site draws blind's ire. Oakland
Tribune, February 10, http://0-www.proquest.com.bianca.penlib.du.edu/
(accessed February 21, 2012).
Wisniewski, J.. 2011. HTML5. Online, November 1, 53-56. http://0www.proquest.com.bianca.penlib.du.edu/ (accessed February 10, 2012).
14