Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248516105
CITATIONS
READS
26
94
3 authors, including:
Tim Charlton
Timor GAP E.P.
28 PUBLICATIONS 800 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Introduction
The Kai archipelago, eastern Indonesia, is located at
the eastern extremity of the Banda Arc, at the apex of
an island arc system which bends through 1800 (Figure
1). Reconnaissance geological and geophysical
fieldwork carried out in the Kai islands in 1987 by
London University and the Indonesian Geological
Research and Development Centre (GRDC) has led to
a significant reappraisal of this eastern segment of the
Banda Arc. and of the adjacent Aru Trough and Weber
Basin.
The Banda Arc is situated in an area of interaction
between three of the earth's major crustal plates: the
Indo-Australian, Eurasian and Pacific plates (Figure 1).
It is a highly anomalous arc system. with old, probably
Mesozoic oceanic crust located on the inner side of the
arc, and Australian continental crust bordering the
outer bathymetric trough around the complete 1800
bend of the arc. The outer trough can be divided into
four segments: the Timor, Tanimbar, Aru and Seram
Troughs anticlockwise around the arc. In cross-section,
the Timor, Tanimbar and Seram Troughs have many of
the structural characteristics of subduction trenches,
and have generally been interpreted in terms of
0264-8172/911010062-08
1991 Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd
62
OCEAN
0"
NEW
GUINEA
IOOS~
INDIAN
ARAFURA
SHELF
IO"S
OCEAN
AUSTRALIA
120"E
Figure 1 Location of the Kai archipelago in the Banda Arc, eastern Indonesia
5S--~------------,-----~--------------------------------------~------~,-------------5S
~ \,
132E:
\,,\~WESTERN PR~VINCE ~
\\.,
s
30
km
EASTERN PROVINCE
Depths in km
CENTRAL PROVINCE
OKUR
line ot section
~-----:-.\9
Cfl
I)
OFADOL
TAYANDU
ISLANDS
\
-.
b
00
~'~h
, 6
60s
..
60s
Figure 2 Location map of the Kai islands showing bathymetry (in km) and location of the line of section in Figure 5
63
km
KAI
BESAR
1~~~Itjj~j:~jl ~~~~tT~~~rgli;:~~~ene)
Elat Formation
(Eocene)
-..........
Normal fault
65
Western province
High grade metamorphic rocks (silicic schists, gneiss
and migmatite; Bowin et al., 1980; Achdan and
Turkandi, 1982) outcrop on the islands of Kur and
Fadol in the western geological province of Kai. They
are found together with Late Miocene- Pliocene
claystone and sandstone (Bowin et al., 1980) and
Quaternary reef. The nature of the contact between the
metamorphics and the Miocene sediments (structural
or stratigraphic) has not been recorded.
The western province of Kai is interpreted as the
innermost part of the west Kai forearc complex. The
acid metamorphic rocks are probably Australian
continental basement emplaced by thrusting on to the
imbricated Australian cover sequence of the central
Kai province. The metamorphics of western Kai
probably occupy a similar structural position to the
Kobipoto Complex on Seram (Audley-Charles et al.,
1979; Tjokrosapoetro and Budhitrisna, 1982).
The western boundary of the west Kai geological
province is the east flank of the Weber Basin (Figu.re 2).
The boundary between the Kai block, which is
tI>
g 200
<0
!!!
0
a<
100
~.
'3
<0
~~~~~~--------'
9
WEBER
BASIN
0
0
11)
'0
:;:.
-;;: 20
~
< 40
"
::I:
MANTLE
o
I
km
50
I
Figure 5 Crustal-scale cross-section through the Kai islands from the Weber Basin to the Aru islands (Arafura Shelf)
66
67
oI
km
10
Figure 6 Line drawings of seismic sections across the Tanimbar Trough (from Schluter and Fritsch, 1985). Note the increasing
extension from south to north
68
Conclusions
The apparent continuity of geological structures around
the Banda Arc is not as simple as first impressions
Figure 7 Comparison of the tectonics of the Banda Arc la) with the strain pattern around a fold Ib) from Dieterich, 1969 via Hobbs et a/.,
1976. Shaded area in ta) is the volcanic arc. Short lines in (b) are parallel to the long axes of strain ellipses at those points. Note the two
zones of E-W extension (the Aru Trough and the Weber Basin) at the eastern apex of the arc, and the corresponding zones of extension
in the fold
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Tony Barber (Royal Holloway and Bedford
New College, London University) for useful
discussions; to Herman Sugilar and Zainal Hayat
(GRDC) who worked with us in Kai, and to GRDC
(former Director Dr M. Untung; present Director Dr
R. Sukamto) for logistical arrangements. The fieldwork
was sponsored by Union Texas (SE Asia) Inc. and
Idemitsu Oil Development Co., with special thanks to
Haydn Rickard (UTSEA) for discussions and support.
Thanks to Janet Baker and Colin Stewart for the
artwork.
References
Achdan, A. and Turkandi, T. (1982) Preliminary geologic map of
the Kai (Tayandu and Tual) Quadrangles, Maluku, 1:250,000,
and accompanying GRDC Open File Report
Audley-Charles, M. G. (1986) Rates of Neogene and Quaternary
tectonic movements in the southern Banda Arc based on
micropaleontology J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 143, 161 175
Audley-Charles, M. G., Carter, D. J., Barber, A. J., Norvick, M. S.
and Tjokrosapoetro, S. (1979) Reinterpretation of the
geology of Seram: implications for the Banda Arcs and
northern Australia J. Geol. Soc. Lond. 136,547-568
Barber, A. J., Tjokrosapoetro, S. and Charlton, T. R. (1986) Mud
volcanoes, shale diapirs, wrench faults and melanges in
accretionary complexes, eastern Indonesia Bull. Am. Assoc.
Petrol. Geol. 70, 1729-1741
69