Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
fiduciary duty to the cost of my VET training put at $250,000 unless proven otherwise
ref attach TAFE 1952001
5. All the time when litigating on employment issues, applying also merit, Law and Judicial
Officers covered up the criminal offence in their decisions (my thinking it was civil tort)
and in one case removing from medical evidence in the NSW IRC.
6. I continue to carry the burden of 1981 crime against me, in my employment as a
firefighter, then reinforced in 1995 by Workers Comp Law Officers which has had
devastating effects on my life as a viable member having the will to apply skills for
societys benefit but then not recognised in welfare employment regimes. A method of
COVENTRY has been employed ref att page 33-34 [sic 2nd report] I can find no lawyer
to represent me LET ME REITERATE, at least 10 Law Officers (Workers Comp
lawyers) in 1995 did not report the 1981 crime against me to police, instead I was retired
in lieu of dismissal on unrecognised Workers Comp with a family to support. NB I
thought at the time the 1981 heinous act was a civil tort as was the case with many
other Fire Brigade victims;
a. These activities have once again skewed with the outcome of Victims Rights and
Support and DPP under the NSW Justice Department it is just too expensive to
prosecute multiple offenders, but its worse when you are forced to carry the burden of
crimes committed by others NB not just emotional burden but applied punishment of
denied access to job fulfilment due to illegal retirement;
7. As a result of various ve aspects of the legal construct of VRC decisions which
included no amended decision to the VC amendment on my review submission I
returned the money by cheque to the Justice Department.
8. I am giving the Honourable Training Ministers the full scope of events that have
impeded my development as a human being. The Crown Contract of my previous
employment exposed the Fire Brigades ref @38 & 39 when you use the word expose
in government it means not good;
INITIAL REQUEST BUT NOT LIMITING
9. Both reports 1 & 2 remain Private and Confidential and I will not divulge the contents in
any way unless no reasonable explanation is forthcoming in a reasonable time for all
four recipients. But I make special pleading to the Federal Attorney to remove me from
the clutches of the NSW system of rough justice.
a. Report 1 to the Honourable Training Ministers may require different decision outcomes
in the future with any further training needs. For instance serving a prison sentence for
breach of Federal Statutory Declaration gives automatic access to the Jobs Game ref
2 of 14
a. The Commonwealth Human Rights & Equal Opportunities Commission may have seen
me as the wrong target group being a 4th generation Single Citizenship Citizen;
b. Lets put it another way I am not going to win any tort action in NSW.
THE CONFLICT OF SUPERANNUATION LAW (reiterated in 2nd report)
14. NB RETIREMENT IS NOT MEANT TO BENEFIT EMPLOYMENT: In this 1st report
describes a plethora of evidence available that my retirement was not as may be
suggested, a windfall. Subsequent litigation determined that my retirement was for the
term of my natural life and therefore a system of Coventry by Judicial and employment
agencies, the jobs game ensued;
15.NSW SUPER LAW: I was retired in lieu of dismissal in July 1995 and enforced
mandatory medical reassessment in July 2003 the Superannuation Act 1916 (NSW),
S29 (4) (4A). This instrument expressed mandatory medical reassessment but did not
express reemployment rather implied under S50 & S51 of that Act, thus as of 2003 I
was in forced retirement for the term of my natural life confirmed by judicial litigations.
I submit that under S29 (4)(4A); S48; S49; S50; S51 Superannuation Act 1916, that my
retirement was confirmed as punishment ref 2nd report att pge 33-34 for the term of my
natural life the burden of crimes were/are upon me;
16.I am not receiving superannuation top up on my NSW State Super pension yet under
Federal Law you can go to jail unlike State Super pension members who receive the
top up, if they get caught working over the permitted hours, there is no Federal breach.
COMMONWEALTH LAW: I had to submit a Commonwealth Statutory Declaration
10 Nov 2011 stating that I would never become gainfully employed either on a full-time
or a part-time basis. I an amount from ASSET Super $4,694.45 (issued 11Nov 2011)
was private superannuation that I had accumulated from 1996 (casual employment) as I
needed it for legal advice - Turnbull Hill Lawyers ref MGC:KLA:120082;
17.CRIMINAL BREACH: However knowing that I was going to get casual work in Feb
2012 (10 days) I submitted a protest to the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal. I
breached Federal Law by breaching the Federal Statutory Declaration by being
employed.
18.A reply on my criminal breach was given to the Federal Attorney General, Nicola Roxon
her response recommended to in letter dated 20 Sept 2012 that I go to the Police if I
wanted to pursue this matter further (Ref MC12/1142) ref 2nd report att pge 18;
19.I have also committed fraud but without any guilty intent at the time with litigations
against Transgrid and Central Coast Group Training ref @34 & 35; [sic 33-35]
4 of 14
INTERIM CONCLUSIONS:
20.Logically the NSW Government were the responsible agency for both employment and
my reemployment on the 2003 official overturning of the reason for retirement and thus
a new certification was issued. This approach with State Pensioners is similar to that of
the Federal Government who would ensure welfare recipients are listed with an
employment agency if its good enough for them then it should be good enough for
me as applied under the Superannuation Act 1916.
a. I was regardless illegally retired 1995 due to the crime of other members and thus
conversely criminalised as punishment in a method of modern day Coventry in 2003
and confirmed at the NSW Administrative Decisions Tribunal (now NCAT) and NSW
IRC.
HISTORICAL ANALOGY WHERE CONVICTS WERE GIVEN STATUS ON
COMPLETION OF INDENTURED SERVITUDE
21.INTRODUCTION: The bright and recently risen Nation has been reduced to the global
tyranny of political correctness programming that has reduced us to a school zone
economy . is how I see it.
22.National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER) 2012 titled Evolution
of Apprenticeships and Traineeships in Australia: an unfinished history . Page
11 - Among the 780 convicts who arrived in 1788 on the First Fleet, there were two
apprentices, 63 whose declared occupation was a skilled trade, and 58 who appear to
be semi-skilled ..
23.These two individual convicts had been sentenced to servitude for trivial crimes as a
result of the chaos of new technology of The Industrial Revolution, which commenced in
Britain causing great social dislocation.
24.Many convicts were either skilled tradesmen or farmers who had been convicted for
trivial crimes and were sentenced to seven years, the time required to set up the
infrastructure for the new colony. Convicts were often given pardons prior to or on
completion of their sentences and were allocated parcels of land to farm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Australia_(1788%E2%80%931850)
THE EMPLOYMENT DEMISE OF CHARLES H. NORVILLE (CHN5)
25.Charles Henry Norville and New South Wales Fire Brigades [2007] NSWIR Comm
45 (in transcript) VIZ REINSTATEMENT OF AN INJURED WORKER: DP Sams
NSWIRC saw fit with the Fire Brigades to remove medical evidence of the criminal
assault from my application of reinstatement of an injured worker and insert Workers
Comp adversarial reports, that he stated as medical referees DP Sams implements
5 of 14
a regime of harsh punishment against enforcing the cruel and unusual punishment as
per Doug Messenger ref2nd report att 33-34. Fire Brigades introduce tainted evidence
from the Fire Brigades vocationally corrupt testing used to renew my firefighter
candidacy (bad legal advice).
26.EXCLUSION BY COMMONWEALTH JOBS GAME. The attached: ESFS 261799
access to employment etc from Centrelink 15 Mar 2016. An updated reiteration that
affirms that non welfare recipients, as myself, are excluded from the Jobs Network
Industry, the jobs game being forced into non participation of employment. I am
mature aged which gives a much higher remuneration to employers which further
disadvantages me when engaging the employment market.
27.MY CULTURE & HERITAGE I have a family lineage in electrotechnology trades as my
father CHN4 was an RAF trained aircraft electrical and instrument fitter and grandfather
CHN3 was a founder of Breville being TAFE trained in electrical and mechanical
engineering. They had earned status on the basis of merit.
28.DENIED THE RIGHT TO DEFEND MY COUNTRY OF BIRTH - I was denied access to
become an Australian Army reservist because of the excessive vetting by the Federal
Government Employer. Female Army personnel phoned my wife (2nd marriage) to join
the Australian Army Reserve as she had also sat for the Army induction process she
declined to join the Army Reserve. Both CHN 3rd & 4th fought for Australia in WW2,
grandad on mums side operated a Vicars machine gun in Europe WW1 mum said he
was too tired to live, but he was a good soldier and did his job and was a kind man, a
printer by trade he assisted in the WW2 effort by training recruits. NB Government is
ignorant of what makes a good soldier, and what kills them as citizens The Australian
Parliament has Globalised the sovereignty of its population in favour of mass dual
citizenry which can never defend Australia. We expect our soldiers to fight for US
hegemony and the dual citizen.
29.EXCLUSION OF THE FIDUCIARY DUTY TO THE TAX PAYER The attached: Enquiry
Number -1952001 from TAFE which I requested to quantify the cost to tax payers of
VET courses that I have completed at TAFE (apart from the required capstone onsite
trade training). I assume that the TAFE courses that I have completed are costed at
$250,000 under present day costs. Without adequate response of audited amounts I
will use the $250,000 for the record.
30.The following completed vocational courses:
6 of 14
9147 NSW Course in Language, Literacy & Numeracy July 2010 (superfluous)
31.I was one of the first if not the first TAFE qualified firefighter in Australia and
unfortunately (career wise) I was one of the least corrupt. The NSW Fire Brigades did
not recognise TAFE studies that were directly fire brigades related.
32.APPRENTICE EMPLOYMENT: I was briefly employed as an apprenticed refrigeration
mechanic until victimised under age discrimination in 2007. I then forced the NSW
Government to place me onto the Continuing Apprenticeship Programme Service
scheme (CAPS). However I was never engaged into apprenticeship employment. The
CAPS scheme didnt permit the updating of merit on further course completions so that
prospective employers were not viewing my current merit for employment. Merit is
treated with contempt by employment agencies the more the merit the older you are.
view, was justified in rejecting that application. It is not incumbent on the respondent to
go to the resume document and to extract from that document the criteria which was
required to be addressed and deduce from that resume that Mr Norville meets those
criteria
35.DOCUMENT OF SUMMARY SUBMITTED TO DP HENNESSY: During proceedings I
presented Deputy Hennessy and CCGT a case summary, with a submission which
contained inter alia the analogy of convicts of 1788 together my own Federal crime on
superannuation statutory declaration (Fed) involving the former Federal Attorney, Nicola
Roxon ref @18-19. I realise now that I have committed fraud and an appeal would
have been illegal under the Federal Statutory Declaration I signed.
36.EXCLUSION BY COMMONWEALTH: Ref: The attached: ESFS 261799 access to
employment regimes from Centrelink 15 Mar 2016. Affirms that non welfare
recipients are not included in the economy. Mature aged allow much higher
remuneration to employers which further disadvantages me when engaging the
employment market.
THE FIRE BRIGADES IS (FORMALLY) VOCATIONALLY CORRUPTION:
37.In 1991 & 1995 I submitted a report to Minister for Emergency Services and other
watchdog instruments of IAC, Ombudsman, WorkCover (and the Coroner) under Crown
Contract as a Statutory Informant on vocational corruption within the NSW Fire
Brigades. One issue is that the Fire Brigades did not recognise TAFE studies that were
directly fire brigades related.
38.THE CROWN CONTRACT The Statutory Instrument: Fire Brigades Act 1989, Part
2 Provision of fire brigades etc S6-Commissioner duty function; S7-Commissioner
authority function S10 Commissioner to Firefighter function; 69(2) viz employed by
government in service of the Crown; Superannuation Act 1916 S48 Breakdown
pensioner held to be on leave. I considered as a Statutory Instrument I had imprimatur
and previous submissions I have uploaded onto World Wide Web other instances of
Fire Brigades and Union corruption that none of the NSW watchdog bodies seem
concerned about. Although my submission on Fire Brigades secondary employment to
the AIRC (Federal) was recognised Ref PR072002 @ 6 & 140 the working hours case.
(Ref SCRIBD web site). http://www.airc.gov.au/alldocuments/PR072002.htm
INTERIM CONCLUSIONS:
39.I hold a great deal of respect and affinity to the mature aged 1788 apprenticed convicts
who were able to serve out their trivial offences and then were given the status of
gainful employment.
8 of 14
industry economy is not future proofing when we are selling national security assets to
other Nations that are then to be weaponised against us.
43.DISCUSSION: We owe a lot to the 1788 convicts that were separated from their
families. The Coat Of Arms of the recently risen Nation where the emu and kangaroo
cannot take a step backwards. A sovereign nation logically requires a forward quality
society not a backward quantity society. Technology demands we do more with less,
nanotechnology will make the cost of labour irrelevant.
CONCLUSIONS & PROJECTED DISCUSSION (1st & 2nd report)
44.A Nation that cannot defend itself becomes absorbed, this is historical fact that we
seem doomed to play out. It doesnt help when people like myself are excluded from
the economy;
45.My actions now I am sure have wrongly vindicated the guilty in an arbitrary approach to
my Rights as a Victim within the Justice Department. If Justice cannot be afforded me I
will take another path under the Rule Of Law:
a. What I think happened Ref 2nd report @5 The VRC made reference to SHORT
MINUTES OF ORDER at para 13 of the VRC decision and I suspect the VRC would
have known about the criminal negligence of the WC Law Officers very early in the
investigation and knew that the decision of non-payment of VC was ultra-vires in the
Civil Jurisdiction of the WC Court. But when physical evidence ref VICTIMS SERVICES
REVIEW OF DECISION is submitted they can no longer pursue non VC payment (thus
Statutory Declaration. The 1788 mature aged convict apprentices did not have these
issues.
49.I have breached a Federal Statutory Declaration as well as committing fraud against
Transgrid and Central Coast Group Training because it was/is illegal for me to work
although I did not realise the fraud against these two companies at the time;
50.For a victim to move on they need to be removed from the crime not to be conversely
criminalised as a means of absolving the guilt of others;
51.Carried forward to report 2 to Attorneys.
Signed:
Charles H. Norville; date: 26 Sept 2016
Encl
666.tar.feathers@gmail.com
ATT page 12: TAFE enquiry 1952001 to inquire about the cost of my courses;
ATT page 13: Centrelink enquiry ESFS 261799 on exclusion of employment regimes
11 of 14
12 of 14
13 of 14
14 of 14
1 of 34
returned, and for other reasons, the amount by cheque to the NSW Dept of Justice
170483D on 22 Aug 2016 with the reassessment form with an alternative request for a
de-novo of the criminal investigation being incomplete.
5. UPDATE: no1 -30 Aug 2016 VRC response by phone in brief Victims Services on
receiving the cheque insist that the amount will be returned with possible additional
amount I refused this. The VS Officer was not interested in my request for a de-novo
of the investigation;
no2 I received 18 Sept VRC letter dated 30 Aug 2016 the VRC
3 of 34
payment (thus payment made) and so an amended decision would undo the
investigation as complete. The VRC then purse further illegitimate enquiry on my
psychiatric fitness outside the legal construct of decision determination. This looks
highly suspicious given the history of my WC abuse, and I rightfully make assertions
to the impasse created.
INITIAL REQUEST BUT NOT LIMITING
6. Both reports 1 & 2 remain Private and Confidential and I will not divulge the contents in
any way unless no reasonable explanation is forthcoming in a reasonable time for all
four recipients. But I make special pleading to the Federal Attorney to remove me from
the clutches of the NSW system of rough justice asap.
THE REVIEW 18 SEPT 2014 OF THE VRC DECISION 11 Aug 2014
7. In the review submission Ref VICTIMS SERVICES REVIEW OF DECISION I gave
physical evidence of the criminal conspiracy by Workers Comp Law Officers, my lawyers
in 1995-6 who had contracted out of the WC Jurisdiction to implement my retirement in
lieu of dismissal for personal gain to remain in the WC Jurisdiction instead of reporting
the crime to NSW Police that I had detailed to my lawyers 1 May 1995 in Garfield
Barwick Chambers ref THE CRIMINAL OMISSION BY LAW OFFICERS 1995 @20-25; ref
att pge 19-29;
8. My retirement in lieu of dismissal would not have occurred if Police had been informed in
1995 and I would have also have received WC rehabilitation.
9. NB it took a special task force for major NSW Police investigation in Nov 2010 before a
conclusion of an obvious crime was finally determined in Aug 2014 on the balance of
4 of 34
Task Force SIME revealed the many criminal assaults by the Fire Brigades that were
I presume as assumed grotesque civil torts;
13.Under Police Task Force SIME 2010, The Police Prosecutor refused to hand over
evidence to my VC lawyers Napier Keen and I dont know what evidence was shown to
the VRC to make their determination;
a.
Even at the point of belated investigation (2010) the Government Law Officers
decided on a suppression of the truth - so much for the Charter of Victims Rights;
14.My VC Lawyers Napier Keen were not going to get involved in this stating to me:
a.
Dec 2012 We are pursuing a victims compensation claim for you only;
b.
29 Aug 2014 (on VRC decision 11 Ag 2014) we are of the view that the review
would be unsuccessful we would be unable to do this for you.
15.What is known as explained to me by police in interview is that all those involved made
admission to their involvement at the time of the incident at Stanmore Fire Station 1981,
but none declared responsibility for specific criminal deeds. There was also
corroborating witnesses who knew of my plight after the incident;
16.The NSW Govt Departments I fear will continue to punish me for the term of my natural
life, with the assistance of: HealthQuest; State Super; Health Care Complaints
Commission; WorkCover; ICAC; Ombudsman; NCAT (ADT); NSWIRC.;
17. DISCUSSION: The VRC looking as though they are in concert with Law and Judicial
Officers in avoiding the criminal context of the SHORT MINUTES OF ORDER as per
5 of 34
VRC decision 14 Aug 2015 and as previously submitted Ref VICTIMS SERVICES REVIEW
OF DECISION 18 Sept 2015.
18. I suspect that NSW Lawyers have always seen the writing on the wall after numerous
emails and phone discussions to attract a lawyer what we have is proforma law for
needy. In declining to assist me, as with The Law Society and Rule Of Law Institute
finding a good lawyer in NSW will be like finding a needle in hay stack;
19. The Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 is an oxymoron to the Rule Of Law of Victims
Rights. There is no provision for me to make a victims impact statement because I am
only a victim on the balance of probabilities. It was ethically proper to return the goaway money to the NSW Justice Department.
THE CRIMINAL OMISSION BY LAW OFFICERS 1995
20.On 1981 I was criminally assaulted by Fire Brigades members on B Platoon at
Stanmore. Regardless of the grotesque nature of the crime Im lead to believe (as many
other firemen) that the crime was a civil tort over the years by Law Officers and Judicial
Officers, who should have known better;
21.On 26 Aug 1994 I go onto unrecognised Workers Compensation for second time for the
injuries of work related stress, the first claim for stress was 16/2/93 26/3/93. I had to go
on welfare to care for my family;
22.On 28 Oct 1994 I sign the WC lawyers PK Simpson retainer agreement, which specified
as follows inter alia;
The solicitor shall not investigate negligence proceedings as I do not wish to spend any
funds on that investigation;
23.On 1 May 1995 in the evening, I attend with a meeting with my Workers Compensation
solicitors PK Simpson, Jeffrey Elia, Gabrielle, and one other and barrister, Vaughn
Jurisich at Garfield Barwick Chambers in the City of Sydney;
a. As per personal diary ledger Ref VICTIMS SERVICES REVIEW OF DECISION;
24.They hear and see my emotional release of what I have stated as a grotesque assault
against me by Fire Brigades members this was probably Post Traumatic Stress release
which I had done previously with psychologist Dr Nicholas Marlowe;
25.At the time and in conclusion of my emotional release barrister Vaughn Jurisich states I
will get them referring to the Fire Brigades and I was thinking of this statement that he
may mean also get the individual members in question as well as the Fire Brigades. I am
not told that what I divulged was a criminal offence;
26.On 2 May 1995 report from my treating psychologist Dr Nicholas Marlowe is sent to
Jeffrey Elia of PK Simpson Workers Compensation solicitors and with respect of the said
6 of 34
assault, inter alia, During his first year he was subjected to humiliating bastardisation
ritual and victimisation;
27.1 June 1995 an WC amendment to an Workers Compensation is sent to Messer
Hickson, Lakeman & Holcombe solicitors acting for the GIO and Fire Brigades and with
respect of the said assault states @ (i) On 26 April 1991 applicant was assaulted by
other employees apart from the wrong year meant to be 1981 not 1991 there is no
mention of criminal assault, which should have been reported to Police, and I dont
remember the specific 26 April date;
28.12 May 1995 I submit a 26 page Chronology under the instruction of Jeffrey Elia of
PK Simpson and on page 19, I outline details of the assault as follows;
a. At page 22 of 26 page Chronology I informed Union Secretary, John Slade on 9
Sept 2987; on 2 Oct 1987 Slade informs Chief Officer, Bill Reay & Personnel Officer;
29.On 1 June 1995 PK Simpson send a letter to the State Authorities Superannuation
Trustee Corporation (state super) and obtain a response dated 7 June 1995, I obtained
under Freedom Of Information (FOI) which requested benefits payable on resignation
and invalidity contracting out of the Workers Comp jurisdiction viz S48; S29(4) (4a)
Superannuation Act 1916;
a.
The Fire Brigades also initiate moves to retire me or rather according to Doug
Messenger confirming punishment att pge 33-34.
30.I was retired on 5 July 1995 by HealthQuest for a personality disorder which no doctor
has ever diagnosed. I was retired in lieu of dismissal on unrecognised Workers
Compensation and on welfare to support my family at the time;
31.In March 1996 at the Workers Compensation Court the barrister acting for PK Simpson,
Mr Vaughn Jurisich questions me in front of the Judge There was a lot of stress being
caused, there was allegations of victimisation and matters of that nature, is that right .
32.I stated to the question by Mr Jurisich Thats correct and was true with respect of most
of the harassment issues listed being a Statutory Informant against Fire Brigades
corruption, but greatly allusive of the assault that all Law Officers knew including the
responding, Messer Hickson, Lakeman & Holcombe solicitors acting for the GIO and Fire
Brigades. I conclude deception of a criminal nature by at least 10 Law Officers;
33. Just prior to the actual Court hearing of March 1996 I signed the consent agreement for
the second injury and within the SHORT MINUTES OF ORDER it states 26 August
1996 which is the declared date of the injury and an amount of $30,000 Commutation is
agreed and to as well [sic agreed to] which was barely meant to cover lost wages;
34.I had been retired (5 July 1995) on an amount of app $730 fortnight from a salary of app
$1,183 fortnight (40% reduction) as per State Super document to PK Simpson 7 June
7 of 34
42. A reply on my Federal breach was given to the Federal Attorney General, Nicola Roxon
and in her response recommended to me in a letter dated 20 Sept 2012 that I go to the
Police if I wanted to pursue this matter further (ref MC12/1142 att pge 18);
43. UNINTENTIONAL FRAUD: I committed a breach of Federal Statutory Declaration 10
Nov 2011, which has consequently lead to fraudulent behaviour in attempting to gain
employment with Trandsgrid (above) and Central Coast Group Training (CCGT). CCGT
have a copy of the submission to Hennessy, NCAT, on my Federal breach of my Stat
Dec. I did not realise at the time that I had done anything wrong.
44. With the anti-discrimination complaint against Transgrid I went [sic as agreed outcome]
onto a training programme with an employment agency HR Solutions with Michael Wolf
for nine months May 2012 till Jan 2013 which included door knocking at employers
which I have done previously anyway and then without success. I was not aware I was
doing anything wrong with either Transgrid nor Central Coast Group Training;
49. There was some bastardisation there in which his clothes were stripped off and his
pubic hair shaved, and he suffered various other indignities. Dr Rod Milton is a
Forensic Psychiatrist who should have queried what is seen as a crime event.
Instead he goads me in an attempt to distress me on the bastardisation and quoted
that must have been rude. Milton was an expensive adversarial Workers Comp
doctor, but he was also a high profile Forensic Psychiatrist and with any suspicion of a
crime should have advised lawyers eg this needs to be reported to police and btw
pay him his workers compensation, treat Mr Norville with some respect give him
rehab [NSW IRC DP Sams uses Rod Miltons report in his determination excluding
treating doctors such Dr Nicholas Marlowes & Dr Howards reports];
50. Hennessy had the criminal assault accounts in her procession as did many NSW
Government Health & Law Officer & Judicial Officers. The respondent State Super
(SASTC) clearly had FOI information confirming this criminally of fraudulent retirement
because Hennessy should have been able to view this legal privilege documents,
which was denied me.
a. Although the 2003 fitness to return to reemployment was determined, Hennessys
determination (2005) seriously damages any chance of employment via employment
agency vetting including the NSW Government Premiers Dept eg att pge 33-34;
51. NSW NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunities Division being an
apprentice trade training entry position RSB:SND 14-260 # 1410508 DP
Hennessy - 21 October 2014 Mr Norvilles addressing of the criteria is so poor that
the respondent, in my view, was justified in rejecting that application. It is not
incumbent on the respondent to go to the resume document and to extract from that
document the criteria which was required to be addressed and deduce from that
resume that Mr Norville meets those criteria ref @36 [sic 34] 1st report.
THE NSW IRC under JP Sams
52. Charles Henry Norville and New South Wales Fire Brigades [2007] NSWIR
Comm 45 (in transcript) DP Sams NSWIRC saw fit with the Fire Brigades to
remove medical evidence from my application of reinstatement of an injured worker
and insert Workers Comp adversarial reports, that he stated as medical referees as
well as tainted evidence from the Fire Brigades vocationally corrupt testing used to
renew my firefighter candidacy (bad advice from my proforma lawyer Coventry).
53. What was appalling was the issue of my opposition to Fire Brigades Institutionalised
Freemasonry raised specifically by the Fire Brigades, counsel. (In paraphrase) DP
10 of 34
57. The response by the Ombudsman Investigation Officer 5 Sept 2013 Ref C/2013/6251
officer Patrick Trieu states inter alia While I note your allegations about being
victimised, harassed or discriminated against, I cannot find any clear evidence of
wrong administrative conduct on the part of a NSW government agency that warrants
any action by this office.
58. INTERIM CONCLUSION: Quite apart from the specific bias, these people deal with the
11 of 34
law they must know what a crime looks like. Lawyers steer clear of litigants of this
nature, like myself, knowing that the of Coventry has displaced the Rule Of Law.
HISTORICAL ANALOGY WHERE CONVICTS WERE GIVEN STATUS ON
COMPLETION OF INDENTURED SERVITUDE
59. National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER) 2012 titled
Evolution of Apprenticeships and Traineeships in Australia: an unfinished
history . Page 11 therein - Among the 780 convicts who arrived in 1788 on the
First Fleet, there were two apprentices, 63 whose declared occupation was a skilled
trade, and 58 who appear to be semi-skilled ..
60. These two individual convicts had been sentenced to servitude for trivial crimes as a
result of the chaos of the new technology of The Industrial Revolution, which
commenced in Britain causing great social dislocation.
61. Many convicts were either skilled tradesmen or farmers who had been convicted for
trivial crimes and were sentenced to seven years, the time required to set up the
infrastructure for the new colony. Convicts were often given pardons prior to or on
completion of their sentences and were allocated parcels of land to farm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Australia_(1788%E2%80%931850) ;
62. The 1788 convicts serving their apprenticed servitude that gave them the skills to
prosper and to be gainfully employed after serving their sentence. Instead I am to be
retired for the term of my natural life in Coventry for a crime committed by others and
prohibited from gainful employment.
THE CHRONOLOGY OF CRIME
In 1981 the criminal assault occurs and is corroborated (belief of civil tort CT)
63. On 9 Sept 1987; 2 Oct 1978 the criminal assault is expressed to the Chief Officer, Bill
Reay; Personnel Officer Alan Grunsell; Union Secretary John Slade; (belief CT) Ref
26 Page Chronology pages 19 & 22 therein;
64. In the early 90s consultation with my clinical psychologist Dr Nicholas Marlowe I
express the criminal assault {CT};
65. On 16 Nov 1994 Dr Rod Milton, a Forensic Psychiatrist report in sent to Fire
Brigades OH&S physician, John Pearce, the assault is described at para 11 [which
is given to DP Hennessy ADT and DP Sams NSWIRC (as well as Dr Marlowes report
to Sams which he removed from evidence)] {CT}
66. On 1 May 1995 the criminal assault is expressed in detail to my WC Lawyers in
Garfield Barwick Chambers {CT};
12 of 34
67. On 2 May 1995 my WC Lawyers obtain Dr Marlowes report expressing the criminal
assault. {CT};
68. On 12 May I give my WC Lawyers the 26 page Chronology detailing the assault and
the names of those involved Ref 26 Page Chronology pages 19 & 22 {CT};
Law Officers do not inform Police of crime and I am retired in lieu of dismissal 5 July
1995 and restored on 7 July 2003 {CT};
69. Law Officers deceive Workers Comp Court Mar 1996 that assault occurred {CT};
70. From 1995 to 2013 I submitted the 26 page Chronology and other medical reports to
Government Law Officers and HCCC, State Super, HealthQuest and Judicial Officers.
{CT};
71. In 2010 Task Force SIME investigates criminal assault on many Fire Brigades
members, by which time I realise the crimes committed by Fire Brigades. VC
Lawyers, Napier Keen are engaged etc {crime not prosecuted -CNP};
72. On 11 Aug 2014 Victims Rights Commission determine and confirm on balance of
probabilities criminal assault against me. But deny Compensation {CNP}
73. On 18 Sept 2014 appeal and sent review along with physical evidence to VRC {CNP}
74. On 1 Oct 2015 Victims Compensation deposited money into bank account and no
amended decision is forwarded.
75. On reflection I realise I am being set up yet again for another white wash to be
maintained on a criminalised existence for the term of my natural life.
76. I use the official reassessment of Victims Compensation form to submit a request to
de-novo investigation I return cheque to Justice Dept on 22 Aug 2016.{CNP}
77. UPDATE: No1-30 Aug phone call VRC/Justice Dept inform them of impending reports
1 & 2 {CNP} No2- 30 Aug letter VRC/Justice Dept to query sanity to overturn original
decision 14 Aug 2014 ref @5 {CNP};
78. CONCLUSION: no conviction no tort, no tort no justice {CNP};
DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDATIONS
79. In 1995 at least 10 Law Officers benefited from the criminal conspiracy by not
reporting the 1981 crime to NSW Police. In doing so they maintain their monopoly
for legal costs within the Workers Comp Jurisdiction, and contract out of the Workers
Comp Jurisdiction through a retirement that has now been established as being
condonation for a 1981 crime by the NSW Justice Departments Victims Rights
Commission possibly the reason for not issuing an amended decision of VRC
review ref @4;
80. I was placed in a position of being illegally retired by those responsible for crimes I
13 of 34
did not commit but was forced to carry the burden of those crimes;
81. The criminal negligence by Law Officers, is seen by other Law Officers as a no go
zone of Coventry for which for watchdog Law Officers such as the Ombudsman and
ICAC are complicit;
82. Similarly the Judicial decisions are manifestly corrupted by the removal of evidence
of criminal assault and completely incompetent decisions a no go NSW Jurisdiction
zone for me;
83. 26 April 1996, document I obtained under FOI with contrary Fire Brigades advice
that the Commutation was not approved for the second 26 Aug 1994 injury but
rather for a closed period for the first the injury 16/2/93 26/3/93 indicates a
problem in the Workers Comp due process ref pge 29;
84. The Superannuation Law is logically not meant to be a profitable enterprise also ref
Superannuation Act 1916 as is also the case under Federal Law;
85. If retirement pension had been required it would have been issued under S48
Breakdown pensioner held to be on leave and reassessment under S29 (4) (4A) &
reemployment under S49, S50 & S51 Superannuation Act 1916, and not for the term
of my natural life being similar for welfare recipients having to register with an
agency the NSW Government logically were responsible for my reemployment;
86. It is obvious to the Justice Department that the restoration feature of the
Superannuation Act 1916 S48 & S29(4) (4a) is not simply a legal fiction, put as legal
argument in NSW IRC (DP Sams) that required reemployment either by the Fire
Brigades or another NSW Government Department NB via State Super;
87. I am not receiving superannuation top up on my NSW State Super pension yet under
Federal Law you can go to jail unlike State Super pension members who receive the
top up, if they get caught working over the permitted hours, there is no Federal
Statutory Declaration to prosecute, which also has me committing fraud on two
occasions seeking redress for age discrimination;
a. The reason for my not receiving the top up in my State Pension as other members is
that I am not entitled to it if I have been declared fit as per July 2003 fitness
assessment under S29 (4) (4a) S50 Superannuation Act 1916;
88. Regardless I am forbidden to work for the term of my natural life thus being placed
in an unenviable position of committing illegal acts whilst carrying the burden for
others crimes in 1981 and 1995 and consequently being criminalised;
89. I am a current victim in a process of Coventry sanctioned by Government Law and
Judicial Officers: excerpt from Grose's The Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue 1811: The
person sent to Coventry is considered as absent; no one must speak to or answer any
14 of 34
question he asks, except relative to duty, under penalty of being also sent to the same
place the heralded statement by Doug Messenger proves the Fire Brigades practice
of cruel and usual punishment was given sanction by Law and Judicial Officers;
90. HOWEVER I SHOULD BE RESTORED TO A POSITION I WOULD HAVE BEEN AT IF THE
CIRCUMSTANCES OF CRIME HAD BEEN REPORTED BY LAW OFFICERS IN 1995;
91. I have made both 1st and 2nd reports Private and Confidential and include the
condition of response ref @6. I request that the current Federal Attorney General,
Senator George Brandis QC, provide me a safe transition to be prosecuted for
breach of the Federal Statutory Declaration, NB There are issues as well with the
fraud against Transgrid and CCGT, and I can find no one to represent me and under
the Australian Constitution I can receive counsel:
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (The Constitution) 1900 - S80 Trial by jury:
provides: S80 - The trial on indictment of any offence against any law of the
Commonwealth shall be by jury, and every such trial shall be held in the State where the
offence was committed, and if the offence was not committed within any State the trial
shall be held at such place or places as the Parliament prescribes;
92. I would ask that the State Attorney General Hon Gabrielle Upton, MP, notify the
Department of Justice asap, of my reports, as per ref @1 review of Victims Rights;
93. The only legal advice that appears adequate was given to me was from Australias
former most senior Law Officer, Attorney General, Nicola Roxon, with respect of my
Federal breach ref page 18 to go to a police station;
THE REASONS FOR FEDERAL PROSECUTION
94. In practical terms by mitigating my crime I can present my Victims Impact Statement
to a jury in a Federal Court under the Constituted Jury system;
95. The Victims Rights and Support under NSW Justice System by all account of their
deleterious behaviour will not prosecute Law Officers who did not report the crime to
police in 1995, which caused an illegal retirement in lieu of dismissal, therefore being
punished for crimes committed against me;
96. The 1788 mature aged apprenticed convicts were allowed to contribute to society
after their servitude I expect nothing less if serving a sentence for the Federal
breach.
Signed:
Charles H. Norville; date: 26 Sept 2016
666.tar.feathers@gmail.com
Encl
15 of 34
ATTACHMENTS:
Page 17 VR&CA 2013 VC assessment form to de-novo with inter alia notation of cheque
attachment;
Page 18 Letter of advice from former Federal Attorney General to report to police;
Page 19 PK Simpson Cost Agreement Terms and Conditions nb para 12 not to
investigate negligence;
Page 20 PK Simpson Orders and Awards from Workers Comp Court dated 15 Mar 1996;
Page 21 PK Simpson cover sheet to WC Orders dated 28 Oct 1996;
Page 22 Front page to WC Consent Orders stipulating date from 26 Aug 1994 as per Mar
1996;
Page 23 signed Consent Orders of legislative inclusions of WC Consent dated as per Mar
1996;
Page 24 Cover sheet to Short Minutes Of Orders dated 15 Mar 1996;
Page 25 The Commencement of WC Proceedings, the preamble with PKS barrister, V.
Jurisich;
Page 26 Page 1 Transcript by PKS barrister V. Jurisich NB victimisation and ie no
criminal assault;
Page 27 Page 2 Transcript by Jurisich 2nd page and Judge makes orders and I stand
down;
Page 28 Page 3 Transcript Jurisich asks for set time for matter to be certified;
Page 3 Transcript cont Judge states to get consent from other side, to put it in, and Judge
will initial it;
Page 29 24 April 1996 Fire Brigades WC section only accept 1st claim in 1993 and decline
the above 2nd claim for 1994 in medical advice an indication of confusion of due
process.
Page 30-31 State Super informs Fire Brigades, Personnel Officer Doug Messenger of
restored fitness from retirement 7 July 2003 and seeking advice on reemployment letter
dated 12 Aug 2003;
Page 32 State Super letter 5 Mar 2004 indicating various hindrances by Fire Brigades,
Doug Messenger on reemployment;
Page 33-34 Fire Brigades, Doug Messenger response dated 17 Aug 2004: refutes
medical fitness creating extrajudicial and adversarial approach to unemploy me. This is
Rule by Law by institutionalised corruption.
16 of 34
17 of 34
18 of 34
19 of 34
20 of 34
21 of 34
22 of 34
23 of 34
24 of 34
25 of 34
26 of 34
27 of 34
28 of 34
29 of 34
30 of 34
31 of 34
32 of 34
33 of 34
34 of 34