Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Institute of Law
Course: Statutory Interpretation and Legislative
Drafting
Semester-VI
Even Semester (December 2016-April 2017)
Page 1 of 32
Components of CCM
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
Page 2 of 32
Page 3 of 32
C. Course Syllabus:
Page 4 of 32
Page 5 of 32
Page 6 of 32
Page 7 of 32
https://sites.google.com/a/nirmauni.ac.in/interpretation-of-statutes
http://lawmin.nic.in/legis.htm
https://legcounsel.house.gov/HOLC/Drafting_Legislation/Drafting_Guide.html
https://www.eduskunta.fi/EN/tietoaeduskunnasta/kirjasto/aineistot/yhteiskunta/Ka
nsalaisvaikuttamisen_tietopaketti/Pages/Kirjallisuutta.aspx
http://www.prsindia.org/ (PRS legislative Research)
F. Video Lectures:
1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EynTjXMilGM
H. Unit / sub-unit wise content of the syllabus and list of case laws
and research articles etc.:
Unit: 1. Principles of Legislation
1.1. Law-making - the legislature, executive and the judiciary
1.1 Principles of Legislation
1.2. Principle of utility
1.3. Relevance of John Rawls and Robert Nozick - individual interest to community
interest.
1.4. Operation of these principles upon legislation
1.5. Distinction between morals and legislation
Page 9 of 32
Text References :
Nirmal Kanti Chakraborty, Principles of Legislation and Legislative Drafting, (R
Cambray and Co.) 2011 p 5-14, 17-22.
ERM Cases:
ERM 1: P. Ramachandra Rao v. State of Karnataka (2002) 4 SCC 578
ERM 2: Padma Sundara Rao v. State of Tamil Nadu (2002) 3 SCC 533
ERM 3: D.M., Aravali Golf Club v. Chander Hass, 2007 (14) SCALE 1
Unit: 3. Aids to Interpretation
3.1. Internal aids
3.1.1. Title
3.1.2. Preamble
3.1.3. Headings and marginal notes.
3.1.4. Sections and sub-sections
3.1.5. Punctuation marks.
3.1.6. Illustrations, exceptions, provisos and saving clauses
3.1.7. Schedules
3.1.8. Non-obstante clause.
Page 10 of 32
Text References :
Vepa P. Sarathi, Interpretation of Statutes, (Lucknow: Eastern Book Company) 2010 p
265-295.
P.M.Bakshi, Interpretation of Statutes, (Allahabad: Orient Publishing Company) 2008
p 182.
G.P.Singh, Principles of Statutory Construction, (Nagpur: Lexis Nexis) 2010 p 155.
M.N.Rao and Amita Dhanda, N.S.Bindras Interpretation of Statutes, (Delhi: Lexis
Nexis) 2007 p 685.
ERM Cases:
ERM 4: Biswambhar Singh v. State of Orissa, AIR 1954 SC 139
ERM 5: M/s. Hiralal Rattanlal v. State of U.P. (1973) 1 SCC 216
ERM 6: Manoharlal v. State of Punjab, AIR 1961 SC 418
3.2. External aids
3.2.1. Dictionaries
3.2.2. Translations
3.2.3. Statutes in pari materia
3.2.4. Contemporanea Exposito
3.2.5. Debates, inquiry commission reports and Law Commission reports
Text References :
Vepa P. Sarathi, Interpretation of Statutes, (Lucknow: Eastern Book Company) 2010 p
301-305.
P.M.Bakshi, Interpretation of Statutes, (Allahabad: Orient Publishing Company) 2008
p 280, 389-390.
G.P.Singh, Principles of Statutory Construction, (Nagpur: Lexis Nexis) 2010 p 219.
M.N.Rao and Amita Dhanda, N.S.Bindras Interpretation of Statutes, (Delhi: Lexis
Nexis) 2007 p 804.
ERM Cases:
ERM 7: ShashiKant Laxman Kale v. Union of India, AIR 1990 SC 2114 :(1990) 4
SCC 366
ERM 8: S.R. Chaudhary v. State of Punjab (2001) 7 SCC 126
ERM 9: State of Mysore v. R.V. Bidap AIR 1973 SC 255
ERM Cases:
ERM 27: Calcutta Municipal Corporation v. East India Hotels Ltd., AIR 1996 SC 419
ERM 28: Oswal Agro Mills Ltd. v. CCE, 1993 Supp(3) SCC 716.
Unit: 5. Presumptions in statutory interpretation
5.1. Statutes are valid
5.2. Statutes are territorial in operation
5.3. Presumption as to jurisdiction
5.4. Presumption against what is inconvenient or absurd
5.5. Presumption against intending injustice
5.6. Presumption against impairing obligations or permitting advantage from one's
own wrong.
Text References :
Vepa P. Sarathi, Interpretation of Statutes, (Lucknow: Eastern Book Company) 2010 p
187-261.
P.St. J. Langen, Maxwell on Interpretation of Statutes, (New Delhi: Lexis Nexis) 2006
p 153- 183.
P.M.Bakshi, Interpretation of Statutes, (Allahabad: Orient Publishing Company) 2008
p 768-825.
Unit: 6. Maxims of Statutory Interpretation:
6.1. Delegatus non potest delegare
6.2. Expressio unius exclusio alterius
6.3 Generalia specialibus non derogant
6.4. In pari delicto potior est conditio possidentis
6.5. Utres valet potior quam pareat
6.6. Expressum facit cessare tacitum
6.7. In bonam partem
Text References :
Vepa P. Sarathi, Interpretation of Statutes, (Lucknow: Eastern Book Company) 2010 p
391-426.
P.St. J. Langen, Maxwell on Interpretation of Statutes, (New Delhi: Lexis Nexis) 2006
p 264- 306.
Page 13 of 32
Page 14 of 32
Text References :
Vepa P. Sarathi, Interpretation of Statutes, (Lucknow: Eastern Book Company) 2010
P.M.Bakshi, Interpretation of Statutes, (Allahabad: Orient Publishing Company) 2008
p 606-725.
M.N.Rao and Amita Dhanda, N.S.Bindras Interpretation of Statutes, (Delhi: Lexis
Nexis) 2007 p 1261- 1389.
Relevant Cases:
ERM 34: M.L.Kamra v. Chairman- cum Managing Director, New Indian Assurance
Co. Ltd. AIR 1992 SC 1072.
ERM 35: Prafulla Kumar v. State Bank of Khulna, AIR 1946 PC.
ERM 36: Atiabari Tea Co. Ltd. v. State of Assam AIR 1961 SC 232.
ERM 37: Bengal Immunity Co. v. State of Bihar, AIR 1955 SC 61.
ERM 38: Chief Justice of Andhra v. I.V.A.Dikshitulu AIR 1979 SC 193.
ERM 39: Saurabh Choudhry v. Union of India AIR 2004 SC 361
ERM 40: The Supreme Court Advocates on Record Association v. Union of India
AIR 1994 SC 268.
ERM 41: Jagdish Sharan v. Union of India AIR 1980 SC 820
Unit 9: Legislative Drafting
9.1 Forms of Legislative Drafting
9.2 Ideals of drafting
9.3 Part of Statute/Act
9.4 Maxims and general rule of interpretation
9.5 Significance of General Clauses Act 1897 in legislative drafting
Text References:
ERM 42: Nirmal Kanti Chakraborty, Principles of Legislation and Legislative
Drafting, (R Cambray and Co.) 2011 p 5-14, 17-22, 25-30, 41-46.
N.S. Bindra, General Clauses Act, (Lexis Nexis Butterworths) 2002.
Research Articles of Unit 9:
ERM 43: Albert R. Menard, Legislative Bill Drafting, 23 ROCKY MT. L. Rev 127
(1950)
ERM 44: Ray Forrester, Truth in Judging: Supreme Court Opinions as Legislative
Drafting, 38 Vand. L. Rev. 463 (1985)
ERM 45: E.A. Driedger, Legislative Drafting, Journal Des Traducteurs Meta:
Translators Journal, Vol. 25, n 3, 1980, p 316-324
ERM 46: S.K. Hiranandani, Legislative Drafting: An Indian View, The Modern Law
Page 15 of 32
Mode of
Teaching / Learning
Weightage
Specific Mode
Allocat
Description
Page 16 of 32
Drafting exercises
Un
Self-Study
Guided Self-Study
with Class
Participation
Cases in BOLD
LETTERS
Un
Expert Lecture /
Cooperative
Teaching / Video
Sessions
1. J.N. Bhatt,
Chairperson, State
Human Rights
Commission, on
Value and basic
rules of
interpretation.
Un
Experiential Learning
2. Mr. N.K.
Nampoothiry, Addl.
Secretary, Legislative
Depart., Ministry of
Law and Justice on
Overview of
Legislative Drafting
Core Teaching
2. T.K Vishwanathan,
Secretary, Lok
Sabha, Structure
and elements of
Legislative Drafting
In-depth Coverage
Lecture and
with various teaching Discussion through
tools / aids
ERMs provided
beforehand to the
students
L. Lesson Planning:
Ms. Silky Mukherjee (SM) (3*3=09 lectures per week)
Sessi
on
No.
Topic
Mapped
CLO
Dictionaries
Translations
Pedagogy
Law-making - the
Lecture and
Discussion
Lecture and
Discussion
Lecture and
Discussion
Lecture and
Page 17 of 32
ERM No.
U
1,2,4,5
legislature, executive
and
the
judiciaryPrinciples
of
Legislation
Law-making - the
legislature, executive
and the judiciary
-Principles
of
Legislation
Contemporanea
Exposito
Discussion
Lecture and
Discussion
Lecture and
Discussion
Debates,
inquiry
commission reports and
Law
Commission
reports
Lecture and
Discussion
Literal rule
1, 2
Lecture and
Discussion
11
Law-making - the
legislature, executive
and
the
judiciaryPrinciples
of
Legislation
Law-making - the
legislature, executive
and the judiciary
-Principles of
Legislation
Literal rule
Lecture and
Discussion
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
12
Golden rule
1, 2
13
Golden rule
14
Law-making - the
legislature, executive
and the judiciary
-Principles of
Legislation
Law-making - the
legislature, executive
and
the
judiciary-
Lecture and
Discussion
Lecture and
Discussion
Lecture and
Discussion
Lecture and
Discussion
Lecture and
Discussion
10
15
Page 18 of 32
1, 2
Principles
of
Legislation
Mischief rule (rule in
the Heydon's case)
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
17
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
18
Rule of harmonious
construction
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
19
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
Lecture and
Discussion
21
1, 2
22
Noscitur a sociis
1, 2
23
Ejusdem generis
1, 2
24
Operation
principles
legislation
of
these
upon
Lecture and
Discussion
Lecture and
Discussion
Lecture and
Discussion
Lecture and
Discussion
25
Operation
principles
legislation
of
these
upon
Lecture and
Discussion
26
Ejusdem generis
27
Reddendo
singulis.
singula
28
Reddendo
singula
16
20
Lecture and
Discussion
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
1, 2
Lecture and
1, 2
Page 19 of 32
singulis.
Discussion
29
Distinction
between
morals and legislation
Lecture and
Discussion
30
Distinction
between
morals and legislation
Lecture and
Discussion
31
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
32
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
33
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
34
Distinction
between
morals and legislation
Lecture and
Discussion
35
Distinction
between
morals and legislation
Lecture and
Discussion
36
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
37
Presumption
jurisdiction
as
to
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
38
Presumption
jurisdiction
as
to
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
39
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
Page 20 of 32
40
Lecture and
Discussion
41
Presumption
against
what is inconvenient or
absurd
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
42
Presumption
against
what is inconvenient or
absurd
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
43
Presumption
against
intending injustice
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
44
Commencement,
operation and repeal of
statutes
Lecture and
Discussion
45
Commencement,
operation and repeal of
statutes
Lecture and
Discussion
46
Presumption
against
impairing obligations
or permitting advantage
from one's own wrong.
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
47
Presumption
against
impairing obligations
or permitting advantage
from one's own wrong.
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
48
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
Page 21 of 32
49
Purpose
interpretation
statutes.
of
of
Lecture and
Discussion
50
Purpose
interpretation
statutes.
of
of
Lecture and
Discussion
51
Expressio
unius
exclusio alterius
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
52
Generalia
specilibus
non derogant
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
53
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
*
Ms. Dhanya Mahesh (No.of lectures per week ( 2*3=6)
Sessi
on
No.
Topic
1. Forms of Legislative
5 Drafting
Pedagogy
Mapped
CLO
ERM No.
Lecture and
Discussion
Page 22 of 32
2. Forms of Legislative
5 Drafting
Drafting
Exercises
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
5. In bonam partem
5
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
6.
5 Ideals of drafting
Drafting
Exercises
7. Ideals of drafting
6
Drafting
Exercises
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
8. Restrictive
and
6 beneficial construction
-Taxing statutes
-Penal statutes
-Welfare legislation
-Interpretation
of
substantive
and
adjunctival statutes
-Interpretation
of
directory
and
mandatory provisions
9. Interpretation
6 enabling statutes
of
-Interpretation
of
codifying
and
consolidating statutes
10. Interpretation
of
6 statutes
conferring
rights
Page 23 of 32
-Interpretation
of
statutes
conferring
powers.
11. Part of Statute/Act
Drafting
Exercises
Drafting
Exercises
1, 2, 3
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
Drafting
Exercises
1,2,3
Lecture and
Discussion
1,2,3
18.
Residuary power
7
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
19.
Doctrine of repugnancy
7
Lecture and
Discussion
1, 2
Lecture and
1,2,3
13. -Harmonious
6 construction
17. -Significance
7 General Clauses
1897 in
drafting
of
Act
legislative
20.
Revision of the course
7
21. Significance of General
Page 24 of 32
Discussion
23.
End
Semester
Examination
(27th
March, 2017 onwards)
Sr.
No
Formati
Description
Assessment
Date
declaration
Assessm
of result
ent
ed
Criteria
Written Test
II
Problem
based
1.Language,drafti
ng and flow of
thought 05
Marks
2.Analysis of the
contentions
raised in the
cases
(judicial
trends) 10
Marks
of
Assign
ve
III
40
Mapped
CLO
2nd
15th
February,
February,
2017
2017
3rd Jan-15th
Within
three days
from
the
day
of
presentatio
n
2,3
10th March,
2017
1,2,3,4
30
questions
Date
Marks
March,
2017
1,2
3.
Effective
conclusion and
contemporary
relevance of the
Maxim05
Marks
4. Presentation
and
defending
the stand 20
Marks
(Presentation-10,
Viva-voce- 10)
1.Language,
drafting and flow
of thought (05
Marks)
2.Research
Marks)
Page 26 of 32
(10
30
10th
Dec-
10 March
2017
3.
Presentation
and
defending
the stand- (15
MarksPresentation-7.5,
Viva voce- 7.5)
O.
under
Continuous
FA-I Rubrics: CLO I & II: Understand the various statutes through the rules and analyze
and interpret the various statutes through the rules
Unit : I, II, III, IV
Skill / level: Apply, Evaluate, and Create
Assessment
technique
and
its
description
Descriptive
and
Application
based
questions
Description
assessment
parameters
Problem
questions
of Below 50%
based
[Answer to the
question shall have
following points:
Identification
of
the
Maxim,
principles, citing of
relevant case laws,
observation
and
application
of
those
principles,
conclusion]
50- 70%
Above 70%
(description of
below
standard
performance
analyzing
assessment
parameters for
the same)
(description of
satisfactory
standard
performance
analyzing
assessment
parameters for
the same)
(description of
satisfactory
standard
performance
analyzing
assessment
parameters for
the same)
No
proper
application of
principles on
facts,
Does
not identify or
explain
the
relevant
principles to
be applied to
the
given
problem, No
coherence and
clarity
in
writing
Understands
the principle
but not able to
apply
the
same in the
given situation
and
no
coherence
Understands
and at the
same
time
correctly
appreciates
the facts and
apply
the
correct
principle on
them.
Coherence
and clarity in
writing
and
Page 27 of 32
Marks
30
Marks
Out of
4
proble
m
based
questio
ns, 3 to
be
attempt
ed. The
questio
ns
would
be
Mapped
PLO
Mapped
PEO
Mapped
GA
1, 2, 3
2, 3, 4
1,2,3
application of
legal
principles
Demonstrates
extra/self
reading.
based
on
Maxim
s and
Case
Laws.
Demonstrates
in
depth
analysis,
citing relevant
case laws and
relevant laws.
FA-II Rubrics: CLO I & II: Understand the various statutes through the rules and analyse
and interpret the various statutes through the rules
Unit : II-VIII
Skill / level: Evaluate and Create
Sr. No.
Assignment
No.
Description
Assessment
Criteria
II
02
Marks
assigned
Date
Date
of Mapped
Declaratio CLO
n of Result
Page 28 of 32
relevance in the
contemporary context.
Presentation along with a
submission shall be taken.
Judicial trends of
the Maxim (6
leading cases
from the Maxim)
Submission in a
group
trends of the
Maxim) 10
Marks
3. Effective
conclusion
and
contemporary
relevance of
the
topic/judgme
nt- 05 Marks
4.
Presentation
and
defending the
stand - 20
Marks
(Presentation10,
Viva
voce- 10)
Assessment
technique
and its description
Description
assessment
parameters
of
(description
of
below
standard
performance
analyzing
assessment
parameters
for the same)
Below 50%
(description
of
satisfactory
standard
performance
analyzing
assessment
parameters
for the same)
50- 70%
Page 29 of 32
(description
of
satisfactory
standard
performance
analyzing
assessment
parameters
for the same)
Above 70%
Mapped
PLO
Mapped
PEO
Mapped
GA
A group of 5
students shall be
selected to draft a
statute
on
an
emerging
area/pending bills
Submission shall
be taken on 15th
February, 2017 from
the group
1.Language, drafting
and flow of thought
(05 Marks)
2.Research (10 Marks)
3. Presentation and
defending the stand(15
MarksPresentation 7.5, Viva
7.5)
Lacks drafting
Satisfactory
and flow of drafting and
thought, Poor flow
of
presentation
thought, good
suggestions
and
Good
presentation.
Excellent
drafting
&
1, 4, 7
flow
of
thought;
Effective
conclusion
and
suggestions
with
Outstanding
presentation.
1, 2, 3, 6
Presentation and
viva shall be taken
thereafter from the
group
Page 30 of 32
1,2
-----xxx-----
Page 31 of 32
Page 32 of 32