Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
- 535789
BSE Limited
Phiroze Jeejeebhoy Towers,
Dalal Slreet,
MUMBAT - 400 001
Sub:
IBULHSGFIN/EQ
National Stock Exchange of India Limited
"Exchange Plaza",
Bandra-Kurla Complex, Bandra (E).
MUMBAT - 400 051
Dear Sir,
Please find enclosed an Earnings Update of Indiabulls Housing Finance
Limited for the
quarter ended December 31,2016, for your information and reiord.
Thanking you,
Yours truly,
for Indiabulls Housing
Limited
Amit Jain
Company Secretary
Enclosure. as above
IndiabultsHousingFinanceLimited 167498
CIN I L65922ou0O5Ptcl36O29
Cor9or.t Offic.r
-'i.tiJ;"hdiabullr
-''-'--
This document does not constitute an offer or recommendation to buy or sell any securities of Indiabulls Housing Finance or
any of its subsidiaries or associate companies. This document also doesnt constitute an offer or recommendation to buy or
sell any financial products offered by Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd.
Investor Contact
Ramnath Shenoy
investor.relations@indiabulls.com
+91 22 6189 1444
Media Contact
Rahat Ahmed
mediaquery@indiabulls.com
+91 22 6189 1155
Contents
Pg. No.
1.
Business Update
04
2.
Operational Update
09
3.
12
4.
15
5.
27
6.
LAP Grading
35
7.
41
8.
Liabilities Profile
50
9.
57
10.
59
11.
Detailed Financials
66
3
Business Update
Our Journey
2016-17
319.3*
2015-16
283.9
2014-15
198.4
2012-13
84.6
2011- 12
64.2
2009-11
48.1
2008
105.6
2006
40.9
2004-05
14.1
2000
Conversion to HFC
Indias 3rd largest HFC by size
PAT 12.7 Bn, RoE: 26%
Credit rating upgraded to AA+
PAT crosses 10 Bn
Balance sheet crosses 300 Bn, RoE: 22%
Market
Cap
( Bn)
Started as an NBFC
* As on 19th Jan
2017
IPO: Initial Public Offering; QIP: Qualified Institutional Placement; HFC: Housing Finance Company; NBFC: Non- Banking Financial Company
Business Update
Key Financial Highlights : 9M FY 16-17
9M FY 16-17
9M FY 15-16
814.22
84.77
34.08
28.02
20.66
622.65
65.78
26.77
22.39
16.69
Y-o-Y
Growth (%)
30.8%
28.9%
27.3%
25.1%
23.8%
Q3 FY16-17
Total Revenues ( Bn)
NII ( Bn)
PBT ( Bn)
PAT ( Bn)
30.04
12.61
10.06
7.51
Q3 FY15-16
23.08
9.71
8.06
6.02
Y-o-Y
Growth (%)
30.2%
29.9%
24.9%
24.7%
A third interim dividend of 9 per share of face value 2/-, amounting to 450%, has been declared in
the board meeting held on 20th January, 2017
6
Strong structural drivers and government focus: Housing for All by 2022
Coordinated efforts by government agencies and regulators to align policies and fiscal incentives
Urban housing requirement estimated at 45 Mn units by 2022
RBI, SEBI and IRDA regulatory focus on increasing funding avenues to HFCs
RBI has reduced risk weights on bank lending to AAA rated HFCs to 20% from 100%
SEBI has increased cap on additional exposure to AA (and above) rated HFCs from 5% to 10% (over the 25%
sectoral limit)
IRDA has exempted investments in AAA rated HFCs from sectoral caps
With PMAY, effective home loan interest rate at 2.4% for home loan of Rs. 2.4 Mn
Home loan amount eligible for subsidy under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) has been increased
For the first time EMI has dropped below rents across cities making home ownership more lucrative and
cheaper than renting property
Home loans growth driven by eHome Loans and Smart City Home Loans
Portfolio performance stable as home loan growth drives total loan asset growth
Technology-led cost-effective expansion into tier-II towns with Smart City Home Loans
20 new Smart City Home Loan branches opened in Q3
Smart City Home Loans contributing 6% of incremental disbursals
Cost-to-Income Ratio
18.7% 18.0% 17.1%
16.4%
14.3% 13.8%
Cost-to-income ratio down to 13.8% in 9M FY17 from 14.3% in FY16 and 18.7% in FY12
Increasing scale and effective technology deployment driving cost efficiencies
Annualised cost-to-income ratio down by 50 bps for 9M FY17
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16 9M FY17
Operational Update
Business Summary
Balance Sheet
1.02 Trillion
Loans Outstanding
:
:
814.22 Bn
(US$ 11.97 Bn)
27%
8,89,070
1,538.2 Bn
(US$ 22.62 Bn)
13.8%
24%
10
Loan Assets
Revenue
CAGR: 28%
CAGR: 28%
CAGR: 30%
687
1,024
253
322
391
444
572
764
198
13
FY11
FY12
19
Amounts in Bn
522
25
FY11
38
FY12
48
FY13
73
59
FY14
FY15
PBT
PAT
CAGR: 23%
CAGR: 26%
CAGR: 26%
24
30
31
34
10
FY13
412
92
NII
38
15
275
344
814
FY14
FY15
FY16 9M FY17
FY11
13
FY12
17
20
25
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16 9M FY17
FY16 9M FY17
23
28
FY11
10
FY12
13
FY13
16
FY14
19
FY15
85
21
FY16 9M FY17
11
Launching
Ver2.0
12
Launching
version 2.0:
Facebook Integration
uploaded
DigiLocker Integration
Single e-signature
documents
for
multiple
13
Smart city home loans driven through eHome loans led sourcing and credit appraisal
Credit focus on appraisal and underwriting, free from time-consuming data entry
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
14.3% 13.8%
FY16 9M FY17
Increasing share of home loans and cost-effective expansion into tier-II smart cities will lead
to continuing decline in cost-to-income
*UIDAI(Aadhar): Government of Indias secured biometric and demographic database for Indian citizens
**NSDL: Online PAN verification by authorized entities
14
15
Strong structural drivers and government focus: Housing for All by 2022
Coordinated efforts by government agencies and regulators to align policies and fiscal incentives
Urban housing requirement estimated at 45 Mn units by 2022
Pg. 18
RBI, SEBI and IRDA regulatory focus on increasing funding avenues to HFCs
Pg. 19
With PMAY, effective home loan interest rate at 2.4% for home loans of Rs. 2.4 Mn
Pg. 22
Home loan amount eligible for subsidy under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) has been
increased
For the first time EMI has dropped below rents across cities making home ownership more lucrative and
cheaper than renting property
16
Real Estate (Regulatory & Development) Act, 2016 will lead to a structured, transparent and
disciplined sector
Tax Incentives
Increased tax incentive reduces effective home loan yields to 2.4% for a 8.65% home loan
Budget 2016-17
100% tax exemption on profits from construction of affordable housing will attract organized
developers and increase supply
Fiscal Incentives
Service tax exemption on construction of affordable housing will lead to reduction in prices, increasing
affordability
Pradhan Mantri
Awas Yojana (PMAY)
Subsidy eligibility under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) enhanced to cover up to 12 lakh of
home loan reduces effective home loan rates to 2.4% for affordable housing
66% of Indias population is below 35 years of age. Urban housing requirement estimated to grow to
45 million units by 2022
Accelerating
Urbanization
Improving
Affordability
Rising disposable income, affordable housing loan interest rates and tepid property price inflation
resulting in rapidly increasing affordability
Government Policy
Thrust
Housing for all by 2022; Smart cities plan; Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation
Funding Drivers
RBI, SEBI and IRDA regulatory focus on increasing funding avenues to HFCs; Distribution tax on
securitization abolished
17
RBI has reduced risk weights on bank lending to AAA rated housing finance companies to 20%
from 100%
SEBI has increased limit for mutual funds for investment in the housing finance sector
Cap on additional exposure in securities of HFCs rated AA and above increased from 5% to 10% (over and
above 25% sectoral limits)
IRDA has also increased limit for insurance companies for investment in the housing finance
sector
Investment in AAA rated bonds of HFCs to be exempt from the sectoral cap of 25%
An aggregate of 15% of the investable corpus should be invested in HFC or infrastructure securities, as
against the earlier requirement of 5% in HFCs and 10% in infrastructure securities
18
Tremendous boost from expansion of coverage under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY)
-
Combined with tax deductions against home loan repayment, small ticket home loans effectively
become interest free
Effective home loan rate for Smart City Home Loan of 1.5 Mn is 1.60%
Effective home loan rate for 2.4 Mn home loan, IBHFLs average ticket size, is 2.35%
Across all above ticket sizes it is now cheaper to own a house than to rent it
PMAY subsidies are promptly processed through the NHB and payments are received within 45
days
19
Steep cut in home loan interest rates have led to effective home loan rates converging with rental yields for
the affordable housing segment
Particulars
Loan amount
2017
2016
2010
2000
2,400,000
2,400,000
2,400,000
2,400,000
8.65%
9.10%
9.25%
13.25%
250,000
250,000
150,000
75,000
150,000
150,000
100,000
20,000
30.90%
34.61%
30.90%
34.50%
15
15
15
15
Tenure (yrs)
Subsidy received under PMAY^
3,33,029
2,96,333
365,173
318,763
369,140
Interest component
1,46,333
215,173
218,763
314,777
Principal component
1,50,000
150,000
100,000
54,363
91,567
126,379
77,250
32,775
54,766
88,794
141,513
282,002
2.35%
3.82%
6.02%
11.88%
Amount in
20
3.9%
3.5%
2.3%
2.9%
3.1%
2.6%
3.4%
2.6%
3.2%
2.7%
2.4%
Rental yield
Increasing Affordability
The effective home loan rate is lower than rental yield making it
cheaper to buy the house than renting it
2.9
3.4
3.8
2.0
1.3
0.4
3.0
0.6
2005
2010
Price of House*
Annual Income
Amount in Mn
1.0
2015
Affordability
(Inverse Scale)
21
Leasing activity is the highest in suburban and peripheral localities, which coincide with supply of affordable
housing
Uptick in commercial office space absorption at an all time high of 43 million sq.ft. in CY20161
-
Supply of retail space to double to 11 m. sq.ft. in CY 2017 up from 5.3 mn. sq.ft. in CY 20162
-
Sustained leasing demand touched 13.9 mn. sq.ft. in Q4 CY 2016 a 20% Q-o-Q growth
Demand is secular across key-micro markets of the country
Sectorally broad-based demand led by IT, ITES, BFSI, engineering and manufacturing
Office space vacancy is at a 5-year low. Office space vacancy in metros has slipped below 10%
-
Bangalore topped the list with only 3%3office space vacancy and it also saw highest leasing volumes in the Asia-Pacific region
Pune and Hyderabad recorded 6% and 9%3 levels of office vacancy space respectively
22
Growth Momentum:
Trends in Residential Real Estate
Subsidy eligibility under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) enhanced to cover up to 1.2 mn of home loan
Demonetization has driven down land prices especially in smaller cities, new launches to be more affordable
Sluggish home sales in premium-segment has got organized developers to focus on affordable housing
23
Housing Potential:
Driven by Favourable Demographics
Demand continues to increase due to rapid urbanization, which is expected to rise to 40% by
2030, and growing trend of nuclear families
81%
88%
41%
09%
India
17%
20%
Thailand
China
26%
29%
Korea
Malaysia
Hong Kong
USA
UK
Low mortgage penetration compared to advanced and emerging economies implies huge
opportunity for growth
Indian mortgage industry at an inflection point and is expected to grow five-fold in the next 10
years
24
17%
CAGR
10,299
4,595
33%
Mar-10
5,538
34%
Mar-11
6,249
36%
Mar-12
Banks' Share
7,526
8,887
38%
39%
37%
Mar-13
HFCs' Share
Mar-14
Mar-15
(Amounts in Bn)
Home loan market is concentrated in the 1.5 Mn to 7.5 Mn range, demand in this segment is sustained and was unaffected
through demonetization
HFCs which are particularly focused on sub - 7.5 Mn loans have out-paced industry growth at a CAGR of 22% between FY12
and FY15
25
No Regulatory Arbitrage:
Regulatory Regime for Housing Finance Cos at par with Banks
Parameters
HFCs
Banks
NBFCs
90 dpd
90 dpd
120 dpd
CRAR
12%
9%
15%
6%
6%
7.5%
0.4%
0.4%
0.25%
1%
0.25-1%
0.25%
Yes
Yes
Yes
NPA Recognition
Tier 1
Standard Asset
Provisions
Housing Loans
Others
SARFAESI Coverage
HFCs are regulated by National Housing Bank (NHB), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
New regulatory guidelines are uniformly applied to both banks and HFCs
Regulations
Imposed
for Banks
Imposed
for HFCs
7 May 2014
18 Oct 2010
Deferred tax liability creation for profit appropriation towards regulatory reserves
27 May 2014
14 Aug 2014
8 Oct 2015
9 Oct 2015
26
27
Total Assets
As at December 31, 2016
As at December 31 , 2015
28
Asset Composition
Q3FY 16-17
Q3FY 15-16
1%
23%
21%
76%
Mortgage Loans
79%
Commercial Vehicle Loans
Home loans, which form the majority of incremental disbursals, are disbursed at an average
ticket size of 2.5 Mn; average LTV of 71% (at origination)
29
Asset Quality
0.86%
0.85%
0.83%
0.52%
0.34%
Dec 14
Gross NPA
0.48%
0.35%
Dec 15
General & Specific Provisions
(as % of Total Loan Assets)
0.49%
0.36%
Dec 16
Net NPA
Provisions for
Contingencies:
Of which
NPAs:
Other provisioning:
10.26
3.98
6.28
Regulatory
Provisioning:
7.11
Excess Provisioning
Over Regulatory
Provisioning:
3.15
NPAs have remained within the target range for the last 21 quarters
Standard Asset Provision and Counter-cyclical Provisions are over and above General and
Specific Provision pool and are not netted off against Gross NPAs in calculation of Net NPAs
3.15 Bn of excess provisioning over and above regulatory requirements
Standard asset provisioning rates are 0.4% for housing loans and 1.0% for non-housing loans
30
74%
External Channels
Branch Walk-ins
31
20 new Smart City Home Loan branches have been added in Q3 FY17
800 Mn of monthly incremental business is being sourced from these branches
1.0 Mn
1.5 Mn
4.0 Mn
20 years
Primary Security
Repayment Type
Monthly amortizing
32
2.5 Mn
80%
15 years
Primary Security
Repayment Type
Monthly amortizing
33
7.3 Mn
65%
7 years
Primary Security
Repayment Type
Monthly amortizing
34
LAP Grading
A Pioneering Initiative for Improved Risk Management
and Greater Transparency
35
LAP grading engagement with CRISIL (a Standard and Poors Company) and ICRA (a Moodys
Investors Service Company)
- CRISIL grades the loans on aspects such as past payment track record; nature of business and financial performance;
nature of property; and loan attributes like ticket size, lending scheme, loan tenure, etc.
- ICRA grades the loans on aspects such as financial strength; business and management; collateral strength, quality and
enforceability; and attributes of the loan itself
- Engagement with CRISIL was initiated in Q1FY16 and with ICRA in Q2FY16
36
Business Management
Collateral Quality
CERSAI
Registrar of companies
Credit bureau checks
CIBIL mortgage checks
RBI willful defaulter list
Experian Hunter fraud check
37
7th Report
CRISIL LAP Grading: Updated for Q3 FY17
Grading
Segment Characteristics
Total
Outstanding
Liabilities/
Total
Networth
Loan to
Value (LTV)
EBITDA
Margins
Grading
Scale
Quality of
LAP Loans#
Disbursals
Apr 15
Dec16
Interest
Service
Coverage
Ratio (ISCR)
LAP1
Highest
8.96%
11.6 14.4
1.4 1.7
49%
14% 17%
LAP2
High
81.13%
10.5 13.6
2.1 2.3
50%
11% 14%
LAP3
Average
9.31%
10.6 13.5
2.9 3.0
54%
9% 12%
LAP4
Below Average
0.26%
13.6 15.7
1.4 1.5
47%
12% 16%
LAP5
Poor
0.34%
8.6 9.3
2 .0 2.1
52%
12% - 15%
99% of incremental
LAP loans are
within the top
three grades
Incremental LAP loans from FY16 onwards are graded by CRISIL Ratings
Grading is based on customized scale developed by CRISIL Ratings for IBHFLs LAP loans to small
business owners
CRISIL grades the loans on aspects such as financial strength; business and management;
collateral; and underwriting process
*CRISIL LAP grading engagement began in Q1FY16 and up till the publication of this earnings update, CRISIL had graded 74% of the disbursals from
Apr 15 to Dec16
# Adjudged by CRISIL in relation to other LAP loans extended to other borrowers
38
In Q2 FY 2015-16, IBHFL tied up with rating agency ICRA to grade its incremental LAP loans
ICRA LAP Grading reflects ICRAs assessment of the credit quality of the loan on a ICRA developed
customised scale
Residential
Commercial
Usage of property
Loan Attributes
Ticket Size
Sourcing channel
Lending scheme
Loan tenure
Self occupied
Rented
Vacant
Property location
Quality of construction
Adherence to sanction plans
39
5th Report
ICRA LAP Grading: Updated for Q3 FY17
Grading
Characteristics
Grading Scale
Level of credit
worthiness
Grading
Distribution
Median LTV
Median FOIR
LAP1
Excellent
17.9%
26%
32%
LAP2
Good
65.5%
52%
47%
LAP3
Average
16.4%
63%
56%
LAP4
Below Average
0.2%
61%
66%
LAP5
Inadequate
Over 99% of
incremental LAP loans
are within the top
three grades
40
41
Drop in funding costs ahead of financial system gives IBHFL considerable leverage to cater to the prime mass-market
affordable housing segment
Falling interest rates will spur house sales and home loan off-take as effective home loan rates converge with rental yields
With savings from tax deductions against home loan repayment, the effective rate for a 2.4 Mn home loan (IBHFLs average ticket
size) works out to 2.35% for a 8.65% home loan
For the first time EMI has dropped below rents across cities making home ownership more lucrative and cheaper than renting
property
Rating Agency
CRISIL
ICRA
CARE
Total
Number of Pools
73
1
6
80
43
Number of
Pools
HL Pools
LAP Pools
Total
46
34
80
of Initial POS
Months on
Book
40
35
38
Pool Principal
( Mn)
44,512.8
42,608.2
87,121.0
Amortisation
90+ dpd %
180+ dpd %
46%
54%
50%
0.03%
0.05%
0.04%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
CCR
99.9%
99.5%
99.6%
MCR
100.5%
100.2%
100.3%
Home Loans
44
Investor
Bank 1
Bank 2
Bank 3
Bank 4
Bank 4
Bank 3
Bank 4
Bank 5
Bank 6
Bank 5
Bank 6
Bank 5
Bank 5
Bank 4
Bank 4
Bank 4
Bank 4
Bank 7
Bank 8
( Mn)
1,679.7
1,427.4
1,057.0
1,654.5
2,731.5
857.1
3,451.6
2,119.7
1,011.2
1,072.1
1,023.7
1,299.1
840.8
2,345.9
1,877.0
1,000.3
2,328.0
999.8
729.1
of Initial POS
Sold Down
Principal
( Mn)
1,587.4
1,371.8
1,026.9
1,501.5
2,566.6
796.7
3,248.2
1,873.7
972.6
1,000.4
941.3
1,073.0
755.1
2,203.2
1,736.8
950.3
2,076.8
939.2
681.6
Pool Principal
MPS
( Mn)
56
56
56
37
35
35
32
32
32
29
28
26
23
23
20
17
17
17
15
541.8
403.6
268.3
410.5
895.5
420.6
1,601.4
702.7
509.5
408.9
589.0
354.2
377.3
1,307.4
1,014.1
699.2
1,328.2
596.4
553.0
Amortisation
68%
72%
75%
75%
67%
51%
54%
67%
50%
62%
42%
73%
55%
44%
46%
30%
43%
40%
24%
90+ dpd %
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.11%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.10%
0.35%
0.18%
0.29%
0.00%
180+ dpd %
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.11%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
CCR
99.9%
99.9%
99.9%
99.9%
99.3%
99.9%
99.8%
99.4%
99.9%
99.7%
99.9%
99.8%
99.9%
99.9%
99.9%
99.8%
99.9%
99.9%
100.0%
MCR
100.6%
100.2%
101.6%
99.5%
104.8%
99.3%
100.6%
98.9%
99.1%
102.7%
97.7%
100.9%
99.5%
101.8%
98.5%
99.5%
99.5%
100.0%
100.3%
45
Investor
Bank 7
Bank 8
Bank 7
Bank 7
Bank 8
Bank 9
Bank 8
Bank 6
Bank 6
Bank 9
Bank 8
Bank 8
Bank 6
Bank 8
Bank 9
Bank 10
Bank 8
Bank 9
Bank 11
( Mn)
1,380.1
1,164.0
1,167.8
528.5
1,178.5
4,496.4
1,053.0
2,818.3
973.8
1,341.8
620.4
597.8
1,119.6
1,864.9
1,153.7
1,358.3
2,564.5
1,189.4
1,286.2
of Initial POS
Sold Down
Principal
( Mn)
1,288.1
1,112.7
1,071.5
501.6
1,096.1
4,158.1
993.4
2,605.9
881.6
1,250.2
589.3
562.7
1,039.1
1,749.4
1,085.4
1,253.7
2,404.8
1,114.6
1,202.3
Pool Principal
MPS
( Mn)
14
14
14
11
11
11
9
8
8
8
8
8
5
5
5
5
2
2
2
834.3
977.9
703.9
382.6
872.9
3,704.5
883.5
2,110.9
718.7
1,020.6
530.0
485.1
945.0
1,631.0
936.0
1,111.1
2,349.9
981.1
1,162.8
Amortisation
40%
16%
40%
28%
26%
18%
16%
25%
26%
24%
15%
19%
16%
13%
19%
18%
8%
18%
10%
90+ dpd %
0.39%
0.09%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.14%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
180+ dpd %
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
CCR
99.9%
99.9%
100.0%
100.0%
99.9%
99.9%
100.0%
99.8%
99.7%
99.8%
99.9%
99.8%
99.9%
99.8%
99.9%
99.1%
99.8%
99.9%
100.0%
MCR
97.0%
99.7%
100.7%
100.0%
99.3%
99.9%
100.4%
99.7%
99.0%
100.0%
99.6%
100.0%
99.8%
99.4%
100.0%
99.8%
99.7%
100.0%
100.0%
46
Investor
Bank 2
Bank 2
Bank 1
Bank 2
Bank 3
Bank 10
Bank 4
Bank 4
Bank 4
Bank 10
Bank 2
Bank 4
Bank 12
Bank 12
Bank 1
Bank 8
Bank 12
Bank 12
Bank 12
Bank 1
Bank 1
Bank 1
Bank 12
Bank 9
Bank 10
Bank 13
Bank 13
Bank 8
( Mn)
3,676.9
2,674.5
2,360.3
2,852.1
2,244.2
4,298.2
2,716.0
2,310.9
1,854.7
4,540.4
10,671.9
1,450.6
2,201.9
2,345.4
3,594.8
4,302.8
333.1
506.3
1,561.8
1,203.8
2,785.4
956.7
1,753.5
2,503.4
4,059.2
1,523.7
2,162.9
3,311.7
of Initial POS
Sold Down
Principal
Pool Principal
MPS
( Mn)
( Mn)
3,354.5
2,502.9
2,223.4
2,596.1
1,984.9
3,664.8
2,382.8
2,104.1
1,706.4
4,129.0
9,661.5
1,253.0
2,007.9
2,225.4
3,166.2
4,045.8
268.4
483.2
1,485.4
1,108.6
2,472.0
860.5
1,666.4
2,326.7
3,682.8
1,386.7
1,942.2
3,036.9
62
59
56
56
35
33
32
29
29
23
20
17
14
14
14
14
11
11
11
11
11
8
8
5
5
2
2
2
374.8
311.7
326.2
285.5
467.6
899.4
787.0
574.1
722.0
1,786.5
5,056.6
715.8
1,397.8
1,515.0
1,977.9
2,619.4
208.7
434.4
1,122.2
860.5
1,544.5
631.6
1,398.7
1,893.5
3,152.5
1,247.5
1,787.9
2,831.2
Amortisation
90%
88%
86%
90%
79%
79%
71%
75%
61%
61%
53%
51%
37%
35%
45%
39%
37%
14%
28%
29%
45%
34%
20%
24%
22%
18%
17%
15%
90+ dpd %
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.16%
0.00%
0.00%
0.12%
0.15%
0.19%
0.00%
0.00%
0.17%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.60%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
180+ dpd %
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.16%
0.00%
0.00%
0.12%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.17%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
CCR
99.8%
99.9%
99.7%
99.9%
100.0%
99.5%
99.8%
99.9%
99.3%
98.7%
99.4%
99.8%
99.2%
99.5%
99.1%
99.3%
99.3%
96.9%
99.9%
99.6%
99.2%
99.8%
99.8%
99.3%
99.9%
99.5%
99.9%
99.5%
MCR
97.1%
99.7%
104.5%
93.5%
100.0%
97.3%
98.7%
107.7%
96.7%
99.4%
101.4%
100.9%
100.5%
97.9%
98.3%
100.4%
95.7%
98.5%
101.4%
98.8%
98.7%
98.2%
106.6%
99.9%
102.4%
99.7%
100.7%
100.3%
47
Investor
Bank 2
Bank 14
Bank 3
FI 1
Bank 3
Bank 14
Sold Down
Date
30-Dec-13
01-Mar-15
31-Dec-12
11-Mar-13
28-Mar-13
27-Sep-13
of Initial POS
1,095.9
2,940.5
1,286.5
10,911.2
1,146.0
3,119.0
Sold Down
Principal
( Mn)
993.3
2,724.4
1,186.2
9,686.4
1,070.9
2,864.4
1,437.3
1,359.8
Disbursement
( Mn)
Pool Principal
Amortisation
( Mn)
MPS
90+ dpd %
180+ dpd %
CCR
MCR
Outstanding
Rating from
36
22
48
45
45
39
484.0
2,058.7
518.0
2,193.4
517.1
1,384.4
56%
30%
60%
80%
55%
56%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
99.9%
99.9%
99.9%
99.8%
99.9%
99.9%
99.8%
99.9%
100.3%
103.0%
100.4%
99.9%
CRISIL
CRISIL
CRISIL
CRISIL
CRISIL
CRISIL
1,313.3
9%
0.00%
0.00%
99.9%
100.5%
CRISIL
CCR
MCR
Bank 14
30-Sep-16
Investor
Bank 2
Bank 3
of Initial POS
Disbursement
( Mn)
20-Mar-14
28-Sep-12
3,353.9
616.0
Sold Down
Principal
( Mn)
3,151.7
549.0
5,686.6
1,114.9
1,114.1
4,403.3
2,279.9
4,932.0
1,024.0
986.0
3,850.0
2,091.0
Pool Principal
Amortisation
( Mn)
MPS
90+ dpd %
180+ dpd %
Outstanding
Rating from
32
50
1,858.7
175.1
45%
72%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
100.0%
100.0%
99.8%
105.2%
ICRA
CARE
44
44
35
32
8
1,074.3
152.1
284.2
1,125.0
1,729.0
81%
86%
74%
74%
24%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
99.4%
99.5%
99.5%
99.7%
98.8%
102.9%
104.5%
100.1%
100.3%
98.9%
CARE
CARE
CARE
CARE
CARE
Bank 3
Bank 3
Bank 2
Bank 2
Bank 3
28-Mar-13
28-Mar-13
30-Dec-13
20-Mar-14
31-Mar-16
48
Dec 16
8,776
8,363
-5%
3,313
2,936
-11%
6.898
5,885
-15%
All NBFCs
1,356
1,246
-8%
% Change
Lender Type
49
Liabilities Profile
50
Liabilities
12%
7%
Share Holders Funds: 117.9 Bn (US$ 1.73 Bn)
Borrowings:
Other Liabilities:
81%
Total Liabilities:
As of December 31, 2016:
As of December 31, 2015:
51
Funding Mix
0%
11%
2%
3%
12%
10%
37%
54%
ECB
49%
Sell Down
Bank Loans
50%
35%
37%
Dec 14
Dec 15
Dec 16
Total Borrowings:
As of December 31, 2016: 831.8 Bn (US$ 12.23 Bn)
As of December 31, 2015: 562.17 Bn (US$ 8.27 Bn)
US $ amounts are converted based on the exchange rate of US $1 = 68
ECB: External Commercial Borrowing
52
Borrowings ( Bn)
832
800
562
700
600
500
437
Borrowings
Net Gearing
400
300
6.1
5.2
4.3
200
Dec 16
Net Incremental
in 9M
Contribution to Incremental
Borrowings in last 9 Months
100
Dec 14
Dec 15
Dec 16
340.0
464.6
27.2
831.8
87.4
919.2
Mar 16
335.7
261.9
13.3
610.9
78.2
689.1
4.3
202.7
13.9
221.0
9.2
230.2
1.9%
88.1%
6.0%
96.0%
4.0%
100.0%
264.1 Bn of capital market debt was raised in 9M 2016-17 was greater than 189.8 Bn raised in the two years of FY 2014-15
and FY 2015-16 combined
Amongst its lenders, the company now counts 355 strong relationships: 26 PSU banks, 20 Private and Foreign banks and 309
Mutual Funds, Provident Funds, Pension Funds, Insurance Companies and corporates
53
Stable Spreads
814
87
9.25%
9.05%
8.80%
8.72%
12.43%
12.25%
12.07%
3.18%
3.20%
3.27%
9.25%
9.05%
8.80%
Jun 16
Sep 16
Dec 16
8.44%
74
8.06%
54
727
427
Dec 14
Own Book
549
Dec 15
Sell Down
Dec 16
Total Loan Assets
Jun 16
Sep 16
Book
Dec 16
Incremental
CoF
Yields
Spread
Total of 40 Bn loans sold down in preceding 12 months, equivalent to 21% of incremental loan assets
11% of total loan assets are sold down and growth of on-balance sheet loan assets (5-year CAGR: 25%) is
slower than growth in total loan assets (5-year CAGR : 27%)
While profits are driven by the spread on total loan assets, capital is required only for on-balance sheet book*
*Minimal capital is required for sold down portfolio for the retained part of the pool or for the credit enhancement offered
54
333
270
153
Up to 1 yr
1 - 5 yrs
Assets
Liabilities
175
Over 5 yrs
(Amounts in Bn)
* Assets in the Up to 1 Yr bucket includes 128.7 Bn (as of March 31, 2016) of Cash, Cash
equivalents and investments in liquid debt instruments
The maturity profile reflects adjustments for prepayments and renewals in accordance
with the guidelines issued by the National Housing Bank
The company had cash, cash equivalents and investments in liquid debt instruments of 228.15 Bn as at 31st Dec, 2016. The company receives
income from its cash, cash equivalents and investments in liquid debt instruments through the quarter, most of which appears in Other Income
55
: Executive Chairman
56
57
Indiabulls Foundation:
Corporate Social Responsibility
Best Overall Excellence in CSR award at National Awards for Excellence in CSR &
Sustainability 2016
Health
Scholarship:
- To over 500 meritorious students
Education`
Sanitation
Green soles:
- Footwear distribution
Kumud:
- Sanitary napkin distribution
- Hygiene for underprivileged rural women
Nutrition
Rural
Empowerment
Paushtik Aahar:
- Free nutrition supplements to the
underprivileged and malnourished
- 5,000 individuals per month
- Over 85,000 children to date
Rahat:
- Water project at 3 tribal ashram schools
- Over 2,500 children will benefit every year
Rainwater harvesting:
- At schools during the Latur drought
- Benefitted over 350 students
``
Nutritional Packets Distribution:
-Nepal earthquake : 10,000 packets
- Chennai floods : 5kg packets to 1,500
families
- Kashmir floods : 10,000 packets
Renewable
Energy
Disaster Relief
59
Centers (MSC)
Branches
Walk-in
branches
Service
Centers
Customer
interaction and
service delivery
Recommends
proposals
No credit authority
Customer
interaction and
service delivery
Detailed credit
analysis
Underwrites high
value cases
Credit authority
for low-ticket
sizes
Best Digital Innovators in
Customer Experience
BFSI Digital
Innovators Award
2016
Navbharat Realty
Business Achievers
Award 2016
Sustainable Growth
Silver Award
Certificate of
Excellence
BFSI Tech
Maestro Awards
2016
60
Credit Ratings
Long Term
Rating
Short Term
Rating
CARE Ratings
AAA
A1+
Brickwork Ratings
AAA
AA+
A1+
AA+
A1+
A1+
61
FY 2015
FY 2014
FY 2013
FY 2012
5,453
4,840
4,099
4,072
4,243
4.3
3.9
3.8
3.1
2.4
140.2
118.2
108.4
80.9
58.5
Cost-to-Income Ratio
14.3%
16.4%
17.1%
18.0%
18.7%
No. of Employees
62
FY 2015
FY 2014
FY 2013
FY 2012
4.9%
4.9%
4.8%
4.9%
4.9%
3.7%
3.7%
3.8%
3.8%
3.7%
RoE (%)^
26%
29%
27%
26%
22%
23.38%
19.60%
20.47%
18.58%
19.96%
- Tier I#
20.36%
16.28%
16.10%
15.05%
19.27%
- Tier II#
3.02%
3.32%
4.37%
3.53%
0.69 %
63
Market Capitalisation
( Bn)
PE Ratio (times)
Mar-16
Mar-15
Mar-14
Mar-13
Mar-12
753.5*
674.0
557.9
285.6
271.8
207.1
319.3
284.0
198.4
95.4
84.9
64.5
11.5
11.3
10.2
6.0
6.8
6.5
27
36
35
29
20
13
4.8%
5.3%
6.3%
10.2%
7.4%
6.3%
61.1%
58.9%
51.8%
41.1%
45.2%
38.7%
IBHFL is a part of Nifty Next 50, Nifty 100, Nifty 200, Nifty 500 and MSCI India indices
64
Shareholding Pattern
10.4%
24.0%
4.5%
61.1%
Founder
MFs/Banks/IFI
Public
65
Detailed Financials
66
228.15 Bn of
Cash & Cash
Equivalents and
Investments in
Liquid Debt
Instruments
The company had cash, cash equivalents and investments in liquid debt instruments of 228.15 Bn as at 31st Dec, 2016. The company receives
income from its cash, cash equivalents and investments in liquid debt instruments through the quarter, most of which appears in Other Income
67
The company had cash, cash equivalents and investments in liquid debt instruments of 228.15 Bn as at 31st Dec, 2016. The company receives
income from its cash, cash equivalents and investments in liquid debt instruments through the quarter, most of which appears in Other Income
68
69
Thank you