Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
LAUNCH
NOVEMBER 2016
MANCHESTERMEDICALJOURNAL COM
.
CONTENTS
Foreword
Inspirational doctors, back pain and the MMJ - Tony Freemont
Editorials
Gene discovery for rare diseases - Miriam J Smith
Critical appraisal skills, tomorrow's doctors and the Manchester
Medical Journal - Joshua Burke, Sadhia Khan, Adam Mitchell
If it is statistically significant does it make it clinically
important? - Simon Beecroft
Original research
Transition at Emerge: evaluating transition practice and
elucidating ethnic differences - Adam Kuhivchak
Audits
Readmissions at Royal Oldham Hospital AMU - Samuel W G
Hogg
Cardiovascular disease risk assessment in psoriasis patients Vera Nakata
Case reports
Treatment options for patients with primary myelofibrosis Andrew Swali, Montaser Haj
Abstracts
Post-surgical complication rates of elective excision of
pilondial sinus disease and the need of post-operative
appointments - Ardit Begaj
Use of augmented reality in surgery - Rathaven Gunaratnarajah,
Parthvi Vanalia
Intraoperative glycaemic control - Dillon Horth
A 3D in vitro co-culture to model peripheral nerve
remyelination after injury - Benjamin Kadler
Bunions, feet and battling nerve damage: is the sentinel vein
a reliable landmark to locate the dorsomedial cutaneous
nerve of the hallux? - Jennifer Lindsay
Cosmetic surgery: a curse or a blessing? - Amir P Salahi
Indications for dual-mobility hip replacements - Jennifer
Rossiter, Anthony Helm
Local excision of early rectal cancers by transanal endoscopic
microsurgery (TEM) - Hon L Wu
The use of routine CT imaging to assess sarcopenia in patients
undergoing chemo-radiotherapy for rectal cancer - Sean Young
3
7
11
19
27
39
55
67
69
71
73
75
77
79
81
83
FOREWORD
Tony Freemont
level being made available through the National Institute for Health
Research, universities, research councils and research charities. Even so,
entering into and lourishing in a research career is not easy, and that is
why there is a real shortage of clinical researchers in the UK. However,
after 35 years as a clinician scientist I would recommend trying the intellectual freedom, the chance to meet great minds and the opportunity to
make a diference to patients lives.
So, supposing you are now thinking that research, as part of a wider
clinical career, might be for you. How should you proceed? Well two big
questions are asked by those considering a medical research career:
How do I discover if I like the rigour of clinical research?
How do I get into medical research?
Firstly, if you are reading this then you have started. You have enquired,
and an enquiring even overtly questioning mind is a prerequisite. But
you need a little (!!) more than that.
You need to build your CV. There are few other medical schools that
allow students the opportunities Manchester does to investigate research
on their course and through sponsoring extracurricular societies. Take
those opportunities; undertake an intercalating degree, and meet and
nurture a relationship with the great clinical researchers in Manchester
in your chosen area of medicine. Take every opportunity to do research,
write it up, present it at meetings and meet more like-minded people.
You have to do the leg work, but there is loads of advice out there. What
everyone worth listening to will tell you is to build your CV, prove that
you are interested, publish and present your indings and listen to, and
learn from, criticism.
It is impossible to think of a better way to cut your research teeth than
by submitting to the MMJ. You wont be successful all, or even most,
of the time, but the feedback from peers and more senior colleagues will
guide your future research and make you a better thinker and researcher.
The only advice I can add is be lucky, and remember the aphorism,
The harder I work, the luckier I get. Or, to translate to the here and now:
support the MMJ and it will support you.
Tony Freemont
University of Manchester
2
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
EDITORIAL
M. J. Smith
4
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
References
5
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
6
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
EDITORIAL
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) provides the foundation for gold standard healthcare worldwide, encouraging the use of high-quality clinical
research to optimise patient care. Since the conception of EBM, research
output has increased exponentially, as has the number of published articles. In 2012, it was estimated that around 28,000 active peer-reviewed
journals in circulation collectively published around 1.8 million articles
per annum.(1) The increasing number of published articles can dilute the
quality of research that contributes towards EBM, posing a challenge
for the healthcare professional trying to keep up to date; journal clubs
have therefore emerged as a useful tool. They have been utilised from as
early as the nineteenth century by Sir William Osler for the purpose and
distribution of periodicals to which he could ill aford to subscribe as an
individual.(2)
More recently the use of social media has revolutionised the journal club
platform,(3,4) but there have been no direct comparative studies between
pedagogical, lecture and group-based journal clubs and those which are
based on the internet. There has been a rise in both free open-access
medical education (FOAM) and open-access (OA) journals. The origins
of both could be argued to come from the Hippocratic oath,(5) which
states: and to teach them this art if they desire to learn it without fee
and covenant.(6) Unfortunately, the critical analysis of research is not necessarily seen as a priority for all medical undergraduates or junior doctors.
As the student doctor reaches for the safe environment of a peer-favoured
7
Manchester Medical Journal, 2016 The Authors.
Published by Manchester University Press, The University of Manchester Library and the Manchester Medical School
http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/MMJ.0017
This is an Open Access article published under the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
textbook to reach his or her primary target of passing exams,(7,8) the junior
doctor may utilise online point-of-care tools (e.g. UpToDate, BMJ Best
Practice, DynaMed) which have become popular in recent years,(9,10) but
with standards for evaluating these tools yet to be fully established.(11) For
both demographics the demands foster a diicult environment in which to
pursue academic interest.(12)
In 1996, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada produced a framework that proposed six pillars of the medical expert.(13) One
of these pillars was the medical scholar, which necessitated the ability to
critically analyse medical literature. It seems reasonable to suggest that
a newly qualiied foundation doctor should have a basic understanding
of how to interpret and digest medical literature. It could be argued that
the motivation to do so is on the decline; however, with the rise of big
data and increasing literature there is a growing necessity to diferentiate good-quality research to ensure excellent clinical care is continually
provided. A number of attempts have been made to assist clinicians in
the development of their critical-appraisal skills, but training currently
varies widely at an undergraduate and postgraduate level.(1416) The latest
Cochrane review suggested that low-intensity critical-appraisal teaching
interventions may result in modest gains despite most studies failing to
blind the outcome assessment.(17) In parallel with difering medical school
curriculums and varied basic surgical teaching, the Royal College of
Surgeons of England has recently published a new national undergraduate
curriculum.(18) Perhaps a national academic undergraduate curriculum
would aid medical students in developing critical-appraisal skills.
Conceivably in an attempt to ill this void, a number of undergraduate
medical journals have been established, many of which utilise undergraduate medical students as reviewers and promote active participation
in critical appraisal. One undergraduate medical journal also involves
consultants or specialist reviewers in its process.(19) However, there exists
a niche for a journal with both high-quality output and formal teaching.
This year has seen the launch of the Manchester Medical Journal
(MMJ), which has the primary aim to promote an environment where all
levels of the academic ladder can learn from critical appraisal. Ofering
the opportunity to publish during a students undergraduate years allows
the journal to facilitate, guide and develop interest and skills in academic
writing. This is the irst student-led open-access journal to utilise an
original blinded peer-review system. PRISM (Peer Review Integrated
Student Model) is a novel platform for undergraduates and junior doctors
to receive timely feedback on both writing and critiquing papers. It is
expected that reviewers will gain experience in critical appraisal and
consolidate this through the feedback loops with academic trainees and
specialists.(20) To uphold reviewer status, participants are required to
attend regular audited critical-appraisal workshops, abide by the journals
8
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
References
1 Ware M, Mabe M. The STM Report; an overview of scientiic and
scholarly journal publishing [Internet]. The Hague: International
Association of Scientiic, Technical and Medical Publishers; 2012 [cited
2015 Oct 18]. Available from http://www.stm-assoc.org/2012_12_11_
STM_Report_2012.pdf.
2 Linzer M, DeLong ER, Hupart KH. A comparison of two formats for
teaching critical reading skills in a medical journal club. J Med Educ.
1987 Aug;62(8):6902.
3 Sherbino J, Joshi N, Lin M. 2015 JGME-ALiEM Hot Topics in Medical
Education Online Journal Club: an analysis of a virtual discussion about
resident teachers. J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Sep;7(3):43744.
4 Roberts MJ, Perera M, Lawrentschuk N, Romanic D, Papa N, Bolton D.
Globalization of continuing professional development by journal clubs
via microblogging: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res [Internet].
2015 [cited 2015 Oct 18]; 17(4):e103. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.
nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4424319/.
5 Nickson CP. From Hippocrates to Osler to FOAM [Internet].
Lifeinthefastlane.com; 200716 [updated 2016 May 24; cited
2016 Aug 1]. Available from: http://lifeinthefastlane.com/
from-hippocrates-to-osler-to-foam/.
6 Edelstein L. The Hippocratic oath: text, translation and interpretation.
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1943.
7 Mcloughlin CS. Characteristics of students failing medical education.
Med Educ Online [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2015 Oct 18]; 14. Available from:
http://www.med-ed-online.org/pdf/L0000029.pdf.
Critical appraisal skills, tomorrows doctors and the Mancheter Medical Journal
9
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
8 Folb BL, Wessel CB, Czechowski LJ. Clinical and academic use
of electronic and print books: the Health Sciences Library System
e-book study at the University of Pittsburgh. J Med Libr Assoc. 2011
Jul;99(3):21828.
9 Younger P. Internet-based information-seeking behaviour amongst
doctors and nurses: a short review of the literature. Health Info Libr J.
2010 Mar;27(1):210.
10 Ketchum AM, Saleh AA, Jeong K. Type of evidence behind point-of-care
clinical information products: a bibliometric analysis. J Med Internet
Res [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2015 Oct 18]; 13(1):e21. Available from: http://
www.jmir.org/2011/1/e21.
11 Shurtz S, Foster MJ. Developing and using a rubric for evaluating
evidence-based medicine point-of-care tools. J Med Libr Assoc. 2011
Jul;99(3):24754.
12 Goldacre M, Stear S, Richards R, Sidebottom E. Junior doctors views
about careers in academic medicine. Med Educ. 1999 May;33(5):31826.
13 Frank, JR. The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency framework.
Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2005.
14 Oxman AD, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH. 1993. Users guides to the medical
literature: I. How to get started. JAMA. 1993 Nov 3;270(17):209395.
15 Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: getting your bearings (deciding what
the paper is about). BMJ. 1997 Jul 26;315(7102):2436.
16 Milne R, Donald A, Chambers L. Piloting short workshops on the
critical appraisal of reviews. Health Trends. 199596;27(4):1203.
17 Horsley T, Hyde C, Santesso N, Parkes J, Milne R, Stewart R. Teaching
critical appraisal skills in healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst
Rev. 2011 Nov 9; (11):CD001270.
18 Royal College of Surgeons England. National undergraduate curriculum
in surgery [Internet]. RCSENG Professional Standards and Regulation;
2015 [cited 2015 Oct 18]. Available from: http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/
publications/docs/national-undergraduate-curriculum-in-surgery.
19 Scottish Universities Medical Journal. Review process [Internet].
University of Dundee; n.d. [cited 2015 Oct 18]. Available from: http://
sumj.dundee.ac.uk/index.php?id=review-process.
20 Burke J, Mitchell A, Khan S. PRISM (Peer Review Integrated Student
Model). Unpublished.
21 Matthews-King A. 2015. GPs diagnostic skills could be obsolete within
20 years, says Hunt. PULSE [Internet]. 2015 Oct 6 [cited 2015 Oct 18].
Available from: http://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/political/political-news/
gps-diagnostic-skills-could-be-obsolete-within-20-years-time-sayshunt/20030142.fullarticle.
10
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
EDITORIAL
In answering any question it is irst imperative to deine the key terms contained therein. The question that forms the title of this essay refers to two
key concepts in the application of evidence to the practice of medicine: statistical signiicance and clinical importance. This essay considers the link
between these two notions in the context of research consisting of clinical
trials evaluating interventions in healthcare.
Of the two, statistical signiicance appears to be the more straightforward to deine, as there is currently a broad consensus on the calculation
of statistical signiicance, although the most common deinition does
have its detractors. The prevailing method of identifying statistical signiicance in hypothesis testing is the use of the p value.(1) The p value represents the probability of obtaining results as extreme as those observed
if the null hypothesis were true. In this system, statistical signiicance is
achieved when the p value is below an (arbitrary) deined signiicance
level, typically set at 0.05 in medical research. It is occasionally argued
that p values should be incorporated into a Bayesian calculus which
includes prior probability(2) in order to better represent the continually evolving nature of scientiic knowledge, but this is not yet common
practice.
In the medical literature the terms clinical importance,(3) clinical relevance(4) and clinical signiicance(5) appear to be used interchangeably, and
the inconsistent terminology seems to be associated with confusion in the
deinition of the concept. This is unfortunate as the diferent terms could
be better used to circumscribe some distinct concepts. Clinical signiicance
could be best used in a narrow sense to describe whether an identiied
efect size achieves the smallest efect of clinical interest. This could free
up clinical importance to cover a more expansive set of issues related to the
application of research indings to medical practice. In this instance, clinical importance would refer to the uptake of the intervention in real-world
clinical practice. Thus the redeined concept of clinical importance should
11
Manchester Medical Journal, 2016 The Authors.
Published by Manchester University Press, The University of Manchester Library and the Manchester Medical School
http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/MMJ.0003
This is an Open Access article published under the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
S. Beecroft
12
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
In spite of decades of collective experience of designing and conducting clinical trials, the medical research community continues to produce
research that is methodologically lawed. A raft of issues in the design and
conduct of medical research can lead to type I error, which is to reject the
null hypothesis when it is true. A brief exposition of commonly encountered problems at this stage includes insuiciently powered studies, studies
that do not appreciate the prior probability of detecting an efect and
studies that investigate too many outcomes.(9) These are problems that
should be identiied by clinicians trained in critical appraisal of literature.
However, constant vigilance on behalf of those involved in front-line care
is not a particularly robust system for weeding out lawed research, and
much research that is unable to demonstrate the relationships it reports
may well be translated into changes in clinical practice.
Statistical analysis
The phenomenon of p-hacking has received increasing scrutiny in recent
years as meta-research indings have begun to suggest that there is widespread inappropriate data manipulation occurring in scientiic research.(10)
There are a number of ways in which data may be treated to increase the
likelihood of generating a statistically signiicant result. These methods
include using interim analyses during data collection; post hoc selection of
primary outcome measures; and modiications of the treatment of outliers,
subgroup analyses, and inclusion and exclusion criteria.(11) These methods
may be subtle and can be diicult to identify during critical appraisal of
research papers, thus leading to unchallenged claims of statistical signiicance that are unfounded. Unfortunately, even when such discrepancies
in research are identiied there are a number of barriers to correcting the
scientiic record,(12) not least editors inability or unwillingness to appreciate the presence of inappropriate treatment of data in research published
in their journals.(13)
Communicating research findings
If clinicians are unable to access research indings then it is impossible for
the insights to be implemented in clinical practice. The issue of knowledge
translation(14) has been explored by researchers in medical education,
and there are a number of barriers identiied to closing the implementation gap. These challenges include the polar opposite issues of restricted
access to information and information overload. Many medical journals
require a paid subscription or apply a per article charge which is generally prohibitively expensive for those without institutional access. Whilst
13
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
S. Beecroft
14
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
Conclusion
In conclusion, the simple answer to the question of whether statistical
signiicance invariably means clinical importance is an emphatic no.
Statistically signiicant results may be clinically important but the association is by no means certain; as the old proverb has it, Theres many a slip
twixt cup and lip. The decoupling of statistical signiicance and clinical
importance is important not only when attempting to ensure a robust
evidence base to be drawn upon when clinicians provide care and make
shared decisions with patients, but also to protect those who participate in
medical research as subjects. If the clinical importance of research indings
is undermined, then the risk:beneit calculus for clinical trial participants
is changed and any harm sufered by participants becomes objectively less
justiiable. It is therefore incumbent on those engaged in medical research
and practice to be aware of these issues and to do all that is reasonably
practical to mitigate them.
References
1 Sterne JAC, Smith GD. Sifting the evidence: whats wrong with
signiicance tests? Br Med J. 2001 Jan 27;322(7280):22631.
2 Goodman SN. Of p-values and Bayes: a modest proposal. Epidemiology.
2001 May;12(3):2957.
3 Mon-Son-Hing M, Laupacis A, ORourke K, Molnar FJ, Mahon J,
Chan KBY, et al. Determination of the clinical importance of study
results: a review. J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Jun;17(6):46976.
4 Bhardwaj SS, Camacho F, Derrow A, Fleischer AB, Feldmann SR.
Statistical signiicance and clinical relevance: the importance of power in
clinical trials in dermatology. Arch Dermatol. 2004 Dec;140(12):15203.
5 Sedgwick P. Clinical signiicance versus statistical signiicance. Br Med J
[Internet]. 2014 [cited 2016 Feb 5]; 348:g2130. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2130.
6 Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting
of research evidence. Lancet. 2009 Jul 4;374(9683):869.
7 Perel P, Miranda JJ, Ortiz Z, Casas JP. Relation between the global
burden of disease and randomized clinical trials conducted in Latin
15
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
S. Beecroft
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
16
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
17
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
18
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Abstract
Background Transition between child and adult services is a notoriously
dificult area of mental health provision. This service evaluation was designed
to determine the standard of transition practice, as well as analysing any
differences in transition between ethnicities at Emerge, a service for 1617 year
olds in Manchester Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS).
Methods This study utilised 68 randomly selected sets of case notes of
cases closed to Emerge. The data was collected manually from these case
notes using a data-collection tool and analysed using Microsoft Excel.
Results Of the seven cases in the sample that transitioned to adult services,
none experienced an optimal transition as deined by the TRACK study.(1)
Only seven of the total cases were from a black and minority ethnic (BME)
background, so elucidating any ethnic differences in transition was not possible.
Conclusion The results showed that transition practice at Emerge did
not meet the standard of practice, prompting a recommendation for better
liaison between CAMHS and Adult Mental Health Services (AMHS). Access to
Emerge for ethnic minorities was shown to be limited, although the study failed
to reveal ethic differences in transition owing to its small sample size.
A. Kuhivchak
As Emerge is a specialist service that deals with young people in the 1617
age range, transition is a key process. Many young people are close to
adulthood when they are referred and may well turn 18 in the care of
Emerge, possibly requiring referral to adult services. One of the main aims
of this service evaluation is to look at transition practice at Emerge. Singh
et al. propose in the TRACK study, a major study looking at transition
between Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) and
Adult Mental Health Services (AMHS), that there are four major criteria
for an optimal transition:
(a) information transfer (information continuity): evidence that a
referral letter, summary of CAMHS care, or CAMHS case notes
were transferred to AMHS along with a contemporaneous risk
assessment
(b) period of parallel care (relational continuity): a period of joint
working between CAMHS and AMHS during transition
(c) transition planning (cross-boundary and team continuity): at least one
meeting involving the service user and/or carer and a key professional
from both CAMHS and AMHS prior to transfer of care
(d) continuity of care (long-term continuity) either engaged with AMHS
3 months post-transition or appropriately discharged by AMHS following transition.(2)
It is against these criteria that transition at Emerge is compared.
This evaluation also aims to look at the demographics of the Emerge
caseload. With a particular focus on ethnicity, this evaluation aims to
bring to light any link between the background of a young person and
their likelihood to transition.
Methods
This service evaluation was begun after informing the trust audit department on 21 January 2014. Data was collected from all the closed case notes
in storage at Emerge between 27 and 28 January 2014; notes were collected
at random from closed cases in storage at Emerge. Any notes that did
not contain information on more than three of the speciied criteria were
not included, as this was insuicient for analysis; in total information for
68cases was collected. A data-collection tool was used to collect the data.
The data was compiled in a document in Microsoft Excel.
For each case the following were collected: gender, age at referral,
ethnic group, referrer, priority, reason for referral, service referred on to,
reason for case closure, outcome of case and attendance statistics. Missing
data was supplemented if possible using the CORC (Child Outcomes
Research Consortium) database. For those cases referred to adult services,
20
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
Results
The total number of cases in the sample was 68. Females numbered 47
(69%) and males 21 (31%). White British was the most commonly recorded
ethnic group with 44 cases (64.7%); in 17 (25%) cases the ethnicity was not
recorded. There were 7 (10.3%) cases in which black or ethnic minority
was recorded: 2 black Somali, 2 British/Pakistani dual heritage, 1 white
Romanian, 1 Arabic and 1 Pakistani (see Table 1).
The median number of ofered sessions attended was 3, the most attended
was 37 and the least 0. The higher median value for number of sessions
listed as did not attend (DNA) than could not attend (CNA) suggests
patients were more likely to not attend a session than for the session to be
cancelled ahead of time by the patient or his or her practitioner. Of patients
referred to Emerge, 20.6% never attended a single session (see Table 2).
The most common referral route was from a GP practice, in 32 (47.1%)
of cases, followed by another trust, 8 (11.8%), a school or pastoral care in
7 cases (10.3%), and from Connexions, Youth Ofending Service (YOS) or
A & E, all noted in 5 cases (7.4%). More detail on referral route is shown
in Table 3.
Male
Female
Total
10
4
7
21
34
3
10
47
44
7
17
68
Table 2: Mean, median and range for numbers of sessions attended, not attended
and cancelled.
Attended
CNA
DNA
Mean
Median
Range
5.19
1.06
1.8
3
0
1
037
013
09
21
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
A. Kuhivchak
Referrer
Number of cases
White British/ethnicity
not recorded
A&E
GP
Connexions
Other trust
School/pastoral care
Self referral
Youth Ofending
Service
Other
Total
5
28
5
8
7
3
4
1
61
Total
1
1
5
32
5
8
7
4
5
1
7
2
68
The most common reason, in 24 (35.3%) cases, for a case being closed
was at the mutual consent of the patient and/or his or her family and
their practitioner. Never having attended a session ofered by Emerge, or
disengaging with the service after attending at least one appointment, was
the next most likely reason, attributable in 14 (20.6%) cases. In 7 (10.3%)
instances, cases were closed when the patient turned 18 and were recorded
as not being transferred to AMHS, and 5 (7.4%) patients were recorded as
being transferred when they turned 18 (see Figure 1).
After initially collecting data from CORC, seven cases were found
in which the recorded case outcome was turned 18, not transferred to
AMHS. However, on examining the case notes, it was found that in two
of these cases a referral to AMHS had in fact been made. This discrepancy is probably due to administrative error, but it should be taken into
account when looking at the graph in Figure 1.
After correcting for the errors on CORC, of the 12 cases in which the
patient had turned 18, 7 were referred to adult services, 1 of which was
from an ethnic minority background. A total of 5 were not referred on to
AMHS. Of those 5 not referred, 3 were not considered for transition to
AMHS and 2 declined onward referral.
Of those that were referred, all case notes showed evidence of transfer
of information between CAMHS and AMHS. None indicated a period of
parallel care. There was no evidence of joint planning meetings involving
CAMHS and AMHS practitioners. Over three months after their discharge from CAMHS, ive cases were still open to AMHS (see Table 4).
Discussion
Of the cases in the study sample where ethnicity was recorded, 12% were
from a non-white ethnic minority, a igure three times lower than the
22
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
30
25
Frequency
15
10
0
Closed at
paent's
request
Closed by
mutual
consent
Disengaged
Turned 18
not
transferred
Turned 18
transferred
Other
Never
aended
20
Figure 1: Bar chart showing reason for case closed and frequency.
Table 4: For all cases referred to AMHS, criteria for optimal transition as deined
by TRACK study.(1)
Criterion
Yes
No
Transfer of
information
Parallel care
Joint planning
Continuity of
care
7
0
0
7
0
7
5
2
A. Kuhivchak
locations around the city, even visiting patients in their homes to try to
deliver the help patients need. Although patients disengaging is worrying
if they have an ongoing need, if patients do not want to engage with the
service that is their prerogative. An audit of cases at Emerge, looking at
whether young people who disengage have been ofered a full and appropriate service before their cases being closed, would ensure that Emerge is
doing all that it can to meet the needs of young people.
Of the seven cases studied that transferred to AMHS, none experienced
an optimal transition. The transfer of information was the strongest
aspect of transition practice, with detailed referral information sent to
AMHS through speciied referral channels. Also, positively, ive of the
patients were still in adult services when this was checked; this is a demonstration of the fact that transfer can happen quite successfully without
a good transition. However, worryingly, in one case that was closed and
apparently referred on, it appeared adult services had never received a
referral at all.
Whilst there was evidence in some cases of planning meetings for
transition involving CAMHS practitioners, there was no evidence of
joint working between AMHS and CAMHS practitioners to hand over
a patient. This echoes other studies into transition between CAMHS and
AMHS that show although joint working is often speciied in transition
protocols, in reality it does not happen owing to a lack of time, poor communication and misunderstanding of opposite services.(2) For practitioners at Emerge, time is of the essence; there is often very little time between
a referral being made and a referral to adult services being considered. The
poor attendance of patients increases this time pressure to try to implement joint work with AMHS. Whilst diiculties clearly exist in making
joint planning meetings part of standard practice, improvement in this
area needs to be made to provide good transition experiences to patients.
A dearth of joint working is also shown by the lack of periods of parallel care. A patient referred to AMHS is unlikely to be ofered an appointment in the near future; so often by the time they have attended their irst
appointment with AMHS, their case has been closed by CAMHS. The
worry is that if patients were to then miss their irst adult appointment,
they may well fall into the gap between services if they are not re-referred.
The age limits of transition boundaries could be lexible, allowing for the
period of parallel care that is essential in the transition process.
Conclusions and recommendations
Transition practice is suboptimal at Emerge. Although transition practice
is followed broadly and transfer into adult services is usually successful,
improvements could be made to make the process smoother for the young
people involved. The creation of new posts for speciic transition workers
24
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
25
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
A. Kuhivchak
26
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
AUDIT
Abstract
Background This paper contributes to the developing body of literature that
explores the theme of hospital readmissions. Interest in this area has grown
since a policy of non-payment for 30-day readmissions was introduced by the
Department of Health. This has moved hospitals to seek out ways of reducing
their readmission rates.
Aim The goal of this study was to investigate the drivers of readmissions at
the Royal Oldham Hospital of the Pennine Acute Trust, by identifying patterns
existing within a sample of readmitted patients.
Methodology A random sample of 55 patients readmitted to the Acute
Medical Unit (AMU) within 30 days of a previous discharge during December
2013 was used. Factors frequently implicated in readmissions were selected
as variables for analysis.
Results The indings were largely concurrent with previous observations
that old age, male gender, previous hospital admissions and existing comorbid conditions increase the risk of readmission. The indings were
consistent with reports that diagnoses at the times of admission and
readmission are typically different, and that common causes of readmission
are infection and complications relating to co-morbid conditions.
Conclusion This study forms solid foundations upon which more expansive
auditing can take place, and speciic recommendations are made for the
reduction of readmission rates on AMU.
27
Manchester Medical Journal, 2016 The Authors.
Published by Manchester University Press, The University of Manchester Library and the Manchester Medical School
http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/MMJ.0005
This is an Open Access article published under the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
S. W. G. Hogg
Introduction
In 2011 the Department of Health introduced legislation which means
that hospitals do not get paid for patients acutely readmitted within 30
days of their previous discharge. This applies to all readmissions for which
the index admission was elective, and 25% of readmissions following an
emergency admission.(1) Readmissions relating to mental health, maternity, children under four years and cancer were excluded on the basis that
in these cases readmission is often considered a necessary part of care.(2)
Beyond these exceptions, it is felt that readmissions following both elective
and emergency admissions should largely be preventable, and high 30-day
readmission rates are seen as indicative of inefective patient management
and inadequate quality of care.(3)
The policy launched on a background of increasing readmission rates:
from 8.4% in 20001 to 11.63% in 201011.(4) According to healthcare
data provider CHKS, hospital admissions occurring within 30 days of a
previous discharge provided hospital trusts with an income of 2.2 billion in
200910. Based on these igures, the 2011 changes to readmissions policy
equate to an annual income deicit for hospitals of 790 million.(2) The
inancial incentives of reducing 30-day readmissions are therefore clear.
The story is similar in the US, where, since 2012, inancial penalties are
applied to underperforming hospitals.(5) Consequently, interest in readmissions has grown, with literature exploring three themes: (1) investigations into whether readmission rates are a good measure of quality of
care, (2) studies of interventions which might reduce readmissions, and (3)
attempts to identify factors that drive readmissions.(6) This paper falls into
the last of these categories.
The list of factors that potentially contribute to readmissions is
long and complex.(2) This may be relected in the varying readmission
rates of diferent hospitals and trusts.(7) Although igures like these
are undoubtedly inluenced by factors outside of trust control, such
as community backup and population demographics, there is growing
evidence that the key determinants of readmissions may originate from
within. For instance, Dharmarajan et al.(8) studied readmissions of
patients in the US with an index admission diagnosis of heart failure,
acute myocardial infarction or pneumonia. The authors report that
the spectrum of diagnoses at readmission is consistent across hospitals with high, average and low readmissions. That is, the distribution of readmission diagnoses does not vary between hospitals but the
absolute rate of readmission does. This indicates that readmissions performance may not be related to disease- and treatment-speciic factors,
but to institution-wide policies and practices, along with demographic
factors such as socioeconomic status afecting the general health of the
population.
28
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
Most relevant are those practices that inluence the standard of inpatient care, the transition from inpatient to outpatient, and community
care at discharge. It is probable that patients experiencing optimal levels
of inpatient care and a smooth, well-coordinated discharge into outpatient or community care, are less likely to be readmitted within 30 days
than those who do not. As such, readmissions could be considered as a
marker of hospital performance in these areas. The contexts of readmissions are equally important. The method or route of index admission
and the latency between discharge and readmission may be particularly
signiicant. A high proportion of readmissions following elective admission periods could well be a consequence of substandard inpatient care
and discharge procedure, and likewise short intervals between the time
of discharge and readmission. This is especially true if a patient rebounds
within seven days. It has been stated that in these circumstances, poor
medical management and insuicient discharge support and medication
reconciliation are frequently implicated.(3) This is also the period in which
iatrogenic causes and hospital-acquired infection are likely to be present.
This would imply that the hospital is often more culpable when the turnaround between discharge and readmission is quick. It is therefore quite
alarming that nearly 50% of readmissions in the NHS occur within seven
days.(3,7)
Avoiding unnecessary readmissions relies on understanding which
patients are likely to be readmitted. Donz et al.(9) report that potentially
avoidable readmissions are commonly related to complications associated
with seven co-morbid conditions: diabetes, chronic heart failure, atrial
ibrillation, ischaemic heart disease, neoplasm, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic kidney disease. Patients with these
co-morbid conditions are therefore a high-risk group. The most frequent
causes of readmission in this study were infection, care of neoplasm and
heart failure. Signiicantly, diagnoses at irst admission and readmission
were typically diferent, suggesting that readmissions are as likely to relate
to a patients co-morbidities as they are to the cause of index admission.(7)
Katikireddi and Cloud(10) have produced a comprehensive list of patient
characteristics commonly associated with readmission. These red lags
are summarised in Table 1. The authors argue that through assessing
patients for these criteria early in their admission period, it is possible to
tailor their care, and make appropriate discharge planning, greatly reducing risk of readmission.
Aims and standards
The aim of this project was to contribute to an ongoing review of
readmissions within the Pennine Acute Trust. Currently, the trust
readmission rate is 8.61%, higher than the average of 8.20% in its peer
29
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
S. W. G. Hogg
Medical factors
Coronary artery
disease
Advanced and
disseminated
malignancy
Chronic renal
failure
Chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease
Diabetes
Heart failure
Dysphagia
3+ chronic diseases
Psychosocial
factors
Use of medical
resources
Patient
characteristics
Poor self-rated
general health
Moderate to severe
functional disability
6+ visits to GP
within 1 year
At least 1 hospital
admission within
1year
Aged 80+
Male
Living alone
Relative risk of
readmission
Readmitted patients
Age
Frequency
Age
Frequency
017
1829
3039
4049
5059
6069
70+
15
66
80
105
144
157
511
1.4
6.1
7.4
9.7
13.4
14.6
47.4
017
1829
3039
4049
5059
6069
70+
1
2
1
7
4
9
31
1.8
3.6
1.8
12.7
7.3
16.4
56.4
1.31
0.59
0.24
1.31
0.54
1.12
1.19
31
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
S. W. G. Hogg
Frequency
Own home
Retirement home
Care home
Nursing home
47
3
3
2
85.5
5.5
5.5
3.6
Frequency
A&E
Elective planned
GP or locum GP
Emergency other
38
8
1
8
69.1
14.6
1.8
14.6
50
Readmied paents with a co-morbid condion
40
35
% of paents
30
25
20
15
10
5
ta
ry
en
un
v
e
In
te
gu
m
Im
cu
lo
s
M
us
Di
ge
s
le
ta
l
ke
oc
rin
e
En
d
sir
at
or
y
Re
p
ita
l
Ur
og
en
em
st
sy
us
rv
o
Ne
Ca
rd
io
va
s
sy cul
st ar
em
45
S. W. G. Hogg
25
20
% of paents
15
10
Diabetes
Heart Failure
Atrial
Fibrillaon
Ischaemic
Heart Disease
Co-morbid
condion
Neoplasm
COPD
Chronic
Kidney
Disease
but the high relative risk in the 4049 group is more likely to be signiicant.
This is diicult to reconcile with previous reports, and any future work
should seek to ascertain whether the pattern is repeated at Oldham or elsewhere, and analyse possible causes. Interestingly, our results also indicate
low readmissions from care and nursing homes. This could be the result
of advance care planning, which may also be an efective tool for reducing
readmissions.
Over 92% of our sample had at least one co-morbid condition. These
were most frequently cardiovascular or neurological. The most common
cardiovascular co-morbid conditions were ischaemic heart disease, atrial
ibrillation and heart failure, whilst dementia accounted for the majority
of neurological co-morbidities. This is perhaps unsurprising given the age
distribution of the sample. The single most common co-morbid condition
was ischaemic heart disease. All co-morbidities identiied by Donz(9) featured heavily in our sample. In concordance with that study, over 61% of
patients in our study were readmitted with diagnoses that are potentially
34
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
Number of pa
ents
0
0
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Time period between discharge and readmission (days)
S. W. G. Hogg
36
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
gastroenterology and respiratory. In addition, diabetes and cardiopulmonary hospitalcommunity interface may have solutions to ofer in
reducing hospital readmissions. However, the low number of nursing- and
care-home readmissions indicates that advance care planning is efective
and should therefore be continued as a development for reducing hospital readmissions. Infection is an ongoing source of readmission. Whilst
infection-prevention measures have yielded lower incidence, this study
highlights a continuing need for improvement in the long term. In addition, it suggests a need for primary and secondary care interaction and
engagement, which may bring in new solutions such as community IV
antibiotic therapy. A prospective audit using our template over a period
of 12 months could provide the trust with a more reliable understanding of hospital readmissions and enable more speciic recommendations
for reducing them. Expansion of the database to include readmissions
to other sites within the Pennine Trust would also help to produce more
robust conclusions for the trust.
Acknowledgements
With thanks to Dr Venkat Sridharan, Consultant in Elderly Medicine
at the Royal Oldham Hospital, who was my supervisor throughout this
project.
References
1 Department of Health. A simple guide to payment by results, gateway
reference 18135. London: Department of Health; 2011.
2 NHS Confederation, Foundation Trust Network. The impact of nonpayment for acute readmissions. Brieing [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2014
Jan 20]; 211:110. Available from: http://www.chks.co.uk/useriles/
iles/The%20impact%20of%20non-payment%20for%20acute%20
readmissions%20FINAL%20FOR%20WEB.pdf.
3 Sg2Healthcare intelligence. Sg2 Service Kit: reducing 30 day emergency
readmissions [Internet]. London: Sg2 Healthcare intelligence; 2011
[cited 2014 Jan 20]. Available from: http://www.hsj.co.uk/Journals/2/
Files/2011/6/15/Sg2_Service%20Kit_Reducing%2030-Day%20
Readmissions.pdf.
4 Department of Health. Research and analysis: emergency readmissions
data. London: Department of Health; 2013.
5 American College of Emergency Physicians. Medicares hospital
readmission reduction programme FAQ [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2014
Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.acep.org/Physician-Resources/
Practice-Resources/Administration/Financial-Issues-/-Reimbursement/
Medicare-s-Hospital-Readmission-Reduction-Program-FAQ/.
37
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
S. W. G. Hogg
38
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
AUDIT
Abstract
Background Psoriasis is a signiicant health problem that affects 2.2% of
the UK population. Recent evidence also suggests an association between
psoriasis and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). As such, the
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines have made
recommendations pertaining to cardiovascular risk management in psoriasis
patients.
Aims An audit was conducted on a single general practice to evaluate how
well the practice was managing the CVD risk of its psoriasis patients on repeat
prescription.
Methods A search was conducted on the practices computer database to
identify all patients who are coded as suffering from psoriasis. Prescription
records were then reviewed to ascertain whether the patient was currently on
repeat prescription for psoriasis treatment. Patient records were then used to
determine the severity of these patients psoriasis, and whether their CVD risks
were calculated and managed appropriately.
Results A total of 32 patients on repeat prescription for psoriasis were
identiied. The practice performed moderately well, with 87.5% of its adult
severe psoriasis patients, 73.9% of its psoriasis patients aged 4074 years
and 100% of its psoriasis patients with a 10-year CVD risk 20% being
adequately managed as per NICE guidelines.
Conclusion This audit highlighted to the practices clinicians that psoriasis
patients require more CVD risk monitoring to achieve ideal 100% standards.
Appointments were arranged for patients whose CVD risk had not been
adequately assessed. Plan to re-audit in 12 months, and at least every ive
years thereafter.
39
Manchester Medical Journal, 2016 The Authors.
Published by Manchester University Press, The University of Manchester Library and the Manchester Medical School
http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/MMJ.0006
This is an Open Access article published under the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
V. Nakata
Introduction
Psoriasis is a signiicant clinical condition as it afects approximately 2.2%
of the UK population,(1) and is associated with considerable reduction in
health-related quality of life.(2) In addition, recent studies have indicated
that psoriasis patients are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease
(CVD).(35) This has been attributed to the similarities in T helper (Th)-celldriven inlammation, as well as the increases in pro-inlammatory cytokines,
which underlie both psoriasis and atherosclerosis.(6) These associations, if
proven true, possess great implications for the management of psoriasis.
Firstly, the recognition and treatment of modiiable CVD risk factors in
patients with psoriasis may help reduce associated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Equally, the efective management of co-morbidities may
also alleviate psoriasis, and thus maximise therapeutic outcomes.
According to the 2012 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
(NICE) clinical guidance for psoriasis,(7) adults with severe psoriasis
(deined as requiring treatment with phototherapy, systemic agents or
hospital admission) of any type should be ofered cardiovascular risk
assessment at presentation using a validated risk-estimation tool. Further
assessment of cardiovascular risk should be ofered every ive years, or
more frequently if required. In addition, risk factors for cardiovascular
co-morbidities should be discussed with people who have any type of
psoriasis.(7)
However, a recent survey conducted by Parsi et al.(8) found that 45%
of primary care physicians and cardiologists were unaware of the link
between psoriasis and CVD, and that psoriasis patients were not routinely
screened for their cardiovascular risk factors. While this survey was conducted on American physicians, it is probable that in the UK psoriasis
patients are not being adequately screened for cardiovascular risk as per
guidelines. This situation may be compounded by the fact that the management of psoriasis is not included in the Quality Outcomes Framework
(QOF),(9) which rewards general practices in the UK according to how
well they care for patients with certain diseases, and may thus result in the
neglect of cardiovascular risk assessment in psoriasis patients.
Hence, an audit was conducted in a single general practice to evaluate
whether adults with severe psoriasis are being adequately assessed for their
cardiovascular risk using a validated risk-estimation tool. In view of the
fact that the recommendation only speciied patients with severe psoriasis,
the audit will also review whether cardiovascular risk assessments are
being carried out in the mild/moderate psoriasis patient population as per
guidelines for the primary and secondary prevention of CVD.(10)
The standards the practice should meet are as stated by the National
Audit Support Guide, which are typically 100% adherence to the guidelines,
with or without certain exceptions.(11,12)
40
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
Table 1: NICE criteria and standards for CVD risk assessment in psoriasis
patients.
Standard
100%
No exceptions
100%
No exceptions
100%
Exceptions:
People who have potential drug
interactions or contraindications
People who decide, after an informed
discussion with their clinician about
risks and beneits, not to start statin
therapy
Criterion
The criteria and standards for the audit are summarised in Table 1.
Thus, the aim of this audit is to give an objective evaluation of how the
practice is doing in terms of managing the cardiovascular risk of its psoriasis patients. The audit also expects to identify some patients whose cardiovascular risk has not been adequately assessed. These patients would then
be highlighted to the practice, so that their CVD risk can be appropriately
managed.
Consequently, recognition that psoriasis could be an independent cardiovascular risk factor may help to decrease cardiovascular co-morbidities
amongst the psoriasis population, and thus improve patients overall
quality of life. There will also be signiicant economic beneit to the NHS,
as it has been found that psoriasis patients with co-morbidities such as
hyperlipidaemia utilised healthcare services more frequently and incurred
greater healthcare costs than patients with psoriasis alone.(13)
Methods
A search was irst conducted on the practices computer system to identify
all the registered patients who are coded as sufering from psoriasis. This
came back with 189 patients. Prescription records were then manually
reviewed to ascertain whether the patient was currently on repeat prescription for psoriasis treatment. It was found that there were 32 patients
who are coded on the system as having psoriasis and are currently being
prescribed psoriasis medications on a repeat basis.
Medical records and clinic letters of the 32 patients were then analysed
to extract the following details:
41
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
V. Nakata
age
diagnosis
severity of psoriasis*
psoriasis medications on repeat prescription
alcohol intake and status
smoking intake and status
total cholesterol level
high-density lipoprotein (HDL) level
body mass index (BMI)
blood pressure
diabetes status
10-year CVD risk (based on the Joint British Societies Cardiovascular
Risk Prediction Chart(14))
date 10-year CVD risk was assessed
whether currently on statin therapy.
*
Figure 1: Flow chart of how patients to be included in the audit were identiied.
Lastly, the average 10-year CVD risk for psoriasis patients currently on
repeat prescription and that for non-psoriasis patients were calculated
using the practice computer system, for the comparison of cardiovascular
risk between these patient groups.
Results
According to the NICE guidelines, severe psoriasis is deined as that
which requires treatment with phototherapy, systemic agents or hospital
admission.(7) Thus, of the 32 psoriasis patients on repeat psoriasis prescription, 8 patients met the criteria of having severe psoriasis. Of these
8 patients, it was found that 7 had been assessed using a validated risk42
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
Standard
Practice
performance
100%
87.5%
(7 out of 8
patients)
100%
100%
Exceptions:
People who have potential drug
interactions or contraindications
People who decide, after an
informed discussion with their
clinician about risks and beneits,
not to start statin therapy
73.9%
(17 out of 23
patients)
100%
exception
(2 out of 2
patients)
V. Nakata
Discussion
The aim of this audit was to evaluate how well the practice is managing
the cardiovascular risk of its psoriasis patients, in accordance with NICE
guidelines. In view of the evidence supporting the notion of a directly proportional relationship between the severity of psoriasis and the increase in
cardiovascular risk,(15,16) the average cardiovascular risk of non-psoriasis
patients, mild/moderate psoriasis patients and severe psoriasis patients
was also investigated.
Results from the audit showed that the practice only managed to
adequately assess the cardiovascular risk in 87.5% of its adult patients
with severe psoriasis, whereas only 73.9% of its psoriasis patients aged
4074 years were identiied and assessed for high risk of CVD. However,
it should be noted that the practice has met the 100% standard in managing its psoriasis patients with a 20% or greater 10-year CVD risk with
statin therapy, with the therapy being ofered and declined by the patients
informed decision.
Another interesting inding from this audit was that while current
literature proposes a doseefect relationship, whereby cardiovascular
risk increases with the severity of psoriasis, this was not observed in the
practices population of psoriasis patients on repeat prescription. It was
found that non-psoriasis patients had a cardiovascular risk of 10.48%,
mild/moderate psoriasis patients on repeat prescription had an increased
cardiovascular risk of 13.04%, but severe psoriasis patients on repeat prescription had a decreased cardiovascular risk of 10.08%. The inconsistency
between the results obtained from this audit and the existing literature
could be attributed to three main reasons.
Firstly, based on the methodology, only eight severe psoriasis patients
on repeat prescription were identiied for this audit. Hence, the average
cardiovascular risk calculated from this small sample group is inconclusive. Furthermore, owing to time constraints, the medical records of psoriasis patients not on repeat prescription were not reviewed. This meant
there could potentially be psoriasis patients who receive systemic treatment directly from secondary care, but are not on the practices repeat
prescription register, who were not identiied. Exclusion of this patient
group could have negatively afected the indings.
Secondly, while the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) is considered the gold standard for assessing the severity of psoriasis,(17) this audit
assessed severity based on the treatment that the patient is on. In PASI,
severity of psoriasis is dependent on the redness, induration, scaling and
area of body surface involved. PASI scores range from 0 (no disease) to
72 (maximal disease), with severe psoriasis being deined as a PASI score
greater than 20.(18) On the other hand, this audit followed the NICE deinition of severe psoriasis as requiring treatment with phototherapy, systemic
44
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
45
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
V. Nakata
References
1 Parisi R, Symmons DP, Griiths CE, Ashcroft DM, Identiication and
Management of Psoriasis and Associated ComorbidiTy (IMPACT)
project team. Global epidemiology of psoriasis: a systematic review of
incidence and prevalence. J Invest Dermatol. 2013 Feb;133(2):37785.
2 Rapp SR, Feldman SR, Exum ML, Fleischer AB Jr, Reboussin DM.
Psoriasis causes as much disability as other major medical diseases. J Am
Acad Dermatol. 1999 Sep;41(3 Pt 1):4017.
3 Prodanovich S, Kirsner RS, Kravetz JD, Ma F, Martinez L, Federman
DG. Association of psoriasis with coronary artery, cerebrovascular,
and peripheral vascular diseases and mortality. Arch Dermatol. 2009
Jun;145(6):7003.
4 Ahlehof O, Gislason GH, Charlot M, Jorgensen CH, Lindhardsen
J, Olesen JB, et al. Psoriasis is associated with clinically signiicant
cardiovascular risk: a Danish nationwide cohort study. J Intern Med.
2011 Aug;270(2):14757.
5 Lin HW, Wang KH, Lin HC, Lin HC. Increased risk of acute myocardial
infarction in patients with psoriasis: a 5-year population-based study in
Taiwan. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Mar;64(3):495501.
6 Sph F. Inlammation in atherosclerosis and psoriasis: common
pathogenic mechanisms and the potential for an integrated treatment
approach. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159(s2):1017.
7 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Psoriasis:
the assessment and management of psoriasis [Internet]. London and
Manchester: NICE; 2012 [cited 2014 Feb 1]. Available from: http://www.
nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/13938/61190/61190.pdf.
8 Parsi KK, Brezinski EA, Lin TC, Li CS, Armstrong AW. Are patients
with psoriasis being screened for cardiovascular risk factors? A study of
screening practices and awareness among primary care physicians and
cardiologists. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012 Sep;67(3):35762.
9 NICE. Quality and outcomes framework: NICE menu of indicators
[Internet]. London and Manchester: NICE; 2013 [cited 2014 Feb 1].
Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/qof/indicators.jsp.
10 Cooper A, Nherera L, Calvert N, OFlynn N, Turnbull N, Robson J,
et al. Clinical guidelines and evidence review for lipid modiication:
cardiovascular risk assessment and the primary and secondary
prevention of cardiovascular disease. London: National Collaborating
Centre for Primary Care and Royal College of General Practitioners;
2008.
11 NICE. Psoriasis: clinical audit tool non-specialist services, CG153
[Internet]. London and Manchester: NICE; 2013 [cited 2014 Feb 1].
Available from: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG153/ClinicalAudit/
NonSpecialistServices/doc/English.
46
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
47
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
Appendix
V. Nakata
Age
(years) Diagnosis
429*
61
Psoriatic
arthropathy
441
29
548
42
614*
64
879
59
897
64
1,308
70
Psoriasis
NOS,
psoriasis
and similar
disorders
Psoriasis
NOS
Psoriatic
arthropathy,
psoriasis
and similar
disorders
Psoriasis
NOS
Psoriasis
NOS
Psoriasis
NOS
2,370*
47
Psoriatic
arthropathy
2,782*
39
Psoriasis
NOS
4,034
54
Psoriatic
arthropathy,
psoriasis
NOS
Psoriasis
medication on
repeat
JBS
Date CVD
10-year risk was
CVD risk recorded
Methotrexate 2.5
mg, sulfasalazine
500 mg
Exorex lotion,
Doublebase gel
3.23
Dermol 200
shower emollient
Methotrexate 2.5
mg, Diprobase
cream, Dermol
500 lotion
Not
Not
None
recorded recorded
10.51
8
None
November
2013
Dovobet gel
Not
Not
recorded recorded
10.5
23 April
2013
33.69
8 October
2013
Lotiderm cream,
Dovobet gel
Lotriderm cream,
calcipotriol
0.005%/
betamethasone
dipropionate
0.05%,
Dermol cream,
Doublebase gel
Methotrexate 2.5
mg, prednisolone
5 mg
Methotrexate 2.5
mg
Calcipotriol
0.005%/
betamethasone
dipropionate
0.05% ointment,
paracetamol 500
mg
27 August None
2013
Not
Not
recorded recorded
16.7
6.57
2.95
Statin
therapy
None
None
None
None
5
Atorvastatin
November
2013
6
None
February
2012
16
None
October
2013
48
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
Patient
code
Age
(years) Diagnosis
Psoriasis
NOS
4,675
65
6,319
54
Psoriasis
NOS
Psoriasis
NOS
6,899
55
Psoriasis
NOS
6,946*
63
Psoriatic
arthropathy
6,961
57
Psoriasis
NOS
8,002
80
H/O
psoriasis
8,840
74
Psoriasis
unspeciied
JBS
Date CVD
10-year risk was
CVD risk recorded
Hydromol
Not
Not
Bath&Shower
recorded recorded
emollient,
tacrolimus
0.1% ointment,
Hydromol
ointment,
Doublebase
gel, Dermax
Therapeutic 0.5%
shampoo, coconut
oil compound
ointment,
Dovobet gel,
Diprosalic
0.05%/3%
ointment
Diprobase cream 10.75
6 June
2013
Dermax
Not
Not
Therapeutic
recorded recorded
0.5% shampoo,
hydrocortisone 1%
cream
Dermax
7.48
22
Therapeutic 0.5%
October
shampoo, Aveeno
2013
body wash,
Aveeno lotion,
Aveeno cream
Methotrexate 2.5 13.99
7 January
mg, fFolic acid
2014
5 mg
QV gentle wash,
8.15
30
calcipotriol
December
0.005%/
2013
betamethasone
dipropionate,
Emollin
aerosol spray,
hydroxyzine 25
mg tablets
Cetraben
43.59
9 January
emollient cream
2014
Sebco ointment
15.56
Statin
therapy
None
Simvastatin
4,095* 50
Psoriasis
medication on
repeat
None
None
Atorvastatin
Simvastatin
Pravastatin
16
Simvastatin
September
2013
49
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
V. Nakata
Patient
code
Age
(years) Diagnosis
9,089
52
Psoriasis
NOS, H/O
psoriasis
9,671
70
Psoriasis
NOS
9,717
24
9,825
47
9,856
35
Psoriasis
NOS
Psoriasis
NOS, H/O
psoriasis
Psoriasis
NOS
10,163* 83
10,734
60
10,853* 58
11,081 25
11,609
36
12,257
44
12,372 40
Psoriasis
medication on
repeat
JBS
Date CVD
10-year risk was
CVD risk recorded
Statin
therapy
Calcipotriol
0.005%/
bethamethasone
dipropionate
0.05% ointment
Betacap 0.1%
scalp application
9.13
None
Epaderm cream
Calcitriol 3 mg/g
ointment
Calcipotriol
0.005%/
betamethasone
dipropionate
0.05% ointment
Psoriatic
Methotrexate
arthropathy, 2.5 mg, folic acid
H/O
5 mg
psoriasis
Guttate
Betamethasone
psoriasis,
valerate 0.1%
psoriasis
scalp application,
NOS
Capsal
Therapeutic
shampoo
Psoriasis
Methotrexate 2.5
NOS
mg, E45 emollient
bath oil, Dermol
cream, Dovobet
gel
H/O
Balneum 84.75%
psoriasis
bath oil, Epaderm
ointment
Psoriasis
Calcipotriol
NOS
0.005%/
betamethasone
dipropionate
0.05% ointment
Psoriatic
Paracetamol 500
arthropathy, mg, amitriptyline
psoriasis
10 mg
NOS
Psoriasis
Dovonex 50
NOS
mg/g ointment,
Dovobet ointment
22 May
2012
27.37
5
None
September
2012
Not
Not
None
recorded recorded
19
Not
None
recorded
Not
Not
recorded recorded
None
6.93
20
January
2014
None
3.82
3
Simvastatin
September
2013
12.64
9
None
December
2013
Not
Not
recorded recorded
None
4.24
14
None
December
2011
4.22
22
None
December
2011
Not
Not
recorded recorded
None
50
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
Age
(years) Diagnosis
12,415
38
Pustular
psoriasis
12,764
43
Psoriasis
NOS
Psoriasis
medication on
repeat
JBS
Date CVD
10-year risk was
CVD risk recorded
Balneum Plus
bath oil, Epaderm
ointment
Diprosalic
0.05%/2% scalp
application
3.18
5.07
Statin
therapy
5
None
September
2012
8 March
None
2013
Psoriasis patients aged 4074 years whose CVD risk has yet to be adequately assessed.
Age
Alcohol (units/
week)
Alcohol intake
status*
Smoking
(cigarettes/day)
Smoking
status
429
61
Trivial
441**
548**
614
29
42
64
Not recorded
Not recorded
8
Light
Not recorded
Light
10
10
0
879**
59
14
Light
897
64
Not recorded
Moderate
Never
smoked
Moderate
Light
Ex-light
smoker
Ex-light
smoker
Ex-heavy
smoker
Moderate
1,308
70
Not recorded
Moderate
20
47
10
Light
2,782
4,034
39
54
1
7
Trivial
Trivial
7
0
4,095,**
4,675
50
65
15
1
Heavy
Trivial
15
0
6,319**
54
Not recorded
Not recorded
6,899
55
Not recorded
(alcohol
dependence
syndrome)
9
Moderate
6,946
63
Not recorded
Light
6961
57
Teetotaller
8002
80
Teetotaller
8,840
74
Trivial
2,370
Patient
code
Never
smoked
Light
Ex-heavy
smoker
Light
Never
smoked
Heavy
Ex-light
smoker
Ex-moderate
smoker
Never
smoked
Ex-light
smoker
Light
51
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
V. Nakata
Patient
code
Age
Alcohol (units/
week)
Alcohol intake
status*
Smoking
(cigarettes/day)
Smoking
status
9,089
52
12
Not recorded
9,671
70
14
Not recorded
9,717**
24
Not recorded
Not recorded
9,825
9,856**
10,163
47
35
83
4
10
0
Light
Not recorded
Teetotaller
1
10
0
10,734
60
Trivial
10,853
58
20
Moderate
11,081**
25
18
Not recorded
11,609
36
Not recorded
Not recorded
12,257
44
Not recorded
12,372**
40
Not recorded
Light
12,415
12,764
38
43
Not recorded
1
Light
Trivial
10
0
Ex-moderate
smoker
Never
smoked
Never
smoked
Light
Moderate
Never
smoked
Never
smoked
Never
smoked
Never
smoked
Never
smoked
Ex-heavy
smoker
Never
smoked
Moderate
Ex-heavy
smoker
*Alcohol intake status teetotaller; trivial: <1 unit/day; light: 12 units/day; moderate: 36 units/day;
heavy: 79 units/day.
Smoking status never smoked; light: 19 cigarettes/day; moderate: 1019 cigarettess/day; heavy: 2039
cigarettes/day).
Severe psoriasis patients deined as requiring treatment with phototherapy, systemic agents or hospital
admission.
**Psoriasis patients aged 4074 years whose CVD risk has yet to be adequately assessed.
Psoriasis patients lipid levels, BMI, blood pressure and diabetes status
Patient
code
Age
Cholesterol HDL
(mmol/L)
(mmol/L) BMI
Blood
pressure Blood pressure
(mm Hg) status
429*
61
5.5
2.5
26.8
118/72
Normal
No
441
29
Not
recorded
Not
recorded
25.62
110/60
Normal
No
548
42
Not
recorded
Not
recorded
31.43
112/70
Normal
No
614*
64
6.2
1.7
33.76
144/88
No
Essential
hypertension on
medication (ramipril,
amlodipine)
879
59
4.8
Not
recorded
21.1
125/79
Normal
Diabetes
No
52
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
Patient
code
Age
Cholesterol HDL
(mmol/L)
(mmol/L) BMI
Blood
pressure Blood pressure
(mm Hg) status
897
64
6.1
1.7
38
122/84
No
Essential
hypertension on
medication (lisinopril)
1,308
70
5.6
1.6
29.05
148/80
Raised
No
2,370*
47
3.8
0.7
30.69
128/80
Normal
Type 2
2,782*
39
5.8
1.1
29.7
110/80
Normal
No
4,034
54
5.5
1.8
29.86
110/60
Normal
No
4,095* 50
5.1
Not
recorded
21.83
128/86
Normal
No
Diabetes
65
5.7
1.5
31.9
126/80
Normal
No
6,319
54
6.5
0.9
26.42
120/70
Normal
No
6,899
55
1.4
37.45
120/60
Normal
No
6,946*
63
3.5
1.6
24.73
130/60
Normal
Type 2
6,961
57
3.5
1.9
68.4
136/74
Borderline raised
Type 2
8,002
80
3.9
1.1
28.62
130/75
Type 2
Essential
hypertension on
medication (ramipril)
8,840
74
3.6
1.2
31.48
132/71
Raised diastolic
9,089
52
6.1
1.1
27.97
120/68
Normal
No
9,671
70
5.5
1.5
27.29
132/75
Raised diastolic
No
9,717
24
Not
recorded
Not
recorded
27.59
130/80
Normal
No
No
9,825
47
3.9
0.9
29.75
118/70
Normal
No
9,856
35
Not
recorded
Not
recorded
28.5
115/85
Normal
No
10,163* 83
2.1
20.03
122/50
Essential hypertension No
on medication
(lisinopril, atenolol,
bendrolumethiazide)
10,734
4.7
1.9
25.89
110/60
No
Essential
hypertension on
medication (lisinopril)
60
10,853* 58
5.8
26.57
144/80
Borderline raised
No
11,081 25
Not
recorded
Not
recorded
42.83
143/78
Raised
No
11,609
36
6.3
1.2
35.81
120/70
Normal
Diabetes
insipidus
12,257
44
132/76
6.3
1.3
34.58
Normal
No
12,372 40
Not
recorded
Not
recorded
Not
Not
recorded recorded
Not recorded
No
12,415
38
5.9
1.4
Not
132/84
recorded
Normal
No
12,764
43
5.3
1.1
27.41
Normal
No
118/62
4,675
*Severe psoriasis patients deined as requiring treatment with phototherapy, systemic agents or hospital
admission.
Psoriasis patients aged 4074 years whose CVD risk has yet to be adequately assessed.
53
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
54
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
CASE REPORT
Abstract
Background Primary myeloibrosis (PMF) is a myeloproliferative disorder
resulting in progressive bone marrow ibrosis. In some PMF patients, a
mutation in the gene coding for janus-associated kinase 2 (JAK2) results in cell
proliferation and evasion of apoptosis. PMF typically occurs in older patients,
and is associated with poor prognosis and low survival, with death occurring
secondary to cardiovascular disease.(1) Investigations include full blood counts,
blood ilm analysis, and bone marrow aspiration and trephine. Treatment is
largely palliative; the single curative intervention of stem-cell transplant being
available only to low-risk younger patients. Potential supportive treatments
include the use of JAK2 inhibitors.
Method This case report studies a patient who was diagnosed with PMF at
the age of 60.
Results The patients condition remained stable for up to 11 years before
her symptoms deteriorated and her treatment was altered. The report focuses
on current and upcoming treatments including JAK inhibitors, and evaluates
their possible future implications for the management of patients with PMF.(2,3)
Conclusion Breakthroughs in the understanding of the underlying PMF
molecular mechanisms have led to improved treatments. There is a future role
for JAK2 inhibitors in the management of palliative care. Ruxolitinib, which
is now available for use in clinical practice, may alter treatment and improve
quality of life for those living with PMF.
55
Manchester Medical Journal, 2016 The Authors.
Published by Manchester University Press, The University of Manchester Library and the Manchester Medical School
http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/MMJ.0007
This is an Open Access article published under the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
A. B. Swali, M. Haj
Introduction
The aims of this article are to gain an understanding of myeloibrosis
(MF), including the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, investigations, and diagnostic and prognostic features. More speciically, it looks at
current treatment options and future developments which could alter the
disease course. In addition, through this case report, we aim to analyse the
management of a patient with longstanding primary myeloibrosis (PMF)
and to discuss currently available and emerging treatment options.
The current guidelines for the diagnosis and management of MF,
published by the British Journal of Haematology in 2012, were used as
the benchmark for current practice in this area. The management of the
patient in our case report was compared to the standards laid out within
these guidelines, and a subsequent review of the literature aimed to identify any advances in therapy since their publication.
Points raised in the discussion focus on the reasons for denial of speciic
treatments to the patient. It looks at future therapies and how they may be
adapted for elderly patients (the majority of PMF patients) who currently
are unsuitable for a number of treatment options. The only curative treatment is currently only suitable for younger patients, with strict controls on
eligibility. A number of journals touch on advances in research into not
only the understanding of the science behind myeloibrosis, but the combination of diferent therapies to achieve desired therapeutic goals.
Case presentation
In June 1998 a 60-year-old Caucasian woman was referred to the haematology department with thrombocytopenia and a suspected possible MF.
At presentation to the haematology clinic, the patient had been bruising
easily for the last four months; there was no history of bone pain, abdominal pain, night sweats or bleeding. The patients past medical history
included hypothyroidism and asthma. She was a non-smoker and drank
two units of alcohol a week. Her medication at the time included clomipramine, thyroxine, hormone replacement therapy and beclomethasone.
On examination the patient had petechiae over her shins, two small
bruises on her sternum and right arm, and some generalised itching.
There was no palpable lymphadenopathy, cardiovascular and respiratory systems were unremarkable, and abdominal examination revealed a
marked splenomegaly, with the tip extending 3 cm below the umbilicus,
and slight hepatomegaly.
A full blood count showed haemoglobin (Hb) 110 g/L, white blood cell
count (WBCC) 4.1 109/L and platelets 57 109/L. A peripheral blood ilm
demonstrated increased reticulin with ine collagenisation; features consistent
with an underlying MF. A bone marrow biopsy resulted in a dry tap and a
56
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
57
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
A. B. Swali, M. Haj
58
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
Treatment
Elderly patients with PMF tend to be treated conservatively. If they have
no symptoms or low risk factors for further development of the disease,
careful observation is adequate.(6)
The most widely used agent for haemopoiesis and splenomegaly is
hydroxycarbamide. Approximately 45% of patients respond within 810
weeks; cytopenias can develop at certain doses. Other drugs such as lowdose melphalan, interferon-alpha (IFN-), cladribine, and immunomodulatory drugs such as low-dose thalidomide when used in combination
with prednisolone have produced weaker responses, often with myelosuppressive side efects. For treatment of splenomegaly, initially hydroxycarbamide should be used. If the patient sufers from cytopenias, then
thalidomide and prednisolone should be used simultaneously. Medical
therapies are the preferred treatment for splenomegaly; however, the use
of splenectomy is also well established. It should only be carried out in
patients with speciic factors such as hypercatabolic symptoms, splenic
infarction, refractory haemolysis, portal hypertension and symptomatic
splenomegaly, and not before the patient has been assessed for hepatic,
renal, cardiac, metabolic and haemostatic risks. Other risks include
hepatic enlargement due to extramedullary haemopoiesis, and thrombocytosis leading to an elevated thrombotic risk; hence the requirement for
normalisation of platelet counts pre- and post-splenectomy. Cytoreductive
therapy post-surgery includes hydroxycarbamide and cladribine as a palliative option. Patients who are inappropriate for surgery with symptoms
of splenomegaly and a platelet count of more than 50 109/L may gain
some relief and a relative decrease in their spleen size. Reduction in size
is temporary and severe cytopenia can be a side efect requiring platelet
transfusion. Therefore, radiotherapy is not an alternative for patients who
are eligible for surgery.(4)
59
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
A. B. Swali, M. Haj
60
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
JAK2 inhibitors
Present management options for PMF, which include androgens, thalidomide, transfusions and myelosuppressive medications, do not alter
the course of the disease. Discovery of JAK2 mutations in approximately
half of PMF patients has led to new research.(10) JAK inhibitors are one
of a few potential treatments that are being currently examined. They are
concerned with improving the symptoms of PMF and spleen enlargement
and have shown consistent responses. Patients who are not eligible for
bone marrow transplants and have not beneited from hydroxycarbamide treatment should be recommended for JAK inhibitor randomised
controlled trials.(4) Currently they are not available for clinical use, but
JAK inhibitors may be suitable as irst-line treatment for patients with
constitutional symptoms and splenomegaly.(4,10) The JAK2 trials which
have been described show active control of constitutional symptoms and
splenomegaly in patients resistant to hydroxycarbamide and alternative
management options. Unfortunately they were less successful in improving anaemia. JAK2 inhibitors including CYT387, AZD1480, SB1518 and
LY2784544 were not able to encourage any remission of PMF or eliminate
the mutated JAK2 clone. Responses were not dependent on the JAK2
mutational status, meaning that it was not clear whether their beneits
were due to inhibition of JAK2 in neoplastic cells or from a global downregulation of the proinlammatory cytokinase signalling.(6)
Ruxolitinib is a powerful JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor that is approved for
the management of high-risk and intermediate myeloibrosis.(11) It selectively inhibits JAK2 V617F-driven Ba/F3 cell proliferation. This results
in reduced activation of STAT factors by reduced phosphorylation of
JAK2. In 2012, Harrison et al.(12) evaluated the eicacy of ruxolitinib when
compared with the best available therapy, which included commercially
available monotherapies or combination therapies such as antineoplastic
agents (hydroxyurea) and glucocorticoids. Using MRI or CT they found
that 28% of the patients on ruxolitinib had a 35% spleen volume reduction,
leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donor, and are well enough for the procedure. Patients who should be considered for myeloablative (MA) alloHSCT include those under the age of 45 with an international prognostic
scoring system (IPSS) of intermediate 2 or higher, and who are having
blood transfusions and/or have adverse cytogenetic irregularities. Similar
patients over the age of 45 should be considered for RIC allo-HSCT.
Bone marrow transplantation should take place before the patient has had
20units of blood transfusions. Plasma levels are used to estimate dosing of
oral busulfan; IV busulfan can be given provided dosage is estimated using
plasma levels. Increased risk of relapse may be seen in patients who have
undergone splenectomies prior to transplant.(4)
61
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
A. B. Swali, M. Haj
62
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
Discussion
The patient studied is signiicant for a number of reasons. She had been
managed conservatively for a number of years without the need for PMF medication. Her anaemia was controlled on folic acid and iron tablets for 12 years
before any further deterioration, perhaps because she was diagnosed before
such guidelines were recommended. In 2010 she was given blood transfusions
when her anaemia became signiicant. She sufered from chronic thrombocytopenia and was eventually started on tranexamic acid and prednisolone.
Later in the disease the patients symptoms included massive splenomegaly but she did not receive any treatment such as hydroxycarbamide; this
was probably owing to her signiicant thrombocytopenia. Additionally,
the patients advanced age meant that she would not have been eligible for
allo-SCT therapy. This is unfortunate as it is still the only management
available with the potential to cure as long as there is no signiicant risk of
mortality or morbidity. In the future as treatments are reined and dosage
reduced, new transplant methods will simultaneously use JAK2 inhibition; this will allow PMF patients of increased age to become eligible for
this type of management.(5)
In 2012 the patient was referred for a ruxolitinib trial. The patient was
regrettably denied, as two of the major side efects were anaemia and
thrombocytopenia. This was unfortunate, as some of the recent reports
concerning ruxolitinib have stated that they were able to manage the issues
of anaemia and thrombocytopenia by briely interrupting the therapy,
reducing the doses, or simply discontinuing the treatment. Patients treated
with ruxolitinib were able to continue with blood transfusions if needed.(12)
Recent studies have led to the development of newer, highly speciic JAK
inhibitors, which reduce undesirable efects such as cytopenia.(13)
63
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
A. B. Swali, M. Haj
64
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
10
11
12
13
65
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
66
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
ABSTRACT
67
Manchester Medical Journal, 2016 The Authors.
Published by Manchester University Press, The University of Manchester Library and the Manchester Medical School
http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/MMJ.0008
This is an Open Access article published under the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
A. Begaj
68
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
ABSTRACT
69
Manchester Medical Journal, 2016 The Authors.
Published by Manchester University Press, The University of Manchester Library and the Manchester Medical School
http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/MMJ.0009
This is an Open Access article published under the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
70
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
ABSTRACT
71
Manchester Medical Journal, 2016 The Authors.
Published by Manchester University Press, The University of Manchester Library and the Manchester Medical School
http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/MMJ.0010
This is an Open Access article published under the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
72
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
ABSTRACT
73
Manchester Medical Journal, 2016 The Authors.
Published by Manchester University Press, The University of Manchester Library and the Manchester Medical School
http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/MMJ.0011
This is an Open Access article published under the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
74
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
ABSTRACT
75
Manchester Medical Journal, 2016 The Authors.
Published by Manchester University Press, The University of Manchester Library and the Manchester Medical School
http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/MMJ.0012
This is an Open Access article published under the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
J. Lindsay
sentinel vein or just distal at the point where the vein joined the plantar venous
network. Subjectively, the appearance and position of the vein was seen to
vary greatly between different specimens. Non-dimensional measurements
placed the sentinel vein at a mean of 30.17% of the total metatarsal
length. However intra- and inter-observer repeatability analysis of the results
suggested that the measurements may not be reliable in accurately describing
the location of the vein.
Conclusion The variation in appearance of the sentinel vein between the
specimens, along with the inability to reliably measure the position of the
vein, indicates that the sentinel vein may not be a reliable landmark for the
dorsomedial cutaneous nerve, and therefore the use of this structure as an
anatomical landmark should be cautioned.
76
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
ABSTRACT
Aesthetic plastic surgery has always been a topic of controversy, but over
recent years public attitudes appear to be shifting in favour of cosmetic
surgery. Glamorisation by the media and advertising can account for this,
and have a predominant effect on how people view their body image.
With breast augmentation using prostheses being a highly sought-after
procedure, this report aims to delineate the preoperative and postoperative
psychology behind breast augmentation. Large numbers of studies have
reported high satisfaction rates in the short term; many women feel more
empowered, conident, and have a stronger positive body image evaluation.
Cosmetic surgery can thus be considered a blessing from this viewpoint.
However, the postoperative complications that may result can hinder these
positive psychological outcomes. Capsular contracture is the most common
complication, and can result in severe breast deformities. Patients living with
psychiatric conditions, including body dysmorphic disorder and personality
disorders, could psychologically be more vulnerable and affected by these
negative treatment results. In this sense, cosmetic surgery is a curse. Therefore,
psychotherapy (such as cognitive behavioural therapy) or pharmacotherapy
(such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) would be a more appropriate
line of treatment for these patients.
77
Manchester Medical Journal, 2016 The Authors.
Published by Manchester University Press, The University of Manchester Library and the Manchester Medical School
http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/MMJ.0013
This is an Open Access article published under the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
78
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
ABSTRACT
This project was aiming to look at the indications for dual-mobility hip
replacements. Dual-mobility hip replacements are a type of total hip
replacement which aim to increase stability compared to standard total hip
replacement due to the large head size, increased range of motion, and, at
least theoretically, reduce wear due to lower frictional torque. Lancashire
Teaching Hospitals Trust began using dual-mobility hip replacements in 2013,
and this retrospective analysis looks at each of the 174 patients who received
one since then to discover why they were put in and how this relates to the
NICE guidelines for treating certain types of hip problems.
The results have shown that 102 were primary hip replacements for
displaced intracapsular fracture of the femur, 31 were revisions for instability
and 41 were for other indications, both primary and revision. Of the 174 dualmobility cups put in, 3 have dislocated, but all were reduced successfully
and have remained stable since. This gives the dual-mobility cups a current
revision rate of 0%, which is very successful in comparison to the average
revision rate for a standard (non-dual-mobility) total hip replacement.
79
Manchester Medical Journal, 2016 The Authors.
Published by Manchester University Press, The University of Manchester Library and the Manchester Medical School
http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/MMJ.0014
This is an Open Access article published under the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
80
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
ABSTRACT
81
Manchester Medical Journal, 2016 The Authors.
Published by Manchester University Press, The University of Manchester Library and the Manchester Medical School
http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/MMJ.0015
This is an Open Access article published under the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
82
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
ABSTRACT
83
Manchester Medical Journal, 2016 The Authors.
Published by Manchester University Press, The University of Manchester Library and the Manchester Medical School
http://dx.doi.org/10.7227/MMJ.0016
This is an Open Access article published under the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
S. Young
84
Manchester Medical Journal (2016)
85
MANCHESTERMEDICALJOURNAL COM
.