Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Department of English
Spring 2017
ENG 353-01
Class
Meeting:
Office
Hour
s:
Course description:
In the first part of the course we will examine ancient literary portraits of
Jesus, especially the New Testament gospels, but some other early Christian
writings about him as well. While we will read these texts as coherent works
of literary art, we will also attend to historical issues they raise, such as the
New Testament gospels complicated relationships to one another and the
problems they present to scholars interested in reconstructing the historical
figure of Jesus. The courses second part will focus on three modern novels
which all, in one way or another, retell Jesus story. In considering how these
novels interpret and respond to the New Testament gospels, we will confront
their innovative and at times taboo portrayals of this sacred figure from
literary history. However, we will also explore the possibility that the biblical
stories of Jesus themselves anticipate some of the apparently novel ideas
about him presented in these modern literary works.
Student learning outcomes:
See
www.brockport.edu/academics/catalogs/2016/programs/english_major.html
for a complete set of English major SLOs. Within that overarching framework,
students in this course will learn to construct arguments that interpret later
literary texts as revisions or rewritings of previous ones. This will involve
becoming proficient in specific interpretive methodologies relevant to biblical
studies, including form and redaction criticism. This course also satisfies the
Contemporary Issues GE requirement, for whose SLOs see
www.brockport.edu/academics/catalogs/2016/learning_outcomes.html.
Within that framework, students will consider how these methodologies shed
light on common invocations of biblical authority in contemporary political
discourse, including in debates about racial injustice and gender identity and
about the evolving conventions determining which familial structures should
be legally sanctioned and socially supported. In particular, students will
examine examples of biblical interpretation from the intersections between
1
political and religious culture in the contemporary US. They will identify and,
when appropriate, critique such examples hermeneutical presuppositions, in
order to become more critical consumers of and participants in relevant
public debate.
Course schedule:
This schedule (subject to alteration at the professors discretion) provides
only a general framework for primary reading and the due dates for formal
writing assignments. More precise reading assignments for primary texts will
be specified as the semester progresses. Primary readings will frequently be
supplemented by secondary texts (contextual materials, literary
comparanda, and scholarly essays). These will be announced orally in class
with sufficient time for completion, and will be made available online.
Informal writing assignments will be handled in the same way. (See
Assignments 3 below.)
Unit 1: Ancient Stories of Jesus
1/23
1/25
1/27
Introduction
Mark
Mark
1/30 Mark
2/1 Matthew
2/3 Matthew
2/6 Matthew
2/8 Luke
2/10 Luke
2/13 Luke; essay 1 due
2/15 John
2/17 John
2/20 John
2/22 Thomas
2/24 Thomas
2/27 Acts
3/1 Acts
3/3 Acts
Unit 2: Modern Stories of Jesus
3/6
3/8
3/10 Silence
3/13
3/15
3/17
Light in August
Light in August
Light in August
5/8
Required Texts:
Dostoevsky, The Idiot (trans. Myers; Oxford; ISBN: 978-0199536399)
Endo, Silence (trans. Johnston; Picador; ISBN: 978-1250082275)
Faulkner, Light in August (Vintage; ISBN: 978-0679732266)
HarperCollins Study Bible, fully revised and updated (HarperOne; ISBN: 9780060786847)
Throckmorton, Gospel Parallels (5th edn.;Thomas Nelson; ISBN: 9780840774842)
Assignments and grading:
3
Essay 1: 15%
Essay 3: 20%
Essay 3: 20%
Essay 4: 25%
Participation: 20% (To earn an A in participation, students must earn checkpluses on at least half of the ARAs.)
Grading criteria for essays:
A range: This essay is outstanding in form and content. The thesis is clear
and insightful; it expands in a new way on ideas presented in the course that
are relevant to the text(s) it addresses. The evidence presented in support of
its argument is carefully chosen and deftly handled. The argument is not only
unified and coherent, but also complex and full of nuance.
B range: This essays thesis is clear; the argument is coherent and presents
textual evidence in support of its points. The argument shows
comprehension of the material and manifests critical thinking about issues
and ideas relevant to the text(s) it addresses. The paper is reasonably well
written and proofread. The argument, while coherent, does not have the
complexity, the insight, or the integrated structure of an A range paper.
C range: This paper has the basic components of an analytic essay (i.e.,
thesis, evidence, argument, and coherent structure), but just barely: for
example, it may offer a thesis of some kind, but present insufficient textual
evidence to support it; or it may present an incoherent thesis; or it may be
poorly organized and therefore incapable of communicating an overarching
argument, even though its individual points are comprehensible or even
strong.
D-E range: A paper will fall into this range if it demonstrates a failure to fulfill
one or more of an analytic essays fundamental requirements: e.g. thesis,
reasonable argumentation, use of text(s) as evidence supporting argument,
basic knowledge about text(s), coherent writing, etc.
Grading criteria for participation:
A range: The student is fully engaged and highly motivated. This student is
well prepared, having read the assigned texts and thought carefully about
them, as evident not only in his or her comments, but also from consistently
high performances on active reading assignments. This student's ideas and
questions are productive (either constructive or critical) and stimulate class
discussion. This student listens and responds to the contributions of
classmates and of the professor.
B range: The student attends class regularly, is well prepared for discussion,
and participates consistently. They contribute productively to the discussion
by sharing thoughts and questions that demonstrate a familiarity with the
4
classmates about the instructional details of a given class meeting you might
have missed.
Assignments
Graded assignments must be submitted in class by the given deadline (see
course schedule). They will be marked down 1/3 of a grade for every 24
hours (or fraction thereof) they are late. Generally, late work will only be
accepted without penalty in emergency situations (for example, in cases of
verifiable medical emergencies or of family tragedies). Incompletes will only
be granted in similar situations.
Plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty will result in failure of the
course, and may even result in your dismissal from the college. Ignorantia
iuris non excusat (ignorance of the law is not an excuse), so if you have
any questions about what constitutes plagiarism, you should review the
College at Brockport policy on student academic dishonesty.1 If academic
pressures (impending deadlines, puzzlement over the material you are
writing about, etc.) ever tempt you to plagiarize, stop what you are doing
and contact me: we may be able to work something out, or at least I can
convince you to turn in your own work late and accept the relatively small
penalty. Once you submit plagiarized work, my hands are tied: if I discover it,
you will fail the course, no matter what led you to cheat.
In addition to formal graded essays you will be responsible for turning in
informal active reading assignments (ARAs) at several class meetings
throughout the semester (on average, one per week). These will usually be
announced at the class before which they are due and assignment prompts
will subsequently be emailed to your Brockport account. You will receive a
check, check-minus, or check-plus on each. I will weigh your performance on
them heavily when calculating the participation component of your grade
(you will not earn an A in participation without check-plusses on at least half)
and so I encourage you to complete them with care. ARAs serve two
functions: 1) They help you to think about the texts we are reading from
perspectives that will facilitate fruitful class discussion on the day on which
they are due. 2) They give you an opportunity to practice analytic techniques
that you will be using in your formal papers. ARAs must be typed, but unlike
your formal papers, they will not receive a penalty for grammar or spelling
errors, provided such errors do not hinder comprehension. I am looking for
thoughtful responses to the prompt, which leverage it for insightful and
1 See
http://www.brockport.edu/policies/docs/policy_on_student_academic_dishone
sty.pdf.
6