Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Remember no programme
can entirely reduce risks.
With recipients and partners,
design and implement a risk
mitigation strategy.
Train implementing partners in
protection mainstreaming.
Develop contingency plans for when
things go wrong.
Assess
needs and
determine
objectives
Determine
the most
appropriate
response
Plan,
design and
implement
17
Operational GUIDELINES
for Cash-Based Interventions
in Displacement Settings
their economic vulnerability (Group B). This may include Persons with Specific Needs (Group
C). However, not all specific needs can be addressed through cash-based interventions.
A persons vulnerability and risks status can change over time.6 At the onset of an emergency,
refugees may not have access to bank accounts or permission to work, for example. In
this case, the target groups needs may be more homogenous and blanket assistance for
a set amount of time may be appropriate and effective. As conditions change over time,
however, refugee needs are likely to become more differentiated and a more comprehensive
assessment of the situation will reveal that not all refugees are equally at risk economically.
There may be refugees and persons of concern who fall into certain categories based on
demographics, marital status, dependency ratio, and source of livelihood. These categories
can be used to facilitate targeting through context-specific analysis and proxy indicators.
Thus, when conducting an assessment (repeated periodically throughout the refugee
assistance), you should ask these key questions: What is the risk? Who is vulnerable? and
Why are they vulnerable?. CBIs are not appropriate to address every need (see examples in
Table 5).
Risk is the likelihood of a harmful event occurring and the probability that a given person or community will be affected by that harmful event.
Vulnerability is often used interchangeably with at risk.
18
Table 5. Who is at risk, what are they at risk of, and why?
Multi-purpose CBIs
Alternative interventions
Examples of potential
responses
Outbreaks of cholera
Entire camp
population
Lack of access to
education due to
discrimination
Entire refugee
population
Entire refugee
population
Those with no or
insufficient economic
assets (income,
remittances, savings,
etc)
Lack of access to
education due to
inability to pay fees,
materials, etcxi
Those with no or
insufficient economic
assets (income,
remittances, savings,
etc)
Lack of livelihood
due to lack of skills,
investment capital, etc
Loss of livelihoods
or assets due to
crisis (displacement,
destruction, etc)
Where intimate partner violence is linked to economic stress, increasing income may reduce domestic violence. WFP and UNHCR (2013);
Fernald (2006).
xi
Where lack of enrolment is due to cultural restrictions (e.g. girls education), cash incentives can increase enrolment rates (see Part III,
Section 6, Ensuring access to education).
19
Operational GUIDELINES
for Cash-Based Interventions
in Displacement Settings
Protracted
pending
Solutions
Return,
re-integration,
resettlement
20
Refugees dispersed in
rural communities
Functioning markets
and different delivery
options available.
CBIs likely to be
appropriate. Emphasis
on coordination with
different government
actors, registration,
targeting, verification
and monitoring
adapted to urban
context.
In-depth market
analysis required.
Markets more likely
to be seasonal and
supply constrained,
which can be
addressed by supplyside interventions,
e.g. coordination
with suppliers, fairs.
CBIs for host families
often appropriate.
Delivery options
limited but technology
rapidly filling the
gap. Emphasis on
monitoring supply
(prices, quality and
quantity).
Political feasibility
may be a challenge.
Refugees more isolated
from host community.
Test markets using
a phased approach,
combination of inkind and CBIs. Given
visibility of aid, indepth protection
assessment essential.
Depending on security, access or other factors, remote management is one option for an
implementation strategy. CBIs may be appropriate when access is constrained as money
business services (banks, transfer agents, etc) and markets may continue to operate even
during conflict. However, given lack of access, risk assessment of the potential for diversion
of the cash is essential. Local partners are essential for monitoring markets, process and
outcomes.
Resources on cash-based interventions in different operating contexts
UNHCR (2009) UNHCR policy on refugee protection and solutions in urban areas, see: http://www.
unhcr.org/4ab356ab6.pdf (a.o. 02.02.2015)
Biron (2012) Adapting to urban displacement: the use of cash transfers in urban areas, see: http://
dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-00808208/ (a.o. 02.02.2015)
UNHCR (2011) Promoting Livelihoods and Self-reliance Operational Guidance on Refugee Protection
and Solutions in Urban Areas, see: http://www.unhcr.org/4eeb19f49.pdf (a.o. 02.02.2015)
Cash Learning Partnership (2011) Cash transfer programming in urban emergencies: a toolkit for
practitioners, see: http://www.cashlearning.org/resources/library/251-cash-transfer-programming-inurban-emergencies-a-toolkit-for-practitioners (a.o. 02.02.2015)
21