O.R. 569/875 Legal Disaster Blog

5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R.
569/875
Follow Share Report Abuse Next Blog» ca11.uscourts.fraud@gmail.com New P
VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
F R I D A Y, J A NUA R Y 2 9 , 2 0 1 0 FO LLO W ER S
VICTIMS EXPOSE LEE COUNTY FRAUD JUDICIALFRAUD

Options
... Would you please do me a favor and add MaizeMaze@gmail.com This is the family Followers (1)
w ho had their farm taken from them in New Jersey. I w ould like for her to see all of
the corruption that you have listed and have filed under, also if you could get some
of w hat she w rites to you about on Scrib....as you did for me. We w ould appreciate
this very much. We are putting a book together.....The Law less Law and if you
w ould like to contribute to it, as many other victims are doing, that w ould be Invite your friends
w onderful. Thank you. Angela
In a message dated 1/29/2010 11:32:55 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, JRBU@aol.com
w rites:
B LO G A R C HI V E
AVATAR: ART IMITATES LIFE IN ▼ 201 0 (4)

LAWLESS FLORIDA ▼ January (4)
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26049851/AVATAR-AND- V ICTIMS EXPOSE LEE
AMERICAN-CROOK-JOHN-EDWIN-STEELE COUNTY FRAUD
LEE COUNTY CORRUPTION:
http://vableecounty.blogspot.com/ 1/29
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
FRA UD Y OU CAN SEE WITH
Y O...
NOTICE OF APPEA L A ND
FRA UD
CORRUPT CHA PPELL'S
CRIMES
► 2009 (7 8)
A B O UT M E
JU DI CI A L F RA U D
V I EW M Y CO M P LET E
P R O FI LE
P O S T ED B Y J UDI CI A LFR A UD A T 10: 30 A M 10 CO M M ENT S

LA B ELS : LEE C O UNT Y C O R R UP T I O N
LEE COUNTY CORRUPTION:
FRAUD YOU CAN SEE WITH

YOUR OWN EYES:
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
“O.R. 569/875”

LA B ELS : FR A UD, LEE CO UNT Y CO R R UP T I O N
F R I D A Y, J A NUA R Y 1 5 , 2 0 1 0
NOTICE OF APPEAL AND FRAUD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
FORT MY ERS DIV ISION
[“TRANSFERRED” FROM: U.S. D.C., SOUTHERN

DISTRICT, W. PALM BEACH DIV.]
JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT, DR. JORG BUSSE,
Plaintiffs,
v ersus Case # 2:09-CV-007 91-FtM-CEH
ROGER ALEJO; KENNETH M. WILKINSON; JA CK N. PETERSON;

ROGER DESJARLA IS; LEE COUNTY , FLORIDA; LEE COUNTY
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
V A LUE A DJUSTMENT BOARD; LORI L. RUTLAND; STATE OF
FLORIDA , BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL
IMPROV EMENT TRUST FUND; STATE OF FLORIDA,
DEPA RTMENT OF ENV IRONMENTAL PROTECTION; CHAD LA CH;
CHARLES “BARRY ” STEV ENS; REA GAN KA THLEEN RUSSELL;
KAREN B. HAWES; ROGER DESJARLAIS; CHA RLIE GREEN; BOB
JA NES; BRIAN BIGELOW; RA Y JUDAH; TAMMY HALL; FRANK
MANN; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY (S); SEA N P. FLY NN; E.
KENNETH STEGEBY ; DAV ID P. RHODES; A. BRIA N ALBRITTON;
CY NTHIA A. PIV ACEK; JOHNSON ENGINEERING, INC.; STEV EN
CA RTA; MIKE SCOTT; HUGH D. HAY ES; GERALD D. SIEBENS;
STATE OF FLORIDA A TTORNEY GENERA L; WILLIA M M.
MARTIN; PETERSON BERNARD; SKIP QUILLEN; TOM
GILBERTSON, NEWS PRESS, R. LENGERICH,
NOT ICE OF
APPEAL, FRAUD &
FABRICAT ION
OF
“RESOLUTION”
[“O.R. 569/87 5”]
___________________________________________________
____________________/
APPEAL FROM FRAUDULENT ORDERS [E.G.,

## 36-38] & MOTION FOR RELIEF
FROM “WILD UNSUBSTANTIATED

ALLEGATIONS” & FABRICATIONS
BY OBJECTIVELY PARTIAL & CORRUPT

MAGISTRATE S. POLSTER-CHAPPELL
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
M O T IO N F O R M A N D A T O R Y R E C U S A L O F D E F .
C O R R U PT U . S . M A G IS T R A T E
S. POL ST ER C HA PPEL L , WHO C ON C OC T ED A

“LE G IS LA T IV E A C T ” [ O . R . 5 6 9 / 8 7 5 ]
AND/OR EXT ENDED T HE RECORD “LEE COUNT Y ”

FRAUD SCHEMES FOR BRIBES
N O T IC E O F C O R R U P T IO N , C R IM IN A L C A S E
F I X IN G , E X T R IN S IC F R A U D B Y
NAMED DEFENDANTS
POLSTER CHAPPELL AND
STEELE, WHO DIS-
ALLOWED
PLAINT IFF(S) “TO ASSERT” T HE T RUT H & FACIAL
NULLIT Y OF “O.R. 569/87 5”
January 1 1 , 201 0
PUBLIC NOTICE AND PUBLICA TIONS OF
GOV ERNMENTA L CORRUPTION & EMINENT DOMA IN FRAUD
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24321 7 94/SHERI-POLSTER-
CHAPPELL-JUDICIAL-CORRUPTION-CONCEALMENT-OF-O-R-
569-87 5
DEF. CHAPPELL FRAUDULENT LY CONCEALED
GOVERNMENT AL FRAUD
1 . Defendant corrupt U.S. Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell
again fraudulently concealed the facial nullity and illegality of
“Lee County ” fraud schemes “O.R. 569/87 5”and the below
forged “Lee County ” “land parcels” [PARCEL 12-44-20-01-

00000.00A0 and PARCEL 07 -44-21-01-00001.0000].
Here, Defendant Chappell fraudulently concealed, e.g., that
said prima facie fraud schemes are not any “genuine issues of
material fact”, muniment of title and/or instrument. Polster

Chappell knew that the prima facie record nullity and illegality
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
of said fraud schemes has been indisputable and patently
clear. Howev er, Chappell continues to corrupt the judicial
process and fraudulently pretend that Lee County purportedly

owns Plaintiffs’ Gulf-front lands and priv ate easements.
PLAINT IFFS APPEAL FROM CHAPPELL’S CRIMES AND
FRAUD ON T HE COURT
2. The Plaintiffs appeal from Chappell’s ex trinsic and ex tra-judicial
fraud and Orders, Doc. ## 36, 37 , 38, in this independent
action for relief from fraud on the Court(s). Here in ex change
for Defendants’ bribes, corrupt Chappell keeps repeating her

dumb determinations while the world is watching her crimes
on the worldwide web. Unless Chappell can identify w ho,
w hen, w here, how , and w hy transferred any title to and/or
interest in Plaintiffs’ riparian lands, Parcel # 1 2-44-20-01 -
0001 5.01 5A , Lee County Plat Book 3, page 25 (1 91 2), corrupt

Chappell’s dumb claims and orders are barred under, e.g.,
Florida’s self-enforcing Marketable Record Title Act.
CROOKED CHAPPELL
PERVERTS THE LAW,
RECORD FACTS AND TITLES

3. Corrupt Chappell knew that under Florida’s self-enforcing
Marketable Record Title Act Plaintiffs’ ex clusiv e and perfected

record title to their riparian Gulf front lands and priv ate
implied easements had been automatically quieted. Crooked
Chappell continues her crimes with wanton disregard for
Florida and Federal law and the record facts.
PLAINTIFFS OBJECT TO
CHAPPELL’S CONCOCTIONS
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
& FRAUD ON THE COURT

4. The pro se Plaintiffs object to objectiv ely partial and corrupt
Polster-Chappell’s capricious concoctions and “wild
unsubstantiated allegations” that, e.g., “Lee County ” forged
“claim” “O.R. 569/87 5” is any resolution and/or “legislative
act”. Here in ex change for Defendants’ bribes, Chappell
fraudulently concealed that no “legislator’ ev er enacted or

executed “O.R. 569/87 5” as admitted by the Defendants on
the record.
DEFENDANT CHAPPELL HAS

BEEN MERELY REPEATING
HER DUMB LIES, AND

PLAINTIFFS ARE ENTITLED
TO CHAPPELL’S
ABSOLUTELY MANDATED
RECUSAL
5. In their independent actions for relief from fraud and
gov ernmental corruption, the Plaintiffs ev idenced the
conclusiv e discov ery in the “prior case(s) regarding the same

issues”. Unintelligently and corruptly , Defendant Chappell
continues to fraudulently conceal the prev iously discov ered
and conclusiv ely prov en nullity and illegality of, e.g., “O.R.
569/87 5”:
“The Plaintiffs hav e made w ild unsubstantiated allegations based

upon the Court’s unfav orable rulings from a prior case regarding
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
the same issues. A llegations of unfav orable rulings and
unsupported allegations are not sufficient reason to recuse.”
Here, the pro se Plaintiffs hav e been v ictims of Defendant
Chappell’s ex tra-judicial and ex trinsic fraud. Based on
discov ery in State and Federal Courts since 2006, Chappell
knew that the Plaintiffs’ allegations were fully substantiated.

Arrogantly and ignorantly , Defendant Chappell fabricated
“w ild unsubstantiated allegations” in the facial absence of any
support and substantiation of her “w ild unsubstantiated” lies.
Under the Florida and Federal Constitutions, the Plaintiffs are

entitled to be free from said gov ernmental oppression and
trash.
6. Furthermore, in her “Order” [Doc. # 37 ], Defendant corrupt
U.S. Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell again
fraudulently concealed the facial nullity and illegality of “Lee
County ” fraud schemes “O.R. 569/87 5” and the below forged

“Lee County ” “land parcels” [PARCEL 12-44-20-01-
00000.00A0 and PARCEL 07 -44-21-01-00001.0000].
POLST ER-CHAPPELL’S RECORD EXT RA-JUDICIAL &
EXT RINSIC FRAUD
7 . For the criminal purpose of concealing the ex tra-judicial and
ex trinsic fraud, Defendant Sheri Polster-Chappell fabricated
with wanton disregard for the truth and public record:

unsupported allegations are not sufficient reason to recuse.”
See Doc. # 37 ; p. 3 of 3.
Here, named Defendant Polster Chappell knew and again
fraudulently concealed that said prima facie “Lee County ”
forgeries could not possibly be “w ild unsubstantiated
allegations” but undisputable record facts.
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
DEF. CHAPPELL
CONTRADICTED THE
DEFENDANTS AND THEIR
ADMISSIONS
8. Here in particular, named party Defendant U.S. Magistrate
Polster Chappell contradicted the Defendants and their record

admissions such as, e.g., that Lee County , Florida, did not sign
and execute facially forged “claim” “O.R. 569/87 5”.
CAPRICIOUSLY, DEF.
CHAPPELL CONTRADICTED
THE U.S. COURT OF

APPEALS
9. Furthermore, named party Def. U.S. Magistrate Polster Chappell
capriciously contradicted the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
11th Circuit, which had declared the Plaintiffs the
unimpeachable record owners of their riparian/littoral Gulf-
front land parcel 1 2-44-20-01 -0001 5.01 5A and the prima
facie nullity of “Lee County ” facial fraud scheme “O.R.

569/87 5” pursuant to Florida’s self-enforcing Marketable
Record Title A ct. Defendant Chappell has no license or
authority to lie, deliberately depriv e, and defraud the pro se
Plaintiffs in ex change for Defendants’ bribes. PRESCOTT, No.
08-1 4846, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 867 8, 2009 WL 1 059631
PREVIOUSLY DEFENDANT
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
CHAPPELL HAD RECUSED

HERSELF
1 0. Following her objectiv ely partial and fraudulent “rulings from
a prior case”, named Defendant U.S. Magistrate Chappell had
prev iously recused herself “regarding the same issues”:

unsupported allegations are not sufficient reason to recuse.” Id.
DEFENDANT CORRUPT MAGIST RAT E CHAPPELL’S

RECUSAL IS MANDAT ED
1 1 . Based on her prior recusal “regarding the same issues”,
Chappell has been under an absolute recusal obligation
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455. Here, Chappell’s rulings are
unintelligent, irrational, and arbitrary . No intelligent and fit
person in Chappell’s shoes could hav e possibly denied recusal

after prev ious recusal “regarding the same issues”. How
dumb!
NAMED DEFENDANT
POLSTER CHAPPELL IS
OBJECTIVELY PARTIAL
1 2. No reasonable, intelligent, and fit magistrate, judge, juror,
and/or person in Polster Chappell’s shoes could hav e possibly

determined and/or ruled that the conclusiv ely ev idenced
facial nullity and illegality of “O.R. 569/87 5” and said
fraudulent “land parcels” are w ild unsubstantiated
allegations.
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
1 3. No reasonable, intelligent, and fit magistrate, judge, juror,
and/or person in Polster Chappell’s shoes could hav e possibly
determined and/or ruled that said patently clearly illegal and

null and v oid “O.R. 569/87 5” is any legislative act,
instrument, resolution, or muniment of title.
PLA INTIFFS DEMA ND RECUSA L(S) AND RELIEF FROM FRA UD
ON THE COURTS
1 4. Here in ex change for Defendants’ bribes, Polster Chappell
ex tends said facial gov ernmental fraud schemes. The Plaintiffs
are entitled to be free from gov ernmental and Polster-

Chappell’s corruption and case fix ing and demand the
requested recusal(s) and relief from said fraud on the Court(s).
FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF “LEE COUNTY ” FACIAL
FRAUD SCHEMES
1 5. OBJECTIV ELY PA RTIA L AND CORRUPT U.S. MAGISTRA TE
SHERI POLST ER CHAPPELL, FRAUDULENT LY
CONCEALED T HE PRIMA FACIE NULLITY , ILLEGA LITY ,
AND CRIMINALITY OF, E.G., “LEE COUNTY ” FACIAL

FORGERIES:
• “O.R. 569/87 5”
http://www.scribd.com /doc/24051290/Lee-County -
Public-Corruption-Inv estigation-O-R-569-87 5-
FRAUD
• FORGED & NON-EXIST ENT “PARCEL 12-44-20-01-

00000.00A0”
See
http://www.leepa.org/Display /Display Parcel.aspx ?
FolioID=10001519
• FORGED & NON-EXIST ENT “PARCEL 07 -44-21-01-

00001.0000”
http://www.leepa.org/Scripts/Property Query /Propert

y Query .aspx ?ST RAP=07 442101000010000
AS CONCLUSIVELY PROVEN BY LEE COUNT Y PLAT
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
BOOK 3, P. 25 (1912).
http://www.scribd.com /doc/2432117 6/1912-CAY O-

COST A-SUBDIVISION-PLAT -LEE-COUNT Y -
FLORIDA-PB-3-PG-25
T HE JUDICIAL DEFENDANT S OBST RUCT ED JUST ICE
AND LAW
1 6. The Plaintiff declared unimpeachable riparian street and

subject real property Owners hav e a Constitutionally
protected right to assert that Lee County ” sham “claim” and
scam “O.R. 569/87 5” [see
FRAUD] was on its face
a. Nev er signed;
b. Nev er executed;
c. A prim a facie em inent dom ain fraud

schem e;
d. Without any legal effect;
e. Null and v oid;
f. Nev er legally existed;
g. Was nev er legally recorded.
17 . Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint [see
http://www.scribd.com /doc/2417 3380/T hird-
Am ended-Com plaint-Doc-282] patently clearly
ev idenced that facially null and v oid “Lee County ” “claim” and
scam “O.R. 569/87 5” was nev er signed, executed, and legally
recorded. Id., p. 9. Here since at least 2007 , Defendant
corrupt U.S. Magistrate Sheri Polster Chappell and Judge John
Edwin Steele perv erted the truth and public record ev idence
and obstructed justice and the law. See

FRAUD.
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
GOVERNMENT AL/JUDICIAL OPPRESSION & FRAUD IN
EXCHANGE FOR BRIBES
1 8. In ex change for Lee County bribes, Defendant corrupt U.S.
Magistrate Sheri Polster Chappell and Judge John Edwin Steele
did not allow the Plaintiff(s) to assert the facial nullity ,

criminality , and illegality of said forged “land” “claim” “O.R.
569/87 5” [see
FRAUD]:
“T he copy of the resolution attached to the

T hird Am ended Com plaint establishes that it
was signed, executed, and duly recorded in the
public records, and plaintiff will not be allowed
to assert otherwise.” Doc. # 338, p. 1 2, ¶ C;
http://www.scribd.com /doc/2417 3832/2-07 -
Cv -228-Doc-338-Opinion-and-Order
1 9. U.S. Magistrate Sheri Polster Chappell and John Edwin Steele
knew, fraudulently concealed, and agreed to conceal that on
its face, said fraud scheme “O.R. 569/87 5” was
a. NOT any instrum ent;
b. NOT any em inent dom ain proceedings

docum ent;
c. NOT any writing;
d. NOT any [em inent dom ain] court judgm ent;
e. NOT any m unim ent of title.
FOR BRIBES, DEFENDANT ST EELE FAKED SIGNATURES
AND AN “ACT”
20. In ex change for Lee County bribes, Defendants U.S. Magistrate
Sheri Polster Chappell and/or John E. Steele corruptly and
falsely pretended:

5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
to assert otherwise.” Doc. # 338, p. 1 2, ¶ C;
http://www.scribd.com /doc/2417 3832/2-07 -
Cv -228-Doc-338-Opinion-and-Order
Here Defendant U.S. Magistrate Sheri Polster Chappell and
John E. Steele knew, fraudulently concealed, and conspired to
conceal that no signature or name of any “legislator”
appeared on “Lee County ” forged “claim” “O.R. 569/87 5”. See
FRAUD.
DEFENDANT JOHN EDWIN ST EELE CONT RADICT ED
DEF. JACK N. PET ERSON
21 . U.S. Magistrate Sheri Polster Chappell knew that under oath,
Defendant Lee County Official Jack N. Peterson had answered
the question: “Do y ou see a signature?”
“No.”
See record Transcript of 02/29/2008 Deposition of Defendant
Lee County A ssistant Attorney Jack N. Peterson; p. 4; lines 6-
7 ; see http://www.scribd.com /doc/24145242/JACK-N-

PET ERSON-PERJURY -PUBLIC-CORRUPT ION-t.
22. No facially un-signed and un-ex ecuted “claim” could hav e
possibly
a. Been any writing or instrum ent;
b. Transferred any interest or estate to Lee

County :
c. Involuntarily divested the Plaintiff declared

unim peachable record riparian street and
Gulf-front land Owners of their subject
Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A. See
http://www.scribd.com /doc/24146811/Lee-
County -Corruption-Perv ersion-of-Public-
Record-Ct.
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
PE R J U R Y & PU B L IC C O R R U PT IO N B Y
D E F E N D A N T J A C K N . PE T E R S O N
23. During the taking of his Deposition on 02/29/2008, Defendant

corrupt Official Jack N. Peterson had perjured himself and
answered in response to
“Do y ou believ e that this draft [“Lee County ”

prim a facie forged “claim ” and fraud schem e
“O.R. 569/87 5”] has any legal effect?”
“I believ e it does hav e legal effect.”
See Transcript of 02/29/2008 Deposition of Defendant
corrupt Jack N. Peterson, p. 4, line 20; see
http://www.scribd.com /doc/24145242/JACK-N-
PET ERSON-PERJURY -PUBLIC-CORRUPT ION-t.
24. When asked: “Why is that?” Defendant corrupt Official Jack
N. Peterson answered:
“It’s a resolution of the board of county
com m issioners.” Id., p. 4, lines 22, 23.
25. Here, no single “county commissioner” could be identified on
said forged “claim” “O.R. 569/87 5”. No name or signature of
any Lee County “commissioner” appeared on the face of null
and v oid “O.R. 569/87 5”. Here, the judicial and other
Defendants, and said Circuit Judges knew, fraudulently
concealed, and conspired to conceal that the facially fake
“resolution” [prima facie scam “O.R. 569/87 5”]:
a. Nev er legally existed;
b. Was nev er legally recorded;
c. Was nev er entitled to any recording;
d. Was not any instrum ent, writing, or m unim ent of

title;
e. Was a prim a facie gov ernm ental fraud and

ex tortion schem e;
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
f. Was not any genuine “claim ”;
g. Was not any conv ey ance;
h. Was nev er signed, executed, or sealed by Lee

County , Florida;
i. Was nev er witnessed;
j. Was on its face null and v oid ab initio;
k. Lacked any platted or other legal description;
l. Could not hav e possibly created or transferred any

property interest or estate to any one;
m . Nev er convey ed any title, interest, or estate to Lee

County , Florida;
n. Facially v iolated the separation-of-powers

doctrine;
o. Facially v iolated the 4 t h , 14 t h , and 5 t h U.S. Const.

Am endm ents;
p. Facially v iolated Florida’s em inent dom ain

Statutes;
q. Facially v iolated Florida’s self-enforcing

Marketable Record T itle Act;
r. Was not any “genuine issue of m aterial fact”;
s. Entitled the Plaintiff unim peachable riparian

“paper” street record Owners to Default and/or
Sum m ary Judgm ent in their fav or under the
Rules.
CONSPIRACY T O DEFRAUD, DEPRIVE, AND CONCEAL
26. Here, no reasonable intelligent person, juror, or judge in
Defendant crooked Official Peterson’s, Polster Chappell’s,

and/or Steele’s shoes could hav e possibly formed any belief
that said facial forgery and fraud scheme “O.R. 569/87 5” had
any “legal effect”.
D E F E N D A N T J . N . PE T E R S O N ’ S A D M IS S IO N
O F N O S IG N A T U R E U N D E R O A T H
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
27 . When asked: “Do y ou see a signature?” corrupt Lee County
Official Peterson answered:
“No.” Id., p. 4, line 7 .
28. When asked: “Perhaps would that indicate to y ou that
the draft or proposal is facially defectiv e?” Defendant
corrupt Official Jack N. Peterson perjured himself and

materially misrepresented:
“No.” Id., p. 4, line 1 0.
U.S. FRAUDULENT AND FALSE PRETENSES OF

“FRIVOLOUS APPEAL”
29. Just like the United States’ fraudulent and false pretenses of
“w eapons of mass destruction” preceding the Iraq War(s), the

United States and its agents arrogantly and ignorantly
pretended “frivolity” of Plaintiff declared riparian street
record Owners’ claims for relief in the glaring presence of a
facially forged “resolution” [Gov ernmental prima facie scam
“O.R. 569/87 5”], which could not hav e possibly involuntarily

divested the Plaintiff declared riparian record land Owners of
their Constitutionally protected street property “on the Gulf of
Mex ico” under any set of circumstances. See Doc. # 385.
S E L F - E N F O R C IN G A B S O L U T E J U D IC IA L
R E C U S A L O B L IG A T IO N , 28 U . S . C . § 4 55
30. The Gov ernmental Agents and/or Judges were named party
Defendants and under a self-enforcing affirmativ e recusal
obligation, which had to be resolv ed in fav or of mandatory
disqualification under 28 U.S.C. § 455. Rather than rationally
and justly reconcile the conclusiv e perjury and public

corruption ev idence on file, the v arious Judges ex tended the
“Lee County ” forgeries such as, e.g:
t. Forged “claim ” of “unidentified” un-platted areas,
“O.R. 569/87 5”, PB 3, PG 25;
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
u. Forged un-platted “parcel 12-44-20-01-
00000.00A0”, PB 3, PG 25 (1912);
v. Forged un-platted “parcel 07 -44-21-01-
00001.0000”, PB 3, PG 25;
w. Forged “park”, which was nev er platted or
subdivided in 1912, PB 3, PG 25.
PU B L IC C O R R U P T IO N A N D P E R V E R S IO N O F
PU B L IC R E C O R D
31 . Here plain and short, the Gov ernmental Agents could not be
trusted while they hav e been brazenly perv erting the public
record ev idence, defrauding the Plaintiff unimpeachable
riparian/littoral street record Owners, and destructing the

stability of titles in egregious v iolation of Florida’s self-
enforcing Marketable Record Title Act, which had
automatically quieted Plaintiffs’ perfected and unencumbered
marketable record title to their riparian “paper” street and
subject Parcel “on the Gulf of Mex ico” as conv ey ed in

reference to the 1 91 2 Cay o Costa Subdiv ision Plat of Surv ey in
Lee County Plat Book 3, p. 25.
PREVIOUS RECUSALS OF CORRUPT JOHN E. ST EELE & S.
POLST ER-CHAPPELL
32. Named Defendant objectiv ely partial and corrupt U.S. District
Judge John E. Steele and Defendant U.S. Magistrate Sheri
Polster-Chappell remov ed Plaintiff declared unimpeachable

riparian street record Owners’ State action, Case # 2006-CA-
0031 85, Lee County Circuit Court, to their U.S. District Court,
Middle District of Florida, Fort My ers Div ision, Case # 2:08-
cv -00899-UA-MAP. On 1 2/09/2008, said Defendants recused

themselv es in that related and/or associated Case # 2:08-cv -
00899-UA-MA P. See Order of Recusal.
33. Furthermore, said Defendants recused themselv es in related
and/or associated Federal Case # 2:09-cv -00602. See Order
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
of Recusal.
JUDICIAL FRAUD & CORRUPT ION: FABRICAT ION OF A
“LEGISLATIVE ACT”
34. In ex change for Defendants’ bribes, objectiv ely partial, unfit,
and corrupt U.S. Magistrate Sheri Polster Chappell and/or U.S.
Judge John E. Steele fraudulently and falsely pretended:
“Plaintiff asserted that the resolution [“O.R.

569/87 5”] effecting the taking of m ore than
200 Acres other than his 2.5 Acres. T his is
sufficient to constitute a legislative act.”
See Doc. # 338, Opinion and Order”, p. 11;
http://www.scribd.com /doc/2417 3832/2-07 -Cv -

228-Doc-338-Opinion-and-Order;
http://www.scribd.com /doc/24023101/John-E-
Steele-Gov ernm ental-Corruption-and-Fraud.
Here in ex change for Defendants’ bribes, U.S. Magistrate

Sheri Polster Chappell and/or Defendant John E. Steele
materially misrepresented that prima facie “Lee County ”
scam “O.R. 569/87 5” was a legislative act and/or
resolution, which no reasonable, intelligent, and fit

person, judge, or juror could hav e possibly found.
JUDICIAL CORRUPT ION: CROOKED DEFENDANT U.S.

JUDGE JOHN E. ST EELE
35. U.S. Magistrate Sheri Polster Chappell knew that Defendant

corrupt Judge John Edwin Steele fraudulently concealed and
conspired with other Defendants to conceal that “Lee County ”
sham “claim” and scam “O.R. 569/87 5” was nev er signed and
executed. See Docket and

http://www.scribd.com /doc/2417 3380/T hird-
Am ended-Com plaint-Doc-282.
36. Fraudulently , named party Defendant objectiv ely partial and
corrupt U.S. District Judge John Edwin Steele falsely
pretended in the May 5, 2008 “Opinion and Order”, Doc. #
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
338:

to assert otherwise.” Id., p. 1 2, ¶ C.
Here unconstitutionally and criminally , said Defendant
crooked U.S. Judge John E. Steele disallowed the Plaintiff
unimpeachable record co-Owner, Dr. Jorg Busse, “to assert”
the truth and defend his Constitutionally protected property ,

riparian Gulf-front “paper” street and subject Parcel # 1 2-44-
20-01 -0001 5.01 5A “on the Gulf of Mex ico”, PB 3, PG 25
(1 91 2) against gov ernmental corruption, fraud, deliberate
depriv ations, seizure, confiscation, conspiracy to deliberately
depriv e, defraud, seize, confiscate, etc.
JUDICIAL EXT ENSION OF “LEE COUNT Y ” FACIAL

SHAM CLAIM AND SCAM
37 . Here, named party Defendant objectiv ely corrupt U.S.

Magistrate Sheri Polster Chappell and Judge John E. Steele
knew and fraudulently concealed that on its face, sham “claim”
and scam “O.R. 569/87 5”, i.e., the forged “resolution”
a. Nev er legally existed;
b. Was nev er legally recorded;
c. Nev er created or transferred any property interest;
d. Could not hav e possibly ev er transferred any

property interest to Lee County ;
e. Was nev er signed or executed by any legislator;
f. Was not any legal instrum ent or m unim ent of title;
g. Was null and v oid ab initio.
EMINENT DOMAIN FRAUD AND GOVERNMENT AL
CORRUPT ION
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
38. Defendant corrupt U.S. Magistrate Sheri Polster Chappell
and/or Judge John Edwin Steele knew, fraudulently
concealed, and conspired to conceal that no legislator and/or

“legislative act” could hav e possibly involuntarily divested
the declared unimpeachable record riparian property Owners
of their Gulf-front “paper” street and subject Parcel # 1 2-44-
20-01 -0001 5.01 5A. Here, Defendant objectiv ely unfit and
corrupt U.S. Judge John Edwin Steele ex tended the record
“Lee County ” facial forgeries and fraud schemes to illegally
by pass Florida’s Constitution and eminent domain Statutes.
FOR BRIBES, JOHN E. ST EELE ALT ERED HIS FINDINGS
39. In ex change for Lee County bribes, Defendant John Edwin
Steele altered and perv erted his findings as stated in Doc. #
87 , see http://www.scribd.com /doc/2417 4482/2-07 -
CV-228-DOC-87 :
“Based on the Court’s rev iew of the file, it appears that

jurisdiction will not be based on div ersity . This Court
also has original jurisdiction ov er cases arising under
the U.S. Constitution and other federal laws. 28 U.S.C.
§ 1 331 . Based on a reading of plaintiff’s filings, it
appears that there is at least one cause of action for
civ il rights v iolations under 42 U.S.C. § 1 983. (Doc.
#25, p. 1 9; # 25-2, p. 8.)”
FRAUDULENT LOCAL RULES VIOLAT IONS T O
CONCEAL RECORD EVIDENCE
40. Here fraudulently , and while no judge had been re-assigned in
State Court after the recusal of Defendant State Judge Ly nn

Gerald, Jr., said Defendants failed to comply with Local Rule
4.2, Doc. # 3, for the unlawful purpose of obstructing the law
and justice and deliberately depriv ing and defrauding the
Plaintiff declared unimpeachable record Owners of their
riparian street and subject Parcel “on the Gulf of Mex ico”,
PRESCOTT, No. 08-1 4846, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 867 8, 2009
WL 1 059631 ; Lee County PB 3, PG 25 (1 91 2).
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
CONST IT UT IONAL RIGHT T O BE FREE FROM
GOVERNMENT AL CORRUPT ION
41 . The Plaintiff indisputable riparian Gulf-front street record
Owners hav e been entitled to be free from the patently clear

and conclusiv ely ev idenced Gov ernmental corruption and the
criminal ex tra-judicial acts of the named Defendant
objectiv ely corrupt and rogue Judges and Magistrates in these
Cases.
T HE LAW SELF-ENFORCED PLAINT IFFS’ DECLARED
RECORD OWNERSHIP
42. The named Defendant objectiv ely partial and corrupt Judges
and Magistrates in these Cases fraudulently concealed and

conspired with Officials to conceal that the law self-enforced
Plaintiffs’ unencumbered, unimpeachable, and perfected
record ownership of and ex clusiv e title to the adjoining
platted riparian street and subject Parcel # 1 2-44-20-01 -

0001 5.01 5A “on the Gulf of Mex ico” as declared by the U.S.
Court of Appeals, 1 1 t h Circuit, on 04/21 /2009:
“T he [Plaintiffs’-]Appellants’ Lot 15A [riparian

Gulf-front Parcel 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, Lee
County Plat Book 3, p. 25 (1912)] is on the west
side of the Cay o Costa Subdiv ision on the Gulf
of Mex ico and is adjacent to land that was
claim ed through resolution 569/87 5 to create

the Cay o Costa State Park.”
See PRESCOTT, No. 08-1 4846, 2009 U.S. A pp. LEXIS 867 8,
2009 WL 1 059631 ; Lee County PB 3, PG 25 (1 91 2). Here, said
U.S. Court of A ppeals followed Murrell v . United States, 269
F.2d 458 (5th Cir.1 959) and West Peninsular Title Co. v . Palm
Beach County , 41 F.3d 1 490, 1 492 n.4 (1 1 t h Cir.), cert. denied,
51 6 U.S. 932, 1 1 6 S. Ct. 338, 1 33 L. Ed. 2d 237 (1 995), in which
the 1 1 t h Circuit relied on the Florida Supreme Court ruling(s)
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
in, e.g., Caples v . Taliaferro, 1 97 So.861 and/or Burns v .
McDanial, 1 04 Fla. 526, 1 40 So. 31 4:
‘T here are also authorities holding that

when a street of highway is laid out wholly
on the m argin of a grantor’s land, a
conv ey ance of the lands abutting such
street or highway carried the fee to the
entire width of such street or highway …’
CONCEALMENT OF SELF-
ENFORCING MARKETABLE
RECORD TITLE ACT
43. Here said indisputably corrupt Defendant Judges and
Magistrates knew, fraudulently concealed, and conspired to
conceal that through the mere passage of time, Florida’s self-
enforcing Marketable Record Title Act had automatically
quieted Plaintiffs’ paramount marketable record title, which

perfectly conv ey ed Plaintiffs’ adjoining riparian “paper” street
and subject Parcel “on the Gulf of Mex ico” in reference to the
1 91 2 Plat of Surv ey of the facially riparian undedicated priv ate
residential Cay o Costa Subdiv ision as recorded in Lee County

Plat Book 3, page 25. See Ex hibits on record.
FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF PLAINT IFF

OWNER(S)’ ST AT E ACT ION
44. The Defendant objectiv ely partial and corrupt Judges and
Magistrates in these Cases fraudulently concealed and
conspired with Officials to conceal that the Plaintiff declared
riparian record Owner(s) had pursued “declaratory
judgment” in State Court since 2006:
“Additionally , plaintiff could hav e pursued an

state action for declaratory judgm ent under
FLA. ST AT . § 86.011, a suit to quiet title,
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
T rustees of Internal Im p. Fund of State of
Florida v . T offel, 145 So. 2d 7 37 (Fla. 2d DCA
1962), or a suit in ejectm ent if the m atter is
v iewed as a boundary dispute. Petry ni v .
Denton, 807 So. 2d 697 , 699 (Fla. 2d DCA
2002).”
See Case # 2:07 -cv -00228-FtM-JES-SPC, “Opinion and
Order”, Doc. # 338.
Here, named Defendant objectiv ely partial and corrupt U.S.
District Judge John E. Steele and corrupt Magistrate Sheri
Polster-Chappell themselv es remov ed Plaintiff(s) State action
to Federal Court. See Cases ## 2006-CA-0031 85, 20th

Judicial Circuit, Lee County , Florida; and 2:08-cv -00899-UA-
MAP; see below Ex hibit of Docket, Case # 2:08-cv -00899-UA-
MAP, ev idencing said remov al and the mandatory recusal of
corrupt judicial Defendants John E. Steele and Sheri Polster-
Chappell.
WHEREFORE, the declared Plaintiff riparian street record Owners

respectfully demand
1 . A n Order for the m andatory recusal of named party

Defendant objectiv ely corrupt and partial U.S. District Judges
John E. Steele, Richard A. Lazzara, and Magistrates Mark Allan
Pizzo, and Sheri Polster-Chappell, because they were
under an absolute and affirmativ e self-enforcing recusal

obligation under 28 U.S.C. § 455 and obstructed justice;
2. An Order enjoining said Defendant U.S. Judges and

Magistrates from obstructing Plaintiffs’ court access under
fraudulent pretenses of “frivolity”;
3. A n Order reliev ing the Plaintiff unimpeachable record riparian
street and subject Parcel Owners from said ex trinsic fraud,
fraud on the courts, and fraudulent pretenses of “Lee County ”
ow nership of a non-ex istent and un-platted “park”, and

facially forged and non-ex istent “parcels” “1 2-44-20-01 -
00000.00A 0” and “07 -44-21 -01 -00001 .0000”, which were
nev er subdivided by original Subdiv ision Owner and

5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
Dev eloper A lex ander C. Roesch in 1 91 2, PB 3, PG 25;
4. A n Order v acating and reliev ing the Plaintiff record riparian
street Owners from said “Order” [Doc. # 3], because on its face
it serv es the unlawful purpose of obstructing justice,
deliberately depriv ing and defrauding the Plaintiff riparian
street and subject Parcel Owners;
5. An Order, which intelligently reconciles said Federal
Appellate Declaration of Plaintiffs’ riparian ownership with
Doc. # 3 and Richard A . Lazzara’s “frivolity” ex trinsic fraud

scheme and fraud on the Court(s);
6. A n Order, which intelligently considers said 1 1 /07 /2007

TRANSCRIPT OF FRAUDULENT PROCEEDINGS and Richard A .
Lazzara’s “frivolity” ex trinsic fraud scheme and fraud on the
Court(s);
7 . An Order v acating and reliev ing the Plaintiff record riparian
street Owners from said “Order” [Doc. # 3], because on its face
it serv es the unlawful purpose of fraudulently concealing the

publicly recorded corruption and case fix ing in ex change for
Defendants’ bribes;
8. A n Order for com pensatory dam ages against all Defendants;
9. A n Order enjoining the Defendant Officials from said “Lee
County ” forgeries and fraud schemes and public gov ernmental
corruption;
1 0. An Order enjoining Defendant Cy nthia A. Piv acek from any
unlawful “attorney review ” ex trinsic fraud scheme, and
obstruction of Plaintiffs’ Constitutional right to court access

and to redress their griev ances;
1 1 . An Order declaring that, through the mere passage of time,

Florida’s self-enforcing Marketable Record Title Act had
automatically quieted Plaintiffs’ perfected and unencumbered
record title to said admittedly riparian Gulf-front street and
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
Parcel # 1 2-44-20-01 -0001 5.01 5A , which touches and abuts
the “Gulf of Mex ico” pursuant to said 1 91 2 record Subdiv ision
Plat and the newly discov ered ev idence;
1 2. A n Order enjoining Lee County , the State of Florida, and its
Officials from maliciously misconstruing said referenced 1 91 2
Subdiv ision Plat of Surv ey , PB 3, PG 25, and the natural record
boundary and monument of the “Gulf of Mex ico” and

“Charlotte Harbor”;
1 3. An Order enjoining, in particular, fraudulent “Lee County ”

“land claim” and scam “O.R. 569/87 5”, which nev er legally
existed and was nev er legally recorded;
1 4. An Order enjoining, in particular, forged and unplatted “Lee
County ” “parcel 1 2-44-20-01 -00000.00A0”, which nev er
legally existed and was nev er legally recorded;
1 5. An Order enjoining, in particular, forged and unplatted “Lee
County ” “parcel 07 -44-21 -01 -00001 .0000”, which nev er
legally existed and was nev er legally recorded;
1 6. An Order enjoining said fraudulent “Lee County ” land

ownership “claims” in the prima facie absence of any Lee
County title;
1 7 . An Order enjoining any trespass onto said priv ate

undedicated residential Cay o Costa Subdiv ision, PB 3, PG 25
(1 91 2), by Lee County , the State of Florida, its Officials, and
the public;
1 8. A n Order enjoining any trespass onto Plaintiffs’ priv ate

implied street and alley easements and onto Plaintiffs’
adjoining riparian street lands and priv ate street easement “on
the Gulf of Mex ico” by Lee County , the State of Florida, its
Officials, and the public;
1 9. An Order reliev ing the Plaintiff unimpeachable record

riparian Gulf-front street Owners from said ex trinsic fraud,
fraud on the courts, and fraudulent pretenses of “Lee County ”
ow nership of non-ex istent and un-platted “parcels 1 2-44-20-
01 -00000.00A0” and “07 -44-21 -01 -00001 .0000” pursuant
to said referenced 1 91 2 Plat, PB 3, PG 25;
20. An Order for punitiv e dam ages against all Defendants;

5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
21 . An Order for relief from the fraudulent Judgments in the

related Cases and Appeals;
22. An Order for the im peachm ent of named party Defendant

objectiv ely partial and corrupt U.S. District Judge Richard A .
Lazzara, who fraudulently concealed Plaintiffs’ unimpeachable
riparian street Ownership as dispositiv ely declared by the 1 1 t h
Circuit on 04/21 /2009;
23. An Order for the im peachm ent of named party Defendant

objectiv ely partial and corrupt U.S. District Judge Richard
Alan Lazzara, who ex tended said crimes, and public
gov ernmental corruption, forgeries, and fraud schemes under
fraudulent and false pretenses of “frivolity”.
______________________________________
/S/JORG BUSSE, M.D., M.M., M.B.A., C.P.M.
Public Corruption and Crim e Victim ; Plaintiff, pro se
State Cert. Res.A ppraiser, Licensed Real Estate Broker, Mortgage

Broker, A ppraisal Instructor;
Consulate General of the Federal Republic of Germ any
C/o Legal and Consular Departm ent
100 N. Biscay ne Blv d., Suite # 2200
Miam i, FL 33132;
T: 239-595-7 07 4; E-mail at:

http://VABLeeCounty .blogspot.com / and/or
JRBU@aol.com
_________________________________
/S/JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT

Crime and Public Corruption Victim; Plaintiff, pro se
P.O. BOX 845, Palm Beach, FL 33480; T: 561-400-3295
JOHN EDWIN STEELE IMPEACHMENT

CAMPAIGN
CAMPAIGN AGAINST JUDICIAL

CORRUPTION
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
GOOGLE: “John Edwin Steele” for the
latest
“O.R. 569/875” FRAUD

SCHEME
johnedwinsteele@aol.com
GOVERNMENTAL CORRUPTION & EMINENT
DOMAIN FRAUD
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24321 7 94/SHERI-POLSTER-
CHAPPELL-JUDICIAL-CORRUPTION-CONCEALMENT-OF-O-R-
569-87 5
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL,

OBJECTIVELY PARTIAL AND CORRUPT U.S.
MAGISTRATE,
FRAUDULENTLY CONCEALED THE
PRIMA FACIE NULLITY, ILLEGALITY,
AND CRIMINALITY OF, E.G.,
“LEE COUNTY” FACIAL FORGERIES:
• “O.R. 569/875”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24051290/Lee-
County-Public-Corruption-Investigation-O-R-569-
875-FRAUD
• FORGED & NON-EXISTENT “PARCEL

12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”
http://www.leepa.org/Display/DisplayParcel.aspx
?FolioID=10001519
• FORGED & NON-EXISTENT “PARCEL

07-44-21-01-00001.0000”
http://www.leepa.org/Scripts/PropertyQuery/Pro
pertyQuery.aspx?STRAP=07442101000010000
AS CONCLUSIVELY PROVEN BY LEE COUNTY

PLAT BOOK 3, P. 25 (1912).
5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875
http://www.scribd.com/doc/24321176/1912-
CAYO-COSTA-SUBDIVISION-PLAT-LEE-
COUNTY-FLORIDA-PB-3-PG-25
CROOKED U.S. MAGIST RAT E SHERI POLST ER

CHAPPELL
http://www.flm d.uscourts.gov /judicialInfo/FtMy ers/JgC

happell.htm

LA B ELS : G O V ER NM ENT A L CO R R UP T I O N
Home Older Posts
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

O.R. 569/875 Legal Disaster Blog

Transféré par

Informations du document

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

O.R. 569/875 Legal Disaster Blog

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

5/27/2010 VAB SCAM O.R.

VAB SCAM O.R. 569/875

VICTIMS EXPOSE LEE COUNTY FRAUD JUDICIALFRAUD

AVATAR: ART IMITATES LIFE IN ▼ 201 0 (4)

P O S T ED B Y J UDI CI A LFR A UD A T 10: 30 A M 10 CO M M ENT S

LEE COUNTY CORRUPTION:

FRAUD YOU CAN SEE WITH

P O S T ED B Y J UDI CI A LFR A UD A T 10: 20 A M 0 CO M M ENT S

NOTICE OF APPEAL AND FRAUD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT MY ERS DIV ISION

[“TRANSFERRED” FROM: U.S. D.C., SOUTHERN

JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT, DR. JORG BUSSE,

v ersus Case # 2:09-CV-007 91-FtM-CEH

ROGER ALEJO; KENNETH M. WILKINSON; JA CK N. PETERSON;

APPEAL FROM FRAUDULENT ORDERS [E.G.,

FROM “WILD UNSUBSTANTIATED

BY OBJECTIVELY PARTIAL & CORRUPT

S. POL ST ER C HA PPEL L , WHO C ON C OC T ED A

AND/OR EXT ENDED T HE RECORD “LEE COUNT Y ”

PUBLIC NOTICE AND PUBLICA TIONS OF

GOV ERNMENTA L CORRUPTION & EMINENT DOMA IN FRAUD

DEF. CHAPPELL FRAUDULENT LY CONCEALED

1 . Defendant corrupt U.S. Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell

again fraudulently concealed the facial nullity and illegality of

“Lee County ” fraud schemes “O.R. 569/87 5”and the below

forged “Lee County ” “land parcels” [PARCEL 12-44-20-01-

Here, Defendant Chappell fraudulently concealed, e.g., that

material fact”, muniment of title and/or instrument. Polster

clear. Howev er, Chappell continues to corrupt the judicial

process and fraudulently pretend that Lee County purportedly

PLAINT IFFS APPEAL FROM CHAPPELL’S CRIMES AND

2. The Plaintiffs appeal from Chappell’s ex trinsic and ex tra-judicial

fraud and Orders, Doc. ## 36, 37 , 38, in this independent

action for relief from fraud on the Court(s). Here in ex change

for Defendants’ bribes, corrupt Chappell keeps repeating her

on the worldwide web. Unless Chappell can identify w ho,

w hen, w here, how , and w hy transferred any title to and/or

interest in Plaintiffs’ riparian lands, Parcel # 1 2-44-20-01 -

0001 5.01 5A , Lee County Plat Book 3, page 25 (1 91 2), corrupt

Florida’s self-enforcing Marketable Record Title Act.

RECORD FACTS AND TITLES

Marketable Record Title Act Plaintiffs’ ex clusiv e and perfected

implied easements had been automatically quieted. Crooked

Chappell continues her crimes with wanton disregard for

Florida and Federal law and the record facts.

& FRAUD ON THE COURT

unsubstantiated allegations” that, e.g., “Lee County ” forged

“claim” “O.R. 569/87 5” is any resolution and/or “legislative

act”. Here in ex change for Defendants’ bribes, Chappell

fraudulently concealed that no “legislator’ ev er enacted or

DEFENDANT CHAPPELL HAS

HER DUMB LIES, AND

gov ernmental corruption, the Plaintiffs ev idenced the

conclusiv e discov ery in the “prior case(s) regarding the same

continues to fraudulently conceal the prev iously discov ered

“The Plaintiffs hav e made w ild unsubstantiated allegations based

Here, the pro se Plaintiffs hav e been v ictims of Defendant

Chappell’s ex tra-judicial and ex trinsic fraud. Based on

discov ery in State and Federal Courts since 2006, Chappell

knew that the Plaintiffs’ allegations were fully substantiated.

“w ild unsubstantiated allegations” in the facial absence of any

support and substantiation of her “w ild unsubstantiated” lies.