Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Hydrometallurgy
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/hydromet
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 25 August 2013
Received in revised form 28 February 2014
Accepted 7 March 2014
Available online 27 March 2014
Keywords:
Sodium stannate
Soda roasting
Leaching
Sodium carbonate
a b s t r a c t
Sodium stannate is widely used in the electroplating and tin alloy industries. The traditional sodium stannate production processes suffer a variety of disadvantages including long owsheet, high production cost and strict requirements for the equipment. In this study, a novel process for preparing sodium stannate is developed by
roasting tin dioxide and sodium carbonate in CO/CO2 mixed gas followed by leaching the intermediate products
in a diluted sodium hydroxide solution. The effects of roasting and leaching parameters on the leaching efciency
of Sn were investigated. The Sn leaching efciency reaches 85.6% under the optimal experimental conditions:
roasting temperature of 875 C, CO content of 15%, roasting time of 15 min, Na2CO3/SnO2 mole ratio of 1.5,
liquid-to-solid ratio of 4 cm3/g, leaching temperature of 40 C, leaching time of 60 min, and stirring speed of
300 rpm. Sodium stannate trihydrate (Na2SnO3 3H2O) having a purity of 95.8% is successfully produced from
cassiterite concentrates with a SnO2 content of 76.4% through the new process, which is superior to the traditional approach for producing the industrial rst-grade stannate.
2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Sodium stannate trihydrate (Na2SnO3 3H2O) is a raw material
widely used in the electroplating (Vitkin, 1951), tin alloy production
(Barry and Thwaites, 1983; Wright, 1982) and catalysts for organic
synthesis (Soler et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2011). Recently, the demand
for sodium stannate has grown rapidly because the conventional
ame retardant (Sb2O3) is gradually replaced by stannates (such as
magnesium/zinc stannate) (Horrocks et al., 2012; Huang, 2000;
Rashad and El-Shall, 2008), which are generally prepared from sodium
stannate through hydrometallurgical processes (Huang et al., 2004;
Wang et al., 2010). Hence, much effort has been spent developing an
economical and efcient method for the production of highly pure sodium stannate.
Sodium stannate, as reported, has readily been generated by hydrothermal reactions in concentrated sodium hydroxide solutions using tin
as the raw material. Sodium nitrate (Horn, 1978; Mciyhenney, 1929) or
hydrogen peroxide must be used as an oxidant during the process (Su
and Tang, 2012). Sodium stannate of acceptable quality can be obtained
after ltration, purication and crystallization (Read and Marvel, 1928).
However, this process has a few drawbacks, such as high production
Corresponding authors at: Biology Building, No. 320, School of Minerals Processing &
Bioengineering, Central South University, 410083 Changsha, Hunan, China. Tel.: +86
731 88877656; fax: +86 731 88830542.
E-mail addresses: zybcsu@126.com (Y. Zhang), yzx445474096@126.com (Z. You),
jiangtao@csu.edu.cn (T. Jiang).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.03.008
0304-386X/ 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
cost and long process ow, because metallic tin must be rst produced
by reduction smelting at high temperatures. A further disadvantage of
the process is the emission of noxious gasses (NO2 or NH3), resulting
in serious air pollution.
Several attempts were made to prepare sodium stannate using cassiterite concentrates as raw materials (Wang and Pu, 1987; Wright,
1982). In this process, the preprocessed cassiterite concentrates react
with fused sodium hydroxide in an electric arc furnace, forming primary
sodium stannate melts at high temperatures (generally higher than
800 C). Then, the melts undergo cooling, crushing, leaching, purifying,
ltering, crystallizing, drying, etc., before the highly puried sodium
stannate is obtained (Little, 1930). However, excess sodium hydroxide
used in this process causes severe equipment corrosion and environmental pollution.
Some secondary tin-containing resources, including tin plating slag,
stanniferous alloy, steel scrap and electronic waste, have also been used
for preparing sodium stannate (Barakat, 1998; Jha et al., 2012; Jun et al.,
2004; Kkesi et al., 2000; Rimaszeki et al., 2012). However, multiple
metallic elements, such as Cu, Pb, Sn, Ni, Fe, Zn and Pd, are commonly
present in these materials, making it difcult to purify the products
and remove these harmful elements (Deren, 1979; Zhang and Qiu,
2008).
In most cases, cassiterite concentrates seldom react with sodium
carbonate under air atmosphere (Sun and Li, 1994). As a result, tungsten
and tin can be separated from tin-bearing tungsten concentrates by
roasting the material with sodium carbonate in air (Martins, 1996;
Martins and Martins, 1997). On the contrary, it was reported that the
gas-sensitivity of stannic oxide may vary substantially after being treated by the reducing gasses (CO, H2, CH4, etc.) (Hyodo et al., 2002; Sergent
and Glin, 2003).
Based on the above analysis, an exploratory experiment on the preparation of sodium stannate from cassiterite concentrates and sodium
carbonate by controlling the roasting atmosphere has been carried
out. The application of sodium carbonate was designed to replace sodium hydroxide, aiming at reducing the production cost and the security
risks for the present sodium stannate production processes. It has
showed that in a weakly reducing atmosphere stannic oxide reacted
with sodium carbonate, forming sodium stannate (Zhang et al., 2012).
Then, high-purity sodium stannate was obtained by leaching the
roasted products with a very diluted sodium hydroxide solution.
In the present work, high-quality sodium stannate is prepared by reduction roasting of chemically pure tin dioxide and sodium carbonate
under CO/CO2 atmosphere followed by diluted sodium hydroxide
leaching. The effects of the roasting and leaching parameters on the
leaching efciency of Sn were also investigated.
2. Experimental
83
Roasting
Grinding
Leaching
Filtrating
Residue
Filtrate
Evaporating and crystallizing
2.1. Materials
Stannic oxide and sodium carbonate used in the study were analytical grade reagents with more than 99.5% purity.
The cassiterite concentrates used were taken from Yunnan, China.
They were roasted at 900 C for 120 min in advance and then leached
with 25% HCl to remove the main impurity elements, including Fe, As,
S, Pb, and Sb. It was found that cassiterite (SnO2) seldom reacted with
gangue during the roasting and was insoluble in hydrochloric acid (Li
and Wei, 1996; Song, 2011; Wright, 1982). The chemical compositions
of the original and pretreated cassiterite concentrates are given in
Table 1.
The tested samples were pre-ground to a particle size passing
through a 200 mesh screen (b0.074 mm). The gasses used for roasting,
including CO, CO2 and N2, were more than 99.99% pure.
Filtrating
Filtrate
Distilled water
Dissolution
Recrystallization
Drying
Grinding
Sodium stannatetri hydrate
2.2. Methods
The experimental owsheet is shown in Fig. 1. Stannic oxide and sodium carbonate were rst mixed in a certain mole ratio. About 5.0 g
mixture with 10% moisture was agglomerated to be a cylindric briquette, 10 mm in diameter under the pressure of 10 MPa to avoid blowing away the powder samples by the airow. The green briquettes were
dried in a drying oven at 105 C for 4 h. Then, the experiments were carried out based on the procedures of roasting, leaching and sodium
stannate preparation.
2.2.1. Roasting process
The dried briquettes were placed in a porcelain crucible and loaded
into a heat resistant quartz glass tube. The samples were pushed to the
roasting zone in an electrically heated horizontal tube furnace. Beforehand, the furnace was heated to a preset temperature. The roasting temperature was measured with a PtRh thermocouple and controlled using
a KSY Intelligent Temperature Controller (accuracy 5 C). The experimental schematic diagram is illustrated in Fig. 2. Pure N2 was directed to
the quartz tube until the temperature reached a constant value. Next the
N2 was immediately replaced by the mixed CO/CO2 gas. The content of
Table 1
Chemical compositions of the original and pretreated cassiterite concentrates (wt.%).
Raw material
Pretreated
Sn
Fe
SiO2
CaO
Al2O3
Zn
As
Pb
42.92
62.93
8.86
0.11
8.31
7.84
6.70
0.17
5.11
0.04
1.16
0.28
1.21
0.02
0.50
0.03
0.38
0.03
84
from the roasted products by water leaching. The possible chemical reaction during the leaching process is (Choi et al., 2013):
m0
100
Leaching efficiency /%
2
Na2 SnO3 s 3H2 O Na2 SnOH6 aq 2Na SnOH6 :
80
60
40
20
10
15
20
25
30
CO content /%
Fig. 3. Effect of the CO content on the leaching efciency of Sn (roasting at 875 C for
45 min with the Na2CO3/SnO2 mole ratio at 1.50).
CO 30%
CO 25%
a
aa
cd d c
Intensity
a a a d d a aa
a dd
a a
a d d a aa
a a
a
a aa
a a
a aa
ab
a a
a aa
a a
a aa
aa
c bc
aa
CO 15%
c
CO 12.5%
b
a
CO 10% b
20
a dd c c
aa
c
10
aa
cd d c
CO 20%
a CO 0%
85
aa
b
c c
c
b
c
c c a
30
c c
c c
40
ab
b
ab
50
60
bb
70
2theta/o
Fig. 4. XRD patterns of the products roasted at different CO contents (roasting at 875 C for 45 min with the Na2CO3/SnO2 mole ratio at 1.50) (a Na2SnO3, b SnO2, c Na2CO3, d Sn).
to 25% and 30%, respectively. Hence, the CO content of 15% is recommended for the subsequent experiments.
Fig. 4 illustrates the XRD patterns of the samples roasted at the CO
contents of 0%, 10%, 12.5%, 15%, 20%, 25% and 30%. It can be seen that
there are diffraction peaks of sodium stannate (Na2SnO3) in all of the
XRD patterns, indicating that sodium stannate was readily formed during the roasting process. At the lower CO content of 012.5%, most of
SnO2 remains inert to sodium carbonate, which explains why only
weak diffraction peaks of stannic oxide (SnO2) can be observed in the
XRD patterns. The diffraction peaks of stannic oxide disappear gradually
with increasing CO content from 12.5% to 15%. Note that the diffraction
peaks of sodium carbonate are still present in the XRD patterns. This
phenomenon may be associated with excessive addition of the
carbonate.
It is noteworthy to mention that the diffraction peaks of metallic tin
appear when the CO content exceeds 25%. It indicates that a small
88
86
100
84
Leaching efficiency/%
Leaching efficiency/%
82
80
78
76
74
72
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
80
60
40
20
0
750
800
850
900
950
1000
Roasting temperature/C
Fig. 6. Effect of roasting temperature on the leaching efciency of Sn (roasting for 45 min
with 15% CO content and Na2CO3/SnO2 mole ratio of 1.50).
86
88
90
86
Leaching efficiency/%
Leaching efficiency/%
85
80
75
70
65
60
84
82
80
78
76
74
72
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Liquid-to-solid ratio /
Roasting time/min
(cm3/g)
Fig. 7. Effect of roasting time on leaching efciency of Sn (roasting at 875 C with 15% CO
content and Na2CO3/SnO2 mole ratio of 1.50).
90
88
Leaching efficiency /%
Leaching efficiency/%
86
84
82
80
78
76
85
80
75
70
74
72
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
Leaching temperature/C
Fig. 8. Effect of leaching temperature on the leaching efciency of Sn (liquid-to-solid ratio
at 4 cm3/g, leaching time of 45 min and stirring rate at 300 rpm).
65
100
200
300
400
500
90
85
Leaching efficiency /%
87
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Leaching time/min
Fig. 11. Effect of leaching time on the leaching efciency of Sn (liquid-to-solid ratio at
4 cm3/g, leaching temperature at 40 C and stirring rate at 300 rpm).
4. Conclusions
A novel process for preparing sodium stannate from stannic oxide
and sodium carbonate is developed in this study by roasting the materials in CO/CO2 mixed gas followed by leaching the intermediates in a
diluted sodium hydroxide solution. The leaching efciency of Sn reaches
85.6% under the optimal experimental conditions: roasting temperature
of 875 C, CO content of 15%, roasting time of 15 min, Na2CO3/SnO2
Table 2
The content of Sn and the impurities in the product (wt.%).
Pb
Sb
As
Fe
NaOH
NO
3
Undissolved
42
42.6
0.002
0.001
0.0025
0.0012
0.0010
0.0005
0.01
0.002
3.5
0.014
0.1
0.001
0.1
0.07
Intensity
Sn
10
20
30
40
50
60
2-Theta/o
Fig. 12. XRD pattern of the crystallized product (C Na2SnO3 3H2O).
70
80
88
Kkesi, T., Trk, T.I., Tams, K., Kabelik, G., 2000. Extraction of tin from scrap by chemical
and electrochemical methods in alkaline media. Hydrometallurgy 55, 213222.
Knutsson, P., Lai, H.P., Stiller, K., 2013. A method for investigation of hot corrosion by
gaseous Na2SO4. Corros. Sci. 73, 230236.
Li, W.C., Wei, Y.D., 1996. Nonferrous Met. 48 (1), 5460 (in Chinese).
Li, Y., He, J.B., Zhang, M., He, X.L., 2013. Corrosion inhibition effect of sodium phytate on
brass in NaOH media. Potential-resolved formation of soluble corrosion products.
Corros. Sci. 74, 116122.
Little, W.T., 1930. Method of producing sodium stannate. US Patent 1787078.
Martins, J.P., 1996. Kinetics of soda ash leaching of low-grade scheelite concentrates.
Hydrometallurgy 42, 221236.
Martins, J.P., Martins, F., 1997. Soda ash leaching of scheelite concentrates: the effect of
high concentration of sodium carbonate. Hydrometallurgy 46, 191203.
Mciyhenney, H.R., 1929. Production of sodium stannate. US patent 1708392.
Rashad, M.M., El-Shall, H., 2008. Effect of synthesis conditions on the preparation of
MgSnO3 powder via co-precipitation method. Powder Technol. 183, 161168.
Read, C.L., Marvel, O.B., 1928. Process for purifying sodium stannate solution. US Patent
1681497.
Rimaszeki, G., Kulcsar, T., Kekesi, T., 2012. Application of HCl solutions for recovering the
high purity metal from tin scrap by electrorening. Hydrometallurgy 125126,
5563.
Sby, F., Potin-Gautier, M., Giffaut, E., Donard, O.F.X., 2001. A critical review of thermodynamic data for inorganic tin species. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 65 (18), 30413053.
Sergent, N., Glin, P., 2003. Study of the interactions between carbon monoxide and high
specic surface area tin dioxide. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 72, 11171126.
Soler, L., Candela, A.M., Macans, J., Muoz, M., Casado, J., 2010. Hydrogen generation
from water and aluminum promoted by sodium stannate. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 35,
10381048.
Song, X.C., 2011. Tin Metallurgy. Metallurgical Industry Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
Su, R.C., Tang, Y.S., 2012. Study on one step synthesis of sodium stannate. Mod. Chem. Ind.
32 (9), 8183 (in Chinese).
Sun, P.M., Li, H.G., 1994. Behaviour of impurities in soda leaching process for low grade
tungsten ore. J. Cent. S. Inst. Min. Metall. 25 (4), 469474 (in Chinese).
Vitkin, A.I., 1951. Tin Plating Process. Metallurgizdat Press, Moscow (in Russian).
Wang, L.C., Pu, S., 1987. Direct preparation of sodium stannate from tin concentrates. J.
Cent. S. Inst. Min. Metall. 18 (4), 427431.
Wang, Z.J., Liu, J., Wang, F.J., Chen, S.Y., Luo, H., Yu, X.B., 2010. Size controlled synthesis of
ZnSnO3 cubic crystallites at low temperatures and their HCHO-sensing properties. J.
Phys. Chem. C 114, 1357713582.
Wright, P.A., 1982. Extractive Metallurgy of Tin, 2nd Rev. ed. Elsevier Scientic Publishing
Company Press, New York.
Zhang, R.L., Qiu, K.Q., 2008. Research on extracting tin and preparation of sodium stannate
from slag containing tin. Min. Metall. 17 (1), 3441 (in Chinese).
Zhang, S.G., Wei, Y.D., Yin, S.F., Au, C.T., 2011. Solid sodium stannate as a high-efciency
superbase catalyst for anti-Markovnikov hydroamination and hydroalkoxylation of
electron-decient olens under mild conditions. Catal. Commun. 12, 712716.
Zhang, Y.B., Jiang, T., Li, G.H., 2012. A novel process sodium stannate preparation from cassiterite concentrate and sodium carbonate by reduction roasting. Chinese Patent
201210412835.9.
The author has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate.