From: (b) (6)

To: (b) (6)

Cc: (b) (6)
Subject: FW: VF300 Standard Drawings
Date: Friday, January 25, 2008 7:57:02 PM
Importance: High

All,

Attached are the El Paso Sector VF300 comments on the standard drawing designs sent for review.
The comments are a collective response from several stations within the El Paso Sector who have
proposed VF300 projects.

My contact information is below if you have any questions about the information from the El Paso
Sector.

Thanks

(b) (6)
Supervisory Border Patrol Agent
El Paso Sector SBInet Office
(b) (6)

From: (b) (6)

Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 11:44 AM
To: (b) (6)

Cc: (b) (6)

Subject: FW: VF300 Standard Drawings
Importance: High

All,

As requested, please give the attachment a look and comment to(b) (6) Please note the timeframe
mentioned in his email.

Thanks,

(b)
(6)

From: (b) (6)

Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 1:12 PM

To: (b) (6)

FLOSSMAN, LOREN W; (b) (6)

Subject: FW: VF300 Standard Drawings

Importance: High

All

Attached is the draft toolkit for our standard vehicle fence designs. Please note that we have already
identified a few minor revisions that need to be made (see below). Please review and provide your
comments by NLT COB Friday, January 25th.

Right now, VF is being planned for the Marfa, El Paso, Yuma, Tucson and El Centro sectors

(b) -I assume you will distribute to the sectors for review and comment.
(6)
(b) (6) -please distribute to the appropriate Corps/Baker folks working VF projects.

(b) (6) -FWS input is desired as well.

Thanks everyone!

(b)
(6)

From: (b) (6)

Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 4:19 PM
To: (b) (6)
Cc: (b) (6)

Subject: VF300 Standard Drawings

1. The following comments will be incorporated into a final set that will be distributed to SBI:

A. Sheet I-1. On line for Vehicle-Gate, change G-1 to V-1G to match sheet number. File
name, G-1.dwg, can remain from my standpoint.

B. Sheet V-1G.

(1). Plan shows fence 5' off of border. Need to revise to reflect 3'.
(2). Sections 1 and 2 show concrete top at 3" below grade. Need to show concrete
coming to grade to avoid corrosion and to keep the sleeves from filling in and locking the posts in
place.

(3). The elevation shows all posts the same height. Need to show staggered post
height to avoid confusion.

(4). Sections 1 and 2 -- show depth of post & sleeve embedment.

.
2. Final comments by the PDT were requested by COB on 16 January 2008. Any additional
comments will be evaluated; revisions to the drawings made, as required; and the revised set
forwarded to SBI.

<<VF300 STANDARD FENCE DETAILS 1-15-08.pdf>>

The comments shown above are generally minor in nature and, in my opinion, would have very little
effect on the study that Boeing is performing. I don't expect any additional comments that would
change Boeing's path -- just my forecast.
V/R,

(b) (6)

Chief, Design Branch

(b) (6)