Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
2016
Guidelines for
Graduation/ Research Projects
1|Page
2016
Contents
Guidelines for ........................................................................................................................................... 1
Graduation/ Research Projects ................................................................................................................. 1
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Word of advice.................................................................................................................................. 9
7.
8.
9.
10.
Expected outcomes/benefits........................................................................................................ 10
11.
12.
13.
Guides .......................................................................................................................................... 10
14.
15.
16.
Details on Jury.............................................................................................................................. 14
17.
2|Page
2016
2016
4|Page
2016
Stage I: Preliminary
1) Identification of Topic
Student shall identify suitable topics for the project. For this purpose they shall need to do extensive
reading of literature available (this includes projects done in similar areas both in NIFT and in other
institutes), interact with faculty and industry people.
The committee of department faculty members shall collectively provide feedback on the proposed
topics submitted by the students. This should be undertaken in Sept- Oct 2014
Students may be advised not to undertake a specific topic due to certain reasons like duplication of
topic, limitation of reference material on the subject or perceived difficulty for the particular student
in undertaking the project.
Alternately the faculty of the department may have some topic in mind and offer to the class or
directly assign the topic to a student/student group based on subject of the topic and capability of
the student.
Decision of the committee will be final in the selection of RP topic.
Since the students have already been associated with the industry they should identify the area of
work and the CC and the faculty guide should help them shape the topic as per the objective of the
department and research project. Student should formulate clear research proposal.
2) Identification of Sponsor
This shall be done by the students with departmental concurrence. Student may interact with
prospective sponsors and obtain sponsorships in tune with departmental policy. The finalization of
sponsorship shall be done with endorsement of the departmental head and formal acceptance in
writing shall be obtained by the students from the sponsor and deposit the same with the
departmental head.
As part of GP drive the students are given opportunity to interact the potential Sponsor. The students
should identify the one in line with their area of research interest with help of CC.
3) Development of research proposal
The student are required to prepare a detailed research proposal which involves introduction to the
topic to be investigated, spell out objectives of the project with the proposed methodology
to be followed, indicate the plan of work, resources required, budget of expenses, formal details
of sponsors etc.
Format of the Proposal
- Introduction and Justification of the topic
- Objectives of the research
5|Page
Review of Literature
Proposed Methodology
Time Plan & Budget
Resources Required
in terms
of
equipments/infrastructure requirements etc.
sponsorship,
organization
2016
support,
The research proposal will be attested by a committee of departmental faculty . Acceptance by this
committee will convey approval of the concept note and the authorization to proceed to the next
stages of project work. This activity should be completed latest by 1st week January 2015
Stage 2: Planning
1) Literature study
The body of literature studied is based on secondary source of data. Students should use the library
extensively. Review of literature will help them understand the existing extent of research done on
the same topic; understand other research approaches and it will also help the students to save
precious time in not doing repetitive work.
2) Design and development of Research Methodology
Students shall review the available body of literature and determine the methodology by which the
project will be executed. Students are required to identify the various research methods and tools
that will be employed.
6|Page
2016
Stage 3: Execution
1) Field work and Data collection
This involves the collection of preliminary data, carrying out actual experiments and compilation of
results.
2) Analysis
This involves the analysis of preliminary data and the analysis and carrying out actual experiments
and compilation of result with supportive discussion and conclusions.
3) Report writing
On a due date draft report along with a synopsis must be submitted duly printed in 3 copies in
unbound form for the viva-voce. Students are also required to prepare presentation for the
industry. If the draft report is not found satisfactory, faculty guide many not allow the student to
appear for viva-voce and/or the presentation.
2016
DATES
Completed by 2nd week September
Semester opening
Research Methodology Classes for finalization of Research
project proposal
Students report to companies with finalized proposals
Midterm review for the progress of the projects
(5th week after commencement of RP)
Completion of the GP
(18 week after commencement of RP)
4 weeks before mid term
1.5 week of mid term
7.5 weeks post mid term
2 weeks of documentation (during placement )
3Weeks of internal external end term jury evaluation
Explore placement possibilities with the companies they are
doing their RPs
End Term Internal Jury
End Term External Jury
8|Page
2016
6. Word of advice
It is the responsibility of the department and mentor to see that the area of research is in line with the
objective of the department and that student implement the class room learning in real life situation of
apparel manufacturing.
Name of the
Mentor from the
Department
Campus:
Name of the
Sponsoring
Company
Name &
Designation of
Industry Mentor
9|Page
2016
10.Expected outcomes/benefits
1) Results of the projects will have practical value and significance for industry and the
institute as a whole.
2) It will help create a bank of knowledge that will add value to teaching and classroom
learning.
3) The outcomes of the projects will aid in developing teaching material, publish papers and
case studies.
4) it should be encouraged that the research work is converted in to publishable article or
research paper for the conferences/ seminar/ journals / magazines etc .
11.Sponsorship of Project
The students sh o u l d undertake project that are sponsored by interested organizations. The
interested organizations could be any one from among the following; export organizations,
domestic manufacturers, consultants, retail organization, Information Technology enabled solutions
and services, government institutions, financial institutions, trade bodies, etc. Sponsorship of the
project entails that the sponsor will cooperate to provide all necessary formalities to the student(s) to
carry out the project work in the premises, will nominate a suitable executive to function as an
external/ industry guide to the student and will incur the costs of the project.
13.Guides
Faculty Guide
He/ She will be a member of the department and be overall supervisor of the students work. The
guide shall only act as sounding-board to the student and will guide the students in the technical
aspects of the project. Faculty guides will be allotted to each group on the basis of project area,
expertise and interest area of the faculty. Students shall report to the faculty guide at least once every
week during the several stages of project work. THE GUIDE WILL BE RESPONSIBLE TO GIVE WRITTEN
10 | P a g e
2016
Industry Guide
He /She shall be a nominee of the sponsoring organization. He /She shall be a person sufficiently
senior in the organization and facilitate or co-ordinate the students obligations in the project
within the organization. The industry facilitator may not have any responsibilities for
technical guidance to the student. It is the responsibility of the faculty guide to coordinate with
industry guide so that the student is given clear direction of work
14.Evaluation matrix
Evaluation matrix
Internal Guide / Mentor
Internal Jury
Mid Semester 10 Marks
End Semester 10 Marks
Industry Feedback / external Mentor
External Jury
TOTAL
Marks
20 Marks
20 Marks
20 Marks
40 Marks
100 Marks.
Timely Report,
Synopsis & Literature study / Methodology,
Documentation and
Work content & Efforts Taken
11 | P a g e
2016
Internal Jury
Mid semester- 10 Marks to be evaluated on the following parameters for 2.5 marks each
Comprehension
Extent of Review of Literature
Understanding of subject matter / Clarity of Research work
Research Plan / Approach to problem solving
End Term - 10 Marks to be evaluated on the following parameters for 2.5 marks each
External Jury- 40 Marks to be evaluated on the following parameters for 5 marks each
Presentation / Communication
Comprehension
Innovation / Implementation/ Research Depth
Subject Clarity
Project Approach
Relevance to Industry / Overall impact of the project
Quantum of work carried out
Analysis & Conclusion
12 | P a g e
2016
:
: ......
: ..
Evaluation Criteria
S. No. Evaluation Criteria
Excellent
5
1.
2.
3.
4.
TOTAL
Very
Good
4
Good
Fair
Poor
Total
:
:
:
:
13 | P a g e
2016
16.Details on Jury
Jury composition
Internal jury
-2-4 Internal Faculty Members from same department (DFT)
External Jury
-2 Professional Experts/faculty from recognized institute/industry experts
-1 Faculty from same department (DFT )of other Campus
-1 Faculty from same department(DFT) same Campus(other than Mentor)
Campu
s
Internal Jury
External Jury
Internal 2-4 Internal External 2-3 Professional
1 Faculty 1-2 Faculty from
Jury
Faculty
Jury Date Experts/faculty
from same
same
Date
Members
from recognized department department(DFT)
from same
institute/industry
(DFT )of
same Centre
department
experts
other
(other than
(DFT )
Campus
Mentor)
14 | P a g e
2016
The Centre Coordinator of the respective discipline shall co-ordinate the jury.
The senior most expert in the case of external jury and senior most faculty in case of internal
jury shall chair the jury to the jury proceedings.
The chair would be responsible for giving the overall direction and guidelines to the
proceedings of the jury.
The jury members would be oriented towards the objective, methodology and significance of
the projects.
Written Feedback
Written feedback will be given to the students clearly stating the shortcoming in the project and the
direction the project has to take.
written feedback will be given during
-The project approval stage
-Mid -term Jury review
- Weekly interaction with Guide
- End term Internal jury review
- End term external jury review
15 | P a g e
2016
All jury members shall assign marks independently and confidentiality for each student.
All marks given by various jury members would be interpolated and an average would be
taken out for various criteria of the evaluation.
The internal Jury should decide whether the project work is satisfactory and can go to
External Jury. If the work is not found satisfactory, the Internal Jury would
suggest FOLLOW UP work
and
recommend
a Re-Jury.Internal Re-Jury to
assess
thefollow up work will be held any time before the last week of July of the same Calendar
year. In case the work is still not found satisfactory by the Internal Jury or subsequent
External jury, student(s) will have to repeat the graduation project with the next batch.
All jury members shall assign marks independently and confidentially for each student.
All marks given by various jury members would be interpolated and an average would be
taken out for various criteria of the evaluation and documented.
All comments given by various jury members will be compiled and formally briefed as a
feedback to the students at the end of jury session.
After the jury evaluation, the respective student's grade sheet would have to be prepared.
17.Award Categories :
DFT award categories
Best Research Project/ Best Graduating Project
Most Innovative Project
Most Commercially viable Project.
Evaluation Guidelines :
Best Research Project/ Best Graduating Project
Awarded to the top student/s scoring the maximum marks in their Mentor, Internal Jury, External Jury
and Industry feedback Marks assessment
Most Innovative Project & Most Commercially viable Project
Most Innovative Project & Most Commercially viable Project, will be adjudged separately both by
internal and external jury members for the creativity/newness and commercial/financial viability.
Logistic of implementation and guiding parameters for evaluation is given underneath
Logistic of implementation:
16 | P a g e
2016
Most Innovative Project & Most Commercially viable Project, will be adjudged separately both by
internal and external jury members by creating two columns in the evaluation sheet for Most
commercially viable and Most Innovative Project. The marks of these columns will not be added to the
total mark of the student. These columns will only be used to identify the awardees in the mentioned
categories. The marking will be done by both internal and external jury on scale of 0- 10 and average of
the scores of the internal and external jury members will indicate the award winner. In case of a tie the
student having the higher overall score (Combine scores of all juries, mentor and industry feedback)
will get the award. In case there is a tie in overall grade also then both the students will get the award.
Guiding parameters for evaluation
Most Innovative Project:
The project has to have innovation / newness in terms of innovative/ creative
1Approach to problem solving
2Product
3System
4Solution
The projects can be classified as per the following cases and evaluation has to be done
accordingly. Guideline for the same is mentioned below
CASE
Classification /Description
CASE 1 Invention/ creation of new ideas. Concepts and products
CASE 2 Innovativeness suggested in research project is not existent in apparel
sector or any other industry
CASE 3 Innovativeness suggested is not existent in apparel sector but exists in
other industry
CASE4 No innovativeness in the research project
Marks Range
8-10
5-7
2-4
0 -1
Classification /Description
Marks Range
Commercially / financially viable with payback period clearly 8-10
calculated
Potential commercially / financially viable with indicative/ suggested 5-7
payback period
17 | P a g e
CASE 3
CASE4
18 | P a g e
2-4
0 -1
2016
19 | P a g e
2016