Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 7

ASSIGNED CASES FOR PUBLIC CORPORATION

1. Tan v. COMELEC FIRST SECOND Adraneda


THIRD
1. Adraneda
2. Torralba v Mun. of Sibagat
2. Albestor
3. Bai Sema v COMELEC Albestor
3. Amodia
4. Province of North Cotabato v Republic of
4. Canete
the Philippines
5. Castillo
5. Bagabuyo
6. Cua v COMELEC Amodia
6. League Dela
7. of Cruz
Cities v COMELEC
8. Decolongon
7. Navarro v Executive Secretary (Dinagatan Canete
case) 9. Donasco
10.vDuenas
8. Alvarez Guingona
11. Endriano
9. Municipality of San Fernando v Firme
12. Esonga
Castillo
10. City of
13.Manila
Fernandov Intermediate Appellate
Court 14. Garin
11. Drilon
15.vGuatelara
Lim Cua
16. Jacob
12. Solicitor General v Metropolitan Manila
Authority17. Mauricio
18. Navarez
13. Ganzon v Court of appeals Decolongon
19. Palma, E
14. Mactan Cebu International Airport
20. Palma, P.
Authority v Marcos
21. Rosales
15. Province of Negros Occidental v Dela Cruz
22. Sapian
commission on Audit
23. Su
16. Cordillera Board Coalition v COA
24. Tomaro
17. Magtajas v Pryce Properties Corp.
25. Tupas Donasco
18. Taule v Santos
19. Binay v Domingo
Duenas
20. City Government of Quezon City v Ericta
21. Villanueva v Castaneda
Endriano
22. Republic v Gonzales
23. Patalinhug v CA
Esonga
24. Ampatuan v Puno
25. Chua Huat v CA Fernando
26. Tatel v Municipality of Virac
27. Bayan v Ermita
Garin
28. IBP v Atienza
29. White Light v City of Manila
Guatelara
30. Basco v PAGCOR
31. Philippine Petroleum Corp. v
Municipality of Pililia Rizal Jacob
32. Floro Cement Corporation v Gorospe
33. PLDT v City of Davao
34. City Government of Quezon City v Mauricio
Bayantel
35. FELS Energy v Province of Batangas
Navarez
36. Digitel v Province of Pangasinan
37. Secretary of Finance v Illarde & Cipriano
Cabaluna Palma, Emmanuel
38. Benguet Corporation v CBAA
39. National Development Co v Cebu City
Palma, Patrick
40. Province of Tarlac v Judge Alcantara
41. Pimentel v Aguirre Rosales
42. Estate of Gregoria Francisco v CA
43. Technology Developers, Inc v CA
44. Laguna Lake Development Authority v Sapian
CA
45. Moday et al. v CA
Su
46. Province of Camarines Sur v CA
47. Barangay San Roque v Heirs of Pastor
48. Municipality of Paranaque v VM Realty Tomaro
Corp
49. City of Cebu v CA
Tupas
50. Francia v Municipality of Meycauyan
51. Heirs of Adorna v Reyes
Adraneda
52. Filstream International Inc v CA
53. Hagonoy Market Vendors Assoication v
Muncipality of Hagonoy Albestor
54. Republic of the Philippines v CA
55. Fortich v Corona
Amodia
56. Roxas & Co. v CA
57. Cabrera v CA
Canete
58. MMDA v Bel Air Village Association
59. Sangalang v IAC
Castillo
60. Macasiano v Diokno
61. Abella v COMELEC Cua
62. Labo v COMELEC (1989)
Decolongon
63. Labo v COMELEC (1992)
64. Frivaldo v COMELEC Cua

65. Mercado v Manzano Dela Cruz


66. Coquilla v COMELEC
67. Japzon v COMELEC
68. Robredo v Tan [CA-G.R. SP No. 101821; Donasco
22 July 2008]
69. Caasi v CA
Duenas
70. Marquez v COMELEC
71. Rodriguez v COMELEC
Endriano
72. De la Torre v COMELEC
73. Magno v COMELEC
Esonga
74. Lingating v COMELEC
75. Flores v Drilon
Fernando
76. Galido v COMELEC
77. Rivera v COMELEC
Garin
78. Bolos v COMELEC
79. Dizon v COMELEC Guatelara
80. Rivera v COMELEC
81. Montebon v COMELEC
Jacob
82. Borja v COMELEC
83. Adorneo v COMELEC
Mauricio
84. Socrates v COMELEC
85. Mendoza v COMELEC
Navarez
v. Tenure of Office
86. Osmea v COMELEC
Palma, Emmanuel
87. Jainal v COMELEC
88. Labo v COMELEC Decolongon
89. Menzon v Petilla
90. Decena v Sangguniang Panlalawigan of Palma, Patrick
Eastern Samar
91. Damasen v Tumamao
Rosales
92. De Rama v CA
93. Alinsug v RTC-Negros Occidental
Sapian
94. Municipalitiy of Pililia, Riza v CA
95. Ramos v CA
Su
96. Salalima v Guingona

97. Ganzon v CA
Tomaro
98. Espiritu v Melgar
99. Aguinaldo v Santos
Tupaz
100. Reyes v COMELEC
101. Hagad v Gozo-Dadole
Adraneda
102. Salalimo v Guingona
103. Grego v COMELEC
Albestor
104. Joson v Executive Secretary v Torres
105. Conduct v Monzon [Adm. Matter]
Amodia
106. Pablico v Villapando
107. Ombudsman v Evangelista
108. Sangguniang Barangay of Don Mariano Canete
v Punong Barangay
Martines
Castillo
109. Bien v Bo
110. Office of the Ombudsman v Barriga
111. Hulleza vs. Escalante, CA-G.R. SP No. Cua
114642
112. Mollenada v Umacob
Decolongon
113. Jacutin v People
114. Civil Service Commission v Belagan
Dela Cruz
115. Narvasa v Sanchez
116. Mendez v CSC
Donasco
117. Macalingag v Chang
118. Garcia v Pajaro
Duenas
119. Rivera v COMELEC
120. Evardone v COMELEC
Endriano
121. Garcia v COMELEC
122. Paras v COMELEC
Esonga
123. Malonzo v COMELEC
124. Claudio v COMELEC
Fernando
125. Javellana v DILG
126. Osea v Malaya
Garin
127. Pimentel v Aguirre, supra
128. NPC v Central Board of Assessment
Appeals Guatelara
129. Aquino v Aure
130. Morata v Go
Jacob
131. Uy v Contreras
132. Wingards v Mejia
Mauricio
133. Corpuz v CA
134. Bonifacio Law Office v Judge Bellosillo
Navarez
135. Mendova v Judge Afable
136. Sharica Mari Go-Tan v Sps. Tan
Palma, Emmanuel
137. Rustan-Ang v CA
139. Munez v Arlino
140. Greater Balanga Development Corp. v Palma, Patrick
Municipality of
141. Lim and Arayblas v CA
Rosales
142. Rivera v Malolos
143. Disomancop v Datumanong Sapian
144. Abbas v COMELEC
145. Pandi v CA
Su
146. Bai Sema v COMELEC
147. Ordillo v COMELEC
Tomaro
148. Cordillera Board Coalition v COA
149. MMDA v Bel Air Village Association
Tupas
150. MMDA v Garlin
151. Feliciano v COA Su
152. San Diego v Municipality of Naujan Navarez
153. Rivera v Municipality of Malolos Amodia
154. Rivera v Maclang Cua
155. Thurman v City of Torrington Donasco
156. Palafox et al v Province of Ilocos Norte Palma, Emmanuel
157. Mendoza v De Leon Palma, Patrick
158. Municipality of La Union v Firme Adraneda
159. Fernando et al v CA and City of Davao Castillo
160. Tuzon v CA Jacob
161. Torio v Fontanilla Mauricio
162. City of Manila v Teotico Garin
163. Abella v Municipality of Naga Endriano
164. Tan Toco v Municipal Council of Iloilo Sapian
165. Municipality of Makati v CA Duenas
166. Pasay City Government v CFI of Manila Tupas
167. Municipality of Paoay, Ilocos Norte v
Esonga
Manaois
END

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi