Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
operations in 1960s and now has an asset base of over US$100 Million.
Woodland was
started in Quebec, Canada for making winter boots and entered India in 1
992. Woodland
was one of the brands that we launched in India from the vast portfolio of
Aero Group.
different and we were known as a rugged, outdoor leather shoe brand, the
kind usually
preferred by adventurists. The youth took a fancy to our shoes. That was i
n the beginning
We have always been an outdoor brand and very much in tune with nature
. Whatever we
do, it will never be against the environment but rather in consonance with
it. Its this
connect that has been the soul of the brand. We not only build this associa
tion through our
promotions, but also through our processes and practices. Woodland plans
to leverage this
that dont harm the nature; by making the manufacturing process less har
mful to the
As part of our growth graph, we currently have 300+ company owned excl
usive Woodland
stores across various cities in India and are growing at the rate of 25 to 30
%. The brand also
Woodland Length :
Shoes (10)
Sandal (5)
Belt (4)
Bag (6)
Cap (1)
Jacket (7)
Gloves (2)
Wallet (4)
Apparels (8)
10 + 5 + 4 + 6 + 1 + 7 + 2 + 4 + 3 + 2
= 44 Products.
Woodland width :
Shoes
Sandal
Belt
Bag
Cap
Jacket
Gloves
Wallet
Apparels
Trekking poles
Woodland Depth :
shirts
A p p a re ls
t-shirts
trousers
Denim
trousers
jackets
Pullovars
fleece
Track suits
Brand Positioning:
1994
2
002
2009
The picture of dense tree with the name of woodland, this logo
has positioned itself as the brand image in the mind-set of the
consumers. Logo itself describes the
3) URL : http://www.woodland.com./
Five years ago, Woodland, the maker of outdoor shoes and apparel, with a
flourishing business in the country's metros, decided to test waters in Tier
2 and Tier 3 cities.
It opened a store each in the retail high streets of Jaipur and Udaipur, both
well-known, well-to-do cities. Woodland had much expectation.
But the stores flopped - there just weren't enough buyers - and had to
shut. Woodland then decided to stay away from smaller cities for a couple
of years. No more experiments, no more testing waters was the message
from the head office in Delhi.
A year-and-a-half ago, amidst the buzz about the potential of Tier 2 and
Tier 3 cities, Woodland decided to venture into these cities once again.
This time it tweaked its strategy a bit.
Instead of opening the regular 300 square feet stores, it decided to go full
throttle taking up entire buildings or up to 30-40 per cent of all the space
in a mall, and converting them into spacious, almost large-format stores.
big store which stands out, it becomes a talking point and they make sure
they visit it," says Woodland Managing Director Harkirat Singh.
For the time being, the strategy seems to be working. The response from
such stores has been encouraging. But Singh admits what's also working
in his favour is a sea change in the retail landscape and consumer attitude
in the past two or three years. Smaller cities are buzzing with retail
activity.
Branded stores are coming up left, right and centre, and the consumer is
no longer shy of opening his wallet. "The consumer in these cities is now
ready. The youth is becoming brand conscious, and we see them much
more open to spending," says Singh.
"In the past two or three months alone we've opened stores in Varanasi,
Allahabad, Vapi, Sangli, Thrissur and so on. Unlike five years ago, many of
these stores have been doing well from day one. Our plans for the next
two to three years will be concentrated on Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities," says
Singh.
But that's a significant shift for a brand which has primarily been catering
to the urban middle class in big cities for almost two decades. Woodland is
a sub-brand of Aero Group which started as a winter boot manufacturer in
Quebec, Canada in the 1950s. Called Aero America then, it manufactured
outdoor winter boots for Canada, Russia and Europe.
The company entered the Indian market with Woodland in 1992. With a
factory in Sonepat, it catered primarily to Delhi and some other large
cities in North India.
Multinational shoe giants weren't in that time and the only competition
came from the likes of Bata.
Nature driven
What drives the brand? Singh says Woodland has always been an outdoor
and adventure brand with close association with nature and environment.
"It's this connect that has been the soul of the brand. We not only build
this association through our promotions, but also through our processes
and practices."
The intent is to make eco-friendliness its brand recall. "While it's good to
see brands taking a higher stand and making eco-friendliness their brand
philosophy, such a positioning is still
not a sales driver in India as much as it may be in the US and UK. It may
have a significant advantage in the long term, but currently I don't see it
making much of an impact," says Dutta of Third Eyesight.
Singh says: "The focus really hasn't been on growing the number of
stores. We could easily have opened many more outlets than we have in
the past one year. The focus is on quality and making products that are
true to the brand's values. If the quality is high and stands by the brand
promise, growth will come on its own."
Early this year, Woodland invested close Rs 30 crore (Rs 300 million) in an
initiative called Pro-Planet to position itself as an environment-friendly
brand and communicate the message across to its target group - the
youth.
The initiative involves high level of interaction with consumers using social
media (Facebook and Twitter), raising awareness on environmental issues
and sustainability, and communicating what Woodland's doing to make its
products and processes green.
"Social media is a big focus area right now. While it helps us communicate
our brand values, more important is the feedback we get from our
customer. They tell us what more can we do, where are we lacking, and
what they expect from the brand, and that's really important for us," says
Singh. In the next two months, Woodland would be rolling out an "E-store"
to sell products online both within the country and internationally.
Early history
By the end of 2011, Uber had raised $44.5 million in funding. That year,
the company changed its name from UberCab to Uber. The name "Uber" is
a reference to the common (and somewhat slangy) word "uber", meaning
"super", and having its origins in the German word ber.
Brand Positioning:
Evolving the way the world moves; Making cities more accessible; Bringing
people and their cities closer One of the most underutilised outcomes of a
business developing a brand strategy and a clear brand positioning is the
effect it can have on organisational culture. Most of the big brands get
this, but SMEs need more education in my experience. Those that do get
it can create a real competitive advantage by using their brand strategy
to drive culture development. Creating a great culture not only benefits
employees who become more engaged in their work, it creates a better
brand experience for your customers. Its a win-win.
The strongest brands are built in the minds of customers through people
to people interaction and customer experiences, as much as they are
through marketing efforts. A good brand strategy will provide direction for
decision making across the entire business, from marketing right through
to customer service and culture development programs.
Taxi drivers feel threatened by Uber. I havent seen much hard data about
how much market shares Uber has taken from taxis yet. Yet, if you read
the media it surely feels like Uber is taking market share from taxis like
Amazon is taking market share from bookstores. Uber is able to offer
transportation for as little as almost half the price of a taxi on certain
routes. At the same time, Uber drivers are said to earn up to three times
as much as a cab driver.
Now why do regulators step in, and why are taxis not as competitive as
Uber? It is often cited in the media, that Uber is disruptive, but why
exactly is the company able to disrupt the taxi market?
The superficial answer is that taxis are regulated. Yet, that doesnt explain
the full picture. Whats the sense of the regulation of taxis if makes them
vulnerable to more efficient competitors? Imagine you have to explain to
your frustrated cab driver why Uber is able to offer lower fees to
customers while paying higher salaries to drivers. More important, he
might be puzzled why a company that doesnt own a car is valued at up to
18bn.
(OLD)
(NEW)
3) URL : https://m.uber.com/
Good news this week for the worlds taxi drivers. Suddenly after months of
aggressive market expansion Uber looks vulnerable and all of it is self-
inflicted.
The response has been uniformly negative with most critics rejecting the
logo for the usual reasons. Its too abstract. It looks too much like the
Death Star. It looks mysteriously similar to Circle CIs logo a company
that shares an office with Uber. These, and many more criticisms quickly
appeared.
For starters, there is the simple fact that the logo appears to have
involved significant amounts of Travis Kalanicks time. According to Wired
magazine, Ubers CEO has spent the last three years working alongside
Ubers design director Shalin Amin and a dozen or so others, hammering
out ideas from a stuffy space they call the War Room. As part of that
process Kalanick studied design concepts like color palettes and font
kerning. I didnt know any of this stuff, Kalanick tells Wired.
Kalanick has bigger fish to fry than corporate design. Id argue even five
minutes of his time spent on font spacing is a crime when he is faced with
bigger issues like, oh I dont know, the fact that his company is losing $1
billion a year in China or banned from operating in Spain and South Korea.
The way Amin saw it, Ubers branding problems were manifold. For one,
the company had two logos one with a U inside a box on the Android
app, and one with a U and no box on the Apple app. The letters in the
UBER wordmark were too widely spaced, and the U had an unsightly twist
on its left prong. Whats more, the lettermark the stylized, upper-case
U looked awkward beside the wordmark. It read U-UBER, says Amin,
like Oooober.
This kind of myopic, design driven minutiae drives me insane. Its not that
fonts and pantones dont matter, its just that they rarely matter enough
to ever necessitate organizational effort. And when they start to represent
the main branding problem for a company these minor design issues
obscure more important branding issues.
What is Ubers brand position? What are the brand perceptions among its
target segments? Does the perception match the position? Do negative
brand associations correlate to reduced Uber usage? What is its net
promoter score across key segments? Is brand equity sufficient to justify
existing price premiums and surge pricing? How strong is Ubers employer
brand across countries? Id rate each of these questions as being at least
50000% more important than how far from the U we place the B in our
name or the color of the squiggly thing that no-one can actually see when
its a 2mm wide iPhone icon.
The lack of strategic focus that this design saga reveals is also troubling.
The new logo is partly a response to the fact that Uber is no longer a taxi
service its now a transportation network that delivers food and
packages, as well as people. Uber isnt a premium service either
anymore. Thanks to a burgeoning phalanx of sub-brands the company
believes it has gone from a luxury to an affordable luxury to everyday
transportation option for millions of people. Those millions of people
inhabit 68 countries and Uber is also about to launch a distinctive look and
feel in each one of these locations too.
In summary Uber targets millions of people, all over the world, offering to
transport anything anywhere at every possible price point in a variety of
colors. Sound like a plan?
6. A Loyalty Program: Not many consumers know it, but Uber has had a
loyalty program for at least about two years now. Uber VIP is exclusive
to those who are actually loyal customers whove taken over 100 Uber
rides. It seems like the main tangible benefit of the program is that VIPs
have special access to the highest-rated drivers. However, the program
also signifies a commitment to and a gratitude for these returning
customers, who surely feel slightly proud of the fact that theyre very
important.