Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Dr. Gonzales
LEPS 520
18 April 2016
that their practices were based on the Citys emphasis on generating revenue instead of public
safety.
shaped its municipal court, leading to procedures that raise due process concerns and
The city of Fergusons police department and municipal court acted in a manner that clearly
condoned racial discrimination. The citys records display a clear pattern of targeting blacks. The
clear and obvious pattern of racial discrimination and bias created deep seeded distrust of the
police department.
The report showed that Ferguson practiced a fine scheme that substantially increased
each year and tasked the police department and municipal court staff with ticketing and
collecting the revenue of the increased fines. The city routinely put pressure on the police
department to generate more revenue by writing more tickets. In one example the citys Finance
Director wrote to the Ferguson Police Chief stating, unless ticket writing ramps up significantly
before the end of the year, it will be hard to significantly raise collections next year. Given that
we are looking at a substantial sales tax short fall, its not an insignificant issue (United States
Department of Justice, 2015, p. 2). The priority on generating revenue for the city was passed on
to the officers of the Ferguson Police Department for execution. Members of the department
openly expressed to Department of Justice investigators that is was common knowledge that the
city leaders expected them to ramp up enforcement operations in order to increase revenue.
The Citys demand for generating increased revenue greatly affected the police
departments tactics, techniques and procedures. The department was directed to write citations
citing the municipal code so that the fines would be paid to city court instead of the state. Ticket
writing activity played an integral role in officers evaluations. Because of the citys focus on
generating revenue, officers viewed the citizens more as a population to exploit for generating
fines than as people worth protecting. This culture within FPD influences officer activities in all
areas of policing, beyond just ticketing. Officers expect and demand compliance even when
they lack legal authority. They are inclined to interpret the exercise of free-speech rights as
The leadership of the department failed miserably to ensure that officers conducted
themselves lawfully and in accordance with departmental policy. Complaints from citizens
The result is a pattern of stops without reasonable suspicion and arrests without probable
retaliation for protected expression, in violation of the First Amendment; and excessive
force in violation of the Fourth Amendment (United States Department of Justice, 2015,
p. 3).
The citys insistence on generating revenue has significantly compromised the courts role in
being fair and impartial when it comes to determining guilt and collecting fines. The municipal
courts role in maintaining checks and balances against unlawful police action has been rendered
non-existent. The court has become a mechanism to compel fine assessment and collection. The
Ferguson Municipal Court practices routinely violate the due process and equal protection
Reference:
United States Department of Justice. (2015). Investigation of the Ferguson Police Department.
https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opa/press-
releases/attachments/2015/03/04/ferguson_police_department_report.pdf