Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
LEGAL STUDIES
PRELIMINARY
SECOND EDITION
Paul Milgate
Kate Dally
Phil Webster
Daryl Le Cornu
Tim Kelly
www.cambridge.edu.au
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521134699
Paul Milgate, Kate Dally, Phil Webster, Daryl Le Cornu, Tim Kelly 2010
Milgate, Paul.
Cambridge preliminary legal studies / Paul Milgate [et al.].
2nd ed.
9780521134699 (pbk.)
Includes index.
Bibliography.
For secondary school age.
LawAustraliaTextbooks.
LawExaminationStudy guides.
Higher School Certicate Examination (N.S.W.)Study guides.
Milgate, Paul
Dally, Kate.
Webster, Phil.
Le Cornu, Daryl.
Kelly, Tim.
349.94
Cambridge University Press has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs
for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this publication and does not
guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
Information regarding prices, travel timetables and other factual information given in
this work are correct at the time of rst printing but Cambridge University Press does not
guarantee the accuracy of such information thereafter.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are respectfully advised that photographs of
deceased people appear in this book and may cause distress.
iii
C H APT ER 5 L AW R E FO RM I N A C TI O N 96
C o n tents
Introduction 194
Children, young people and the law 201
Mechanisms for protecting the rights of children and young people 201
Responsiveness of the law 205
Conclusion 209
Chapter review 210
AR EA 4: C R IMIN AL O R C I V I L C A SE S TH AT RA I SE I SSU ES
OF IN T ER ES T T O S T U DENTS 304
Student CD Contents
Additional chapters
C o n tents
CHILD REN AN D Y OUN G PEOPL E
vii
Phil Webster
Phil Webster BA DipEd MEd
MACE is Head Teacher of Social
Scence at Mosman High. He
has over 20 years experience
in HSIE as a teacher of Legal
Studies, Society and Culture,
and Business Studies, with
a particular interest in the
changing role of law in society.
Phil is passionate about issues
of human rights, justice and
fairness in a rapidly changing
world a world in which the
balance of power between the
individual and state is constantly
brought into question.
Thanks to my wife, Barbara, my daughter, Ebony, and Society, p. 35; National Library of Australia/ Yes for Aborigines,
nla.aus-vn3116836-1x-v, p. 37 /Joseph Lycett, Aborigines using re to
my son, Zach a great team! hunt kangaroos, nla.pic-an2962715-s20-v, p. 47 top /Lyn McLeavy,
Land Council Meeting, Fitzroy Crossing, nla.pic-an23389398, p. 47
PAUL MILGATE
bottom /The Australian Constitution, 16211, p. 62 /Captain Cooks
landing at Botany, nla.pic-an7890396-m, p. 100 top; Ron Tandberg
Thanks to all of my family and friends who put up with for The Age, p. 42; Aboriginal Studies Press, AIATSIS and Auslig/
Sinclair, Knight, Merz, 1996, p. 46; Wikimedia Commons/Agencia
me as I wrote my chapters.
Brasil. This image is licensed and freely available under the Creative
K ATE DALLY Commons Attribution 2.5 Brazil License. p. 53 top; Wikimedia
Commons/ Bidgee, pp. 60, 151, 299 /Socrates2008, p. 140 /samh_78,
To the boys at Hells Angels MC thanks for your assistance p. 159 right /John Erling Blad, p. 182 /author unknown, p. 214 /
Paul 1953, p. 325 top /Angelo Tsirekas, p. 326, These images are
with OMCGs. To Katie Wood at Amnesty huge thanks licensed and freely available under the Creative Commons Attribution
ShareAlike 3.0 License; Getty Images/ Michael Kelley, p. 66 /Bernd
for your support and research. To Abby, Frankie and
Opitz, p. 156 /Spencer Platt, p. 237 bottom; Corbis/ Epa, Peter Foley,
Kobe, Daddy is not on the computer tonight! p. 72 /Penny Tweedie, p. 109 /Epa, Mast Irham, p. 142; Wikimedia
Commons/Dedda71. This image is licensed and freely available under
PHIL WEBSTER the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. p. 79;
Wikimedia Commons/ Richard Johnstone, p. 80 /Timeshift9 p. 132,
I would like to dedicate this book to the Class of 2008 These images are licensed and freely available under the Creative
Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.0 License; Wikimedia Commons/
HSC Legal Studies students at Mount Annan High
Salim Fadhley. This material is licensed and freely available under
School. the Free Art License at <http://artlibre.org/licence/lal/en> p. 85
top; ActionAid Austalia (formerly Austcare), p. 91; Newspix/ News
DARYL LE CORNU Ltd, pp. 98, 104, 259, 295 /Kym Smith, pp. 110 right, 245 /James
Knowler, p. 115 /Braden Fastier, p. 157 /Nathan Edwards, p. 237 top
To Amanda, Jack and Hannah thanks, innity times, left /Sam Rosewarne, p. 256 /Jodie Richter, p. 275 /Craig Borrow,
p. 291 top left /Robert McKell, p. 315 bottom /Jeff Darmanin, p. 325
always.
bottom; National Archives of Australia: A6180, 12/12/73/107, p. 100
TIM KELLY bottom /A8598, AK6/5/80/11, p. 103; Fairfax Photos/ The Age, p. 102 /
Bruce Miller, p. 291 bottom /AMH/Penny Bradeld, p. 297; AAPImage/
Jonathan Ng, p. 111 /Alan Porritt, p. 164 /Itsuo Inouye, p. 237 top
right /AAPImage, pp. 237 bottom left, 239 left /Radar Bali, p. 238 /
Anwar Mustafa, p. 239 right /Dita Alangkara, p. 241 /Steve Holland,
The authors and publisher wish to thank the following p. 254 /Torsten Blackwood, p. 255 /Jenny Evans, p. 258 /Aijaz Rahi,
pp. 268 left, 277 left /Dave Hunt, p. 278 /Pool/Steven Siewert, p. 286
sources for permission to reproduce material:
/Asahi Shimbun, p. 287 /Shannon Morris, p. 308; Jonas Liebschner/
JL Photography, p. 116; NSW Rape Crisis Centre, p. 121; Manly
Cover: iStockphoto/Anthony Brown.
Council, NSW, p. 123; ACTU, pp. 160, 224 bottom; Amnesty
Images: Shutterstock, pp. 1, 4, 5, 9, 10 left & right, 12 right, 13 top, International Australia, p. 166; Coca Cola, p. 177 left; Cadbury,
19, 21, 26, 28, 58, 59, 63, 64, 65, 69, 76, 77, 81, 85 bottom, 86, 90, p. 177 right; Facebook is a registered trademark of Facebook Inc.
92, 96 left & right, 97, 110 left & centre, 113, 118, 119, 129, 130, p. 178 left; Sheila Smart/Sheila Smart Photography, p. 219; UN
131, 134, 135, 141, 148, 149, 150, 153, 154, 158, 163, 168, 169, Photo/Ryan Brown, p. 228; National Security Department, p. 242;
170, 172 left & right, 173, 174 top & bottom, 178, 179, 180, 185, Wikimedia Commons/Arnaud Gaillard, pp. 243 top left & right,
187, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 197, 200, 201, 204, 206, 216, 221, These images are licensed and freely available under the Creative
224 top, 226, 234, 235, 250, 251, 258, 272, 284, 285, 294 top left, Commons Attribution ShareAlike 1.0 License;
304, 305, 306, 307 left & right, 309, 313, 315 top right, 317, 320, Reuters/David Gray, p. 262; Inkcinct Cartoons, p. 277 right;
321, 323, 327, 328 left, 330, 332 left & right, 333, 337; iStockphoto/ Wikimedia Commons/CC-BY-SA-2.0-DE. This image is licensed and
Anthony Brown, pp. 2, 3; Wikimedia Commons/ Fir0002, p. 7 / freely available under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike
Infrogmation, p. 12 top left /Hanhil, p. 50 /David Shankbone, pp. 52, 2.0 Germany License. p. 288 bottom left; F.R.E.E. Australia Party,
291 top left /Thalan, p. 73 left /Jeremy, p. 78 /Yann Forget, pp. 93, p. 301; Esther Dyson via Flickr, at <http://www.ickr.com/photos/
176 /Enoch Lau, p. 137 top /Schutz, p. 159 left /lkiwaner, p. 208 / edyson/1742438> p. 311 bottom; AFACT, p. 315 top left;
Fanny Schertzer, p. 253 left /Tirin, p. 225 /Francis Tyers, p. 269 top Australian Defence Force, p. 328 right.
/Simon Wedege Peterson, p. 269 bottom right /Manuel Gonzalez
Text: Cigarette beach ban goes up in smoke in Sydney, The
Olaechea y Franco, p. 269 bottom left /Klaus Enslin, p. 288 top right
Australian, January 11, 2009 <http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/
/Dori, p. 288 bottom right, These images are licensed and freely
story/0,25197,24895070-5006784,00.html> p. 11; Geoff Earle, NY
available under the GNU Free Documentation License; Wikimedia
Post. p. 138; Extract from ABC News Channel Seven guilty in Corby
Commons/ Chris Metcalf, p. 12 bottom left /Wilson Afonso, p. 39 /
defamation case rst published by ABC Online, 29 May 2008, is
Patrick Gruban, p. 53 bottom /Chris Johnson, p. 144 /Joi Ito, pp. 171,
reproduced by permission of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation
311 top /Library of Congress, p. 207 /Robert Scoble, p. 218 /Ruth
and ABC Online. (c) 2008 ABC. All rights reserved. p. 142; Matthew
Elison, p. 243 bottom left, These images are licensed and freely
Benns, Courtesy of The Sun-Herald p. 155; Belinda Merhab, Courtesy
available under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 License;
of The Australian, p. 164; Extract from ABC News Controversial bikie
Wikimedia Commons/Public domain, pp. 13 bottom left, 40, 54,
laws pass NSW Parliament rst published by ABC Online, 3 April
68, 73 centre & right, 84, 101, 137 bottom, 152, 202, 215, 243
2009, is reproduced by permission of the Australian Broadcasting
bottom right, 244, 268 right, 288 top left, 294 top right; Wikimedia
Corporation and ABC Online. (c) 2009 ABC. All rights reserved. p. 299;
Commons/ TwoWings, p. 13 bottom right /2002 Dustin M Ramsey,
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, p. 322; Andrew West,
p. 44 /Thomas Schoch, p. 139, These images are licensed and freely
Courtesy of The Age. p. 329; Extract from ABC News School drugs
available under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.5
test a waste of money by Michael Turtle rst published by ABC
License; Dreamstime/ Krystof, pp. 16, 17 /Alfonsodetomas, p. 166 /
Online, 26 March 2008, is reproduced by permission of the Australian
Silviaantunes, pp. 212, 213 /Yellowcrest, p. 267 /Aspectimages,
Broadcasting Corporation and ABC Online. (c) 2008 ABC. All rights
p. 266; Photolibrary/ Mary Evans Picture Library, p. 20 /North Wind
reserved. p. 331.
Pictures Archives, p. 324. State Library of Queensland, Negative
Number 16964, p. 32 left; Gordon H Woodhouse, Unoccupied White Every effort has been made to trace and acknowledge copyright. The
Australia, H15362/37, State Library of Victoria, p. 32 right; John D publisher apologises for any accidental infringement and welcomes
Chesworth, p. 33; Ross Scott, Courtesy of the Tasmanian Wilderness information that would redress this situation.
ix
To the student
Congratulations on choosing Cambridge Legal the world and how you understand the concept of
Studies Preliminary (Second Edition). This edition achieving justice through the law.
has been completely updated to meet the require- Cambridge Legal Studies Preliminary (Second
ments of the 2009 Stage 6 Legal Studies Syllabus Edition) is a comprehensive resource that intro-
in New South Wales. duces you to a dynamic and challenging subject.
Legal Studies was rst introduced into the NSW It brings the law to life for you, both inside and
Curriculum in 1989. Since then, thousands of outside the classroom.
students have nished their secondary schooling You will discover a wealth of material that
better informed citizens, able to think more introduces you to the Australian legal system, how
critically about the processes and institutions that the individual interacts with and is affected by
shape their lives on a daily basis. the law, and gain insight into how the law works
The rights people enjoy within democratic in practice in a variety of contexts. You will be
societies have at times been eroded by governments engaged and stimulated by up-to-date case law
when electorates become apathetic about their and recent legislative developments. Practically,
freedoms and liberties. Legal Studies will allow updated research and review activities will assist
you to explore the power vested in our democratic to build your research skills and make sure that
institutions and wielded by our elected leaders. It you are ready for your exam.
explores issues that will challenge the way you see We wish you luck and success.
The Cambridge Legal Studies Preliminary s legal research tips and information to help you
resource package consists of ve components: understand case citations.
3 Study Toolkit
The Study Toolkit packaged with the Student
Book contains a wide range of material to help
you succeed in Legal Studies, including:
s exam preparation and study tips
s additional multiple-choice, short-answer and
extended response questions for each part of
the course
GUID E T O IC ON S
This icon lets you know that there is some additional information or activities on the
Student CD at the back of the book.
This icon lets you know that you will need to access the internet in order to
complete an activity or research task.
xi
CHAPTER 2
Sources of contemporary
Australian law
Chapter openers
signicant cases)
k e y te r m s/v o c a b u l a ry
s /DD LAW IN #HAPTERS n
appeal ex parte ratify
appellate jurisdiction external affairs power ratio decidendi
bicameral federation referendum
bill indictable offences residual powers
committal hearing inquisitorial system sanction
common law jurisdiction stare decisis
concurrent powers legislative powers summary offences
customary law mediation statute law
defamation natural justice terra nullius
delegated legislation obiter dicta treaty
domestic law opinio juris ultra vires
equity original jurisdiction
A number of current media The Australian, 20 November 2008 decision. What are the
weapon.
these deaths. potential problems with
Mr Scipione said Tasers had been drawn,
THE NSW Ombudsman has recommended a A NTI-D ISCRIMINAT ION BOA RD OF internal review?
but not necessarily used, 70 times since last
two-year freeze on further roll-outs of Taser NSW ( A D B) IND EPEND ENT COMMISSION
situations.
such as disability, age, race and sex. It attempts to protect the interests of the pub- which peoples privacy is
There is already evidence of this. Tasers about situations where they shouldnt be
have been used on people on ve occasions in advises the government and also provides lic, prevent breaches of public trust, and protected in NSW.
used, the Ombudsman said. It must be
the rst two weeks of general-duties use. This an inquiry service to inform people about inuence the behaviour of public ofcials. 5 What is judicial review?
remembered that Tasers are not a non-lethal
compares with only 48 incidents over a ve- weapon, they are just a less lethal weapon. their rights and responsibilities under Some examples of corrupt behaviour How does it differ from
year period by special unit ofcers. Mr Barbour recommended a two-year anti-discrimination laws. The Board will include bribery, fraud and theft. ICAC has review of the merits of a
The Ombudsmans investigation found review into Taser use, and said the standards investigate and conciliate complaints when the power to investigate the activities of pri- decision?
ofcers from special units had predominantly
Activities
that deemed Tasers safe applied only to action is necessary. It has the power to vate citizens if such behaviour affects the
used Tasers from a distance, but in the rst two 6 Outline the role of an
healthy people. issue nes for behaviour that violates anti- proper administration of public ofces.
weeks of use by general-duties ofcers, in four ombudsman. How is an
out of the ve incidents the Tasers were used discrimination laws. ICAC has the authority to ask the police ombudsman limited in
16-year-old girl who had ignored police proceedings, but fact-nding exercises. At the end of an investigation it can report
are designed to help you man, who had heart disease, hepatitis C and
schizophrenia, died of a heart attack.
Figure 7.13 The use of Taser guns by the police
is a controversial issue.
the NSW police service (NSW, 1995).
Commissions of inquiry do not have the
Supreme Court.
In 2005, ICAC investigated a claim that a
and follow the link to Legal
cases from Equal Time.
Mr Barbour was unable to say whether the power to prosecute offenders. At the end private tutoring rm was assisting English 3 Discuss two cases and
test your knowledge of key Taser played a role in the mans death.
NSW Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione
said he was only made aware of the mans
of an inquiry, the commission will produce
a report containing recommendations,
Extension II students with work that was
ultimately submitted as part of their HSC
evaluate the effectiveness
of the ADB in bringing
which may include recommending criminal assessment. Although ICAC did not prove about just outcomes. You
death through the Ombudsmans report on
concepts and skills. Research the case. prosecution of individuals. The government
may decide to act on the commissions rec-
that students had been assisted, it raised
serious concerns about assessment tasks in
should include a case that
has been dismissed by the
ommendations: a number of police ofcers the HSC that are of a take-home nature. ADB.
Although the federal Privacy Act is only 20 years old, it groups that held this view was an advocacy organi-
Mrs Donoghue alleged that failing to use care and skill inDecency
his Act of
as 1996
being(CDA). Two when
so affected provisions
I am of the Some internet service providers dislike the
care to provide:
For further information on digital
Stevenson had failed in his duty of conduct would cause danger
safety issues, see the Australian
injury.
CDAofprohibited the knowing
directing
internet of obscene
my mind transmission
or indecent
or omissions
to the acts on the
that aresexual communi-
called in
521 US 844 (1997) see http://
caselaw.lp.ndlaw.com/cgi-bin/
proposal because it is too easily bypassed by users,
and because enforcement would be too onerous.
denitions are designed to
governments Net Alert website: getcase.pl?court=us&navby=case
s a system of working his business Until Donoghue v Stevenson, cations or images to people under 18 years of age.
question. Another objection is the risk that the lter would
www.netalert.gov.au/
which would prevent snails individuals had no rights againstThis was seen by many as a violation of the
principle of freedom of expression. One of the
&vol=000&invol=96-511
block material that has nothing to do with the type
of content that the law aims to ght.
help you learn and revise key
terms from the syllabus.
16840 Cam
Camb rbi d
r igdeg eL eLgeal
g alS tSutduideise s P rel i mi m
P rel i na r yr y
i na C h a p t e r 8 T h e in d ivid u a l a n d t e ch n o lo g y 181
Legal links
In addition to the activities,
there are suggested links
to internet resources and
activities in each chapter.
These will help you extend
s The attacks on the World Trade Center and
the Pentagon on 11 September 2001 (9/11)
mark the beginning of terrorism as a global
your knowledge and stay up-
Ch ap te r su m m a r y t a sk s
L a w i n p r a ct i ce
2002. Bombs were exploded at Paddys Bar the bombings. What is the war on terror?
and the Sari Club, both popular with Australian s The Bali bombings revived debate about the What was known about Jemaah Islamiyah Who were the main suspects arrested for the
tourists.
s While no group took immediate responsibility
death penalty.
s The Bali bombings saw the introduction of
before the Bali bombings?
Explain the connection between Hambali and
Bali bombings?
What was controversial about the trial of Abu
legal system.
for the bombing, the radical Islamic Australian anti-terrorism legislation and the the Bali bombings. Bakar Bashir?
association, Jemaah Islamiyah, was suspected. strengthening of the enforcement agencies Who was Abu Bakar Bashir and why was he a Why was the Australian governments policy
s Amrozi, Imam Samudra and Mukhlas stood responsible for homeland security. suspect? towards the death penalty controversial?
trial for the Bali bombings and were found s This legislation has come under criticism by Why are good relations between Australia What key changes in anti-terrorism legislation
guilty. They were sentenced to death by ring those who believe it jeopardises civil liberties and Indonesia important from the Australian have occurred in Australia since the Bali
squad and executed in November 2008. and key legal rights. governments point of view? bombings?
Mu lt i pl e -ch o i ce qu e s tio n s
To pi c re vi e w
Which of the following is NOT true of Which of the following was not a result of
terrorism?
A It can be utilised by fundamentalist
AustralianIndonesian cooperation since the
Bali bombings?
EXTEND ED RESPONSE
Discuss the anti-terror legislation, with
reference to the arguments for and against a
Marking criteria for the extended response Chapter review
questions can be found at www.cambridge.
religious groups or political groups. A Australian police involved in the bill of rights.
B It can be constituted by a threat of violence
directed at a population in order to induce
identication of victims of the Bali
bombings
Outline how the Australian and Indonesian
governments have cooperated since the Bali
edu.au/education. Refer to these criteria
when planning and writing your response. At the end of each chapter,
a government to change its policies. B the establishment of the Australian Federal bombings.
C It is intended to cause death, not fear.
D It was used prior to 2001.
Jemaah Islamiyah was:
Police
C the establishment of the Jakarta Regional
Cooperation Team
Outline the key stages in the investigation of
the Bali bombings.
Contrast the war on terror and the rule of
you will nd a summary of
A a peaceful Islamic organisation D the establishment of the Jakarta Centre for law approaches taken in the ght against
B a foreign terrorist organisation that
established a branch in Indonesia
Law Enforcement Cooperation
Which of the following types of provision was
terrorism.
Describe the Australian governments policy
the chapter, multiple-choice
C under suspicion from the CIA for having contained in the anti-terrorism legislation towards the death penalty.
links with Al Qaeda well before the Bali
bombings
D the name of the Indonesian
passed by the Commonwealth after the Bali
bombings?
A detention of persons suspected of
questions and chapter tasks.
counterterrorism force terrorism offences for the purpose of
Which of the following alleged suspects
responsible for the Bali bombings ended up
investigation
B detention of illegal immigrants from
In Part III you will also nd
walking free? countries known to harbour terrorists
A Iman Samudra
B Abu Bakar Bashir
C immunity of anti-terrorism legislation from
judicial review extended response activities.
C Amrozi D immunity of any Commonwealth employee
D Ali Ghufron from prosecution
xiii
Syllabus outcomes, objectives, performance bands meaning in the Higher School Certicate docu-
and examination questions have key words that ments. Using this glossary will help students and
state what students are expected to be able to do. teachers understand what is expected in responses
A glossary of key words has been developed to to examinations and assessment tasks.
help provide a common language and consistent
3 Classication of law
s 0UBLIC LAW EG CRIMINAL s Criminal and civil court
law, administrative law, procedures including legal
constitutional law) personnel
s 0RIVATE LAWCIVIL LAW EG CONTRACT s Common and civil law systems
law, tort law, property law)
4 Law reform
s Conditions that give rise to law parliamentary committees,
REFORM EG CHANGING SOCIAL media)
VALUES NEW CONCEPTS OF JUSTICE s -ECHANISMS OF REFORM EG
new technology) courts, parliaments, United
s !GENCIES OF REFORM EG Nations, intergovernmental
law reform commissions, organisations)
anarchy
customary law
customs
equality
ethics
fairness
JUSTICE
law
legal system
NATURAL JUSTICE
procedural fairness
rule of law
rules
tyranny
values
law
a set of rules imposed
on all members of a
community which are
ofcially recognised,
binding and
enforceable by persons
or organisations such
AS THE POLICE ANDOR
courts
values
principles, standards,
or qualities considered
worthwhile or desirable
within a society
rules
regulations or
principles governing
procedure or
controlling conduct
behaviour among people in a society or group. internet, you would nd many denitions of the customary law
principles and
Customs vary depending on the culture, religion word rules. Generally, rules refer to prescribed procedures that have
and history of a group of people, society or country. directions for conduct in certain situations. Rules developed according
to the customs of a
For example, in Australia it is customary for men are generally made by groups and only affect
people or nation, or
to shake hands when greeting a friend, whereas in people within those groups. These rules often groups of nations,
Europe this greeting may be in the form of a kiss vary between groups and are not enforceable by and are treated as
obligatory
on each cheek. the state. For example, there are rules for playing
nation-state
Where a custom is followed by most of the games, behaviour in the classroom, and so on.
a politically
population over time, it may become part of If these rules are broken, there is some form of independent country
the laws of that society. Because of differences punishment attached, enforce-
between societies, not all customs become law. able by those involved in the
Customary law consists of established patterns making of the rules (e.g. sus-
of behaviour that are accepted within a particular pension, detention). Rules can
social setting. These principles and procedures also be altered by these people
develop through general usage according to the in order to deal with changes in
customs of a people, nation-state or group of situations. This usually happens
nation-states. Customs arose to deal with problems after consultation with the group
in the most harmonious ways. Over time, these members involved.
customs become accepted as legal requirements. In a legal sense, rules form the
Three areas in which customary law has inuenced basis of laws. However, rules can
the Australian legal system are: be changed quite quickly with
s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander customary the agreement of those involved.
law Laws, as you will discover, are
s English customary law much more difcult to change
s international customary law. and punishment is not always a
In many societies, most customary law is simple process.
never written down, as is the case with Indige-
nous Australian customary law. In other societies, Figure 1.2 There may not be a law
customary law eventually is recorded and trans- about wearing school uniform, but
ferred into written law in formal legal systems. there is often a rule.
d
them different from rules:
1 Laws are binding on the whole community.
S C H OOL R UL ES This means that they apply to all members of
a Students must always wear correct school society.
uniform on school grounds. 2 Laws can be enforced. This means that penalties
b apply if a law is broken.
c 3 Laws are ofcially recognised. This means that
governments and courts recognise laws and
d
enforce them.
S OC IAL ET IQUET T E 4 Laws are accessible (or discoverable). This
a Always cover your mouth and nose when means that people can nd out which law
sneezing in public. applies to a particular situation.
b 5 Laws relate to public interest. This means that
Laws Rules
s to be obeyed by all citizens of a society s to be obeyed by specic individuals or groups
s made by a law-making body s made by individuals or groups
s enforced through the courts s enforced by leaders of a group
s consequences of a breach results in a s consequences of a breach at the discretion of
Va l u es a n d e t h ic s
We all have values by which we try to live. Living legal system. Two classic examples (with varying
according to our ethics means that we do things degrees of success) are:
that we consider to be morally right. s The Mardi Gras (Sydney) an internationally
Lawmakers try to incorporate these values recognised annual event celebrating same-
and ethics into laws. However, it is very difcult sex relationships. It originally started off as a
to make rules, and thus laws, about everyones protest march against the treatment of same-
values, especially as there are often groups in sex couples by the legal system and the lack of
society that have different standards of what is protection afforded to their relationships.
morally right or wrong. For this reason laws will s The Mardi Grass (Nimbin, northern NSW) an
only cover those ethical values that are common annual event that attempts to inuence the gov-
to all. Over the past three decades many groups ernment to relax the laws relating to the use and
have voiced their values and ethics in a public cultivation of marijuana. It includes events like
manner in an attempt to inuence the law and the the Hemp Olympics and the Dope Pickers Ball.
T h e n a t u r e o f j u s t i ce
legal system The system of courts, prosecutors and police for them. For example, children under 10 years
the system of courts,
in a country is often called the legal system. It of age cannot be held legally accountable for their
prosecutors and police
in a country is the task of the legal system to ensure that all actions and therefore cannot be convicted of a
equality citizens have equal access to the law and that criminal offence. This presumption is known as
the state or quality of the law provides equality, fairness and justice to doli incapax. In the case of 1014-year-olds, the
being equal, that is, of
all members of society. Equality, fairness and court will make an assessment as to whether the
having the same rights
or status justice are central concepts which allow us to child can tell the difference between right and
fairness distinguish good law from bad law. However, if all wrong, and this will inuence the way in which
free from bias, citizens do not have full and equal access to the the matter is handled.
DISHONESTY OR INJUSTICE
legal system, equality, fairness and justice are just
a concept commonly
related to everyday empty concepts. It is only by combining all of these
activities principles that a legal system will be seen to be
Fairness
doli incapax providing justiable and appropriate outcomes. Fairness and justice are usually associated
a Latin term meaning
incapable of wrong; with each other. The difference is that the term
the presumption that fairness applies to everyday life, whereas justice
A CHILD UNDER YEARS Equality has more legal connotations. People may have
of age cannot be held
legally responsible for Equality means that all people in a society are treat- different opinions about what is fair.
his or her actions and ed in the same way with respect to political, social For example, suppose one team wins a sport
cannot be guilty of a
and civil rights and opportunities; no one enjoys competition because all of its players, randomly
criminal or civil offence
unfair advantage or suffers unfair disadvantage. selected, happen to be taller than those on the
Although we would like to think that equality other team. If the rules of the competition do
applies to everyone, our society tolerates many not specify that both teams must have players of
types of equality and many forms of inequality. For the same size, it may seem unfair to the losing
example, depending on the situation, a 10-year-old team, but there is no fact of the matter. If Ann
child will be treated differently from a 17-year-old places a bet on the team she knows has the taller
teenager or a 40-year-old adult. players, and none of the other people who placed
While the law strives for equality, it also takes bets knows anything about the teams or how tall
into account peoples different capacities, such as the players are, Anns winning the bet may also
maturity, recognises that some people are more be regarded as unfair as a result of her having
vulnerable than others, and provides protection knowledge the others lacked.
Access
The ultimate goal of the law is to protect the rights
of all citizens in a society; however, the legal Figure 1.4 Historically, Indigenous Australians have had limited access
system can only full this goal if all people have to the legal system in Australia.
equal access to the agencies and institutions of the
law. Access refers to the ability to obtain or make However, in reality, the legal system is not access
the right or
use of something. The concept of justice suggests accessible to everybody equally. Financially disad-
opportunity to make
that everyone who is covered by a legal system and vantaged people, disabled people, people from use of something
its laws should have equal access to that system. non-English speaking backgrounds, women,
This includes ensuring that citizens are aware of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, and
the laws that affect them, and understand their those who are institutionalised may experience
rights and responsibilities under these laws. particular difculties.
Procedu ra l fa i rness a n d t he
p ri nc ip les o f n a t u ra l j u s t ice
Procedural fairness refers to the idea that there The assertion that justice should not only procedural fairness /
natural justice
must be fairness in the processes that resolve be done, but should be seen to be done comes
the body of principles
disputes. It is closely linked to the concept of from the English case R v Sussex Justices; Ex parte used to ensure the
natural justice; the two terms are often used McCarthy [1924] 1 KB 256. It was discovered that in FAIRNESS AND JUSTICE OF
the decision-making
interchangeably. a criminal trial in which McCarthy was convicted of
procedures of courts;
Natural justice refers to the fact that everyone dangerous driving, a clerk to the magistrates was in Australia it generally
should be treated fairly in legal situations. There are also a solicitor who had represented the person refers to the right to
present your case,
two main principles of natural justice. These are: suing McCarthy in a separate civil case arising
the right to freedom
s the right to be heard this includes the right to out of the accident. Although the magistrates did from bias by decision-
a fair hearing not consult the clerk for his opinion, and the clerk makers, and the right
to a decision based
s the right to have a decision made by an unbiased gave them no advice on the matter, McCarthys on logically relevant
decision-maker even an appearance of bias is conviction was overturned on the basis of the evidence
enough to constitute a breach of natural justice. possibility of bias.
sanction ofcials make favourable decisions for relatives agree with them or feel that the rules have no
a penalty imposed on and friends but apply the law fully for everyone connection to them. This is especially so if the
those who break the
else. penalty attached to the rule is seen as inadequate.
law, usually in the form
of a ne or punishment For example, think about the penalties attached to
Why do people obey the riding your bike or skateboard in areas where it is
not permitted, or talking on a mobile phone when
law? driving. While many people obey these rules and
In general terms, people within a society like to laws, others do not, as they do not consider the
have rules and laws because they create order. penalty (e.g. a ne or demerit points) to be enough
Laws help each person to feel a sense of security of a deterrent.
the law is clear about what is expected of them As would be expected, however, laws against
as citizens and what they can expect from others. more serious offences carry a range of stricter
As the law is based on customs, it also helps to penalties, which are intended to make people
reinforce the values of most members of society. think seriously about the consequences before
In principle, the law embodies the concept that breaking the law.
Figure 1.5 People sometimes disobey laws if they do not consider the penalty to be sufciently harsh.
m e d i a cl i p
1 Why do we need laws? For
Cigarette beach ban goes up in smoke
what reasons do members
in Sydney
of society obey the law?
The Sunday Telegraph *ANUARY
2 Dene the following
basic legal notions. You
Councils responsible for Sydneys popular beaches have
Figure 1.6 !FTER (URRICANE +ATRINA IN PARTS OF .EW Figure 1.7 The Circle-A is the most widely
Orleans slipped into a brief state of anarchy. recognised symbol for anarchy.
1 Which of these statements about the c The police ofcer has not treated all
difference between a rule and a law is true? pedestrians equally.
a Rules are not binding on the whole of the d You should be allowed to cross the road
community. wherever you want.
b Rules do not involve rights and 5 What is the purpose of the law?
responsibilities. a to divide power among all of the different
c Rules are not enforceable. groups in society
d Rules have nothing to do with ethics. b to provide stability for the ruling
2 What is anarchy? government
a constant violence and disorder c to maintain order in society
b the absence of law d to make people do things that no one
c wearing black clothes to break the rules wants to do
d rebellion against the government
3 What are ethics?
a allowing people to be different
b a mix of equality and fairness
c the principles that help us make decisions
about right and wrong behaviour
d different peoples perceptions of the law
4 A police ofcer charges a man for crossing
the road against the lights, but does not book
a woman doing the same thing. Why is this
UNJUST
a The police ofcer should concentrate on
serious crimes.
b Studies show that women are better at
crossing roads.
statute law brought with them the law that applied in Britain, case, and thus disproved the other sides case.
law made by known as common law. Contemporary Australian
parliament
law has evolved from both common law and statute
adversarial system
law. Common law refers to laws created in court
The inquisitorial system
a system of resolving
legal conicts, used in that is, decisions made by judges. Statute law refers In an inquisitorial system, the court is actively
common law countries to laws made by parliament. These concepts are involved in determining the way in which the
such as England
discussed in further detail below. competing claims are presented. It is different
and Australia, that
relies on the skill of from the adversarial system, where the role of the
representatives for
EACH SIDE EG DEFENSE The adversarial system of court is to act as an impartial referee.
The inquisitorial system derives from the
and prosecution
lawyers) who present
trial Roman and Napoleonic codes. It is found in
their cases to an The English system of law has heavily inuenced Europe, as well as Japan and some other countries.
impartial decision-
maker Australian law and practice, including the way In this system, called the civil law system, a judge
inquisitorial system in which court cases are conducted. As a result, or group of judges have the task of investigating
a legal system Australia uses the adversarial system as part of the case before them.
where the court or
both criminal and civil court proceedings. The word Indonesia uses an inquisitorial system for
a part of the court
EG THE JUDGE IS adversary means opponent. In a trial the two criminal trials. This means that the judges will
actively involved in sides of the case try to prove their version of the conduct an inquiry into the truth of what occurred:
conducting the trial
facts and disprove the version of the other side. The that is, the facts behind the legal issues in dispute.
and determining what
questions to ask; used defendant in a criminal trial does not have to prove They are able to admit evidence that might not
in some countries with anything, as he or she is assumed to be innocent be admitted in an Australian court. Judges are
civil legal systems as
opposed to common
until proven guilty. However, most people accused empowered to decide which witnesses will be
law systems of a crime will retain the services of a legal team to called, and could even call for outside testimony
show how the prosecutions case is awed. that had not been requested by either side.
Co m m o n l aw
courts of equity The term common law has many different uses, including Australia, New Zealand, Canada and
historically, courts
as you would nd if you were to put the term into the USA.
whose decisions were
more discretionary a search engine on the internet. Common law in
and based on moral
principles, and which
Australia today includes elements of the following:
Development of the
s court-made law (as opposed to laws made by
served as an antidote
parliament)
common law
to the inexibility of the
common law s law developed by the courts of common law, as The British legal system itself developed from a
distinct from the courts of equity number of sources. In Anglo-Saxon England, for
s the system of court-based law used in the United example, questions about rights and obligations
Kingdom and many of its former colonies, were decided on the basis of local custom and
disputes were resolved by local courts. After the said to have committed it (the defendant) had to
Normans invaded England in the 11th century, swear an oath. The defendant might have the help
they began a system of travelling judges who of oath-helpers people willing to swear to his
applied a common set of laws to all areas of innocence. If the court found the defendants oath
England. Petitions from people who felt that the believable, he or she could simply walk away. If,
local courts had been unjust were dealt with on however, the plaintiff could bring witnesses who
the premise that similar cases should be treated would swear that the defendant had committed
in a similar way. The decisions made by the judges the act, the defendant might be required to parti-
provided the precedents for later cases, and the cipate in a trial by ordeal.
laws they applied became the basis of the British Before the ordeal, the defendant had to fast for
legal system. three days and attend a special mass. He was then
This system was the one brought over to given a painful task to complete or to bear, such
Australia with the First Fleet, but gradually as carrying a red-hot iron bar a certain distance in
Australia has developed its own legal system his bare hands, retrieving a stone from a cauldron
based on its statute law and common law. Many of boiling water, putting his hand into a ame, or
British legal principles have been retained in the being thrown into a river or pond. If the defendant
Australian system. These include the principles of completed the task without injury or death, if the
natural justice. wound healed within a prescribed period, or if the
From about the sixth to the 11th century, the defendant sank, he or she was considered innocent
law was enforced by local administrative bodies. and set free; if not, execution usually followed.
The kings appointees, the church, and local Trial by ordeal continued after the Norman
landlords all had a role in court resolution of legal conquest, though there were new requirements
matters. Crimes were treated as wrongs for which imposed by the church, for example that no one
the offender had to compensate the victim. could be made to undergo an ordeal without the
If the court accepted a case, both the person bishops permission. It was eventually condemned
against whom the illegal act was allegedly by the church in 1215 and abolished by royal
committed (the plaintiff) and the person who was decree in 1219.
In this case, the plaintiff argued in New York, USA, the plaintiff This was one of the rst legal
that he had been defamed over successfully argued that he had cases to look at the internet as
the internet. The defendant, been defamed in his own city a source of defamation. It set
Dow Jones, publishes an online because more than 300 people a precedent for defamation
news magazine. An article had accessed the report in claims being brought across
in that magazine discussed Melbourne. The Supreme Court jurisdictional boundaries, and
the business dealings of the of Victoria held that publication sparked international interest.
plaintiff, a prominent Melbourne occurs when an article is The decision shows that
businessman, and alleged downloaded, and that a plaintiff internet communication is no
that he was involved in money can bring proceedings in any different from other forms of
laundering and fraud. Even jurisdiction where the offending communication, and is subject
though the article originated statements can be accessed. to the same laws.
defamation
the act of making Cou r t h ie ra rc hy : j u ri sdic t io n
statements or
suggestions that harm
someones reputation
of s t ate a n d fede ra l cou r t s
in the community
appeal Australia has two levels of law: state and federal.
State and territory courts
an application to As a result, there are separate state and federal
have a higher court
jurisdictions, each of which has its own court The state court system in New South Wales
reconsider a lower
courts decision, on the structure. operates under the following hierarchy:
basis of an error of law All courts have the power to hear a case for 1 Lower courts
the rst time. Some courts can also hear appeals 2 Intermediate courts
from lower courts. This means they can reconsider 3 Superior courts.
the decision of a lower court, where the losing The Australian Capital Territory does not have
party believes there has been an error in the the intermediate level, but is otherwise similar.
lower courts legal reasoning. Figure 2.4 shows the Each court has its own jurisdiction, or area over
structure of state courts in New South Wales, and which it has authority. Minor matters are dealt with
federal courts in Australia. The arrows show the lower in the court hierarchy, whereas the higher
specic courts that can hear appeals from each of courts are reserved for more serious matters and
the lower courts. appeals from the lower courts.
In criminal cases, minor offences such as loit- Territory, the court that has this role is called the summary offences
ering and obstructing trafc are called summary Magistrates Court. criminal offences that
can be dealt with by a
offences these are dealt with in the lower courts. Most criminal matters are heard in the Local SINGLE JUDGE WITHOUT
More serious criminal offences, such as assault or Magistrates Court, as only very serious crimes A JURY AND DO NOT
require a preliminary
and murder, are called indictable offences are referred to the District or Supreme Courts. In
hearing
these are dealt with in the higher courts. the case of indictable offences, the magistrate will
indictable offences
listen to an outline of the evidence to determine serious criminal
whether the prosecution has a strong enough case offences that require
Lower courts AN INDICTMENT A
to be able to try the defendant in the District Court
formal, written charge)
LOCAL COURT AND MAGISTRATES COURT or Supreme Court. This preliminary hearing is and a preliminary
In New South Wales, the Local Court deals with called a committal hearing. hearing; they are
typically tried before a
minor criminal matters and minor civil disputes. The Local Court in New South Wales has
JUDGE AND JURY AND ARE
In this court a magistrate will hear and decide jurisdiction to deal with the following areas: SUBJECT TO A GREATER
the case, and will set the punishment for criminal s minor criminal and summary offences penalty
offences. The Local Court is also known as the s civil matters with a monetary value of $5000
Magistrates Court, and in the Australian Capital to $60 000
Superior courts
L AN D AN D EN VIR ONM ENT C O U RT
The Land and Environment Court is a specialist court TH E SU P REM E C O U RT
responsible for interpreting and enforcing environ- The Supreme Court is the highest court in the
mental law in the state of New South Wales. It has a state or territory hierarchy. It deals with the most
wide jurisdiction and deals with matters related to serious criminal matters and civil cases involving
environmental planning (e.g. zoning of park lands), large sums of money (there are no monetary limits
environmental offences (e.g. illegal polluting or on its civil jurisdiction). It also deals with appeals
dumping) and appeals to local council rulings. from the lower courts in that state or territory.
corporations law
legislation that The Supreme Court has criminal jurisdiction
regulates corporations over the most serious indictable offences such
and the securities Intermediate courts
as murder and manslaughter, attempted murder,
and futures industry
in Australia; it is THE DISTRICT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES kidnapping, major conspiracy and drug-related
administered by the The District Court of New South Wales deals with charges, and Commonwealth prosecutions for
Australian Securities
and Investments
more serious criminal matters. These include serious breaches of the corporations law. All
#OMMISSION !3)# everything from charges of larceny to more cases are heard before a judge and jury.
T he leg al s y s tem
jury is used in some circumstances. about which court has the appropriate jurisdiction
The Supreme Court also hears appeals. The to hear their particular case. Some of the savings
Court of Appeal is the highest court in each state expected to result from the restructure would be
and territory, for both civil and criminal matters. used to provide non-adversarial dispute resolution
Three judges hear most appeals, but some are services in the area of family law.
heard by two, and, in special cases, they may be
heard by more than three. If the judges cannot The Federal Court of Australia
agree, the majority view prevails. To appeal to The Federal Court of Australia was established by
the High Court from the Court of Appeal, special an Act of Parliament in 1976. It assumed some of
permission must be granted by the High Court. the jurisdiction formerly exercised by the High
Court of Australia and all of the jurisdiction of two
courts that had dealt with industrial matters and
Federal courts bankruptcy. It deals with civil disputes governed
The federal court system has a hierarchy in much by federal law (except for family law matters),
the same way as the state court system does. as well as some summary criminal offences.
These include: The Federal Courts position in the federal court
hierarchy is equivalent to that of the Supreme
The Federal Magistrates Court Courts in the states and territories. In relation to
of Australia the other courts in the federal hierarchy, it is equal
The Federal Magistrates Court of Australia was to the Family Court of Australia, and superior to
established by the Commonwealth Parliament the Federal Magistrates Court.
towards the end of 1999 and conducted its rst
sittings in July 2000. The Family Court of Australia
The Federal Magistrates Court was established The Family Court of Australia is a superior federal
to relieve some of the case load of the Federal court which deals with the most complex family
and Family Courts and reduce the cost and time law matters. It was established by the Australian
required to deal with more minor federal matters. Parliament in 1975. Its main function is to rule on
The jurisdiction of the Federal Magistrates cases related to specialised areas in family law,
Court includes family law and child support, such as divorce, parenting orders, the division of
administrative law, bankruptcy, human rights, property and spousal maintenance. In its appellate
consumer protection and trade practices, privacy, jurisdiction, it can hear appeals from a decision of a
migration, copyright, and industrial law. It does federal magistrate or a single Family Court judge.
not deal with criminal matters. It shares its original
jurisdiction with the Family Court of Australia and The High Court of Australia
the Federal Court of Australia; matters can be The High Court of Australia is the highest court in
transferred between these courts, depending on the Australian judicial system. It was established
the complexity of the legal issues. in 1901 under section 71 of the Australian Consti-
In November 2008, the federal government tution. The High Court deals with appeals from
decided that the Federal Magistrates Court would the Federal Court of Australia, the Family Court
of Australia, and the state and territory Supreme interpretation of the Australian Constitution and
Courts. It also deals with cases concerning the the constitutional validity of laws.
R EVI EW 2 . 1
l eg al l i nks
4HE 1UEEN REPRESENTED BY THE
Governor-General)
St a t u te l aw
Statute law is the law made by parliament. It is and the territories, all state parliaments and the bicameral
containing two
also known as legislation or Acts of Parliament. federal parliament are bicameral. This means
chambers or houses of
In Australia, any parliament has the power to that they have two houses, an upper house and parliament
make statute law. This means that state, territory a lower house. The Australian Capital Territorys
and federal governments all have the right to parliament is unicameral: it only has a lower
make laws. The Australian Constitution sets out house, called the Legislative Assembly. In New
the powers of the state and federal parliaments South Wales, the lower house is known as the
with respect to making law. Legislative Assembly and the upper house is called
the Legislative Council.
The role and structure of In federal parliament, the two houses are the
Senate (the upper house) and the House of Repre-
parliament sentatives (the lower house). The government is
A parliament is a body of elected representatives. formed by the political party that has the majority
It debates proposed legislation, passes or rejects of seats in the lower house. Sometimes parties
it, and amends legislation. Apart from Queensland will unite to form a government (such as the
For information on the One of the most important functions of parlia ment
Commonwealth Parliament is the passing of laws. Most laws are introduced by
go to www.aph.gov.au the party that holds government. A proposed new
law is known as a bill. The making of a law can be
time-consuming and difcult. The process is open
Advantages Disadvantages
s The people making the legislation s Members of parliament do not have Act of Parliament
are usually experts in that eld. the time or expertise to fully check Statute law, resulting
from a bill successfully
s Delegation of minor legislation the delegated legislation.
passing through
frees up parliamentary time for very s With many different bodies involved
parliament and gaining
serious issues. in making delegated legislation, royal assent
s It is easier to amend delegated there can be inconsistencies.
legislation and thus it is more s Little publicity surrounds the
exible. delegated legislation and thus the
public usually cannot voice their
views.
First The rst formal reading of the Upper In the Upper House, the process
reading bill takes place by the Clerk of the House is repeated. If the bill does not
Parliament who reads out the title pass in the Upper House is may be
of the bill. Each member receives a returned to the Lower House for
copy of the proposed Act. AMENDMENTS OR MAY BE REJECTED
Third During the third reading a vote is Royal If the bill is passed in the Upper
reading taken on the bill. If the bill passes, it assent House, it is presented to the
moves to the Upper House. 'OVERNOR IN THE CASE OF .37
legislation) or Governor-General
IN THE CASE OF FEDERAL LEGISLATION
for formal approval. The bill now
becomes an Act of Parliament
and is law as of the date
specied in the Act.
force, Australia consisted of six colonies, which content of the nal constitution document. As referendum
the referral of a
were independent of each other with the right to with any democratic process, politicians have to
particular issue to the
govern within their own borders. These six colonies persuade the public to vote for their proposals, electorate for a vote
were not answerable to any authority in Australia, and sometimes they have to make trade-offs to rail gauge
but rather to the British government. By the 1880s gain voter condence. This was essential to get the distance between
the inner sides of the
various groups and individuals began to promote the necessary votes in the each of the federation
two rails of a train
the concept that Australia would be better off if the referendums. line
White Australia
Policy
the government
Table 2.2 !RGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST FEDERATION IN
policy of allowing
only Europeans and
Arguments for federation Arguments against federation
English-speaking
Economics: the removal of trade barriers Trade: tariffs could be used to protect people to immigrate
between the colonies would promote a more industries in certain colonies from competition to Australia
efcient economy in other colonies tariff
a tax that must be
Transport: a national rail network would Fear: smaller states believed that the more
paid on imports or
overcome problems caused by the colonies populous and richer states would simply exports
having different rail gauges override their interests
Defence: as the colonies were far from Britain Apathy: many people felt that federation
and thus from Britains ability to assist in the was irrelevant to their daily lives; this was
event of attack, a unied military force would compounded by the severe economic
reduce vulnerability DEPRESSION OF THE S
Nationalism: there was a desire to foster a Expense: federation would be expensive to
unique Australian identity and culture distinct achieve and a national government would be
FROM THE @MOTHER COUNTRY %NGLAND IN expensive to run
OF !USTRALIANS WERE OF "RITISH ORIGIN
Racial purity: implementing national policies Cheap labour: Queensland was determined to
restricting immigration would keep Australia protect its sugar industry by allowing Pacic
WHITE THE White Australia Policy) )SLANDERS KANAKAS TO WORK ON THE SUGAR
plantations
After a series of referendums in 1898, 1899 and ment was required. The Commonwealth of Australia
1900, the colonies eventually found a compromise Constitution Act 1900 (UK) was passed and Australia
position on a proposed constitution, but, before it came into existence as a nation on 1 January 1901.
could take effect, approval from the British Parlia- The key features of this British Act were:
s Australia was a federated nation consisting of s The Senate provides a check (restraint) on
six states (Western Australia joined shortly after the power of the House of Representatives.
the other states). The Northern Territory gained The Senate is sometimes called the states
self-government in 1978 and the ACT in 1988. house, since all states have the same number
s There was a bicameral federal parliament of senators (12) regardless of population. Each
(House of Representatives and Senate). territory has two senators.
s A High Court of Australia was established to s Section 128, which covers the process for alter-
oversee any other courts and provide nal ing the Constitution, species that a majority
and conclusive judgments upon any appeals it of states need to vote yes on a proposal for
s hears (s 73 of the Australian Constitution). it to succeed that is, four out of six states.
abbreviation for
s It outlined both the division of power and the In addition, an absolute majority of voters
section of any
legislation; ss is separation of powers as they would apply in Australia-wide must vote yes that is, 50 per
the abbreviation for Australia. cent of voters plus one. It should be noted that
@SECTIONS PLURAL
s It enabled the Constitution to be altered by a ref- this strict requirement has made constitutional
erendum (s 128 of the Australian Constitution). change very difcult: no referendum has suc-
The Constitution itself is s 9 of the Common- ceeded since 1977.
wealth of Australia Constitution Act. Although s The division of power outlined in s 51 ensures
the Constitution came into force through an Act that the states have control over the residual
of the British parliament, the Act brought the powers, that is, those not listed in s 51. This will
Commonwealth of Australia into existence as a be examined in detail later in this chapter.
nation, and the Constitution can be changed only
by a referendum of Australian voters.
The Australian Constitution contains certain
Division of power
checks and balances as a result of debate and After all the controversy and discussions leading
discussion during the federation process: up to the formalisation of the Australian Consti-
If either the Commonwealth or a state Franklin was included as one such area. ultra vires
,ATIN BEYOND THE
government passes a law that contravenes Now there was a state law allowing the
power or authority
the Australian Constitution, then that law construction of the dam and a federal law legally held by a
T he leg al s y s tem
would be deemed unconstitutional and which demanded that it be stopped. person, institution or
statute to perform
thus be declared invalid. The case went to the High Court.
an act
Technically the government would be There are seven judges on the full
external affairs
said to be acting ultra vires. But what bench of the High Court. In a 43 power
happens if the state and Commonwealth decision, the court ruled that the federal the power of the
Commonwealth
laws were both valid, as can often be the government was validly using the
to legislate on
case with a concurrent power? This external affairs power of the Constitution international matters
situation arose in Commonwealth v (s 51(xxix)), which gives it the authority to involving Australia;
interpreted by
Tasmania [1983] HCA 21, known more legislate on any matter of international the High Court to
commonly as the Tasmanian Dam case. concern. Although Tasmania had argued mean that when the
Commonwealth signs
Tasmania wanted to build a that the construction of the dam and the
an international treaty
hydroelectric dam on the Franklin regulation of that area of the state were or convention it has
and Gordon river system. A group of purely internal or domestic affairs, the the authority to enact
laws to give effect to
environmentalists began a protest High Court held that the Commonwealth
this international law
campaign against this proposal and the had the power to make laws with respect within Australia
Wilderness Society and the Australian to international obligations that also
Conservation Foundation got actively govern conduct within Australia. Under
involved. Nationwide protests were s 109, the federal law would override the
organised under the No Dams slogan, state law. Section 109 states that when a
and a range of high-prole personalities law of a State is inconsistent with a law of
took up the cause. the Commonwealth, the latter shall prevail,
Tasmania refused to budge. The and the former shall, to the extent of the
Tasmanian government argued that the inconsistency, be invalid. The construction
building of the dam was a residual power of the dam was stopped and the Franklin
and the protesters, while entitled to their River was ultimately preserved for future
view, were not going to change Tasmanias generations.
decision. In the lead-up to the 1983 federal
election, the leader of the Australian Labor
Party promised to stop the dam if elected.
Labor won the election, but Tasmania
continued to build the dam.
The federal government recognised
the Wild Rivers area as a region of special
signicance and it was listed under the
World Heritage Convention. The federal
government passed the World Heritage
(Property Conservation) Act 1983 (Cth),
which specied that such areas of special Figure 2.12 There were numerous street marches
signicance should be protected. The PROTESTING AGAINST THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE &RANKLIN $AM
The law and the legal system must be 5 The alteration must go to the Governor-
dynamic to be effective. Mechanisms must General for royal assent.
be in place to change ineffective, obsolete In 1967, one of the more popular
or unfair laws. Statutes (Acts of Parliament) referendums altered s 51(xxvi) and deleted
can be changed through the parliamentary s 127, which enabled the Commonwealth
process. Common law can be changed government to pass laws in relation
through the courts when a judge to Aboriginal people and Torres Strait
sets a new precedent. The Australian Islanders. This ensured consistency of
Constitution, while technically a statute, laws, as some states had discriminatory
has a unique alteration process contained laws and were reluctant to change them.
within it. This process is found in Chapter Other successful referendums included
VII, Alteration of the Constitution, s 128, amending s 72 so that judges in the
and is known as a referendum. High Court and the other federal courts
Of the 44 proposed amendments to had to retire at age 70. This was the last
the constitution, only eight have been successful referendum; the next nine
successful. In some published copies proposals were all defeated. The last
of the Australian Constitution, these referendum was held on 11 November
successful amendments are often shown 1999 and involved changing Australia to
in bold type or by having deleted parts a republic with a president appointed
ruled through (see s 51(xxvi)). The margin by a two-thirds majority of both houses
notes also indicate alterations made of parliament, which would require
bipartisan to the Constitution after a successful bipartisan support of the nomination. The
having the referendum. The specics of successfully proposal was soundly defeated, but the
support of
THE TWO MAJOR altering the Australian Constitution, as set push to make Australia a fully independent
political parties out in s 128, are: nation remains.
1 The proposed change must pass
both houses (Senate and House of
Representatives) with an absolute
majority.
2 The proposed change must be put to
the electors not less than two months
nor more than six months after going
through both houses.
3 There must be an absolute majority of
voters Australia-wide who approve the
change, that is, 50 per cent of voters
plus one.
4 There must be a majority of states that
approve the change, that is, four of the
six states must vote for the change.
REVIEW 2.3
1 Dene the term constitution. c Outline the process by which the federal
2 Use examples to outline the constitutional division of government could construct a rail line from Brisbane
power. In your answer distinguish between: to Melbourne. Refer to s 51(xxxii), (xxxiii) and
a legislative powers (xxxiv).
b enumerated powers d What part of the Constitution reproduced here has
c concurrent powers been altered by a referendum? Explain the impact
d exclusive powers of this amendment.
e residual powers. e Explain s 51 (xxxvii) in your own words.
3 Study the extract of s 51 and answer the following 4 Write a summary of Commonwealth v Tasmania [1983]
questions: HCA 21 using the following headings:
a Under what section of the Constitution can the a facts
federal government legislate with respect to b issue
imports and exports? Explain your answer. c judgment.
b With specic reference to s 51(xxi) and (xxii) outline 5 With specic reference to s 128, outline why it is so
the grounds on which de facto relationships are difcult to alter the Australian Constitution, even if
considered residual powers. Explain why these more than 50 per cent of voters want the proposed
relationships were not covered in the Constitution change.
by our founding fathers.
(v) in which a writ of mandamus or prohibition Constitution involves stipulating what areas the injunction
a court order stopping
or an injunction is sought against an ofcer of Commonwealth can legislate on and what areas an individual or
the Commonwealth; belong to the states. In association with such organisation from
performing a particular
the High Court shall have original jurisdiction. decisions, the High Court makes statements on
action
how each level of government can use its powers
Section 76
The Parliament may make laws conferring original
jurisdiction on the High Court in any matter
(i) arising under this Constitution, or involving its
interpretation;
(ii) arising under any laws made by the
Parliament;
(iii) of Admiralty and maritime jurisdiction;
(iv) relating to the same subject matter claimed
under the laws of different States.
On 30 July 1991 Heather Osland of grounds including the conduct sought a formal pardon from
and her son David Albion planned of the trial, criminal complicity, the Governor of Victoria, in
to get Frank Osland (Heathers evidence issues and causation an attempt to clear her name.
husband and Davids stepfather) issues. When the pardon was refused,
out of their lives. They rst dug The High Court also dealt with she sought access to documents
a grave, then drugged Frank the issue of battered woman outlining the reasons why. In
by putting sedatives in his syndrome (BWS) for the rst 2008, Heather Osland stated:
evening meal to induce sleep. time in Australia. The High Court Domestic violence is a big issue
David Albion carried the plan conrmed its admissibility into today, but in my day it was locked
to nality after Frank went to evidence if it related to the in a cupboard.
bed by fatally hitting him over particular facts of the case. The
the head with an iron pipe in the High Court specied that BWS
presence of Heather. Later, David was not a new discrete defence
and Heather buried Frank in the but was applicable in Australia
grave they had earlier prepared. where expert evidence is
David and Heather did not received to describe common
deny digging the hole (as they features of the conduct in
called it) or giving Frank the abusive relationships and where
sedatives. They also did not deny provocation and self defence are
that David delivered the fatal put in issue.
blow or that they buried Frank The point was made, obiter
in the hole. Heather reported dictum, that abusive relationships
Frank as a missing person. It are not gender-specic. Figure 2.16 Changing social
wasnt until January 1995 that the As a result of this ruling, attitudes should be reected in
pair were charged with murder. battered partner syndrome High Court rulings. Domestic
Both David and Heather was accepted into the fabric of violence is no longer a hidden
CRIME AND MORE JUST OUTCOMES
relied on self-defence and the criminal justice system; that
are now possible, depending on
provocation to account for is, victims in such relationships
the facts of the case.
their actions. The defence could use it where the facts did
provided detailed evidence of not allow them to rely solely on
extreme violent behaviour by provocation or self-defence.
Frank over the years, and its Ironically, the High Court ruled R ESEAR CH 2 . 3
escalation in the days preceding that it did not apply in Oslands 1 Read Heather Oslands
his death. David and Heather case. story, in her own words,
believed there would be dire Justice Kirby noted that the at http://home.vicnet.net.
consequences for them if Frank raising of battered partner au/~rhog/story.htm
realised he had been drugged. syndrome does not raise a 2 Conduct research using
Initially David was acquitted protective cloak over an accused the internet, then
and Heather was convicted of charged with murder. compare and contrast
murder and sentenced to 14 Heather Osland spent nine- Said Morgans case
years imprisonment. Heather and-a-half years in prison. She with Heather Oslands.
appealed this decision on a range was released in July 2005 but
Aborigi na l a n d To rres St ra it
I s l a n de r Peop l es c u s t o m a r y l aw s
The Indigenous cultures of Australia are the oldest Torres Strait Islander communities, speaking
living cultures in the world. Over time, they have different languages and with various cultural
been inuenced by other peoples, both those who beliefs, practices and traditions. It was very
came to Australia to stay and those who visited much a hunter-gatherer lifestyle, and one in
Australia for trade or other reasons, but did not stay. which gender played a role: men hunted the large
Indigenous peoples also traded among themselves animals such as kangaroos, emus and turtles, and
and exchanged ideas, songs and dances. These the women and children hunted smaller animals
exchanges often took place at large ceremonial and collected fruits, berries and other plants.
gatherings where many people collected together. On the coast, people relied on catching sh and
The gatherings often occurred at a time and place many types of shellsh. Not all Indigenous peoples
when there were plenty of particular foods. were nomadic; in many cases, groups would
Like all cultures, Indigenous Australian stay in an area only for a certain period of time
cultures have changed and developed over time. because of seasonal variations and the availability
Colonisation of Australia brought rapid changes to of food.
Indigenous society and dramatically affected the There is no single system of Aboriginal and
land and the way people lived. Torres Strait Islander law. The separate Indigenous
Prior to European settlement, only Indigenous nations developed their own laws, but there were customary law
people populated Australia. When the First Fleet also common aspects among groups. All of these principles and
procedures that have
sailed into Sydney Harbour in 1788, Aboriginal laws are spiritually based and closely linked to the
developed through
people inhabited the whole of Australia and Torres land. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander law is general usage
Strait Islanders lived on the islands between based on tradition, ritual and socially acceptable according to the
customs of a people
Australia and what is now Papua New Guinea. conduct. For this reason it is known as customary or nation, or groups of
Australia had many different Aboriginal and law. nations
Diversity of Indigenous
societies
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander law is tribal
and different tribes have their own variations of
customary law. Australia is a large land mass,
and as a result, different languages and modes of
conduct developed. However, the similarities in
customary law outweigh the differences.
For example, under traditional law, the majority
of Indigenous communities will generally see that
disputes are not restricted to individuals. The
resolution of the dispute, involving negotiation,
mediation and conciliation, will involve everyone
Figure 2.17 Aboriginal rock paintings in the community. There are also offences that
to the appropriate people and reinforced often broken, elders are often directly involved in
through dance and storytelling. Many of these applying sanctions.
ceremonies are sacred and people from outside Sanctions vary from place to place. The relatives
the community are not permitted to participate of the wronged party, ceremonial leaders, or both
or watch. The stories have been handed down for may be involved in the punishment, the form of
thousands of years and explain things such as the which may be determined through negotiations
creation of all things, why things happen, tribal and/or kinship relationships. For the most serious
boundaries, family relationships, cultural practices offences, elders may need to ensure that the
and forbidden acts. punishment is appropriately carried out and
restraint is exercised.
mitigation
making the severity
The significance of land Islander people have links with the sea, lakes,
rivers and all bodies of water. These are not owned
of an offence or a and bodies of water to
sentence milder or less by individuals, but are cared for by the group under
severe
Indigenous societies customary law.
The idea of individual land ownership is alien to Each group has distinct responsibilities govern-
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander thought. Being ing the way that they look after their land and
a member of a tribe means that a person is able bodies of water. These responsibilities are tied into
to live on and use the resources of certain lands. their traditional laws and the stories and rituals that
Thus, the land belongs to the group and loss of this pass on these laws and responsibilities. Failure to
land means losing the tribes culture and history. follow the traditional laws can be seen as a failure to
In the same way, Aboriginal and Torres Strait show respect for the land and traditional values.
Legal decisions
The International Court of Justice (ICJ), which is
part of the United Nations, is the judicial body
Figure 2.21 The International Criminal Court in that deals with disputes between states. Many
The Hague, The Netherlands treaties designate the ICJ as the means of resolving
disputes that arise under the treaty.
ratify negotiations between nations. If all parties involved Stare decisis does not apply to decisions of the
to formally conrm that
agree, the treaty will be signed. A document will ICJ. According to Article 59 of the Statute of the
the country intends to
be bound by the treaty only become a treaty if all parties have the intention International Court of Justice, a decision of this court
declarations of being bound by its provisions and obligations only binds the parties to the particular dispute.
formal statements at the time of signing. The treaty only becomes However, the court considers past rulings in its
of a partys position
binding on a nation when that nation raties it decisions, and ICJ decisions may help to shape the
on a particular issue.
Declarations are not that is, conrms that it intends to be bound. content of treaties.
legally binding under For some countries, such as France, treaties There are other international courts and tribu-
international law.
which that country has ratied automatically nals whose judgments contribute to establishing
United Nations
a world organisation
become part of the domestic law. Other countries international law. The International Criminal Court
dedicated to world require domestic legislation to be passed in order (ICC) and the European Court of Human Rights
peace and the for the treaty to be implemented into their law. (ECHR) are two examples. The ICC was set up
sovereignty and equality
of all its members In other cases, whether domestic legislation is to prosecute the most serious crimes concerning
required will depend on the type of treaty. the worldwide community; the ECHR is a regional
I n t e r n a t i o n a l o r g a n i s a t io n s
The United Nations The UNs International Law Commission is
the body primarily responsible for codifying and
The United Nations is the chief organisation developing international law. The UN General
involved in international law. It was established Assemblys Legal Committee (Sixth Committee)
in 1945 by the Charter of the United Nations. At receives the Commissions reports and considers
its rst meetings, fty-one countries were repre- its recommendations. It may then organise a con-
sented; by 2009, there were 192 members. Its ference to draw up a convention based on those
main objectives are to maintain global peace recommendations, that the member countries
and security; to develop friendly relations among vote upon.
nations based on respect for equal rights and Critics of the United Nations believe that reform
each nations right to govern its own political, is necessary for its continued relevance. State
economic and social development; and to promote sovereignty often poses a challenge to the authority
cooperation in solving international problems. The of the UN, especially in situations involving peace
UN has been central to the protection of human and security. It has also been suggested that the
rights and to developing a legal framework to structure of the Security Council should be re-
address terrorism, drug trafcking, the clearing examined (this will be discussed later). As the UN has
of landmines, and protection of the environment. no powers to make countries enact its resolutions
It has also been active in concrete efforts to ght into domestic law or to follow a particular course of
disease, reduce poverty, provide emergency relief action, it effectiveness is very much dependent on
in natural disasters, and many other humanitarian the political will of nation-states.
operations. The main organs of the UN are discussed below.
in September, disappointed many human rights The other main organs of the United Nations are
groups due to the absence of stronger measures the Economic and Social Council, the Trusteeship
such as an immediate oil embargo and targeted Council, the Secretariat and the International
sanctions against government ofcials. Court of Justice (discussed below).
A further criticism of the Security Council is
l eg al l i nks
Private law
The aim of private law is to regulate relationships
between individual persons, companies and
organisations. Private rights are protected by both
statute and common law. When an individual
brings a court action against another individual for
infringement of his or her private rights, it must
civil jurisdiction be in a court exercising civil jurisdiction and the
the power of a court to
action is known as a civil proceeding. Three major
hear matters involving
disputes between areas of civil law are contract law, tort law and
private individuals, and property law.
to award civil remedies
damages
Contract law
monetary
compensation for harm A contract is an agreement, or promise, between
or loss suffered two or more parties that is recognised by law.
Contract law is concerned with the recognition of
this agreement and the actions taken to enforce it.
When one of the parties to a contract believes
that all or part of the contract has been breached,
he or she can bring a legal action in a civil court.
Damages are usually the common law remedy
available for breach of contract. Damages are
Figure 3.2 The Australian Constitution viewed as a substitute for performance of the
C H I L DRENS C O U RT H E A RI NG S
Children charged with a crime are treated differ-
ently by the court system, as immature persons are
regarded as having a different degree of respon-
sibility from adults. Conviction by a Childrens
Court, even for a serious crime, has less severe
consequences than conviction in an ordinary
criminal court. Most charges against people under
18 years of age are heard in a special Childrens
Court hearing. They are usually heard before a
magistrate who specialises in childrens cases and
takes reasonable measures to ensure that the child
understands the proceedings.
The case is heard in a closed court and the public
is not allowed to attend. If journalists are present,
they are not permitted to publish the identity of
the offender. In New South Wales, if the child is
under 16 years of age, no conviction is recorded.
and civil cases Accessing cases online is one of the most time-
efcient ways of collecting information about
There are a number of ways in which you can gain a criminal and civil cases. Two reliable sites to visit
better understanding and appreciation of the oper- are www.legalaid.nsw.gov.au (look under Links)
ation of criminal and civil law. This can be done and www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au (under Legal
by: resources). Both of these sites have information
1 3
5 6
7 2
4 4 4 4
7 Court reporter
All court proceedings are recorded, either in short- Figure 3.10 The media, following a high prole
hand or using a shorthand machine, or in audio and/ court case
or visual form. A transcript of the proceedings is an
accurate written record of what has been said.
selection of the entire panel of jurors, or individual
jurors. Challenges for cause are based on the
Other participants person not being qualied to serve on a jury,
being ineligible or disqualied, or being suspected
Corrective services officer of bias. Both sides can also exercise a certain
A corrective services ofcer is required to guard number of peremptory challenges of prospective
the accused in a criminal case and escort that jurors, without having to give a reason. However,
person to and from the courtroom. challenging the selection of a juror can be difcult:
neither side knows anything about them in
Jury advance apart from their names, and peremptory
A jury is a panel of citizens, selected at random, challenges are usually based on nothing more
who consider the evidence and decide on questions than name or appearance (e.g. age, gender, race,
raised in the case. Their job can be described as clothing, physique).
fact-nding, and their decision is called a verdict.
Before a court case begins, they are sworn in. Plaintiffs and defendants
In most cases, a criminal trial The person who brings a civil action against some-
involves a jury of 12 people. Civil one else is called the plaintiff, while the person
RE VIE W 3.4 cases may be heard by a judge who must defend his or her actions is called the
1 Outline the role of a judge alone or (in NSW) with a jury of defendant. In a criminal trial, the defendant is
or magistrate in court four people. the person accused of the crime, and there is no
proceedings. The members of a jury are plaintiff.
2 What forms of legal ordinary citizens selected at ran-
representation are available to dom from the jury list, which is Media
a person who is having legal compiled from the electoral roll. The media often attend high-prole court cases in
problems? In a criminal trial, both the order to report on them. Generally, representatives
3 Compare and contrast the prosecution and the defence have from the media sit in the media gallery or wait
roles of the judge and the jury. the right to challenge either the outside the court in order to interview people.
Figure 3.11 The ruins of the Figure 3.12 Common law in Australia has Figure 3.13 The Palazzo della Consulta,
Forum Romanum 2OMAN its origins in customary law developed in seat of the Italian Constitutional Court,
&ORUM England. This image shows Queen Elizabeth I DESIGNED BY &ERDINANDO &UGA
in the Court of Kings Bench the highest
COMMON LAW COURT IN %NGLAND UNTIL
individuals and the state and includes trial, the prosecution has the burden of proof.
criminal, administrative and constitutional law. In a civil matter, the plaintiff has the burden
s The Australian Constitution sets out the of proof.
foundational rules of Australian government. s The standard of proof in a criminal trial is
Constitutional law governs any changes made beyond reasonable doubt. In a civil hearing, it
to these laws. is on the balance of probabilities.
s Private law governs relationships between s Contemporary Australian law is based on
individuals or between them and English common law. Many other countries
organisations or companies. It includes use the civil law system, which is based on a
contract, tort and property law. statutory code rather than on precedent.
M ul ti p l e- c hoi ce q ues ti ons
1 Why is criminal law prosecuted by the state 4 What can a plaintiff expect from a successful
rather than by individual citizens? tort claim?
a Victims of crime are usually unable to a compensation from the defendant in the
afford legal representation. form of damages
b Crime is considered a wrong against us all b compensation from the state
and thus a matter of public law. c AN INJUNCTION TO PREVENT THE DEFENDANT
c Crime is often due to government from approaching the plaintiffs solicitor
decisions or policy and the state must take d an order of specic performance
responsibility for it. 5 Which of these statements about the burden
d It is a matter of organisation and thus is a and standard of proof is true?
subset of administrative law. a The defence in a criminal trial must prove
2 What is the main purpose of administrative that the defendant is innocent, beyond
law? reasonable doubt.
a TO ACHIEVE JUSTICE IN CIVIL CASES b The defendant in a civil trial must prove
b to ensure fairness in government decisions that the plaintiffs case is awed, on the
c to allow people to bring criminal charges balance of probabilities.
against government departments c The plaintiff in a civil trial must prove his or
d to allow people to receive damages in civil her case on the balance of probabilities.
cases d The plaintiff in a civil trial must prove that
3 What is the High Courts role in relation to the the defendant is guilty beyond reasonable
laws made by parliament? doubt.
a to decide whether they are consistent with
the Australian Constitution
b to exercise veto power if necessary, when a
bill comes before parliament
c to ensure that they are consistent with
international treaties that Australia has
signed
d to advise the minor parties on how they
can get laws passed
IM PORTA N T L EGIS L AT ION The Commonwealth and all states and territories
Marriage Act 1961 #TH except the ACT, which is land-locked, have
Property (Relationships) Act 1984 .37 passed similar statutes, each of which is titled
Crimes (Forensic Procedures) !CT .37 the Crimes at Sea Act. These Acts allow
Crimes Act 1900 .37 the federal and state governments to enter
Young Offenders Act 1997 .37 into a cooperative agreement to divide up
Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act responsibility for enforcing the law relating to
.37 CRIMES COMMITTED AT SEA *URISDICTION DEPENDS
Australian Law Reform Commission Act 1996 on the part of the sea where the crime was
#TH committed. Although some states have passed
Law Reform Commission Act 1967 .37 laws allowing a defendant to be convicted
Jury Act 1977 .37 ON THE BASIS OF A MAJORITY JURY VERDICT THIS IS
Family Law Act 1975 #TH not permitted in any areas of the sea where
THE #OMMONWEALTH HAS JURISDICTION BECAUSE
only unanimous verdicts are constitutionally
permitted where the offence is against federal
law: Cheatle v R ;= (#!
Co n d i t i o n s t h a t g i ve r i s e t o l aw
reform
Changing social values
Social values are standards or principles that
guide people in their thinking about aspects of
their society and that are underpinned by beliefs
about right and wrong. Social values are not
necessarily the same as individual values, but they
both inuence and are inuenced by individuals
judgment. Both individual and social values and
ethics are shaped by various cultural factors, often
including religion.
When the majority of people within a society
hold similar views about an issue, the views can
be said to reect public morality. The law must
reect the social values of the majority of the
community if it is to stay relevant and be assured
Figure 4.1 Historically, social values in Australia have been heavily of a high rate of compliance. As Australia is a
inuenced by the Christian faith. diverse multicultural society, it can sometimes be
morality is not static; it continues to evolve. These Facto Relationships Act was amended to include public morality
standards of behaviour
changing social values are an impetus for law same-sex couples and was renamed the Property
capital punishment 100 federal Acts that discriminate against same- to allow same-sex marriages. The federal govern-
the practice of sex couples. The Rudd government has indicated ment has consistently refused to consider this
sentencing a person
an intention to pass legislation to remove discri- reform. It seems that marriage is one area where
TO DEATH BY JUDICIAL
process; also referred to minatory legislative provisions. This will mean members of government do not believe that the
as the death penalty that same sex-couples will have the same status public has shifted far enough in their thinking to
as heterosexual de facto couples at both state and warrant legislative reform.
federal levels.
ca s e s tu d y
R EV I EW 4 . 1
1 Outline the sequence of events that led
to the Property (Relationships) Legislation
Amendment Act 1999 (NSW). What did that
Act accomplish?
2 What are some other types of social
changes that might lead to law reform?
How might the reform be accomplished?
T he leg al s y s tem
of a person involved
that the crime of domestic violence deserved cameras to photograph the scene and any
in an intimate,
a stand-alone Act of Parliament. Hence the injuries, and record any witness statements. spousal or de facto
Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act Thereafter, weekly meetings with repre- relationship
2007 (NSW) was passed and took effect in 2008. sentatives from welfare agencies, the Local
This Act repealed Part 15A of the Crimes Court, the Department of Community Services
Act, which dealt with apprehended violence and the police are scheduled, to assist the victim
orders, and re-enacted those provisions as a and ensure that his or her needs are met. The
new Act, with some modications and additional Ofce of the Director of Public Prosecutions will
provisions. It was also felt that domestic also provide a prosecutor specically trained
violence was treated as a lesser crime, hidden in the legal and social issues associated with
in the Crimes Act. Under the new Act a person domestic violence cases, who will handle the case
may be charged with a domestic violence from start to nish. Each cases is to be nalised
offence. While the acts constituting such an within 12 weeks, in an effort to minimise the
offence are not new, being charged with the stress and trauma on the victim and any children.
criminal acts under the new name has signicant The DVICM also offers support to offenders
implications for bail, the offenders criminal to assist with their own psychological and social
record and any future convictions. difculties. Police and correction ofcers are
Under s 38, an ADVO made to protect an involved in the process.
adult must automatically include any children The photographic evidence has been
living with that adult, unless sufcient reasons credited with an increase in guilty pleas by
are given are to why they should be left off. offenders, from 50% in 2004 to approximately
63% by 2006.
ADDITIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE While an increase in nancial resources, as
INITIATIVES IN NEW SOUTH WALES well as political will, is necessary to ensure the
The NSW government has recognised that ongoing effectiveness of programs such as the
there is still room for improvement, with respect DVICM, its positive results to date indicate that
to both the protection of victims and the such costs would go towards breaking the cycle
prevention of domestic violence in the future. of violence and protecting individuals in their
The Domestic Violence Intervention Court own homes.
Model (DVICM) involves a coordinated
response to domestic violence by the police and
le g al li nk s
R EV I EW 4 . 2
1 What are the factors that
have to be balanced when
introducing new legislation
or amendments that use
scientic advances to
increase police investigative
powers?
2 What are some other
scientic advances that have
led or may lead to legislative
changes? List some of the
considerations that need to
be considered or balanced
when making changes.
Figure 4.7 DNA testing holds great potential for law enforcement agencies, but
brings with it a range of legal and ethical issues.
Over the past ten years there has been an obtaining loans, government benets or
increase in what is known as identity theft or employment benets; evading the payment
identity fraud. With the development of more of taxes; money laundering; drug smuggling;
sophisticated computers, scanning devices and people smuggling; or stalking or intimidating
software applications, this type of crime has someone.
become easier. It is also attractive, as it can The theft or assumption of another persons
yield signicant rewards with a high probability identity, or the use of his or her personal
of not being caught. information, was not itself a criminal offence
Identity theft has the potential to cause in most Australian jurisdictions until recently.
immediate nancial loss as well as damage to (The rst states to enact legislation specically
a victims credit rating and reputation. It can criminalising identity theft were South
also be psychologically distressing to know that Australia and Queensland, in 2003 and 2007
someone else is using your identity to engage in respectively.) Rather, it was what was done with
serious criminal activities. Those activities could the stolen identity. Because assuming another
include using credit card numbers; fraudulently persons identity was a preparatory step in
Figure 4.8 The advent of digital technology has made identity theft easier to commit and more
DIFlCULT TO PROSECUTE BECAUSE OFFENCES ARE COMMITTED ACROSS JURISDICTIONAL BORDERS
NGOs can work with governments where there public as well as governmental inquiries. They may
are shared goals. The Australian governments do this by writing letters, requesting a meeting
overseas aid program has the aim of reducing with a representative or senator, or making policy
poverty in developing countries. The program submissions, or by writing letters to the editor or
is managed by the Australian Agency for Inter- calling talkback radio. A lobby group may also be
national Development (AusAID). Among other an NGO, an industry group or other interest group.
tasks, AusAID provides funding for NGOs within The Lone Fathers Association of Australia has
Australia that have this particular mission and that been a strong advocate for shared equal parent-
undergo an accreditation process to ensure that ing. Amendments to the Family Law Act 1975
they have strong community support. (Cth) in 2006 were intended to encourage the
As a mechanism for law reform the effectiveness use of non-court-based services for dealing with
of NGOs can vary. Some NGOs such as Amnesty relationship difculties and separation, and to
International, discussed in Chapter 2, and Green- ensure that children have meaningful relationships
peace have developed a formidable reputation in with both parents after a separation or divorce. A
their pursuit of goals such as human rights and number of organisations including the Womens
combating environmental threats. Consequently, Refuge Resource Centre, the Family Law Director
they now have the resources and the tactics, devel- of NSW Legal Aid, and Womens
oped over many years, to put pressure on nations. Legal Services NSW made sub-
Due to NGOs independent status, however, missions to a state inquiry into R EVI EW 4 . 3
governments and other institutions can ignore the impact of the amendments, 1 Compare and contrast the
them and continue to carry out practices that are expressing concern that they not aims and methods of the
contrary to the NGOs goals. The Royal Society for only subordinate childrens best following agencies of law
the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) has interests to the interests of the reform:
campaigned for an end to live animal exports to parents, but also offer reduced a Law Reform Commissions
other countries, while the Australian government protections for victims of family and lobby groups
is reluctant to stop this protable trade. violence. Former Chief Justice of b Parliamentary committees
the Family Court Alistair Nicholson and Law Reform
commented that the amendments Commissions
Lobby groups were ill-researched, unduly inu- c Lobby groups and the
A lobby group is an organised group of people who enced by fathers groups and did media
try to inuence government ministers or other little to reform family law. d Lobby groups and NGOs
members of parliament to advance their social or Lobby groups can be important 2 What are some of the ways
political agenda. The goal may be to change the agents of law reform as long as some individuals can contribute
law, to keep a particular law that already exists, or groups interests are not favoured to an inquiry by a law
to introduce new laws. over others simply because they reform commission or a
Lobby groups target members of parliament, are better organised and can more parliamentary committee on
parliamentary committees, the media and the effectively articulate their views. an issue that concerns them?
When parliament wants to amend an Act, they are no longer needed. They must contain
it has to pass another Act to accomplish a provision to guard against their purpose
this. For example, the Crimes (Forensic being undone when they are repealed,
Intergovernmental
organisations
As mentioned in Chapter 2, many intergovern-
mental organisations (IGOs) are subsidiaries of
the UN. These bodies are established to meet and
decide upon certain international issues such as
refugees, tariffs and wealth. To this extent they
contribute to international law reform on a global Figure 4.12 The United Nations, Geneva
as well a regional scale through the promotion and
development of multilateral and bilateral treaties. Royal Commissions www.ag.gov.au/www/agd/
agd.nsf/Page/Consultationsreformsandreviews_
Royalcommissions
Other agencies The NSW Coroner www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/
Other agencies of law reform also exist. Go to the CORONERS
websites below to research the role they perform The Ofce of the NSW Ombudsman www.
in contributing to law reform in Australia. ombo.nsw.gov.au/
1 Which of the following statements is the most 3 Law reform commissions have been set up by
correct way to describe public morality? parliaments to investigate areas of potential
a a shared set of religious beliefs law reform. Which of the following determines
b crimes committed against the community the scope of their investigation?
c similar values and beliefs held by the a ministers directions to the Commission
MAJORITY OF THE COMMUNITY AT A PARTICULAR b terms of reference
point in time c public opinion
d the shared set of beliefs held by the d media commentary
Australian Parliament 4 Which of the following is not an agent of law
2 Law reform is necessary at times because reform?
technology advances at a rate faster than a unions
the law. Which of the following is not an area b the Queen
in which the law has had to change due to c superior courts
technological change? d lobby groups
a identity theft 5 What could citizens do about a federal law
b same-sex relationships that explicitly discriminates against naturalised
c )6&