Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Conclusions ................................................................................................................................. 32
Appendix ...................................................................................................................................... 33
2. The trip generation calculations show the 23-lot development is projected to generate 17 trips
during the morning peak period, 23 trips during the evening peak period, and a total of 218 daily
trips.
3. Based on a detailed review of the crash history, no significant patterns or contributing design
concerns were identified at the study intersections.
4. Based on the measurements of sight distance at SW 2nd Avenue and at the location of the pro-
posed SW Hume Street connection, it is anticipated that the connection of SW Hume Street to
SW Taylors Ferry Road will operate as safe as or safer than the intersection of SW Taylors Ferry
Road at 2nd Avenue.
5. All study intersections, with the exception of SW Taylors Ferry Road at Terwilliger Boulevard and
SW Taylors Ferry Road at 2nd Avenue, are projected to operate acceptably regardless of the ad-
ditional traffic resulting from the Macadam Ridge development. With the 23-lot development, all
surrounding local streets will still operate within their intended carrying capacity.
6. The intersection of SW Taylors Ferry Road at Terwilliger Boulevard currently experiences a sig-
nificant amount of congestion and delay during peak periods. The impacts from the proposed
subdivision will be de minimis and will not alter the operation of the intersection. The intersection
of SW Taylors Ferry Road at 2nd Avenue is expected to experience long delays for southbound
drivers turning left onto Taylors Ferry Road, regardless of the proposed development or the
movement restrictions at SW Taylors Ferry Road at Hume Street. However, other routes such
as SW 3rd Avenue and SW 4th Avenue are available and would also serve traffic to keep delays
from becoming excessive.
7. Based on a detailed review of each of the City of Portlands land division approval criteria, the
surrounding transportation system is capable of safely supporting the proposed use in addition to
the existing uses in the site vicinity for access and loading, on-street parking, transit availability,
impacts to the immediate and adjacent neighborhoods, and safety for all modes.
Introduction
The area located west and north of SW Taylors Ferry Road and east of SW Ruby Terrace in Port-
land, Oregon, is proposed for development. The Macadam Ridge project would divide the subject
property into 23 lots for construction of single-family detached dwellings. The proposed site plan is
provided in the appendix.
This report assesses the traffic impacts of the proposed land division on the nearby street system
and provides recommendations regarding any mitigations to maintain safe and efficient operation.
Supporting information including traffic counts and detailed traffic analysis calculations are included
in the attached appendix.
Location Description
The Macadam Ridge project is to be constructed on approximately 14.17 acres located north and
west of SW Taylors Ferry Road and east of SW Ruby Terrace. The subject property is surrounded
primarily by single-family dwellings with a funeral home located to the east.
The proposed development will be served by an internal street that is accessed by an extension of
SW Hume Street, extending east from SW Ruby Terrace and forming a new intersection with SW
Taylors Ferry Road.
Based on scoping conversations with Jennifer Tower and Robert Haley with the City of Portland, the
following intersections have been identified for analysis of impacts related to the development:
Vicinity Streets
The City of Portland classifies streets within the following categories of use:
District Transit
SW Taylors Ferry Rd City Bikeway City Walkway Truck Access
Collector Access
District/Nbrhd Transit
SW Terwilliger Blvd City Bikeway City Walkway Truck Access
Collector Access
SW Troy St Local Service Local Service Local Service Local Service Local Service
City Walkway/
SW Miles St Local Service Local Service City Bikeway Local Service
Local Service
Major Transit
SW Macadam Ave Major City Local Service City Walkway Major Truck
Priority
SW 2nd Ave Local Service Local Service Local Service Local Service Local Service
SW Ruby Terrace Local Service Local Service Local Service Local Service Local Service
Macadam Avenue, also known as Oregon Highway 43, is under the jurisdiction of the Oregon De-
partment of Transportation (ODOT). All other roadways listed above are under the jurisdiction of the
City of Portland. The table on the following page offers a summary of the street configurations in the
vicinity of the subject property.
Study Intersections
The intersection of SW Terwilliger Boulevard at Troy Street/6th Avenue is a four-legged intersection
controlled by a traffic signal. The northbound and southbound approaches on SW Terwilliger Boule-
vard each have a dedicated left-turn lane served with protected phasing and a shared through/right-
turn lane. The westbound approach on SW Troy Street and the northbound approach on SW 6th
Avenue each has a single shared lane for all turning movements. A restriction to right-turns on red
signal indication is in effect for the westbound approach from SW Troy Street.
The intersection of SW Taylors Ferry Road at Terwilliger Boulevard is a four-legged intersection con-
trolled by a traffic signal. The northbound approach on Terwilliger and the eastbound approach on
Taylors Ferry each have a dedicated left-turn lane served with protected phasing and a shared
through/right lane. The westbound approach on Taylors Ferry has a dedicated left-turn lane served
with protected phasing, a through lane, and a dedicated right-turn slip lane controlled by a signal.
The southbound approach on Terwilliger has a dedicated left-turn lane served with protected phas-
ing, a through lane, and a shared through/right lane. No turns are permitted on red indication for the
northbound, southbound, and westbound approaches.
The intersection of SW Taylors Ferry Road at 2nd Avenue is a three-legged intersection with stop
control for the southbound 2nd Avenue approach. The westbound approach on Taylors Ferry Road
has a through lane and a shared through/right lane while the eastbound approach has a single
shared lane for all turning movements.
The intersection of SW Ruby Terrace at 2nd Avenue is a three-legged uncontrolled intersection with
single lane approaches.
Figure 1 on page nine provides a vicinity map showing the existing lane configurations and traffic
control device at the study intersections.
Traffic Counts
At the time of this study, major construction is ongoing to replace the Sellwood Bridge, located 0.5
miles south of the intersection of Macadam Avenue at Miles Street. Since the construction likely al-
ters traffic patterns at the intersections of SW Macadam Avenue at Miles Street and SW Taylors Fer-
ry Road at Terwilliger Boulevard, historic traffic counts were used that were captured prior to the be-
ginning of construction. The use of these pre-construction traffic counts was requested by, and coor-
dinated with, City of Portland staff.
Historic counts at the intersection of SW Macadam Avenue at Miles Street were collected Tuesday,
October 3rd, 2006, between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM for the morning peak period and between 4:00 PM
and 6:00 PM for the evening peak period. The intersections peak volumes that occurred between
7:30 AM and 8:30 AM for the morning peak hour and between 5:00 PM and 6:00 PM for the evening
peak hour were used for analysis.
Historic counts at the intersection of SW Taylors Ferry Road at Terwilliger Boulevard were collected
Thursday, November 3rd, 2005, for the same morning and evening periods. Data corresponding to
the morning peak hour of 8:00 AM to 9:00 AM and the evening peak hour of 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM was
used for analysis.
Traffic movement counts at the intersection of SW Terwilliger Boulevard at Troy Street were collect-
ed on Tuesday, September 15th, 2015, between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM to capture the morning peak
period and between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM to capture the evening peak period. Traffic movement
counts for the remaining study-area intersections were collected between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM on
Wednesday, February 11th, 2015, to capture the evening peak period and between 7:00 AM and
9:00 AM on Thursday, February 12th, 2015, to capture the morning peak period. Data corresponding
to each intersections individual peak hour was used for the analysis.
Figure 2 on page 10 and Figure 3 on page 11 shows the traffic volumes occurring at each of the
study-area intersections for both the morning and evening peak hours, respectively.
Trip Generation
The Macadam Ridge development will consist of a total of 23 lots, each to be constructed with a sin-
gle-family detached dwelling. These lots will take access from an extension of SW Hume Street from
SW Ruby Terrace to SW Taylors Ferry Road. The proposed development is anticipated to contrib-
ute traffic to SW Taylors Ferry Road as well as the local streets between SW Ruby Terrace and SW
Terwilliger Boulevard.
To estimate the number of trips that will be generated by the proposed development, trip rate data
from the manual TRIP GENERATION1 were used. Data corresponding to land-use code 210, Sin-
gle-Family Detached Housing, was referenced based on the number of dwelling units.
The trip generation calculations show that 23 single-family dwellings will generate a total of 17 trips
during the morning peak hour with 4 entering trips and 13 exiting trips. During the evening peak
hour, the site is projected to generate a total of 23 trips with 14 trips entering the site and 9 trips exit-
ing the site. The Macadam Ridge development is projected to generate 218 total daily trips with half
entering and half exiting the site.
The new connection of SW Hume Street to SW Taylors Ferry Road is under consideration for the
restriction of left-turning vehicles into or out of the subject site. It was assumed for the primary anal-
ysis that the access would permit full movements; however, additional scenarios were included in the
operational analysis corresponding to the restriction of left-turns into the site, out of the site, and both
left-turn movements. Trips that would normally make a left-turn into or out of the site were assumed
to use SW 2nd Avenue instead.
Figure 4 on page 13 and Figure 5 on page 14 shows the trip assignments for the proposed Mac-
adam Ridge development during the AM peak hour and the PM peak hour, respectively.
1 Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), TRIP GENERATION MANUAL, 9th Edition, 2012.
The intersection of SW Terwilliger Boulevard at Troy Street had nine reported crashes during the
analysis period, all of which were rear-end collisions. Two of the crashes resulted in only property
damage, six of the crashes resulted in possible injuries or complaints of pain, and one crash resulted
in a non-incapacitating injury. The crash rate for the intersection was calculated to be 0.26 CMEV.
The intersection of SW Taylors Ferry Road at Terwilliger Boulevard had 54 reported crashes during
the analysis period. Thirty-one of the reported crashes were rear-end collisions, four crashes were
with a vehicle backing in the travel lane, eleven crashes were involving a turning movement, two
crashes were angle collisions (one of which involved a bicycle), one crash was a sideswipe-meeting
collision, three were sideswipe while overtaking, one crash was with a fixed object, and one crash
involved a pedestrian. Of the reported crashes, 34 of the crashes resulted in only property damage,
17 resulted in possible injury or complaint of pain, and 3 crashes resulting in non-incapacitating inju-
ries. The crash rate for the intersection was calculated to be 0.91 CMEV.
The crash at the intersection that involved a bicyclist occurred when an eastbound motorist struck a
northbound bicyclist who did not have right-of-way at the time of the incident. The bicyclist suffered
non-incapacitating injuries. The crash involving a pedestrian occurred when a northbound right-
turning vehicle failed to yield right-of-way to a pedestrian crossing in the crosswalk. The pedestrian
suffered non-incapacitating injuries.
The intersection of SW Taylors Ferry Road at 2nd Avenue had seven reported crashes during the
analysis period. These crashes included one rear-end collision, one crash involving a turning vehi-
cle, two crashes involving a fixed object, one crash with an animal, one head-on collision, and one
sideswipe collision that occurred when a vehicle improperly overtook a bicycle in the roadway.
Three crashes resulted in only property damage, two crashes resulted in possible injuries or com-
plaints of pain, and two crashes resulted in non-incapacitating injuries (including the crash involving
the bicyclist). The crash rate for the intersection was calculated to be 0.21 CMEV.
No other crash records were found for the other study-area intersections.
Based on a detailed review of the crash history, no significant patterns or contributing design con-
cerns were identified at the study intersections.
Sight Distance
Intersection sight distance was evaluated at the proposed Hume Street intersection with SW Taylors
Ferry Road. The minimum intersection sight distance was determined in accordance with A POLICY
ON GEOMENTRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYS AND STREETS2. Intersection sight distance meas-
urements are based on a drivers eye height of 3.5 feet above the roadway with the entering drivers
eye 15 feet behind the edge of the near-side travel lane.
Based on the posted speed of 40 mph along SW Taylors Ferry Road, the required intersection sight
distance is 445 feet for the intersection to operate efficiently with minimal impact to the flow of
through traffic. For safe operation of the proposed intersection, a minimum of 365 feet of stopping
sight distance is required for traffic traveling eastbound while a minimum of 270 feet of stopping sight
distance is required for traffic traveling westbound. The stopping sight distance calculations conser-
vatively assume a 2.5-second perception-reaction time, a comfortable 11.2 ft/sec2 rate of decelera-
tion, and an average grade of ten percent over the braking distance.
It should be emphasized that the eastbound approach is more critical for sight distance due to SW
Taylors Ferry Road having an average grade of approximately ten percent sloped towards the east.
This downhill grade increases the amount of distance required to slow or stop for eastbound vehicles
while reducing the amount of distance required for westbound vehicles.
Sight distance for the proposed SW Hume Street connection was measured to be in excess of 800
feet to the west and 365 feet to the east limited by vegetation along the frontage of the property.
With the vegetation cleared along the right-of-way, sight distance could be improved beyond 500 feet
to the east. The available sight distance was found to be adequate for the safe operation of the pro-
posed access.
A comparison of sight distance at the location of the propose SW Hume Street connection was made
to the existing alignment of SW 2nd Avenue where it intersects with SW Taylors Ferry Road. Sight
2
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), A POLICY ON GEOMETRIC DE-
SIGN OF HIGHWAYS AND STREETS, 6th Edition (2011).
Based on the measurements of sight distance at SW 2nd Avenue and at the location of the proposed
SW Hume Street connection, it is anticipated that the connection of SW Hume Street to SW Taylors
Ferry Road will operate as safe as or safer than the intersection of SW Taylors Ferry Road at 2nd
Avenue, since sight distance will be more favorable at the new SW Hume Street connection.
Warrant Analysis
Left-turn lane warrants were examined for the intersections along SW Taylors Ferry Road. A left-
turn refuge is primarily a safety consideration for the major street, removing left-turning vehicles from
the through traffic stream. The left-turn lane warrants examined used methodology outlined in the
NCHRP Report #457, published by the Transportation Research Board in 2001. These turn-lane
warrants are evaluated on the number of left-turning vehicles, the number of advancing and oppos-
ing vehicles, and the roadway travel speed. Satisfaction of warrants does not require installation of
a turn lane, but merely suggests that a turn lane be considered as part of an engineering study such
as this report.
Left-turn lane warrants were found to be met for the intersections of SW Taylors Ferry Road at 2nd
Avenue under existing conditions and for SW Taylors Ferry Road at the new access to SW Hume
Street after the completion of the proposed development. Due to a significant amount of through
traffic along SW Taylors Ferry Road, it is likely left-turn lane warrants are met under existing condi-
tions at the other intersections in the site vicinity, such as SW 3rd Avenue and SW 4th Avenue. How-
ever, the construction of left-turn lanes at each of these intersections would require a significant
amount of widening to SW Taylors Ferry Road and would likely be cost prohibitive due to topography
and environmental concerns.
Although left-turn lane warrants are met for the intersections, the crash history of SW Taylors Ferry
Road at 2nd Avenue indicate that the intersection is operating safely under the existing configuration.
A review of the crash data at the other similar intersections of SW 3rd Avenue and SW 4th Avenue
show no trends indicative of a safety concern regarding left-turns from SW Taylors Ferry Road with-
out the use of a left-turn refuge. Due to low volumes projected to make the left-turn movement after
completion of the connection, it is anticipated the intersection of SW Taylors Ferry Road at Hume
Street will operate in a similar manner with a low occurrence of crashes if constructed without a left-
turn refuge.
As mentioned previously, growth observed between the historic traffic volumes (collected at the in-
tersection of SW Taylors Ferry Road at Terwilliger Boulevard in 2005 and at the intersection of SW
Macadam Avenue at Miles Street in 2006) and the traffic counts collected in the vicinity of the subject
property has been relatively static. To maintain a conservative analysis, the 0.5 percent per year
growth rate was maintained for forecasting year 2018 volumes at the study-area intersections under
the jurisdiction of the City of Portland.
The projected year 2018 traffic volumes are shown in Figure 6 on page 19 for the morning peak hour
and in Figure 7 on page 20 for the evening peak hour. Projected year 2018 traffic volumes with the
addition of site trips from the proposed Macadam Ridge development are shown in Figure 8 on page
21 for the morning peak and in Figure 9 on page 22 for the evening peak.
For intersections operating in the City of Portland, the applicable minimum operational standards are
established under TRN-10.27 under Title 17, Public Improvements Administrative Rules, and are
based on a level of service (LOS). Levels of service can range from A, which indicates very little or
no delay, to F, which indicates a high degree of congestion and delay. The City of Portland requires
signalized intersections to operate at LOS D or better and stop-controlled intersections to operate at
LOS E or better.
Since it is undecided at this time if SW Hume Street will provide a connection to SW Ruby Terrace
and movement restrictions are under consideration for the intersection of SW Taylors Ferry Road at
Hume Street, additional analysis scenarios were examined for year 2018 background plus site.
These scenarios include:
Left-turns onto SW Hume Street from SW Taylors Ferry Road being prohibited,
Left-turns from SW Hume Street onto SW Taylors Ferry Road being prohibited,
SW Hume Street connection to SW Taylors Ferry Road being restricted to right-in/right-out
only, and
SW Ruby Terrace at Hume Street only providing emergency access.
The intersection of SW Terwilliger Boulevard at Troy Street/6th Avenue currently operates at LOS B
during both peak periods. The intersection is projected to continue operating at LOS B under year
2018 traffic conditions, regardless of additional trips from the proposed development or of the lane
configuration of the Hume Street access.
The intersection of SW Taylors Ferry Road at Terwilliger Boulevard is currently operating at LOS E
during both the morning and evening peak periods. The intersection will continue to operate at this
level of service for all scenarios examined, even with the proposed development in place. While this
intersection does not meet the City of Portlands operational standard for signalized intersections
(LOS D or better), the impact from the proposed development is de minimis.
Northbound and southbound through traffic on Terwilliger Boulevard is heavy and commonly sees
the most congestion and queuing. Similarly, the southbound left-turn movement is high during both
the morning and evening peak hours. This heavy left-turn movement opposes the heavy northbound
movement which is the primary cause of existing congestion at the intersection.
Possible mitigation that could reduce delay and improve the level of service of the intersection would
require the acquisition of additional right-of-way or the removal of sidewalk to accommodate addi-
Given the location of the Macadam Ridge site and the availability of alternative routes, the large ma-
jority of site traffic, particularly during the peak hours, will use other travel routes and avoid the inter-
section of SW Taylors Ferry Road at Terwilliger Boulevard. For example, during the PM peak hour,
the site will only add 8 to 17 trips to the intersection (depending on scenario) which represents 0.5
percent of the total entering traffic volume. As shown in the analysis, the impacts from the site will
be very minimal. The change in traffic volume and the intersection operation will be considerably
less than daily fluctuations in traffic and site impacts will be imperceptible.
The intersection of SW Taylors Ferry Road at 2nd Avenue currently operates at LOS D during the
morning peak hour and LOS F during the evening peak hour. Under year 2018 conditions, the inter-
section is projected to operate at LOS E during the morning peak hour and continue operating at
LOS F during the evening peak period, regardless of additional trips from the proposed development.
These levels of service describe the stop-controlled, southbound approach of 2nd Avenue, since this
movement experiences the longest delays.
In reality, drivers will seek alternate routes when delays get excessive. In this case, SW 3rd Avenue
and SW 4th Avenue are alternate locations that drivers could use to reach Taylors Ferry Road. Be-
fore delays at 2nd Avenue reach the levels calculated, drivers will diver to these alternate routes, re-
sulting in lower delays.
Under the analysis scenario that permits full movement from the SW Hume Street access to SW
Taylors Ferry Road, no additional traffic related to the proposed development will be contributed to
the southbound approach. However, if left-turns are restricted at SW Hume Street, delays are pro-
jected to increase up to 10 seconds at the intersection of SW Taylors Ferry Road at 2nd Avenue with
site traffic using the closest available connection to travel in their intended direction.
The intersection of SW Macadam Avenue at Miles Street currently operates within the performance
standards as set by the City of Portland. With the construction and occupancy of the Macadam
Ridge development, the operation of the intersection is not anticipated to degrade beyond level of
service D during any of the analysis scenarios.
Intersections internal to each of the neighborhoods near the development of Macadam Ridge (such
as SW Ruby Terrace at 2nd Avenue or SW Hume Street at Front Street) operate favorably under year
2018 conditions, regardless of additional trips from the development. These intersections will con-
tinue to have very low volumes and may remain uncontrolled intersections without significant impact
to operation or safety.
The intersection of SW Taylors Ferry Road at Hume Street is projected to operate at LOS D or better
during the morning peak period and LOS E or better during the evening peak period under year 2018
conditions. The longer delays that would be experienced at this intersection would be for south-
The results of the capacity analysis, along with the levels of service, calculated delay, and volume-to-
capacity ratios are shown in the following table. Detailed calculations, as well as tables showing the
relationships between delay and level of service, are included in the appendix to this report.
The intersection of SW Taylors Ferry Road at Terwilliger Boulevard is currently operating above the
City of Portlands performance standard for signalized intersections (level of service D or better).
Short of redesigning the intersection to accommodate more travel lanes on Terwilliger or by provid-
ing new routes and connections for traffic to use, the operation of the intersection is unlikely to be
able to be improved to accommodate the existing demand of the facilities to the standard set by the
City.
Even with the intersection of SW Taylors Ferry Road at Terwilliger operating above the Citys stand-
ards, the impact projected to occur from the proposed Macadam Ridge development will be imper-
ceptible from daily fluctuations in traffic.
The intersection of SW Taylors Ferry Road at 2nd Avenue is also currently operating above the City
of Portlands performance standard. Southbound movements from 2nd Avenue experience long de-
lays due to high volumes of traffic on Taylors Ferry Road and are only likely to increase with more
traffic using the approach. However, if full movement is permitted from the intersection of SW Tay-
lors Ferry Road at Hume Street, the proposed development will have little to no impact to the south-
bound movements at this intersection.
The remaining study-area intersections are projected to operate within the City of Portlands perfor-
mance standards. The intersection of SW Ruby Terrace at 2nd Avenue and other streets internal to
the surrounding neighborhood are projected to continue to have low volumes and very little delay
after the addition of trips associated with the Macadam Ridge development. Although Ruby Terrace
may have a significant increase in traffic volumes if left-turn restrictions are made at SW Taylors Fer-
ry Road at Hume Street, the volumes will be within reasonable levels for a local street and the street
will continue to be considered a very low-volume roadway.
Based on the design plan of the subject property and the streets surrounding the project, adequate
vehicle access and loading opportunities are provided.
On-street parking was observed along SW Ruby Terrace between SW 2nd Avenue and where the
street ends. The street of SW Ruby Terrace becomes narrow in areas allowing for parking on only
one side of the street. Even assuming parking only uses one side of the entire street, the street was
observed to only be parked to approximately 10 percent of capacity. This parking would likely only
be utilized by the proposed development if the SW Hume Street connection remains open for site
traffic to use.
The parking demand that will be generated as a result of the construction of the Macadam Ridge
development was estimated using rates from the manual PARKING GENERATION3. The data cor-
responding to land-use code 210, Single-Family Detached Housing, was used to determine the park-
ing demand for the 23 single-family dwellings. Based on the data for average peak parking demand,
the development could result in an increased demand for up to 42 parking spaces during the late-
evening peak period. Based on the 85th-percentile parking demand data, the proposed development
could result in a demand for up to 49 parking spaces during the late-evening peak period. The 85th-
percentile peak parking demand is conservative and represents demands that are unlikely to occur
at most comparable developments.
The Macadam Ridge development is anticipated to be constructed with 23 homes that have at least
two off-street parking spaces. Approximately 23 new on-street parking spaces will be provided along
the new cul-de-sac street providing access to the SW Hume Street connection. If the assumption is
made that each of the 23 lots are parked to the two-vehicle off-street capacity when the 85th-
percentile parking demand occurs, only three of the vehicles would be required to use on-street park-
ing, which could easily be accommodated along the new street.
Based on the available supply of parking in the vicinity of the proposed development in addition to
the additional parking being provided by the development, no significant impacts to on-street parking
in the area is anticipated. Accordingly, no parking mitigations are necessary or recommended.
TriMets Bus Route 43-Taylors Ferry Rd connects Portland City Center, Burlingame, and Washington
Square along 4th, 5th, Lincoln, 1st, Corbett, Virginia, Taylors Ferry, Huber, 80th, Locust and Hall.
The route runs along SW Taylors Ferry Rd in the vicinity of the project site. The stops closest to the
development are bus stop ID 5717 and bus stop ID 5718 located near the intersection of SW Taylors
Ferry Road at 2nd Avenue. Weekday headways are generally 45 minutes to an hour during most of
the day, and service runs from after 7:00 AM to approximately 7:30 PM. There is no scheduled
weekend service.
West of the subject property, five other bus lines are within a half-mile walking or biking trip. These
routes include TriMets Bus Route 39-Lewis and Clark, TriMets Bus Route 38-Boones Ferry Rd, and
TriMets Bus Route 65-Marquam Hill/Barbur Blvd which provide weekday service along SW Terwil-
liger Boulevard.
Access to the transit is sufficient to safely serve the proposed development in addition to the existing
uses in the site vicinity.
Neighborhood Impacts
The impact of site traffic resulting from proposed Macadam Ridge development on the adjacent
neighborhood along SW Ruby Terrace, assuming the connection of SW Hume Street is not reserved
for emergency services only, is projected to be minor and within acceptable levels. If left-turns are
restricted onto or from SW Taylors Ferry Road at the location of the new connection, traffic from the
development destined for locations to the east will be required to travel down SW Ruby Terrance and
SW 2nd Avenue to make the left-turn movement. Additionally, with the significant delays that are ex-
perienced at SW Taylors Ferry Road at Terwilliger Boulevard, the traffic traveling to and from the
northwest in the direction of Barbur Boulevard or Interstate 5 may find the route using the traffic sig-
nal at the intersection of SW Terwilliger Boulevard at Troy Street to be more efficient. In this case,
traffic will filter through the neighborhoods prior to traveling down Ruby Terrace.
Based on the trip assignment from the development as well as existing volumes captured at SW Ru-
by Terrace at 2nd Avenue, it is anticipated that traffic volumes on SW Ruby Terrace could increase
from approximately 14 vehicles during the evening peak hour to almost 31 vehicles, depending on
movement restrictions at SW Taylors Ferry Road at Hume Street. While this is a significant increase
in traffic on the street, it amounts to an additional two vehicles traveling on the road every five
minutes during the peak evening hour. Even with the increase in traffic, SW Ruby Terrace will still
be considered a very low-volume roadway with an average daily volume of less than 400 vehicles
per day.
It should be noted that the new connection of SW Hume Street from SW Taylors Ferry Road to SW
Ruby Terrace under the development scenario, if remaining unrestricted, could lead to a redirection
Based on the detailed analysis, projected impacts to the surrounding neighborhood from the Mac-
adam Ridge development are acceptable and no mitigations are recommended.
Based on a detailed review of the crash history, no significant patterns or contributing design con-
cerns were identified at the study intersections.
Daily traffic volumes and speed data were collected along SW Ruby Terrace to identify if traffic calm-
ing measures were needed. Traffic volumes on SW Ruby Terrace north and east of SW 2nd Avenue
were measured to be less than 125 vehicles per day that traveled at an 85th-percentile speed of less
than 20 mph in both directions. If the SW Hume Street connection is made, these volumes are antic-
ipated to reach as much as 294 vehicles over the span of the day, depending on movement re-
strictions at SW Taylors Ferry Road at Hume Street. Due to the character of the neighborhood,
speeds are not projected to increase significantly or exceed 25 mph.
Traffic volumes west of SW 2nd Avenue on SW Ruby Terrace were measured to be less than 300
vehicles per day. The 85th-percentile traffic speed was measured to be less than 23 mph, less than
the statutory residential speed limit. Depending on movement restrictions at SW Taylors Ferry Road
at Hume Street, traffic volumes could reach approximately 400 vehicles per day, still less than what
classifies a roadway as a Very Low-Volume Local Road.
Terwilliger Boulevard has bike lanes and sidewalks on both sides of the street. The intersection of
Taylors Ferry Road at Terwilliger Boulevard also has advance stop lines on both Terwilliger ap-
proaches and signalized pedestrian crossings. Macadam Avenue has sidewalks but lacks bicycle
facilities on the roadway; however, the Willamette Greenway runs parallel to Macadam and provides
a comfortable and safe bike route.
The facilities of SW Ruby Terrace, SW 2nd Avenue, and SW Troy Street have low traffic volumes and
travel speeds limited by the statutory residential 25 mph speed limit. Due to this, bicyclists can safe-
ly and comfortably share the travel lane with motor-vehicles. Connectivity within the nearby neigh-
borhoods provide a safe and comfortable network to allow bicyclists to travel to their destinations.
The length of Taylors Ferry Road between Terwilliger Boulevard and Macadam Avenue lacks con-
tinuous sidewalks and bicycle facilities. Without the facilities on this stretch of roadway, the neigh-
borhoods around Fulton Park Boulevard are not easily connected to those around Ruby Terrace.
The City of Portland has identified the lack of connectivity with Taylors Ferry Road and has ex-
pressed desire to widen the roadway and provide bike facilities for cyclist traveling westbound in the
uphill direction.
The intersection of SW Taylors Ferry Road at Terwilliger Boulevard is operating at level of service E
under all analysis scenarios, regardless of additional trips resulting from the development. Even
though the intersection is operating above the City of Portlands performance standard, the impact
from the proposed development is de minimis and will not alter the operation of the intersection.
The intersection of SW Taylors Ferry Road at 2nd Avenue is expected to experience long delays for
southbound drivers entering Taylors Ferry Road, regardless of the proposed development or the
movement restrictions at SW Taylors Ferry Road at Hume Street. However, other routes such as
SW 3rd Avenue and SW 4th Avenue are available and would also serve traffic to keep delays from
becoming excessive.
Based on a detailed review of each of the City of Portlands land division approval criteria, the sur-
rounding transportation system is capable of safely supporting the proposed use in addition to the
existing uses in the site vicinity for access and loading, on-street parking, transit availability, impacts
to the immediate and adjacent neighborhoods, and safety for all modes.
Synchro Output: 2018 Background Plus Site AM Peak Period .............................................. 153
Synchro Output: 2018 Background Plus Site PM Peak Period .............................................. 193
HV 1.9%
Total Vehicle Summary
PHF 0.86
828 1,157
21 787 20
HV 0.0%
PHF 0.73
8
121 58
Clay Carney Out 23 61 In
2 0
7
(503) 833-2740
In 125 26 Out
2 3
6
HV 0.8%
SW Terwilliger Blvd & SW Troy St PHF 0.66
HV 2.3%
PHF 0.94
2 978 4
Tuesday, September 15, 2015 Out In
792 984
7:00 AM to 9:00 AM
Peak Hour Summary
7:55 AM to 8:55 AM
5-Minute Interval Summary
7:00 AM to 9:00 AM
Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians
Start SW Terwilliger Blvd SW Terwilliger Blvd SW Troy St SW Troy St Interval Crosswalk
Time L T R Bikes L T R Bikes L T R Bikes L T R Bikes Total North South East West
7:00 AM 0 48 0 2 1 26 1 1 4 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 82 1 0 0 0
7:05 AM 0 82 0 1 0 32 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 122 0 0 0 0
7:10 AM 0 82 0 0 3 41 1 1 5 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 135 0 0 1 0
7:15 AM 0 77 0 0 1 34 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 124 0 0 0 0
7:20 AM 0 87 0 0 3 24 2 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 131 0 0 0 0
7:25 AM 0 97 0 4 1 55 0 2 4 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 164 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 71 0 3 2 29 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 113 1 0 0 0
7:35 AM 0 77 0 0 0 41 0 1 12 0 1 0 0 0 7 0 138 2 0 1 0
7:40 AM 0 78 0 5 0 40 0 1 6 0 0 3 1 1 9 0 135 0 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 85 0 3 4 58 1 0 11 0 1 0 0 0 8 1 168 0 0 1 0
7:50 AM 0 78 0 0 1 43 3 0 12 0 0 1 0 0 10 0 147 0 0 2 0
7:55 AM 0 86 0 3 2 66 1 0 14 0 1 2 0 0 8 1 178 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 1 83 0 4 2 60 2 0 17 0 0 1 0 0 7 0 172 2 2 2 0
8:05 AM 0 85 0 3 0 64 2 0 13 2 0 0 0 0 6 1 172 0 0 0 0
8:10 AM 0 88 1 0 3 67 2 1 9 0 0 1 0 0 6 0 176 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 79 0 1 2 61 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 157 0 0 0 0
8:20 AM 1 85 0 2 2 53 1 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 158 0 0 0 0
8:25 AM 0 84 0 1 2 61 2 1 8 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 163 2 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 56 0 1 2 68 3 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 140 0 0 0 0
8:35 AM 0 87 1 0 0 56 1 1 10 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 159 3 4 0 0
8:40 AM 0 90 1 1 1 85 2 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 189 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 81 1 1 1 84 3 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 182 1 0 5 0
8:50 AM 0 74 0 0 3 62 1 0 5 0 1 0 2 0 4 0 152 0 0 0 0
8:55 AM 0 71 0 0 1 65 0 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 151 0 0 0 0
Total
2 1,911 4 35 37 1,275 32 11 205 2 4 11 6 2 128 5 3,608 12 6 12 0
Survey
Page 36 of 238
In Out
Heavy Vehicle Summary 16 24
1 15 0
1 0
Out 1
Clay Carney 0 0
(503) 833-2740 In 1
0 0
Page 37 of 238
Peak Hour Summary
Clay Carney
(503) 833-2740
Blvd
SW Terwilliger
0 0
Bikes
5
828 1157
21 787 20
SW Troy St Peds 8
Bikes 4
58
0 23 0 61 0
3
Peds 0
Peds 7
121
0 125 2 26 0
Bikes 4
2
Peds 6 SW Troy St
2 978 4
SW Terwilliger
792 984
Bikes
17
Blvd
0 0
Page 38 of 238
In Out
HV 0.9%
Total Vehicle Summary
PHF 0.91
1,116 727
57 1,017 42
HV 2.5%
PHF 0.63
3
30 33
Clay Carney Out 72 40 In
6 2
4
(503) 833-2740
In 41 55 Out
5 5
6
HV 2.4%
SW Terwilliger Blvd & SW Troy St PHF 0.68
HV 1.5%
PHF 0.86
13 664 7
Tuesday, September 15, 2015 Out In
1,027 684
4:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Peak Hour Summary
4:10 PM to 5:10 PM
5-Minute Interval Summary
4:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians
Start SW Terwilliger Blvd SW Terwilliger Blvd SW Troy St SW Troy St Interval Crosswalk
Time L T R Bikes L T R Bikes L T R Bikes L T R Bikes Total North South East West
4:00 PM 0 55 0 0 0 67 3 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 129 0 0 0 0
4:05 PM 0 53 1 0 0 73 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 134 0 1 1 0
4:10 PM 0 57 1 0 4 94 8 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 4 0 173 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 46 0 1 5 87 10 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 155 2 2 0 0
4:20 PM 4 43 0 0 5 90 3 0 7 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 158 0 0 0 0
4:25 PM 1 66 2 0 4 82 3 2 2 1 0 0 1 0 4 0 166 0 0 2 0
4:30 PM 2 60 1 1 3 82 3 1 1 2 2 0 1 0 3 0 160 0 0 0 0
4:35 PM 0 67 0 0 2 82 2 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 160 0 1 0 1
4:40 PM 0 53 0 1 6 93 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 158 0 1 0 1
4:45 PM 0 60 1 1 1 78 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 145 0 0 0 0
4:50 PM 2 58 0 0 0 79 3 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 151 0 0 0 0
4:55 PM 1 47 0 0 3 92 4 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 154 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 1 48 0 0 3 80 9 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 145 0 1 0 0
5:05 PM 2 59 2 0 6 78 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 156 1 1 2 1
5:10 PM 2 49 3 0 6 68 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 140 0 2 1 1
5:15 PM 3 57 1 2 4 78 5 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 4 0 156 0 0 3 1
5:20 PM 1 53 0 2 2 92 6 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 158 0 1 1 0
5:25 PM 3 70 0 0 8 72 5 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 164 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 61 1 0 5 72 5 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 153 0 1 2 0
5:35 PM 0 57 1 1 7 77 8 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 156 0 0 1 0
5:40 PM 0 50 1 2 4 85 7 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 152 0 2 3 2
5:45 PM 0 43 0 2 5 94 8 2 2 1 0 0 1 1 5 0 160 0 1 2 0
5:50 PM 0 53 1 3 3 68 6 5 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 135 0 0 0 0
5:55 PM 0 45 0 1 3 73 5 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 134 0 0 1 0
Total
22 1,310 16 17 89 1,936 128 28 58 10 10 0 7 5 61 0 3,652 3 14 19 7
Survey
Page 39 of 238
In Out
Heavy Vehicle Summary 10 11
1 9 0
1 0
Out 1
Clay Carney 0 0
(503) 833-2740 In 1
0 1
Page 40 of 238
Peak Hour Summary
Clay Carney
(503) 833-2740
Blvd
SW Terwilliger
0 0
Bikes
11
1116 727
57 1017 42
SW Troy St Peds 3
Bikes 0
33
0 72 2 40 0
5
Peds 3
Peds 4
30
0 41 6 55 0
Bikes 0
5
Peds 6 SW Troy St
13 664 7
SW Terwilliger
1027 684
Bikes
4
Blvd
0 0
Page 41 of 238
In Out
HV 0.0%
Total Vehicle Summary
PHF 0.75
15 46
8 7
HV 2.5%
PHF 0.89
1
46 0
Clay Carney Out 692 684 In
830 684
0
(503) 833-2740
In 876 837 Out
0
HV 1.4%
SW 2nd Ave & SW Taylors Ferry Rd PHF 0.90
HV 0.0%
PHF 0.00
Thursday, February 12, 2015 Out In
0 0
7:00 AM to 9:00 AM
Peak Hour Summary
7:25 AM to 8:25 AM
5-Minute Interval Summary
7:00 AM to 9:00 AM
Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians
Start SW 2nd Ave SW 2nd Ave SW Taylors Ferry Rd SW Taylors Ferry Rd Interval Crosswalk
Time Bikes L R Bikes L T Bikes T R Bikes Total North South East West
7:00 AM 0 1 0 0 4 52 0 53 0 0 110 0 0 0 0
7:05 AM 0 0 0 0 0 47 0 73 0 0 120 0 0 0 0
7:10 AM 0 0 1 0 0 50 0 59 0 0 110 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 63 0 0 127 0 0 0 0
7:20 AM 0 0 0 0 2 62 0 62 0 0 126 0 0 0 0
7:25 AM 0 0 1 0 2 65 0 62 0 0 130 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 1 60 0 51 0 0 112 0 0 0 0
7:35 AM 0 1 0 0 3 65 0 52 0 0 121 0 0 0 0
7:40 AM 0 3 1 0 5 67 0 73 0 0 149 1 0 0 0
7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 4 79 2 62 0 0 145 0 0 0 0
7:50 AM 0 0 1 0 5 69 0 58 0 0 133 0 0 0 0
7:55 AM 0 0 1 0 6 80 0 50 0 0 137 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 0 0 2 0 7 76 0 56 0 0 141 0 0 0 0
8:05 AM 0 0 0 0 5 60 0 49 0 0 114 0 0 0 0
8:10 AM 0 1 0 0 5 64 0 52 0 0 122 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 2 1 0 2 76 0 58 0 0 139 0 0 0 0
8:20 AM 0 0 1 0 1 69 0 61 0 0 132 0 0 0 0
8:25 AM 0 0 0 0 1 53 1 57 0 0 111 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 42 0 74 0 0 116 1 0 0 0
8:35 AM 0 0 0 0 2 70 1 57 0 0 129 0 0 0 0
8:40 AM 0 0 1 0 1 62 0 64 0 0 128 0 0 1 0
8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 51 0 63 0 0 114 0 0 0 0
8:50 AM 0 1 0 0 0 57 0 69 0 0 127 0 0 0 0
8:55 AM 0 0 0 0 1 60 0 63 1 0 125 0 0 0 0
Total
0 9 10 0 57 1,500 4 1,441 1 0 3,018 2 0 1 0
Survey
Page 42 of 238
In Out
Heavy Vehicle Summary 0 0
0 0
0 0
Out 17
Clay Carney 12 17
(503) 833-2740 In 12
Page 43 of 238
Peak Hour Summary
Clay Carney
(503) 833-2740
SW 2nd Ave 0 0
Bikes
0
15 46
8 7
Bikes 0
0
Peds 0
46
Bikes 2
Bikes
0
0 0
Page 44 of 238
In Out
HV 0.0%
Total Vehicle Summary
PHF 0.54
13 8
1 12
HV 0.6%
PHF 0.96
1
4 4
Clay Carney Out 1,087 1,090 In
747 1,086
0
(503) 833-2740
In 751 759 Out
0
HV 0.5%
SW 2nd Ave & SW Taylors Ferry Rd PHF 0.87
HV 0.0%
PHF 0.00
Wednesday, February 11, 2015 Out In
0 0
4:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Peak Hour Summary
4:45 PM to 5:45 PM
5-Minute Interval Summary
4:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians
Start SW 2nd Ave SW 2nd Ave SW Taylors Ferry Rd SW Taylors Ferry Rd Interval Crosswalk
Time Bikes L R Bikes L T Bikes T R Bikes Total North South East West
4:00 PM 0 1 1 0 0 40 0 74 0 0 116 0 0 0 0
4:05 PM 0 0 0 0 0 48 0 61 0 0 109 0 0 0 0
4:10 PM 0 1 0 0 0 57 0 72 2 0 132 0 0 0 0
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 67 0 72 1 0 140 0 0 0 0
4:20 PM 0 4 0 0 0 65 0 76 0 0 145 0 0 0 0
4:25 PM 0 2 0 0 0 60 0 77 0 0 139 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 80 1 0 131 0 0 0 0
4:35 PM 0 3 0 0 1 54 0 84 2 0 144 0 0 0 0
4:40 PM 0 3 1 0 2 60 0 85 0 0 151 0 0 3 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 91 0 0 141 0 0 0 0
4:50 PM 0 2 1 0 0 50 1 88 0 0 141 0 0 0 0
4:55 PM 0 1 0 0 0 61 0 93 0 0 155 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 0 1 0 0 2 69 1 81 0 0 153 0 0 0 0
5:05 PM 0 0 0 0 1 58 0 98 1 0 158 0 0 0 0
5:10 PM 0 1 0 0 0 65 0 84 0 0 150 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 81 0 101 1 0 183 0 0 0 0
5:20 PM 0 1 0 0 0 54 0 87 1 0 143 0 0 0 0
5:25 PM 0 4 0 0 0 81 0 90 0 0 175 1 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 1 0 0 0 59 0 94 0 0 154 0 0 0 0
5:35 PM 0 0 0 0 0 60 0 89 0 0 149 0 0 0 0
5:40 PM 0 1 0 0 1 59 0 90 1 0 152 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 48 0 63 1 0 113 0 0 0 0
5:50 PM 0 1 1 0 1 72 0 68 0 0 143 0 0 0 0
5:55 PM 0 1 0 0 0 61 0 69 2 0 133 0 0 0 0
Total
0 29 4 0 8 1,429 2 1,967 13 0 3,450 1 0 3 0
Survey
Page 45 of 238
In Out
Heavy Vehicle Summary 0 0
0 0
0 0
Out 6
Clay Carney 4 6
(503) 833-2740 In 4
Page 46 of 238
Peak Hour Summary
Clay Carney
(503) 833-2740
SW 2nd Ave 0 0
Bikes
0
13 8
1 12
Bikes 0
4
Peds 0
4
Bikes 2
Bikes
0
0 0
Page 47 of 238
In Out
HV 0.0%
Total Vehicle Summary
PHF 0.69
11 3
8 3
HV 0.0%
PHF 0.00
1
2
Clay Carney Out 20 0 In
0
(503) 833-2740
In 6 0 Out
4
1
HV 0.0%
SW 2nd Ave & SW Ruby Terrace PHF 0.75
HV 0.0%
PHF 0.81
12 1
Thursday, February 12, 2015 Out In
7 13
7:00 AM to 9:00 AM
Peak Hour Summary
7:15 AM to 8:15 AM
5-Minute Interval Summary
7:00 AM to 9:00 AM
Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians
Start SW 2nd Ave SW 2nd Ave SW Ruby Terrace SW Ruby Terrace Interval Crosswalk
Time L T Bikes T R Bikes L R Bikes Bikes Total North South East West
7:00 AM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
7:05 AM 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1
7:10 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
7:15 AM 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
7:20 AM 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 1 0 0
7:25 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
7:30 AM 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
7:35 AM 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
7:40 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0
7:45 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1
7:50 AM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
7:55 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
8:05 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
8:10 AM 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
8:20 AM 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0
8:25 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8:35 AM 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
8:40 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
8:45 AM 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
8:50 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
8:55 AM 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1
Total
16 2 0 7 20 0 3 5 0 0 53 2 1 0 4
Survey
Page 48 of 238
In Out
Heavy Vehicle Summary 0 0
0 0
0
Out 0
Clay Carney
(503) 833-2740 In 0
0
Page 49 of 238
Peak Hour Summary
Clay Carney
(503) 833-2740
SW 2nd Ave 0 0
Bikes
0
11 3
8 3
SW Ruby Terrace Peds 1
Bikes 0
0 20 0
Peds 2
Peds 0
2
0 6 0
Bikes 0
4
Peds 1
12 1
SW 2nd Ave
7 13
Bikes
0
0 0
Page 50 of 238
In Out
HV 0.0%
Total Vehicle Summary
PHF 0.31
5 9
3 2
HV 0.0%
PHF 0.00
0
6
Clay Carney Out 9 0 In
0
(503) 833-2740
In 12 0 Out
6
0
HV 0.0%
SW 2nd Ave & SW Ruby Terrace PHF 0.60
HV 0.0%
PHF 0.56
6 3
Wednesday, February 11, 2015 Out In
8 9
4:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Peak Hour Summary
4:50 PM to 5:50 PM
5-Minute Interval Summary
4:00 PM to 6:00 PM
Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians
Start SW 2nd Ave SW 2nd Ave SW Ruby Terrace SW Ruby Terrace Interval Crosswalk
Time L T Bikes T R Bikes L R Bikes Bikes Total North South East West
4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:05 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
4:10 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:20 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
4:25 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4:30 PM 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
4:35 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
4:40 PM 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
4:50 PM 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
4:55 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
5:00 PM 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
5:05 PM 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
5:10 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
5:20 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
5:25 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
5:35 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
5:40 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
5:45 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
5:50 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0
5:55 PM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Total
6 9 0 6 3 0 10 8 0 0 42 0 1 0 2
Survey
Page 51 of 238
In Out
Heavy Vehicle Summary 0 0
0 0
0
Out 0
Clay Carney
(503) 833-2740 In 0
0
Page 52 of 238
Peak Hour Summary
Clay Carney
(503) 833-2740
SW 2nd Ave 0 0
Bikes
0
5 9
3 2
SW Ruby Terrace Peds 0
Bikes 0
0 9 0
Peds 0
Peds 0
6
0 12 0
Bikes 0
6
Peds 0
6 3
SW 2nd Ave
8 9
Bikes
0
0 0
Page 53 of 238
City of Portland
Office of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave Rm 800
Portland, OR 97204
"The City That Works" File Name : t051103tab
Wx: Shwrs-rain 55f By: CDB Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 11/3/2005
SW TERWILLIGER BLV @ SW TAYLORS FERRY RD Page No :1
Grand Total 592 733 47 5 1372 255 610 628 11 1493 120 1187 72 8 1379 95 561 96 4 752 28 4996 5024
Apprch % 43.1 53.4 3.4 17.1 40.9 42.1 8.7 86.1 5.2 12.6 74.6 12.8
Total % 11.8 14.7 0.9 27.5 5.1 12.2 12.6 29.9 2.4 23.8 1.4 27.6 1.9 11.2 1.9 15.1 0.6 99.4
Page 54 of 238
City of Portland
Office of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave Rm 800
Portland, OR 97204
"The City That Works" File Name : t051103tab
Wx: Shwrs-rain 55f By: CDB Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 11/3/2005
SW TERWILLIGER BLV @ SW TAYLORS FERRY RD Page No :2
SW TERWILLIGER BLV
Out In Total
1910 1372 3282
47 733 592
Right Thru Left
1529
Total
SW TAYLORS FERRY RD
SW TAYLORS FERRY RD
1225
Out
95
Right Thru
Left
North
628
752
561
Right Thru
In
1493
11/3/2005 07:00
In
610
11/3/2005 08:45
96
Left
777
VEHICLES PEDS
255
Out
Total
2718
Left Thru Right
120 1187 72
Page 55 of 238
City of Portland
Office of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave Rm 800
Portland, OR 97204
"The City That Works" File Name : t051103tab
Wx: Shwrs-rain 55f By: CDB Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 11/3/2005
SW TERWILLIGER BLV @ SW TAYLORS FERRY RD Page No :3
Page 56 of 238
City of Portland
Office of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave Rm 800
Portland, OR 97204
"The City That Works" File Name : T051103TPB
Shwrs 58f By: CDB Site Code : DB400 #5
Start Date : 11/3/2005
SW TERWILLIGER BLV @ SW TAYLORS FERRY RD Page No :1
Grand Total 642 1424 110 23 2176 489 730 572 16 1791 219 886 104 13 1209 98 483 154 11 735 63 5911 5974
Apprch % 29.5 65.4 5.1 27.3 40.8 31.9 18.1 73.3 8.6 13.3 65.7 21
Total % 10.9 24.1 1.9 36.8 8.3 12.3 9.7 30.3 3.7 15 1.8 20.5 1.7 8.2 2.6 12.4 1.1 98.9
Page 57 of 238
City of Portland
Office of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave Rm 800
Portland, OR 97204
"The City That Works" File Name : T051103TPB
Shwrs 58f By: CDB Site Code : DB400 #5
Start Date : 11/3/2005
SW TERWILLIGER BLV @ SW TAYLORS FERRY RD Page No :2
SW TERWILLIGER BLV
Out In Total
1556 2176 3732
1794
Total
SW TAYLORS FERRY RD
SW TAYLORS FERRY RD
1229
Out
98
Right Thru
Left
North
572
735
483
Right Thru
In
1791
11/3/2005 16:00
In
730
11/3/2005 17:45
154
Left
1059
VEHICLES PEDS
489
Out
Total
3020
Left Thru Right
219 886 104
Page 58 of 238
City of Portland
Office of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave Rm 800
Portland, OR 97204
"The City That Works" File Name : T051103TPB
Shwrs 58f By: CDB Site Code : DB400 #5
Start Date : 11/3/2005
SW TERWILLIGER BLV @ SW TAYLORS FERRY RD Page No :3
Page 59 of 238
City of Portland
Office of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave Rm 800
Portland, OR 97204
"The City That Works" File Name : t051103tab
Wx: Shwrs-rain 55f By: CDB Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 11/3/2005
SW TERWILLIGER BLV @ SW TAYLORS FERRY RD Page No :1
08:00 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 5
08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1
08:30 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
08:45 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2
Total 0 3 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 2 10
Grand Total 0 3 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 10 0 0 14 0 0 3 0 3 21
Apprch % 0 75 25 0 0 0 0 0 28.6 71.4 0 0 0 0 100 0
Total % 0 14.3 4.8 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 19 47.6 0 0 66.7 0 0 14.3 0 14.3
Page 60 of 238
City of Portland
Office of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave Rm 800
Portland, OR 97204
"The City That Works" File Name : T051103TPB
Shwrs 58f By: CDB Site Code : DB400 #5
Start Date : 11/3/2005
SW TERWILLIGER BLV @ SW TAYLORS FERRY RD Page No :1
17:00 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4
17:15 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3
17:30 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
17:45 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total 0 5 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 9
Grand Total 0 9 0 0 9 0 1 0 0 1 4 6 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 20
Apprch % 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 40 60 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total % 0 45 0 0 45 0 5 0 0 5 20 30 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0
Page 61 of 238
CITY OF PORTLAND
Bureau of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave RM 800
503-823-5211 File Name : 061003tab
Cldy 58f By: CDB Site Code : 00000000
SW MACADAM AVE @ SW TAYLORS FERRY RD / Start Date : 10/3/2006
SW MILES ST Page No :1
08:00 0 106 0 0 106 4 4 0 0 8 0 462 148 0 610 138 5 84 0 227 0 951 951
08:15 0 100 0 3 100 1 0 0 0 1 2 462 187 0 651 162 5 91 0 258 3 1010 1013
08:30 1 117 0 1 118 1 1 1 2 3 1 394 206 0 601 137 4 69 0 210 3 932 935
08:45 1 136 0 1 137 2 0 1 1 3 1 332 152 0 485 131 3 64 0 198 2 823 825
Total 2 459 0 5 461 8 5 2 3 15 4 1650 693 0 2347 568 17 308 0 893 8 3716 3724
Grand Total 3 756 0 9 759 15 6 3 4 24 6 3323 1406 0 4735 1167 34 548 0 1749 13 7267 7280
Apprch % 0.4 99.6 0 62.5 25 12.5 0.1 70.2 29.7 66.7 1.9 31.3
Total % 0 10.4 0 10.4 0.2 0.1 0 0.3 0.1 45.7 19.3 65.2 16.1 0.5 7.5 24.1 0.2 99.8
Page 62 of 238
CITY OF PORTLAND
Bureau of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave RM 800
503-823-5211 File Name : 061003tab
Cldy 58f By: CDB Site Code : 00000000
SW MACADAM AVE @ SW TAYLORS FERRY RD / Start Date : 10/3/2006
SW MILES ST Page No :2
SW MACADAM AVE
Out In Total
3886 759 4645
3 756 0
Right Thru Left
3164
Total
SW TAYLORS FERRY RD
Out
548
Right Thru
40
Left
North
SW MILES ST
15
1749
34
Thru
In
10/3/2006 07:00
In
24
10/3/2006 08:45
6
1167
Right
Left
1415
VEHICLES PEDS
Out
Total
3
64
Left Thru Right
1406 3323 6
Page 63 of 238
CITY OF PORTLAND
Bureau of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave RM 800
503-823-5211 File Name : 061003tab
Cldy 58f By: CDB Site Code : 00000000
SW MACADAM AVE @ SW TAYLORS FERRY RD / Start Date : 10/3/2006
SW MILES ST Page No :3
Page 64 of 238
CITY OF PORTLAND
Bureau of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave RM 800
503-823-5211 File Name : 061003TPB
Cldy 60f By: CDB Site Code : 00000000
SW MACADAM AVE @ SW TAYLORS FERRY RD / Start Date : 10/3/2006
SW MILES ST Page No :1
17:00 2 291 0 2 293 1 7 9 0 17 2 136 138 0 276 126 8 32 0 166 2 752 754
17:15 2 341 0 0 343 2 3 2 0 7 2 175 161 0 338 159 3 23 0 185 0 873 873
17:30 2 320 0 2 322 0 0 0 2 0 0 159 143 0 302 143 4 21 0 168 4 792 796
17:45 0 341 0 4 341 2 1 8 1 11 2 160 143 0 305 180 6 31 0 217 5 874 879
Total 6 1293 0 8 1299 5 11 19 3 35 6 630 585 0 1221 608 21 107 0 736 11 3291 3302
Grand Total 8 2439 0 9 2447 11 17 32 4 60 10 1202 1158 0 2370 1152 36 205 0 1393 13 6270 6283
Apprch % 0.3 99.7 0 18.3 28.3 53.3 0.4 50.7 48.9 82.7 2.6 14.7
Total % 0.1 38.9 0 39 0.2 0.3 0.5 1 0.2 19.2 18.5 37.8 18.4 0.6 3.3 22.2 0.2 99.8
Page 65 of 238
CITY OF PORTLAND
Bureau of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave RM 800
503-823-5211 File Name : 061003TPB
Cldy 60f By: CDB Site Code : 00000000
SW MACADAM AVE @ SW TAYLORS FERRY RD / Start Date : 10/3/2006
SW MILES ST Page No :2
SW MACADAM AVE
Out In Total
1418 2447 3865
8 2439 0
Right Thru Left
2576
Total
SW TAYLORS FERRY RD
Out
205
Right Thru
46
Left
North
SW MILES ST
11
1393
36
Right Thru
In
10/3/2006 16:00
In
17
60
10/3/2006 17:45
1152
Left
1183
VEHICLES PEDS
Out
Total
32
106
Left Thru Right
1158 1202 10
Page 66 of 238
CITY OF PORTLAND
Bureau of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave RM 800
503-823-5211 File Name : 061003TPB
Cldy 60f By: CDB Site Code : 00000000
SW MACADAM AVE @ SW TAYLORS FERRY RD / Start Date : 10/3/2006
SW MILES ST Page No :3
Page 67 of 238
CITY OF PORTLAND
Bureau of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave RM 800
503-823-5211 File Name : 061003tab
Cldy 58f By: CDB Site Code : 00000000
SW MACADAM AVE @ SW TAYLORS FERRY RD / Start Date : 10/3/2006
SW MILES ST Page No :1
08:00 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 2
08:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
08:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3
08:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Total 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0 6 6
Grand Total 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 1 1 0 2 0 10 10
Apprch % 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 50 50
Total % 0 30 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 50 0 10 10 20 0 100
Page 68 of 238
CITY OF PORTLAND
Bureau of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave RM 800
503-823-5211 File Name : 061003tab
Cldy 58f By: CDB Site Code : 00000000
SW MACADAM AVE @ SW TAYLORS FERRY RD / Start Date : 10/3/2006
SW MILES ST Page No :2
SW MACADAM AVE
Out In Total
6 3 9
0 3 0
Right Thru Left
2
Total
SW TAYLORS FERRY RD
Out
1
Right Thru
Left
North
SW MILES ST
0
2
1
Right Thru
In
10/3/2006 07:00
In
10/3/2006 08:45
0
0
Left
0
BIKES
Out
Total
0
1
Left Thru Right
0 5 0
3 5 8
Out In Total
SW MACADAM AVE
Page 69 of 238
CITY OF PORTLAND
Bureau of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave RM 800
503-823-5211 File Name : 061003tab
Cldy 58f By: CDB Site Code : 00000000
SW MACADAM AVE @ SW TAYLORS FERRY RD / Start Date : 10/3/2006
SW MILES ST Page No :3
Page 70 of 238
CITY OF PORTLAND
Bureau of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave RM 800
503-823-5211 File Name : 061003TPB
Cldy 60f By: CDB Site Code : 00000000
SW MACADAM AVE @ SW TAYLORS FERRY RD / Start Date : 10/3/2006
SW MILES ST Page No :1
17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
17:15 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6
17:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Total 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 3 5 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10
Grand Total 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 4 8 0 0 12 2 2 0 0 4 0 20 20
Apprch % 0 100 0 0 100 0 33.3 66.7 0 50 50 0
Total % 0 10 0 10 0 10 0 10 20 40 0 60 10 10 0 20 0 100
Page 71 of 238
CITY OF PORTLAND
Bureau of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave RM 800
503-823-5211 File Name : 061003TPB
Cldy 60f By: CDB Site Code : 00000000
SW MACADAM AVE @ SW TAYLORS FERRY RD / Start Date : 10/3/2006
SW MILES ST Page No :2
SW MACADAM AVE
Out In Total
8 2 10
0 2 0
Right Thru Left
6
Total
SW TAYLORS FERRY RD
Out
0
Right Thru
Left
North
SW MILES ST
0
4
2
Right Thru
In
10/3/2006 16:00
In
10/3/2006 17:45
2
2
Left
2
BIKES
Out
Total
0
8
Left Thru Right
0 8 4
4 12 16
Out In Total
SW MACADAM AVE
Page 72 of 238
CITY OF PORTLAND
Bureau of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave RM 800
503-823-5211 File Name : 061003TPB
Cldy 60f By: CDB Site Code : 00000000
SW MACADAM AVE @ SW TAYLORS FERRY RD / Start Date : 10/3/2006
SW MILES ST Page No :3
Page 73 of 238
CITY OF PORTLAND
Bureau of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave RM 800
503-823-5211 File Name : 071003TAB
O'cast rain 55f By: CDB Fro: Bower Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 10/3/2007
SW MACADAM AVE @ SW MILES ST Page No :1
Grand Total 2 770 0 11 772 11 12 9 3 32 11 3492 1296 0 4799 1021 36 605 1 1662 15 7265 7280
Apprch % 0.3 99.7 0 34.4 37.5 28.1 0.2 72.8 27 61.4 2.2 36.4
Total % 0 10.6 0 10.6 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.2 48.1 17.8 66.1 14.1 0.5 8.3 22.9 0.2 99.8
Page 74 of 238
CITY OF PORTLAND
Bureau of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave RM 800
503-823-5211 File Name : 071003TAB
O'cast rain 55f By: CDB Fro: Bower Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 10/3/2007
SW MACADAM AVE @ SW MILES ST Page No :2
SW MACADAM AVE
Out In Total
4108 772 4880
2 770 0
Right Thru Left
2972
Total
Out
605
Right Thru
47
Left
North
SW MILES ST
SW MILES ST
11
1662
36
Right Thru
In
10/3/2007 07:00
In
12
32
10/3/2007 08:45
1021
Left
1310
VEHICLES PEDS
Out
Total
9
79
Left Thru Right
1296 3492 11
Page 75 of 238
CITY OF PORTLAND
Bureau of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave RM 800
503-823-5211 File Name : 071003TAB
O'cast rain 55f By: CDB Fro: Bower Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 10/3/2007
SW MACADAM AVE @ SW MILES ST Page No :3
Page 76 of 238
CITY OF PORTLAND
Bureau of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave RM 800
503-823-5211 File Name : 071003TPB
O'cast Shwrs 55f By: CDB For: Bower Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 10/3/2007
SW MACADAM AVE @ SW MILES ST Page No :1
17:00 1 331 0 0 332 2 10 4 0 16 1 128 144 0 273 190 4 27 0 221 0 842 842
17:15 0 279 0 1 279 0 2 1 1 3 2 176 158 0 336 137 0 29 0 166 2 784 786
17:30 2 301 0 2 303 2 7 3 0 12 4 175 161 0 340 132 4 20 0 156 2 811 813
17:45 0 317 0 1 317 1 1 0 0 2 2 158 151 0 311 130 1 35 1 166 2 796 798
Total 3 1228 0 4 1231 5 20 8 1 33 9 637 614 0 1260 589 9 111 1 709 6 3233 3239
Grand Total 6 2345 1 7 2352 9 26 16 3 51 13 1267 1163 0 2443 1188 17 201 1 1406 11 6252 6263
Apprch % 0.3 99.7 0 17.6 51 31.4 0.5 51.9 47.6 84.5 1.2 14.3
Total % 0.1 37.5 0 37.6 0.1 0.4 0.3 0.8 0.2 20.3 18.6 39.1 19 0.3 3.2 22.5 0.2 99.8
Page 77 of 238
CITY OF PORTLAND
Bureau of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave RM 800
503-823-5211 File Name : 071003TPB
O'cast Shwrs 55f By: CDB For: Bower Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 10/3/2007
SW MACADAM AVE @ SW MILES ST Page No :2
SW MACADAM AVE
Out In Total
1477 2352 3829
6 2345 1
Right Thru U-Turn
2601
Total
Out
201
Right Thru
31
Left
North
SW MILES ST
SW MILES ST
9
1406
17
Right Thru
In
10/3/2007 16:00
In
26
51
10/3/2007 17:45
1188
Left
1195
VEHICLES PEDS
Out
Total
16
82
Left Thru Right
1163 1267 13
Page 78 of 238
CITY OF PORTLAND
Bureau of Transportation
1120 SW 5th Ave RM 800
503-823-5211 File Name : 071003TPB
O'cast Shwrs 55f By: CDB For: Bower Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 10/3/2007
SW MACADAM AVE @ SW MILES ST Page No :3
Page 79 of 238
TRIP GENERATION CALCULATIONS
WEEKDAY SATURDAY
Trip Rate: 9.52 Trip Rate: 9.91
Page 80 of 238
Page 81 of 238
Page 82 of 238
Page 83 of 238
Page 84 of 238
Page 85 of 238
Page 86 of 238
Page 87 of 238
Page 88 of 238
CDS150 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 1
11/19/2015 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT
CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE
TERWILLIGER BLVD and TROY ST, City of Portland SW, Multnomah County, 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2014
YEAR: 2013
REAR-END 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 2 1 2 1 0 0 0
YEAR 2013 TOTAL 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 2 1 2 1 0 0 0
YEAR: 2012
REAR-END 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
YEAR 2012 TOTAL 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
YEAR: 2011
REAR-END 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
YEAR 2011 TOTAL 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
YEAR: 2010
REAR-END 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 0 2 2 0 1 1 0
YEAR 2010 TOTAL 0 2 0 2 0 4 0 0 2 2 0 1 1 0
FINAL TOTAL 0 7 2 9 0 10 0 4 5 7 2 1 2 0
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and
Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not
guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirements, effective
01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
Page 89 of 238
CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 1
11/19/2015 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT
URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING
CITY OF PORTLAND SW, MULTNOMAH COUNTY TERWILLIGER BLVD and TROY ST, City of Portland SW, Multnomah County, 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2014
Total crash records: 9
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
01442 N N N 02/11/2010 16 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD INTER 4-LEG N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE TH 0 SW TROY ST CN UNKNOWN N WET REAR PRVTE NW-SE 000 00
5P 03 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 18 M OR-Y 026 000 07
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE NW-SE 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 20 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
01597 N N N 02/18/2013 16 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 013 07
NONE MO 30 SW TROY ST E (NONE) UNKNOWN N WET REAR PRVTE W -E 000 00
5P 05 0 N DUSK INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 52 F OR-Y 026 000 07
(02) OR<25
01 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE W -E 000 00
PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJB 12 M 000 000 00
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE W -E 011 013 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK 000 000 00
OR<25
03 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE W -E 011 013 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 47 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
04 NONE 0 STOP
UNKN W -E 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 000 000 00
UNK
09435 N N N 09/11/2013 16 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE WE 100 SW TROY ST E (NONE) NONE N DRY REAR PRVTE W -E 000 00
6P 07 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 20 M OR-Y 026 000 07
(02) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE W -E 011 013 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 19 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
03 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE W -E 022 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 52 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
05557 N N N 06/02/2014 16 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE MO 100 SW TROY ST E (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY REAR UNKN W -E 000 00
6P 07 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M UNK 026 000 07
(02) UNK
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE W -E 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 57 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
10046 N Y N N N 09/11/2014 16 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 33,07
CITY TH 100 SW TROY ST E (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY REAR PRVTE E -W 000 00
4P 08 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 23 M OR-Y 051,026 000 33,07
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
Page 90 of 238
CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 2
11/19/2015 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT
URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING
CITY OF PORTLAND SW, MULTNOMAH COUNTY TERWILLIGER BLVD and TROY ST, City of Portland SW, Multnomah County, 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2014
Total crash records: 9
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
(02) OR>25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE E -W 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 44 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
12551 N N N 11/18/2011 16 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD STRGHT N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE FR 600 SW TROY ST E (NONE) UNKNOWN N WET REAR PRVTE W -E 000 00
5P 07 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 45 M OR-Y 026 000 07
(02) OR>25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE W -E 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 17 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE W -E 011 00
PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 71 F 000 000 00
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE W -E 011 00
PSNGR CAR 03 PSNG INJC 93 F 000 000 00
13528 N N N 12/12/2013 16 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 013 07
NO RPT TH 355 SW TROY ST NW (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY REAR PRVTE SE-NW 000 00
7A 07 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 22 F OR-Y 026 000 07
(02) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE SE-NW 011 013 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 22 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
03 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE SE-NW 022 00
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
Page 91 of 238
CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 3
11/19/2015 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT
URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING
CITY OF PORTLAND SW, MULTNOMAH COUNTY TERWILLIGER BLVD and TROY ST, City of Portland SW, Multnomah County, 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2014
Total crash records: 9
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 47 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
Page 92 of 238
CDS150 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 1
11/19/2015 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT
CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE
TERWILLIGER BLVD and TAYLORS FERRY RD, City of Portland SW, Multnomah County, 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2014
YEAR: 2013
ANGLE 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0
BACKING 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
REAR-END 0 3 4 7 0 3 0 6 1 6 1 3 2 0
SIDESWIPE - OVERTAKING 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0
TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0
YEAR 2013 TOTAL 0 5 9 14 0 5 1 12 2 12 2 5 2 0
YEAR: 2012
BACKING 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
REAR-END 0 1 3 4 0 2 0 3 1 4 0 3 0 0
SIDESWIPE - OVERTAKING 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1
TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 0
YEAR 2012 TOTAL 0 1 7 8 0 2 1 5 2 8 0 6 0 1
YEAR: 2011
BACKING 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
REAR-END 0 4 2 6 0 7 0 3 2 4 2 2 3 0
Page 93 of 238
CDS150 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 2
11/19/2015 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT
CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE
TERWILLIGER BLVD and TAYLORS FERRY RD, City of Portland SW, Multnomah County, 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2014
YEAR: 2010
BACKING 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
FIXED / OTHER OBJECT 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
REAR-END 0 3 4 7 0 3 0 4 3 6 1 3 1 0
SIDESWIPE - MEETING 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0
TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0
YEAR 2010 TOTAL 0 6 6 12 0 7 0 8 4 9 3 6 1 1
FINAL TOTAL 0 20 34 54 0 26 2 39 13 39 15 26 6 2
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and
Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not
guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirements, effective
01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
Page 94 of 238
CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 1
11/19/2015 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT
URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING
CITY OF PORTLAND SW, MULTNOMAH COUNTY TERWILLIGER BLVD and TAYLORS FERRY RD, City of Portland SW, Multnomah County, 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2014
Total crash records: 54
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
04985 N N N 05/11/2010 16 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE TU 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD N TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N -S 000 00
4P 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 17 M OR-Y 026 000 07
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE N -S 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 16 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
05256 N N N 05/19/2010 16 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE WE 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD N TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR UNKN S -N 000 00
12P 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 58 M OR-Y 026 000 07
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE S -N 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 35 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
00841 N N N 01/24/2012 16 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N RAIN O-1STOP 01 NONE 0 BACK 10
NONE TU 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD N TRF SIGNAL N WET BACK UNKN S -N 000 00
10A 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 51 M OR-Y 011 000 10
OR<25
02 UNKN 0 STOP
PRVTE N -S 011 00
UNKNOWN 01 DRVR NONE 36 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
04171 N N N 04/09/2014 16 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE WE 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD N TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE N -S 000 00
8P 06 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 026 000 07
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE N -S 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 64 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
12267 N N N 11/08/2010 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE MO 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD NE TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE SE-NW 000 00
2P 09 1 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 47 M OR-Y 026 000 07
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE SE-NW 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 52 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
06728 N N N 07/01/2011 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N CLR O-1STOP 01 NONE 0 BACK 10
NONE FR 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD E TRF SIGNAL N DRY BACK PRVTE W -E 000 00
UNK 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 18 M OR-Y 011 000 10
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE E -W 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 27 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
13861 N N N 12/21/2011 16 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N FOG S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE WE 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD E TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE E -W 000 00
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
Page 95 of 238
CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 2
11/19/2015 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT
URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING
CITY OF PORTLAND SW, MULTNOMAH COUNTY TERWILLIGER BLVD and TAYLORS FERRY RD, City of Portland SW, Multnomah County, 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2014
Total crash records: 54
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
12A 06 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 026 000 07
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE E -W 012 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 60 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
07717 N N N 07/21/2012 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
CITY SA 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD E TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR UNKN E -W 000 00
2P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK 026 000 07
UNK
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE E -W 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 53 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
80717 N N N 02/28/2011 16 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 013 07
NO RPT MO 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD S TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE S -N 000 00
7P 06 0 N DARK INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 39 M OR-Y 026 000 07
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE S -N 011 013 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 00 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
03 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE S -N 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 19 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
07137 N N N 07/10/2013 16 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE WE 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N 000 00
8A 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 44 M OR-Y 026 000 07
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE S -N 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 30 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
13092 N N N 12/03/2013 16 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE TU 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N 000 00
3P 06 1 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 36 F OR-Y 026 000 07
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE S -N 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 37 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
00466 N N N 01/15/2014 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE WE 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N 000 00
6P 06 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M UNK 026 000 07
UNK
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE S -N 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 41 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
Page 96 of 238
CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 3
11/19/2015 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT
URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING
CITY OF PORTLAND SW, MULTNOMAH COUNTY TERWILLIGER BLVD and TAYLORS FERRY RD, City of Portland SW, Multnomah County, 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2014
Total crash records: 54
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
PRVTE S -N 011 00
PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG NO<5 02 F 000 000 00
00800 N N N 01/25/2014 16 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE SA 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N 000 00
7P 06 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M UNK 026 000 07
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE S -N 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 41 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
02231 N N N 03/03/2010 16 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N CLR O-OTHER 01 NONE 0 BACK 10
NONE WE 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD W TRF SIGNAL N DRY BACK PRVTE E -W 000 00
4P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M UNK 011 000 10
UNK
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE W -E 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 62 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
09640 N N N 09/10/2010 16 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N CLR O-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 05
NONE FR 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD W TRF SIGNAL N DRY SS-M PRVTE E -W 000 00
11P 06 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 21 M OR-Y 044 000 05
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE W -E 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 33 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE W -E 000 00
PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 41 F 000 000 00
00058 Y N N 01/04/2012 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N Y UNK PRKD MV 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 01
NONE WE 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD W UNKNOWN N UNK SS-O PRVTE E -W 000 00
4P 05 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 61 M OR-Y 047,080 000 01
OR<25
02 NONE 0 PRKD-P
PRVTE E -W 008 00
PSNGR CAR
04897 N N N 05/10/2012 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE TH 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD W TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR UNKN W -E 000 00
6A 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK 026 000 07
UNK
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE W -E 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 56 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
10617 N N N 09/30/2012 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE SU 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD W TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE W -E 000 00
9A 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 24 F OR-Y 014 000 07
OR<25
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
Page 97 of 238
CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 4
11/19/2015 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT
URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING
CITY OF PORTLAND SW, MULTNOMAH COUNTY TERWILLIGER BLVD and TAYLORS FERRY RD, City of Portland SW, Multnomah County, 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2014
Total crash records: 54
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE W -E 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 45 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
00025 N N N N N 01/02/2014 16 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N RAIN PED 01 NONE 0 TURN-R 02
CITY TH 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD W TRF SIGNAL N WET PED PRVTE N -W 000 00
9P 05 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 56 F OR-Y 029 000 02
OR<25
-
STRGHT 01 PED INJB 19 M I XWLK 000 035 00
N S
06264 N N N 06/14/2010 16 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N CLR O-1TURN 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 02
NONE MO 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE W -N 000 00
3P 02 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 45 M OR-Y 028,004 000 02
OR>25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE E -W 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 52 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
10030 N N N 09/22/2011 16 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N CLR O-1TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02
NONE TH 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE N -S 000 00
8P 01 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 58 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
02 NONE 0 TURN-L
PRVTE S -W 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 16 F OR-Y 028,004 000 02
OR<25
12567 N N N 11/18/2011 16 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N CLR O-1TURN 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 02
NONE FR 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE W -N 000 00
8P 02 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 65 F OR-Y 028,004 000 02
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE E -W 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 27 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
09442 N N N 08/31/2012 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N CLR O-1TURN 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 02
NONE FR 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE W -N 000 00
7A 02 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M UNK 004,028 000 02
OR<25
02 NONE 1 STRGHT
PRVTE E -W 000 00
SEMI TOW 01 DRVR NONE 63 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
02071 N N N N N 03/02/2013 16 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N CLR BIKE 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 04
CITY SA 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY ANGL PRVTE W -E 000 00
9P 04 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 67 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
-
STRGHT 01 BIKE INJB 17 M I INRD 028 000 02
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
Page 98 of 238
CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 5
11/19/2015 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT
URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING
CITY OF PORTLAND SW, MULTNOMAH COUNTY TERWILLIGER BLVD and TAYLORS FERRY RD, City of Portland SW, Multnomah County, 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2014
Total crash records: 54
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
S N
06677 N N N 07/03/2013 16 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N CLR O-1STOP 01 NONE 0 BACK 02
NONE WE 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY BACK PRVTE W -E 000 00
8A 02 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 28 F OR-Y 011 000 02
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE E -W 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 23 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
10695 N N N 10/06/2013 16 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 004 07
NONE SU 0 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR UNKN S -N 000 00
1P 04 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M UNK 026 000 07
UNK
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE S -E 013 004 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 31 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
00093 N N N 01/03/2014 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD ALLEY N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE FR 125 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD E (NONE) NONE N DRY REAR PRVTE W -E 000 00
1P 07 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 25 F OR-Y 026 000 07
(04) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE W -E 013 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 61 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
06229 N N N 06/11/2010 16 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD ALLEY N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 02
NONE FR 50 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD S (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY TURN PRVTE E -S 018 00
3P 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 18 F OR-Y 028 000 02
(03) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE S -N 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 34 F UNK 000 000 00
OR<25
11946 N N N 11/04/2011 16 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD ALLEY N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02
NONE FR 50 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD S (NONE) L-TURN REF N DRY TURN PRVTE S -N 000 00
1P 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 33 F OR-Y 000 000 00
(04) OR>25
01 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE S -N 000 00
PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG NO<5 04 M 000 000 00
01 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE S -N 000 00
PSNGR CAR 03 PSNG NO<5 02 M 000 000 00
02 NONE 0 TURN-L
PRVTE E -S 018 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 20 F OR-Y 028 000 02
OR>25
02 NONE 0 TURN-L
PRVTE E -S 018 00
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
Page 99 of 238
CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 6
11/19/2015 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT
URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING
CITY OF PORTLAND SW, MULTNOMAH COUNTY TERWILLIGER BLVD and TAYLORS FERRY RD, City of Portland SW, Multnomah County, 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2014
Total crash records: 54
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 19 M 000 000 00
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
05825 N N N 06/07/2011 16 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE TU 20 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD N (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY REAR PRVTE N -S 000 00
11A 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 46 F OR-Y 026 000 07
(03) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE N -S 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 53 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE N -S 011 00
PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 55 M 000 000 00
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
(03) UNK
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE W -E 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 45 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
12007 N N N 11/08/2011 16 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE TU 30 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD S (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY REAR PRVTE N -S 000 00
4P 05 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 59 F OR-Y 026 000 07
(03) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE N -S 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 000 000 00
UNK
13009 N N N 11/23/2010 16 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD STRGHT N N RAIN S-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE TU 50 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD S (NONE) NONE N WET REAR PRVTE S -N 000 00
6P 06 N DUSK PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK 042 000 07
(04) UNK
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE S -N 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 57 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
12745 N N N 10/20/2011 16 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 013 07
NONE TH 50 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD S (NONE) UNKNOWN N UNK REAR PRVTE S -N 000 00
9A 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 026 000 07
(03) UNK
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE S -N 011 013 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 000 000 00
UNK
03 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE S -N 011 013 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 28 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
03 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE S -N 011 013 00
PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG NO<5 01 F 000 000 00
04 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE S -N 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK 000 000 00
UNK
02218 N N N 03/03/2010 16 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE WE 100 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD S (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY REAR PRVTE N -S 000 00
3P 08 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 026 000 07
(04) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE N -S 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 30 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
82351 N N N 07/02/2013 16 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD STRGHT Y N CLR S-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NO RPT TU 100 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD S (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N 000 00
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
2P 08 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 32 F OR-Y 042 000 07
(02) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE S -N 006 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 63 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR>25
06936 N N N 07/10/2013 16 TERWILLIGER BLVD STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE WE 120 TAYLORS FERRY RD S (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N 000 00
7A 08 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 026 000 07
(02) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE S -N 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 55 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR>25
08708 N N N 08/20/2010 16 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NO RPT FR 200 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD S (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N 000 00
5P 08 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 50 M OR-Y 026 000 07
(02) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE S -N 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 26 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
10787 N N N 10/14/2014 16 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD STRGHT N N CLD S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE TU 200 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD S (NONE) UNKNOWN N WET REAR PRVTE S -N 001 00
7A 08 N DAWN PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 56 M OR-Y 026 000 07
(02) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE S -N 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
10489 N N N 10/01/2013 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD STRGHT N N CLR S-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 13
NONE TU 275 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD S (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY SS-O PRVTE E -W 000 00
5P 08 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F OR-Y 045 000 13
(03) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE E -W 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 34 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
11602 N N N N N 10/23/2012 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD STRGHT N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 013 07
CITY TU 30 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD W (NONE) UNKNOWN N WET REAR UNKN W -E 000 00
5P 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 Unk UNK 026 000 07
(02) UNK
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE W -E 011 013 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 20 M OTH-Y 026 000 07
OR>25
03 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE W -E 011 013 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 22 M SUSP 000 000 00
OR<25
04 NONE 0 STOP
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
PRVTE W -E 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 20 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
00193 N N N 01/07/2013 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NO RPT MO 50 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD W (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY REAR PRVTE W -E 000 00
3P 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 60 F OR-Y 026 000 07
(02) OR>25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE W -E 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 47 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
90728 Y N N N N 01/23/2010 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD STRGHT N Y RAIN FIX OBJ 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 058,095 01
CITY SA 100 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD W (NONE) UNKNOWN N WET FIX PRVTE E -W 000 058,095 00
4A 01 N DARK PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 21 F OR-Y 081 000 01
(02) OR<25
12202 N N N 11/05/2010 16 SW TERWILLIGER BLVD CURVE N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE FR 100 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD N (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N 000 00
4P 07 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 20 M OR-Y 026 000 07
(03) OR>25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE S -N 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 28 F OTH-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
YEAR: 2013
FIXED / OTHER OBJECT 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1
MISCELLANEOUS 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0
YEAR 2013 TOTAL 0 1 2 3 0 2 0 3 0 1 2 1 0 1
YEAR: 2011
HEAD-ON 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
SIDESWIPE - OVERTAKING 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
YEAR 2011 TOTAL 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0
YEAR: 2010
REAR-END 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
YEAR 2010 TOTAL 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
FINAL TOTAL 0 4 3 7 0 5 0 5 2 4 3 1 0 2
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and
Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not
guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirements, effective
01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
Page 105 of 238
CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 1
11/19/2015 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT
URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING
CITY OF PORTLAND SW, MULTNOMAH COUNTY TAYLORS FERRY RD and 2ND AVE, City of Portland SW, Multnomah County, 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2014
Total crash records: 7
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
04592 N N N 05/02/2013 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER 3-LEG N N CLR O-1TURN 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 02
NONE TH 0 SW 2ND AVE CN UNKNOWN N DRY TURN PRVTE SW-N 000 00
5P 02 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 80 M OR-Y 028,004 000 02
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE NE-SW 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F OR-Y 000 000 00
UNK
05038 N N N N N 05/19/2011 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD STRGHT N N CLR BIKE 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 19,06
CITY TH 50 SW 2ND AVE NE (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY SS-O PRVTE NE-SW 000 00
3P 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 63 M OR-Y 032 000 06
(03) OR<25
-
STRGHT 01 BIKE INJB 34 M ROAD 000 041 19
NE SW
02402 N N N N N 03/11/2011 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD STRGHT N N CLR O-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 05
CITY FR 100 SW 2ND AVE NE (NONE) NONE N DRY HEAD PRVTE SW-NE 007 00
11A 07 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 27 M OR-Y 039,080 000 05
(03) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE NE-SW 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 28 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
12328 N N N 11/13/2013 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD STRGHT N N CLR ANIMAL 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 035 12
NONE WE 100 SW 2ND AVE NE (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY OTH PRVTE SW-NE 000 035 00
6P 07 0 N DUSK PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 53 F OR-Y 000 000 12
(02) OR<25
09241 N N N 08/31/2010 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD STRGHT N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 013 07
NO RPT TU 985 SW 2ND AVE NE (NONE) UNKNOWN N WET REAR UNKN SW-NE 000 00
6P 07 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F OR-Y 026 000 07
(03) UNK
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE SW-NE 011 013 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 53 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
03 UNKN 0 STOP
UNKN SW-NE 011 00
UNKNOWN 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK 000 000 00
UNK
01467 N Y Y N N 02/16/2013 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD STRGHT N Y CLR FIX OBJ 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 079 10
CITY SA 1320 SW 2ND AVE NE (NONE) NONE N DRY FIX PRVTE SW-NE 000 079 00
1A 07 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 26 M OR-Y 080 000 10
(02) OR<25
01 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE SW-NE 000 079 00
PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJB 29 M 000 000 00
14205 N Y N N N 12/10/2014 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD CURVE N Y RAIN FIX OBJ 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 079 27,33
CITY WE 100 SW 2ND AVE NE (NONE) UNKNOWN N WET FIX PRVTE NE-SW 000 079 00
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
11P 08 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 25 F OR-Y 079,051,016 038 27,33
(02) OR<25
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
YEAR: 2013
REAR-END 0 1 2 3 0 1 0 2 1 3 0 2 1 0
SIDESWIPE - OVERTAKING 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0
TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
YEAR 2013 TOTAL 0 2 4 6 0 2 1 4 2 6 0 2 1 0
YEAR: 2012
REAR-END 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0
SIDESWIPE - OVERTAKING 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0
YEAR 2012 TOTAL 0 2 2 4 0 2 0 3 1 4 0 0 0 0
YEAR: 2011
MISCELLANEOUS 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1
REAR-END 0 1 3 4 0 2 0 3 1 4 0 3 0 0
SIDESWIPE - OVERTAKING 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
TURNING MOVEMENTS 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 0
YEAR 2011 TOTAL 0 2 6 8 0 3 0 6 2 6 2 4 0 1
YEAR: 2010
REAR-END 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0
FINAL TOTAL 0 10 15 25 0 11 1 18 7 21 4 9 1 2
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and
Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not
guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirements, effective
01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
Page 109 of 238
CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 1
11/19/2015 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT
URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING
CITY OF PORTLAND SW, MULTNOMAH COUNTY MACADAM AVE and MILES ST, City of Portland SW, Multnomah County, 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2014
Total crash records: 25
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
05604 N N N 06/01/2011 14 SW MACADAM AVE INTER CROSS N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NO RPT WE SW MILES ST N TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR PRVTE N -S 000 00
3P 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 34 M OR-Y 026 000 07
OR>25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE N -S 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 81 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE N -S 011 00
PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 80 M 000 000 00
04294 N N N 04/27/2011 14 SW MACADAM AVE INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE WE SW MILES ST S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR UNKN S -N 000 00
3P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK 026 000 07
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE S -N 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 32 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR>25
10977 N N N 10/18/2014 14 SW MACADAM AVE INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NO RPT SA SW MILES ST S TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR UNKN S -N 000 00
11A 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OTH-Y 026 000 07
UNK
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE S -N 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 45 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
12353 N N N 11/14/2013 19 SW MACADAM AVE INTER CROSS N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NO RPT TH 0 SW MILES ST SW TRF SIGNAL N WET REAR UNKN NW-SE 000 00
4P 09 1 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 026 000 07
UNK
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE NW-SE 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 32 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR>25
08235 N N N 08/07/2010 14 SW MACADAM AVE INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NO RPT SA SW MILES ST W TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE W -E 000 00
10A 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 34 F OR-Y 026 000 07
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE W -E 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 56 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
08885 N N N 08/27/2013 14 SW MACADAM AVE INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE TU SW MILES ST W TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE W -E 000 00
2P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 026 000 07
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE W -E 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 61 M OR-Y 000 000 00
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
OR<25
09701 N N N 09/18/2014 19 SW MACADAM AVE INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE TH 0 SW MILES ST W TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE W -E 000 00
1P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 26 M OR-Y 026 000 07
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE W -E 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 38 M OTH-Y 000 000 00
N-RES
09421 N N N 09/07/2011 14 SW MACADAM AVE INTER CROSS N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE WE SW MILES ST NW TRF SIGNAL N DRY REAR PRVTE NW-SE 000 00
1P 09 1 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 42 M OR-Y 026 000 07
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
RENTL NW-SE 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 30 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
83884 N N N 10/16/2011 14 SW MACADAM AVE INTER CROSS N N CLR O-1TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02
NO RPT SU SW MILES ST CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE N -S 000 00
2A 01 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 19 M OTH-Y 000 000 00
N-RES
02 NONE 0 TURN-L
PRVTE S -W 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 25 M OR-Y 028,004 000 02
OR<25
10461 N N N 10/01/2013 14 SW MACADAM AVE ALLEY N N CLR O-1TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02
NONE TU SW MILES ST N (NONE) NONE N DRY TURN PRVTE S -N 000 00
4P 03 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 59 M OR-Y 000 000 00
(05) OR<25
02 NONE 0 TURN-L
PRVTE N -E 019 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 32 M OR-Y 004,028 000 02
OR<25
00911 N N N 01/26/2011 14 SW MACADAM AVE ALLEY N N CLR O-1TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02
NO RPT WE SW MILES ST S (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY TURN PRVTE S -N 000 00
12P 05 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 32 F OR-Y 000 000 00
(04) OR<25
02 NONE 0 TURN-L
UNKN N -E 019 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OTH-Y 028,004 000 02
UNK
07430 N N N 07/13/2012 14 SW MACADAM AVE STRGHT N N CLR S-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 10
NO RPT FR SW MILES ST N (RSDMD) UNKNOWN N DRY SS-O PRVTE S -N 000 00
5P 06 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M OR-Y 080 000 10
(05) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE S -N 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 51 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
05199 N N N 05/20/2010 14 SW MACADAM AVE STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
NONE TH SW MILES ST S (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY REAR UNKN S -N 000 00
7A 05 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F OR-Y 026 000 07
(04) OR>25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE S -N 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 42 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
12699 N N N 11/17/2010 14 SW MACADAM AVE STRGHT N N RAIN S-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 13
NONE WE SW MILES ST S (NONE) UNKNOWN N WET SS-O PRVTE S -N 000 00
6A 07 0 N DARK INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 18 M OR-Y 045 000 13
(05) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE S -N 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 45 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
01345 N N N 02/10/2011 14 SW MACADAM AVE STRGHT N Y CLR ANIMAL 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 034,040,079 10
NO RPT TH SW MILES ST S (NONE) UNKNOWN N WET OTH PRVTE N -S 000 034,040,079 00
12A 02 0 N DLIT PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 25 F OR-Y 080 000 10
(05) OR>25
03600 N N N 04/05/2011 14 SW MACADAM AVE STRGHT N N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE TU SW MILES ST S (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY REAR PRVTE N -S 000 00
9A 04 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 50 F OR-Y 026 000 07
(04) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE N -S 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 66 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
13201 N N N 12/05/2011 14 SW MACADAM AVE STRGHT N N CLR S-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 13
NONE MO SW MILES ST S (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY SS-O PRVTE S -N 000 00
9A 05 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 38 M OR-Y 045 000 13
(04) OR>25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE S -N 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 55 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
03163 N N N 03/29/2012 14 SW MACADAM AVE STRGHT N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 UNKN 0 STRGHT 07
NONE TH SW MILES ST S (NONE) UNKNOWN N WET REAR UNKN S -N 000 00
5P 06 0 N DAY INJ UNKNOWN 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK 026 000 07
(05) UNK
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE S -N 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 33 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
12318 N N N Y 11/05/2012 14 SW MACADAM AVE STRGHT N N CLR S-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE MO SW MILES ST S (RSDMD) UNKNOWN N DRY REAR PRVTE N -S 000 00
11A 03 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M UNK 042 000 07
(04) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE N -S 006 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 54 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR>25
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
01158 N N N 02/04/2013 14 SW MACADAM AVE STRGHT N N CLR S-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 13
NONE MO SW MILES ST S (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY SS-O PRVTE S -N 000 00
8A 06 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 26 F OR-Y 045 000 13
(05) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE S -N 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 30 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
12473 N N N N N 11/15/2013 14 SW MACADAM AVE STRGHT N N RAIN S-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 13
CITY FR SW MILES ST S (NONE) ONE-WAY N WET SS-O PRVTE N -S 000 00
1P 03 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 74 M OR-Y 045 000 13
(04) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE N -S 000 00
TRUCK 01 DRVR NONE 37 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
11844 N N N 11/04/2014 14 SW MACADAM AVE STRGHT N N CLR S-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 00
NONE TU SW MILES ST S (RSDMD) NONE N DRY REAR PRVTE S -N 000 00
4P 03 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 42 M OR-Y 000 000 00
(04) UNK
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE S -N 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F UNK 000 000 00
UNK
14267 Y N N Y 12/20/2014 14 SW MACADAM AVE STRGHT N Y RAIN FIX OBJ 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 044,010 01
CITY SA SW MILES ST S (RSDMD) MEDIAN BAR N WET FIX PRVTE S -N 000 044,010 00
1A 05 N DLIT INJ MTRCYCLE 01 DRVR INJB 26 M OR-Y 047,080 000 01
(04) OR<25
08157 N N N 08/09/2013 19 SW MILES ST STRGHT Y N CLR S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE FR 75 SW MACADAM AVE W (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY REAR PRVTE W -E 000 00
1P 08 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 38 M OR-Y 026 000 07
(02) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE W -E 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 39 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR>25
05021 N N N 05/13/2012 14 SW MACADAM AVE TRANS N N CLR S-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 13
NONE SU SW MILES ST S (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY SS-O PRVTE N -S 000 00
4P 04 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 65 M OR-Y 045 000 13
(05) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE N -S 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 81 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
FINAL TOTAL
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and
Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not
guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirements, effective
01/01/2004, may result in fewer property damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
Page 114 of 238
CDS380 OREGON.. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Page: 1
11/25/2015 TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANAYLYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT
URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING
CITY OF PORTLAND SW, MULTNOMAH COUNTY TAYLORS FERRY RD and 3RD AVE, City of Portland SW, Multnomah County, 01/01/2010 to 12/31/2014
Total crash records: 6
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
14299 Y N N N N 12/28/2014 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER 3-LEG N Y RAIN FIX OBJ 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 053,121 01
CITY SU 0 SW 3RD AVE W NONE N WET FIX PRVTE E -W 000 053,021 00
3A 05 0 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 23 M OR-Y 047,080 017 01
OR<25
01 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE E -W 000 053,021 00
PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 24 F 000 000 00
11990 N N N 11/06/2013 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER 4-LEG N N RAIN O-1TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 08
NONE WE 0 SW 3RD AVE CN STOP SIGN N WET TURN PRVTE W -E 000 00
5P 02 0 N DARK INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 24 F OR-Y 000 017 00
OR<25
02 NONE 0 TURN-L
PRVTE E -S 088 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 36 F OR-Y 004 000 08
OR<25
03 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE E -W 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 64 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
04 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE E -W 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F OR-Y 000 000 00
N-RES
06492 N N N N N 06/25/2011 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD STRGHT N Y CLR FIX OBJ 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 040,079,052 16
CITY SA 25 SW 3RD AVE E (NONE) NONE N DRY FIX PRVTE E -W 000 040,079,052 00
6A 06 0 N DAWN PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 19 F OR-Y 080 025 10
(03) OR<25
12028 Y Y N N N 10/31/2012 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD STRGHT N Y RAIN FIX OBJ 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 053 32,01
CITY WE 100 SW 3RD AVE W (NONE) UNKNOWN N WET FIX PRVTE E -W 000 053 00
2P 07 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 55 M OR-Y 052,047,080 000 32,01
(03) OR<25
00615 N N N 01/16/2010 16 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD CURVE N N RAIN O-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 05
NO RPT SA 30 SW 3RD AVE E (NONE) UNKNOWN N WET SS-M PRVTE W -E 000 00
6A 07 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 20 F OR-Y 039 000 05
(02) OR<25
02 NONE STRGHT
PRVTE E -W 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 21 F OR-Y 039 000 05
OR<25
02 NONE STRGHT
PRVTE E -W 000 00
PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 22 M 000 000 00
02 NONE STRGHT
PRVTE E -W 000 00
PSNGR CAR 03 PSNG NO<5 02 F 000 000 00
13641 N Y N N N 12/08/2010 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD CURVE N N CLD O-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 013 33,05
CITY WE 100 SW 3RD AVE W (NONE) NONE N WET SS-M PRVTE W -E 000 013 00
5P 07 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 25 F OR-Y 051,039 017 33,05
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
(02) OR>25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE E -W 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 25 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR>25
03 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE E -W 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 31 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR>25
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
01990 N N N 02/18/2011 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER 3-LEG N N RAIN O-1TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02
NONE FR 0 SW 4TH AVE CN UNKNOWN N WET TURN PRVTE E -W 000 00
3P 02 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 M UNK 000 000 00
OR<25
02 NONE 0 TURN-L
PRVTE W -N 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 85 F OR-Y 028,004 000 02
OR<25
02064 N N N 02/28/2014 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER 3-LEG N N CLR O-1TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02
NONE FR 0 SW 4TH AVE CN STOP SIGN N DRY TURN PRVTE E -W 000 00
4P 02 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 30 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
02 NONE 0 TURN-L
PRVTE W -N 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 37 F OR-Y 004,028 000 02
OR<25
06893 N N N 07/07/2014 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER 3-LEG N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 062 02
NO RPT MO 0 SW 4TH AVE CN STOP SIGN N DRY TURN PRVTE E -W 000 00
2P 01 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 38 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
02 NONE 0 TURN-L
PRVTE N -E 015 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 82 F OR-Y 028 000 02
OR<25
02 NONE 0 TURN-L
PRVTE N -E 015 00
PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJC 25 F 000 000 00
08153 N N N 08/08/2014 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD INTER 3-LEG N N CLR O-1TURN 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02
NONE FR 0 SW 4TH AVE CN TRF SIGNAL N DRY TURN PRVTE E -W 000 00
5P 02 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 49 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
02 NONE 0 TURN-L
PRVTE W -N 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 39 F OR-Y 004,028 000 02
OR<25
03153 N N N 03/30/2011 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD ALLEY N N RAIN ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 02
NONE WE 100 SW 4TH AVE W (NONE) UNKNOWN N WET TURN PRVTE W -E 000 00
11A 08 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 30 F OR-Y 000 000 00
(03) OR<25
02 NONE 0 TURN-L
PRVTE S -W 018 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 38 M OTH-Y 028 000 02
N-RES
03590 N N N N N 04/10/2010 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD ALLEY N N CLR ANGL-OTH 01 NONE 0 TURN-L 32,02
CITY SA 200 SW 4TH AVE W (NONE) UNKNOWN N DRY TURN PRVTE S -W 018 00
2P 08 0 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 48 M OR-Y 052,028 000 32,02
(02) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE W -E 000 00
MTRCYCLE 01 DRVR INJA 36 M OR-Y 000 000 00
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
S D
P R S W INT-TYPE SPCL USE
E A U C O DATE CLASS CITY STREET RD CHAR (MEDIAN) INT-REL OFFRD WTHR CRASH TRLR QTY MOVE A S
SER# E L G H R DAY DIST FIRST STREET DIRECT LEGS TRAF- RNDBT SURF COLL OWNER FROM PRTC INJ G E LICNS PED
INVEST D C S L K TIME FROM SECOND STREET LOCTN (#LANES) CONTL DRVWY LIGHT SVRTY V# TYPE TO P# TYPE SVRTY E X RES LOC ERROR ACT EVENT CAUSE
OR<25
03321 N N N 04/02/2010 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD STRGHT N Y CLR FIX OBJ 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 040 10
NO RPT FR 60 SW 4TH AVE E (NONE) UNKNOWN N UNK FIX PRVTE E -W 000 040 00
7P 08 0 N DUSK PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 28 M OR-Y 080 000 10
(04) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE E -W 000 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 52 M OTH-Y 000 000 00
N-RES
12754 N N N 11/23/2011 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD STRGHT N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE WE 100 SW 4TH AVE E (NONE) UNKNOWN N WET REAR PRVTE W -E 000 00
3P 07 N DAY INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 19 M OR-Y 000 000 00
(02) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
PRVTE W -E 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJC 41 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
09923 N N N 09/16/2010 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD STRGHT N N RAIN S-1STOP 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 07
NONE TH 100 SW 4TH AVE W (NONE) UNKNOWN N WET REAR PRVTE W -E 000 00
7A 08 0 N DAY PDO PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 47 M OR-Y 026 000 07
(02) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STOP
UNKN W -E 011 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR NONE 00 F OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
10605 Y Y N N N 10/03/2014 17 SW TAYLORS FERRY RD STRGHT N N CLR O-STRGHT 01 NONE 0 STRGHT 010 33,01,05
CITY FR 100 SW 4TH AVE W (NONE) NONE N DRY HEAD PRVTE E -W 000 00
10P 08 N DLIT INJ PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 39 M OR-Y 051 000 33,05,01
(04) OR<25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE W -E 000 010 00
PSNGR CAR 01 DRVR INJB 53 M OR-Y 000 000 00
OR<25
02 NONE 0 STRGHT
PRVTE W -E 000 010 00
PSNGR CAR 02 PSNG INJB 10 M 000 000 00
Disclaimer: The information contained in this report is compiled from individual driver and police crash reports submitted to the Oregon Department of Transportation as required in ORS 811.720. The Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit is committed to providing the highest quality crash data to customers. However, because submittal of crash report forms is
the responsibility of the individual driver, the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit can not guarantee that all qualifying crashes are represented nor can assurances be made that all details pertaining to a single crash are accurate. Note: Legislative changes to DMV's vehicle crash reporting requirement, effective 01/01/2004, may result in fewer property
damage only crashes being eligible for inclusion in the Statewide Crash Data File.
Project: 15137MacadamRidge
Intersection: SWTaylorsFerryRdatSW2ndSt
Date: 9/15/2016
Scenario: 2015ConditionsAMPeak
OUTPUT
Variable Value
Limitingadvancingvolume(VA), veh/h: 370
Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay:
Left-turn treatment warranted.
1000
Opposing Volume (VO), veh/h
Left-turn treatment
warranted.
800
600
400
Left-turn
200 treatment not
warranted.
0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h
CALIBRATIONCONSTANTS
Variable Value
Averagetimeformakingleftturn,s: 3.0
Criticalheadway,s: 5.0
Averagetimeforleftturnvehicletocleartheadvancinglane,s: 1.9
Project: 15137MacadamRidge
Intersection: SWTaylorsFerryRdatSW2ndSt
Date: 9/15/2016
Scenario: 2015ConditionsPMPeak
OUTPUT
Variable Value
Limitingadvancingvolume(VA), veh/h: 763
Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay:
Left-turn treatment NOT warranted.
1200
Opposing Volume (VO), veh/h
Left-turn treatment
warranted.
1000
800
600
Left-turn
400 treatment not
warranted.
200
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h
CALIBRATIONCONSTANTS
Variable Value
Averagetimeformakingleftturn,s: 3.0
Criticalheadway,s: 5.0
Averagetimeforleftturnvehicletocleartheadvancinglane,s: 1.9
Project: 15137MacadamRidge
Intersection: SWTaylorsFerryRdatSWHumeSt
Date: 9/15/2016
Scenario: 2018SiteConditionsAMPeak
OUTPUT
Variable Value
Limitingadvancingvolume(VA), veh/h: 1377
Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay:
Left-turn treatment NOT warranted.
1200
Opposing Volume (VO), veh/h
Left-turn treatment
warranted.
1000
800
600
Left-turn
400 treatment not
warranted.
200
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h
CALIBRATIONCONSTANTS
Variable Value
Averagetimeformakingleftturn,s: 3.0
Criticalheadway,s: 5.0
Averagetimeforleftturnvehicletocleartheadvancinglane,s: 1.9
Project: 15137MacadamRidge
Intersection: SWTaylorsFerryRdatSWHumeSt
Date: 9/15/2016
Scenario: 2018SiteConditionsPMPeak
OUTPUT
Variable Value
Limitingadvancingvolume(VA), veh/h: 622
Guidance for determining the need for a major-road left-turn bay:
Left-turn treatment warranted.
1200
Opposing Volume (VO), veh/h
Left-turn treatment
warranted.
1000
800
600
Left-turn
400 treatment not
warranted.
200
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100
Advancing Volume (VA), veh/h
CALIBRATIONCONSTANTS
Variable Value
Averagetimeformakingleftturn,s: 3.0
Criticalheadway,s: 5.0
Averagetimeforleftturnvehicletocleartheadvancinglane,s: 1.9
Level of service is used to describe the quality of traffic flow. Levels of service A
to C are considered good, and rural roads are usually designed for level of service C.
Urban streets and signalized intersections are typically designed for level of service D.
Level of service E is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. For unsignalized
intersections, level of service E is generally considered acceptable. Here is a more
complete description of levels of service:
Level of service A: Very low delay at intersections, with all traffic signal cycles
clearing and no vehicles waiting through more than one signal cycle. On highways, low
volume and high speeds, with speeds not restricted by other vehicles.
Level of service D: Tolerable operating speeds; long traffic delays occur at in-
tersections. The influence of congestion is noticeable. At traffic signals many vehicles
stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. The number of signal cycle
failures, for which vehicles must wait through more than one signal cycle, are noticeable.
This is typically the design level for urban signalized intersections.
Level of service E: Restricted speeds, very long traffic delays at traffic signals, and
traffic volumes near capacity. Flow is unstable so that any interruption, no matter how
minor, will cause queues to form and service to deteriorate to level of service F. Traffic
signal cycle failures are frequent occurrences. For unsignalized intersections, level of
service E or better is generally considered acceptable.
Level of service F: Extreme delays, resulting in long queues which may interfere
with other traffic movements. There may be stoppages of long duration, and speeds may
drop to zero. There may be frequent signal cycle failures. Level of service F will typically
result when vehicle arrival rates are greater than capacity. It is considered unacceptable by
most drivers.
Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 121 2 2 3 0 58 20 787 21 2 978 4
Future Volume (vph) 121 2 2 3 0 58 20 787 21 2 978 4
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1751 1549 1770 1855 1770 1861
Flt Permitted 0.69 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1267 1535 1770 1855 1770 1861
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 129 2 2 3 0 62 21 837 22 2 1040 4
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 132 0 0 65 0 21 858 0 2 1044 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 6 6 8 7
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 4 5 17
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 5 2
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.5 18.5 1.9 84.9 1.0 84.0
Effective Green, g (s) 18.5 18.5 1.9 84.9 1.0 84.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.02 0.72 0.01 0.71
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 198 240 28 1335 15 1325
v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.46 0.00 c0.56
v/s Ratio Perm c0.10 0.04
v/c Ratio 0.67 0.27 0.75 0.64 0.13 0.79
Uniform Delay, d1 46.8 43.8 57.8 8.6 58.0 11.1
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 16.4 0.6 71.8 2.4 4.0 4.8
Delay (s) 63.2 44.4 129.6 11.0 62.0 15.9
Level of Service E D F B E B
Approach Delay (s) 63.2 44.4 13.8 16.0
Approach LOS E D B B
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 18.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 117.9 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.2% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 53 321 70 135 292 333 73 584 42 341 510 34
Future Volume (vph) 53 321 70 135 292 333 73 584 42 341 510 34
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1791 1752 1845 1568 1752 1823 1752 3467
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 1791 1752 1845 1568 1752 1823 1752 3467
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Adj. Flow (vph) 55 331 72 139 301 343 75 602 43 352 526 35
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 55 397 0 139 301 343 75 645 0 352 561 0
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 4 4
Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pt+ov Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 81 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s) 5.2 26.6 10.1 31.5 60.1 8.6 43.0 24.1 58.5
Effective Green, g (s) 5.2 26.6 10.1 31.5 60.1 8.6 43.0 24.1 58.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.22 0.08 0.26 0.49 0.07 0.35 0.20 0.48
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 74 391 145 477 773 123 643 346 1665
v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.22 c0.08 0.16 0.22 0.04 c0.35 c0.20 0.16
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio 0.74 1.01 0.96 0.63 0.44 0.61 1.00 1.02 0.34
Uniform Delay, d1 57.6 47.6 55.6 40.0 20.0 55.0 39.4 48.8 19.6
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 32.7 49.3 61.5 2.7 0.4 8.3 36.3 52.9 0.5
Delay (s) 90.3 96.9 117.1 42.7 20.4 63.3 75.7 101.7 20.2
Level of Service F F F D C E E F C
Approach Delay (s) 96.1 46.2 74.4 51.6
Approach LOS F D E D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 62.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service E
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.00
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 121.8 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.8% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 366 24 666 1 5 8 712 1943 2 0 396 1
Future Volume (vph) 366 24 666 1 5 8 712 1943 2 0 396 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1797 1599 1676 1752 3504 5034
Flt Permitted 0.73 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1371 1599 1656 1752 3504 5034
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 389 26 709 1 5 9 757 2067 2 0 421 1
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 8 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 415 701 0 9 0 757 2069 0 0 422 0
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Perm NA pt+ov Perm NA Prot NA NA
Protected Phases 4 45 8 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 35.5 91.5 35.5 51.5 75.5 19.5
Effective Green, g (s) 35.5 91.5 35.5 51.5 75.5 19.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.76 0.30 0.43 0.63 0.16
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 405 1219 489 751 2204 818
v/s Ratio Prot 0.44 c0.43 c0.59 0.08
v/s Ratio Perm c0.30 0.01
v/c Ratio 1.02 0.58 0.02 1.01 0.94 0.52
Uniform Delay, d1 42.2 6.0 29.9 34.2 20.2 45.9
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 51.2 0.7 0.0 34.8 9.3 2.3
Delay (s) 93.4 6.7 29.9 69.1 29.5 48.3
Level of Service F A C E C D
Approach Delay (s) 38.7 29.9 40.1 48.3
Approach LOS D C D D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 40.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service D
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.02
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.5% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 30 6 5 5 2 33 42 1017 57 13 664 7
Future Volume (vph) 30 6 5 5 2 33 42 1017 57 13 664 7
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.98 0.89 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.96 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1747 1584 1770 1844 1787 1878
Flt Permitted 0.80 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1443 1554 1770 1844 1787 1878
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Adj. Flow (vph) 31 6 5 5 2 34 43 1048 59 13 685 7
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 38 0 0 41 0 43 1106 0 13 692 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 6 6 3 3 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 11 4
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1%
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 5 2
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.1 18.1 5.8 87.0 2.1 83.3
Effective Green, g (s) 18.1 18.1 5.8 87.0 2.1 83.3
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.72 0.02 0.69
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 216 233 85 1329 31 1296
v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 c0.60 0.01 0.37
v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.03
v/c Ratio 0.17 0.18 0.51 0.83 0.42 0.53
Uniform Delay, d1 44.8 44.8 56.1 11.8 58.7 9.2
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 0.4 4.7 6.2 8.9 1.6
Delay (s) 46.5 45.2 60.7 17.9 67.6 10.8
Level of Service D D E B E B
Approach Delay (s) 46.5 45.2 19.5 11.8
Approach LOS D D B B
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 17.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.7 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.5% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 54 239 94 274 437 331 125 493 42 324 787 55
Future Volume (vph) 54 239 94 274 437 331 125 493 42 324 787 55
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1758 1787 1881 1599 1752 1815 1752 3451
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 1758 1787 1881 1599 1752 1815 1752 3451
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Adj. Flow (vph) 57 252 99 288 460 348 132 519 44 341 828 58
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 57 339 0 288 460 348 132 563 0 341 886 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 8 10 18
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 3 5
Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pt+ov Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 81 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s) 4.6 23.4 18.9 37.7 64.9 13.7 37.9 22.7 46.9
Effective Green, g (s) 4.6 23.4 18.9 37.7 64.9 13.7 37.9 22.7 46.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.19 0.16 0.31 0.54 0.11 0.31 0.19 0.39
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 66 340 279 586 858 198 568 328 1338
v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.19 c0.16 0.24 0.22 0.08 c0.31 c0.19 0.26
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio 0.86 1.00 1.03 0.78 0.41 0.67 0.99 1.04 0.66
Uniform Delay, d1 57.8 48.7 51.0 37.9 16.6 51.4 41.3 49.1 30.5
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 65.1 47.6 62.5 6.8 0.3 8.2 35.7 60.4 2.6
Delay (s) 122.9 96.3 113.5 44.7 16.9 59.6 77.0 109.5 33.1
Level of Service F F F D B E E F C
Approach Delay (s) 100.0 54.0 73.7 54.3
Approach LOS F D E D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 63.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service E
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.01
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.9 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.1% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 112 22 636 20 12 5 612 659 6 0 1352 6
Future Volume (vph) 112 22 636 20 12 5 612 659 6 0 1352 6
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1806 1599 1758 1752 3499 5032
Flt Permitted 0.78 1.00 0.82 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1459 1599 1481 1752 3499 5032
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 119 23 677 21 13 5 651 701 6 0 1438 6
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 142 671 0 35 0 651 707 0 0 1443 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 8 8
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 8 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Perm NA pt+ov Perm NA Prot NA NA
Protected Phases 4 45 8 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.7 70.9 18.7 47.7 92.3 40.1
Effective Green, g (s) 18.7 70.9 18.7 47.7 92.3 40.1
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.59 0.16 0.40 0.77 0.33
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 227 944 230 696 2691 1681
v/s Ratio Prot c0.42 c0.37 0.20 c0.29
v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.02
v/c Ratio 0.63 0.71 0.15 0.94 0.26 0.86
Uniform Delay, d1 47.4 17.3 43.8 34.7 4.0 37.3
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 5.3 2.6 0.3 19.8 0.2 5.9
Delay (s) 52.7 19.9 44.1 54.4 4.2 43.3
Level of Service D B D D A D
Approach Delay (s) 25.6 44.1 28.3 43.3
Approach LOS C D C D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 33.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service C
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.8% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 123 2 2 3 0 59 20 799 21 2 993 4
Future Volume (vph) 123 2 2 3 0 59 20 799 21 2 993 4
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1751 1549 1770 1855 1770 1861
Flt Permitted 0.69 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1260 1535 1770 1855 1770 1861
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 131 2 2 3 0 63 21 850 22 2 1056 4
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 134 0 0 66 0 21 871 0 2 1060 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 6 6 8 7
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 4 5 17
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 5 2
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.5 18.5 1.9 84.9 1.0 84.0
Effective Green, g (s) 18.5 18.5 1.9 84.9 1.0 84.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.02 0.72 0.01 0.71
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 197 240 28 1335 15 1325
v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.47 0.00 c0.57
v/s Ratio Perm c0.11 0.04
v/c Ratio 0.68 0.28 0.75 0.65 0.13 0.80
Uniform Delay, d1 46.9 43.8 57.8 8.7 58.0 11.3
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 17.4 0.6 71.8 2.5 4.0 5.1
Delay (s) 64.3 44.4 129.6 11.2 62.0 16.5
Level of Service E D F B E B
Approach Delay (s) 64.3 44.4 14.0 16.6
Approach LOS E D B B
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 19.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 117.9 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.0% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 54 326 71 137 296 338 74 593 43 346 518 35
Future Volume (vph) 54 326 71 137 296 338 74 593 43 346 518 35
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1791 1752 1845 1568 1752 1823 1752 3467
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 1791 1752 1845 1568 1752 1823 1752 3467
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Adj. Flow (vph) 56 336 73 141 305 348 76 611 44 357 534 36
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 56 403 0 141 305 348 76 655 0 357 570 0
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 4 4
Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pt+ov Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 81 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s) 5.2 26.6 10.1 31.5 60.1 8.6 43.0 24.1 58.5
Effective Green, g (s) 5.2 26.6 10.1 31.5 60.1 8.6 43.0 24.1 58.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.22 0.08 0.26 0.49 0.07 0.35 0.20 0.48
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 74 391 145 477 773 123 643 346 1665
v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.22 c0.08 0.17 0.22 0.04 c0.36 c0.20 0.16
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio 0.76 1.03 0.97 0.64 0.45 0.62 1.02 1.03 0.34
Uniform Delay, d1 57.7 47.6 55.7 40.1 20.1 55.0 39.4 48.8 19.7
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 35.0 53.4 66.0 2.8 0.4 8.9 40.3 56.8 0.6
Delay (s) 92.7 101.0 121.7 42.9 20.5 63.9 79.7 105.7 20.2
Level of Service F F F D C E E F C
Approach Delay (s) 100.0 47.1 78.0 53.1
Approach LOS F D E D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 65.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service E
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.02
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 121.8 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.0% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 372 24 676 1 5 8 723 1972 2 0 402 1
Future Volume (vph) 372 24 676 1 5 8 723 1972 2 0 402 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1797 1599 1676 1752 3504 5034
Flt Permitted 0.73 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1370 1599 1655 1752 3504 5034
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 396 26 719 1 5 9 769 2098 2 0 428 1
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 422 712 0 9 0 769 2100 0 0 429 0
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Perm NA pt+ov Perm NA Prot NA NA
Protected Phases 4 45 8 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 35.5 91.5 35.5 51.5 75.5 19.5
Effective Green, g (s) 35.5 91.5 35.5 51.5 75.5 19.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.76 0.30 0.43 0.63 0.16
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 405 1219 489 751 2204 818
v/s Ratio Prot 0.45 c0.44 c0.60 0.09
v/s Ratio Perm c0.31 0.01
v/c Ratio 1.04 0.58 0.02 1.02 0.95 0.52
Uniform Delay, d1 42.2 6.1 29.9 34.2 20.6 46.0
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 56.1 0.7 0.0 39.1 10.9 2.4
Delay (s) 98.3 6.8 29.9 73.3 31.5 48.4
Level of Service F A C E C D
Approach Delay (s) 40.7 29.9 42.7 48.4
Approach LOS D C D D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 42.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service D
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.04
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.6% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 30 6 5 5 2 33 43 1032 58 13 674 7
Future Volume (vph) 30 6 5 5 2 33 43 1032 58 13 674 7
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.98 0.89 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.96 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1747 1584 1770 1844 1787 1878
Flt Permitted 0.80 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1443 1554 1770 1844 1787 1878
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Adj. Flow (vph) 31 6 5 5 2 34 44 1064 60 13 695 7
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 38 0 0 41 0 44 1122 0 13 702 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 6 6 3 3 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 11 4
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1%
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 5 2
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.1 18.1 5.8 87.0 2.1 83.3
Effective Green, g (s) 18.1 18.1 5.8 87.0 2.1 83.3
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.72 0.02 0.69
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 216 233 85 1329 31 1296
v/s Ratio Prot c0.02 c0.61 0.01 0.37
v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.03
v/c Ratio 0.17 0.18 0.52 0.84 0.42 0.54
Uniform Delay, d1 44.8 44.8 56.1 12.0 58.7 9.3
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 0.4 5.2 6.7 8.9 1.6
Delay (s) 46.5 45.2 61.3 18.7 67.6 10.9
Level of Service D D E B E B
Approach Delay (s) 46.5 45.2 20.3 11.9
Approach LOS D D C B
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 18.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.7 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.3% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 55 243 95 278 444 336 127 500 43 329 799 56
Future Volume (vph) 55 243 95 278 444 336 127 500 43 329 799 56
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1758 1787 1881 1599 1752 1815 1752 3451
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 1758 1787 1881 1599 1752 1815 1752 3451
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Adj. Flow (vph) 58 256 100 293 467 354 134 526 45 346 841 59
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 58 345 0 293 467 354 134 571 0 346 900 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 8 10 18
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 3 5
Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pt+ov Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 81 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s) 4.6 23.4 18.9 37.7 64.9 13.8 37.9 22.7 46.8
Effective Green, g (s) 4.6 23.4 18.9 37.7 64.9 13.8 37.9 22.7 46.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.19 0.16 0.31 0.54 0.11 0.31 0.19 0.39
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 66 340 279 586 858 199 568 328 1335
v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.20 c0.16 0.25 0.22 0.08 c0.31 c0.20 0.26
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio 0.88 1.01 1.05 0.80 0.41 0.67 1.01 1.05 0.67
Uniform Delay, d1 57.9 48.8 51.0 38.1 16.7 51.4 41.5 49.1 30.7
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 69.1 52.4 67.6 7.4 0.3 8.7 39.1 64.9 2.7
Delay (s) 127.0 101.1 118.6 45.5 17.0 60.1 80.6 114.0 33.5
Level of Service F F F D B E F F C
Approach Delay (s) 104.7 55.7 76.7 55.8
Approach LOS F E E E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 65.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service E
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.02
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.9 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.3% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 114 22 646 20 12 5 621 669 6 0 1372 6
Future Volume (vph) 114 22 646 20 12 5 621 669 6 0 1372 6
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 1599 1758 1752 3499 5032
Flt Permitted 0.78 1.00 0.82 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1459 1599 1479 1752 3499 5032
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 121 23 687 21 13 5 661 712 6 0 1460 6
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 144 681 0 35 0 661 718 0 0 1466 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 8 8
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 8 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Perm NA pt+ov Perm NA Prot NA NA
Protected Phases 4 45 8 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.7 71.2 18.7 48.0 92.3 39.8
Effective Green, g (s) 18.7 71.2 18.7 48.0 92.3 39.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.59 0.16 0.40 0.77 0.33
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 227 948 230 700 2691 1668
v/s Ratio Prot c0.43 c0.38 0.21 c0.29
v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.02
v/c Ratio 0.63 0.72 0.15 0.94 0.27 0.88
Uniform Delay, d1 47.4 17.3 43.8 34.7 4.0 37.8
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 5.7 2.6 0.3 21.3 0.2 6.9
Delay (s) 53.1 19.9 44.1 56.0 4.3 44.8
Level of Service D B D E A D
Approach Delay (s) 25.7 44.1 29.1 44.8
Approach LOS C D C D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 34.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.9% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 123 2 2 3 0 64 21 800 21 2 995 4
Future Volume (vph) 123 2 2 3 0 64 21 800 21 2 995 4
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1751 1547 1770 1855 1770 1861
Flt Permitted 0.66 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1220 1534 1770 1855 1770 1861
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 131 2 2 3 0 68 22 851 22 2 1059 4
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 134 0 0 71 0 22 872 0 2 1063 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 6 6 8 7
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 4 5 17
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 5 2
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.5 18.5 2.9 86.8 1.0 84.9
Effective Green, g (s) 18.5 18.5 2.9 86.8 1.0 84.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.02 0.72 0.01 0.71
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 188 236 42 1344 14 1318
v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.47 0.00 c0.57
v/s Ratio Perm c0.11 0.05
v/c Ratio 0.71 0.30 0.52 0.65 0.14 0.81
Uniform Delay, d1 48.1 44.9 57.8 8.6 59.0 11.9
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 20.6 0.7 11.3 2.4 4.7 5.4
Delay (s) 68.7 45.6 69.1 11.0 63.6 17.2
Level of Service E D E B E B
Approach Delay (s) 68.7 45.6 12.4 17.3
Approach LOS E D B B
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 19.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 119.8 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.1% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 54 327 71 138 298 340 74 593 43 347 518 35
Future Volume (vph) 54 327 71 138 298 340 74 593 43 347 518 35
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1791 1752 1845 1568 1752 1823 1752 3467
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 1791 1752 1845 1568 1752 1823 1752 3467
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Adj. Flow (vph) 56 337 73 142 307 351 76 611 44 358 534 36
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 56 404 0 142 307 351 76 655 0 358 570 0
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 4 4
Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pt+ov Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 81 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s) 5.2 26.6 10.1 31.5 60.1 8.6 43.0 24.1 58.5
Effective Green, g (s) 5.2 26.6 10.1 31.5 60.1 8.6 43.0 24.1 58.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.22 0.08 0.26 0.49 0.07 0.35 0.20 0.48
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 74 391 145 477 773 123 643 346 1665
v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.23 c0.08 0.17 0.22 0.04 c0.36 c0.20 0.16
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio 0.76 1.03 0.98 0.64 0.45 0.62 1.02 1.03 0.34
Uniform Delay, d1 57.7 47.6 55.7 40.2 20.1 55.0 39.4 48.8 19.7
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 35.0 54.2 67.7 3.0 0.4 8.9 40.3 57.6 0.6
Delay (s) 92.7 101.8 123.4 43.1 20.6 63.9 79.7 106.5 20.2
Level of Service F F F D C E E F C
Approach Delay (s) 100.7 47.5 78.0 53.5
Approach LOS F D E D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 65.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service E
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.02
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 121.8 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.2% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 374 24 677 1 5 8 723 1972 2 0 402 1
Future Volume (vph) 374 24 677 1 5 8 723 1972 2 0 402 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1797 1599 1676 1752 3504 5034
Flt Permitted 0.73 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1370 1599 1655 1752 3504 5034
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 398 26 720 1 5 9 769 2098 2 0 428 1
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 424 713 0 9 0 769 2100 0 0 429 0
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Perm NA pt+ov Perm NA Prot NA NA
Protected Phases 4 45 8 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 35.5 91.5 35.5 51.5 75.5 19.5
Effective Green, g (s) 35.5 91.5 35.5 51.5 75.5 19.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.76 0.30 0.43 0.63 0.16
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 405 1219 489 751 2204 818
v/s Ratio Prot 0.45 c0.44 c0.60 0.09
v/s Ratio Perm c0.31 0.01
v/c Ratio 1.05 0.58 0.02 1.02 0.95 0.52
Uniform Delay, d1 42.2 6.1 29.9 34.2 20.6 46.0
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 57.5 0.7 0.0 39.1 10.9 2.4
Delay (s) 99.8 6.8 29.9 73.3 31.5 48.4
Level of Service F A C E C D
Approach Delay (s) 41.3 29.9 42.7 48.4
Approach LOS D C D D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 42.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service D
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.04
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.7% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 123 2 2 3 0 64 21 800 21 2 995 4
Future Volume (vph) 123 2 2 3 0 64 21 800 21 2 995 4
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1751 1547 1770 1855 1770 1861
Flt Permitted 0.66 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1220 1534 1770 1855 1770 1861
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 131 2 2 3 0 68 22 851 22 2 1059 4
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 134 0 0 71 0 22 872 0 2 1063 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 6 6 8 7
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 4 5 17
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 5 2
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.5 18.5 2.9 86.8 1.0 84.9
Effective Green, g (s) 18.5 18.5 2.9 86.8 1.0 84.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.02 0.72 0.01 0.71
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 188 236 42 1344 14 1318
v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.47 0.00 c0.57
v/s Ratio Perm c0.11 0.05
v/c Ratio 0.71 0.30 0.52 0.65 0.14 0.81
Uniform Delay, d1 48.1 44.9 57.8 8.6 59.0 11.9
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 20.6 0.7 11.3 2.4 4.7 5.4
Delay (s) 68.7 45.6 69.1 11.0 63.6 17.2
Level of Service E D E B E B
Approach Delay (s) 68.7 45.6 12.4 17.3
Approach LOS E D B B
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 19.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 119.8 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.1% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 54 327 71 138 298 340 74 593 43 347 518 35
Future Volume (vph) 54 327 71 138 298 340 74 593 43 347 518 35
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1791 1752 1845 1568 1752 1823 1752 3467
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 1791 1752 1845 1568 1752 1823 1752 3467
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Adj. Flow (vph) 56 337 73 142 307 351 76 611 44 358 534 36
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 56 404 0 142 307 351 76 655 0 358 570 0
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 4 4
Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pt+ov Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 81 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s) 5.2 26.6 10.1 31.5 60.1 8.6 43.0 24.1 58.5
Effective Green, g (s) 5.2 26.6 10.1 31.5 60.1 8.6 43.0 24.1 58.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.22 0.08 0.26 0.49 0.07 0.35 0.20 0.48
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 74 391 145 477 773 123 643 346 1665
v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.23 c0.08 0.17 0.22 0.04 c0.36 c0.20 0.16
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio 0.76 1.03 0.98 0.64 0.45 0.62 1.02 1.03 0.34
Uniform Delay, d1 57.7 47.6 55.7 40.2 20.1 55.0 39.4 48.8 19.7
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 35.0 54.2 67.7 3.0 0.4 8.9 40.3 57.6 0.6
Delay (s) 92.7 101.8 123.4 43.1 20.6 63.9 79.7 106.5 20.2
Level of Service F F F D C E E F C
Approach Delay (s) 100.7 47.5 78.0 53.5
Approach LOS F D E D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 65.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service E
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.02
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 121.8 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.2% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 374 24 677 1 5 8 723 1972 2 0 402 1
Future Volume (vph) 374 24 677 1 5 8 723 1972 2 0 402 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1797 1599 1676 1752 3504 5034
Flt Permitted 0.73 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1370 1599 1655 1752 3504 5034
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 398 26 720 1 5 9 769 2098 2 0 428 1
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 424 713 0 9 0 769 2100 0 0 429 0
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Perm NA pt+ov Perm NA Prot NA NA
Protected Phases 4 45 8 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 35.5 91.5 35.5 51.5 75.5 19.5
Effective Green, g (s) 35.5 91.5 35.5 51.5 75.5 19.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.76 0.30 0.43 0.63 0.16
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 405 1219 489 751 2204 818
v/s Ratio Prot 0.45 c0.44 c0.60 0.09
v/s Ratio Perm c0.31 0.01
v/c Ratio 1.05 0.58 0.02 1.02 0.95 0.52
Uniform Delay, d1 42.2 6.1 29.9 34.2 20.6 46.0
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 57.5 0.7 0.0 39.1 10.9 2.4
Delay (s) 99.8 6.8 29.9 73.3 31.5 48.4
Level of Service F A C E C D
Approach Delay (s) 41.3 29.9 42.7 48.4
Approach LOS D C D D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 42.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service D
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.04
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.7% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 123 2 2 3 0 64 21 800 21 2 995 4
Future Volume (vph) 123 2 2 3 0 64 21 800 21 2 995 4
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1751 1547 1770 1855 1770 1861
Flt Permitted 0.66 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1220 1534 1770 1855 1770 1861
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 131 2 2 3 0 68 22 851 22 2 1059 4
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 134 0 0 71 0 22 872 0 2 1063 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 6 6 8 7
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 4 5 17
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 5 2
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.5 18.5 2.9 86.8 1.0 84.9
Effective Green, g (s) 18.5 18.5 2.9 86.8 1.0 84.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.02 0.72 0.01 0.71
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 188 236 42 1344 14 1318
v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.47 0.00 c0.57
v/s Ratio Perm c0.11 0.05
v/c Ratio 0.71 0.30 0.52 0.65 0.14 0.81
Uniform Delay, d1 48.1 44.9 57.8 8.6 59.0 11.9
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 20.6 0.7 11.3 2.4 4.7 5.4
Delay (s) 68.7 45.6 69.1 11.0 63.6 17.2
Level of Service E D E B E B
Approach Delay (s) 68.7 45.6 12.4 17.3
Approach LOS E D B B
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 19.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 119.8 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.1% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 54 327 71 138 298 340 74 593 43 347 518 35
Future Volume (vph) 54 327 71 138 298 340 74 593 43 347 518 35
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1791 1752 1845 1568 1752 1823 1752 3467
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 1791 1752 1845 1568 1752 1823 1752 3467
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Adj. Flow (vph) 56 337 73 142 307 351 76 611 44 358 534 36
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 56 404 0 142 307 351 76 655 0 358 570 0
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 4 4
Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pt+ov Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 81 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s) 5.2 26.6 10.1 31.5 60.1 8.6 43.0 24.1 58.5
Effective Green, g (s) 5.2 26.6 10.1 31.5 60.1 8.6 43.0 24.1 58.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.22 0.08 0.26 0.49 0.07 0.35 0.20 0.48
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 74 391 145 477 773 123 643 346 1665
v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.23 c0.08 0.17 0.22 0.04 c0.36 c0.20 0.16
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio 0.76 1.03 0.98 0.64 0.45 0.62 1.02 1.03 0.34
Uniform Delay, d1 57.7 47.6 55.7 40.2 20.1 55.0 39.4 48.8 19.7
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 35.0 54.2 67.7 3.0 0.4 8.9 40.3 57.6 0.6
Delay (s) 92.7 101.8 123.4 43.1 20.6 63.9 79.7 106.5 20.2
Level of Service F F F D C E E F C
Approach Delay (s) 100.7 47.5 78.0 53.5
Approach LOS F D E D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 65.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service E
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.02
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 121.8 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.2% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 374 24 677 1 5 8 723 1972 2 0 402 1
Future Volume (vph) 374 24 677 1 5 8 723 1972 2 0 402 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1797 1599 1676 1752 3504 5034
Flt Permitted 0.73 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1370 1599 1655 1752 3504 5034
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 398 26 720 1 5 9 769 2098 2 0 428 1
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 424 713 0 9 0 769 2100 0 0 429 0
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Perm NA pt+ov Perm NA Prot NA NA
Protected Phases 4 45 8 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 35.5 91.5 35.5 51.5 75.5 19.5
Effective Green, g (s) 35.5 91.5 35.5 51.5 75.5 19.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.76 0.30 0.43 0.63 0.16
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 405 1219 489 751 2204 818
v/s Ratio Prot 0.45 c0.44 c0.60 0.09
v/s Ratio Perm c0.31 0.01
v/c Ratio 1.05 0.58 0.02 1.02 0.95 0.52
Uniform Delay, d1 42.2 6.1 29.9 34.2 20.6 46.0
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 57.5 0.7 0.0 39.1 10.9 2.4
Delay (s) 99.8 6.8 29.9 73.3 31.5 48.4
Level of Service F A C E C D
Approach Delay (s) 41.3 29.9 42.7 48.4
Approach LOS D C D D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 42.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service D
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.04
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.7% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 123 2 2 3 0 64 21 800 21 2 995 4
Future Volume (vph) 123 2 2 3 0 64 21 800 21 2 995 4
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1751 1547 1770 1855 1770 1861
Flt Permitted 0.66 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1220 1534 1770 1855 1770 1861
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 131 2 2 3 0 68 22 851 22 2 1059 4
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 134 0 0 71 0 22 872 0 2 1063 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 6 6 8 7
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 4 5 17
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 5 2
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.5 18.5 2.9 86.8 1.0 84.9
Effective Green, g (s) 18.5 18.5 2.9 86.8 1.0 84.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.02 0.72 0.01 0.71
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 188 236 42 1344 14 1318
v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.47 0.00 c0.57
v/s Ratio Perm c0.11 0.05
v/c Ratio 0.71 0.30 0.52 0.65 0.14 0.81
Uniform Delay, d1 48.1 44.9 57.8 8.6 59.0 11.9
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 20.6 0.7 11.3 2.4 4.7 5.4
Delay (s) 68.7 45.6 69.1 11.0 63.6 17.2
Level of Service E D E B E B
Approach Delay (s) 68.7 45.6 12.4 17.3
Approach LOS E D B B
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 19.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 119.8 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.1% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 54 327 71 138 298 340 74 593 43 347 518 35
Future Volume (vph) 54 327 71 138 298 340 74 593 43 347 518 35
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1791 1752 1845 1568 1752 1823 1752 3467
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 1791 1752 1845 1568 1752 1823 1752 3467
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Adj. Flow (vph) 56 337 73 142 307 351 76 611 44 358 534 36
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 56 404 0 142 307 351 76 655 0 358 570 0
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 4 4
Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pt+ov Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 81 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s) 5.2 26.6 10.1 31.5 60.1 8.6 43.0 24.1 58.5
Effective Green, g (s) 5.2 26.6 10.1 31.5 60.1 8.6 43.0 24.1 58.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.22 0.08 0.26 0.49 0.07 0.35 0.20 0.48
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 74 391 145 477 773 123 643 346 1665
v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.23 c0.08 0.17 0.22 0.04 c0.36 c0.20 0.16
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio 0.76 1.03 0.98 0.64 0.45 0.62 1.02 1.03 0.34
Uniform Delay, d1 57.7 47.6 55.7 40.2 20.1 55.0 39.4 48.8 19.7
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 35.0 54.2 67.7 3.0 0.4 8.9 40.3 57.6 0.6
Delay (s) 92.7 101.8 123.4 43.1 20.6 63.9 79.7 106.5 20.2
Level of Service F F F D C E E F C
Approach Delay (s) 100.7 47.5 78.0 53.5
Approach LOS F D E D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 65.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service E
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.02
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 121.8 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.2% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 374 24 677 1 5 8 723 1972 2 0 402 1
Future Volume (vph) 374 24 677 1 5 8 723 1972 2 0 402 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1797 1599 1676 1752 3504 5034
Flt Permitted 0.73 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1370 1599 1655 1752 3504 5034
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 398 26 720 1 5 9 769 2098 2 0 428 1
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 424 713 0 9 0 769 2100 0 0 429 0
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Perm NA pt+ov Perm NA Prot NA NA
Protected Phases 4 45 8 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 35.5 91.5 35.5 51.5 75.5 19.5
Effective Green, g (s) 35.5 91.5 35.5 51.5 75.5 19.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.76 0.30 0.43 0.63 0.16
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 405 1219 489 751 2204 818
v/s Ratio Prot 0.45 c0.44 c0.60 0.09
v/s Ratio Perm c0.31 0.01
v/c Ratio 1.05 0.58 0.02 1.02 0.95 0.52
Uniform Delay, d1 42.2 6.1 29.9 34.2 20.6 46.0
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 57.5 0.7 0.0 39.1 10.9 2.4
Delay (s) 99.8 6.8 29.9 73.3 31.5 48.4
Level of Service F A C E C D
Approach Delay (s) 41.3 29.9 42.7 48.4
Approach LOS D C D D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 42.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service D
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.04
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.7% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 123 2 2 3 0 59 20 801 21 2 1000 4
Future Volume (vph) 123 2 2 3 0 59 20 801 21 2 1000 4
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.87 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1751 1549 1770 1855 1770 1861
Flt Permitted 0.69 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1260 1535 1770 1855 1770 1861
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 131 2 2 3 0 63 21 852 22 2 1064 4
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 134 0 0 66 0 21 873 0 2 1068 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 8 6 6 8 7
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 4 4 5 17
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 5 2
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.5 18.5 1.9 84.9 1.0 84.0
Effective Green, g (s) 18.5 18.5 1.9 84.9 1.0 84.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.02 0.72 0.01 0.71
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 197 240 28 1335 15 1325
v/s Ratio Prot c0.01 0.47 0.00 c0.57
v/s Ratio Perm c0.11 0.04
v/c Ratio 0.68 0.28 0.75 0.65 0.13 0.81
Uniform Delay, d1 46.9 43.8 57.8 8.7 58.0 11.4
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 17.4 0.6 71.8 2.5 4.0 5.3
Delay (s) 64.3 44.4 129.6 11.2 62.0 16.8
Level of Service E D F B E B
Approach Delay (s) 64.3 44.4 14.0 16.9
Approach LOS E D B B
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 19.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 117.9 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.4% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 54 327 71 138 298 345 74 593 43 348 518 35
Future Volume (vph) 54 327 71 138 298 345 74 593 43 348 518 35
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1791 1752 1845 1568 1752 1823 1752 3467
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 1791 1752 1845 1568 1752 1823 1752 3467
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Adj. Flow (vph) 56 337 73 142 307 356 76 611 44 359 534 36
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 56 404 0 142 307 356 76 655 0 359 570 0
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 4 4
Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pt+ov Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 81 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s) 5.2 26.6 10.1 31.5 60.1 8.6 43.0 24.1 58.5
Effective Green, g (s) 5.2 26.6 10.1 31.5 60.1 8.6 43.0 24.1 58.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.22 0.08 0.26 0.49 0.07 0.35 0.20 0.48
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 74 391 145 477 773 123 643 346 1665
v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.23 c0.08 0.17 0.23 0.04 c0.36 c0.20 0.16
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio 0.76 1.03 0.98 0.64 0.46 0.62 1.02 1.04 0.34
Uniform Delay, d1 57.7 47.6 55.7 40.2 20.2 55.0 39.4 48.8 19.7
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 35.0 54.2 67.7 3.0 0.4 8.9 40.3 58.5 0.6
Delay (s) 92.7 101.8 123.4 43.1 20.7 63.9 79.7 107.3 20.2
Level of Service F F F D C E E F C
Approach Delay (s) 100.7 47.4 78.0 53.9
Approach LOS F D E D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 65.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service E
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.02
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 121.8 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.3% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 374 24 677 1 5 8 723 1972 2 0 402 1
Future Volume (vph) 374 24 677 1 5 8 723 1972 2 0 402 1
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1797 1599 1676 1752 3504 5034
Flt Permitted 0.73 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1370 1599 1655 1752 3504 5034
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 398 26 720 1 5 9 769 2098 2 0 428 1
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 7 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 424 713 0 9 0 769 2100 0 0 429 0
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 2 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Perm NA pt+ov Perm NA Prot NA NA
Protected Phases 4 45 8 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 35.5 91.5 35.5 51.5 75.5 19.5
Effective Green, g (s) 35.5 91.5 35.5 51.5 75.5 19.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.76 0.30 0.43 0.63 0.16
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 405 1219 489 751 2204 818
v/s Ratio Prot 0.45 c0.44 c0.60 0.09
v/s Ratio Perm c0.31 0.01
v/c Ratio 1.05 0.58 0.02 1.02 0.95 0.52
Uniform Delay, d1 42.2 6.1 29.9 34.2 20.6 46.0
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 57.5 0.7 0.0 39.1 10.9 2.4
Delay (s) 99.8 6.8 29.9 73.3 31.5 48.4
Level of Service F A C E C D
Approach Delay (s) 41.3 29.9 42.7 48.4
Approach LOS D C D D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 42.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service D
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.04
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.7% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 30 6 5 5 2 37 48 1034 58 13 675 7
Future Volume (vph) 30 6 5 5 2 37 48 1034 58 13 675 7
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.98 0.89 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.96 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1747 1581 1770 1844 1787 1878
Flt Permitted 0.79 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1439 1554 1770 1844 1787 1878
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Adj. Flow (vph) 31 6 5 5 2 38 49 1066 60 13 696 7
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 38 0 0 45 0 49 1125 0 13 703 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 6 6 3 3 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 11 4
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1%
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 5 2
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.1 18.1 5.9 87.0 2.1 83.2
Effective Green, g (s) 18.1 18.1 5.9 87.0 2.1 83.2
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.72 0.02 0.69
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 215 233 86 1329 31 1294
v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 c0.61 0.01 0.37
v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.03
v/c Ratio 0.18 0.19 0.57 0.85 0.42 0.54
Uniform Delay, d1 44.8 44.9 56.2 12.1 58.7 9.3
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 0.4 8.4 6.8 8.9 1.6
Delay (s) 46.6 45.3 64.6 18.8 67.6 11.0
Level of Service D D E B E B
Approach Delay (s) 46.6 45.3 20.8 12.0
Approach LOS D D C B
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 18.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.7 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.5% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 55 246 95 279 445 337 127 500 43 331 799 56
Future Volume (vph) 55 246 95 279 445 337 127 500 43 331 799 56
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1759 1787 1881 1599 1752 1815 1752 3451
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 1759 1787 1881 1599 1752 1815 1752 3451
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Adj. Flow (vph) 58 259 100 294 468 355 134 526 45 348 841 59
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 58 348 0 294 468 355 134 571 0 348 900 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 8 10 18
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 3 5
Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pt+ov Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 81 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s) 4.6 23.4 18.9 37.7 64.9 13.8 37.9 22.7 46.8
Effective Green, g (s) 4.6 23.4 18.9 37.7 64.9 13.8 37.9 22.7 46.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.19 0.16 0.31 0.54 0.11 0.31 0.19 0.39
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 66 340 279 586 858 199 568 328 1335
v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.20 c0.16 0.25 0.22 0.08 c0.31 c0.20 0.26
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio 0.88 1.02 1.05 0.80 0.41 0.67 1.01 1.06 0.67
Uniform Delay, d1 57.9 48.8 51.0 38.1 16.7 51.4 41.5 49.1 30.7
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 69.1 54.7 68.7 7.5 0.3 8.7 39.1 66.7 2.7
Delay (s) 127.0 103.5 119.7 45.6 17.0 60.1 80.6 115.8 33.5
Level of Service F F F D B E F F C
Approach Delay (s) 106.7 56.0 76.7 56.4
Approach LOS F E E E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 66.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service E
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.03
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.9 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.6% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 115 22 647 20 12 5 622 669 6 0 1372 6
Future Volume (vph) 115 22 647 20 12 5 622 669 6 0 1372 6
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 1599 1758 1752 3499 5032
Flt Permitted 0.78 1.00 0.82 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1458 1599 1479 1752 3499 5032
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 122 23 688 21 13 5 662 712 6 0 1460 6
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 145 682 0 35 0 662 718 0 0 1466 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 8 8
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 8 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Perm NA pt+ov Perm NA Prot NA NA
Protected Phases 4 45 8 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.7 71.3 18.7 48.1 92.3 39.7
Effective Green, g (s) 18.7 71.3 18.7 48.1 92.3 39.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.59 0.16 0.40 0.77 0.33
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 227 950 230 702 2691 1664
v/s Ratio Prot c0.43 c0.38 0.21 c0.29
v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.02
v/c Ratio 0.64 0.72 0.15 0.94 0.27 0.88
Uniform Delay, d1 47.5 17.2 43.8 34.6 4.0 37.9
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 5.8 2.6 0.3 21.1 0.2 7.1
Delay (s) 53.3 19.9 44.1 55.7 4.3 45.0
Level of Service D B D E A D
Approach Delay (s) 25.7 44.1 28.9 45.0
Approach LOS C D C D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 34.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.0% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 30 6 5 5 2 37 48 1034 58 13 675 7
Future Volume (vph) 30 6 5 5 2 37 48 1034 58 13 675 7
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.98 0.89 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.96 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1747 1581 1770 1844 1787 1878
Flt Permitted 0.79 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1439 1554 1770 1844 1787 1878
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Adj. Flow (vph) 31 6 5 5 2 38 49 1066 60 13 696 7
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 38 0 0 45 0 49 1125 0 13 703 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 6 6 3 3 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 11 4
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1%
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 5 2
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.1 18.1 5.9 87.0 2.1 83.2
Effective Green, g (s) 18.1 18.1 5.9 87.0 2.1 83.2
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.72 0.02 0.69
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 215 233 86 1329 31 1294
v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 c0.61 0.01 0.37
v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.03
v/c Ratio 0.18 0.19 0.57 0.85 0.42 0.54
Uniform Delay, d1 44.8 44.9 56.2 12.1 58.7 9.3
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 0.4 8.4 6.8 8.9 1.6
Delay (s) 46.6 45.3 64.6 18.8 67.6 11.0
Level of Service D D E B E B
Approach Delay (s) 46.6 45.3 20.8 12.0
Approach LOS D D C B
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 18.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.7 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.5% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 55 246 95 279 445 337 127 500 43 331 799 56
Future Volume (vph) 55 246 95 279 445 337 127 500 43 331 799 56
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1759 1787 1881 1599 1752 1815 1752 3451
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 1759 1787 1881 1599 1752 1815 1752 3451
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Adj. Flow (vph) 58 259 100 294 468 355 134 526 45 348 841 59
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 58 348 0 294 468 355 134 571 0 348 900 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 8 10 18
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 3 5
Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pt+ov Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 81 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s) 4.6 23.4 18.9 37.7 64.9 13.8 37.9 22.7 46.8
Effective Green, g (s) 4.6 23.4 18.9 37.7 64.9 13.8 37.9 22.7 46.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.19 0.16 0.31 0.54 0.11 0.31 0.19 0.39
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 66 340 279 586 858 199 568 328 1335
v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.20 c0.16 0.25 0.22 0.08 c0.31 c0.20 0.26
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio 0.88 1.02 1.05 0.80 0.41 0.67 1.01 1.06 0.67
Uniform Delay, d1 57.9 48.8 51.0 38.1 16.7 51.4 41.5 49.1 30.7
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 69.1 54.7 68.7 7.5 0.3 8.7 39.1 66.7 2.7
Delay (s) 127.0 103.5 119.7 45.6 17.0 60.1 80.6 115.8 33.5
Level of Service F F F D B E F F C
Approach Delay (s) 106.7 56.0 76.7 56.4
Approach LOS F E E E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 66.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service E
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.03
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.9 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.6% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 115 22 647 20 12 5 622 669 6 0 1372 6
Future Volume (vph) 115 22 647 20 12 5 622 669 6 0 1372 6
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 1599 1758 1752 3499 5032
Flt Permitted 0.78 1.00 0.82 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1458 1599 1479 1752 3499 5032
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 122 23 688 21 13 5 662 712 6 0 1460 6
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 145 682 0 35 0 662 718 0 0 1466 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 8 8
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 8 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Perm NA pt+ov Perm NA Prot NA NA
Protected Phases 4 45 8 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.7 71.3 18.7 48.1 92.3 39.7
Effective Green, g (s) 18.7 71.3 18.7 48.1 92.3 39.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.59 0.16 0.40 0.77 0.33
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 227 950 230 702 2691 1664
v/s Ratio Prot c0.43 c0.38 0.21 c0.29
v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.02
v/c Ratio 0.64 0.72 0.15 0.94 0.27 0.88
Uniform Delay, d1 47.5 17.2 43.8 34.6 4.0 37.9
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 5.8 2.6 0.3 21.1 0.2 7.1
Delay (s) 53.3 19.9 44.1 55.7 4.3 45.0
Level of Service D B D E A D
Approach Delay (s) 25.7 44.1 28.9 45.0
Approach LOS C D C D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 34.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.0% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 30 6 5 5 2 37 48 1034 58 13 675 7
Future Volume (vph) 30 6 5 5 2 37 48 1034 58 13 675 7
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.98 0.89 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.96 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1747 1581 1770 1844 1787 1878
Flt Permitted 0.79 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1439 1554 1770 1844 1787 1878
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Adj. Flow (vph) 31 6 5 5 2 38 49 1066 60 13 696 7
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 38 0 0 45 0 49 1125 0 13 703 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 6 6 3 3 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 11 4
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1%
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 5 2
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.1 18.1 5.9 87.0 2.1 83.2
Effective Green, g (s) 18.1 18.1 5.9 87.0 2.1 83.2
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.72 0.02 0.69
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 215 233 86 1329 31 1294
v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 c0.61 0.01 0.37
v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.03
v/c Ratio 0.18 0.19 0.57 0.85 0.42 0.54
Uniform Delay, d1 44.8 44.9 56.2 12.1 58.7 9.3
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 0.4 8.4 6.8 8.9 1.6
Delay (s) 46.6 45.3 64.6 18.8 67.6 11.0
Level of Service D D E B E B
Approach Delay (s) 46.6 45.3 20.8 12.0
Approach LOS D D C B
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 18.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.7 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.5% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 55 246 95 279 445 337 127 500 43 331 799 56
Future Volume (vph) 55 246 95 279 445 337 127 500 43 331 799 56
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1759 1787 1881 1599 1752 1815 1752 3451
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 1759 1787 1881 1599 1752 1815 1752 3451
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Adj. Flow (vph) 58 259 100 294 468 355 134 526 45 348 841 59
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 58 348 0 294 468 355 134 571 0 348 900 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 8 10 18
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 3 5
Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pt+ov Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 81 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s) 4.6 23.4 18.9 37.7 64.9 13.8 37.9 22.7 46.8
Effective Green, g (s) 4.6 23.4 18.9 37.7 64.9 13.8 37.9 22.7 46.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.19 0.16 0.31 0.54 0.11 0.31 0.19 0.39
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 66 340 279 586 858 199 568 328 1335
v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.20 c0.16 0.25 0.22 0.08 c0.31 c0.20 0.26
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio 0.88 1.02 1.05 0.80 0.41 0.67 1.01 1.06 0.67
Uniform Delay, d1 57.9 48.8 51.0 38.1 16.7 51.4 41.5 49.1 30.7
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 69.1 54.7 68.7 7.5 0.3 8.7 39.1 66.7 2.7
Delay (s) 127.0 103.5 119.7 45.6 17.0 60.1 80.6 115.8 33.5
Level of Service F F F D B E F F C
Approach Delay (s) 106.7 56.0 76.7 56.4
Approach LOS F E E E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 66.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service E
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.03
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.9 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.6% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 115 22 647 20 12 5 622 669 6 0 1372 6
Future Volume (vph) 115 22 647 20 12 5 622 669 6 0 1372 6
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 1599 1758 1752 3499 5032
Flt Permitted 0.78 1.00 0.82 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1458 1599 1479 1752 3499 5032
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 122 23 688 21 13 5 662 712 6 0 1460 6
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 145 682 0 35 0 662 718 0 0 1466 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 8 8
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 8 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Perm NA pt+ov Perm NA Prot NA NA
Protected Phases 4 45 8 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.7 71.3 18.7 48.1 92.3 39.7
Effective Green, g (s) 18.7 71.3 18.7 48.1 92.3 39.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.59 0.16 0.40 0.77 0.33
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 227 950 230 702 2691 1664
v/s Ratio Prot c0.43 c0.38 0.21 c0.29
v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.02
v/c Ratio 0.64 0.72 0.15 0.94 0.27 0.88
Uniform Delay, d1 47.5 17.2 43.8 34.6 4.0 37.9
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 5.8 2.6 0.3 21.1 0.2 7.1
Delay (s) 53.3 19.9 44.1 55.7 4.3 45.0
Level of Service D B D E A D
Approach Delay (s) 25.7 44.1 28.9 45.0
Approach LOS C D C D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 34.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.0% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 30 6 5 5 2 37 48 1034 58 13 675 7
Future Volume (vph) 30 6 5 5 2 37 48 1034 58 13 675 7
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.98 0.89 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.96 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1747 1581 1770 1844 1787 1878
Flt Permitted 0.79 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1439 1554 1770 1844 1787 1878
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Adj. Flow (vph) 31 6 5 5 2 38 49 1066 60 13 696 7
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 38 0 0 45 0 49 1125 0 13 703 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 6 6 3 3 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 11 4
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1%
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 5 2
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.1 18.1 5.9 87.0 2.1 83.2
Effective Green, g (s) 18.1 18.1 5.9 87.0 2.1 83.2
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.72 0.02 0.69
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 215 233 86 1329 31 1294
v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 c0.61 0.01 0.37
v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.03
v/c Ratio 0.18 0.19 0.57 0.85 0.42 0.54
Uniform Delay, d1 44.8 44.9 56.2 12.1 58.7 9.3
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 0.4 8.4 6.8 8.9 1.6
Delay (s) 46.6 45.3 64.6 18.8 67.6 11.0
Level of Service D D E B E B
Approach Delay (s) 46.6 45.3 20.8 12.0
Approach LOS D D C B
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 18.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.7 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.5% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 55 246 95 279 445 337 127 500 43 331 799 56
Future Volume (vph) 55 246 95 279 445 337 127 500 43 331 799 56
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1759 1787 1881 1599 1752 1815 1752 3451
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 1759 1787 1881 1599 1752 1815 1752 3451
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Adj. Flow (vph) 58 259 100 294 468 355 134 526 45 348 841 59
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 58 348 0 294 468 355 134 571 0 348 900 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 8 10 18
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 3 5
Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pt+ov Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 81 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s) 4.6 23.4 18.9 37.7 64.9 13.8 37.9 22.7 46.8
Effective Green, g (s) 4.6 23.4 18.9 37.7 64.9 13.8 37.9 22.7 46.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.19 0.16 0.31 0.54 0.11 0.31 0.19 0.39
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 66 340 279 586 858 199 568 328 1335
v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.20 c0.16 0.25 0.22 0.08 c0.31 c0.20 0.26
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio 0.88 1.02 1.05 0.80 0.41 0.67 1.01 1.06 0.67
Uniform Delay, d1 57.9 48.8 51.0 38.1 16.7 51.4 41.5 49.1 30.7
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 69.1 54.7 68.7 7.5 0.3 8.7 39.1 66.7 2.7
Delay (s) 127.0 103.5 119.7 45.6 17.0 60.1 80.6 115.8 33.5
Level of Service F F F D B E F F C
Approach Delay (s) 106.7 56.0 76.7 56.4
Approach LOS F E E E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 66.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service E
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.03
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.9 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.6% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 115 22 647 20 12 5 622 669 6 0 1372 6
Future Volume (vph) 115 22 647 20 12 5 622 669 6 0 1372 6
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 1599 1758 1752 3499 5032
Flt Permitted 0.78 1.00 0.82 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1458 1599 1479 1752 3499 5032
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 122 23 688 21 13 5 662 712 6 0 1460 6
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 145 682 0 35 0 662 718 0 0 1466 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 8 8
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 8 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Perm NA pt+ov Perm NA Prot NA NA
Protected Phases 4 45 8 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.7 71.3 18.7 48.1 92.3 39.7
Effective Green, g (s) 18.7 71.3 18.7 48.1 92.3 39.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.59 0.16 0.40 0.77 0.33
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 227 950 230 702 2691 1664
v/s Ratio Prot c0.43 c0.38 0.21 c0.29
v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.02
v/c Ratio 0.64 0.72 0.15 0.94 0.27 0.88
Uniform Delay, d1 47.5 17.2 43.8 34.6 4.0 37.9
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 5.8 2.6 0.3 21.1 0.2 7.1
Delay (s) 53.3 19.9 44.1 55.7 4.3 45.0
Level of Service D B D E A D
Approach Delay (s) 25.7 44.1 28.9 45.0
Approach LOS C D C D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 34.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.0% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 30 6 5 5 2 33 44 1039 58 13 679 7
Future Volume (vph) 30 6 5 5 2 33 44 1039 58 13 679 7
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 0.98 0.89 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.96 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1747 1584 1770 1844 1787 1878
Flt Permitted 0.80 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1443 1554 1770 1844 1787 1878
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97
Adj. Flow (vph) 31 6 5 5 2 34 45 1071 60 13 700 7
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 38 0 0 41 0 45 1130 0 13 707 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 6 6 3 3 4
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 11 4
Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1%
Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 4 8 1 6 5 2
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.1 18.1 5.8 87.0 2.1 83.3
Effective Green, g (s) 18.1 18.1 5.8 87.0 2.1 83.3
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.05 0.72 0.02 0.69
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 216 233 85 1329 31 1296
v/s Ratio Prot c0.03 c0.61 0.01 0.38
v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 c0.03
v/c Ratio 0.17 0.18 0.53 0.85 0.42 0.55
Uniform Delay, d1 44.8 44.8 56.1 12.1 58.7 9.3
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 0.4 5.8 7.0 8.9 1.7
Delay (s) 46.5 45.2 62.0 19.1 67.6 10.9
Level of Service D D E B E B
Approach Delay (s) 46.5 45.2 20.7 12.0
Approach LOS D D C B
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 18.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service B
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.7 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.7% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 55 246 95 279 445 341 127 500 43 336 799 56
Future Volume (vph) 55 246 95 279 445 341 127 500 43 336 799 56
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99
Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1752 1759 1787 1881 1599 1752 1815 1752 3451
Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1752 1759 1787 1881 1599 1752 1815 1752 3451
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Adj. Flow (vph) 58 259 100 294 468 359 134 526 45 354 841 59
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 58 348 0 294 468 359 134 571 0 354 900 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 8 10 18
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 3 5
Heavy Vehicles (%) 3% 3% 3% 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pt+ov Prot NA Prot NA
Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 81 5 2 1 6
Permitted Phases
Actuated Green, G (s) 4.6 23.4 18.9 37.7 64.9 13.8 37.9 22.7 46.8
Effective Green, g (s) 4.6 23.4 18.9 37.7 64.9 13.8 37.9 22.7 46.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.19 0.16 0.31 0.54 0.11 0.31 0.19 0.39
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 66 340 279 586 858 199 568 328 1335
v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.20 c0.16 0.25 0.22 0.08 c0.31 c0.20 0.26
v/s Ratio Perm
v/c Ratio 0.88 1.02 1.05 0.80 0.42 0.67 1.01 1.08 0.67
Uniform Delay, d1 57.9 48.8 51.0 38.1 16.7 51.4 41.5 49.1 30.7
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 69.1 54.7 68.7 7.5 0.3 8.7 39.1 72.5 2.7
Delay (s) 127.0 103.5 119.7 45.6 17.1 60.1 80.6 121.6 33.5
Level of Service F F F D B E F F C
Approach Delay (s) 106.7 55.9 76.7 58.3
Approach LOS F E E E
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 67.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service E
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.03
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.9 Sum of lost time (s) 18.0
Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.9% ICU Level of Service F
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (vph) 115 22 647 20 12 5 622 669 6 0 1372 6
Future Volume (vph) 115 22 647 20 12 5 622 669 6 0 1372 6
Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91
Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Frt 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00
Flt Protected 0.96 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (prot) 1805 1599 1758 1752 3499 5032
Flt Permitted 0.78 1.00 0.82 0.95 1.00 1.00
Satd. Flow (perm) 1458 1599 1479 1752 3499 5032
Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94
Adj. Flow (vph) 122 23 688 21 13 5 662 712 6 0 1460 6
RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 6 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 145 682 0 35 0 662 718 0 0 1466 0
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 3 8 8
Confl. Bikes (#/hr) 1 8 1
Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%
Turn Type Perm NA pt+ov Perm NA Prot NA NA
Protected Phases 4 45 8 5 2 6
Permitted Phases 4 8
Actuated Green, G (s) 18.7 71.3 18.7 48.1 92.3 39.7
Effective Green, g (s) 18.7 71.3 18.7 48.1 92.3 39.7
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.59 0.16 0.40 0.77 0.33
Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Lane Grp Cap (vph) 227 950 230 702 2691 1664
v/s Ratio Prot c0.43 c0.38 0.21 c0.29
v/s Ratio Perm 0.10 0.02
v/c Ratio 0.64 0.72 0.15 0.94 0.27 0.88
Uniform Delay, d1 47.5 17.2 43.8 34.6 4.0 37.9
Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Incremental Delay, d2 5.8 2.6 0.3 21.1 0.2 7.1
Delay (s) 53.3 19.9 44.1 55.7 4.3 45.0
Level of Service D B D E A D
Approach Delay (s) 25.7 44.1 28.9 45.0
Approach LOS C D C D
Intersection Summary
HCM 2000 Control Delay 34.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C
HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89
Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 13.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.0% ICU Level of Service E
Analysis Period (min) 15
c Critical Lane Group
WEEKDAY