CEIVED 03/26/2013 10:04 RE 8/26/13 TUE 09:05 FAX Go4B090Sz0 COURT FILE NUMBER courT LOCATION / JUDICIAL CENTRE APPLICANT DOCUMENT Name: Address: Phone: ADDRESS FOR SERVICE AND CONTACT INFORMATION OF PARTY FILING THIS DOCUMENT File Now: For Court Office use only: 4032975294 COURT OF APREAL ‘BKEMPO.ESG Booz Court of Appeal of Alberta Calgary Brad Kempo Application for Fee Waiver’ and Statement of Finances" Brad Kempo 914 - 950 Drake Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6z 289 (Home) 604-609-0520 (Work) N/A Brad Kempo, 914 - 950 Drake Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6z 2B9 Statement reviewed and fee reduction: Approved Filing Fee reduced to: Approved - redulod ty $aco2° Narcln 20(2013 Denied, because; Se Be 1, Brad Kempo, declare that: 1. Lam; — Married ~ living In an adult X single It interdependent relationship — living common taw09/26/13, TUE RECEIVED 09/26/2013 19:04 4032975254 COURT OF APPEAL 9:09 FAX 6048090520 BKEMPO.ESQ 2. I support and maintain: — Children under 18: N/A — Other dependants (specify): N/A 3. Listed below is an accurate statement of finances for my household, which includes all income received in my household during approximately the Past three and three-quarter months, from December 1, 2012 to March 23, 2013, Gross Income from All Sources for Three Month Period (Before income taxes, and other mandatory deductions) Description Amount Employment $0 Workers Compensation / Disability Pension $0 Social Assistance (Support for independence) $0 Maintenance $0 Income from children (if any) / Child Tax Credit $0 Rental Income $0 Investment Income $0 Other (specify): GST rebate $146.25 Gross income of spouse / common law partner / adult interdependent partner living with me SNA TOTAL GROSS INCOME for Three Month Period $146.25 Average Gross Monthly Family Income $48.75 4. Additional financial information 1 believe is relevant is Exhibit "A", which comprises the following: (a) Proof of having obtained indigent status in the Federal Court of Canada in July 2002; (2) Proof of having obtained indigent status in the Supreme Court of (c) British Columbia in June 2003; A copy of an affidavit sworn on February 7, 2013 pursuant to seeking indigent status in the Supreme Court of British Columbia. Exhibit "C” ‘therein is portions of my successful indigent status BoosRECELVED 93/26/2013 18:04 4032975294 COURT OF APPEAL, 03/26/18 TUE 09:03 FAT 6046090820 BKENPO. ESQ, oor application filed in the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta in November 2011, 5. [ state the following in paragraph 12 of the affidavit sworn February 7, 2013: My necessities of life throughout the 1990s and 2000s were and continue to this day to be exclusively paid for by my lawful mother, Wallis Kempo, except where funded on occasion by social assistance in the 1990s and up to but never after July 2004, She continues to provide sald necessities but refuses to provide money for anything else. Occasionally she gives me $50.00 for spending money. 6. Attached hereto and marked Exhibit “B” is my Income Tax Return for the year 2012. It, like other returns herein, identifies “income”. Not having had any means of personal support and yet living in the way that she provides for two decades left me feeling vulnerable to government malfeasance as presented herein; so I arbitrarily identified income as representative of a small portion of the approximately $20,000 she annually spends on my housing, food and utilities. No income in the conventional sense, i.e., from employment, investments, etc., was earned. 7. The only time during the last quarter century I've had conventional and taxable income was when I practiced law in Edmonton, Alberta, from October 1990 until January 1993 and in 2000 and 2001 when I was employed by the market research firm Hampton Financial Partners Inc. and Milan Uzelac Law Offices, both situate in Vancouver, British Columbia, For a few months in 2001 1 was commissioned by a British Columbia licensed lawyer to update his academic publication. 8. The litigation referenced in paragraph 4(a) sought damages for multi- agency, i.e. systemic, unlawfulness, abuses of power and human rights violations (hereinafter “malfeasance”) that commenced in the late 1980sRECEIVED 03/26/2013 10:04 4932975294 COURT OF APPEAL, 09/26/18 TUE 09:04 FAX 6046090520 BKEMPO.ES@ oos and which continue to this day. As a direct result of what was pled in the Federal Court Statement of Claim (and as amended in March 2003) and after the Defendant, Government of Canada, claimed national security privilege during the production of documents phase, plus being subject to what I reasonably and verily believed was judicial bias adversely compromising motions filed therein, 1 conducted academic research. It commenced in March 2004; with substantial findings being made in December 2004 and when it concluded in May 2007. What was discovered both politically and geo-politically answered the question why was I, a then practicing member of the Alberta Bar, the lawful son of a federal judge and lawful nephew of a Senator, subject to the pled malfeasance and judicial bias. 2 I verity believe it is unreasonable, inappropriate and unjust I should have to pay any court costs to file the within appeal because my impoverishment now and since the early 1990s Is and was a direct result of government malfeasance on the federal and provincial levels. 10. Academic research (Submission 1 herein) demonstrates the true nature of Canadian governance and the conditions and antecedents for the said malfeasance. It comprises 52 pages and being voluminous it is cost prohibitive to print out and provide hard copy of same in the within application; and so it’s posted in the Word Doc format at http://qb- ca.weebly.com. 11. Said Submission was introduced and accepted into the Court record by Jeffery J. in the hearing below now being appealed as rebuttal to what the Applicants (proposed appeal Respondents) submitted. Submission 2 was also accepted into the Court record for the same reason. It is 33RECEIVED 03/26/2013 10:04 4032975294 COURT OF APPEAL 03/26/13 TUE 09:04 FAX 6046090520 ‘BKEWPO. ES Boo pages and because it is voluminous and cost prohibitive to print out and provide in hard copy form, it is also posted in the Word Doc format at http://qb-ca.weebly.com. 12. Submissions 1 and 2 constitute more and exceptionally compelling evidence and information why I am and have been impecunious since the early 1990s with the exception of 2000 and 2001. 13. Submission 2, inter alia, documents the steps taken in the Federal Court lawsuit and the results of various motions filed therein. Throughout the entire litigation not once did the Defendant seek to cross-examine me on the merits with respect to any of the many affidavits filed pursuant to seeking pre-trial relief, As a direct consequence the credibility of my allegations of malfeasance were never challenged and my sald Credibility survived the pre-Examination for Discovery dismissal of the case: paragraphs 21 - 25, 14. In Submission 2 the following paragraphs are from personal knowledge: 1-4; 6-7; 10-12; 15-20; 22-23; 26-28; 32; 35-36; 38-39; 45; 48; 50- 53; 55 (sentences 5 & 6); 56-59; 61-64. The following paragraphs are ‘on information and belief: all direct and indirect references to the "R&D"; 5; 8-9; 21; 24-25; 29-31; 33-34; 44; 49; 65. What is not included in this list comprises legal and academic sources and argument, public domain information and credibility unchallenged pled facts. 15. The following paragraphs of Submission 3 are from personal knowledge: 4; 6; 7 (sentence 3); 9 (sentence 3); 10; 13-14; 16; 21-28; Appendix 1; 29; 30-45; 47-52. The following paragraphs are on Information andRECEIVED 03/26/2013 10:04 4932875284 ‘COURT OF APPEAL 03/26/19 TUE 09:04 FAX 6016000520. BKEMPO.ES@ 16, a. belief: all direct and indirect references to the "R&D"; 7; 8-9; 15; 16; 46. What is not included in this list comprises legal and academic sources and argument, public domain information and credibility unchallenged pled facts, In Submission 4 the following paragraphs are from personal knowledge: 1-4; 5 (sentences 2-3); 6; 8 (sentence 1); 9; Appendix 2; 16-17; 18 (sentences 3 & 4); 19 (sentences 3-5); 25-26; 28-29; 31- 33 (sentences 1, 2 & 4); 34 (sentence 2 et seq.); 35-42; 43 (sentence 2 et Seq.); 45-59; 60 (sentence 3 et seq.); 61; 63-66; 68-69; 71-72; 81-8 87-88 (photos); 89; 90; 91 (second half of sentence); 92-102; 104- 106; 107 (report); 108; 109 (“wig” & “confessed” facts); 110; 117; 118; 120 (“incarcerate” facts); 122 (“abandon", “gasoline” and “committal” facts); 124 ("seeking and “intercede” facts); 125 (*lawsuit” and “ruled” facts); 128 (and photos); 129, The following paragraphs are on information and belief: all direct and indirect references to the "R&D"; 5 (Sentences 1 & 4); 8 (sentence 2); 10-11; 15; 18 (sentence 1 & last half of 6); 21-24; 27; 30; 33 (sentence 3); 44; 60; 67; 70 (Sentence 1-3); 74-80; 87; 91; 110: (last sentence); 120; 122 (instructed” facts); 124 (“instructed” and “RCMP” facts); 127; 130. What is not included In this list comprises legal and academic sources and argument, public domain information and credibility unchallenged pled facts, Submissions 1 - 4 are excerpts from a publication, the authorship of which commenced mid-August 2012 and concluded on November 24, 2012. Self-published as an eBook and marketed exclusively in the United States, it Is posted at http://worst-nightmare.com/contents. pdf. Submission 1 herein is Addendum 1, Submission 2 is Addendum 2.RECEIVED 03/26/2013 10:04 4032975294 COLRT OF APPEAL, 09/26/18 TUE 09:05 FA 6046090520 BKEMPO ESQ) Boos Submission 3 is Chapter 1, And Submission 4 is Chapter 2. There has been only one purchase of $24.95 to date, all of which went to my business partner to cover domain name registration and pursuant to the 95-5% contractual split of gross proceeds. 18. I am unable proceed with the proposed appeal, which I verily believe is meritorious, if the fee isn’t waived completely. I solemnly declare that the above information is correct. T make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing it to be true and kngwing it Is of the same force and effect as if made under oath. Signature of Declarant Declared before me at Vancouver, British Columbia this 23 day of March, 2013. 4, CHRISTOPHER MEYER < we > ‘WATSON GOEPEL LLP i and Solicitor Commissioner for Taking Affidavits in the Vanco TEM: Seria Steet Province of British Columbia Te 604-888-195: Canc g eae Application for Fee Waiver: Arguments and Authorities 1. The Applicant seeks a full waiver of the $600 fee to file an appeal of the decision of Jeffery J., dated March 15, 2013. The matter to which the appeal being sought relates was a successful motion by the Applicants (proposed appeal Respondents) striking the Statement of Claim. 2. The Affidavit in support of the within Application attests to having not just been impecunious for the last three months, but living in poverty back to the early 1990s (with small exception in 2000 and 2001). Instead ofRECEIVED 03/26/2013 10:04 4032975294 COLRT OF APPEAL 5/26/13 TUE 09:08 FAX 6046090520 BKEMPO.ES@ having practiced law as he was trained and licensed to do since his call to. the Alberta Bar in September 1990, he was a victim of egregious, systemic malfeasance by the federal and provincial governments that led to him being impoverished in perpetuity. His only financial support has been welfare (1993 - 2004, except 200 and 2001) and family resources that only provide for the necessities of life. 3. Indigent status has been granted three times in the past: July 2002 (Federal Court), June 2003 (B.C. Supreme Court) and November 2011 (Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta). 4. The law related to granting indigent status in Alberta is stated in Toronto Dominion Bank v, Beaton, 2012 ABQB 125 (CanLII): 33 Historically, where an individual was indigent and was unable to pay the costs of bringing an action, the individual could proceed in forma pauperis, or “in the manner of an indigent who is permitted to disregard filing fees and court costs". (Black's Law Dictionary, 7th ed. s.v. “In forma pauperis"), 1 41 Before leaving [Pearson v. Canada 2000 CanLII 16218 (FC)], we note that Muldoon J. canvassed the evidentiary requirements that would allow for a waiver of the fees prescribed in the Federal Court and permit Mr. Pearson to proceed in forma pauperis. [...] We take from both Pearson and Spatling that the evidentiary burden necessary to trigger relief in proceedings in forma pauperis is a high one. It is not ‘met in this case for two reasons. First, Mr. Polewsky implies that he has Income from time to time from other sources. (1 43 Prothonotary Hargrave also noted at para. 9 that the federal Crown had pointed out that "financial difficulties do not necessarily equal an indigent status, that is a person of scant means and all the more so does not necessarily constitute that a person Is a pauper, that is a person without any means.” oooRECEIVED 63/26/2613 18:84 4832975234 COURT OF APPEAL 03/20/13 TUE 09:05 FAX 6046090520 BKEMPO. ESQ. 5. The test per the cited case distinguishes between “financial difficulties” and “a pauper”, i. deposed to having been deemed the latter on three occasions. And his financial circumstances have not changed since the first time he was granted said status on July 15, 2002 by Campbell J. of the Federal Court of Canada. .. “a person without any means”. The Applicant has 6. Relevant for consideration is what the mode of impoverishment has been. The facts in the case law are to be distinguished from pro-active government malfeasance that has as its objective to cause impecuniosity, i.e., living at the bottom of the economic ladder, and to ensure that condition in perpetuity. The Applicant deposes to having been compelled by government action into severe poverty for two full decades. 7. For the government to seek a filing fee to pursue remedies for its abhorrent conduct in a court of law is contrary to the principles of justice. The State ought not be allowed to benefit from misconduct that by its very nature prevents access to the justice system. 8. Having not once been cross-examined on the Applicant’s plethora of affidavit evidence in the Federal Court lawsuit, legally no one, including assessors of the within application, may substitute their opinions, beliefs and doubts for what was alleged as pled since credibility was never questioned by the Defendant (Submission 2). The veracity of the allegations and the evidence submitted to support th motions survived the dismissal of the lawsuit and are unchallengeable oroRECEIVED 93/26/2013 10:84 4032375294 COURT OF APPEAL 93/26/13 TUE 09:08 FAX 6046000520 ‘BKENPO.ES@ ‘This fo Exnibie A *roferrad to in the affidavit of. Ashe. J. CHRISTOPHER MEYER Warne soe Ln the Supreme Court of British Columbia 1700. 1075 W. Georgia Street VorBelwepmc. VBE 3Co Tok: 604-688-1901 For: 604 888-810 Brad Kempo Petitioner and Information and Privacy Commissioner of British Columbia Respondent AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF INDIGENT APPLICATION |, Brad Kempo of 914 - 950 Drake Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia V6z 289 Unemployed SWEAR (OR AFFIRM) THAT: 1. lam the Petitioner in this proceeding, 2 I make this affidavit in support of my application for an order that | be declared indigent with respect to the payment of fees set out in Schedule 1 of Appendix C of the Supreme Court Civil Rules. 3. Lam 64 years old, 4. [have no dependents, 5. On July 18, 2002 | was granted indigent status by Order by the Honourable Mr. Justice Campbell of the Federal Court of Canada (Court File #1-1114-02). Annexed hereto is Exhioit "A", the seriginal cover letter trom the Court Clerk ‘garding sald Order, a copy of whe ig Exhibit 6. On une 9, 2003 | was granted indigent status by Order of the Supreme Coutt of British Columbia (Court File #8023809). Annexed hereto is Exhibit “B", a copy of said Order, jouwRECEIVED 03/26/2013 18:24 4032975294 COLRT OF APPEAL 93/26/13 TUE 09:08 Fax 6046090820 BKEMPO.E5Q) DECLARED AND AFFIRMED BEFORE ME at Vancouver British Columbia on February 7, 2013, tor British Columbia On November 30, 2011 | was granted indigent status by the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Court File #1110-01922). Annoxed hereto is Exhibit “C, comprising Court Registry documentation of same and a copy of the Affidavit tiled to obtain said reli. My financial circumstances have not changed in any material way since swearing said Affidavit. Annexed hereto is Exhibit “D" is my financial statement, Annexed hereto is Exhibit “E* is an accurate description of my educational and ‘employment history. 114, Annexed hereto is Exhibit 4B" is & copy of the document | seok to file and with which I intend to proceed, ‘12, My necessities of life throughout the 1890s and 2000s were and continue to this day to be exclusively paid for by my lawful mother, Wallis Kempo, except where funded on occasion by social assistance in the 1990s and up to bul never after uly 2004. "She continues to provide said necessities but refuses to provide money for anything else, Occasionally she gives me $50.00 for spending money. 18. 1 do not have, nor in the foreseeable future will | have funds to pay court fees; nor ‘am | able to raise money to pay sald fees Issioner for taking Affidavits ) ) ) oe ) ) J. CHRISTOPHER MEYER WATSON GOEPEL LLP Barrister and Solicitor 17001075 W. Georgie Steet Vancouver, 8.C. V8E3C8 Tol 604.688.1301 Far: 604.688.8199 GoreRECELVED 03/26/2013 99/26/13 TUE 09:08 FAX 6046000820, Hedecal Comrt of Canada This is Exhibit" referrad tu in the: attic on. ee Ae Be Yor Brien Columba Mr. Brad Kempo 914 - 950 Drake Avenue Vancouver, B.C. V67. 289 Dear Mr. Kempo: | Re: 7-1114.02 re terreg (Bee 10:84 4032975294 COURT OF APPEAL ois BKEMPO. ES Gour fédérate du Canada 0.x 104s 701 W. Geagin Se - 38, Vaneoaie, 8. vivine July 17, 2002 Brad Kempo v. Attorney General of Canada See ECE EEE Enclosed please find certified copies of the Orders, dated the 15 day of July, Di/mp Enclosures Noe 2002, signed by Mr. Justice Campbell with respect to the above matter, Senior Registry Officer ‘rai in 0 Oil Langs tal fal ein, deta utes eda ay ess en fe ied ye Coan ae suc io fi gg ett ol duel noe So ncn nly oe ft ol nae, cey be vena the ode agen oe ae rest when sani ‘Seafarers jue rc es ay ren sete ds ou (eas et des gus eras i ese goa linge fst tes ieee en gees ps he, ep el vena ds ate roe ion wate ht ADDRESS ALL. COMMUNICATIONS TO THE ADMINISTRATON — ADAESSER TOUTE CORRESFONDANCE A ADMINISTRATEURRECEIVED 03/26/2013 18:84 4932975294 COURT OF APPEAL 09/26/13 TUE 09:06 FAX 6049090820 BKENPO. E50) ou I : | AS [ Borders! Cun Srelion dv preiisre tysimier d FN ote a — Date: 20020715 | Docket: T-1114-02 J Vancouver, British Columbia, Monday, the 15" day of July, 2002 | PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CAMPBELL | BETWEEN: | BRAD KEMPO Plaintiff | ~and - : ATTORNEY GENERAL OF GANADA Defendant ORDER With respect to the Plaintiff's motion that the Plaintiff is unable to pay the filing fee of the statement of claim herein because he is without sufficient funds, and a confidentiality order with respect to the Plaintif’s identity should be made; as no objection is made by the Defendant heroin to the relief requested; | hereby order as follows: (1) [grant the Plaintiff's impecuniosity application to relieve the Plaintif from the payment of the filing fee for the statement of claim tendered, and any otherRECEIVED 03/26/2013 10:04 402975294 COURT OF APFEAL 93/26/13 TUE 09:07 FAK 6046090820. BKEMPO ESQ) (2) ay Page: 2 filing fee for interlocutory matters on the condition that, should the Plaintiff's economic situation improve, the Plaintiff will abandon the roliof granted. To gain relief from the payment of fling feos after the action is commenced, the Plaintiff agrees to provide to the Defendant's counsel in affidavit form a statement of income and expenses, and the Defendant is at liberty to ask for the direction of the Court to require the Plaintiffto abandon the relief granted, should the economic facts warrant. It is understood and agreed by the Plaintiff that the impecuniosity relief granted hereby does not extend to paymentof costs which might be awarded by a Justice or a Prothonotary of this Court. With resect to confidentiality, | order that the Plaintiff's identity be protected from media enquiries and those of non-parties to this action, ‘hereby direct that the Registry keep separate files in this matter: one file to contain all information and to be kept confidential as ordered, and the second file to contain duplicate documents supplied by the parties which do not contain information respecting the Plaintiffs identity. also direct that the duplicate file note the Plaintiff as "Mark Doe” and, by ‘agreement between the Plaintiff and Defendant, the Defendant is the Attorney General of Canada and will be noted in both sets of files. ousB El p [ B I i i I I | | | | | RECEIVED 3/26/2613 10:04 03/26/13 TUE 09:07 FAX 6046000520 4032975234 BKEMPO. ESQ COURT OF APPEAL Page: 3 I make no order as to costs with respect to this motion and order that no filing fee be paid on this motion, APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: 1d.) “B. Kem Brad Kempo (Sad,) "Glenn Rosenfeld” Glenn Rosenfeld 1 HEREBY CERTIFY that tha aoove document ta ‘rao copy of the origina fled of record inthe Registry a me aca oe of Dateo his. day of. ay AD. 20 (Sgd.) “Douglas R. Campbell” JUDGE oreRECEIVED 93/26/2013 10:84 4037375294 COURT OF APPEAL 93/26/13 TUE 09:07 FAX 6046090520 BKEMPO.ES@ oir P- ExhibiLZ? * raterred to in the ‘Sunnie tbuer or BRITISH COLMEIA SEAL VANCOUVER REGISTRY sian (or veklng Ailidavits tor British Con STER OF THE COURT Ng. Shd $s Le ny Registry IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA IN THE MATTER OF THE SUMMARY APPLICATION WITH RESPECT TO THE INDIGENCY OF BETWEEN: Brod Kenpo NO: Cah A asso PRAECIPE PETITIONERYPLAINTIFF RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT REQUIRED: ‘An Order pursuant to B.C, REGULATION 22190 that ‘he PlaintifPetitioner, be declared indigent with respect to the fees set forth in Appendix C, Schedule 1, of the Rules of Court, as they apply to this application and the within proceedings. Date: wap E Ne Ge [ ao aya /ER ay FRITS] 5 PcRECEIVED 03/26/2013 10:04 4032975294 COLRT OF APPEAL 03/26/13 TUE 09:07 FAX 6046090520 BKEMPO. ESQ. @ois Canade Revenue Agence du revend NOTICE OF AgGESEMENT 2 Bel is a'canage ae nia ° [Baie a ‘Social rourenceno | Taxyeat | Taxcenio Itay 7, 2009 | BRADLEY JOHN KENPO 627 152 044 | 2008 | surrey sc var set 340720116727 ‘Summary fine ee ee (2 i pemoription 9)! 2 hawt 150 Total income . i beeeeee 3,600 Deductions from total income ... a sees 4 236 Met income ...........see008 sees 3,596 260 Taxable income ..... . 3,596 350 Total federal non-refundable .. 1,440 tax credits 6150 Total British Columbia ,... deweeeee 465 non-refundable tax credits 420 Net federal tax .......cseeeeceneeeees 0.00 421 CPP contributions payable ...........- 9.90 9.90 435 437 Total payable . British Columbia sales tax credi® Total income tax deducted .. Thin Jy Exhibits “referred to IONE e KGiacbe frigavit oF Ss eon before me aaaeserise 75.00 02. 479 Total British Columbia tax .... .thiecterday, Xe 75.00 credits 482 Total credits ........605 75.00 (Total payable minus Total credits) (65.10) Balance from this assessment = €R 65.10 wee 3 wom ater Comme a 2009 RRSP Deduction Limit Statement ‘Your RRSP deduction limit for 2009 (amount A) is the maximum amount you can deduet on your 2009 return for contibutions you made to an RASP afer 1990 and betore March 2, 2010, This deduction limit ‘apples to contributions to your RRSP or fo an RSP for your spouse or common-law partner for which we hhave not previously allowed you & deduction. In addition: ‘© The maximum amount you can deduct is over and above any deductions you ean claim for allowable transfers to an RRSP. '* it you turn 74 during 2009, you can only contribute to your RSP unti!tio ond of 2003, ‘lf Your spouse or common-law partner turns 7% durin 2008, you can only contribute to his or her RRSP unt the end of 2009, Your pension adjustment, past service pension agjustment, and pansion adjustment reversal are amounts your employer or pansion administrator ‘calculated. For more information, see your employer (or pension administrator, Your unused RRSP contributions (amount B) available for 2009 ara RRSP contributions that you ‘could not deduct or which you chose not to deduct on a prior year return. Report these contibutions on line 1 of your 2009 Schedule 7. You can cary forward this amount and use @ as a deduction on a future return up, {o your RRSP deduction limit for that year. your unused AASP contributions available for 2009 plus any contributions you make during 2009 are ‘greater than your 2009 RRSP deduction imi, you may have to pay a tax on the amount over $2,000,RECEIVED 03/26/2013 19:04 ‘BKEMPO.ES@ ois 93/20/13 TUE 09:08 FAX 6046090520 Canada Revenue Agence du tevenu ‘Agency Canada 4032975234 COURT OF APPEAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT 2 7452 8 (10) Insc is leceier acters s[erasren||scs [ace ee at clean: sina 150 Total income 3,500 236 wee tacos = 3.500 260 Taxable income . 3,500 350 Total federal non-refundable . : aecenn 1,548 non-refundable tax credits 435 Total payable . se neeeee saereee 0.00 437 Total income tax deducted ........ bees 0.00 British Columbia sales tax credit . os 75.00 479 sgh Britian colo es ls 25.00 (Total payabte minus total eregita) (75.00) Balance from thie assessment seeeee cR 75.00 nda UroteatacPnecton ommsioner ot Ravens ‘Your 2010 RRSP Deduction Limit Statement RRSP deduction timit for 2010 - Amount (A) is. {he maximum amount you can deduct on your 2010 return for: © Your unused RRSP contributions (amount B) that are available for 2010; and, ‘= ASP contibutions you make from March 2, 2010, to March 1, 2011, Note that this maximum amount that you can deduct is ver and abave any deduction you ean claim for ‘certain eligible income that you transfer to an RRSP. Unused RRSP contributions - Amount (8) is your unused RRSP contributions at the end of 2009 that are available for 2010. You elthar could net deduct “this amount, or you chase not to deduction prior year retum. Report amount (B) on line 1 of your 2010 Schedule 7. ‘Tax on RRSP excess contributions - You may have to ay a tax of 1% oer month on RASP excess contributions it your unused RASP contributions (amount B) plus any ‘additional contributions you may make trom March 2, 2010, fo December 31, 2010, exceed your RRSP deduction mit for 2010 (amount A), you have RRSP excess contributions, refer to “Tax on RASP excess contibutions* ‘in Chapter 2 of the Guide T4040, ARSPs and Other Registered Plans for Retirement Additional information - For more information about RASPS, ineluding how we determine your RRSP deduction limit, see Guide T4040, RASS ‘and Other Plans for Retirement.| 09/28/13 TUE 00:08 FAK BOL0000820 *Steypdoeag =e BEL Sere even Annee au revena NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT ste} 3 Bae rie a [May 8, 2011 [RADLEY JOHN KEMPO 1627 152.044 | 2010 |Sumrey BC _vaT 5E1 ‘Summary ora ‘Line § " $ Amount 150 Total income ... a 5,800 Deductions from total income ... 113 236 Net ancome .......... 000. ee 5,687 260 Taxable income ... ‘ Names 5,687 350 Total federal non-refundable .... ie 1,874 tax credits 6150 Tota} British Columbia . eee aie seat 562 non-refundable tax eredi 420 Net federal tax Seiee cetera cate 0.00 421 CPP contributions payable 227.70 435 Total payable .... diets aia ca 227.70 437 Total income tax deducted 2.2... .....e.cceeeeeeeeeeees 0.00 482 Total credits ........ eee 0.00 (Total payable minus Total credits) é 227.70 Balance from this assessment ...........0....222......DR 227.70 Balance due . a 227.70 Il und Leote-MacPrereon Commoner of evensRECEIVED 93/26/2013 10:04 4032975234 COURT OF APPEAL 08/28/13 TUE 09:09 FAX BosG090520 BKEMPO.ESQ oar Canada aula ‘Selecteer ah 2009 27 wuee a7 a 1c BRADLEY JOHN. KRKPO ae) 116271 C/O ANCHOR POENT HO 1 vou. 289 + Lazare GOODS AND SERVICES TAX (GST) CREDIT BRITISH Canadit — sctowmcomecrmare ‘ACTION TAX CREDIT AND AC HST CREDIT COLUMBIA 2G fects nah ] Seat sn one — BRADLEY JOHN KENPO 27 152084 €/o ANCHOR POINT? No 1 Traxcenre 514-950 Deak 8p ‘VANCOUVER BC. reset 0) Verse 1-800-959-1953 “Gyo Er The BC HOT credit is an initiative which ie fully funded by the Province of British Columbia. The BC Low Income Climate Action tax credit iz an initiative which is fully funded by the Province of British Columbia. cst/HsT credit 462.50 BC Climate Action tax create $26.25 BC He? credit Cheque attachea $146.25 ‘This te Extipit@ “referred to in the amiga of See ec sor before me eee thie 2 day of-rece= ——— “or raking Affidavits 1 Comm nik otunbie ie aoe ‘The Honourabi Con Hansen Unda Liza MaePheraon trl FranceRECEIVED 83/26/2013 18:04 4032975294 COURT OF APPEAL 93/26/13 TUE 09:00 FAX eose090820 BRENPO.ESQ Goze BME Gerses rove gence du rovenu NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT est 6 (9) tu Canada 2 Mar 7, 2013 _[orao.ey Keno 627 189 04a | 2012 Surey BC__V3T 5E1 J ‘Summary ose Line Description $ Amount 180 Total income . a 5,800 Deductions from total income ae 113 236 Net income .............., 5,687 260 Taxable income . weet E 5,687 380 Total federal non-refundable 1,640 tax cradite 6150 Total British Columbia... 580 non-refundable tax credits 420 Net federal tex ..........,, sate 0.00 421 CPP contributions payable ...,, : 227.70 435 Total payable stints raeereneerseceeorssnassees 227.70 437 Total income tax deducted . Sarees 0.00 482 Total credits .... eels 0.00 (Total payable minus Total credits) 227.70 Balance from this assessment .... + ssDR 227.70 Previous account balance ..... 257.71 Balance due ..... # setae ecide 485.41 "referred to I barley ne ferred so 19 sue affidavit of ‘worn before me. eas, CHRISTOPHER MEYER 7. WATSON GOEPEL LLP imcey ot Arson COReEL - aE 7u0-1078W. Geo Sine rm Incouver, B.C. VBE 3 ‘or British Columbia oo Feces on ACor Date are Soeaetanae Forgan [Tareas Mar?, 2013 | BRADLEY J KEMPO 627 152044 2012 |Sureypc var set Your 2013 RRSP Deduction Limit Statement ‘The back ots noe contains impotantntrmaton, Aneun make wih an astra (ean les han zor RSP deduction limit for 2012... , : + $10,155 ‘Minus: Allowable RRSP contributions deducted for 2012. + ponents Unused RRSP deduction iit at the end of 2012 . , ea 910,155 Plus: 18% of 20:2 eared income of $5, 800 ~ (max. $29,620) $2,044 Minus: 20%2 pension adjustment $0 $1,044 * $11,199 ‘Minus: 2013 net past service pension adjustment $0 Plus: 2013 pension adjustment reversal . . $0 ‘Your RRSP deduction limit tor 2013 $11,199 _“(A)) You have, $0 (8) of unused RRSP contributions available for 2013. this amount is more than amount (A) above, you may have to pay a tax on the excess contibtions IIRECEIVED 93/26/2013 10:04 4932975294 COURT OF APPEAL 03/26/13 TUE 09:03 FAX 6046000520 BKEMPO. ESQ) Boor Canadian Governance Reform Council 914 ~ 950 Drake Avenue Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6Z 289 Ph. 604.609.0520 March 24, 2013 Court of Appeal of Alberta 450 - 1st St. S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P SH1 c Attention: Suzanne Jarvie, Team Lead ~ Calgary, C.A. Regist ve Fax: 403-297-5294 Dear Suzy: eal of 0 vba Alberta et rt of Quee! Bel . 1110- Further to our original discussion and subsequent exchange of emails, this fax contains my application for indigent status. As I advised, my documentation is authored in the event a motion has to be brought challenging an assessment that a fee is to be paid. Consequently, and because of the unique circumstances on which the relief Is being sought, what's submitted herein is more voluminous that would otherwise be the case. Best regards, Brad Kempo Esq.