Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
shells
August 27, 2015 1 Comment
30
0
1
0
0
Stress analysis of lines connected to API tanks is very critical. I am sure most of you have
done stress analysis of lines connected to equipment nozzles. However when it comes to
tank nozzle, there are some differences, due to which the approach followed for equipment
nozzle cannot be followed.
In the Stress analysis of lines connected to normal Equipment nozzle (Vessel, Column, Heat
Exchanger etc.), generally there are only 2 things which we have to account during Caesar
modelling.
Nozzle flexibility
But in additional to those two things, there are two additional points which we have to account
in the Caesar modelling during analysis of tank connected piping system. These are,
Tank settlement
About the first two, i.e. Nozzles thermal movements and Nozzle flexibility, we all are well
aware, and therefore I will not be covering these in this article.
We will see other two effects, about which we may not be aware, or if aware, not very clear
how to model these in Caesar and take care of these along with Nozzles thermal
movements, and Nozzle flexibility.
So first in the current article we will see Nozzle Rotation due to tank bulging.
Due this, tank wall try to expand more at bottom (as seen in slide).
But the bottom plate prevents this expansion and holds the bottom end of shell in position.
Due to tank shell bulging, the nozzle on the shell moves radially outward, and rotates in
vertical plane, depending upon their position.
The nozzle on lower portion of the tank rotates downwards whereas nozzle on upper portion
rotates upwards.
Equipment diameter is relatively much small (up to 3 m). Therefore the amount of
radial growth is much less. Whereas tank diameters are generally large, of the order
of 10 m to 60 m. Due to this the amount of radial growth is significant.
Also, equipment has internal pressure, not only pressure due to fluid weight. Thus
pressure variation from top to bottom is not so much where as in tank, pressure on
top is zero.
At the same time, the bottom of equipment is not flat like tank, which does not deflect
but acts like stiffener, to holds the shell ends.
In the design code API 650, which governs the design of tank, this bulging effects is covered
in Appendix P.
This Appendix P is mandatory for tanks greater than 36 m diameter and for tank with
diameter 36 m & below, it is optional or mandatory only if specified by purchaser.
The intent of 36m diameter condition is to inform the user that the bulging effect is significant
in large diameter tanks, which code has considered as above 36m diameter, hence put as
mandatory.
The formulas for calculation of Radial movement and rotation due to tank bulging is provided
in API 650 and produced in Fig 2 and Fig 3 for your reference.
If you calculate the outward radial movement and rotation using the above formulas it can be
found that the effect of tank bulging on nozzle at higher elevation is insignificant.
Due to bulging, nozzle at lower levels rotates downward. This causes pipe to move vertically
downwards. To minimize the amount of this movement:
Piping shall be rotated through 90 as close to the tank wall as practical. 2D (D=outer
diameter of pipe) spool may be provided to avoid elbow stiffening due to flanged
elbow. This is shown in Fig. 4
Refer my next article to find out the effect of tank settlement in stress analysis of tank
connected piping system.