Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Article history: The microstructure of centrifugally cast heat resistant alloys of the HP-series (Fe35Ni25Cr
Received 16 January 2008 0.4C, wt.%) contains several minor phases, like carbides (M7C3, M23C6 and MC). Several alloys
Received in revised form are characterized by means of scanning electron microscopy in back-scattered electron
31 January 2008 imaging and energy dispersive spectroscopy, of electron probe micro-analysis by X-ray
Accepted 1 February 2008 wavelength dispersive spectroscopy, and of electron back-scattered diffraction. On the one
hand, scanning electron microscopy imaging in the back-scattered mode, associated with
Keywords: energy dispersive spectroscopy analysis and electron back-scattered diffraction, can lead to
Cr7C3 the identification of all phases, but with a lack of accuracy in certain cases. On the other
Cr23C6 hand, electron probe micro-analysis by X-ray wavelength dispersive spectroscopy alone can
NbC always provide a strict identification of all phases, with additional precise information on
EDX phase composition, including for light elements, which is important in the case of carbides.
Castaing microprobe 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1044-5803/$ see front matter 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2008.02.001
M A TE RI A L S C H A RAC TE RI ZA T ION 5 9 ( 2 00 8 ) 1 5 8 01 5 8 6 1581
precipitates: chromium carbides (M7C3 and M23C6) and nio- for all the analysed radiations are smaller than 1.5 m under
bium carbides (MC) in as-cast and aged alloys. an accelerating voltage of 20 kV.
For SEM observation and EDS analysis, specimens are
mounted in an epoxy resin and polished with 240, 400, 800,
2. Materials and Characterization Techniques 1200, 2400 grit silicon carbide papers, then polished with 1 m
diamond paste and finally cleaned with distilled water and
2.1. Materials ultrasonically cleaned in ethanol. A LEO Stereoscan 440 scan-
ning electron microscope, equipped with a LINK-ISIS X-ray
Two specimens are studied: an as-cast alloy (A) and a energy dispersive spectroscopy analyzer from Oxford Instru-
laboratory-aged alloy (B). Alloys A and B come from the same ments, is used. In this study, all observations and EDS ana-
melt, with B being aged in air for 100 h at 950 C. Average lyses are performed at a voltage of 20 kV (corresponding to an
chemical composition is presented in Table 1. approximate analysis volume of 1 m3). Probe currents be-
tween 150 and 250 pA, and between 1 and 2 nA are used,
2.2. Characterization Techniques respectively for BSE imaging and EDS analysis. The elemental
analysis is performed in a spot mode in which the beam is
2.2.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) in the Back- focused on a chosen point of the specimen.
Scattered Electron Imaging Mode with X-ray Energy Dispersive
Spectroscopy (EDS) 2.2.2. Electron Back-Scattered Diffraction (EBSD)
In a scanning electron microscope, a focused electron beam EBSD is based on the acquisition of electron diffraction pat-
scans the surface of the specimen, and generates a variety of terns from bulk specimens in the scanning electron micro-
signals, resulting from beammatter interactions. The three scope. A beam of highly accelerated electrons strikes a titled
most common modes of operation in SEM are secondary specimen. The diffracted electrons form a set of paired large
electron imaging (SE), back-scattered electron imaging (BSE), angle cones corresponding to each diffracting plane. The re-
and EDS chemical analysis. Backscattered electrons are pro- gions of enhanced electron intensity between the cones pro-
duced by the elastic interactions between the specimen and duces the Kikuchi bands of the electron back-scattered
the incident electron beam. The production efficiency of these diffraction pattern (EBSP), which are then used to form an
high-energy electrons roughly correlates to the mean atomic image on a fluorescent screen. Kikuchi bands can be inter-
number, so that BSE offers a visual contrast between phases preted in terms of crystallographic structure. More detailed
based on their electron density. For example, a niobium par- discussion of the technique can be found, for example, in the
ticle (atomic number 41) would appear significantly brighter review of Humphreys [2].
than a chromium particle (atomic number 24). The first step of specimen preparation is the same as for
The elemental composition of a phase is determined using SEM observation and EDS analysis. Afterwards specimens are
the characteristic X-ray spectrum of the examined specimen. polished using colloidal silica for 10 h to remove any strain
The EDS scintillation detector is capable of identifying ele- hardening due to mechanical polishing, and then cleaned with
ments with atomic numbers equal to or greater than five distilled water.
(boron) although the quantification is very difficult for ele- The equipment employed for EBSD is the LEO Stereoscan
ments with atomic number below eight (oxygen). In this study, 440 microscope associated with Nordlys 2 camera and Chan-
all detected elements with atomic numbers higher than eight nel 5 EBSD software from HKL Technology. EBSD is carried out
were quantified from the EDS spectra using the classical ZAF on a specimen which is tilted 70 from horizontal. An
model. All the spectra were recorded under a 20 kV accelerat- accelerating voltage of 20 kV is used for these operations.
ing voltage and a standard-less quantification procedure was The software controls the beam location on the specimen, as
followed. The summation of all the quantified elements was well as data acquisition and treatment. In the present work,
normalized to 100%. It must be noted that this quantification electron back-scattered patterns (EBSP) are recorded in spot
procedure is not very accurate for carbides: indeed, the ZAF mode for specific locations on precipitates. HKL Technology
corrections are not absolutely right since one major element Flamenco software is used to analyse the patterns. The EBSP is
(carbon) is not taken into account. Nevertheless this procedure indexed and the best matching phase is determined auto-
gives a reasonable estimation of the relative concentrations of matically by the software, based on its crystal structure and
the quantified elements with respect to each other. Addition- lattice parameters.
ally, the carbides chosen for analysis were sufficiently large
(typically 3 m in width) to avoid any significant contribution 2.2.3. Electron Probe Micro-Analysis (EPMA) by X-ray Wave-
from the surrounding matrix. Indeed, both the diameter of the length Dispersive Spectroscopy (WDS)
beammatter interaction zone and the X-ray emission depth The principle of EPMA-WDS (also known as Castaing electron
probe) is the following: as for EDS analysis, a beam of highly
accelerated electrons strikes a small surface (approximately
Table 1 Initial chemical composition, in weight percent
1 m2) of the specimen. The emerging X-rays are then selected
(wt.%), of investigated alloys
on the basis of their wavelength, using Bragg diffraction con-
Cr Ni Nb Si C Mn Fe + others ditions on an adapted crystal. The intensity of each radiation is
27 35 1.2 0.8 0.36 0.6 Bal then measured using a gaseous proportional counter. Moreover,
it is possible to quantify the information by comparing the
Remainder is Fe and other minor alloying elements.
intensities of X-ray characteristic of each element present in the
1582 M A TE RI A L S C H A RAC TE RI ZA T ION 5 9 ( 2 00 8 ) 1 5 8 01 5 8 6
nk 2d sin h 1
Fig. 1 SEM micrograph of alloy A in the BSE mode.
where is the wavelength of the X-ray, n is the order of
diffraction, d is the interplane distance in the crystal (or the
interlayer distance in the case of a multilayer crystal), and
the diffraction angle. The peak positions are usually expressed
in sin 105, which is proportional to the wavelength. tively. Tables 4 and 5 present examples of compositions of
Unlike EDS, EPMA-WDS analysis allows the detection and different phases in alloys A and B, respectively.
quantification of light elements like carbon, which should These results (Fig. 1 and Table 4), show that alloy A is
allow, in the present case, the analysis of carbides. constituted of an austenite matrix with a niobium-rich phase
Specimen preparation is the same as for SEM observation (white phase) and a chromium-rich phase (dark grey phase).
and EDS analysis. EPMA-WDS is carried out with a Cameca According to the existing literature on HP alloys [1], the
SX50 electron probe equipped with four spectrometers con- niobium-rich phase should correspond to niobium carbides of
taining several analysis crystals. In the present case, the the NbC type and the chromium rich phase should correspond
crystals listed in Table 2 are used. to chromium carbides of the M7C3 type or M23C6 type.
The phases to be analysed are first identified using the BSE Fig. 2 and Table 5 show SEM observation and EDS analysis
detector of the microprobe. In our case, EPMA-WDS analyses for alloy B (i.e. alloy A aged 100 h at 950 C). Alloy B is
are performed in the spot mode, under an accelerating voltage constituted of an austenite matrix, with a niobium-rich phase
of 10 kV and a probe current of 10 nA. The beam diameter in (white phase), probably niobium carbides of the MC type, and a
these conditions is approximately 1 to 2 m. The SAMx chromium-rich phase (dark grey phase).
software suite [4] is used to control the spectrometer and to Using the SEM and EDS, it is easy to observe differences
process the experimental data. The experimental conditions between chromium-rich carbides (M23C6 and M7C3) and
are summarized in Table 3. More details concerning the setup niobium-rich carbides (MC). Indeed, on back-scattered elec-
of the microprobe are given in appendices 1 and 2. tron images, the bright niobium-containing phases can be
distinguished easily from the dark grey chromium-rich
phases. Nevertheless, this technique cannot differentiate
3. Results and Discussion M23C6 from M7C3, because they have similar electronic
densities (1.96 electrons/3 for Cr23C6 and 1.92 electrons/3
3.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and X-ray Energy for Cr7C3) and therefore similar chemical contrasts in BSE.
Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) Additionally, it should be reminded that EDS analysis does not
lead to the determination of carbon content and that, con-
Alloys A and B have been investigated with these techniques. sequently, the above results should only be considered as
Figs. 1 and 2 present micrographs of alloys A and B respec- (very probable) assumptions.
Relative compositions are given (in atomic percent, at.%), since EDS
analysis does not provide carbon content.
lies between 96% and 99%. The fact that this summation
does not exactly reach 100% may be due to slight chemical
effects (change in peak shape and position between the
specimen and the standard material) on carbon (K lines) or
even on chromium and iron (L lines). Anyway, this does not
strongly affect the atomic fractions (deduced from weight
fractions).
Fig. 2 SEM micrograph of alloy B in the BSE mode.
Table 4 EDS analysis of phases in alloy A Fig. 3 Examples of EBSP with the indexing of (a) chromium
Element (at%) Fe Ni Cr Si Nb carbide in alloy A and (b) chromium carbide in alloy B. The
three Euler angles (1, , 2) are = 63.2, 1 = 23.1 and
Dark grey phase 7.94 92.06
White phase 4.51 3.87 8.00 1.87 81.75 2 = 72.9 from (515) plane as the SEM frame of reference for
the chromium carbide in alloy A and = 345.1, 1 = 29.2 and
Relative compositions are given (in atomic percent, at.%), since EDS 2 = 3.1 from (035) plane as the SEM frame of reference for the
analysis does not provide carbon content.
chromium carbide in alloy B.
1584 M A TE RI A L S C H A RAC TE RI ZA T ION 5 9 ( 2 00 8 ) 1 5 8 01 5 8 6
Table 6 Composition of chromium-rich phase in alloy A Table 8 Composition of niobium-rich phase in alloy A
(at.%), determined by EPMA-WDS (at.%), determined by EPMA-WDS
Analysis C Cr Fe Ni Cr + Fe + Ni Average Analysis C Ti Nb Cr + Fe + Ni Average
composition composition
1 30.59 58.89 8.35 2.17 69.36 M7C3.07 1 46.09 8.10 40.90 4,91 M0.55C0.45
2 32.63 58.96 7.91 0.50 67.37 2 44.62 7.99 43.03 4.36
3 28.98 63.58 6.59 0.85 71.02 3 45.19 1.84 45.94 7.03
4 29.63 62.81 6.89 0.67 70.37 4 44.75 2.57 45.21 7.47
According to our results, there are two types of chromium the ability of each technique (or combination of techniques) to
carbides in these alloys. In the as-cast alloy (alloy A), chromium identify all phases: The SEM with back-scattered electron imaging
carbides are of M7C3 type but in the aged alloy (alloy B) only M23C6 and EDS, EBSD and EPMA-WDS. In conclusion, there are two
carbides are found. So, after exposure to high temperatures, groups of techniques that allow the identification of all the
M7C3 chromium carbides transform into M23C6 chromium carbides in HP alloys, on the one hand a combination of SEM, EDS
carbides, which occurs in less than 100 h at 950 C. The EPMA- and EBSD, and on the other hand EPMA-WDS alone. Indeed:
WDS results are therefore consistent with the EBSD results.
Indeed, the latter have also shown that chromium carbides are A combination of SEM, EDS and EBSD (as they are often
of M7C3 type in the as-cast alloy and of M23C6 type in aged alloys. found in the same equipment) is a rather good way to
Moreover, the niobium-rich phase has been investigated identify diverse precipitates: first, BSE imaging contrast can
in alloy A. An example of average chemical composition in easily make a difference between chromium-rich carbides
atomic percent (at.%) of this phase in alloy A is presented in (M23C6 or M7C3) and niobium-rich carbide (MC). EDS can also
Table 8. As for chromium carbide analysis, the summation of differentiate between chromium-rich phases (M23C6, M7C3)
the measured weight fractions is not exactly equal to 100% but and MC carbides. Finally, in the case of M23C6 and M7C3,
varies between 99% and 104%. which cannot be differentiated neither by SEM nor by EDS,
These results show that the stoichiometry of the niobium- EBSD can be used to identify the two different lattice sym-
rich phase is not exactly of type MC but rather of type MC1 x metries of M23C6 and M7C3. This combination of techniques is
where x = 0.18. This is consistent with the NbC binary phase less expensive than EPMA-WDS, but specimen preparation is
diagram [7] and with thermodynamic calculations of phase rather difficult in the case of EBSD, and specific to each
composition in this alloy [8]. different alloy. Moreover, even if the nature and approximate
Consequently, since EPMA-WDS is a rather accurate composition of phases are obtained, no precise information
analysis technique, able to measure the concentrations of is given on the chemical composition of phases.
light elements, it can be used to determine the chemical The EPMA-WDS technique alone can be used to obtain the
composition of precipitates and thus identify each phase. In chemical composition of all precipitates, including carbon
the present case, it has been successfully used to distinguish content, with a much better precision and level of con-
between M7C3, M23C6 and MC, and to evidence the transfor- fidence than EDS. Although the equipment is relatively
mation of M7C3 into M23C6 during high temperature ageing. expensive, it is an excellent technique to identify exactly all
precipitates in HP alloys.
4. Conclusions
Appendix A. Justification of Experimental Conditions
HP alloys are complex materials, since they can contain different Used for EPMA-WDS
phases (austenite, M7C3, M23C6, MC), with high temperature phase
transformations. In the present work, two HP alloys (~Fe35Ni Standards
25Cr0.4C1Nb) have been studied, with two different micro-
structural states: an as-cast alloy and a laboratory-aged alloy. For elements Cr, Fe, Ni, Nb and Ti, pure metals were used as
Different phases with various stoichiometries are present in standards. For carbon, Fe3C (cementite) was used. Fe3C was
these alloys: chromium rich-phases (M23C6 and M7C3) and nio- obtained by carburising an iron specimen for 2 h at 900 C. After
bium carbides (MC). Complete characterization of precipitates has carburising, the specimen contained large areas (~50 m) of
been performed, using several techniques, in order to evaluate cementite in a pearlite (Fe/Fe3C lamellar eutectoid structure)
matrix. Fe3C is conductive and perfectly stoichiometric. More-
over, chemical effects (change in carbon peak shape and
Table 7 Composition of chromium-rich phase in alloy B
position) are expected to be small between the specimen and
(at.%), determined by EPMA-WDS
the standard since carbon is in the form of carbides both in the
Analysis C Cr Fe Ni Cr + Fe + Ni Average specimen and in the standard.
composition
1 20.73 47.56 18.07 13.64 79.27 M23C6.41 Choosing the X-ray lines to be analysed
2 21.67 44.69 17.85 15.79 78.33
3 22.67 56.27 13.17 7.39 77.33 For the microanalysis of transition metal elements, K lines are
4 22.15 55.46 14.14 8.25 77.85
usually preferred to L lines to avoid chemical effects (change
M A TE RI A L S C H A RAC TE RI ZA T ION 5 9 ( 2 00 8 ) 1 5 8 01 5 8 6 1585
in peak shape and position). Nevertheless, we chose here to Some authors [11] have proposed to use an area/peak factor
work on L lines to quantify Cr, Fe and Ni in the analysed (APF) in order to correct the error that one makes when mea-
secondary phases. The reason for that is explained below. suring peak heights instead of peak areas. Nevertheless, this
It is shown in this study that the secondary phases APF depends on composition and should then be determined for
analysed in this work can contain large amounts of iron (up each phase to be analysed, which in turn is equivalent to
to ~20 at.%) and nickel (up to ~15 at.%). Iron and nickel K lines working in an integral mode. That is why no APF was taken into
are strongly absorbed by chromium and are likely to induce account in this work. Nevertheless, because of the poor spectral
the fluorescence of the chromium K line. Indeed, iron and resolution of the Ni/C crystal, we estimate that the error on the
nickel K lines (EK K
Fe = 6.40 eV and ENi = 7.48 eV respectively) can
intensity of the carbon K line should not exceed 5%.
ionize the chromium K level (EK Cr = 5.99 eV) with a high
probability according to the criterion proposed in [9]: Background measurement
REFERENCES