, ,

'meR ~ (bI'(q)~~R.-aifq;~ ~
-"/' POWER
-- GRID CORPORATION
--- --- OF INDIA
- -- - - - -
LIMITED
- ,.....

~ 40(}~.cfi. \iqij)~ NELLORE 400 K. V. SUB STATION

,~'

Ref: SR-1/ NLR/ CAO-TL/ 2013/, DT: 01-02-2013

Sub: Construction of transmission lines under different projects in SRTS-I - Right of way -'
Tree compensation- reg.

Competent' authority has nominated committee' consisting of, undersigned members for
. .' ...- .
studying the tree compensation assessment procedure for uniform implementation in the
region.

Accordingly, committee has intera~ed with AP state horticulture department, APTRANSCO,

State revenue authorities, collected the'information regarding tree compensation rates and
following observations are made.!':'

1. AP ~tat~,G~vt'J pe~5~f B.evenue ~a~~not~fied the rates for fruit I:!earing tre~ orchards vide
G.O.M.S No;3~7 DT:22-{)3~2006. These tree orchards were classified into three categories
(Categor)l~A/Healthy Growth, B/Average. growth & .C/Poor 'Growth). Summary. of rates
notified under the G.O., and the copy of G.O. is enclosed herewith. Notified rates have not
, considered the size/girth, variety of fruits etc.
2.. For the tree varieties"not covered under above G.O., (e.g., Eucalyptus, Cassurena, Teak etc.,) -
District -collector, Nellore has notified the rates: Copy enclosed.
,3. Both the above orders h~venotified the 'rates per'acre and no. of trees per acre. However"
rates~o calculat~C1for the scattered trees~ based on above G.O., -are not being accepted by
, .(. ,

local farmers and incidences of stiff resistance are observed.,

4. C~mmittee ~otedthat assessment of each individual tree and value of its yield is not
practicable and hence the rates calculated based on above G.O.s., for the scattered fruit
bearing trees are not matching'with its real value.
5. During interaction with APTRANSCO TL Construction wing, it is learnt that rates notified
under above G.O was not being accepted by the farmers in their .line sections, too. Hence, it
,

is learnt that a committee was formed by:their Headquarters to rationalize tree'

compensation Cjssessment r~tes and their report is yet to be finalized. '
6. Committee has also interacted with local MROs for tree compensation rates and was
:.- .-"', ... . t:," ~,

informed that fixation of tree compensation rates are not under ~heir jurisdictipn. '
. ,

7. Further, committee has studied ,the tree compensation procedures followed during
construction of transmission"lines during.previous years. It is noted that during recent line
cpnstruction of 400kV Gooty-Raichu'r Jine~ Mandai Revenue officer, D~var~kohda, Kurnool.',
distriq:., has notified 'compensation' rates for scattered jisolatedtrees based on girth size
vide Letter ref: nil., DT:08-()l-07. It is"found that tHe said rates were largely a~cepted by the

"<:,,r,
farmers, during consfruction of said line and the disbursements
- _ . , ---- -~~
were made accordingly.
-- _ .. - " l'
~ . .. .~ ..h'~if~~ Contd ..

. "I~.I-3 ~.

mfi <t~I cit ~ cit ~~.

 .~ .

",
.f/2//
;.'-">.

"
Ref: SR-1/ NLR/ CAb-TLI 201~/ DT: 01-02-2013

Construction of transmission lines under different projects in SRTS-I - Right of way -

Tree compensation- reg.

8. In
.
view
. of above, committee. recommends for,
().. adoption of periocation rates of tree compensation notified by District collector,
Nellore for Mango, Lemon, eucalyptus and cassurena tree orchards, where tower
spotting falls in the saidorchards/plantatfon. Copy enclosed ..
. t .' . . .

b. adoption of tree compensation rates notified under GOMS NO.357 DT: 22-03-2006
for tree orChards/plantation':'oth~r than Mango,'Lemon, eucalyptus and cassurena,'
- - ,1".". -

where tower spotting falls in the~orchards/plantations other than mentioned.

c... -adoptions of rates notified by. the District Collector, Nellore vide procee:dings of
_. . DiStrict~orrector, "-N~lrore';-Df 26-06:'2006 for'teak'wood iree~'compensation. Copy
enClosed. '
d. 'wh~r~-ever'Scattered/isdJated trees~otherthan teak are'to be c~Ue.g.,;htf:1eJin~
':co~'ridot)~' rates adopted for . Gooty - Raichurline"~ide letter 'from"MRO,
. DeVa'rai<onda DT: '08~of~2007-with~'n
." _,' :._~:.'.,.' , . -.
es~alationof
. .~:z~""
jO% 'is recommended:. to
'.,' __ "

'compensate the increase in rates during past six' years: Rates calculatedwjth 30%
escalati.ono~e; the'rat~s <'adopteqfor Gooty ..::."Raichdr'lineare found to be
ieason~ble'~~d a'cceptable to the f~~mers., ..... . . ."
:e. -ad~Ptio~ dfrat~s (peracr~ notifj~dby Districtcoll~cto~, Nellore for ~~calyptus and
cassurena'for cutting of bulkplaptation in line'torridor.-

.-. I

'. -R' GM/Projects-II

' ..,
 I

-~_.---_.-

: PO\iVER
. " ~
,
'", .

Ref.No:SRTS.1/NLR/CAO.Tl/2012/ ~ Date: 29.12.12

AJ-\ \ !- C) ~\. ~\ '?-
Sub:- Construe lion of Transmission lines under different Projects -Right of
Way Tree CompensationReg.

presentl'1 nL ,..,.)[":',e" of Tr:Jn,n-issior lines ore unjer construction in Southern

Re(lion 1. Ti~e, ,::J!B\)n~'jer .onel'S steges c/ constrUC:lon. n~ right of WOy
recuires peYnJe'it 0; cornuer-,sotion Ie :r,e affected owners.

In case of :..:'cp CClnper'SoJlion. the s~ote Revenue Department is issuing

055e,srnent ane! or e 0e~ng ocid to the affected owners.

'1:JVvever kil the trp'::: cOT,pensotion. ri"ere ore no uniform guidelines or a

sing:~ jely.)rTrYIE'''q :0' (.1S,~ssn!e"t Deoer.r:j:n~~on the 'vpe ot tree, the
asses,ing deoartr .... snts oJ'!:; ,jiflerent Fisc, t'le ossessmf,?nt -IS diffenng with
j.' Ci'rferer1 deportr.-:enl deoencj'ig upon the place. time ana trle need. in order
10 gt:T the ~:()'.AI ,:!s:oreJ 'J r80sonctde Justlflob1e compensatlo'1 shall be
;;X(o;,:-J

Therefo:e : i~ C'()pOsed to fOr'rTl :J ,~O"'imittee consisting of Engineer-In-

charges of ':'r~:-+:,:: ~5 fi'~a"'ce execL,ti'iE' to st\.Jdy the free cornpensatiof)
assessment f~lOdf: l:'v Yhe' ,jeoorrme~~s Iii::e,l\riR.ANSCO. POWERGRI~'s past
s\..'ch ~-:ompe')st)k-,!~ orcce,jure and PUi LJP committee"s recommendolion
,-itl'In : 0 days ~:l:: .jiffer:::(., .,.miety .;)f Ire,:;s encm,r,tered ;n the line corridors 10
I

bri'ig L;ni~ol
rn-ty i'-', S;"; 1

Tr-,eproposed c ynrnd:ee 1'lembels ore given beiow.

, ; :-.r, .~'2K i<edrj. C'GM.;Cl,::>TI.) ~,jL:::

L.)'SfI. S .\A.V ~~cr'(Hi.C~lef Mcw.ager fCAO-TLC.SRSS-18j.I\lLR
.3.: Sri S. KOdotlrlC''..)r'J-' :-::ryel !\/.onoger "&.,I\."'~:;>

Put Up for k:nj C1;::"(Y O\".:;i Of ED !SRTS- i

~")
VWC~
,/ --c:;;q \, :>-\ ,~
. (S,R.A,\lI)' ~
Addl.Gererol Manager (Proj-lIl

Sec'bad:

Addl.General Ma7~Al. See'bad:

..w ~~T qft ~ qft ~ t"

" . ~;%r.(;~ WA
0" ~: _ .:' ~'; .'.~~.
'

.~
 GI
f

f ..
t-
QI

..
Q.

C
:J
o
EI'll
"a
QI
III

.1t
.. ..
N

GI
Q.
c1;
UUl
+
"a ~ II
7ii 5~
Q.
GI
.c
S. 1!!
u
C I'll
:J
o
E
I'll
"a
5:
.1t

1!!
u
..
I'll

QI
Q.
III ....
lD'"

fo
I'll 5
E
I'll
C

~~~~~~~~O~~~~ON~m~~~~
m~mmO~O~N~~m~~O~Noo~m
1!!
u~~~~~~~~~~~~~b~~~~~~~~
5 ~~m~~~ m~mm~m~~m~~Nm~
u
..
I'll
~~~~~~o~~o~m~~~~m~~~N
~~N~~~_~N~oom~mNmmo~~
~ 0 0
.2
---
000
.. om~~mm~~N~~~mm~mN~o~m oo~
~ ~ m
~
lD~~~o~m~~~~~~mo~m~~~N~~
~
U
~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ N~~~m~N ~mN
--
Q.

'tij
Z

~~~mm~momo~m~
ON~~~~ON~~O~~
..
GI
u
oom~~NommO~mN
m~m~~ooo~~~~m
o ~~~~
..GI
I'll
~
N~~

Q.
C
o
!:

:; u
b
1;;
o
u

C.

1
L.

Q. 5"QI

u
e :;E ~
Vl
_
C
I'll
....
o
QI
~:;E
z .
EI'll .9:!
Z 66
-
V)z0
 Rc.No.D3.2959!11

From To
Sri B.Sreedhar, LA.8., The Chief Manager(CAOTL)
Collector and District Magistrate Power Grid C<Jrpn. ofIndla Ltri.,
Sri Poni Srlramulu Nellore District NelJore
The ExecU'Jvc Engineer
400KYi Construction! Krishnapatnam
A."PTR,ANSCO, Nellen:

Sir,

Sub:- Compensation for Standing crops-ROW- Right ofVlu)'-Power

Transmission lines -through standing crops - negotiations for
compensation - report - submitted-reg.,

Ref:- LChicfManager, POWERGRID,SR:JlNLRlCATI1GOOTI/2011,

Dt 20-0911.
2. Tnis office Lr. Rc.D3.2959/i 1,dt.26-09-11
3. J.D.(A,gl), (,r.R.c.No.Extu. Vll!1301l2011,dtl2-1Q..2011
4. Asst., Cane Commissioner, Lr.No.B/US/'lOll, dt.l-1O-2011
5. Auction Superintendent, Tohacoo boar'd, ReLNo.TBI2911 (11)!
2011-12/PdD, dt03-1 Q..2Dl 1.
6. Proceedingsof t4e Pist...l.evel ~mmittee for Regist.ration of
trees value no.t eo".ered by G.O.Ms.No.357~<it.22..o3~2006
7. A.D.,-I. (Hom) Rc.No.Cl496111-,dt.28-1Q-2011
8. E.E., 400KVlKtishnapatnslm,2WKVSS, Compound. Lr.No.E.E.
400KV t'KP'rM!NI.BIF.NoA.81D.N0.sf303flO11,dt24flO/11

~,
il
" .' .
J4~'lef~'llt~~ Chief~et', ~'Grid'~ of
ln4ia Lhnited. has submi.tU:d'1Uli' ~ ~":~ .the _ ()f'~ of po~ .
evaeua1ion scheme'for KtishnapainamUltra Mega Power Project tbroUg;b400KV Quad Moose
Dooblc Cireuif:Powct'1tmes',XTishn4pn1nam...QoQty,Krisbnapatna:m-Nellore{Manubolu);and
Krisbnapatnam to CbiUOOrmilisi;.'l~Qil~'and lin~ are ~thiopgh~e: the egrialltuml
funds locatedIn Muthukur'
, ,.~OJt. . am, p~;.L~:LJ.":"_t-._
~I~_..l.~t.. Venbta.chlU ,,",,,,,,,""~,
AmUrtbasaglltam apd M1!Iripadu Mandals in SPS NeUore Distri~He has further requested lofix
the IeaS()nablel gOod 1J11f)Ut)t of compensation to the crops to be paid to ryots, for the crops
damaged while erecting towers. ~
In the reference g6 cited, the HoE., APIRANSCO, 4O(}KVsubmiitc:l;t that.
APTR:ANSCO is consttucting 4(iOk'V Quad Moose Double Circuit POi\'er lines 2 Nos. from
SDSlPs., Kri~ to 4QOK,V Sub-Station Manubolu & 400KV StJb.Stati~lIl, Cbittoor and
the proposed Power lines were DOtifie4 in 1he A.P.Oazette No.75, dt.28-05-1O. These
TfllnSIllission Jines are passing1hrougb MlJthukur, VenkataclWam. Manubolu, KOOi. 0ziIi,
Naidupet and Pellllkur Mandals.in SPS Ne110re District llI1d ~ for the recomincndation of
assessmentof ~ damag~ 10 be d to the ryo1s~

In tbe'.~~ ~ -oit1:4. ~ JoiIit ~1 (Agl). #Ie Assistant Ome ~oner,

NelIore, and Auotion~ T:obaeoo..board,D.C.PaIH. Marrlpadu (M) have,been
, req~ to ~ ~'OrJmpensation to be paid to ryots.

l
 ill the reference 3"; cited, The Joint Director(AgJj, sub!IlIlte~ rewmmel!dalwru; lor

Groundnut. Blackgram, Bengalgmm, Conon, Sunflo ...

er. Redgrem and Mai.ll: per acr(. per
tower and for three seasons m the District.
In the reference 4Ul cited, the Ass!, Cane Commissioner, submiued recommendation th.1t
45 MT per acre Piant Crop and 35 MT per acre for Raloon Crop.' Further the J.D.,{.f\gl}
:.~'
re.c.vm.rnended compensation, if there is plant crop, compensmion should . given to J Plan, ew,'
and 2 Ratoons after deduting cost of cultivation for the 2 r;;toon;, @ Rs.20,OOO- P'_7 latoon. If
there is 1>Tr-.nOon, compensation should be given to .1ratoon and 2' ratoou after deducting COS!

nd
of c.ultivation for 2 r-atoCin.
In the refereLtce 511' cited, the Auction Superintendent, Tobacco Board, D.C.Palli
submitted rewrnmeudation per HCCUlre Rs.l,17,700/-. Tills amounts to Rs. 47,615/- per act::.
rills rate fur Ii three 5=00" IDllY be ,Mopted for paying compensation to the ryl)ts pel acre per
tower.
y/" In the referelli?- 6th cited, the District Level Commiue-.e decided the value of EucalyPtu
clones per acre pet season Rs,48.583/- and value of Sasuarin.as is Rs. 44,000/- per acre and per
crop in SPS Nellore District. The rates for three seas...'111S may be adopted for payment of .
compensation to fue ryots per acre per tower in the District.
In the reference 7th c;ited, the A.D.,-2 (Horo) ~ommended an llmount of Rs. 1070161-
for 40 Mango trees per acre.
According1y, the recommcudati.ons of the above officers ~ the crops
;". ..
concahcd is enclosed herewith fur further aQtion in this matter in SPS NeI10xe District

SdI- Saurabh Gaur

Joint Collector

,
'.'

,.'

~I~.IJ
!

r
f

~,
II
,
I
 .,

II ~i i ..::- ~ .
.:f-t"] .:"I~I
l~~",",-
PRdcE~~lNG~:;1fOF TIm DITRICT LT~vrf;L CO!\1MITTEI~ VOl{
REqIST~i\':flO,l'i! pF THEE VALUE 'OF .sUCH VAI{fETY OF THEE)-; NOT
CO'\fERIP)HY.:~:! p.O.l\1S.NO.357, dt:22-3-200G AND G.O.MS. ;\J(U,() I.
DT:~9-6-9,~. ";il i
,;) ;\ '~;:\jl:, .' *"*. , _'
i Th,~ ~i~triqn;evel Con;mittee orNellore District. for fixing of tree value for
the v~riet~~.i~'d?M~r/ orchids n~t~o'~ered by G.6~S.N~J57, Rev.(L.A) Dept.,
dt:22j3.20~i;~d {9i~.Ms.NO.60 J, Rev. (L.A) Dept., dt: 19.6.92 has b~en constituted
vide as pet.Jheg~fH~::nes issued in para 4 at page 2 ill the G.O.Ms.No.357. ell "Plill~!
.' : : 1.1;?,i I': . " ,
the Joint CoJlecto~~fI,)nc orthl: Il1l:l1lbt.:rs. .
;' ;ch t
. The.cOlilmV(p~:has
. '" . t~fV t mel in ,ilt: Chamber of I)ist. Collector, alld it is Cil;ll""" 11.,

I!',,,, Di,,,,(rict.t~oJl'ec~~r-:'Tbl' fnIICI':!::g OtTic;:rs .. MCll1bcrs attenued the n:cc:::"~ .

'D' In, .. , . :.'J
1. ..S~ ~C.,~~~pllr. ~Cii:gUgcl:I(;: J 'j . CC(

2. ~~ib.C:~:/lefjguganga Project. Nellore.

t.. , h.:~h
:43.. lR",~ l~I!lIr~, Nellore. .
A.D.,'l-{ottiCulture, Neilore,
" :.~~~
~i"
, 5. A~R.,S~t{~Iture, Nellore
"i ;i:lt ,

I :6. Assista~L~~nservnlor
". ::',4ilr

:7. E-S., Tdftl~iJganga Project. Vcnkatagiri,

! ,,' :1:"'" .
ol'ForcsIS, Knv<1li.(Rt.:prcscnling J).I',O.).t'-JclllliC

:
8. Joir;t
~." I
ColIWor.
_. 1~i:';~~
Nellore.

I ' :;
been ta ken.. '; :
I
,I'"

J',' :;
;,
I'j'fr'~'
,The ~ollowi~~'i~slles have been discllssed at length and specific decisions hale
q',\,:
.'.: ....

I :1. Fixatio:l b:fy,l\llle of Teak trees covered by 7lh Br.lnch Can,t!. l\:JIIUU~,.I!l~;l
J I

P~ject, i~'J{osallllr \fillngt.: ofPeliakur Mundal.

1". :
',..

lrhe
' . issues:"i-clLlted
.'1 '" 10 the soil iii Nellore.District , Ihe c1illwtie ;;"lltiill!lll',

I prevaiIihg in tht.: DisWc~.

I" ~ nUlural
"f groll'lb
,.generally observed whencvcr leak 1'1;1I11;11Hll~
is taken;up a~~ :the gtii~ral expenditure being incurred by the farmers and the value "I'
I .. ~".

the tree~ that i~.gen,~rarl)' fetched areidisclissed at lenglh.

I
I 1"

\ . :~hrr6I\~~Vil1gare the observations and, decision~, taken:.

(. T1ie girth J ::df :he tree is measured at an height of 1.37 Mlrs. Fmlll 111\:
. :j::' .'.

I i
grou'nd,le'~d;1is Illeasured AFTER THE Bark is removcd ..
The teak ;ibnts do not carry any .timber valuc. When the girth is UP!(l

I oUjO Cm. is fillalized liSshown beloll:

I ;.

c~\r ..Lf~
 2

Value in Rs. per tree

RS.l DOl

RS.ISO/

RS.27S/,.

RS.3S0/
----1
',':~~lt.
~~:'of'the plant is more than 60 ems .. timber value is there and
:dji.1he following Jines considering lhat the height or [he plant is
sactually in Nellore District it is around 3 MIl'S.

---T-'--',
0.66 0.67 0.66 0.69 0.70 0.71 0.73 1_ ._Q.2~ _0 c" .
I I '

0.165 0.1675 0.17 0.1725 0.175

0.1775 '11 Q.J~t() + 183
I

Q]B5/'
I

().'e,5 .

I I I
4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 L~t--
I
4.00 4 00 .!.O.D . 40C;
I I !
I i
mt
I
0.109 0.1.12 0116 0.119 0.123 0.116 ......Q;!}()_I ... Q. \1137! 9"!

I 3.812 3.928 4.046 4.166 4.286 4.4~1 4.536 46631

---I
4.792:
----.
4 n2

I iI
I
800 800 _3.QQ... 600 __ ~. ~Q. 600 800 noo (1110

3049 3142 3237 3333 3430 3522,. ~2:i .. __=!71Q.] .. =!Q3:J I 39.:W j
-i

I
~' ..
0.81 0.82 0.63 0.84 0.65 ~ -.Q.,J[7. _. q,~
~:.
0.2 0.2025 0.208 0.21 0.213 0.215 0.2175 0.22
f
.~.

I 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.'30 'is:

0.144 0.148 0.164 0.169 I

I I
I
~
fti
5.054 5.188 5.741 . 5.654
I
f
I t

I
,,

I ~.
.J~~.
;::" .

I
I ~ 1<.1...t~

I
 .~
3
~ ~
i! I

I . !
800

.:4593
800

.4707
BOO

4822
800

4931J
-J
5p50
800

1__ G177
~2P~_.
5298 I
800

5421
I
i
.. (I.~o.

~J~~_~~71l
J
I
UOlt

0.96

0.24
0:97:

0.2425
0.98

0.245
0.99

0.2475
:r
. 0.25
l' 1.0\

0.2525 0.255
,,,~:T_~~~~"_I
0.258 0.26 I 0.262~ I
-I--
I I
4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 I 4.00 I
I ~
! I .
I
I i
! I
0.235 o 240 0~5 ..2.250 0.255 n ,f,n 0.265 ~ O.27~ ~~fLi

, iii ! i
7406 8.064 8.233 8.404 8.576 8.750 I 8 QZ5; : ~04 i S 2a3. 9 464 ~I

I 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200

"~--,,,,,,r~".) !'''-~-,-".,. "'""!
8695 8887 9081 9677 9879 10084 10~~L!.QZ22.1 ..10924t~~!19..i !!1~7_: __1!.5.?6.

I 1.06 1.07 1.08 1.11 1.12

i
I

I 1.13 1.14 .1.15_1~

i t I
~?i-'U~-I I
-:----i

1 19 :
!
, 20 i
I
I_~' !' i
I
0.268 0.27 0.2775 0.28 0.283 0.285 0.28B 0.20251 0.295 o 20B : o:s I
_...
-'-'T
i
~.OO ~.OO 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 r.
4.00 __ .~.00 . __ ~Q I'_,4QQ~ 4.00 I 400 I
i I

t.
!
! I
!
I 0.286 0."308 0.314 0.319 0.325 0.331 0.336 0.342 0.348

i
..Q]~~ j .,O~EQi
;

I i
10.018 10.206 10.781 10.970 11.173 11.372 11572
I '1.774 .l!..~l!l..
I

1?..~L!2}~1 --_.
12.GOO 1

I 1200 1200 1200 ~200 1200 1200 1200 ....!~ ,.

1200 I ILflfl
I
I 1mn i In!!" 12111i
!
:
I
i
:
12021 12937 13171 13407 13646 13086 i I !~'l{J1
I
11798 .122~7 _~129 ~Z1J 14620 1'~?~

I
,
I

,
,
I .,
 I I I

! i
1200 12~' ':?P';-
81 ~ ~I A~" I

-eave an.: quii2'Tcasonabb taldng the runne(~ aspects illlu

1 .." ' .
n ,;,jew
~
of conside;ing
.
the height as 4 Mlrs. rather than 3
- .
~:I~eplant is "found to have timber valuc in Nellore District

,
~ ~~:
:rate for cubic foot is c.onsidercd us per the market value
.. ~ .
R'.Ji.1ity of teak tha't is grown in the District of 'e'- class
:;.f .
.f..
1 j!
f',li~1l ~1rlree value ror I:::l\calypllls . Casuarillas, Nl:l:111

t'ts',it has been decided 10 fix up tht: ratcs once the 0.1'.0 ..
f
j:li\r.ar)' exercise on the rates as per the age, girth. elC. of

.
J
,
I
I
-I
I
i m
!
I
If'I'
I,
1 . .':
!
i
I
I
I
i~
I,

i'
i

I . ! -. , ,.' .'....

-.I

I
I .~

. ..:0
..~I

"~ ~1
~.

,{
'\b
 RC.No.D3.2959 j 11 Collector's Office, Nellore
Dated 21 -04-12

From To
Sri B.Sreedhar, LA.S., The Chief Manager
Collector and District Magistrate PoWer Grid Corpn. of India Ltd.,
SPS Nellore District >\-Nellore

Sub:- Power Grid corpn., of India Ltd.,-SPS Nellore Dt.,-765 KV

.DC Quad Nellore PS-Kurnool line-under common system-
Associated with ISGS Projects in Krishnapatnam area-35% hike
In compensation for Crops and trees-reg.,

Ref:- 1 .Chief ManagerjCAO-TL, Lr.SR-IjNLRjCAO-TLjN-K/20l2/700,

Dt. 03-03-2012.
2. J.D.(Agl), Lr.Rc.No.Extn.VII/1301/2011,dt.29-06-2011
3. J.D.(Agl), Lr.Rc.No.Extn.VIIj1301j2011,dt.12-10-2011
4. Asstt., Director of Horticulture, Rc,No.Cj496/11, dt.12.07.11,
5. Asstt., Director of Horticulture, Rc.No.Cj496/11, dt.28.10.11,
6. Asst., Cane Commissioner, Lr.No.B/118j2011, dt.l-l0-2011
7. Auction Superintendent, TobaccoboardRef. No.TB/29 /1 (ll)j
2011-12/Pdn, dt.03-1O-2011.
8. Procdgs of Dist., level committee Dt. 19.06.92
9. This office Lr. RC.D3.2959 j 11, dt. 3.11.11

***

I invite your attention to the references cited.

In the reference 1~ cited, the Chief ManagerjCAO-TL submitted that Power

Grid Corporation of India Ltd., is constructing 765 KV QUAD D/C Nellore PS-Kurnool
transmission line for Krishnapatnam Ultra Mega Power Project.
The line is passing through Muthukur, Manubolu, Venkatachalam, Podalakur,
Sydapuram, Atmakur , Ananthasagaram and Marripadu Mandals. During the stringing of

line, agriculture crops and trees may got to be cut.

The towers in Nellore-Kurnool 765KV line use 95% larger area than 400KV

line towers from Krishnapatnam to Gooty, which is in progress.. Hence farmers are

demanding more compensation than the amount they were paid for Krishnapatnam-Gooty
line.

the Chief Manager/CAO-TL further submitted that the 400KV Krishnapatnam-

.
Gooty line project is progressing as per schedule, as the affected farmers are being paid
.

crop compensation timely and are happy to get reasonable amount of compensation in time.
 Finally, the Chief Manager requested to fix compensation to 765KV D/C line

to 35% more than the compensation fixed by District Collector for 400KV D.C

Krishnapatnam-Gooty line, as the crops like paddy, Blackgram, Redgram, Bengalgram,

Tobacco, Sugarcane and fruit gardens like Mango and Lemon and Eucalyptus and casurina

plantations are being damaged during construction'!'of 765 KV D/C line.

In this context it is to submit that the following amounts were recommended by Joint

Director of Agriculture, Assistant Director of Horticulture, Assistant Sugar cane

commissioner, and Tobacco Inspector to be paid to the ryots as compensation, in the

District, in respect of 400KV DC Krishnapatnam-Gooty line.

In the reference 2nd

cited, the J.D., (Agl), Nellore has furnished, t~e mandai wise
particulars of the crop compensation to be paid for standing crop loss during the process of

400KV line construction work, as detailed below.

SI Mandai Name of Area Assessed value Cost of Net profit Assessed

N the crop yield per of yield per cultivati per Acre amount to be
0 acre/in acre in Rs. on per per a paid for 3
~J Qtls acre in seasom in seasons per
Rs. Rs. Tower in Rs.
1 Muthukur Paddy 38.00 47500 15000 32500 97500
2 Venkatach Paddy 38.00 -47500 . 15000 32500 96000
alam
3 f\1anubolu Paddy 38.00 47500 14500 33000 99000
Total 292500

Further, in the reference 3rd cited, the Joint Director (Agl) has recommended tthat
(
the of assessment to be paid to ryots of different crops as shown in the following table.

-
SI.N Name of the Area yield Assessed Cost of Net profit Assessed
crop Per value of cultivation per acre per amount to
0
acre/in yield per per acre season in paid for
Qtls acre in Rs Rs. seasons I
tower in Rs
1 Groundnut 16 64,000-00 19,700-00 44,300-00 1,32,900-0C

2 Blackgram 6 30,000-00 9,000-00 21,000-00 63,000-0(

3 Bengalgram 8 32,000-00 8,500-00 23,500-00 70,500-0(

4 Cotton 10 49,200-00 14,000-00 ,35,200-00 1,05,600-0(

~~-
5 Sunfluwer 8 21,600-00 7,000-~.~~~ 14,600-00 43,800-01

6 Redgram 5 15,000-00 3,500:bo 11,500-00 34,500-01

7 Maize 30 25,500-00 8,000-00 17,500-00 52,500-01
 th
In this context, the Asst., Director, Horticulture, Nellore, in the reference 4 has

cited recommended, compensation to be paid as below.

Q) (f)
.c Q) Assessed
+-' Q)
Cost of Net profit Damages
51. co
L..
+-' amount to be
"0 'l-
0 'l- cultivation per for per
c 0 C paid per acre
No. co (f) 0 acre(100 .e(100 acre(100
~ Q)
:J Ol (100 plants)
E a.
0
+-'
co
2) plants)Rs. plants)Rs. plants)Rs.
co L.. +-' co 6+7+8
Z u (J) u
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

L..
Q)
:J
~ E ~Q)
.!5! ,- Ol 29595-00 71648-00 14330-00 115573-00
1 co
L.. co .B
"0
"0
'0
co+-,
~(f)
,
0
0..

In the reference 5th cited, the A.D., Horticulture recommended compensation to be

paid to Mango as detailed below.

Q) (f)
.c Q) Assessed
+-' Q)
Cost of Net profit Damages
L..
51. co 'l- ,+-, amount to be
"0 0 ' 'l- C cultivation per for per
c 0 paid per acre
No. co (f) 0 acre(100 acre(100 acre(40
Q) Ol
~ Eo. :J Q) (40 plants)
+-'
co +-' plants)Rs. plants)Rs. plants)Rs.
co 0 co 6+7+8
+-'
zb (J) u
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

L..
:J
~ 0 ~Q)

I 1 .!5!
co
"0
Ol
c
co
:E
.-L..Ol
co
co+-,
~(f)
A 21420-00
i
71330-00 14266-00 107016-00
0
0..

i;" , ,In the reference 6th cited, the Assistant Cane Commissioner, has furnished
, 'j
\~,'
recommendation to be paid to ryots as in the following table in 3 types of crop variation.
~an t crop "
Crop type Avg yield Rate Rs Total cost Rs Minus cost Net payble Rs
of cultivation
Plant 40 MT 2100-00 84,000-00 -- 84,000-00
I Raton 35 MT 2100-00 73,500-00 20,000"'00 53,500-00
II Raton 35 MT 2100-00 73,500-00 20,000-00 53,000-00
Total 1,91,000-00

1 Ratoon

Crop type Avg yield Rate Rs Total cost Rs Minus cost Net payble Rs
of cultivation
I Raton 35 MT 2100-00 73,500-00 -- 73,500-00
II Raton 35 MT 2100-00 73,500-00 20,000-00 53,000-00
Total 73,500-00
 II Ratoon \

Crop type Avg yield Rate Rs Total cost Rs Minus cost Net payble Rs
;,.- of cultivation
II Raton 35 MT . 2100-00 73,50~~00 -- 73,000-00
Total 1,27,000-00

In the reference 7th cited, the Auction Superintendent, Tobacco Board, has
submitted that the recommendation of assessment Rs. 1,17,700-00 per Hectare as shown in
the following table.

SI,No Name of the Optimum Yield per Gross returns

cro Hectare K in Rs.
1 Tobacco 1100-00 1/17,700-00

In the reference 8th cited, the District level committee for Registration of tree value
f\
, -'
under the chairmanship of the then District Collector has finalized the rates for Eucalyptus
trees on 25.07.06. The above particulars have already been furnished to the power Grid
,i
,J
Corporation in the reference 10th cited, for payment of compensation to the Ryots in respect
of 400KV Krishnapatnam-Gooty line.

In the ~eference 9th cited, the amount of compensation to be paid to

. the ryots towards the loss of various agriculture, Horticulture and commercial
crops which was recommended by the authorities concemedhave been
communicated to the Chief Manaker, Power Grid Corporation Ltd., Nellore and t..~e
E.E., 400 KVj constsructionj Krishnapatnam, AP Transco, Nellore in respect of
400KV line for taking further action. Copy of the reference 9th cited along with the
recommendations of the District officers regarding crops concemed is enclosed.

I request you to take further action for payment of compensation to the

farmers covered under 765KV DC Nellore PS-Kumool transmission line, .35% more
than the compensation paid in respect of 400KV lines.
Yours faithfully
Sdj-B.Rami Reddy
For Collector and District Magistrate
N f2.il.;v R:.
Su perintendent(D)
~)'V

~1'.1..tJ
 From.
\landal Revenue Ofticcr
DC', i"makonda
Kumon! (1)1)
.I
To.
Dy.1\,1anager
f P()\\crgrid Corporation of India limited
Conslrw:lion area officer
" (IPot~ '

Sir.
Sub: construction of 400kY ole Raichur-Gooty Transmission line (pati) Yemmiganur-(i()(ll\'
section-Furnishing the tree valuation (Usufruct value) for payment ufcompensaliull.

Ret': SR-[: CAO: RC'R: SSSR-lIl: 'frees: 414 dId 09,11.06

With rclerellce to the above cited letter, r herewith furnishing the tree valuation lusufruCI \ :Il;l( 1

ror payment of compensation to the affected tree owners and the fell trees sholl ld be liand\.d (1\\'1

10 lhe concerned owners. .

 ...... __ _----------------
~ ~.".~

J/

~1''--I.3

Page 2of2
...
 POWER GRID CORPORATIONOF INDIA LIMITED
RECOMMENDED TREECOMPENSATION RATEs FORTRANSMISSION LINE PROJECTSIN SRTS-I
- --- -- .~- - Date ::01-02-2013
Usufruct Value in 2007 Proposed Usufruct Value
SI.No Name of the Tree Girth in Mtrs
(RS.l (RS.)
1 Babul Sapling ( < 0.2 ) 200 260
Babul 0.21 to 1.0 500 650
Bcibul 1.01 to 2.00 750 975
Babul 2.01 and above 1500 1950
2 Coconut Sapling 0.2) 750 975
Coconut Non Yield 2500 3250
Coconut Yield 5000 l' 6500
3 Eucalyptus Sapling 0.2) 300 390
Eucalyptus 0.21 to 0.5 500 650
Eucalyptus 0.~1 to 1.0 500 650
Eucalyptus 1.01 to 2.00 2500 3250
Eucalyptus 2.01 and above 2800 3640
4 Tamarind (Emil) Sapling 0.2 ) 500 650
Tamarind (Emil) 0.21 to 1.0 1500 1950
Tamarind (Emil) 1.01 to 2.00 4000 5200 .
Tamarind (Emil) 2.01 to 3.0 7500 9750
Tamarind (Emil) 3.01 to 4.0 10500 13650
Tamarind (Emil) 4.01 and above 15000 19500
5 . Jammi 0.01 to 1.0 500 650
Jammi 1.01 and above 1000 1300
6 Jungle 0.01 to 1.0 500 650
Jungle 1.01 and above 1000 1300
1/7
Mango Sapling ( < 0.2 ) 500 650
Mango 0.21 to 0.5 1000 1300
Mango 0.51 to 1.0 2000 2600
Mango 1.01 to 2.00 6000 7800
Mango 2.01 to 3.0 9000 11700
Mango 3.01 to 4.0 13000 16900
Mango 4.01 and above 15000 19500
8 Medi 0.01 to 1,0 500 650
Medi 1.01 and above 1000 1300
9 Neem Sapling 0.2) 400 520
Neem 0.21 to 1.0 , 800 1040
Neem 1.01 to 2.00 1800 2340
Neem 2.01 and baove 2500 3250
10 Palm Below 5 Mtr height 600 780
Palm Above 5 Mtr height 1000 1300
11 Date-Palm (Eetha) Below 5 Mtr height 400 520
Date-Palm (Eetha) . Above 5 Mtr height 800 1040
12 Regu Sapling 0.2) 300 390
Regu 0.21 to 0.5 500 650
Regu 0.51 to 1.0 1000 1300
Regu 1.01 to 2.00 1800 2340
Regu 2.01 tand above 2500 3250
13 Sapota Sapling 0.2) 400 520
Sapota 0.21 to 0.5 800 1040
Sapota 0.51 to 1.0 1200 1560
Sapota 1.01 to 2.00 2000 2600
Sapota 2.01 and above 2800 3640
Remarks: Cut trees shall be handed over to th on erned farmers

I. ~rI g-:w~~
~(N ISMV) 3 (SKODA~ (ARK REDDY)
Chief Manager Chief Manager DGM