Ramblings on Ayanamsa

October 4, 2008 visti

2 Comments
Jyotia
Share This
A topic which brings much doubt and tests the faith of newcomers in Jyotish is the topic of
Ayanamsa. Where our western counterparts who use the tropical zodiac arent affected by this
problem, those who use the sidereal zodiac, or a zodiac based on star positions are cast into a deep
dilemma as to which ayanamsa to use. Where western sidereal astrologers are almost forced to take
the plunge into learning the intricacies of the ayanamsa and thereby choose the ayanamsa they like
the best, vedic astrologers are presented with a peculiar situation where faith tends to be the
compelling factor in choosing ayanamsa.

This writeup doesnt claim to ascertain a correct ayanamsa, but tries to shed light on the many
different facets of the ayanamsa, and some possibilities within the same.

i. What is ayanamsa
To explain ayanamsa it becomes necessary to describe two different zodiacs, the Niryana chakra
and the Sayana chakra. These are two different zodiacs in a sense.
The Niryana is based on the stars and the Sayana is based on the equinoctial points, i.e. the seasons.
The Niryana or star-based zodiac is moving in comparison to the Sayana chakra, which
is seen by the stars being in different positions during the same time every year. This
difference between Niryana and Sayana chakra is called Ayanamsa.

ii. Two different theories on precession

In an attempt to explain the cause of the ayanamsa two major theories have arisen: luni-solar theory
and what some are calling the binary theory.
The luni-solar theory was initially referred to by Copernicus and later Newton, and has been
modified several times ever since. The theory is based on the idea that the reason the stars are
changing with reference to the earth, is because earths angle to them is changing. The reason for the
many modifications of the theory, is because its based on the idea that the Sun and Moons gravity is
the cause of the earths changing angle. Here whilst scientists could prove that the Sun and Moon did
indeed affect the earths angle, it wasnt enough to explain the change in ayanamsa. Further the
theory was based on a number of calculation principles which didnt deal well with predicting
future positions of the ayanamsa.
Here we come to the binary theory. This theory is much closer to home and coincides with some of
the Vedic concepts of the universe, namely that the Sun is moving around another point, i.e. Dhruva
or some other fixed point. See, the Moon revolves around the Earth in about 27 days. This is a lunar
return. Yet, a full moon occurs only after ~29 days. So the Moon has to spend 2 days extra catching
up with the Sun to complete the full moon phase.
Similarly, the earth revolves around the Sun in ~365 days. Yet, based on the binary theory, the Sun
is simultaneously moving around another point/binary star, and therefore the earth, just like the
moon, must spend more time to catch up with the star-placements in the heavens.
Because the earth has to spend more time moving forwards around the Sun it appears as if the stars
are moving backwards every year.

iii. Rate of precession

This brings us to the entire predicament of the ayanamsa the rate at which it is moving! The rate
at which its moving is called precession. The ayanamsa moves based on the star positions with
regards to the equinoctial points, and it has been found that the precession speed is changing. Where
it initially was 46 seconds of arc () in 150 AD [1], it is now ~50 seconds of ark and increasing.
Therefore for a complete cycle around the zodiac, it would take about 25 thousand years with
present information. Yet with data only spanning over a period of 2000 years, we only have a 1/12th
fraction of the knowledge of the zodiac movement.

[2]
These days most makers of astrological software do not take into account the change in precession
rate, and calculate a fixed rate of precession from a given date. This is a completely wrong
approach.
Some intelligent programmers have instead based their ayanamsa calculations on actual ephemeris
data of star positions. Though this is the best approach, it is limited to empirical/observed data.
Therefore the goal of astronomers and astrologers today is to define and make a model which can
imitate the precession.

iv. Clues from the seers

We are not left without clues from the seers of the vedas. According to Surya Siddhanta[3], the
circumference of the nakshatras wherein the stars exist are sixty times larger than the circumference
of the earths movement around the Sun. By this is implied that it takes sixty times longer for the
Sun to progress one degree, than it takes the earth. Therefore it takes 60 years before the Sun has
progressed one degree in the stars, and 120 years before it progresses two degrees. This makes the
average rate of precession of the ayanamsa one minute per year. This is ten arc seconds faster than
the current precession (50).
Assuming this data to be accurate, it would give a cycle lasting 21600 years before the Sayana and
Niryana chakras aligned again.

v. Ayanamsa choices
Today the most common choice among the vedic astrologers is the Lahiri ayanamsa. The reason
being that the ayanamsa was selected by a committee after intense scrutiny. The Lahiri ayanamsa is
based on the Chitra Paksha Ayanamsa. There are two main ayanamsas given in the vedic scripture
namely Revati-paksha and Chitra-paksha. The word paksha refers to 180 degrees or an exact
opposite position from a fixed star. Here Revati and Chitra do not refer to a large constellation of
nakshatras spanning ~13 degrees, but to the original stars which make up the base of the nakshatra
positions. The star Chitra corresponds to the star Spica, whilst Revati corresponds to the star Zeta
Piscium. 180 degrees opposite the star Chitra is said to be 0 degrees of Aries, whilst 180 degrees
opposite Revati is 0 degrees of Libra.
Today the tropical degree of Spica is 23 degrees 57 minutes 2.03 arc seconds. These degrees are the
actual ayanamsa at present. This corresponds to the sidereal degree of 0 degrees Libra and opposite
this is the sidereal 0 degrees of Aries according to the Chitra Paksha/Lahiri Ayanamsa. The reason
for choosing stars at the beginning of these two points is that they correspond to the Deva Ayana,
i.e. the day of the Deva begins in Aries, and ends in Libra, where the day of the Asuras begin.
Preferably any ayanamsa which depicts the movement of the stars should be based on these
starting/ending points as according to the Rg Veda, the stars are the abode of the Deva.
There also exists the Raman Ayanamsa and the Krishnamurty Paddhati Ayanamsa. Where the
former was not openly announced by its author, the latter is very close to Lahiri and could be an
approximation made to compensate for the inaccuracies in the Lahiri ayanamsa at the given time.
This is because astrologers had relied on a mean motion of the ayanamsa which caused inaccuracies
in the calculation with time. One more ayanamsa called Yuktesvaras ayanamsa exists but it wasnt
used to predict planetary positions but to justify yuga calculations, hence its unclear as to whether
the author of it actually meant to use it for any other purpose.
What is common for these three mentioned ayanamsas is that their authors havent linked them to
any fixed-star positions.
vi. How to choose?
Unfortunately, the astronomical backing is lacking in many of the new ayanamsas today, and
mainly because astrologers are too quick to ignore the star positions before ascribing to an
ayanamsa. And if it isnt the star position, then the precession rate itself doesnt correspond to the
actual precession of the stars. This leaves new ayanamsas as being imaginary or arbitrary positions
in space.
The fixed stars are the basis of the Niryana chakra, without which there is no basis for fixing the
zodiacs starting points. Therefore good advise to beginners on choosing ayanamsa is to analyze
these following points:
1. Stars initiating the ayanamsa.
2. Actual precession rate of the stars.
3. The signs which initiate the ayanamsa.
So far the only software today, to this authors knowledge, which depicts the Ayanamsa based on
actual star positions is Jagannath Hora, by PVR Narasimha Rao. The software uses an ephemeris
with the actual star positions to fix the ayanamsa. Yet, it is this authors hope that one day astrologers
will be able to calculate the ayanamsa for any given time using the knowledge given to us by the
seers.
[1] Hipparchos and Ptolemys observations.
[2] Source from Binary Research Institute (http://www.binaryresearchinstitute.org)
[3] Surya Siddhanta, Chapter XII, sloka 80.