Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 4

MATH1251 Calculus Test 3 2007 S2 v2a

Full Solutions
August 16, 2015

These solutions were written and typed up by Brendan Trinh. Please be ethical with this
resource. It is for the use of MathSOC members, so do not repost it on other forums or groups
without asking for permission. If you appreciate this resource, please consider supporting us by
coming to our events and buying our T-shirts! Also, happy studying :)

We cannot guarantee that our working is correct, or that it would obtain full marks - please
notify us of any errors or typos at unswmathsoc@gmail.com, or on our Facebook page. There
are sometimes multiple methods of solving the same question. Remember that in the real class
test, you will be expected to explain your steps and working out.

Please note quiz papers that are NOT in your course pack will not necessarily reflect the style
& difficulty of questions in your quiz.

1. (a) Consider 4a2n+1 8,

4a2n+1 8 = 4 (f (an ))2 8


1 2
 
1
=4 + 8
2 an
 
1 2 1
=4 a +1+ 2 8
4 n an
4
= a2n + 4 + 2 8
an
4
= a2n 4 + 2
an
2 2
 
= an > 0.
an

1
Thus, 4a2n+1 8 > 0 = a2n+1 > 2 for n 1. When n = 0, a21 = 22 = 4 > 2.
Hence, a2n > 2 for n 1.

(b) Using the definition of an+1 ,

an+1 = f (an )
1 1
= an +
2 an
1 1
= + 2 an
2 an

1
Note that a2n > 2, so a2n
< 21 .
Thus, an+1 < 12 an + 1
2 an = an for all n 1.
That is,
an+1 < an for all n 1.

(c) We explain this using the Monotone Convergence Theorem.

Firstly, the sequence {an }


n=1 is monotonically decreasing.

Next, we show that an is bounded,

an+1 = f (an )
1 1
= an +
2 an
r
1
2 (AM-GM Inequality)
2

= 2.

Thus, an is bounded from below.

Hence, the sequence converges by the Monotone Convergence Theorem, and there
exists a number L such that an L as n .

(d) We know that an+1 = limn f (an ).


Then, taking the limit as n on both sides,

lim an+1 = lim f (an )


n n
 
lim an+1 = f lim an (by continuity of f )
n n

L = f (L) (since limn an = limn an+1 )


L 1
L= +
2 L

2
L2
L2 = +1
2
L2
=1
2
L2 = 2

L = 2. (since an > 2 n 1)

2. True. If the limit doesnt tend to 0, then well always be adding numbers that are not
close to 0 in the sum and so itll diverge. Note that this explanation is not required.

3. False. We use a counterexample to show that its wrong.


You can choose any counterexample you like, this is just the one I chose.
1
Let an = n2
and bn = n1 .
Clearly, 0 an bn for n 1.
Also,
P P
n=1 an converges since it is a p-series with n = 2 and n=1 bn diverges since it is
a p-series with n = 1 (the harmonic series).

4. Let an = 1 .
n
We prove that this converges using Leibniz Test (the Alternating Signs Test).
Note that limn an = limn 1 = 0.
n

an+1 1/ n+1
Also, = = n < 1.
an 1/ n n+1
So an+1 < an for all n 1.
Thus, since:

the series is alternating, as an 0 for n 1,

an 0 as n ,

an+1 < an for n 1,

then by Leibniz Test (the Alternating Signs Test), the series converges.
(x1)n
5. Let an = .
2n (1+ n)

an+1
For the radius of convergence, we consider an and the limit as n since we wish
to have be less than 1 for it to converge.
So,

an+1 (x 1)n+1 / 2n+1 1 + n + 1

an =

(x 1)n / (2n (1 + n))



(x 1) 1 + n
= .
2 1 + n + 1

As n , (x1) 1+
n x1

2 .

2 1+ n+1

3

We require limn an+1
an < 1 for convergence, thus


x 1
2 < 1 = |x 1| < 2.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi