Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
But this was to change, according to the website, after its current
President, Dr. Anuruddha Padeniya, returned to Sri Lanka after
overseas training to assume its leadership once again. According
to GMOA, it was Dr. Padeniya who had pressurised this otherwise
militant trade union 'to take a clear stand on the issue'. What it
means is that had it not been for Dr. Padeniya, GMOA would have
accepted SAITM as a recognised medical college just like it had
accepted the medical college run by KDU. Curiously, the website
of GMOA does not bear any evidence that it had protested against
that medical college at all.
What this means is that, since the Private Medical College had not
been set up under this legislation, its degrees cannot be approved
by SLMC. Thus, the management of the Private Medical College at
Malabe had known as far back as 2009 that its graduates cannot
register themselves in Sri Lanka as medical practitioners under
the existing laws. Yet, this information had not been conveyed to
parents or students who had chosen it to pursue medical studies.
To the contrary, it had misinformed them that the particular
college is being supervised by SLMC, prompting the latter to issue
a public denial.
SAITM is not approved to run a medical school
The Padeniya Report had not been kind to the private medical
college at Malabe. It had criticised the college from many
viewpoints, some relevant and most others irrelevant.
In a similar tone, the Padeniya Report had expressed the fear that
those medical graduates could cause Sri Lanka's high healthcare
indices to fall over time. That is also a presumptuous claim.
They could also do much harm, says the Padeniya Report, to Sri
Lanka's plan to set up a knowledge hub, an avowed goal of the
previous as well as the present Government. In fact, if SAITM is a
success, it would definitely help Sri Lanka to build its reputation
as a knowledge hub.
The Padeniya Report also charges SAITM for derailing Sri Lankas
attempt at promoting medical tourism in the country. That again
is too much to claim. The success of Sri Lanka as a medical
tourism destination will depend on the quality of services
provided by both the State and private healthcare facilities.
One bad example does not mean Sri Lanka should throw away
private sector-based higher education. It has to go for that, but
before doing so, it is necessary to establish independent
authorities to assure the quality and standards of all universities
in the country, both State and private sector sponsored.