Political Crimes & Criminals

The bald faced-lies and warped reasoning that are thinly disguised and hidden within a club
sandwich that also contains some elements of truth and reference to reality; are what the 'ruling
class' have arrogantly served to us, and relied upon for so long - in order to pull the wool over the
eyes of what they term as the "sheeple".

But the people are becoming more and more aware that they are being lied to - that there
is a thin veil, an opaque veneer of deception that exists between what they are being told
and a set of hidden agendas.

The people are increasingly seeing now that they are being decieved, being fed cover
stories. They are getting a sense of what is really going on with the politicians and their
masters, the multinational corporatocracy.

One of the latest and most obvious examples of their shams is the TPPA - the Trans Pacific
Partnership Agreement.

If this agreement is really so beneficial to us all - why is it being negotiated in secret; why are the
people not allowed to know what they 'rulers' are attempting to shoe-horn us into?

This section not only details the activities of the Cabal, but also positive movements countering
their agendas.

We see this playing out with the recent developments with respect to the likes of Nigel Farage
and Donald Trump (despite the negative spin that the Cabal-controlled mainstream media
attempts to put on such developments that are in fact positive).

Facts You Need To know About Syria & Syrian President Bashar Al Assad Fields
Questions From French Media And Defends Alternative Media
January 12 2017 | From: AustralianNationalReview / 21stCenturyWire

The Assad family belongs to the tolerant Islam of Alawid orientation.

Syrian women have the same rights as men to study, health and education.
 Syrian women are not forced to wear the burqa. The Sharia (Islamic law) is unconstitutional.

Related: Ron Paul on Aleppo Aftermath: We Need a New Syria Policy

Syria is the only Arab country with a secular constitution and does not tolerate Islamic extremist movements.

Roughly 10% of the Syrian population belongs to one of the many Christian denominations, all fully integrated in
Syrian political and social life.

In other Arab countries the Christian population is less than 1% due to sustained hostility.

Syria has banned genetically modified (GMO) seeds, stating his decision was made in order to preserve human
health,

Syria has an opening to Western society and culture like no other Arab country.

Its media and universities openly debate the global power elites influence in things. This means that they fully
grasp the fact that real power in the West lies not in the White House but rather with the complex and powerful grid
of elite think-tanks and central banks.

Throughout history there have been five popes of Syrian origin. Religious tolerance is unique in the area.

Prior to the current civil war, Syria was one of the only peaceful countries in the area, having avoided major wars
or internal conflicts.

Syria was the only country that admitted Iraqi refugees without any social, political or religious discrimination.

Syria clearly and unequivocally opposes Zionism and the Israel government.

Following a massive oil find in Syrias Golan Heights, occupied by Israel since 1967, Netanyahu recently asked
Obama to recognize its annexation of the territory. To consolidate its hold, plans are afoot to quadruple Israeli
settler numbers to 100,000.

And The Most Two Important Points:

Syria is one of the only countries in the Middle East without debts to the International Monetary Fund (Pre-
invasion Libya & Iran the only others)
 Syria is the only Mediterranean country which remains the owner of its oil company, with an oil reserve of 2,500
million barrels, the operation of which has avoided privatization and is reserved exclusively for state-owned
enterprises.

So now ask yourself, why are we truly attempting to overthrow yet another government?

What are we hoping to fix here?

If the recent invasions and illegal assassinations of Presidents like Qaddafi and Saddam have taught us anything, it should
be the understanding of the blowback effect of such lawless actions by the West and the vacuum of chaos that always
supersedes it.

Debt Conquer. Invent a reason to invade and destroy, then offer $Trillions in IMF funding to rebuild conveniently
paid back by control of your oil fields and the free access to build gas pipelines to the west.

Related Articles:

Bolivian actress Carla Ortiz exposes what went wrong with Western media coverage of Syrian conflict

Syria Story Is A Fools Paradise

Western Media Credibility In Free Fall Collapse: Case In Point: UN Peace Council: The US Media Is Lying To The
American people. The War In Syria Is Not A Civil War, It's A Proxy Invasion By The United States

Syria: Attack On Aid Convoy Kills Twenty, Destroys Aid, And Obliterates US War Crimes In Support Of ISIS-Daesh
Terror Group?

I Am A Syrian Living In Syria: It Was Never A Revolution Nor A Civil War: The Terrorists Are Sent By Your
Government

The Boy In The Ambulance: US State Dept-Funded Groups Behind Latest 'Iconic Image' Designed To Demonize
Russia And Encourage Further Bloodshed In Syria

Checkmate! U.S. Loses Syria & Turkey; Erdogan Will Visit Putin + John McCain Is Directly Responsible For ISIS

Clinton Email Reveals: Google Sought Overthrow Of Syria's Assad

In Syria, If You Cant Find Moderates, Dress Up Some Extremists

Paris-Syria Timeline Of Terror

The End Of The New World Order As Russia Shifts Balance Of Power: Russia's Syrian Operation To Smash
Terrorists, End Tyranny Of Banking Elite

Secret Pentagon Report Reveals US "Created" ISIS As A "Tool" To Overthrow Syria's President Assad & War is
Peace: US Needs External Enemy to Ensure Internal Unity

Syrian President Bashar Al Assad Fields Questions From French Media And Defends
Alternative Media

Recently we reported on the targeting of a French delegation to Syria, led by politician, Thierry
Mariani, by the US backed FSA (Free Syrian Army) Company 23.
Aleppo airport was shelled by this group of primarily US supported moderate rebels led by a defected Syrian
Arab Army colonel, Hassan Rajoob, just prior to the planned take off of the plane ferrying the delegation back to
Damascus.

Related: US, UK Paid White Helmets Help Al Qaeda Blocking Water To 5 Million Syrians

The delegation then met with Syrian President, Bashar Al Assad, on the 9th January 2017. Following the meeting, President
Assad met with and fielded questions from French media.

Related: US Backed Moderate Rebels Target French Delegation in Aleppo

We always have hopes that the next (French) administration, or government, or president will want to deal with
the reality, to disconnect themselves from the disconnected policy from our reality. That is our hope..and they can
work for the interests of the French people.

The question now, after six years, as a French citizen, do you feel safer? I dont think the answer is yes. The
immigration problem, has it made the situation in your country better? []

This is the question the next administration, government, president should deal with in order to deal with our reality
not what is in their imagination as has been happening for the last six years.

(Fillons) rhetoric regarding the terrorists, or lets say the priority to fight the terrorists and not meddling in the affairs
of other countries are welcome, but we have to be cautious, because what we have learned in this region, during
the last few years, is that many officials would say something and do the opposite.
 I am not saying M Fillon would do this, I hope not, but we have to wait and see because there is no contact. But so
far, what he is saying, if it is implemented, that will be very good.

If I want to send (a message to French politicians) I would say the self evident thing, that we have to work for the
interests of the Syrian citizens, and for the last six years the situation is going in the opposite direction. The French
politics harmed the French interests.

For the French people, I would say the mainstream media has failed in most of the west, the narrative has been
debunked because of the reality and you have the alternative media, you have to look for the truth.

Truth was the main victim of the events in the Middle East, including Syria.

I would ask any citizen in France, please search for the reality, for the real information, through the alternative
media. When they search for this information, they can be more effective, in dealing with their government, or at
least not allowing some politicians to base their politics on lies.

Related: Who Are Syria's White Helmets?

Facebook Knows A Whole Lot About Your Offline Life + The World's Best Security
Engineers Are Working On Flappy Bird
January 12 2017 | From: Digg / Inverse

Facebook has long let users see all sorts of things the site knows about them, like whether they
enjoy soccer, have recently moved, or like Melania Trump.

But the tech giant gives users little indication that it buys far more sensitive data about them, including their
income, the types of restaurants they frequent and even how many credit cards are in their wallets.

Related: How a 2011 Hack Youve Never Heard of Changed the Internets Infrastructure

Since September, ProPublica has been encouraging Facebook users to share the categories of interest that the site has
assigned to them. Users showed us everything from "Pretending to Text in Awkward Situations" to "Breastfeeding in
Public." In total, we collected more than 52,000 unique attributes that Facebook has used to classify users.
Facebook's site says it gets information about its users "from a few different sources."

What the page doesn't say is that those sources include detailed dossiers obtained from commercial data brokers about
users' offline lives. Nor does Facebook show users any of the often remarkably detailed information it gets from those
brokers.

"They are not being honest," said Jeffrey Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy.

"Facebook is bundling a dozen different data companies to target an individual customer, and an individual should
have access to that bundle as well."

Related: Privacy Advocates Walk Out in Protest Over U.S. Facial Recognition Code of Conduct

When asked this week about the lack of disclosure, Facebook responded that it doesn't tell users about the third-party data
because its widely available and was not collected by Facebook.

Our approach to controls for third-party categories is somewhat different than our approach for Facebook-specific
categories," said Steve Satterfield, a Facebook manager of privacy and public policy.

"This is because the data providers we work with generally make their categories available across many different
ad platforms, not just on Facebook."

Satterfield said users who don't want that information to be available to Facebook should contact the data brokers directly.
He said users can visit a page in Facebook's help center, which provides links to the opt-outs for six data brokers that sell
personal data to Facebook.

Limiting commercial data brokers' distribution of your personal information is no simple matter. For instance, opting out of
Oracle's Datalogix, which provides about 350 types of data to Facebook according to our analysis, requires "sending a
written request, along with a copy of government-issued identification" in postal mail to Oracle's chief privacy officer.

Users can ask data brokers to show them the information stored about them. But that can also be complicated. One
Facebook broker, Acxiom, requires people to send the last four digits of their social security number to obtain their data.
Facebook changes its providers from time to time so members would have to regularly visit the help center page to protect
their privacy.
One of us actually tried to do what Facebook suggests. While writing a book about privacy in 2013, reporter Julia
Angwin tried to opt out from as many data brokers as she could.

Of the 92 brokers she identified that accepted opt-outs, 65 of them required her to submit a form of identification such as a
driver's license. In the end, she could not remove her data from the majority of providers.

ProPublica's experiment to gather Facebook's ad categories from readers was part of our Black Box series, which explores
the power of algorithms in our lives. Facebook uses algorithms not only to determine the news and advertisements that it
displays to users, but also to categorize its users in tens of thousands of micro-targetable groups.

Our crowd-sourced data showed us that Facebook's categories range from innocuous groupings of people who like
southern food to sensitive categories such as "Ethnic Affinity" which categorizes people based on their affinity for African-
Americans, Hispanics and other ethnic groups. Advertisers can target ads toward a group 2014 or exclude ads from being
shown to a particular group.

Related: US Government Quietly Starts Asking Travelers for Social Media Accounts

Last month, after ProPublica bought a Facebook ad in its housing categories that excluded African-Americans, Hispanics
and Asian-Americans, the company said it would build an automated system to help it spot ads that illegally discriminate.

Facebook has been working with data brokers since 2012 when it signed a deal with Datalogix. This prompted Chester, the
privacy advocate at the Center for Digital Democracy, to filed a complaint with the Federal Trade Commission alleging that
Facebook had violated a consent decree with the agency on privacy issues.

The FTC has never publicly responded to that complaint and Facebook subsequently signed deals with five other data
brokers.

To find out exactly what type of data Facebook buys from brokers, we downloaded a list of 29,000 categories that the site
provides to ad buyers. Nearly 600 of the categories were described as being provided by third-party data brokers. (Most
categories were described as being generated by clicking pages or ads on Facebook.)
Related: Facebook Kills Pro-Trump Account In Free Speech Crackdown

The categories from commercial data brokers were largely financial, such as "total liquid investible assets $1-$24,999,"
"People in households that have an estimated household income of between $100K and $125K, or even "Individuals that
are frequent transactor at lower cost department or dollar stores."

We compared the data broker categories with the crowd-sourced list of what Facebook tells users about themselves. We
found none of the data broker information on any of the tens of the thousands of "interests" that Facebook showed users.

Our tool also allowed users to react to the categories they were placed in as being "wrong," "creepy" or "spot on." The
category that received the most votes for "wrong" was "Farmville slots." The category that got the most votes for "creepy"
was "Away from family." And the category that was rated most "spot on" was "NPR."

The World's Best Security Engineers Are Working On Flappy Bird

Fewer people want to engage in a modern "spy vs. spy."

Eugene Kaspersky explains hacking like its a bank robbery:

Imagine you visit your bank and there are a thousand people crowding the office, Kaspersky tells Inverse.

There are so many of them, you simply cant get inside. Theyre just messing around asking irrelevant questions,
shouting, and acting silly. Most workers at the bank wont be able to serve you or anyone else that day. Thats a
DDoS attack."

Later that night, someone unarms the alarms, breaks into the bank, cracks the vault, and steals all the money.
Thats hacking.

The bank in his metaphor is a server, and hackers in 2016 have had a banner year screwing with them. In October, a chunk
of code known as Mirai hijacked thousands of internet-connected devices to launch a record-size DDoS attack.

Together, they spewed access requests at a DNS server - a switchboard for the internet, basically - and brought down some
of the biggest sites on the internet: Twitter, Reddit, and Spotify among them. Again, merely an annoyance.
The more sophisticated attack on a server is when hackers - either lone wolves, loose collectives, or state-sponsored
snoops - retrieve information from a server and release it to the public to influence public opinion and even sway elections.
This scenario should be familiar to everybody by now.

The problem is, there just arent enough people smart enough to guard the vaults. Kaspersky would know. Hes a big deal in
the world of cybersecurity.

As the founder and CEO of cybersecurity giant Kaspersky Lab, hes often in the news for spotting security flaws for his
clients. He also cant find enough people to work for him.

There are more than 1 million unfilled security jobs worldwide, a number that could grow to 1.5 million by the end of the
decade, according to a report from technology conglomerate Cisco Systems.

Would a healthier cybersecurity industry have stopped the years biggest hacks - Wikileaks and DDoS attacks - from being
pulled off?
Eugene Kapersky

Protecting against these two threats requires different skills and different technologies, including the software and
hardware needed, Kaspersky tells Inverse. To some extent, theres an overlap of skills simply because IT
security people get to learn about both threats.

But DDoS attacks are ham-fisted and blunt. They dont do much damage and often dont keep a website down for long.
Whats more dangerous are targeted attacks carried out to destroy machinery or collect information. And there arent
enough security experts to stop those, either.

Perhaps the most famous example is the so-called zero day virus named Stuxnet.

Although the United States government still wont even address it, the destruction of uranium enrichment machinery in Iran
in 2009 - the kind that could provide ingredients for a nuclear bomb - is widely seen as an American ploy. The machinery
was destroyed after malware infected the program that regulated centrifuges.

It was brilliant, but it spread beyond its target of the Iran nuclear facility.
Eric Chien, an engineer at California-based security company Symantec, helped track how the weaponized code used in
Iran known as Stuxnet worked. (Kaspersky Lab also analyzed the virus over the course of about two years.)

At a panel after a screening of Zero Days, a documentary about the attack, Chien lamented that the next wave of computer
science graduates might be more interested in making freemium apps rather than uncovering international intrigue.

We go into the office thinking about how we are going to defeat these adversaries.

We see a lot of people getting into things like mobile or social, and people are creating Flappy Bird and people are
making millions of dollars", Chien said.

But what we both really love about this job and why were super-passionate about this, is its unique in some
sense. While we have competitors in our business - also creating security products - when we go in the office,
were not thinking about, Oh, how do we make another dollar? How do we beat our competitor?

We go into the office thinking about how we are going to defeat these adversaries. How are we going to defeat
these actors. And those actors are constantly changing.

Bruce Schneier, a cyber security expert and author, gets it. Young engineers might not see security as sexy, he
says. Which is weird to me, because I think its the coolest ever. Its spy versus spy.

At a hacking competition at New York University this year, one could find a lot of students who would agree with that
sentiment.
One of the annual competitive formats during NYUs Cyber Security Awareness Week is known as Capture the Flag, or
CTF, and it attracts the kinds of students who could help fill the computer security talent gap.

This year, students from all over the world competed in a 36-hour marathon, scrolling through endless lines of code to crack
security challenges.

The skills you learn in a CTF are exactly the type of outside-the-box thinking that is required, says David
Kohlbrenner, a Ph.D. student in security and systems at UC San Diego.

He got involved in cybersecurity purely through CTF, and is an original member of the Plaid Parliament of Pwning, a
dominant CTF team from Carnegie Mellon that won this years competition.

What the companies need are people who can solve a variety of different challenges and can approach them from
different angles, Kohlbrenner tells Inverse.

Kohlbrenner says the Mirai botnet responsible for Octobers massive DDoS attack was honestly trivial to set up, and a
continued dearth of security engineers (and, Schneier argues, a market failure to make the Internet of Things decently
secure) could keep it that way in the future.
Click on the image above to open a larger verion in a new window

Its clear companies need more manpower, whether thats to ward off DDoS attacks or server hacks. But when it comes to
recruiting, Schneier says new technology companies have the upper hand in attracting talented young programmers.

You dont want to work for Procter & Gamble, he says.

"You want to work for Google, or you wanna go work for Facebook, or the next high tech startup, Schneier says.

"But Procter & Gamble, turns out, needs maybe a couple dozen cybersecurity people.

Nick Winter, the co-founder of a gamified coding community called CodeCombat, agrees. No one is thinking, hmm, Im
gonna get a job at an insurance company".

Doesnt matter if they have all these interesting technological problems to solve and tons of important data to protect.
Theyre at a huge disadvantage there compared to any start-up in San Francisco or even, like, a tech-focused, big tech
company like Cisco.

Both Schneier and Winters examples are reminders that it isnt just tech companies - from router manufacturers to dating
apps - that have a lot to lose when security engineers are in short supply.

All companies become software companies, Winter says. And all data becomes more important and mission
critical.

Half of the 4,000 companies in a recent survey by Kaspersky Lab cited cybersecurity as a concern.
 The findings show a general shortage in full-time security staff and expert talent availability, which calls for the
need for more specialists in the field, reads a press release about the survey results.

Its up to universities like NYU to prepare students for an ever-changing field, Kaspersky says. Server attacks in the future
shouldnt feel like bank robberies that change elections.

The job market is changing too fast for the education system, Kaspersky says.

Universities are fairly conservative institutions, plus, of course, it takes considerable time to educate people.

We see that theres a growing number of IT security programs, and more and more people are getting interested in
the field, but the job market is expanding faster.

His advice for young programmers? Learn how to prevent attacks.

There are many skills that are in deficit that require very focused technical training Kaspersky says.

Intrusion detection, development of secure software, digital forensics. All these skills are in high demand, but
there are not many folks who have them.

US Deep State In Deep Trouble + A Deeper Understanding Of Technocracy

January 11 2017 | From: Sputnik / JonRappoport
US ruling power is in deep trouble because there are growing signs that the mass of citizens are
no longer beholden to the supposed authority residing in Washington.

Once the legitimacy of would-be authorities begins to collapse in the eyes of the people, then profound political
change is in the offing, as history shows us through countless empires that came and went often ignominiously.

Related: Creeping Technocratic Dictatorship: Google Can Access Medical Records; Microsoft Storing Data On Your
DNA

"The so-called American Deep State comprising the military-intelligence apparatus and its operatives in the
political and media establishment has put its credibility on the line over allegations of Russian interference in the
US elections."

Those allegations are threadbare, indeed baseless, despite concerted, overweening attempts by the Deep State to conjure
up something of substance.

Related: US Intelligence 'Laid Itself Open to Ridicule' by Accusing Russia of Hacker Attacks

The latest high-level intelligence report from the CIA, NSA, FBI and other US spy agencies on alleged Russian cyber
hacking may have wowed President Barack Obama, various members of Congress and the corporate-controlled news
media. Not so for ordinary Americans. Among rank-and-file citizens the reaction has been underwhelming to say the least.

And that should be a matter of anxiety for the ruling establishment. If the people can no longer be commanded,
then the whole foundation for power begins to erode like a sandcastle.

As a New York Times report put it:

"Whats the big deal? asks Trumps supporters on Russian hacking report.
Trump is quite a hit in Russia - here he is on sugar packaging in a Russian store

Related: How Trump May Have Just Caused Russia to Fall Back in Love with the USA

Among ordinary voters far removed from the Washington Beltway Bubble the consensus is one of derision towards the
once-revered US intelligence community.

"Sore losers, sour grapes, crybabies and absurd were just some of the disbelieving responses from ordinary
folks about claims that Russian agents directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin had tipped the US November
election in favor of Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton."

I dont believe the [US] intel report, said one man in Louisiana. Why is everybody so afraid of Russia? Im not
against Putin.

Related: WikiLeaks: US Intel Report on Russia Hacking 'Has Poor Sourcing and No Evidence'

Another man, a retired US air force officer, added:

"From the parts of the [US intel] report Ive seen it seems silly.

President-elect Trump, once again, seems more in tune with the real, pressing concerns of common citizens.

He emerged from his so-called briefing by US intelligence chiefs last Friday and pointedly refused to join the Washington
blowhards accusing Russia of an act of war.

Trump in fact followed up with a comment that it was only a stupid person would not want to have good relations with
Russia.

This was not the response that the spooks wanted from Trump. The CIA and their surrogates in the Obama administration,
Congress and the media were building up the US intel report like a witch-hunt against anyone who dares to dissent from the
allegations of Russian cyber interference.

Unlike warmongering Congress members such as John McCain and Lyndsey Graham, Trump has not jumped on the
bandwagon to demonize Russia.

"And the thing is that people beyond the thrall of the Deep State centered in Washington appear to agree with
Trump.

At a time of immense social challenges from poverty, unemployment, financial indebtedness, deteriorating
infrastructure and public services, and so on, a US policy of hostility towards Russia seems like an alien
distraction. A contemptible waste of priority and resources, not to say a reckless drumbeat to war between nuclear
powers."

Shocker: 'Proof' of Russia's Trump Support Was Compiled During Obama's Election

The US intelligence agencies, aided by the Obama White House and mainstream media, tried to muster gravitas to play its
Russian card against Trump.

But Trump and the popular sentiment out there are not responding in the deferential manner expected by the
spooks.

In fact, despite sensationalist headlines in the mainstream media about Putin ordering an influence campaign to help Trump
win the election, the US intelligence agencies are now in real danger of being exposed as ridiculous liars.
The collapse of the US establishment has been underway for sometime, but lately the momentum has quickened with the
election of Trump and the mainstream medias penchant for fake narratives.

Last week the Washington disgraced itself by running a story about Russia hacking into the US electric, a story which was
quickly exposed as fake news.

On the latest US intel report, as well as Trump and ordinary Americans, many observers from around the world were taken
aback by the amateurish dearth of evidence and generally low quality of analysis. Independent cyber security experts,
including US-based ones, poured scorn on the claims against Russia.

Related: US Readiness to Throw Rocks at Russia Marks Need for Policy U-Turn Ex-Adviser to Trump

The US spy agencies claim that they have supporting evidence that Russia hacked Hillary Clintons emails, but they say,
unconvincingly, that they cant disclose the information in order to protect sensitive sources and methods. Such a conjuring
trick just makes the US spooks and the subservient news media look even more ridiculous.
A major giveaway was the disproportionately huge focus that the US intelligence report devoted to trying to discredit
Russian news media outlets, RT and Sputnik.

The report claims that the news services are part of the Kremlins influence campaign and then cites its own ropey
rationale as evidence that Russia hacked the US election.

If thats the best that Americas national security guardians can come up with then we can be sure their case against
Russia is null and void.

There was a time in the American past when shadowy, unelected elites could control society through monopolistic, servile
media and servile politicians kowtowing to their supposed authority.

There was also a naive belief among people that the secret services were defending the nations best interests.

Not any more alas. People have got wise to the massive manipulation and criminality of such shadowy powers who
orchestrate wars and regime changes all around the world for the narrow benefit of elite corporate power.

Ordinary Americans pay with their lives and livelihoods for the machinations of the ruling cabal.

"The Deep State intel chiefs may have been fawned over by Obama, Congress and the media in their outlandish
claims of Russian subversion. But growing numbers of ordinary people in the US and around the world can see
through the lies and blatant agenda of hostility towards Russia an insane hostility that only serves the elite
interests of the Deep State."

The once feared, and revered, US Deep State is now facing a deep dilemma and maybe even an existential crisis. For it
knows deep down that its erstwhile credibility and authority are shot to pieces.
Down through history, the American rulers got away with their charade of inciting wars and conflicts through false flags and
contrived catastrophes: the not-so-secret Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, the fabricated Gulf of Tonkin incident that
escalated the US genocidal war on Vietnam, the dubious 9/11 terror attacks and Iraqs non-existent weapons of mass
destruction, to mention just a few.

This same warmongering American ruling class want another arms race, Pentagon-pumping Cold War with Russia. But this
time they have played a card that is all too evidently blank. The US spooks and their elitist establishment know that Trump,
the American people, Russia and the rest of world all know that they have nothing to offer.

No credibility, no morals and no authority, the US Deep State is in deep trouble.

A Deeper Understanding Of Technocracy

Technocracy is the basic agenda and plan for ruling global society from above, so we need to
understand it from several angles.
Consider a group of enthusiastic forward-looking engineers in the early 20th century. They work for a company that
has a contract to manufacture a locomotive.

Related: Technocracy: A Scientific Dictatorship

This is a highly complex piece of equipment. On one level, workers are required to make the components to spec. Then they
must put them all together. These tasks are formidable. On another level, various departments of the company must
coordinate their efforts. This is also viewed as a technological job. Organizing is considered a technology.

When the locomotive is finished and delivered, and when it runs on its tracks and pulls a train, a great and inspiring victory is
won.

And thenthe engineers begin to think about the implications. Suppose the locomotive was society itself? Suppose society
was the finished product? Couldnt society be put together in a coordinated fashion?

And couldnt the technology of organizing things be utilized for the job?
Related: "Smart City" Is Really Government Spying On An Unimaginable Scale

Why bother with endlessly arguing and lying politicians? Why should they be in charge? Isnt that an obvious losing
proposition? Of course it is.

But engineers could lay out and build a future society that would benefit all people. Hunger, disease, and poverty could be
wiped out. Eliminating them would be part of the uncompromising blueprint.

This insight hit engineers and technicians like a ton of bricks. Of course! All societies had been failures for the
same reason: the wrong people were in charge.

Armed with this new understanding, engineers of every stripe began to see what was needed. A revolution in thinking about
societal organization. Science was the new king. And science would rule.

Of course, for an engineered world to work, certain decisions would have to be made about the role of the
individual. Every individual. You couldnt have an air-tight plan if every human were free to pursue his own
objectives.

Too many variables. Too much confusion. Too much conflict. Well, that problem could be solved. The individuals
actions would be tailored to fit the coordinated operations of the planned society.
Related: Technocracy: evolution told as a fairy tale

The individual would be inserted into a pre-ordained slot. He would be one of the components of the locomotive. His life
would be connected to other lives to produce an exemplary shape.

Yes, this could imply a few problems, but those problems could be worked out. They would have to be worked out, because
the overriding goal was the forming of a world organization.

What would you do if one bolt (an individual human) in one wheel of a locomotive was the wrong size? You would
go back and correct the error. You would re-make the bolt.

Among sincere technocrats, the overall vision superseded the glaring problems.

Butother people entered the game. High-echelon Globalists saw technocracy as a system they could use to control the
population. Control was their goal. Period. What happened to the individual in the process was of no concern to them. The
individual had freedom or he didnt have freedom, and the Globalists overtly intended to wipe out that freedom.

Erasing hunger, poverty, illness? Nonsense.

For the Globalists, those realities would be exacerbated. Sick, weak, and debilitated people were easier to rule and
control and manage.

Essentially, a vastly misguided vision of a future technocratic utopia was hijacked. Something bad was made much worse.

In a nutshell, this is the history of technocracy. A locomotive is a society? No.

That was the first fatally flawed idea. Everything that followed was increasingly psychotic.

Unfortunately, many people in our world believe in Globalism, if you could call a partial vague view a legitimate belief.

They dreamily float on all the propaganda cover stories - greatest good for the greatest number of people; no more
poverty; equality of sharing; reducing the carbon footprint; a green economy; sustainable development;
international cooperation; engineering production and consumption of goods and services for the betterment of
everyone; and all of this delivered from a central platform of altruistic guides.

If you track down the specifics that sit under these pronouncements, you discover you discover a warped system of
planning that delivers misery and de facto slavery to the global population.
Related: Fabian Socialist Society

The collective utopia turns out to be a sham. Waking up is hard to do? Breaking up is hard to do? They must be
done.

A workable technological fix is a very nice achievement when the project is a machine. But transferring that glow of victory to
the whole of society is an illusion. Anything that calls itself education would tackle the illusion as the first order of business.

Related Articles:

Minds Like Machines

Robert Steele: The Soft Coup Collapses

Military Coups, Regime Change: The CIA Has Interfered In Over 81 Foreign Elections

As We Move Into 2017: The Cracks in the Empire are Here How will the U.S. Empire Dissolve?

The Op: Unelected Agents Now Infiltrating Critical Infrastructures

Obama Regime Moves To Federalize Elections

Editing Reality: Former Employees Admit Facebook Censors Conservative News

American Pravda: How The CIA Invented "Conspiracy Theories"

January 10 2017 | From: UNZ / ActivistPost / Various

With the sudden, bizarre rise of the Fake News accusations throughout the entire Corporate
Media megaphone and the equally bizarre and totally unsubstantiated CIA allegations that the
Russians had stolen the election for Donald Trump, this topic is highly pertinent.
A year or two ago, I saw the much-touted science fiction film Interstellar, and although the plot wasnt any good,
one early scene was quite amusing. For various reasons, the American government of the future claimed that our
Moon Landings of the late 1960s had been faked, a trick aimed at winning the Cold War by bankrupting Russia into
fruitless space efforts of its own.

Related: Trump Plans to Shrink, Reorganize CIA, Other Intel Agencies

This inversion of historical reality was accepted as true by nearly everyone, and those few people who claimed that Neil
Armstrong had indeed set foot on the Moon were universally ridiculed as crazy conspiracy theorists. This seems a realistic
portrayal of human nature to me.

Obviously, a large fraction of everything described by our government leaders or presented in the pages of our most
respectable newspapers - from the 9/11 attacks to the most insignificant local case of petty urban corruption - could
objectively be categorized as a conspiracy theory but such words are never applied.

Instead, use of that highly loaded phrase is reserved for those theories, whether plausible or fanciful, that do not
possess the endorsement stamp of establishmentarian approval.
Related: The 70 Greatest Conspiracy Theories in Pop-Culture History

Put another way, there are good conspiracy theories and bad conspiracy theories, with the former being the ones
promoted by pundits on mainstream television shows and hence never described as such.

Ive sometimes joked with people that if ownership and control of our television stations and other major media
outlets suddenly changed, the new information regime would require only a few weeks of concerted effort to totally
invert all of our most famous conspiracy theories in the minds of the gullible American public.

The notion that nineteen Arabs armed with box-cutters hijacked several jetliners, easily evaded our NORAD air defenses,
and reduced several landmark buildings to rubble would soon be universally ridiculed as the most preposterous conspiracy
theory ever to have gone straight from the comic books into the minds of the mentally ill, easily surpassing the absurd lone
gunman theory of the JFK assassination.

Even without such changes in media control, huge shifts in American public beliefs have frequently occurred in the recent
past, merely on the basis of implied association.

In the initial weeks and months following the 2001 attacks, every American media organ was enlisted to denounce and vilify
Osama Bin Laden, the purported Islamicist master-mind, as our greatest national enemy, with his bearded visage endlessly
appearing on television and in print, soon becoming one of the most recognizable faces in the world.
But as the Bush Administration and its key media allies prepared a war against Iraq, the images of the Burning Towers were
instead regularly juxtaposed with mustachioed photos of dictator Saddam Hussein, Bin Ladens arch-enemy.

As a consequence, by the time we attacked Iraq in 2003, polls revealed that some 70% of the American
public believed that Saddam was personally involved in the destruction of our World Trade Center.

By that date I dont doubt that many millions of patriotic but low-information Americans would have angrily denounced and
vilified as a crazy conspiracy theorist anyone with the temerity to suggest that Saddam had not been behind 9/11, despite
almost no one in authority having ever explicitly made such a fallacious claim.

These factors of media manipulation were very much in my mind a couple of years ago when I stumbled across a short but
fascinating book published by the University of Texas academic press. The author of Conspiracy Theory in Americawas
Prof. Lance deHaven-Smith, a former president of the Florida Political Science Association.
Based on an important FOIA disclosure, the books headline revelation was that the CIA was very likely responsible for the
widespread introduction of conspiracy theory as a term of political abuse, having orchestrated that development as a
deliberate means of influencing public opinion.

During the mid-1960s there had been increasing public skepticism about the Warren Commission findings that a lone
gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, had been solely responsible for President Kennedys assassination, and growing suspicions
that top-ranking American leaders had also been involved.

So as a means of damage control, the CIA distributed a secret memo to all its field offices requesting that they
enlist their media assets in efforts to ridicule and attack such critics as irrational supporters of conspiracy
theories.

Soon afterward, there suddenly appeared statements in the media making those exact points, with some of the wording,
arguments, and patterns of usage closely matching those CIA guidelines.

The result was a huge spike in the pejorative use of the phrase, which spread throughout the American media, with the
residual impact continueing right down to the present day. Thus, there is considerable evidence in support of this particular
conspiracy theory explaining the widespread appearance of attacks on conspiracy theories in the public media.
But although the CIA appears to have effectively manipulated public opinion in order to transform the phrase conspiracy
theory into a powerful weapon of ideological combat, the author also describes how the necessary philosophical ground
had actually been prepared a couple of decades earlier.

Around the time of the Second World War, an important shift in political theory caused a huge decline in the respectability of
any conspiratorial explanation of historical events.

For decades prior to that conflict, one of our most prominent scholars and public intellectuals had been historian Charles
Beard, whose influential writings had heavily focused on the harmful role of various elite conspiracies in shaping
American policy for the benefit of the few at the expense of the many, with his examples ranging from the earliest
history of the United States down to the nations entry into WWI.

Obviously, researchers never claimed that all major historical events had hidden causes, but it was widely accepted that
some of them did, and attempting to investigate those possibilities was deemed a perfectly acceptable academic enterprise.

However, Beard was a strong opponent of American entry into the Second World War, and he was marginalized in the years
that followed, even prior to his death in 1948. Many younger public intellectuals of a similar bent also suffered the same fate,
or were even purged from respectability and denied any access to the mainstream media.

At the same time, the totally contrary perspectives of two European political philosophers, Karl Popper and Leo Strauss,
gradually gained ascendancy in American intellectual circles, and their ideas became dominant in public life.

Popper, the more widely influential, presented broad, largely theoretical objections to the very possibility of important
conspiracies ever existing, suggesting that these would be implausibly difficult to implement given the fallibility of human
agents; what might appear a conspiracy actually amounted to individual actors pursuing their narrow aims.

Even more importantly, he regarded conspiratorial beliefs as an extremely dangerous social malady, a major contributing
factor to the rise of Nazism and other deadly totalitarian ideologies.

His own background as an individual of Jewish ancestry who had fled Austria in 1937 surely contributed to the depth of his
feelings on these philosophical matters.
Meanwhile, Strauss, a founding figure in modern neo-conservative thought, was equally harsh in his attacks upon
conspiracy analysis, but for polar-opposite reasons.

In his mind, elite conspiracies were absolutely necessary and beneficial, a crucial social defense against anarchy or
totalitarianism, but their effectiveness obviously depended upon keeping them hidden from the prying eyes of the ignorant
masses.

His main problem with conspiracy theories was not that they were always false, but they might often be true, and therefore
their spread was potentially disruptive to the smooth functioning of society.

So as a matter of self-defense, elites needed to actively suppress or otherwise undercut the unauthorized
investigation of suspected conspiracies.

Even for most educated Americans, theorists such as Beard, Popper, and Strauss are probably no more than vague names
mentioned in textbooks, and that was certainly true in my own case. But while the influence of Beard seems to have largely
disappeared in elite circles, the same is hardly true of his rivals.

Popper probably ranks as one of the founders of modern liberal thought, with an individual as politically influential as left-
liberal financier George Soros claiming to be his intellectual disciple.
Related: George Soros World is Falling Apart, Blames Everyone but Himself

Meanwhile, the neo-conservative thinkers who have totally dominated the Republican Party and the Conservative
Movement for the last couple of decades often proudly trace their ideas back to Strauss.

So, through a mixture of Popperian and Straussian thinking, the traditional American tendency to regard elite
conspiracies as a real but harmful aspect of our society was gradually stigmatized as either paranoid or politically
dangerous, laying the conditions for its exclusion from respectable discourse.

By 1964, this intellectual revolution had largely been completed, as indicated by the overwhelmingly positive reaction to the
famous article by political scientist Richard Hofstadter critiquing the so-called paranoid style in American politics, which he
denounced as the underlying cause of widespread popular belief in implausible conspiracy theories.

To a considerable extent, he seemed to be attacking straw men, recounting and ridiculing the most outlandish conspiratorial
beliefs, while seeming to ignore the ones that had been proven correct.
For example, he described how some of the more hysterical anti-Communists claimed that tens of thousands of Red
Chinese troops were hidden in Mexico, preparing an attack on San Diego, while he failed to even acknowledge that for
years Communist spies had indeed served near the very top of the U.S. government.

Not even the most conspiratorially minded individual suggests that all alleged conspiracies are true, merely that some of
them might be.

Most of these shifts in public sentiment occurred before I was born or when I was a very young child, and my own views
were shaped by the rather conventional media narratives that I absorbed. Hence, for nearly my entire life, I always
automatically dismissed all of the so-called conspiracy theories as ridiculous, never once even considering that any of
them might possibly be true.

To the extent that I ever thought about the matter, my reasoning was simple and based on what seemed like good, solid
common sense. Any conspiracy responsible for some important public event must surely have many separate moving
parts to it, whether actors or actions taken, let us say numbering at least 100 or more.

Now given the imperfect nature of all attempts at concealment, it would surely be impossible for all of these to be kept
entirely hidden. So even if a conspiracy were initially 95% successful in remaining undetected, five major clues
would still be left in plain sight for investigators to find.
And once the buzzing cloud of journalists noticed these, such blatant evidence of conspiracy would certainly attract an
additional swarm of energetic investigators, tracing those items back to their origins, with more pieces gradually being
uncovered until the entire cover-up likely collapsed.

Even if not all the crucial facts were ever determined, at least the simple conclusion that there had indeed been some sort of
conspiracy would quickly become established.

However, there was a tacit assumption in my reasoning, one that I have since decided was entirely false.
Obviously, many potential conspiracies either involve powerful governmental officials or situations in which their
disclosure would represent a source of considerable embarrassment to such individuals.

But I had always assumed that even if government failed in its investigatory role, the dedicated bloodhounds of the Fourth
Estate would invariably come through, tirelessly seeking truth, ratings, and Pulitzers. However, once I gradually began
realizing that the media was merely Our American Pravda and perhaps had been so for decades, I suddenly recognized
the flaw in my logic.
If those five - or ten or twenty or fifty - initial clues were simply ignored by the media, whether through laziness,
incompetence, or much less venial sins, then there would be absolutely nothing to prevent successful conspiracies from
taking place and remaining undetected, perhaps even the most blatant and careless ones.

In fact, I would extend this notion to a general principle. Substantial control of the media is almost always an absolute
prerequisite for any successful conspiracy, the greater the degree of control the better.

So when weighing the plausibility of any conspiracy, the first matter to investigate is who controls the local media
and to what extent.

Let us consider a simple thought-experiment. For various reasons these days, the entire American media is extraordinarily
hostile to Russia, certainly much more so than it ever was toward the Communist Soviet Union during the 1970s and 1980s.

Hence I would argue that the likelihood of any large-scale Russian conspiracy taking place within the operative
zone of those media organs is virtually nil.
Indeed, we are constantly bombarded with stories of alleged Russian conspiracies that appear to be false
positives, dire allegations seemingly having little factual basis or actually being totally ridiculous.

Meanwhile, even the crudest sort of anti-Russian conspiracy might easily occur without receiving any serious mainstream
media notice or investigation.

This argument may be more than purely hypothetical. A crucial turning point in Americas renewed Cold War against Russia
was the passage of the 2012 Magnitsky Act by Congress, punitively targeting various supposedly corrupt Russian officials
for their alleged involvement in the illegal persecution and death of an employee of Bill Browder, an American hedge-fund
manager with large Russian holdings.

However, theres actually quite a bit of evidence that it was Browder himself who was actually the mastermind and
beneficiary of the gigantic corruption scheme, while his employee was planning to testify against him and was therefore
fearful of his life for that reason.
Naturally, the American media has provided scarcely a single mention of these remarkable revelations regarding what might
amount to a gigantic Magnitsky Hoax of geopolitical significance.

To some extent the creation of the Internet and the vast proliferation of alternative media outlets, including my own small
webzine, have somewhat altered this depressing picture.

So it is hardly surprising that a very substantial fraction of the discussion dominating these Samizdat-like publications
concerns exactly those subjects regularly condemned as crazy conspiracy theories by our mainstream media organs.

Such unfiltered speculation must surely be a source of considerable irritation and worry to government officials who have
long relied upon the complicity of their tame media organs to allow their serious misdeeds to pass unnoticed and
unpunished.

Indeed, several years ago a senior Obama Administration official argued that the free discussion of various
conspiracy theories on the Internet was so potentially harmful that government agents should be recruited to
cognitively infiltrate and disrupt them, essentially proposing a high-tech version of the highly controversial
Cointelpro operations undertaken by J. Edgar Hoovers FBI.
Until just a few years ago Id scarcely even heard of Charles Beard, once ranked among the towering figures of 20th century
American intellectual life. But the more Ive discovered the number of serious crimes and disasters that have completely
escaped substantial media scrutiny, the more I wonder what other matters may still remain hidden.

So perhaps Beard was correct all along in recognizing the respectability of conspiracy theories, and we should return to his
traditional American way of thinking, notwithstanding endless conspiratorial propaganda campaigns by the CIA and others to
persuade us that we should dismiss such notions without any serious consideration.

Related: Conspiracy Theorist Max Spiers Found Dead Days After Texting His Mother to Investigate if Anything
Happened to Him

150 Terabytes! Norway Busts Largest Dark Web, Child Porn Networks In History - US,
UK Media Ignore Story
January 9 2017 | From: TheNewNationalist / IllegalNews / Various

Its one of the largest child sex abuse cases in history. A year-long special investigation called
Operation Darkroom resulted in the seizure of 150 terabytes of data material in the form of
photos, movies and chat logs containing atrocities against children as young as infancy,
Norwegian police announced at a news conference in late November.

Among the 51 perpetrators said to be involved, 20 have been arrested. The list of the accused includes highly
educated individuals, including two former or current elected politicians, one teacher, a lawyer and a police
officer.

Related: Massive Evidence Emerges That Satanic Voodoo Doughnuts of Portland May Be Heavily Involved in Child
Sex Trafficking

Yet, English-language media both in Europe and stateside in the U.S. have ignored the story.

As Norwegian news publication Tadens Krav reports, the material shows penetration of toddlers, children being tied,
children who have sex with animals and children who have sex with other children. One of the accused men had a pregnant
girlfriend and planned with another to commit offenses against the child when it was born, police said.

Some of the accused performed abuses directly online, including atrocities against their own children. Police stressed that
the case involves a network. The investigation is ongoing.
Related: Has John Key been Implicated in the #PizzaGate Child Sex Trafficking Ring?

So while the U.S. media busied itself with its campaign of denial, lies and cover ups involving Pizzagate and fake news,
this huge child sex abuse story broke in Norway. The story did appear on Associated Press wire, but did anyone run it?

The infamous crime syndicate rags The Washington Post had the story briefly on Nov. 20 but has since taken it offline, as
did The New York Times. German state news group Deutsche Welle and UK Independent provided a brief story, and
Sputnik ran a more thorough article. Fox News still has this up but would a thinking person even call this coverage?

It is a truly remarkable story with global implications. Take special note of the shocking file size - 150 terabytes! Its too
horrible to even contemplate. To put this into context, the Library of Congress holds about 600 terabytes of Web data. Its
online archive grows at a rate of about 5 terabytes per month.

Also note the horrifically sadistic nature of the material seized. And note that police are investigating the reach
as worldwide, which means it involves a massive scale of evil filth. But nobody in the criminally compliant
mainstream media thinks its newsworthy.

Adding insult to public-service journalism injury, the crime syndicate has shifted gears and rolled out entertainment media to
mock and lecture you. If you can stomach it, watch Stephen Colbert (below) reading unnaturally off of a script about fake
news, Pizzagate and Michael Flynn.

He engages in the same straw-man arguments we covered in our critique of the The New York Times skuldruggery. Colbert
puts forth all the usual deceptions involving Hillary Clinton, tunnels and basements before declaring Pizzagate was politically
motivated and fake. When you see this particular narrative, know that you are being gas-lighted and diverted.

Yeah, laugh it up, fellas. The New Nationalist (TNN) has said from the beginning that Pizzagate is a poor term. We prefer
pedogate. This goes far beyond just one perv hangout pizzeria. And, of course, it transcends the political spectrum,which
explains why there is no investigation.

The assertion that Pizzagate fake news is right-wing inspired is a scam. Perhaps its because of the word nationalist in
the name of our website that the media keeps citing us in its narratives.

And just below our masthead, it very clearly states that TNN is third position, meaning beyond the Hegalian left-right
dialectic.

We are true humanists, who insist on protecting children from criminals.

Related Articles:

Hillary Clinton Connected To Norway Pedophile Ring

Homosexual George Bush Pedophile Sex Ring and Blackmail of Congress

Clintons, Soros Implicated In Norway

5 Questions for Gareth Cheapest Pizza Morgan and his Opportunities Party #TOPNZ

Hollywood Paedophiles Exposed

California just decriminalized child prostitutes beginning Jan 1 legalization stirs outrage
 Epic! Hero Uber Driver Saves Little Girl from Sex Slavery Then Praises Trump

State Department & Jeffrey Epstein Tied to Child Trafficking Operation

Pope Francis proclaims zero tolerance to child molesters

Trafficking and Jeffrey Epstein w/ Conchita Sarnoff

Largest Pedophile Ring In History, 70,000 Members, Heads Of State, The Rats Scramble

Nicole Kidmans Father Dies Amid Pedophile, Child Murder Ring Allegations

Reddit Bans "Pizzagate" - "We Don't Want Witchhunts On Our Site" + #Pizzagate Was Merely Code For Child Sex
Trafficking

Pizzagate: How 4Chan Uncovered The Sick World Of Washingtons Occult Elite + The Clinton Child Sex
Trafficking Network: A Comprehensive Guide

Satanic Pedophilia Network Exposed In Australia - It Starts At The TOP, Just Like In The USA And UK

Retired Head Of Los Angeles FBI Tells All: Illuminati, Satanism, Pedophile Rings

PizzaGate Is 100% Real, Why Is Media Lying?

PizzaGate is entirely real, which is perhaps why the massive mainstream media cover-up attempt - to label
PizzaGate as a "fake news onslaught" (whatever that is) without reviewing ANY of the pertinent facts or Wikileaks
emails - is so troubling for those of us with a moral compass.

They're covering for a child trafficking and abuse ring operating in Washington, DC. That is not okay. None of this is okay.

10 Reasons Operation Darkroom Was Covered Up!

What is Operation Darkroom? Why is the mainstream media, trying so hard to cover it up?

Savile and the 9th Circle

PedoGate (PizzaGate) Connection to Finders Cult Protected by CIA, Chinese Pedophilia

Related: PedoGate PizzaGate Origins - CIA, Political and Financial Elites Featured in this Pedophilia Special

False Flag Terrorism: Murdering The Innocent In Order To Support The Lie + 15 Ways
To Detect A False Flag Operation
January 9 2017 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / ActivistPost / Various

As my readers know, I reported, factually, on the Boston Marathon alleged bombing case. I
interviewed carefully the pro bono attorney, John Remington Graham, who intervened in behalf of
the Russian aunt, a lawyer in the Russian Federation, in behalf of the falsely convicted younger
Tsarnaev brother, Dzhokhar, the older brother having been murdered by the FBI.
Graham conclusively proved that the FBIs own evidence proved beyond any doubt that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was
innocent, which means so was the older brother.

Related: False Flag Terrorism explained: A Star Wars Analogy

It is clear beyond reasonable doubt that there was no real bombing at the Boston Marathon and that the alleged terrorist
event, using crisis actors, was an orchestration designed to convince dumbshit Americans that they really were under a
Muslim threat. The entire foreign policy of the United States in the 21st century is based on an orchestrated Muslim
threat.

The orchestrated threat was also used for a practice exercise in closing down one of Americas largest cities in order to
manhunt with intent to kill a young man chosen as the villain for the orchestrated event.
Related: Heres why Nazionists Launched Multiple False Flag Operations this Year

American citizens were forced at gunpoint out of their homes while Homeland Security, a Nazi reminiscent name from the
Hitler era, disrupted the life of an entire city and its airport service in behalf of this orchestrated event that murdered
American civil liberty.

The entire exercise was based on a lie, an event that never happened, like Saddam Husseins weapons of mass
destruction, Assads use of chemical weapons, Russias invasion of Ukraine, and so forth. Just another lie in behalf of the
exceptional people.

A number of websites have disproved the false case against the Tsarnaev brothers. Attorney John Remington Graham has
brought the case to the justice authorities, but the US Department of Justice (sic) has no interest whatsoever in justice.

Now comes forward an attorney, Mary Maxwell with a book. It is available online free. I read the first eight chapters, which
was sufficient to comfirm me in my independent conclusion that there was no Boston Marathon bombing by terrorists.

I recommend to you Mary Maxwells account. However, I will say that I believe that she uses irony excessively and that on
occasions her irony gets in the way of the factual message. Knowing this, stick with it, and read her account.

Irony is the style that she has chosen, and we must respect a person prepared to stand up to the murderous American
establishment and to challenge one of the founding myths of the American Police State and Washingtons wars against the
world.
Read her book Marathon Bombing - Indicting the Players here.

Any US citizen that believes the falsified case of the Boston Marathon bombing is a dangerous and direct threat to American
civil liberty and to the lives of millions of people on planet Earth.

If Americans do not wake up to the orchesrations to which they are subjected, they will forfeit their freedom. The Russians
and the Chinese are individually and together more powerful than Washington, and they are not going to put up with the lies
with which insouciant Americans are content.

If Americans cannot take back their country from self-serving oligarchs, Americans are doomed.

Related: 9/11 False Flag Conspiracy - Finally Solved (Names, Connections, Motives)

15 Ways To Detect A False Flag Operation

A false flag formula is becoming readily apparent in the face of so many mass shootings and
bombings in the US. The phenomenon has become so commonplace in the last 3 years that its
becoming more American than apple pie.
According to ShootingTracker.com, there have been 353 mass shootings in the USA for 2015 so far. However, as
scary as that number is, the good news is that you dont have to be afraid of them like you may think. A very large
number of them - and all of them with any mass media significance and attention are false flag staged terror
events.

Related: False Flag Terror. A Historical Overview

Some have real victims, some do not, but either way, the most criminal of all institutions the Government is the
orchestrating force behind them.

They are scripted, pre-planned operations which are definitely not the result of random gun violence. Just as Obama stated
(by hiding the truth in plain sight), there is a pattern behind these mass shootings. The Controllers are following a
definite false flag formula.

Below is a list of the top 15 elements of this formula, which you can now use to detect a false flag operation as it occurs:

False Flag Formula #1: Drill at the Same or Nearby Time and Place

The exercise or drill at the same time, at the same place has became the sine qua non or indispensable element of the
recent false flag operation. Sometimes there are slight variations on this when the Government plans a drill nearby (a few
miles away) rather than at the exact place, or plans a drill earlier on in the day, so it can just coincidentally go live.
There was a twist in the case of the recent San Bernardino shooting: the Government planned regular drills in the building
where the shooting took place every month! (Think about it what are the chances of a real mass shooting occurring in a
building used for mass shooting drills?)

As Captain Eric H. May, a former US Army military intelligence officer, stated:

The easiest way to carry out a false flag attack is by setting up a military exercise that simulates the very attack
you want to carry out."

In the case of 9/11, there were no less than 46 drills occurring simultaneously during the event, according to Webster
Tarpley, author of Synthetic Terror: Made in USA.

In the case of the London 7/7 bombings, Peter Power admitted on radio that he was leading a team who were training for
that exact scenario when it unfolded!
There were active shooter drills in all of the false flag attacks of Sandy Hook, Boston Marathon, Charleston, San
Bernardino, the Norway attack, the 2nd Paris attack of 2015 and many many more.

Whats the point of having a drill at the same time and place? Here are a few of its purposes:

1. Distract and remove key personnel who would otherwise be at the scene to contain and investigate it;

2. Confuse other personnel who will treat the whole event in a different way if they think it is a drill rather than a
real event;

3. Slow down, reduce or eliminate an effective response, especially of police and other law enforcement, given the
removal and confusion of personnel;

4. Distract and confuse witnesses, the media and the public in general;

5. Provide a great cover and period of lower defenses and security to carry out an attack, which would otherwise
be difficult or impossible if defenses were at their usual or optimal operating level.

False Flag Formula #2: Foreknowledge

Another way you can tell that a mass shooting is a false flag op is if you find proof of foreknowledge of the event. As it so
happens, all of the notorious and publicized mass attacks of late have had evidence of foreknowledge. Going way back in
time, there was foreknowledge of the Pearl Harbor attack of 1941 that got the US into World War 2.
There were many aspects of foreknowledge on 9/11, including the BBC reporting WTC7 falling before it actually did, and
mysterious calls to people like author Salman Rushdie and San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown advising them not to fly to
NYC on Sept. 11th. Sandy Hook had blatant foreknowledge (with various webpages put up days before the event), as did
the Boston Marathon.

False Flag Formula #3: Eyewitnesses Have Conflicting Accounts

You can also spot a likely false flag operation when you see or hear of multiple conflicting witness accounts. In the case of
the Aurora Colorado Batman mass shooting, eyewitnesses claimed they saw an entire team of shooters, rather than the
single shooter James Holmes of the official narrative.

With Sandy Hook, we saw multiple scenes of law enforcement chasing men into the surrounding forest, yet the official
narrative declares the only shooter was Adam Lanza. In San Bernardino, too, witnesses stated they saw 3 white athletic
men, not the 2 brown husband-and-wife team we were told did the shooting.
Related: 1 Trillion Dollar Lawsuit Filed Against MSM For Staging 'Sandy Hook'

Conflicting eyewitness accounts can destroy the official narrative no matter what the detail is. On 9/11, various fireman told
us there were bombs in the building, contradicting the official story that planes alone took down the Twin Towers.
With Sandy Hook, Gene Rosens testimony itself was full of holes and was contradicted by that of the school bus driver and
the official report.

False Flag Formula #4: MSM Quickly Name and Demonize the Patsy

Have you ever wondered how quickly the MSM (Mainstream Media) discovers the name of the patsy? They had somehow
deduced that Osama bin Laden was responsible for 9/11 just hours after the attacks.

Have you ever wondered why the Government is so good at telling us who supposedly executed these attacks right after
they happen, with almost no time to investigate, yet cant seem to manage to actually stop these alleged terror attacks?
Related: President Putin Reveals Possession Of 9/11 Satellite Imagery Evidence Indicating US Government
Complicity In False Flag Attack

Without any evidence, the MSM endlessly repeated bin Laden like a crazy mantra after 9/11, despite the fact bin Laden
himself denied involvement in the attacks and that in the end he was never formally charged by the FBI.

Have you ever wondered why many of the patsies, or sorry, deranged mass shooters, are Muslim? That wouldnt have
anything to do with the fact that the Zionist Government and MSM are trying to paint all Muslims as crazy and scary, would
it? Nothing like a good dose of Islamophobia to take your freedom away

False Flag Formula #5: Patsy Has No Military Training, Yet Shoots Extremely Fast and Accurately

Another element of the false flag formula is the skilled and lethal patsy.

According to the official narrative of false flag ops like Sandy Hook and Aurora, we are supposed to believe that skinny and
non-muscular youths, without any discernible military training, were able to acquire expensive military gear (including armor,
guns, ammunition and more), wear that gear without getting bogged down in speed, and shoot incredibly fast and
accurately.

In San Bernardino, we are supposed to believe that a young mother was strong and skilled enough to participate in killing 14
and injuring 17 people while she was strapped up with body armor and holding heavy weaponry!

In these cases and more, the official story would have you believe that its no big deal or just a coincidence that the patsy
can acquire all this high-end gear and use it so well.

False Flag Formula #6: Patsy Gets Killed, Drugged or Suicided

It is also part of the false flag formula to ensure that the patsy, who is earmarked before the event to take the fall, cannot
speak out to rationally defend themselves. This is achieved in a number of ways. The simplest is to have the patsy kill
himself or herself by committing suicide.
Related: Case Closed: JFK Killed After Shutting Down Rothschilds Federal Reserve

Another favorite way is to take the patsy out in a thrilling high speed chase, which has the added benefit of drawing clueless
people in through the MSM and gushingly promoting the police state. Sometimes a patsy is killed in plain sight, just because
its so important to suppress his testimony (e.g. Lee Harvey Oswald in the JFK assassination).

A third way is to mind control and drug the patsy to such an extent that they become a zombie vegetable unable to articulate
anything, as was the case with James Holmes.

False Flag Formula #7: Shooter Leaves Manifesto

In this day and age, writing a manifesto is a strange and anachronistic thing to do. Yet, for some strange reason, shooters
manifestos seem to crop up an awful lot after mass shootings.

Conveniently for the Controllers, these manifestos provide a perfect explanation for the official narrative, and help fill in the
missing (non-existent) motive for the attack which probably pushes those on the fence over into believing the
Governments version of the event.

While the manifesto is not an element in every false flag operation, it is present in enough of them to be regarded as part of
the false flag formula.

False Flag Formula #8: Evidence Gets Conveniently Destroyed

Another element of the false flag formula is the deliberate destruction of evidence, so that the Controllers can cover their
tracks.
In 9/11, the scrap metal (in the smoldering ruins of the WTC towers) was immediately shipped off to China right from the
start; with Sandy Hook, the entire school was demolished; in San Bernardino, the supposed landlord of the supposed
shooters actually allowed MSM reporters into the suspects house to poke around and touch all their stuff, in complete
disregard for what could be a possible crime scene!

Could it get any more blatant?

False Flag Formula #9: No Obvious Motive for the Mass Attack

Have you ever wondered why there is no obvious motive in any of these mass shootings? Crimes are supposed to be
solved on the merit of motive and opportunity, yet to hide the reality of a false flag op, the MSM just lies about the motive
part, and chalks it up to a deranged shooter.
Other times we are offered the flimsiest of motives, such as people going on an all-out rampage because they had a
grievance with a co-worker. In San Bernardino, we were told the young mother, with a 1-year-old child, was aggressive and
psychotic enough to help kill 14 and injure 17 people at the risk of never seeing her child again!

Meanwhile, the real purveyors of these operations profit immensely from the ensuing fear, yet somehow the
majority of people dont seem to see that motive...

False Flag Formula #10: Immediate Calls for Gun Control

Gun control is obviously one of the key agendas behind all of these false flag mass shootings, since a disarmed population
is far easier to exploit and manipulate than an armed one. It is an obvious aspect of the false flag formula. Sometimes gun
control is even pushed in the immediate aftermath of the event when people are still in a highly emotional and suggestible
state.

Take a look at the behavior of Andy Parker, who we were told was the father of a victim killed in the Virginia mass shooting
of 2015.
Within hours of hearing the news of the death of his child, Parker had already contacted and talked with the
Governor of Virginia, and then appeared on TV saying he would be devoting his entire life to gun control.

In a similar fashion, Richard Martinez, the alleged father of a Santa Barbara mass hooting victim, appeared on TV right after
the death angrily pleading for more gun control. In both cases, the political agenda of gun control angrily dominated their
reactions, rather than grief or other emotions.

False Flag Formula #11: Fake Victims = Crisis Actors

The above 10 points are a useful outline of the false flag formula as it pertains to mass shootings with real victims, i.e. where
real people die. However, ever since the surreal Sandy Hook event, which still contains many unanswered questions, we
have entered the twilight zone of the false flag hoax.

This is a term used to describe the false flag mass attacks where no one dies where fake bodies, fake blood and fake
victims are used instead. In this way, the entire operation is more tightly controlled and less messy. A hallmark of the false
flag hoax is that the authorities never produce a credible piece of evidence showing an actual dead body of a victim.
Is this the same girl crying at all three massacres - Aurora, Sandy Hook and Boston?

The following 5 points relate to false flag hoaxes, and specifically to the people employed to pull them off crisis actors. It
is truly a testament to just how utterly fake our normal world is (the Matrix) that false flag ops have now descended to the
level where we have to question whether the event even happened at all.

There are organizations of crisis actors in the US (such as the IIF), and there is clear evidence crisis actors were
used at Sandy Hook, Boston Marathon and many others.
Related: Charlie Hebdo: French False Flag Terror Event

Government officials have been caught using the word actor to describe various players in these dramas; the MSM has
even resorted to calling them actors too (it was one of the buzzwords of the recent San Bernardino mass shooting).

False Flag Formula #12: Victims Get Killed Twice

The surreal quality of the false flag hoax reached point of absurdity when it was discovered that one of the victims was
reportedly killed twice!

We were told that Noah Pozner was one of the victims of the Sandy Hook shooting, yet his picture was also among
those killed in a Pakistan Taliban attack.

Apparently the recycling of fake victims is another part of the false flag formula.

False Flag Formula #13: Families of Victims Have Elite or Acting Backgrounds

Is it just a coincidence that the families of mass shooting victims have either elite or acting backgrounds? At the Sandy
Hook event, local CEO of the Newtown bank John Trentacosta (whose house was next to the Lanzas and had a lot of
unusual activity occurring there the day of Sandy Hook) was connected to the New York Federal Reserve (and thus the
international banking elite).

Francine Wheeler was formerly the personal assistant of former chief Democratic National Committee fundraiser Maureen
White whose husband Steven Rattner is a Wall Street investment banker and member of the Rockefeller CFR (Council on
Foreign Relations)!

Related: Censorship Shock: Amazon.com Bans Investigative Book Nobody Died At Sandy Hook Because It
Disagrees With Government Version Of What Happened

It was also noteworthy at Sandy Hook how acting showed up in the resumes of so many of the key players there. Gene
Rosen, David and Francine Wheeler (both professional actors) and others all had a background in acting. Father of Virginia
mass shooting victim Andy Parker is an actor (and a politician too). This fact supports the idea that another element of the
false flag formula is to watch for people with elite connections and acting backgrounds.

False Flag Formula #14: Families of Victims Show Little to No Emotion, and Even Snigger and
Laugh

Luckily for truth seekers, the majority of crisis actors used in these false flag events are poor actors who are utterly
unconvincing in the roles they play. The majority display little or no emotion after an alleged tragedy like losing a family
member child to a random and violent mass shooting.

It is true that humans do vary widely with emotional response and expression. However, with many of the crisis actors,
judging by their reactions, it simply strains credibility too much to believe that they have just have been through a harrowing
and traumatic ordeal.
Related: The Great Terrorism Hoaxes from Boston to Berlin #CrisisActors Exposed

Given the range of possible reactions to a tragedy like losing a loved one in a mass shooting, what are the chances that
many of the victims family members are so non-emotional, or so understanding, or so quick to forgive?

Its shameful enough that the crisis actors playing these roles are perpetrating a monumental deception on the public,
tugging at the average persons heartstrings solely to trick them.

However, on top of that, these actors have the gall to actually laugh to smile, snigger and giggle while pulling off their
atrocious stunts. The only conclusion to draw from this is that it must be pretty funny to get a paid gig like this fooling millions
of people

False Flag Formula #15: Families of Victims Receive Millions in Federal Payoffs

In the US, the land of the lawsuit, people are generally pretty fast to initiate a lawsuit if they feel they have been wronged. It
is highly strange, therefore, that none of the alleged parents of the Sandy Hook event decided to sue the Government for
negligence or to demand redress for any other grievance.
Additionally, many of the alleged parents received a total of millions in unsolicited federal payouts (check out the free
houses they magically got on Christmas day 2009) thats right, unsolicited.

The Federal Government just gave it over to them without asking! Ask yourself: is is more likely the Government would just
do this out of the goodness of its heart, or that the money was more like a bribe/blackmail/payout all rolled into one, awarded
to actors playing a part in a role and being sworn to silence?

Related: Sandy Hook Truth Bomb Patch Media's Blatant LIES About Jonathan Reich

Conclusion: Use the 15 Elements of the False Flag Formula to Be More Aware

These are 15 elements I noticed forming the false flag formula. There may well be more.

Meanwhile, use the knowledge you have of the false flag formula to become more aware, wise and hip to the deception, so
that the next time it unfolds (as it surely will), you will be among those that spot the fakery, rather than among those who are
too scared, shell-shocked and gullible to do anything other than buy the official narrative.

Related: Articles:

Turkish Nightclub a False Flag: Mistaken Prime Suspect? Turkish Nightclubs Security Taken Over Prior to Attack
Saudi survivor: There were three killers at Reina nightclub on New Year

Convenient? Active Shooter Kills 5 in Fort Lauderdale, CNN Claims Voices in His Head Told Him to Join ISIS

Florida Governor Reaches Out to Trump Multiple Times after Shooting Bypasses Lame Duck Obama

Berlin False Flag Faked - Video Hoax

Analysis by Ole Dammegard of Norway Breivik Massacre as a False Flag Event

Ian R Crane - The False Flag Agenda

Trump Confirms "No Effect On The Outcome Of The Election" Following Intelligence
Briefing + Experts Reveal The Tricks Mainstream Media Uses To Brainwash And
Control The Masses
January 8 2017 | From: Zerohedge / NaturalNews / Various

President-elect Trump has issued a statement following his briefing with various intelligence
agencies over the Russian hacking allegations, seemingly rejecting the Democrats' charges that it
was the Russians alone and that it had any effect on the outcome of the election.
Additionally, Trump promised to appoint a team to give him a plan to combat cyber attacks within 90 days of taking
office.

Related: Fake News, Mass Hysteria, And Induced Insanity

Not quite the "stunning" reaction that Nancy Pelosi had.

The mainstream media is very disappointed...

Related: Hacker Guccifer Calls US Allegations Against Russia 'Fake Cyber War'

Experts Reveal The Tricks Mainstream Media Uses To Brainwash And Control The
Masses

You may not know this, but intelligence agencies around the world have, for decades, infiltrated
target countries by having their agents and operatives pose as journalists (no, Im not an
intelligence operative).
That served two purposes: 1) it provided the operative with legitimate cover; and 2) it allowed the operatives
government to use the operatives media position to shape public opinion in the host country.

Related: Ten basic forms of fake news used by major media

Brainwash them, in other words, with propaganda.

But in truth, that kind of propagandizing and brainwashing is also done by institutional media pushing a specific political
agenda. Think back to our recently concluded presidential election cycle and what the mainstream media did in a failed
effort to get its anointed candidate, Hillary Clinton, elected.

They lied, made up narratives out of whole cloth, and tried to smear her opponent, now-President-elect Donald J.
Trump, in an effort to defeat him.

As reported by The Waking Times, experts denote a number of techniques that are used by the establishment media to
brainwash the public and create/control the daily narrative.

The Mainstream Media Are the Real Purveyors of Fake News

Edward Bernays is known as the father of modern propaganda. He was the first to use social engineering techniques spread
via the mass media of the day. In the early 20th century, he laid the groundwork for what became cultural programming at
the societal level by assisting in the transformation of a mostly rural, agrarian-based American society into a homogenized
culture of devout statists and consumers.
The principles he developed and implemented have greatly influenced the growth of American culture, how it grew and the
direction it took.

Having picked up Bernays torch in the 21st century, several experts on modern brainwashing, mind control and propaganda
have recently given insight into their craft.

Think about what is ailing our countries today, in terms of societal problems. There is corruption of so-called grassroots
movements that are actually funded by Left-wing billionaires such as George Soros and Bill Gates, and yet the movements
are portrayed by the establishment media very often as spontaneous and locally brewed, but all are attempting to achieve a
specific social and political result.

The efforts of these allegedly organic groups are amplified many times their size by the media, which gives them both
credence and a megaphone with which to shout their views. And what do they shout?

America is racist, bigoted, homophobic, unfair, politically broken, etc. Never are the calls for unity or praise for our country
given any attention at all.

Related: Former CBS Reporter Exposes Media Lies, Internet Shills & Astroturfing
Much of this is done via a technique known as astroturfing. Seasoned veteran investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson
explains;

Astroturf is a perversion of grassroots. Astroturf is when political, corporate or other special interests disguise
themselves and publish blogs, start Facebook and twitter accounts, publish ads, letters to the editor, or simply post
comments online, to try to fool you into thinking an independent or grassroots movement is speaking.

Controlling Our Thoughts by Creating False Narratives

Another technique used is subliminal messaging. This is a cornerstone of mind control, and when a person is unwittingly
bombarded with cleverly concealed information, an emotion can be trigged leaving a persons intellect and better judgment
subjugated in favor of a mental process like fear or sexual desire.

You may never consciously understand or realize why you begin to adopt certain behaviors, products of lifestyles, but the
attraction is nonetheless real and that manifests itself through actual personal choices.

In a 2011 documentary called Programming the Nation, filmmaker, graphic artist and digital media producer Jeff Warrick, a
former advertising sales rep, provided examples of how subliminal messaging and other subconscious methods are
employed by ad executives and other media to create cultural norms and social programs like consumerism,
materialization of womens bodies, health choices and the glorification of violence.

Could such techniques really be contributing to a variety of social, political and economic problems currently
present in our culture? Such as obesity, anorexia, and other eating disorders? The ongoing war on terror?
 And what about the ever-increasing amounts of debt, that has tightened its grip on a growing percentage of the
population? the documentary says.

Other techniques include fake news - yes, by the mainstream media - omission (not covering an issue as though it wasnt
real or important); slanting coverage through the use of biased expert sources; and publishing falsified data and science as
though it were legitimate.

Related Articles:
The Great "Fake News" Scare Of 1530

Ty Simpson: Taking Down David Brock and His Illicit Fake News Empire Citizens Audit

CNN Runs Fake News Story About Russia Closing Anglo-American School in Moscow

Washington Post cant stop faking the news: U.S. electrical grid penetration story a complete fabrication

FakeNews: Russia hacks Vermont infrastructure! - Old Ukrainian malware found instead

Majority Are Still Falling for Fake News

Julian Assange with Sean Hannity Russians Did Not Hack the US Election

EU Creating Fake News Watchdogs for Upcoming Elections

Fake News Mainstream media Has Half of Hillary's Supporters Believing Russia Stole Election

Two of the worlds most evil people Bill Gates and George Soros behind Facebooks news censorship agenda

Julian Assange: Media Is Colluding with Democrat Party in America

Media blackout on death of NATO auditor was he assassinated to cover-up NATOs black budget?

Donald Trump Endorses Rand Pauls Audit The Fed Bill

DNC Refused to Give FBI Access to Its Servers - Gave Access to a DNC Consultant Tied to Anti-Russia Group

CIA Training Handbook: How to Fake Intelligence Plus Case Study on Faking Russians Hacking US Election

A Case Study in the Creation of False News

The Fake News Saga: From Official Policy to Mainstream American Discourse, Propaganda in the Making

New Twist on Fake News Russian Hacking Story

The Russian Hacking: How the Leaks From Clinton and the DNC Happened

Trump Fires All Obama Politically Appointed Ambassadors Effective Inauguration Day

The European Union Initiates Cashless Society Project

January 8 2017 | From: GlobalResearch

A few months back The Guardian ran an article stating that Swedes are blazing a trail in Europe,
with banks, buses, street vendors and even churches expecting plastic or virtual payment as if
the cashless society was something to be celebrated by modern society.
I dont use cash any more, for anything, said Louise Henriksson, 26, a teaching assistant. You just dont need it.
Shops dont want it; lots of banks dont even have it. Even for a candy bar or a paper, you use a card or phone.

Related: Europe Proposes Confiscating Gold, Cash, Bitcoin, & Prepaid Cards to Fight Terrorist Financing

Cash transactions are already outdated in Sweden. According to central bank the Riksbank, cash transactions will make
up up barely 0.5% of the value of all payments made in Sweden by 2020.

Likewise and according to The Independent, Denmark has moved one step closer to becoming the worlds first cashless
society, as the government proposes scrapping the obligation for retailers to accept cash as payment because, as they
say, its to do with the burden of managing change and notes.
Strange then that all this is happening in an environment where EUR bank note circulation is still rising.

The European Payments Council (EPC), a subdivision of the European Central Bank, are taking steps in their quest to fully
eliminate all cash. The reason is not to lift the burden off retailers or to make transactions more convenient but in reality to
raise desperately needed taxes.

Highly respected ArmstrongEconomics reports that the EPC are going full steam ahead to enable immediate payment
systems throughout not just the Eurozone but the entire European Union.

The Single European Payments Area (SEPA) has been devised with the ultimate goal of eliminating ATM cash machines
and force everyone to use their mobile phones or plastic cards, the project starting as early as November 2017.
In the absence of confirmed information on this point, it is likely that tourists and business people will be forced to pre-pay
Euros onto an App if they come from a country outside the eurozone, currently made up of Austria, Belgium, Cyprus,
Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal,
Slovakia, Slovenia, and Spain.

The final goal of the EU Commission is best described in their own words:

The Single Euro Payments Area (or SEPA for short) is where more than 500 million citizens, over 20 million
businesses and European public authorities can make and receive payments in euro.

SEPA also means better banking services for all: transparent pricing, valuable guarantees ensuring that your
payments are received promptly and in full, and banks assuming responsibility if something goes wrong with your
payment.

This year, meetings and conferences called Towards a cashless society were started to get the information transfer across
to the infrastructure, supported very heavily by the banks.
It looks as though the initial battleground for banning cash will be Greece.

Greek banks propose a series of measures to combat tax evasion, strengthen the electronic transactions and limit
the use of cash in the economy. One of the measures proposed is a special tax on cash withdrawals.

Bankers reportedly stress that cash money can easily and largely be channeled in the black economy. Therefore, a
tax on cash withdrawals will drastically reduce cash transactions and by extension the black economy.

- From KeepTalkingGreece (27/11/16)

The proposal includes reforming the tax system by introducing a revenue-expenditure system. Households and/or
workers will only be taxed on the amount of income that is has not been spent. In this way, people will have a strong
incentive to seek receipts for any expenditure in order to increase their expenditure and reduce the tax amount they will
have to pay.

There will also be an obligation for all businesses and regardless of their size to pay electronically every salary and wage.
There is another tactic in play to push the cashless society even quicker. As Sratfor Global Intelligence reports:

The eurozone has found a new scapegoat for international crime: the 500-euro note.

The Continents leaders are seriously discussing decommissioning the euros highest denomination,
which is favored by crime groups for transferring massive sums across international borders.

Eliminating the bank note could help temper criminal activity, but in reality the implications are much broader. The
idea is just the most recent step in an ongoing process moving Europe, and indeed the world, closer to an entirely
cashless economy.

None of this will go down well in both Germany and Austria who experienced periods of extreme hyperinflation after the
world wars. This, along with life under dictatorships and in high-surveillance societies, has given both populations a fierce
desire to protect their privacy (please note) - something that is afforded by the anonymity of using cash - and to keep wealth
in physical form to avoid relying on systemic institutions.

There is another more sinister reason for forcing a cashless society. TruePublica reported last September that a deal had
been signed by the administrations of the US, UK and EU when it comes to bank depositors. We said that:

Procedures in the event of the failure of a systemically important bank clearly states that depositors are to be
protected that is, until options have ceased to exist.

Next time, the state will be last in line, not first. Depositor bail-in schemes are now a reality.

In other words, if a big bank fails you will be unable to cause a run on a bank by withdrawing your cash.
Indeed, the rescue of Italys Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena, reported by all the press as imminent has one other thing in
common, none of them are sure if this will be full or partial nationalisation, state bail-out or a depositor bail-in.

What the authorities want to do is avoid this nightmare scenario that happened on Britains streets: The Economist (Sept
2007 just before the full blown financial crisis erupted) - The queues that formed outside Northern Rock, the countrys fifth-
biggest mortgage lender, represented the first bank run in Britain since 1866.

Related: Washington is Behind Indias Brutal Demonetization Project

The panic was prompted by the very announcement designed to prevent it. Only when the Bank of England said that it
would stand by the stricken Northern Rock did depositors start to run for the exit.

Attempts by Alistair Darling, the chancellor of the exchequer, to reassure savers served only to lengthen the queues of
people outside branches demanding their money.

Bitcoin Surge Explained and The Future Of Cryptocurrencies

The run did not stop until Mr Darling gave a taxpayer-backed guarantee on September 17th that, for the time being, all the
existing deposits at Northern Rock were safe.

In addition to all of this, the use of negative interest rates, never implemented in 5,000 years since the invention of money, is
designed to force money out of the banks and into the economy which can be manipulated simply by changing the rate
when required.

The holy grail of economic measurement is rising GDP, which has eluded the ECB policymakers since the financial
crash reared its ugly head leaving wave after wave of social crisis.

Its answer was to print money and push 50% more into the economy and yet achieved an inflation rate barely above zero.
Taxing cash at ATMs or forcing it out of banks via punitive interest will be the norm in a few years.

Finally, with all money moving electronically the banks and government have another distinct advantage over you.
Eighteen months ago, there was a run on the banks in Greece so the central bank imposed capital controls, highly
restricting the amount of cash that could be withdrawn daily. In the few weeks prior to those controls 45billion
was withdrawn and stuffed under mattresses. This wont happen again if there are no ATMs and cash transfers have all but
been eliminated.

One way to the other in the end, you are not going to be in control of your own money in a cashless society,
thats for sure.

Trump Will Repeal 60-70% Of Obamas Executive Orders & Trump To Repeal A Lot Of
Obamas Actions On Day One
January 6 2017 | From: 21stCenturyWire / RT / TheGatewayPundit / Various

In a recent interview former House Speaker, Newt Gingrich, told Fox that Trump will likely be
vetoing out the majority of executive orders made by Obama.
If we examine the mountain of executive orders that were penned under the Obama administration, we must
wonder if Gingrich isnt making a good point and an accurate assessment about President Elect Trumps intentions
with regards to his promise to drain the swamp.

Related: The 2 Rules that will guide Trumps administration

Obama had very little luck getting many of the draconian, unconstitutional policies his administration wanted to see enacted
approved by Congress so he leaned heavily on Executive Orders to push policies and conflicts that would not have been
approved by Congress otherwise.

Perhaps this will be one of the early indicators of how serious Trump is about rolling back policies that have proven to be
detrimental to Americans.

US President-elect Donald Trump may reverse up to 70 percent of President Barack Obamas executive orders, practically
erasing the legacy of the first African-American head of state, Former House speaker Newt Gingrich told Fox.

I think in the opening couple days, hes going to repeal 60 to 70 percent of Obamas legacy by simply vetoing out
all of the various executive orders that Obama used because he couldnt get anything through Congress, Gingrich
said in an interview with Sunday Morning Futures on Fox Business.
Related: On Vacation, Donald Trump Announces 8,000 New Jobs for the United States

Obama, who signed over 260 executive orders in his two terms in office, urged Trump, who will be inaugurated on January
20, not to circumvent Congress when trying to enact his agenda. Obama used his executive powers to push through labor,
climate and immigration reforms after Congress refused to go along with his proposed programs.

Related: US refusal to veto UN Israeli resolution symbolic gesture by lame duck Obama

My suggestion to the president elect is, you know, going through the legislative process is always better, in part
because its harder to undo, Obama told NPR last week. In my first two years, I wasnt relying on executive
powers because I had big majorities in Congress and we [were] able to get bills passed. Even after we lost
the majorities in Congress, I bent over backward consistently to try to find compromise and a legislative solution to
some of the big problems that weve got.

Related: We are rooting for his success: Obama on Trump victory as he urges smooth transition

Obama noted that Trump is entirely within his lawful power to sign new executive orders and if he wants to reverse some
of those rules, thats part of the Democratic process.
Gingrich believes that by exercising such power Trump will just sign Obamas legacy away.

I think President Obama is beginning to figure out that his legacy is like one of those dolls that as the air comes
out of it, it shrinks and shrinks and shrinks, Gingrich said.

Related: Trump White House Chief: Were Not Interested In Going To War All Over The World

During the election campaign Trump did promise to repeal Obamas initiatives, telling his voters in North Carolina in
September that his administration would eliminate every unconstitutional executive order and restore the rule of law to our
land.

That promise now seems a reality especially after Obama failed to honor his promise of a smooth transition to Trump after
his victory. The rift between the future administration and Obama's office became apparent on Friday when the US
abstained from voting at the UN Security Council, allowing an anti-Israeli settlement resolution to pass, despite a strong calls
for Trump to veto the document.

He [President Obama] is in this desperate frenzy. What hes actually doing is hes setting up a series of things to
distract Trump, which will make his liberal allies feel good about Democrats and hate Republicans when Trump
rolls them back, Gingrich noted.

ThinkProgress reviewed and broke down Obamas signed orders, which ranged from allowing military reserves to help with
crises abroad to letting federal workers leave early on Christmas Eve.

However international sanctions orders dominated Obama's agenda and covered 34 cases that targeted people from at
least a dozen countries ranging from Libya, North Korea, and Venezuela, to Yemen, Somalia, and Russia.

Related Articles:
 Nigel Farage commends Putins mature response to US diplomatic expulsions

Donald Trump Plans Revamp of Top U.S. Spy Agency

Trump questions claim of Russia hacking DNC, says he knows things other people dont

The Coup Against Truth

Competing Secret Space Programs Disclosure, Will Trump Do it?

The Inevitable Crash: Who Will The Elites Blame?

Media Freaked Out By Trump Using Twitter to Have a Direct Conversation With Americans

Trumps incoming spokesman questions Obama response to alleged Russian hacking

Insane Nazi Collaborator Soros Calls Trump Hitler

Insider Exposes Elites Plan to Overthrow Trump

George Soros Conjures Hitler In Attack On 'Ascendant Populists', Warns "Democracy Is Now In Crisis"

Trump To Repeal A Lot Of Obamas Actions On Day One

The New American Era

In an interview with ABCs This Week, Trumps incoming White House press secretary Sean Spicer said that
President-elect Donald Trump plans to repeal a lot of President Barack Obamas executive actions in his first day in
office.

Related: Trump Mocks CNN, NBC; Praises Putin: "Great Move On Delay - I Always Knew He Was Very Smart"

Spicer said that the Trump administration will immediately repeal a lot of the regulations and actions that have been taken
by this administration over the last eight years that have hampered both economic growth and job creation.

"It was one of two moves Spicer said Trump will make immediately after he takes the oath of office.
He didnt specify which executive actions Trump will repeal.

However, Trump has long been critical of Obamas moves on immigration, energy regulation and foreign policy,
and could look for ways to undo those and other actions.

Spicer also said Trump will begin reforms intended to bring a new brand to Washington with a restriction on
members of his administration becoming lobbyists for a period of five years after they leave Trumps government.

Its very forward-thinking, Spicer said.

 What weve had in the past is people who have looked in the rearview mirror. This time, were thinking forward. If
you want to serve in a Trump administration, youre going to serve this country, not yourself.

- CNN

Related: The Top 10 GREATEST TRUMP LINES from the 2016

Le Pen: Lets Frexit, Bring Back National French Currency & Frexit: Le Pen Promises
To Take France Out Of EU & NATO
January 6 2017 | From: Infowars / RT

Trump effect spreads worldwide as globalists lose control: French presidential candidate Marine
Le Pen said she wants to take France out of the Euro and reintroduce a new national currency after
a potential Frexit.

Le Pen, leader of Frances far-right party National Front, said she would hold a referendum on Frances place in the
EU and pledged to hold a vote within six months of winning the election.

More and more European citizens realize their economies have been suffocated by the euro, she told reporters at
a Paris press conference.

The French want less Europe and more France. I want a national currency with the euro as a common currency.
Le Pen is referring to the ECU (European Currency Unit) framework, which is a basket of currencies that served as an aid in
reducing fluctuations between European state currencies for two decades until the euro was introduced in 1999.

The ECU existed alongside a national currency, Le Pen stated. A national currency co-existing with a common
currency would not have any consequences for French daily life.

Le Pens deputy Florian Philippot explained that this proposal did not mean that Le Pen has changed her position about
leaving the euro.

A currency following the ECU model is not a currency you have in your wallet or your bank account. Its an
accounting currency between countries, he said.

It could be a model, maybe even a transitory one, he added.

Le Pens economic adviser Philippe Murer echoed a similar sentiment.

With a return to the ECU, we could retain a trace of the euro, said Murer, who is also Le Pens assistant at the
European Parliament.

We will only determine these questions after consulting the French people. The nation must be able to decide for
itself.

The two-round French presidential election will take place on April 23 and May 7 of this year, with Le Pen set to win at least
the first round of voting. Her political rise has been propelled by deep discontent with the refugee crisis, the economy, and
EU trade policy.
Frexit: Le Pen Promises To Take France Out Of EU & NATO

French presidential candidate Marine Le Pen said that NATO exists only to serve Washingtons
objectives, and that she planned to hold a Brexit-style referendum, in an interview with a Greek
newspaper.

Le Pen, the leader of France's far-right National Front and a candidate for the 2017 presidential elections, is known
for her Euroscepticism and anti-immigrant views. Together with France, she also suggested that Portugal, Italy,
Spain, Ireland, Greece and Cyprus should also leave the European Union.

Frexit will be a part of my policy, she said in an interview with Dimokratia.

The people must have the opportunity to vote for the liberation from slavery and blackmail imposed by technocrats
in Brussels to return sovereignty to the country.

Flowers and candles are placed near the Christmas market at Breitscheid square in Berlin, Germany, December 23, 2016
Hannibal Hanschke Schengen must go, populist politicians say following deadly Berlin attack

Along with her main rival, the center-right Francois Fillon, Le Pen has called for closer ties with Russia and has criticized
NATO expansion into eastern Europe.

Le Pen said that she would take France out of the alliance if she became president because, as she said, its existence is no
longer needed.
 It was established when there was a risk from the Warsaw Pact and the expansionism of the communist Soviet
Union, said Le Pen. The Soviet Union no longer exists, and neither does the Warsaw Pact.

Washington maintains the NATO presence to serve its objectives in Europe.

On the topic of immigration, Le Pen said she supported measures to restrict the flow of asylum seekers into Europe.

I am against the policy which would promote the entry of immigrants into Europe, which cannot accept them
this tsunami of migrants should be limited.

Europe does not have the power to ensure they all find work and opportunities to enrich themselves. Immigrants
are illegal since once they set foot on European soil... they have violated the law.

They must be sent back to their homeland."

However, when asked whether the National Front has ties to the far-right Greek party Golden Dawn, a group often
described as extremist, Le Pen said she neither has nor wants relations with them.

Le Pen is running against former Prime Minister Francois Fillon of the Republican Party in the French presidential elections
due to be held in May next year. A left-wing candidate for the Socialist Party has not yet been nominated, as incumbent
President Francois Hollande has stated he would not be running for a second term.
Part 3: 8 Signs That The Global Elite's Ship Is Sinking + The Bilderberg's Website
Hacked By Anonymous: "We Will Watch You"
January 6 2017 | From: TheMindUnleashed / Various

The last few weeks of 2016 brought with it some dramatic and tangible events that the political and
banking elite are scrambling to try and reverse the changes that have been happening.

To catch up, check out Part 1 and Part 2 as well.

Related: Wikileaks: Leaks Coming In 2017 'Will Blow You Away'

21. December 10th, 2016: U.S. House Representative from Hawaii Tulsi Gabbard introduces a bill that aims to stop the
U.S. government from funding and aiding terrorist groups like ISIL and al-Qaeda. Thought it got some mainstream media
attention, this topic is one that should be discussed everyday on the news as she just called out the U.S. government as a
nation funding ISIL. She asks, If you or I gave money, weapons or support to al-Qaeda or ISIS, we would be thrown in jail.
Why does our gov get a free pass on this? Will something big come of this? Well see.

22. December 11th, 2016: Researchers in the UK show that solar power is now able to generate more energy than fossil
fuels, thanks to a landmark study.
Controlling finance, politics and society with fossil fuels is coming to an end and will accelerate in its demise even quicker
now.

23. December 27th, 2016: Turkeys President Recep Erdogan says that the U.S. is helping ISIL and that Turkey has
evidence in the form of pictures and videos. The evidence has yet to be released, but would be a welcomed delight by most
of the international community, if true. His overall message corroborates with that of Tulsi Gabbards message: The U.S. is
funding ISIL. Will more people begin to speak out and voice the same message?

24. December 28th, 2016: Israeli Prime Minister Bejamin Netanyahu is now under criminal investigation for at least two
separate cases. Israeli police are investigating claims of bribery and aggravated fraud. Many people have long suspected
Netanyahu as engaging in illegal activities and being towards the top of the Cabals pyramid. Will the investigations lead to
anything major?
 25. December 30th, 2016: The Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte continues speaking his mind freely and calling out
major individuals and organizations while he is at it. This time, he has called out the Vatican for pedophilia and gold
hoarding. When talking about the fear of hell that the Vatican dispenses, Duterte said:

Do not believe it. That is what that religion is all about, they are instilling fear that you will go to hell if you are a
sinner. But you will only know if there is indeed a hell if you die Be careful about religion, it is about gold. It is
about gold. They have not done anything. Where is their God and their grace? There is the hypocrisy of it all.

He then went all out and made a bold claim: Catholicism is a sordid religion. It is about time to show you its
history. Pope Leo was sired and even had sex with his child.

With so much attention these days around pedophilia (remember, it is an established fact that the Vatican has paid out of $4
billion to sexual abuse claims in the past 50 years), it is good to see a major world leader call out another major organization
(the Vatican) for what they have done.

Duterte also calling for the real history of the Vatican to be revealed is another bold move. Keep your eyes on Rodrigo
Duterte. He has gained a reputation very quickly for speaking inconvenient truths .
 26. December 30th, 2016: The Bilderberg Clubs website is taken down by Anonymous and HackBack Movement and is
given a 1 year ultimatum to begin working for the benefit of humanity or the hackers will begin targeting the groups finances
and other assets. Their message was simple, yet strong:

Mind the current situation: We control your expensive connected cars, we control your connected house security
devices, we control your daughters laptop, we control your wifes mobile. We tape your secret meetings, we read
your emails, we control your favorite escort girls smartwatch, we are inside your beloved banks and we are
reading your assets. You wont be safe anywhere near electricity anymore.

27. December 30th, 2016: Russia continues to outplay and outmaneuver the U.S. in many regards. After embarrassing
defeat in Aleppo, Syria, the U.S. amped up its propaganda rhetoric and dismissed over 30 Russian diplomat, sending them
back to Russia from the U.S.

Instead of retaliating by dismissing the same number of U.S. diplomats, Putin said he would not sink to such a petty level
and decided not to dismiss any diplomats. Putin then invited the children of the U.S. diplomats over to Russia to join their
families for a New Years Eve celebration. Diplomacy and integrity will continue to win the battles. Times are changing.

28. December 30th, 2016: Neil Keenan releases an update exposing a massive plot that is taking place right now to try
and steal from the global collateral accounts. The parties involved are Yoshiaki Kobayashi, the Japanese Imperial Court, the
Japanese Royal Family, the Queen of England, Bill and Hillary Clinton and Mino Entebbe, among others.
For those that arent aware, the global collateral accounts are what JFK was murdered over as he was to use these
accounts to create a gold-backed Treasury note, along with legally exposing and ending The Federal Reserve and the CIA.

For more information on the global collateral accounts, read here.

2016 was quite a ride for most people. For the elite, we have seen tangible results that their plans for a world
government are failing. The people are not cooperating as the mass awakening continues.

May 2017 be the year that our world is set truly free.

Related: The Stage is Set for A Global Renaissance 2.0

The Bilderberg's Website Hacked By Anonymous: "We Will Watch You"

The Bilderberg Clubs website has been hacked, and the hackers have a big message they have
sent to the infamous club: Start working for humanity within the next year, or well hack and go
after your assets.
The Bilderberg Club is a group of European and American elite, which comprise of politics, global industry,
finance, media and academics, who have met annually since 1954. Their meetings are famously closed to the
public and blacked out to press coverage. Their last meeting was in Dresden, Germany, which took place in June of
this year.

Related: Anonymous Hacks Bilderberg

On December 30th, the hackers took down the Bilderbergs website and posted a message of their own:

Dear Bilderberg members, from now on, each one of you have 1 year (365 days) to truly work in favor of humans
and not your private interests.

The hackers, who claim to be from the HackBack Movement and Anonymous, took
down bilderbergmeetings.org and further posted an even more threatening message on the site:

Mind the current situation: We control your expensive connected cars, we control your connected house security
devices, we control your daughters laptop, we control your wifes mobile. We tape your secret meetings, we read
your emails, we control your favorite escort girls smartwatch, we are inside your beloved banks and we are
reading your assets. You wont be safe anywhere near electricity anymore.

We wonder what kind of backlash this might have, both for the hackers and for the Bilderberg members. It has been said
that the third world war is already happening, but happening not on a battle field, but in cyberspace.

Just last month, Barrett Brown was released from prison after serving more than four years behind bars for hacking
information related to the U.S. Army and U.S. Air Force. Brown claimed to be the unofficial spokesman for Anonymous and
has said he will continue his investigative journalism now that he is out of prison.
In the past couple years, Anonymous has claimed responsibility for dozens of high level hacks, including releasing
information about the KKK and affiliated politicians and hacking the ISIL terrorist group.

Anonymous also has released a threatening message to the mainstream media, which happened last month. Just a few
days ago, Anonymous also released a message to humanity saying that 2017 would be an exciting year in many regards.

What Is The Obama Regime Up To? + Seven Ways Obama Is Trying To Sabotage The
Trump Administration
January 5 2017 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / Breitbart / Various

Obama has announced new sanctions on Russia based on unsubstantiated charges by the CIA
that the Russian government influenced the outcome of the US presidential election with
malicious cyber-enabled activities.

The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has issued a report related to the declaration of 35 Russian
officials persona non grata for malicious cyber activity and harassment.

Related: Its A Plot, The Russians Are Coming: Obama Illegally Sanctions Russia for Nonexistent US Election
Hacking

The report is a description of:

Tools and infrastructure used by Russian intelligence services to compromise and exploit networks and
 infrastructure associated with the recent U.S. election, as well as a range of U.S. government, political and private
sector entities.

The report does not provide any evidence that the tools and infrastructure were used to influence the outcome of the US
presidential election.

The report is simply a description of what is said to be Russian capabilities .

Related: DHS/FBI Issues Joint Analysis Report: GRIZZLY STEPPE Russian Malicious Cyber Activity

Moreover, the report begins with this disclaimer: DISCLAIMER: This report is provided as is for informational purposes
only. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) does not provide any warranties of any kind regarding any information
contained within.

Related: GRIZZLY STEPPE Russian Malicious Cyber Activity

In other words, the report not only provides no evidence of the use of the Russian tools and infrastructure in order to
influence the US presidential election, the report will not even warrant the correctness of its description of Russian
capabilities.

Related: 18 Major Scandals in Obamas Scandal-Free Presidency

Thus the DHS report makes it completely clear that the Obama regime has no evidential basis for its allegations on the
basis of which it has imposed more sanctions on Russia.

What is going on here?

First there is the question of the legality of the sanctions even if there were evidence. I am not certain, but I think that
sanctions require the action of a body, such as the UN Security Council, and cannot legally be imposed unilaterally by one
country. Additionally, it is unclear why Obama is calling the expulsion of Russian diplomats sanctions.

No other country has to do likewise. During the Cold War when diplomats were expelled for spying, it was not called
sanctions. Sanctions imply more than unilateral or bilateral expulsions of diplomats.
Second, it is clear that Obama, the CIA, and the New York Times are fully aware that the allegation is false. It is also clear
that if the CIA actually believes the allegation, the intelligence agency is totally incompetent and cannot be believed on any
subject.

Third, President Trump can rescind the sanctions in 21 days, a third reason that the sanctions are ridiculous.

So why are President Obama, the CIA, and the New York Times making charges that they know are false and for
which they have not produced a shred of evidence?

Related: Soros Launches Plan to Bring Down US and Israel

One obvious answer is that the neoconized Obama regime is desperate to ruin US-Russian relations past the point that
Trump can repair them. As the New York Times puts it;

Mr. Obamas actions clearly create a problem for Mr. Trump. The question the New York Times says, is whether
Trump stands with his democratic allies on Capitol Hill or his authoritarian friend in the Kremlin.

Can Trumps foreign policy be controlled by false allegations?

According to the New York Times, Trump has relented and agreed to being briefed by the CIA about the Russian hacking
now that Republicans such as Paul Ryan, John McCain, and Lindsey Graham have lined up with Obama and the CIA in
accepting charges for which no evidence has been presented.

However, a briefing without evidence would seem simply to further discredit the CIA in Trumps eyes.

As I have emphasized in my columns, facts no longer have a role in the United States and its empire. Allegations alone
suffice, whether in court cases, interrogation centers, foreign and domestic policies, or classrooms.

The US even bases its military invasions on false allegations - weapons of mass destruction. Indeed, the entirely
of US foreign policy since the Clinton regime has been based on nothing but false allegations.
The Russian government should have learned by now, but perhaps Moscow still thinks that facts matter in Washingtons
decisions.

Possibly we should consider that more is going on than meets the eye. Perhaps the propaganda about the Russian cyber
threat to democracy is being used to prepare American and/or European populations for an incident.

The CIA has morphed into a deep state that uses disinformation and propaganda to align decisions of Congress, the
executive branch, and foreign governments with secret behind-the-scenes agendas. Many books, such as Stephen
Kinzers The Brothers and Douglas Valentines CIA As Organized Crime have described some of these secret agendas.

Related: Trumans True Warning on the CIA

In order to deter Trump from restoring normal relations with Russia, an incident would have to be severe and irreversible.
Rather than accept defeat for their agenda of US world hegemony, the neoconservatives are prepared to take high risks.
The willingness to take risks is demonstrated by the public effort of the CIA Director to discredit the president-elect.

As expected, Putins response to the latest provocation is low key as the sanctions appear to be meaningless on the
surface.

Related: Stephen Lendman Reports President Putins Response To Obamas New Sanctions

However, in the event that something dangerous is below the surface, the Russian government might want to consider
putting its military forces on alert.

Related Articles:

Stephen Lendman Reports President Putins Response To Obamas New Sanctions

Obama Retaliates Against Russians Over Purported Cyberattack, But Is There a Double Standard?
 Russia sanctions childish, petulant & pointless revenge for Clinton loss UKs ex-Syria envoy

Russia Responds To Obama On Expelled Diplomats: New Hostile Steps Will Receive An Answer

Plane with Russian diplomats expelled from US lands in Moscow

Washingtons Intent is Economic Destabilization and Regime Change In Venezuela

Rescuing Boris - TIME Magazine, 1996

Russia to Obama: Put up or Shut Up

HuffPo Turns On Obama: He Presided Over The "Destruction Of The Democratic Party"

Refugees Surge 86% Year on Year: Ahead of Trump Presidency Obama Rushes Muslim Refugees into US

Benjamin Netanyahu SLAMS Obama and Kerry In Fiery Response

Seven Ways Obama Is Trying To Sabotage The Trump Administration

President Barack Obamas final weeks in office seem dedicated to setting foreign and domestic
policy on fire to make life as difficult as possible on his successor, Donald Trump.

Here are some of the biggest mousetraps Obama scattered across the White House floor on his way out:

Related: Assange: Obama Is Obviously Trying To Delegitimize Trump - Wikileaks founder says source of email
hack is '1000% Not Russia'
 1. Betraying Israel at the United Nations: Obamas refusal to block a United Nations vote against Israel, his
administrations shadowy machinations to bring that ugly motion to the floor, and Secretary of State John Kerrys long-
winded broadside against Israel will leave President Trump with a massive political crisis in the Middle East, and quite
possibly a security crisis, if terror groups and their political wings are emboldened by the rebuke of Israel.

Obamas Israel maneuver also damages American credibility, teaching would-be allies that the United States is not the best
friend to have. Americas erstwhile battlefield allies in Syria can teach the same lesson, assuming any of them are left alive
to take the podium.

This comes at the very moment aspiring hegemons in China and Russia are showing their allies how Beijing and Moscow
will go to the mat for them.

Related: Obama Publishes $7.4 BILLION Worth Of Regulations In One Night

Obamas team thinks it was clever to saddle Trump with an international edict the U.S. president cannot easily reverse.
They might not have thought this all the way through, because some of the options that are available to Trump could leave
internationalists, and Palestinian leaders, cursing Barack Obamas memory.

Note that even some commentators friendly to Obama, and sources within the Obama Administration itself, have described
the Israel vote as a deliberate act of sabotage aimed at Trump, because Obama is alarmed by some of Trumps
appointees.

2. A New Cold War With Russia: After eight years of relentlessly mocking anyone who said Russia was a major
geopolitical threat to the United States (most famously including his 2012 presidential opponent, Mitt Romney) Barack
Obama suddenly realized: You know what? Russia is a major threat!
He also awoke to the dangers of cyber-warfare, after an entire presidency of treating electronic espionage as a purely
political problem to be minimized and spun away, because taking it seriously made him look bad. Who can forget how
Obama left victims of the OPM hack twisting in the wind for weeks, because the administration didnt want to admit how
serious the attack was?

But then a top Democrat political operative fell for a crude phishing scam, and the Democratic National Committee got
hacked, so Obama well, he still didnt take cyber-espionage seriously.

He slapped the snooze bar again, because as one anonymous official put it, they thought Hillary Clinton was a
cinch to win the 2016 election, so they were willing to kick the can down the road.

No, it was Hillary Clintons loss in the election, and the desperate push to damage President-elect Trumps legitimacy, that
made the president who politely ignored China hacking 25 million American citizens private data get tough on information
security.

Tucker Carlson Destroys Leftist on Russian Election Hacking Claims

Related Articles:

Hannity Has Sit-Down Interview with Julian Assange It Was Not Russia

Robert Parry: John V. Whitbeck on the Criminal Insanity of the US Establishment Claiming Russians Hacked the
Election When It as the Establishment That Lost Under Its Own Byzantine Fraud-Friendly Rules

Intelligence Insider: Russian Hack Story Is A Giant Hoax

Robert Steele in Defence and Intelligence Norway: The Russians Did Not Hack the US Election a Few Facts
from a Former CIA Spy
Until now, states involved in cyber-espionage never got anything worse than a few carefully-chosen words of sour
disapproval from the expiring administration, but the Russkies received a sprinkling of sanctions, and 35 diplomats
were expelled.

Russia responded by unleashing an army of ducks and trolls from the depths of the Kremlin. The New Cold War is only a
few days old, and its already weirder than the old one was.

Presumably Obama thinks hes maneuvered Trump into a position that will make whatever rapprochement he might have
entertained with Moscow more difficult, or at least more politically costly for the new President.

Related: Buoyant Putin and Sinking Western Mis-Leaders

The end result might be easier relations between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, and a lingering memory of
how little Barack Obama cared about cybersecurity until it was politically expedient for him to freak out.

3. Ban on Oil Drilling: An overt act of sabotage directed at the American economy itself, leaving an especially heavy
bootprint on Alaska. Smug administration flacks spent the past couple of weeks assuring media talking heads that
Obamas unprecedented abuse of an obscure law was impossible for his successor to reverse.

Its like they stayed up all night, looking for executive actions that cant be undone by the new President four weeks later.

(Amusingly, Obama dropped this bomb on our energy sector just a few weeks after publicly advising Trump not to abuse
executive orders.)

Its likely that legions of lawyers will battle throughout 2017, and perhaps beyond, to determine if Obamas latest poke at
Trump (as Politico put it) really is irreversible. What a lovely parting gift from the departing President to the country that
elected him twice: a pile of gigantic wealth-destroying lawsuits!

4. National-Monument Land Grab: The other theoretically irreversible presidential edict discovered by Obamas
munchkins is the ability to designate national monuments. Another 1.65 million acres in Utah and Nevada was yanked off
the market in the last week of December, bring Obamas Antiquities Act acreage up to an unprecedented 553 million acres.
Related: Obama seizes Bundy Ranch area in massive last minute land grab

"This arrogant act by a lame duck president will not stand. I will work tirelessly with Congress and the incoming
Trump administration to honor the will of the people of Utah and undo this designation, thundered Senator Mike
Lee of Utah.

Sixty-five percent of his state is now under the wise and compassionate environmental protection of the same government
that turned the Colorado River into a toxic-waste dump.

5. Eliminating the National Immigration Registry: Just in case Trump got any ideas about using it as the basis for the
enhanced vetting he has promised for immigrants from terrorist-infested regions, the Obama administration killed a long-
dormant program called NSEERS that once committed the unforgivable politically-incorrect sin of tracking military-age males
from violently unstable Muslim-majority countries.

Its highly debatable whether the NSEERS program was of any practical use. When it pulled the plug, the Department of
Homeland Security noted that the post-9/11 program called for collecting data that is now routinely collected for most foreign
visitors, along with more sophisticated biometric information.

Almost everyone saw the elimination of these roles as a purely symbolic act - i.e. political sabotage directed at the incoming
President.

6. The Great Guantanamo Jailbreak: After paying little more than lip service to his promise to close the Guantanamo Bay
prison for much of his presidency, Obama went into overdrive in his last years, transferring over 150 detainees. A shocking
number of them ended up back on the battlefield.

Rep. Ed Royce (R-CA) of the House Foreign Affairs Committee wrote a Wall Street Journal op-ed this week to sound the
alarm about Obamas midnight push to empty out Guantanamo.

The White House has repeatedly released detainees to countries it knew lacked the intent and capability to keep
the detainees from returning to terrorism. The results have been deadly, Royce wrote, challenging the wisdom of
such Obama administration brainstorms as dropping al-Qaedas top bomb maker into Bosnia, a country with
limited security services but plenty of radical mosques and unemployed military-age males.
Related: 2017: The Year Of Microchipping Americans. The Law Was Just Passed

Royces committee has been investigating allegations the administration tried to pay the bomb-maker $100,000 to refrain
from passing his deadly skills along to eager apprentices. Hunting down the rest of the transferred prisoners who transferred
themselves right back into the global jihad will be a job for the Trump administration.

7. Depicting Trumps Election as a Disaster: Lets not forget Obamas acts of rhetorical sabotage, such as describing
Trumps presidential campaign as a crime against American class and racial harmony, or his wife wailing that all hope was
lost for Americas children. Trump himself has taken note of the many inflammatory President Obama statements and
roadblocks.

Its hard to remember a previous instance of the outgoing president attacking the legitimacy of his successor this way,
especially during the transition, before the new chief executive has actually done anything.

And its probably not over yet. The time for big executive orders is growing short, but Obama is always just one day away
from calling a press conference and saying something else that will make the transition more difficult.

Alex Jones To Announce Who Really Hacked the DNC

Of course he can still talk all he wants after January 20th, and hes given every indication he wont follow the dignified path
of his predecessors and allow the new president time to chart his own course, but theres no substitute for the bully pulpit of
the presidency.

The timber of Barack Obamas political voice will be very different on January 21st than it was on January 19th. More likely
than not, hell use it before he loses it.

Related: Obamas legacy of debt and disease: National debt doubles in just eight years while 10.7 million more
Americans now on food stamps to buy cancer-causing junk foods

Erdogan Says He Has "Confirmed Evidence" The US Supports ISIS + US Senator Says
ISIS Used As Tool By Saudis, US & Turkey When It Suits Their Interests
January 4 2017 | From: Zerohedge / RT

One year after this website demonstrated that Turkey was cooperating with the Islamic State, in the
very least trading cash in exchange for crude oil sold to various Turkish outposts (a trade which
was subsequently ended by the Russian air force), Turkey has flipped the tables and on Tuesday
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said he has uncovered evidence that US-led coalition
forces have helped support terrorists in Syria - including Isis.
"They give support to terrorist groups including ISIS" Erdogan said during a speech in Ankara on Tuesday, adding that
US coalition forces "give support to terrorist groups including Daesh, YPG, PYD. It's very clear. We have confirmed
evidence, with pictures, photos and videos."

Related: Erdogans Accusations re US Supporting Terrorists A Parting Shot For Obama

Which, incidentally, should also not come a surprise in light of the May 2015 declassified Pentagon report, which claimed
that ISIS was created as a Pentagon tool to overthrow Syria's president Assad.

Its very clear that the US-led coalition is supporting terrorist groups in Syria, Islamic State. They give
support to terrorist groups including Daesh (Arabic for IS).

We have confirmed evidence, with pictures, photos and videos.

- Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan

Related: Absolutely Stunning: Leaked Audio of Secretary Kerry Reveals Obama Intentionally Allowed Rise of ISIS

Nevertheless, the "pot calling the kettle black" comes at a sensitive time for both the US and Turkey, which are both pivoting
aggressively, one internally from Obama to Trump, while the other is shifting its foreign geopolitical allegiance from the US
to Russia, which may also explain today's outburst by Erdogan.
Related: Erdogan tells Israel: "We see Western weapons in Daesh hands"

Saying that the US have accused Turkey of supporting IS, speaking at a press conference on Tuesday the Turkish leader
blamed the US-led coalition for assisting terrorists themselves. Apart from IS, he also mentioned Kurdish People's
Protection Units in northern Syria (YPG) and Democratic Union Party (PYD) as groups supported by the coalition.

Earlier on Tuesday, Moscow accused Washington of "sponsoring terrorism" in Syria.

Commenting on the latest National Defense Authorization Act signed into law by President Barack Obama, the Russian
Foreign Ministry pointed out that the new bill "openly stipulates the possibility" of delivering more weapons to Syria, and
added that those arms "will soon find their way to the jihadists," which Russia would view as a "hostile act."

Erdogan's comments echoed those from the Iranian Defense Minister Hossein Dehghan, who told RT that Washington
appears unready to play a serious role in fighting Islamic State, as it has fostered terrorists itself and now wants them
to remain in the Middle East.

"The Western coalition is of a formal nature, they have no real intention to fight neither in Syria nor in Iraq. We
dont see any readiness on their part to play a truly useful and meaningful role in fighting IS, because its them who
have raised terrorists and they are interested in keeping them there, Dehghan said.

According to the Iranian defense minister, Tehran has never coordinated its operations with the Americans and will never
collaborate with them.
He then slammed the US' motives behind the "war on ISIS' saying that:

"Maybe the coalition forces would like to see terrorists weakened, but certainly not destroyed, because those
terrorists are their tool for destabilizing this region and some other parts of the world.

One wonders how long before Putin is blamed for this latest political scandal, because if indeed Erdogan does provide proof
of US support for the Islamic State, then the Pentagon will need a back story very fast, and what better scapegoat than the
Russian president.

US Senator Says ISIS Used As Tool By Saudis, US & Turkey When It Suits Their
Interests

Speaking to RT on the advance of ISIS militants from Mosul toward Palmyra, Virginia Senator
Richard Black (R) expressed doubt that the US-led coalition could have overlooked such a
regrouping, pointing to possible interests of the US and regional players.
Given that the territory between areas occupied by Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) and Palmyra is a very
barren rocky desert, it is unconceivable that the American-led collation could not have seen this massive army
moving towards Palmyra, Senator Black told RT.

Related: Congresswoman Says US Is Arming ISIS, Introduces Bill to Stop It

"The Western coalition is of a formal nature, they have no real intention to fight neither in Syria nor in Iraq. We
dont see any readiness on their part to play a truly useful and meaningful role in fighting IS, because its them who
have raised terrorists and they are interested in keeping them there, Dehghan said.

I was surprised that ISIS was able to attack Palmyra. Its important to recognize that the distance from ISIS-held territory
[to] Palmyra is approximately 100 miles, added the senator, who has repeatedly voiced support for Syrian President Bashar
Assad in battling the jihadists.

The fact that the US-led coalition seemingly turned a blind eye to the imminent terrorist threat to the UNESCO world
heritage site is not a coincidence, he argues, but rather a part of the foreign policy strategy employed by the current White
House administration towards Islamic State.

Unfortunately, I believe, under the Obama administration, I think there have been great deal of coordination between
terrorist forces and the US-led coalition, Black said.

While the US, as well as other western countries and major regional players, do not share the same goals as the terrorists,
they have been seemingly sparing Islamic State if airstrikes against the terrorist group could have resulted in disadvantage
to Turkey, the key NATO member in the region and a US ally, which Black alleges, has engaged in economic relations with
terrorists.

Related: Decamped from Mosul ISIS fighters in Syria perfect for US narrative
 There [the terrorists] have not been loved by anyone, but they have been a major trading partner of Turkey, and
the United States withheld any attack when they first seized Palmyra travelling a hundred miles over open territory,
and, I confirm, there was not a single bomb dropped by the American-led coalition, he said.

This very selective approach to fighting terrorists gives reason to suggest that the US-led coalition is battling jihadists only
when it does not interfere with the narrow interests of its members, Black suggests, dubbing the coalitions efforts under
such circumstances as disastrously unproductive.

I think ISIS is often used as a tool between Turkey and the United States and as long as they are useful to one of
those parties they are protected and when they are not useful they are not protected, Black said, arguing that ISIS
served as tool of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United States and NATO forcesfrom the very beginning of
the conflict in Syria.

At the same time, the senator commended the US-led offensive in Iraq, which has centered on liberating its second largest
city, Mosul, from militants, saying that the coalition was doing some very good work in Mosul and seems to be genially
poised to drive ISIS forces from Mosul.

Related: 'CIA created ISIS', says Julian Assange as Wikileaks releases 500k US cables

However, US President Barack Obamas recent decision to lift restrictions on the delivery of weapons to:

"Foreign forces, irregular forces, groups or individuals, who are supported by US military in Syria, plays into the
hands of terrorists and looks like a desperate last attempt by the outgoing administration, Black said.
The senator said that the looming change of commander-in-chief in the United States will be marked by a U-turn in Syria,
with the US cutting all its ties with militants.

When Donald Trump comes in, the support is going to be cut for the terrorists. We are not going on to the side of
the terrorists anymore, he said.

Sen. Black has been known as a fierce critic of the current US policy towards Syria, calling it insane in comments to the
Washington Post in April, when he argued that it is within our power to stop the bloodshed.

Related: Actress Angelina Jolie Humiliates Obama for the Whole World to See

In April, Black traveled to Palmyra and met with Syrian government officials. He has said that Syria being entrapped in the
military conflict is not the result of domestic issues but of a plot contrived by foreign intelligence, including that of the western
countries, Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

The government and people in Syria want peace, but regional countries dont, Black told Homs Governor Talal
Barazi at the time, as cited by the Syria Times.

US State Department Blueprint To Oust Duterte Leaked By US Embassy Insider

January 3 2017 | From: Geopolitics / Various
An elaborate blueprint to dislodge the Philippine president, Mayor Rodrigo Duterte, has emerged
through a local newspaper in the Philippines.

The Oust Duterte blueprint was allegedly written by the former US Ambassador Philip Goldberg, who started the
verbal tussle with the then-candidate Duterte when the former issued an unsolicited statement detrimental to the
candidacy, a few months ago, of the incumbent president.

Related: Duterte Says US Ambassadors Are CIA "Spies" As Alleged US Plot To Overthrow Him Emerges

If you want to understand how exactly the US State Department is conducting its regime change program without
the use of ground military invasion against a targeted state, just read on.

The Manila Times reports;

Not only did former United States Ambassador Philip Goldberg leave the Philippines with a legacy of fractured
relations between the two countries, he allegedly left behind a blueprint to undermine Duterte, a strategic
recommendation ostensibly to the State Department for the ultimate removal of President Rodrigo Roa
Duterte from office, according to a highly placed source.

It is not clear, however, if the State Department in Washington DC had given its imprimatur to the recommendation
by its former ambassador to the Philippines.

A document received over the weekend by The Manila Times from that source said Goldberg had outlined a list of
strategies to undermine President Duterte and called for his eventual ouster. The blueprint gave a timetable of
one-and-a-half years.

Quoting Goldberg, it said the political actors (the opposition) would need all the political weapons in their arsenal
to replace the Duterte administration and replace it with something more to the oppositions liking. He noted,
however, that (deposing Duterte) would be a challenge for the opposition.

Analyzing the Presidents weakness, Goldberg said that Mr. Duterte has no real friends outside of his region for
his propensity to mock and ridicule people close to him. He also said that the Presidents views are shaped not
by ideology or personal ambitions, but by old-fashioned nationalism where he holds the United States
accountable for the Philippines current state of poverty and dependency.

To bring down Duterte, the Goldberg plan calls for stoking public dissatisfaction with the President over unfulfilled
election promises, isolating the Philippines from the rest of the ASEAN by extending military assistance to member
countries except the Philippines, and/or through economic blackmail that aims to limit trade by some
ASEAN member countries with the Philippines.

Goldberg also encourages support for the opposition through aids and grants, sowing discontent among the
Duterte supporters and cultivating the cleavage between the congressmen and the senators over the Charter
Change issue.

In brief, the plan calls on the US government to employ a combination of socio-economic-political-

diplomatic moves against Duterte to bring him to his knees and eventually remove him from office.

The paper outlined the Ambassadors strategies to be employed such as:

Political and economic isolation of the Philippines in the region by engaging the leaders of Japan, Vietnam,
Cambodia and Laos and by highlighting the basic question of the risk of doing business in the Philippines.

Enhanced US military relationship with members of the Asean community except the Philippines.

Blackmail neighboring countries so they would turn against Duterte by reducing trade with the Philippines in
favor of Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos.

Deepen ties with Philippine officials (the opposition), the police/military and leaders in the region who share
the US concerns over Duterte.

Track corruption cases and highlight the failures of Duterte.

Focus on the needs of the people at the grassroots and assist the opposition groups in delivering those
failed promises through USAID such as alleviation of poverty, housing and education to name a few.

Utilize the media to expose the truth about Duterte his false vision for the Filipino people and his dangerous
international relationships with China and Russia.

Goldberg also recommends, change the political landscape by dividing the core leadership of Duterte by
sowing discontent among (his) partymates. He observed that some of the Presidents allies are privately
becoming concerned over his shift in foreign policy and the twist in the character of his economic and social
agenda that veers closely toward the Left.

The former US Ambassador underscores the need to stoke the fire between the defenders of the rule of law
and Dutertes Leftist group by highlighting the demands of the Left to free all political prisoners in the
country even before a formal peace agreement could be signed between the government and the CPP/NDF/NPA,
and an end to US military presence in the Philippines.

It is not clear from what the source said how Goldberg would go about weakening the Philippine currency, but it
states that such a scenario would lead to inflation (and would raise prices of food and other commodities).

(Authors note: He was wrong, though, in predicting that a weak peso would make our agriculture less competitive.
On the contrary, a weak peso would help strengthen our exports and make our products more competitive in the
global market.)

The paper also quoted Goldbergs recommendation to capitalize on a possible stalemate as a possible course
of action if and when the Lower House marginalizes the Senate on the voting on Charter Change. The Lower
House has already publicly declared that both the House and the Senate should vote as one and not separately,
as espoused by the Senators. Voting as one would, as some senators say, disenfranchise them given the sheer
number of the congressmen 240 representatives versus 24 Senators.
 There will be fallout as a result of the Charter Change stalemate. Many legislators will break away from the
administration as a consequence, Goldberg predicts.

In his observation, the US former envoy to the Philippines said that while President Duterte has been successful in
earning the support of the people for his campaign against drugs, his political and economic program has failed to
deliver the desired results. The US government, he said, should try to understand how Duterte thinks and what
his next moves would be.

With growing concern about the countrys security situation and economic discontent, the pressure is on Duterte
to deliver concrete results, the paper wrote, quoting Goldberg. In this increasingly sensitive environment a
country susceptible to favor political disruption, our approach must be measured. Opposition actors across the
political spectrum look at us (US) for cues, and our (US) influence is much greater than our footprint.

Goldberg also advises restraint in expressing public support for former President Fidel Valdez Ramos and Vice
President Leni Robredo, as well as other opposition leaders so as not to alarm the Duterte administration of
an impending destabilization or a coup. He admits, however, that the operation (coup) is obscured with
difficulties.

Two other options were presented by Goldberg, according to the paper: The rift among the Duterte supporters
should be exploited, or assist the Robredo-led opposition groups (to include the Catholic Church and
other religious groups, business sectors, civil society groups and the youth) in addressing the international
community regarding the shift in foreign policy issue, restoration of democracy and the protection of human rights
through constitutional means.

Goldberg predicts a worsening of the US-Philippine relations, more so on the issue of the US military presence in
the Philippines, more particularly during the last two years of the Duterte administration.

The paper also wrote that the former US ambassador to the Philippines wanted to know the views of Sen.
Bongbong Marcos on a variety of issues such as: the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA), China,
Human Rights and the US-PH relations.

- TheManilaTimes

Now, you understand how the United States has been scheming the political and economic affairs of the Philippine
citizenry for the last 113 years.

So, who exactly leaked Goldbergs anti-Duterte plot to the mainstream media?

Congressional Hearing re State Department Oust Duterte Covert Ops

There will be a congressional investigation soon, but allow this writer to disabuse your mind for a moment and lets explore
as to who could be behind the leaking of the Goldberg Oust Duterte plan.
Related: Philippines President Duterte Calls Out Vatican For Pedophilia & Gold Hoarding

First, we already know that the leak came directly from the highly placed source inside the US Embassy in Manila. But we
cannot expect that the people there would volunteer the information to the Philippine Congress.

Yet, there are only few specific highly placed personalities who should have access to the Oust Duterte blueprint left
behind by the former American Ambassador to the Philippines Philip Goldberg. In fact, we can only think of one potential
silent whistleblower as of now, and he is of Asian blood.

He was directly in front of the president when the latter expressed his candid assessment of the true root cause of the Moro
rebellion in Southern Philippines, justifying his preference for a shift to a federal-parliamentary system of government.

The United States were here. They lorded it over for 50 years and lived off with the fat of the land. But when
they want out, they went out and it was still a unitary type [of government]. And to hear them say,

We will cut your aid if this thing happens again Cmon, shut up!

Shut up! I do not need your assistance. Millennium Challenge? $400 million?

China is going to release to me $15 billion. Go home. I do not need you here."

Duterte further advices the West that;

You should be careful with Orientals With due respect to the Ambassador of the United States, when youre
dealing with Asians, be very careful of your language. You could not do that to the Japanese, and Koreans
theyd feel insulted.
 Why do you have to say, Well cut your aid if?

He said these statements point blank to the current Ambassador of the United States to the Philippines, Sung Kim, who was
sitting directly in front of the presidential podium at the inauguration of the Entrepreneurship for Peace in Sulu, the first
collaboration between the Duterte government and the local business community, i.e. progressive sector of the Oligarchy.

New Ambassador of the United States to the Philippines, Sung Kim, from South Korea

Would it be too farfetched to speculate that the newly arrived ambassador, who happens to be a Korean, was the one who
leaked the Goldberg blueprint to preempt the Khazarian plot to oust Duterte?

Surely, the ambassador is already making himself available to the children in the country.
On December 22, Ambassador Sung Kim and U.S. Marines from the Marine Security Guard Detachment from the U.S. Embassy in the Philippines
distributed toys to children at Reach Youth Ministries, a local organization that provides educational, livelihood, and values formation programs to
youth from the nearby San Andres Bukid communities. U.S. Embassy employees and local businesses donated the toys as part of the U.S. Marine
Corps Toys for Tots program

Yes, its all public relations BS, but its already a huge departure from his predecessor who prefers to spend his time
spewing garbage through the pro-US local media.

Commenting on what the president is doing to better the lives of his people is a big no-no in any foreign diplomacy. Other
ambassadors are not doing what he was doing, and quite frankly, he should be slapped with a persona non grata badge on
his way out.

He should have tucked his tongue to the bilateral relations only between his country and the host, and not comment on any
business involving a third party, unless the former ambassador was sowing intrigue between the people and the president,
which is of course what is now being revealed, outlined in the leaked blueprint that he allegedly wrote to begin with.

Why would the US State Department and the CIA want to remove Duterte from Office?

The primordial reasons why would they want to remove Duterte are his decisive Pivot to China and Russia and his highly
effective war on drugs.
Related: US Embassy in Manila denies existence of blueprint to oust Duterte

The first measure has dealt a destructive blow to the Clinton-Obama Pivot to Asia doctrine to mitigate the growing
influence of China in the region.

The second one, dented the CIA drug sales in the country, in a big way.

Dutertes Drug War Banging on CIA Drug Enterprise in Southeast Asia

The Philippine authorities have proclaimed victory over the war on illegal drugs as the largest drug bust ever in the history
of Philippine drug busting, involving PHP 6 billion worth of high-grade methamphetamine, led to the arrest of the most
sophisticated drug manufacturers so far.

Said group dismantles their equipment after every cooking session. Pre-raid NBI surveillance took about 4 months of hard
work.

Previous drug busting yielded the discovery of a 4.8 ton monthly capacity drug laboratory in Virac, Catanduanes and
hundreds more drug busting operations upon medium scale meth labs spread all throughout the country.

In addition to the domestic efforts to squeeze the fancy world of the local druglords, Duterte has been very active in
coordinating the countrys war on drugs with the rest of the ASEAN members he had already visited to, in the last 6 months.

If The Agency that is running the whole illegal drug enterprise is looking at these highly successful anti-drug operations, it
will be forced to act just to save its milking cow.
Related: I could sense a good rapport with Trump: Duterte

If the State Department, which sought to destroy the country from within, thats looking at this same decisive effort to change
the economic conditions of the Philippine population, so that they would never be slaves in foreign lands, no more, it must
seek to dislodge the authority spearheading these actions.

Duterte must be ousted from his position now.

If the State Department and the CIA should decide to pursue its ousting of President Duterte, as they have done in the past
to several Philippine presidents, it would not succeed now that the full spectrum of Philippine society, i.e. class A, B, C, D, E,
communist cadres, and Muslim secessionist groups in the South, are all with him in the march towards real and meaningful
change for all.

Related: Mayor Duterte is Not Genocidal, The West is. Heres the proof

Conclusions

Nationwide demonstrations spearheaded by the Catholic Church have so far netted only a few brainwashed students from
Catholic schools, and state universities.

Even a military coup is much harder to pull off due to the active engagement of the president as to their plight as the
protector of Philippine sovereignty. Duterte is one of the few presidents, if not the only leader, who actively visits the military
camps and military hospitals to let them know that a true government of the Filipino people is now in-charge of Philippine
affairs.

No wonder that the Presidential Security Guard made an extra effort lately to sing a few Christmas carols to their
Commander in Chief. In its entire history, this is the first time that they ever did this voluntarily to a sitting president
Their loyalty to their Oath and the Republic at large has never been put to question in the past. We can rest assured they
wont fail the president now and in the next 6 years of his term.

It would become even more difficult for the Oust Duterte operators starting next year, when his own national budget will be
in full swing and multiple infrastructure projects are being implemented.

The CIAs and US State Departments only option would be a lone assassin, just like that was used against the Russian
ambassador a few days ago.

Related: Putin Assures Envoy Karlovs Murderers to Feel the Heat of Russian Response

Filipinos may have long ropes, but when they lose it, they can do the extremes, too, and they are everywhere.

So, we can speculate with a high degree of certainty that if something will ever happen to the president during his term, a
destructive effect on the close relationships between the two governments will surely develop in the aftermath of such an
event.

To those people seeking his ouster, or his death, Duterte has this to say.

Some people say that I should be very careful with the CIA, and Id tell them, well, if its my
time, its my time.

But somebody has to stand up against them and say, you know, dont fuck with me.
 Dont fuck with me.

- Mayor Rodrigo Duterte, President of the Republic of the Philippines

Related Articles:

Duterte to Putin at APEC summit: Western nations start wars they are scared to fight themselves

Vatican Does Nothing to Help Drug Addicts, Just Collects Money at Mass | Duterte

Duterte says once threw man from helicopter, would do it again

Chinese military official says Moscow-Beijing relations are at best phase in history

Diary Of A Person Of Interest & Oxford PHD Katherine Horton "Intelligence Agencies
Are Attacking Me With Direct Energy Weapons!"
January 3 2017 | From: Endarken / Stop007.org

Kiwi journalist and activist Suzie Dawson has been extensively targeted by Western intelligence
agencies and their contractors. This video and the following one are very important. The second
one more so if you want to understand the how and why of exotic microwave 'Non-Lethal Weapons'.
In the wake of several attempts on her life, she had to leave New Zealand to live in exile in Europe.

Related: Electronic Torture + 21st-Century Bio-Hacking And Bio-Robotizing

In this unique documentary, Suzie discusses what it is really like to be a target of the Five Eyes; why she was targeted, who
she was targeted by, how they targeted her, what their end game is and how to try to counter it.

UPDATE: Since making this documentary Suzie has applied for asylum in Russia.

Suzie's original article titled 'Diary of a Person of Interest' can be found here.

Her debrief and speech notes from her 2015 talk of the same name can be read here.

The extent of the havoc wreaked by American political interests in New Zealand (particularly since 2008) is best explained by
Suzie's colossal article "The Desecration of New Zealand" which can be read here:

The Desecration Of New Zealand

Suzie says:

"Hey guys, thank you for watching and sharing my first film. The events depicted in it roughly cover the period
October 2011 to January 2015. Some may find the topics discussed here terrifying - but it is reality in this day and
age and to change it we have to face it.

There is a lot more yet to be revealed about my story, what I did and what has happened to me since becoming
exiled. So you can expect more content from me and soon. If you want to reach out, or to walk with me on my
journey you can follow me on Twitter: @Suzi3D or keep an eye on my website: Suzi3D.com.

The more friendly eyes I have on me, the safer I am and the better chance I have to be able to continue my work.
Please, pass this video on to anyone who you think may be a target, as the information presented here can be the
difference between sanity and a breakdown, to someone going through it. Thank you so much for your support.
Love, Suzie"
Viewing Guide:

Intro: 00:00:00
Part 3: Who Does It? 00:18:42
Part 1: Occupy 00:00:43
- State Agencies 00:19:04
- Our Purpose 00:02:25
- Private Agencies 00:21:37
Part 2: Why You? 00:05:27
Part 4: The Targets 00:24:04
- Occupy 00:05:58
Part 5: How? 00:26:43
- Anonymous 00:06:31
- Physical Surveillance 00:27:57
- Kim Dotcom 00:07:06
- Signals Surveillance 00:29:53
- Internet Party 00:08:19
- Public Surveillance 00:31:39
- GCSB 00:08:55
- Harassment 00:35:03
- FVEY 00:09:28
- Isolation 00:43:53
- Shihad 00:09:51
- Sabotage 00:47:56
- Snowden/Greenwald 00:10:42
- Entrapment 00:51:11
- Moment of Truth (#MoT) 00:10:56
- Social Engineering 00:51:57
- The Intercept/Nicky Hager/NSA 00:15:00
- Institutionalisation 00:55:09
- #TPPANoWay 00:15:41
- Assassination Attempts 00:58:25
- #NZ4Gaza 00:16:!5
Part 6: What Do They Want? 01:01:18
- #SaveGI 00:16:48
- What You Learn To Do 01:02:53
- Exile / Berlin 00:17:12
Credits: 01:04:26
- WikiLeaks 00:17:42

Related: TargetedIndividuals.com

Oxford PHD Katherine Horton "Intelligence Agencies Are Attacking Me With Direct
Energy Weapons!"
Related: Stop007.org

The Top 10 Most Outrageous Science Hoaxes Of 2016

January 2 2017 | From: NaturalNews

Science hoaxes were running rampant throughout 2016, pushed by the fakestream media (CNN,
WashPost, NYT, etc.) alongside complicit government organizations working in collusion with
dishonest corporations steeped in scientific fraud (Monsanto, Big Pharma, etc.).
2016 saw more science hoaxes than a typical year, with the media placing special emphasis on the Zika virus terror
campaign (rooted in total scientific hucksterism) and more climate change propaganda (all based on fraudulently
altered data).

Related: Seeding Doubt: How Self-Appointed Guardians Of Sound Science Tip The Scales Toward Industry

In every case, those pushing the science frauds claimed to have a divine monopoly on science while declaring all opposing
views to be unscientific.

In this way, much of the science in todays corrupt society has really become nothing more than a cult of scientism,
complete with faith in the correctness of socially-reinforced beliefs while exercising instant rejection of evidence that
contradicts the fairy tale narratives of the science elite.

Sadly, science in 2016 functioned more like a priesthood of dogmatists fervently demanding the obedient worship of
their unassailable assumptions. On every issue that matters, data were thrown out the window and replaced with fraud.
Related: The Cult Of 'Scientism' Explained: How Scientific Claims Behind Cancer, Vaccines, Psychiatric Drugs And
GMOs Are Nothing More Than Corporate-Funded Science Fraud

To drive home the fraud, the scientifically illiterate lamestream media catapulted the propaganda to new heights, even
while remaining completely oblivious to the laughably false science they were promoting.

Here, I offer a summary of the most outrageous science hoaxes of 2016, along with a few links where you can explore more.
By the way, the video on the Cicret bracelet invention that claims to turn your arm into a mobile device touchscreen is
also a complete fraudulent hoax that has fooled millions of people, and I cover that in detail at the bottom of this article.

My primary message for 2017 is to stop believing in all the fake science being pushed by media, governments, academia
and corporate liars.

Science Hoax #1: Scientific Political Polling

Through the entire year, we were all subjected to an endless onslaught of so-called scientific political polls that almost
universally showed Hillary Clinton would win the election.

All the scientific polls were wrong, it turns out. (And yes, I called all this well before the election, on the record.)

What we now know is that the word scientific was slapped onto these fraudulent polls to try to give them an aura of
credibility when, in reality, they were all fabricated or distorted to give Hillary Clinton the appearance of certain victory.
But guess what? All the experts were wrong. But how is that possible if all these polls were scientific as claimed? Are the
pollsters now telling us that science is broken?

Or maybe, just maybe, they were making s##t up all along and there wasnt any real science behind the
scientific claim in the first place.

Science Hoax #2: The Zika Virus Terror Campaign

2016 saw the rolling out of an elaborate media-fronted Zika terror campaign designed to scare the entire country into
ridiculously believing that mosquito bites would cause millions of women in America to give birth to babies with shrunken
heads.

Yeah, I know, it sounds like something a Batman villain would threaten to unleash in Gotham City. Pay me one million
dollars or all your babies will be born with shrunken heads! Mwuah hah hah!
Related: Whos Behind The Zika Virus Outbreak & Fearmongering?

But, alas, the American sheeple bought the medical science hoax hook, line and sinker. Belief in the Zika virus microcephaly
hoax was so deeply embedded in the psyche of the nation that even when the Washington Post published a story admitting
there was no link after all, the vast majority of so-called scientists and doctors still believe the hoax!

So, for the record, Ill say it again in the hopes of educating all the scientifically illiterate scientists who still dont understand
actual facts: The original wave of shrunken heads in Brazil was caused by a larvacide chemical that was dumped into
the water supply, not by the Zika virus alone.

The Zika apocalypse predicted by all the doctors, scientists and TV talking heads simply did not materialize. And when
evidence contradicts your theory, you have to start questioning your theory. Otherwise, you arent a scientist. Youre just a
petty fool.

Science Hoax #3: The Flint Michigan Lead Poisoning Cover-Up

In order to poison a million black children with brain-damaging lead, the U.S. EPA masterminded a large-scale science fraud
that deliberately altered heavy metals testing results for the Flint, Michigan water supply.

Eventually, a few of the science scapegoats were charged with felony crimes for engaging in a conspiracy to alter water
quality test data, but no one from the EPA was ever charged or prosecuted for their role in the scheme. (This also proves, by
the way, that conspiracies are quite real and very much alive in our society right now.)
The result of all this was the mass poisoning of mostly African-American children with a toxic heavy metal thats well known
to damage cognitive function and impede learning.What a great way to raise more democrats!

Its all part of the new science of keeping the sheeple dumbed down so they will keep voting for corrupt criminals
like Hillary Clinton.

Instead of let them eat cake, the new progressive Jon Podesta version is, Let them drink lead!

Science Hoax #4: The Banning of GMO Labeling Nationwide by Scientifically Illiterate
Republicans

In the name of science, Republican lawmakers passed the so-called DARK Act to outlaw honest food labeling of
genetically engineered foods.

Apparently, Republicans believe that knowledge is a dangerous thing in the hands of consumers, therefore preventing
people from knowing what theyre eating is the best solution.
Related: Monsanto Promoting Worldwide Infertility? + Academic GMO Shills Exposed: Fraud & Collusion With
Monsanto

This was all accomplished via an unholy alliance among biotech corporate giants (like Monsanto) and right-leaning
lawmakers, most of whom have never met a toxic chemical they didnt absolutely love.

Notably, while Democrats are passing local laws that criminalize Big Gulp sodas, Republicans are blocking labeling laws as
a way to say, If you dont SEE the poison on the label, it doesnt actually count!

Keeping consumers in the dark is now the official science policy of the federal government.

Hows that for transparency?

Science Hoax #5: Climate Change Data Fraud

Democrats have their own science fraud, of course, and theres no better example than global warming / climate change.

An analysis of climate data reveals that 100% of U.S. warming has been faked by altering temperature data.
Related: Climate Scare Declared Officially Over- Error In Model Calculations Discovered

To the great frustration of celebritards like Matt Damon, the data dont show any warming at all unless you cook the
numbers first.

This means climate change science is actually more like climate change alchemy, which isnt science at all. Its more like
Tarot cards mixed with voodoo blended with AlGoratotalitaritopian idiocy.

Note to intelligent people: If the world were really warming, they wouldnt have to alter the temperature data, would
they?

Science Hoax #6: Abortion Organ Harvesting for Scientific Research

According to leftists, chopping up living human babies who have just been forcibly birthed in order to harvest their organs
and brains isnt unethical at all. Nope, its a tremendous advancement for scientific research, you see.

Organ harvesting isnt just limited to places like Communist China and North Korea: The practice is alive and well in
America, too. But in the U.S., it takes on a genocidal milestone because most abortions are carried out on black babies
yep, the very same black babies that were also intentionally poisoned by the EPA in Flint, Michigan (see above).
Hmmm there seems to be a pattern in all this, but I cant quite put my finger on it but it definitely seems to have
something to do with killing as many black babies as possible while labeling it all science.

Its noteworthy to remember that Adolf Hitlers eugenics programs were also conducted under the umbrella of
science.

It seems not that much has changed in almost 80 years except that instead of Jews being exterminated by the millions,
its now black babies being exterminated by the millions while democrats demand an open borders human blitzkrieg to
replace them all with socialist-leaning illegal aliens who are uninformed enough to vote for leftists.

Science Hoax #7: The California Vaccine Mandate

Another large-scale science hoax that also happens to place a disproportionate burden on African-American babies is the
California medical police state vaccine mandate pushed by Californias own Mercury Joker Dr. Richard Pan.

After receiving bribes from vaccine makers, the medical child molesting California state senator Richard Pan took part in a
media-backed medical terrorism campaign against Californias citizens, attempting to scare everyone into falsely
believing that the best way to protect the health of children is to inject them with mercury (instead of, I dont know,
maybe feeding them nutritious foods and vitamin D).
Related: Doctors Who Discovered Cancer Enzymes In Vaccines All Found Murdered

The entire vaccine mandate was founded on blatantly fraudulent quack science claims fronted by the child-murdering
vaccine industry, which continues to absurdly insist that vaccines pose zero risk to children (i.e. claiming they do not harm a
single childever). The claim is, of course, rooted in sheer delusion. But thats also what passes for legislation in
California.

We can only hope Californias #Calexit effort succeeds soon, so we can build a wall around California and stop the
contagious epidemic of lunacy from spreading Eastward.

Science Hoax #8: Janet Yellens Libtardtopia Economics Science

No summary of science quackery would be complete without bringing in the subject of economics. Yes, it qualifies as a
science at least if you ask the economists. (If you ask non-economists, it qualifies mostly as voodoo.)

Nevertheless, according to Janet Yellen and the decrepit wizards of collapse who are currently steering the global debt
Titanic directly into an array of large shards of icebergs, the best way to keep a global economy in balance is to create
endless new money until the whole thing explodes, at which point the system collapses to equilibrium where
everybody starves roughly the same amount (i.e. Venezuela).

To demonstrate this brilliant hypothesis, Yellen and her crotchety academic cohorts have been busy pumping trillions of fiat
currency dollars into the pockets of their bankster pals while raising interest rates to accelerate the debt avalanche
apocalypse timetable.
Ideally, they hope to trigger the whole thing to come crashing down sometime during Trumps first term. Then, theyll all
express total shock and dismay while pleading to the press that we should all Bring back Obama because he was a
monetary genius! (Or perhaps a radical Muslim sleeper cell working for the communists to subvert America, but thats
another hilarious satire article altogether.)

As a cherry on top, Obama also doubled the national debt in just eight years, all while handing Iran a path to nuclear
weapons, dissing Israel, subverting American culture, gutting the U.S. military and secretly telling his Russian counterparts
he would drastically reduce U.S. nuclear capabilities.

Yes indeed, the dream team of Obama, Clinton and Yellen has pulled off what Americas worst enemies could not: The
near-complete financial paralysis of the U.S. economy all while claiming Everything is awesome!

Thank God all the pensions across the country are fully funded, huh? Or that would be a real disaster.

Science Hoax #9: Transgenderism and the Lunatic Liberal Theory of Spontaneous Genetic
Transmutation

2016 also saw many gullible people being convinced to believe that a biological man can instantly transform himself into a
biological woman by declaring himself to be a woman.

At least one journalist even claimed that a transgendered man could become pregnant after declaring himself to be a
woman. Yes, science education in America has utterly collapsed at this point, replaced with liberal P.C. insanity and
delusional college lesson plans rooted in feelings rather than physical reality.

Across most of todays gender-confused college-educated youth, belief in the laws of genetic expression have been
replaced by belief that a persons sex is a choice. Its no longer permutations, phenotypes and genotypes its now
metrosexual, generation snowflake, pu##ified blathering idiocy with a diploma, safe space cry rooms and $100K in student
debt.
Sorry to burst their bubble of stupid, but sex classification isnt a personal choice. A simple genetic test shows you either
have XY chromosomes, XX chromosomes, or the far more rare extra-X-or-Y chromosome defect which typically leads to
serious physical and mental defects (including infertility).

Somebody please direct gender confused college snowflakes to the National Human Genome Research Institutes fact sheet
page on chromosomes.

According to todays college snowflakes, the National Human Genome Research Institute is a purveyor of HATE because
their fact sheet page says all these mean things about chromosomal defects:

Inheriting too many or not enough copies of sex chromosomes can lead to serious problems. For example,
females who have extra copies of the X chromosome are usually taller than average and some have mental
retardation.

Males with more than one X chromosome have Klinefelter syndrome, which is a condition characterized by tall
stature and, often, impaired fertility. Another syndrome caused by imbalance in the number of sex chromosomes is
Turner syndrome. Women with Turner have one X chromosome only. They are very short, usually do not undergo
puberty and some may have kidney or heart problems.

Thus, there are only two sexes in the biology of all mammals: Male and female. And no, you dont get to change them up
just because you think its trendy to be a gender-confused metrosexual snowflake.

This doesnt mean you cant be gay, by the way. Gay men still realize theyre men. They just choose male partners
instead of female partners. On the spectrum of personal freedom, I say people should be able to partner with
whomever they want.

Gay or straight, its all a personal choice as far as Im concerned, because its none of my business and stop shoving
your sexual preferences in my face, all you militant gay mafia activists.

Just be gay and be done with it. The gay rights war is over, and you already won it. Stop being bullies and thinking
youre still oppressed victims.
Marry whomever you want, but just #STFU about it already. Obama already lit up the White House with rainbows, for Gods
sake.

But to say that yesterday you were a male, but today youre a female now thats just technically bonkers. Youre not really
a female. Youre a male impersonating a female and thats it. Bruce Jenner, take note: You are not a woman, no matter
how much you want to impersonate one.

The greatest insult in all this was when some fashion magazine voted Bruce Jenner Woman of the Year, instantly
declaring that this guy who impersonates a woman is a better woman than all the other women. Dudes with dongs
out-women the women?

And thats celebrated by the women? Yeah, its insane. And all these same progressive women also insist that pervs with
dongs should be able to invade womens restrooms, too, because thats embracing gender identity and inclusiveness
blabbity blah blah.

Get a grip, people. Check your drawers and briefly fondle your hardware. If its junk, youre a dude, and stop playing with it
already. If it isnt, youre a woman. If you have both, go ask a doctor to run a genetic test and find out if you have ovaries.

Science Hoax #10: Every Science Journalist Working for the Fakestream Media

This is more of a collection of hoaxes rather than a single hoax. It all centers around the hilarious fact that most science
journalists are scientifically illiterate morons who only think they understand science.

I remember reading a science column in a major U.S. publication that claimed cell phones could run on water. (Yeah, I
know. I tried that by dropping my cell phone into a glass of water, but it turned off all the power for some strange reason.
Maybe I need special water?)
There has also been a wave of hilariously stupid media coverage for this bracelet computing project called Cicret that
ridiculously claims to turn your arm into a touchscreen.

The entire video promoting this Cicret bracelet is a complete fraud. Racking up almost 25 million views on Youtube, the
video shown here is accomplished purely with special effects overlays. The bracelet does not exist and cannot exist as
depicted in the video for the simple reason that light cannot bend around the curvature of your arm.

Incredibly, countless journalists across the mainstream media fell for this total hoax, stupidly believing that a hi-res
touchscreen rendition can be projected onto your skin from a bracelet that barely sits just a few millimeters above your skin
in the first place.

Question for brain dead science journalists: Do you really believe light rays from the Cicret can bend around your wrist and
then magically bounce off skin that isnt in a direct line of sight with the bracelet projector?

Seriously, you have to be incredibly stupid (or scientifically illiterate) to think the Cicret bracelet, as depicted in the videos,
can actually function. But that sure didnt stop publications from all across the world pushing the hype and convincing their
readers that this cool tech was real.
Related: Western Media Credibility In Free Fall Collapse: Case In Point: UN Peace Council: The US Media Is Lying
To The American people. The War In Syria Is Not A Civil War, It's A Proxy Invasion By The United States

And yes, the younger people are on social media these days, the more gullible they are, too. So special effects viral videos
can be very successful at raising millions of dollars in Kickstarter funds for devices that cannot ever exist because they
violate the laws of physics.

Its a whole new kind of financial scam thats legal because it only extracts money from people who are too stupid enough to
believe the viral videos. In summary, Kickstarter viral videos are a tax on stupid progressives the same way that the lotto
is a tax on stupid conservatives.

And now that Ive thoroughly offended everyone, lets wrap all this up

2016 Was a Bad Year For the Credibility of Real Science Lets Hope 2017 is Better

In summary, 2016 saw the pushing of numerous science hoaxes by the fakestream media, governments, academic
institutions and corporate propaganda whores like Forbes.com. (Oh, and we cant leave out the actual whores running
SNOPES, who were exposed as prostitutes and fetish bloggers.)

So how do we rescue science in 2017? Its simple: We start using science to tell the truth instead of allowing
governments and corporations to use science to lie.

A few fundamental scientific truths Id like to see finally embraced in 2017 would include:

Yes, there is extraterrestrial intelligence in the universe.

Yes, there is (or was) microbial life on Mars.

Yes, human consciousness is non-material and not located in the physical brain.

Yes, vaccines cause autism.

 Yes, flu shots still contain mercury.

Yes, there are many anti-cancer foods that can help prevent cancer.

Yes, transgenderism is a mental disorder, not a choice.

Yes, glyphosate causes cancer.

Yes, DEET is toxic to human neurology.

Yes, genetically engineered crops seeds are a genuine threat to the environment and the food supply.

Yes, water can retain non-physical properties that subtly alter its interactions with living systems.

No, carbon dioxide is not the enemy of mankind.

No, chemotherapy does not cure cancer. It often makes it worse.

No, harvesting organs from living human babies is not ethical science.

No, science journals are not unbiased, objective arbiters of truth.

No, scientific political polls are not reliable. They are bunk.

No, the experts are not as smart as they think they are. Mostly, theyre idiots who have attained high positions
of persistent idiocy in academia or government, and their job is to protect the idiocy for as long as possible,
making sure no one overthrows idiocy with intelligence.

Mathematical Report Proves Human Society Is Too Complex To Be Ruled By A

Government
January 1 2017 | From: TheMindUnleashed

Society is past the point of being governed. We no longer need a president to function as a healthy
society. In fact, the idea of central bodies of government ruling over differing classes of people is
just absurd.
We are all just too complex for a ruler! At least, this is what a recent report suggests.

Related: Open Source Government: True Government Of The People, By The People

Is There Hope for Us?

Prior to election day, Vices Motherboard published a report called Mathematics, which included proof that democracies
are irrelevant to our society today. Social policy, or the idea that one process can work for everyone, has been deemed
ludicrous as society is much too complex, and government always fails us in our expectations.

A Complex Organism

We, as humans, have become increasingly complex over time, which has no relation to democracy or communism. And this
complexity matters, says Yaneer Bar-Yam, the New England Complex Systems Institutes (NECSI)s director,

Theres a natural process of increasing complexity in the world that at some point will run into the complexity of
the individual. Once we reach that point, hierarchical organizations will fail.

Bar-Yam realized how ridiculous it was to organize society into sections of a few. Government officials are, in most
cases, detached from individual situations from lack of experience in the area.

Bar-Yam told Motherboard,

 We are raised to believe that democracy is good for us.

Is this true? I think Democracy is over-rated, and so are other systems such as dictatorships and communism. Their
centralized processes and democracies only focus on one or few groups of individuals, still leaving others with no ample
representation. It just fails!

Human Complexity

When discussing the individual needs of society, human action takes form as a possible solution to this problem. If you
look at the human as a unique creature as compared to another, you may get the idea of why we are much too complex
to be ruled as a group.

Humans are made from atoms, which make cells and then organs. If you try to describe an individual atom, its almost
impossible. Its only possible in relation to collective behavior of the whole. At least, its a bit easier.

This works in much the same manner when describing an individual person in a job, as opposed to a workforce. Its
easier to understand the pattern of an entire workforce than to catalog the daily behavior of one worker.

Is There a Solution?

Bar-Yam suggests a solution called a control hierarchy, which enables an individual to control only their own actions
separately from others. With this, one individual can influence others into taking the same actions.

If this works, it will prove much more effective than hoping the government will influence a larger group into following their
lead.

In fact, what government does, in a nutshell, is control groups of people as if they are much simpler beings.

Human Action
In fact, these arent new ideas. They are, in fact, ideas that surfaced in 1949 as well. Praxeology, or the study of purposeful
behavior (human action), said that humans exist and act for a reason, basically.

Action is will put into operation.

Economist Ludwig von Mises said that those who are detached from a situation cannot possibly know what will happen
inside the situation. Although science is pretty accurate at predicting what will happen in a situation, it cannot predict the
future without question.

Related: Government Versus Anarchy

And no matter the similarities from one situation to the next, there will always be incomplete knowledge with any given event
or within any new group. Its apparent that Mises understood the complexity of society way before Bar-Yam was involved in
the study.
Mises writes in Human Action;

Government means coercion and compulsion and is the opposite of liberty.

Both Mises and Bar-Yam concluded that complexities of the human being, especially the level in which humans have
attained at this point, makes it almost impossible for the government to rule effectively.

As we saw with the elections, numerous people refusing to vote, the desire for the governmental rule is on the decline.
Choosing leaders obviously doesnt matter as much anymore, and working as individuals to solve problems may just be
what we need to thrive as human beings.

So Correct: Trump Responds To Putins Holiday Letter + Putin To Democratic Party:

You Lost, Get Over It
December 31 2016 | From: RT / MSN / Various

President-elect Donald Trump has praised a very nice holiday letter from Russian President
Vladimir Putin, expressing hope about renewed cooperation between Moscow and Washington
after the change in management.

Extending his warmest Christmas and New Year greetings to Trump, Putin wrote that relations between Russia
and the US remain an important factor in ensuring stability and security of the modern world, according to an
unofficial translation of the letter made available by the president-elects transition team.

Related: Putins Withering Scorn for Barack Obama Laid Bare

 I hope that after you assume the position of the President of the United States of America we will be able by
acting in a constructive and pragmatic manner to take real steps to restore the framework of bilateral cooperation
in different areas as well as bring our level of collaboration on the international scene to a qualitatively new
level,said the letter, dated December 15.

A very nice letter from Vladimir Putin; his thoughts are so correct,Trump said Friday, in a statement to reporters
accompanying the letter. I hope both sides are able to live up to these thoughts, and we do not have to travel an
alternate path.

The statement comes a day after Trump posted a cryptic tweet advocating that the US must greatly strengthen and expand
its nuclear capability until such time as the world comes to its senses regarding nukes, sparking fears of a renewed atomic
arms race with Russia.

During the campaign, Trump has repeatedly argued it would be nice if [US] could get along with Russia, prompting
accusations from his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton that he was Putins puppet.

Democrats have also said that Russian hackers were responsible for the disclosure of emails both from the party and the
private account of Clintons campaign chair John Podesta, which were released by WikiLeaks prior to the November 8
election.

Recent Developments:
The NWO globalist establishment are in a desperate frenzy, kicking Russians out of the US in a frenzied attempt to
give credence to their lies about Russian hacking - while George Soros has a meltdown:

US expels Russian diplomats, closes compounds in cyber attack sanctions

Putin Announces Nationwide Ceasefire in Syria; Obama Expels 35 Russian Diplomats

Russia Warns Of "Proportional Response" To Obama's "Paranoia"

Time to move to bigger and better things - Trump after sanctions on Russia announced

Soros: Trump is a Would Be Dictator Who Threatens the New World Order

CFR Fears Collapse of UN Under President Trump

Russian Embassy: Obama Sanctions Attempt to Restart Cold War

Judge Jeanine: I'll Tell You What Hope is, Michelle

Putin To Democratic Party: You Lost, Get Over It

Russias President Vladimir Putin has a message for the White House and Democratic leaders who
accuse him of stealing their victory: Dont be sore losers.
That was how Putin answered a question Friday about whether Russia interfered in the U.S. presidential election in
favor of Donald Trump at the Russian leaders nationally televised annual press conference.

Related: Russian Foreign Ministry: Entire World 'Disgusted' by Obama's Disastrous Foreign Policy

Democrats are losing on every front and looking for people to blame everywhere, Putin said in answer to a
Russian TV host, one of 1,400 journalists accredited to the marathon session.

They need to learn to lose with dignity.

The Kremlin leader pointed out Republicans had won the House and Senate, remarking Did we do that, too?

Trump understood the mood of the people and kept going until the end, when nobody believed in him, Putin said,
adding with a grin.

Except for you and me.

Related: Donald Trump Wildly Cheered at Christmas Eve Church Service

Putin has repeatedly denied involvement despite the accusations coming from the White House, and the Kremlin has
repeatedly questioned the evidence for the U.S. claims. On Friday he borrowed from Trumps dismissal of the accusations,
remarking Maybe it was someone lying on the couch who did it.

And it's not important who did the hacking, it's important that the information that was revealed was true, that is
important, Putin said, referring to the emails that showed that party leaders had favored Hillary Clinton.

Putin has given one press conference a year at the end of December for the 12 years hes been president (taking a break
for the four years he was prime minister). He deflected a question from an American reporter about whether he will move up
2018 elections.

Some have speculated that the Kremlin leader might want to hold the elections earlier while his popularity soars above 80
percent. Putin has not made it clear whether he will run, though any suggestion that he might retire also seems premature.

Putin restated his interest in improved relations with the United States after the inauguration of Trump, who has promised
work closely with Russia in the fight against terrorism.
Related: Voters wanted to Make America Great Again!: Trump Slams Obamas Third Term Remarks

In the wake of the assassination of Russias ambassador to Turkey this week, Moscow and and Ankara have made a show
of their willingness to work together and, along with regional power Iran, bring a settlement to Syria.

Putin moved back the press conference a day to attend the funeral of his slain ambassador to Turkey, Andrei Karlov, who
was assassinated in a brazen public shooting by a man shouting slogans about the war in Syria.

Putin deflected a question about Trumps promise to upgrade the U.S. nuclear arsenal, saying Russia was also upgrading
its nuclear deterrent, so that it will be stronger than any aggressor. He blamed U.S. efforts to develop anti-missile
technology for creating conditions for a new arms race.

Preconditions for the new arms race were created when the U.S. withdrew from the anti-missile treaty. We are not
violating any agreements, Putin said. Representatives of the current U.S. administration started to say that they
are the strongest and most powerful in the world. Yes, indeed, they have more rockets, submarines, and aircraft
carriers. We can't argue with it."

Putin, always concerned about his high popularity rating, touted a few good-news items about the Russian economy, hailing
what he called record-low inflation of 5.5 percent, and congratulating villagers on this years harvest.
Related: Neocon Panic and Agony

In recent poll by the Yuri Levada Analytical Center that gave Russians an opportunity to select which events they consider
most important, 30 percent mentioned inflation, 28 percent mentioned the election of Trump, and 22 percent mentioned
Syria. Russias efforts to mediate the civil war are at the top of nightly news.

Related Articles:
Marxist Prof Lives In Fear As Consumer Confidence Skyrockets Under Trump

Are Russian Spetsnaz GRU Operators Securing Donald Trump From Khazarian Assassins?

Trump Secures Historic Victory with 304 Electoral College Votes

Only One Living President Has RSVPd For Trumps Inauguration

Trump's favorability surges one month after election

Poll: Americans Backing President-Elect Donald Trump Just Weeks After Bitter Campaign

Is Obama a Russian Agent?

Senate Quietly Passes The "Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act" & Obama
Bans Free Speech In The Dead Of Night
December 30 2016 | From: ZeroHedge/ Infowars / Various

While we wait to see if and when the Senate will pass (and president will sign) Bill "H.R. 6393,
Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017", which was passed by the House at the end of
November with an overwhelming majority and which seeks to crack down on websites suspected of
conducting Russian propaganda.
President Trump is going to have an awful lot of un-doing to do...

It calls for the US government to "counter active measures by Russia to exert covert influence carried out
in coordination with, or at the behest of, political leaders or the security services of the Russian Federation and the
role of the Russian Federation has been hidden or not acknowledged publicly, another, perhaps even more
dangerous and limiting to civil rights and freedom of speech bill passed on December 8.

Related: Gun Control FAIL: Mass Shootings Surge 240% During Obamas Presidency

Recall that as we reported in early June;

"A bill to implement the U.S. very own de facto Ministry of Truth has been quietly introduced in Congress. As with
any legislation attempting to dodge the public spotlight the Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act
of 2016 marks a further curtailment of press freedom and another avenue to stultify avenues of accurate
information.

Introduced by Congressmen Adam Kinzinger and Ted Lieu, H.R. 5181 seeks a whole-government
approach without the bureaucratic restrictions to counter foreign disinformation and manipulation,
which they believe threaten the worlds security and stability.
Related: "Ministry of Truth" now active in America

Also called the Countering Information Warfare Act of 2016 (S. 2692), when introduced in March by Sen. Rob
Portman, the legislation represents a dramatic return to Cold War-era government propaganda battles.

"These countries spend vast sums of money on advanced broadcast and digital media capabilities, targeted
campaigns, funding of foreign political movements, and other efforts to influence key audiences and
populations, Portman explained, adding that while the U.S. spends a relatively small amount on its Voice of
America, the Kremlin provides enormous funding for its news organization, RT.

Surprisingly, Portman continued, there is currently no single U.S. governmental agency or department
charged with the national level development, integration and synchronization of whole-of-government
strategies to counter foreign propaganda and disinformation.

Long before the "fake news" meme became a daily topic of extensive conversation on wuch mainstream fake news portals as
CNN and WaPo, H.R. 5181 would rask the Secretary of State with coordinating the Secretary of Defense, the Director of
National Intelligence, and the Broadcasting Board of Governors to establish a Center for Information Analysis and
Response, which will pinpoint sources of disinformation, analyze data, and - in true dystopic manner - develop and
disseminate fact-based narratives to counter effrontery propaganda.
Related: Epic Montage Video Illustrates How Badly the Media Failed in 2016

Fast forward to Thursday, December 8, when the "Countering Disinformation and Propaganda Act" passed in the Senate,
quietly inserted inside the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) Conference Report.

Here is the full statement issued by the generously funded Senator Rob Portman (R- Ohio) on the passage of a bill that further
chips away at press liberties in the US, and which sets the stage for future witch hunts and website shutdowns, purely as a
result of an accusation that any one media outlet or site is considered as a source of "disinformation and
propaganda" and is shut down by the government.

How North Korea and the Obama regime Both Use the Same Mind Control Techniques Against Their
Citizens

This eye-opening new video details how U.S. government propaganda under Obama parallels the socially-reinforced
mind control tactics used in North Korea, a radical left-wing dictatorship rooted in the cult worship of its leader.
Related: Obama Signs Portman-Murphy Kill Alt-Media Bill into Law Under Xmas Cover

Barack Obama is simply a more polite rendition of the same social control tyranny used by Kim Jong-Un. Angela
Merkel, in many ways, invokes the same tactics of disinformation and linguistic social control, deliberately lying to
the people of Germany in order to control them while the country is systematically destroyed to appease globalist
interests.

As I also state in the video, most Americans would be obedient Kim Jong-Un worshipers if they had grown up in North Korea.

The vast majority of individuals in western society today falsely believe they are independent thinkers, but thats only
because theyve been indoctrinated under a system of mind control thats very good at pretending to be based on freedom.

Watch the full video to see for yourself. (This video was recorded before the Nov. 8 Trump election victory, which provides a
least some glimmer of hope that the globalist agenda might be slowed.)

Senate Passes Major Portman-Murphy Counter-Propaganda Bill as Part of NDAA

Portman/Murphy Bill Promotes Coordinated Strategy to Defend America, Allies Against Propaganda and Disinformation from
Russia, China & Others

U.S. Senators Rob Portman (R-OH) and Chris Murphy (D-CT) today announced that their Countering Disinformation and
Propaganda Act legislation designed to help American allies counter foreign government propaganda from Russia,
China, and other nations has passed the Senate as part of the FY 2017 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)
Conference Report.
Related: How the Crackdown on Patriots Will Occur: Dissent Will Become Unthinkable

The bipartisan bill, which was introduced by Senators Portman and Murphy in March, will improve the ability of the United
States to counter foreign propaganda and disinformation by establishing an interagency center housed at the State
Department to coordinate and synchronize counter-propaganda efforts throughout the U.S. government.

To support these efforts, the bill also creates a grant program for NGOs, think tanks, civil society and other experts outside
government who are engaged in counter-propaganda related work. This will better leverage existing expertise and empower
local communities to defend themselves from foreign manipulation.

The passage of this bill in the Senate today takes us one critical step closer to effectively confronting the
extensive, and destabilizing, foreign propaganda and disinformation operations being waged against us.
While the propaganda and disinformation threat has grown, the U.S. government has been asleep at the
wheel.

Today we are finally signaling that enough is enough; the United States will no longer sit on the sidelines. We are
going to confront this threat head-on, said Senator Portman.

With the help of this bipartisan bill, the disinformation and propaganda used against our allies and our interests
will fail.

Congress has taken a big step in fighting back against fake news and propaganda from countries like
Russia. When the president signs this bill into law, the United States will finally have a dedicated set of
tools and resources to confront our adversaries widespread efforts to spread false narratives that
undermine democratic institutions and compromise Americas foreign policy goals, said Murphy.

Im proud of what Senator Portman and I accomplished here because its long past time for the U.S. to get off the
sidelines and confront these growing threats.

NOTE: The bipartisan Countering Disinformation and Propaganda Act is organized around two main priorities to help achieve
the goal of combatting the constantly evolving threat of foreign disinformation.

They are as follows:

 The first priority is developing a whole-of-government strategy for countering foreign propaganda and disinformation. The
bill would increase the authority, resources, and mandate of the Global Engagement Center to include state actors
like Russia and China in addition to violent extremists.

The Center will be led by the State Department, but with the active senior level participation of the Department of
Defense, USAID, the Broadcasting Board of Governors, the Intelligence Community, and other relevant agencies. The
Center will develop, integrate, and synchronize whole-of-government initiatives to expose and counter foreign disinformation
operations and proactively advance fact-based narratives that support U.S. allies and interests.

Second, the legislation seeks to leverage expertise from outside government to create more adaptive and responsive U.S.
strategy options. The legislation establishes a fund to help train local journalists and provide grants and contracts to
NGOs, civil society organizations, think tanks, private sector companies, media organizations, and other experts
outside the U.S. government with experience in identifying and analyzing the latest trends in foreign government
disinformation techniques.

This fund will complement and support the Centers role by integrating capabilities and expertise available outside the U.S.
government into the strategy-making process. It will also empower a decentralized network of private sector experts and
integrate their expertise into the strategy-making process.

In other words, the Act will:

i) Greenlight the government to crack down with impunity against any media property it deems "propaganda", and

ii) Provide substantial amounts of money fund an army of "local journalist" counterpropaganda, to make sure the
government's own fake news drowns that of the still free "fringes."

So while packaged politely in a veneer of "countering disinformation and propaganda", the bill, once signed by Obama, will
effectively give the government a full mandate to punish, shut down or otherwise prosecute, any website it deems offensive
and a source of "foreign government propaganda from Russia, China or other nations."

And since there is no formal way of proving whether or not there is indeed a foreign propaganda sponsor, all that will
be sufficient to eliminate any "dissenting" website, will be the government's word against that of the website. One
can be confident that the US government will almost certainly prevail in every single time.

Obama Bans Free Speech In The Dead Of Night

America adopts Soviet style media controls.

By slipping through the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act, President Obama has signed the Countering
Disinformation And Propaganda Act into law, effectively putting all speech under federal control.

Related: So Called Fake News Could be a Thing of the Past

The Sovereignty Of Sidekicks & John Key Era One Giant Facepalm
December 29 2016 | From: Katehon / NewZealandHerald

It should surprise no honest human being that New Zealand, along with Australia, Canada, and the
United Kingdom, is a part of historys first global empire.

This Atlanticist English-speaking empire first partially established itself after the defeat of Napoleon, and then
cemented itself more firmly after the First and Second World Wars.

Related: New Zealand Prime Minister John Key Resigns - Warned Of Arrest Status By John Kerry
It is headed by the United States, of course, but includes the United Kingdom in a grandfathered special relationship that
increasingly resembles the role a ventriloquists dummy plays in a cringe-worthy comedy routine.

The United Kingdoms former colony, New Zealand, thus, cannot honestly be described as a sovereign, independent, nation-
state, however much its citizens would like to believe this to be the case.

Rather, this small nation of fewer than five million souls continues very much as in the past, an extremely junior and
therefore even more extremely disposable sidekick who is good for a little public relations coup now and again but otherwise
of small importance.

Related: Former Head Of The NSA And CIA Makes Statements That Imply John Key Is Lying About Mass Surveillance

Before Kiwi readers throw up their hands in disgust, let it be argued that the good citizens of Aotearoa New Zealand should be
glad of this status. It gives them the opportunity to strike out for actual statehood. The imperial core may chafe and lash out,
but the stakes are so low it will likely allow full independence in the end.

The immediate obstacle remains New Zealand itself. Its elites, especially in the National Party (an ironic misnomer if ever
there was one), identify completely with the Atlanticist Empire.

This is proven by the career path of its globalist Prime Minister, who cut his teeth as a servile hatchet-man for The City of
London and whose most expensive residential property cuts a fine sky-line in Hawaii, USA.

Fortunately for New Zealand national independence, Prime Minister John Key has decided to resign his
position. This surprise move ultimately stems from the Atlanticist imperial defeats in Syria, Libya, Ukraine, and the
reversals to globalism in Britain, the EU, and the United States itself.

Sending Kiwi troops to Iraq over a year ago could even land Key in the dock at The Hague someday. He has certainly
breeched a fistful of United Nations binding resolutions, and may have directly contravened New Zealand statute law by
sending New Zealand forces to support terrorism in the Middle East.
Related: New Zealand Troops To Stay In Iraq For Another 18 months: John Key

In 2015, Key dispatched New Zealand armed forces to Camp Taji, Iraq, a former US base and prison north of Baghdad. There
soldiers train the Iraqi 16th Mountain Division, whose area of operation lies northward from Taji to the Turkish border.

It just so happens that this Kurdish region is known for the theft of oil belonging to the nation of Iraq and the sale of this illegal
commodity to Turkey, whose ruling clique uses it to launder ISIS-pirated oil from both Iraq and Syria.

Thus, the now running-for-cover, Key involved Kiwi armed forces in the furtherance of ISIS funding, arms and explosives
purchases, and terror attacks (including those in Paris, Egypt, Mali, and elsewhere).

Proof that the 16th Mountain Division is involved in this oil-running lies in the assassination of its commander outside his home
in July, 2015 (i.e., it is embroiled in a turf war over protection rights among Iraqi army units).
Related: Banker John Keys Corporate Repackaging Of War

Proof that the former Prime Minister knows this lies in the very recent Official Information Act lawsuit by Minister Ron Mark
which reveals that New Zealands armed forces are conducting absolutely no after action analyses on how the
16th Mountain Division has used its Kiwi training.

Turkeys involvement in supporting ISIS has been an utterly open secret for many, many years.

Surely the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service briefed the Prime Minister. The mainstream press has been briefing the
public on the issue since before 2013. As former US intelligence officer G. Murphy Donovan writes, Turkish support for
ISIS is the worst kept secret in Mesopotamia.

Turkey receives more US foreign aid than any other nation, apart from Israel and Egypt. This number-one son seeks and
receives permission for absolutely everything it does, including its laundering/brokering of ISIS oil and oil sales, and the
shootdown of the Russian Federations Su-24 bomber on November 24, 2015.
Related: What Is The Real Agenda Behind John Key's Drive To Change The New Zealand Flag: Due Authority - A Very
Silent Coup?

Its security services also provide ISIS with weapons and domestically manufactured explosive compounds. Most recently, its
military has invaded both Syria and Iraq in exactly those areas traversed by illegal oil and arms convoys.

And yet, the United States stoutly refuses to censure its tool, for reasons that should by now be pretty obvious ISIS is an
Operation Gladio-style manufactured enemy upon whom interventions may be blamed, because of whose existence popular
sovereignty, political liberty, and political equality may be restricted, and by whom, lastly, false flag attacks may be conducted.

ISIS resembles the Contras of the 1980s or UNITA of the 1970s. The phenomena is, at its core, a mere intensification of the
Al Qaeda model, which has served US imperialism so well since 1980. As former Reagan Administration official, Dr. Paul
Craig Roberts, states in a recent article:

Washington is not opposed to terrorism. Washington has been purposely creating terrorism for many years.

Terrorism is a weapon that Washington intends to use to destabilize Russia and China by exporting it to the
Muslim populations of those countries.
Related: Key Must Explain How GCSB Spying On Citizens Is Lawful + Pacific Action Needed Against Spy Net

The ultimate aim remains Atlanticist global hegemony and the looting of those two nations in order to repay twenty trillion
dollars of government debt, sixty-four trillion dollars of overall debt, and six-hundred and fifty trillion dollars of derivative
overhang.

This being the case, New Zealand involvement in Operation Inherent Resolve amounts to criminal participation in aggression,
theft on a global scale, and wholesale as opposed to retail terrorism. The United Nations has passed many resolutions on
these issues: for example, it declares all direct or indirect support for ISIS oil smuggling to be a breach of international law.

New Zealand statute law clearly prohibits all contravention of UN resolutions, whatever their nature, so its wilful entrance into
the ongoing violence in the Middle East, organised by the United States, the EU and NATO, is a crime of aggression.

Former Prime Minister John Key, as then commander-in-chief, has ordered New Zealand armed forces to train and
assist Iraqi military units who are culpably engaged in indirect support of ISIS. New Zealand troops, therefore,
indirectly support ISIS.

This is expressly sanctioned by the United Nations and is a violation of international law. And it must be stressed that this was
done with full knowledge. The Prime Minister cannot claim he did know that Turkey laundered ISIS oil with oil smuggled
through the operational zone north of Camp Taji.

Everyone in Iraq knows this. The Russian Federation has filmed the immense, and impossible not to notice, scale of the theft.
Footage shows at length oil heading for processing in Batman, Turkey, just across the border from Mosul.
Related: First It Was The Christchurch City Rebuild, Now Its The Skycity Convention Centre Contract: John Key
Fattening His Masters Again

With full knowledge but little concern, John Key has committed acts expressly prohibited by New Zealand statute law and is
pretty clearly subject to prosecution. This is the most likely reason for the banker-turned-politician to have resigned.

Now that John Key has removed himself from the office he has hesitated not one second to sell to Atlanticist hegemony,
perhaps the citizens of Aotearoa New Zealand can see to it that their country becomes an actual independent nation-state
with full sovereignty, complete with its own foreign policy (based on positive and respectful interaction with all nations, rather
than blind and cringing obedience to the global torture-master).

No honest human being could object.

John Key Era One Giant Facepalm

I'm not gonna lie. I'm glad to see the back end of him. Clothed, of course.
I could have chosen to dress up my column today with all sorts of nuanced, insightful, and charitable words about
John Key's departure. It'd be akin to going to someone's funeral that you consistently bagged - both publicly and
privately. Tacky.

Related: Penny Bright Talks Tough On Corruption

My motto: Why waste time being anything other than honest?

There were three issues (from the multitudes) that got to me personally during his time in power. Like everyone, it's why we
either like a politician or we don't. In 2008 I ticked National for my party vote. Like most of the rest of the country I was well
and truly over Helen Clark and Labour, with the Foreshore and Seabed debacle being the final straw for me.

Key appeared fresh and new, and above all, keen. He wanted the job of Prime Minister, and his childlike zeal on election night
was endearing. Within a year I was uncomfortable. Within two, it felt like I was sitting on a bed of nails.

I'm not sure of the exact moment I knew the Key train had uncoupled from its charisma caboose. All I know is the train
thundered on without me onboard.
Related: John Key Wants War Between Maori And Pakeha. Are You Going To Let Him?

Logically, it was likely when I realised that Key had no understanding of, or respect for, the environment. He seemed
to me to care only for running New Zealand like a huge corporation by squeezing every last dollar out of it - no matter
the downstream consequences.

I say "downstream" because my focus back then was firmly on water quality. The Key-led Government has played a massive
role in the funding of dairy and irrigation intensification since, leading in turn to the steady decline in the quality of our nation's
waterways.

I'm not so naive to think he was solely responsible for such cynical fare. However, as the frontperson for the tragedy
of losing our swimmable rivers, one must understand that some of us will never forgive such recklessness. A good
money man? Key's bold and brassy belief that he managed the Global Financial Crisis well is, shall we say, deluded. He got
lucky. Pure and simple.

I'll wager that within the next 12 months, and well before the 2017 election, our economy will match the global outlook
perfectly. It'll be munted. He is less an economic guru and more a tinny bastard, frankly.
Related: UK Minister Holds Top-Level Defence Talks In Wellington + John Key Called Out

I say this in complete awe at Key's uncanny ability to ride the rollercoaster of pure providence. Despite the poor getting
poorer, and the rich getting richer, he somehow managed to convince the wider electorate that he was a financial
whizz - as opposed to the money trading gambler he ultimately is.

Inequality has never been worse in this country, and that has to be the test. Key's reign encouraged many to hate on the poor.
Little did he and his cohorts comprehend, it also taught just as many to hate on the rich.

This will not be solved by a new face at the top, or by an obsequious media happy to create corny commentary for
those of you who actually care that he is exiting stage right.

My biggest thumbs down is reserved for the free licence he issued to a particular segment of male culture. It's never a good
thing when the public learn about the pubic. Key's predilection for appearing on trashy radio means we all possess the
knowledge - like it or not - that he doesn't trim his "downstairs", has urinated in the shower, and had a vasectomy.

Call me pass but the title of Prime Minister should mean something. Jumping in a cage and picking up a bar of soap - in a
nod to prison rape - is probably not a component of that.
Ponytail-gate sealed it. The man sent a message to the world - and I mean the world - that he was an unsophisticated
fool at best, and a creep at worst.

Since then the planet's got Trump, so maybe Key won't be remembered for those weirdnesses. However, his legacy is that he
contributed massively to the type of male culture in New Zealand that sees women as not much more than just pom-pom girls
cheering from the sidelines. On a good day.

So, those are my top three gripes, and you'll have yours. Is there any redeeming feature about Key that I could mention? Yes,
I think there is. Work ethic. He had a good one.
Related: Does John Key Run The NZ Meth Trade?

It's the end of an era that I'm glad to wave goodbye to. It was eight years of teeth gritting, face palming, guttural
groaning, a fair bit of drinking, and throwing things at the TV. If you think he's aged, you should see me.

So long John, and thanks for all the (dead) fish.

Mainstream Media Confirm Dalai Lama Is A CIA Asset

December 28 2016 | From: Geopolitics

That the Tibetan Dalai Lama is a CIA asset was just a conspiracy theory, has now been confirmed as
fact by the Los Angeles Times and the agency itself.
This brings to question how much of what the media consider as theory now would end up later on as fact?

Related: How Can We Stop Drug Trafficking When Its The CIA Thats Running The Show / The Philippines Fight The
Cabal

How much of what the media consider as fake news right now would end up later on as the accurate account of an event?

In short, what gives them the authority to determine what is factual and truthful when their own journalistic standards and
ethics include telling their readers mere half-truths for a while, i.e. when it is in the best interest of other institutions they are
still working with in the interim?

The Los Angeles Times reports:

For much of the 1960s, the CIA provided the Tibetan exile movement with $1.7 million a year for
operations against China, including an annual subsidy of $180,000 for the Dalai Lama, according to newly
released U.S. intelligence documents.

The money for the Tibetans and the Dalai Lama was part of the CIAs worldwide effort during the height of the Cold
War to undermine Communist governments, particularly in the Soviet Union and China. In fact, the U.S.
government committee that approved the Tibetan operations also authorized the disastrous Bay of Pigs invasion of
Cuba.

The documents, published last month by the State Department, illustrate the historical background of the situation
in Tibet today, in which China continues to accuse the Dalai Lama of being an agent of foreign forces seeking to
separate Tibet from China."

The CIAs program encompassed support of Tibetan guerrillas in Nepal, a covert military training site in
Colorado, Tibet Houses established to promote Tibetan causes in New York and Geneva, education for Tibetan
operatives at Cornell University and supplies for reconnaissance teams."

- LA Times

Is the mainstream confirmation of the Dalai Lama as a CIA asset now can be considered the whole truth, or is there
something more to the story?
 To dispel the Dalai Lama supporters doubts, the representatives of the Tibetan leader claimed in an interview
with The New York Times on October 2, 1998 that the subsidy earmarked for the Dalai Lama was spent on setting
up offices in Geneva and New York and on international lobbying.

However, the devil is in the detail.

Verkhoturov emphasizes that the denial was intended for those unfamiliar with the documents and facts. The
documents say that in 1963 the CIA allocated considerable funds for the Dalai Lamas entourage in Dharamsala,
India, where his residence was located. There were no offices at Geneva and New York at the time.

Furthermore, soon the role of the CIA in the 1959 Tibetan Uprising and the formation of the government in exile
also surfaced.

The US government viewed Tibet as a potential bulwark against China since 1949, when Chinese Communist
leader Mao Zedong declared the creation of the Peoples Republic of China (PRC).

A picture released by Chinese official news agency in August 1965 with a caption saying: New buildings are going up at the foot of the Potala Palace
(in the background, the former home of the Dalai Lama) in Lhasa. AFP 2016/ JU SHUI-CHU / XIHNUA
According to Memorandum for the 303 Committee (1968), the so-called CIA Tibetan program was partially
initiated in 1956 with the cognizance of the Committee, is based on US Government commitments made to the
Dalai Lama in 1951 and 1956.

The program consists of political action, propaganda, paramilitary and intelligence operations, appropriately
coordinated with and supported by [less than 1 line of source text not declassified], the document read.

The declassified memorandum stated that in September 1958 the 303 Committee approved the CIA covert
support to Tibetan resistance - just a year before the all-out uprising in the region erupted.

According to the publicist, the Dalai Lamas exile opened the door to the CIAs covert program aimed at recruiting
and training the Tibetan leaders followers and supporters in reconnaissance operations, sabotage, guerilla tactics,
data encoding and radio operator skills. According to some estimates, about 170-240 Tibetans had undergone this
special training.

The Memorandum for the Special Group (1964) reveals that the CIA planned to create a spy network in Tibet,
including approximately 20 singleton resident agents two road watch teams in Tibet to report possible Chinese
Communist build-ups, and six border watch communications teams.

Verkhoturov believes that this spy activity could have targeted Chinas nuclear program and the countrys first
nuclear tests on October 16, 1964.

However, Chinas Cultural Revolution - a sociopolitical movement that took place in the Peoples Republic of China
from 1966 until 1976 - dealt a heavy blow to the Tibetan spy network and eventually brought an end to the
espionage activity in the region.

As a result, the budget of the CIAs Tibetan program decreased to $1,165,000 in 1968.

According to Jonathan Mirsky, a historian of China, the CIA program finally ended with President Richard Nixons
visit to China in 1972.
 Still, in the early 1970s the CIA continued to allocate funds directly to the Dalai Lama, however, the amount
of these subsidies remains shrouded in secrecy.

In 1999, I asked the Dalai Lama if the CIA operation had been harmful for Tibet, Mirsky wrote in 2013, Yes, that
is true, he replied. The intervention was harmful, he suggested, because it was primarily aimed at serving
American interests rather than helping the Tibetans in any lasting way. Once the American policy toward China
changed, they stopped their help, he told me, Otherwise our struggle could have gone on.

- Sputnik

Indeed, theres more to the story and so, we need to continue exposing the false idols right at their own home turf.

Beyond the Dalai Lamas engagement with the CIA, his conviction to his own teachings has come to question when he was
caught wearing a Rolex while he preached about the great scourge of materialism in this world.

What Kind Of Man Wears Rolex?

When you think of Political figures who wear a gold Rolex you might think of U.S. Presidents, Dwight Eisenhower,
Lyndon Johnson or Bill Clinton, or even former U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney. When people think about Civil
Rights Leaders who have worn yellow gold Rolex watches, they might think about Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., or
Jesse Jackson.
One man who might surprise people with wearing a Yellow Gold Rolex President, is no other than His Holiness,
The Dali Lama of Tibet."
As mentioned, The Dalai Lama typically goes out of his way to make certain his watches never appear to be fancy
or ostentatious.

His holiness does so, by typically putting them on inexpensive stretchable Speidel Twist-O-Flex watch bands. In
this recent photo, we see the Dalai Lama with Prince Charles, and the Dalai Lama is wearing a yellow gold Rolex
Day-Date with a cobalt blue dial."
- RolexMagazine

From another site glorifying his love for watches

The Second War was still going on, and the Allies wanted to make a road over Tibet from Assam, in India, to
China.

So two American military representatives came with a letter from President Roosevelt and a box containing a gold
watch. A Patek Philippe. I was very excited. It was a very beautiful, very smart model. I still have it and it still
works.

The watch is most likely a Patek Phillipe Perpetual Calendar Ref. 1526 from around 1942. No doubt it has been
opened and dismantled more than once in its lifetime.
 Besides this cherished first watch, His Holiness has also been photographed in public wearing a Rolex Day-Date
and this two tone Rolex Datejust with a jubilee bracelet. I can only speculate what his collection might be worth
should it ever go up on auction.

- EdgarDaily

What about the holiness of his preachings on vegetarianism and non-violence?

Well, the CIA didnt just finance his rebellion against China, the agency also trained and supplied arms to those who were
willing to fight for him, according to Newsweek:

In the midst of this cold-war playground was Gyalo Thondup, who helped choose the first batch of trainees from
Kalimpong. But the big brother kept his younger sibling - the Dalai Lama was then in his early 20s - in the dark
about the spook business.

I didnt inform His Holiness about my contacts with the CIA and Indian intelligence, says Gyalo Thondup. This
was very dirty business.Under a full moon in October 1957, the first two-man team of CIA-trained Tibetans took off
from an old World War II grass airstrip in East Pakistan, near Dhaka. They rode in a B-17 sanitized of all
markings.
 The parachutists were Athar Norbu and another Tibetan named Lhotse - Tom and Lou to their handlers. They
were equipped with everything from dried beef to radios, from signal mirrors to folding-stock submachine
guns.

They landed smack on target, 60 miles from Lhasa, and quickly hooked up with the local resistance leader, Gompo
Tashi Andrugtsang, an influential trader whose legendary Khampas had been battling the Chinese for years.

The ragtag resistance waged a desperate struggle. In early 1958 many guerrillas were surrounded by 1,000
Chinese soldiers with artillery.

All our leaders were wounded, including Gompo Tashi, says one survivor. We kept hoping the CIA would drop
us some weapons, but they never came.

Help was on the way. In 1958 more than 30 Tibetans began training secretly at Camp Hale, not far from
Leadville, Colorado. Here about 300 Tibetans in all - assigned names like Jack, Rocky and Martin - were
schooled in the black arts of covert warfare, from spy photography and sabotage to Morse code and mine-laying.

We had great expectations when we went to America; we thought perhaps they would even give us an atom
bomb to take back with us, said one trainee, Tenzin Tsultrim.

- Newsweek

Enjoying the benefits of conniving with a certain entity while feigning ignorance of what crimes that same entity has
committed is the height of ones hypocrisy.

Its not only that one practices what one preaches, but the same must clean his own house first before he ventures out into the
world, and begin finding faults against another.

This week it was reported that a five-year old Tibetan girl had been allegedly raped by two Tibetan adult males in
the settlement of Mundgod, South India. As shocking as the alleged crime was the revelation that the Mundgod
camp officer and settlement officer had encouraged the father of the child not to pursue criminal charges against
the men.

Why? Out of fear of shaming HH the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan people. Sadly, I and others living in the Tibetan
community in exile were not surprised to learn this."

- HuffPost web cached article, Not in the Name of the Dalai Lama: Tibetan Reaction to Child Rape Reveals a
Deeper Malaise

Kalu Rinpoche says that he was molested by elder monkssexually abused by elder monks, and when he was 18 his tutor
in the monastery threatened him at knifepoint.

Its all about money, power, controlling. And then I became a drug addict because of all this misunderstanding and I
went crazy.

A gang of older monks who would visit his room each week... This was hard-core sex, he says, including penetration.

Most of the time, they just came alone, he says. They just banged the door harder, and I had to open. I knew what was
going to happen, and after that you become more used to it.

It wasnt until Kalu returned to the monastery after his three-year retreat that he realized how wrong this practice was. By then
the cycle had begun again on a younger generation of victims, he says. Kalus claims of sexual abuse mirror those of Lodoe
Senge, an ex-monk and 23 year old tulku who now lives in Queens, New York.
When I saw the video, Senge says of Kalus confessions, I thought, Shit, this guy has the balls to talk about it when I didnt
even have the courage to tell my girlfriend. Senge was abused, he says, as a 5-year-old by his own tutor, a man in his late
twenties, at a monastery in India.

False idolatry and false institutions are two great scourges on this planet. Both have created a strong, opaque barrier between
the mind and the Truth it is seeking.

The only way to know the Whole Truth and free humanity at last is to launch a great rebellion against them both.

Be prepared for what the mainstream media are doing right now, which is to publish some chosen truths to regain the peoples
trust, as they start filtering the social media networks for fake news.

Lets not fall for this shenanigan, not anymore.

Related: Are You A Mind-Controlled CIA Stooge? + The Term Conspiracy Theory Was Invented By The CIA In Order
To Prevent Disbelief Of Official Government Stories

New Zealand's Israel Resolution: Peacemakers Seldom Win Friends

December 26 2016 | From: MSN

A UN Security Council resolution, calling for a ban on illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied
territories, has passed, with NZ taking a major role. Phil Smith outlines the background and the
blowback.
New Zealand has dared to go where even Egypt's strongman, President el-Sisi, feared to tread.

Related: How Britain wrought destruction on the Palestinian homeland

Abdel Fattah el-Sisi put a forward a resolution demanding an end to Israeli settlement building, but after an incredibly
inappropriate call from Donald Trump, el-Sisi withdrew it again. Exactly how Trump achieved that is anyone's guess, but
America's $1.5 billion aid package to Egypt may have been threatened.

President el-Sisi said he wanted to let Trump's incoming administration have first crack at the issue. It was obviously an
excuse. Trump's nomination for Ambassador to Israel is a hardliner who wants more settlement construction and who has
compared Jews who advocate for a 'two-state peace' to Capos (Jews who assisted in Nazi death-camps).

When el-Sisi retreated, New Zealand stepped up. Together with Venezuela, Malaysia and Senegal, New Zealand called for a
vote on the resolution, and for the first time since the Carter administration, the US declined to veto a rebuke over illegal
Israeli settlements.
The US noted that settlement construction had accelerated since the US vetoed a similar resolution in 2001, and that the
Obama administration has been warning Israel for eight years that this 'trend-line' was both making peace more difficult and
isolating Israel from the international community.

The Foundations of the Settlements

Settling population in militarily-occupied territory is contrary to the Geneva Convention, to international law and previous
United Nations rulings.

Settlement building is usually strategic. Settlements create 'facts-on-the-ground', making it more difficult to give back captured
territory (in this case, territory captured during the 1967 Six Day War). Hardliners believe the territory is theirs by God-given
right, but its return, at least in part, would be necessary for a lasting peace based on a two-state solution.

The tracts that are currently Palestinian controlled areas are an unworkable, disconnected patchwork of territories.

Related: Top Israeli General Speaks Out Against Israels Crimes Against Palestinians + Parallels Between Israel &
1930's Germany & Ten Facts Why Netanyahu Is A Criminal And That Israel Is A Rogue State

Settlements also increase local conflict by expropriating land and resources to construct and sustain the townships. Moderate
Israeli administrations have tended to restrict or demolish settlements, while hawkish governments look the other way, or - like
the current one - are gung-ho on expansions which push Palestinians into an ever-diminishing corner.
Related: Water war against Palestinians: Israel planned to supply West Bank with 40% less water than settlers

Former US President Jimmy Carter has repeatedly stressed that peace in Israel/Palestine is only likely when the Palestinians
also have a viable state, where middle class citizens have a reason to hope and work for a future. Some form of two state
solution has been American policy for decades.

Seeing this may be about to change, and after significant antagonism from Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu, President Obama
apparently believes it is time to allow a line in the sand.

Kiwi Peace-Broker

A few years ago, after the successful Bougainville peace talks, New Zealand imagined a role for itself as an international
peace broker. It was a nice idea that turned out to be harder than it sounded, but it marked an increased New Zealand
confidence to act independently, for good purpose.

This week's action is a further brave step from New Zealand. It has no obvious ulterior motives, but instead seems an attempt
to simply do the right thing and bugger the consequences.
A nation like New Zealand cannot throw its feather-weight around internationally in order to win friends. Frequently, the
opposite is achieved. A friend won with one action is alienated with the next, and nations often remember sleights more
strongly than support.

The Blowback

The blowback has already begun. Israel is apoplectic and has recalled its envoys to New Zealand and Senegal, and stopped
its Senegal aid programme. It called the resolution "despicable" and "an evil decree". The Israeli Ambassador to the UN said
the vote was "a victory for terror, a victory for hatred and violence."

New Zealand was already in Israel's bad books. In 2014 Israel refused to accept New Zealand's ambassador because he was
also to act as an envoy to the Palestinian Authority. In October 2015, Israeli officials reprimanded our Ambassador after New
Zealand dared propose a Security Council resolution that dared encourage a return to peace negotiations. Palestinian
supporters were equally upset, seeing the wording as supporting Israel.

But this time is worse. Israeli-New Zealand relations haven't been so poor since 2004, when New Zealand imprisoned
'Mossad spies' for attempting to fraudulently obtain a New Zealand passport. After a year, Israel apologised and
relationships were slowly mended.
Related: Israeli ministers okay draft bill to legalize Jewish settlements on private Palestinian land despite Supreme
Court ruling

This new rift may take longer. Much of the anger is being directed at the US, where President Obama could have chosen to
veto the resolution.

But Netanyahu's conservative government will not take kindly to us fronting a resolution that pointedly calls East
Jerusalem "occupied Palestinian territory".

New Zealand's government will have known blowback was likely. It has decided that, if you ask to be on the Security Council
you need to appear from behind the parapet and take a stand.

In an era where the world's mood seems to be trending towards resentment, aggression and extremism, a country wins few
friends by calling for tolerance or asking for restraint. But that doesn't mean that working for peace and goodwill isn't the right
thing to do.

14 Eyebrow-Raising Things Google Knows About You

December 24 2016 | From: NetworkWorld

Some are fascinating, others are frightening - but here's how to find out what Google has on
you. Google may know more about me than I know about myself.
I'm not just saying that, either: I recently started poking around in Google's personal data repositories and realized
that, between my wide-reaching use of the company's services and my own brain's inability to remember anything
for more than seven seconds, Google may actually have the upper hand when it comes to knowledge about my life.

Related: Google Employee Sues the Company for Internal Spying Program

From face-tagged photos of my past adventures (what year did I go to Nashville, again - and who went with me to that Eddie
Vedder show?) to the minute-by-minute play-by-play of my not-so-adventuresome days (wait, you mean I really only left the
house once last Wednesday - and just to get a freakin' sandwich?!), Google's got all sorts of goods on me.

Heck, even my hopes and dreams (which may or may not involve sandwiches) are probably catalogued somewhere in its
systems. And the data itself is only half the story: Google also compiles oodles of stats - stats that, for better and for worse,
shed light onto the tech-connected habits of our modern lives. And don't doubt Apple does the exact same things either.

How many emails have you actually sent over the years, for instance, and how many thousands of web pages have you
pulled up in your browser? It really is enlightening, among other things, to see your actions broken down so precisely .

Before you freak out, though, remember: The only way anyone else could get at any of this info would be if they were to gain
access to your Google account - something two-factor authentication and good mobile security hygiene make highly unlikely.

And remember, too, that all this data collection is completely optional - and very much a tradeoff: By agreeing to let
Google store and use your data, you're getting access to an ever-expanding array of futuristic features at no
monetary cost.
Related: Titanpointe: The NSAs Spy Hub in New York, Hidden in Plain Sight

But the decision is ultimately in your hands. To learn more about how Google uses specific types of data and how you can opt
out of any or all areas of collection, see the "Opting out and taking control" section at the end of this story.

All of that being said, here are some of the more amusing - and maybe slightly surprising - things you might find about yourself
by prodding the right parts of Google's noggin. How many of these items actually apply to you depends on which Google
services you use and how exactly you use them.

To wit: Android users who take advantage of built-in features such as voice commands, location history and photo
backups will almost certainly have more data tracked by Google than non-Android users.

But anyone who regularly uses Gmail, Google search, Google Maps, YouTube, Chrome and/or other Google services from
any mobile device or computer will likely find at least some interesting nuggets from the following list.

1. A full history of your voice commands with any Google product - including actual audio
recordings

Everything you've ever said to Google, in one convenient place. OK, Google: Remind me how silly I sound when talking to my
phone (you know, when it seems like no one else is listening). If you use voice commands on Android or any other Google
product (for instance, voice searches in the Google iOS app when you're logged in with your Google account), head to the
"Voice & Audio" section of Google's My Activity site to see and hear a comprehensive list of everything you've ever said to that
inanimate object in your pocket.

And yes, your voice really does sound like that.

2. An objective breakdown of your real BFFs (according to Google)

Data doesn't lie. Discover whom among your Google contacts you interact with the most by clicking the "Contacts" header
on Google's account dashboard. Just be prepared to make up excuses if your significant other doesn't make the "Frequently
contacted" list.

3. How much stuff Chrome has saved about you

Your browsing habits, broken down into indisputable numbers.

If you use the Chrome browser and typically stay signed into it, check out your account's Chrome Sync settings page to see all
sorts of brag- and/or shame-worthy stats about your personal browsing habits - things like how many bookmarks you've
saved, how many tabs you have open across different devices and how many websites you've typed into Chrome's address
bar (since last resetting your browser's history).

Free cookie* if you guess within five points of any of your values. * A free browser cookie, that is. C'mon - what did you
expect?

4. How many Gmail conversations you've had

Provided you use Gmail's archiving system instead of permanently deleting messages, you may be in for a shock: Click the
aptly named "Gmail" header in Google's account dashboard, and get ready to see why your days always seem so short.

Case in point: I have 145,810 message threads in my Gmail account -- with just over 28,000 sent messages. Let me repeat
that: Twenty-eight thousand sent messages. No wonder I never get anything accomplished.

Related: Podesta Ignored Advice to Encrypt Sensitive Emails

5. A full history of everywhere you've ever been

File this one under "Cool Yet Creepy": Google Maps' Timeline feature contains a detailed diary of your every move -- down to
the minute.

No exaggeration: If you carry an Android phone and have opted into location history, the site will show you where you were
every moment of every day. And if you really want to weird yourself out, open Timeline from a desktop and click the year tab
in the upper-left corner of the screen. Select "All Time," then click the red box in the lower-left corner to see an ordered list of
your most visited places.
(My top four are currently my house, Target, the grocery and Barnes & Noble. What can I say? It's a wild and crazy life I lead.)

6. A full list of everything you've done from any Android device

Your smartphone is a fantastic tool for productivity-enhancing tasks like word processing, spreadsheet creation, and... oh, who
the hell are we kidding? You're using the thing for mindless web browsing and meaningless game-playing, just like everyone
else.You can see a detailed log of activity on your Android devices at Google's My Activity site.

Find out for sure what you're doing on your Android devices - or what someone else is doing on them, if colleagues or kiddos
ever get their hands on your phone - by opening Google's My Activity site. Select the option to "Filter by date & product," then
select "Android" and click the blue search icon.

Just don't let your boss see that you spent all of Tuesday's meeting "working" on Words With Friends.

7. A comprehensive collection of every site you've visited in Chrome - on any device

These days, Chrome isn't just a desktop browser - and if you're using the program from a phone or tablet as well as a regular
computer, you're bound to have quite the collective history.

See where you've been on the web (while signed in to Chrome) by opening Google's My Activity page and checking "Chrome"
in the filter list. You can search for specific keywords and even filter further by date -- a useful tool if you ever need to find a
site you pulled up somewhere but can't quite remember.

If you're not seeing your Chrome history on the My Activity page, go to the Activity controls and make sure the Web & App
Activity toggle is on and the "Include Chrome browsing history and activity from websites and apps that use Google services"
box is checked. (Also make sure that you're signed into Chrome on your various devices.) Your Chrome activity will be tracked
from this point forward.

As for the sites you'd rather not have recorded - well, amigos, let's just say that Incognito mode is your friend.

8. Exactly how many Google searches you've made this month

First and foremost, Google is a search engine -- so how much are you Googling? Get the skinny by scrolling down to the
"Search History" header in Google's account dashboard.

Click the header to see precisely how many times you've called upon Google's knowledge from any device while signed into
your Google account in the past month -- along with a breakdown of your most common search types and some of your most
frequently used queries. (Again: Incognito mode. Never forget.)

9. A running count of how many Android devices you've had connected to your account over the
years

Think you've been through a lot of phones and mobile devices? Calculate your official Android Geek Quotient score by pulling
up Google's account dashboard and looking for the "Android" header. The big green number beneath it will tell you how many
Android products have ever been associated with your account. (Hopefully yours isn't as high as my almost-silly-seeming
score of 78.)

You can get more detailed info on all the devices, too -- including when each product was last used and a list of all the apps it
has backed up to Google's servers -- by clicking the header. And a quick tip: If you want to get old, inactive devices out of your
hair, head to the Play Store settings page and uncheck the "Show in menus" option next to any phones or tablets that are no
longer relevant.

10. A running count of how many Android apps you've ever installed

Your Android app stats can be both enlightening and alarming. Trying out new apps is a great way to keep your mobile tech
feeling fresh -- to a certain point, anyway. See if you've crossed the line from adventurous to ridiculous by finding the "Play
Store" header on Google's account dashboard.

If you manage to top my current total of 1,191 apps, seek immediate help.

11. Some stats on your invite-accepting habits

Are you a person who tends to accept event invitations? Or do you say "no" more often than "yes"? If you're a Google
Calendar user who frequently interacts with other Google Calendar users, you can find out by clicking the "Calendar" header
at Google's account dashboard. That'll give you a breakdown of your accepting-vs.-rejecting activity over the past month,
including a handy pie chart to illustrate your temperament in visual form. Hey, at least there's no line graph on the lameness of
your excuses.

Related: Consumer watchdogs say popular toys are secretly spying on your children

12. How many images you've stored with Google Photos

I don't know about you, but I tend to take way too many pictures -- mostly of my 22-month-old daughter (and occasionally of
those damn squirrels that always run through my backyard and taunt me with their superior short-term memories).

Thankfully, Google Photos makes it simple for me to store all these images and access them anywhere -- and also to see at a
glance just how absurdly large my personal photo collection has gotten. To get the lowdown on your own virtual photo box,
mosey down to the "Photos" header in Google's account dashboard. And be sure to take a mental snapshot of the result.

13. A full list of all your activity in the Google Play Store

Everything you've ever searched for in the Play Store, in one centralized place.

Have you ever looked at or searched for something in the Play Store -- then tried to find it again later, only to realize your
memory was worse than your friendly neighborhood squirrel's? I know I have.

So use my trick: The next time you find yourself wishing for a time machine, just scamper over to Google's My Activity page.
Filter the results to "Play," and voila: You'll find a full list of every item you've viewed and every Play Store search you've made
while signed into your Google account. Now if only this thing had a way to tell me where I buried my acorn the other day...

14. How many YouTube videos you've watched this month

We've all been there: You're in the middle of something extremely productive (naturally) when a single YouTube link happens
to catch your eye. Watching one video seems harmless enough, right?

But then the inevitable happens: One video turns to two. Wait, what's that in the "Related" section - a clip of a bird whistling
the melody to Guns N' Roses' "Patience"? Click. Watch. Repeat. Before you know it, you're 19 videos in, and the afternoon is
over.
Discover just how much YouTube time-whittlin' you've done in the last month (while logged into your Google account) by
visiting Google's account dashboard and clicking the "YouTube" header. And for the love of Goog, if your monthly tally is over
200, think long and hard before clicking that next cat-dancing clip.

Opting out and taking control

Want to turn off specific types of data collection or delete existing info from your Google account history? The Google privacy
site is the best place to start; there, Google provides detailed information about how each type of data is used along with links
to opt out of any specific areas. You can also visit Google's Activity controls page for a simple single-page list of on-off
toggles.

If you're looking to clean up your history for anything that Google has been tracking, head to the My Activity site.

You can delete any individual item right then and there by clicking the three-dot icon in its upper-right corner and
choosing Delete, or click the "Delete activity by" link in the left column for an easy way to erase info based on date
and/or product.

Data collection controls can be also found on an Android device by opening the main system settings and selecting Google
(or, if you're on an older device, looking for the standalone Google Settings app) and then tapping "Personal info & privacy."

Related: The Terrifying Cost of "Free Websites

Top Doctors Reveal Vaccines Turn Our Immune System Against Us + Study Pulled
From Publication After Proving Truth Of Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated Children
December 24 2016 | From: NaturalBlaze/ NaturalNews
The research is hard to ignore, vaccines can trigger autoimmunity with a laundry list of diseases to
follow. With harmful and toxic metals as some vaccine ingredients, who is susceptible and which
individuals are more at risk?

No one would accuse Yehuda Shoenfeld of being a quack. The Israeli clinician has spent more than three decades
studying the human immune system and is at the pinnacle of his profession.

Related: Nursing student expelled for questioning directives to use threats, lies to coerce patients to vaccinate

You might say he is more foundation than fringe in his specialty; he wrote the textbooks. The Mosaic of
Autoimmunity, Autoantibodies, Diagnostic Criteria in Autoimmune Diseases, Infection and Autoimmunity, Cancer and
Autoimmunity the list is 25 titles long and some of them are cornerstones of clinical practice.

Hardly surprising that Shoenfeld has been called the Godfather of Autoimmunology the study of the immune system turned
on itself in a wide array of diseases from type 1 diabetes to ulcerative colitis and multiple sclerosis.

But something strange is happening in the world of immunology lately and a small evidence of it is that the Godfather of
Autoimmunology is pointing to vaccines - specifically, some of their ingredients including the toxic metal aluminum as a
significant contributor to the growing global epidemic of autoimmune diseases.
Related: Trump: Vaccines Cause Autism And Will Be Investigated

The bigger evidence is a huge body of research thats poured in in the past 15 years, and particularly in the past five years.
Take for example, a recent article published in the journal Pharmacological Research in which Shoenfeld and colleagues
issue unprecedented guidelines naming four categories of people who are most at risk for vaccine-induced autoimmunity.

On one hand, vaccines prevent infections which can trigger autoimmunity, say the papers authors, Alessandra Soriano, of
the Department of Clinical Medicine and Rheumatology at the Campus Bio-Medico University in Rome, Gideon Nesher, of the
Hebrew University Medical School in Jerusalem and Shoenfeld, founder and head of the Zabludowicz Center of Autoimmune
Diseases in the Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer.

He is also editor of three medical journals and author of more than 1,500 research papers across the spectrum of medical
journalism and founder of the International Congress on Autoimmunology.

On the other hand, many reports that describe post-vaccination autoimmunity strongly suggest that vaccines can
indeed trigger autoimmunity.

Defined autoimmune diseases that may occur following vaccinations include arthritis, lupus (systemic lupus
erythematosus, SLE) diabetes mellitus, thrombocytopenia, vasculitis, dermatomyosiositis, Guillain-Barre syndrome
and demyelinating disorders. Almost all types of vaccines have been reported to be associated with the onset of
ASIA.
Related: Herd immunity is a myth: Why un-vaccinated children are not a threat to others

ASIA or Autoimmune/inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants (also known as Shoenfelds syndrome) - first appeared
in the Journal of Autoimmunology four years ago.

It is an umbrella term for a collection of similar symptoms, including Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, that result after
exposure to an adjuvant an environmental agent including common vaccine ingredients that stimulate the immune
system.

Since then an enormous body of research, using ASIA as a paradigm, has begun to unravel the mystery of how environmental
toxins, particularly the metal aluminum used in vaccines, can trigger an immune system chain reaction in susceptible
individuals and may lead to overt autoimmune disease.

Autoimmune disease results when the bodys system meant to attack foreign invaders turns instead to attack part of the body
it belongs to (auto is Greek for self). If the immune system is like a national defence system, antibodies are like drones
programmed to recognize a certain type of invader (a bacteria say) and to destroy them or mark them for destruction by other
special forces.
Autoantibodies are like drones that are misidentifying a component of the human body and have launched a sustained attack
on it. If they mistakenly target a component of the conductive sheath around neurons, for example, nerve impulses stop
conducting properly, muscles go into spasm and coordination fails; multiple sclerosis results.

If autoantibodies erroneously focus on joint tissue; rheumatoid arthritis results. If they target the islets of Langerhans in the
pancreas, Type 1 diabetes, and so on

Throughout our lifetime the normal immune system walks a fine line between preserving normal immune reactions
and developing autoimmune diseases, says the paper.

The healthy immune system is tolerant to self-antigens. When self-tolerance is disturbed, dysregulation of the
immune system follows, resulting in emergence of an autoimmune disease. Vaccination is one of the conditions
that may disturb this homeostasis in susceptible individuals, resulting in autoimmune phenomena and ASIA.

Who is susceptible is the subject of the paper entitled, Predicting post-vaccination autoimmunity: Who might be
at risk? It lists four categories of people:

1. Those who have had a previous autoimmune reaction to a vaccine

2. Anyone with a medical history of autoimmunity

3. Patients with a history of allergic reactions

4. Anyone at high risk of developing autoimmune disease including anyone with a family history of autoimmunity,
presence of autoantibodies which are detectable by blood tests and other factors including low vitamin D and
smoking.

Previous Reaction
Regarding those who have had a previous adverse reaction to vaccines, the paper cites five relevant studies including the
case of a death of a teenage girl six months following her third Gardasil injection against HPV virus.

Related: Gardasil Fully Exposed: HPV Vaccine Being Tested on Infants Has Killed, Permanently Injured Thousands

She had experienced a range of symptoms shortly after her first dose, including dizziness, numbness and tingling in her
hands, and memory lapses. After her second injection, she developed intermittent arm weakness, frequent tiredness
requiring daytime naps, worse tingling, night sweats, chest pain and palpitations.

A full autopsy was unrevealing but blood and spleen tissue analysis revealed HPV-16 L1 gene DNA fragments - matching the
DNA found in vials of the Gardasil vaccine against cervical cancer - thus implicating the vaccine as a causal factor.

The DNA fragments had also been found to be complexed with the aluminum adjuvant which, according to the report, have
been shown to persist for up to 8 to 10 years causing chronic immune system stimulation.

Although data is limited, Shoenfeld and his colleagues concluded, it seems preferable that individuals with prior
autoimmune or autoimmune-like reactions to vaccinations, should not be immunized, at least not with the same
type of vaccine.

Established Autoimmune Condition

The second group which the paper cites for vaccine exemption is patients with established autoimmune conditions. Vaccines
dont work so well in them, say Shoenfeld and his colleagues, and they are at risk for flares following vaccination.

Inoculations that contain live viruses including chickenpox, yellow fever and the measles, mumps and rubella triple vaccine
(MMR) are generally contraindicated for people with autoimmune conditions because of the risk of uncontrolled viral
replication. But inactivated vaccines are not such a good idea either because they usually contain the added ingredient
aluminum, linked to autoimmunity.

The immunologists describe recent studies in which patients with autoimmune rheumatic disease given the influenza vaccine
(without aluminum) suffered more joint pain and fever than controls and whose levels of autoantibodies (the drones that attack
self) increased after receiving the flu vaccine.
Related: How The CDC And Vaccine Court Create An Epidemic Of Autism

Whats more, they developed new types of autoantibodies that werent present before the vaccines, and those persisted. As
the presence of autoantibodies can be predictive of developing autoimmune disease in patients without symptoms, even
years ahead of disease onset, this is troubling to those who understand immunology.

A number of studies claim vaccines are safe for the overwhelming majority of patients with established autoimmune
diseases, the study allows, but they only looked at rheumatoid arthritis and lupus and not at severe and active cases so the
potential benefit of vaccination should be weighed against its potential risk, they cautioned.

Patients With a History of Allergy

Vaccine trials have usually excluded vulnerable individuals - only extremely healthy individuals with no allergies are
recruited. Its a selection bias, say Soriano and Shoenfeld, and has likely resulted in serious adverse events being
considerably underestimated in real life where vaccines are mandated to all individuals regardless of their susceptibility.

The true incidence of allergic reactions to vaccines, normally estimated at between one in 50,000 to one in a million doses, is
probably much higher and particularly where gelatin or egg proteins are on the ingredients list, they say.

Theres a long list of vaccine ingredients that are potential allergens: besides the infectious agents themselves, there are
those from hens egg, horse serum, bakers yeast, numerous antibiotics, formaldehyde and lactose, as well inadvertent
ingredients such as latex.
Related: New Study Confirms That Mercury Is Linked to Autism

Peoples allergic histories have to be taken before vaccination say the researchers. But some signs of reaction dont
show up until after the shot.

The public health nurse or GP might tell patients that a long-lasting swelling around the injection site after a vaccine is a
normal reaction, for example. But that is not what the immunologists say. [A]luminum sensitization manifests as nodules [hard
lumps] at the injection site that often regress after weeks or months, but may persist for years. In such cases, they say, a
patch test can be done to confirm sensitivity and to avoid vaccination.

According to a growing body of research, though, allergy may be only the beginning of many dangerous aluminum-induced
phenomena.

The Trouble With Aluminium

Aluminum has been added to vaccines since about 1926 when Alexander Glenny and colleagues noticed it would produce
better antibody responses in vaccines than the antigen alone. Glenny figured the alum was inducing what he called a depot
effect slowing the release of the antigen and heightening the immune response.

For 60 years his theory was accepted dogma. And over the same time, the vaccine schedule grew decade on decade, but few
ever questioned the effects of injecting aluminum into the body, which is strange considering its known toxicity.

A PubMed search on aluminum and toxicity turns up 4,258 entries. Its neurotoxicity is well documented. It affects memory,
cognition, psychomotor control; it damages the blood brain barrier, activates brain inflammation, depresses mitochondrial
function and plenty of research suggests it is a key player in the formation of the amyloid plaques and tangles in the brains of
Alzheimers patients.
Related: The WHO's condescending tips for EU healthcare workers to convince informed patients that vaccines are
safe

Its been implicated in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and autism and demonstrated to induce allergy.

When kidney dialysis patients were accidentally infused with aluminum, the dialysis-induced encephalopathy (DAE) they
developed neurological symptoms: speech abnormalities, tremors, memory loss, impaired concentration and behavioural
changes. Many of the patients eventually went into comas and died. The lucky ones survived: when the source of toxicity,
aluminum, was removed from their dialysis they recovered rapidly.

With these new observations, researchers began investigating the adjuvant effects of aluminum and in the past decade there
has been a flurry of research. Far from being a sandbag that holds the antigen for a while and then gets excreted, it turns out
that aluminum salts trigger a storm of defence action.

Vaccines: A Violation of Human Rights

The video below is a rational discussion about vaccines with Christina Hildebrand, President of A Voice For Choice,
Inc. where she explains why mandatory vaccines are a violation of your human rights and how they are potentially
dangerous to you or your child's health.

Christina is passionate about ensuring people know what they are putting into their bodies - be it food, air, water or
medications. For the past 12 years, Christina has spent many thousands of hours researching and sharing her knowledge
within her local community.

However, with the growth of the Big Ag and Big pHARMa's influences on US politics, Christina realized that she needed to
take this to a different level and educate the masses on their right to informed choice and transparency of what goes into their
bodies.
Within hours of injection of the same aluminum oxyhydroxide in vaccines into mice, for example, armies of specialized
immune cells are on the move, calling in grid coordinates for more specialist assault forces. Within a day, a whole host of
immune system commandos are in play - neutrophils, eosinophils, inflammatory monocytes, myeloid and dendritic cells,
activating lymphocytes and secreting proteins called cytokines.

The cytokines themselves cause collateral damage but they send out signals, directing cell-to-cell communication and
recruiting other cells into action. If the next phase of the attack is launched: fibroblast growth factor, interferons, interleukins,
platelet derived growth factor, transforming growth factor and tumour necrosis factor might all be engaged.

Theres evidence that poorly understood and pesky inflammasomes, (currently a topic of cutting- edge cancer causation
research) such as the Nod-like receptor 3( NLRP) are activated too, but its all still too early to say exactly what theyre doing.

Related: The most evil people in medicine today

New research emerging from University of British Columbia has found that aluminum adjuvant injected into mice can alter the
expression of genes associated with autoimmunity.

And in their recent study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, immunologists at the University
of Colorado found that even host DNA is recruited into the aluminum assault, that it rapidly coats injected alum, triggering
effects that scientists have barely scratched the surface of understanding.

The Significance of Macrophagic Myofasciitis

This mobility or translocation of aluminum in the body is perhaps the most disturbing of the mounting evidence in current
aluminum research. In 1998, French researcher Romain Gherardi and his colleagues observed an emerging condition of
unknown origin which presented in patients post-vaccination with Chronic Fatigue like symptoms including swollen lymph
nodes, joint and muscle pain and exhaustion.

Tissue biopsies of the patients deltoid revealed lesions up to 1 cm in diameter and unique from similar lesions of other
diseases. They went to the lab for analysis and to Gherardis astonishment, they mainly consisted of macrophages large
white blood cells in the immune system whose job is to swallow up foreign invaders in the body. Enclosed in the cellular fluid
of these phagocytes were agglomerates of nanocrystals of aluminum.
Related: Cannabis Oil Cured Girls Leukemia After HPV Vaccine Broke Down Her Body: Hayley Willar

Gherardi and his colleagues began injecting mice with aluminum to see what happened. Their research published in 2013
revealed that the metal particles were engulfed by macrophages and formed MMF-like granulomas that dispersed to distant
lymph nodes, spleen, liver and eventually brain.

This strongly suggests that long-term adjuvant biopersistence within phagocytic cells is a prerequisite of slow
brain translocation and delayed neurotoxicity, writes Gherardi in his February 2015 review of the relevant
research in Frontiers in Neurology.

A more frightening animal study of aluminum is that of Spanish veterinary researcher Lluis Lujans study of ovine ASIA.

After huge numbers of sheep in Spain died in 2008 in the wake of a compulsory multiple vaccine campaign against
bluetongue in Spain in 2008, Lujan set out to find out what killed them and he began by inoculating them with aluminum.

His 2013 study found that only 0.5% of sheep inoculated with aluminum vaccines showed immediate reactions of lethargy,
transient blindness, stupor, prostration and seizures

Characterized by a severe meningoencephalitis, similar to postvaccine reactions seen in humans.

Most of them recovered, temporarily, but postmortem exams of the ones who didnt revealed acute brain inflammation.
The delayed onset chronic phase of the disease affected far more of the sheep - 50-70% of flocks and sometimes virtually
100% of animals within a given flock, usually including all of those who had previously recovered.

The reaction was frequently triggered by exposure to cold and began with restlessness and compulsive wool-biting, then
progressed to acute redness of the skin, generalized weakness, extreme weight loss and muscle tremors, and finally, entered
the terminal phase where the animals went down on their front quarters, became comatose and died.

Related: Cancer industry profits 'locked in' by nagalase molecule injected into humans via vaccines... spurs tumor
growth... explains aggressive vaccine push

Post-mortem examinations revealed severe neuron necrosis and aluminum in the nerve tissue.

The immune systems reaction to aluminum represents a major health challenge, Gerhardi declares in his recent review, and
he adds that;

Attempts to seriously examine safety concerns raised by the bio-persistent character and brain accumulation of
alum particles have not been made A lot must be done to understand how, in certain individuals, alum-
containing vaccines may become insidiously unsafe.

Back to the problem of which certain individuals should avoid vaccination to avoid autoimmune disease.

People Prone to Develop Autoimmunity

Soriano and Shoenfelds identify a final category: anyone at risk of developing autoimmune disease. Since a number of them
have been shown to have genetic factors that would include anyone with a family history of autoimmune disease.

It also includes anyone who has tested positive for autoantibodies which can indicate disease years before symptoms show
up. Vaccinations, the doctors say, may trigger or worsen the disease.

Smokers too, have an exceptionally high risk of developing an autoimmune disease, says the report. The American Cancer
Society estimates that about 18% of Americans smoke. That means about 42 million Americans have an elevated risk of
developing an autoimmune disease and theyre stacking the odds with every vaccine.
Related: Vaccinations: An analysis of the health risks

And finally, factors that Shoenfeld and Soriano associate with high risk of developing autoimmunity are high estrogen and low
vitamin D - which means anyone taking birth control or hormone replacement therapy and, according to one 2009 study of
vitamin D status, about three quarters of American teens and adults should be wary of vaccines.

Shoenfeld doesnt seem to mean to exclude all of these people from immunization, however. The paper concludes that for
the overwhelming majority of individuals, vaccines carry no risk of systemic autoimmune disease and should be administered
according to current recommendations.

Which is in stark contrast to the body of the paper. The final word is cautionary about weighing the potential benefit of
vaccinationagainst its potential risk.

Its exemplary of a strange sort of schizophrenia in a wide range of recent immunology papers. The doctors seem to be trying
to reconcile a century of safe and effective vaccine dogma with the last decades worth of terrifying research findings.
Theres a lot of on the one hand and on the other hand in them.
Related: Gary Null: Are we being lied to about 'vaccine efficacy'?

The new research seems about to gain the upper hand, however. A 2013 overview of ASIA by six immunologists including
Shoenfeld, for example, is a catalogue of vaccine side effects from Gardasil deaths, narcolepsy epidemics, infertility, chronic
fatigue, dead sheep and aluminum-addled brains. It is rife with statements that would have been virtually unheard of inside
mainstream medicine a decade ago. Like this shocker:

Perhaps, in twenty years, physicians will be dueling with better characterized particles of autoimmunity, and the
vaccines may become fully safe as well as effective.

Nonetheless the recognition of ASIA has initiated the change to put more efforts in identifying the good, the bad
and the ugly of vaccines and in particular of adjuvants as triggers of autoimmunity.

Bad and ugly of vaccines? Whats wrong with the adjuvants? Thats not in the CDC hand-out.

Or How About This One:

Despite the huge amount of money invested in studying vaccines, there are few observational studies
and virtually no randomized clinical trials documenting the effect on mortality of any of the existing
vaccines.

One recent paper found an increased hospitalization rate with the increase of the number of vaccine doses
and a mortality rate ratio for 5-8 vaccine doses to 1-4 doses of 1.5, indicating a statistically significant
increase of deaths associated with higher vaccine doses.
 Since vaccines are given to millions of infants annually, it is imperative that health authorities have
scientific data from synergistic toxicity studies on all combinations of vaccines

That could be any anti-vaxxer jabbering onbut its not.

But Here is the Topper:

The US Supreme Court ruled that vaccines makers are immune from lawsuits charging that the design of the
vaccine is defective. Thus there is need for innovative clinical trial design and the vaccines themselves should be
redesigned.

Immunologists including the worlds leading authority on autoimmunity are saying it is time to take vaccines back to
the drawing board.

Autoimmune disease is the third leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and now among the top 10 killers of
young American women.

The American Autoimmune Related Diseases Association estimates that 50 million Americans suffer from one of 88
autoimmune diseases - from type 1 diabetes to systemic lupus erythematosus - and some research puts the figure at one in
five globally.

At least 40 more diseases are suspected to be immune-mediated. Most of them are devastating - frequently crippling,
expensive to treat and incurable. And they are increasing at an astonishing pace.

Related: Mercury and autism: New research provides yet more damning evidence that mercury exposure leads to
ASD
At this stage, it looks like the more the research pours in, the harder it is going to get for pro-vaccine immunologists to keep
multiple personality disorder or complete nervous breakdown - at bay. Ten years of cutting edge research into aluminums
effects on the immune system has revealed primarily how wrong they were.

And how little they know. If, after 90 years, doctors finally have begun to seriously examine the mechanism and question the
merits of injecting metal toxins into newborn babies, what have they yet to discover? ASIA sounds awful. (Too bad for all the
people whose kids suffered through chronic fatigue when it was just a Freudian yearning to sleep with their mother.)

But what if, like Lujans sheep, the negligible minority that has been paying the price for the good of humanity is actually only
the tip of the iceberg? What if some people with no apparent adverse immune reactions still have nanocrystals of aluminum
silently depositing in their brains? What if ASIA really includes Alzheimers? ALS, autism? ADD? And thats just the As.

Related: New Transmissible Vaccine Spreads Like Virus, No Consent Necessary

Even if immunologists keep wearing their rose coloured glasses, and vaccine ingredients are only responsible for a tiny
fraction of the exploding autoimmunity, the ugly in vaccines will still get harder and harder to ignore.

When everyone on the planet is getting injected, 20 years is a long time for disabled people to stack up while scientists duel
with the characterized particles of autoimmunity.

In the fury over the Disneyland measles outbreak that is gripping the worlds vaccine promoters, time is running out for
doctors and researchers who see the bad and ugly side of vaccines and their adjuvants to do something about it.

Theres slim chance of a vaccine redesign in the absence of a profit incentive and a strong chance of universal vaccine
mandates for one and all - previous anaphylactic shock reaction or not.

Study Pulled From Publication After Proving Truth Of Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated
Children

The censorship of science is nothing new. In Canada, for instance, there were serious concerns
about the federal governments increasingly strict regulations that prevented scientists from sharing
their findings with the public.
Censorship, on the whole, is a persistently under-acknowledged problem in our society. The election of Donald
Trump certainly showcased the fact that the mainstream media only portrays the narratives they want us to see.

In the latest instance of scientific censorship, an article from a scientific journal was unpublished, but only after vaccine
enthusiasts proclaimed that it needed to be removed. The study, you see, examined the differences in health outcomes
between vaccinated and unvaccinated children.

The studys results indicated that:

Vaccinated children were significantly less likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with
chickenpox and pertussis, but significantly more likely to have been diagnosed with pneumonia, otitis
media, allergies and NDDs (defined as Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder,
and/or a learning disability).

From the mothers reports, the researchers found that vaccinated children were more likely to have allergies and
neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). The team noted that even after controlling for other factors, vaccination remained
significantly associated with the presence of an NDD.

VaxXed Stories: Social Engineering of Medical Professionals

Dr. Suzanne Humphries attends a meeting called "Confronting Vaccine Resistance: Strategies For Success" at NYU
Langone Medical Center in New York, New York on November 21, 2016.

This meetings speakers were Senator Richard Pan, Dr. Paul Offit and Dorit Rubenstein Reiss. Afterwards she comes out to
the VaxXed Bus to share what happened. Camera and editing by Joshua Coleman.

Indeed, those that were vaccinated were three times more likely to be diagnosed with an NDD such as autism. The
combination of preterm birth and vaccination produced an even higher risk of NDD, increasing the chances of it by more than
six-fold.

In the abstract, the researchers wrote in their conclusion;

In this study based on mothers reports, the vaccinated had a higher rate of allergies and NDD than the
unvaccinated. Vaccination, but not preterm birth, remained significantly associated with NDD after controlling for
other factors.

However, preterm birth combined with vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in the
odds of NDD. Further research involving larger, independent samples is needed to verify and understand these
unexpected findings in order to optimize the impact of vaccines on childrens health.

Baxter Dmitry from Investment Watch Blog notes that the study was unpublished from the journal Frontiers In Public Health.
Normally, one can still view the cached version in internet archives.

But Baxter says this too was removed, noting that a cached version available on internet archives has also been removed,
suggesting there is a serious campaign to stop members of the public from viewing the study.

Fortunately, a screenshot of the study was saved before the whole thing was scrubbed off the internet for good.
Prior to being removed from the internet, the study was subjected to massive amounts of scrutiny; apparently in this instance,
the use of surveys which are widely used for data gathering somehow invites bias.

Some of the colorful public comments included;

This study is of poor design, though not impossible results. Study relies of self-report of moms, inducing
bias, and, Another garbage vaccine study in Frontiers journal. Scientists, stop reviewing/publishing there.
This, of course, is not the first time that a study that showcased the potential ill effects of vaccines has been pulled from the
internet. In February, the journal Vaccine temporarily removed, and eventually retracted, a study that linked the HPV vaccine
to behavioral issues in mice.

Publishing research that contains information that conflicts with the mainstream narrative continues to prove to be a quick and
easy way to find yourself blacklisted and censored by conventional media. This just underscores the importance
of independent research and alternative media outlets.

Related: Big Pharma now wants to vaccinate babies while theyre still in the womb

10 More Signs That The Global Elites Ship Is Sinking + Viral Image Shows Why The
Global Elite Are Panicking - Former U.S. VP To Media We Dont Need You Guys
Anymore
December 23 2016 | From: WakingTimes / IUV / Various

Times are continuing to shift in a big way and humanitys rise over the darkness that has plagued
our planet for a very long time is gathering momentum by the day.

Remember, the elites modus operandi is to crush any form of hope or belief that things can or will get better.

Related: The Ongoing Historic Fall Of The Khazarian Empire

Truth prevails though and we are seeing the old world order crumble. 2017 is sure to be an exciting year. Continue to dream
big.

1. June 23rd, 2016: Britain votes to leave the European Union. While some are choosing to see this as an extremist act
whose focus was on securing the border from immigrants, there is a much bigger picture to that event.

While it must be said that the immigration issue is in the minds of some who were pro-Brexit (and thus needs to be humanely
and compassionately addressed), the bigger issue was that Britain reclaimed its sovereignty back from the imperialistic
banking and political cabal.
Related: Criminally Negligent IMF Head Lagarde Unpunished, Heres Why

As it has been reported in The Telegraph, a mainstream media outlet in the UK, the CIA and the U.S. State Department have
been heavily involved in the creation of the European Union from the very beginning.

As Professor Alan Sked said in the article: Voters in Britains referendum need to understand that the European Union was
about building a federal superstate from day one.

2. July 22nd, 2016: Wikileaks releases over 20,000 emails from the Democratic National Convention and shows the deep
collusion between the Clinton Campaign and the DNC itself. These revelations ultimately helped force the resignations of the
top 4 positions within the DNC.

3. October 8th, 2016: Shortly after Wikileaks began dumping the PodestaFiles, emails were revealed that John Podesta, the
Clinton campaign chairman, was receiving emails about UFO/E.T. disclosure as well as free energy technology, whose emails
came from former NASA astronaut Edgar Mitchell.
These are highly significant in the fact that it is admitted by Mitchell that such technologies do exist and that even the Vatican
knows of them.

Once these technologies are known about on an even wider scale, the lies and corruption of the oil industry will fall apart and
humanity can then reclaim its freedom.

4. October 10th, 2016: Turkey defies the banking cabal and signs the Turkish Stream gas pipeline deal with Russia.
Because Russia is in opposition to the cabal, or NWO, as some would prefer, this is a massive financial and geopolitical
game-changer.

5. October 20th, 2016: The Philippines president Rodrigo Duterte visits China with 200 Filipino businessmen to mend ties
with China. He also announces his separation from the U.S. (which is a blow to the cabal) and seeks an alliance with not only
China, but Russia too. The BRICS Alliance continues to grow.

6. October 30th, 2016: Icelands Prime Minister steps down as the activist, anti-establishment party, known as The Pirate
Party, comes in second in national elections and jumps its number of parliament seats from 3 to 10.
As more people around the world herald the call for true freedom, political parties reflecting such ideals will continue to prevail.
The Pirate Party is in over 40 countries around the world currently, and the movement continues to grow.

7. November 4th, 2016: Wikileaks emails reveal the Podesta brothers were invited to a spirit cooking dinner and involved
eating sperm and menstrual blood. While some surely laughed this off, keep in mind that former FBI special agent Ted
Gunderson spent several years investigating and exposing this information to the public, before being murdered.

We must also keep in mind that former BBC star Jimmy Savile was revealed to being involved in a massive, elite-ridden
pedophile ring.
Related: Report: Obama Threatened Putin With WAR Over Election Hacking Conspiracy Theory

The pedophilia and ritualistic claims against many of the elites is well known around the world and is a very serious issue. The
fact that even a small bit of this came out in the Wikileaks revelations is significant and a sign of the times. So much more is
coming.

8. November 8th, 2016: It was revealed by Neil Keenan that several globalists/cabalists, including Mark Carney of the Bank
of England, Janet Yellen of the Federal Reserve, the Rothschilds, Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak and others were
involved in a deal to steal 1 million metric tons of Gold from the global collateral accounts.

As of this writing, the deal has been stopped and it very beneficial to humanity.

While this story might not make much sense to many readers, understand that the global collateral accounts are the cabals
biggest financial secret on this planet. It is the reason JFK was killed and it also relates to 9/11.

9. November 13th, 2016: The European countries of Moldova and Bulgaria elect new presidents, both of whom are pro-
Russia. This is yet another major setback for the globalists plans of creating a superstate out of Europe. Watch for even more
countries to begin aligning with Russia.

10. November 15th, 2016: More than 200 rallies around the U.S. take place to protest the North Dakota pipeline that is
being attempted to form.

The world is continuing to awaken and sees the lunacy of oil and gas for energy. Clean solutions already exist.

What are some other stories that you believe are signs that the elites ship is sinking? Some believe that the election of
Donald Trump is a sign.

Further signs are the recent resignations of Cabal-placed heads of state, namely the resignation of the Prime Minister of New
Zealand, the Prime Minister of Italy and the President of France - all three of which announced their intention to resign their
positions withinn the same 24 hour period.

Related: The Liberation of Aleppo: A Regional Turning Point. Setback for US-Led Aggression

Viral Image Shows Why The Global Elite Are Panicking - Former U.S. VP To Media We
Dont Need You Guys Anymore
There is a direct correlation between populism growing across the globe, replacing the global
elite one by one, and the fall of the mainstream media. The media has not become irrelevant
because the globalists are falling, but rather the global elite are falling because the media has
become irrelevant.
That is a very important distinction and a lesson learned in 2016 that must not ever be forgotten.

Populism is described as a political doctrine that stems from a viewpoint of struggle between the populace and a ruling
faction. Nationalism on the other hand is defined as patriotic feeling, principles, or efforts.

Globalism is the exact opposite of both. Globalists believe what is best for the international community, should override what
is best for individual countries, basically sacrificing the welfare of a nations populace to benefit the international community
as a whole.

One Globalist Leader Left Standing

With the passing of the Brexit referendum in the UK which caused David Cameron, the Prime Minister, to resign, the election
of Donald Trump in the U.S. as a repudiation of globalist leader Barack Obama, the Italian referendum which
caused the Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi to resign, and the recent announcement by French President Francois
Hollande that he will not be seeking re-election, there is one global elite leader left standing

Angela Merkel, who has suffered some major losses herself in Germany.
Camerion, Obama, Merkel, Hollande, Renzi at G5 Summit

The image above, minus the X marks on their heads, has been going viral on social media, with messages like Three pro-EU
globalists down, one more pro-EU globalist to go, and four down, Merkel to go, according to the Independent UK, in an
article headlined Last world leader standing: The photo that shows just how much the world has changed in 2016.

Each of these leaders have been seen as betrayers by the populists in their respective countries, putting the good of
others above the good of those they were elected to represent, and each have been repudiated in elections and
referendums in 2016 by the very people they have betrayed with their globalist policies.

Jobs, manufacturing, the economy, all sacrificed by the five globalists above in pursuit of their New World Order, and all but
one will be gone in 2017, with Angela Merkel seeking a fourth term, despite a historic loss in the Berlin state election in
September, which many believe was a backlash against her open immigration policies.

Globalist Cheerleaders (Mainstream Media) Become Irrelevant

The globalist supporting media in each of the unexpected losses had campaigned hard to prevent populism from overcoming
globalism or to rephrase, to prevent the people from overcoming the elite and their agenda.
Before the Brexit vote, the media hyperventilated and claimed the whole world and markets would be thrown in turmoil, in an
attempt to influence the referendum results.

Headlines from before the referendum included Brexit would have huge economic impact and spark turmoil in global
markets from the Daily Mail and Brexit would create turmoil and damage Irish trade, from the Irish Times. One of the most
amusing headlines came from the UK Mirror at the time, who declared Brexit could end Britains hopes of hosting another
World Cup or Olympics.

The same hyperbolic headlines proceeded Italys recent referendum, with promising chaos if the No vote one and Renzi
resigns.

The same type of howling preceded the U.S. elections with dire warnings of what would happen if Donald Trump beat globalist
Hillary Clinton, where CNN headlined on November 6 with:

US election 2016: this is the global market turmoil that would be triggered by a Donald Trump victory, to which
not only didnt happen, but just the opposite occurred, as one day after the election, markets rallied and stocks
soared, with increases still being seen as CNBC reports today that Stocks have been on a rip-roaring rally
since the U.S. election.

One pattern here is that in every case, the mainstream media had attempted to influence the outcome, always in favor of the
globalists, but the more important pattern is that the populace in each instance in their respective countries.. ignored
them.

Ignored the consistent flow of skewed polls claiming the populist candidate or position had no chance, ignored the constant
negative stories being slammed out daily, in many case multiple times a day, against the candidate or position the media
didnt favor.
While polling over the decades has shown an increase of distrust toward the mainstream media, until 2016, they were still
able to influence primaries, elections, referendums and votes. those days are gone, and that is why the global elite are
panicking.

Former US VP to Media: "We Don't Need You Guys Anymore"

Former U.S. VP Dick Cheney recently sat down with Former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and CNNs Barbara Starr at
the Reagan Library, and said something horrifying to the mainstream media and the globalists.

Love him or hate him... the truth is the truth. Starr asked Cheney about the language of President-elect Trumps tweets and
after answering her Cheney stated:

I think one of the reasons people get so concerned about the tweets is it is sort of a way around the press. He
doesnt have to rely upon, uh, rely upon - this is the modern era, modern technology. Hes at the point
where we dont need you guys anymore.

The laughter from the audience is clearly heard but nothing from CNNs Starr, because those are the words the global elite
and the MSM are all terrified of because they are the truth.

That comment comes at the 3:20 minute mark in the clip below:
Bottom Line

The mainstream media and their fake news, along with their fake polls, using skewed demographics intended to create an
illusion meant to influence the public, has failed, and with it they took the last thing propping up globalism and touting it as the
way forward, in an attempt to create a New World Order.

The term leader of the free world has often been used to describe the United States and more commonly the U.S. President
of the United States, and having a populist U.S. President is a tremendous blow to globalists across the world, so it is no
coincidence that after an election to where the populist candidate won, Clinton teamed up with Green Party candidate Jill
Stein to petition for recounts in the three states that Trump flipped, which if successful would have handed the election to the
globalist candidate Hillary Clinton.

It is also no coincidence that organized protests, funded by globalist George Soros, have been seen across America after the
election or that we are seeing dire warnings of bloody Friday, with reports warning that ISIS could attack on inauguration
day.

The panicked globalists will not give up...

Fear, Bloodshed And Human Sacrifices Before Winter Solstice

December 22 2016 | From: VigilantCitizen

The killing of an ambassador in Turkey on live television and the attack of a Christmas market in
Berlin occurred at a crucial time of year.

The Russian ambassador with his killer standing behind him, moments before the gunshot
On December 19th 2016, Donald Trump was officially confirmed as President of the United States by the Electoral
College. Media coverage of this event was however eclipsed by attacks that ironically confirm why he was elected in
the first place. And these attacks will most likely greatly influence upcoming elections in Germany, France and the
Netherlands. A drastic change in political scenery is in the horizon, and it is fueled by fear, bloodshed and rejection
of globalism.

Related: Putin vows to destroy ISIL after ambassador killed

The assassination of a Russian ambassador on live television and the violent attack of a Christmas market in Germany are
events that are not only violent, but charged with intense symbolism meant to shock the public mind.

Whether this was coincidental or not, these events occurred right on the brink of the winter solstice a period that is historically
prone to blood sacrifices as it is a minor Sabbath in the occult calendar. Before Christmas, there was Saturnalia.

The origins of Christmas predate Christianity through the Pagan holiday called Saturnalia, which was a week-long
of lawlessness from December 17th through December 25th that honored Saturn and included human sacrifice,
intoxication, naked caroling and rape. During these seven days, there were no punishments for breaking any laws,
according to Roman law.

- In5d, Esoteric Meaning of Christmas

It was traditional to offer gifts of imitation fruit (a symbol of fertility), dolls (symbolic of the custom of human
sacrifice), and candles (reminiscent of the bonfires traditionally associated with pagan solstice celebrations). A
mock king was chosen, usually from a group of slaves or criminals, and although he was permitted to behave in an
unrestrained manner for seven days of the festival, he was usually killed at the end.

The Saturnalia eventually degenerated into a week-long spree of debauchery and crime giving rise to the
modern use of the tern saturnalia, meaning a period of unrestrained license and revelry.

- Time and Date, Holidays and Traditions around the December solstice

On December 19th, the entire world witnessed a live murder, a carefully planned sacrifice.

The Russian Ambassador

Andrey Karlov, Russias ambassador to Turkey was shot dead on Monday evening as he delivered a speech at a photo
exposition. The killer, identified as Mert Altintas, was an off-duty member of Ankaras police force.

The entire scene was extremely surreal because, beyond the violence, it was visually perfect. It was a set piece made for
mass media.
Related: Russian Officials: Highly Likely Ambassador Assassination a NATO False Flag

Mert Altintas stood behind the ambassador, wearing a stylishly tailored black suit, which sharply contrasted with the
immaculate white background adorned with pictures of Russia. Several gunshots then wring out and the ambassador falls on
his back, suddenly lifeless. The gunman then walks around the body, yelling Allahu Akbar and Dont forget Aleppo until
police finally manages to reach him and shoot him down.

As one reviews this surreal scene, one wonders: How was this even allowed to happen? How come this 22-year-old, off-duty
cop, who is part of the riot squad, was the only person standing behind Karlov this entire time? Reports are now saying that
the gunman refused security check.

The off-duty police officer who assassinated Russias ambassador to Turkey refused to go through an X-ray
security check before the shooting - but was let into the event anyway, according to a report.

The Hurriyet Daily News reported Tuesday that the assassin, Mevlt Mert Altintas, simply flashed his police ID to
enter Ankaras Contemporary Arts Center - where Russian Ambassador Andrey Karlov was scheduled to speak at
a photo exhibition.

- Daily News, Assassin of Turkeys Russian ambassador refused security check before ambushing event

Related: Putin Assures Envoy Karlovs Murderers to Feel the Heat of Russian Response
Also, all signs point to the attack being ordered from above, Mert Altintas being the proverbial patsy.

It had been determined Tuesday if Altintas, 22, was part of a wider plan to take out the Russian ambassador. But
a senior Turkish official told the Associated Press Altintas likely did not act alone. The official, speaking
anonymously, called the killing fully professional, not a one-man action.

- Ibid.

Turkish authorities suspect that Altintas was under the influence of Fetullah Gulen, a Turkish preacher who is currently based
in the United States, in Pennsylvania. He is suspected of being a CIA operative conducting operations meant to
destabilize Erdogans government.

Although some draw comparisons between this event and the assassination that lead to WWI, it is unlikely that the killing will
cause significant change. It will most likely justify the Russian-Turkish involvement in Syria.

Berlin Attack

The truck used to conduct the attack with Christmas decorations stuck on the windshield. Sadly symbolic

Related: Statement from President-Elect Donald J. Trump on the Attack in Berlin

Around the same time the assassination occurred in Turkey, a horrific attack took place in Berlin killing 12 people and 48
others.

What authorities can say for certain is that a tractor-trailer with Polish license plates and laden with steel rods
jumped a sidewalk around 8 p.m. Monday and plowed into the market near the Kaiser Wilhelm Memorial Church, a
symbolic Berlin site whose spire, jagged from bomb damage, was intentionally left unrepaired after World War II.

- NY Times, Berlin Christmas Market Was Target of Terrorist Attack, Angela Merkel Says

This event was also charged with symbolic meaning. It was not simply about killing people, it was an attack on German
culture, history and tradition. Christmas markets are a German tradition originating from the Middle Ages where locals shop for
various goods while getting into the Christmas spirit.

The market that was attacked is situated near the Kaiser Wilheml Memorial church, a symbolic piece of German history.

Related: The CIA Strikes Again?

The truck and the wreckage it caused at the foot of the Church. Although not all Germans are religious, the building remains a
piece of local history.

This bloody attack is therefore custom-built to anger the German population who have to witness a beloved tradition being
turned into a bloodbath by terrorists.

This anger might very well translate into votes against Merkel (and her open-door policy to refugees) in the upcoming
elections. It might also influence the French elections where Le Pen is gaining traction.

At the time of writing this article, Berlin police detains a suspect who is said to be a refugee from Pakistan. However, police
also stated that they might have the wrong person and that the true culprit might still be on the run. No matter who finally gets
arrested, ultimate losers will be citizens who will have to suffer through even more scrutiny, monitoring and surveillance for
more security.

The elites motto is Ordo Ab Chao (Order Out of Chaos) and Merkels policy brought to Germany great deal of chaos. Now
people will crave for order. And that order might come at a terrible price.

In Conclusion

The two events described above were not only about killing people. They were about sending a message. They were charged
with symbolic meaning custom made for mass media and social networks.

These events occurred at a sensitive time of the year, the winter solstice, a minor Sabbath, historically celebrated with human
sacrifice. Whether this date was intentionally selected or not, the entire world was forced to witness a planned killing, a ritual
sacrifice carried out methodically as the killer screamed God is Great.

Top 10 Most Delusional Facts Of The Lunatic Left-Wing Fact-Checkers

December 22 2016 | From: NaturalNews

Since Facebook has announced its intention to erect a Ministry of Truth echo chamber by labeling
all news it doesnt like fake news, I thought it appropriate to unveil the top 10 most delusional
facts people will be subjected to if they keep viewing Facebook, CNN, or any other news
propaganda being put out by what has become the mentally ill political left today.
As anyone with a functioning brain already knows, the unhinged left is utterly clueless about the properties of
facts or where they come from. To them, facts are whatever their friends keep repeating, even if they have no
basis whatsoever in evidence or reality.

Related: The Western Presstitutes Are Firmly Based In Nazi Propaganda Techniques

In essence, facts are whatever they believe, while fake news is whatever you believe. (It really is that simple in their feeble
brains.)

So consider these top 10 most delusional facts well soon see rolled out as truth by the newly-sprung news
cartels operating inside Fakebook.

Fact #1: Eating Meat is Cruelty to Animals, But Harvesting the Organs of Living, Partially-Born
Human Babies Isnt Cruel at All

Somehow, the delusional left has decided that animals are conscious beings but not human babies. Yeah, its insane, I know.
Liberalism is best defined as a kind of mental illness where a person can hold two utterly contradictory thoughts in their head
at the same time while simultaneously believing them both.

To demonstrate this particular brand of lunacy, a Beastie Boy recently announced a new line of cruelty free sneakers with
proceeds to benefit abortion providers. Yep, no animals were harmed in the process of butchering these babies might as
well be the sicko slogan of the unhinged left.

Fact #2: If Not For the Burning of Fossil Fuels, Earths Climate Would Never Change at All

At first, they called their hoax global warming, but when it turned out the Earth wasnt warming at all - funny how that works
when you use actual data instead of fraudulently altered numbers - they had to roll out a more encompassing name: Climate
Change.

According to Climate Change cultists - named thusly because no amount of evidence can alter their faith in Climate Change
- Earths climate never changed at all until humankind came along and started burning fossil fuels.
But now - OMG! - every hurricane, flood, drought, forest fire and freezing arctic blast is automatically attributed to climate
change. Yep, especially among young leftists who have been indoctrinated by the lies of government-run schools, they think
their ancestors lived in a time when Earth was eternal Spring, with no climate variation or natural disasters whatsoever.

Its only because you and I are using air conditioning and driving SUVs that the planet has become angry, unleashing all sorts
of climatic changes that otherwise would have never occurred.

This explanation, you may have noticed, closely resembles the superstitions of 5th-century humans who largely believed that
bad weather and solar eclipses were caused by angry gods seeking to punish them. In over 1000 years, weve learned
nothing, it seems, and progressives have thrust us back to an era of incredible ignorance and superstition where scientific
evidence is abandoned for the sake of powerful cult-like beliefs.

Fact #3: People with XY Chromosomes Can Instantly Transform All Their Genes Into XX
Chromosomes by Declaring Themselves to be Women (the Theory of Spontaneous Genetic
Transmutation)

Ask any young liberal and theyll tell you there are at least 30 genders, maybe even more if you count TransUnicorn. If you
can stop laughing hilariously, ask them whether sex is determined by genetic expression or by a choice. They will insist its a
choice!
And just like that, the delusional leftists discard centuries of scientific knowledge in genetics, sexual reproduction, phenotype
expressions and physical reality. If you dare point out to them that transgenderism is a mental illness, they will label you a
purveyor of either hatred or fake news.

To them, a feeling is more REAL than actual science, you see. And if a young man sucks down enough bisphenol-A to start
feeling like a woman, then his womanhood is accepted as a fact by the deranged lunatic left. Some of them even insist that
such gender-fluid biological males can get pregnant and have babies!

I have named this hilarious bit of leftish delusional idiocy the Theory of Spontaneous Genetic Transmutation. This theory is
quite literally accepted as fact by nearly every liberal under the age of 30.

Fact #4: Media News Coverage During the Presidential Campaign Was Completely Fair to Both
Clinton and Trump, But the DNC Hacks Were One-Sided, and Thus Totally Unfair

Yep, according to the delusional left, the almost universally glowing media coverage of Hillary Clinton - alongside relentless
media attacks waged against Trump - were fair and balanced. But Trump won the election because the DNC hacks (which
were actually leaks from a Bernie Sanders supporter, not hacks at all) were totally unfair because they only leaked the emails
of the democrats, not republicans.

Kellyanne Conway: CIA Should Go and Testify and Stop Leaking to the Media
Hidden in that protest is an astonishing presumption that all the leaked DNC emails were true! And they reveal a deeply
shocking level of collusion inside the DNC to destroy Bernie Sanders and steal the nomination for Hillary Clinton.

Fact #5: Hillary Clinton Should be President Because She Won the Popular Vote, But When
Bernie Sanders Kept Winning the Popular Vote During the Primary, Clinton Somehow Got All the
Delegates Hmmm

Hilariously, the Clinton campaign (and all delusional leftists in general) only believes in popular votes when they win the
popular vote.

When they dont win the popular vote, they believe in rigging the delegates to make sure their candidate gets the delegate
votes even if they lost the popular vote. This is exactly how Hillary Clinton kept walking away with the vast majority of
delegates even in states where Bernie Sanders won the popular votes (sometimes in a landslide).

Beyond all that, the presidential election is not determined by popular votes, or else Donald Trump would have campaigned
heavily in places like New York City and Los Angeles.

The winner is determined by Electoral Votes, which is why Donald Trump campaigned in the areas that deliver
electoral victories. (Gosh, is he supposed to be a bad person for following the rules and winning by those rules?)

Judge Jeanine: I'll tell you what hope is, Michelle

If the Clinton campaign didnt think the Electoral College was fair, why didnt they protest it before the results revealed Hillary
to be the loser? The answer, of course, is because nearly every leftist in America was completely convinced that Hillary
Clinton would win the election (because thats what the media echo chamber told them).

Hilariously, this caused many of them to avoid going out to vote, thereby ensuring their ballot box loss. CNNs false media
narrative that Hillary was unbeatable, in other words, may have actually handed Donald Trump the election victory. (Such is
the price of extreme arrogance.)
 Fact #6: Theres No Such Thing as a Hate Crime Against White People

According to the lunatic left, hate crimes can only be committed by white people against people of color. The opposite
cannot occur because white people deserve to be beaten, raped, or shot by people of color, you see. (For the record, I am a
person of color, which means I am therefore incapable of committing any hate crime myself, you see.)

Thus, when a group of Black Lives Matter terrorists marches in the streets calling for the open murder of white people - or
dragging people out of their vehicles and beating them solely because of their white skin color - they are not engage in hate
crimes at all, according to the delusional left.

Instead, they are said to be engaged in social justice. Because, you see, violence is always called justice by the worst
criminals in every collapsing society.

This is why the entire left-wing media censors all news about black people attacking white people, but strongly emphasizes all
news about white people attacking black people. Its all part of controlling the narrative to paint the kind of one-sided
propaganda that the delusional left depends on for its very survival.

For the record, here at Natural News, we believe that there is no such thing as a thought crime. Crimes of violence are
crimes in and of themselves due to their actions. Attaching a layer of hate to the motivation behind such a crime is a grave
injustice.

Crimes should be prosecuted based on the actions of those who committed them, not on the words uttered while carrying
them out. Otherwise, we are admitting that words are crimes.

Fact #7: Guns Are Conscious, Self-Animating Objects That Leap Out Of Their Holsters and Shoot
People All On Their Own
According to delusional leftists who essentially believe in magic, guns are self-directed objects that shoot people all on
their own. Leftists truly believe that a gun in a room can leap to its feet, target individuals and discharge bullets without
needing to be actuated by the will of a person.

This is where the delusional left comes up with meaningless phrases like gun violence, placing the emphasis on the
inanimate object rather than the person deploying it. There is no such thing as gun violence any more than there is hammer
violence when murderers use hammers.

When Somali tribes commit mass murder against each other using machetes, the left never describes such events as
machete violence and tries to blame machetes. Ever wonder why? Because that would sound incredibly stupid.

But when it comes to guns, the left gladly invokes the phrase gun violence in order to blame guns rather than people. Its a
deliberately loaded phrase thats designed to blame guns rather than the mostly left-wing criminals who use them to commit
violence against society.

Similarly, when radical Islamic terrorists used an ice cream truck to mow down tourists in Paris, the left-wing media reported
the mass murder as being carried out by the truck! News reports proclaimed, TRUCK runs over 85 people or Authorities
are searching for TRUCK that murdered 85

Somehow, it never occurs to idiotic leftists that a terrorist was driving the truck. And if trucks are such murderous instruments
of death, then why isnt the left calling for a nationwide truck ban?

Fact #8: Only Progressives Can Identify Facts Everyone Else Doesnt Know What Theyre
Talking About

This fact is the best one of all. According to the delusional, fringe left, only people who support left-wing policies can
recognize or identify facts.

This twisted special sauce of circular logic is what leftists tell themselves when they proclaim their version of facts to be
absolute and authoritative, while anyone elses version of facts are nothing but lies and falsehoods.
Related: Facebook's plan to tackle fake news raises questions over limitations

Thus, the lunatic left believes it gets facts straight from God in a sort of divining ritual from which indisputable facts
emerge much like a genie might appear after vigorously rubbing a brass lamp.

This monopoly of facts is the sole domain of liberals, you see, and they know this because so many of them agree with that
supposition, thus proving it to be true by social consensus. They surveyed each other, you see, and now they cite the survey
which states that 100% of all people everywhere participate in surveys. This, too, is a fact of the delusional left-wing media.

(Its kind of convenient for journalists at the Washington Post when they merely need to cite each other as unnamed sources
for whatever news they happen to be fabricating at the moment, too.

Who needs actual intelligence sources when WashPost reporters can circle jerk each other for made-up quotes that get
worked into their front page fabrications?)

Fact #9: Intentions Count MoreThan Actions

Obama is a good President and a good person. How do we know that? Because he has good intentions.

Never mind the fact that he doubled the national debt to nearly $20 trillion. Never mind the fact that his DOJ masterminded a
gun-running operation to put illegal weapons into the hands of Mexican drug cartels (Operation Fast and Furious).

Never mind the indisputable observation that he was a race baiter who created division, hatred and distrust across Americas
cultural fabric. And pay no attention to the astonishing job loss, unemployment and plummeting wages caused by the
Obamacare scheme he championed as some sort of twisted, pathetic legacy.

Nope, youre not supposed to consider actual reality when it comes to judging people on the left. They are all given a pass on
their behavior as long as they have good intentions, you see.
This is why it doesnt matter to the left that Bill Clinton is an accused rapist, sexual molester and repeated attacker of multiple
women who have openly and publicly accused him of sexual assault.

According to the delusional left, Bill Clinton gets a free pass on all that because hes a good liberal. He has compassion, dont
you know? He supports abortion, carbon taxes and banning the Second Amendment. Thus, according to the left, it doesnt
matter how many women he raped, abused or molested.

Facts be damned. When it comes to protecting the champions of the political left, no amount of legitimate evidence of criminal
wrongdoing can overcome the lefts blind faith in their so-called leaders, even if they be pedophiles ordering sicko sessions
with minors like buying pizza off a menu.

Fact #10: Bigger Government is Always the Answer

No matter what challenges society may face, the disconnected left believes bigger government is always the answer.

Got a problem with people drinking too much soda? We need bigger government to function as food police and criminalize
large sodas offerings.

Are too many dementia patients forgetting where they are and wandering aimlessly across mall parking lots? We need bigger
government, the left insists, to microchip and track the location of all those afflicted with mental disorders. (Its true,
Congress just passed the law for government to microchip citizens.)
Cant afford your rent? Mobile phone bills? Groceries? Dont worry, the government will create a new program to take money
from all those who earned it and redistribute the funds to loyal democrat voters who consume it (while, of course, padding the
pockets of the politically connected elite along the way).

According to the delusional left, theres no problem too large that even larger government cant solve! Their utopian
economy, in fact, is a system where the free market is abolished and replaced by a centrally planned economy which
values equality above all else.

Our world already has a system like that, by the way. Its called Venezuela. And right now, all the self-righteous Venezuelans
who voted for equality are eating out of grocery store dumpsters while having their cash criminalized and confiscated by the
very same government they stupidly put into power. (Will socialists never learn?)

The Greatest Fact of All is the Fact That Leftists Have Increasingly Become Fact-Free Lunatics

So lets cut the crap. Almost everything the lunatic left insists is a fact turns out to be a fairy tale or outright lie. Polar bears
are going extinct! If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor! Raising taxes on corporations is good for creating jobs!

Hillary Clinton believes in honoring the outcome of all democratic elections except for the ones she loses.
And if you lose an election in a democracy, the correct course of action, according to the left, is to keep threatening electoral
voters with murder until you get your way.

It turns out that, for the most part, leftists are fact-free lunatics. I could lay out a hundred striking examples of the lunacy and
contradictions of the delusional left, but you probably already see many of them yourself.

The left has become so deranged and disconnected from reality that their cheap tactics of race baiting and slandering
their political opponents simply dont work anymore.

The political left in America, which was once a semi-respected organization that opposed George Bushs corporate-run wars
and fought to reduce air pollution has become a twisted cabal of deranged fringe lunatics who have already crossed the
threshold of mental illness.
Now, with the help of Fakebook - which has become the online equivalent of Darth Vader - theyre going to try to steamroll
society with a whole new set of fabricated facts that will also fail miserably just like their recent election efforts.

Facts are stubborn things. More importantly, no one has a monopoly on them.

Those who try to censor whatever facts they dont agree with will only end up making the things they dispute increasingly
popular for the simple reason that human beings are curious about the world around them, and they dont take kindly to
having a homogenized, sanitized worldview shoved down their throats by self-proclaimed fact checkers who genuinely
belong in a psychiatric ward.

But dont take my word for anything. After all, everything Ive written here is merely my opinion. Open your eyes, explore the
world for yourself, and make up your own mind.

That simple act, by the way, will make you a lifelong enemy of the left which demands you remain blindly obedient to their
facts even when your own direct experiences contradict them.

Remember: The ultimate goal of the radical left is to make you abandon trust in your own senses, thoughts and logical
conclusions. Only then can they dominate your existence with their fabrications that any clear-headed person would instantly
see right through.

Related: As the Coup Against Trump Fails, the Threat Against His Life Rises

Putin: Attempts To Create A "Unipolar World" Have Failed

December 21 2016 | From: TheMindUnleashed

In what is becoming an almost weekly occurrence, Russias Vladimir Putin has just issued another
bombshell statement for the world to digest.
In an interview with Russias NTV channel, Putin discussed a range of topics including Donald Trump, world
geopolitics and finance.

Related: Former CIA Spy Says "Russian Hacking" Is Another Lie

Putin made waves though when he said the following:

I believe that it is not a secret, everyone can see, that many of our partners prefer to refer to the principles of
international law, because the balance of power is gradually being restored in our world.

But this is inevitable! Attempts to create a unipolar world have not succeeded. We are living in a different
dimension. Russia has always held this point of view-that, while protecting our national interests, we must respect
the interests of other countries. So, this is the way we establish relations with other countries.

Attempts to create a unipolar world have not succeeded. In other words, the plans of the New World Order, which
has wanted to create a one world government (unipolar) have failed.

The banking and political cabal behind this unipolar agenda are failing and Putin just called them out publicly.

But are they failing like Putin stated? If we look at real world evidence, and not the fake news being spewed out by most
mainstream media outlets, we can conclusively come to the understanding that yes, the twisted plans of the NWO are failing,
and countries are breaking away from their former controllers.

BRICS

While the elite controlled press has continuously branded Putin as a dictator (remember though that he received an 89%
approval rating last year) and isolated from the rest of the world, he has continued to make trade and diplomatic deals with
several other nations, as well as not falling for the attempts by the West and NATO to start WWIII.

One of the big reasons the West has done such blasting of Putin/Russia is because they have been leading the way in the
moves against the fiat-based, central-banking system. It has always been about the money.
Related: Donald Trump Completes Final Lap, Electoral College, to White House

The BRICS Bank, which consists of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, as well as the Asian Infrastructure
Investment Bank have stated that these two institutions were created to challenge the World Bank and International Monetary
Fund.

This Eastern Alliance has also made it no secret as to what their end-game is by continuing to import and mine more gold so
that their respective currencies can be backed up by metals. Such a financial system reset would immediately expose and end
the charade that The Federal Reserve, the IMF, World Bank and all central banks have been running on, which is fiat-based
currency. This will end the century-long manipulation and will hold accountable those who have been illegally using the global
collateral accounts.

The NWO knows that keeping fiat-based currencies and The Federal Reserve running is a way for them to stay in power. Any
attempts to cull this power is met with immense force.

Hence, we see such negative propaganda against Putin who is not only making diplomatic deals with more and more
countries who were once subservient to the Cabal (Turkey, Egypt, Philippines and more), he is also on the verge of
cleaning out the last of ISIL in Allepo, Syria, which Russia has said could be accomplished by the end of 2016.
Of course, as has been documented and released by The Pentagon in May of 2015, the U.S. created ISIL to try and
overthrow Assad so that they could create a pipeline that would run through Syria as a way to financially and politically control
a nation that has been defiant of the NWOs agenda.

Brexit

Brexit was another example of the balance of power shifting and of the unipolar agenda failing. We must remember too, that
while the border and immigration issue was present in the Brexit campaign, a much bigger situation was stopped when Britain
voted to leave the European Union. As Alan Sked said in The Telegraph;

We believe providing more context can help people decide for themselves what to trust and what to
share, the company said.

Weve started a program to work with third-party fact checking organizations that are signatories of Poynters
International Fact Checking Code of Principles. Well use the reports from our community, along with other signals,
to send stories to these organizations.

voters need to understand that the European Union was about building a Federal Superstate from day one. The author
of this incredible story that somehow made it into mainstream UK news, detailed how the U.S. State Department and C.I.A.
actively funded and advised on how to create this Federal Superstate.
Once again, Brexit was a defeat for those trying to create such a world order.

Additionally, a vote in Italy today could see the present government fall and an anti-Euro and anti-establishment party known
as The Five Star Movement come into power in the weeks ahead, which has said would hold a referendum as to whether Italy
should stay or leave the E.U.

Also, parties in France and The Netherlands are surging before elections in March and May that will decide if other anti-Euro
parties come into power.

What is clear though is that the dark, new world order agenda is falling and Vladimir Putin has just told the entire
world how he feels about the matter.

Fascinating times we live in.

Related: Putin & Co. Continue to Defy Khazarian Threats

Facebook To Become Left-Wing Propaganda Echo Chamber With Orwellian Plan To

Label Independent Journalism Fake + Facebook Jumps On Fake News Fact-Checker
Train, Will Roll Out With PolitiFact
December 21 2016 | From: NaturalNews / WashingtonTimes

Facebook has announced a new plan today that will very quickly transform the social media site into
an echo chamber of left-wing media lies and delusional propaganda (just like weve recently seen
pushed by the Washington Post).
The new effort will rely on left-wing fact checker organizations like Politifact and Snopes to determine the
truthiness of news stories, reports Business Insider. Those stories deemed by left-wing fact checkers to be
inaccurate will be buried in Facebook users feeds as a form of organized totalitarian censorship.

Related: PropOrNot: Evidence of a CIA Psychological Operation

This Ministry of Truth news dictatorship plan will, of course, transform Facebook into nothing more than a news bubble
where left-wing propaganda is repeated as fact while independent journalism is labeled fake.

This means all stories that are critical of vaccines, GMOs, Planned Parenthood or Hillary Clinton will be censored out of
existence. The political left, you see, doesnt seek to win any debate at all their goal is to ban the debate so that you never
read any views other than theirs. (They cant win any legitimate debates or legitimate elections, so they cheat.)

In essence, Facebook has now announced its going to become the North Korea of social media.

Facebooks Fact Checkers Are Left-Wing Propagandsts Who Despise Factual Journalism

We believe providing more context can help people decide for themselves what to trust and what to
share, the company said.

Weve started a program to work with third-party fact checking organizations that are signatories of Poynters
International Fact Checking Code of Principles. Well use the reports from our community, along with other signals,
to send stories to these organizations.

Facebook has announced it will introduce warning labels on stories they deem to be fake news, with the help of partisan
fact checking organisations such as Snopes and PolitiFact, reports Breitbart.com.

Business Insider reports that these organisations will include the likes of Snopes, ABC, Politifact, and FactCheck.org, all of
which have records of left-wing partisanship - particularly throughout the 2016 election.

For example, PolitiFact infamously said it was mostly false when Donald Trump claimed in a presidential debate that Hillary
Clinton wanted open borders. PolitiFact made this ruling despite Clinton being on the record at a paid speech saying
My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders.
Trump also said that Russia has 1,800 nuclear warheads and has expanded its arsenal while the U.S. has not. PolitiFact
admitted that Trumps claim was factual, but it rated the statement as half true for supposedly missing the big picture.

In both of these cases, PolitiFact went beyond mere fact-checking and moved the goal posts in ways that benefited Clintons
candidacy.

This type of ideological fact checking went beyond parody during Octobers presidential debates, with NBC taking
Trumps statement that Clinton acid washed her emails (a reference to the data deletion tool BleachBit) 100%
literally and declaring the statement false.

Its Time to Leave Facebook and Discover Alternatives Like Diaspora or Gab.ai

As Facebook turns into an echo chamber of mentally ill liberal whackos, informed people will look elsewhere for uncensored,
independent news. One of the best alternatives for Facebook is Diaspora, a network of independent social media hubs run by
independent, open source organizations like Natural News.

Our Diaspora hub is found at Share.NaturalNews.com, and its rapidly growing. There, youll receive every story we post,
unlike Facebook where 99% of our posts are deliberately buried by Facebook itself.
Gab.ai is also rapidly growing, promising uncensored free speech in a social media format. You can find my articles posted in
real time at these two accounts:

https://gab.ai/healthranger / https://gab.ai/NaturalNews

Join all these sources so that you can stay informed. Understand that Facebook, Google, Twitter, Yahoo and all the other
internet gatekeepers are now engaged in an all out war against independent news, hoping to censor it out of existence.

(Theyve lost the narrative, and they lost the election. Now theyre desperate to destroy whatever voices they dont control
but it will only cause them to lose their audience.)

A Mass Exodus Away From Fakebook

By censoring independent journalism, Facebook is going to lose tens of millions of users who will simply go somewhere
else. The left-wing propaganda swallowers who stay behind at Facebook will simply become increasingly misinformed and
mentally ill as they follow the left-wing media down the rabbit hole of delusional Russian hacker conspiracy theories and
hatred against America, the Constitution and the entire male population in general.

It wont be long, probably, before Snopes officially confirms that having white skin makes you a racist, or that all men are evil
due to their genetics.

Politifact might throw down its own delusional facts that claim Donald Trump was hypnotized by the Russians as a
Manchurian candidate to commit genocide against women (or whatever) whose body parts will be harvested for organ
donations to gray aliens from planet Cockamamie.

I cant wait for Snopes to confirm that people can transform XY chromosomes into XX chromosomes by declaring themselves
to be transgender. Before long, everything pushed by the left - from climate change lunacy to transgender psychosis - will
be rooted in sheer delusion that stands in complete contradiction to scientific reality.

Yet it will all be pushed by Facebook as verified fact. To the utterly insane left, facts are whatever they believe in,
no matter how disconnected from reality they might be.

We have now entered the Orwellian nightmare we all knew was coming. The good news is that you can simply change the
channel and escape the nightmare by avoiding Facebook altogether.

Its time to #DumpFacebook for good.

Related: Over The Top! MSM Calls For Banning Alex Jones From The Airwaves

Facebook Jumps On Fake News Fact-Checker Train, Will Roll Out With PolitiFact
Facebook announced Thursday that it is ready to roll out a process by which alleged fake news
is identified and flagged for users.
Concern for so-called fake news, which has permeated the media landscape since Democrat Hillary Clintons
Election Day loss to Republican Donald Trump, will now be met by Facebook in a major way.

Related: Facebook to Restrict Content by Morphing Into Virtual TV Network

The social media giants newsroom announced that it will partner with third-party organizations to identify hoaxes and
unreliable stories.

We believe providing more context can help people decide for themselves what to trust and what to
share, the company said.

Weve started a program to work with third-party fact checking organizations that are signatories of Poynters
International Fact Checking Code of Principles. Well use the reports from our community, along with other signals,
to send stories to these organizations.

According to Facebook, if the fact checking organizations identify a story as fake, it will get flagged as disputed and there will
be a link to the corresponding article explaining why. Stories that have been disputed may also appear lower in News Feed.

Still, CEO Mark Zuckerbergs company said its workforce and partners cannot become arbiters of truth while essentially
designating them as such. One of the organizations Facebook plans on teaming up with is Snopes, which bills itself as
an essential resource for truth.
Others groups the social media platform will work with include ABC News, FactCheck.org, PolitiFact, and The Associated
Press.

Conservative commentators were quick to put forth a who watches the watchmen counter-argument.

Sometimes the experts are also partisans who have an agenda. That was certainly the case with regard to
Obamacare, wrote Hotairs John Sexton on Thursday.

Health care wonks like Ezra Klein and Jonathan Gruber knew a great deal about the program.

They were also prepared to help their Democratic allies in government lie to the public if necessary to see it
succeed. Its not that they didnt know the truth its just that they werent going to share all of it (except occasionally
to a friendly audience).

Now imagine applying these new rules retroactively to this story. Would any story which challenged Obamas
statement be flagged as fake news prior to 2013?

The Weekly Standards Mark Hemingway concurred.

Two university studies show PolitiFact rates the GOP as liars over Democrats at a rate of 3 to 1 and 2 to 1
respectively. [] I once asked the head of PolitiFact to explain a university study suggesting they were
biased, Mr. Hemingway said in a series of tweets.

He no joke told me that based on what people tell him at parties he thinks hes fair. I could go on but
the idea of PolitiFact censoring political speech at any major social media network is horrifying.

Facebook, for all intents and purposes, dismissed such concerns as hyperbole over a work-in-progress with good intentions.

Were excited about this progress, but we know theres more to be done, the company wrote. Were going to
keep working on this problem for as long as it takes to get it right.
The New Zealand Road Toll Statistics They Tried To Bury
December 20 2016 | From: BreakingViews

I checked the latest road toll statistics a few days ago. Interesting. For the year from January 1, road
deaths were up from 291 last year to 300.

For the 12 months to Tuesday, they were up from 315 to 328. For driver fatalities, the figures were up from 138 to 151
(for the calendar year to date) and from 146 to 170 (over 12 months). These are not big increases, but they appear to
be more than mere statistical blips.

Related: The Rise And Rise Of Control-Freak Government

Even more interesting are some of the figures from a Ministry of Transport booklet called Alcohol and Drugs 2016.

Most of the tables in the booklet pull together figures covering the years 2013-2015 without breaking them down year by year.
They reveal that alcohol and/or drugs contributed to 12 per cent of fatal smashes.

This might come as a surprise. Given the official obsession with alcohol as a risk factor (all those checkpoints, all those TV
ads, all those earnest lectures from senior police officers every holiday period), I imagine most people would have thought the
ratio of deaths attributable to booze must be much higher.
But what especially interested me was whether road deaths involving alcohol had decreased since the legal blood-alcohol limit
was lowered on December 1 2014.

This is information of some importance, since the objective of the law change was to reduce the road toll. But you have to turn
to page 8 before you find any figures relating to the year after the new limits kicked in.

These reveal that the number of alcohol-affected drivers involved in fatal crashes actually increased from 70 to 90 in the 12
months after the new law came into effect.

This was not what we were led to expect. It is the opposite of what the new limit was intended to achieve, which was to deter
people who had been drinking from getting behind the wheel.

Opponents of the law change argued that it would punish safe, law-abiding motorists while hard-core drink-drivers
would continue to flout the law with impunity. That appears to be precisely what has happened.
Drink-drive fatalities last year were the highest since 2010. In the 20-24 age group, the number of alcohol-affected male
drivers involved in fatal crashes increased from 12 to 22 thats nearly double. For men overall, the number was up from 56
to 82.

If the numbers had gone the other way, Im sure the ministry would have been shouting from the rooftops. As it is, its hard to
escape the impression the figures were buried.

We shouldnt be in the least bit surprised that the law change hasnt delivered the promised improvement. Control-
freak policy-makers and poll-driven politicians refuse to accept that human behaviour cant conveniently be changed
by legislative decree.
Related: 8 Ways Control Freak Government Is Sabotaging Freedom And Making Life More Difficult For Us

Thats also apparent from the anti-smacking law (on average, one child continues to be killed by domestic violence every five
weeks while responsible parents risk prosecution for disciplining out-of-control kids with a harmless slap) and from laughably
ineffective dog-control rules, which have entered a whole new realm of fantasy with the expectation that owners of dangerous
dogs will obtain special high-risk dog owner licences, submit their dogs to good citizenship tests, have their properties
inspected and demonstrate they understand their legal obligations.

Yeah, right. Cant you just see gang members meekly queuing at council offices to fill in the forms and register their
blood-flecked pitbulls for obedience training?

Now heres the key point. Any benefits arising from lower blood-alcohol limits and so far there dont seem to be any should
be weighed against the social downsides.

As we brace for the annual bout of Christmas finger-wagging, we should ask whether New Zealanders enjoyment of
life has been unnecessarily diminished just to satisfy the bureaucratic urge to regulate and control.

Theres an economic cost too. Country pubs - the heart of some rural communities - are going out of business and wineries
can expect fewer summer visitors because people fret that a harmless tasting will push them over the limit.

Any supposed benefit must also be weighed against the undoubted change in the public attitude toward the police, who are
increasingly resented as bullies and harassers - unwilling or unable to attend burglaries, but never short of the numbers to run
alcohol checkpoints at all hours of the day, or to hamper law-abiding bar owners in their attempts to run a business, or to
make the staging of public events such as wine festivals so onerous that some participating companies decide that it's just not
worth the effort any more.

Comment: Anyone who still thinks the Police do not have quotas to meet for traffic and other 'offences' is deluded. It
has been established as fact and I and many others have heard it admitted.

QUOTAS = REVENUE

New Revelations On Obamas Birth Certificate Released

December 20 2016 | From: Infowars / TheGatewayPundit / Various
Long-awaited press conference to reveal new information.

Infowars reporters Lee Ann McAdoo and Margaret Howell cover Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaios press conference on
President Barack Obamas birth certificate.

Related: Trail of Dead Bodies Leading To Obamas White House Worse Than Hillarys

Obama has been harassing Sheriff Joe Arpaio for eight long years. On Thursday Sheriff Joe got the last laugh. Arpaio
held a news conference to discuss Barack Obamas controversial birth certificate.

Whitehouse.gov: birth-certificate-long-form.pdf

Sheriff Joe says it has 9 points of forgery.

And the document to appears to be a created document that sources an official Hawaiian birth certificate belonging to
a Johana Ahnee.

ABC15 reported:

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Chief Investigator Mike Zullo say nine points of forgery have been found
on President Barack Obamas birth certificate.

During a Thursday press conference, Arpaio and Zullo said their five-year-long investigation revealed new
evidence including forensic analysis showing the characters on the document were pieced together from
secondary sources.

RELATED: Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio criticized for probing President Barack Obamas citizenship

According to Zullo, the certificate released by the White House in 2011 appears to be a created document that
sources an official Hawaiian birth certificate belonging to a Johana Ahnee.

A video played during the press conference showed nine elements that were lifted and placed on the Obama
certificate in an apparent attempt to make it appear authentic.

My concern was not where the president was born, but whether the document presented to the people was a
fraud, Arpaio said of his offices investigation."

And with that, Sheriff Joe gets the last word in on Obama.

Related Articles:

Barack Obama Admits he was born in Kenya Speech

Who Is Obamas Boss? And Why It Matters

 Obama & other brainless imbeciles

Never Before Seen Video Obama on Race: I am saddened that whites are still superior.things could explode

Obama Threatens to Send Clear Message to Russia Then Boards a Plane to Hawaii for 2 Weeks

Obama Drops from 3rd to 48th in Forbes Most Powerful People List

Obamas Kids Are Adopted!! I Found The Real Parents!! 2016

Malia & Sasha Obama - Who are the REAL Parents?

Poll: Americans Backing President-Elect Donald Trump Just Weeks After Bitter
Campaign + A "Soft Coup" Attempt: Furious Trump Slams "Secret" CIA Report Russia
Helped Him Win
December 19 2016 | From: Breitbart / AllNewsPipeline / Various

President-elect Donald J. Trump heads into his Jan. 20 inauguration riding a wave of approval from
Americans, according to a national Remington Research Group poll conducted Dec. 11 and Dec. 12
with 1,945 voters.

America is five weeks removed from one of the most negative presidential campaigns in history, said Titus
Bond, Remingtons director of research.

Related: Top Pollster: Trump Could Create Long Term Majority And Change Politics as We Know It

Donald Trump has been able to improve his image in a very short span and if that continues he will govern with a
mandate, he said. Forty-seven percent of Americans view the president-elect favorably with 41 percent viewing
him unfavorably with 12 percent having no opinion.

The poll carries a 2.3 percent margin of error and was paid for and commissioned independent of any campaign or committee.

Related: Republican Elector Slams Coup Detat Attempt to Overturn a Fair and Legal Election

Bond said the direct reason for Trumps approval rating improving is the success of the stock market.

The Dow Jones Industrial Index closed Nov. 7 at 18,259.60, the day before the presidential election and the DJIA closed Dec.
9 at 19,756.85.

Trumps rebounding image could be attributed directly to the stock market, he said. Fifty-nine percent of
Americans believe stock market gains are attributed to the election of Donald Trump, with 30 percent saying
Trump is solely responsible for the gains. Just 30 percent of Americans believe the election of Trump had nothing
to do with the rise in the stock market.

The poll showed that people are siding with Trump against the press, he said.

Half of all Americans believe the media has been unfair in its coverage of Trump with 39 percent saying the media
has been fair, Bond said.
 The mainstream media is viewed negatively by 57 percent of Americans with just 25 percent viewing mainstream
media outlets favorably, he said.

Americans have a mixed opinion of the team the president-elect is putting together for his cabinet, Bond said.

Forty percent of poll participants said they approved of Trumps selections and 43 percent disapproved, he said.
Related: Forbes List of Worlds Most Powerful People: 1. Putin, 2. Trump 48. Obama

Americans are also split when asked if Donald Trump will make America great again, Bond said. Forty-three percent believe
he will and 43 percent do not believe he will, while 46 percent said they think the United States will be more safe under a
Trump presidency and 43 percent believe America will be less safe.

Remington Research Group is a polling firm that specializes in automated IVR technology. Remington Research Group
accurately predicted the outcome of the 2016 Presidential election and its surveys have been featured in
RealClearPolitics, Newsweek, U.S. News & World Report, the Wall Street Journal, 538 and numerous local media throughout
the United States.

Related: NYT Claims Trump a Threat to Democracy

A "Soft Coup" Attempt: Furious Trump Slams "Secret" CIA Report Russia Helped Him
Win

Recently the media propaganda wars escalated after the late Friday release of an article by the
Washington Post(which last week admitted to using unverified, or fake, news in an attempt to smear
other so-called "fake news" sites) according to which a secret CIA assessment found that Russia
sought to tip last months U.S. presidential election in Donald Trumps favor, a conclusion
presented without any actual evidence, and which drew an extraordinary, and angry rebuke from the
president-elects camp.
These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, Trumps transition team
said, launching a broadside against the spy agency.

Related: Washington Post goes full treason fabricates entire story falsely claiming Trump won because of
Russian hacks

"The election ended a long time ago in one of the biggest Electoral College victories in history. Its now time to
move on and Make America Great Again.

The Washington Post report comes after outgoing President Barack Obama ordered a review of all cyberattacks that took
place during the 2016 election cycle, amid growing calls from Congress for more information on the extent of Russian
interference in the campaign.

The newspaper cited officials briefed on the matter as saying that individuals with connections to Moscow provided WikiLeaks
with email hacked from the Democratic National Committee, Democratic nominee Hillary Clintons campaign chief and others.

Without a shred of evidence provided, and despite Wikileaks' own on the record denial that the source of the emails was
Russian, the WaPo attack piece claims the email messages were steadily leaked out via WikiLeaks in the months before the
election, damaging Clintons White House run.

Essentially, according to the WaPo, the Russians aim was to help Donald Trump win and not just undermine the U.S.
electoral process, hinting at a counter-Hillary intent on the side of Putin.

It is the assessment of the intelligence community that Russias goal here was to favor one candidate
over the other, to help Trump get elected, the newspaper quoted a senior U.S. official briefed on an
intelligence presentation last week to key senators as saying. Thats the consensus view.
CIA agents told the lawmakers it was quite clear - although it was not reported exactly what made it "clear" - that electing
Trump was Russias goal, according to officials who spoke to the Post, citing growing evidence from multiple sources.

And yet, key questions remain unanswered, and the CIAs report fell short of being a formal U.S. assessment
produced by all 17 intelligence agencies the newspaper said, for two reasons.

As we reported in November "The "Fact" That 17 Intelligence Agencies Confirmed Russia is Behind the Email Hacks
Isnt ActuallyA "Fact", and then also because aside from so-called "consensus", there is - once again - no
evidence,otherwise the appropriate agencies would have long since released it, and this is nothing more than another
propaganda attempt to build tension with Russia.

In fact, the WaPo admits as much in the following text, which effectively destroys the article's entire argument:

"The CIA presentation to senators about Russias intentions fell short of a formal U.S. assessment produced by all
17 intelligence agencies. A senior U.S. official said there were minor disagreements among intelligence officials
about the agencys assessment, in part because some questions remain unanswered.

For example, intelligence agencies do not have specific intelligence showing officials in the Kremlin
directing the identified individuals to pass the Democratic emails to WikiLeaks, a second senior U.S.
official said.

Those actors, according to the official, were one step removed from the Russian government, rather than
government employees. Moscow has in the past used middlemen to participate in sensitive intelligence operations
so it has plausible deniability.

...
 Ill be the first one to come out and point at Russia if theres clear evidence, but there is no clear
evidence - even now, said Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and a
member of the Trump transition team. Theres a lot of innuendo, lots of circumstantial evidence, thats it.

And since even the WaPo is forced to admit that intelligence agents dont have the proof that Russian officials directed the
identified individuals to supply WikiLeaks with the hacked Democratic emails, the best it can do is speculate based on
circumstantial inferences, especially since, as noted above, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has denied links with Russias
government, putting the burden of proof on the side of those who challenge the Wikileaks narrative.

So far that proof has not been provided.

Related: Trumps Showdown with the Deep State

Nonetheless, at the White House, Deputy Press Secretary Eric Schultz said Obama called for the cyberattacks review
earlier this week to ensure the integrity of our elections.

This report will dig into this pattern of malicious cyberactivity timed to our elections, take stock of our defensive
capabilities and capture lessons learned to make sure that we brief members of Congress and stakeholders as
appropriate, Schultz said.

Taking the absurdity to a whole new level, Obama wants the report completed before his term ends on January 20, by none
other than a proven and confirmed liar: "The review will be led by James Clapper, the outgoing director of national
intelligence, officials said."

In other words, the report that the Kremlin stole the election should be prepared by the time Trump is expected to be
sworn in.
 We are going to make public as much as we can, the spokesman added. This is a major priority for the
president.

The move comes after Democrats in Congress pressed the White House to reveal details, to Congress or to the public, of
Russian hacking and disinformation in the election.

On Oct. 7, one month before the election, the Department of Homeland Security and the Director of National Intelligence
announced that:

The Russian Government directed the recent compromises of emails from U.S. persons and institutions, including
from U.S. political organizations. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the U.S. election
process, they said.

Trump dismissed those findings in an interview published Wednesday by Time magazine for its Person of the Year award.
Asked if the intelligence was politicized, Trump answered: I think so.

Related: 2016 Person Of The Year - Donald Trump

I dont believe they interfered, he said. It could be Russia. And it could be China. And it could be some guy in his
home in New Jersey.

Worried that Trump will sweep the issue under the rug after his inauguration, seven Democrats on the Senate Intelligence
Committee called on Nov. 29 for the White House to declassify what it knows about Russian interference. The seven have
already been briefed on the classified details, suggesting they believe there is more information the public should know.
On Tuesday this week, leading House Democrats called on Obama to give members of the entire Congress a classified
briefing on Russian interference, from hacking to the spreading of fake news stories to mislead U.S. voters.

Republicans in Congress have also promised hearings into Russian activities once the new administration comes in. Obamas
homeland security adviser Lisa Monaco said the cyberinterference goes back to the 2008 presidential race, when both the
Obama and John McCain campaigns were hit by malicious computer intrusions.

...

An interesting aside to emerge from last night's hit piece and the Trump team response is that there is now a full blown turf
war between Trump and the CIA, as NBC's Chuck Todd observed in a series of late Friday tweets:
To which Glenn Greenwald provided the best counterargument:
However, of the mini Tweetstorm, this was the most important aspect: the veiled suggestion that in addition to Russia, both
the FBI and the Obama presidency prevented Hillary from becoming the next US president...

...which in light of these stunning new unproven and baseless allegations, she may very well have renewed aspirations
toward.
...

So while there is no "there" there following the WaPo's latest attempt to fan the rarging fires of evidence-free propaganda, or
as the WaPo itself would say "fake news", here is why the story has dramatic implications. First, the only two quotes which
matter:

"...There is no clear evidence - even now, said Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the chairman of the House
Intelligence Committee and a member of the Trump transition team. Theres a lot of innuendo, lots of
circumstantial evidence, thats it.

...

"...Obama wants the report before he leaves office Jan. 20, Monaco said. The review will be led by [PROVEN
LIAR] James Clapper, the outgoing director of national intelligence, officials said."

And then the summary:

1. Announce "consensus" (not unanimous) "conclusion" based in circumstantial evidence now, before the
Electoral College vote, then write a report with actual details due by Jan 20.

2. Put a proven liar in charge of writing the report on Russian hacking.

3. Fail to mention that not one of the leaked DNC or Podesta emails has been shown to be inauthentic. So the
supposed Russian hacking simply revealed truth about Hillary, DNC, and MSM collusion and corruption.

4. Fail to mention that if hacking was done by or for US government to stop Hillary, blaming the Russians would be
the most likely disinformation used by US agencies.

5. Expect every pro-Hillary lapdog journalist - which is virtually all of them - in America will hyperventilate (Twitter is
currently on fire) about this latest fact-free, anti-Trump political stunt for the next nine days.

Or, as a reader put it, this is a soft coup attempt by leaders of Intel community and Obama Admin to influence the
Electoral College vote, similar to the 1960s novel "Seven Days in May."

Related: Michigan Elector: Anti-Trump Celebrities Are Not Smarter Than the American People

A CIA-Led Coup Against American Democracy Is Unfolding Before Our Eyes +

The Albuquerque Journal Asks The Relevant Question: Just Who Is Undermining
Election? Russians Or CIA?
December 19 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / AlbJournal

This article by Moon of Alabama is not conspiracy theory: The "Elite" Coup of 2016 - Read it
carefully. Check out the links.
Putin stands in brazen defiance of the New World Order globalist agenda - another thing that makes him a target

The article is a documented and accurate description of a coup that is underway. The extraordinary lies that are
being perpetrated by the media and by members of the US government have as their obvious purpose the prevention
of a Donald Trump presidency.

Related: Obama Must Declassify Evidence of Russian Hacking

There is no other reason for the extraordinary blatant lies for which there is not a shred of evidence. Indeed, there is massive
real evidence to the contrary. Yet the coup proceeds and gathers steam.

President Eisenhower warned us more than a half century ago of the danger that the military/security complex presents to US
democracy. In the decades since Eisenhowers warning, the military/security complex has become more powerful than the
American people and is demonstrating its power by overturning a presidential election.

Will the coup succeed?

In my opinion, former and present members of the US government and the media would not dare to so obviously and
openly participate in a coup against democracy and an elected president unless they expect the coup to succeed.

It is an easy matter for the ruling interests to bribe electors to vote differently than their states. The cost of the bribes is
miniscule compared to the wealth and income streams that a trillion dollar annual budget provides to the military/security
complex.

The fake news of a Putin/Trump election-stealing plot generated by unsupported allegations of present and former members
of US intelligence, the lame-duck President Obama, and the presstitute media provide the cover for electors to break with
precedent in order to save America from a Russian stooge.
Related: Larry Nichols: Globalists Readying Lawsuits to Shut Down Free Press

The CIA-controlled European media, the politicians in Washingtons European vassal states, NATO officials, and the
brainwashed European peoples will support the coup against Trump.

The only ones speaking against the coup are the voters who elected Trump - all of whom are alleged to have been deceived
by Russian fake news - the Russian government, and the 200 websites falsely described by the Washington Post and the
secret organization PropOrNot as Russian agents.

In other words, those objecting to the coup are the ones described by the coup leaders as those who made the coup
necessary.

I do not know that the coup will succeed, but looking at the commitment so many high level people have made to the
coup, I conclude that those bringing the coup expect it to succeed.

Therefore, we should take very seriously the expectation of success that those who control levers of power are
demonstrating.

Related Articles:

Obama Vows Retaliation Against "Russia Hacking", To Hold Press Conference On Friday

New York Times To Vacate 8 Floors From Its Iconic Building In Manhattan

The Albuquerque Journal Asks The Relevant Question: Just Who Is Undermining
Election? Russians Or CIA?
Congress needs to dust off its Magic 8 Ball. At this point, how else are our elected representatives
going to get to the bottom of allegations that Russia and its president, Vladimir Putin, tried to
influence the U.S. general election?
After all, the Central Intelligence Agency isnt being very open at least not with our elected representatives.

Related: Senate Quietly Passes The "Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act"

Instead of briefing the House Intelligence Committee about the alleged Russian role in hacked emails made public during the
campaign which Democrats desperately seek to blame for Hillary Clintons loss the agency is leaking conclusions
without facts to the Washington Post, New York Times and television networks.

The media, naturally, are quick to report the anonymous bits of blame Putin information to the public.

So to the extent Putin meddled, our own spies have at least matched his efforts to discredit our electoral system.

To recap: Private emails from the Democratic National Committee and Clinton campaign were made public via
WikiLeaks, allegedly through hacking, even though the FBI had tried to warn the DNC back in September 2015 of
problems with its security system.

The agency couldnt get past the partys technical help desk harking back to Hillarys email security problems on
her own private server.
Pizzagate Podesta

Related: Heres the Public Evidence Russia Hacked the DNC - Its Not Enough

The media reported on the leaks daily and if a reporter had obtained the same information from inside sources,
there would be no controversy at all.

Todays uproar is over the source not the substance.

But the CIAs alleged conclusion that Russia intervened to help Trump win does not square with comments made
Nov. 17 by James Clapper, director of National Intelligence. He said he lacked good insight about whether there
was a connection between the WikiLeaks releases and Russia.

Congressional Republican leaders are taking the allegations seriously. The Russians are not our friends, Senate Majority
Leader Mitch McConnell said. House Speaker Paul Ryan called any Russian intervention;

"Especially problematic because, under President Putin, Russia has been an aggressor that consistently
undermines American interests.

But Intelligence Committee member Peter King of New York flatly accused the U.S. intelligence community of waging a
disinformation campaign aimed at undermining Trumps credibility if not changing the course of the Electoral College.

Not surprisingly, President Obama is seizing a newfound political opportunity and is taking a new interest despite
earlier claims of knowing all along of Russian shenanigans but choosing not to go public with whatever evidence he
had none of which he has produced.
This is from a man who plays imaginary golf

He has ordered an investigation into whether Russia has attempted to influence U.S. elections going back to
2008. He said the reported CIA findings should come as no surprise to anyone, as suspicions that Russia was trying to
influence the election were widely reported before the general election. Clinton herself spoke frequently about the possibility.

President-elect Donald Trump rejected the idea that Russia helped him win as ridiculous.

Concerning the source of the leaked emails, on Sunday he told Chris Wallace of Fox News;

"Personally, it could be Russia. I dont really think it is. But who knows? They dont know and I dont know.

The source of the campaign leaks remains an interesting question, but one unlikely to be answered credibly unless the CIA
coughs up its findings to Congress. Cooperation also might help answer the question of possible Russian motives if it was
involved:

Was it to cast doubt on the U.S. election system? If so, it was highly successful with the help of our own intelligence
community and desperate Democrats who simply cant accept that Trump won 306 Electoral College votes.

Though the CIA based its supposed findings of pro-Trump intervention on the fact that no Republican emails were leaked
before the election, the Republican National Committee says it wasnt hacked.

And Wikileaks co-founder Julian Assange stands firm in his claim the Russians were not the source of the leaks. Cyber
hacking has become one of the mainstays of life Yahoo most recently was hacked of more than one billion user
accounts.

And intervention into foreign elections is something many nations, including the United States, do regularly. Obama recently
tried to influence the Brexit vote.
And while nobody should feel good about foreign interests intervening in U.S. elections, the reluctance of the U.S.
intelligence community to share its information with official sources charged with making decisions about national
security, while leaking information via media outlets, is very disturbing, raising the spectre of a political coup by our
nations intelligence forces.

Related: Only a Counter-Coup Can Save American Democracy

Putin Lashes Out At Obama: "Show Some Proof Or Shut Up" + Someone Has Officially
Called The CIAs Bluff Over Russia
December 18 2016 | From: Zerohedge / TheAntiMedia

Putin has had enough of the relentless barrage of US accusations that he, personally, "hacked the
US presidential election."
The Russian president's spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, said on Friday that the US must either stop accusing Russia of
meddling in its elections or prove it. Peskov said it was "indecent" of the United States to "groundlessly" accuse
Russia of intervention in its elections.

Comment: If watching the 6pm news was not comical before it sure as hell is now. The Western Cabal establishment
is so desperate and pathetic, one must ask - just who among us anymore is so stupid as to believe this utter
propaganda - bullshit?

Related: Treason: Left-wing media attempting a soft coup in America by hyperventilating over self-contrived
Russian conspiracy fabrication

You need to either stop talking about it, or finally show some kind of proof. Otherwise it just looks very
indecent, Peskov told Reporters in Tokyo where Putin is meeting with Japan PM Abe, responding to the
latest accusations that Russia was responsible for hacker attacks.

Peskov also warned that Obama's threat to "retaliate" to the alleged Russian hack is "against both American and international
law", hinting at open-ended escalation should Obama take the podium to officially launch cyberwar against Russia.
Previously, on Thursday, Peskov told the AP the report was "laughable nonsense", while Russian foreign ministry spox
Maria Zakharova accused "Western media" of being a "shill" and a "mouthpiece of various power groups", and added that;

It's not the general public who's being manipulated," Zakharova said.

"The general public nowadays can distinguish the truth. It's the mass media that is manipulating
themselves."

Meanwhile, on Friday Sergei Lavrov, Russia's foreign minister told state television network, Russia 24, he was "dumbstruck"
by the NBC report which alleges that Russian President Vladimir Putin was personally involved in an election hack.

The report cited U.S. intelligence officials that now believe with a "high level of confidence" that Putin became personally
involved in a secret campaign to influence the outcome of the U.S. presidential election.

"I think this is just silly, and the futility of the attempt to convince somebody of this is absolutely
obvious,"Lavrov added, according to the news outlet.

As a reminder, last night Obama vowed retaliatory action against Russia for its meddling in the US presidential election last
month. "I think there is no doubt that when any foreign government tries to impact the integrity of our elections that we need
to take action and we will at a time and place of our own choosing," Obama told National Public Radio.

US intelligence agencies in October pinned blame on Russia for election-related hacking. At the time, the White House vowed
a "proportional response" to the cyberactivity, though declined to preview what that response might entail.
Meanwhile, both President-elect Donald Trump, the FBI, and the ODNI have dismissed the CIA's intelligence community's
assessment, for the the same reason Putin finally lashed out at Obama: there is no proof.

That, however, has never stopped the US from escalating a geopolitical conflict to the point of war, or beyond, so pay close
attention to what Obama says this afternoon.

According to an NBC report, a team of analysts at Eurasia Group said in a note on Friday that they believe the outgoing
administration is likely to take action which could result in a significant barrier for Trump's team once he takes office
in January.

"It is unlikely that U.S. intelligence reports will change Trump's intention to initiate a rapprochement with Moscow,
but the congressional response following its own investigations could obstruct the new administration's
effort," Eurasia Group analysts added.

At the same time, Wikileaks offered its "validation" services, tweeting that "Obama should submit any Putin documents to
WikiLeaks to be authenticated to our standards if he wants them to be seen as credible."
We doubt Obama would take the whistleblower organization on its offer, even if he did have any Putin documents to
authenticate.

Someone Has Officially Called The CIAs Bluff Over Russia

The scapegoating of Russia is now so widespread, Dirty Wars author and investigative journalist
Jeremy Scahill took to The Intercept to call the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) on its bluff.

In the article, Obama Must Declassify Evidence Of Russian Hacking, Scahill and Jon Schwartz called out U.S.
intelligence agencies for their record of deceit, asserting that the American people are not going to simply take their
word for it.
Related: Insane: Obama Threatens Russia Over Election Hacking Conspiracy

"U.S. intelligence agencies have repeatedly demonstrated that they regularly both lie and get things
horribly wrong, the article argues.

But when it comes to the CIAs case against Russias alleged interference with the latest U.S. presidential elections, its
impossible to claim the hearsay is based on facts if evidence is not made available to support the agencys claims.

Nevertheless, Scahill and Schwartz argue, its possible that Russia may have pulled some strings. But even if the Kremlin had
its reasons and acted on them, America is the country with the long history of election meddling - not Russia.

Take Hillary Clintons comments on the Palestinian elections, for instance. A leaked audio recording from 2006 revealed then-
senator Clinton advocated doing something to determine who was going to win in Palestines elections.

Comment: We are witnessing the final stage of the fall of the Khazarian / Zionist / Illuminati Cabal - and they are
throwing one hell of a tantrum on their way down in a desperate attempt to escape the inevitablity of their demise.

And yet here she is, hoping to use the Russia did it talking point to give censorship a boost. The CIA has its
own history of meddling in foreign elections.

In order to give Barack Obamas administration that extra push to release any proof the CIA has that the 2016 U.S. elections
were rigged, the Intercepts duo encouraged feds or whistleblowers to use the publications secure drop link, where a
patriotic whistleblower within the U.S. intelligence community may drop the leak that proves Russia is behind President-elect
Donald Trumps win. [W]e will verify its legitimacy and publish it, they added.
Related: Russian hack narrative revealed to be elaborate media hoax - leaks came from Bernie Sanders insider

This response seems fitting. After all, assertions are not evidence, and major publications like the Washington
Posthave been basing their Russia-related reports using nothing but assumptions.

Using an anonymous source, for instance, the WaPo reported that:

[U.S. intelligence] agencies have identified individuals with connections to the Russian government who provided
WikiLeaks with thousands of hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee and others.

But Reuters has since reported that [the] overseers of the U.S. intelligence community have not embraced a CIA
assessment that Russian cyber attacks were aimed at helping Republican President-elect Donald Trump win the
2016 election. This means the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) has not endorsed [the CIAs]
assessment because of a lack of conclusive evidence.

Caitlin Johnstone put it best in an article for Newslogue:

"Believing something the CIA says is like trusting a meth addict with your car, and trusting the CIA when
theyre working with the Washington Post is like trusting a meth addict with your car and leaving your kid
in the back seat with the house keys and money for Taco Bell.

Unless proof is produced either by the CIA or a whistleblower, partisan voices crying wolf in Washington and in the media will
continue to run on empty, feeding their base with nothing but fake news. But wasnt that what we were told to unite over so
we could fight it effectively? Heres your chance, Mr. President.
Why Now? Tangled Webs: Google, Microsoft, Facebook, The Internet Giveaway, And
The Wild, Wild West Of Information
December 17 2016 | From: AmericanPolicy

The use of lies and deception, or as the new term coming into vogue; fake news, has been a
standard tool of the trade for over a century by the government and their willing and/or unwilling
stooges in the mainstream media.

A few examples include Newspaper owners William Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer, with the unspoken
blessings of US President, William McKinley, spreading lies to stir up the masses enough to start a war with Spain.

Related: The Oppression of the Internet is Global

This allowed McKinley to start an American empire by taking over the Philippines, Guam, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico at the close
of the 19th century. In the following decades, the media has obediently followed along coving up such things as the
fraudulent Gulf of Tonkin incident, the governmental attack on the Branch Davidians, 9/11, and the Obamacare fiasco.

In spite of the lies and distortions presented by the government then spread by an obedient media, there were still
some journalists who were doing their job by reporting the truth.

In 1983, fifty companies controlled 90% of the American media, today it is just six multinational corporations. They are
Viacom, Comcast, Time-Warner, Disney, CBS, and News Corp and these companies are working very hard to make sure that
the news you hear is the news they and the government want you to hear.

From the anti-Muslim video that caused the killing of four Americans at Benghazi, lying about the state of the economy
before the 2008 meltdown, to the massive push to promote Obamacare, the main stream media is relentless in pushing the
government / corporatist agenda to its audience.
This control is the dream of every tyrannical state in history and the US government has almost achieved it.

Only, they have, like the American Army in the WWII Battle of Arnhem, pushed their power too far and too fast causing the
American people to no longer trust the main stream media.

In the spring of 2016, a major poll was conducted by the Media Insight Project, a partnership of The Associated Press-NORC
Center for Public Affairs Research and the American Press Institute; they found that just 6% of those polled have confidence
in the main stream media for news.

The bias and outright lies have become so bad that even a 30 year insider like Sharyl Attkisson commented on it:

There is unprecedented, I believe, influence on the media, not just the news, but the images you see everywhere.
By well-orchestrated and financed campaign of special interests, political interests and corporations. I think all of
that comes into play.
ICANN is arguably the single most powerful institution in the world - Jeff Baron

In every format, the main stream media is losing patrons. From failing newspapers to falling television ratings, the old model is
dying because of the internet.

The Internet has become the primary source for information for a huge percentage of Westerners today.

In fact, in the last 25 years the internet has transformed the world. It has completely revamped the way people do
business, communicate, purchase household goods, plan vacations, find friends, look up information and just about
every human activity imaginable.

Since it first became available for average people, the internet has been a way to find information the elites did not want
exposed and they have been looking to shut down that freedom of information for years.

Subsequently with the support of numerous multinational corporations like Microsoft, Google, Dell, Yahoo, Amazon,
and Facebook along with the blessing from globalist mouth pieces like the Council on Foreign Relations, the LA
Times, NBC, the International Chamber of Commerce and Human Rights Watch, President Obama failed to renew the
contract with ICANN effectively giving the control over the internet to a private company.
That company is ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) and it is a CA based nonprofit corporation.
In 1998, the Commerce Department began contracting with ICANN, to take over management of IANA (The Internet Assigned
Numbers Authority) and the internets domain name system.

The US Commerce Department has, for the most part, let ICANN govern itself, but it maintained the authority to pull the
nonprofits contract.

In essence ICANN records the numbers (easier for computers to use) using words (easier for humans to use)
through DNS.

Domain name system (DNS) is basically a directory for internet-connected devices that helps translate domain names to
numerical IP addresses. Without DNS it is difficult for people to access websites as it requires remembering large numbers of
IP address, a series of numbers such as 194.66.82.10.

So President Obama just ceded power over the allocation of domain names from Google.com to your churchs website
without the consent of Congress and over the objections of millions of citizens.
Those supporting the transfer are quick to report that there is nothing to fear from this transfer, after all ICANN is a private
company under a global multi-stakeholder group to oversee its Board of Directors. What can possibly go wrong with the
internet in the hands of a private company? Plenty.

ICANN is first and foremost, a complete monopoly. It has exclusive rights to allow and renew domain names and that
is a power it has not always been used benevolently.

It also has complete control over how much to charge for a top level domain such as .com, .net, .biz and several
times in the past, it has abused those powers.

For instance it allowed a top level domain named .sucks to be purchased by the company Vox Populi which charges $2,500 to
protect a companys or individuals name from being purchased and slandered with a .sucks after it, then failed to rein the
company in when it was running an extortion operation.

ICANN has also been accused numerous times of siding with those who have the most to pay its fees and since it costs over
a million dollars to have ICANN officially look into a complaint, not many decisions are overturned.

Another troubling aspect of ICANN is that ICANN has made a fortune off of its rapidly expanding list of Generic Top Level
Domain Names (gTLDs). Names like .lawyer; .google; .africa are going for at least $200,000 each and then annual fees.

The .web domain brought $135,000,000 into their coffers giving them not only a complete monopoly on issuing domains but
the means to create a very monopolistic self-supporting group of elites.

Amazon, the giant online retailer, applied to register the gTLD .amazon. ICANN has written limitations that govern the sale of
a domain name but since the name .amazon does not fall, into any of the categories that are forbidden there should have no
problems with Amazons request.

Only there was, the South American countries of Brazil and Peru, through the interest group Government Advisory Committee
(GAC), declared this application to be illegal, based on the fact that the Amazon River is a geographical area inhabited by
some 30million people.

ICANN sided with the governments proving that the advantage of being a monopoly is that you get to make up rules
as you go along. Amazon is now in the process of suing ICANN over the matter.

The exact same thing happened to the sports company called Patagonia when it filed for the .patagonia domain. The
governments of Argentina and Chile objected and ICANN decided against selling the name to the company.

This trend shows that not only are rules made to be broken but governments are meant to be appeased.
This pattern is more than disturbing considering that since 1998, nations that routinely censor the internet of their citizens
including Russia, China, Iran and Saudi Arabia have pushed extremely hard to place the functions of ICANN under the control
of the U.N.s Russian dominated International Telecommunications Union (ITU) and President Obama may very well have just
handed them their chance.

For, as stated above, ICANN holds a COMPLETE monopoly over the World Wide Web root zone and complete
monopolies in private hands are illegal in most of the world. When operating under contract with the Commerce
Department, ICANN becomes a legal monopolist as it becomes an instrumentality of government.

As L. Gordon Crovitz points out in his article U.S. Surrender: Internet Giveaway to the U.N.?, once ICANN became
independent, they lost that umbrella of US Government protection leaving them open to legal challenges from every despotic
government on earth looking to force them under the control of the United Nations.

Hence President Obama, in another case of: if you want your doctor, you can keep your doctor;

Simply lied again when he pledged that ICANN would not replace U.S. control for a government-led or an inter-
governmental organization solution.

This fact is verified on 10/14/16 When Obama gave a speech in Pittsburg, PA in which he glorified the days of the three major
networks delivering the news that most people trusted.

Obama went on to say:

We are going to have to rebuild within this wild-wild-west-of-information flow some sort of curating
function that people agree to.

There has to be, I think, some sort of way in which we can sort through information that passes some
basic truthiness tests and those that we have to discard, because they just dont have any basis in
anything thats actually happening in the world, Obama added.

That is hard to do, but I think its going to be necessary, its going to be possible. The answer is
obviously not censorship, but its creating places where people can say this is reliable and Im still able
to argue safely about facts and what we should do about it. he added.
There should be no longer any doubt as to why Obama went against Congress and the people to give away the internet; we
can no longer have the wild-wild-west-of-information flow out there to inform the people of what is really going on in the
world.

German Chancellor Merkel, speaking at a press conference with out-going President Obama on 11-17-16, reinforced what
ship we will soon see coming to the internet port; censorship. She christened the surge of populist or right wing politics as a
wave that engulfs us that emanates from the United States.

Look at the European parliament. There are a lot of people who are looking for simplistic solutions and are
preaching simplistic solutions which are very unfriendly policies. We have them here in Europe; too, we have them
in Germany too.

Digitization is a disruptive technological force that brings about deep-seated change and transformation in society.
Look at the history of the printing press, when this was invented what kind of consequences it had, or
industrialization, what consequences that had.

Very often, it led to enormous transformational processes within individual societies and it took a while until
societies learned to find the right kinds of policies to contain this, to manage and steer this. We live in a period of
profound transformation.

Directing her ire against the Germans who are angered with her flooding Germany with Muslim invaders and massive job loss,
she lashed out against PEGIDA, the anti-mass migration and counter-Islamisation movement, repeating their slogan:Wir Sind
Das Volk - We Are The People - the chancellor said:

The most important and noble task of politicians these days is to see that each and every person can find his
place. But those who purportedly belong to certain groups say we are the people, and not others.

In another of those frequent ironies so often dumped on the citizens, Merkel, a former (?) East German communist,
now says of PEGIDA:
 At the time when we had [this saying] in the GDR [East Germany] when the people stood in the streets and said
we are the people it filled me with great joy, but the fact these people have hijacked it does not fill me with joy.

How long will it be before other world leaders join Ms. Merkel and president Obama in demanding web censorship?

Certainly foreign media is now calling for it as Germanys Zeit newspaper published a piece calling for controls to prevent a
German Donald Trump, while Britains Independent former newspaper website published a list of fake news sites which
they claimed may have swayed votes towards Donald Trump.

Even the British news outlet The Guardian is in on the fake news bandwagon. That list is the same list being circulated by
Google and Facebook.

Consequently, now, the very instrument that has become the great equalizing force against corporatism/globalisms control
over the main stream media might now become just another weapon in their arsenal of global censorship.

Unfortunately, it is only one of several ways the internet is being manipulated for corporatist/governmental advantage. One
only needs to look at the two most popular search engines and the most popular social media site to see complete censorship
in action.

What kind of drug does one have to take to believe Microsoft is a friend? - Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Google, Bing and Facebook have an unbroken record of suppressing sites, postings and searches that dont follow their world
view. Of the three, Bing is certainly the smallest but being part of Microsoft, perhaps they try harder. Bing claims to be neutral
and in fact, the subscriber can set the search engine to their own preference of conservative; liberal; Christian; etc. so how
can they be biased?

Well the Bing headline on August 16, 2016 for the conservative bias setting in Bing featured three negative Trump articles:

Donald Trump plots strategy on ISIS - and campaign revival (CNN)

 Analysis: Making Sense of Donald Trumps Disjointed Foreign Policy Pitch (NBC News)

Early Voting Limits Donald Trumps Time to Turn Campaign Around (New York Times)

The first headline implies Trumps campaign had stalled and needs revival. The second inferred Trumps foreign policy was
chaotic and the third noted that the early vote will give Hillary such a lead that discouraged Trump supporters wont vote.

Microsoft, donated $650,000 to the Hillary Clinton campaign and both Bill and Melinda Gates were considered as possible
Vice Presidential running mates for her Presidential campaign.

This is the Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, whose obsession with globalism and censorship is well known and on Sept. 20,
2016 at a conference in Vancouver, B.C. he openly stated that opposition to globalism is a huge concern, and says the
underlying issues of resistance to it warrant a close examination.

This is the same Bill Gates that along with Steve Ballmer (Microsoft CEO) spoke at the World Economic Forum in Davos,
Switzerland in early 2015 on the critical need for immigration and more H-1B visas because of a shortage of high tech
workers, and then laid off some 18,000 American high tech workers.

In 2010, China demanded that Google and Microsoft censor the results of their search engines in China.
Google resisted but Microsoft was more than willing to go along. Bill Gates even criticized Googles decision to uncensor their
search engine in China by saying:

Youve got to decide: do you want to obey the laws of the countries youre in or not? If not, you may not end up
doing business there.

Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer then said If the Chinese government gives us proper legal notice, well take that
piece of information out of the Bing search engine.

Chinese President Xi Jinping also stopped in for dinner at Bill Gates house in September of 2015 before meeting with the
heads of Microsoft, Google and Facebook amongst other business leaders.

So great is the Bing Censorship of China that the Chinese Web anti-censorship monitoring service has gone to great lengths
to show that Bing censors content in China even more than the Chinese State owned search engine Baidu does. But dont
worry; Microsofts support of the ICANN was completely in the name of a free internet.
Privacy is no longer a social norm. - Mark Zuckerberg

Facebook is just as bad. In addition to being an outspoken advocate of globalism and a liberal, Facebook CEO Mark
Zuckerberg is the controlling force behind the most powerful social media platform ever created. Facebook controls the global
dialogue used by over a billion people with an invisible touch that is unprecedented.

Almost two-thirds of American adults get news from social media, with 44% of them getting their news from
Facebook alone.

This means Facebooks algorithms dominate the information of almost half the American public. As Gizmodos Michael Nuez
puts it, with Facebook, we dont know what were not seeing.

And he controls that platform with an iron grip.

Facebook has conducted numerous studies to better understand how information spreads in a social network. For
instance, in 2010 Facebook conducted a secret experiment on 61 million unknowing people by tampering with their
news feeds to find out how successfully it could manipulate the real-world voting habits of those people.

Later, Facebook released the findings and claimed that they increased voter turnout by more than 340,000 people. Facebook
regularly skews the news it posts; in 2012 it manipulated the feeds on 700,000 people without their consent to make them feel
sad and then published the results in the respected (?) scientific journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The results showed fairly conclusively that Facebook had found the key to intentionally influencing peoples emotions. That
year they did the same type of experiment on 1.9 million people to influence the US election. In 2014 Facebook used the
rainbow flag as another experiment to get people to be more accepting of same-sex marriage.

Facebook has made an empire of selling information about every person they can. It openly manipulates
the feeds and posts they allow on Facebook and the posts people are allowed to place for other members of Facebook.

Facebook is now reluctantly being forced to manipulate their algorithm to crack down on fake news being posted on
Facebook.

Though this sounds like a noble goal, the potential for censorship is unmistakable, especially when one looks at the
list of websites they plan on censoring.

The sites Facebook and Google are going to censor as fake was created by a self-proclaimed feminist assistant
professor at Merrimack College who did not like the sites her students citing in their research papers.

Sites like Breitbart; Realfarmacy; Lew Rockwell; Zerohedge; and World Net Daily.

Though all have posted articles that have proven to be false, Facebook has no problem with posting articles from even less
reliable news site like USA Today; MSNBC; CNN; BBC and the New York Times. Google is now planning on using this same
list to censor content. It does not take a rocket scientist to see where this censorship is headed.

In fact, in one of the most blatant acts of fake news to ever hit the news media was perpetrated by the New York Times in
early 1957, when a former war correspondent, Herbert L. Matthews, wrote numerous articles filled with the glories and praises
of a young Cuban revolutionary named Fidel Castro.

Article after article spewing from Matthews typewriter glowed with tales that eventually created a Robin Hood persona for a
murdering communist thug. It cannot be understated how important the fake news was to propel Castro into power. Yet
the New York Times stands as a purveyor of honest journalism according to our Ministry of truth.
The New York Times; Unrepentant Communist Enabler

We know where you are. We know where youve been. We can more or less know what youre thinking about. - Eric
Schmidt

The last of the big three masters of manipulation is Google, and they are arguably the biggest of the bunch. Google CEO Eric
Schmidt is about as open with his liberal bias as one could ever be. The Bilderberg attendee bankrolled a startup company
called The Groundwork to provide technical experts Hillary Clinton needed to run her campaign. Schmidt was instrumental in
getting Barack Obama elected both times as he was the main supplier of technical experts for all three campaigns.

Technology is right up Schmidts alley as Google is the defacto gateway to information. Google averages some 40,000
search queries every second equaling over 3.5 billion searches per day and 1.2 trillion searches per year worldwide.

Google conducts over 64% of all internet searches in the US and over 90% in some countries. Google has indexed some 45
billion web pages while Bing, its closest competitor has only 14 billion.

Of course the 45 billion web pages are only part of the Schmidt plan to control everything on earth. Schmidt has
stated that privacy is an excuse to hide wrongdoing:

If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place.

In his plan to deprive you of your privacy, Schmidt has employed some of the worlds top technocrats to find ever
more powerful ways to pry into every corner of your life since Googles business is, literally, mass surveillance, and
they have become amazingly good at it.
They are also a contractor to the US Government, including the NSA and several military contractors as well. When
Edward Snowden revealed to the world the unimaginable world of government spying on US citizens, he also
revealed that the NSA has direct access to the information stored on Googles computers as they do to Facebook,
Twitter, Bing and every other company storing online information on you.

In a US News and World Report article published on 6/22/16, contributor Robert Epstein wrote an extremely troubling article
on just how powerful Google is. According to Epstein:

When Googles employees or algorithms decide to block our access to information about a news item, political
candidate or business, it causes opinions and votes to shift, reputations to be ruined and businesses to crash and
burn. Because online censorship is entirely unregulated at the moment, victims have little or no recourse when
they have been harmed.

Epstein then exposes blacklists that Google wields like Jack the Ripper did his knives with the first being the autocomplete
blacklist. This one is simple enough; it quietly guides the searcher to where the company wants you to go.

From directing away from negative articles on Hillary Clinton to pointing to negative articles on Donald Trump, there
is little doubt that Google had a large impact on the recent US election. In any search you make, the algorithm is your
spiritual guide.

Google maps is a stalkers dream showing just about every house and area in the US and huge sections of the world. They
did not ask for permission to film your house, they just did it.

Military installations and a few other places are excluded but chances are, your house is there.

Googles You Tube blacklist allows users to tag certain clips as inappropriate and Googles censors may or may not remove
them.
However, You Tube is notorious for removing politically and morally conservative videos on a regular basis while
never doing the same to liberal videos. They are also willing to work with foreign governments to determine which
videos will be allowed to be shown in the country.

The Google account blacklist can cut peoples access to their own email account as well as You Tube and other
Google products without any notice or recourse.

The Google News blacklist is insidious in every way. They are the biggest news aggregator on the planet, tracking
tens of thousands of news sources daily and converting them to numerous languages.

They have been accused on numerous occasions of excluding conservative news feeds as well as certain writers and
competing companies. This is an incredibly powerful and nearly unnoticeable tool to promote political, moral and/or religious
agenda.

Google Adwords blacklist is how Google gets the lions share of its money (some $56 billion annually) by selling keywords to
the highest bidders.
These keywords are how the website is found by searchers so if your site does not have them, you are going to sink.
On numerous occasions, Google has simply deleted those keywords on sites effectively making them invisible and
financially crushing them.

The search engine blacklist is a make or break situation for many web pages. Google, for many unknown reasons will push
web page down the list of rankings effectively ruining many businesses in a very short time.

The power to blacklist a site is Googles most dreaded weapon however. Google claims this power is to keep the internet
free from malicious malware which, they claim is a public service. The problems with this argument are many however.
Googles crawlers often make mistakes, blacklisting websites that do not contain malware.

Because of how extensively Google crawls the web, all the other main search engines use their blacklist which means that
once on the list, the site is effectively cut off from public access.

Google has used this power on numerous occasions on people they do not like.

Google even profits from this arrangement as they collect information from every user that accesses Googles results and then
sells it. Google has, for all intents and purposes, become the internet police man and they use this power to further their
globalist agenda on a regular basis and it is now supporting the same list of fake news sites that the British Independent and
Facebook are touting.

Google, Microsoft and Facebook have all three censored users on the behest of world governments and all three; have
consistently censored users for no apparent reason. They, along with Twitter (another social media monster) sided with
Obama to give away Americas right the control the internet.
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire

Tragically, the US now finds every purveyor of media has been compromised and censored by those with globalist views.
Once ICANN loses its independence to the UN, the corporatist/governmental takeover will be complete.

Controlling access to information is every tyrants dream and our government is no different.

The main stream media did a masterful job of concealing the 2008 economic meltdown from the masses just like they have
the corruption of Hillary Clinton; the imploding Deutsche Bank; the growing threat of nuclear war with Russia; the threat of an
EMP from North Korea and now the escalating violence of the Clinton supporters after the election of Donald Trump.
It was only the access of the people to alternative news sites that alerted and continue to alert those willing to listen to truth
that news of these events get out at all.

Post-election America is now a powder keg awaiting a spark. The Green Party candidate for President, Jill Stein, started a
fund to recount the votes in three states in hopes of overturning the election of Donald Trump and now Democratic
candidate Hillary Clinton has joined her in what is only going to create a greater rift in our already shredded national tapestry.

Related: Michigan Recount Exposes Clinton Electoral Fraud: Half Of Detroit Votes Show Signs Of Tampering

This is only a part of the drama as now; the Washington Post has publically called the Drudge Report, Zero Hedge and former
Congressman Ron Paul agents of Russian Propaganda. As if on cue, the call has come from numerous governments on the
spread of hate speech in the US and the call to regulate it.

Which Mark Zukerberg is only too happy to oblige as he outlined a seven point plan to help stop the spread of fake news
on Facebook. So convincing is this fake news that it fools most students a new study finds which of course means that our
very Ministry of Truth will need to decipher it for us. In fact, the media is now calling on the FBI to investigate the fake news
without a shred of evidence to support them.

With a growing population of closed minded bigots unwilling to even listen to opposing opinions or facts, the US is slowly
returning to the Dark Ages with only a few sources controlling access to information.
Freedom loving people everywhere should all be asking themselves why this particular time was chosen for Obama to open
the door for the UN takeover of an already censored internet.

It is past time to look into a ham radio and other forms of communication that cannot be controlled by the elites. Here in the
Pacific Northwest we have an excellent source for information called the Radio Free Redoubt.

Time is of the essence as the days of the open internet are coming to a rapid close.

Hell is truth seen too late. Thomas Hobbes Leviathan

References:

1. Why the Media Lies So Much

2. Selling Empire: American Propaganda and War in the Philippines
3. 5 Times When The Mainstream Media Created Fake News And People Died As A Result
4. Waco, Texas: Where A Part Of Americas Heart And Soul Died.
5. The Great 9/11 Cover-up
6. ABC, NBC Ignore All Obamacare Failures in 2016, CBS Barely Covers
7. Six Corporations Control 90% of American Media
8. Hillarys Worst Crime Was Against the Filmmaker
9. The media and the financial crisis: Journalism failed
10. The Great ObamaCare Failure Our Corrupt Media Cant Talk About
11. Animated Map: The Battle of Arnhem
12. Just 6% of the People
13. Former CBS Reporter: I Was Called a Troublemaker for Pursuing Benghazi
14. Obama Admin Wants To Surrender US Control Over Internet To Global Bureaucracy
15. Statements in Support of the IANA Stewardship Transition
16. What Does ICANN Do?
17. Critics fear censorship as Obama hands control of internet to multi-national body
18. Heres Why We Should Go through the IANA Transition
19. US to Hand Over Internets Naming System, But Is ICANN Ready for Transition?
20. S. Surrender: Internet Giveaway to the U.N.?
21. Governing Cyberspace: ICANN, a Controversial Internet Standards Body
22. In Congressional Hearing, Stakeholders Highlight ICANNs Failures and Need for Reform
23. ICANN reports .sucks to the FTC over predatory pricing
24. ICANN Transition is Premature
25. ICANNs Amazon Problem
26. Amazon files appeal on rejected .amazon domain
27. Governments kill off Patagonias dot-brand bid
28. US hands internet control over to ICANN
29. Stop Obamas Internet Giveaway
30. Lie of the Year: If you like your health care plan, you can keep it
31. Obama: We Have to Change Wild West Media Landscape
32. Obama Says He Wants To Change The Free Flow Of Information
33. Merkel With Obama: Internet Disruptive Force that Has to Be Contained, Managed, and Steered by Government
34. Obama Merkel - Internet Censorship Will Control Middle Class Rebellion
35. Obama, Merkel Blame Social Media for Being Politically Disruptive
36. Microsoft is Still an Evil Company, Dont Believe the Reputation Laundering Campaigners
37. Liberal Media Bias
38. How Bing Search Engine Plays Politics in Election 2016
39. Tim Cook and Bill Gates Might Have Been on Hillary Clintons Vice President List
40. Gates Foundation accused of dangerously skewing aid priorities by promoting corporate globalization
41. Web censorship in China? Not a problem, says Bill Gates
42. Bill Gates: Voter opposition to globalization is a huge concern - and a wake-up call
43. Bill Gates says in order to keep talent in America the country must overhaul perverse immigration laws
44. Soros & Fellow Billionaires for Open Borders Lobby GOP on Amnesty
45. Microsoft Lays Off Thousands While Demanding More H1-B Visas
46. Xi Jinping in Seattle to meet with CEOs of Apple, Microsoft and other tech giants
47. New research claims that Microsofts Bing censors heavily within China, even more so than Baidu
48. Is Facebook Trying to Turn you Into a Globalist?
49. The end of Trump: How Facebook deepens millennials confirmation bias
50. Zuckerberg proves he is Facebooks editor by allowing Trumps hate speech.
51. Will Facebook Replace the News?
52. Facebook is a Media Company, Treat it as One
53. 61 million person experiment in social influence
54. Facebook Deliberately Experimented on Your Emotions
55. Facebook wants you to vote.
56. Did YOU change your Facebook picture to a rainbow?
57. Meet leftist prof who wrote hit list of fake news sites
58. HOW FAKE NEWS CREATED THE MYTH OF FIDEL CASTRO AS LATIN ROBIN HOOD
59. The New York Times; Unrepentant Communist Enabler
60. 1957: Matthews NY Times interview Castro in Sierra
61. Still Fronting for Fidel at the New York Times
62. Facebook Censorship
63. How Facebook Censors your posts
64. Facebook to crack down on spread of misinformation
65. The Top Ten Things We Cant Believe Eric Schmidt Ever Said
66. Of Course Facebook Is Biased. Thats How Tech Works Today
67. Wikileaks: Googles Eric Schmidt Planning Hillarys Campaign Since 2014
68. The Groundwork
69. Google defends its search engine against bias it favors Clinton
70. Eric Schmidt Dismisses Movie Driven Fear of AI
71. Google Search Statistics
72. Search Engine Ratings
73. Googles power of censorship: who controls the controllers of the internet?
74. Google controls what we buy, the news we read and Obamas policies
75. The new mind control
76. The NSAs Bulk Collection Is Over, but Google and Facebook Are Still in the Data Business
77. The New Censorship
78. NSA Prism program taps in to user data of Apple, Google and others
79. Youre a Criminal in a Mass Surveillance World How to Not Get Caught
80. Clinton to join recount that Trump calls scam
81. Washington Post: Drudge, Zero Hedge, & Ron Paul As Anti-Clinton Sophisticated Russian Propaganda Tools
82. Liberals are suddenly experts in Russian Espionage
83. Washington Post Peddles Tarring of Ron Paul Institute as Russian Propaganda
84. EUROPEANS CALL ON US LEADERS TO CURB HATE SPEECH
85. How Facebook plans to crack down on fake news
86. The Fake epidemic of fake news
87. Most Students Cant Tell the Difference Between Fake and Real News, Study Finds
88. Elite Media Plot New Censorship Regime
89. If you question the establishment, you are guilty of Espionage, says Corporate Media
 90. Radio Free Redoubt

Additional Reading:

Cortana: The spy in Windows 10

Google Is Burying Negative Search Suggestions For Hillary Clinton, New Study Shows
Google to Bias Search Engine Based on Facts
Google will soon ban fake news sites from using its ad network
Google is Liberal and Biased
7,000 Sources or just a few favorites
Analyzing the Google bias
Why we should care about Facebook and Googles political bias
How Google Skewed Search Results
You Think Google Wight be Biased?
Ban on Fake News: What is Fake News?
ICANNs War on Whois Privacy
ICANN Can Be Fixed
ICANN faces first post-transmission test of U.N. power
Obama Admin Wants To Surrender US Control Over Internet To Global Bureaucracy
FCC Commissioner Hits Back at Internet Handover Proponents
Internet giveaway day? US govt relinquishes control of webs address book
S. to relinquish remaining control over the Internet
Please Stop Sharing These Sites:
Fake news sites, deceptive memes, and the rise of post truth politics
Liberal News, Conservative News and Fake News
False, Misleading, Clickbait-y, and/or Satirical News Sources
List of Fake News Websites
Two-thirds of the worlds internet users live under government censorship: report
Donuts Inc.s major play for new Web domain names raises eyebrows
Not Obamas to Give Away
Clintons Russian roulette
*BREAKING* Anti-Trump Globalist Zuckerberg Weaponizing Facebook to Influence 2016 Election
Facebook admits human role in news operation but denies left wing bias
Fake News threaten Democracy, Obama Says
Using fake news against opposing views

The Question That Fluoridation Promoters Cant Answer

December 17 2016 | From: FluorideAlert

During 2016, I asked this question to many fluoridation promoters and have yet to receive an
adequate scientific answer.
I asked it in several audiences in New Zealand and also to promoters at a council hearing in Naples, Florida and most
recently at a debate in Cortland, New York with Johnny Johnson and Steve Slott. Neither Johnson nor Slott,
otherwise very vocal on promoting fluoridation, had an answer.

Related: Why Does NZ Still Fluoridate? TV Commercial FFNZ

The Question to Promoters of Fluoridation:

What primary scientific studies (not bogus reviews conducted by pro-fluoridation agencies) can you cite
that gives you the confidence to ignore or dismiss the evidence that fluoride damages the brain as
documented in over 300 animal and human studies (including 50 IQ studies).

If proponents cannot provide an adequate scientific answer to this question: fluoridation should be halted
immediately.

On Nov 22, 2016, Michael Connett, JD, asked this question to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), on behalf of
FAN, Food & Water Watch, Organic Consumers Association, American Academy of Environmental Medicine, International
Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology, Moms Against Fluoridation, and several individual mothers, in a petition calling on
the EPA to ban the deliberate addition of fluoridating chemicals to the drinking water under provisions in the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA).

The EPA has 90 days to reply, and if they fail to provide a satisfactory reply then they can be taken to Federal Court.

How you can take this further?

We are requesting that each one of you to ask this question of any promoter of fluoridation and keep asking it throughout
2017 until you can get an answer. Send that answer to us.

Based on responses we have seen so far we anticipate that there will be no satisfactory answers. In our view, there is no
scientific evidence that could justify ignoring the large number of scientific studies that fluoride damages the brain and thus no
justification for continuing this unethical and reckless practice of deliberately adding fluoridating chemicals to the drinking
water.
This in essence will be our 2017 campaign. Very simple, very direct and very important. We hope that you will support this in
two ways: a) ask this showstopper question in as many creative ways as you can and as many times as you can, and b)
support FAN financially.

Five More Ways to Take Action:

1. Send a letter-to-the-editor to your local newspapers

2. Sign on to FANs petition to the EPA.

3. Send the press release to your media outlets

4. Share this Facebook and this Twitter post.

5. Make a donation to support this campaign (see below).

Fundraising Update

Our new totals are $70,150 from 235 donors. We will be updatinng our running totals on a daily basis on our home
page: www.FluorideACTION.net

Related Articles:

Undeniable Evidence From Numerous Studies Proves That Fluoride Causes Cancer
 New Zealand Government Plans To Drown Its Citizens In Toxic Fluorides

Auckland: No Consultation Needed For Stopping Or Starting Fluoridation + Decision Is An Attack On Democracy

Fluoride: Poison On Tap Official Trailer

The Fluoride Deception

New Zealand Fluoridation Review Unscientific And Intellectually Dishonest Say International Reviewers

Fluoride Free New Zealand: Dirty Science

Secret Fluoridation Review Totally One-Sided Admits Chair

Harvard Research Finds Link Between Fluoridated Water, ADHD & Mental Disorders

Climate Scare Declared Officially Over- Error In Model Calculations Discovered

December 16 2016 | From: RickWells

Acclaimed climate realist and former adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, Lord
Christopher Monckton, has some major news of a breakthrough discovery he has made in the area
of climate science. Comment: How long are the Cabal going to try to bury this latest hit?

Hes interviewed at the Global-Warming; an Inconvenient Lie conference in Phoenix, AZ by Millie Weaver, a
reporter for Infowars.

Related: Inconvenient Truths About the Man-made Global Warming Scam

Moncton is proud to be able to announce that he and his;

Team of very distinguished professors and doctors of science have discovered a major, significant,
substantial error in the way in which the computer models calculate how much warming they would
predict should be happening.

He says, Take that error away and there is no longer any climate problem. You might get one or two Celsius
of warming with a doubling of CO2 concentration but you wont get much more than that.

He says, All the suggestions that were facing some tipping point and suddenly we might see five or six, seven,
eight, ten, twelve, thirteen Celsius of warming for a doubling of CO2, the kind of dramatic figures that have been
appearing in some scientific papers, we can now prove that all of those very high end forecasts of how much
warming we might get are based on an error in mathematics.

Correct for the error and we are back down to a maximum of two, perhaps two and a half Celsius of warming for a
doubling of CO2.

Monckton says, I have been looking for this error in the mathematics for ten years. I have known it was
there but I didnt know what the error was, I just knew theyd made a mistake."

He then goes on to explain in some mathematical detail how he knew it, describing himself as a classical mathematician.

Related: With Ice Growing at Both Poles, Global Warming Theories Implode

He also has an announcement regarding a discovery by one of his esteemed colleagues, Professor William Happer of
Princeton, who discovered that the central estimate of global warming has been exaggerated by forty percent.

When his result is combined with the discovery by Monckton declares, officially, that the climate scare is over.
Infowars Reporter Millie Weaver interviews Lord Christopher Monckton who reveals a breaking
discovery which may prove the entire 'climate change' scare is based on faulty mathematics.

At the "Global-Warming; an Inconvenient Lie" conference in Phoenix, AZ Lord Monckton covers in depth the mathematical
discovery his team has made and announces that these findings have been submitted for proper peer review.

Related: Colleges Ban Free Speech Over Global Warming Skepticism

Michigan Recount Exposes Clinton Electoral Fraud: Half Of Detroit Votes Show Signs
Of Tampering
December 16 2016 | From: RussiaInsider

This is some next-level poetic justice: A Michigan recount backed by Jill Stein and the Democrats,
and intended to deligitimize Trump's astonishing victory on November 8, has actually
exposed widespread fraud in precincts which voted heavily for Clinton.

Hillary even sucks at cheating. Via the Detroit News:

Related: Pro-Monsanto think tank helped funnel Republican money into the Hillary Clinton campaign

Michigans largest county voted overwhelmingly for Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, but officials
couldnt reconcile vote totals for 610 of 1,680 precincts during a countywide canvass of vote results late
last month.

Most of those are in heavily Democratic Detroit, where the number of ballots in precinct poll books did not match
those of voting machine printout reports in 59 percent of precincts, 392 of 662.
 According to state law, precincts whose poll books dont match with ballots cant be recounted. If that happens,
original election results stand.

Its not good, conceded Daniel Baxter, elections director for the city of Detroit."

Understatement of the millenium?

Clinton's legendary "blue firewall"

Related: Wikileaks: Colbert Report Gave Clinton Foundation Control Over Production

Here's the best part: Officials blame the scanners used to tally votes for the huge discrepancies. Hard to believe:

Once they started the Michigan recount in earnest, and knowing he would be exposed, the Detroit City Clerk
Daniel Baxter all of a sudden started claiming that the optical scanners which read the paper ballots did not work
the day of the election.

Baxter blamed the discrepancies on decade-old voting machines. That is his cover story. Nothing like this was
mentioned until he realized their voting fraud scheme would be detected.

Baxters claim is that, when trying to push the ballots through the readers, the ballots would be stuck and theyd
have to push them through again thus ACCIDENTALLY resulting in a double count.

He says the poll workers sometimes FORGET to adjust the machine count and instead let the ballot count
twice."
Sounds reasonable.

It gets worse, though. Vigilant citizens who observed the recount said that there were numerous signs of vote tampering in
Hillary-heavy precincts.

Related: Alleged FBI Insider Says Bill Clinton Will Die, Everyone Is Exposed including Elite Pedophiles, Benghazi
Server, False Flag Events, All Part of the Final Drama

Ken Crider, a 2014 Republican candidate for District 19 of the Michigan House of Representatives, said he watched the
recount effort in Cobo Hall in Detroit with his wife, Penny. In a Facebook post Tuesday, he claimed to have witnessed some
serious ballot discrepancies. Crider wrote:

Penny Crider and I just got back from helping watch the recount at Cobo Hall in Detroit. On Nov. 8th (Election
Day) the election officials at 8:00 p.m. shut down the polls.

They then reconciled the differences from the machine count and the voter count on the computer. At this point, a
Metal tag/seal with a serial number is put on the box and the box was taken away.

Pennys precinct, Detroit Precinct #152 had an unbroken seal and everything looked proper. The tag on the box
said 306 and the book said 306 and the ticket said 306, so there should be 306 paper ballots on the box, right.

Well when they pulled out the ballots the stack seemed short and when they finished separating the two page
ballot to count the Presidential page only guess how many ballots were in the box?

304 no, 299 nope, 200 nada, how about 100 wrong again. There were only exactly 50 paper ballots in a locked
sealed box that again was supposed to have 306. Hmm.

Oh I forgot to add, since there was a discrepancy in the two numbers, the original count stands.
 One more thing my precinct (sorry I forgot the number), had 525 votes on the book, tag and ticket and we
counted 525 ballots the election official was praising the Lord Hallelujah we have a countable precinct
Jill Stein had three (3) votes."

In other words: In Democratic Detroit, each vote was counted 6 times!

Just imagine the landslide popular vote victory Trump would have enjoyed if the Democrats played fair on Election Day.

Related Articles:

Report: Hillary Clinton Spent $1.2 Billion to Lose 2016 Election

A Clinton Fan Manufactured Fake News That MSNBC Personalities Spread to Discredit WikiLeaks Docs

Hillary Clinton Just Proved She Learned Nothing from Losing the Election

Report: Drunk Hillary Demanding Recount to Lift Her Spirits

The truth about Gaddafi's Libya, NATO's bombing, and the Benghazi 'consulate' attack

Money, Power and Oil. Exposing the Libyan Agenda: A Closer Look at Hillarys Emails

Report: Hillary Planning Yet Another Run For President in 2020

Former UK Ambassador Blasts "CIA's Blatant Lies", Shows "A Little Simple Logic
Destroys Their Claims" + Top Experts Dismiss Reported Claim That Russia Influenced
the US Election
December 15 2016 | From: BlacklistedNews / PaulCraigRoberts / InformationClearingHouse

I have watched incredulous as the CIAs blatant lie has grown and grown as a media story blatant
because the CIA has made no attempt whatsoever to substantiate it.
Former Ambassador Craig Murray

I have watched incredulous as the CIAs blatant lie has grown and grown as a media story blatant because the CIA
has made no attempt whatsoever to substantiate it.

Related: CIA: Washington Post Report Linking Russian Government to Trump & Election Hacking Is Outright Lie

A little simple logic demolishes the CIAs claims. The CIA claim they know the individuals involved. Yet under Obama
the USA has been absolutely ruthless in its persecution of whistleblowers, and its pursuit of foreign hackers through
extradition.

We are supposed to believe that in the most vital instance imaginable, an attempt by a foreign power to destabilise a
US election, even though the CIA knows who the individuals are, nobody is going to be arrested or extradited, or (if in
Russia) made subject to yet more banking and other restrictions against Russian individuals?

Plainly it stinks. The anonymous source claims of We know who it was, it was the Russians are beneath contempt.

As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless
times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks there is a major difference between the two.

Related: The Conspiracy to Shut Down Truth, Donald Trump, and The American People

And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to
disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not
accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not
failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.

The continued ability of the mainstream media to claim the leaks lost Clinton the election because of Russia, while
still never acknowledging the truths the leaks reveal, is Kafkaesque.

I had a call from a Guardian journalist this afternoon. The astonishing result was that for three hours, an article was
accessible through the Guardian front page which actually included the truth among the CIA hype:

The Kremlin has rejected the hacking accusations, while the WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has previously
said the DNC leaks were not linked to Russia.
 A second senior official cited by the Washington Post conceded that intelligence agencies did not have specific
proof that the Kremlin was directing the hackers, who were said to be one step removed from the Russian
government.

Craig Murray, the former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, who is a close associate of Assange, called the CIA
claims bullshit, adding: They are absolutely making it up.

I know who leaked them, Murray said. Ive met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian
and its an insider. Its a leak, not a hack; the two are different things.

If what the CIA are saying is true, and the CIAs statement refers to people who are known to be linked to the
Russian state, they would have arrested someone if it was someone inside the United States.

America has not been shy about arresting whistleblowers and its not been shy about extraditing hackers. They
plainly have no knowledge whatsoever."

But only three hours. While the article was not taken down, the home page links to it vanished and it was replaced by a
ludicrous one repeating the mad CIA allegations against Russia and now claiming incredibly that the CIA believe
the FBI is deliberately blocking the information on Russian collusion.

Presumably this totally nutty theory, that Putin is somehow now controlling the FBI, is meant to answer my obvious objection
that, if the CIA know who it is, why havent they arrested somebody. That bit of course would be the job of the FBI, who those
desperate to annul the election now wish us to believe are the KGB.

It is terrible that the prime conduit for this paranoid nonsense is a once great newspaper, the Washington Post, which
far from investigating executive power, now is a sounding board for totally evidence free anonymous source briefing of utter
bullshit from the executive.

Related: Trumps Stock Market Rally Continues at Record Pace This Has Never Occurred in 110 Years!

In the UK, one single article sums up the total abnegation of all journalistic standards. The truly execrable Jonathan
Freedland of the Guardian writes Few credible sources doubt that Russia was behind the hacking of internal Democratic
party emails, whose release by Julian Assange was timed to cause maximum pain to Hillary Clinton and pleasure for Trump.

Does he produce any evidence at all for this assertion?

No, none whatsoever. What does a journalist mean by a credible source?

Well, any journalist worth their salt in considering the credibility of a source will first consider access. Do they credibly
have access to the information they claim to have?

Now both Julian Assange and I have stated definitively the leak does not come from Russia. Do we credibly have access?
Yes, very obviously. Very, very few people can be said to definitely have access to the source of the leak. The people saying it
is not Russia are those who do have access. After access, you consider truthfulness.

Do Julian Assange and I have a reputation for truthfulness? Well in 10 years not one of the tens of thousands of documents
WikiLeaks has released has had its authenticity successfully challenged. As for me, I have a reputation for inconvenient truth
telling.

Contrast this to the credible sources Freedland relies on. What access do they have to the whistleblower? Zero. They have
not the faintest idea who the whistleblower is. Otherwise they would have arrested them. What reputation do they have
for truthfulness? Its the Clinton gang and the US government, for goodness sake.

Related: The Wisconsin Vote Recount Raised Trumps Vote Count (And the Michigan vote recount found that in
Detroit some Hillary votes were multiplied by 6.)

In fact, the sources any serious journalist would view as credible give the opposite answer to the one Freedland
wants.

But in what passes for Freedlands mind, credible is 100% synonymous with establishment. When he says credible
sources he means establishment sources. That is the truth of the fake news meme. You are not to read anything unless it
is officially approved by the elite and their disgusting, crawling whores of stenographers like Freedland.

The worst thing about all this is that it is aimed at promoting further conflict with Russia. This puts everyone in danger for the
sake of more profits for the arms and security industries including of course bigger budgets for the CIA. As thankfully the
four year agony of Aleppo comes swiftly to a close today, the Saudi and US armed and trained ISIS forces counter by moving
to retake Palmyra.

This game kills people, on a massive scale, and goes on and on.

Related: FBI Disputes CIAs Fuzzy And Ambiguous Claims That Russia Sought To Influence Presidential Election

Top Experts Dismiss Reported Claim That Russia Influenced the US Election

Presstitutes such as the New York Times and Reuters continue to hype an alleged CIA finding that
Russians hacked Hillarys emails and used them to influence the election outcome.

As a number of experts have noted, there is no evidence whatsoever for the claim, which is in the category of fake
news.

Related: Anonymous Leaks to the WashPost About the CIAs Russia Beliefs Are No Substitute for Evidence

Julian Assange at Wikileaks, which released the leaked, not hacked, documents, denies that the Russians were involved.

William Binney, former top NSA official says that if Russia did it, NSA would have clear evidence. Binney said that:

They have failed to prove anything, which suggests they dont have proof and just want to war-monger
the public into a second cold war with the Russians.

After all, theres lots and lots of money in that for the military-industrial-intelligence-governmental
complex of incestuous relationships.

How To Instantly Tell If Russia Hacked the Election

December 11, 2016 "Information Clearing House" - "Moon Of Alabama" - Anonymous CIA officials claim that Russia hacked
the U.S. election by accessing emails from top Democratic officials and then leaking them to Wikileaks.

But the Washington Post notes:

Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) voiced doubts about the veracity of the intelligence, according
to officials present.
 ***

A senior U.S. official said there were minor disagreements among intelligence officials about the agencys
assessment, in part because some questions remain unanswered.

For example, intelligence agencies do not have specific intelligence showing officials in the Kremlin directing the
identified individuals to pass the Democratic emails to WikiLeaks .

***

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, has said in a television interview that the Russian government is not
the source. [The former intelligence analyst, British Ambassador to Uzbekistan, and chancellor of the University of
Dundee (Craig Murray) who is close friends with Wikileaks Assange said he knows with 100% certainty that
the Russians arent behind the leaks.]

***

Ill be the first one to come out and point at Russia if theres clear evidence, but there is no clear evidence
even now, said Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and a
member of the Trump transition team. Theres a lot of innuendo, lots of circumstantial evidence, thats it.

Indeed, some cybersecurity consultants claim that its impossible to ever know for sure who is behind hacks of this nature.

But thats wrong

In reality, it would be childs play to determine whether or not the Russians really hacked the Dem emails and shared
them with Wikileaks.

Related: Is The Deep State At War... With Itself?

Specifically, Edward Snowden says the NSA could easily determine who hacked the Democratic National Committees emails:
 Evidence that could publicly attribute responsibility for the DNC hack certainly exists at #NSA, but DNI traditionally
objects to sharing."

- Edward Snowden (@Snowden) July 25, 2016

But dont trust Snowden

The NSA executive who created the agencys mass surveillance program for digital information, who served as
the senior technical director within the agency, who managed six thousand NSA employees, the 36-year NSA veteran widely
regarded as a legend within the agency and the NSAs best-ever analyst and code-breaker, who mapped out the Soviet
command-and-control structure before anyone else knew how, and so predicted Soviet invasions before they happened (in
the 1970s, he decrypted the Soviet Unions command system, which provided the US and its allies with real-time surveillance
of all Soviet troop movements and Russian atomic weapons) confirmed to Washingtons Blog that the NSA
would definitely know who the hacker was.

Binney told Washingtons Blog in July:

Snowden is right and the MSM is clueless.

***

Do they have evidence that the Russians downloaded and later forwarded those emails to wikileaks? Seems to me
that they need to answer those questions to be sure that their assertion is correct.

***

You can tell from the network log who is going into a site. I used that on networks that I had. I looked to see who
came into my LAN, where they went, how long they stayed and what they did while in my network.

Further, if you needed to, you could trace back approaches through other servers etc. Trace Route and Trace
Watch are good examples of monitoring software that help do these things. Others of course exist probably the
best are in NSA/GCHQ and the other Five Eyes countries. But, these countries have no monopoly on smart
people that could do similar detection software."

In October, Binney told us:

If the idiots in the intelligence community expect us to believe them after all the crap they have told us (like WMDs
in Iraq and no we dont collect data on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans) then they need to give
clear proof of what they say. So far, they have failed to prove anything.

Which suggests they dont have proof and just want to war monger the US public into a second cold war
with the Russians.

After all, theres lots and lots of money in that for the military-industrial-intelligence-governmental complex of
incestuous relationships.

***

If you recall, a few years ago they pointed to a specific building in China that was where hacks on the US were
originating. So, lets see the same from the Russians. They dont have it. Thats why they dont show it. They want
to swindle us again and again and again. You can not trust these intelligence agencies period."
Related: Rogue Elements of the CIA Are Operating Against President-elect Trump

That same month, Binney told Newsweek:

U.S. officials know how many people [beyond the Russians] could have done this but they arent telling us
anything. All theyre doing is promoting another cold war.

Binney compared allegations about Russian hacks to previous U.S. fabrications of intelligence to justify the
invasion of Iraq in 2003 and the bombing of North Vietnam in 1964.

This is a big mistake, another WMD or Tonkin Gulf affair thats being created until they have absolute proof of
Russian complicity in the DNC hacks, he charged during a Newsweek interview. He noted that after the Kremlin
denied complicity in the downing of a Korean Airlines flight in 1983, the U.S. exposed the conversations where
[Russian pilots] were ordered to shoot it down. Obama officials have the evidence now of who hacked the DNC,
he charged. So lets see it, guys.

Last month, Binney explained:

If it were the Russians, NSA would have a trace route to them and not equivocate on who did it. Its like
using Trace Route to map the path of all the packets on the network. In the program Treasuremap NSA has
hundreds of trace route programs embedded in switches in Europe and hundreds more around the world. So, this
set-up should have detected where the packets went and when they went there.
In other words, theres no need to speculate on whether the Russians were the hackers. The NSA could easily determine
who was behind the hacks.

Of course, in an era where challenging officials to provide evidence may get one labeled as a Russian propagandist, the
question is how many people will stand up for the all-American value of questioning the proclamations of those in power:

Tucker Carlson DESTROYS Congressman Adam Schiff On Russian Interference In U.S Election

Related: Anti-Trump False Flag: Rogue CIA, Globalist Left Attempt to Overthrow Trump

Fake News Hysteria Hinges On The Laughable Assumption That Corporate-Run Media Has A
Divine Monopoly On Facts + US Lawmakers Move To Criminalize Fake News, Propaganda On The
Web
December 14 2016 | From: NaturalNews / Sputnik/ Various

The insidious assumption behind the fake news accusations being flung far and wide by the
fakestream media (CNN, NPR, WashPost, NYT, MSNBC, etc.) is that somehow the corporate media
has a divine monopoly on facts.

The Cabal Establishment is in Panic Mode as Alternative Media Blasts the Controlled-Mainstream
Media Out of the Water - the Corporate Media Lies are Being Exposed Virally, Worldwide.

The assumption is ludicrously demonstrated when MSNBC rolls out convicted liar Brian Williams to decry fake
news.

Related: Fake News: Who is Really Making the War on Truth?

Youd be hard pressed to find any fake news propagandist who churned out more fake news than Brian Williams and hes
still working at MSNBC!

Back in early 2015, Breitbart News presented a list of at least 32 times that NBC News let Williams present such fake news to
the American people - lies and disputed stories - including his false claims about being in a helicopter that was hit by an
RPG, reports Breitbart.com, one of the new media giants accused of publishing fake news by the collapsing lamestream
media.

As long as the government engages in intelligence activities that violate our rights secured by our Constitution,
any Intel Authorization bill should be opposed, Justin Amash told Sputnik News.

Williams also made up stories about Seal Team 6, the fall of the Berlin Wall, the Pope, Hurricane Katrina, quitting
college, rescuing a puppy from a house fire, and more, Breitbart continues.

If the Media Establishment Only Tells the Truth, Why are so Many of Their News Reports Obviously
Faked?

If the corporate-run media really had some sort of divine monopoly on facts, then none of us would be able to find examples
of laughably fake news on their websites, would we? Yet even the Washington Post has now been exposed for, if you can
believe it, faking a news story about fake news!

Any honest investigation can go right down the list: CNN, NYT, WashPost, HuffPost, LA Times, USA Today, NPR, MSNBC,
Fox News and so on every one of these news organizations has run genuinely fake news while claiming it was
fact.

Its not even difficult to find examples of these organizations deliberately fabricating fake news in order to alter the outcome of
the recent election.
Nearly all of them reported, for example, some variation of the absurd claim that Donald Trump cant win the
election.

These are also the same fake news organizations that obediently and enthusiastically repeated Obamas fabricated claims
about Obamacare. Remember If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor?

Or how about the claim that Obamacare will save American families $2500 a year, on average? Not only were these glaring
examples of fake news, they were known to be false at the time they were published by the corporate-run media.

Another way the Media Fakes the News: Censorship of Important Stories they Dont Want you to
Learn

And then there are the stories the entire fakestream media censors because they dont want anyone to learn about actual
facts. As a particularly egregious example, it is an established fact that CDC scientist Dr. William Thompson publicly admitted
to falsifying scientific data at the CDC to obscure the statistical link between vaccines and autism in African-Americans. That is
not only indisputable, its also an incredibly important piece of news for the health of all Americans.

Did the fakestream media cover that story? Not by a long shot: They censored it.

Every single fakestream media organization across the country obediently blackballed the story. The censorship was
obviously coordinated, deliberate and malicious. Remember, censorship of important facts is another way the insidious
corporate-run media lies to its misinformed viewers.

Hilarious Videos of CNN Staging Fake Locations, Fake Missile Attacks and Fake Seafaring

CNN has forever used fakery, theatrics and false reporting to influence public opinion rather than report the news. Perhaps the
most hilarious example of dishonest CNN fakery is the Charles Jaco video from the first Gulf War.

In order to pretend to be covering the Gulf War from a live set in Saudi Arabia, CNN built a Saudi stage in the USA and
faked a SCUD missile attack on its news anchor Charles Jaco.

Hilarious, as the video shows below, while Charles Jaco grabs a gas mask, his co-anchor grabs a helmet (see the 7:00 mark
in the video below). Its funnier than a really bad SNL skit!
Remember, this was all broadcast as CNN Live, where CNN literally pretended this was all real and true.

Faking the news is a specialty of CNN, and there are countless examples of the network going out of its way to stage fake
sets, fake locations and even use actors following mass shootings to make sure the proper narrative is delivered to the
public.

For example, this video interview reveals a comprehensive collection of CNN news fakery such as the bizarre
moment when CNN anchors try to pretend they are not in the same parking lot.

That incident, detailed in this UK Daily Mail article, involved a CNN anchor and guest desperately trying to pretend they were
broadcasting live from distant locations when, in reality, they were in the exact same parking lot. (This is evidenced by the
simple fact that the exact same vehicles pass behind them, in the exact same sequence)

CNN frequently uses green screens to fake locations.

The hilarious video below shows CNN building an entire fake ship on a green screen set to try to create the illusion that their
reporter is on the scene in the Black Sea, covering US war ships near Ukraine.

During the hilariously bad fake set report, the CNN journalist even points off in the distance behind him to try to
make the green screen illusion more convincing:

Youll discover another jaw-dropping compilation of fake, scripted news from the mainstream media in this next
video, covering media fakery involving the Gulf War, the defamation of Ron Paul, 9/11 attacks, Bin Laden and more:

The entire Sandy Hook mass shooting narrative was deeply layered in all sorts of CNN fakery, including the use of actors
who were told to read lines to the cameras while sobbing uncontrollably for maximum effect.

Related: Censorship Shock: Amazon.com Bans Investigative Book Nobody Died At Sandy Hook Because It
Disagrees With Government Version Of What Happened

In one case, a cheerful white man is laughing it up in the background, then when signaled to approach the
microphone to speak on camera, starts hyperventilating and crying while reading his obviously scripted lines. (The
guy turns out to be a professional actor.)

In the same video, shown below, another actor is caught on a hot mic asking, Do you want me to read the card? right before
sobbing on camera, playing the part of a grieving parent.

Yet another Sandy Hook theatrical fake news hoax was the use of David Wheeler, a professional actor, as both a
grieving parent and a SWAT team sniper.

As with all the other actors rolled out for CNNs cameras, this professional actor performed a scripted role in order to evoke
a powerful emotional response with the sole purpose of repealing the Second Amendment (a necessary step before
America can be overrun and controlled by radical leftist communists).

The way he carries his sniper rifle (upside down, by the magazine) makes it laughably obvious to anyone familiar
with firearms that he has absolutely no clue how to carry a rifle

The Corporate-Run Media has Done Nothing but Fake the News for Decades

Search YouTube for terms like CNN green screen or crisis actors or Sandy Hook or faked news and you can spend
hour and after watching clear examples of outlandish news fakery by the mainstream media. It doesnt take long for any
intelligent, clear thinking individual to realize the mainstream media has been faking the news for decades.

CNN, in fact, can be best described as a fake news theater organization pretending to be engaged in legitimate journalism.

I even recorded a podcast on this very subject, discussing all the news fakery weve all been subjected to over the years by
the deliberate fabrications of the corporate-controlled media.

Come to think of it, you probably need to go back and revisit what you think is really true about many historic events covered
by the lying media: Oklahoma City, 9/11, Sandy Hook, the assassination of JFK and even the nuking of Japan in World War
II.

In every case, what was reported by the lying mainstream media was a scripted narrative, not a serious investigation into
what really happened.

Related Articles:
Whos Behind PropOrNots Blacklist of News Websites

Whos the Biggest Peddler of Fake News?

Denzel Washington Slams Mainstream Media For Peddling BS

Reddit Shadow Bans Infowars As Fake News War Accelerates

How the mainstream medias fake news undermines democracy and protects the corrupt establishment

Facebook, Google, Twitter, YouTube: A Spirit of Cooperation

Trump Labels CNN Fake News

US Lawmakers Move To Criminalize Fake News, Propaganda On The Web

The witch hunt for fake news and Russian propaganda has been kicked up a notch, after the
House passed a bill quietly tucked inside the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017,
designed to crack down on free speech and independent media.
Under "Title V - Matters relating to foreign countries, the bill seeks to "counter active measures by Russia to exert
covert influence carried out in coordination with, or at the behest of, political leaders or the security services of
the Russian Federation and the role of the Russian Federation has been hidden or not acknowledged publicly.

It lists media manipulation as:

Establishment or funding of a front group

Covert broadcasting

Media manipulation

Disinformation and forgeries

Funding agents of influence

Incitement and offensive counterintelligence

Assassinations

Terrorist acts

It is easy to see how this law, if passed by the Senate and signed by the president, could be used to
target, threaten, or eliminate so-called fake news websites, a list which has been used to arbitrarily define
any website, or blog, that does not share the mainstream medias proclivity to serve as the Public
Relations arm of a given administration, - Global Research reported.

The frightening attack on speech and independent media was opposed by only 30 members of the House, including Tulsi
Gabbard, Thomas Massie, and Justin Amash - who stated that he fought against it.
 As long as the government engages in intelligence activities that violate our rights secured by our
Constitution, any Intel Authorization bill should be opposed, Justin Amash told Sputnik News.

The bill must now pass through Senate, though a senior Rand Paul aide has told Sputnik News that the Senator is currently
holding the intelligence bill for several reasons - and that they are looking at this specific issue very closely.

Curiously, the bill which was passed on November 30, was introduced on November 22, two days before the Washington
Post published its Nov. 24 article citing experts who claim Russian propaganda helped Donald Trump get elected, Zero
Hedge noted.

The experts the newspaper cited was a group called PropOrNot, although it have refused to name the experts behind the
operation. The organization has promoted a Ukrainian hacker group on their Twitter feed.
PropOrNot also listed over 200 websites that they accuse of peddling Russian propaganda, including extremely popular news
websites on all sides of the political spectrum, including The Drudge Report, Zero Hedge, TruthOut, Sputnik News, and even
WikiLeaks.
Former presidential candidate Ron Pauls website is also mentioned in many of the articles on so-called fake news, an issue
that should be concerning to those who believe in free speech, including his son, Senator Rand Paul.

The elder Paul has long been a vocal supporter of freedom of speech, as it is enshrined in the Constitution of the United
States, and he and his supporters have repeatedly been the target of finger pointing and demonization.

In 2012, a risk-assessment report from a Missouri-based fusion center stated that support for Ron Paul's presidential bid was
a sign of membership in a domestic terrorist group."

Related: Washington Posts Piece on Fake News Promotes Fake List of Unreliable Sources

For purposes of this definition it does not matter whether the sites listed here are being knowingly directed and paid by
Russian intelligence officers, or whether they even knew they were echoing Russian propaganda at any particular point: If
they meet these criteria, they are at the very least acting as bona-fide useful idiots of the Russian intelligence services, and
are worthy of further scrutiny, the so-called experts cited by PropOrNot state.
Many of those listed on censorship hit lists are speaking out against the attempt to stop independent media.

Information is dangerous and with this new reactionary shift of people making ban lists of so called fake
news, it shows us how afraid they are of knowledge and differences of opinion that spur people to have
an open mind, Luke Rudkowski, the owner of We Are Change, one of the sites on the blacklist, previously
told Sputnik News.

Information is very dangerous for the establishment status quo that tried to keep things the way they
are.

The bill, Zero Hedge notes, will soon proclaim much of the internet to be criminal Russian propaganda if it is allowed to pass.

Related Articles:
Congress Admits CIA Moving To Ban Free Speech In America

If You Are For Peace You Are A Russian Agent

Fake News Viewed as Move to Ban Dissenting Voices

MSM Takes Fake News To The Next Level

Why Labeling Websites As Russian Propaganda is Dangerous

Pike River: The Great Disgrace

December 13 2016 | From: Uncensored / Archvival

The recent open letter from the directors of solid energy regarding pike river - the greatest disgrace
& corrupt act of treason in new zealands history.

Solid Energy's penned an open letter defending its plan to permanently seal the Pike River mine reiterating it won't
change its stance. The company's directors maintain it's not safe to re-enter the mine, and say anyone who disagrees
is being reckless.

Related: 'The town bully just went down' - Pike River families say control of mine's access road given to them

But families of the 29 men who died in the in the 2010 explosions are protesting near the site and say Solid Energy is ignoring
expert research that shows the mine can safely be re-entered. The mine is expected to be permanently sealed by February.

According to Dr Jacob Cohens mind-blowing book Murder at Pike River Mine (on the Internet, (the NZ intelligence agencies
have been trying to censor censoring it) or it is available through Mr Lawrie Drew at Greymouth (a father of one of the victims):

1. The 29 miners at Pike River Mine explosion in 2010 were all deliberately murdered, to facilitate Pike River Coal
Ltd to collect a $100 million insurance pay-out, turn the publics attitude away from underground coal mining and
reduce opposition to open-cut mining.

This would allow BATHURST RESOURCES LIMITED (at the time registered on the Australian Stock Exchange but now dually
listed) which foreign bankers also secretly control with Pike River Coal, to overtly come into New Zealand and buy up all of the
countrys coal resources and then open cut mine it which has by now almost been fully completed!

2. Interestingly, Dr Cohen mentions in great detail with references from Bathursts own website, that just before the explosion
in the mine, BANK OF AMERICA was aggressively buying up shares in Bathurst Resources Limited. Guess who was working
for Bank of America before he became NZ Prime Minister.
 3. COLLUSION BETWEEN THE DIRECTORS OF PIKE RIVER COAL LTD, THE DIRECTORS OF THE BIG
SHAREHOLDERS OF PIKE RIVER COAL, THE NEW ZEALAND GOVERNMENT, THE NZ PM, THE NZ MINISTER OF
POLICE, THE NZ JUDICIARY, THE NZ INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES, THE ROYAL COMMISSION INTO THE PIKE RIVER
COAL MINE DISASTER, THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA AND THE FOREIGN BANKING CRIMINALS THAT CONTROL THE
LOT AT THE TOP has ensured the New Zealand public have been totally brainwashed about the true facts of this
monstrous crime and cover-up.

4. And just to make sure the mine victims families, or the general public cant ever know the full truth about the crime, or
even get into the mine to inspect the crime scene, and cant sue the Government, the companies or Pikes criminal directors,
the spurious rat and High Court Judge heading the corrupt, Royal Commission of Inquiry.

Oh, the quandry for the corporate 'it', such that is has intentionally failed

According to Lawrie Drew, HAS EMBARGOED ALL THE CRITICAL EVIDENCE FOR 75 YEARS! And yes, this has all been
totally censored by the incredibly vile, corrupt mainstream media!

5. This means, in simple mans terms, that the corrupt lawyers and judiciary involved all now know, that when for example
the Government Department supposedly that wanted to bring CEO of Pike River Coal Peter Whittall to trial under Health and
Safety laws (actually it was just a pretence because they all knew that it would fail) all that Peter Whittalls legal counsel had to
say to the judge in the pre-trial hearing was:

Your Honour, as all the critical evidence has been been embargoed by the Royal Commission for 75 years, we
cannot get disclosure and my client cannot defend himself against the allegations because all the evidence is
being kept secret and cannot be accessed.

Judge: Case dismissed.

6. This therefore means that the NZ Government, police, the judiciary etc. at least at the top - ALL KNOW they are a pack of
lying criminals, including the drafters of this latest Open Letter FROM THE DIRECTORS OF SOLID ENERGY.

7. All I can say is, because of the widespread indifference of the the general public in putting up with this outrageous evil, we
all deserve the judgment coming on us all. Because inevitably it will come. If they will get away with this, what will be next?

8. Apparently, PM John Key was personally given a copy of Dr Jacob Cohens mind-blowing book so he cant say he was
not informed. Isnt it rather strange to see he is abruptly resigning around the same time they want to seal up the mine.

9. Finally these devils want to seal up the entrance to the mine with a 30 metre thick plug of concrete. 30 metres! Can you
believe it? They sure do want to make sure nobody ever investigates the crime scene dont they?

In the United States of America a similar coal mine explosion occurred at the Upper Big Branch Mine not long before Pike
River explosion when exactly 29 miners were also killed. Since then, the miners families have received millions of dollars in
pay-outs and the CEO of the company concerned Don Blankenchip is now in jail.

Yet here in New Zealand, not even one director has even been charged or brought to trial. We hear about the criminal
activities of government agencies in the United States being bad, but our government and corporate criminal cabal is a
hundred times worse! 29 miners cruelly killed, and yet nobody has even received a slap on the hand. What an utter disgrace.

Frankly, if we just sit back and put if with this rot and say nothing about the blatant lies being perpetuated by the mainstream
corporate media propaganda goons, nearly five million of us, seriously, I fear for the freedoms and liberties of every single
person in this country.

Isnt it about time things changed dramatically?

Truly.

Pike River Murder Of 29 Miners & Blocking Of Re-Entry

September 25 2014 | From: Dr Jacob Cohen & 'Jack' (see download link below)

A censored book claims corruption at the very highest level of Government, Poice, International
Bankers, Corporations and Media Propoganda - naming those who should be charged.
"Ive been watching the reports on TV and mainstream media over last couple of days, and hadnt realised that your
victims families had sought, successfully, under the Official Information Act the experts reports that say the drift 2.3
km access tunnel is now perfectly safe for re-entry, yet Solid Energy have been lying about this fact, and it is plain
what their delayed decision in October will be negative!"

"Clearly, there is something in the access tunnel that they know they dont want to be revealed to either you or the public.

It all points to the fact the serious allegations in Dr Jacob Cohens book, MURDER AT PIKE RIVER MINE are 100% correct,
and that all the miners were plainly murdered.

Further, in even greater support of Dr Cohens penetrating allegations now, is the undeniable fact that government intelligence
agencies (it couldnt be anyone else) have REMOVED and CENSORED the book almost entirely from the Internet. The only
copy I could find this morning was on this site below.

You can have a look at the few remaining references to it if you GOOGLE-search it and you will find the books references are
still there, but the book has been DELETED.

Perhaps, you and the families, could have copies of the book printed up and personally delivered to all MPs.

While this would not guarantee mine re-entry and police examination of some of the crime scene, at least it will mean that the
entire government, (representing the entire nation) has been properly informed of the real truth and the blatant cover-up,
headed by big business in collusion with the NZ Prime Minister John Key, brought out so vividly by Dr Cohen. "

Download a PDF copy of Dr Cohen's book here.

Rothschilds Greater Israel Plan Is Effectively Defeated

December 12 2016 | From: Geopolitics

On the eve of the complete recovery of Aleppo City, Rothschild puppet Obama issued a rather
strange last minute attempt at saving the anti-Assad operation by granting a waiver for military
restrictions on the nature of war materiel aid to its proxies, i.e. moderate rebels and Al-Nusra
terror operatives.
A White House press release Thursday announced that foreign fighters in Syria supporting US special
operations to combat terrorism in Syria would be excused from restrictions on military assistance.

Related: 10 Signs The Global Elite Are Losing Control

I hereby determine that the transaction, encompassing the provision of defense articles and services to foreign
forces, irregular forces, groups, or individuals engaged in supporting or facilitating ongoing U.S. military operations
to counter terrorism in Syria, is essential to the national security interests of the United States,President Obama
affirmed in the presidential determination and waiver.

The order delegates responsibility to the US secretary of state to work with and report to Congress on weapons export
proposals, requiring 15 days notice before they are authorized.

Obama announced a similar waiver of the Arms Export Control Act in September 2013, following the Ghouta chemical
attack in August of that year.

That order facilitated the transfer of US military weaponry to select vetted members of opposition forces battling Syrian
President Bashar Assad, while Thursdays order appears less narrow in scope.

Related: Obama grants waiver for military support of foreign fighters in Syria - White House

Why would he issue such 11th hour executive order after he admitted the US incapacity to topple the Talibans in
Afghanistan?
The most probable reason would be that once Aleppo is completely liberated, the full degree of US involvement on the ISIS
misadventures in Syria and Iraq would be exposed for all the world to see.

Civilians who escaped from terrorists talk about new crimes committed by militants of the so-called moderate
opposition in eastern Aleppo. Cases of torture, public executions and massacres of the population have been
confirmed.

Related: Syrian Army Controls 93% of Aleppo - Russian MoD

There wasnt any Plan B in Syria because there wasnt any need for it if only Hillary Clinton won the White House for the
Cabal.

All they could do now is to keep on imposing all sorts of sanctions against all Syrian allies as if they still control everything
just like before. Yet, while Russia and China have been buying more gold and other physical assets, the West keeps losing
on the economic front, and they just dont care because they, the policymakers, are all insulated from these crises.

While the politicians are barking at the Russian-led operations, US and EU companies are expressing their interest
in getting back to the Russian market.

Carter Page, a former adviser to US President-elect Donald Trumps presidential campaign, told Sputnik that US and
European companies are interested to get back to the Russian market.
Carter Page

There is a high level of interest amongst US as well as European companies to get back to the Russian market.
This interest cuts across a diverse array of sectors, Page told Sputnik.

He also commented on the recent Rosneft privatization deal. Page believes that efforts to punish the Russian oil
giant have backfired and primarily hurt Western companies:

The hostile efforts to punish Rosneft and their senior management team through Western sanctions have primarily
hurt Western companies, rather than their intended target. This weeks innovative transaction underscores these
constraints, as many other potential strategic investment partners were excluded, Page said.

Related: US, EU Companies Interested to Get Back to Russian Market - Trump's Ex-Adviser

The Obama desperate countermeasures to salvage the dire Daesh situation in Syria, and the expression of unwillingness on
the part of the business sector in the West are proof enough that the people are tired of wars and sanctions.

Still, tangible actions beyond the choice of lesser evil need to be done by the Europeans. The rise of the Pirate Party in
Iceland is a good template.

Elsewhere in Asia, the Khazarian Empire continues to lose some of its cooperative regimes. South Korean
President Park is impeached.

South Korean lawmakers voted overwhelmingly on Friday to impeach President Park Geun-hye over an influence-
peddling scandal, setting the stage for her to become the countrys first elected leader to be expelled from office in
disgrace.

The impeachment motion was carried by a wider-than-expect 234-56 margin in a secret ballot in parliament, meaning more
than 60 of Parks own conservative Saenuri Party members backed removing her. The votes of least 200 members of the
300-seat chamber were needed for the motion to pass.
The Constitutional Court must now decide whether to uphold the motion, a process that could take up to 180 days.

Related: South Korean parliament votes overwhelmingly to impeach President Park

Russia and Japan are also inching closer to a settlement of the Kuril Islands dispute.

Andrei Fesyun, an expert at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow, said that setting up joint ventures on the islands
was a highly complicated issue.

There was an idea to build a spa hotel there and other things but there are more to this than just economic gain
for business. For the Japanese the Kuril Islands are a very sensitive issue and what Prime Minister [Shinzo] Abe is
now doing is nothing short of a heroic feat.

He is the first Japanese Premier to openly say that he wants to have better relations with Russia. I can imagine
how much resistance he has to deal with, thats why I dont think we should expect any quick breakthroughs here.
One thing is clear: we are now ready to meet and talk things over, he said.

Fumio Kishida arrived in Moscow on December 3 for a two-day visit ahead of President Vladimir Putins planned official
trip to Japan later this month.
Lavrov said that Kishidas meeting with President Putin on Friday showed directions in which Japanese-Russian relations
should progress.

Meanwhile, Japans Foreign Ministry has expressed hope that President Vladimir Putins visit to Japan on December 15-16
would further strengthen relations between the two countries. According to the statement, Putin will meet with Japanese
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in Nagato and in Tokyo.

Related: Against All Odds: Russia, Japan Inching Towards a Deal on Disputed Kuril Islands

The fall of the South Korean puppet government, and Japans peaceful re-engagement with Russia, will make it impossible
for the installation of the US THAAD missile system, in both countries.

We are hoping that all of these positive developments should not make way for any desperate attempt at pushing the red
button, as predicted by multiple sources.

IRD And Fraud Prosecution Inequalities In New Zealand

December 11 2016 | From: EnviroWatchRangitikei / BruceJessonFoundation

Every year the IRD identifies about $1.2 Billion in Fraud committed by NZ business people - and
Welfare Fraud? $30 Million.
They have gone ahead and set up the technical bases last week to enable the immediate payments system
throughout Europe.

Related: New Zealand Government Has Pledged Millions Of Dollars Worth Of Taxpayer Funds To The Corrupt
Clinton Foundation & Clinton Health Access Initiatives

Every year the IRD identifies about $1.2 Billion in fraud committed by NZ business people. Yes, every year. It discovers
around $30 Million in welfare fraud (tiny by comparison).

Yet, as Dr Marriott discovered - welfare fraudsters are far more likely to be sent to prison than white collar criminals.
Remember our [Ex] Prime Minister is a banker and our country has been heisted by corporate money interests and our
welfare state is seriously in demise, thanks to the aforementioned!

Tax Fraud Vs Welfare Fraud

Im on the board of the Bruce Jesson Foundation which supports investigative journalism and each year funds a lecture on
some aspect of society.

This years lecture was by Dr Lisa Marriott from Victoria University Business School on her investigation into how and why
white collar tax fraud is treated far more leniently than welfare fraud.

Yet , as Dr Marriott discovered - welfare fraudsters are far more likely to be sent to prison than white collar
criminals. You can eatch her lecture below.
Why are those less advantaged in New Zealand society treated differently from those who are in relatively privileged
positions?

Why are white-collar tax evaders treated differently to welfare fraudsters? In the Annual Jesson Lecture in Politics for 2016,
Dr Lisa Marriott considers the circumstances where this occurs, aiming to highlight and challenge issues of equity, privilege,
and the construction of crime and criminals in New Zealand.

Related: 8 Ways Control Freak Government Is Sabotaging Freedom And Making Life More Difficult For Us

The Diabolical World Of George Soros: I Cannot And Do Not Look At The Social
Consequences Of What I Do
December 10 2016 | From: DaisyLuther / Uncensored / Various

Do you want to know who George Soros, the creepy grandaddy of globalization, really is? He told
us decades ago and nobody listened.
Check out the following chilling 60 Minutes interview from Deember 20, 1998.

Related: George Soros: A Psychopaths Psychopath

Soros destabilizes economies to add to his billions and he doesnt care about how this affects the people who suffer. During
the interview, he said, with regard to speculative market attacks:

I dont feel guilty. Im engaged in an amoral activity which is not meant to have anything to do with guilt."

Soros complete lack of guilt about anything seems to be an ongoing theme in his life. One segment of the interview is of
particular note the part that talks about his formative years.

To understand the complexities of his personality, you have to go back to the very beginning, to Budapest, where
George Soros was born 68 years ago to parents who were wealthy, well-educated, and Jewish.

When the Nazis occupied Budapest in 1944, George Soros father was a successful lawyer. He lived on an island
in the Danube and liked to commute to work in a rowboat. But knowing there were problems ahead for the Jews,
he decided to split his family up.

He bought them forged papers and he bribed a government official to take 14-year-old George Soros in and swear
that he was his Christian godson. But survival carried a heavy price tag.

While hundreds of thousands of Hungarian Jews were being shipped off to the death camps, George Soros
accompanied his phony godfather on his appointed rounds, confiscating property from the Jews.
(Vintage footage of Jews walking in line; man dragging little boy in line)

KROFT: (Voiceover) These are pictures from 1944 of what happened to George Soros friends and neighbors.

(Vintage footage of women and men with bags over their shoulders walking; crowd by a train)

KROFT: (Voiceover) Youre a Hungarian Jew

Mr. SOROS: (Voiceover) Mm-hmm.

KROFT: (Voiceover) who escaped the Holocaust

(Vintage footage of women walking by train)

Mr. SOROS: (Voiceover) Mm-hmm.

(Vintage footage of people getting on train)

KROFT: (Voiceover) byby posing as a Christian.

Mr. SOROS: (Voiceover) Right.

(Vintage footage of women helping each other get on train; train door closing with people in boxcar)

KROFT: (Voiceover) And you watched lots of people get shipped off to the death camps.

Mr. SOROS: Right. I was 14 years old. And I would say that thats when my character was made.

KROFT: In what way?

Mr. SOROS: That one should think ahead. One should understand and and anticipate events and when when
one is threatened. It was a tremendous threat of evil. I mean, it was a a very personal experience of evil.

KROFT: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted
godson.

Mr. SOROS: Yes. Yes.

KROFT: Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews.

Mr. SOROS: Yes. Thats right. Yes.

KROFT: I mean, thats that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for
many, many years. W as it difficult?

Mr. SOROS: Not not at all. Not at all. Maybe as a child you dont you dont see the connection. But it was it
created no no problem at all.

KROFT: No feeling of guilt?

Mr. SOROS: No.

KROFT: For example that, Im Jewish and here I am, watching these people go. I could just as easily be there. I
should be there. None of that?

Mr. SOROS: Well, of course I c I could be on the other side or I could be the one from whom the thing is being
taken away. But there was no sense that I shouldnt be there, because that was well, actually, in a funny way, its
 just like in markets that if I werent there of course, I wasnt doing it, but somebody else would would would
be taking it away anyhow. And it was the whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator, the property was
being taken away. So the I had no role in taking away that property. So I had no sense of guilt.

And now, George Soros lives in America, according to some reports, in Bedford Hills, a suburb of New York City.

He donated millions to help Hillary Clintons failed presidential bid, and he funds organizations that organize
protests which often become violent.

We saw it in Ferguson and were seeing it right now in the anti-Trump protests going on across the US. Last week, I wrote:

Soros was busted for paying protesters to go into Ferguson and stir things up. This is not theory. Its FACT. The
Daily Mail reported that Soros spent $33 million to bankroll the protests. The Washington Times reported that it
was totally cool, though, because humanitarian that he is, Soros just wanted to help the civil rights movement.

What a guy. Of course, this seems to be a thing with the kabillionaires. The Ford Foundation and Rockefeller
foundation also fund social activism. Which is kabillionaire code for mess stuff up and wreak havoc.

And guess who footed the bill for the rent-a-thug protesters at Trump rallies in California and New York?
(Heres another source, too.) You guessed it. Everyones favorite Hungarian-American troll.

Keep in mind that the organization Black Lives Matter was born through the Ferguson riots.

If the Modus Operandi in these protests looks familiar, thats because MoveOn.org is organizing a lot of them,
and MoveOn is funded byyou guessed it: George Soros. The organization was originally founded to combat the
 impeachment of Bill Clintonare you seeing a link here? Another proud instigator is the Answer Coalition which
also are you sitting down? Has links to Soros

Someone who wants to see America ripped apart is causing this division. Last summer, it was leaked that Soros
attempted to destabllize Russia and depose Putin in 2012. Putin responded by banning Soros and all of his
organizations from Russia. In 2014, Putin issued an international arrest warrant for Soros."

This is the background of the billionaire philanthropist who is opposing the Trump presidency. Hes betting against America
right now, hoping to cash in and make billions when our economy crashes due to the instability he is causing.

Without one drop of remorse. Because

I cannot and do not look at the social consequences of what I do.

Related Articles:

George Soros Caught Red-Handed Funding Anti-Trump Protests, Paying Protesters $15/hr
 C.I.A. Links Top Hillary Donor George Soros to Terrorist Bombing

The Bizarre Media Blackout Of Hacked George Soros Documents

Soros Hack Shows Billionaire Tried to Buy Supreme Court Ruling on Immigration

Leaked Soros Document Calls For Regulating Internet To Favor Open Society Supporters

George Soros Warns Europe: Accept Refugees Or Face Extinction

Fomenting A National Crisis & Color Revolution: Soros-Funded Anti-Trump Protesters Riot In Cities Across US

George Soros Hacked, Thousands Of Open Society Foundations Files Released Online

How George Soros Singlehandedly Created The European Refugee Crisis - And Why

The Diabolical World Of George Soros

In a document which was released by DC leaks, George Soros' Open Society's Foundation stated: Our inclination is to
engage in activities and with actors that will understand and counter Russian influence and support to movements defending
traditional values.

Related: Shots Fired: Wikileaks Accuses Panama Papers' Leaker Of Being "Soros-Funded, Soft-Power Tax Dodge"
+
Rothschild's Primer: How To Launder Money In U.S. Real Estate And Avoid "Blacklists"

The Orwellian War On Skepticism: Battling Fake News & Institutional Investors Now
Dominate Media Company Ownership
December 9 2016 | From: GlobalResearch / Scoop

Under the cover of battling fake news, the mainstream U.S. news media and officialdom are
taking aim at journalistic skepticism when it is directed at the pronouncements of the U.S.
government and its allies.
One might have hoped that the alarm about fake news would remind major U.S. news outlets, such as The
Washington Post and The New York Times, about the value of journalistic skepticism. However, instead, it seems
to have done the opposite.

Related: Who is Behind Fake News? Mainstream Media Use Fake Videos and Images

The idea of questioning the claims by the Wests officialdom now brings calumny down upon the heads of those who dare
do it. Truth is being redefined as whatever the U.S. government, NATO and other Western interests say is true.

Disagreement with the Wests group thinks, no matter how fact-based the dissent is, becomes fake news.

So, we have the case of Washington Post columnist David Ignatius having a starry-eyed interview with Richard Stengel, the
State Departments Undersecretary for Public Diplomacy, the principal arm of U.S. government propaganda.

Entitled The truth is losing, the column laments that the official narratives as deigned by the State Department
and The Washington Post are losing traction with Americans and the worlds public.

Stengel, a former managing editor at Time magazine, seems to take aim at Russias RT networks slogan, question
more, as some sinister message seeking to inject cynicism toward the Wests official narratives.

Theyre not trying to say that their version of events is the true one. Theyre saying: Everybodys lying! Nobodys
telling you the truth!, Stengel said.

They dont have a candidate, per se. But they want to undermine faith in democracy, faith in the West.

No Evidence

Typical of these recent mainstream tirades about this vague Russian menace, Ignatiuss column doesnt provide any
specifics regarding how RT and other Russian media outlets are carrying out this assault on the purity of Western
information.

Its enough to just toss around pejorative phrases supporting an Orwellian solution, which is to stamp out or marginalize
alternative and independent journalism, not just Russian.
The Washington Post building in downtown Washington, D.C.

Ignatius writes:

Stengel poses an urgent question for journalists, technologists and, more broadly, everyone living in free societies
or aspiring to do so. How do we protect the essential resource of democracy - the truth - from the toxin of lies that
surrounds it? Its like a virus or food poisoning. It needs to be controlled. But how?

Stengel argues that the U.S. government should sometimes protect citizens by exposing weaponized information,
false information that is polluting the ecosystem.

But ultimately, the defense of truth must be independent of a government that many people mistrust. There are
inherent dangers in having the government be the verifier of last resort, he argues.

By the way, Stengel is not the fount of truth-telling, as he and Ignatius like to pretend.

Early in the Ukraine crisis, Stengel delivered a rant against RT that was full of inaccuracies or what you might call fake
news.

Yet, what Stengel and various mainstream media outlets appear to be arguing for is the creation of a Ministry of
Truth managed by mainstream U.S. media outlets and enforced by Google, Facebook and other technology
platforms.

In other words, once these supposedly responsible outlets decide what the truth is, then questioning that narrative will earn
you virtual expulsion from the marketplace of ideas, possibly eliminated via algorithms of major search engines or marked
with a special app to warn readers not to believe what you say, a sort of yellow Star of David for the Internet age.

And then theres the possibility of more direct (and old-fashioned) government enforcement by launching FBI investigations
into media outlets that wont toe the official line. (All of these solutions have been advocated in recent weeks.)
On the other hand, if you do toe the official line that comes from Stengels public diplomacy shop, you stand to get
rewarded with government financial support. Stengel disclosed in his interview with Ignatius that his office funds
investigative journalism projects.

How should citizens who want a fact-based world combat this assault on truth? Ignatius asks, adding:

Stengel has approved State Department programs that teach investigative reporting and empower truth-
tellers.

Buying Propaganda

After reading Ignatiuss column on Wednesday, I submitted a question to the State Department asking for details on
thisjournalism and truth-telling funding that is coming from the U.S. governments top propaganda shop, but I have not
received an answer.

Related: EU Demands Social Media Websites Censor Fake News Within 24 Hours

But we do know that the U.S. government has been investing tens of millions of dollars in various media programs to
undergird Washingtons desired narratives.

For instance, in May 2015, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) issued a fact sheet summarizing its work
financing friendly journalists around the world, including:

Journalism education, media business development, capacity building for supportive institutions, and
strengthening legal-regulatory environments for free media.

USAID estimated its budget for media strengthening programs in over 30 countries at $40 million
annually, including aiding independent media organizations and bloggers in over a dozen countries.

In Ukraine before the 2014 coup ousting elected President Viktor Yanukovych and installing a fiercely anti-Russian and
U.S.-backed regime, USAID offered training in mobile phone and website security, skills that would have been quite helpful
to the coup plotters.

USAID, working with currency speculator George Soross Open Society, also has funded the Organized Crime and
Corruption Reporting Project, which engages in investigative journalism that usually goes after governments that
have fallen into disfavor with the United States and then are singled out for accusations of corruption.

The USAID-funded OCCRP collaborates with Bellingcat, an online investigative website founded by blogger Eliot Higgins.
Higgins has spread misinformation on the Internet, including discredited claims implicating the Syrian government in the
sarin attack in 2013 and directing an Australian TV news crew to what appeared to be the wrong location for a video of a
BUK anti-aircraft battery as it supposedly made its getaway to Russia after the shoot-down of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 in
2014.

Despite his dubious record of accuracy, Higgins has gained mainstream acclaim, in part, because his findings always
match up with the propaganda theme that the U.S. government and its Western allies are peddling. Higgins is now
associated with the Atlantic Council, a pro-NATO think tank which is partially funded by the U.S. State Department.

Beyond funding from the State Department and USAID, tens of millions of dollars more are flowing through the U.S.-
government-funded National Endowment for Democracy, which was started in 1983 under the guiding hand of CIA Director
William Casey.

NED became a slush fund to help finance what became known, inside the Reagan administration, as perception
management, the art of controlling the perceptions of domestic and foreign populations.

The Emergence of StratCom

Last year, as the New Cold War heated up, NATO created the Strategic Communications Command in Latvia to further
wage information warfare against Russia and individuals who were contesting the Wests narratives.
NATO headquarters in Brussels, Belgium

As veteran war correspondent Don North reported in 2015 regarding this new StratCom, the U.S. government has come to
view the control and manipulation of information as a soft power weapon, merging psychological operations, propaganda
and public affairs under the catch phrase strategic communications.

This attitude has led to treating psy-ops - manipulative techniques for influencing a target populations state of
mind and surreptitiously shaping peoples perceptions - as just a normal part of U.S. and NATOs information
policy.

Now, the European Parliament and the U.S. Congress are moving to up the ante, passing new legislation
to escalate information warfare.

On Wednesday, U.S. congressional negotiators approved $160 million to combat what they deem foreign propaganda and
the alleged Russian campaign to spread fake news. The measure is part of the National Defense Authorization Act and
gives the State Department the power to identify propaganda and counter it.

This bipartisan stampede into an Orwellian future for the American people and the worlds population follows a shoddily
sourced Washington Post article that relied on a new anonymous group that identified some 200 Internet sites, including
some of the most prominent American independent sources of news, as part of a Russian propaganda network.

Typical of this new McCarthyism, the report lacked evidence that any such network actually exists but instead targeted
cases where American journalists expressed skepticism about claims from Western officialdom.
 McCarthyism is the practice of making accusations of subversion or treason without proper regard for evidence. It
also means "the practice of making unfair allegations or using unfair investigative techniques, especially in order to
restrict dissent or political criticism."

The term has its origins in the period in the United States known as the Second Red Scare, lasting roughly from
1950 to 1956 and characterized by heightened political repression against supposed communists, as well as a
campaign spreading fear of their influence on American institutions and of espionage by Soviet agents.

Originally coined to criticize the anti-communist pursuits of Republican U.S. Senator Joseph McCarthy of
Wisconsin, "McCarthyism" soon took on a broader meaning, describing the excesses of similar efforts.

The term is also now used more generally to describe reckless, unsubstantiated accusations, as well as
demagogic attacks on the character or patriotism of political adversaries.

Consortiumnews.com was included on the list apparently because we have critically analyzed some of the claims and
allegations regarding the crises in Syria and Ukraine, rather than simply accept the dominant Western group thinks.

Also on the black list were such quality journalism sites as Counterpunch, Truth-out, Truthdig, Naked Capitalism and
ZeroHedge along with many political sites ranging across the ideological spectrum.

The Fake-News Express

Normally such an unfounded conspiracy theory would be ignored, but because The Washington Post treated the
incredible allegations as credible the smear has taken on a life of its own, reprised by cable networks and republished by
major newspapers.
Related: My interview with former CBS star reporter: fake news

But the unpleasant truth is that the mainstream U.S. news media is now engaged in its own fake-news campaign
about fake news. Its publishing bogus claims invented by a disreputable and secretive outfit that just recently popped up
on the Internet. If that isnt fake news, I dont know what is.

Yet, despite the Posts clear violations of normal journalistic practices, surely, no one there will pay a price,
anymore than there was accountability for the Post reporting as flat fact that Iraq was hiding WMD in 2002-2003.

Fred Hiatt, the editorial-page editor most responsible for that catastrophic group think, is still in the same job
today.

Two nights ago, MSNBCs Chris Matthews featured the spurious Washington Post article in a segment that - like similar
rehashes - didnt bother to get responses from the journalists being slandered.

I found that ironic since Matthews repeatedly scolds journalists for their failure to look skeptically at U.S.
government claims about Iraq possessing WMD as justification for the disastrous Iraq War.

However, now Matthews joins in smearing journalists who have applied skepticism to U.S. and Western
propaganda claims about Syria and/or Ukraine.
MSNBCs Hardball host Chris Matthews

While the U.S. Congress and the European Parliament begin to take action to shut down or isolate dissident sources of
information all in the name of democracy - a potentially greater danger is that mainstream U.S. news outlets are already
teaming up with technology companies, such as Google and Facebook, to impose their own determinations about truth on
the Internet.

Or, as Ignatius puts it in his column reflecting Undersecretary for Public Diplomacy Stengels thinking;

The best hope may be the global companies that have created the social-media platforms.They see this
information war as an existential threat, says Stengel.

The real challenge for global tech giants is to restore the currency of truth. Perhaps machine
learning [presumably a reference to algorithms] can identify falsehoods and expose every argument that uses
them.

Perhaps someday, a human-machine process will create what Stengel describes as a global ombudsman for
information.

Ministry of Truth

An organization of some 30 mainstream media companies already exists, including not only The Washington Post and The
New York Times but also the Atlantic Council-connected Bellingcat, as the emerging arbiters or ombudsmen for truth,
something Orwell described less flatteringly as a Ministry of Truth.
Big Brother poster illustrating George Orwells novel about modern propaganda, 1984

The New York Times has even editorialized in support of Internet censorship, using the hysteria over fake news to justify
the marginalization or disappearance of dissident news sites.

It now appears that this 1984-ish MiniTrue will especially target journalistic skepticism when applied to U.S. government
and mainstream media group thinks.

Yet, in my four decades-plus in professional journalism, I always understood that skepticism was a universal journalistic
principle, one that should be applied in all cases, whether a Republican or a Democrat is in the White House or whether
some foreign leader is popular or demonized.
Related: The Ultimate Fake News List: The mainstream media is the primary source of the most harmful, most
inaccurate news ever

As we have seen in recent years, failure to ask tough questions and to challenge dubious claims from government
officials and mainstream media outlets can get lots of people killed, both U.S. soldiers and citizens of countries
invaded or destabilized by outsiders.

To show skepticism is not the threat to democracy that Undersecretary Stengel and columnist Ignatius appear to think it is.

Whether you like or dislike RTs broadcasts - or more likely have never seen one - a journalist really cant question its
slogan: question more. Questioning is the essence of journalism and, for that matter, democracy.

[In protest of the Posts smearing of independent journalists, RootsAction has undertaken a petition drive, which can
be found here.]

PETITION: Defend Independent Media From Fake News Attacks

Ask President-elect Donald Trump to take a stand against the establishment's desperate move to label
independent media as fake news.

This is a red level emergency.

Infowars, Breitbart, the Drudge Report and other independent sources are destroying the mainstream media
narrative like never before, and the establishment is getting desperate.

In an effort to try and censor the liberty movement and free speech, the mainstream media is now attempting to
label legitimate news sources like Infowars as "fake news" to push towards a government-led shut down of
Infowars.com.
 The Washington Post has even gone as far as to label sites like Infowars as "Russian propaganda fake
news" web sites, exemplifying the last attempt of a dying media conglomerate to force out any and all
dissenting voices.

Even more concerning, the United States House of Representatives quietly passed legislation
targeting 'Russian propaganda' websites.

But the calls for censorship do not end with the United States.

The European Union is demanding that Twitter, YouTube and Facebook censor illegal hate speech
within 24 hours and content that includes so-called fake news, a term so broad that it includes perfectly
legitimate news content.

Microsoft, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter have also announced that they will be ramping up efforts to remove
"extremist" content from their websites by using a shared database of offenders.

And perhaps most importantly, Twitter has recently gone on record stating the company will ban
President-Elect Donald J. Trump's Twitter account if he were to violate the company's "hate speech" rules.

We are calling on and asking President-Elect Donald J. Trump to take a stand against the establishment media's
"fake news" attacks and to stop the impending censorship of independent media platforms like Infowars.com and
others.

Click here to go to the petition page

Related: US House Bill 6393 Passed to Counter Russian Fake News & its Repeaters

Institutional Investors Now Dominate Media Company Ownership

Institutional investors now dominate the ownership and governance of New Zealand media
companies, according to the sixth annual update on local media ownership from the Auckland
University of Technology's Journalism, Media and Democracy Research Centre.
"For the first time in six years, our media companies are exclusively owned by financial institutions and it is in their
interest to push structural changes through," the report's author, Merja Myllylahti, says in a review of a sector in
which two major mergers are proposed: between news publishers NZME and the New Zealand assets of Australian
media firm Fairfax Media; and between Vodafone New Zealand and Sky Network Television.

Related: Is the US Government Behind the Fake News Media Attacks on President-elect Trump?

Media owners have largely pulled out of the sector, she notes.

"Many of the directors have no declared media interests, but have directorships in financial firms and corporate
advisory businesses.The board structures of media corporates support further consolidation."

The report lists the most significant events in New Zealand media ownership this year as:

NZME separating from its Australian parent APN News & media, to become a standalone NZX-listed company; Rupert
Murdoch's News Corp selling all its NZME shares, inherited as a result of the APN split; the proposed merger between
NZME and Fairfax's New Zealand assets; Vodafone proposing a merger with Sky Network Television; and TV3 owner
MediaWorks getting a new board and senior management.
NZME, publisher of the New Zealand Herald newspaper and website and the Newstalk ZB radio network among
other assets, is 85.6 percent-owned by financial institutions, she said.

Myllylahti painted a grim outlook for traditional news publishers, saying merging was;

Not a solution for NZMEs and Fairfaxs troubled business models".

"The market challenges remain the same."

She noted a report by David Kaynes, an Australian-based analyst for multinational investment bankers Citi, reported in
Australian media yesterday, suggesting Fairfax's flagship titles in Australia have no future if digital revenue continues to
decline.

The only way for the merged company to stabilise its revenue in the short-term is to implement cost savings and
cut hundreds of jobs, and it is their intention to do so," said Myllylahti.
The report notes that media and telecommunications consolidation is accelerating in many countries.

The relations and dependencies between news media corporations, social media companies, search engines,
chat providers, and news app companies became increasingly intertwined and complex" in 2016.

NZME and Fairfax are arguing they must merge to have a chance of competing with global platforms like Facebook and
Google, which are becoming go-to venues for news while hoovering up digital advertising revenues, which are a far smaller
than the total pool of advertising spend once available to newspaper publishers.
That's in spite of new evidence that the total proportion of all ad spending committed to digital channels is growing fast.

The Standard Media Index, a measure of New Zealand advertising spend, shows some 31.6 percent of total ad spending
was on digital from January to September this year was 31.6 percent, compared with 26.2 percent in the same period last
year and 11.6 percent for the same period five years ago.

Related: Why I named my web site no-more-fake-news in 2001

CIA MKULTRA: Drugs To Take Down The Nation

December 8 2016 | From: JonRappoport / Various

Drugs to transform individualsand even, by implication, society. Drug research going far beyond
the usual brief descriptions of MKULTRA.
The intention is there, in the record: A CIA document was included in the transcript of the 1977 US Senate Hearings
on MKULTRA, the CIAs mind-control program.

Related: Roseanne Barr: MK Ultra Rules In Hollywood

The document is found in Appendix C, starting on page 166. Its simply labeled Draft, dated 5 May 1955 (note: scroll down
to #123-125 in the document).

It states: A portion of the Research and Development Program of [CIAs] TSS/Chemical Division is devoted to the discovery
of the following materials and methods:

What followed was a list of hoped-for drugs and their uses.

First, a bit of background: MKULTRA did not end in 1962, as advertised. It was shifted over to the Agencys Office of
Research and Development.

John Marks is the author of the groundbreaking book, Search for the Manchurian Candidate, which exposed MKULTRA.
Related: MK-ULTRA - The CIA's Mind Control Program

Marks told me a CIA representative informed him that the continuation of MKULTRA, after 1962, was carried out with a
greater degree of secrecy, and he, Marks, would never see a scrap of paper about it.

Im printing below, the list of the 1955 intentions of the CIA regarding their own drug research. The range of those intentions
is stunning.
Some of my comments gleaned from studying the list: The CIA wanted to find substances which would promote illogical
thinking and impulsiveness. Serious consideration should be given to the idea that psychiatric medications, food additives,
herbicides, and industrial chemicals (like fluorides) would eventually satisfy that requirement.

The CIA wanted to find chemicals that would produce the signs and symptoms of recognized diseases in a reversible
way. This suggests many possibilities - among them the use of drugs to fabricate diseases and thereby give the false
impression of germ-caused epidemics.

Related: Implanting False Memories is Real, says Psychologist | A Memory Hacker Explains How to Plant False
Memories in Peoples Minds

The CIA wanted to find drugs that would produce amnesia. Ideal for discrediting whistleblowers, dissidents,
certain political candidates, and other investigators. (Scopolamine, for example.)

The CIA wanted to discover drugs which would produce paralysis of the legs, acute anemia, etc. A way to make
people decline in health as if from diseases.

The CIA wanted to develop drugs that would alter personality structure and thus induce a persons dependence
on another person. How about dependence in general? For instance, dependence on institutions, governments?

The CIA wanted to discover chemicals that would lower the ambition and general working efficiency of
men. Sounds like a general description of the devolution of society.

Related: Central Intelligence Agency collection: MKULTRA

As you read the list yourself, youll see more implications/possibilities.

Here, from 1955, are the types of drugs the MKULTRA men at the CIA were looking for. The following statements are direct
CIA quotes:

A portion of the Research and Development Program of TSS/Chemical Division is devoted to the discovery of the
following materials and methods:
 1. Substances which will promote illogical thinking and impulsiveness to the point where the recipient would be
discredited in public.

2. Substances which increase the efficiency of mentation and perception.

3. Materials which will prevent or counteract the intoxicating effect of alcohol.

4. Materials which will promote the intoxicating effect of alcohol.

5. Materials which will produce the signs and symptoms of recognized diseases in a reversible way so that they
may be used for malingering, etc.

6. Materials which will render the induction of hypnosis easier or otherwise enhance its usefulness.

7. Substances which will enhance the ability of individuals to withstand privation, torture and coercion during
interrogation and so-called brain-washing.

8. Materials and physical methods which will produce amnesia for events preceding and during their use.

9. Physical methods of producing shock and confusion over extended periods of time and capable of
surreptitious use.

10. Substances which produce physical disablement such as paralysis of the legs, acute anemia, etc.

11. Substances which will produce pure euphoria with no subsequent let-down.

12. Substances which alter personality structure in such a way that the tendency of the recipient to become
dependent upon another person is enhanced.

13. A material which will cause mental confusion of such a type that the individual under its influence will find it
difficult to maintain a fabrication under questioning.

14. Substances which will lower the ambition and general working efficiency of men when administered in
undetectable amounts.

15. Substances which promote weakness or distortion of the eyesight or hearing faculties, preferably without
permanent effects.

16. A knockout pill which can surreptitiously be administered in drinks, food, cigarettes, as an aerosol, etc., which
will be safe to use, provide a maximum of amnesia, and be suitable for use by agent types on an ad hoc basis.

17. A material which can be surreptitiously administered by the above routes and which in very small amounts
will make it impossible for a man to perform any physical activity whatsoever.

At the end of this 1955 CIA document, the author [unnamed] makes these remarks:

In practice, it has been possible to use outside cleared contractors for the preliminary phases of this [research]
work. However, that part which involves human testing at effective dose levels presents security problems which
cannot be handled by the ordinary contactors.

The proposed [human testing] facility [deletion] offers a unique opportunity for the secure handling of such clinical
testing in addition to the many advantages outlined in the project proposal.

The security problems mentioned above are eliminated by the fact that the responsibility for the testing will rest
completely upon the physician and the hospital. [one line deleted] will allow [CIA] TSS/CD personnel to supervise
the work very closely to make sure that all tests are conducted according to the recognized practices and embody
adequate safeguards.
In other words, this was to be ultra-secret. No outside contractors at universities for the core of the experiments, which by
the way could be carried forward for decades.A secret in-house facility. Over the years, more facilities could be created.

If you examine the full range of psychiatric drugs developed since 1955, youll see that a number of them fit the CIAs
agenda. Speed-type chemicals to addle the brain over the long term, to treat so-called ADHD.

Anti-psychotic drugs, AKA major tranquilizers, to render patients more and more dependent on others (and government)
as they sink into profound disability and incur motor brain damage.

Related: Monarch Mind Control & The MK-Ultra Program

And of course, the SSRI antidepressants, like Prozac and Paxil and Zoloft, which produce extreme and debilitating highs
and lows - and also push people over the edge into committing violence.

These drugs drag the whole society down into lower and lower levels of consciousness and action.

Related Articles:

Secret Deep-Black War to Hijack Your Mind

Investigating MK-ULTRA and psychedelic and environmental movements Brain database

Central Intelligence Agency collection: Stargate

The Stargate Project : Psychic Warriors and the CIA

New Zealands Elite Child Abuse Rings Exposed

December 7 2016 | From: MediaWhores / Various

Minister of State Organised Child Abuse - Anne Tolley - has announced there will be no
investigation into mass child abuse by the Crown. The Crown presumably has the God given right
to abuse as many Kiwi children as it likes and its none of tax payers business.
Fearless blog Lauda Finem that specialises in exposing NZs pedophile corporate elite and the justice system that
appears to systematically protect them has recently posted allegations that the NZ judiciary have also been caught
red handed covering up pedophilia in NZ.

Related: Tolley rules out apology for child abuse in state care
Related: District Court Judge Hinton Put On Notice, Supreme Court Advised Of Attempted Judicial Paedophilia
Cover-up

Nothing new to us at Media Whores. It has long been alleged that even New Zealands chief justice - Sian Elias - is married
to a serial child sex offender - Hugh Fletcher. So perhaps it is no surprise that pedophiles are protected by the NZ justice
system.

The Justin Davis Files floating around the web seems to suggest that the NZ judiciary is actively involved in the covering up
and protection of powerful pedophiles and pedophile rings in New Zealand including some MPs, and many top
businessmen, doctors and dentists in NZ.

Whistle Blower Justin Davis gives us a first hand look into the world of these pedophiles who use sophisticated date rape
drugs to drug and abuse children in their doctors rooms, dentistry clinics, churches and even MP offices.
Sian Elias

The drugs they use mean the victims usually do not even know they have been abused, and just wake up in a haze feeling
drowsy with no memory of the abuse but they will never be the same traumatised in the subconscious for life.

Every so often we see such cases float to the surface, but they are usually covered up and suppressed as quickly as
possible the fact is they are only the tip of the iceberg..they are likely all connected, and probably using the same drugs
and drug networks exposed by Justin Davis- drugs being distributed by top doctors and dentists around NZ.

Related Articles:

New Zealander charged with sex assaults on drugged backpackers

Jury finds former St John ambulance officer guilty on all eight sex charges

Hawkes Bay doctor accused of stupefying continues bid to keep name secret

Doctor granted permanent name suppression

Auckland professional caught with 6000 objectionable images

We have also recently seen the astounding situation of NZ Judge Lowell Goddard seeming to fudge the investigation into
the Westminister Scandal in the UK where over 100,000 children are alleged to have been abused by British MPs, Lords,
Judges and high profile entertainers. The NZ judiciary right in the thick of it. They are very much an International operation
that much is clear.
Lowell Goddard

Ironically it was the blogger Cameron Slater who exposed in 2014 that at least 5 sitting MPs have name suppression for
child abuse crimes.

Slater is obviously part of same establishment with his blanket protection of John Key and his gang, but was being put under
pressure during the Dirty Politics scandal and published it on his blog one day, presumably as a threat to those who he
works with and for.
Max Key

We know quite a few MPs have had to stand down in recent years Mike Sabin was one of them but the public are not
even allowed to discuss that case on the orders of the NZ judiciary.

We are aware that Nick Smith MP recently hired a Nelson lawyer to fight child abuse ring allegations circulating online. Nick
Smith was also tied up with the Civic Crache case in which young children came forward with stories of sexual abuse. Close
to the fire it seems, is the NZ Housing Minister.

Stephanie Key

Related: MP Nick Smith Hires Lawyer To Silence Child Abuse Ring Rumours

And then there was Prime Minister John Keys joke about the escaped pedophile killer Phillip Smith (there goes that name
again) on the world stage / G20 summit. John Key obviously thinks pedophilia is quite humorous.

Related: John Key's killer paedophile joke disgusts victims' family

The very fact they call these people Ministers is highly suspect it stinks of religious overtones and we all know too well
about the reputation of Church ministers. It is all the same church in our view.
John Key and his love for little girls ponytails and his highly sexualised children. Something is clearly not quite right with
the PM.

To their credit it was Radio NZ who reported on the 1000 children who have gone missing from Child Youth and Family
over the years the Government and Anne Tolley raced to counter the fall out by relabeling the Crowns apparent child
trafficking operation with a new name.

Radio NZ appear to spend most of their time covering this stuff up, but this article was good work on their part.

Related: 'CYFS need to listen to carers'

Facebook is awash with stories of Child Youth and Family now kidnapping children as young as 4 weeks old from their
breastfeeding mothers they do this using their laws and mandatory (and unverifiable) drug tests which they enforce on
poor parents who are reliant on their communist welfare / warfare system.
Related: 'CYFS Need To Listen To Carers'

So they take a breast feeding child off its mother at 4 weeks and place it in the hands of strangers where the statistics say
they are at least 10 times more likely to be abused.

How can the public be assured these kids are not being kidnapped to order by pedophiles who are connected to these
people who pose as Government and Justice? Perhaps these freaks feed off children in fact some argue this is often
the case.

There are numerous petitions online from families who have had their children kidnapped by the State under dubious
circumstances. Can you imagine knowing your kids have been taken by people with numerous documented ties to
pedophile rings and child abuse? Horrific.

Related: Government; Hold a Ministerial Inquiry into the taking of Children by CYFS
Related: Andrew Breitbart - Was he murdered for investigating pizzagate back in 2012?

Its was exiled NZ author Greg Hallett who first claimed (quote) The judiciary shows itself to be a paedophile and crime
creation movement whose primary goal is fatherless families. in his book available on Amazon New Zealand a
Blackmailers Guide.

Greg was denied a fair hearing by the same judiciary in NZ and then had a number of murder attempts on his life before
fleeing the Country back in 2007.

Further below we post some links to recent name suppression cases in which the NZ judiciary protect child sex offenders,
many of them caught red handed, some even with child murder videos but still escaped conviction. A reasonable person
would have to at least suspect that this is in fact a major goal of the judiciary in NZ- to protect child sex offenders.

You will know them by their deeds. Very wise words. Not by the fancy titles and honors they give themselves.

You can watch Greg Halletts interview with US researcher Jim Fetzer below - Greg maintains his sense of humor even as
the mafia chase him around trying to murder him- a true National / Kiwi hero, exposing the child abusers of NZ and their
global network and risking his own life to do so...

Recent name Suppression and related cases in NZ- the Nation is literally crawling with pedophiles and the judiciary
seem to go out of their way to protect them the list includes MPs, top businessmen and many more high profile
New Zealanders. Quite a club they are running.

Jury finds former St John ambulance officer guilty on all eight sex charges

Ex MP charged with indecent assault

Cabinet ministers brother accused of abusing two 11-year-olds

National MP Nick Smith found in contempt of court

Hon Dr Nick Smith, M.P and the Family Court

 Permanent name suppression for top professional

Name suppression for Auckland professional

Doctor granted permanent name suppression

Auckland professional caught with 6000 objectionable images

But they only give name suppression to protect the victims right?

Abused sisters lose High Court bid to name attacker

Investigated teacher refused to open laptop, but can still teach

GP accused of indecent assault finally loses his right to practice

Fight to keep name suppressed in couch-surfing case

Convicted rapist back tutoring

New Zealander charged with sex assaults on drugged backpackers

Permanent name suppression for prominent New Zealander

Prominent Auckland actor on sex charges retains name suppression

Sex offender Ronald Van der Plaats release angers Te Atatu community

Name suppression for New Plymouth man who imported pornography

Invercargill underage sex accused not guilty

Acquitted prominent NZer wins permanent suppression

Man jailed for 13 years for raping daughter

Name suppression threshold too high QC

Sex offender seeks further name suppression

Kiwi entertainer retains name supression

Suppression for man on rape charge

Community work and name suppression for child porn downloader

NZ actor facing sex charges keeps name suppression

Judge declines to lift suppression of kiwi actor on sex charges

Comedian says incident was drunken accident

Wellington child pornography offender discharged without conviction

Pharmacist suppression orders lifted

Upskirt filmer gets name suppression

 Name suppression for Auckland flasher

Teachers found guilty of misconduct over relationship with 13-year-old girl lose name suppression

Some argue its the same agenda as Political Marxism and it springs from these peoples ancient religious beliefs a
scientific and/or spiritual method of destroying communities for power and control - and New Zealand is suffering under it at
extreme levels under the John Key foreign banker regime, at least as much as it did under the Marxist Clark regime.

Related: John Boener Displays Some Creepy Behaviour

Mike Gillam Thompson & Toresen

Mike Gillam Private Investigator whom pedophile exposing website Lauda Finem has exposed many times. Such people
are deployed to help with cover ups Lauda Finem claims

Kiwis need to ask themselves- are we governed by a gang of child sex offenders that feed off our children?

Related Articles:

Every Awful Thing We Know About PizzaGate and the DC Pedophiles So Far

Podesta, Madelene Connection: The Smoking Gun

Pizzagate: The Bigger Picture

Evidence and Forensics of Ritual Abuse in Australia

A Nation Breathes a Sigh of Relief as its Filthy Lying PM Resigns the John Key Holocaust is Over!
New Zealand Prime Minister John Key Resigns - Warned In Person By United States
Secretary Of State John Kerry Of Arrest Status
December 6 2016 | From: TheGuardian / Secure

Key says he would vote for his deputy prime minister, Bill English, if he put his name forward for
leader, after shock announcement that he is quitting. The Cabal is falling and Key is the latest
casualty...

We are witnessing the publicised beginnings of the fall of the Khazarian Nazionist Luciferian Cabal right now

John Key, the New Zealand prime minister and leader of the National party, has resigned in a decision that has
taken the country by surprise.

Related: Italy Referendum: Prime Minister Renzi Quits as Voters Deliver Stinging Rebuke

Warning: Brace yourself for the horrific backslapping of Cabal minions... Wake up Rebecca.

Key held a media conference in Wellington at 12.45pm local time, after informing the cabinet of his decision.

His resignation will be effective from 12 December, when National MPs will meet to select a new leader.

Key said he would vote for his deputy prime minister, Bill English, if he put his name forward. English briefly led the party to
its worst-ever electoral defeat in the 2002 election, but has since served as a successful finance minister.

Key is widely regarded as one of the most popular prime ministers in New Zealands history. He was first elected in 2008,
and recently marked his 10-year anniversary as leader of the National party.
He said stepping down was the hardest decision he had ever had to make, but there was no way he could have served a
full fourth term.

This felt like the right time to go, he told reporters;

Sometimes youve got to make hard decisions to make right decisions, he said, adding it was an opportunity to
refresh the National partys leadership of the country and hopefully clinch a fourth term.

I think one of the reasons governments fail at that fourth-term hurdle is leaders dont want to leave, everyone says
Ive seen this before. This is the chance to demonstrate newness about us.

He said he had a pretty long discussion about standing for a fourth term with his wife, Bronagh Key.

I dont feel comfortable looking down the barrel of the camera and not being honest ... On a family basis, I dont
think I could commit much longer than the next election.

He denied that Bronagh had given him an ultimatum, but said his leadership had come at a cost to his family.

Its been a decade of a lot of long, lonely nights for her and its the right time for me to come home.

His children, Max and Stephie, had suffered an extraordinary level of intrusion along with the opportunities that came with
being New Zealands first family.
Related: Radio Station George FM Warns Staff About Max Key

In the past year, Key has had to answer to questions about his sons burgeoning career as a DJ and social media
personality. Spending more time with his family was a major factor in his decision to stand down, he said.

Key said he believed the mark of a good prime minister was one who left the country in better shape than they found it.

Over time others will judge whether Ive done that. All I can say is I gave it everything I had. I have left nothing in
the tank.

One of his regrets was not getting the Trans-Pacific Partnership over the line, as well as his failed bid to change the flag.

He said he considered his economic management of the country as a mark of success, even though New Zealand had
weathered some crises during his government, including the Canterbury earthquake and the Pike River mining
disaster. Very few countries are in the financial position were in.

But Winston Peters, the leader of the New Zealand First party, said Key had consistently misled the public about the state of
the economy, and his resignation showed he was unable to muddy the waters anymore.

Key said he would remain in parliament long enough to avoid a byelection, but would step down as an MP before the next
election. He said he stood down hoping and believing New Zealand had been well served by the government I led.
Related: Banker John Keys Corporate Repackaging Of War

Comment: Key was warned to get the hell out by John Kerry (on his recent visit when he was also declined access
to a secret facility in Antarctica) because the Cabal is going down and Key is fairly well up on the arrest list.

The reason for his placement at #4 is not clear, perhaps because of his bankster history. We are told that in the #1
spot is George Soros, followed by Hillary Clinton in the #2 spot. Interesting times indeed.

He plans to remain in Auckland after leaving politics, and enter the commercial sector.

English, who has Keys backing to replace him, praised the prime ministers intelligence, optimism and integrity and said
he would be judged by history as one of New Zealands greatest leaders. He said the National caucus would now
consider the implications of the prime ministers decision, and that Key left behind a united team with plenty of talent.

He told reporters at a press conference that he learned from Key he was considering leaving in September. English had not
yet decided whether to stand for leadership, but would not rule it out.
Related: Does John Key Run The NZ Meth Trade?

Ultimately, that is a matter for the caucus ... Weve put a premium on stability and unity, and I dont think you
should expect to see the kind of public brawling that you see over leadership changes in Opposition.

The country benefits from stable, clear direction and government.

English pointed out that the caucus had only known about Keys resignation for a few hours.

Say it aint so, bro - Australian PM

The leader of the Labour party, Andrew Little, and the Green party co-leader, Metiria Turei, both wished Key well for the
future on Twitter.
Australias prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull, said he was disappointed to hear from his very good friend that he was
resigning.

I sent him one very short message: Say it aint so, bro.

Turnbull said Key was one of the most outstanding national leaders in the world today, whose influence was out
of proportion to the size of the country.

New Zealand has never boxed above its weight as much as it has done with John Key as its Prime Minister. He is
truly outstanding.

Turnbulls only consolation, he said, was that Keys resignation meant he might see more of him.
Related: New Zealand Troops To Stay In Iraq For Another 18 months: John Key

When Turnbull ousted Tony Abbott in September last year, he singled out Keys leadership as an inspiration.

Abbott also praised Keys fine innings on Twitter.

Australias opposition leader, Bill Shorten, said Key had been a good friend to Australia and wished him well.
The New Zealand dollar fell more than a quarter of a cent after the announcement.

If You Question The Establishment You Are Guilty Of Espionage, Says Corporate
Media - Because Russia + The Fake News Furor And The Threat Of Internet
Censorship
December 4 2016 | From: ActivistPost / GlobalResearch

Mainstream, corporate media has launched a dangerous and slanderous campaign to label any
news outlet not spewing accepted governmental narrative as professional Russian propagandists -
and those unaware theyd apparently been duped by Russia, useful idiots.

Ordinarily, the complete dearth of proof this claim has even a shred of truth would cause a reflexive eye roll but
in this case, the American exceptionalist machine behind the supposed analysis calls for FBI and Department of
Justice to investigate possible violations of Espionage Act.

Related: Establishment Media Declares War On Their Competition As Fake News

Conflating legitimate journalism with espionage because it refutes a narrative acceptable to the establishment is
categorically ludicrous.

This irresponsible, criminal violation of ethics devoid of any journalistic integrity came from the Washington Post, which
reported two teams of independent researchers discovered The Russians were behind fake news articles to help
Donald Trump win the election and undermine faith in American democracy.

It could be said you cant make this up - but apparently thats exactly what these so-called expert researchers
did.

The flood of fake news this election season got support from a sophisticated Russian propaganda campaign that
created and spread misleading articles online with the goal of punishing Democrat Hillary Clinton, helping
Republican Donald Trump and undermining faith in American democracy, say independent researchers who
tracked the operation, the Post declared in its lede.

Russias increasingly sophisticated propaganda machinery - including thousands of botnets, teams of paid human trolls,
and networks of websites and social-media accounts - echoed and amplified right-wing sites across the Internet as they
portrayed Clinton as a criminal hiding potentially fatal health problems and preparing to hand control of the nation to a
shadowy cabal of global financiers.

Who would have thunk such a thing?

The effort also sought to heighten the appearance of international tensions and promote fear of looming hostilities with
nuclear-armed Russia.

Related: The Myth Of Aggressive Russia

However, as has been the highly-suspect tendency thus far in the corporate medias war on ostensible disinformation,
literally no evidence accompanied the Posts report - nor the analyses provided by these two putatively independent
research groups - making the article a prime example of libel.
Related: House Quietly Passes Bill Targeting "Russian Propaganda" Websites

In fact, the credibility of this reporting is so wet tissue paper-flimsy, even the mainstream outlet Fortune refuted the contents
in an article appropriately titled, No, Russian Agents Are Not Behind Every Piece of Fake News You See, because
the case starts to come apart at the seams the more you look at it.

Fortune notes one of the two research groups, the Foreign Policy Institute, is:

A conservative think tank funded and staffed by proponents of the Cold War between the U.S. and Russia, which
says it has been researching Russian propaganda since 2014.

PropOrNot, the other group publishing the exhaustive list of even award-winning sites, tweets and retweets anti-Russian
sentiments from a variety of sources, has only existed since August of this year, according to Fortune. And an article
announcing the launch of the group on its website is dated last month.
None of the supposedly multiple people responsible for the fledgling PropOrNot website are named, even by the Post.

Its executive director, whom the Post quoted on the condition of anonymity to avoid being targeted by Russias legions
of skilled hackers- a laughable excuse worthy of its own tinfoil hat - claims;

The way that this propaganda apparatus supported Trump was equivalent to some massive amount of a media
buy. It was like Russia was running a super PAC for Trumps campaign... It worked.

Once again, the Russia did it narrative belies the underlying establishment frustration and inability to come to
terms with the loss of democratic election - a loss alternative, independent media undoubtedly assisted, but not for
the tiresome reasons corporate outlets repeat ad infinitum.

Hillary Clinton did not lose the 2016 presidential election because some shady, Russian-government crafted cabal of non-
mainstream outlets plotted her downfall for the benefit of Donald Trump. Indeed, most of the outlets listed - including The
Free Thought Project - castigated both Clinton and Trump when pertinent information became available.

No, Hillary Clinton lost because - even faced with as contentious a character as megalomaniacal Trump - the American
populace has grown too weary of Washington politics-as-usual, foreign policy-as-usual, and corruption-as-usual.

Related: McCarthyism Is Breaking Out All Over - Paul Craig Roberts

Independent media did a phenomenal job reporting on revelations published by WikiLeaks, and equally stellar
slaying of U.S. government propaganda reported as legitimate news by irresponsible corporate media presstitutes,
who some time ago abandoned journalism for establishment acceptance.

Pointing fingers will never make this any less true - and, in actuality, only deepens the shameful dereliction of journalistic
duty.

To wit, the Posts regurgitating this thinly veneered anti-Russian agenda as fact, when literally no investigation was
undertaken - no one contacted the outlets on this list to offer their side, for example - is precisely the sort of fake news the
establishment insists it needs to fight.

Fortune points out:

Theres also little data available on the PropOrNot report, which describes a network of 200 sites who it says are
 routine peddlers of Russian propaganda, which have what it calls a combined audience of 15 million Americans.
How is that audience measured?

We dont know. Stories promoted by this network were shared 213 million times, it says. How do we know this?
Thats unclear."

Once again, we have literally unverifiable information coughed up by unknown entities, who employed unknown methods to
produce a blacklist of media sites - which incidentally includes a disparate mishmash from Ron Paul and Chris Hedges, to
the Drudge Report and Lew Rockwell - that the public should deem verboten because they said so. That, and because
Russia.

As The Intercepts Glenn Greenwald tweeted:

Yes, the WashPost is saying: some people who we wont identify, using methodologies we wont describe, created This
Important Blacklist!

Again, though its difficult not to laugh at this altogether ironic travesty, the peril lies in these unknown entities at
PropOrNot suggesting these outlets and the journalists behind them have violated the Espionage Act, the Foreign
Agent Registration Act, and other related laws, but determining that is up to the FBI and the DOJ.

Just two paragraphs prior, PropOrNot paradoxically claims it fiercely believe in the rights to freedom of expression and
freedom of the press, and have no interest in seeing anyone punished for exercising them.
Although PropOrNot flatly claims its questionably researched and flagrantly unvetted list shouldnt be considered
McCarthyistic, well, it is.

So in other words, any and every one who is anything but a liberal drone is now a Russian plant? Zero Hedge,
which also landed a spot on the Everyone the Establishment Dislikes Is a Russian Agent list, asked rhetorically. McCarthy
would be proud.

Related: The Major Purveyor of Fake News is the CIA-Corporate Complex

The Fake News Furor And The Threat Of Internet Censorship

In the weeks since the November 8 election, US media reports on the spread of so-called fake
news during the presidential campaign have increasingly repeated unsubstantiated pre-election
claims that the Russian government hacked into Democratic Party email servers to undermine the
campaign of Hillary Clinton.

There is more than a whiff of McCarthyism in this crusade against fake news on social media and the Internet,
with online publications critical of US wars of aggression and other criminal activities being branded as Russian
propaganda outlets.

Related: Fake News List Death Knell for MSM-Paul Craig Roberts

A case in point is an article published in the November 24 edition of the Washington Post headlined Russian propaganda
effort helped spread fake news during election, experts say.

The article includes assertions that Russian botnets, teams of paid human trolls, and networks of web sites and social
media accounts were used to promote sites across the Internet;

"As they portrayed Clinton as a criminal hiding potentially fatal health problems and preparing to hand
control of the nation to a shadowy cabal of global financiers.
Comment: Well they may not have been Russian bot-nets but they sure as hell were real people who have woken
up to the reality of that the psychopathic luciferial control-freak establishment wanted...

According to the Post, the exposure of Russian involvement in the spread of fake election news is based on the work of a
team of independent researchers and another anonymous group calling itself PropOrNot, which has expertise in computer
science, national security and public policy.

Oh for the love of Christ who do they think believes this hore shit anymore?

Pathetic.

Although no one from the PropOrNot organization is mentioned by name, the Post quotes the executive director of this
group anonymously. The organization has gone so far as to publish a list of 200 web sites - including WikiLeaks, the ultra-
right Drudge Report and the left-liberal Truthout - that are deemed routine peddlers of Russian propaganda.

It should be obvious that the Post report is itself an example of the state-sponsored pseudo-news that is
increasingly dispensed by the corporate-controlled media to promote the geopolitical and military aims of
American imperialism.

The New York Times has published similar articles, including one authored by David E. Sanger and posted on
the Times web site on November 25 under the headline US Officials Defend Integrity of Vote, Despite Hacking Fears.

Sanger, the chief Washington correspondent of the Times, is a regular sounding board for the military/intelligence
establishment, to which he is closely plugged in. He writes that:

Intelligence officials are still investigating the impact of a broader Russian information warfare campaign, in which
fake news about Mrs. Clinton, and about United States-Russia relations, appeared intended to influence voters.

He adds, Many of those false reports originated from RT News and Sputnik, two state-funded Russian sites.
The readers of this and virtually all other articles on the topic of Russias role in fake news will search in vain for a single
piece of evidence to substantiate the claims made.

Instead, the views and opinions of experts, usually unnamed, are cited and treated as indisputable fact - much in
the manner of Joe McCarthy and similar witch-hunters.

The editors and writers who produce these articles seem not even to notice that their publications have been caught in one
colossal lie after another - from the claims of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction used to justify the illegal invasion and
occupation of Iraq in 2003 to the more recent flood of government propaganda in support of neo-colonial wars in Libya and
Syria and drone killings in a growing number of countries - all justified in the name of human rights and the war on terror.

There are no institutions anywhere in the world more adept at producing fake news than the American corporate-
controlled media.

These same media outlets further discredited themselves by overtly slanting their news coverage of the election campaign
in favor of their preferred candidate, Hillary Clinton, and predicting that she would secure a decisive victory.

Blindsided by the support for Trump among disaffected and angry lower-income people and taken unawares by the electoral
collapse of the Democrats, the corporate media are responding to the growth of popular distrust by seeking to discredit
alternative news sources.

Related: Dear Donald Trump: Blockade the lying mainstream media and recognize the independent media as
America's real free press

This is not to deny the spread of false information and propaganda masquerading as news on the Internet.

Fabricated news stories and hoaxes have been circulating online since the World Wide Web began in the 1990s, but there
was a significant increase in fake political sites and content during the US elections.

Stories that stretched the truth or were entirely made up typically started on mock news web sites and were then amplified
by social media sharing.

Related: Putin awaits my application for citizenship, says Russian agent Paul Craig Roberts

Other false reports originated on platforms such as Facebook and Twitter and spread rapidly with the like, share and
comment features of social media.

An analysis published by Buzzfeed on November 16 showed that false political news stories in the final three
months of the election campaign, such as a report that the Pope had endorsed Trump for president, generated
more engagement on Facebook than the combined top stories of nineteen major US news organizations.

The Buzzfeed study noted the hyperpartisan right-wing nature of the top fabricated news items, as well as the spike in the
number of visitors to these sites during the final election months.

Another key aspect of online fake news has been the growth of its scope internationally. The Guardian reported in August,
for example, that a group of teenagers and college students from Veles, Macedonia set up dozens of political web site
faades to both influence and cash in on the Trump candidacy.

The Guardian report also pointed out that, although the pro-Trump sham news sites were more popular, both offshore and
domestic web sites became very popular and generated income for their publishers whether they were peddling phony
conservative or liberal misinformation.

That being said, the campaign in the corporate media against fake news on the Internet, including calls for social media
outlets such as Google and Facebook to vet the material that appears on their sites, is a reactionary attack on freedom of
the press.

It has already elicited positive responses from major Internet sites.

Both Google and Facebook have published statements acknowledging that they are working on systems that will
use third-party fact-checking of news content published on their services.

In the case of Facebook, this initiative - reminiscent of Orwells Thought Police - will be reinforced by barring
accounts identified as fake news sources from using online advertising tools.

Pressure to shut down or muzzle fake news sites and social media accounts are emanating from the offices of corporate
media organizations concerned about the loss of their influence over the public. Any moves to censor Internet content must
be opposed as an attack on democratic rights.

The measures being prepared today against fake news web sites and social media publishers will be perfected and used
tomorrow against the working class and the socialist media - the World Socialist Web Site - that articulates and fights for its
independent interests.

Related: FAKE NEWS: Newsweek Admits They Didnt Proof Read Madam President Issue; They Didnt Even Write
It

Climate Intervention: A Government Cover-Up Of Epic Proportions

December 3 2016 | From: WND

I recently addressed how CIA Director John Brennan gave a historic speech to the Council on
Foreign Relations, confessing something few thought they would ever hear: the federal
governments explicit and intentional climate intervention via operations like stratospheric aerosol
spraying or injections, or SAI.
What I didnt explain is that SAI is a ginormous federal geo-engineering cover up that is now being exposed, and
yet not a single mainstream media outlet has reported on it. Let me explain.

Related: The Real Fake News exposed: '97% of scientists agree on climate change' is an engineered hoax... here's
what the media never told you

In April, the U.S. Senate directed the Department of Energy (DOE) to review the findings of the National Academy [of
Sciences, or NAS] report, Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth, and to study the potential impacts of
albedo modification [or solar radiation management], a potential method of geoengineering, which included smaller scale
field trials.

Science magazine explained:

Albedo modification would work by lacing the atmosphere with tiny particles or aerosols that would reflect sunlight
and mimic natural processes.

For example, in 1991 the volcano Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines spewed 20 million tons of sulfur dioxide into
the stratosphere, which spans altitudes from 10 to 50 kilometers.

There, the sulfur dioxide produced aerosols that reflected enough sunlight to reduce global temperature by an
estimated 0.3C for 3 years.

Albedo modification might also work by using aerosols to seed cloud formation in a lower atmospheric layer called
the troposphere.

The U.S. Senate pushed the DOE to pursue albedo modification action a couple months before CIA Director Brennan gave
his blessing to stratospheric spraying as a government operation that potentially could help reverse the warming effects of
global climate change.
Whats crazy about all that government endorsement is that the February 2015 NAS report, on which the feds base their
entire toxic rain operation;

Warned explicitly that albedo modification shouldnt be deployed now because the risks and benefits
were far too uncertain.

What are those risks? Here are just three grave consequences that we know about:

Drought: The team under Chien Wang, a co-author of the NAS study and a senior research scientist at MITs Center for
Global Change Science and the Department of Earth, concluded that albedo modification would lead;

To dangerous changes in global weather: Precipitation would also decline worldwide, and some parts of the world
would be worse off. Europe, the Horn of Africa, and Pakistan may receive less rainfall than they have historically.

Loss of blue sky: According to a report by the New Scientist, Ben Kravitz of the Carnegie Institution for Science explained,
Releasing sulphate aerosols high in the atmosphere should in theory reduce global temperatures by reflecting a small
percentage of the incoming sunlight away from the Earth.

Related: Trump Picks Top Climate Skeptic to Lead EPA Transition

However, the extra particles would also scatter more of the remaining light into the atmosphere. This would reduce by 20
per cent the amount of sunlight that takes a direct route to the ground, and it would increase levels of softer, diffuse
scattered light, making the sky appear hazier.

Hazards to human health and other earth life: The gravest of all consequences of atmospheric aerosol spraying is that,
simply put, whats sprayed above us settles down upon us and in us, as well as other life on earth.

The U.S. governments own National Center for Biotechnology Information, or NCBI, released a report in January 2016, the
goal of which was Assessing the direct occupational and public health impacts of solar radiation management with
stratospheric aerosols. The NCBI concluded:

Our analysis suggests that adverse public health impacts may reasonably be expected from SRM via deployment
of stratospheric aerosols.

Little is known about the toxicity of some likely candidate aerosols, and there is no consensus regarding
acceptable levels for public exposure to these materials.

There is also little infrastructure in place to evaluate potential public health impacts in the event that stratospheric
aerosols are deployed for solar radiation management.

No wonder the co-author of the study on Climate Intervention, Dr. James Fleming, called geo-engineering like
SAI: untested and untestable, and dangerous beyond belief.

Related: A new study suggests that carbon-hungry plants help keep atmospheric CO2 levels in check

Another colleague and co-author, Dr. Raymond T. Pierrehumbert, the Louis Block professor in geophysical sciences at the
University of Chicago, and Swedens King Carl XVI Gustafn, chairman in environmental science at Stockholms Universitet,
took it one step further. He warned;
 The nearly two years worth of reading and animated discussions that went into this study have
convinced me more than ever that the idea of fixing the climate by hacking the Earths reflection of
sunlight is wildly, utterly, howlingly barking mad.

(That is why Dr. Pierrehumbert prefers to call albedo modification by the name albedo hacking.)

Dr. Pierrehumber added: The report describes albedo modification frankly as involving large and partly unknown risks. It
states outright that albedo modification should not be deployed.'

So, why are the U.S. Senate and CIA director disregarding the dire and passionate warnings of scientists like Dr.
Pierrehumbert and Dr. Fleming by demanding that the Department of Energy proceed with trials on geo-engineering? In the
words of Dr. Pierrehumber, are they wildly, utterly, howlingly barking mad? Answer: Yes!

Is it a mere coincidence that the very government agencies that are spraying our stratosphere with toxic chemicals were the
actual sponsors of the NAS report? The NAS itself confessed:

The study was sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences, U.S. intelligence community, National
Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and U.S. Department of
Energy (italics mine).

Isnt that like your right hand quoting your left hand so that your right hand can grab what its already holding? Is
the NAS report another government push and ploy to collaborate and cite scientific proof to justify its clandestine
climate agenda?

Why else would the CIA and U.S. Senate be proceeding in climate aerosol spraying when the very scientists
preparing the study warned, Stop! Dont do it! Its crazy and dangerous!

The most colossal and tragic of all government cover-ups is the fact that the feds have been waging climate warfare for
more than 30 years, lacing our clouds and stratosphere with dangerous nano-particles, including environmental sulfates,
black carbon, metallic aluminum and aluminum oxide aerosols.
The truth is, for decades, the feds have been covertly and overtly running sky criminal operations behind (above!) our backs,
leaving humans and the rest of the planet life as lab rats of their toxic cocktail fallout.

Geoengineeringwatch.org reported that a 1978 750-page congressional report was recently discovered with a mountain of
information going back decades that confirms the ongoing extensive involvement of our government in climate
modification/weather warfare.

This document also confirms the involvement of foreign governments around the globe, even governments that would
otherwise have been considered hostile to US interests.'

Why hasnt a single mainstream media outlet reported on the CIA and DOEs march forward with SAI when the scientific
community has explicitly and repeatedly warned against it?

Why are geo-engineering researchers being stonewalled by government and media?

And why in hell are watchdogs on both the left and right dodging the feds intentional and hazardous climate intervention,
when they seek to uncover government cover-ups and conspiracies with the most scant of evidence?

Dane Wigington, the lead researcher for GeoengineeringWatch.org and a fierce fighter for government geoengineering
transparency, was absolutely right when he wrote: How big does the climate engineering elephant in the room need to be
before it can no longer be hidden in plain site?
How much more historical proof do we need of the ongoing climate engineering/weather warfare before the denial of the
masses crumbles? When will populations around the globe bring to justice all those responsible for the ongoing and rapidly
worsening worldwide weather warfare assault?

Is it a mere coincidence that, in October 2015, the feds put a universal gag order on agency employees in The National
Weather Service, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the U.S. Dept. of Commerce?

Is it a mere coincidence that the Obama administration has spent more taxpayer monies for legal prosecutions of
government whistleblowers than all other U.S. presidents combined, resulting in 31 times the jail sentences?
Its time to blow the lid off the governments climate cover-up!

That is why my wife, Gena, and I encourage citizens everywhere to do their own research on geo-engineering and then
write their government representatives to demand action. We also encourage the support of the Legal Alliance of pro-bono
lawyers now amassed as a united front to fight the geo-engineering government cover-up in court.

To read or learn more immediately, I highly recommend the work and website of Dane
Wigington. GeoEngineeringWatch.org is loaded with great research on the many facets of climate intervention.

The Possibility Of Trump The Great + Donald Trump Said Willing To Consider A Gold
Standard
December 2 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / BusinessInsider

Liberals, progressives, and the left-wing (to the extent that one still exists) are aligning with the
corrupt oligarchy against president-elect Trump and the American people.
They are busy at work trying to generate hysteria over Trumps authoritarian personality and followers. In other
words, the message is: here come the fascists.

Related: Donald Trump believes in health freedom, not government dictates

Liberals and progressives wailed and whined about an all white male cabinet, only to be made fools by Trumps
appointment of a black male and two women, one a minority and one a Trump critic.

The oligarchs are organizing their liberal progressive front groups to disrupt Trumps inauguration in an effort to continue the
attempt to delegitimize Trump the way the paid Maidan protesters were used in Kiev to delegitimize the elected Ukrainian
government.

To the extent any of the Trump protesters are sincere and not merely paid tools of oligarchs, such as George Soros, military
and financial interests, and global capitalists, they should consider that false claims and unjustified criticism can cause
Trump and his supporters to close their ears to all criticism and make it easier for neoconservatives to influence Trump by
offering support.
Related: Trump to scrap Nasa climate research in crackdown on politicized science

At this point we dont know what a Trump government is going to do. If he sells out the people, he wont be reelected. If he is
defeated by the oligarchy, the people will become more radical.

We do not know how Washington insiders appointed to the government will behave inside a Trump presidency. Unless they
are ideologues like the neoconservatives or agents of powerful interests, insiders survive by going along with the current. If
the current changes under Trump, so will the insiders.

Trump got elected because flyover America has had all it can take from the self-dealing oligarchy. The vast bullk of
America has seen its economic prospects and that of children and grandchildren decline for a quarter century.

The states Hillary carried are limited to the liberal enclaves and oligarchys stomping grounds on the NE and West coasts
and in Colorado and New Mexico, where effete wealthy liberals have located because of the scenary. If you look at the
red/blue electoral map, geographically speaking Hillarys support is very limited.
Related: Fear and Loathing Inside The Deep State

We know that Hillary is an agent for the One Percent. The Clintons $120 million personal wealth and $1.6 billion personal
foundation are proof that the Clintons are bought-and-paid-for.

We know that Hillary is responsible for the destruction of Libya and of much of Syria and for the overthrow of the
democratically elected government in Ukraine.

We know that the Clinton regimes sanctions on Iraq resulted in the deaths of 500,000 children. These are war crimes and
crimes against humanity. We know Hillary used government office for private gain.

We know she violated national security laws without being held accountable. What we dont know is why groups that
allegedly are liberal-progressive-leftwing are such fervent supporters of Hillary.

One possible answer is that these groups are mere fronts for vested interests and are devoid of any sincere motives.

Another possible answer is that these groups believe that the important issues are not jobs for Americans and avoiding war
with nuclear powers, but transgender, homosexual and illegal alien rights. Another possible answer is that these groups are
uninformed and stupid.
Related: Trump Has Won, But the Battle Has Just Begun

What these protesters see as a threat in Trumps strong and willful personality is actually a virtue. A cipher like Obama has
no more ability to stand up to the oligarchy than a disengaged George W. Bush so easily stage-managed by Dick Cheney.

Nothing less than an authoritarian style and personality is a match for the well-entrenched ruling oligarchy and willful
neoconservatives. If Trump were a shrinking violet, the electorate would have ignored him.

Trump did not purchase his presidency with the offer of handouts to blacks, the poor generally, teachers unions, farmers,
abortion rights for women, etc. Trump was elected because he said:

Those who control the levers of power in Washington and the global special interests they partner
with, dont have your good in mind.

Its a global power structure that is responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working
class, stripped our country of its wealth and put that money into the pockets of a handful of large
corporations and political entities.

The only thing that can stop this corrupt machine is you.

Related: Trump's opponents see normal Americans as deplorables

It has been a long time since the electorate heard this kind of talk from someone seeking public office. Trumps words are
what Americans were waiting to hear.
As willful as Trump is, he is only one person. The oligarchy are many. As impressive as Trumps billion dollars is, the
oligarchs have trillions.

Congress being in Republican hands will spare Trump partisan obstruction, but Congress remains in the hands of interest
groups.

As powerful as the office of the president can be, without unity in government changes from the top dont occur, especially if
the president is at odds with the military with regard to the alleged threat posed by Russia and China.

Related: Putin: Trump and I are in agreement - US-Russia relations 'must be straightened out'

Trump says he wants peace with the nuclear powers. The military/security complex needs an enemy for its budget.

It is absolutely necessary that a lid be put on tensions between nuclear powers and that economic opportunity reappears for
the American people. Trump is not positioned to benefit from war and jobs offshoring.

The only sensible strategy is to support him on these issues and to hold his feet to the fire.

As for the immigration issue, the Obama Justice (sic) Department has just worsened the picture with its ruling that American
police departments cannot discriminate against non-citizens by only hiring citizens as officers. Now that US citizens face
arrest in their own country by non-citizens, the resentment of immigrants will increase.

Clearly it is nonsensical to devalue American citizenship in this way. Clearly it is sensible to put a lid on immigration until the
US economy is again able to create jobs capable of sustaining an independent existence.

If Trump can defeat the oligarchy and save America, he can go down in history as Trump the Great.

I think that this prospect appeals to Trump more than more wealth. Instead of trying to tear him down in advance,
he should be supported.

With Trumps determination and the peoples support, change from the top down is possible. Otherwise, change
has to come from the bottom up, and that means an awful lot of blood in the streets.

Related Articles:
Trump Quits All Business To Focus On Presidency
 Green Party Disowns Jill Stein Over Hillary Recount

More Lies From The Experts

Trump Is Meeting With An Ex-Bank CEO Who Wants To Abolish The US Federal
Reserve

Perhaps this is why the Elites were so desperate to prevent a Donald Trump Presidency? As
President-elects Donald Trumps transition rolls on, more and more attention is being paid to
possible selections for a variety of high ranking positions, and meetings that might help decide
these appointments.

Related: Trump Picks Top Climate Skeptic to Lead EPA Transition

On Monday, Trump met with John Allison, the former CEO of the Winston-Salem, NC-based bank BB&T and former
CEO of the conservative think tank The Cato Institute.

While it is unclear what Allison is being considered for, there have been reports that he is being considered for the Chair of
the Securities and Exchange Commission, Treasury Secretary, or a spot as the Federal Reserve Governor of Oversight.

The last possible appointment is interesting given Trumps statements on the campaign trail have questioned the future of
the Federal Reserves political independence. Allison actually takes that rhetoric a step further. While running the The Cato
Institute, Allison wrote a paper in support of abolishing the Fed altogether.
 I would get rid of the Federal Reserve because the volatility in the economy is primarily caused by the
Fed, wrote Allison in a 2014 article for the Cato Journal, a publication of the Institute.

Allison said in the article that simply allowing the market to regulate itself would be preferable to the Fed harming the
stability of the financial system.

When the Fed is radically changing the money supply, distorting interest rates, and over-regulating the financial
sector, it makes rational economic calculation difficult, wrote Allison.

Markets do form bubbles, but the Fed makes them worse.

Allison, in the same paper, also suggested that the governments practice of insuring bank deposits up to $250,000 should
be abolished and the US should go back to a banking system backed by a market standard such as gold.
Related: Trump Miracle -Deplorables Take Back America - Leftists Total Freak Out

Allison also argued for higher capital reserves of up to 20% of assets at banks. On the other hand, he also argued that the
government should repeal three of the broadest banking regulations.

We should raise capital standards, but it is even more important to eliminate burdensome regulations - including
Dodd-Frank, the Community Reinvestment Act, and Truth in Lending, wrote Allison.

About 25% of a banks personnel cost relates to regulations. Banks cannot pay the regulatory costs and have high
capital standards.

This is similar to Trumps desire to roll back regulation - including Dodd-Frank - on financial institutions, though he has back-
tracked somewhat on those promises.

It is unclear if any of Allisons policy views will ultimately become a part of Trumps plan going forward, but given the
unconventional nature of his ideas, the meeting is notable.

Donald Trump Weighs in on Marijuana, Hillary Clinton, and Man Buns

As for bringing back the gold standard, the global economy order until World War II, President-elect Trump thinks it will be
hard but is open-minded.

Bringing back the gold standard would be very hard to do, but boy would it be wonderful, he said. Wed have a
standard on which to base our money.
Related: Trump Trolls Media into Savaging Hillary Clinton

Whereabouts Of Julian Assange Remain A Mystery + Want To Know Julian Assanges

Endgame? He Told You A Decade Ago
December 1 2016 | From: Infowars / Wired / Various

Speculation is exploding about the fate of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, whos been out of
public spotlight since Hillary Clinton lost the U.S. presidential election.

Wikileaks has responded by asking people to stop requesting proof of life, and that Ecuadorian President Rafael
Correa is to blame for controlling Assanges movement.
Want To Know Julian Assanges Endgame? He Told You A Decade Ago
[Archical but relevant] Amid a seemingly incessant deluge of leaks and hacks, Washington, DC
staffers have learned to imagine how even the most benign email would look a week later on the
homepage of a secret-spilling outfit like WikiLeaks or DCLeaks.
In many cases, theyve stopped emailing altogether, deleted accounts, and reconsidered dumbphones. Julian
Assange - or at least, a ten-years-younger and more innocent Assange - would say hes already won.

After another week of Clinton-related emails roiling this election, the political world has been left to scrub their inboxes,
watch their private correspondences be picked over in public, and psychoanalyze WikiLeaks inscrutable founder.

Once theyre done sterilizing their online lives, they might want to turn to an essay Assange wrote ten years ago, laying out
the endgame of his leaking strategy long before he became one of the most controversial figures on the Internet.

In Conspiracy as Governance, which Assange posted to his blog in December 2006, the leader of then-new WikiLeaks
describes what he considered to be the most effective way to attack a conspiracy - including, as he puts it, that particular
form of conspiracy known as a political party.

Consider what would happen if one of these parties gave up their mobile phones, fax and email correspondence -
let alone the computer systems which manage their [subscribers], donors, budgets, polling, call centres and direct
mail campaigns. They would immediately fall into an organisational stupor and lose to the other.

And how to induce that organisational stupor? Foment the fear that any correspondence could leak at any time.

The more secretive or unjust an organization is, the more leaks induce fear and paranoia in its leadership and
planning coterie.

This must result in minimization of efficient internal communications mechanisms (an increase in cognitive secrecy
 tax) and consequent system-wide cognitive decline resulting in decreased ability to hold onto power as the
environment demands adaptation.

WikiLeaks would publish its first leak the same month as that blog post, a communication from a Somalian Islamic cleric
calling for political assassinations.

Three years later itd put out the Pentagon and State Department leaks provided by Chelsea Manning, and six years after
that, leaked emails from the Democratic National Committee and Clinton advisor John Podesta would lead to the ousting of
DNC Chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and shake Hillary Clintons campaign.

The last decade has shown just how prescient Assange was. Take, for example, the Russian hackers who published private
files from the World Anti-Doping Agency after Russias athletes got banned from the Olympics for doping.

Now a group like WADA has to take everything they say to every person into account. They have to think, this could
leak, says Dave Aitel, a former NSA staffer and founder of the security firm Immunity who focuses on cyberwar and
information warfare. The idea is, If we can prevent them from having secrets, they have to operate very differently.'

That move comes straight from Assange.

It was a crappy, annoying manifesto, Aitel says. And it was ahead of its time by many years.

- Dave Aitel, Former NSA analyst

A spokesperson for WikiLeaks says Assanges essay was a thought experiment that the organization still believes to be
true. Organizations have two choices:

1. reduce their levels of abuse or dishonesty or

2. pay a heavy secrecy tax in order to engage in inefficient but secretive processes, the spokesperson writes.
As organizations are usually in some form of competitive equilibrium this means that, in the face of WikiLeaks,
organizations that are honest will, on average, grow, while those that are dishonest and unjust will decline.
 The more secretive or unjust an organization is, the more leaks induce fear and paranoia in its leadership and
planning coterie."

- Julian Assange, writing in 2006

Of course, Assanges claim that a political party leaks in direct proportion to its dishonesty looks almost laughable after the
last several months.

WikiLeaks has published leaks exclusively damaging to Clinton and the Democratic Party, while publishing nothing from
Donald Trump or his campaign. (Trump has, of course, faced the leaks of his 1995 tax returns and a damning video where
he brags about sexual assault.

But mainstream newspapers published both, and neither came from the sort of internal communications Assange wrote
about. Trump himself also famously doesnt use email, as good a security measure as anyone could hope for.)

In fact, the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence have both said that
recent WikiLeaks releases originated with Russian state-sponsored hackers seeking to influence US electoral politics.

Comment: Horse shit. The Cabal were so hard up for a cover story that they had a tantrum and tried to blame the
Russians. Fucking pathetic. These people are inept, worthless scum.
Assanges essay doesnt account for the possibility that a government might exploit or collude with a leak platform like
WikiLeaks. (WikiLeaks spokesperson denied that there has been any official claim that any documents published by
WikiLeaks have come from a state actor, somehow ignoring last weeks DHS and ODNI announcement.)

The notion in Assanges essay that only corrupt conspiracies keep secrets is one that Clinton herself has argued against -
ironically, something we know because she said it in a speech whose partial transcript WikiLeaks leaked last Friday.

Speaking to the National Multi-Housing Council in 2013, Clinton cited how President Lincoln secretly promised jobs to lame
duck Congressmen of the opposing political party if they agreed to vote for the 13th Amendment, which ended slavery.

If everybodys watching all of the backroom discussions and the deals, you know, then people get a little nervous, to say
the least, she said. So, you need both a public and a private position.

But the other point Assange makes - the secrecy tax that organizations pay when they try to avoid leaks - rings true. Any
organization that has tried to encrypt all its communications, delete them, or throttle, quarantine, and compartmentalize them
in the name of secrecy knows the toll that paranoia takes.

An authoritarian conspiracy that cannot think efficiently cannot act to preserve itself against the opponents it
induces...

When we look at a conspiracy as an organic whole, we can see a system of interacting organs, a body with
arteries and veins whose blood may be thickened and slowed till it falls, unable to sufficiently comprehend and
control the forces in its environment.

Let that be a warning to the Democratic Party and any other organization with secrets to keep. If the leaks dont kill you, the
fear of them just might.

The following articles are a cross-section of developments over recent weeks and months, some of which may
provide clues as to what has led to this strange situation:
 Why Did WikiLeaks Tweet a Picture of Gavin MacFadyen?

Ecuador Admits They Silenced Assange Because Clinton Leaks Were Interfering With US Election

Wikileaks Warns It Is Launching "Phase Three" Of Its Election Coverage

Julian Assange Gets Sweet Revenge After Hillary Cuts His Internet

Wikileaks Appears To Have Just Released Its First Insurance File, Fully Open And Unencrypted

Assange: WikiLeaks Will Publish Docs on Elections, Oil, War & Google, Every Week for Next 10 Weeks

Wikileaks: Hillary Clinton Proposed Killing Assange With Drone Strike

Assange ready to surrender to US

Renowned lawyer who represented Julian Assange died after being struck by train in West Hampstead

WikiLeaks Founder Just Revealed Why Sanders Really Dropped Out

Under Intense Pressure to Silence Wikileaks, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton Proposed Drone Strike on Assange

Wikileaks Cancels Highly Anticipated Tuesday Announcement Due to Security Concerns

Wikileaks Email Exposes Podesta Using Soviet Assassination Term Just Prior to Justice Scalias Death

FBI Found "Tens Of Thousands Of Emails" Belonging To Huma Abedin On Weiner's Laptop

Hillary Just Got Politically Assassinated: Wikileaks Just Released Her Full Isis Donor List With Names!

Shocking: Top 100 Bombshell WikiLeak Emails Revealed So Far

Google Is Funding A Ministry Of Truth With Corporate Media Outlets Known For
Deadly Deception + Heres Why Fake News Sites Are Dangerous
December 1 2016 | From: TheFreeThoughtProject / JonRappoport

While establishment Democrats trumpet all sorts of excuses for Hillarys loss, few are willing to
admit that she represented the alliance of bureaucratic corruption and corporate greed people are
sick of.
The most insidious excuse being pushed by the establishment Left (consisting of party leaders and much of the
mainstream media) is the so-called fake news trope.

Related: The Western War On Truth

No one denies that publishing articles about made-up events, and presenting that as real news, is a terrible thing, which
unfortunately gets shared without people taking the responsibility of verifying information.

But the censorship crusade being carried out by MSM is about more than actual fake news.

It is a vehicle for silencing alternative media and dissenting voices that represent a threat to the narrative. The
target is not just the alt-right but alternative news and views from a range of political categories.

MSM outlets such as NYMag, LA Times and the Independent immediately picked up on a list of False, Misleading,
Clickbait-y, and/or Satirical News Sources produced by a university professor. Without providing reasoning or examples to
back up the claim that this list should be taken seriously, it was held up as a blacklist to be avoided.

That may have been only the first salvo, as far greater plans are in the works, represented by something called the First
Draft Coalition.
Related: NZ's Media Already Very Concentrated, Lacks Diversity

Funded by Google News Lab, this coalition of over thirty major news and technology organisations aims to tackle issues
of trust and truth in reporting information that emerges online. Notable members include the New York Times, Washington
Post, CNN and BBC.

They have anointed themselves as a sort of Ministry of Truth, as Robert Parry describes in his examination of the fake
news subject:

It has also led to some very real harassment of the people caught up in the theory, including the owner of the
Comet Ping Pong pizzeria in the District, James Alefantis.

Alefantis has received hundreds of death threats over the past couple of weeks, he told the New York Times this
week, after Pizzagate enthusiasts decided that his restaurant was the secret headquarters of a child sex-trafficking
ring run by Hillary Clinton and members of her inner circle."

However, these self-appointed deciders have their own dubious history with accuracy in journalism.

We recently reported on five campaigns of deception that mainstream media have happily marched along with, resulting in
the suffering of millions and the whitewashing of American foreign policy. The New York Times and Washington Post were
particularly irresponsible with their reporting of falsities on nuclear weapons and WMD in Iraq.

They have long pushed the narrative for the foreign policy establishment, from ignoring the Iran-Contra scandal to providing
cover for U.S. machinations in Syria.
Related: The Major Purveyor of Fake News is the CIA-Corporate Complex

CNN silenced their own reporter who found evidence of human rights abuses being carried out in Bahrain, a Middle East
dictatorship that also happens to host the U.S. Navy Fifth Fleet.

But the irony of the First Draft Coalition goes even further. One of the founders of First Draft Coalition a citizen journalism
site called Bellingcat has published high-profile stories with false information, and, according to Parry, has a close
association with NATO through the Atlantic Council.

Despite Bellingcats checkered record and its conflicts of interest through the Atlantic Council, major Western
news outlets, including the Times and Post, have embraced Bellingcat, apparently because its articles always
seem to mesh neatly with U.S. and European propaganda on Syria and Ukraine.

Two of Bellingcats (or its founder Eliot Higginss) biggest errors were misplacing the firing location of the
suspected Syrian rocket carrying sarin gas on Aug. 21, 2013, and directing an Australian news crew to the wrong
site for the so-called getaway Buk video after the July 17, 2014 shoot-down of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17.

But like many news outlets that support establishment group thinks, Bellingcat wins widespread praise and
official endorsements, such as from the international MH-17 investigation that was largely controlled by Ukraines
unsavory intelligence agency, the SBU and that accepted Bellingcats dubious MH-17 evidence blaming the
Russians.

Parry believes that if this Ministry of Truth called the First Draft Coalition existed during Iran-Contra and the Iraq invasion,
the voices of dissent that ultimately exposed government and MSM lies would have been quashed.

U.S. intervention in Syria and the nurturing of the Salafist sect that went on to become ISIS - as well as the McCarthyist
aggression against Russia - all could not have happened without the support of Washington think-tanks and MSM
cheerleaders toeing the government line.
Related: Washington Post Disgracefully Promotes a McCarthyite Blacklist From a New, Hidden, and Very Shady
Group

So it comes back around to the problem of who gets to decide what constitutes fake news?

How can establishment outlets - who have purveyed a fake narrative of U.S. foreign policy that hides a truly
subversive, hegemonic and war-making nature - be trusted to tell us what is real?

There are undoubtedly great journalists among the members of the First Draft Coalition, who brave dangerous parts of the
world and the gauntlet of political retribution to bring us valuable information. Its the overarching agenda of establishment
media, acting as Praetorian Guard for Washingtons political elite, that has become so obvious and so troubling.

While its undeniable that some false or dubious stories get pushed during the heat of a political campaign and in
wartime and journalists have a role in fact-checking as best they can there is potentially a greater danger when
media insiders arrogate to themselves the power to dismiss contrary evidence as unacceptable, especially given
their own history of publishing stories that turned out to be dubious if not entirely false.

Its even more dangerous when these self-appointed arbiters of truth combine forces with powerful Internet search
engines and social media companies to essentially silence dissenting opinions and contrary facts by making them
very difficult for the public to locate.

Alternative media represent a choice for people who are fed up with the system, and it is the peoples responsibility to
research the news in order to achieve an accurate perspective on events.

It is not up to a self-proclaimed Ministry of Truth laden with the same corrupt baggage that acted as proverbial bouy for
Hillary Clinton during the campaign to dictate what is right and wrong.
Heres Why Fake News Sites Are Dangerous
Were not supposed to believe these fake news Individuals created their news operations on
their own.

Were not supposed to believe each individual had a vision of what the news is supposed to be and followed that
vision forward with great energy.

Related: 5 Times Corporate Media Got Caught Publishing Fake News Causing the Death & Suffering of Millions
Here is your daily mantra: Narrow the range of thought, narrow the range of thought.

Exposing elites who run the world?

Exposing pedophile networks?

Documenting the lies and fabrications of major media?

Laying bare the manipulations of Globalists?

Revealing the crimes of both major political parties in America?

Uncovering the spread of pharmaceutical devastation?

Tracking the ruthless ops of major corporations?

Yes, many so-called fake news sites do all this and much more - but something else is also going on.

Many of these sites were launched and are spearheaded by ONE man or woman.

No person outside the mainstream is supposed to be so emboldened by his/her own point of view and passion.

All points of view belong to a group.

An individual works for what he believes is true? He keeps his own counsel? He forges ahead, despite all opposition? He
may even, when all is said and done, make a profit from his own labors?

Were supposed to oppose these evils, and by the grace of governments and their shadow operators, we will emerge from
the darkness and find our salvation in a New Order of things.

And never - if you happen to disagree with what some independent news site is saying - NEVER entertain the idea
of starting YOUR OWN news operation and building it from the ground up to reflect YOUR OWN vision.
Related: Washington Post claims Natural News is controlled by the Russian government

NEVER. That is individual power, which is the horrible fate that would await you. DOING IT ON YOUR OWN? Avoid it
like the plague.

America was originally built on chipping away at peoples individual creations and tearing them down. Right? How else could
America have succeeded?

It is only by taking away independence in all its forms that we could have arrived at the cusp of this grand triumph
now: One Collectivist World.

If we give all our attention to the six corporations that own big media and deliver their news to us, we will arrive.

Hail, Caesar! Your followers salute you! Let the bands play. March to the tune. No individual ever built anything, no
individual can build anything, no individual ever will build anything.

Search for the media-teat of the State. Find it. And drink from it.

Related: The Fake News Witch Hunt: McCarthys Red Scare Redux

Ah. How rejuvenating.

In summary, independent news-site creators are fakes because theyre real.

Outside the mainstream, on their own, they launched and expanded their operations. Being real outside the mainstream is
fake, because the powers-that-be do not support that model.

Are we clear? I hope so.

You can be fake within the approved model: thats real. But if youre real outside the approved model: thats fake.
Got it?

Dont you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought?

- 1984, George Orwell.

Did Orwell even think to obtain permission from the New York Times before writing that statement?

New Zealands Reputation Stained By Corruption - Case In Point: The Turitea Wind
Farm
November 30 2016 | From: TuriteaDocuments

Observers of recent world events have witnessed a pushback against corruption and the poor
behaviour of governments. Unfortunately New Zealand is not corruption free. When making such a
claim there must be concrete evidence to back it up.
This evidence, which has taken more than six years to assemble, is provided in the link below.

Related: New Zealand Government Has Pledged Millions Of Dollars Worth Of Taxpayer Funds To The Corrupt
Clinton Foundation & Clinton Health Access Initiatives

The government, which self reports on its corruption status, secretly colluded with Mighty River Power, a then State Owned
Enterprise, and our local government authority, Palmerston North City Council [PNCC], to force a gigantic wind farm on the
local community; known as the Turitea wind farm.

This was initiated during the reign of former Prime Minister Helen Clark. The consummation of a hitherto punitive, secret
contract, which cancels the governments social contract with all New Zealanders, took place during the current
administration.
The Turitea Wind Farm is comprised of 60 turbines. The 60 3MW Turitea turbines are 10 metres taller than these at Tararua three and will tower over
the city

This mafia like contract imposes a 3 million dollar penalty on PNCC if it helps anyone affected by the wind farm and further
imposes unlimited liability if it changes its mind about supporting it.

A variation to the contract shows all participants would conspire to overthrow any decision by a court impeding the
wind farm.

The wind farm was "approved" and a consent issued by a judge, Shonagh Kenderdine. Kenderdine however was not a
judge as she had been automatically and compulsorily removed, by virtue of age, from the judicial register more than
13 months prior to issuing the consent at the conclusion of a Call-In process, which has higher legal authority than an actual
court of law.

This fraud by Kenderdine is certainly not a Commonwealth first. Kenderdine, without a warrant and just a member
of the public, took a very substantial bribe to bring the secret contract to a predetermined conclusion.

No one was supposed to find out. Virtually all the executive from the Prime Minister and Attorney-General down either know
about this or are actively in on the fraud.
"Judge" Shonagh Kenderdine being awarded the Insignia if a Companion of the Queen's Service Order for services to the judiciary by then New
Zealand Governor-General Sir Jerry Mateparae

They and a range of government agencies have been contacted on numerous occasions. These agencies include the Office
of the Governor-General, police, Financial Markets Authority, LCRO, Judicial Conduct Commissioner, Ministry for the
Environment, Serious Fraud Office, Environment Court, Law Commission, Ombudsman, Office of the Auditor General, etc.

With the exception of one, which was compelled to give the game away, all have maintained a code of silence.

The factual account linked below has all the hallmarks of a systematic fraud; corruption at the highest levels of government,
subversion and alienation of existing law, illegal payments, securities fraud, media collusion, and PNCC ratepayers facing
severe financial loss, the whole nine yards, but with two laughably novel twists.

1. The Turitea and Puketoi wind farms have been deliberately located right on top of three of the country's most
dangerous active fault lines.

2. A 49% share in Mighty River Power, which owns the consents, was subsequently sold to unwitting investors.

Despite assurances the earthquake risk was not revealed. Taxpayers and individual investors will bear the inevitable losses.

Below is part of the fault line map of New Zealand. The red box shows the area of the location of the Turitea Wind
Farm. The yellow box marks the town of Kaukoura, the worst hit area during the recent 7.8 magnitude earthquake.
Click on the image above to open a larger version in a new window

The recent 7.8 magnitude earthquake causing very serious damage at the top of the South Island is a stern reminder of the
certain vulnerability of the Manawatu and Wairarapa landscape to even greater events.

Conspiratorial corruption is here laid out with all the proof needed. The main participants are identified and their
actions laid bare. Be prepared for some surprises:

For more detail see this PDF document | Also visit: TuriteaDocuments

Related: Does The Local Government Act Amendment Bill Result In Amalgamation By Stealth? Local Body
Developments

Reddit Bans "Pizzagate" - "We Don't Want Witchhunts On Our Site" + #Pizzagate Was
Merely Code For Child Sex Trafficking
November 30 2016 | From: Zerohedge / FreedomOutpost / Various

For those not familiar with the movement, the "Pizzagate" subreddit was started by a group of
Trump-supporting internet sleuths who were attempting to use WikiLeaks' leaked Podesta emails
to connect the Clintons and John Podesta to the convicted sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein.
John David Podesta was the former chairman of the 2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. He previously served as chief of staff to President
Bill Clinton and Counselor to President Barack Obama

That said, when the Podesta emails failed to reveal a "smoking gun" linkage, the sleuths instead turned their focus
to mulitple "pizza" references in Podesta's emails which then led to the speculation that those "pizza" references
must be code for something far more sinister.

Related: Pizzagate: How 4Chan Uncovered The Sick World Of Washingtons Occult Elite + The Clinton Child Sex
Trafficking Network: A Comprehensive Guide
As of November 24, the subreddit, r/Pizzagate, was officially banned by Reddit which posted the above notice to their site

According to the Washington Post, the "Pizzagate" sleuths are convinced that the "secret headquarters of a child sex-
trafficking ring run by Hillary Clinton and members of her inner circle" is located in the basement of a Washington
D.C. pizza shop called the Comet Ping Pong Pizzeria. The owner of the pizzeria, James Alefantis, says he has received
numerous death threats over the past couple of weeks and has been forced to go to the FBI for protection.

It has also led to some very real harassment of the people caught up in the theory, including the owner of the
Comet Ping Pong pizzeria in the District, James Alefantis.

Alefantis has received hundreds of death threats over the past couple of weeks, he told the New York Times this
week, after Pizzagate enthusiasts decided that his restaurant was the secret headquarters of a child sex-trafficking
ring run by Hillary Clinton and members of her inner circle."
Related: Obamas Homosexual Bundler Arrested for Child Rape

According to the New York Times, Alefantis first heard of Pizzagate after he started receiving threatening messages on
Instagram and Facebook. Aside from some friendships with prominent democratic insiders like David Brock and Tony
Podesta, Alefantis told the Times he's not sure how this conspiracy theory got linked to his business.

None of it was true. While Mr. Alefantis has some prominent Democratic friends in Washington and was a
supporter of Mrs. Clinton, he has never met her, does not sell or abuse children, and is not being
investigated by law enforcement for any of these claims. He and his 40 employees had unwittingly become real
people caught in the middle of a storm of fake news.

From this insane, fabricated conspiracy theory, weve come under constant assault, said Mr. Alefantis, 42,
who was once in a relationship with David Brock, a provocative former right-wing journalist who became an
outspoken advocate for Mrs. Clinton.

Mr. Alefantis suspects those relationships may have helped to make him a target. Ive done nothing for days
but try to clean this up and protect my staff and friends from being terrorized, he said.

Mr. Alefantis mingles with other Washington chefs and his establishment helped him to be named No. 49 in GQ
magazines 50 most powerful people in Washington in 2012.

His customers include some high-powered locals, such as Tony Podesta, the brother of John Podesta,
whom Mr. Alefantis knows casually. Mr. Alefantis and Mr. Brock, who is the founder of Media Matters for
America, a website that tracks press coverage critical of the Clintons and works to debunk misinformation in the
conservative press, broke up five years ago.

While WaPo says the Pizzagate sleuths have failed to uncover any actual evidence of their accusations, the dismissal of
their efforts by the media only seems to be strengthening their resolve.
 "Pizzagate has yet to produce any actual evidence for its extremely weighty and life-ruining accusations, but
every debunking of its claims - including the one in the Times - has only convinced its believers that they must be
right, and that the circle of pedophiles and sympathizers trying to cover up their findings must be even bigger and
more powerful than they imagined."

In fact, after the Reddit ban, one former moderator of the Pizzagate subreddit posted the following message
on r/The_Donald:

Finally, we are not finished. Obviously the entire mod team and everyone else is tightening up our opsec
and putting on our battle-armor.

To those who pressured Reddit into this censorship: none of us are turning back. We have all made life
insurance videos. We have all vowed to continue this fight. You have only increased our number. This morning
we were numerous, tonight we are legion."

Reading between the lines, we'd say they're not quite ready to give up on Pizzagate.
#Pizzagate Was Merely Code For Child Sex Trafficking

The Pizzagate scandal is the latest news to be broken by Wikileaks. It's real. It's disgusting.
It's criminal.

It's nothing more than predatory pedophiles in high positions using code words for ordering a pizza to refer to
wanting to engage a child in sex, and it looks like Hillary Clinton's campaign manager's brother was right in the
middle of it, along with Thalemic Spirit Cooking advocate Marina Abromovic.

Related: #PizzaGate Norway? Pedophiles: Politicians, Police Reportedly Among 20 Arrested Suspects

Now, many web sites and social media are being censored for reporting on the subject.

Remember when Julian Assange was leading America down the road of the corruption at the heart of the Clinton
Foundation? Well, this is what he was going after. He was trying to make the American people aware of the depravity of
those who represent them.

Infowars gives a brief synopsis of what took place and how it could be understood, including the symbolism, which is taken
directly from unclassified FBI documents that list symbols and logos used by pedophiles to identify sexual preferences.

Pizzagate Is Real: Something Is Going On, But What?

A warning to viewers, the following images are disturbing.

This all began after Wikileaks founder Julian Assange released hundreds of thousands of secret documents detailing a
corrupt DNC, a backstabbing Clinton foundation and the modus operandi of a clumsy criminal campaign attempting to attain
the keys to the most powerful seat on Earth.

But the real truth Assange was leading us to was hidden between the blurred lines of Hillary Clintons campaign manager
John Podestas released emails.

Fast forward past John Podestas brother Tonys casual email exchange with Thalemic Spirit Cooking adherent Marina
Abromovic. That was simply an introduction. The Rosetta Stone was needed next. A Verification that high level Washington
D.C. Predatory Pedophiles were using a code to communicate child sex trafficking as casually as ordering a pizza.

All hidden in plain view. The FBI has long known the symbols pedophiles are using to operate.
Now, isn't that interesting that the FBI, the same unconstitutional agency that violated federal law in running Operation
Pacifier that distributed tens of thousands of pictures and video of underage children in sex acts.

This is also the same agency that criminally operated 23 child porn sites in order to arrest those who looked at what they
were providing.

Keep in mind, this is the same agency, whose director confirmed that Hillary Clinton broke the law, but would not
recommend she be prosecuted for her crimes.

We know James Comey has ties to Clinton Foundation donors, which has amassed him seven figures. Could it be that Mr.
Comey is trying to keep something else like Pizzagate from coming out?

Infowars reported:

The Rosetta Stone was needed next. A Verification that high level Washington D.C. Predatory Pedophiles were
using a code to communicate child sex trafficking as casually as ordering a pizza. All hidden in plain view."

"The FBI has long known the symbols pedophiles are using to operate," the report continues.

"An FBI Unclassified document from WikiLeaks reveals 'Symbols and Logos Used by Pedophiles to Identify Sexual
Preferences... to include those who sexually abuse children as well as those who produce, distribute, and trade
child pornography, are using various types of identification logos or symbols to recognize one another and
distinguish their sexual preferences.

To specifically indicate the pedophile's gender preference, members of pedophilic organizations encourage the use
of descriptions such as 'boylove,' 'girllove,' and 'childlove.'

These symbols have been etched into rings and formed into pendants, and have also been found imprinted on
coins.

Investigators should also be attentive to pedophilia symbols advertised on Web sites. During examinations of
computer files, investigators should be conscious of subjects who try to conceal child pornography by labeling
them with symbols instead of the typical suggestive explicit names."

"Nowclues. The menu from Comet Ping Pong," the report added.

"Notice the symbol of the ping pong paddles and its clever resemblance to the FBI documents symbol for Child
Love. Hang on New York Times before you declare this fake news from your Ivory Tower.

Now look at the symbol for Besta Pizza just two doors down from Comet Ping Pong Pizza, boldly using the symbol
for boy lover as was recorded on the Unclassified FBI Document.

The evidence begins to reveal that Besta Pizza and Comet Ping Pong Pizza maybe competing for the lucrative
Washington D.C. Pedophile market right out in the open."
Click on the image above to view a larger version in a new window

Additionally, it was discovered that Andrew Kline is the owner of Besta Pizza, whose corporation is Uptown Pizza. In
an article from Vanity Fair in 2011 (archived copy) Kline is identified.

The person who made the discovery said he was "not directly accusing Andrew of anything," but simply wanted
these facts made known"

Besta Pizza logo contained known pedophile symbolism

 Best Pizza logo removed symbolism within the last few days

Andrew Kline owns Besta Pizza.

Andrew Kline worked/works as an attorney in Human Trafficking Prosecution Unit of the DoJ

Andrew Kline was appointed to this position by Bill Clinton

We are also seeing some censorship taking place on reports on Pizzagate. Mac Slavo of SHTFPlan.com writes;

"The evidence is now overwhelming whatever the full truth of the matter, something is very, very suspicious about the
"pizza code" that has been discovered in the leaked Podesta emails that many believe is connected to a ring of pedophilia
activity.

Independent researchers have been scouring the web for supporting information, and have pieced together a disturbing pile
of circumstantial evidence connecting many of DC's most powerful to lewd comments, references to illegal sex acts and
child trafficking, dark art and more.

John Podesta - to see what he is up to here be sure to watch the fillowing video
It is very likely that this could go to the very top, where powerful people are protected by people with ranking positions inside
the power structure."

The De-Occulting of John Podesta

In case you still doubt that these people are part of an occult organisation hiding in plain site and rubbing it in your faces -
the following will remove any doubt as to such...

"Perhaps that is why many channels and researchers are meeting censorship, threats and bans," he added. "Reddit's thread
on the topic, which was quickly becoming the definitive gathering place for the information, was shut down.

Meanwhile, the entire The Daily Sheeple website was shutdown temporarily over a copyright claim about an image in "pizza
gate" story (see video at bottom).

Numerous YouTube accounts have been suspended or blocked as well. Read more: The Disturbing, Disgusting Pedophile
Code Hidden in the John Podesta Emails."

Slavo then introduced a video from SGT Report on the "scrubbing" of social media accounts and censoring of websites.

"While the NY Times tries to soft peddle #PizzaGate, Reddit tries to kill the Sub-Reddit investigation and Twitter attempts to
censor breaking news on the global pedophile ring it's too late. The genie is out of the bottle. We will not be stopped. Truth
will be revealed. Because #PizzaGate is a WORLDWIDE CITIZEN INVESTIGATION NOW. And the pedos are running
scared."

Take a look for yourself and see if this might be, in part, the reason for going after outlets and labeling them as "fake news"
that seriously question and attempt to bring to the light things the mainstream media won't touch with a ten foot pole.

Pizzagate is a Worldwide Citizen Investigation Now

While the NY Times tries to soft peddle #PizzaGate, Reddit tries to kill the Sub-Reddit investigation and Twitter attempts to
censor breaking news on the global pedophile ring - it's too late. The genie is out of the bottle. We will not be stopped. Truth
will be revealed. Because #PizzaGate is a Worldwide Citizen Investigation now. And the pedos are running scared.

And then there is this, this, this and this:

PizzaGate Definitive Factcheck: Oh My God

Is PizzaGate real, sort of real, or blown out of proportion? Researcher Megan (twitter.com/zeduslepedus) gave all of this an
independent look on her own, in case I was seeing connections that were not there. Sadly, I've perhaps been too tame in
my coverage here- these are totally sick people. NO doubt in my mind. None whatsoever. My God.
 NYT's Defense Of PizzaGate DC Pedophiles Blown Apart

Shame on The New York Times. Shame on Cecilia Kang. Shame on disgusting James Alefantis. America is watching,
sickos. The entire world is watching. And we are very, very angry. Global justice.

Related: PizzaGate - NYT Defense Trashed - Reddit Bans PizzaGate - Elite Pedophilia Network Defensive?
UPDATE 2

#PizzaGate: What We Know So Far

Related: Reddit Bans Pizzagate Investigation into D.C.-area Child Sex Ring - Labels it a Witch Hunt

#PizzaGate the Documentary, Pedophilia Involving Podesta Emails, Clinton, Obama, David Brock,
DNC

This is the complete and definitive documentary on the Pizza Gate Pedophilia Scandal involving John & Tony Podesta,
Hillary & Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, the DNC, Andrew Kline and Arun Rao of the DOJ, David Brock of Media Matters, and
many more.

For further research all the links have been compiled on my steemit blog: here.

Related: 1 in 3 Refugee Kids Vanished After Calais Jungle Camp Demolition - Charity

The Truth About Money Is Out & Austerity In 8 Minutes: Why It Does Not Work, Why It
Is Still Practised
November 28 2016 | From: TheGuardian / Yanis Varoufakis

The truth about money creation and Austerity. Back in the 1930s, Henry Ford is supposed to have
remarked that it was a good thing that most Americans didn't know how banking really works,
because if they did, "there'd be a revolution before tomorrow morning".
In 2014, something remarkable happened. The Bank of England let the cat out of the bag. In a paper called "Money
Creation in the Modern Economy", co-authored by three economists from the Bank's Monetary Analysis
Directorate, they stated outright that most common assumptions of how banking works are simply wrong, and that
the kind of populist, heterodox positions more ordinarily associated with groups such as Occupy Wall Street are
correct.

Archival: Russell Norman Starts Talking About The Fraudulent Money Creation System A Month Ago And Has Just
Resigned

In doing so, they have effectively thrown the entire theoretical basis for austerity out of the window.

To get a sense of how radical the Bank's new position is, consider the conventional view, which continues to be the basis of
all respectable debate on public policy. People put their money in banks.

Banks then lend that money out at interest either to consumers, or to entrepreneurs willing to invest it in some profitable
enterprise. True, the fractional reserve system does allow banks to lend out considerably more than they hold in reserve,
and true, if savings don't suffice, private banks can seek to borrow more from the central bank.
The central bank can print as much money as it wishes. But it is also careful not to print too much. In fact, we are often told
this is why independent central banks exist in the first place.

If governments could print money themselves, they would surely put out too much of it, and the resulting inflation would
throw the economy into chaos. Institutions such as the Bank of England or US Federal Reserve were created to carefully
regulate the money supply to prevent inflation.

This is why they are forbidden to directly fund the government, say, by buying treasury bonds, but instead fund private
economic activity that the government merely taxes.

It's this understanding that allows us to continue to talk about money as if it were a limited resource like bauxite or
petroleum, to say "there's just not enough money" to fund social programmes, to speak of the immorality of government debt
or of public spending "crowding out" the private sector.

The Bank of England has admitted that none of this is really true. To quote from its own initial summary:

Rather than banks receiving deposits when households save and then lending them out, bank lending creates
deposits" "In normal times, the central bank does not fix the amount of money in circulation, nor is central bank
money 'multiplied up' into more loans and deposits."

In other words, everything we know is not just wrong it's backwards. When banks make loans, they create money.
This is because money is really just an IOU.

The role of the central bank is to preside over a legal order that effectively grants banks the exclusive right to create IOUs of
a certain kind, ones that the government will recognise as legal tender by its willingness to accept them in payment of
taxes.

There's really no limit on how much banks could create, provided they can find someone willing to borrow it. They will never
get caught short, for the simple reason that borrowers do not, generally speaking, take the cash and put it under their
mattresses; ultimately, any money a bank loans out will just end up back in some bank again.
So for the banking system as a whole, every loan just becomes another deposit.

What's more, insofar as banks do need to acquire funds from the central bank, they can borrow as much as they like; all the
latter really does is set the rate of interest, the cost of money, not its quantity.

Since the beginning of the recession, the US and British central banks have reduced that cost to almost nothing. In fact, with
"quantitative easing" they've been effectively pumping as much money as they can into the banks, without producing any
inflationary effects.

Austerity In 8 Minutes: Why It Does Not Work. Why It Is Still Practised

What this means is that the real limit on the amount of money in circulation is not how much the central bank is willing to
lend, but how much government, firms, and ordinary citizens, are willing to borrow.

Government spending is the main driver in all this (and the paper does admit, if you read it carefully, that the
central bank does fund the government after all). So there's no question of public spending "crowding out" private
investment. It's exactly the opposite.

Why did the Bank of England admit all this? Well, one reason is because it's obviously true.

The Bank's job is to actually run the system, and of late, the system has not been running especially well. It's
possible that it decided that maintaining the fantasy-land version of economics that has proved so convenient to
the rich is simply a luxury it can no longer afford.

But politically, this is taking an enormous risk.

Just consider what might happen if mortgage holders realised the money the bank lent them is not, really, the life savings of
some thrifty pensioner, but something the bank just whisked into existence through its possession of a magic wand
which we, the public, handed over to it.

Historically, the Bank of England has tended to be a bellwether, staking out seeming radical positions that ultimately become
new orthodoxies. If that's what's happening here, we might soon be in a position to learn if Henry Ford was right.

Going With The Flow: The Global Battle For Your Personal Data
November 26 2016 | From: ArtsTechnica

Should governments be allowed to impose localisation requirements to protect privacy?

It's a clich that "data is the new oil"- a metaphor that dates back to at least 2006. Like oil, data is beginning to drive
conflict, as different political blocs fight for control of how this valuable resource flows around the world.

Related: Former Head Of The NSA And CIA Makes Statements That Imply John Key Is Lying About Mass
Surveillance

That tussle is at a critical juncture because of the confluence of three major factors: The Snowden revelations about
massive online surveillance; key judgments by Europe's top court; and attempts by the US to use major trade deals to lock
in unrestricted data flows globally.

The growing awareness of the importance of data flows to both technology and the world's economy is reflected in the
number of reports on the topic that have been issued recently. For example, in April 2014, McKinsey published "Global flows
in a digital age," which noted:

Global online traffic across borders grew 18-fold between 2005 and 2012, and could increase eightfold more by
2025. Digital technologies, which reduce the cost of production and distribution, are transforming flows in three
ways:

Through the creation of purely digital goods and services, digital wrappers that enhance the value of physical
flows, and digital platforms that facilitate cross-border production and exchange."
A month later, the European Centre for International Political Economy (ECIPE) issued a report that aimed to:

Quantify the losses that result from data localisation requirements and related data privacy and security laws that
discriminate against foreign suppliers of data, and downstream goods and services providers."

Data localisation in this context means keeping data within the same country - or legal bloc, in some cases - where it
originated.

According to ECIPE's econometric modelling, if the European Union were to introduce economy-wide data localisation
requirements that applied across all sectors of the economy, its GDP would suffer a loss of 1.1 percent as non-EU
companies run fleeing to the hills.

ECIPE said domestic investments would fall by 3.9 percent, and the economic losses suffered by EU citizens would total
156 billion (182 billion, $193 billion).

The Snowden Revelations

One reason why many countries were and still are considering data localisation requirements that would force companies to
keep data within national or legal boundaries, is the Snowden leaks.

These showed the NSA and GCHQ carrying out surveillance on a hitherto unsuspected scale.

In particular, Edward Snowden revealed that both agencies spied on data as it flowed across US and UK borders to
and from other countries.

An obvious way to avoid this problem is to keep data in the country where it is generated, to minimise opportunities for
foreign interception.

That too has issues - for example, it's easier for national governments to spy on and demand information - but it does place
obstacles in the way of external intelligence agencies like the NSA and GCHQ.
Related: New Zealand Prime Minister Uses Bogus Islamic State Threat As Excuse To Ramp Up National Security
And Surveillance Powers

One country that has already adopted this approach is Russia, which passed a data localisation law in 2014. LinkedIn's
failure to comply means that the soon-to-be Microsoft subsidiary faces the prospect of Russian ISPs blocking access to its
site. As Ars has reported, China too is bringing in data localisation requirements.

Perhaps even more important than Snowden's impact on governments' future data localisation policies have been the
knock-on consequences of his revelations for the "Safe Harbour" framework that has governed data flows from the EU to
the US since 2000.

In 1998, the EU's directive on data protection went into effect, which prohibited the transfer of personal data to non-
European Union countries that do not meet the 28-member-state bloc's "adequacy" standard for privacy protection - in other
words, that offered sufficient safeguards for personal data.

The Safe Harbour website explains:

"In order to bridge these differences in approach and provide a streamlined means for US organisations to comply
with the Directive, the US Department of Commerce in consultation with the European Commission developed a
'Safe Harbour' framework and this website to provide the information an organisation would need to evaluate - and
then join - the US-EU Safe Harbour programme."

Snowden's leaks showed the NSA gaining access to personal data held by major US online companies like Facebook as
part of the PRISM programme.
Click on the image above to open a larger version in a new window

Related: Surveillance: The Hidden Ways Youre Tracked

As a result, the Austrian privacy activist Max Schrems brought a legal challenge to data transfers made between the EU and
the US using the Safe Harbour framework.

As his site puts it:

"Safe Harbour does not allow for [data] forwarding as it is performed under PRISM. If it would allow such
forwarding the 'Safe Harbour Decision' would itself be illegal under Regulation 95/46/EC [the EU directive on data
protection]."

Further Reading: Europes highest court strikes down Safe Harbour data sharing between EU and US

Since Facebook has its European headquarters in Ireland, Schrems took his complaint to the Irish data protection agency.
According to Schrems, the Irish data protection commissioner argued that "he does not have any duty to investigate the
complaint and later argued that the legal view expressed in the complaint is 'frivolous'." As a result, Schrems' complaint was
not investigated.
Related: Not Just Surveillance: 3 Current Phenomena Exposing 1984 As An Instruction Manual For The State

Schrems sought a judicial review by the Irish High Court, which then asked the Court of Justice of the European Union
(CJEU) to rule on issues raised by the Safe Harbour framework. On October 6 last year, Europe's top court handed down its
judgment, which effectively struck down Safe Harbour.

The central problem, the court found, was that PRISM allowed:

"Access on a generalised basis to the content of electronic communications," which the CJEU said "must be
regarded as compromising the essence of the fundamental right to respect for private life," and therefore
unacceptable under EU law.

Unless a suitable replacement for Safe Harbour could be found, data flows across the Atlantic would be illegal, and
companies continuing to transfer EU personal data to the US risked large fines.

What was needed was an upgraded version of Safe Harbour, otherwise US companies faced the prospect of being forced to
keep all the personal data of their EU users within the European Union, something they insisted they were reluctant to do.

After fraught negotiations, the new Privacy Shield framework was announced on July 8. The European Commission claimed
it was "fundamentally different" from Safe Harbour, and ruled out "indiscriminate mass surveillance":

The EU-US Privacy Shield will ensure a high level of protection for individuals and legal certainty for business. It is
fundamentally different from the old 'Safe Harbour': It imposes clear and strong obligations on companies handling
the data and makes sure that these rules are followed and enforced in practice.

For the first time, the US has given the EU written assurance that the access of public authorities for law
enforcement and national security will be subject to clear limitations, safeguards and oversight mechanisms and
has ruled out indiscriminate mass surveillance of European citizens' data.
 And last but not least the Privacy Shield protects fundamental rights and provides for several accessible and
affordable redress mechanisms."

Reactions to the new Privacy Shield were mixed. Microsoft called it "an important achievement for the privacy rights of
citizens across Europe, and for companies across all industries that rely on international data flows to run their businesses
and serve their customers."

Schrems, by contrast, said:

"Privacy Shield is the product of pressure by the US and the IT industrynot of rational or reasonable
considerations. It is little more than an little upgrade to Safe Harbour, but not a new deal. It is very likely to fail
again, as soon as it reaches the CJEU."

Joe McNamee, executive director of European Digital Rights, agreed with this view:

"We now have to wait until the court again rules that the deal is illegal and then, maybe, the EU and US can
negotiate a credible arrangement that actually respects the law, engenders trust and protects our fundamental
rights."

Further Reading: Welcome to the machine: Yahoo mail scanning exposes another govt spy tool

News that Yahoo had been secretly scanning customers' e-mails greatly increases the likelihood of the Privacy Shield
scheme being thrown out by the EU's top court. Snowden tweeted that during the Privacy Shield negotiations the US
insisted that this kind of spying would never occur. As a result, the CJEU judges are unlikely to be impressed by any claims
that Privacy Shield complies with EU laws.
A legal challenge to the Privacy Shield framework has already been filed, but not at the Court of Justice, which heard and
threw out Safe Harbour. Instead, Digital Rights Ireland is asking the lesser-known General Court of the European Union to
annul Privacy Shield, still on the grounds that it affords insufficient privacy protection to EU citizens.

General Data Protection Regulation

A successful challenge to Privacy Shield would be a serious problem for US companies wishing to move personal data out
of the EU. At the end of 2015, the European Parliament, the Council, and the Commission reached an agreement on "new
data protection rules, establishing a modern and harmonised data protection framework across the EU," including
the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which greatly extends the reach and force of EU privacy laws.

Related: You Can Defeat Mass Surveillance: Heres How (Pictorial Guide)

Chapter 5 of the GDPR confirms the need for something like Privacy Shield to regulate the flow of data outside the EU, and
spells out huge fines for companies that flout the new GDPR rules - up to 20 million, or four percent of the total worldwide
annual turnover of the preceding financial year, whichever is higher.

Stricter GDPR rules, coupled with the prospect that personal data might need to remain within the EU's borders, may
represent a threat for US companies, but they are also a business opportunity for cloud computing services.

For example, the newly-formed Cloud Infrastructure Services Providers in Europe (CISPE) recently announced that it had
created:

"The first-ever data protection code of conduct requiring cloud infrastructure services providers to offer their
customers the ability to exclusively process and store data within the EU/EEA territories."
 The CISPE added:

Under the CISPE Code of Conduct, cloud infrastructure providers cannot data mine or profile customers personal
data for marketing, advertising or similar activities, for their own purposes or for the resale to third parties. The
CISPE Code precedes the application of the new European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulation
(GDPR)."

US companies are also cashing in on the demand for EU-based processing and storage. For example, last
November Microsoft opened data centres in Germany, which it claimed would be immune to requests from the US
government to hand over data - thus attempting to address the key problem of surveillance that emerged in the Schrems'
judgment.

While the above looks like some type of military facility it is actually a Microsoft data center

Related: iSucker: Big Brother Internet Culture

More recently, Microsoft announced it had invested a total of 2.3 billion ($3 billion) in setting up its European cloud
computing facilities.

Further Reading: Microsoft is building data centres in Germany that the US government cant touch

The New York Times quoted Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella as saying:

"=Were building our global cloud infrastructure in Europe so it can be trusted by the multiple constituents. We can
meet the data residency needs of our European customers."

The newspaper also noted that other US giants are also investing heavily in EU facilities:
 Amazon Web Services, the largest player, announced last week that it would soon open multiple data centres in
France and Britain. Google, which already has sites in countries like Finland and Belgium, is expected to finish a
new multimillion-dollar data complex in the Netherlands by the end of the year."

Trade Deals

Although those moves might suggest that US Internet companies are resigned to a future where keeping the personal data
of EU citizens within the EU will be the norm, that's not the case. The main strategy of the online giants is doing everything
they can to stop data localisation happening; the new data centres are more like an insurance policy, in case they aren't
successful.

These multinational megacorps have a range of weapons at their disposal, but the most powerful is trade agreements. As
Ars has reported, today's big trade deals go far beyond simply removing tariffs.

Now, the emphasis is on harmonising national regulations in order to remove "non-tariff barriers." Prompted by
Stateside Internet companies, the US tries to use trade deals to persuade other countries to agree to unhindered
cross-border data flows, and to ban data localisation requirements.

One of the main battlefields here is the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). Recently, senior US
politicians sent a letter to the US Trade Representative, Michael Forman, who is responsible for US trade negotiations. The
politicians wrote:

TTIP must include clear and enforceable commitments on digital trade, but the EU has not engaged meaningfully
in this sector, particularly regarding cross border data flows and data server localization requirements."
As part of the TTIP deal, the politicians say, the EU must permit easy cross-border data flows by loosening its stringent
privacy protections, and forbid member states from requiring data localisation.

Further Reading: CETA: The Canadian TTIP nobody noticed until it was (almost) too late

TTIP is in limbo after Donald Trump won the US presidential election, and may even be dead, so the argument over how
data flows should be treated there will not re-commence for many months, if ever. But there are two other major deals
seeking to regulate European data flows, the Trade in Investment Services Agreement (TISA) - an international treaty
between 23 parties including the US and EU - and the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between
Canada and the EU.

A recent study, entitled "Trade and privacy: complicated bedfellows?", suggested that new free trade deals should contain a
binding provision which fully exempts the existing and future EU legal framework for the protection of personal data from the
scope of the agreements.

However, in a commentary on the report, the activist Ante Wessels had doubts about the efficacy of this approach. He
wrote:

Trade and privacy are indeed difficult bedfellows. It is an open question whether data protection-proof free trade
agreements are possible."

If, indeed, that is the case, the report further suggests "the EU should not enter into additional commitments
concerning free data flows in new and enhanced disciplines that lack any reference to the partys privacy and data
protection laws."

One of the organisations that commissioned the report, BEUC, explained its position as follows:

Under the CISPE Code of Conduct, cloud infrastructure providers cannot data mine or profile customers personal
data for marketing, advertising or similar activities, for their own purposes or for the resale to third parties. The
 CISPE Code precedes the application of the new European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulation
(GDPR)."

Related: How To Start Browsing The Web Anonymously

It's still not clear what the European Commission intends to do on this important issue. According to a report on EurActiv;

European Commission officials have struck a deal that could put a clause guaranteeing international data flows
into a trade agreement with 22 countries outside the bloc, including the United States and Australia [TISA]. But the
commission is in deadlock over whether to cave to pressure from the US despite criticism that salvaging the pact
on services could undermine EU privacy law."

According to the EC's summary of the latest round of TISA talks, data flows and localisation of computing facilities
will "Continue to require in-depth discussions between Parties."

Once again, the election of Donald Trump is likely to be a complicating factor here .

Further Reading: WikiLeaks releases secret TISA docs: The more evil sibling of TTIP and TPP

The position of the European Parliament is more straightforward, since it has adopted a text on TISA in which it calls on the
European Commission "to immediately and formally oppose the US proposals on movement of information."
Boris Johnson addresses supporters during a rally for the "Vote Leave" campaign

Post-Brexit Problems

Finally, it's worth noting there are major implications here for the UK as it heads towards Brexit. The UK's new Information
Commissioner, Elizabeth Denham, recently gave a speech called "Transparency, trust and progressive data protection," in
which she directly addressed the question of what the EU's new GDPR would mean post-Brexit:

The fact is, no matter what the future legal relationship between the UK and Europe, personal information will
need to flow. It is fundamental to the digital economy.

In a global economy we need consistency of law and standards - the GDPR is a strong law, and once we are out
of Europe, we will still need to be deemed adequate or essentially equivalent.

For those of you who are not lawyers out there, this means there would be a legal basis for data to flow between
Europe and the UK."

Whether or not the UK is a member of the EU, and whatever its formal relationship might be, if British companies - for
example, in the financial sector - want to process EU personal data, the protection in the UK must be "adequate or
essentially equivalent" for data flows from the continent to be permitted. It is therefore likely that the UK government will
need to bring in data privacy laws that align closely with the GDPR.

However, it's worth remembering that the reason why Safe Harbour was struck down, and why Privacy Shield may suffer the
same fate, is that the EU's highest court deemed the surveillance carried out by the NSA as excessive and therefore illegal.
Related: The Entire Internet History of UK Citizens Now Viewable by Government Organizations Such as Police,
Military, Taxes, Jobs and Pensions

But we know from Snowden's documents that GCHQ's Tempora programme is just as invasive - indeed, Snowden said that
historically: "They [GCHQ] are worse than the US."

That raises the interesting question of whether the CJEU would find that GCHQ's surveillance of data flows is also excessive
and therefore illegal under EU privacy laws if a challenge were brought by someone like, say, Schrems.

Further Reading: GCHQs data-mining techniques revealed in new Snowden leak

The UK government has managed to sidestep this issue so far. But once the UK is outside the European Union, continental
companies will not want to risk fines of up to four percent of their global turnover by sending personal data to a country
which may be judged a privacy pariah by the courts.

As data progresses from being the new oil that helps powers modern economies, to becoming the very life-blood that keeps
them alive, data flows will become a key strategic issue for all governments.

That's especially true for the UK, which will depend on them for its new, and as-yet undefined, relationships with the world's
nations, their citizens, and their companies.

Related: The Key To Ending Mass Surveillance? Maths

In The Wake Of Trumps Historic Victory The 4th Estate Is Rightfully Burning To The
Ground
November 26 2016 | From: TheGatewayPundit / Infowars

Thanks to Wikileaks we know at least 65 MSM Reporters Were Meeting with and/or Coordinating
Offline with Top Hillary Advisors.
The info-fascists in the political and corporate media classes have a new meme in their war on information they
dont like: the scourge of so called fake news.

Related: Proof Mainstream Media Publishes Fake News

Even President Obama (who will never pass up a microphone except to avoid quelling violent anti Trump-nuts) is railing
about the fake problem of fake news. But watch out. Youll notice Obama and his media enablers conveniently add hyper-
partisan sites to their list of declared enemies of the people.

Facebooks Mark Zuckerberg just announced to his liberal masters that he will go after fake news and cites as an
example some outrageous story printed on an unheard of clickbait site. But his real target, as it is for corporate
media and liberal politicians, are sites such as the one you are on now.

The fact is the media and its losers on the campaign trail are desperately trying to avoid self reflection after being exposed
as partisan hacks themselves throughout the campaign. Its a reality confirmed on election night as newscasters and
experts collectively acted as if their puppies were being summarily executed in front of their eyes.
Related: After Election Loss Hillary Clinton Looks Like Death

But the only true death was that of their credibility. With no more electronic wall maps to desperately poke on in hopes
of finding more Hillary votes, they have nowhere to turn in the aftermath except to invent another enemy besides
Republicans, Trump and good ideas.

Youll notice the hyper partisan category only includes such conservative sites such as Breitbart, the Blaze and The
Gateway Pundit. There is no mention of Daily Kos, Media Matters, or Buzzfeed. Nor is there any mention of CNBC, CNN or
ABC which are staffed on air by hyper partisans and former employees of the Clintons.

Thats mainly because the Conservative sites were wickedly effective in balancing the left wing moonbattery which rotted
seconds after being printed.

It is true that bias is seen in what is reported and stated. But most media bias comes in the form of what is NOT
reported and NOT stated.

The sites currently targeted told the truths the corporate mainstream media was unwilling to tell because of their support of
one ideology and one candidate.

And, more importantly, these sites relegated corporate media into nothing but a bunch of third world government -speak
mimics. And much like it was with the government ghouls so it was with the liberal media hacks both open and closeted:
Smarter Americans flushed them on Election Day.
Related: Mainstream Media Corruption

It should be noted the Conservative sites being targeted in his fake news jihad make no mystery of where they stand
politically. Its why Americans seem to trust them MORE not less, as they dont have to sit there and decipher the views of
who is behind the information.

But Mainstream media pretends to be objective when its not. Its consumers know better and feel lied to en masse.

The good (and accurate) news is that there is no hope for the info fascists. There is no recovery. The liberal
ayatollahs will never win as they attempt to stomp on free speech and sites that show them as clothesless emperors.

And their #NeverTrump partners typing away in usual suspect NRO circles have been exposed as well. Having been
humiliated after joining forces with Libs to attack the outsider and get Hillary Clinton elected , their operations are now the
dumpster fires that they so arrogantly called the Trump movement.

How Trump Destroyed Mainstream Media Forever

Related: How Trump Destroyed Mainstream Media Forever

Gallup shows only a third of Americans trust mainstream media. That was a month before the election.

Once the advertisers start to shed them the revolution will be complete.

The fourth estate is rightfully burning to the ground. This election was a huge victory for non-traditional media.

It truly reminded the right people of our never ending - and never to be abridged - freedom to discern.
Related: New York Times publisher vows to 'rededicate' paper to reporting honestly

Obama Declares War On Infowars, Breitbart

With the intention to censor independent media, President Obama is now spearheading the fervent
assault on so-called fake news.

This war on fake news began after anti-Trump world leaders, heads of social media platforms and the
mainstream press realized they lost the presidential election because they no longer had credibility and influence
over the US population.

Related: Who is Behind Fake News? Mainstream Media Use Fake Videos and Images

Obama made clear his desire to limit news reports by populist media at a press conference in Lima, Peru, on Sunday where
he also defended the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

If, generally, weve got elections that arent focused on issues and are full of fake news and false information and
distractions, then the issue is not going to be whats happening from the outside; the issue is going to be what are
we doing for ourselves from the inside, he claimed. The good news is thats something that we have control
over.

These assertions come in conjunction with statements he made last week at a press conference in Germany alongside
Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Part of ways changed in politics is social media and how people are receiving information, he said.
Related: Entrenched Western Media Propaganda Accepted As Truth

In a recent interview in the The New Yorker, Obama targeted some of what he likely considers his enemies in the media by
name.

People didnt see me coming. In southern Illinois, in those counties I won, I was at VFWs and fish fries hearing
peoples stories and talking to folks, so that they knew me, he said. They werent getting me through Fox or Rush
Limbaugh or Breitbart or Red State.

But as former congressman Dr. Ron Paul points out, the origin of fake news isnt independent media sites like Infowars and
Breitbart, but rather the establishment media which has hit all-time lows in public trust and ratings.

These are the news sources that told us if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor, Dr. Paul revealed.

They told us that Hillary Clinton had a 98% chance of winning the election.

They tell us in a never-ending loop that The economy is in great shape!

President-elect Donald Trumps campaign was famous for powerful, simple slogans, such as Make America Great Again
and Drain the Swamp, and was bolstered by a massive wave of social media support fueled by stories originating from
alternative media outlets which are now being falsely smeared as fake news by the corporate press.

Related: Ron Paul Reveals Hit List of Alleged Fake News Journalists
Pizzagate: How 4Chan Uncovered The Sick World Of Washingtons Occult Elite
+ The Clinton Child Sex Trafficking Network: A Comprehensive Guide
November 24 2016 | From: VigilantCitizen / CivilanWarCollege

Posters over at 4Chan and Reddit have been conducting an extremely bizarre investigation
following the John Podesta e-mail leak (Hillary Clintons campaign chairman) and the results are
surreal: Theyve apparently uncovered an elite child trafficking network which celebrates its
tendencies using code words and disturbing artworks.

Warning: This article contains disturbing material

Related: Largest Pedophile Ring In History, 70,000 Members, Heads Of State, The Rats Scramble

In my article Clintons Campaign Chairman John Podesta Invited to an Occult Spirit Cooking Dinner by Marina Abramovi, I
explained how a mundane dinner invitation found in the Podesta e-mail leaks was actually a clear link to bizarre occult
ceremonies happening at the highest levels of power. While that by itself was rather shocking, it appears to only be the tip of
a very disgusting iceberg.

4Chan effectively unearthed a strange network of high-powered people who, through art, events and social media, actually
celebrate a culture that revolves around death, torture, cannibalism and child abuse. Most of this disturbing material was
not even hidden, it was out there in the open, exposed on business walls and posted on social media.

Furthermore, an analysis of the Podesta e-mails revealed that the network appeared to communicate using code words to
coverup their shady dealings.

Understanding #PizzaGate

The epicenter of this entire thing is, believe or not, a hipster pizza place named Comet Ping Pong.
Comet Ping Pong

Comet Ping Pong is a family friendly pizzeria where people can eat, drink and play ping-pong.

Click on the image above to view a larger version in a new window

The Comet Ping Pong menu contains a logo that is strikingly similar to the child lover logo used in these circles. Also, Play
Eat Drink = PED.

The owner of Comet Ping Pong is James Alefantis who is, for some reason, ranked #49 in the top 50 Most Powerful People
in Washington of GQ magazine.

Alefantis as featured on the GQ website. He is described as D.C. Radical Chic

Alefantis boyfriend is David Brock, the founder of liberal media watchdog group Media Matters for America. He was
described by Time magazine to be one of the most influential operatives in the Democratic Party.

The power couple was heavily involved in Hillary Clintons campaign.

An invitation to a Clinton fundraising event featuring Chef James Alefantis of Comet Ping Pong, Clintons campaign chair John Podesta and others

Heres an e-mail sent by Alefantis to John Podesta:

A leaked John Podesta e-mail from James Alefantis sending him the H logo with a pizza. Alefantis is in direct connection with some of the most
powerful people in the world

In short, Alefantis is very connected to very powerful people. Now lets look at his Instagram account, which was publicly
accessible until 4Chan began prying in. The account is filled with bizarre and disturbing pictures - often involving small
children. Here are some examples (I cant even post them all).
A young girl with her arms taped to a table with a man standing behind her. One of the comments say This is pretty creepy bro. This is beyond
creepy bro

A young girl inside a basket as if she was about to be bought. Many pictures allude to buying and owning children while preying on this innocence
A closeup picture of another baby. Alefantiss (aka jimmycomet) posted #hotard which is slang for being a ho and a retard. Yes, he posted this
next to the picture of an INFANT

Another strange pic involving a child and a weirdly placed yellow beads necklace. Also, notice the hashtag #chickenlovers
Heres a definition of chicken lover found with a basic web search.

A pic of a German baby doll for sale. Buying babies appears to be an important hobby
Pills n bills before a trip. The comment Ping Pong in London sounds tempting is obviously code for something else

A picture posted by the barman at Comet Ping Pong. It heavily alludes to the fact that pizza means something else in their strange code.
A screenshot from a child beauty pageant girl wanting pizza

A rather upsetting picture of a baby holding Euros. There is not a guest at the Pizza place, this is happening in Europe? Why is this guy in Europe
with a baby spending Euros?
Making out with a dead dog. Dont google babybirding"

A closeup of the eye of a dead pig

For some reason, Alefantis posted a picture of a cavernous room. EVERY SINGLE comment next to this picture is EXTREMELY CREEPY, almost as
if they knew that something awful was about to happen there
I am not quite sure what is happening here, but there is clearly a bizarre, 'Eyes Wide Shut', ritualistic aspect to it involving young people
This is the mural prominently on display at Comet Ping Pong by artist Arrington de Dionyso. It depicts strange people holding the heads of smaller
people
This is another painting de Dionyso. His work often contains MKULTRA-related themes such as dual personalities (two heads), the exploitation of
children often mixed with occult symbolism

A regular guest at Comet Ping Pong is the performer Majestic Ape from the group Heavy Breathing.
A screenshot from a video of Majestic Ape hosting a birthday party at Comet Ping Pong
A screenshot from one of Majestic Apes music video where she jokes about sigh

Heres another video of that Ape joking about sigh.

Another radical artist that is close to Comet Ping Pong is Marina Abramovic.

A picture of Marina Abramovic posted by Alefantis holding a bundle of sticks

Abramovic on the cover of dust magazine covering the eyes of a shirtless child
A screenshot from Marinas Spirit Cooking video where she throws pig blood at a statue shaped like a small child

Lady Gaga and Marina at the 20th Annual Watermill Center benefit in a place called Devils Heaven (cant make this up). They are partaking in
pretend cannibalism

Lady Gaga with a friend during the same event. Why are there children there? RUN AWAY KID!
Related: Nicole Kidmans Father Dies Amid Pedophile, Child Murder Ring Allegations

The Podesta Wikileaks dump revealed that John Podesta and his brother Tony were personally invited to Marinas Spirit
Cooking event.

John Podesta

A screenshot of John Podesta sitting in his office during an interview. Hanging on the wall is a painting that clearly alludes to cannibalism

John David Podesta was the Chairman of the 2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. He previously served as Chief of
Staff to President Bill Clinton and Counselor to President Barack Obama.

Wikileaks released thousands of Podestas e-mails and it was soon discovered that an inordinate amount of messages
referred to pizza and hot dogs. Often times, these words were used in bizarre contexts and in sentences that did not make
any sense.
One of many e-mails where pizza clearly alludes to something else
Some observers believe that handkerchiefs are used as mementos in MK abuse. This is a painting from Monarch mind control survivor Kim Noble
depicting a victim being abused. Theres a piece of cloth underneath the child. The body appears to be levitating, which represents dissociation after
extreme trauma

Read my full article about Kim Noble here

This is an ad for Comet Ping Pong which appears to use the same dissociation symbolism

Then theres John Podestas brother Tony, whose strange taste in art has even made the news. Heres an article from the
Washington Post describing how guests were horrified by the art inside Podestas bedroom.
Podestas most notable piece is Louise Bourgeois The Art of Hysteria a sculpture of a headless man violently arching
back. This sculpture was posted by Alefantis on Instagram. He apparently visited Podestas home.
The sculpture depicts the violent physical reaction of patients suffering from hysteria.

The physical tension of the hysterical arch an intense muscular contraction, resulting in immobility and paralysis
of the limbs is emblematic of an equally extreme emotional state. Bourgeois makes this highly vulnerable
position even more so by suspending her male figure from the ceiling.

- National Gallery of Canada

Bourgeois was inspired by studies on hysteric women. The subject of her art is however a man

The sculpture is also strikingly similar to one of Jeffrey Dahlmers headless victims. I wont post the picture in this article but
it can be found here. Dahlmer was a serial killer who abused and cannibalized young men. He often placed his victims in
symbolic positions and took pictures of them.

An article from Washington Life describes Podestas love from Marina Abramovic (do see the links connecting?) as well as
under-the-radar artist named Biljana Djurdjevic.

If youve ever dreamed of strolling through a museum with a slice of pizza and glass of wine in hand, you need to
befriend superlobbyist Tony Podesta.

Known about town as a legendary political fix-it man, Podesta has turned his Kalorama home into a shrine to
contemporary art, ranging from relatively under-the-radar artists such as Serbian painter Biljana Djurdjevic to
those who are much better known (like French sculptor Louise Bourgeois). ()

Currently he has collected from 40 different artists in some depth, with his top five being Marina Abramovic, Vik
Muniz, Bourgeois, Olafur Eliasson and Antony Gormley.

Washington Life, Inside Homes: Private Viewing

Podesta has a large paint of Djurdjevic in his living room. Heres another painting by Djurdjevic.

Rationalize it all you want, but this is a painting of a child being tortured
In Conclusion

This article only contains some of the findings uncovered by private investigators online. What has been exposed is, most
likely, only the tip of the iceberg of a huge, complex network that has many ramifications. Each thread could probably be
investigated further and lead to even more disturbing facts connecting even more high-powered individuals.

Going through the material of this article is a difficult and painful process, but it exposes the true mind-state and
philosophy of the occult elite.

They publicly celebrate a specific culture of death, abuse and dehumanization through their art and events, leaving
us to only speculate about what they do behind closed doors.

The symbolism in the above images is in perfect accordance with the occult elites culture that I have been describing on
Vigilant Citizen for years. The Pizzagate investigation reveals, at best, the disturbing culture of the elite and, at worst, an
all-out child trafficking ring.
And dont believe that only Democrats are into this.

This is the true culture of the occult elite, a circle of powerful people who operate far above political parties, and far
above the law.

Related Articles:

MP Nick Smith Hires Lawyer To Silence Child Abuse Ring Rumours

60 Minutes Makes 'Special' On UK's VIP Paedophiles

Major Satanic Ritual Abuse / Paedophile Network Exposed In Australia

Satanic Pedophilia Network Exposed In Australia - It Starts At The TOP, Just Like In The USA And UK

Retired Head Of Los Angeles FBI Tells All: Illuminati, Satanism, Pedophile Rings

The Clinton Child Sex Trafficking Network: A Comprehensive Guide

The best way to tell this story is to start learning about it in the way that it was understood by us
who researched first. Rather than go in some chronological order of events that could stretch back
decades we will start with the recent Wikileaks dump of John Podestas emails.
This article begins to detail a highly sophisticated network of child sex trafficking involving dozens of people very
close to Hillary Clinton.

Related: Persons of Interest James Achilles Alefantis aka jimmycomet at Comet Ping Pong

I have also made a nodal network map using the relationships from this article in a visual format - Take a look.

General History

A video detailing the political corruption of John Podesta. It is important to first realize the level of surface level deceit, and
then learn about the motivation and the blackmail that is required to be in this kind of a political position. Also keep in mind
where John competes with his brother Tony over their art collections.

Abby Martin Exposes John Podesta:

Here is a data dump of global pedophile-ring implicating governments and etc. Some of this information overlaps into the
web which we will discuss.

Important Foundation Information

According to the FBI:

Pedophiles, to include those who sexually abuse children as well as those who produce, distribute, and trade child
pornography, are using various types of identification logos or symbols to recognize one another and distinguish
their sexual preferences.
 To specifically indicate the pedophiles gender preference, members of pedophilic organizations encourage the
use of descriptions such as boylove , girllove, and childlove. These symbols have been etched into rings and
formed into pendants, and have also been found imprinted on coins."

Child trafficking Block in Washington D.C.

All of the businesses shown on this map are involved with the Clinton campaign/foundation in some fashion as well as the
child sex trafficking. The corner of Connecticut and Nebraska Avenues in D.C. Details are below.
Click on the image above to view a larger version in a new window

Tony Podesta
Tony Podesta, John Podestas brother and the guy who has a pasta obsession according to many e-mails did a 3
to 4 month trip to Japan with Dennis Hastert where they both taught students.

In his first year of graduate school, Hastert spent three months in Japan as part of the People to People Student
Ambassador Program. One of Hasterts fellow group members was Tony Podesta (then the president of the Young
Democrats at University of Illinois at Chicago Circle)."

Hastert admitted to molesting kids when he did work as a teacher. Tony Podesta still keeps in regular contact with Hastert.

Tony Podesta has a Huge vault underneath his house

They are known for purchasing awkward works, such as video installations, that many other private collectors
will not consider. Its easy to store them, but difficult to display them, says Podesta.

To get round the problem, he and his wife have excavated a huge subterranean vault beneath their house outside
Washington a white space 5m square and 4m high in which it will be possible to show very complicated video
pieces on all four walls."

- TheGuardian

Tony and Heather Podestas art collection contains a wide assortment of things that disturb the author of this Washington
Post article.
Which recently was deleted from Washington Posts website.

One shows a boy seemingly born from a sewing machine. Another finds a young girl knitting her own hair. A third
has a naked woman immersed in blood-red liquid.

Folks attending a house tour in the Lake Barcroft neighborhood in Falls Church earlier this year got an eyeful when
they walked into a bedroom at the Podesta residence hung with multiple color pictures by Katy Grannan, a
photographer known for documentary-style pictures of naked teenagers in their parents suburban homes.

They were horrified, Heather recalls, a grin spreading across her face."

Going to see Rachel Rose

Youtube: Pause at 0:10, attendee wearing counterclockwise spiral ring.

Remember this pose for later when we get to Sasha Lords and Comet Ping Pong

Clinton campaign chairman John Podestas New York office features an oil painting in which two men are preparing to eat
another human.

This article refers Tony Podestas home as a shrine to the artist Biljana Djurdjevic who I would not recommend googling
unless you have a strong stomach for paintings that border on stuff that looks illegal.

If it were photographs they WOULD be illegal.

He has collected from 40 artists in some depth with the top 5 being: Has collected from 40 different artists in some depth,
with his top five being Marina Abramovic, Vik Muniz, Bourgeois, Olafur Eliasson and Antony Gormley.

But as for the pizza references the article itself closes in the CREEPIEST WAY- : He regularly opens his house to casual
pizza parties co-hosted by his friend James Alefantis, the owner of Comet Ping Pong.

Over 200 pies emerge from the outdoor pizza oven as guests wander through the house and garden while studying his art
collection. Remember the Serian connection, as it comes up a lot.
Above is art from Biljana Djurdjevic, Tony Podestas favorite artist

Related: How Art Can Be Used To Pay For Human Trafficking

Marina Abramovic: Spirit Cooking

Another image shows Abramovic posing with a bloody goats head a representation of the occult symbol
Baphomet.

Speaking of cutting into your fingers

Probably nothing, but lets continue. Here's Lady Gaga with Abramovic at a Spirit dinner.
Abramovic was paid $10,000 by the Clinton Foundation for one of her performances.

Following the Pizza Chain

John - Hosting pizza party at Belmont for HFA on April 10.

Maya Harris is joining, but need you. Can you come? Thanks much, Tony

- Wikileaks

In 2012 Harris was Vice President for Democracy, Rights and Justice at the Ford Foundation. One of the issues
she addresses through her position is the problem of child brides.
 Harris grew up in the San Francisco Bay Area. When she was eight, she and her sister worked to get the
apartment building they lived in to open an unused courtyard as a place for children to play.

Maya Harriss sister is Kamala Harris.

As a deputy district attorney in Alameda County, Kamala Harris specialized in child sexual assault cases, a
focus she carried into her two terms as the elected district attorney of San Francisco.Her younger sister, Maya
Harris West, was the executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California and is now a
vice president at the Ford Foundation.

- Bloomberg

Now, this is likely nothing. Turns out this pizza party was advertised online and was going to be held at John Podestas
home. Unlikely hes referring to any illicit when its publicly advertised right? Are we back to normality?

The weird thing though is that the pizza chef is a guy who was blackmailed of 850Gs on the threat of releasing derogatory
information about him.

But it gets weirder.

He talks about cooking in strange ways. But sometimes when he says cooking, we know he means either things. Take
Spirit Cooking. This is something he seems to enjoy with his friends.

Shes looking forward to do doing this with Podesta and maybe his brother.

Dear Tony, I am so looking forward to the Spirit Cooking dinner at my place. Do you think you will be able to let
me know if your brother is joining? All my love, Marina

- Wikileaks

Thats not all. There is another email here about pizza. It is in regards to a jpg picture in the attachment.
re: pizza.jpg Nice

As John said, it doesnt get any better than this."

So the picture is of pizza AND a child (and two women). This gets us nowhere? Or somewhere?

Well, it turns out pizza is internet slang for child sex. It started out as child porn = cheese pizza and then became just
pizza in some circles.

So who are the two women in the picture of the little girl, with the pizza?

They were Laura Ling and Euna Lee who were arrested in North Korea while reporting on sex trafficking. They were freed
and must have taken this picture. But how come the second we get away from sex trafficking we are right back to it?

This links the phrase pizza with child sex trafficking through their own emails.

That pizza party image is ccd to both Huma Abedin, and Zach Shwartz of Shangri-La Entertainment. Shangri-La
Entertainment is owned by Steve Bing, major Democratic party donor, friend of both Bill Clinton and the famous Hollywood
madam and procurer of sex, Heidi Fleiss.

Who went to go pick these women up during their report on sex trafficking? Bill Clinton and Steve Bing.

On August 5, 2009, a 737 private aircraft owned by Stephen Bing and based out of hangar 25 at the Burbank
airport in Southern California, was utilized in the return of American reporters Laura Ling and Euna Lee who had
spent 5 months of a 12-year sentence in North Korea.

Former President Bill Clinton was instrumental in their return, and accompanied the reporters back to the U.S. Bing
reportedly covered the cost of the entire flight, estimated to be around $200,000.

- TheDailyBeast
Now why did Bill Clinton make it such a high priority for him to go to North Korea personally to get these women back?

Or rather, what did the North Koreans have on Bill that made him jump to their command?

Lets keep looking.

How about this pizza chat:

Mary not free Would love to get a pizza for an hour? Or come over

Tony Podesta

So Mary isnt around, and hes hungry? And he wants to get a pizza for an hour?

Ive gone for pizza in an hour, Ive never had a pizza for an hour. Could be reaching, who knows.

- Wikileaks

Pizza for and hour, and then this.

If you will be around for dinner or pizza on Sunday

Dinner or pizza? Pizza is dinner, but maybe not to the elites. Odd, maybe nothing.
- Wikileaks

But does Nancy Pelosi have a pizza place as front company? It seems she may. Do these people need excuses to discuss
pizza, or is there a more legitimate purpose?

What is this front company, Concurrent Technologies Inc. - doing donating so much to the Clinton Foundation?

A tech company fronting for an adult video store that makes frequent $1,500 dollar donations.

These guys treat pizza like its very important. See this message about this pizza related handkerchief that was left behind.

This is one of the oddest parts. If this isnt code, what is it?

Hi John, The realtor found a handkerchief (I think it has a map that seems pizza-related. Is it yorus? They can
send it if you want. I know youre busy, so feel free not to respond if its not yours or you dont want it. Susanna

I just came from checking the Field house and I have a square cloth handkerchief (white w/ black). I also meant to
inquire yesterday about the pillows you purchased. I can send them as well, if you let me know where they are
in the house.

- Wikileaks

Handkerchiefs are used as a BDSM sex code.

His handkerchief is pizza related.

White usually seems to mean kissing/handjob or Virgin/Pedo, the black may mean something else to them. But she says the
color, and says its a pizza related handkerchief.
Click on the image above to view a larger version in a new window

Pillows is slang for ordering a prostitute at a luxury hotel.

That message about pizza and pillows is from someone at the Sandler Foundation.

The Sandler Foundation pays John Podesta $7,000 a month.

I dont even know what to think of this one, also from the Sandler Foundation. My god. I know John Podesta does cook but
what are we supposed to think about this? Playing dominos on cheese? WTF??

John.

I think you should give notice when changing strategies which have been long in place. I immediately
realized something was different by the shape of the box and I contemplated who would be sending me something
in the square shaped box.

Lo and behold, instead of pasta and wonderful sauces, it was a lovely, tempting assortment of cheeses, Yummy. I
am awaiting the return of my children and grandchildren from their holiday travels so that we can
demolish them.

Herb.

Ps. Do you think Ill do better playing dominos on cheese than on pasta?

- Wikileaks
Click on the image above to view a larger version in a new window

Peter Kadzik is the person at the Department of Justice who is currently in charge of the Clinton Foundation investigation.
As you know, the DOJ refuses to prosecute the child trafficking case here. Also, you know that Peter Kadzik is Podestas
friend who kept him out of jail.

Unfortunately, Peter Kadzik goes to Tony Podestas birthday party before the Pizza Extravaganza. Kadzik is there, along
with Alefantis, and so on.

The Posto restaurant is another part of it they DELETED FUCKING EVERYTHING after Podesta was hacked. And they
periodically have FOODIE FUNDRAISERS. You know for people who like food. Its all in the Wikileaks emails.

Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Edward Epstein is an American financier and sex offender.

Former President Bill Clinton was a much more frequent flyer on a registered sex offenders infamous jet than
previously reported, with flight logs showing the former president taking at least 26 trips aboard the Lolita Express
- even apparently ditching his Secret Service detail for at least five of the flights, according to records obtained
by FoxNews.com.

Epstein, who counts among his pals royal figures, heads of state, celebrities and fellow billionaires, spent 13
months in prison and home detention for solicitation and procurement of minors for prostitution.

He allegedly had a team of traffickers who procured girls as young as 12 to service his friends on Orgy Island, an
estate on Epsteins 72-acre island, called Little St. James, in the U.S. Virgin Islands."

Ghislaine Maxwell: - Jeffrey Epsteins teen sex slave was ordered to hand over any correspondence between her and the
billionaire pedophile over the past 17 years, a Manhattan judge ruled in March.

Ghislaine is also shown at the bottom of the article in the image with the Podesta brothers and missing Madelein Mccann

Susan Alefantis

Sister of James Alefantis. Wrote a letter in support of Christopher Kloman:

Link

Link

Link

Backup
Christopher Kloman was sentenced to 43 years in prison for mutliple counts of child molestation;

Link

Backup

Also on the list is Kenneth Starr:

Link

Comet Ping Pong

A front company for child sex trafficking:

Comet Ping Pong logo next to the FBI declared pedophilia symbol

Podesta e-mails make multiple mention of Comet Ping Pong, family-friendly restaurant / venue with ping-pong for
kids (example email):

Comet Ping Pong seems to be the central hub for the pedophile ring, as it comes up the most in emails and through all the
connections.

From their website: Friends of Comet Ping Pong: heavy breathing, the washington ballet, politics & prose, hemphill fine
arts, don rockwell, transformer, apple, metrocurean, modern times coffee house, modern art notes, media
matters,brightestyoungthings, pandahead magazine, dr pong, bucks fishing and camping, sasha lord presents, squareforms

Go look into most any of those groups and you will find an entire chain of supplemental evidence.
James Alefantis on right

Comet Ping Pong owned by James Alefantis, once listed 49th most influential person in DC by GQ.

James Alefantis caught in love triangle with chief of Media Matters (A left wing attack organization which also looks to be
money laundering,) David Brock (a paranoid who rambles about right wing hit teams, and is allegedly open with his coke
use

Media Matters chief David Brock paid William Grey (Alefantiss boyfriend) $850,000 after being threatened with damaging
information involving the organizations donors and the IRS a deal that Brock later characterized as a blackmail payment.

Brock accused William Grey of making repeated threats to expose him to the scorn or ridicule of his employees, donors
and the press in demanding money and property.

We recently found the instagram account of James Alefantis.

The contents of it are indescribably bizarre and the contexts of the posts and comment chains are weird. Alefantis does not
have any children nor do his closest associates, but the photos seem to be a near constant assortment of different children
of a variety of ages, intermingled between posts about gay bars, clubs, photos of common rape drugs, and piles of foreign
currency.

After it being trawled through for 24 hours it has been set to private. A large set of archived copies can be seen here in the
next section. Similarly the instagram and twitter accounts of Comet Ping Pong are being edited selectively.

The accounts of the people favoriting and commenting on these posts are equally bizarre in both content, context, and
demeanor.

Elis father has a blog where we found Eli in a Changeling costume. A Changeling is an occult symbol usually depicting a
Replacement for a child stolen by a fairy (gay/pedo) or by a demon/devil.
The primary artist at Comet Ping Pong is Sasha Lord. Looking at her work you can see the esoteric, occult, pedophilia
symbolism.
Besta Pizza
A front company for child sex trafficking, directly next door to Comet Ping Pong.

Besta Pizza, which is located right next to BOTH COMET PING PONG and Bucks Fishing & Camping (which is the the
other business James Alefantis owns) is using a pedophilia symbol as their logo.

EDIT The Andrew Kline connection here is wrong (for anyone whos heard about the ownership connection.)

And so is Politics and Prose for their exterior sign. The Ampesand has a spiral in it. This is not used in any of their
letterheads.

Politics and Prose is owned by Lissa Muscatine, who comes up in both the leaked Clinton E-mails and Podesta e-mails over
300 times.

TerraSol Artisans

Related: TerraSol Website

TeraSol Artisans across the street from James Alefantiss businesses (Comet Ping Pong, Besta Pizza, and Bucks) is also
using a derivation of a pedophilia symbol. They were also visited by Hillary Clinton herself.
Across the street is the Beyond Borders more on the Clinton Haiti connection elsewhere.

- Sashalordpresents

- Invitation

Podestas invitation to an AFTER party at David Brock home (pic related, was attached in email)

- Wikileaks

David Brock is described as batshit crazy by Neera Tanden. His work history also shows temperamental behavior and
volatility.

- Wikileaks

NY Times article being discussed is this one.

- NewYorkTimes

The company that planned the event has a long roster.

- Detail

- Detail

Heres a party tip: If youre hosting an impromptu dinner and want guests to show up, have Academy Award-
winner Mira Sorvino as your guest of honor.
 Thats exactly what Kimball Stroud did after Sorvino attended a briefing on child trafficking on Capitol Hill with
Sens. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and John Cornyn (R-Tex.), filmmaker Libby Spears (Playground) and several
survivors of child trafficking.

- Detail

Related: Star Of Hobbit Films Elijah Wood Says Hollywood Is Masking A Child Sex Epidemic

An Open Secret documentary on Hollywood pedos revealed that several major Hollywood pedos had mansion
pedophile parties called after parties.

Brock Pierce is mentioned as the ringleader of the parties

- Brock Pierce

- Backup

Pierce supports non-profit and advocacy efforts, and is a member of the Clinton Global Initiative.

Get served at Comet Ping Pong, a hipster-heavy pizza parlor in the Upper Northwest with rough concrete walls, bathrooms
hidden behind secret panels, and table tennis galore
Podesta e-mail with HRC pizza logo says to donate to PizzaPAC.com registered to one JZ Drizin; Most recent tweet is
retweet from Pizza Packet, company that sells and delivers nothing but seasoning packets for pizza

However, Pizza Packet is owned by Itchie Gross; Richard Itchie Gross LinkedIn profile (now deleted) had picture of a
commercial jet. Color scheme appears very similar to Jeffrey Epsteins personal 727.

Address for Dr. Itcuie Gross, MD, who does not seem to have an NPI number, goes to 533 Bedford Avenue, Brooklyn, NY;
Does not look like a doctors office; two young children can be seen at the entrance.

Angels of Love Deals From Heaven deals with Haitian kids, based in Florida, Follows Pizza Packet on Twitter.

- Detail

Google Maps indicates that it is the only house on the street with all windows barred; Does not look like a business of any
sort.

Haiti

Laura Silsby and Charisa Coulter, women who planned to start an orphanage, New Life Childrens Refuge, in the Dominican
Republic; Arrested with several children in Haiti; Huma e-mailed HRC with regular updates; Silsby represented by attorney
convicted of sex trafficking; Allowed to leave the country

- Wikileaks

- Wikileaks

- Wikileaks

- HarvardHumanRightsJournal

- Wikileaks

WikiLeaks e-mail discusses pricing of transporting children:

- Wikileaks
Dyncorp

This email: [ Wikileaks ] from Hillary Clintons archive mentions Dyncorps hiring an adolescent boy dancer from
Afghanistan for some sort of event that, at least to most folks, looked very inappropriate.

Here is a direct quote:

According to my reporting, the week of April 13th, the DynCorp regional commander from Konduz, Flint
Chambers, allowed his men to hire a 15-year-old boy dancer to do tribal dances at a DynCorp party on the training
site.

Some 15 or so DynCorp employees in attendance pulled out a single chair and had the boy do mock lap dances.
This was captured on video.

The video shows DynCorp employees putting dollar bills in the boys waistband, just as they would a strippers
garter. The revelry lasted about 45 minutes.

This is sent directly to Hillary Clinton from Cheryl Mills who is one of her big time lawyers. Why would a LAWYER be
messaging Hillary this if she didnt have direct ties to DynCorp?

I did some investigating into DynCorp and they were involved in a sex scandal slavery in Bosnia in 1999:
 It's employees accused of rape and the buying and selling of girls as young as 12.

[Quote from article]

They have a long history of this. In 2005 the Chicago Tribune accused the government of covering up child trafficking.

According to this Portguese article Hillary is in favor of DynCorp.

In her emails there is another about inappropriate behavior by department contractor.

- Wikileaks

DynCorp is known for a gross history of sexual assault. The CEO is Lewis Von Thaer, and the parent organization of
DynCorp is Cerberus Capital Management.

Hillary Clinton has ties to both Cerberus and DynCorp. Cerberus gave $40,628 to her campaign.

The state department lost $1 billion dollars and DynCorp is to blame.

What is ironic is they appointed Jack Lew (Hillarys right hand man, according to the article) to look into it. DynCorp has a
history of stealing money.

1991 State of the Nation It appears that Dyncorp broke the original investigation on this. Dyncorp was the
accountant for roughly $2.7 trillion missing 1991-2001. Also missing in 1996 or 1997; $60 billion missing out of
HUD. Dyncorp appears to be the accounting division of the US government these days.
 - NewsFollowUp

Hillary covered up for DynCorp.

1. The Washington Post wrote about it to her

2. Later they publish a story saying the DynCorp employee was fired and no mention of the boy

3. Nothing ended up being done

- So WikiLeaks Is Evil For Releasing Documents But DynCorp Gets A Pass For Pimping Young Boys To Afghan Cops?

And here are the sensitive but unclassified documents from her emails.

- DocumentCloud

What is most disgusting is we now know Hillary has covered up for Weiner texting an underage girl and Laura Silsbys crew
of kidnapping children from Haiti for trafficking.

- DailyMail

- Truthfeed

Random Information for Later Sorting

Ruby, Emerson and Maeve are the children of Alexandra Tydings, the actress who played the goddess Aphrodite on Xena
the Warrior Princess.

She is married to Benjamin Luzatto, son of Tamara Luzzatos ex husband.

Click on the image above to view a larger version in a new window

And the Controlled Mainstream Media Disinformation Begins: Fake News Onslaught Targets Pizzeria as Nest of
Child-Trafficking

TPPA Dead In The Water At Last: Why Do Some NZ Commentators Continue To

Believe It Was A Free Trade Agreement?
November 20 2016 | From: KiwiWatch

The Trump victory has finally consigned the TPPA to the bin, certainly in its current form, yet here
in NZ our government has invested heavily into a treaty of the globalist elites pronouncing it free
trade when the main body of the treaty was the description of the powers the multi national
corporations would have over the sovereign laws of signatory countries.

How come it is only Trump who saw just how this treaty was going to impact his own country and our own
government and its commentators are all in favour? We were hell bent on consigning our national laws to the trash
in favour of multi national corporates.

Related: TPP has 'no chance' if Trump wins: Key

The TPPA was an agreement that was central to the US globalist establishment as represented by their candidate Hillary
Clinton and her announced pivot towards Asia having first completely destroyed the Middle east militarily. It was seen by
many as a mechanism for US multi nationals to challenge the emergence of China as a global trading and military force.

Globalists are behind the de-stabalising of nations and the implementation of trade deals according to their terms the world
over with George Soros as always in the thick of it.
Right now the city of Florence in Italy is facing being sued by multi national company McDonalds for $20m in lost
future profits because the Florence city council disallowed McDonalds to build one of their stores in what the
Florence people deemed to be a sensitive geographical site.

The NAFTA trade agreement already allows this sort of practice and the TPPA only enhances these powers further. Obama
was pushing for the TPPA and TTIP (with its fines for any government daring to impose standards that cost these multi
national companies money) as one of his legacies.

Now on the bright side, these trade agreements to enable corporations to block public laws protecting the environment,
consumers and society at large are now presumably dead.

5 Reasons NZ Should Not Sign The TPPA

Of course Trump recognised that multi national corporations of the U.S., companies like Apple, Microsoft, McDonalds,
Monsanto do not bring their corporate profits back home for the benefit of America and Americans as redistributed through
the tax system.

Mostly they employ hundreds of accountants and lawyers to disguise earnings and file their global returns in tax havens
virtually avoiding any contribution in tax to the Federal government in the U.S.

Multi nationals are not patriotic companies for America in that sense, they are simply the means of the elite owners to
extract massive profits for the elites and avoid contributing to the benefit of society wherever they are. Take Apple as an
example.

APPL sits on billions of cash hidden in accounts all round the world. As an APPL shareholder this is your asset, but do they
pay this out to shareholders in dividends? Hell No!

The corporate owners and directors keep this locked away for themselves, shareholders and the customers are only the
pawns that enable the company to be this money making machine.
I dont think Trump is impressed by this sort of behaviour and hes stated that getting these companies to pay up their fare
share to the Federal government will largely eliminate the need for tax increases, the reason why he is introducing tax cuts
for everyone.

The globalist agenda appears to have hit a wall with Trumps victory and they are reacting badly to his election making sure
the riots continue in cities around America busing in rioters from other states to keep the reaction going, as Soros is doing
right now.

The Hawkes Bay Today published and article today quoting Special Trade Envoy Mike Petersens comment that world
trade is now a lot more complicated because TPPA is dead his main emphasis being dairy access to the U.S. yet he goes
on to say NZ is still in a strong trading position.

Yes it is, look at the agreement with China, now we can complete agreements like that with who we wish individually and
without multi nationals being able to over ride sovereign laws of the signatory countries.

Lets face it, the claim of the TPPA proponents was that it was only going to increase New Zealands GDP by $1bn in 20
years time and now there is no reason why that still cant be the place with much more safety.

Frankly we should all be rejoicing. Thanks Donald Trump!

TPP Dead, Now Stop PPP Crony Capitalism by Another Name

Multinational corporations still looking to take advantage of America

Toll roads & other Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) are being offered as the means of Trumps $1 Trillion
Infrastructure Plan.

They are crony capitalism by another name, not trickle-down economics but the metaphor from Outlaw Josey Wales - Dont
PPP down my back & tell me its raining.

PPP contains much of the crony capitalism, ownership & control by multinational corporations that we hoped to stop in TPP.
10 Recent Signs That The Global Elite's Ship Is Sinking
November 19 2016 | From: TheMindUnleashed

Times are continuing to shift in a big way and humanitys rise over the darkness that has plagued
our planet for a very long time is gathering momentum by the day.

Remember, the elites modus operandi is to crush any form of hope or belief that things can or will get better. Truth
prevails though and we are seeing the old world order crumble. 2017 is sure to be an exciting year. Continue to
dream big.

Related: The 5 Biggest Threats To Humanity Exposed

1. June 23rd, 2016: Britain votes to leave the European Union. While some are choosing to see this as an extremist act
whose focus was on securing the border from immigrants, there is a much bigger picture to that event.
While it must be said that the immigration issue is in the minds of some who were pro-Brexit (and thus needs to be
humanely and compassionately addressed), the bigger issue was that Britain reclaimed its sovereignty back from the
imperialistic banking and political cabal.

As it has been reported in The Telegraph, a mainstream media outlet in the UK, the CIA and the U.S. State Department
have been heavily involved in the creation of the European Union from the very beginning. As Professor Alan Sked said in
the article: Voters in Britains referendum need to understand that the European Union was about building a federal
superstate from day one.

2. July 22nd, 2016: Wikileaks releases over 20,000 emails from the Democratic National Convention and shows the deep
collusion between the Clinton Campaign and the DNC itself. These revelations ultimately helped force the resignations of
the top 4 positions within the DNC.

3. October 8th, 2016: Shortly after Wikileaks began dumping the PodestaFiles, emails were revealed that John Podesta,
the Clinton campaign chairman, was receiving emails about UFO/E.T. disclosure as well as free energy technology, whose
emails came from former NASA astronaut Edgar Mitchell.
These are highly significant in the fact that it is admitted by Mitchell that such technologies do exist and that even the
Vatican knows of them. Once these technologies are known about on an even wider scale, the lies and corruption of the oil
industry will fall apart and humanity can then reclaim its freedom.

4. October 10th, 2016: Turkey defies the banking cabal and signs the Turkish Stream gas pipeline deal with Russia.
Because Russia is in opposition to the cabal, or NWO, as some would prefer, this is a massive financial and geopolitical
game-changer.

5. October 20th, 2016: The Philippines president Rodrigo Duterte visits China with 200 Filipino businessmen to mend ties
with China.
He also announces his separation from the U.S. (which is a blow to the cabal) and seeks an alliance with not only China, but
Russia too. The BRICS Alliance continues to grow.

6. October 30th, 2016: Icelands Prime Minister steps down as the activist, anti-establishment party, known as The Pirate
Party, comes in second in national elections and jumps its number of parliament seats from 3 to 10. As more people around
the world herald the call for true freedom, political parties reflecting such ideals will continue to prevail. The Pirate Party is in
over 40 countries around the world currently, and the movement continues to grow.

7. November 4th, 2016: Wikileaks emails reveal the Podesta brothers were invited to a spirit cooking dinner and
involved eating sperm and menstrual blood. While some surely laughed this off, keep in mind that former FBI special agent
Ted Gunderson spent several years investigating and exposing this information to the public, before being murdered.
We must also keep in mind that former BBC star Jimmy Savile was revealed to being involved in a massive, elite-ridden
pedophile ring. The pedophilia and ritualistic claims against many of the elites is well known around the world and is a very
serious issue. The fact that even a small bit of this came out in the Wikileaks revelations is significant and a sign of the
times. So much more is coming.

8. November 8th, 2016: It was revealed by Neil Keenan that several globalists/cabalists, including Mark Carney of the
Bank of England, Janet Yellen of the Federal Reserve, the Rothschilds, Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak and others
were involved in a deal to steal 1 million metric tons of Gold from the global collateral accounts.

As of this writing, the deal has been stopped and it very beneficial to humanity. While this story might not make much sense
to many readers, understand that the global collateral accounts are the cabals biggest financial secret on this planet.
It is the reason JFK was killed and it also relates to 9/11.

9. November 13th, 2016: The European countries of Moldova and Bulgaria elect new presidents, both of whom are pro-
Russia. This is yet another major setback for the globalists plans of creating a superstate out of Europe. Watch for even
more countries to begin aligning with Russia.

10. November 15th, 2016: More than 200 rallies around the U.S. take place to protest the North Dakota pipeline that is
being attempted to form. The world is continuing to awaken and sees the lunacy of oil and gas for energy. Clean solutions
already exist.
What are some other stories that you believe are signs that the elites ship is sinking? Some believe that the election of
Donald Trump is a sign. Do you agree or disagree with that? Share with us in the comments section what events you feel
should be included in the upcoming Part 2 of this ongoing story. If we agree, well post it in Part 2.

Related: Tragedies never end until the Truth is widely known

Establishment Media Declares War On Their Competition As Fake News

November 18 2016 | From: ActivistPost / Various

The establishment media is dying. This is not a biased view coming from alternative media, it is
a fact borne out by metrics and opinion polls from within the establishment itself.
It was true before the recent election, and is guaranteed to accelerate after their shameless defense of non-reality
which refused to accept any discontent among the American population with standard politics.

Related: Desperate: Establishment Media Says Everything Apart From Itself Is Fake

Now, with egg on their face after the botched election coverage, and a wobbling uncertainty about how they can maintain
multiple threads of a narrative so fundamentally disproven, they appear to be resorting to their nuclear option: a full shut
down of dissent.

Voices within independent media have been chronicling the signposts toward full-on censorship as sites have encountered
everything from excessive copyright infringement accusations, to de-monetization, to the open admission by advertising
giants that certain images would not be tolerated.

However, until now these efforts have appeared random, haphazard, and rife with retractions and restorations of targeted
sites and content. A massive backlash of reader outrage toward these restrictive measures has confirmed that most
consumers dont like the idea of being given boundaries to their intellectual freedom.

That said, there has been a notable increase of hoax websites beginning to populate the information stream. We can attest
that this has been an incredible annoyance as we are bombarded daily with new outrageous claims and rabbit holes that
readers expect us to sift through.

Most times, a cursory glance at the About page or any disclaimers quickly shows where this information is coming from.

Other times, a bit of common sense and discernment about why a site that has just appeared on the scene (check Alexa for
this info) would have EXCLUSIVE BREAKING content under the banner of an apparent local news channel or a name
that is the twisted version of a legitimate news outlet.

But even with those caveats, weve all been taken in at one time or another and have had to retract or update articles as
necessary, or apologize to our e-mail list for sending out a given link. This does jam up the works, but it is the tax we all
must pay if we believe in the free-market of ideas and information.

Were not perfect, but at least we have never been deliberately misleading like CNN and others often have been.
The government recently legalized using propaganda against US citizens. They wielded all of their establishment
media force to sell their lies. And now theyre frustrated that people still prefer the truth as they see it naturally.

As The Verge highlighted in a recent article, "Two-thirds of the worlds internet users live under government censorship."
Although this is roundly decried by establishment media as evidence of declining freedom, this is exactly the path we are
heading toward at the behest of that same media within those areas that have managed to thwart such a reality.

The voices of the corporate media are making a show of calling Facebook to task for evidently not having stringent
enough algorithms to discern legitimate news from deliberate hoax. We are being told that this very likely led to the
election of Trump, and that this has become a major problem in need of a major solution.

The first shots are being fired as we speak. Yesterday we learned that Facebook and Google would take swift action against
fake news by de-monetizing or banning them outright.

"Moving forward, we will restrict ad serving on pages that misrepresent, misstate, or conceal information about the
 publisher, the publishers content, or the primary purpose of the web property, a Google spokesperson said in
a statement given to Reuters.

This policy includes fake news sites, the spokesperson confirmed. Google already prevents its AdSense program
from being used by sites that promote violent videos and imagery, pornography, and hate speech.

- Source

This is problematic on a number of levels, not least of which is the vague notion of what constitutes violent imagery and hate
speech. War, of course, is what should first come to mind when thinking of violence. Police shootings and other clashes
might qualify as well, but routinely populate the most mainstream of sources. And one persons hate speech is another
persons dissent.

The second component is that of transparency, where we see claims about any effort to conceal information about the
publisher. Again, very vague, but as any journalist worth their salt knows, it is anonymity which leads to the truth more often
than not, especially when threats against journalists and whistleblowers are demonstrably on the rise.

Today, the mainstream media named us as one of the top fake news sites to avoid. Its quite an honor.

US News (linked above) has published a list of websites that it deems unworthy of support, and is essentially urging to be
de-monitized or banned based on the previous calls to action.

"Here are several fake news sites that have become popular on Facebook, and which should be avoided if youre looking for
the facts:"
- Source

Firstly, the grouping of satire, hoax, and propaganda is troubling, as the definitions of each arent even remotely related to
one another.

Satire is literature and has a tradition dating back thousands of years; it has been recognized as an essential component of
intellectual and political freedom. A deliberate hoax, we can all agree, is lacking integrity, purposely deceptive, and can be
legitimately harmful or dangerous.

Propaganda, though, is aligned with the State; and most commonly is directed and funded by the State. That is a serious
accusation and one that is entirely without merit for this website. It is also an especially ironic and dubious accusation
coming from an outlet called US News.

Yet were proud to be biased for peace, love, and liberty. Anyone against those principles is serving fake news as far as
were concerned.

Related: The Real Reason Why The UN Wants Control Over The Internet

All of this is to say that we are entering dangerous new territory, as the Internet itself is under a new regime with the transfer
to ICANN, an international body. If 2/3 of the globe is under digital dictatorship, what else is the likely outcome from such
international control over information?

However, it is also an exhilarating time to be a part of such mammoth upheaval, where the entrenched apparatus of
the State itself has declared information to be its enemy and to acknowledge that it must do everything in its power
to maintain its tenuous monopoly on the truth.

The unfortunate reality for them is that the truth will always be more efficient and, therefore, simpler to disseminate than the
complexities of lies and true propaganda.

Related Articles:

The Bizarre Media Blackout Of Hacked George Soros Documents

Infowars Announces Fake News Analysis Center

15 Facts About The Imploding U.S. Economy That The Mainstream Media Doesnt Want You To See

This Video Proves The Media is Lying About Trump

 Lamestream Media Suddenly Cares About Free Speech!

Trump Campaign Manager Calls on Democrats to Tell Paid Protesters to Cut it Out

Fomenting A National Crisis And Color Revolution: Soros-Funded Anti-Trump

Protesters Riot In Cities Across United States
November 18 2016 | From: Sott / Various

Globalist investor in murder and mayhem George Soros is at it again, funding his MoveOn.org to
organize post-election "sour grapes" protests around the country in response to underdog
Trump's surprising President-elect victory.

Complicit crime partner mainstream media is having a field day deceitfully spinning these top down, billionaire
driven demonstrations as a spontaneous, grassroots populist uprising against racist dictator Donald. From a press
release from MoveOn.org:

Related: Soros And Liberal Mega-Donors Plot For War With Donald Trump

"The gatherings - organized by MoveOn.org and allies - will affirm a continued rejection of Donald Trump's bigotry,
xenophobia, Islamophobia, and misogyny and demonstrate our resolve to fight together for the America we still
believe is possible."
The Soros-affiliated machine further boasts:

"Within two hours of the call-to-action, MoveOn members had created more than 200 gatherings nationwide, with
the number continuing to grow on Wednesday afternoon.

The Washington oligarchy's propaganda ministry wants the world to believe a groundswell of concerned, mindful citizens
have taken to the streets in a surge of moralistic patriotic fervor determined to derail the spread of Trump's legitimacy as the
so called leader of the "free world," that is if you still believe living in a fascist totalitarian police state called Amerika
is still "the free world."

Thanks to the likes of the Clintons, Obama and the Bushes who've for decades conspired to strip away all our constitutional
rights and freedoms in the name of New World Order deep state tyranny, "the free world" no longer exists on this planet.

But the self-righteous, follow-the-leader sheep of befuddled malcontents rioting in the streets across America
haven't a clue with propaganda lies now owning them.

Related: Trump Campaign Manager Calls on Democrats to Tell Paid Protesters to Cut it Out

In every large city in America that voted heavily for Hillary, a Soros organized and financed mercenary army has been
unleashed engaging in violent destructive behavior.

We're all supposed to accept MSM reporting that tens of thousands of fellow Americans who in good conscience just can't
accept a Trump-led United States are joining forces in righteous solidarity, defiantly marching now in large numbers crying
foul that that a "xenophobic racist" is soon to be our president.

They're violently hitting the streets in robotic, monkey see, monkey do support for a former serial rapist president
and his thug wife who intimidated and silenced all his victims and who also lost Tuesday's election.
Related: Secret Recordings Fueled Mutinous FBI Investigation of Clintons Despite DOJ Orders To "Stand Down"

And as far as their track record, the Clintons have been consistently supporting and implementing the globalist agenda that
exploits racial tensions promoting racial and religious division and war against dark skinned people.

Though the Clintons have always paid lip service pretending to support minorities in order to secure their votes,
they have never done anything beneficial for people of color.

Take a look at how they raked in millions from their Haiti post-earthquake scam, leaving the Western Hemisphere's poorest
nation's people abandoned, still suffering and thoroughly ripped off. If you want to get real with racism and sexual
perversion, than look no further than the Clintons.
But in a truth-starved, deep state world, the automatons now running violently in America's streets have systematically
been conditioned to be oblivious to the truth.

In Hillary and Bill's belated concession speech, each conspicuously wore purple in a symbolic covert message giving the
greenlight to the latest Soros' funded "color revolution" taking place in America.

As Paul Craig Roberts incisively observes, the anti-Trump protesters are mere tools of the oligarchy to "de-legitimize"
the Trump presidency the same way Soros funded while Hillary's US State Department NGO's were used to disfavor
the democratically elected Ukraine president three years ago that led to his overthrow in February 2014.

Soros-Hillary's blood-soaked hands in past color revolutions sponsored by the CIA destabilized the Middle East and North
Africa during 2011's Arab Spring Uprising that included Syria, Tunisia, Egypt, Libya among others.
Related: Thanks to WikiLeaks, we now have direct email evidence of the collusion between the MSM and Hillary
Clinton

The subversive objective is regime change by inciting domestic tensions and upheaval designed to destabilize wherever
Empire encounters resistance to its brutal rape and pillaging.

Lingering effects from these abominable, highly illicit Soros-Clinton operations interfering with the internal affairs of targeted
sovereign nations around the world are still lethally raging as wars in Ukraine, Syria, Libya and Yemen, chaotic disaster in
Venezuela, simmering violent tensions periodically boiling over in Armenia's Nagorno-Karabakh, South Sudan and now the
Philippines as well among many more.

Any nation state that refuses to be chewed up and spit out by US Empire/World Bank/IMF economic hit job becomes a
CIA/NGO target for violent coups and insurrections, and now it's USA's turn using the Trump presidency as its next victim.

As if the bloodshed and violence that George Soros' filthy money has caused around the globe isn't enough, as of late he's
been especially active in America trying to create race wars on US soil.
Related: Trumps Opponents See Normal Americans as Deplorables - Paul Craig Roberts

Spending millions to send busloads of his mercenary army of agitators to foment riots and violence in inner cities
right after another white cop kills another unarmed black man in Ferguson and Baltimore, Soros as a huge $25
million Clinton campaign donor also deployed mentally handicapped individuals to disrupt and incite brawls at
Trump rallies this year blaming it on opponents Sanders and Trump.

The bloodsucking Soros thrives on stirring up trouble and hostilities around the globe, pitting various people and groups
against each other as part of his elitist strategy to divide and rule over the world.

Since the late 1980's the double trouble kingpin has conspired insurgence and regime change revolts in Eastern European
nations like Poland and the Czech Republic and ran the show dictating at will with his money and unbridled power what
Secretary of State puppet Hillary needed to do in Ukraine, Albania and elsewhere in order to continue receiving both his
financial support and "guidance."

This week the Soros and Clinton paid minions are out in full force deployed onto the streets of Washington, New York,
Boston, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Oakland, Portland, Seattle and Austin, totaling over
a couple dozen cities.

Related: Blocks Of Anti-Trump Protest Buses Caught On Tape

As a matter of fact, photographic evidence proving the protests are nothing more than artificially staged "civil disturbances"
inflicted on America by Soros, a fleet of chartered buses showed up in Austin, Texas.

But of course the loyal Clinton presstitutes are creating the false narrative that an authentic citizen uprising is
organically growing out of moral indignation for Trump, and they're milking it for all its worth with headlines like
"Anti-Trump Protests Spread Around Nation."

Ironically it was supposed to be all the disgruntled Trump diehards who would angrily rise up in arms after the rigged
election triggers a violent national citizen revolt from Trump supporters. But instead it's the violent rabblerousing Hillary
camp starting fires and spreading anarchy in America's streets.
With purple Hillary and MSM's subtly hidden blessings, mainstream coverage of the ensuing violence and property damage
continuing to erupt for a third straight day in a row is predictably being downplayed. Reuters reports:

"The protests were for the most part peaceful and orderly, although there were scattered acts of civil disobedience
and damage to property."

Reuters goes on to explain only "a handful of protesters" were arrested in Portland, Oregon.

That said, in stark contrast, this is what "peaceful" pro-Hillary demonstrations actually look like. Enraged Trump haters
went out seeking revenge against the Donald's supporters celebrating early Wednesday morning at Times Square,
promptly crashing Trump's party with violent clashes. Pro-Hillary supporters resorted to widespread violence in at
least two dozen US cities.

Reports that American flags have been burned in multiple cities is actually right in synch with Hillary and her
globalists' masterplan to erase all sovereign borders in favor of their one world government.

So will the globalists' trade agreements like TPP and TTIP that Hillary secretly supports put the final nail in the
coffin of America as a sovereign independent nation.

The so called peaceful demonstrators turned into violent rioters in a number of locations like Oakland and Portland, setting
fire to garbage and tires and breaking windows.

An unruly mob of 7,000 Oakland protesters quickly grew out of control, engaging in acts of arson starting about 40 different
fires, throwing rocks, bottles, M-80's and Molotov cocktails at police injuring three officers who then fired tear gas to break
up the crowd as thick plumes of smoke filled the embattled city skies.

Related: PROOF The Trump protests utilizing paid professional protesters financed by George Soros
An Oakland police patrol car was also torched. One entire Oakland block was seriously vandalized. Protesters spray painted
graffiti messages "kill Trump" and "fuck Trump" as they set fires. At least 30 were arrested during the Oakland rampage.

The more vocal pro-Hillary outbursts began surfacing on America's college campuses. At the University of Oregon and
California universities like UCLA and UC Berkeley the anti-Trump forces converged... a far cry from the 60's and early 70's
when these same colleges were the bastions of the antiwar peace movement.

Now the same schools are spawning violence in support of their nasty crime boss who vowed to bomb
Russia and Iran. Meanwhile, the object of their violent hatred is a noninterventionist vowing to help Putin kill the
very same terrorists that their favored losing candidate helped create and continues supporting.

Sadly, times have vastly changed not for the better. Too many university students today are media brainwash victims.

Related: Report: Three Million Votes in Presidential Election Cast by Illegal Aliens

Across America hundreds of protesters have been arrested. In Los Angeles about 3,000 demonstrators gathered in two
places, disrupting traffic commandeering the 101 freeway that passes through the downtown area. Another contingent of
angry anti-Trump protestors assembled outside of Los Angeles city hall.

A bloody head of Trump was burned in effigy. In all, 29 people were reported to be arrested in LA. A confrontation between
police and protesters in Orange County's Santa Ana witnessed a brick thrown into a police cruiser, two other cars damaged
and two businesses vandalized with 10 arrests.

4,000 protesters in Portland disrupted downtown traffic and forced train delays, shattered windows, lit a fire in a dumpster
and vandalized 19 vehicles at a car dealership. A group of violent anarchists led the crowd inciting property destruction
although a number of demonstrators chanted "peaceful protest."

But likely the Soros paid agitators succeeded in turning the protest into a riot, resulting in at least 26 arrests. Denver
protesters walked onto Interstate 25 shutting down both sides of the freeway for a half hour. 500 demonstrators assembled
in Louisville.
In New York City over 30 were arrested gathering in two locations, one outside the Trump Tower and another at Columbus
Circle. Clinton loyalists Lady Gaga, Madonna and Cher joined the Trump Tower protesters on Wednesday night where
American flags were burned as well as in Philadelphia and Washington. 15 arrests were made at the Trump Towers in New
York for disorderly conduct.

Speaking of has-been celebrities, in dire desperation the last week of her campaign, Hillary paraded her A-list
of star power onto the stage playing the pied piping idolatry card as a last gasp cheap ploy to condescendingly buy
votes from the younger generations.

Beyonc, husband Jay Z, Katy Perry, Miley Cyrus, LeBron James and Bruce Springsteen all payed homage to their favorite
crime boss. Meanwhile, Cher, Lena Dunham, Samuel L. Jackson, Barbra Streisand, Amy Schumer, Jon Stewart, George
Lopez, Al Sharpton, and Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg have all gone on public record stating that they plan
to move out of the country if the rigged election still fails to get their murdering crime boss queen elected. Good riddance!

On Friday evening protests were organized in Miami and West Palm Beach as well. 1000 demonstrators each marched in
Milwaukee and Minneapolis, slightly less in Columbus, Ohio. Up to 2,000 marchers in Chicago gathered at Trump Tower
while others attempted to obstruct traffic.
Related: Anti-Trump Protests: Proof Of Professional Activist Involvement

USA Today counted over 50 protests since Tuesday night and over a dozen more known already planned.
The MoveOn.org supplying the centralized organizers of these nationwide protests in reaction to a Trump presidency is
intended to spread and grow over time into a political movement throughout the country.

Soros is prepared to fuel the protests with deep pockets and paid professional anarchists designed to incite
widespread violence, vandalism and civil unrest throughout the US.

The treasonous aging billionaire is seeking regime change right here in America in plain sight, clearly a direct
assault on our nation's democratic principles, against both the democratically elected leader as well as against the
will of the American people who specifically voted for the outsider as a rejection of the very corrupt dirty power
politics game represented by Soros, Hillary and her Democratic Party.

Related: Break Up the Democratic Party: Its Time for the Clintons and Rubin to Go - and Soros Too

The hypocritical hubris of these diehard Clinton supporters is projected on full display when they resort to lawbreaking
anarchy violence at the same time that misguided, flowery language flows out of their mouths. In the words of one New York
protester:

"There's a man who's the human embodiment of hate who's going to become our next president, so the best thing
we can do is try to connect with people who are representing love and connection...

Hmm, like the most dangerous, warmongering presidential candidate in US history who promised the world that America
would go to war against both Russia and Iran... or the vicious, demonic mastermind who buys violence, death and
destruction like they're commodities on a monopoly board, or like the "loving" protesters spreading violence across America
right now, all in the name of love and connection.

Meanwhile, anti-Trump death threats showed up on Twitter calling for Trump and his Vice President-elect Mike Pence to
be assassinated. That's how some who object to Trump show their love.

If it were angry Trump supporters on a wild rampage like this, mainstream media would be calling protesters
committing this exact same behavior as hateful, anti-American racists bent on causing race wars in cities across
America, forcing the government to take measures to quell such out of control, Trump-inspired violent anarchy and
hate.

In the same way that Soros and the media giants both engage in race baiting that foments further violence and unrest in
places like Ferguson and Baltimore as part of a sinister globalist agenda, the same diabolical dynamic is currently underway
with the media inciting American citizens to hit the streets in protest and a meta-message to spread violence and bloodshed
that will invariably be blamed on Donald Trump, who is being demonized just like Putin and Assad.

The disturbing truth here is there's a hidden Soros-Clinton-MSM agenda purposely adding fuel to the fire so that
paid Soros-Hillary shills violently act out in efforts to lead another color revolution coup staged as an "out of
control crisis" and "national rebellion."

Remember the operative word here is perception where MSM covertly creates and stages a false narrative that a national
emergency will warrant President Obama to opportunistically call out the National Guard in order to stabilize the nation
"bordering on civil war," thus handing him the excuse to declare martial law prior to Trump's inauguration in January.

Or if that particular endgame scenario fails to materialize, as long as the civil unrest and widespread violence continues to
grow nationally, the ruling elite may engineer some other form of false flag crisis like a cyberattack on the US banking
infrastructure, then subversively blame the Trump-Putin duo for the conspiracy.
Related: Soros, Liberal Billionaires Meet in DC to Plan War on Trump

Or if Trump does manage to outlast his January inauguration date and become president, you can bet that the globalists will
soon thereafter unleash a full blown financial crisis where their house of cards global economy collapses like dominos into a
worse depression than the one that followed the 1929 stock market crash that they also initiated.

President Trump of course would be accused of causing that catastrophe as well.

That's why this election was rigged by preprogrammed voting machines to deliver the outcome that has shocked so many.
Once the elite deemed Hillary to be damaged goods and a liability with all her nonstop scandals and criminality, suddenly a
decision was made to fix the election so a narrow margin of victory could be claimed by Donald Trump.

Comment: The narrative that Trump is controlled opposition is yet another desperate attempt to derail positive
developments in the battle against the Cabal.

When just before the election Hillary and Bill were both accused of being pedophiles by honest members of the New York
Police Department and the FBI after discovering evidence on Anthony Weiner's laptop, directly connecting the Clintons to
their billionaire buddy, registered sex offender and fellow pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's international child sex slavery
trafficking ring, the elite conceded defeat and threw Hillary under the bus.
With this worldwide child sex ring threatening to expose not only the Clintons but the likes of the Bushes, Prince Andrew,
other members of European royalty, multiple high court judges in both North America and Europe, prominent politicians in
both US Congress as well as European parliaments, high ranking military officers and world famous entertainers as part of a
Satanic worshipping cabal that rules the world,

But it's too late for that now as the cat's already been let out of the bag .

Courageous whistleblowers in both law enforcement and journalism are pushing for the ugly truth to be fully exposed as the
best opportunity to remove this criminal cabal from power once and for all, seeking justice by placing the perpetrators on trial
for their unlimited high crimes that include treason, war atrocities, pedophilia, human genocide and crimes against
humanity.

An international truth and reconciliation commission will need to be organized to facilitate those from lower levels of this
international cabal to come forth providing evidence and testimony to hold those guilty at the top fully accountable. This tall
order is what "draining the swamp" will really be all about.
Getting rid of the subhuman scum that have controlled virtually all human affairs over the past few centuries will pave the
way for a new beginning where such advanced technologies as free energy and a resource-based global infrastructure can
be developed and built to sustain a population of 11 billion people.

By purging the crime cabal leaders and their puppet masters, the ruling elite's plan to commit human genocide by drastically
reducing the world population from its current 7.4 billion to just over a half billion people will be circumvented. Once we
"drain the swamp" of these Satanic mass murderers, a social, economic and spiritual transformation will then finally be freely
in place to promote humans into living in harmony and peace on this earth the way that God originally intended.

Related Articles:

Clinton Foundation: Admits hiding Qatar's $1M 'donation'; Killary at the 'center of the wheel'

Podesta email bombshell: Clinton campaign was heavily funded by Monsanto

Huma Abedin Said To Suffer Emotional Breakdown

FBI Now 99% Certain at Least 5 Foreign Agencies Hacked Into Hillarys Server

What? Clinton Camp Says Media Bias Caused Loss

Martin Armstrong Exposes "The Real Clinton Conspiracy" Which Backfired Dramatically

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton walk in to a bar

This is the email that hacked Hillary Clintons campaign chief

Memo to Hillary Supporters: Trump Won, Stop Whining and Grow Up

How Hillary Clinton Stole the Democratic Nomination from Bernie Sanders, Did Not Legally Win the Popular Vote
Are Microwave Transmission Weapons Of Mass Destruction Being Used To Trigger
Catastrophic Earthquakes? + New Zealand Earthquake: The Worlds Biggest Offshore
Seismic Blasting Ship The Amazon Warrior
November 17 2016 | From: GeoEngineeringWatch / TheContrail

Are unimaginably powerful microwave transmissions actively and aggressively being used as
weapons of mass destruction? If all available evidence is examined, the logical conclusions are
chilling.

Understanding the full potential of the power that can be projected from the ionosphere heater installations (like
HAARP) is difficult and complex.

Related: Worlds Biggest Seismic Testing Ship Amazon Warrior Parked On Top Of New Zealand Fault Line & 6.2
Aftershock Shakes New Zealand After Powerful 7.8 Earthquake Kills At Least 2

We all know and understand that microwave transmissions produced in our countertop ovens can heat a cup of water
(or frozen TV dinners) at blinding speed. Unfortunately, most don't know and thus have never even considered (let alone
investigated) what massively powerful and interlinked microwave transmissions can do to the planet.

When immensely powerful microwave transmissions are bounced off the atmosphere (facilitated by the atmospheric aerosol
saturation) and directed back into the Earth's strata (in a seismically sensitive location), the triggering of seismic activity
becomes scientifically possible.
The constant jet aircraft spraying of reflective and electrically conductive particles into the atmosphere (as part of the
ongoing climate engineering/geoengineering assault) is a verifiable fact. Is New Zealand, yet again, the victim of microwave
transmission super-weapons?

There is a long list of shocking facts surrounding a number of recent catastrophic earthquakes. It is imperative to examine
these facts without preconceptions or programmed denial.

Let's start with the month leading up to the extremely destructive 2010 earthquake in Haiti, MIT satellite monitoring detected
a radical increase in ULF (ultra low frequency/microwave) radio transmissions over the quake epicenter.

Spacecraft Saw ULF Radio Emissions over Haiti before January Quake

A French satellite observed a dramatic increase in ultra low frequency radio waves over Haiti in the month before
the M7.0 earthquake earlier this year.

DEMETERs is an unusual mission. Its job is to monitor low frequency radio waves generated by earthquakes.

Today, a group of geoscientists release the data associated with the M 7.0 earthquake that struck Haiti in January.
They say that DEMETER saw a clear increase in ultralow frequency radio waves being emitted from the Earths
the crust in that region in the build up to the quake.

The anecdotal evidence of electromagnetic effects associated with earthquakes is legion. Various accounts link
earthquakes with mysterious light and heating effects."

After the Haiti quake, the US military moved in and occupied the country. In addition, the long drawn-out Clinton Foundation
reconstruction debacle began.
The following year a deadly earthquake struck Christchurch, New Zealand. Many circumstances surrounding this disaster
were also troubling. Did US officials know the earthquake was coming? Some excerpts from a report on the disaster are
below.

"Was the Christchurch earthquake a terrible natural disaster, or was it a terrible MAN MADE disaster?

9 members of US Congress were in Christchurch for a summit meeting on Feb 21 & 22 but left Christchurch 2.5
hours before the earthquake hit and relocated to Wellington even though the meeting was not due to finish until the
evening of Feb 22nd.

The US Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, was supposed to be visiting Christchurch and speaking
at the summit meeting on Feb 22, but on Feb 18 announced she was cancelling her visit 3.

The Deputy Administrator of FEMA (US Federal Emergency Management Agency), Timothy Manning, just
happened to be in Christchurch at the time with a US delegation.

All of the rest of the delegation left Christchurch shortly before the quake hit except for Mr Manning who stayed
behind, and then after the quake hit he assisted with directing the emergency response.

Exactly the same thing happened with FEMA delegates with the Haiti earthquake. In Haiti , the FEMA delegates
just happened to be there at the time conducting training exercises for responding to major earthquakes."

Recent releases from Wikileaks resulted in the headline below:

Hillary Clinton Emails Show Advanced Warning of Christchurch Earthquake.

In the days before the catastrophic Japanese Earthquake (that occurred on March 11, 2016), world renowned research
institution, MIT, yet again, noted extremely profound and anomalous atmospheric heating directly over the quake
epicenter. MIT published the following report:

"Atmosphere Above Japan Heated Rapidly Before M9 Earthquake

Infrared emissions above the epicenter increased dramatically in the days before the devastating earthquake in
Japan, say scientists.

They say that before the M9 earthquake, the total electron content of the ionosphere increased dramatically over
the epicentre, reaching a maximum three days before the quake struck.

At the same time, satellite observations showed a big increase in infrared emissions from above the epicentre,
which peaked in the hours before the quake. In other words, the atmosphere was heating up."
Though the science community is desperately trying to link pre-quake atmospheric heating to some unknown phenomenon
of an atmospheric coupling with the pressure buildup in the strata, is this a rational conclusion?

The much more logical and straightforward conclusion is this, the atmospheric heating is being intentionally created by the
global network of ionosphere heaters as immense microwave signals are bounced off of the atmosphere and back down into
the planet.

Unfortunately, the science community is not allowed to even consider this possibility, let alone talk about it. In the period
preceding the decimating Japanese earthquake, US Japanese relations were very strained.

The post-quake scenario of US/Japanese relations seemed to suddenly be unquestionable, was there a connection? Was
the catastrophic quake just a natural event? Or an engineered warning to Japan?

On the 13th of November, 2016, another catastrophic earthquake struck near Christchurch, New Zealand.

The list of troubling questions surrounding this earthquake is long and growing. Below are some quotes from seismologist
Anna Kaiser (who is investigating the latest New Zealand earthquake activity):

"We don't know what we are dealing with right now but it may be it involves potentially more than one fault we
need to figure out what was going on before and after the 7.5 magnitude quake "

Kaiser went on to say this:

"We're working very hard this is looking quite complex. The epicenter was possibly just south of the Hope fault,
but it did look like "something else was going on.

The seismologist statements are only the beginning, there are many more concerning factors surrounding the latest New
Zealand Earthquake that should be considered.
In spite of the unfolding US election circumstances, in the days before the latest New Zealand quake John Kerry first went to
Christchurch, and then on to McMurdo Station, Antarctica.

The stated purpose of Kerry's visit was to examine the effects of global warming and the record low sea ice, but this trip at
this time was criticized by some.

"US Secretary of State John Kerry is scheduled to head back to New Zealand after checking out summer in
Antarctica.

He's been criticized for heading to such a remote place while the US election riveted the world

He tweeted a photograph of himself boarding C-17 cargo plane in Christchurch saying "headed to Antarctica to see
firsthand some of the drastic effects of climate change".

In Antarctica he was scheduled to meet with scientists and researchers at McMurdo Station, the largest research
station of the US Antarctic programme, as well as visit surrounding areas on Ross Island, and the US
Government's Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station.

He is the first secretary of state and the most senior US government official to ever travel to Antarctica.

He is hosted by the US National Science Foundation, which manages the US Antarctic program me."
In fact Antarctica has just broken a new climate record, with record low winter sea ice. After a peak of 18.5 million square
kilometers in late August, sea ice began retreating about a month ahead of schedule and has been setting daily low records
through most of September.

Though Antarctic sea ice (and global sea ice) are at record shattering low levels, why else might John Kerry go to McMurdo
Station at this exact window of time? Could the ionosphere heater (microwave transmission) facility that is constructed at
McMurdo be a factor?
Noctilucent clouds in the skies above Antarctica are an ominous harbinger of the atmospheric damage that is occurring there

"Many are under the belief that HAARP, now labeled IRI, no longer exists Operationally due to the
Gakona, AK spin. One must understand that these Frequency Generators are Globally Ubiquitous. There are so
many that are of dissimilar designs, and go by different acronyms, it is not seen as functionally one and the same.

In the case of McMurdos Radome and all of the Radar equipment there; Raytheon has had the contracts
beginning to end. The National Science Foundation and Raytheon Polar Services Company are housed in the
same building. For years the station has grown. It can house 1258 personnel and an average of 200 winter over."

Raytheon is one of the largest private "defense contractors" on the planet, this corporation is also the holder of
numerous climate engineering patents including some that relate directly to ionosphere heaters. The power structure is likely
microwaving the skies for a multitude of reasons, none of those reasons are in the interest of the common good.

Shocking atmospheric flashing lights were filmed in the skies above New Zealand as the massive Earthquake was
occurring.

Kerry returned to Christchurch from Antarctica, and then promptly (and conveniently) departed only hours before the
catastrophic earthquake struck.

The statement below is from CBS news.

 "Sec. John Kerry had left the country before it struck, and just landed in Singapore on his way to Oman when news
of the quake was reported.

Is it just a coincidence that US officials always seem to safely depart quake impact zones just prior to the event?

Then there is this headline to consider:

"Worlds Biggest Seismic Testing Blast Ship Amazon Warrior Parked on top of New Zealand Fault
Line

Is this just a coincidence?

Another point of interest, New Zealanders protested against US Oil exploration continued right up to the day before the
quake. Then there was the conflict in New Zealand over the visit of a US warship, this story was covered the day before the
quake hit.

The New Zealand Prime Minister's apparent apprehension about the US election results just days prior to the quake are also
of interest.

Finally, could known massive oil deposits just off the New Zealand coast also be a part of the equation?

Microwave transmission signals/rings near Antarctica are clearly visible in the satellite composite image shown below.
The regions of New Zealand near the epicenter have been constantly assaulted with aerosols spraying and microwave
transmissions.
The uniform ribbing of aerosolized cloud cover is a clear indication of microwave transmission exposure.

Though some "official" sources try to explain this type of cloud pattern as being a result of the underlying land topography,
this explanation is patently false.

The same patterns are now regularly seen over oceans as well as land as is shown in the satellite photo below that was
taken of New Zealand directly over the quake region.
The image below bears testimony to what the global power structure does to those that try to get in the way of their agendas
and operations.

This photo is of the bridge of the Greenpeace ship "The Rainbow Warrior". It was bombed and sunk by the French Secret
Service in order to prevent the ship and its crew from witnessing ongoing illegal and unimaginably destructive nuclear
detonations.
Over 2 decades ago I dove alone on the wreck of the Rainbow Warrior, as it laid on the seafloor off the coast of New
Zealand. I swam through the area shown above, around the ship, and examined the gapping bomb blast hole in the hull of
the once noble vessel. I hovered over the wreck and contemplated the tyranny of those who rule the world.

We are all at a crossroads, and the horizon is darkening rapidly. The power structure wields weapons of unimaginable
destruction, they can only do so because of the order-followers that carry out their insanity. As the saying goes, "we have
seen the enemy, and they are us".

It is up to us, the people, all of us, to refuse any further participation in the insanity. It is up to us to fully investigate and fully
face the whole truth. It is up to us to prioritize the fight for the greater good because we owe that debt to our children, to the
planet, and to the whole.

Make your voice heard, while you can, while it can still matter.

New Zealand Earthquake: The Worlds Biggest Offshore Seismic Blasting Ship The
Amazon Warrior

Dots: Super-supermoon, Climate change huckster American Politician, Amazon Warrior, Oil
Exploration and Mapping for drilling, Earthquake M7.5 and plates shifting generating many
aftershocks the entire length of the fault line through NZ.

The 11/13/16 quake, with a magnitude of 7.8, was much stronger than the magnitude-6.3 quake in 2011. But it also
was much deeper - striking 23 kilometers (14 miles) below the earth's surface. The 2011 quake had a depth of just 5
kilometers (3 miles). The shallower a quake is, the more destruction it tends to cause.
The evil empire are after New Zealand's unobtainium. First shake up the locals, destroy infrastructure, weaken the economy
and then extort deals to rape the resources of the country.

If you were planning to do seismic blasting off the coast of a Country, the best time to do it would be with the super full moon
wouldnt it? So that people only discuss that as the possible reason.

Kaikoura was clearly the target now destroyed, and that basin is full of the precious oil for the foreign bankers and the only
thing stopping them was the people of Kaikoura - now homeless and to be relocated by NZ Navy ship. Kaikoura is also
known for its whale populations, the area should be protected from ALL sonic oil exploration and Naval activity!

The Worlds Biggest Seismic Testing Ship - The US "Amazon Warrior" - Parked On Top Of New
Zealand Fault Line during the November 13, 2016 Earthquake!

The Worlds biggest seismic blasting ship the Amazon Warrior was photographed off Rarangi Beach in Cloudy Bay last
night. Right on top of a major fault line. The ship was met with protests when it arrived on the 13th! It was seen off the
Coast of Kaikoura on Nov. 13th, but its ETA from Panama was 10 am on Nov 14th in Wellington.
The Amazon Warrior came from Panama, was seen off of Kaikoura on the 13th and then went to anchor off of Cloudy Bay
at the top of the South Island, across the channel from Wellington. If you are steaming to NZ from Panama, and your
destination is Wellington, then there is no need to go an extra 95 miles south before arriving at your charted destination;
after a long sea journey of 7,353 miles.

This fact alone shows that there was something very fishy going on in the state of Aotearoa.

If their scheduled arrival was for 10am on the 14th in Wellington, then their trip to Kaikoura was already calculated into their
original ETA. The AW's estimated project-to-project transit speed is 17 knots or 19.5633 mph. Thus traveling the 7353 miles
to NZ will take around 16 days, and the last report in Vessel Finder was Oct 25, 2016 17:52 UTC which was probably the
departure time from Panama.

Roughly Oct 26 to Oct 13 is 19 days, so they left plenty of leeway to ensure they could make it to Kaikoura before heading
to Wellingtonhowever rather than 3 days leeway, it is only 2 days because NZ is one day ahead of Panama.

On a ship like the Amazon Warrior... to travel 95 miles distance from Kaikoura to Wellington it takes around 5 hours, so they
have 1.75 days to engage in their seismic mayhem. The ship only pulled into Cloudy Bay to avoid the protesters at
Wellington. Yea, rather obvious isn't it. By their deeds shall they shall be known.
Further information on the Amazon Warrior is available here and here.

The Amazon Warrior is owned by WesternGeco which is a geophysical services company. It is headquartered in
the Schlumberger House on the property of London Gatwick Airport in Crawley, West Sussex, and also has an office in
Denver CO. The company provides reservoir imaging, monitoring, and development services.

The company, a business segment of Schlumberger, offers 3D and time-lapse seismic surveys, electromagnetic surveys,
and multicomponent surveys for delineating prospects and reservoir management.

The giant defense contractor Raytheon, now holds all 12 HAARP patents. HAARP devises can be made mobile on ships,
such as the HAARP Sea-Based X-Band Radar (SBX) platform.
A HAARP phased array antenna system was transmitting the 2.5Hz ULF frequency and it triggered the 9.0 magnitude
earthquake off of Japan and ensuing tsunami.

The earthquake inducing 2.5 Hz ULF frequency was being broadcasted for two days prior to March 11, 2011during which
time the sky over Tokyo turned red as the ionosphere was pulled down into the oxygen rich atmosphere. DARPA is also
developing an airborne version of HAARP.

Related: HAARP to blame for Japan Quake?

Any country that is in the way of an oil pipeline, has valuable and strategic resources, or threatens to drop the $US dollar
standard is in danger of being chemtrailed, HAARP zapped and attacked with earthquakes and extreme weather events.

The earthquake frequency can be focused on an area during a solar flare event or full moon and once the earthquake is
triggered, a seismic research vessel like the Amazon Warrior can take readings of the shockwaves moving through the
earths crust and get an excellent picture of oil deposits even at very deep levels.

Ray Tomes:

America and NZ tested a system of using bombs to cause seismic activity and make tsunamis as a weapon in
1944 off the coat of NZ (yes, 72 years ago). "Preliminary modelling suggests that the earthquake was caused by a
rupture of a northeast-striking fault that projects to the surface offshore"

Related: What happened in New Zealand's magnitude 7.5 earthquake?

The Amazon Warrior is due to commence imminent seismic testing for oil on behalf of Norwegian Oil giant Statoil. Seismic
testing involves the dragging of a seismic airgun along the seabed, emitting seismic blasts every 10 seconds, 24 hours a
day, from now until next May.
Statoil acquired their permit from American multinational oil corporation Chevron, and the permit extends along the eastern
seaboard and to depths that are unprecedented for New Zealand.

Seismic blasting has been proven to be disruptive and harmful to sea life, including marine mammals, and is opposed by
coastal fishing interests and eco-tourism operators including Ngi Tahus Whale Watch ventures.

Chevron Corporation (NYSE: CVX) is an American multinational energy corporation. One of the successor companies of
Standard Oil, it is headquartered in San Ramon, California, and active in more than 180 countries.

Standard Oil Co. Inc. was an American oil producing, transporting, refining, and marketing company. Established in 1870
by John D. Rockefeller as a corporation in Ohio, it was the largest oil refiner in the world of its time.
Tesla-HAARP-Earthquakes

Tesla quaked Manhattan around Houston St. with a small resonant device attached to a beam in his workshop/lab, and
smashed it with a hammer when it started to shake things to a dangerous level, which stopped the quake instantly.

One of his basic working principles was resonance, mechanical and electromagnetic. It's how the Tesla coil drives up huge
voltage on a low current.

HAARP is an adaptation of Tesla technology used for nefarious purposes. The microwave array broils the Upper
Atmosphere to 100F with a focused and steerable electromagnetic beam, that lifts areas of the ionosphere by heating those
areas. Electromagnetic waves then bounce back onto earth and penetrate everything - living and dead.

Along with chemtrails and this heating of the atmosphere with HAARP dries up precipitation thus producing drought. I learnt
somewhere they
HAARP uses sunspot cycles, sunspots, solar flares, hurricanes, fault tension build ups etc... for a EMF assisted corporate-
political warfare. HAARP is boost assist and director of natural energies. They can even reflect of the moon to generate
massive explosions.

On the HAARP web site in 2001 discussed successful moon bounce experiments (done since the 1960's by HAM radio
operators) see: HAARP array may use Moon as a reflector to reach distant targets on Earth to create Nuclear-Sized
Explosions Without Radiation!. In order to target the moon you need a steerable array and three arrays minimum are
required.

Related: HAARP likely not Primary Ionospheric array in Alaska

HAARP is capable of creating weather like hurricanes and tornadoes and tsunamis and earthquakes. It is also capable of
altering peoples moods.
NASA tomographic image of the subducted Farallon Plate in the mantle beneath eastern North America

Earth tomography is used by the oil and gas industry to find deposits. Tomography refers to imaging by sections or
sectioning, through the use of any kind of penetrating wave or mechanical method. ELF waves or extremely low frequency
waves can trigger an earthquake on faults that have built up tension.

Thus a ship like Amazon Warrior with even weak exploratory ELF waves can trigger fault lines into concussive domino effect
earthquakes of any magnitude depending on how much tension is held in the tectonic ridges.

HAARP Weapon How to Make an Earthquake

Conclusion

It appears that the earthquake was accidentally triggered by the Amazon Warrior's exploratory ELF waves...then they
quickly pulled out of the area to avoid being held responsible, but didn't go to Wellington due to the protest, and possible
fear of reprisal from the New Zealand Navy.

However it is illegal to travel through New Zealand waters and conduct personal "business" PRIOR to checking in officially
at one's port of entry first.

I conclude that the 11/13 quakes were accidentally triggered by an oil exploratory vessel working for Chevron. So
Chevron should be made responsible for picking up the tab for repairing the damage to the countrys infrastructure
and the lives of the people by this little chiropractic adjustment to the backbone of New Zealand.
The ship went about their business conducting their "research" in New Zealand territorial waters PRIOR to officially
checking in with customs.

Plus this sortie was premeditated due to the original ETA, and so their actions were criminal and secretive... by going for the
gold (oil) first before being invited into the country.

However reading the shenanigans of US officials in Christchurch before and after the 2011 quake....it appears that the
11/13/16 quake swarm was likely deliberate, and appears to be an act of economic war.

Related Articles:

Earthquakes: Worldview of New Zealand, Macquarie Island, Guadalupe Island & Nova Scotia / Nov. 13, 2016

New Zealand on NASA EOSDIS Worldview: A Collection of Various Screenshots / 2016

Goldman Sachs And the Sacking of New Zealand

Goldman Sachs appears to be undertaking economic warfare on areas to drive up the prices of its commodities
and stocks, and to lay claim to resources.
Canadian wildfires, pipeline attacks in Nigeria and the Gulf Oil Spill are likely sabotage undertaken by Goldman Sachs to
drive up prices for its own benefit.

In New Zealand now, the Christchurch and Kaikoura quakes and the Rena shipwreck toxic spill event are acts of
war against a sovereign nation for economic gain and to intimidate and demoralize Kiwis into submission to the
poisoning and sacking of their country.

On 5 October 2011 the Rena ran aground near Tauranga, New Zealand, resulting in an oil spill. The spill has been
described as New Zealand's worst maritime environmental disaster.
The ship was carrying 1,368 containers, eight of which contained hazardous materials, as well as 1,700 tonnes of heavy fuel
oil and 200 tonnes of marine diesel oil.

Related: Rena Oil Spill

The election of the ex-Goldman Sachs exec John Keys is key to the implementation of the disaster capitalization
and resource rape of New Zealand.

Related: Goldman Sachs Plans for the depopulation of the East Coast of New Zealand for Oil & Gas Drilling by BP,
Shell Oil & Todd Energy

Goldman Sachs Now Sees Chevron Better Off Than Exxon Mobil. Goldman Sachs is now buying and selling enough natural
gas to make it one of the key players on the market - even reportedly overtaking oil major Exxon Mobil and Chevron.
According to a recent regulatory filing, Goldman Sachs bought and sold 1.2 trillion cubic feet of physical gas in the U.S. in
2015, which equates to 25 percent of the countrys residential consumption and more than double its 2013 volumes.

These figures turn Goldman Sachs and its J Aron commodities division into the seventh largest gas marketer in North
America.

Related: Goldman Sachs Is Now Bigger Than Exxon, Chevron in Nat Gas Trading

Goldman Sachs, Chevron, the owners of the Amazon Warrior and the American Military Industrial Machine should be
charged with war crimes, deliberate environmental sabotage and held accountable to damages.

John Kerry is in Bed with Goldman Sachs as is Evidenced by their Joint white Washing Projects
Secretary of State John Kerry and Lloyd C. Blankfein, chairman and CEO of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (NYSE: GS),
in partnership with Harvard Kennedy School have announced the first-ever cross-border exchange and leadership program
to support emerging women leaders across the private and non-profit sectors in the Middle East and Northern Africa.

Senator John Kerry appears to be Goldman Sachs running man, or rather flying manbut appears to be innocent of their
crimes of international disaster capitalism.

John Kerry is the most Carbon Intensive Politician on the Planet - I guess we now know why John Kerry was making a
short notice / unexplained trip to NZ right in the middle of a fierce US elitecon.
He went to Antarctica, which has a HAARP at the US base. Kerry is said to be on a climate saving mission. Speaking
Sunday in Wellington, New Zealand before flying to Oman via Singaporeafter NZ he flew to Oman, and another Arab Gulf
states and then Morocco before winging to Peru and then back home.

John Kerrys current trip could be said to be responsible for 853.4 metric tons of CO2 as many as 52 average Americans
produce in a year. The average CO2 emission for aircraft at 53.3 pounds per air mile. [ CarbonFootprint.com ]

Natural Health: The Silver Bullet To Medical Vampires + Australia To Search Out And
Prosecute Anti-Vax Nurses And Midwives; Calls For Public To Turn Them In
November 16 2016 | From: Sott / NaturalBlaze / Various

It turns out that unvaccinated children aren't little time bombs walking around ready to blow and
spread devastating disease in their wake. That's a myth. It's told by the medical cartel, for their
own obvious reasons.
And it turns out that children raised in a healthy way are strong, and have strong immune systems. This was once
viscerally known and understood and accepted as a truism.

Related: CDC Blocks Whistleblower From Vaccine Injury Testimony

Those who insist on 50 or 60 shots of germs and toxic chemicals for every child, like it or not, are participating in an ongoing
criminal enterprise.

Their vision is unnatural and perverse.

It turns out that stimulating the production of antibodies - which is the purpose of vaccines - is not the be-all and
end-all of existence. It isn't the road to health. It isn't an automatic lease on life.

Every aspect of a child's life contributes to, or detracts from, his immune-system health and strength. This is traditional
knowledge. This basic tree of knowledge has been shaken and hacked at by decades of remorseless propaganda from
official medical/government/corporate mob bosses.

The vaccine establishment has become a protection racket. Take your shots or pay the social and political consequences.
Natural health is a reality. It isn't a stunt.

When smallpox ravaged England, it wasn't the lone work of a virus. It was sewage in the city streets, horrendous
overcrowding, lack of basic nutrition, grinding poverty. It was also the smallpox vaccine:

"Smallpox, like typhus, has been dying out (in England) since 1780. Vaccination in this country has largely fallen into disuse
since people began to realize how its value was discredited by the great smallpox epidemic of 1871-2 (which occurred after
extensive vaccination)." (W. Scott Webb, A Century of Vaccination, Swan Sonnenschein, 1898.)

And then there is this:

The combined death rate from scarlet fever, diphtheria, whooping cough and measles among children up to fifteen
shows that nearly 90 percent of the total decline in mortality between 1860 and 1965 had occurred before the
introduction of antibiotics and widespread immunization.

In part, this recession may be attributed to improved housing and to a decrease in the virulence of micro-
organisms, but by far the most important factor was a higher host-resistance due to better nutrition."

- Ivan Illich, Medical Nemesis, Bantam Books, 1977

Improve environmental conditions and the standard of living, and you pave the way for natural health. It's not a
mystery. It never was.

The basic purpose of promoting these dud "epidemics" that come down the pipeline every few years is: to
convince the population that they can't live in a state of natural health; there is no such thing as natural health;
everyone must live their lives under the constant supervision of doctors.

This is becoming the central myth of our times. It is becoming the primary form of surrender. Natural health is a silver bullet
to medical vampires.
Related: Former UK Govt Science Chief Warned Of MMR Vaccine-Autism Link

How many studies can you find that investigate the factors of health in children who do quite well without overriding medical
attention? How many studies in peer reviewed journals examine large groups of healthy unvaccinated children? None.

Health is basically a non-medical condition. The primary medical psyop is the effort to erase that understanding.

Every healthy unvaccinated child is a refutation of the medical cartel.

If your business is sickness, and you're unscrupulous, it stands to reason you'll try to find more and more
sickness, even, and especially, where it doesn't exist.

You'll never study health, because it would put you out of business.

Related Articles:

CDC vaccine science covers up giant conflict of interest

30,000 Indian Girls Suffering From Cancer Vaccine Tests Conducted By The Gates Foundation

The Toxic Science of Flu Vaccines

Media dare not report wave of paralyzed children caused by vaccines

Australia To Search Out And Prosecute Anti-Vax Nurses And Midwives; Calls For
Public To Turn Them In
While Australia whines about the lack of democracy and freedom in places like Syria, it is doing
everything in its power to ensure that nothing resembling either of those things is allowed within
its own borders.
Apparently having found itself in a race with France, Germany, the UK and the United States, for which country can
eliminate personal liberties, freedom of speech - or even thought - while launching wars all across the world on the
basis of protecting those things, Australia is proving itself to be a capable competitor.

Related: CDC police will eventually arrest the unvaccinated as diseased criminals

The examples of Australias thought control policies are legion, but the most recent is surrounding the vaccination hysteria in
the ability of free adults to choose whether or not they accept toxic chemicals (or life-saving medicines with no side effects)
into their bodies.

According to a report by the Guardian, the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia has announced a fatwa of jihad against
nurses and midwives who discourage vaccination or are critical of vaccines.

After releasing vaccination standards the boards statement reads:

The board is taking this opportunity to make its expectations about providing advice on vaccinations clear to
registered nurses, enrolled nurses and midwives. The board expects all registered nurses, enrolled nurses and
midwives to use the best available evidence in making practice decisions."

Of course, when the board says best available evidence it means vaccine fanaticism and unquestioning
adherence to faith-based science.

Under Australian law, promoting false, misleading or deceptive information will be prosecuted by the Australian health
practitioner regulation agency. The NMBA is specifically targeting nurses and midwives who question the safety or
effectiveness of vaccination via social media.

The statement goes even further by urging members of the public to report nurses or midwives who are doing so even on
social media.

Obviously, Australia must consider one of its founding documents to be George Orwells 1984 although we are afraid
Australian leadership may have missed the point of the book.
Related: The end of medical freedom and the rise of mandatory vaccinations

Professor of Midwifery at the University of Western Sydney, Dr. Hannah Dahlan supports the new policy. She says;

I agree that they have a very serious obligation to provide the best available evidence, and it is of course
concerning that some are taking to social media in order to express a position not backed by science.

But Dahlan also says that she is worried that the policy may have some unintended effects.

The worry, she says, is the confirmation bias that can occur, because people might say: there you go, this is
proof that you cant even have an alternative opinion. It might in fact just give people more fuel for their belief
systems.

Actually, this is undeniably proof that you cant even have an alternative opinion. In case Mrs. Dahlans degree did
not require an understanding of logic, banning someone from expressing an alternative opinion does indeed serve
as proof to them that they are not allowed to have an alternative opinion.

In all fairness, neither Dahlan nor the NMBA are saying you cannot have an alternative belief that contradicts the Borg. They
are merely saying that if you express that belief even on social media, you will lose your job, have your license to practice
taken away and possibly be sent to jail.

If anyone ever proved Voltaires statement that in order to learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not
allowed to criticize the NMBA has closed the case.
Remember, when Dahlan worries about positions that are not backed by science, she does not mean science, but Big
Pharma, the NMBA that Big Pharma owns and the Australian government. Coming from a government that only 40 years
ago did not even consider its indigenous people to be humans, we definitely say there is room for error.

Predictably, the Australia Medical Association is getting in on the act too. The AMA President, Dr. Michael Gannon
stated, Immunization saves lives. That is an undeniable fact."

Notwithstanding the redundancy of the latter part of the brilliant Dr. Gannons statement, that immunization saves
lives is very deniable and is in no way a fact.

Gannon also touted the governments no jab, no pay policy as having improved public health because 6,000 children whose
parents who had previously registered as conscientious objectors were effectively threatened with the possibility of not being
able to feed those children, losing them, or losing their homes into vaccinating.
Of course, Gannons statement proves nothing, except that 6,000 children were vaccinated, not that public health
was improved.

Indeed, according to Gannons logic, we could disembowel 795 million people and claim that we eliminated world hunger.
Thankfully, no one is arguing to do that, but lets hope that Dr. Gannon is never made president of the World Food Program.

In all seriousness, however, the new initiative by the NMBA is just yet another example of the downward spiral of Australia
and most of the Western world into authoritarianism and into a scientific dictatorship.

While Westerners shiver in fear over Vladimir Putin defending his borders, they are none the wiser as their own
countries march directly down the same path as Russia in the early 20th century.

Related: CDC vaccine whistleblower and the silence that kills

Eight Ways Control Freak Government Is Sabotaging Freedom And Making Life More
Difficult For Us
November 16 2016 | From: TheDailySheeple

Its no secret that the US government continues to grow larger, more oppressive, and more
authoritarian with each passing year. Comment: This is an American article but the principles are
global.
If one were to attempt to write down all of the ways the government impedes liberty and stomps all over the people
it is supposed to serve, it would take days perhaps weeks to accomplish.

Related: The Rise And Rise Of Control-Freak Government

The truth is that any form of authoritarian control - any type of government, whether constitutional,
democratic, socialist, fascist, or anything else - will result in a set of masters forcibly oppressing a group
of slaves.

That is what authority is - all it ever has been, and all it ever could be, no matter how many layers of
euphemisms and pleasant rhetoric are used in an attempt to hide it."

- Larken Rose

So, this list is by no means exhaustive, but here are 8 ways the control-freak US government is sabotaging freedom and
making life more difficult for citizens.

1. The War on Drugs

Cannabis has been illegal at the federal level since 1970, when Congress placed it under Schedule I. It was supposed to be
a provisional classification. Back then, not much was known about the plant.

In 1972, the National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse released a report favoring decriminalization of cannabis.
The Commissions chairman, Raymond P. Shafer, presented a report to Congress and the public entitled Marihuana, A
Signal of Misunderstanding, which favored ending marijuana prohibition and adopting other methods to discourage use.
The Commissions report said that while public sentiment tended to view marijuana users as dangerous, they actually found
users to be more timid, sleepy, and passive. It concluded that cannabis did not cause widespread danger to society. It
recommended using social measures other than criminalization to discourage use, and compared its use to that of alcohol.

But the Nixon administration took no action to implement the recommendation, and the reasons are pretty damn nefarious:

President Richard Nixon saw pot prohibition as a way to destroy the antiwar left, according to clandestine
recordings made by Nixon in the White House as well as statements from his staff to the press.

Nixon convened The National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse (what became known as the Shafer
Commission) to engineer scientific support for cannabiss Schedule I placement.

I want a goddamn strong statement on marijuana, Nixon said in tapes from 1971. Can I get that out of this
sonofabitching, uh, domestic council? I mean one on marijuana that just tears the ass out of them.

Nixon aid John Ehrlichman told journalist Dan Baum in 1994, according to an article published in Harpers Magazine in
2016, the truth about the origins of the War on Drugs:

"You want to know what this was really all about? The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after
that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what Im saying?

We knew we couldnt make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the
hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those
communities.

We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings and vilify them night after night on the
evening news.

Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."

The War on the People is a more apt title for Nixons sinister plan. Unfortunately, the consequences did not end with his
reign: the long-term effects have been devastating to society. The US has the highest incarceration rate in the world (land of
the free, indeed), and about half of those imprisoned are locked up on drug charges. Who pays for the drug war and the
associated mass incarceration? Taxpayers. Each year, the war on drugs costs us $51,000,000,000.

And theres no end in sight.

On August 11, 2016, the US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) announced for the 4th time that it would not reclassify
marijuana. The plant will remain a Schedule I drug. Despite a substantial and growing body of evidence that cannabis NOT
a danger to society and even offers incredible health benefits, the agency has opted to keep it illegal at the federal level.

Why? Well, it just might have something to do with the DEAs highly profitable Domestic Cannabis Eradication/Suppression
Program.

In 2014, via this program, 4,300,833 cannabis plants were seized, 6,310 arrests were made, and the value of assets
seized from cultivators totaled $27,342,950.59.

Even states that have legalized marijuana for recreational use are not immune from the DEAs eradication programs:

"Last year, they continued in Washington and Oregon. Full state breakdowns have not been provided, but a DEA
spokesman said that just under 36,000 marijuana plants were destroyed in Washington last year at a cost to
federal taxpayers of about $950,000, or roughly $26 per plant.
 In many states, the eradication program money is used to fund aerial operations involving helicopters searching for
marijuana plants. Sometimes, overzealous or untrained officers seize perfectly legal plants, like okra, mistaking
them for marijuana."

On August 31, the DEA announced that it was going to wage war on another medicinal plant kratom. The agency plans to
list it under Schedule I, like cannabis.

A group of kratom vendors filed a lawsuit against the government to block the move, angry advocates took to social media in
protest, and scientists expressed concern over whether they would be able to continue kratom research.

After widespread and VERY vocal outrage, the DEA announced it would postpone the schedulingto allow time for the US
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to expedite research on the plant.

Translation: The DEA is going to get the FDA to pretend to investigate kratom. The FDA will not actually conduct any
research, but will claim that it did, and will say it found that kratom is dangerous. The FDA will tell the DEA that listing the
medicinal plant under Schedule I is justified.

The DEA will do that very thing, and the War on Drugs will shift its focus from cannabis (which is expected to become legal
in at least five more states this year) to kratom.

You see, we cant have kratom being legal and available, because it poses a serious threat to Big Pharma, and
pharmaceutical companies and the FDA have a cozy relationship.

The FDA has a lot to lose by allowing medicinal plants to be fully legal: the agency has collected $7.67 billion in user fees
since pharmaceutical manufacturers began paying the fees in 1992.

It costs big bucks to get the FDA to put its seal of approval on a drug. Both cannabis and kratom show a great deal of
promise in treating and managing a wide range of serious and chronic health problems.

Kratom can be used in place of prescription opiates in the management of pain and also can treat opiate
addiction.
Related: The Truth About Addiction And Recovery

And because both cannabis and kratom are plants that are easily grown, we dont need Big Pharma to provide
them for us.

Meanwhile, one of the most dangerous and widely abused drugs remains legal and commonly prescribed: opiate painkillers.
Since 1999, prescription opioids have killed over 190,000 people.

It used to be that police departments focused on solving real crimes ones with an actual victim. But theres no money to be
made there. While the number of rapes that occur in the US is said to be steadily declining, the country still frequently finds
itself among nations with the highest number of confirmed rapes in the world.

Obtaining physical evidence of rape is crucial to convicting offenders, and that evidence is collected via the use of rape kits.

But it seems that police departments dont really care about nabbing rapists. After all, whats in it for them?

As we recently reported:

"Last year, Harold Medlock, Chief of Police for the Fayettville Police Department in North Carolina, admitted that
between 1995 and 2008, 333 of their rape kits were destroyed to make more space in their evidence room, of
which, 167 were for unsolved crimes."

Even when these kits arent destroyed, many of them sit around for years without being tested. Its been estimated that there
is a massive backlog of about 400,000 rape kits in this country, though the actual number may be even higher since many
police departments dont keep track of this statistic.
Rapists are free, roaming the streetswhile non-violent drug users are locked in cages.

Law enforcement departments and the government are using sophisticated surveillance and tracking technology to watch
us and catch us breaking the smallest of laws (license plate readers can now inform police if you have not gotten car
inspections or complied with emissions test requirements, for example).

You would think that all of this technology would mean more actual, violent crimes are being solved. Not so in fact, despite
the ever-growing police state, cops are solving LESS murders:

"In criminal justice, clearance rates are used as a measure of crimes solved by the police. The clearance rate is
calculated by dividing the number of crimes that are cleared (a charge being laid) by the total number of crimes
recorded.

In the United States, the murder clearance rate in 1965 was more than 90 percent. Since the inception of the war
on drugs, the murder clearance rate has plummeted to an average of less than 65 percent per year.

This decline is in spite of there being far fewer murders. It is also in spite of new technological developments to
help police solve crimes, like DNA testing, advanced forensic labs, and unethical spying devices like the stingray."

Solving rapes and murders are not profitable endeavors for police departments.

Speaking of that, theres something else government thugs like to do

2. Civil Asset Forfeiture

This racket allows armed government thugs cops to seize your property cash, jewelry, cars and even your
home without charging or convicting you with a crime. The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments are supposed to
prohibit the governmental takings of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, but the thugs have found a
way around that.

In civil asset forfeiture cases the government proceeds directly against your property. YOU dont need to be convicted of a
crime, so criminal procedure does not apply. And because the forfeiture is against your property, you are a third party
claimant in related court proceedings.

This practice is, in essence, legalized theft.

Asset forfeiture creates huge incentives for law enforcement officers to police for profit. The money can be used for
salaries and to purchase advanced equipment and all kinds of fun stuff for police departments.

In 2014 alone, federal authorities seized over $5 billion in assets. Thats more than the $3.9 billion stolen by everyday
criminals in the same year.

Thats right: Law enforcement agencies are stealing more from us than the criminals cops are supposed to protect us from.
Wrap your head around that.

3. Expanding Police State

George Orwells classic novel was not meant to be an instruction manual, but here we are.

As Brandon Turbeville explains:

"Americans may not be able to admit it to themselves but the military soldiers parading on the streets as police
officers, police-operated tanks, and horrifying number of imprisoned citizens have spoken for them. The number of
Americans brutalized physically and mentally by those who are sworn to serve and protect are speaking clearly
enough.

The relatively recent concept of pain compliance, rough interrogation, and rough rides coupled with the long
held tradition but fast increasing commonality of direct beatings, shootings, murders, and on-site executions by
police in America have had the final say."

And we, the taxpayers, are being forced to pay for this.

The amount spent on domestic counter-terrorism since 9/11 is a shocking $1 trillion. This is only for homeland security
measures, not the overseas so-called War on Terrorism. Yet, we are more likely to be killed by a police officer than by a
terrorist. Go figure.

4. For-Profit Prisons

Yes, there are industries that profit from people being locked up. Police unions, private prison corporations, and prison
guard unions are three of them.
Continuing the War on Drugs, which leads to nearly half of all imprisonments, benefits the alcohol and beer industries, and
of course Big Pharma (those industries hate competition!). All of these groups have powerful lobbies that influence policy.

5. Destruction of the Healthcare System

The Obama administration promised Americans that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) would allow us to keep our plans and
our doctors, that our premiums would be lower, that families making less than $250,000 per year would not see any form of
tax increase, that we would have more choices and lower costs, and that every American would be insured.

Not a single one of those promises has been kept. In fact, the opposite of every one of those claims is now true, and
the middle class is suffering the most.
Prior to the birth of the ACA, government meddling in healthcare made it more expensive, as the Mises Institute explains:

"The U.S. health care cost crisis didnt start until 1965. The government increased demand with the passage of
Medicare and Medicaid while restricting the supply of doctors and hospitals. Health care prices responded at twice
the rate of inflation.

The history of medical cost inflation and government interference in health care markets appears to support the
hypothesis that prices were set by the laws of supply and demand before 1980 and perhaps 1990.

Even the degree of monopolization and nationalization promoted by politicians before 1965 was not enough to
cause significant cost inflation and spending increases until demands created by Medicare and Medicaid
outstripped the restricted supply of physicians and hospitals."

This should have been a cautionary tale, but government is not one to learn from history (nor does it care, as long as there
is a chance to extort money from the people). Instead of butting out of the healthcare market, the government doubled
down.
Also from Mises:

"...Americans also spend large amounts of private funds on health care. And, thanks to continued increases in
health care regulation brought on by Obamacare, health care premiums will continue to increase.

In June the Associated Press reported: Premiums for popular low-cost medical plans under the federal health care
law are expected to go up an average of 11 percent next yearPremiums are going up faster in 2017 than they
have in past years, said Cynthia Cox, lead author of the analysis.

Essentially, Americans pay twice for health care. They pay once through taxation and regulation which increases
subsidies. The subsidies in turn raise prices, just as subsidies always do (ceteris paribus). And then, Americans
pay a second time when the time comes to pay those subsidy-inflated prices out of pocket."

Expect this to get worse. As Obamacare collapses, single payer will be ushered in.

Related Articles:

Obamacare is totally imploding just like we warned five years ago at Natural News

The deepest secrets of Obamacare

Obamacare premiums skyrocket by double-digits as economically traumatized Americans scream ENOUGH!

Statement on Obamacare Premiums Exploding in 2017

Gruber on Rising Premiums: Obamacare Working as Designed

 6. Eminent Domain

If the government wants your private property for their purposes, they may take it or regulate it through the power of eminent
domain. Government officials can legally force you to sell them your property if they want the land for redevelopment plans,
for instance.

In 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court decided (Kelo v. London) that held government officials could use eminent domain to take
private property based on nothing more than a promise to generate more tax revenue.

A large eminent domain case is currently being argued in Connecticut, and it is particularly disturbing. Instead of the
government contacting a private developer to advance a redevelopment plan (as in Kelo), the reverse is happening.

That is, the government of West Haven didnt come up with the idea to tear down private properties to build a shopping mall
a private developer did, and it is using the force of government to get what it wants. This is not only wrong, but is
unconstitutional.

Speaking of government taking property

7. Property Taxes

You dont truly own much in the US these days. Even if your home or car is paid for in full, the government will expect you to
pay taxes on those pieces of property for eternity. And if you fail to pay, guess what? Theyll come and take itno matter
how little you owe.

In one particularly heinous example of this, a woman lost her home over an unpaid interest charge of a
whopping $6.30.

"All you have to do is miss a tax payment for the harsh reality of home ownership to slap you in the face.

Eileen Battisti of Aliquippa, PA, found that out the hard way. When Anthony, her husband, died in 2004, she paid
off the mortgage with proceeds from his life insurance.
 In September 2011, she lost her home, valued at around $280,000, over an unpaid interest charge of $6.30.

Her house was sold at auction for $116,000."

In July 2015, Battisti won back her home after four years of court battles over the property.

Xui Lui of Georgia purchased a condo in 2011. She paid for the unit in cash, but didnt pay a $95 tax bill for the property that
year.

In 2014, Lui received notice that her home was sold at auction over the unpaid bill, despite her having paid all city and
county taxes every year except for the first year she bought the condo!

Certified letters warning Lui of the outstanding tax bill were returned to the city because a clerical error didnt include her full
address.

City officials themselves never picked up on the problem either, despite the fact that the notices sent to Lui kept
being returned to sender. The problem? The warnings were mailed without Luis name or address posted on the
letters.

An October 2014 update on this case states that Lui was offered the option to keep her condoif she paid $300 in late fees
for something that wasnt even her fault.

In the article Dear Homeowner: If Youre Paying $260,000 in Property Taxes Over 20 Years, What Exactly Do You
Own?

Charles Hugh Smith says, If we understand property taxes as a lease from the local government for the right to gamble on
another housing bubble arising, we see ownership in a different light.:
 "If the homeowner owes local government $13,000 a year in property taxes, what does the homeowner own once
they pay $260,000 in property taxes over 20 years?"

8. Excessive Taxation

Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform (ATR), said:

"The American income tax is perhaps the most dramatic example of how government grows at the expense of
liberty. Slowly. Constantly. Inexorably."

A chart created by ATR shows just how much the income tax alone has grown since its inception:
In 2015, Americans handed over more than five trillion dollars to federal, state, and local governments about 30 percent of
what they earn.

If you worked during all 52 weeks of 2015, more than 16 weeks of your labor went to the IRS. Thats almost $1 trillion more
than we spend on food, clothing, and housing put together.

Of course, the income tax is far from being the only tax we are forced to pay, as Michael Snyder explains:

"...there are dozens of other taxes that Americans pay every year. Of course not everyone pays all of these taxes,
but without a doubt we are all being taxed into oblivion. It is like death by a thousand paper cuts.

Our politicians have become extremely creative in finding ways to extract money from all of us, and most
Americans dont even realize what is being done to them. By the time it is all said and done, a significant portion of
the population ends up paying more than half of what they earn to the government."

Snyder then goes on to list 97 other taxes Americans pay. NINETY-SEVEN.

I believe Ron Paul and Judge Andrew Napolitano said it best

This concludes Part 1 of our exploration of the ways government stomps all over us. Stay tuned for Part 2.

Worlds Biggest Seismic Testing Ship - Amazon Warrior - Parked On Top Of New
Zealand Fault Line & 6.2 Aftershock Shakes New Zealand After Powerful 7.8
Earthquake Kills At Least 2
November 15 2016 | From: MediaWhores / RT / Various

If you were planning to do seismic blasting off the coast of a Country, the best time to do it would
be with the full moon wouldnt it? So that people only discuss that as the possible reason.
The Worlds biggest seismic blasting ship the Amazon Warrior was photographed off Rarangi Beach in Cloudy Bay
last night. Right on top of a major fault line.

Related: Smoking Gun For Christchurch Killer Quake: Hillary Clinton Emails Show Advance Warning Of
Christchurch Earthquake

Green MP Steffan Browning reported it on his Facebook page hours before the giant quakes.

The post has been shared over 400 times at time of this post:
The ship was met with protests when it arrived on the 13th:

Related: Oil protesters throw 'unwelcoming party' on Wellington Harbour

There are trillions of dollars worth of Oil and Gas around NZs shores:

Related: North oil may be worth trillions

It has now been well reported (in the real / social media) that the US State department had advanced knowledge of the
Christchurch Quakes with John Key saying they were man made earthquakes.

Surely the oil company banker would know? Plus the usual dose of foreign spies with extra passports on scene as there
always is with most of these events.
Kaikoura was clearly the target now destroyed, and that basin is full of the precious oil for the foreign bankers and the only
thing stopping them was the people of Kaikoura - now homeless and to be relocated by NZ Navy ship.

Related: Auckland Council backs away from oil exploration stance

And I guess we now know why John Kerry was making a short notice / unexplained trip to NZ right in the middle of
a fierce US elitecon...

Related: Evidence of global warming overwhelming - Kerry

US disaster relief FEMA was in Christchurch the week before the Christchurch earthquake also. Strange how they seem to
know when the quakes will strike isnt it.
Surely John Key, Simon Bridges and their fellow foreign banker mafia should now be rounded up for questioning.
People have died.

Or perhaps Kiwis should just be thankful they havent been carpet bombed, like the same club has done to Iraq, Libya and
Syria for their resources. And Afghanistan for its opium of course.
The USGS website showed that the entire "Ring of Fire" volcanic area was triggered, with over 30 local aftershocks at the time of writing

The semi-retarded Government sponsored experts are all over the media today explaining that there is no way such ships
have the technology to trigger such a large quake.

As if they would have access to accurate info on the latest military technology.

Related: The Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (TTIP) Is Dead + Earthquakes

6.2 Aftershock Shakes New Zealand After Powerful 7.8 Earthquake Kills At Least 2
A new earthquake measuring 6.2 has struck 39km west of Kaikoura, New Zealand. This is one of
the most powerful in a series of tremors that followed a 7.8 magnitude quake which struck the
town, located some 180km northeast of Christchurch, on Sunday.

Local residents Chris and Viv Young look at damage caused by an earthquake along State Highway One near the town of Ward, south of Blenheim
on New Zealand's South Island, November 14, 2016

The quake took place at around 12:30am GMT at a depth of 8.3 kilometers, and was initially measured at 6.8, but
was later downgraded to 6.2 by USGS.

Related: Christchurch: The Man-Made Earthquakes - What Really Happened, How And Why

Meanwhile GeoNet, the official source of geological hazard information for New Zealand, measured the latest quake at 6.3
and said its depth was around 35 kilometers.
At least two people were killed following the initial quake which struck New Zealand just after 11:00am GMT on Sunday
(12:02am Monday local time).

The ministry of civil defense immediately issued a warning saying that a destructive tsunami with waves of up to five
meters (16 feet) was possible. The ministry treated the possibility of a tsunami as an event of life-threatening or national
significance.

Tsunami warning sirens notified residents in coastal areas of New Zealand to leave for higher ground. Police and
emergency workers mobilized in the wake of the quake to help with evacuations. Authorities eventually downgraded tsunami
warnings around the country after people fled and the waves arrived two hours later.

We've canceled the tsunami warning in place for Wellington to Banks Peninsula. Based on all available data, the tsunami
threat has now passed, Civil Defense said in their latest bulletin, stressing that coastal areas could still experience
unusual, strong currents and sea level fluctuations.

New Zealand Prime Minister John Key confirmed that at least two people were killed. Police said one person died in
Kaikoura and another died in Mt. Lyford, a nearby ski resort, AP reported. Police also say that several people had suffered
minor injuries in Kaikoura.

A local state of emergency was declared in Kaikoura and Hurunui. Roads in Canterbury and Marlborough have been
severely damaged. Trains and ferries between North and South Islands were also affected by the quake. Authorities are
now assessing the extent of the damage from the quake.

After the initial 7.8 disaster, all trains on South Island were initially stopped but KiwiRail later resumed services between
Christchurch and Invercargill, local media reported.
Related: Tsunami alert lifted after New Zealand earthquake, aftershocks kill 2

Power and phone lines outages were also reported in addition to the structural damage to homes.

It was the most significant shock I can remember in Wellington, PM Key told reporters. There will be quite major costs
around roads and infrastructure.

Related: New Zealand earthquake: thousands stranded and towns cut off

Trump On FBI Backing Off: Clinton Being Protected By A Rigged System

+ Clinton's Guilt a 'Moot Point' - 'She Cannot Take the Oval Office'
November 9 2016 | From: Infowars / FoxNewsInsider / Various

"You can't review 650,000 emails in eight days."

But there was one omission, probably because it describes a type of administration that the Greeks never
envisaged. For want of a better term, Ill call it control-freak government.

Related: Sean Hannity Rips FBI After Clearing Criminal Hillary for the Second Time

GOP nominee Donald Trump declared Sunday that Hillary Clinton is being protected by a rigged system as it was
announced by FBI Director James Comey that the bureau is discontinuing its investigation into her home email
server for a second time.

Right now she is being protected by a rigged system. Its a totally rigged system, Trump said Sunday evening
during a rally in Sterling Heights, Mich.

Follow

ABC News Politics

.@realDonaldTrump responds to FBI letter: "You can't review 650,000 new emails in
8 days." http://abcn.ws/2fRPfAm
5:38 PM - 6 Nov 2016


9797 Retweets

9797 likes

You cant review 650,000 emails in eight days. You cant do it folks.

Trump exclaimed, referring to the sheer volume of material that was reportedly recovered from a computer belonging to the
disgraced Anthony Weiner, who was in a relationship with top Clinton aide Huma Abedin.
 Newt Gingrich Just Exposed The Real Reason Why James Comey Let Hillary Go. Oh My:

As Trump iterated his disgust at the fact that the FBI was suspending its investigation again, the raucous crowd
chanted lock her up.

Its unbelievable, unbelievable, what she gets away with. Trump said, adding that he believes the investigations
into her crimes will go on for a long time, likely concluding in a criminal trial.

Trump urged that the rank and file special agents at the FBI wont let her get away with her terrible crimes.

Hillary Clinton is guilty. She knows it, the FBI knows it, the people know it, he said. And now it is up to the
American people to deliver justice at the ballot box on November 8. Trump told supporters.

Hillary Clinton is the most corrupt person ever to seek the office of the presidency of the United States, he added.

We dont want it taken away from us, Trump later said of the election. We dont want it taken away.

Trump surrogates also questioned how thoroughly the FBI was able to review the material and conclude that no further
action was needed in the case:
Related: Is Clinton a Threat to World Peace?

Trumps Campaign Manager Kellyanne Conway appeared on the Today show Monday morning, and described the email
investigation as a hot mess.

In a further appearance on Morning Joe,Conway said:

 The fact is, serious point, we already know what Hillary Clinton would do with classified information.

We already know that shes unfit and unqualified. Conway added.

Clinton's Guilt a 'Moot Point' - 'She Cannot Take the Oval Office'

This week on Justice, Judge Jeanine Pirro offered her final Opening Statement before Election Day
2016.

Pirro laid out the case for why Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton cannot be allowed to move back into the
White House.

We cannot have a country led by a president subject to ongoing criminal investigations, potential indictments and
never-ending hearings. We cannot have a president under that level of scrutiny, that inevitably leads to even more
questions and more investigations," she said.

"Irrespective of what happens to her - whether she's indicted or even guilty - it doesn't matter. Her guilt is a moot
point. She cannot take the oval office."

Pirro called Tuesday's decision "the most important election of your lifetime.":

How do you think the world is going to look at the United States when a woman under federal criminal
investigation, who's lied repeatedly to the American people, is elected? Do you think they'll take her at her word?

How many countries already own her through the Clinton family 'charitable' foundation - which was used to raise a
minimum of $100 million for her husband. How many countries like Morocco own her because they gave $12
million for five minutes with Bill Clinton?" she said, "Just think: We can even have our own world joke."

"It's time to vote for the person who believes in the Constitution - the only one who will bring changes - the one
who doesn't give a darn about political correctnes - the one who knows how to create jobs, and wants to make
America great again," Pirro said.

Video: Podesta Caught Throwing Hot Tub Parties with Children

Can U.S. Elections Really Be Stolen? Yes

Is election theft possible in the United States? And might the suspects live closer to home than the Kremlin? Professor Mark
Crispin Miller, author of numerous books and articles on computerized election fraud, explores the very real possibilities.

Related Articles:
Stephen Lendman Sums Up The NYT - NYT Scare Tactics for Hillary

Latest Most Damaging Wikileaks

US Public Lacks Confidence in Elections

FBI Puppet Comey Folds On Massive Investigation

Criminal President Obama Encourages Illegal Aliens to Vote Promises No Repercussions

WikiLeaks says email publication servers under targeted DoS attack since #DNCLeak2

Hillary Loses the Left

Busted, Here Are The Complete Election Results [?]

Wikileaks Releases 8,200 Emails From DNC Hack; Reveals Collusion Between CNN And Democrats

Donald Trump Wins 2016 Presidential Election

Donald Trump's Argument For America

Catherine Austin Fitts: What's About To Happen To The Economy

November 9 2016 | From: Sott

"How is the government going to get people to pay their taxes if the government is not viewed as
legitimate?"- Catherine Austin Fitts
The world economy is designed to fail through the mechanism of a banking system that requires all users of
money to pay usury every time a transaction takes place.

Related: More Confessions Of An Economic Hit Man: "This Time, Theyre Coming For Your Democracy"

In this way, the financial systems of the world can be manipulated into a managed collapse, thereby causing global chaos so
that the world's nations and citizens can be tricked into demanding a global currency managed a global elite.

Who is Catherine Austin Fitts?

Catherine is the president of Solari, Inc., publisher of The Solari Report, and managing member of Solari
Investment Advisory Services, LLC, based in the US.

Catherine served as managing director and member of the board of directors of a Wall Street investment bank and
as Assistant Secretary of Housing and Federal Housing Commissioner at the United States Department of
Housing and Urban Development in the first Bush Administration.

Catherine offers a unique perspective on how to navigate the opportunities and risks in the global financial Isystem
and political economy.

The Solari Reports mission is to help people build wealth in ways that build real wealth in the wider economy.

She believes that personal and family wealth is a critical ingredient of both individual freedom and community
health and wealth.

Catherine graduated from the University of Pennsylvania (BA), the Wharton School (MBA) and studied Mandarin
Chinese at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. She lives in Tennessee, USA.

Problem, reaction, solution. Economic hit man John Perkins wrote about this strategy as it was used in the 20th century to
bring developing nations under the control of the international monetary fund and transnational profiteers, and at present this
scheme is being globalized.
 If an EHM is completely successful, the loans are so large that the debtor is forced to default on its payments after
a few years. When this happens, then like the Mafia we demand our pound of flesh.

This often includes one or more of the following: control over United Nations votes, the installation of military
bases, or access to precious resources such as oil or the Panama Canal.

Of course, the debtor still owes us the money - and another country is added to our global empire."

- John Perkins, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man

For decades now, the dollar has been in a slow burn style of collapse, and while many journalists, primarily outside of the
mainstream, have been warning the world about how and why this is happening, we're quickly approaching a turning
point, where the slow burn moves into something more severe.

While at first glance this seems like a frightening potentiality, the truth is that an economic collapse may very well be our
best chance at freeing ourselves from the rule of the Gods of Money.

A Whistleblower Warns Us and Gives Us Hope

Speaking to Greg Hunter of USA Watchdog news, former Wall Street banker and former Assistant Secretary of Housing
and Federal Housing Commissioner at the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development in the first Bush
Administration, Catherine Austin Fitts explains why the slow burn is about to come to an end.

The system has the capacity with monetary policy in one sense to keep going forever if the force and military
capacity is there to do it, but at some point, you burn through the fat, you burn through the muscle and then you
have to change institutions."

- Catherine Austin Fitts

During the financial crisis of 2008, the government was able to prevent an uncontrolled firestorm collapse of the system by
colluding with the chiefs of the financial sector, giving them bailouts of extraordinary magnitude, then inflating the dollar by
the Federal Reserve's introduction of quantitative easing.
Eight years later, this tactic has reached its limit, however it has given the public significant reason and time to understand
why our economy functions the way it does, and people are losing faith in our leadership.

"It's going to be extremely difficult to get people to continue to pay their taxes when they're highly
confident the money's not being spent legally and it's going to the advantage of small parties or things
that they don't understand. And so you can't move further without institutional overhaul."

- Catherine Austin Fitts

The thing that frightens her most is the fact that groups within the U.S., such as ALEC, are already calling for changes in the
law and even a new constitutional convention to overhaul these institutions.

The financial sector has already been operating outside of the law and beyond the constitution for some twenty plus years,
and if we haven't been using the constitution, she notes, then why do they wish to change it?

"If you want to enforce the Constitution or fix things, that's what you do. The reason you get a Constitutional
Convention is you want to tear it up because you're worried, now that people realize the extent of the corruption,
that they're going to try and enforce."

- Catherine Austin Fitts

Her warning is that as people continue to wake up to the corruption of our government and financial rulers, the entrenched
elites who are fully invested in destroying the middle class will fight tooth and nail to prevent us from holding them
accountable, by means of bringing more Draconian laws into place to protect themselves.
In this light, the economic war that is brewing isn't completely technical, it is social as well, quickly becoming class
warfare. The world's financial elite are in grave danger of being held to the fire for their crimes, and surely they
know they how quickly things can change in favor of the populous, as historical events like the French Revolution
have shown.

Prepare Now

As individuals stuck in the debt-slave matrix, there is very little we can do to challenge this sort of massive global scheme as
it's happening, however, preparing now for collapse is our best chance of chucking our burden of debt to these people, if
they are even human, and of creating a future without such obvious criminal financial tyranny holding us back.

Working now to expose these criminals is imperative so that when the ball drops, ordinary people understand why, how and
who is truly to blame, thereby making resisting to the takeover possible.

Taking care of personal emergency preparations by gathering healthy storable foods, networking in your community, and
having plans in place to survive are absolutely necessary at this stage, and once this is done, efforts to awaken others are
critical.

The Rise And Rise Of Control-Freak Government

November 8 2016 | From: BreakingViews

The ancient Greeks left us several words describing various forms of government: Democracy,
Autocracy and Oligarchy, to give just three examples.
But there was one omission, probably because it describes a type of administration that the Greeks never
envisaged. For want of a better term, Ill call it control-freak government.

Related: How the Oligarchy Has Prepared the Groundwork for Stealing the US Election

This is a form of government in which policy-makers, politicians and bureaucrats constantly devise new ways of controlling
our behaviour on the pretext that they have to protect us from our own foolishness. Perhaps we could call it a bullyocracy.

Control-freak government is based on the supposition that were all basically incapable of making our own responsible
decisions.

We need paternalistic minders and a suffocating regulatory regime to stop us from getting into trouble.

This busybody culture pervades our lives slowly and insidiously, eventually reaching the point where we become so
accustomed to it that we assume its the natural order of things and accept restrictions on what we can do without a murmur
of complaint.
In the meantime it restricts individual autonomy, erodes personal responsibility and piles needless extra costs on society.

One tiny example: Small-scale cheesemaker Biddy Fraser-Davies recently protested that at least half the $40,000 annual
income from her four jersey cows gets swallowed up by government fees.

Fraser-Davies, who farms near Eketahuna, has been hounded for years by food safety officers from the Ministry for Primary
Industries. This, incidentally, is the same government department that turns a blind eye to the large-scale, illegal dumping of
fish.

Elderly women (Fraser-Davies is 74) are clearly a much more tempting target than big, hairy fishing companies . She says
she was recently billed $10,000 for testing 10 of her cheeses and calculates the cost comes to $240 per kilo.
On radio recently, she recalled that after she featured on Country Calendar in 2009, the Food Safety Authority pounced
within minutes because it had no record of her having filed a risk management plan. I suppose we should be impressed by
the authoritys 24/7 vigilance (it was a Saturday night, after all), but this suggests an almost obsessive level of control-
freakery.

To my knowledge no one ever fell sick or died from eating Fraser-Davies cheeses, unless shes buried the bodies
somewhere on her farm. Perhaps the MPI should send some men to start digging the place up.

To her credit, she refuses to be cowed by the public-sector commissars. This sets her apart from most timid New Zealand
business owners, who keep their heads down and meekly comply. Presumably, getting offside with the enforcers is more
trouble than its worth.

The MPI justifies its cheese-testing regime because theres a theoretical risk of harmful pathogens. Eliminating risk can be
used to justify all manner of bureaucratic meddling. Its all part of the grand mission to create a perfect world where Nanny
State keeps us all safe.
A priceless example was the edict that went out years ago forbidding brass bands from playing on the backs of trucks. I
must have missed the news reports about hapless tuba players toppling from truck decks and being crushed under the
wheels while playing God Rest Ye Merry Gentlemen in Christmas parades.

Perhaps I also missed hearing the anguished cries of builders and roofers plummeting from house rooftops. There must
have been an epidemic of such deaths to justify the requirement that safety scaffolding now be erected around the roofs of
houses under construction.

I'm told even chimney sweepers are now saying they cant work without protective scaffolding, which can bump up
the cost of the job from $200 to $1000.

It goes without saying theres an element of risk in many undertakings. The crucial consideration should surely be whether
the action taken to minimise risk is proportionate or, to put it another way, whether the cost of trying to eliminate risk far
outweighs any possible benefit.
Compulsory scaffolding around rooftops may have averted a few broken limbs, but at what cost to house owners and home
buyers?

The police, too, have been captured by a control-freak mentality. Just look at their heavy-handed enforcement of
liquor controls. Wellington Police have an alcohol harm reduction officer (how Big Brother is that?) who gives
the impression of being on a moral crusade.

And while police numbers are stretched and burglars are able to strike with apparent impunity, there always seem to be
enough officers to operate drink-drive checkpoints in the hope of nabbing some harmless mug whos unwittingly had one
glass of sauvignon blanc too many.

Its another case of low-hanging fruit. Burglars are hard to catch; women on the way home from bowls, not so
much.
Speaking of which, I wrote a column in this space roughly a year ago criticising the lower drink-drive limits introduced in
2014, which I predicted would catch out responsible, otherwise law-abiding people while hard-core recidivist drunk drivers
would continue to behave as they always had.

I also said I would quite likely get pinged myself, since the new limits had made it much harder to judge when you were at
risk of breaking the law.

My column attracted a pompous response from an overpaid poo-bah in the New Zealand Transport Agency. He wrote that
there was no such thing as safe drink-driving, thus confirming what Id suspected: that the objective of the law change was
to deter us from drinking altogether.

But heres the thing: road deaths have increased since drink-drive limits were lowered, from 293 in 2014 to 319 in
2015 and 263 so far this year compared with 253 at this time last year.

Its a crude measure, admittedly, but it reminds us of what the economist Milton Friedman said about the folly of
judging things by their intentions rather than their results.

Of course a few more country pubs have gone out of business in the meantime, because the people who previously
socialised in them are terrified of having one too many and getting caught.

But why should the city-dwelling bureaucrats worry? They never drank in them anyway. And if they go one over the limit at a
fashionable Thorndon caf, they can just call a cab.

Theirs is a different world from the one inhabited by the people whose lives they seek to control.

Related: Obama regime planning massive false flag terror attacks to halt a Trump victory and save democrats from
being indicted
FBI, CIA, NYPD Officials Set To Drop The Hammer: Video Evidence Of Bill Clinton
And Six Government Officials Taking Part In Sexual Acts With Minors To Be Released
Before Election
November 8 2016 | From: DCClothesline / Various

The 2016 Presidential election is about to get even crazier. Earlier this week Joe Joseph
reported that recent Wikileaks point to the Clinton family having ties to a child porn abduction ring
in Haiti.

On top of that, emails appear to confirm that both Bill and Hillary Clinton previously joined convicted
pedophile Jeffrey Epstein at his sex slave island, with Fox News having confirmed that Former President Bill
Clinton flew with Epstein on his private jet at least 20 times. As Fox News notes, the plane was outfitted with a bed
where travellers would often engage in group sex.

Related: Dont Act So Shocked! Of Course Hillary Clinton is a Satanist

The evidence of criminal activity identified via Anthony Wieners laptop is so damning that the NYPD was preparing arrest
warrants for a number of Clinton campaign officials. A Brietbart report indicates that the investigation was stifled earlier this
week by the Justice Department after huge pushback.

And while the Obama administration and liberal mainstream news sources are doing everything in their power to keep the
thousands of Wikileak revelations at bay, according to a developing story from the Gateway Pundit, it will be impossible for
them to contain the fallout from what comes next.

As early as this weekend we could see the most explosive email, video and photographic evidence yet. According to
members of the hacking collective Anonymous, 4Chan, and Hillary State Department target Kim Dotcom, a government
insider has provided undeniable evidence that Bill Clinton and six other government officials engaged in sexual acts with
minors.

Kim Dotcom, apparently privvy to the evidence, posted a series of Tweets this week as highlighted by The Daily Sheeple:
With the last one coming Friday evening:

It appears Dotcoms Tweet was in reference to a 4Chan post archived at The Free Republic which indicates in no uncertain
terms that a government official has the evidence that confirms Bill Clinton is indeed a sexual predator:
Related: FBI Exposes Clinton Pedophile Satanic Network

Until this month, Wikileaks and Anonymous have worked together in building an efficient, detailed, comprehensive set of
documents that would be responsible for the incarceration of Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton, and 21 individuals ranging from the
DNC, FBI, CIA, and Clinton foundation. These documents will show without a doubt, evidence of Treason,
Obstruction of Justice, Election Fraud, Manipulation and Bribery.

This was intended to be the October surprise. But before the release of these documents, we were contacted by a
member of the FBI, as well as another from the CIA, and a week later by the NYPD. All with information retaining to
something much darker than we ever imagined.
Related: RNC: Comeys Eleventh-Hour Announcement Doesnt Change The Fact That The Clinton Foundation Is
Under Investigation for Bribery

Due to the nature of these leaks, we all worked together as efficiently as possible to ensure two objectives:

1. That all necessary information would be given to the public in an organized, searchable, manageable way.

2. Those who provided us with this information would be able to find safety before these releases were made (This
concern wasnt without warrant).

The new leaks being released this week will provide documents in the form of emails, pictures, and videos. Within
these will be evidence of Bill Clinton, as we as at least 6 other Government officials, taking part in sexual acts with
minors.As well as evidence of Human trafficking that also include minors.

We believe these pictures and videos were taken for the purpose of political manipulation. In order to make sure all
participants followed through on a previously agreed agenda.
These documents were given to us by an American Government official when he had come to learn that this crime had
been covered by Hillary and her staff through methods including bribery and blackmail. He also told us that due to the
restricted access to these documents, they would soon know he was the one who released them to us.

We tried to make arrangements for him to exit the country safely, but he was killed before those arrangements could be
carried out. We are still not sure if this is because they became aware of the leak, or if they were scared that he may in the
future. In either case, his identity will be made public in this next set of leaks so that he can be honored for the hero that he
was.

We will not only be releasing these documents, but we have multiple members of the FBI, CIA, and NYPD who will be
publicly verifying their authenticity once their safety is assured.

This hack has not come from Russia or anyone else they may try to blame this on. This is a leak from Americas own
Government Officials who fear for their safety had the opposed them directly due to reasons that will be made clear soon.

We thank you for your patience, as well as your determination and assistance in helping us expose the corruption that has
infested our own government. Democracy will be restored to America.

Remember remember the 5th of November.

Related: FBI Director Comey Just Put A Trump Sign On His Front Lawn

If true, then sometime this weekend we will see the end of the Clintons. While they can cover up tens of thousands of email
chains and be protected from prosecution by the Justice Department for bribery or pay-for-play, no one will stand in the way
if actual sex tapes come to light, especially if minors are involved.

Perhaps this is why FBI Director Comey operated with such haste in recent weeks and publicly re-opened the Clinton
investigation, because no one will want to be a friend to Bill or Hillary after this hits the internet.

- Courtesy of SHTFplan.com

Editors Note: There have been rumors about this for days, but please understand that they are only rumors, until they are
confirmed with a release of evidence. Sometimes we publish stories before they fully develop, but we always try to keep our
readers in the loop. Mac Slavo is on the money more often than not, so I decided to publish this one as soon as I could get
the information out. Stay vigilant. - Dean Garrison

Update 7:45 PM Though it is still too early to tell, it would appear that Mac Slavo was ahead of the game again. After
publication of this article, the hacker group Anonymous released part 1 of the Clinton child sex scandal.

Related: FBI Agent Suspected in Hillary Email Leaks Found Dead in Apparent Murder-Suicide

Anonymous Posts Clinton Underground Child Sex Scandal: Part 1

Anonymous just posted the first in a series of exposes on Hillary and Bill Clintons involvement in
a massive child trafficking and pedophile sex ring.
Read it all - this is not a post you can skim.

Anonymous: Part 2 will either be posted later tonight (EST) or tomorrow morning.

Report: Bill Clinton Wasnt Only One to Go to Sex Slave Island, Hillary Went with HimSix Times

Background on: Spirit Cooking"

Code words: Translations i.e. Pizza

First Some Background on Lolita Island

Related: Criminal Roots: A Shocking Expos On The Clinton Family And Their Rise To Power

Citing a well-placed source in the New York Police Department, Blackwater USA founder and retired Navy SEAL Erik
Prince claims that among the 650,000 Huma Abedin emails on her estranged husbands laptop is evidence Hillary Clinton,
as well as former President Bill Clinton, was a visitor to convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epsteins Caribbean hideaway, known
as Orgy Island.

Prince told the Breitbart News Daily radio show that Abedin and her estranged husband, former Democratic Rep. Anthony
Weiner, are now cooperating with authorities in multiple investigations of Bill and Hillary Clinton.

They found State Department emails, he said of FBI investigators.

They found a lot of other really damning criminal information, including money laundering, including the fact
that Hillary went to this sex islandwith convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Bill Clinton went theremore than 20
times. Hillary Clinton went there at least six times.

In May, FoxNews.com reported Bill Clinton was a much more frequent flyer on Epsteins infamous Boeing 727 Lolita
Express jet than previously reported.

Flight logs show he took at least 26 trips and apparently even ditched his Secret Service detail for at least five of the flights.
The manifests for the trips, between 2001 and 2003, identified fellow passengers by their initials or first names,
including Tatiana.

The jet was reportedly outfitted with a bed where passengers had group sex with young girls. FoxNews.com reported in
Julythat attorneys for Epstein touted his close friendship with Bill Clinton and even claimed the billionaire helped start the
Clinton Global Initiative.
Prince Andrew is a pal of Epstein's and has also been implicated in goings-on at the island

Emails that surfaced in August showed famed defense attorney Roy Black was deemed too controversial to host an event
for President Obama because he represented Epstein against charges of trafficking nearly three-dozen underage girls for
sex for himself and his powerful friends.

Black and co-counsel Alan Dershowitz were able to secure a deal in 2008 in which Epstein pleaded guilty to only one count
related to prostitution with a minor. Epstein registered as a sex offender and served, partly in home detention, just 13
months of a 19-month sentence.

So disgusting

Prince said the NYPD wanted to do a press conference announcing the warrants and the additional arrests they were
making in the Weiner investigation but received huge pushback from the Justice Department

The amount of garbage that they found in these emails, of criminal activity by Hillary, by her immediate circle, and
even by other Democratic members of Congress was so disgusting they gave it to the FBI, and they said, Were
going to go public with this if you dont reopen the investigation and you dont do the right thing with timely
indictments. Prince told Breitbart News Daily.

Abedin, who has been at Hillary Clintons side throughout the 2016 campaign, was immediately removed from the campaign
trail after FBI Director James Comey informed Congress last Friday of the discovery of the 650,000 emails and the decision
to reopen the investigation into Hillary Clintons handling of classified information. More here.
Below is the Anonymous post:

The Clinton investigation is now connected to a massive child trafficking and pedophile sex ring operating within
Washington, D.C.

Over the next few days, and this November 5th, we will be referencing evidence and exposing the Clinton foundations for
multiple incidences of child trafficking and sex scandals.

Hillary Clinton is being investigated by the FBI for involvement in an elite Washington pedophile ring, according to veteran
State Department official Steve Pieczenik.

Billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, his relationship with Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew and other famous
names, and their connection to a high-level sex scandal is exposed by Conchita and Cristina Sarnoff.
The FBI wants to know everything about the Lolita Island that Jeffrey Epstein owns. Lucky for them Anthony Weiner knows
a lot about the Underage sex Island that Bill Clinton would visit and Weiner is ready to Talk.

Hillary has a LONG history of interest in Ms. Silsby. Wikileak emails dating back till at least 2001 have been found in her
archives discussing Lauras NGO.

Laura had claimed she planned to build an orphanage in the Dominican Republic, but authorities in the country said she
never submitted an application for this purpose. They instead located to Haiti.

Related Articles:
Media Continued to Focus on the Fate of the U.S. Missionaries Being Held on Trafficking Charges

Statement for "After" Flight Goes Wheels Up

Haiti Prosecutors Urge Prison for US Missionary

Missionary Stumbles on Road to Haiti

One of the first things Hillary did when she took over the scene in Haiti was to get Laura off the hook

The attorney who represented Laura Silsby A man who was himself convicted as a sex trafficker

WikiLeaks: Pricing how much it costs to transport children

Again, this was the same group that got busted by Haitian Authorities trying to Traffic kids

Theyre in the Clinton Emails

Pitch for funding or some shit, super sketchy

This looks like Mills & co are drafting statements following extradition
Jorge Puello (real name JORGE TORRES ORELLANA) is their lawyer who also was charged in el salvador for child sex
trafficking.

The children were sent to the SOS Childrens Village orphanage in Croix-des-Bouquets, a suburb of Port-au-
Prince, and it became clear that most (if not all) of them were not orphans.

NLCR missionaries maintained that they were told that the children were orphaned. In turn, people in Calebasse
and SOS Childrens Villages accused the missionaries of lying about their intentions.

Although the childrens relatives were told that they would be able to visit them and eventually take them back, the
NLCRs mission statement clearly outlined plans for adoption.

So, how was Hillary Clinton part of this, and wheres the child sex trafficking? Mostly in the fevered imaginations of
the excitable internet detectives of The Donald, who decided that since Clinton discussed the case in emails with
Huma Abedin and other aides, she was going out of her way to help the child abductors escape justice.

This leaves out one tiny detail: as secretary of State, Clintons job was to help American citizens arrested in other
countries.

Huma emailed her articles about the case, and from there, Reddit decided that can only mean theyre all child
traffickers trading children all over the world for sex slaves, and probably hitching rides on Jeffrey Epsteins sex
plane, too.

For more raw links visit: DCClothesline

Assange: Clinton Resisted FBI, And Now Theyre Out For Payback + He Points Out
Hillarys Emails Confirm Oligarchic Control
November 7 2016 | From: RT / Various
Hillary Clinton sparked an FBI backlash, which is now surfacing, when she stonewalled the Feds,
who were trying to investigate her private server, Julian Assange said during the John Pilger
Special, courtesy of Dartmouth Films, which is now available in full on RT.

If you go to history of the FBI, it has become effectively America's political police. And the FBI demonstrated with
taking down the former head of the CIA [David Petraeus in 2012] over classified information given to his mistress
that almost no one was untouchable. The FBI is always trying to demonstrate that. No one can resist us, Assange
told the Australian journalist during the 25-minute interview.

Related: Watch / Read Full Iinterview Here

But Hillary Clinton very conspicuously resisted the FBI's investigation. So, there is anger within the FBI because it
made the FBI look weak.

FBI director James B. Comey threw a spanner into the presidential race that threatened to become a Clinton procession last
week, when he claimed that the agency had potentially obtained new information pertaining to Clintons use of a personal
email server, set up shortly after she became Secretary of State in 2009, when they obtained the laptop of Anthony Weiner,
the ex-husband of close Clinton aide Huma Abedin. Weiner was being investigated for an unrelated sexting offense.

Clinton has categorically denied mishandling classified information by using a vulnerable personal email address for State
Department business. Fox News has alleged that the FBI has obtained new evidence from Weiners computer that shows
that Clinton was very likely hacked."
Related: The Podesta Connection to Washington Deplorables

The right-wing network has also claimed that there is a high priority FBI investigation into whether favors were exchanged
by Clinton for donations to her husbands foundation, though other media have refuted these claims, saying that an earlier
investigation into the Clinton Foundation, which cleared the power couple, remained closed.

Assange, whose WikiLeaks website has over the last ten months released three sizable batches of emails, relating to
Clinton herself, the Democratic National Committee, and her campaign manager John Podesta, said the FBI has cause to
investigate Clinton.

There's a thread that runs through all of these emails. There is quite a lot of "pay-to-play," as they call it - taking
giving access in exchange for money for many individual states, individuals and corporations. Combined with the
cover-up of Hillary Clinton's emails while she was Secretary of State this has led to an environment where the
pressure on the FBI [to investigate] increases, Assange said.

Regardless of whether Clinton ever faces charges, Assange asserted that Clinton was beholden to corporate and political
entities that have been hidden from the electorate during the race to the White House.

She's this centralizing cog, so that you've got a lot of different gears in operation from the big banks like Goldman
Sachs, and major elements of Wall Street, and intelligence, and people in the State Department, and the Saudis,
and so on.

She's is the, if you like, the centralizer that interconnects all these different cogs. She's smooth central
representation of all that, and all that is more or less what is in power now in the United States, stated Assange,
who said that the leaked emails presented a clear picture of this nexus of influences.
Assange also insisted that despite his image, projecting hope and change, President Barack Obama became very close to
banking interests during his own initial White House campaign in 2008.

In fact, one of the most significant Podesta emails that we released was about how the Obama cabinet was
formed and half the [first] Obama cabinet was basically nominated by a representative from Citibank. It is quite
amazing, Assange said.

Libya was Hillarys War

According to Assange, Clintons emails reveal a masterplan, hatched months before the Wests intervention in Libya in
March 2011, to make it the signature conflict of her tenure as secretary of state, and a podium from which to realize her
presidential dreams.

Related: Former FBI Official: Clintons are a Crime Family & Something Big is about to Happen
 Libya more than anyone else's war was Hillary Clinton's war. Barack Obama initially opposed it. Who was the
person who was championing it? Hillary Clinton. That's documented throughout her emails, Assange said.

There's more than 1,700 emails out of the 33,000 of Hillary Clinton's emails we published just about Libya. It's not
about that Libya has cheap oil. She perceived the removal of Gaddafi and the overthrow of the Libyan state
something that she would use to run in the general election for president.

So late 2011, there's an internal document called the "Libya Tick Tock" that is produced for Hillary Clinton, and it's
all the... it's a chronological description of how Hillary Clinton was the central figure in the destruction of the Libyan
state.

But the scheme not only failed on a personal level, after Clinton was largely blamed for allowing a jihadist ransacking of a
US compound in Benghazi in 2012, but also continues to haunt the country, which remains in a state of civil war, and
Europe.

Related: Associated Press reporter admits faking news stories for Hillary Clinton... stunning admission reveals how
AP prints whatever the Clintons want, Facts Be Damned

As a result, there [have been] around 40,000 deaths within Libya. Jihadists moved in, ISIS moved in. That led to
the European refugee and migrant crisis, because not only did you have people fleeing Libya, people then fleeing
Syria, destabilization of other African countries as a result of arms flows, said Assange.

Over the course of the interview, Assange also expounded on his views on Donald Trump, the relationship between
WikiLeaks and Russia, and his plan to leave the Ecuadorian embassy, where he has lived as a legal fugitive since 2012.

The full transcript of the interview is available here, and previous excerpts here, and here.

Watch Homeland Security Chairman Make Hillary GASP With 1 Word: Treason
Related: FOX News: Indictment Likely in Clinton Foundation Case, FBI Found NEW Emails on Weiner Laptop

Related Articles:

Hillary Admits Clinton Foundation Donors Fund ISIS

Assange: Clinton is a cog for Goldman Sachs & the Saudis

The FBI is going to bring down the DOJ... and America will cheer as the Clinton crime regime is finally toppled

FOX News: Indictment Likely in Clinton Foundation Case, FBI Found NEW Emails on Weiner Laptop

Wikileaks Reveals Clinton Email Where They Are Literally Pricing How Much It Costs to Transport Children

FBI Finds Previously Unseen Hillary Clinton Emails On Weiner's Laptop

THIS IS MASSIVE! Watch Homeland Security Chairman Make Hillary GASP With 1 Word

Hillary Literally Became the Definition of Pathological Lying on Google Yesterday

Department of Homeland Security Chairman Officially Indicts Hillary Clinton Of Treason

Who Is This Man?

 Spirit Cooking: Clinton Campaign Chairman Practices Bizarre Occult Ritual

Bombshell: Hillary Clintons Satanic Network Exposed

Clintons Campaign Chairman John Podesta Invited to an Occult Spirit Cooking Dinner by Marina Abramovi

Hillary Camp Blames PUTIN for John Podesta Invite to Satanic Spirit Cooking Party

Hacker Guccifer 2.0 Issues Warning: Democrats May Rig Election on November 8

4Chan, Anonymous, and Kim DotCom Say They Have Pics, Video of Bill Clinton Sex with Minors

Market Indicator Gives Trump An 86% Chance Of Winning The Election

ICE Officers Warn Hillary Immigration Plan Will Unleash Gangs, Cartels & Drug Violence Nationwide

NYPD Blows Whistle on New Hillary Emails

John Podesta Emails Exposing Elite Pedophilia and Satanic Rituals Including Child Murder Snuffing

Faded Rose: YouTube (8:46) Alex Jones on Hillary Clintons Top Aide - John Podestas Cult, Pedophilia, &
Snuffing Connections - Temple Found in NY, NYPD Demanding FBI Do Its Job

Trump Slams Stupid Obama, Says Hillary Got Away With Murder

Can The Oligarchy Still Steal The Presidential Election?

New Zealand Government Has Pledged Millions Of Dollars Worth Of Taxpayer Funds
To The Corrupt Clinton Foundation & Clinton Health Access Initiatives
November 6 2016 | From: NationalBusinessReview / WakeUpNZ

The New Zealand government will continue supporting the Clinton Foundation's flagship project
by donating a further $6 million despite a new wave of recent controversy surrounding the
charitable organisation.

Question: WHY is John Key sending our money to a knowingly corrupt operation? Does this make him complicit in
the ongoing fraudulent machinations of the Clinton related criminal Cabal activities? Does he even have any choice
at this juncture? And what the hell will happen to John Key when this whole farce comes falling down given the
mathematical certainty of just that outcome?

Related: Clinton Charities Raked in Millions of Taxpayer Dollars

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) tells NBR it has "no intention to further review our support for the Clinton
Health Access Initiative (CHAI)."

CHAI began as an initiative under the Clinton Foundation but has since been separated out to a non-profit organisation with
a focus on reducing the cost of HIV/AIDS medicine in sub-Saharan Africa.

CHAI accounts for almost two-thirds of the Clinton Foundation's annual income and expense according to online disclosures
and was, until recently, vice-chaired by Chelsea Clinton with former US President Bill Clinton serving as a board member.

Following political pressure, CHAI released a list of all of its donors from the past six years, along with how much they had
donated in August.
Related: Wikileaks Confirms Hillary Sold Weapons To ISIS + Wikileaks Will Release More Emails On The Clinton
Foundation FBI Has Enough Evidence To Indict

It turns out, MFAT was on the list and near the top alongside the likes of the World Health Organisation, Save the Children
and the Rockefeller Foundation, which all donated between &US1-5 million. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation was one
of CHAI's biggest donors, along with the Australian government, which donated more than $US25 million to the
organisation.

MFAT says it has donated to the CHAI since 2013 through New Zealand's Aid Programme.

The programme has been providing funding and technological assistance for the agriculture-strengthening component of a
project in Rwanda and Ethiopia.

MFAT had an original budget of $13.7 million to distribute to CHAI, of which $7.7 million has been distributed to date, with a
further $6 million remaining. It has a $1.7 billion budget over three years, of which most will be delivered through
international organisations such as CHAI, an MFAT spokesman says.
MFAT's only support for CHAI has been through the funding of a project that aims to significantly reduce child malnutrition
and raise incomes in Rwanda and Ethiopia, he says.

In Hot Water

CHAI has recently found itself at the centre of controversy in the US. US presidential candidate Hillary Clinton as been
forced to defend the Clinton Foundation on her campaign trail, following accusations by her Republican rival Donald Trump,
along with other Republicans, that wealthy donors may be expecting favourable treatment from the US Government.

Although Mrs Clinton denies this, the foundation last month revealed that it will no longer receive donations from foreigners
to corporations if Mrs Clinton won the race for the White House. But the organisation made no mention of CHAI at the time.

After weeks of speculation, in early September a CHAI spokeswoman announced that the initiative would take steps to
sever ties with the Clinton family and if Mrs Clinton is elected president and would spin CHAI into a "completely
independent" charity.

Clinton Health Access Initiative, Inc.

Cumulative Donations By Donor (January 2010 to June 2016)

Funding Ranges: (in Donor's Name:

$USD)

1. Above $25 Million Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Global Affairs Canada, Ikea Foundation, Norwegian
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Australian Government, ELMA Foundation, UK Department
for International Development, UNITAID

2. $10 Million to $25 Million Children's Investment Fund Foundation, Swedish International Development
Cooperation Agency

3. $5 Million to $10 Million Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Foundation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC), Elton John AIDS Foundation, Embassy of Ireland, New Zealand Ministry of
Foreign Affairs and Trade, Sheik Mohammed Hussein Ali Al Amoudi, STOP AIDS
NOW, United Nations Children's Fund, World Health Organisation

Related: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Exposed

But CHAI does not plan on implementing restrictions on where it can raise money - meaning it can still accept donations
from New Zealand.

The controversy did not stop there. Just weeks after CHAI's decision, US Republican Congresswoman Marsha Blackburn
released a 17-page report slamming CHAI's "self-serving" philanthropy in sub-Saharan Africa.

The report, titled: The Clinton Foundation and the "India Success Story: Self-serving philanthropy, watered down drugs and
money in sub-Saharan Africa, alleges the Clinton Foundation "likely facilitated the distribution of watered-down HIV/AIDS
medications in sub-Saharan Africa through it's Health Access Initiative [CHAI].

The report scrutinises the relationship the relationship between CHAI and Indian pharmaceutical company Ranbaxy, which
partnered with the initiative in 2003, working with CHAI to combat HIV/AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa. Ranbaxy Laboratories,
now owned by Sun Pharma, is a multinational pharmaceutical company.

Related: Bill Gates And George Soros Fund Monsanto And A World Depopulation Agenda

One of CHAI's main roles is to bring together buyers of antiretroviral drugs used to fight HIV/AIDS, such as governments,
non-profits and multilateral aid organisations, with sellers such as Ranbaxy.

The initiative has, by most accounts been successful in bringing down the price of the lifesaving drugs and has been
welcomed by the global community. But Ranbaxy has run into problems with US regulators.

Ms Blackburn's report says a former employee of the company turned whistleblower, Dinesh Thakur, confirmed the
company's HIV/AIDs antiretrovirals were adulterated.

The US government took Ranbaxy to court in 2007 resulting in the company pleading guilty to seven felonies and paying a
half billion dollar fine in 2013.
Related: Hillary Clintons Relationship With The Rothschild / Rockefeller Establishment Is Now On Full Display

Ms Blackburn also suggests the adulterated drugs may have "increased patient mortality rates" in the region.

MFAT won't comment on the report but says its funding is focused on providing technical assistance for agriculture-
strengthening components of projects in Rwanda and Ethiopia, as well as working with local farmers to aid in the
development of factories to produce food.

Comment: Horse shit. This is a PR spin - once the money is released to the Clinton Foundation, MFAT and the New
Zealand government have NO IDEA as to what use they are put. Then again, they very may well know all too well.

Related: Indian Doctors Sue Bill Gates For Harming Children With Deadly 'Humanitarian' Vaccines + Dr. Robert
Rowen Reveals The Raw Truth About Vaccines At The Vaccine World Summit

$13.7 Million Dollars Of New Zealand Taxpayer Funds Pledged To Shady Clinton
Charity

It has been revealed that millions of New Zealand taxpayer dollars have been donated by
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) to Hillary Clintons charity, the Clinton Health
Access Initiative (CHAI), a non-profit organisation created from the Clinton Foundation with the
stated goal to reduce HIV/AIDs in Africa.
An MFAT spokesman confirmed to the NBR that between January 2010 and June 2016, $7.7 million of taxpayer
funds had already been donated and another $6 million was to follow, keeping to a pledge to donate $13.7 million
made by the government organisation in 2013.

Related: Prime Minster John Key caught channeling millions of dollars of taxpayer's money to 'ethically
compromised' Clinton Foundation

ACT party member David Seymour commented:

In a world where New Zealanders can crowdsource to buy a beach, its not clear what role there is for the
government to collect taxes and contribute it to a global charity which is more than capable of reaching out and
raising its own money.

The big question is, why is our government sending millions of dollars overseas while at the same time cutting funding for
crucial services which desperately need the money here in New Zealand?

To fully understand how Clinton charities operate and decide whether a single taxpayer dollar should have been donated,
we first need to look at some of the controversies.

Over the past 15 years, the Washington Post can reveal the charities have raised over $2 billion dollars, mainly from big
corporates, foreign governments and political donors. Many have called the contributions pay for play, where powerful
donors exchange funds for future political favours.

Speeches make up a large part of the revenue stream, with the Clintons earning hundreds of thousands per speech from
the likes of big Wall Street banks including Goldman Sachs as revealed by WikiLeaks.
Related: The Clinton Chronicles

Hacked emails also released by WikiLeaks revealed that in 2012, Qatar pledged to donate US $1 million to the Clinton
Foundation raising a question of ethics after Hillary promised that while she was serving as secretary of the state donations
from foreign governments would no longer be accepted due to the potential influence on foreign policy.

It was also been revealed the Clinton charities utilised the devastating Haiti earthquake to implement disaster capitalism,
funneling funds into Haiti under the pretense of aid but only for the funds to flow away from the Haitians desperately in need
and instead to companies who had made previously large donations to the Clinton Foundation.

Then there is the $145 million pay for play contributions made to the Clinton Foundation by shareholders of Canadian
company Uranium One, a mining company with concessions in Kazakhstan and the US.

Uranium One sought to sell these concessions to the Russians, but the deal had to be approved by a government
committee due to the implications to national security.
Related: Criminal Roots: A Shocking Expos On The Clinton Family And Their Rise To Power

In return for the contributions and the extra $500,000 Bill Clinton received in speaking fees from a Russian investment bank,
the 20% purchase of US uranium assets by the Russians was approved, knowing this purchase would mean the production
of more nuclear weapons against Americas own interests.

The Clinton Health Access Initiative has also had its share of controversy.

US Congresswoman Marsha Blackburn recently released a 71 page report which slammed CHAIs self-serving
philanthropy in Africa, after the charity was found distributing watered down HIV/AIDS medications to sick Africans.

According to the report, these cheaper drugs which were provided by Ranbaxy Laboratories:

Subjected patients to increased risks of morbidity and mortality.

Ranbaxy later was found guilty of selling badly made generic drugs and fined a record US$500 million.
Related: Leaked DNC Emails Prove Once And For All That The Conspiracy Theorists Were Right All Along + FBI
Source: Clinton Foundation Can Bring Down Entire Government

If Hillary is elected president, she has committed to changing how the Clinton Foundation operates. Bill Clinton has said:

The Foundation will accept contributions only from U.S. citizens, permanent residents, and U.S.- based
independent foundations, whose names we will continue to make public on a quarterly basis. And we will change
the official name from the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation to the Clinton Foundation. While I will continue
to support the work of the Foundation, I will step down from the Board and will no longer raise funds for it.

However, CHAI, which receives around 60% of the funds from the Clinton Foundation, has yet to decide whether it will also
refuse foreign government donations if she was to win, and when asked for comment on CHAI the Clinton campaign
spokesman declined.

Theres no doubt the Clinton charities have done some incredible work overseas through CHAI, but the manner in which
these charities are utilised as vehicles for personal benefit can not be ignored.

With strong financial ties to Wall Street, big pharmaceuticals and other large corporate sponsors, its clear the charities are
being used as avenues to channel funds under the guise of philanthropy.

What is of great concern here in New Zealand is the level of taxpayer funded donations made to Hillarys charity without
public knowledge, and how quiet the mainstream media has been about it.
John Key and the National Party clearly have no issue using millions of taxpayer funds as bribes, revealed by the
corrupt Saudi sheep deal, so it should be of no surprise to see the government fund a shady charity found to be
acting only for self serving interests.

We need to hold our government accountable for where taxpayer funds are being applied, especially when gifted to charities
operated by corrupt American political figureheads.

Our country currently can not afford to be sending millions of dollars overseas. Instead of donating the remaining $6 million
pledged to CHAI, we demand that MFAT reallocate the funds within New Zealand to help assist those struggling under our
poverty and homelessness crisis.
For an excellent review of the Clinton Foundation, please have a read through the Washington Posts
feature Inside the Clinton Donor Network.

We also highly recommend watching the in-depth documentary Clinton Cash, which discusses the pay for play model and
resulting corruption which can be viewed here.

Putins Compelling Exposure Of The Egregious Lawless Behaviour Of The Western

Dark Cabal In The Wake Of The True Revolution Of The Masses
November 5 2016 | From: StankovUniversalLaw / Kremlin / Various

Speech at the Valdai International Discussion Club, October 27, 2016.

President of Russia Vladimir Putin:

Related: Vladimir Putins Third Way: As Seen Through the Nooscope

Tarja, Heinz, Thabo, colleagues, ladies and gentlemen,

It is a great pleasure to see you again. I want to start by thanking all of the participants in the Valdai International Discussion
Club, from Russia and abroad, for your constructive part in this work, and I want to thank our distinguished guests for their
readiness to take part in this open discussion.

Our esteemed moderator just wished me a good departure into retirement, and I wish myself the same when the time
comes. This is the right approach and the thing to do. But I am not retired yet and am for now the leader of this big country.
As such, it is fitting to show restraint and avoid displays of excessive aggressiveness. I do not think that this is my style
in any case.

But I do think that we should be frank with each other, particularly here in this gathering. I think we should hold candid, open
discussions, otherwise our dialogue makes no sense and would be insipid and without the slightest interest.

I think that this style of discussion is extremely needed today given the great changes taking place in the world. The theme
for our meeting this year, The Future in Progress: Shaping the World of Tomorrow, is very topical.
Related: Can The American People Defeat The Oligarchy That Rules Them?

Last year, the Valdai forum participants discussed the problems with the current world order. Unfortunately, little has
changed for the better over these last months. Indeed, it would be more honest to say that nothing has changed.

The tensions engendered by shifts in distribution of economic and political influence continue to grow. Mutual distrust
creates a burden that narrows our possibilities for finding effective responses to the real threats and challenges facing
the world today.

Essentially, the entire globalisation project is in crisis today and in Europe, as we know well, we hear voices now saying that
multiculturalism has failed.

I think this situation is in many respects the result of mistaken, hasty and to some extent over-confident choices made
by some countries elites a quarter-of-a-century ago. Back then, in the late 1980s-early 1990s, there was a chance not just
to accelerate the globalisation process but also to give it a different quality and make it more harmonious and sustainable
in nature.

But some countries that saw themselves as victors in the Cold War, not just saw themselves this way but said it
openly, took the course of simply reshaping the global political and economic order to fit their own interests.

In their euphoria, they essentially abandoned substantive and equal dialogue with other actors in international life, chose
not to improve or create universal institutions, and attempted instead to bring the entire world under the spread
of their own organisations, norms and rules.
They chose the road of globalisation and security for their own beloved selves, for the select few, and not for all. But far from
everyone was ready to agree with this.

We may as well be frank here, as we know full well that many did not agree with what was happening, but some were
unable by then to respond, and others were not yet ready to respond.

The result though is that the system of international relations is in a feverish state and the global economy cannot extricate
itself from systemic crisis. At the same time, rules and principles, in the economy and in politics, are constantly being
distorted and we often see what only yesterday was taken as a truth and raised to dogma status reversed completely.

If the powers that be today find some standard or norm to their advantage, they force everyone else to comply.

But if tomorrow these same standards get in their way, they are swift to throw them in the bin, declare them
obsolete, and set or try to set new rules.
Thus, we saw the decisions to launch airstrikes in the centre of Europe, against Belgrade, and then came Iraq, and then
Libya. The operations in Afghanistan also started without the corresponding decision from the United Nations Security
Council.

In their desire to shift the strategic balance in their favour these countries broke apart the international legal framework that
prohibited deployment of new missile defence systems.

They created and armed terrorist groups, whose cruel actions have sent millions of civilians into flight, made
millions of displaced persons and immigrants, and plunged entire regions into chaos.

We see how free trade is being sacrificed and countries use sanctions as a means of political pressure, bypass the World
Trade Organisation and attempt to establish closed economic alliances with strict rules and barriers, in which the main
beneficiaries are their own transnational corporations.
And we know this is happening. They see that they cannot resolve all of the problems within the WTO framework and so
think, why not throw the rules and the organisation itself aside and build a new one instead. This illustrates what I just said.

At the same time, some of our partners demonstrate no desire to resolve the real international problems in the world today.

In organisations such as NATO, for example, established during the Cold War and clearly out of date today, despite
all the talk about the need to adapt to the new reality, no real adaptation takes place.

We see constant attempts to turn the OSCE, a crucial mechanism for ensuring common European and also trans-Atlantic
security, into an instrument in the service of someones foreign policy interests. The result is that this very important
organisation has been hollowed out.

But they continue to churn out threats, imaginary and mythical threats such as the Russian military threat.
Related: Hillary Clintons Strategic Ambition In A Nutshell. Regime Change in Russia Putin is an Obstacle

This is a profitable business that can be used to pump new money into defence budgets at home, get allies to bend
to a single superpowers interests, expand NATO and bring its infrastructure, military units and arms closer to our borders.

Of course, it can be a pleasing and even profitable task to portray oneself as the defender of civilisation against the new
barbarians. The only thing is that Russia has no intention of attacking anyone.

This is all quite absurd. I also read analytical materials, those written by you here today, and by your colleagues
in the USA and Europe.

It is unthinkable, foolish and completely unrealistic. Europe alone has 300 million people. All of the NATO members
together with the USA have a total population of 600 million, probably.

Putin Warns Americans: You're Being Distracted!

Of all the internal problems the Presidential candidates could solve - Clinton harps on about "Russian aggression"
and mainstream media goes into Russophobic overdrive.

But Russia has only 146 million. It is simply absurd to even conceive such thoughts. And yet they use these ideas in pursuit
of their political aims.

Another mythical and imaginary problem is what I can only call the hysteria the USA has whipped up over supposed
Russian meddling in the American presidential election.

The United States has plenty of genuinely urgent problems, it would seem, from the colossal public debt to the increase
in firearms violence and cases of arbitrary action by the police.
You would think that the election debates would concentrate on these and other unresolved problems, but the elite
has nothing with which to reassure society, it seems, and therefore attempt to distract public attention by pointing
instead to supposed Russian hackers, spies, agents of influence and so forth.

I have to ask myself and ask you too: Does anyone seriously imagine that Russia can somehow influence the American
peoples choice? America is not some kind of banana republic, after all, but is a great power. Do correct me if I am wrong.

Putin expressed hopes that a new US president will work with him to rectify the dangerous deterioration in relations between
the US and Russia. Obviously, this cannot happen if the new president is Hillary.

Related: President Putin Asks US To Stop Provoking Russia

The question is, if things continue in this vein, what awaits the world? What kind of world will we have tomorrow? Do we
have answers to the questions of how to ensure stability, security and sustainable economic growth? Do we know how we
will make a more prosperous world?

Sad as it is to say, there is no consensus on these issues in the world today. Maybe you have come to some common
conclusions through your discussions, and I would, of course, be interested to hear them.

But it is very clear that there is a lack of strategy and ideas for the future. This creates a climate of uncertainty that has
a direct impact on the public mood.

Sociological studies conducted around the world show that people in different countries and on different continents tend
to see the future as murky and bleak. This is sad. The future does not entice them, but frightens them. At the same time,
people see no real opportunities or means for changing anything, influencing events and shaping policy.

Yes, formally speaking, modern countries have all the attributes of democracy: Elections, freedom of speech, access
to information, freedom of expression. But even in the most advanced democracies the majority of citizens have no
real influence on the political process and no direct and real influence on power.
People sense an ever-growing gap between their interests and the elites vision of the only correct course, a course
the elite itself chooses.

The result is that referendums and elections increasingly often create surprises for the authorities.

People do not at all vote as the official and respectable media outlets advised them to, nor as the mainstream parties
advised them to. Public movements that only recently were too far left or too far right are taking centre stage and pushing
the political heavyweights aside.

At first, these inconvenient results were hastily declared anomaly or chance. But when they became more frequent, people
started saying that society does not understand those at the summit of power and has not yet matured sufficiently to be able
to assess the authorities labour for the public good.

Or they sink into hysteria and declare it the result of foreign, usually Russian, propaganda.

Friends and colleagues, I would like to have such a propaganda machine here in Russia, but regrettably, this is not
the case. We have not even global mass media outlets of the likes of CNN, BBC and others. We simply do not have this
kind of capability yet.
As for the claim that the fringe and populists have defeated the sensible, sober and responsible minority - we are
not talking about populists or anything like that but about ordinary people, ordinary citizens who are losing trust
in the ruling class. That is the problem.

By the way, with the political agenda already eviscerated as it is, and with elections ceasing to be an instrument for change
but consisting instead of nothing but scandals and digging up dirt who gave someone a pinch, who sleeps with whom, if
youll excuse me.

This just goes beyond all boundaries. And honestly, a look at various candidates platforms gives the impression that they
were made from the same mould the difference is slight, if there is any.

It seems as if the elites do not see the deepening stratification in society and the erosion of the middle class, while
at the same time, they implant ideological ideas that, in my opinion, are destructive to cultural and national identity.

And in certain cases, in some countries they subvert national interests and renounce sovereignty in exchange
for the favour of the suzerain.
This begs the question: who is actually the fringe? The expanding class of the supranational oligarchy
and bureaucracy, which is in fact often not elected and not controlled by society, or the majority of citizens, who
want simple and plain things stability, free development of their countries, prospects for their lives and the lives
of their children, preserving their cultural identity, and, finally, basic security for themselves and their loved ones.

People are clearly scared to see how terrorism is evolving from a distant threat to an everyday one, how a terrorist attack
could occur right near them, on the next street, if not on their own street, while any makeshift item from a home-made
explosive to an ordinary truck can be used to carry out a mass killing.

Moreover, the terrorist attacks that have taken place in the past few years in Boston and other US cities, Paris, Brussels,
Nice and German cities, as well as, sadly, in our own country, show that terrorists do not need units or organised
structures they can act independently, on their own, they just need the ideological motivation against their enemies, that is,
against you and us.
The terrorist threat is a clear example of how people fail to adequately evaluate the nature and causes of the growing
threats. We see this in the way events in Syria are developing. No one has succeeded in stopping the bloodshed
and launching a political settlement process.

One would think that we would have begun to put together a common front against terrorism now, after such
lengthy negotiations, enormous effort and difficult compromises.

But this has not happened and this common front has not emerged. My personal agreements with the President
of the United States have not produced results either.

There were people in Washington ready to do everything possible to prevent these agreements from being
implemented in practice.

This all demonstrates an unexplainable and I would say irrational desire on the part of the Western countries to keep making
the same mistakes or, as we say here in Russia, keep stepping on the same rake.

We all see what is happening in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and a number of other countries. I have to ask, where are
the results of the fight against terrorism and extremism? Overall, looking at the world as a whole, there are some results
in particular regions and locations, but there is no global result and the terrorist threat continues to grow.

We all remember the euphoria in some capitals over the Arab Spring. Where are these fanfares today?

Russias calls for a joint fight against terrorism go ignored. Whats more, they continue to arm, supply and train
terrorist groups in the hope of using them to achieve their own political aims.
Related: Hillary Clinton embraces George Soros radical vision of open-border world

This is a very dangerous game and I address the players once again: The extremists in this case are more cunning, clever
and stronger than you, and if you play these games with them, you will always lose.

Colleagues, it is clear that the international community should concentrate on the real problems facing humanity today,
the resolution of which will make our world a safer and more stable place and make the system of international relations
fairer and more equal.

As I said, it is essential to transform globalisation from something for a select few into something for all. It is my firm belief
that we can overcome these threats and challenges only by working together on the solid foundation of international law
and the United Nations Charter.

Today it is the United Nations that continues to remain an agency that is unparalleled in representativeness and universality,
a unique venue for equitable dialogue. Its universal rules are necessary for including as many countries as possible
in economic and humanitarian integration, guaranteeing their political responsibility and working to coordinate their actions
while also preserving their sovereignty and development models.

The NSA leaked the DNC emails because they hate Hillary - Judge Napolitano

Related: Assange: WikiLeaks did not receive Clinton emails from Russian govt

We have no doubt that sovereignty is the central notion of the entire system of international relations. Respect for it and its
consolidation will help underwrite peace and stability both at the national and international levels.

There are many countries that can rely on a history stretching back a thousand years, like Russia, and we have come
to appreciate our identity, freedom and independence.

But we do not seek global domination, expansion or confrontation with anyone.

In our mind, real leadership lies in seeing real problems rather than attempting to invent mythical threats and use
them to steamroll others.

This is exactly how Russia understands its role in global affairs today.

There are priorities without which a prosperous future for our shared planet is unthinkable and they are absolutely obvious.
I wont be saying anything new here.

First of all, there is equal and indivisible security for all states. Only after ending armed conflicts and ensuring the peaceful
development of all countries will we be able to talk about economic progress and the resolution of social, humanitarian
and other key problems.

It is important to fight terrorism and extremism in actuality. It has been said more than once that this evil can only be
overcome by a concerted effort of all states of the world. Russia continues to offer this to all interested partners.

It is necessary to add to the international agenda the issue of restoring the Middle Eastern countries lasting statehood,
economy and social sphere.

The mammoth scale of destruction demands drawing up a long-term comprehensive programme, a kind of Marshall Plan,
to revive the war- and conflict-ridden area. Russia is certainly willing to join actively in these team efforts.

We cannot achieve global stability unless we guarantee global economic progress. It is essential to provide
conditions for creative labour and economic growth at a pace that would put an end to the division of the world into
permanent winners and permanent losers.
The rules of the game should give the developing economies at least a chance to catch up with those we know
as developed economies.

We should work to level out the pace of economic development, and brace up backward countries and regions so
as to make the fruit of economic growth and technological progress accessible to all.

Particularly, this would help to put an end to poverty, one of the worst contemporary problems.

It is also absolutely evident that economic cooperation should be mutually lucrative and rest on universal principles
to enable every country to become an equal partner in global economic activities.

True, the regionalising trend in the world economy is likely to persist in the medium term. However, regional trade
agreements should complement and expand not replace the universal norms and regulations.

Russia advocates the harmonisation of regional economic formats based on the principles of transparency and respect
for each others interests. That is how we arrange the work of the Eurasian Economic Union and conduct negotiations with
our partners, particularly on coordination with the Silk Road Economic Belt project, which China is implementing.
We expect it to promote an extensive Eurasian partnership, which promises to evolve into one of the formative centres
of a vast Eurasian integration area. To implement this idea, 5+1 talks have begun already for an agreement on trade
and economic cooperation between all participants in the process.

An important task of ours is to develop human potential. Only a world with ample opportunities for all, with highly skilled
workers, access to knowledge and a great variety of ways to realise their potential can be considered truly free.

Only a world where people from different countries do not struggle to survive but lead full lives can be stable.

A decent future is impossible without environment protection and addressing climate problems. That is why the conservation
of the natural world and its diversity and reducing the human impact on the environment will be a priority for the coming
decades.
Another priority is global healthcare. Of course, there are many problems, such as large-scale epidemics, decreasing
the mortality rate in some regions and the like. So there is enormous room for advancement.

All people in the world, not only the elite, should have the right to healthy, long and full lives.

This is a noble goal. In short, we should build the foundation for the future world today by investing in all priority areas
of human development.

And of course, it is necessary to continue a broad-based discussion of our common future so that all sensible
and promising initiatives are heard.

Colleagues, ladies and gentlemen, I am confident that you, as members of the Valdai Club, will actively take part in this
work.
Your expertise enables you to understand all angles of the processes underway both in Russia and in the world, forecast
and evaluate long-term trends, and put forward new initiatives and recommendations that will help us find the way
to the more prosperous and sustainable future that we all badly need.

Thank you very much for your attention.

Video Version of Full Speech:

Addendum:

Media comments on Putins Valdai Speech:

Putin takes part in Valdai clubs final session (LIVE UPDATES) - RT

Vladimir Putin Addresses 13th Annual Valdai Discussion Club (VIDEO) - Sputnik

Putin says Russia showing restraint in Syria but patience may run out - Reuters

Putin says Russia has no option but to clear Aleppo of militants - Reuters

Putin urges new Marshall Plan for Middle East to see recovery and growth - TASS

Putin says Russia does not plan to get militarily involved in Iraq, Libya - Reuters

Russia threat exaggerated by West to justify military spending Putin - SKY News

Putin: Russia is not going to attack anyone - TASS

Putin is sure Russia and Ukraine will find way to end crisis - TASS

Russias Putin says cyber attacks are unacceptable - Reuters

Putin urges US not to provoke Russia to actively protect national interests - TASS
 Calling Trump Moscows favorite is nonsense created by media - Putin - RT

Putin says U.S. hysteria over Russia is election ploy - Reuters

Putin rejects claims of Russian interference in US election - AP

Russias Putin says Trump behaves extravagantly to get message across - Reuters

Russias Putin says Obama administration does not stick to any deals - Reuters

Biggest Election Fraud In History Discovered + Former Clinton Colleague Speaks Out
November 5 2016 | From: Infowars / Various

Shocking video reveals secret software designed to rig elections.

Bev Harris, the countrys leading vote fraud expert, joined the Alex Jones Show Monday to reveal the results of a
bombshell investigation into vote shaving software.

Related: NBC Caught Preparing Hillary Victory Results Before Election

Used in precincts all across the country, the software deemed the most devastating election theft mechanism yet found
allows votes to be fractured and rounded up or down to sway the results for any candidate.

Related: How Americas Elections Are Hacked, Missing Link Discovered

According to Harris, a member of the non-partisan Black Box Voting investigative team, this latest discovery constitutes
the missing piece that blows the lid off of wide-scale voter fraud.
Related: How Voting Machines Are Programmed In Order To Steal Elections

It was put in the system in 2001 but it came into wide use in 2006, Harris said. It took someone with a special set
of skills to know what to look for.

A mini-documentary by Black Box Voting on the discovery shows real-time demonstrations with the secretive software.

Related: Vote Fraud Expert: Election Theft Algorithm Uncovered

It can give contract signing authority to whoever the user chooses, the videos description states. All political
power can be converted to the hands of a few anonymous subcontractors.

It runs silently, invisibly, and can produce plausible results that really pass for the real thing.

Further analysis on the malicious software provided by Alex Jones reveals how this revelation ties into the 2016 presidential
election.

Related Articles:
Rigging the Rigged U.S. Elections & A Counter- Coup?

Hillary Now Stealing The Election: Top Elections Expert

Princeton Professor Shows How Easy it Is to Hack an Election in Just 7 Minutes

Black Box Voting - Ballot Tampering in the 21st Century

The Failure of Democracy, How The Oligarchs Plan To Steal The Election

Confessed Clinton Colleague, Larry Nichols: "Hillary Must Be Stopped"

George Soros Hacked, Thousands Of Open Society Foundations Files Released

Online
August 16 2016 | From: RT

More than 2,500 files from the raft of organizations run by billionaire George Soros have been
leaked by hackers.
Saturdays leak, published by DC leaks, includes hundreds of internal documents from multiple departments of
Soros groups, predominantly the Open Society Foundations.

Related: How George Soros Singlehandedly Created The European Refugee Crisis - And Why
The files are grouped into sections such as geographical region, the World Bank and the Presidents Office, and cover the
period from 2008 up until 2016, according to The Daily Caller.

They reveal work plans, strategies, priorities and other activities by Soros, and include reports on European elections,
migration and asylum in Europe.

DC Leaks claims to be the work of American activists who want to present the truth about the US decision-making process
as well as about the key elements of American political life.

US security experts however are blaming the leak on Russian hackers, according to Bloomberg, in a similar reaction seen in
the wake of the DNC leaks.

Related: Absurd election rhetoric: Kremlin, Assange slam Clinton for blaming DNC leaks on Russia

The DC Leaks hackers previously released data from the Open Society Foundations in June, a breach that was reported to
the FBI, according to spokeswoman Laura Silber.
She said an investigation by a security firm found the intrusion was limited to an intranet system used by board members,
staff and foundation partners.

DC Leaks also revealed emails from former NATO general Philip Breedlove which showed he tried to provoke President
Obama to start US conflict against Russia. Breedlove claimed to CNN in July that the emails were stolen as part of a state-
sponsored intelligence operation.
An email leaked by WikiLeaks earlier this week showed Soros had advised Hillary Clinton during her tenure as Secretary of
State on how to handle unrest in Albania advice she acted on.

Related: US government, Soros funded Panama Papers to attack Putin WikiLeaks

Soros Open Society Foundations provides funding to the International Consortium for Investigative Journalists, which came
under the spotlight earlier this year after the release of the Panama Papers, which included millions of records from law firm
Mossack Fonseca showing how the wealthy are using tax havens.

The Panama Papers leak came under criticism from WikiLeaks, who claimed the US government and Soros funded the
project to attack Russia and President Vladimir Putin.

Related: George Soros: A Psychopaths Psychopath

Political Crimes & Criminals

 Part One: Click here

Part Two: Click here

Part Three: Click here

Part Four: Click here

Part Five: Click here

Part Six: Click here

Part Seven: Click here

Part Eight: Click here

http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/political-crimes-criminals-1.shtml

Political Crimes & Criminals

Part One: Click here

Part Two: Click here

Part Three: Click here

Part Four: Click here

Part Five: Click here

Part Six: Click here

Part Seven: Click here

Part Eight: Click here

Counter-Coup: US Intelligence Joins With WikiLeaks To Put Down The Criminal

Cabal Seeking To Extend Control Over US Government + Hillary Clinton Goes Full Tin
Foil Hat
November 4 2016 | From: StevePieczenik / NaturalNews / Infowars / Various

We are watching history unfold before us with such sound and fury that we are likely to never
witness comparable events again in our lifetime.

As of today, I am now convinced that the deep state has turned on Hillary Clinton and will unveil damning evidence
in the next few days that will end the Clintons' reign of terror over America and collapse her bid for the presidency.

Related: Mutiny At The FBI: Comey warned by his own agents to indict Clinton or watch the FBI's reputation go
down in flames

The mainstream media, of course, will never report this news for the simple reason that they are the propaganda arm of the
criminal Clinton cartel. As such, they will lie to the public to the bitter end, even as the Clinton Titanic sinks with all of them
on board (in deep, frigid waters, no less, with no more lifeboats to be found).
The so-called "deep state" - the powerful insiders who really run the intelligence services and inner layers of untouchable
bureaucracy - has decided Hillary Clinton is too damaged to defend any longer.

Even if she were to win by stealing the election, she would be so mired in criminal investigations and political illegitimacy
that she would rip the nation to shreds while fighting for her own political survival.

It has now been decided, I believe, that Hillary Clinton will be taken out of power by releasing criminally damaging emails
which have long been held by the NSA and FBI.

[Note: Remember, this article represents just one line of observation in terms of how this could play out - however
the video below denotes actions that are already in play.]

Related: Unprecedented Crisis, Collapse of the Clinton Apparatus? Hacker Whistleblowers, Trump, and the FBI
Converge

This will likely happen before the coming weekend. Once that is accomplished, the next goal will be to wait for President
Trump to take office, then destroy the U.S. economy through a controlled, global debt collapse so that Trump can be
blamed for the near collapse of western economies.

(Remember: The deep state isn't pro-Trump. They're still all about defending the establishment. But Hillary is one
bridge too far for even the statists to stomach...)

Instead of allowing Hillary Clinton to take power and destroy America from the top, in other words, deep state power brokers
have reverted to "Plan B" which is to let Trump take the White House, then destroy America through the controlled
demolition of its currency and economy.

This is simpler than it sounds. Bringing down the debt pyramid of a nation carrying nearly $20 trillion in national debt isn't
exactly rocket science. All they have to do is stand back and stop manipulating the markets and stop printing new money for
a few months while raising interest rates. Monetary gravity will do the rest...
In the mean time, Hillary Clinton and a long list of her co-conspirators are going to find themselves charged
with obstruction of justice, lying under oath, destruction of evidence, conspiracy, corruption and other serious charges that
will lead to serious prison time for many.

The criminal racket of the Clintons is about to implode. The participants will be charged under the RICO Act for
"racketeering" activities, for which ample evidence already exists.

A New Video from Steve Pieczenik Describes Some of This

In this video, intelligence insider Steve Pieczenik lays out how high-level intelligence insiders are now working in concert to
"reverse the Clinton coup" that's attempting to take over America and destroy it from within.

Even if you don't believe Pieczenik - and I fully realize he's controversial in his own way - this short video is a very
important "must watch" explanation to know what people in the intelligence community are doing... "we've initiated a
counter-coup..."

Steve Pieczenik was Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance and James
Baker. His expertise includes foreign policy, international crisis management and psychological warfare.

He served the presidential administrations of Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan and George H.W.
Bush in the capacity of deputy assistant secretary.

As we constantly emphasize, 95% of those working for the US Government are good people trapped in a
bad system. A tipping point appears to have been reached in which these good people are now saying to
the corrupt political class: ENOUGH!
The Clintons are Going to Go "Full Murder" In a Last Ditch, Desperate Effort to Save Themselves

Beware of what may yet unfold in the coming days. Like a cornered wild animal, the Clintons are extremely dangerous when
they realize they have nothing to lose by going "full murder" in an attempt to save themselves.

I will not be surprised the least bit if bodies of people in high places start piling up over the next week. Watch for news
reports of mysterious car crashes, swimming pool accidents or "natural" deaths involving people like James Comey, who'd
better have armed security personnel around him at all times.

Related: Hillary Admits In Leaked Email That Clinton Donors Are Funding ISIS

Look for desperate measures such as the Clintons attempting to blackmail Obama, Comey or anyone who they think might
serve as leverage to save their own skins. We might also see desperate false flag attacks unfold in the next few days,
although that's increasingly unlikely since it seems the Clintons are now on their own (they would need the assistance of
Obama to pull off another Sandy Hook, you see).

A Deal has Already Been Struck With Obama

Most likely, deep state operatives have already struck a deal with Obama to avoid prosecuting him for his own serious
crimes as long as he stays out of the way as Hillary Clinton's head is served up on a platter.

This likely explains why Obama is now publicly saying he trusts Comey (and refuses to go to bat for Hillary). There's no love
lost between Obama and the Clintons (remember 2008?).

As all this is going down, the propaganda ministry of the Clinton regime - CNN, NYT, Washington Post, etc. - is going to
explode into an all-out "bat-s##t crazy" conspiracy theory phase where they blame the Russians, extraterrestrials, Bigfoot
and the Loch Ness Monster for everything that's imploding around the Clintons.
Related: The Failure of Democracy, How The Oligarchs Plan To Steal The Election

Mainstream media news reports are going to increasingly sound like sociopathic babble from crazy people grasping at
whatever outlandish theories they can invoke. Maybe crop circles were created by the Russians as a secret code to
Wikileaks and Donald Trump, eh?

Meanwhile, conspiratorial operatives like George Stephanopoulos fully realize they are probably going to jail for
collusion and sedition, so they have nothing left to lose by desperately trying to put Hillary in the White House via any
means at their disposal, including totally faking negative news against Donald Trump (which is, of course, the entire news
mission of CNN at this point, a disgraced propaganda network run by anti-American traitors).

If the Vote is Stolen for Hillary Clinton, All Hell Breaks Loose

Should the globalist Soros operators manage to steal the vote, bribe the electoral voters or rig the black box voting
machines sufficiently to place Hillary Clinton in the White House, all Hell breaks loose across America:

The FBI goes into full indictment mode to push criminal charges for the Clinton criminal regime.

Donald Trump launches a massive legal challenge to the election outcome, dispatching an army of lawyers to
level a vast assortment of charges involving coordinated voter fraud, the rigging of voting machines, the attempted
bribery of Electoral voters and so on.

The U.S. military revs up its plans for an armed military coup to depose Clinton and restore democracy. This one
should be especially entertaining to watch unfold if it gets activated... (and yes, YOU will beg for a short-term
military dictatorship as long as they promise to depose Clinton and restore open, fair and free elections).

Armed U.S. citizens prepare for a massive march on Washington to take back their democracy and restore a
lawful society where the political elite don't get away with corruption, fraud and murder. Expect this march to be
joined by police officers and federal law enforcement officials of all kinds.
Related: NSA Whistleblower: US Intelligence Worker Likely Behind DNC Leaks, Not Russia

The NSA likely goes into "full dump" mode to unleash every scrap of damning criminal evidence against Hillary
Clinton. This will likely be joined by CIA assets who already have the goods on the Clintons and their "Lolita
Express" pedo joy rides.

Wikileaks, Anonymous and every former NSA analyst goes into "destroy the Clintons" mode and begins to hack
and expose every last shred of email evidence ever possessed by the Clintons and anyone close to them.

Anonymous alone has enough technical clout to accomplish this with little or no outside help. (I expect Kim
Dotcom to be aiding this entire effort as well, as he rightly holds extreme hatred toward Hillary Clinton... as do we
all, come to think of it.)

The establishment Republicans in the U.S. Congress will, as usual, meekly surrender to the democrats, pulls
down their britches and bend over to prepare to take it in the rear because that's what they do best when the going
gets tough.

Totally useless politicrats like John McCain can't get their pants around their ankles quickly enough when
democrats start accusing them of something. These useless heaps of human baggage will be tossed out of
Washington as the revolution unfolds, replaced with individuals who actually honor the U.S. Constitution (like Rep.
Louie Gohmert).

I Root for All Groups Working to Save America and Expose the Criminal Politicians

Bring out the marshmallows and weiners, folks: This is going to be the most bizarre campfire front row seat to U.S. history
that anyone has witnessed in over 200 years.

Try not to trip and "face plant" into the flames as all this unfolds. It might be a smart idea to have some preparedness
supplies at the ready, since no one really knows just how nasty this is all going to get. (And thank God Hillary doesn't have
her fingers on the nuclear launch codes, or she'd probably launch them just to change the narrative...)
Related: This Viral Video Has Hillary Running Scared

As for me, I'm with anybody who's trying to save America, restore democracy and throw the establishment criminals in
prison.

Like almost everybody else, I've had enough of the lies, the corruption, the media deceptions and the incessant blood
sucking parasites in Washington D.C. who are too arrogant and stupid to realize just how much they're universally
despised.

The revolution is ON. Anonymous, Wikileaks, Project Veritas, the FBI and the NSA have all been activated. There's no
stopping them now, and all the details of all the crimes of the Clintons are about to spill onto the stage of history, dirty deeds
and all.

Be warned, you are probably not psychologically prepared for the truth about what the Clintons really are. You will probably
vomit.

Internal Coup Against Hillary Clinton Has Begun: Red Alert

Inside the Invisible Government

The Path to Total Dictatorship: America's Shadow Government and Its Silent Coup
 Clinton Emails Linked To Political Pedophile Sex Ring FBI Insider

FDNY Fireworks Detail for Hillary Clinton Prompts Questions

'Clinton is in serious trouble': Internet pirate Kim Dotcom warns 'there's unpublished material yet to come'

Hillary Clinton embraces George Soros radical vision of open-border world

Hillary Clintons Strategic Ambition In A Nutshell. Regime Change in Russia Putin is an Obstacle

The World Purposely Destabilised

Hillarys Girlfriend Caught In Yahoo Attack

Forget the FBI cache; the Podesta emails show how America is run

Wikileaks Releases Clinton Foundation Bombshell: If This Story Gets Out, We Are Screwed

Hillary Clinton is an alcoholic

Is This Why Comey Broke: A Stack Of Resignation Letters From Furious FBI Agents

650,000 Emails Found On Anthony Weiner's Laptop; DOJ Blocked Foundation Probe

Clinton operative 'Dirty' Donna Brazile let Hillary Clinton CHEAT at the debates

John Podesta's Best Friend At The DOJ Will Be In Charge Of The DOJ's Probe Into Huma Abedin Emails

Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia

Feds Leak Details of New Clinton Investigation / Weinergate - Could this be the end of Hillary's campaign?

The Director of the FBI Reopens the Hillary Case

Clintons Are Under Multiple FBI Investigations as Agents Are Stymied

Trey Gowdy Just Joined Trump And Gave The Best Media Attack

Guilty as Sin Uncovering New Evidence of Corruption and How Hillary & the Democrats Derailed the FBI
Investigation

Hillary Clinton Goes Full Tin Foil Hat

Clinton resorts to pushing outlandish accusations in attempt to divert attention from herself

With her campaign going up in flames, Clinton resorts to red-baiting and finger pointing, obvious projection that
ironically exposes her own corruption.
The Globalization Of Media: A Failing Strike Force
November 3 2016 | From: JonRappoport

I begin this piece with three quotes from my work-in-progress, The Underground:

There is a media metaphysics. Its basic principle states that nothing exists until it becomes information. Now we
have a new twist: information only becomes real when it reaches a mind already attuned to it. In other words, the
tree falling in the forest makes a sound only if a user/consumer who wants a tree to fall receives video and audio of
the event

Related: Mainstream Media Achieve Historic Milestone + Trust This: New Zealanders Don't Trust MPs, Bloggers,
The Media

Information can be dressed up a thousand different ways. But it tends to have an elastic quality. By that I mean you
eventually get to see the person who dressed it up. Thats a problem for chronic liars who inhabit the press. They expose
themselves, even though they dont want to. It takes a surprisingly small push to expose the whole operation. This is
happening now, right in front of our eyes.

The basis of big media is theater. News is theater. Its directors and producers think theyre doing a first-rate job. But
theyre sadly mistaken. Gaps and obfuscations are growing larger. The outright non-sequiturs and gibberish are becoming
more apparent. The audience is wising up to the farce. Who are these fools who direct the news?

Theyre simply people who want to sell their souls and have found an elite buyer. But that transaction doesnt contain any
guarantees about shelf life. Mainstream news is decaying, and the expiration date is approaching. Like civilizations, the
petty princes of information rise and fall

Globalized media. Its nice plan. Lets examine it.

Related: Western Media Credibility In Free Fall Collapse: Case In Point: UN Peace Council: The US Media Is Lying
To The American people. The War In Syria Is Not A Civil War, It's A Proxy Invasion By The United States

The new technocratic media is based on profiling users. There is no impactful news unless each member of the audience is
surveilled and analyzed on the basis of what he already likes and wants.

Shocking? Its to be expected. How else would technocrats parlay the untold hours theyve spent sizing up their
consumers/users?

Several years ago, I wrote:

Tech blather has already begun, since Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon, bought the Washington Post at a fire sale.
Jeff Genius will invent new ways to transmit the news to people on the go and make the Post a smashing
success. Mobile devices. Multiple platforms.

Digital taking over from print. Ads customized to fit readers interests (profiling). News stories customized to fit
readers interests (more profiling).

In other words, non-news. If you thought media were irrelevant and deceptive before, you havent seen anything. The new
news will create millions of virtual bubbles in which profiled users can float contentedly, under the cozy cottage roofs of their
favorite little separate paradigms.

The tech giant Apple has waded into this territory with an app that will deliver news to users. Yahoo:

Apple News, part of the upcoming iOS 9 operating system, aims to be the primary news source for users of the
iPhone and iPad Apple says its news app follows over a million topics and pulls relevant stories based on your
specific interests

Joshua Benton of the Nieman Journalism Lab said the app will be important because through the awesome power
of default, Apple distribution puts it in an entirely other league. This [news] app will be on hundreds of millions of
devices within 24 hours of its debut.
Translation: Profiling their users down to their toenails, Apple will present them with virtual bubbles of news they
want to see and read.

Not just one overall presentation for all; no, different news outlets for Apples audiences.

Related: I Used to Be a Human Being

This introduces a whole new layer of mind control.

Youre an Obama fan? Here are stories confirming your belief in the Prophet.

You want neo-con on the rocks with a conservative Republican twist? Heres some war footage thatll warm your heart.

Do you believe government gridlock is our biggest concern? Congress cant get anything done? Weve got headlines for
that from here to the moon.

Tuned into celeb gossip? Heres your world in three minutes.

The idea: convince users, one day at a time, that what they already believe is important IS the news of the day.

Its Decentralized Centralization. One media giant carving its global audience up into little pieces and delivering them a
whole host of different algorithmically appropriate lies and fluff and no-context psyops.
Related: Obama Decries 'Wild West' [Independent] Media Landscape

And for fringe users? Youre doubtful about GMOs? Well, look at what Whole Foods is planning for their healthier produce
section. Cheer up. Nothing about Maui voters declaring a temporary ban on devastatingly toxic Monsanto/Dow experiments
or the dangers of Roundup.

Youre anti-vaccine? Sorry, you dont count. Youre not a recognized demographic. But heres a piece about a little
unvaccinated boy who was involved in car crash on the I5.

Does this sound like science fiction? It isnt. Its the mainstream look of the near-future. Search engines are already
personalizing your inquiries. US ABC national news is climbing in the ratings because its giving viewers lighter stories,
and spending less time on thorny issues like the Middle East.
Related: Who Owns New Zealand's Media?

The mainstream news business is desperately looking for audience; and treating every user as a profiled social-construct-
bundle of superficial preferences is their answer.

Mr. X, weve studied the little virtual bubble you live in, and now we can sell you your own special brand of truth.

Hello, audience. Were going to pitch you on becoming full-fledged obsessed consumers, as if there is no other worthy goal
in life - and then were going to profile you from top to bottom, to find out exactly what kind of obsessed consumer you are,
so we can hit you and trigger you with information that uniquely stimulates your adrenal glands

The one-two punch.

Trey Gowdy Joins Trump and Gives a Great Mainstream Media Attack

Any actual event occurring in the world will be pre-digested by robot media editors and profilers, and then split up into
variously programmed bits of information for different audiences.

Who cares what really happened? In the new world, there is no what really happened. Thats a gross misnomer. A faulty
idea. A metaphysical error.

No, there is only a multi-forked media tongue that simultaneously spits out a dozen or a hundred variations of the same
eventbecause different viewers want and expect different realities.
Related: Hidden Truths About The Mainstream News Media

In 1984, Orwells Big Brother was issuing a single voice into the homes of the population. That was old-school. That was
primitive technology. That was achieving unity by hammering unity into peoples skulls. This, now, is the frontier of unity
through diversity.

We want to make all of you into androids, through basic PR and propaganda and a pathetic excuse for education.
However, we recognize youll become different varieties of androids, and well serve that outcome with
technological sophistication. Trust us. We care about what you prefer.

User A: Wow, did you see the coverage of the border war in Chula Vista?

User B: War? They had a fantastic exhibit of drones down there. At least a hundred different types. And then I
watched an old WW2 movie about aerial combat.

User C: Chula Vista? They had a great food show. This woman made a lemon pie. I could practically taste it.

User D: That wasnt a border war. It was a drill. And then afterwards, these cops gave a demonstration of all their
gear. Vests, shields, communication devices, flash-bangs, auto rifles with silencers, batons. I watch drills all over
the country. Love them.

User E: Chula Vista? The only thing I saw on the news was sunny and mild this week. I watch all the weather
channels. I love them.

BUT when a Big One comes along, like the 2016 national election in the US, the separate tunes come together and ring as
one. Then the overriding need to extend Globalisms goals (in the person of Hillary Clinton) blot out every other priority.
Related: Alternative Media Is Winning: 60% Of Americans [ Read: The West ] Distrust Mainstream Media

Then the major media twist whatever they need to twist. Then its the same bubble for everyone.

One problem, though. Major media have been lanced thousands of times by alt news sites, and by Wikileaks and Project
Veritas. This attack has exposed the truth and the Clinton crimes.

And alt news reflects the growing interest of the public in whats actually happening on many fronts.

The technocratic plan for the news is failing.

It was a nice plan, but Its turning out to be a dud.

Alt media are forcing public awareness of one giant scandal after another: Hillary/Obama support for ISIS; pro-vaccine liars;
the collapse of Obamacare; the GMO hustle; pesticide damage... on and on and on.
Related: Mainstream Media Manipulation / Controlling The Narrative + Mosaic Of Facts: Inside The Information War

The result? Major media are being backed into a corner, where they must defend lies and build monolithic lies for
EVERYONE all the time. The idea of creating separate news for each profiled user is collapsing.

Major media are playing defense against the rest of the world.

Its quite a party. And it has no expiration date.

A final note: Trump, Wikileaks, Project Veritas, Drudge, and many alt news sites created a perfect storm in 2016, raining
down on major media.

It was and is unprecedented.

The mainstream press has been exposed down to its roots, as never before. The lying, the collusion, the arrogant
sense of entitlement, the desperation, the corruption - its all there to see, for anyone who has eyes and a few
working brain cells.

Expect more to come, regardless of the outcome of the election. The train has really left the station

Dear Mainstream Media

You f**king suck! Youve almost succeeded in destroying the 4th estate and you should be ashamed of yourselves.

This is why 94% of the American people dont trust you. When are you going to get that through your thick skulls?

You lie, you smear, you ingratiate yourselves with wanton abandon.
Dear mainstream media: Youve betrayed your profession, sacrificed its once sacred principles, and stabbed the American
people in the back.

Related: Six Giant Corporations Control the Media, and Americans Consume 10 Hours of Programming a Day

The Real Reason Why The UN Wants Control Over The Internet
November 2 2016 | From: DeWeeseReport

By its very nature, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is a non-
profit organization exclusively run by Technocrats.

As such, it is an apolitical body that is happy to serve whatever form of governance exists as long as funding is
received and salaries are paid. To a Technocrat, a world run by science and technology is better than any other
form of governance.

Related: The UN Releases Plan to Push for Worldwide Internet Censorship

That Technocrats have played a supporting role in world history is unquestioned. Scientists, engineers and technicians
played a huge role in the Communist dictatorship in the former Soviet Union (For instance, see Science and the Soviet
Social Order).
Related: Vampire Technocrats Fly To Jekyll Island To Stop Trump

Technocrats likewise played a central role in support of Adolph Hitler and National Socialism (See Scientists, Engineers and
National Socialism). In both cases, the Technocrat goal was not necessarily Communism or Nazism, but rather the
methodical exercise of science according to its Scientific Method.

In other words, the process was more important than the outcome and in both cases, the outcome was not questioned or
resisted, but simply accepted.

Reality Check: Obama Administration Has Handed Over The Internet to a Private Corporation

The reason that ICANN formerly served the interests of the United States was simply that it answered to our governments
judicial, legislative and executive branches. In other words, the U.S. held the umbrella over ICANN and that was enough to
keep it working for our national interests and not for someone elses interests.

Obama changed that when he cut ICANN loose on September 30, 2016 by letting the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
(IANA) contract expire without being renewed. After expiration, we forever lost the right to renew the contract again.

So, ICANN is now a free-agent looking for shelter in the same way that a boll weevil looks for a cotton plant: it needs a
host organization in order to practice its craft, and, I dare say, it doesnt care one whit who that host is.

What does ICANN do?

Click on the image above to open a larger version in a new window

It is no secret that the United Nations is making a play to become host to ICANN. In particular, the UNs International
Telecommunications Union (ITU), run by the Peoples Republic of China, is expected to play the central role in this effort.

However, whether it is the ITU or some other UN agency is immaterial because it will still be the UN in the end.

But, why the UN? Because it is the fountainhead of the plans and operations to establish Technocracy as the sole global
economic system while destroying capitalism and free enterprise. Technocracy is the issue here. Others know it as
Sustainable Development or Green Economy, but the correct historical term is Technocracy.

In February 2015, the head of climate change at the UN, Christiana Figures, stated,

This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a
defined period of time to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150
years, since the industrial revolution. [emphasis added]

What is unclear about this? Sustainable Development, or Technocracy, is a resource-driven economic model regulated by
energy rather than by supply and demand plus monetary currencies. In 1938, the original Technocrats defined Technocracy
as

The science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute
goods and services to the entire population.

To achieve its Utopia goals, the UN must have ICANNs steering wheel and throttle. But while everyone is stressing over
Internet censorship of web sites and the suppression of free speech, the real prize is completely overlooked: The Internet of
Things (IoT).
In terms of follow the money, IoT is expected to generate upwards of $3 trillion by 2025 and is growing at a rate of at least
30 percent per year. In other words, it is a huge market and money is flying everywhere. If the UN can figure out a way to
tax this market, and they will, it will provide a windfall of income and perhaps enough to make it self-perpetuating. Currently,
the UN is financed by contributions from member states.

But, what is the IoT and who cares? IoT are the connections between inanimate objects and the humans that depend upon
them. The digital Smart Meter on your home communicates energy usage via WiFi to the utility company; but it also
communicates with the major appliances in your home and can even control them remotely without your consent or
knowledge.
The smart phone that you carry communicates with cell towers and localized signal receptors to create a map of your every
movement. Smart home technology lets your stereo send sound to remote wireless speakers and to light bulbs equipped
with sensors.

The security camera that you installed to watch your home while you were on vacation can communicate with other
cameras, microphones, the police department, etc. Examples go on and on.

ICANN issues the so-called IP addresses that are assigned to all these devices on a global basis. The original addressing
scheme, IPV4, was based on four blocks of up to three digits each, punctuated with a period (e.g., 192.168.2.14). This
scheme allows for a discrete address for up to 16.8 million devices.

A few years ago, IPV4 ran out of numbers, forcing Internet service providers, corporations and other organizations to
improvise internal numbering systems, known as proxy servers, to issue safe addresses to devices within their own
domain. These systems are not only fragile, but they are bloated beyond reason and generally easy to hack.

To fix this, ICANN devised a new IP numbering system called IPV6, which adds two more blocks of numbers (e.g.,
192.168.2.14.231.58).

This scheme provides for 3.41038 addresses, or 340 trillion, 282 billion, 366 million, 920 thousand, 938 - followed by 24
zeroes. There is probably a way to say this number, but I cannot imagine what it would be. Its somewhere beyond a trillion
trillion unique numbers for every human being on earth!

Thus, IPV6 provides a way to assign a unique and directly addressable number to every electronic device on earth for
centuries to come.
As IPV6 rolls out to the world, the modified mission for ICANN will be to inventory and categorize the device attached to
each IP address. For instance, all the air conditioners in the world would be directly addressable from a single list. Likewise
for all computers, all automobiles, all cameras, all phones, all refrigerators, all articles of clothing, etc.

Whoever has control over and access to this data will literally be able to control the entire world, down to the last minutiae
and that is the United Nations exact mission: inventory, monitor and control.

But, this concept was set in history long before the technology existed. The original bible of Technocracy, the Technocracy
Study Course (1934), laid out the hard requirements necessary for its implementation:

1. Register on a continuous 24 hour-per-day basis the total net conversion of energy.

2. By means of the registration of energy converted and consumed, make possible a balanced load.

3. Provide a continuous inventory of all production and consumption

4. Provide a specific registration of the type, kind, etc., of all goods and services, where produced and
where used

5. Provide specific registration of the consumption of each individual, plus a record and description of
the individual.

- Scott, Howard et al, Technocracy Study Course, p. 232

As I thoroughly documented in my book, Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation, the United
Nations is indeed the engine of modern Technocracy and as such, it is acting in a perfectly predictable manner.
Related: Technocracy: A Scientific Dictatorship

It seeks to establish a global Scientific Dictatorship where it controls all resources, all production and limits all consumption
to its own liking. These Technocrats will dutifully apply their pseudo-scientific methodology to every problem in the world,
and simply issue instructions to the net to make it so.

Yes, free speech will decrease and censorship will increase, but that pales in comparison to the real prize of the IoT
that the United Nations desperately wants and needs in order to accomplish its own twisted goals.

Congress never understood this when they passively let Obama fail to renew our contract with ICANN. However, Obama
and his globalist handlers understood it perfectly well, which makes the deception and treachery of it even worse.

Thanks to this scurrilous bunch, the world has just been sold into digital slavery, from which there may be no return.

Related: Warning: Dont Share This Article, Facebook Might Ban You!

Whose Work Was The Inspiration For The First [Supposedly] Nuke-Free Country?
November 2 2016 | From: HelenCaldicott / GregHallett

New Zealand was the first country in the world to pass national nuclear-free legislation. Marilyn
Waring reflects on how Dr. Helen Caldicotts influence culminated in the passage of the
cornerstone of New Zealands foreign policy.
If you were growing up in New Zealand and Australia post World War II, theres a chance you knew about the United
States using the Marshall Islands as a nuclear testing site from 1947 until 1962.

In an agreement signed with the United Nations, the U.S. government held the Marshall Islands as a trust territory and
detonated nuclear devices in this pristine area of the Pacific Ocean - leading, in some instances, to huge levels of radiation
fall-out, health effects, and the permanent displacement of many island people.

In all, the U.S. government conducted 105 underwater and atmospheric tests. You would have also known that the British
conducted seven atmospheric tests between 1956 and 1963 on traditional Aboriginal land, in Maralinga, Australia.
It may be that you read Neville Shutes 1957 novel On the Beach, in which people in Melbourne, Australia wait for deadly
radiation to spread from a Northern Hemisphere nuclear war.

This book made a memorable impact on Helen when she read it as a teenager. When I was a teenager, some years later, I
read Bertrand Russells 1959 classic, Common Sense and Nuclear Warfare.

Both Helen and I saw Peter Watkins The War Game, a BBC documentary drama about nuclear war and the consequences
in an English city. In New Zealand the film was restricted for children unless accompanied by an adult, so I had to get my
father to take me. The War Game won the Oscar for the best documentary in 1965.
France began its series of over 175 nuclear tests at Mururoa, in the South Pacific, in 1966. At least 140 of these tests were
above ground.

In 1973, the New Zealand and Australian governments took France to the World Court for continued atmospheric testing,
and forced the last tests underground. The testing finally came to an end in 1976.

In New Zealand the U.S. Navy made regular visits between 1976 and 1983 with nuclear-powered and, most likely, nuclear-
armed, ships.

These visits produced spectacular protest fleets in the Auckland and Wellington harbours, when hundreds of New
Zealanders - in yachts of all sizes, in motor boats and canoes, even on surf boards - surrounded the vessels and tried to
bring them to a complete stop.

By 1978, a campaign began in New Zealand to declare borough and city council areas nuclear-free and, by the early 1980s,
this symbolic movement had quickly gained momentum, covering more than two-thirds of the New Zealand population.

Helen Caldicott and I had not met up to this point, but these were shared parts of our history and consciousness when Helen
visited New Zealand in 1983.

Helen Caldicott graduated with a medical degree from University of Adelaide Medical School in 1961. She moved to the
United States, becoming an Instructor in paediatrics at Harvard Medical School and was on the staff of the Childrens
Hospital Medical Centre in Boston, Massachusetts.
In the late 1970s, Helen became the President of Physicians for Social Responsibility. This group was founded when Helen
was finishing medical school, quickly making its mark by documenting the presence of Strontium-90, a highly radioactive
waste product of atmospheric nuclear testing, in childrens teeth.

The landmark finding eventually led to the Limited Nuclear Test Ban treaty, which ended atmospheric nuclear testing.

But it was the Three Mile Island accident that changed Helens life. An equipment failure resulted in a loss of cooling water
to the core of a reactor at the Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station in Pennsylvania, causing a partial meltdown.

Operator failure meant that 700,000 gallons of radioactive cooling water ended up in the basement of the reactor building.

It was the most serious nuclear accident to that date in the U.S. Helen published Nuclear Madness the same year. In it she
wrote:

As a physician, I contend that nuclear technology threatens life on our planet with extinction. If present trends
continue, the air we breathe, the food we eat, and the water we drink will soon be contaminated with enough
radioactive pollutants to pose a potential health hazard far greater than any plague humanity has ever
experienced.

In 1980, Helen resigned from her paid work positions to work full time on the prevention of nuclear war.

In 1982, Canadian director Terre Nash filmed a lecture given by Helen Caldicott to a New York state student audience.
Nashs consequent National Film Board of Canada documentary If You Love this Planet was released during the term of
U.S. President Ronald Reagan, at the height of Cold War nuclear tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union.

The U.S. Department of Justice moved quickly to designate the film foreign propaganda, bringing a great deal of attention
to the film. It went on to win the 1982 Academy Award for Documentary Short Subject. That same year, Helen addressed
about 750,000 people in Central Park, New York in the biggest anti-nuke rally in the United States to that date.

In 1983, I was serving as a member of the New Zealand parliament, having been elected eight years earlier at the age of
23.

Our parliament established a Disarmament and Arms Control Select Committee to conduct hearings on the possibility of
making New Zealand a nuclear-free zone.

During this critically important time, Helen was invited to New Zealand on a lecture tour. The documentary If You Love This
Planet was shown at her speaking engagements. I did not get to meet her, nor hear any of her lectures in person, as I was
working in parliament every night. But I did follow the media coverage.

Helen told the magazine the Listener about having observed five-star generals in U.S. congressional and senate committees
complaining that the Russian missiles were bigger than the American ones.

The Russian missiles are very big (and) inaccurate and clumsy. America has very small, very accurate missiles,
which are better at killing people and destroying targets, she explained.

A frequent message in her talks to New Zealand audiences was the redundant overkill capacity of both superpowers.
Caldicott noted to her audiences that [T]he U.S. has 30,000 bombs and Russia 20,000.

I had sat in a New Zealand parliamentary committee hearing some months earlier, when a government colleague,
brandishing a centrefold of a Russian submarine, excitedly called for us to Look at how big it is.
I had thought that no one would believe me if I had repeated such an inane banality - when an adult male was more
impressed by the size of the submarine than its capacity to destroy life on this planet.

Helens public addresses were grounded in the potential impact of nuclear weapons. Imagine a 20-megaton bomb targeted
on Auckland, she told audiences in New Zealand.

The explosion, five times the collective energy of all the bombs dropped in the Second World War, digs a hole
three-quarters of a mile wide by 800 feet deep and turns people, buildings and dirt into radioactive dust.

Everyone up to six miles will be vaporised, and up to 20 miles they will be dead or lethally injured. People will be
instantly blinded looking at the blast within 40 miles. Many will be asphyxiated in the fire storm.

Helen did not hold back, explaining that nuclear war means blindness, burning, starvation, disease, lacerations,
haemorrhaging, millions of corpses and an epidemic of disease. Helens dramatic and blunt style reduced many in her
audiences to tears.

She always ended her talks with a call to action - especially to parents - as she strongly believes that nuclear disarmament
is the ultimate medical and parenting issue of our time.

To those who would claim New Zealand was not a target she had a short reply:

Trident submarines in ports are targeted. They are a first strike target. It is much easier to destroy subs when they
are in dock than it is when they are submerged in the ocean.
In 2015, I asked Helen how she managed to deliver such bad news and yet keep her audiences with her. Being a doctor
helps because you have to learn to negotiate with a patient and with language they can understand, she explained.

You have to convert the medical diagnosis and treatment to lay language. I also have to keep them awake
sometimes by letting them laugh because it relieves their tension and because the stuff I say is pretty awful. Helen
told me that she practices global preventative medicine.

Helens tour through New Zealand in 1983 had a huge, and lasting, impact. At one stop, Helen addressed over 2,000 people
at a public event in Auckland. The librarian with whom I corresponded looking for old newspaper reports of Helens visit,
wrote to me:

Her chillingly detailed description of the effects of a nuclear device detonated over the hall in which we were sitting
remains rooted in my psyche to this day!

The other message I most recall is the dichotomy she evoked between the destructive drive of old men rulers, the
instigators of war, versus the procreative energy of mothers most impelled to oppose them - which, however
reductive, retains the compelling logic of a truism!

Helens approach was transformative in New Zealand. Helens speaking events packed auditoriums, and overflows of
audiences had to be accommodated using loud speaker systems.
People responded strongly to this woman, whose life work involved caring for children, speaking about medical effects of
fallout, and speaking without the use of the clichd military and defence ideological rhetoric that treated people as if they
were simpletons who couldnt understand.

Her speeches inspired people to act. After Helen spoke, the volume of mail delivered to my parliamentary office increased -
particularly from women.

On May 24, 1983, 20,000 women wearing white flowers and armbands and holding banners with peace signs marched
quietly up a main street in Auckland to hold a huge rally and call for New Zealand to be nuke-free. It was one of the largest
womens demonstrations in New Zealands history.

In her book, Peace, Power and Politics How New Zealand Became Nuclear Free, Maire Leadbetter writes:

I am one of many activists who think of Helen Caldicotts visit as the point when the peace movement began to
grow exponentially Helen had a magical ability to motivate previously passive citizens to become activists.

Shortly after Helens visit to New Zealand, in 1984, I advised that I intended to vote for the opposition-sponsored nuclear-
free New Zealand legislation. This prompted conservative Prime Minister Rob Muldoon to call a snap election. Muldoon told
media that my feminist anti-nuclear stance threatened his ability to govern.

The new Labour Government of 1984 passed the New Zealand Nuclear Free Zone, Disarmament and Arms Control Act in
1987, the worlds first national nuclear-free legislation. Dr. Helen Caldicotts influence had culminated in the passage of the
cornerstone of New Zealands foreign policy.

New Zealand's Nuclear History?

Unfortunately, technically speaking, New Zealand is NOT nuclear free. We have food-irradiating facilities
(sounds super healthy) and according to researcher Greg Hallett - a whole lot more in our past...
According to Hallett, "The Wairakei Geothermal Power Station was not for the production of power, but was built by
the British Atomic Energy Commission to produce heavy water for the manufacture of nuclear weapons."

The Wairakei Geothermal Power Station was a front for heavy water production to be used for nuclear power and
the production of deuterium and tritium for hydrogen bombs. These were a thousand times more powerful than the
first atom bomb and were first tested in at least three different locations."

...

During the nuclear scare, Kiwis were buying houses in Taupo to be away from a nuclear blast, which they thought
would be aimed at Auckland and Wellington.

The funny thing was, Taupo was the only nuclear target the Russians had in New Zealand. At least one nuclear
weapon was aimed squarely at the Wairakei Geothermal heavy water power station which produced much of the
heavy water for the Western world.

...

But more importantly, New Zealand took over the production of nuclear detonators from Norway in 1961. Norway
was producing detonators for nuclear bombs during and after World War Two and they paid quite a heavy price in
casualties. After World War Two the Norwegians said, A plague on both of your houses. Take this shit away, and
they stopped production."

The Americans didnt want the job as theyd be under attack, so New Zealand held its hand up highest and
produced nuclear detonators in secret.

Thats Walter Nashs duplicitous Labour government for you [195760]. He was charged with sedition while
fronting as a man of peace and producing nuclear detonators. No doubt he on-sold any secrets gained to the
Russians. But this also has a more recent history to it.

...

If you went up the hill towards Eastbourne then took the alternative route through the gorse-covered hills to
Wainuiomata at the back of Gracefield, there was a sign saying Nuclear Research Facility. This is where the firing
devices for the nuclear blast at Mururoa were made.

New Zealand supplied the nuclear detonation gear to the French via the British. Yes, it was New Zealand that
provided the detonation gear for the atmospheric nuclear tests at Mururoa Atoll from July 1966, and for the
underground tests from 1975. "

...

There was a big stink in the armed forces about the anti-nuclear protests because they violated secret military
pacts that went back years. Labour wanted the military to act against the pacts and thats why the military decided
to take part in the killing of Prime Minister Norman Kirk."

...

In 1981, the known gay and child sex abuser Colin Moyle was re-elected to Labour and became the Minister of
Agriculture and Fisheries from 198490. He assisted the Russians in placing submarine locator beacons for
Russian nuclear-powered submarines for a nuclear strike against America."

...

Helen Clarks anti-nuclear policy only applied to American ships. Russian nuclear-armed vessels were never
questioned. Such duplicity is consistent with those converted to an agenda-driven ideology from a foreign country
for non-national purposes, in exchange for hiding their sexuality. This results in treasonous activities tantamount to
war and thats what we got so very close to nuclear war from NZ.

...

"New Zealand is the only Nuclear-Free State that fails to put to print its history of manufacturing nuclear material.
As well as heavy water, New Zealand also manufactured detonators for nuclear bombs and Prime Minister
Muldoon was set on testing a nuclear power station in at least three different locations."
Someone Elses Country - The Neoliberal Revolution In New Zealand
October 31 2016 | From: AlisterBerry

The Globalist's test case trial of Corporatisation: In the early 1980s a group of free market
economists came to dominate policy at the New Zealand Treasury.

With the election of the Labour Party in 1984 and the appointment of Roger Douglas as finance minister, the new
right elite took power and began relentlessly and ruthlessly turning New Zealand into their vision of the model free
market state.

"A coherent and comprehensive account of the years which will define this country for a century to come." - New Zealand
Herald.

Clinton Disaster Continues - FBI Reopens Investigation Into Clinton Emails + Busted:
Early Votes Are Already Being Switched - Even More Corruption Exposed On Video
October 30 2016 | From: Infowars / Zerohedge / Various

FBI looking into "new developments" after previously recommending no charges against
Democrat candidate.
The FBI on Friday announced it is reopening its investigation into Hillary Clintons private email server, another
shocking October surprise for the Democrat candidate days from the presidential election.

Related: Recent Poll Shows More Americans Want Clinton Indicted than Want Her to Be President

In a letter to committees and lawmakers relevant to the matter, FBI Director James Comey cited recent developments for
the bureaus decision to look into new emails which may contain classified information and how they may relate to its
previous investigation.

"In previous congressional testimony, I referred to the fact that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had
completed its investigation of former Secretary Clintons personal email server. Due to recent developments, I am
writing to supplement my previous testimony, Comey wrote in the letter obtained by CNBC.

In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to
the investigation.

I am writing to inform you that the investigative team briefed me on this yesterday, and I agreed that the
FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to
determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our
investigation.

Although the FBI cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be signifcant, and I cannot predict how long
it will take us to complete this additional work, I believe it is important to update your Committees about our efforts
in light of my previous testimony, Comey stated.
Republican Congressman Jason Chaffetz, who led an Oversight Committee effort to pursue perjury charges against Hillary,
tweeted about the FBIs announcement.
Back in July, Comey announced the FBIs investigation into Clintons use of a private email server during her tenure as
secretary of state would not result in a recommendation to the Justice Department to pursue charges.

"Although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our
view that no charges are appropriate in this case, the FBI director stated in a speech at the time.

A Clinton campaign spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment, reported the Washington
Post on Friday.

Related: Most Americans want Hillary indicted for email scandal Poll

Democrat vice presidential pick Tim Kaine said hes got to read a little more when asked about the FBI investigation during
an early voting site visit in Tallahassee, Florida, Friday.

Likewise, Hillary ignored questions shouted at her from reporters when she disembarked from her campaign plane for a rally
in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, according to the Associated Press.
She did not address the FBI announcement during her speech.

Reports state the campaign was unaware of the news until they touched down in Iowa as her plane did not have wi-fi:
However, one Wall Street Journal writer claims the plane does indeed have wi-fi:

Related: Watergate's Bob Woodward: "Clinton Foundation Is Corrupt, It's A Scandal"

So it just happens to go out today? asks the American Mirrors Kyle Olson.

The campaign later released a statement saying FBI Director Comey should provide the American public more information
than is contained in the letter he sent to eight Republican committee chairmen.
Already we have seen characterizations that the FBI is reopening an investigation but Comeys words do not match that
characterization, the campaign claimed.

Speaking at a campaign rally in Manchester, New Hampshire, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump jumped on
the bureaus decision to reopen its case:

The FBI has just sent a letter to Congress informing them that they have discovered new emails pertaining to the
former Secretary of State Hillary Clintons investigation. And they are reopening their case into her criminal and
illegal conduct that threatens the security of the United States of America.

Hillary Clintons corruption is on a scale we have never seen before. We must not let her take her criminal scheme
into the Oval Office.

I have great respect for the fact that the FBI and the Dept. of Justice are now willing to have the courage to right
the horrible mistake that they made. This was a grave miscarriage of justice that the American people fully
understood and it is everybodys hope that it is about to be corrected.

CNBC reports, Stocks turned negative after the report of the new probe, adding that Many analysts have said
that markets were pricing in a Clinton victory in November.

Related: Statement On Attempted Coverup Of Clinton's Emails At The State Department

Robert Creamer's Illegal $20,000 Foreign Wire Transfer Caught On Tape

Project Veritas has just released Part IV of it's multi-part series exposing numerous scandals
surrounding the DNC and the Clinton campaign, including efforts to incite violence at Trump rallies
and, at least what seems to be, illegal coordination between the DNC, Hillary For America and
various Super PACs.

Disgraced Democratic operative Robert Creamer participated in daily calls with the Hillary Clinton campaign, and worked directly with President
Barack Obama to organize issue campaigns.

Part IV focuses on a $20,000 foreign donation made by an undercover Project Veritas journalist to Americans
United for Change (AUFC). Ironically, shortly after the $20k donation wire was released, the contributor's "niece"
was offered an internship with Creamer's firm, Democracy Partners.

Related: "Dont Repeat That To Anybody" - Hillary Clinton And Donna Brazile Personally Implicated + The
Presstitutes Have Set Up The Election To Be Stolen

In the new video, Creamer says:

Every morning I am on a call at 10:30 that goes over the message being driven by the campaign headquarters
I am in this campaign mainly to deal with what earned media with television, radio, with earned media and social
media, not with paid media, not with advertising.

He also mentions a conference call discussing a woman potentially coming forward to accuse Trump of inappropriate
behavior.

Creamer, a seasoned Chicago activist who is married to Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), whose Republican opponent, Joan
McCarthy Lasonde has called for her to resign over her husbands activities, also talks about his work with Barack Obama,
whom he says he has known since the 1980s, when Obama was a community organizer in Chicago: Hes a pro, Ive known
the President since he was a community organizer in Chicago.

Related: Wall Street Journal Lashes Out The Press Is Burying Hillary Clintons Sins

Elsewhere, Creamer adds: I do a lot of work with the White House on their issues, helping to run issue campaigns that they
have been involved in. I mean, for immigration reform for the the health care bill, for trying to make America more like
Britain when it comes to gun violence issues.

In the effort to prove the credibility of the undercover donor featured in the videos and to keep the investigation
going, Project Veritas Action made the decision to donate twenty thousand dollars to Robert Creamers
effort. Project Veritas Action had determined that the benefit of this investigation outweighed the cost. And it did.

First thing, like I said, thank you for the proposal. And Id like to get the $20,000 across to you. The
second call Im going to make here is to my money guy and hes going to get in touch with you and auto
wire the funds to you, said the PVA journalist.

Creamer told the PVA journalist to send the money to Americans United for Change. Shortly after the money
was released, the donors niece - another Project Veritas Action journalist - was offered an internship
with Creamer.

In an effort to see how far Creamer would go with the promise of more money, another Project Veritas journalist
posing as the donors money liaison requested a meeting with Creamer. During that meeting, Creamer spoke
about connections he had with Obama and Clinton.

AUFC President, Brad Woodhouse, subsequently returned the money, after Project Veritas started to release their
undercover videos, citing "concerns that it might have been an illegal foreign donation."

Oddly, Woodhouse was not terribly concerned about the "legality" of the donation when he chose to accept it a month prior.

In an unexpected twist, AUFC president Brad Woodhouse, the recipient of the $20,000, heard that Project Veritas
Action was releasing undercover videos exposing AUFCs activities. He told a journalist that AUFC was going to
return the twenty thousand dollars.

He said it was because they were concerned that it might have been an illegal foreign donation. Project
Veritas Action was pleased but wondered why that hadnt been a problem for the month that they had the
money.

Related: Statement on Hillary Clintons Deliberate Incitement of Violence at Trump Rallies

While the latest video focuses on the "$20,000 illegal foreign contribution" from an undercover Project Veritas
journalist, the following comments from Robert Creamer were also rather intriguing in light of recent White House efforts to
vehemently deny any connections between he and President Obama.

"Oh Barack Obama's was the best campaign in the history of American politics, I mean the second one, I mean the
first was good too. I was a consultant to both, the second one, was everything hit on every level and every
aspect.

He's a pro. I've known the President since he was a community organizer in Chicago.

I was just at and event with him in Chicago actually, on Friday last. He is just as good as ever. I do a lot of
work with the White House on their issues. Helping to run issued campaigns that they have been involved in. I
mean, for immigration reform for the...the health care bill...trying to make America more like Britain when it comes
to gun violence issues."

Video 1 revealed DNC efforts to incite violence at Trump rallies. Video 2 provided the democrat playbook on how to commit
"mass voter fraud". Video 3 directly linking Donna Brazile and Hillary Clinton to efforts to disrupt Trump events.

See the first 3 videos and more in this earlier article:

Related: "Dont Repeat That To Anybody" - Hillary Clinton And Donna Brazile Personally Implicated + The
Presstitutes Have Set Up The Election To Be Stolen

Clinton Insider: Rigging Only Way Hillary Can Win

Shes going to lose and she knows it, he said.

Nichols explained that the establishment is already doing what it can to prevent an open and transparent election.

The DNC filed a lawsuit to try to force the removal of poll watchers at the polls, he said. Why would they do that
if they know theres no cheating going on? Why would they fight the voter ID if they dont plan to have massive
voter fraud?

The mainstream media and the Clinton campaign are also doing everything they can up until Election Day to make
everybody believe that the election is already over in Hillarys favor, Nichols said.

Folks, do not believe it, he said. The polling is a part of this game plan to destroy your confidence in your ability
to win.

I believe Donald Trump is winning, Nichols added. Youre winning. Youve just got to stay the course.

Nichols warned that voters must take extra steps to ensure their vote isnt being altered.

Youve got to make people at the precinct prove that your vote was recorded properly, he said. If they cant show
you proof, then demand a paper ballot.

The damning videos provided by Project Veritas exposing high-level Democrat operatives discussing how they steal
elections illustrate that worries about voter fraud arent unfounded, with even the New York Times acknowledging a recent
survey showing that most voters fear their ballot wont count because they believe the political process is so dominated by
corporate interests.

Related: Maryland Trump Supporter: They Switched My Vote to Hillary

Hillary's #1 Aide Huma Abedin: Undeniable Ties to Terrorists & 9/11 Funders

Related: The Failure of Democracy, How The Oligarchs Plan To Steal The Election

Related Articles:

Facebook goes full Orwellian, begins deleting PRIVATE messages that mention Hillary Clintons crimes

Clinton Fixer: Nothing I have heard Trump comes close to the sexual and moral corruption of the Clintons
 Meet The Man Who Can Expose "The Real Hillary Clinton Scandal"

WikiLeaks Just Dropped Bombshell About Hillarys Health The Truth, Revealed

Mainstream Media Attempts To Defend Hillary And Attack Wikileaks, Fails Epically

Here Are Hillary Clinton's Three Speeches To Goldman Sachs For Which She Was Paid $675,000

Statement On Clinton Campaign Misleading Misleading On Contents Of Secret Server

Hillary's ties to Monsanto mean more GMOs, less transparency in labeling

Proof: Hillary Clinton Is Worse Than Putin

Hillarys Dark Secret Revealed Before Final Debate

Hillary Admits Shadow Government In Control

FBI Files: Hillary Clinton Stole Furniture From State Dept.

Wikileaks Emails Prove Obama Lied When He Said He Didnt Know Hillary Was Using Unsecure Email Server

Hillary Leaks Nuclear Secrets During Debate

False Flag Red Alert Potential for Murders Intended to Frame Trump and Twist Narrative with CNN Complicity

The Wikileaks List: At Least 65 MSM Reporters Were Meeting with / Coordinating Offline with Top Hillary Advisors

DNC Nomination Elections were Fabricated against Sanders

Hillary Clinton embraces George Soros radical vision of open-border world

SHOCKING Report Documents Massive Election Theft by the Democrats

Former Ohio Governor Triggered By Questions About Voter Fraud

Leaked Memo Exposes Shady Dealings Between Clinton Foundation Donors And Bill's "For-Profit" Activities

Statement On More Clinton State Department Corruption

Trump Attacks Hillarys Wild Spending Binge of Taxpayer Dollars

Leak Exposes Who Ordered Hillary To Leave behindThe 4 Men In Benghazi

Hillarys Massive meltdown"If that f - - - ing bastard wins, we all hang from nooses!

Clintons Leaked Emails Confirm Libya Plunder By Killing Gaddafi + Libya: From
Africas Richest State Under Gaddafi, To Failed State After NATO Intervention
October 29 2016 | From: Geopolitics / Various

It was broad daylight robbery and murder when US , France, and the rest of NATO, hunted down
Muammar Qaddafi, and destroyed the most prosperous nation in Africa, i.e. Libya., in 2011.
The above picture is taken during the G8 Summit Italy, in 2009. Libya used to be one of few countries with
sovereign central banks.

Muammar Qaddafi, President of the African Union at that time, was planning to issue gold denominated African dinar to
replace Francs in Francophone Africa, to help his African brothers from centuries of economic plunder.

But thats not all.

The West just hated Muammar Qaddafis internal policies which were kept from the rest of the world by Rothschild
controlled mainstream media.

Here are some examples:

There is no electricity bill in Libya; electricity is free for all its citizens.

There is no interest on loans, banks in Libya are state-owned and loans given to all its citizens at zero percent
interest by law.

Having a home considered a human right in Libya.

All newlyweds in Libya receive $60,000 dinar (U.S.$50,000) by the government to buy their first apartment so to
help start up the family.

Education and medical treatments are free in Libya. Before Gaddafi only 25 percent of Libyans were literate.
Today, the figure is 83 percent.

Should Libyans want to take up farming career, they would receive farming land, a farming house, equipments,
seeds and livestock to kickstart their farms are all for free.

If Libyans cannot find the education or medical facilities they need, the government funds them to go abroad, for
it is not only paid for, but they get a U.S.$2,300/month for accommodation and car allowance.

If a Libyan buys a car, the government subsidizes 50 percent of the price.

The price of petrol in Libya is $0.14 per liter.

Libya has no external debt and its reserves amounting to $150 billion are now frozen globally.

If a Libyan is unable to get employment after graduation the state would pay the average salary of the profession,
as if he or she is employed, until employment is found.
 A portion of every Libyan oil sale is credited directly to the bank accounts of all Libyan citizens.

A mother who gives birth to a child receive U.S.$5,000.

40 loaves of bread in Libya costs $0.15.

25 percent of Libyans have a university degree.

Gaddafi carried out the worlds largest irrigation project, known as the Great Manmade River project, to make
water readily available throughout the desert country.

These things Qaddafi was doing while the West maintains its exceptionalist mindset of being the epitome of freedom and
democracy throughout the globe. Nothing could be farther from the truth.

These are the faces of the people that would murder him more than a year later.

Now, with the fall of CIA Daesh Islamic State in Syria, Libya is hosting the highest population of ISIS terrorists, and added
itself to a growing number of failed states in the region.

ISIS Massacred Over 300 West African Migrants In Libya

The Khazarian Nazionist agenda in the Middle East, and the methods being used against the Arabs and Africans, are still
the same methods that were used by Western pirates not too long ago in the Pacific, which includes:

Bribery of local overlords to help them loot the country; Saudi Arabia is a perfect example; Leaders in Latin
America were also subjected to the same attacks by economic hitmen;

Removal of uncooperative leaders through color revolutions;

Total destruction of the State through divide and conquer by pitting clans and warlords against each other;

For the last 400 years, another resource rich country like the Philippines fall victim to all three methods.

The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) has a hit list of Arab nations to conquer obviously with little regard for
Arab casualties. Such hit list includes a total of seven countries beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran,
Somalia, and Sudan.
Related: Its A US-led Invasion, Not Civil War in Syria | US Peace Council

The leaked Clinton email confirms that what they did and continue to do in Libya is the fulfillment of this hit list:

France's Client and Gaddafis Gold:

From: Sidney Blumenthal

To: Hillary Clinton
Date: 2011-04-01 21:00

Subject: FRANCES CLIENT & QADDAFIS GOLD

UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05785522 Date: 01/07/2016

RELEASE IN FULL CONFIDENTIAL April 2, 2011

For: Hillary
From: Sid
Re: Frances client & Qaddafis gold

A high ranking official on the National Libyan Council states that factions have developed within it. In part this
reflects the cultivation by France in particular of clients among the rebels. General Abdelfateh Younis is the leading
figure closest to the French, who are believed to have made payments of an unknown amount to him. Younis has
told others on the NLC that the French have promised they will provide military trainers and arms.

So far the men and materiel have not made an appearance. Instead, a few risk assessment analysts wielding
clipboards have come and gone. Jabril, Jalil and others are impatient. It is understood that France has clear
economic interests at stake. Sarkozys occasional emissary, the intellectual self-promoter Bernard Henri-Levy, is
considered by those in the NLC who have dealt with him as a semi-useful, semi joke figure.

Rumors swept the NLC upper echelon this week that Qaddafi may be dead or maybe not.

Qaddafi has nearly bottomless financial resources to continue indefinitely, according to the latest report we
have received:

On April 2, 2011 sources with access to advisors to Saif al-Islam Qaddafi stated in strictest confidence that while
the freezing of Libyas foreign bank accounts presents Muammar Qaddafi with serious challenges, his ability to
equip and maintain his armed forces and intelligence services remains intact.

According to sensitive information available to this these individuals, Qaddafis government holds 143 tons of
gold, and a similar amount in silver.

During late March, 2011 these stocks were moved to SABHA (south west in the direction of the Libyan border
with Niger and Chad); taken from the vaults of the Libyan Central Bank in Tripoli. This gold was accumulated prior
to the current rebellion and was intended to be used to establish a pan-African currency based on the Libyan
golden Dinar.

This plan was designed to provide , the Francophone African Countries with an alternative to the French
franc (CFA). (Source Comment: According to knowledgeable individuals this quantity of gold and silver is valued
at more than $7 billion.

French intelligence officers discovered this plan shortly after the current rebellion began, and this was one of the
factors that influenced President Nicolas

UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05785522

Date: 01/07/2016
 Sarkozys decision to commit France to the attack on Libya. According to these individuals Sarkozys plans are
driven by the following issues:

a. A desire to gain a greater share of Libya oil production,

b. Increase French influence in North Africa,

c. Improve his internal political situation in France,

d. Provide the French military with an opportunity to reassert its position in the world, address the concern of his
advisors over Qaddafis long term plans to supplant France as the dominant power in, Francophone Africa. )

On the afternoon of April 1, an individual with access to the National Libyan Council (NLC) stated in private that
senior officials of the NLC believe that the rebel military forces are beginning to show signs of improved discipline
and fighting spirit under some of the new military commanders, including Colonel Khalifha Haftar, the former
commander of the anti - Qaddafi forces in the Libyan National Army (LNA). According to these sources, units
defecting from Qaddafis force are also taking a greater role in the fighting on behalf of the rebels.

- Source

They were monitoring where the gold is heading, and they got what they wanted.

Fortunately for us, they were interrupted in Syria and Iran as the BRICS, and 180 more allied countries, decided to standup
to these few old men and women with kleptocratic and eugenics tendencies.

But it is extremely important to remind ourselves that the United Nations and mainstream media were complicit to all of
these high crimes committed against the sovereign people of Libya, and other countries.

We cannot afford to lower our guards however the covert NWO geopolitical game is played.

Libya: From Africas Richest State Under Gaddafi, To Failed State After NATO
Intervention

It has been five years since the Western-backed assassination of Libyas former president,
Muammar Gaddafi, and the fall of one of Africas greatest nations.
In 1967 Colonel Gaddafi inherited one of the poorest nations in Africa; however, by the time he was assassinated,
Gaddafi had turned Libya into Africas wealthiest nation. Libya had the highest GDP per capita and life expectancy
on the continent. Less people lived below the poverty line than in the Netherlands.

Related: Hillarys War Crime: The Murder of Muammar Gaddafi. We Came, we Saw, he Died.

After NATOs intervention in 2011, Libya is now a failed state and its economy is in shambles. As the governments control
slips through their fingers and into to the militia fighters hands, oil production has all but stopped.

The militias variously local, tribal, regional, Islamist or criminal, that have plagued Libya since NATOs intervention, have
recently lined up into two warring factions. Libya now has two governments, both with their own Prime Minister, parliament
and army.

On one side, in the West of the country, Islamist-allied militias took over control of the capital Tripoli and other cities and set
up their own government, chasing away a parliament that was elected over the summer.
Tripoli

On the other side, in the East of the Country, the legitimate government dominated by anti-Islamist politicians, exiled 1,200
kilometers away in Tobruk, no longer governs anything.

The fall of Gaddafis administration has created all of the countrys worst-case scenarios: Western embassies have all left,
the South of the country has become a haven for terrorists, and the Northern coast a center of migrant trafficking. Egypt,
Algeria and Tunisia have all closed their borders with Libya.

This all occurs amidst a backdrop of widespread rape, assassinations and torture that complete the picture of a state that is
failed to the bone.

America is clearly fed up with the two inept governments in Libya and is now backing a third force: long-time CIA
asset, General Khalifa Hifter, who aims to set himself up as Libyas new dictator.

Hifter, who broke with Gaddafi in the 1980s and lived for years in Langley, Virginia, close to the CIAs headquarters, where
he was trained by the CIA, has taken part in numerous American regime change efforts, including the aborted attempt to
overthrow Gaddafi in 1996.
In 1991 the New York Times reported that Hifter may have been one of 600 Libyan soldiers trained by American
intelligence officials in sabotage and other guerrilla skillsto fit in neatly into the Reagan Administrations eagerness to
topple Colonel Qaddafi.

Hifters forces are currently vying with the Al Qaeda group Ansar al-Sharia for control of Libyas second largest city,
Benghazi.

Ansar al-Sharia was armed by America during the NATO campaign against Colonel Gaddafi. In yet another example of the
U.S. backing terrorists backfiring, Ansar al-Sharia has recently been blamed by America for the brutal assassination of U.S.
Ambassador Stevens.
Hifter is currently receiving logistical and air support from the U.S. because his faction envision a mostly secular Libya open
to Western financiers, speculators, and capital.

Perhaps, Gaddafis greatest crime, in the eyes of NATO, was his desire to put the interests of local labour above foreign
capital and his quest for a strong and truly United States of Africa.

In fact, in August 2011, President Obama confiscated $30 billion from Libyas Central Bank, which Gaddafi had
earmarked for the establishment of the African IMF and African Central Bank.

In 2011, the Wests objective was clearly not to help the Libyan people, who already had the highest standard of living in
Africa, but to oust Gaddafi, install a puppet regime, and gain control of Libyas natural resources.
He may not have been a Saint, but for over 40 years, Gaddafi promoted economic democracy and used the
nationalized oil wealth to sustain progressive social welfare programs for all Libyans. Under Gaddafis rule,
Libyans enjoyed not only free health-care and free education, but also free electricity and interest-free loans.

Now thanks to NATOs intervention the health-care sector is on the verge of collapse as thousands of Filipino health workers
flee the country, institutions of higher education across the East of the country are shut down, and black outs are a common
occurrence in once thriving Tripoli.

One group that has suffered immensely from NATOs bombing campaign is the nations women. Unlike many other
Arab nations, women in Gaddafis Libya had the right to education, hold jobs, divorce, hold property and have an
income. The United Nations Human Rights Council praised Gaddafi for his promotion of womens rights.

When the colonel seized power in 1969, few women went to university. Today, more than half of Libyas university students
are women. One of the first laws Gaddafi passed in 1970 was an equal pay for equal work law.

Nowadays, the new democratic Libyan regime is clamping down on womens rights. The new ruling tribes are tied to
traditions that are strongly patriarchal.

Also, the chaotic nature of post-intervention Libyan politics has allowed free reign to extremist Islamic forces that see gender
equality as a Western perversion.
Five years ago, NATO declared that the mission in Libya had been one of the most successful in NATO history.

Truth is, Western interventions have produced nothing but colossal failures in Libya, Iraq, and Syria.

Lest we forget, prior to western military involvement in these three nations, they were the most modern and secular states in
the Middle East and North Africa with the highest regional womens rights and standards of living.

A decade of failed military expeditions in the Middle East has left the American people in trillions of dollars of debt. However,
one group has benefited immensely from the costly and deadly wars: Americas Military-Industrial-Complex.

Building new military bases means billions of dollars for Americas military elite. As Will Blum has pointed out, following the
bombing of Iraq, the United States built new bases in Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Oman and Saudi
Arabia.

Where in the World is the US Military?

Following the bombing of Afghanistan, the United States is now building military bases in Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan
and Tajikistan.

Following the recent bombing of Libya, the United States has built new military bases in the Seychelles, Kenya, South
Sudan, Niger and Burkina Faso.

Given that Libya sits atop the strategic intersection of the African, Middle Eastern and European worlds, Western control of
the nation, has always been a remarkably effective way to project power into these three regions and beyond.

NATOs military intervention may have been a resounding success for Americas military elite and oil companies but for the
ordinary Libyan, the military campaign may indeed go down in history as one of the greatest failures of the 21st century.

"Dont Repeat That To Anybody" - Hillary Clinton And Donna Brazile Personally
Implicated + The Presstitutes Have Set Up The Election To Be Stolen
October 28 2016 | From: Zerohedge / PaulCraigRoberts / Various

Last week, Jame O'keefe and Project Veritas Action potentially altered the course of the U.S.
election, or at a minimum raised serious doubts about the practices of the Clinton campaign and
the DNC, after releasing two undercover videos that revealed efforts of democrat operatives to
incite violence at republican rallies and commit "mass voter fraud."
While democrats have vehemently denied the authenticity of the videos, two democratic operatives, Robert
Creamer and Scott Foval, have both been forced to resign over the allegations.

Related: Rigged: Twelve Ways the Two-Party Tyranny Rigs the US Electoral System to Block Out Independents,
Small Parties, and 70% of the Eligible Voters

Many democrats made the rounds on various mainstream media outlets over the weekend in an attempt to debunk the
Project Veritas videos. Unfortunately for them, O'Keefe fired back with warnings that part 3 of his multi-part series was
forthcoming and would implicate Hillary Clinton directly.

Now, we have the 3rd installment of O'Keefe's videos which does seemingly reveal direct coordination between Hillary
Clinton, Donna Brazile, Robert Creamer and Scott Foval to organize a smear campaign over Trump's failure to release his
tax returns.
Per Project Veritas:

"Part III of the undercover Project Veritas Action investigation dives further into the back room dealings of
Democratic politics. It exposes prohibited communications between Hillary Clintons campaign, the DNC and the
non-profit organization Americans United for Change.

And, its all disguised as a duck. In this video, several Project Veritas Action undercover journalists catch
Democracy Partners founder directly implicating Hillary Clinton in FEC violations.

In the end, it was the candidate, Hillary Clinton, the future president of the United States, who wanted
ducks on the ground, says Creamer in one of several exchanges. So, by God, we would get ducks on the
ground.

It is made clear that high-level DNC operative Creamer realized that this direct coordination between Democracy
Partners and the campaign would be damning when he said: Dont repeat that to anybody.

Within the video both Clinton and Brazile are directly implicated by Creamer during the following exchange:

"The duck has to be an Americans United for Change entity. This had to do only with some problem between
Donna Brazile and ABC, which is owned by Disney, because they were worried about a trademark
issue. That's why. It's really silly.

We originally launched this duck because Hillary Clinton wants the duck.

In any case, so she really wanted this duck figure out there doing this stuff, so that was fine. So, we put all these
ducks out there and got a lot of coverage. And Trump taxes. And then ABC/Disney went crazy because they
thought our original slogan was 'Donald ducks his taxes, releasing his tax returns."

They said it was a trademark issue. It's not, but anyway, Donna Brazile had a connection with them and she
didn't want to get sued. So we switched the ownership of the duck to Americans United for Change and
now our signs say 'Trump ducks releasing his tax returns.' And we haven't had anymore trouble."

As Project Veritas points out, this direct coordination between Clinton, Brazile and Americans United For Change is a
violation of federal election laws:

"The ducks on the ground are likely 'public communications' for purposes of the law. It's political activity
opposing Trump, paid for by Americans United For Change funds but controlled by Clinton/her campaign."

Here is the full video just released:

As a reminder, below are parts 1 & 2 of the Project Veritas series in case you missed them.

Video 1 revealed DNC efforts to incite violence at Trump rallies:

Video 2 provided the democrat playbook on how to committ "mass voter fraud":

The Presstitutes Have Set Up The Election To Be Stolen

Over the course of its history, the New York Times has reported on many American elections that
have been rigged or stolen or are suspected of having been being rigged or stolen. For example,
as a supporter of the black civil rights movement, the NY Times has many stories in its archives of
elections rigged by disenfranchisement of black voters.

But this was when the NY Times was an independent voice before it became a whore for the Oligarchs who rule
America. When the NY Times reported that black Americans could have no confidence in the integrity of American
elections, the NY Times did not denounce itself for delegitimizing American democracy.

Related: What Is At Stake In The Election - Paul Craig Roberts

The NY Times forgot all of this when it published Max Fishers article yesterday. Fisher fished up scholars among the
Hillary advocates, and they obligingly told him that Trumps questioning of the integrity of American elections were the
tactics of a would-be dictator who is at work delegitimizing democracy so that he can take over.

What Fisher and his scholars overlook is that the US government is already delegitimized in the eyes of the American
population, as well as foreign populations.

If the US government was not already delegitimized, Donald Trump would not have been successful in what, despite
Trumps damnation by the presstitutes, was an easy sweep-aside of the Establishments candidates for the Republican
presidential nomination.
Aerial photos show how downtown Detroit has been turned into a tiny urban island, surrounded by abandoned housing blocks

The US government is delegitimized, not only in the eyes of Americans, but also in the eyes of most of the world. Millions of
Americans have lost their jobs, their careers, their hopes, because corrupt bought-and-paid-for-Washington enabled
Globalism to send the futures of the American people to China and India.

Millions of Americans lost their homes, because the corrupt Federal Reserve came down on the side of five banks too big
to fail at the expense of the American people.

Millions of Americans along with much of the world know that the US government has been slaughtering millions
of peoples in seven countries based on lies, wasting not only countries and the lives of millions of peoples, but
trillions of American dollars that Americans needed for their welfare.

Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction. Assad did not use chemical weapons.

Gaddafi was innocent of all the absurd charges that Washington used to destroy Libya, a country that had the most
progressive social system on earth.

Russia did not invade Ukraine.

The Taliban had nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11.

Yet countries are in ruins because of Washingtons war crimes justified by transparent lies.

If the NY Times does not know this, the organization is too stupid to justify its existence. Of course the Times knows it. But
the NY Times is no longer a newspaper. It is a cog in the Ministry of Propaganda that works to create a Matrix in which
brainwashed Americans accept the dictates of the Oligarchs.
The purpose of the Times article is to discredit in advance criticism of an election that the ruling Oligarchs intend to steal. If
the Times believed that Hillary would have a clear election victory, there would be no point to Fishers article.

We see voluminous signs of the intended theft of the election.

For example, Hillarys lead in the polls is based on the pollsters skewing the affiliation of those polled to Democrats. The
percentage of Democrats in the samples is far higher than their percentage of registered voters.

Related: This Is How WaPo's Latest Poll Gave Hillary A 12 Point Advantage Over Trump

It the past it was difficult to steal elections unless they were very close. Exit polls were a check on vote count, and the
disenfranchisement of blacks could be risky if it attracted the attention of the US Department of Justice.
The new method, which is unfolding before our eyes, steals the election in advance with the Oligarchs candidate far ahead
in the polls (now by 12 points according to the latest fiction) and by making anyone who questions the faked results into a
fascist dictator.

Obviously, if Hillary was really ahead by 12 points - a landslide - there would be no need for Fishers article or for the
constant drumbeat against Trump.

Judging from the hysteria, as reflected in Fishers NY Times article, for example, the Oligarchs are aware that objections to
their rule have elevated Trump.

In order to hold on to power, the American Oligarchs must smash Trump and put their bought-and-paid-for-candidate, Hillary
- whom the Oligarchs have provided along with Bill a personal fortune of $120 million and endowed the Clinton Foundation
with $1,600 million - into the Oval Office.

Pollsters by nature of their business are unreliable.

If truthful results offend the establishment political organizations, the pollsters are out of work. Polls have to serve the
Oligarchs or the polling firms go down. Trump is an outsider toward whom the ruling Oligarchy is totally opposed, which is
why Americans support him.

Therefore, polling firms are adverse to betting their future on poll results favorable to Trump, especially when the whores
who constitute the American print and TV media, such as the NY Times, are all out to put Hillary in the White House.

As Hillarys public statements have made clear, Hillary is antagonistic toward Russia and the Russian government, calling
the president of Russia the new Hitler. She promises conflict with Russia, which would certainly be nuclear and end life on
earth.
Trump says in the face of contrary ruling neoconservative opinion that he sees no point in conflict with Russia and no point
in NATOs continued existence a quarter century after the purpose of NATO collapsed with the Soviet Union.

Trump might not be successful in appointing a government that serves his instincts, but at least he gives us hope of avoiding
military conflict with Russia and China. With Hillary there is no hope whatsoever.

My opinion is that the world would not survive Hillarys first term. I have known the neoconservatives since the
1970s. They are crazed fanatics, and they hate Russia. Hillary is their agent.

It is unclear that the Russian government understands, or takes seriously, the neoconservative ideology of US world
hegemony. Putins hesitant, indecisive behavior in Syria has done more to set himself and Russia up for demonization than
to defeat ISIS.

Related: By Cooperating With Washington On Syria Russia Walked Into A Trap

The Western world is corrupt and evil. The list of its victims is almost endless. What disconnect makes some Russians
desire association with the Western world?

How the Media and Democrats Rig the Perception of Trump

Democratic heads roll after video shows agitators planted at Trump rallies

The Orchestrated Trump-Putin Connection

Leaked emails prove that the Trump-Putin connection was orhestrated as campaign talk
to deflect attention from damaging content of Clintons released emails.

Slaughter Donald for Putin bromance: #Podesta15 emails reveal ISIS strategy diversion for Clinton

Integrity Of US Elections Among Lowest Of All Countries

According to Shyla Nelson, the co-founder of Election Justice USA, US elections are manipulated in many ways, including
voter suppression, unauthorized registration purges, district gerrymandering, gross exit poll variances, the privatization of
voting machinery, and the lack of transparency in ballot processing our elections will continue to rank among the lowest in
the world in integrity.
US elections are so corrupt that the US has threatened Russian diplomats with arrest if they attempt to monitor the US
November presidential election.

US Gives Another Reason to Believe Its Democracy Is Deeply Flawed

Bill Clintons Rape Victims (the ones we know about)

Juanita isn't the only one: Bill Clinton's long history of sexual violence against women dates back some 30 years

But we must not tolerate Trumps lewd comments.

Bill and Hillary are lawless because they have never been held accountable. As the justice system has given Hillary a pass,
will voters hold her accountable in November, or will the American public also give her a pass?

Hillary Has Never Been Held Accountable For Anything

What is worse, Hillary laughing about her success in getting a child rapist off or Trumps lewd comments about women?
Why is it that the TV women cant come up with the right answer? How can democracy function when a propaganda ministry
takes the place of the media?

'I never trusted a polygraph again': Hillary Clinton LAUGHS in 30-year-old interview as she recalls how she helped
a suspected child rapist walk free after the prosecution lost crucial evidence

Exclusive: Hillary Clinton Took Me Through Hell, Rape Victim Says

A Comparison of Trumps and Hillarys Crowds

Trumps crowds are hundreds of times larger than Hillarys, so how is it that she is
in the lead? We are being told lies in order to cover up the coming election theft.

Donald Trump vs. Hillary Clinton Rally Crowds

 Poll of Likely Voters Finds 53% Want Hillary Indicted

If 53% of voters want Hillary indicted, how can she be leading in the presidential race?

Which of the polls is wrong?

Most Americans want Hillary indicted for email scandal poll

Rigged Elections Are An American Tradition

Rigged Elections Are An American Tradition

Trump's Speech to the New World Order

Related Articles:

SHOCKING Report Documents Massive Election Theft by the Democrats

Former Ohio Governor Triggered By Questions About Voter Fraud

Putin Just Exposed US Election Rigging By Trolling The State Dept. In The Most Hilarious Way

'Rigged' Debates? Questions Arise Again Over Lighted Screen At Hillary's Podium

New Podesta Email Exposes Playbook For Rigging Polls Through "Oversamples"

Trump: Democrats Are Rigging The Polls

Media Rigging Polls To Suppress Voter Turnout!

Proof Media Is Working For Hillary To Steal The Election

New Wikileaks Confirm Media Rigging Polls For Hillary

Clinton Campaign Admits Making False Claims Against Trump

How To Stop Election Fraud

Destroying Election Integrity By Executive Order

Calibration error changes GOP votes to Dem in Illinois county

North Carolina voters report voting machines switching their votes to GOP candidate

Voting Machine in Chicago Switches Republican Votes into Democratic Votes

After Obama Attacked Trup, Trump Pulled Out His Secret Weapon & Shot Back

Texas County Switches to Paper Ballots after Electronic Voting Glitches

 Top Clinton Ally Caught Accepting $20k Foreign Donation

More Reports of Votes Flipping From Trump to Clinton in Texas

Video: Hillary Supporters Beg For Election Fraud

Trump Warns Of Vote Flipping On Machines

ABC Poll Oversamples Dems by 9%, Claims Hillary Leading

Ignoring The Law To Rig Elections

Donald Trump Has Won The 2016 Presidential Election

Donald Trump Lays Out Historic Plan For First 100 Days In Office: End Corruption,
Stop The Crooks In Washington And Unleash Economic Abundance For America
October 27 2016 | From: NaturalNews / Various

For anybody who is still dopey enough to swallow the Cabal's embarassingly desperate Hillary
Clinton propaganda that is being heaved about by the pathetic Western mainstream meda, this is
going to be one hell of a wake up call...

Donald J. Trump just delivered an historic speech that lays out his plan for the first 100 days in office. [These
statements have the establishment Cabal in a mad panic].

Related: Donald Trump Exposes Globalist Control & Criminal Clintons Live In Florida Speech + All-Out Effort To
Destroy Trump Proves He's Not Part Of The Establishment
Highlights are listed here. Actual quotes from Donald Trump:

"The system is totally rigged and broken."

"The dishonest mainstream media is a major part of this corruption. They lie and fabricate stories to
make a candidate that is not their preferred choice look as bad and as dangerous as possible....

They're trying desperately to suppress my vote and the voice of the American people...

They're trying to poison the mind of the American voter."

"If they can fight somebody like me, who has unlimited resources, just imagine what they can do to
YOU...'

"The rigging of the system is designed for one reason: to keep the corrupt establishment and the special
interests in power at your expense."

"We will never solve our problems by relying on the same politicians who created these problems in the
first place. Hillary Clinton is running against all the American people..."

"[This 100-day plan is] a contract between Donald J. Trump and the American voter... to bring honestly,
accountability change to Washington D.C."

"We will drain the swamp in Washington D.C. and replace it with a new government of, by and for the
People."

"This is my pledge to you. If we follow these steps, we will once more have a government of, by and for
the people. We will make America great again."

This Video Could Win The Election For Trump

A. Six Groundbreaking Political Reforms that Will End Corruption in Washington

1. A constitutional amendment to impose term limits on all members of Congress.

2. A hiring freeze on all federal employees, exempting military, public safety and public health.

3. A requirement that for every new federal regulations, two existing regulations must be eliminated. "Regulations are
killing our country and our jobs..."

4. A five year ban on White House and congressional officials becoming lobbyists after they leave government. service.

5. A lifetime ban on White House officials lobbying on behalf of a foreign government.

 6. A complete ban on foreign lobbyists raising money for American elections.

Former FBI Assistant Director Endorses Trump Our Constitution is At Stake!

James Kallstrom, former Assistant Director of the FBI offered a passionate endorsement of Trump on Stuart Varneys show
this week. Hes deeply concerned about the direction our country is going in.

Heres a partial transcript:

Ex-FBI Assistant Director Makes First-Ever Political Endorsement for Trump With Emotional Plea to America

"Im endorsing Donald Trump. Ive know him 40 years. Ive never endorsed a candidate. Hes a good human being.
Hes a generous person.

Hes got a big heart. Hes done hundreds and hundreds of things for people without fanfare. Hes a good guy. Hes
a patriot of this country.

And regardless of what he says, his acts show that he is not that person. Hes been in this Hollywood crowd that
talks like that, a lot of people talk like that.

He doesnt do these things. Hes a good guy. Ive known his family from the time they were kids. Look at his
children. Could you find a better family than he brought up in this country?

He is not a fan of Hillary Clinton.

He's absolutely right. This election really is that serious.

B. Seven Actions to Protection American Workers

1. Totally renegotiate NAFTA, "one of the first deals out country has ever made."

2. Announce withdrawal from the TPP, "a potential disaster for our country."

3. Direct the Secretary of the Treasury to label China a currency manipulator. "What they have done to us by playing [with]
currency is very sad... I blame our politicians for letting this take place."

4. Direct the Secretary of Commerce to identity all foreign trading abuses that unfairly impact American workers, and to
use "every tool" under American law to end those abuses.

5. Lift restrictions on production of $50 trillion worth of job-producing American energy reserves, including shale, oil, natural
gas and clean coal. "And we will put our miners back to work."

6. Lift Obama / Clinton roadblocks that allow this vital energy infrastructure projects to go forward. "We're going to allow
the Keystone pipeline ... to move forward."

7. Will cancel billions in payments to UN climate change programs and use the money to fix America's water and
environmental infrastructure.
 Jon Voight Just Destroyed Hillary Clinton, George Soros, and Robert Deniro

Jon Voight has a message that every American needs to hear, and it is all about how important this election is. And trust
me, folks, he didnt hold ANYTHING back!

In his Plea to save America, Voight tackles all the biggest issues facing America including:

Dangerous Refugees, Obamas failed Presidency, No Jobs , Robert De Niro being a Hillary shill, Freedom of religion
under attack, George Soros selling Jews to Nazis, and Hillary Making the Supreme Court Socialist

And that list is just the half of it folks. Trust me when I say, you just gotta see this one for yourself

See what I mean? Pretty great rant if you ask me.

Plus, its good to see at least 1 major A-list actor supporting Donald Trump this election (sorry Scott Baio). I guess Hillarys
money doesnt buy off everyone.

So thank you, Jon Voight, for believing in America enough to put yourself and your career at risk to make a difference. We
hope more Americans can be inspired by the great work you do.

Related: 'May God protect the real truth and may Donald Trump win this presidency': Jon Voight issues 'plea to
save America' and lashes out at Robert De Niro AGAIN

C. Five actions to restore security and constitutional rule of law in America

1. Cancel every unconstitutional executive order and action issued by Obama.

2. Begin the process of selecting a replacement for Justice Scalia.

3. Cancel all federal funding for sanctuary cities.

4. Remove two million criminal illegal immigrants from the country, and cancel visas to foreign countries that won't take
them back.

5. Suspend immigration from terror prone regions where vetting cannot safetly occur.

Donald Trump vs. Hillary Clinton Rally Crowds

D. Substantial tax policy changes that will create jobs, simplify tax forms and reduce taxes on the
middle class by up to 35%
1. Reduce taxes for the middle class. "The largest tax reductions are for the middle class... they have been forgotten. The
middle class family with two children will get ... a 35% tax cut."

2. The number of tax brackets will be reduced from 7 to 3. Tax forms will be greatly simplified.

3. The business rate will be lowered from 35% to 15% and the trillions of dollars in corporate money overseas will be
brought back at a 10% rate. (This will allow businesses to invest in American operations that will create millions of new
jobs.)
 4. End the offshoring act, establish tariffs to discourage companies from laying off their workers and relocating to foreign
countries.

Side comment: We are going to work on fixing the VA hospital problem. "We have illegal immigrants that are treated far
better than our veterans."

Donald Trump Roasts Hillary Clinton

Donald Trump just beat Hillary Clinton right where it hurts tonight. This video needs to be seen by everyone. Seriously. This
video will go down in history. Donald Trump walked out on stage and said something that will change the election forever!

E. Donald Trump's Proposed Acts for Serious Reform

1. Infrastructure Reinvestment Act would restore investment in our domestic infrastructure (bridges, roads, water systems).

2. School Choice and Education Opportunity Act will give parents the right to send their child to the schools of their
choice. "We're going to end Common Core and bring education supervision to local communities... Our current system is not
working." We will expand vocational and technical education, and make 2- and 4-year colleges more affordable.

3. Repeal and Replace Obamacare Act: Fully repeal Obamacare and replace it with health savings accounts. The ability to
purchase health insurance across state lines (to create competition), and let states manage Medicaid funds. Reforms will
include cutting the red tape at the FDA. We want to speed the approval of lifesaving medications.

4. Affordable Childcare and Elder Care Act would allow caregivers to deduct care costs from their taxes. Creates tax free
dependent care savings accounts.

5. End Illegal Immigration Act: Fully funds the construction of a wall on our southern border, with the understanding that
the country of Mexico will be reimbursing the United States for the full cost. Establishes 2-4 year mandatory prison
sentences for those illegally re-entering the USA if they have multiple prior deportations or felony convictions.

6. Restoring Community Safety Act: Creates a task force on violent crime, increases funding for programs to train and
assist local police. "Put violent offenders behind bars or out of our country..."

7. Restoring National Security Act: Rebuilds our military by eliminating the defense sequester and expanding military
investment. "Peace through strength... we need a strong military." It also provides our veterans with the ability to receive
public VA treatment or visit a private doctor of their choice.

Additional comment: "We are going to protect our vital infrastructure from cyber attack."

8. Clean up Corruption in Washington Act: Enact new ethics reforms to reduce corrupting influence of special interests and
donors.

Stay informed at Trump.news and Newstarget.com

Watch the Full Speech Here: Donald Trump Delivers Historic Speech in Gettysburg, PA 10/22/16

Related: Trump could be First in History to Win all 50 States according to Linguistic Genius

Related Articles:
 Trump Cleveland Rally Has 1.7 MILLION Views Hillary Cleveland Rally has 3,825 Views

Mainstream Media Losing Power to Stop Trump

THE WIKILEAKS LIST: At Least 65 MSM Reporters Were Meeting / Coordinating Offline with Top Hillary Advisors

Statement on Hillary Clintons Deliberate Incitement of Violence at Trump Rallies

Media plotting with Clinton operatives to gun down democrats and blame it on Trump

At Trump Rally In PA, WOMEN FOR TRUMP Signs Are Everywhere!

Man Behind Brexit Issues Warning For America

Why The Nobel Peace Prize Is A Complete Joke

October 27 2016 | From: TrueActivist

Numerous war criminals, such as Barack Obama and Henry Kissinger, have won the Nobel Peace
Prize over the years, which seems fitting as Alfred Nobel himself was known as the merchant of
death.

2016 Nobel Peace Prize Winner, Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos, and 2009 Nobel Peace Prize Winner, US President Barack Obama
have both been responsible for tens of thousands of civilian deaths

Since its founding in 1901, the Nobel Peace Prize has ostensibly been the most prestigious international
award recognizing those who have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition
or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.

However, the Norwegian committee, which chooses the peace prize winner annually, uses no formal definition of peace
and has been criticized for the politicizing the award numerous times.

Peace certainly was not a fort of Alfred Nobel, the Swedish arms dealer who created the prizes which bear his name.

Nobel invented dynamite in 1867 and was the owner of Bofors AB, a steel producer that Nobel transformed into a major
manufacturer of cannons and other weapons.
Today, what remains of Bofors is owned by Saab AB and United Defense Industries. His reputation during his lifetime was
so notorious that newspapers labeled him the merchant of death due to the massive wealth he received;

"Finding ways to kill more people faster than ever before.

Perhaps, it is no surprise then that the Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded to several war criminals over the course of its
115-year history.

Past winners of the Nobel Peace Prize include Henry Kissinger, former US secretary of State as well as Shimon Peres,
a founding father of Israel who was largely responsible for their covert nuclear program.
Peres

Kissingers award was especially controversial as two members of the Nobel committee resigned in protest. Kissinger
received the award in 1973 alongside Le Duc Tho, of North Vietnam, for the peace agreement ending the Vietnam War.

Le Duc Tho refused to accept the award alongside Kissinger, claiming that the peace agreement was a sham. Kissinger,
that same year, had organized a bloody coup in Chile, which overthrew the democratically elected president Salvador
Allende and replaced him with brutal dictator Augusto Pinochet, who went on to rule for 17 years.

This years winner of the Nobel peace prize, Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos, is the head of one of Colombias
wealthiest families and, as president, has overseen the genocide of Colombias largest indigenous group, the Wayu. This
genocide has resulted in the death of 14,000 children in only 5 years.
Pinochet

Yet, the peace prize winner whose actions have most flagrantly belittled all that the prize purports to stand for is current US
president Barack Obama. In 2009, Obama was awarded the prize for Obamas promotion of nuclear nonproliferation and for
Obamas outreach to the Muslim world.

Even Obama expressed that he felt undeserving of the award and used his acceptance speech to promote the decidedly
Orwellian idea of a just war.

Obamas outreach to the Muslim world has since materialized in the form relentless bombing campaigns in 7 Muslim
countries, which have caused tens of thousands of civilian casualties, as well as the rise of terror groups such
as ISIS and Al-Nusra, which have benefited handsomely from US arms deals.
In addition, Obamas promotion of nuclear nonproliferation resulted in Obamas plan announced this January
to modernize the US nuclear arsenal at a cost of $1 trillion over the next 30 years as well as the likelihood of nuclear war
with Russia higher than ever.

Obama has also overseen the countrys largest arms deal with Saudi Arabia, funder of ISIS and murderer of Yemeni
civilians, with over $115 billion arms sold over his 8 years as president.

It seems that Obama, perhaps more than any other questionable recipient of the award, fully displays the
schizophrenic nature of the Nobel Peace Prize the public promotion of peace alongside a dark, sinister history of
promoting and profiting from war.

Syria Story Is A Fools Paradise

October 26 2016 | From: PeterDrew

George W Bush was infamous for the many comically calamitous lines he delivered during his
presidency. But one quote he delivered, albeit very poorly, was in fact a very poignant line and one
that could not be more applicable right now in Syria: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice,
shame on me.
What about fool me thrice? How can the architects of the current holocaust in Syria possibly think that they can
fool the public with the same card trick three times in a row?

Related: I Am A Syrian Living In Syria: It Was Never A Revolution Nor A Civil War: The Terrorists Are Sent By Your
Government

Manufactured regime change in Iraq, then in Libya, and now in the sixth year of desperately attempting the same
thing in Syria.

On each occasion, the leader of those nations has been portrayed by the West as tyrants who are slaughtering their own
people and who must be overthrown, either directly or indirectly for the good of democracy in the world, no matter how many
innocent people get killed in achieving that noble goal.

Under the Geneva Convention it is an international war crime to launch military action against another nation for the
purposes of regime change. Under the Geneva Convention, Iraq and Libya are clear war crimes and have been legally
declared as such through numerous legitimate legal channels.
The Geneva Convention

If the Nuremburg trials were being held tomorrow, both George W Bush and Barrack Obama would be as guilty as all the
others war criminals on trial at Nuremburg. Both Iraq and Libya have been totally destroyed as nations, and illegal regime
change achieved by the West. Likewise Syria is all about Western driven regime change.

Anyone who doubts that Iraq, Libya, and Syria have not been meticulously targeted by Western political and military powers
for systematic regime change need look no further than two very publicly available pieces of information. Firstly, the report
published in September 2000 by PNAC (Project for a New American Century).
PNAC was a Washington think tank headed up by leading Neo-Conservatives, many of whom would take up leading
positions in the Bush Administration the following year. Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld are two of the more recognised
names.

The purpose of PNAC was to look at how the United States could most strongly position itself in the world in the 21st
century.

The 2000 PNAC report clearly outlined the need for a very different power structure across the Middle East, new
government regimes who would be more compliant to US interests, and for the United States to have a much stronger
influence and military presence there, including military bases.

Related: What Washington Really Wants in Syria

However, it also clearly stated that the public would not easily support aggressive military action in the Middle East aimed at
regime change, which could make it very difficult to take the public with them.
 "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent
some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor...

The events of 9/11 exactly one year later gave the PNAC Neoconservatives that catastrophic and catalysing event
and the opportunity they were seeking. The second important piece of information regarding what is really happening
with the Middle East holocaust occurred shortly after 9/11.

In December 2001, 4-Star General Wesley Clarke made a visit to the Pentagon during which he was informed that there
was a plan for the United States to invade Iraq, even though they knew there was nothing at all tying Iraq to 9/11.

He was also told that this was part of an overall plan of invading and bringing down the governments of seven
Middle East countries in five years.

Related: British Parliament Confirms Libya War Was Based On Lies - Turned Nation Into a Shit Show - Spread
Terrorism

Those 7 countries being Iraq, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, Sudan, Somalia, and Iran.

In 2007 General Clarke went public about this and his speech can be seen here.

"Weve got a good military and we can take down governments Are we still going to war with Iraq?

"He said, its worse than that... this is a memo that describes how were going to take down seven countries in five
years starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off with Iran

So, just like Iraq and Libya, regime change by Western powers has always been the plan for Syria.

Everything in Syria has been manufactured by the West in just the same way as the sexed up dossiers about
weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

Just the same as the manufactured public uprising and rebellion was orchestrated in Libya to provide public legitimisation
for bombing Libya back to the stone ages allowing the assassination of its President and the overthrow of the government.
The chemical weapons attacks in Syria in 2013 were put forward by the West in exactly the same way as the
weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

Supposed conclusive proof that legitimised Western military intervention on humanitarian grounds.

The West demonised Assad for these grotesque attacks on his own people even though there were strong
indications and strong evidence that the chemical weapons attacks were in fact conducted by the rebel terrorist
groups and not the Syrian government.

No condemnation by the West of the possible role that the rebel forces could have played in these terrible crimes against
the innocent Syrian public.

Just blanket condemnation of President Assad and the Syrian government.

As with the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, no thought given to any other possible scenario, no matter how uncertain
the evidence was to support their position.

Just a continuation of the story that all the violence in Syria was being generated by the Syrian government against their
own people.

On the back of these supposed chemical attacks by the Syrian government, President Obama demanded that they now be
allowed to bomb Syria into oblivion as he had done in Libya two years earlier, and how his predecessor had done in Iraq.

British parliament however put paid to Obamas war cry on this occasion.
It was too much for the British public who were deeply scarred and feeling bitterly betrayed by Tony Blairs lies and
illegal destruction of Iraq.

With carpet bombing of the Syrian people by the West now off the table, a quick revising of plans was required to keep
Syrian regime change on the table. The narrative at the time from the West was of a mixture of the supposedly legitimate
Syrian peoples rebellion mixed in with other more radical groups.

However, within just a few months of the decision by British parliament to block the bombing option in Syria, the more
radical groups in Syria suddenly morphed into something which was reported by the West as being much more extreme and
was suddenly branded as ISIS.
Related: The Real Humanitarian Crisis Is Not Aleppo. The Crisis is Washington Losing its ISIS Mercenaries

A seemingly huge, global network of pure evil which had sprung up out of nowhere and was now a great threat to the whole
world. Since then it is ISIS that has provided the narrative for a massive escalation in the level of Western arming, funding,
and training of groups in Syria who are fighting the Assad regime.

These same rebel groups are now well known to be extreme radical terrorist groups affiliated to Al Qaeda such as Al
Nusra, and many of them coming from other countries such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
Not an internal uprising of the Syrian people for their freedom over tyranny as the Western powers keep telling the
world.

The West has literally been in military partnership with Al Qaeda and ISIS.

It is illegal regime change in Syria by the West through stealth.

Western powers supporting and facilitating radical extremist terrorist groups to do what the civilised world deems illegal and
immoral if done through more direct and more obvious means such as carpet bombing.
The PNAC report and General Clarkes testimony have made it very clear what the agenda is in the Middle East.

The official line for the public is that terrible things are going on in those countries, and for the good of the world and to
help spread democracy and freedom, the West must either bomb them to rubble and dust, or support the freedom fighters
to do it for them.

We know that Saddam Hussein, while clearly no saint, did not have any weapons of mass destruction and was not
a threat to the world.

Now more than one million innocent people are dead and a nation of 25 million people destroyed.

When the West started its massive bombing campaign of Libya in 2011 to help overthrow President Gaddafi and his
government, did they inform the public that Libya was actually the most advanced nation in Africa, was in the top 50
most advanced nations in the world, that it had free health care and free education, and that Nelson Mandela had
described President Gaddafi as the hero of Africa?
Above is an image from Libya. The other similar-looking images in this article are from Syria. Is it not interesting that wherever the Cabal-run US and
their Allies deploy 'democracy' - that these places always wind up looking very much the same...

Libya is now a basket case of a country run by brutal terrorist extremists.

Now in Syria we have the Assad government, who were legitimately and democratically re-elected to power in 2012 with
huge public support, being systematically demonised by the West in exactly the same way as President Gaddafi in Libya.

It would seem that all President Assad and the Syrian Army have been doing is defending themselves and the Syrian people
against radical extremist terrorists commonly referred to as ISIS and Al Qaeda, who have been proven to be recruited from
other countries and actively supported by Western military and intelligence.

Syria is under a massive multi-national external attack, not an internal civil war.
Related: The Boy In The Ambulance: US State Dept-Funded Groups Behind Latest 'Iconic Image' Designed To
Demonize Russia And Encourage Further Bloodshed In Syria

At the specific request of President Assad, Russia has joined with the Syrian Army to support them in that fight against ISIS
and their brutal attacks on the Syrian people.

As Russias current military intervention in Syria is at the official request of the Syrian government, it is legal under
international law.

All other current military action by other nations in Syria, including the United States, is illegal under international
law.

US Secretary of State John Kerry even admitted this himself recently when he was caught on microphone off air.
Related: Western Media Credibility In Free Fall Collapse: Case In Point: UN Peace Council: The US Media Is Lying
To The American people. The War In Syria Is Not A Civil War, It's A Proxy Invasion By The United States

"We dont have a basis (to intervene), our lawyers tell us, unless we have a UN Security Council Resolution which
the Russians can veto or unless we are under attack from folks or unless we are invited in.

Russia is invited in by the legitimate regime," said Kerry acknowledging the Assad governments stature under the
doctrines of international law.

- US Secretary of State John Kerry

Yet incredibly, despite this, Russia has now also been universally demonised by the West in a vicious propaganda smear
campaign and blamed for war crimes in Syria simply for supporting Syria defend itself against ISIS as requested by the
Syrian government.

When the world looks at the daily news of what is allegedly happening in Syria there is another important recent disclosure
that needs to be considered.

It has now been officially admitted that the Pentagon has more than a half billion dollar budget which it has been
using to engage the services of British PR company Bell Pottinger in the Middle East.
Aww, chemtrails

Bell Pottingers function is seemingly to create manufactured images and footage in the Middle East that supports
a specific political narrative.

Presumably this would be the narrative that the United States government wishes to portray to the world.

It would seem that the Pentagon is paying for fake news images and footage to be created and shown to the world for
political purposes.

The Pentagon is paying big money for Hollywood style theatre to be created and portrayed to the world as real
news.

The Bell Pottinger theatre news seems to go very much hand in hand with the incredible piece of legislation that President
Obama signed off in 2012.
The Smith-Mundt Modernization Act (H.R. 5736) overturned the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 which banned government
propaganda.

The passing of HR 5736 essentially made it legal for the United States government to broadcast fake news or deliberate
propaganda through the media for political purposes, and they have allocated a huge budget to the Pentagon to do just
that. We have entered a very different world here.

President Assad's Wife Tells it Like it Is

Source Article: Asma al-Assad gives first interview in 7 years

What is real news and what is manufactured theatre? When we see small Syrian children being pulled from the rubble from
the supposed attacks by the Syrian government, is this real or is it PR theatre to push the agenda set out by PNAC in
2000?

The systematic and illegal regime change that is being orchestrated across the Middle East as part of PNAC has
created a holocaust the likes of which hasnt been seen since World War 2.

The devastating humanitarian cost of this is bad enough. But the current situation has the potential to escalate into
something far greater and far more destructive on a global scale.
Related: Covert Hybrid WW3 Summary October 2016

The world is on a knife edge at the moment with tensions between the United States and Russia at an all-time critical level,
and with nuclear options not off the table.

Russia has drawn a line in the sand in Syria with regards the United States Project for a New American Century
because they know that the next step after Syria and Iran will be Russia.

So, with this in mind we would be wise to heed those wise words of George W Bush;

"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

The world cannot afford to fall for this card trick a third time in Syria.

The stakes are far too high.

Related Articles:

Pentagon Commandos Fighting vs. CIA Daesh Terrorists in Syria

Debunking the Western Medias Coverage of the War on Syria

Six points regarding the US' attempt to destroy Syria

CIA Drug Wars Could Explain Why Syrian Rebels, ISIS Violence Fuelled by Captagon Pills
The Ongoing Philippine Revolution Is Catching Fire: Rebellion Against Western NWO
Cabal
October 25 2016 | From: Geopolitics

Asians have learned a lot from its experience with Western intrusions over the last 300 years.
Theyve been duped and swindled of their historical assets, not just once, but multiple times
during this period, and all recent clandestine attempts at subverting the ongoing BRICS Alliance-
led global reformation for purposes of usurping again their growing geostrategic influence, have
all been averted.

For those who have been following this website from the very beginning, its very clear that our humble purpose is
to encourage the people to take tangible action towards individual emancipation.

Related: Regime Change In The Philippines

One cannot have real freedom without ever fighting for it. If others are claiming to be fighting it for you, it must be a scam.
And we have fallen victims to these people for the last several years.

Weve given them the benefit of the doubt, but most, if not all, of them fell short of our minimum expectations.

Historical Background

Asians have learned a lot from its experience with Western intrusions over the last 300 years. Theyve been duped and
swindled of their historical assets, not just once, but multiple times during this period, and all recent clandestine attempts at
subverting the ongoing BRICS Alliance-led global reformation for purposes of usurping again their growing geostrategic
influence, have all been averted.

The Corporation: History & Revolution

Hidden History of the Incredibly Evil Khazarian Mafia

The Khazarian Mafia 2.0

There is now a solid ASEAN regional consensus to repel all coercive interference from the outside, in parallel with its active
involvement in matters of combating terror in some parts of Mainland Eurasia.
Being of significant geostrategic importance to the US government, the recent unequivocal statement of pursuing an
independent foreign policy of the Duterte government has dealt a huge blow to the geopolitical ambitions of its former
colonial master.

Certainly, this would result to numerous attempts at assassinating the Philippine president, color revolution, or a military
coup, like what happened to at least five non-conformist leaders in the past.

More than a hundred years ago, we saw the assassination of the leader of the Katipunan who rose up to remove the
Spaniards, Gat. Andres Bonifacio, in the hands of the elitist Gen. Emilio Aguinaldo, just as the revolution was gaining the
upper hand.

This was preceded with a firing squad of Dr. Jose P. Rizal by the Jesuits, and followed by the CIA assassination via plane
crash of Ramon Magsaysay.
Emilio Aguinaldo

Consequently, Gen. Aguinaldo appointed himself as the 1st president of the new Philippine Republic. It turned out, Pres.
Aguinaldo was a puppet of the United States. His presidency marked the beginning of a systematic US plunder of the
country.

Fast forward to 1986, the combined Jesuit-CIA-Manila Oligarchy instigated the Yellow Revolution, which successfully
overthrow the Mascosian dictatorship which paved the way for an unhampered 15 years of massive privatization of
government-owned utilities, the most critical of which, i.e. energy generation, water supply, mass media, either went to
prominent families, or to some West-controlled corporations, where Vatican corporate fronts are also deeply invested until
now.
Between mid-1998 and early part of 2001, the poorest of the population saw a glimmer of hope under president Erap
Estrada, but the Oligarchy was quick enough to dislodge him through an impeachment, subsequently installing Gloria
Arroyo.

The latters term of office was itself put under constant Oligarchy threat when it was clear that China is threatening the local
monopolies with large investments in infrastructures and communications, the very same thing that the Duterte
administration is pursuing during his visit to China.

Pointing to his own experience, now Mayor Erap Estrada is warning his countrymen to see the bigger picture

In a telephone interview with The STAR, Estrada also called on Filipinos to support the Presidents war on drugs, despite
criticisms from the US and other Western nations.
 'The Philippines is a sovereign country. The US should not interfere with the purely internal affairs of the
Philippines, particularly on President Dutertes campaign against illegal drugs, Estrada said.

He recalled that when he was president, the US tried to meddle in his all-out war against the Moro Islamic Liberation Front
(MILF).

Estrada stressed its the Presidents duty to prevent the country from becoming a narco-state where drug lords dictate on
officials.

"What will happen if all the elected officials like governors, congressmen, mayors and others are funded by drug
lords? What will happen if we will allow narco-politics to reign in the country? These officials will be beholden to the
drug lords and they will just say, yes sir, yes sir, to all their orders and interest, Estrada said.

All peace-loving Filipinos should throw their all-out support to the campaign of the President against illegal drugs.
Not because the US is helping us, we will just allow it to interfere in our internal affairs. We are a sovereign
country. We have our own Constitution. The President is right with what he is doing, the mayor said.

In a statement released by the Manila Public Information Office (PIO), Estrada voiced his support for Dutertes veering
toward China. Unlike the US, China has never interfered in Philippine affairs, the former president said.
Related: Philippines not Cutting Ties with US

The Arroyo government would have installed, in cooperation with ZTE, Corp., a national internet broadband that covers the
entire country, but the PLDT-Globe duopoly sabotaged the whole plan using a crying patsy, Rodolfo Lozada, claiming he
was about to be assassinated for having known too much about the highly corrupt transaction.

This was later on proven to be of no basis by the Supreme Court, leading to the recent release of the now Congresswoman
Gloria M. Arroyo, while the former government employee cum crying patsy, Lozada, is now facing corruption lawsuits.

The skillful CIA-Vatican machinations about our local politics is at the core of our maldevelopment.

We are deliberately made to crawl on the mud in exchange for some American junk, and to make us constantly
subservient to the good graces of the Europeans. They have rigged the entire system, i.e. political, economics, education,
mass media, and cultural, gravely in favor for just one section of our society, i.e. Spanish mestizos, the descendants of the
conquistadors.

Most noticeably, these conquistadors have cornered 80% of the national budget for decades, making the infrastructure
projects to be concentrated only in Metro Manila and nearby provinces. Both the Visayas and Mindanao regions were
purposely left out.
The rise of a Duterte within that same corrupt exceptionalist system is a huge anomaly.

Until now, their own mass media and so called experts could not understand what just happened, and what will continue to
happen in the immediate future, unless they act again to prevent it.

They are reportedly planning to remove the president, but all attempts are unsuccessful so far. The 400 tycoons who went
with him to China is proof that the Oligarchy is disunited.

Being the first texting capital of the world, the nation immediately embraced the social media like a virus. The socio-political
consciousness immediately expanded like a firestorm.

Our own website statistics are showing that they are now ready to accept conspiracy theories, dig exotic technologies like
HAARP, and above all, they are now laughing at the Bobo, or stupid journalists fronting the mass media.

The Duterte Phenomenon 2016 is the Resumption of the Revolution in 1896

The campaign baller band worn by Duterte during the campaign period was auctioned and able to fetch P1 million from Mr. Johnny Sy, a
businessman attending the PH-China Business Meet and Greet event

Related: Dutertes State Visit to China is Oversubscribed, Makes U.S. Restless

True accounts about the Philippine Revolution against the Spaniards and the Americans in 1896 onwards are now being
shown on the big screens.

We need more movie producers doing the same materials so that offline audience can see the bigger picture of whats really
going on in the country.
The recent visit of the president to China which saw the signing of major investments on infrastructure projects and
telecommunications, which should enhance interisland physical and digital connectivity, something that the local Spanish
Oligarchy didnt want to happen ever, in pursuance to their continued divide and conquer strategy, since our Datu
Lapulapu cut off the head of the first European invader, Magellan.

The Duterte Phenomenon is breaking all established norms and challenging suppressive taboos from politics to religion.

Political correctness is being shattered one cuss word at a time.

The local Vatican infrastructure trembled when their money laundering, pedophilia and chronic hypocrisy were all exposed in
response to their church-wide campaign against Duterte prior to his election.

His academic failure earlier on is now serving him well. He wasnt properly institutionalized, that he can afford to think
independently from the norms, and even from his own cabinet secretaries who, like him, are all constantly hard at work.

His presidential family is the best team we ever have.

The mainstream media love to quote him literally, since they could do nothing better. Worse, these robots even went to
extreme lengths of splicing his long monologues, because the method serves their employers agenda.

But the people have learned a lot of their own history from the last 3 months, just by listening to many of his elaborate
diatribes against the Exceptionalist West.

Those off the cuff verbal retaliations, which are mere token summations of the peoples condemnation of all the
sufferings inflicted upon them for almost five centuries by the same people now criticizing the efforts to rid the
country of drugs, crimes and narco-politics, will continue to underscore the importance of taking real actions now
that we have the momentum.

Dutertes noisy strategy is working, the US State Department doesnt know how to respond.

If he is assassinated now, the world would at least know why. And so, in the last few days, nobody in the West
would have thought that he will do the unthinkable.

The Philippines will now chart its own course away from the corrosive diktats of the West, and as equal among nations on
Earth, which even China and Russia have expressed their own commitment not to intervene in any of its internal affairs, but
only in matters of mutual progressive developments and regional security.

This major pivot away from the 113-year old Western containment which, no matter what Dutertes lieutenant would say
afterwards, cannot be undone in the foreseeable future.

Yes, there may be some pockets of resistance to his radical decisions and pronouncements back home, but the merit of his
actions today can surely be felt later on. All visionaries like him know that.

In the meantime, his able lieutenants can only be more diplomatic to attenuate the full impact of the presidents statement

But we knew how the president went on to show Obama and the rest of the ASEAN leaders, some pictures from the US
Archives about how the US mercenaries massacred hundreds of women and children in the crater of Mt. Bud Dajo in
1906, only hours after he apologized for calling Obama a son of a bitch.

This means that once the other half of the population has gotten over with their Hollywood brainwashing, the country will be
able to complete its Pivot to BRICS in no time. This is, of course, not directed at the good people of America, but against the
foreign policies of their corporate government.

This ongoing Philippine Revolution, as inspired by the Duterte Phenomenon, will be long, and will be fought hard in honor of
those who died valiantly during the struggle of 1896 onwards, for the survival of the nation and the welfare of the next
generations.

Our only hope is for the rest of the world to see this as an inspiration to do something with what they already have right now.

The Philippine Revolution 2016 is Your Revolution, Too

Related: Dutertes China Visit a Turning Point

Even if we won this one, the enemy of humanity will just move on to the next target. The Western military industrial
complex is currently building a drone base in Africa.

That will be their next battleground, after their impending defeat here in Southeast Asia and the Middle East. The region has
been subjected to Ebola bioweapon attack earlier purposely to remove the population in areas of great importance to the
mining companies.

It is for this reason that all peoples around the world need to get on board now. We must seize the moment when
leaderships of highly populated and highly industrialized counties are rising up to the root cause of the worlds problem.

Dont ever think that nobody reads your social media post, because they will. And when you have struck the right
chord, it will spread like wildfire. And in time, youll see that your own little revolution will continue to grow much
larger than you would have ever imagined.
Most of all, remember that courage is contagious. You need only look at Duterte to see that this is already happening now
as more and more in the alternative media are catching up to the Duterte Phenomenon.

This has always been the case all throughout time. All it takes is one passionate visionary leader, and a few good generals
to change the course of history.

For some time now, we are seeing major yet covert military actions in the Middle East between two large factions
vying for planetary control.

This hybrid war being directed against the age old enemy of humanity is headed by visionaries who would rather act silently,
and just let the outcome do the talking afterwards.

While successfully keeping our common enemy constantly at the disadvantage, the rest of the population is mostly kept in
the dark.

When these silent visionaries are assassinated, nobody will know what they have done until theyre gone.

Who would have known outside of Libya that Mummar Kaddafi was a good leader, giving free healthcare, free education,
and a visionary for planning to use a gold-backed currency for Africa?

Related: Clintons Leaked eMails Confirm Libya Plunder by Killing Qaddafi

Imagine what a loud mouth like Dutertes could contribute to the efforts of China, Russia, and Iran in toppling the most
vicious, most arrogant US State Department and the Khazarian Criminals behind the facade.

So that, it wasnt really surprising at all when the Russian ambassador readily jumped at the latest opportunity to engage the
man constructively when Duterte said:
 'I will also go to Russia to talk to Putin and tell him that there are three of us against the world - China,
Philippines, and Russia. Its the only way.

Of course, hes not referring to the world, but the Old World Order.

Heres how the Philippine president can be very effective

' by directly taunting the CIA, as he did last week when he said You want to oust me? You want to use the
CIA? Go ahead, the president may have removed the favorite US short-cut of dealing with intransigent rulers.

The biggest threat to the US is the loss of the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement, reached under
Dutertes predecessor, which allows the US to rotate ships, aircraft, and personnel through five Philippines bases,
an arrangement seen as crucial to projecting U.S. military power on Chinas doorstep.

Meanwhile, every attempt by the U.S. to raise questions about Dutertes campaign against drugs, in which more
than 3,000 people have been killed since he took office in June, has only made him angrier: he has derided
Obama as a a son of bitch and said he should go to hell.

It doesnt seem to help to say anything because the minute you say something, he just lets loose his
barrage of obscenities, said Murray Hiebert, deputy director of the Southeast Asia Program at the Center for
Strategic and International Studies. I think for the U.S. to just blast him constantly is probably not very
effective.

Related: Obama Admin Stunned By Duterte: "The Minute You Say Something, He Lets Loose His Barrage Of
Obscenities"

Now, if he is constantly doing his thing, he might be able to wake more people up, encourage more countries to
join in the fold of the Reformists, and hopefully bring down the Khazarian Criminal Empire for good.

US Losing the Pivot to Asia Fulcrum

The geostrategic importance of the Philippines cannot be overestimated. It is a major doorway to Southeast Asia, where $5
trillion of physical trading passes by annually, and the fulcrum by which the Clinton Pivot to Asia doctrine was
formulated upon.

The Chinese government fully understood that, and the top officials of the Bank of China have acknowledged the same even
during the recent signing of the some 17 trade and infrastructure development agreements worth $24 billion, recently.

So that, it is so easy to speculate that since it is to Chinas geostrategic advantage to help develop the country, most
economic projects in the Philippines from here on will be underwritten by Bank of China, and to some degree by any of the
three BRICS infrastructure banks, i.e. Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank [AIIB], Silk Road Fund, New Development Bank
[NDB].

Any possible attacks of whatever form on the Philippines will be repelled from here on by this newly reestablished alliance,
as the Chinese have more to lose to the Western aggressors, than we are.
Indeed, we are already seeing this covert intervention most notably with the recent HAARP attack directed towards Luzon,
which could have inflicted the same damage as Typhoon Haiyan in late 2013, but have fizzled out right away without
significant loss of life, i.e. 13 casualties only as opposed to 8,000 in 2013.

Interestingly, the recent typhoon is said to be the most lightning filled storm according to one witness. It might be the
HAARP signals wrestling each other out, i.e. a separate HAARP signal can be directed at the eye of the storm, or the LPA,
to raise its temperature up and kill the storm.

Ultra-high HAARP voltage and low pressure gas with high moisture content wont go together nicely, hence the
lightning discharges.

Related: Keep Your Aid! Philippines to Obama

Moving Onwards

Our immediate concern now is his scheduled visit to Japan next week. Although hes very popular with the Japanese
people, the CIA might move to eliminate him while he is in the country. We know that there are already some movements
towards this direction, here and abroad.

We just hope that the Japanese people remember what had happened to them on March 2011, which is just a repeat of the
massively devastating attack on Indonesia which wiped out 120,000 lives in 2006.

Japan, for its part, is going for bilateral talks in settling their territorial dispute with China, as their visiting Foreign Minister
Fumio Kishida told Duterte early on.

When a CNN reporter asked Duterte, upon his arrival from China, who he prefers between Clinton and Trump, he
responded, My favorite hero is Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Vladimir Putin happens to have issued a very stern warning after the United States sabotage the last bilateral ceasefire

If the two countries China, and Russia could work together to provide security and ensure the Philippines military and
foreign policy separation from the United States, that would mean a total checkmate for the Khazarian Criminal Cabal here
in Asia, because the Chinese Navy is already in Vietnam just a day after Obamas recent cozying up with the Vietnamese
leader, as we have mentioned earlier.

Chinese military personnel will participate in activities with the Vietnamese navy and will also meet with Hanois provincial
leaders. This will be the last stop for the Chinese fleet on their way home after visiting Myanmar, Malaysia and Cambodia,
according to Senior Colonel Wang Hongli, commander of the task force.

Related: Chinese Naval Fleet Visits Vietnam Amid South China Sea Tensions

Jimmy Carter: The U.S. Isnt A Democracy, Its An Oligarchy + Evo Morales:
Imperialism And Capitalism Are The Root Causes Of Issues Humanity Is Facing
October 23 2016 | From: TrueActivist / Sott

The former U.S. president asserts that money controls politics in the U.S. and that both parties
greatly benefit from the system.
In case you missed it, former U.S. president Jimmy Carter appeared on the Thom Hartmann Program in 2015 and,
during the interview, stated that the political scheme in the United States is far from what it seems.

Carter stated that America is now an oligarchy in which unlimited political bribery has resulted in a total
subversion of the political system as a payoff to major contributors.

Related: The Overthrow Of America - By Its Enemies Within

It doesnt matter which party you support, he says. After all, both Democrats and Republicans look upon this unlimited
money as a great benefit to themselves, he asserts. His claim is supported by a study conducted by Princeton University,
which you can read about here:

Related: Princetons Study Confirms Americas Government: And its Not Democratic
A portion of the transcript follows:

HARTMANN: Our Supreme Court has now said, unlimited money in politics. It seems like a violation of principles of
democracy. Your thoughts on that?

CARTER: It violates the essence of what made America a great country in its political system. Now its just an oligarchy,
with unlimited political bribery being the essence of getting the nominations for president or to elect the president. And the
same thing applies to governors and U.S. senators and congress members.

So now weve just seen a complete subversion of our political system as a payoff to major contributors, who want and
expect and sometimes get favors for themselves after the elections over.

The incumbents, Democrats and Republicans, look upon this unlimited money as a great benefit to themselves.
Somebodys whos already in Congress has a lot more to sell to an avid contributor than somebody whos just a challenger.

Watch a clip from the interview below:

Related: The British Woke UP - Can The Americans?

Evo Morales: Imperialism And Capitalism Are The Root Causes Of Issues Humanity Is
Facing

The main objective of humanity should be "to eradicate" capitalism and imperialism,
recommended the Indigenous head of state.

On the International Day of Peace, Bolivian President Evo Morales condemned the imperialist and warmongering
policies of Israel and the United States during his address at the United Nations General Assembly in New York
Wednesday.

"Israel's warmongering policies are probably one of the most barbaric examples in the world," said
Morales, vigorously condemning Israeli attacks against Palestinian civilians.

"We have to stop the genocide against the Palestinians."

" As for the U.S., they must immediately end the blockade on Cuba and gave the island reparations", he said.

Imperialism and capitalism are the root causes of the issues humanity is facing in the 21st century, he added, and the main
objective of humanity should be "to eradicate" capitalism.

"Capitalism is the worse enemy of life and humanity, and of future generations; it destroys Mother Earth;
concentrates wealth the hands of a few; and generates extreme poverty," he told global leaders.

"If we don't build another system soon for society, we will replace sustainable development with sustainable
death," he warned.

"A lot of people in the world are either refugees or displaced, because of global warming or because of the
wars and conflicts, while more than 800 million people in the world are hungry," he stated.

"This is the face of capitalism."

"We condemn violence and terrorism but in order to address terrorism we must address the roots of this
plague: wealth is concentrated in the hands of a few: the greater the poverty and inequality, the greater the
discrimination, which encourages violence."

The leader highlighted that since Bolivia kicked out U.S. military bases, the fight against drug trafficking has significantly
improved, as the U.N. documented - contradicting what Washington argues.

"Terrorism and drug trafficking are twins that the North American empire uses in order to invade and
control the world, I am certain of that," he said.

"When the Drug Enforcement Agency was in Bolivia, only half of the drugs seized was incinerated, the
other was to get rich," he said, quoting information from military officials.

He also rejected the management of Luis Almagro as the head of the Organization of American States, "We don't need a
manager from the empire to govern us," he said, stressing that the existence of the OAS would no purpose if the
organization did not respect the sovereignty of peoples.

He expressed his support for the Venezuelan government of Nicolas Maduro which has been targeted by Almagro.

Submission On The NZ Intelligence And Security Bill

October 22 2016 | From: KeithLocke

The NZ Intelligence and Security Bill unnecessarily allows for greater surveillance of New
Zealanders by our intelligence services and intrudes further on our privacy.
The definition of national security is so broad that it could enable even more surveillance of legitimate political
dissenters by the intelligence services than has happened to date.

Related: New Zealand Intelligence And Security Bill

The Bill should not be proceeded with.

Threats Faced by New Zealand

Any discussion of whether the intelligence services should be granted extra powers should begin with a discussion of the
threats facing New Zealand.

The fact is that we are a remarkably peaceful people. In the last 100 years there is not one proven case of politically
motivated act by a New Zealander causing death. [My only qualification is that the Wellington Trades Hall bombing in 1984,
which resulted in one death, may have been politically motivated.]
Related: New Zealand Prime Minister Uses Bogus Islamic State Threat As Excuse To Ramp Up National Security
And Surveillance

The only proven terrorist act was committed by non-New Zealanders, namely the French agents who bombed the Rainbow
Warrior in Auckland Harbour in 1985, killing a Portuguese photographer.

Non-state terrorism has proven to be a problem in some Western countries, especially those, unlike New Zealand, that are
heavily involved in foreign wars, or have a socio-economically marginalised Muslim population, or have a body politic
significantly prejudiced against Muslim people.

There is no global terrorist threat. The majority of nations are not threatened by non-state terrorism.

Of course, there is always the possibility of a politically motivated violent act, causing death, taking place on New Zealand
soil, but it would be an exceptional event. It would not, by itself, justify enlarging the present powers of New Zealands
intelligence services.

The Bill Massively Increases the Collection of Personal Information on New Zealanders

There are several reasons why granting the GCSB power to spy on New Zealanders will result in a much greater intrusion
on the privacy of New Zealanders.

Firstly, the GCSBs intelligence collection is less targeted than that traditionally carried out by the Security Intelligence
Service. We already know that the GCSB collects bulk information on satellite communications accessed by at its Waihopai
spy station (which is part of the Five Eyes network).
Related: The [Cabal Controlled] American Empire Is A Threat To Every Nations Security
There is nothing in the proposed legislation stopping this from continuing. Nor will anything in the Bill prevent the
international communications of New Zealanders being drawn down into the satellite dishes at Waihopai to be stored and
later analysed, because such communications dont identify NZ citizenship.

We know from the Snowden documents that the whole direction of the Five Eyes network (including the GCSB) is to
collect, store and share with each other as much raw communications and social media data as is technically
possible - on the basis that some of it may later be useful.

The all-inclusive definition of information infrastructure in Clause 4 covers any electronic communication, and Clause 66
allows the GCSB access to any such transmitted or stored communication.

There are no clear limits to what can be collected and through what means.

Secondly, because the GCSB shares a mass of its raw data with its four Five Eyes partners [loosely provided for under
Clause 13], the result of this sharing will be a greater intrusion into the privacy of New Zealanders, as well as its misuse
against New Zealanders.

We know from the Snowden papers that the data collected by the Five Eyes is mainly used to spy on other governments or
political dissenters, for political ends which are often contestable.

For example, the GCSBs proven spying on, Roberto Azevedo, the (successful) Brazilian candidate for WTO director-
general, was aimed at giving New Zealander Tim Groser the edge in the contest.

Related: No Public Accountability For The GCSB, Prime Minister Goes Back On His Word + Documents Shine Light
On Shadowy New Zealand Surveillance Base

This was spying to advance the governments neo-liberal trade and investment agenda, personified by former Trade
Minister Groser, an agenda which is contested by other New Zealand political parties.

Thirdly, we also know from the Snowden papers that Five Eyes partners are providing intercept information about New
Zealanders. In 2012 Tony Fullman, a New Zealand citizen, had his house raided on the basis of information passed on to
the GCSB by the US National Security Agency.

His crime was to be a peaceful advocate of democracy in Fiji.

Related: The Raid: In Bungled Spying Operation, NSA, GCSB & SIS Targeted Pro-Democracy Campaigner
Analysis of the Snowden papers showed he was one several Fiji pro-democracy activists who had their Gmails and
Facebook posts monitored by the NSA.

Fourthly, the warrant system contained in the Bill will not prevent information on many law-abiding New Zealanders being
taken from the mass of intercept data collected by the GCSB and Five Eyes. The warrants can be very broad in their
catchment.

Related: "Smart City" Is Really Government Spying On An Unimaginable Scale

They can be for a class of persons (Clause 61), or they can be what are called purpose-based warrants (Clause 64).
Either way such warrants can cover a lot of people, such as those New Zealanders attending a mosque or group of
mosques, or all those New Zealanders travelling to certain countries.

Fifthly, GCSB can pass on to other agencies for analysis anything from its mountain of electronic intelligence data. All it
has to do is define that information as incidentally-obtained intelligence under Clause 91. Remember such intelligence
doesnt need to have anything to do with real or potential criminal activity.

All that is required is that there is believed to be a potential threat to New Zealands security as determined by
the agencies.

Under Clause 91 information incidentally obtained on legitimate political dissenters could be kept or passed on.

Using Intelligence Information Against Legitimate Dissenters

There is an inherent contradiction in the legislation. Clause 22 says that collecting intelligence is not justified when it is
infringing the right of persons to engage in lawful advocacy, protest, or dissent in respect of any matter.
 However, this can be overridden when national securityis deemed at risk.

As defined in Clause 5 national security can include any activity, even if it is not criminal activity, which affects
New Zealands status as a free and democratic society or threatens international security or the quality
of life of the New Zealand population or represents acts of foreign interference, that may cause serious
damage to New Zealands economic security or international relations.

What this means is that the intelligence services are authorised to act in secret to monitor and help counter perfectly legal
activity if those agencies define it as contrary to national security, whether that activity is carried out by New Zealanders or
non-New Zealanders.

All of the types of legal political activity targeted under the national security label are politically contestable.

For example, dissenters in New Zealand believe the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement threatens our national
security in that the agreement threatens our status as a free and democratic society and our quality of life and
could, by increasing global inequality, threaten international security.

Related: The Secret Government Rulebook For Labeling You A Terrorist

The present New Zealand government believes the opposite, that the anti-TPPA dissenters threaten national
security, and under this Bill could use the intelligence services to monitor those dissenters.

New Zealand anti-TPPA dissenters believe it is perfectly proper, under our Bill of Rights, to coordinate campaigning against
the TPPA with international NGOS (eg. Greenpeace and Oxfam) or other governments without these foreign NGOs or
governments being spied on for committing acts of foreign interference that may cause serious damage to New
Zealands economic security or international relations.

New Zealand should champion a free global debate among people, organisations and nations over free trade and
investment pacts, without any involvement of security services.

Unfortunately, that is not the case, as we have seen in the Groser/WTO case and in the NSAs spying on European
governments during trade negotiations, as disclosed in the Snowden documents.

Related: NZ Government Accused of Spying on WTO Top Job Candidates

GCSB spying on Pacific Governments Unjustified and Contrary to our Interests

The GCSB electronic spying on Pacific Island governments, exposed in Snowden papers and rightly criticised by several
Pacific leaders, is an unjustified and illegal breach of their right to privacy. It negatively affecting our relations with these
states, none of whom are conducting electronic spying on us.

Spy agencies focus on political critics of the NZ government, not those engaged in illegal activity.

The fundamental problem is that the SIS and GCSB are primarily agencies for political spying on legal activity. While part of
the Bills definition of national security [Clause 5] covers unlawful acts (ie: those which have a political motive), in practice
the agency does little in this area, for two reasons.

The first, which I aludded to earlier, is that in recent years there have been not been politically motivated criminal
acts of any consequence.

Secondly, we already have an institution, the Police, which is dedicated to detecting and prosecuting politically
motivated illegal acts such as the bombing of the Rainbow Warrior in 1985, or the securing of fraudulent New
Zealand passports by Mossad agents in 2004.

A perusal of those personal SIS files that have been released proves that the overwhelming bulk of the agencies
work has been directed against perfectly legal dissent.

This is likely to continue under the terms of this Bill. My own SIS file, which covers 51 years of my life, records only my legal
political activities as a dissenter. I have no criminal record.

Oversight Mechanisms Inadequate

There has been some improvement in oversight mechanisms, but they are still inadequate. While more people from outside
the service will be involved in granting surveillance warrants this wont act as much of a check if those people accept the
Bills ethos that political spying to advance a governments political agenda is ok.

The Intelligence and Security Committee in the Parliament will remain relatively toothless.
Related: The Entire War On Terror Has Been A Lie And These Charts Prove It

The GCSB and SIS Directors can still block information going to the Committee by defining it as sensitive (Clause 163). It
is good, however, that the Inspector-General will now have access to all security information (Clause 142).

Much will now depend on the quality of the Inspector-General as a check on abuses in the system, and as someone who
can listen to whistleblowers. However, in relation to whistleblowers, I strongly oppose new provision 78AA (Clause 207)
providing for 5 years in prison for those who disclose anything classified.

Related: CFRs RAND Corporation: Terror From Everywhere Requires More Surveillance

Whistleblowing is sometimes the only way to expose wrongdoing in public institutions and the SIS and GCSB are not
exceptions. Particularly worrying is the potential for journalists to be penalised (under 78AA 2 (b) (ii)) for publishing classified
material that exposes wrongdoing.

An Independent Cybersecurity Agency Needed

The GCSB currently has one useful responsibility, cybersecurity [see Clause 15], but this function should be devolved to a
new independent government cybersecurity agency, which involves and coordinates its work with the Police and other
relevant agencies.
Related: The Corporate US Government Are The Terrorists - The Islamic State Is A Big Lie

The GCSB, tasked with breaking in to computers and creating back door entry in to communications devices, is not the best
agency to protect our IT systems.

Recommendations

I ask the Select Committee be bold and challenge the need for the SIS and the GCSB, given that our Police force is
perfectly adequate to deal with politically motivated criminal behavior, and we dont need a state agency to monitor our non-
criminal political behavior.

The GCSBs cybersecurity function should be devolved to a new independent agency.

I recommend the Select Committee not proceed with this Bill in its present form.

Overall it puts New Zealanders in a worse situation than in already existing legislation, in relation to both their
personal privacy and their right to untrammeled freedom of expression.

Related: Not Just Surveillance: 3 Current Phenomena Exposing 1984 As An Instruction Manual For The State

However, given the Bill is likely to have the numbers to proceed I do support the deletion (or amendment) of any Clauses
which extend the scope of GCSB and SIS spying on non-criminal political activity.

I have already mentioned the problems with Clauses 4, 5, 13, 15, 61, 64, 66, 91, 163 and 207. Conversely, I support all
measures in the Bill which may improve, even if marginally, the accountability of SIS and GCSB operatives. I have
mentioned, for example, Clause 142 which I support because it removes the existing restraint on the Inspector-General
accessing all security information.

Related: Washington Admits, War On Terror Is Designed To Be Permanent State of War

Real Reason Trump's Being Treated Like He's Crazy For Refusing To Accept Election
Results + Top Highlights From The Final Presidential Debate
October 22 2016 | From: OpEdNews / Infowars

The mainstream media and the duopoly corporate parties - both Republican and Democratic - have
gone into full force attack on Donald Trump for his refusal to accept the election results, which he
has repeatedly said are rigged. It's time a candidate who has been the victim of a rigged election
speaks up.

Everywhere you turn today the mainstream media is united in attacking Donald Trump for refusing to say he will
accept the results of the election he considers rigged.

Related: Donald Trump Exposes Globalist Control & Criminal Clintons Live In Florida Speech + All-Out Effort To
Destroy Trump Proves He's Not Part Of The Establishment

Related: Rigged Elections Are An American Tradition

Related: Public Awakens To Massive Election Fraud

They're saying that his attitude undermines democracy, that it shows no respect for the election system our country is based
upon. Really? As publisher of OpEdNews.com I've published over 10,000 articles on election integrity, questioning the
trustworthiness and raising the concern that elections can be hacked or corrupted.

We know, through Wikileaks, that Hillary and the Clinton campaign rigged, in many ways, the Democratic primary, using the
State Department to influence the FBI, lying and deceiving within the DNC, collaborating with the mainstream media. Trump
has every reason to believe that the Clinton campaign will do all it can to rig the election.
Related: Trump Is Right: Heres Proof Hillary & Obama Founded ISIS + Obama Admits Were Training ISIL

Bernie Sanders accepted the results of the primary, even after some of the Wikileaks revelations began to come out. I'm not
judging him for doing that. His rationale is he negotiated the most progressive Democratic platform in history.

If Bernie had challenged the results, especially after the Wikileaks revelations, if he'd called for his supporters to take action,
to go to the streets, to make noise to demand a legal response - to the rigging, to the FBI corruption of the law.

It appears that Trump will fight such rigging. He's started fighting it already. He's preparing his supporters to be furious, to
take action. I don't know what kind of action, but they'll be ready for action. In reality, Trump has done much to sabotage his
campaign, perhaps not intentionally, but because he is a narcissistic who is unable to control his impulses.

But his message that he does not trust the election is not a bad one for democracy. It is a good one. It is getting millions of
people to look more closely at the election system and process.

The risk of corruption of electronic voting, with the inability to do a verifiable recount is very real, yet the mainstream media
have literally mocked those who raise the concern as conspiracy theorists. Chuck Todd, current host for Meet The Press, is
one of the worst.
Related: Wikileaks Confirms Hillary Sold Weapons To ISIS + Wikileaks Will Release More Emails On The Clinton
Foundation FBI Has Enough Evidence To Indict

It's hard to believe that the mainstream media are so obtuse or stupid to ignore the obviousness of the problem of
an electronic voting system. That suggests that their indignance, their outrage is a drama aimed at embarrassing,
intimidating and making people who are inclined to believe Trump feel foolish.

This media offensive aimed at challenging the idea that the election is rigged goes hand in hand with the massive campaign
Clinton and Obama are orchestrating, selling Wikileaks as a propaganda agent being used by the Russians.

Let's start with the statement by NBC's Bryan Williams, who said;

"The disqualifying moment for Americans who believe in and respect a peaceful transition of power came along
with an audience gasp in the room when Donald Trump refused under direct questioning to say he would honor the
outcome of the election, the will of the voters."

This is from a man who was suspended from NBC because he lied about his experience.

Then, there's David Gregory, a hack who was dumped from hosting Meet The Press, who said, "This Is a Death Blow for
Donald Trump."

Lawnews.com reports:

'University of California-Irvine election law professor Rick Hasen said, "Our democracy is a fragile thing which
depends upon accepting the rules of the game."'

Mediaite.com reports that Joe Scarborough of Morning Joe on MSNBC had a different take, quoting him as saying, "How
many people in Scranton, Pennsylvania care about what he said in that answer compared to people in news rooms that are
whimpering and whining with their, you know, soy lattes?"
And further, Mediaite reports Scarborough said;

'"I think for elites and media people ["] to try to boil that entire debate down to that one answer, that's very
predictable," he said. The notion that Trump said he would challenge the election was a media fiction, Scarborough
insisted. "He never said that! Which is extraordinary - the leap that all the media has made," he said.'

The list is long and deep. This message, that the election system is trustworthy, is a core part of keeping the crooked
corporate system up and running.

If millions of people start questioning our election process, if they question Hillary's win, who knows where it will go?

One thing I am sure of. We need more people waking up to the reality that the system IS broken, that the system
has been rigged for a long time, that big corporations and the plutocrats have been at war with the middle class.

Related: Excellent Trump / Farage Speech & Hillary Thinks Mr. Brexit Is Just Another Right-wing, Xenophobic,
Sexist, Bigot That You Should Promptly Ignore

Bill Moyers said it 13 years ago. It's even worse now, and a big part of the reason it's worse is because most Americans,
especially liberals, the ones who supported Hillary in the primary, have not awakened to the reality.

It's freaking the powers that be out that a presidential candidate is speaking the truth about the system.

I can't bring myself to vote for Clinton or Trump, but at least Trump is bringing some truth to the process. It's no surprise that
the powers that be are trying to make Trump look crazy.

Related Articles: Election Rigging, Hacking and Voter Fraud

Hacking Democracy in Less than 60 Seconds

Former Congressman Joe Scarborough Exposes the Rigged Voting System

 Watch this Voting Machine Test Failure

Elections in Australia, Canada, England, Germany, Netherlands

Spains Orwellian Citizens Security Law Gag

Why Vote When Our Votes Really Dont Count

Doug Caseys Top Five Reasons Not to Vote

Top Highlights From The Final Presidential Debate

Lies,lies,and more lies. Hillary stood poised with an air of smug arrogance. Supposedly
emboldened by her thirty years in a variety of undeserving roles in government where she racked
up zero beneficial major accomplishments.

Donald stood by reserved and battle worn after enduring along with the American people a unification of fraud from
the globalists bought and paid for mainstream media propaganda machine, the tremendous amount of scathing
info from the Wikileaks, Another torpedo to the democrats from James O' Keefe, and the FBI's announcement that a
four star general will face prison time for charges that are dwarfed by Hillary's email breach of national security.

Related: Only Half of Americans Realize Election System Is Rigged

Related: Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies

I don't know about you but how can we believe a word Hillary says. And why should we?

Related: Presidential Debate Check: 12 Hillary Lies Debunked + Lots More

Trump Relies On Intelligence Hillary Relies On Ignorance

It is more obvious than ever what seperates Trump and Clinton on how they view their voters. Trump made a
statement tonight on how he relies on American voters seeing through propaganda, while Wikileaks emails show
Democrats rely on voter ignorance.

Related:Hillary Smiles At America's Destruction

Hillary Presidency Means Immediate War With Russia

Hillary Clinton wants nothing more than to go to war with Russia and Vladimir Putin after blaming them for hack
they clearly had nothing to do with.

Related: It Turns Out Assange Wasn't Kidding & NWO Hyper-Desperate Attempts To Manage Clinton Train Wreck
Proven: Hillary Clinton Is TPP Puppet
Wikileaks and Donald Trump once more remind the public that Hillary Clinton called the TPP the 'gold standard' for
trade deals.

Related: The Clinton Chronicles

Trump Calls Clinton Foundation Corrupt Organization

Donald Trump hits Hillary with her crimes against the people of Haiti and how her foundation kept the donations
that were meant to rebuild Haiti.

Related: Debate Post-Mortem: Trump Crushes Clinton - "You Should Be In Jail"

Dear Clinton Team: We Noticed You Might Need Some Email Security Tips
October 20 2016 | From: TheIntercept

There is probably no one more acutely aware of the importance of good cybersecurity right now
than Hillary Clintons campaign chairman John Podesta, whose emails have been laid bare by
WikiLeaks, are being mined for news by journalists (including at The Intercept), and are available
for anyone with internet access to read.

So as a public service to Podesta and everyone else on Clintons staff, here are some email security tips that could
have saved you from getting hacked, and might help you in the future.

Use a Strong Password

Theres a method for coming up with passwords that are mathematically unfeasible for anyone to ever guess by brute force,
but that are still possible for you to memorize. Ive written about it before, in detail, including an explanation of the math
behind it.

But in short: You start with a long list of words and then randomly select one (by rolling dice), then another, and so on, until
you end up with something like: slinging gusty bunny chill gift.

Using this method, called Diceware, there is a one in 28 quintillion (that is, 28 with 18 zeros at the end) chance of guessing
this exact password.

For online services that prevent attackers from making very many guesses - including Gmail - a five-word Diceware
password is much stronger than youll ever need. To make it super easy, use this wordlist from the Electronic Frontier
Foundation.

Do Not Use a Weak Password

So if thats a strong password, what does a weak password look like? Runner4567.

Use a Unique Password for Each Application

The same day that WikiLeaks published Podestas email, his Twitter account got hacked as well. How do you think that
happened? I have a guess: He reused a password that was exposed in his email, and someone tried it on his Twitter
account.

Even if you use a strong password, it quickly becomes worthless if you use it everywhere. The average person has accounts
on dozens of websites. For those who reuse passwords, all it takes is for any one of those sites to get hacked and your
password to get compromised, and the hacker can gain access to your accounts on all of them.
You can avoid this by using different strong passwords for every account. The only way this is possible is by using a
password manager, a program that remembers all your passwords for you (in an encrypted database) so you dont have to.
You should secure your password manager with an especially strong password. I recommend a seven-word Diceware
passphrase.

There are many password managers to choose from: KeePassX, LastPass, 1Password, and more. Shop around for
whichever one fits your organization the best. It doesnt so much matter which you use, so long as you use strong, unique
passwords for each account. Password managers also help you generate secure random passwords.

Turn on Two-Factor Authentication

Last year, when I asked National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden what ordinary people could do to improve
their computer security, one of the first pieces of advice he gave was to use two-factor authentication. If Podesta had
enabled it on his Gmail account, you probably wouldnt be reading his email today.

Google calls it 2-Step Verification and has an excellent website explaining why you need it, how it works, and how it
protects you.
Comment: Of course in reality you do not want to be using ANYTHING Google makes. It really is the fox guarding
the hen house.

Related: How The CIA Made Google

In short: When you log in to your account, after you type in your password youll need one more piece of information before
Google will allow you to proceed. Depending on how you set it up you might receive this uniquely generated information in a
text message, a voice call, or a mobile app, or you could plug in a special security key into your USB port.

Once you start using it, hackers who manage to trick you into giving up your password still wont be able to log in to your
account - at least not without successfully executing a separate attack against your phone or physically stealing your
security key.

Do it Right this Second

Google handles all of the email for hillaryclinton.com. If youre a Clinton staffer, you should immediately stop what youre
doing and make sure youve enabled 2-Step Verification for your email.

You should also enable two-factor authentication for all of the many other services that support it, including Twitter,
Facebook, Slack, and Dropbox, to name just a few. (If Podesta had enabled it on his Twitter account, that probably wouldnt
have gotten hacked either.)

Watch Out for Phishers

How did these prominent political figures get their emails hacked in the first place? It appears that Russian hackers used
spear-phishing attacks against many high-profile political targets, and some of them bit.
Spear-phishing works like this: The attacker sends a target a carefully crafted email, something that looks legitimate but is
actually a fake. The target clicks a link in the email and ends up at what looks like a login page for their bank, or an online
store, or, in this case, the Google login page.

But its not. If they carefully examined the URL of the website, they would see that it doesnt begin with
https://accounts.google.com/ and therefore isnt a real Google login page.

But they dont notice, so they go ahead and enter their username and password. Without realizing it, they just gave their
Google password to the attacker. Now the attacker can use this password to log in to the targets Gmail account and
download all of their email (assuming they are not using two-factor authentication, that is).

Well-crafted spear-phishing emails can be incredibly hard to spot, but if you ever end up on a website asking you for a
password, you should be skeptical. Check the URL and make sure youre at a legitimate login page before typing in your
password, or navigate to the login page directly.

Encrypt Your Email

All of the previous tips are aimed at keeping your email account secure. But even if you follow all of the security best
practices, its still possible that your email could get compromised.

For example:

You could fall for an incredibly sophisticated spear-phishing attack that tricks you into giving up your
password as well as your two-factor authentication token

Your Google Apps administrator could get hacked, giving the hacker the ability to reset the email passwords of
everyone in your organization

A hacker could find a fundamental security flaw in Gmail itself and use that to gain access to your account

A state-level actor could find a way to exploit the infrastructure of the internet to spy on all of your data held by
Google

Or maybe you just dont trust Google, or anyone who can compel the company with legal requests for data, with the
contents of your email.
For any or all of those reasons, its probably worth using encrypted email.

Using encrypted email is more complicated than using a strong password and using two-factor authentication - which are
really easy - but its simple enough that everyone at The Intercept, including all of the non-nerds, uses it.

An important caveat is that everyone needs to be ready to use encrypted email before you can start using; you cant send
an encrypted email to someone who doesnt have an encryption key yet. (You can find our encryption keys on our staff
profiles if you want to send us encrypted emails.)

To get started, check out the Electronic Frontier Foundations Surveillance Self-Defense guide for using email encryption
for Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux. If enough people in your organization use encrypted email, consider using our newly
released tool GPG Sync to make it somewhat simpler.

Had Podesta, or anyone in the Democratic National Committee - or really anyone whos had their email leaked in recent
years - used encrypted email, a lot more of the emails would look something like this:

If a hacker steals all of your encrypted email and then wants to decrypt it, theyll need to hack into your computer and steal
your secret encryption key. That is a whole level of difficulty higher than just getting your password. If you choose
to keep your secret encryption key on a physical USB device, such as a Yubikey, the hacker has even more hoops to jump
through before they have any hope of decrypting your emails.

Alternately, Use an Encrypted Messaging App Instead of Email

If encrypting your email sounds too hard, it might make sense to just use email less, in favor of easy-to-use encrypted
message apps such as Signal. The Clinton campaign is reportedly already using Signal for its mobile communications about
Donald Trump.

Now the iPhone version of the app has desktop support, too. So if you need to send a quick, but sensitive, message to a
colleague, why not type it into the Signal app instead of sending an email?

Dont Listen to the Wrong People

Hillary Clintons policy on encryption is dubious, even to the point of calling for the government to commission a Manhattan-
like project to figure out how to create strong, unbreakable encryption that nevertheless has a back door for law
enforcement to access. This idea is firmly in the realm of fantasy, because a back door is definitionally a weakness.

And no matter what U.S. policy is in the future, the email encryption I described above will not contain a backdoor and will
be available to everyone in the world, because its open source software developed largely outside of the United States.

The obvious conclusion is that Clinton simply doesnt understand cybersecurity, in theory or in practice.

On the practical level, she needs better in-house technical expertise.

On the theoretical level, she should listen to the unanimous consensus of cryptography experts and take a firm stance in
support of strong encryption without back doors. This will improve the cybersecurity of both government and
private businesses, protect the constitutionally protected privacy rights of Americans - and maybe even save herself from
similar embarrassments in the future.

Comment: I can personally recommend the following solutions to anyone seeking secure communications:

Encrypted Instant messaing: Wickr

Ecrypted Email: Securage

Encrypted Audio / Video calls: Mega

 Encrypted Phone calls: SilentCircle

"Smart City" Is Really Government Spying On An Unimaginable Scale

October 19 2016 | From: BlacklistedNews

"Smart PGH" (Smart City) and their 'smart spine system' is one of the most intrusive, government
funded, TOTAL surveillance networks ever dreamed up.

Columbus, Ohio, actually won $50 million in DOT grant money to turn their city into a "Smart City" calling
it "SmartColumbus." The city of Columbus will receive an additional $90 million in pledges from public and private
sector partners.

Related: Money Talks: From smart meters to power politics

"Smart PGH's" tag line at the end of the above video is chilling, "If It's Not For All, It's Not For Us". As "Smart PGH's"
documents reveal, 'smart city' surveillance spies on All of Us.

Pittsburgh, actually received close to $11 million to help turn their city into a "smart city".

City of Pittsburgh Smart Cities Challenge Proposal Video

Smart Columbus
(Fast forward to approx., 2:18 to see the numerous corporations involved in 'Smart Cities')

Not much is known about "SmartColumbus," but you can bet it's probably a carbon copy of "Smart PGH."

The document below, reveals "smart cities" are really just a euphemism for government spying on an unimaginable scale.

City of Pittsburgh's Proposal, Beyond Traffic: The Smart City Challenge (SCC)

The City of Pittsburgh sees the confluence of transportation and energy as the key to U.S. Department of Transportations
(USDOT) Smart City Challenge. To meet the challenge, we will develop an open platform and corresponding governance
structure to improve the safety, equity, and efficiency of our transportation network and its interaction with the energy and
communications networks.

By building on existing technology deployments and increasing fixed and mobile sensors over a number of
major Smart Spine corridors that connect with primary commercial centers and amenities, Pittsburgh will collect,
analyze, visualize, and act on information to improve mobility for residents.

The non-proprietary nature of our platform allows the City of Pittsburgh and its partners to set an open, national standard for
a municipal service delivery platform, which enhances industry and supports innovation.

According to the SCC, 'smart spines' use advanced technology like real-time adaptive traffic signals and vehicle-to-vehicle
(V2V) communication at intersections.

"Smart PGH" is working with Uber to spy on customers. (see page 4)

It appears that "smart cities" are part of the government's "Vision Zero" program, see page 6 of SCC's 'Enabling Hierarchy'
diagram. Also on page 6, under the subject 'Data Collection Network' they mention, "Social Media Assets" otherwise known
as social media spying. (more on that below)

Uber, Lyft and Bike Share to spy on customers.

Page 13:

In addition, we [Smart PGH] would like to work with Pittsburgh Bike Share, Uber, Lyft, and others to move towards more
robust V2V communications that allow Port Authority buses, City fleet, bike share bicycles, ride-sharing services, etc. to
become safer by sensing one another on Pittsburghs streets. Bicycle tracking has already begun, Ford Motor Company has
given Palo Alto, $1.1 million to equip bicycles with GPS devices.
Joshuah Mello, the citys chief transportation official, said the main draw of the new smart-bike system, operated by Motivate
and sponsored by Ford, is that it will be part of a network growing in Bay Area cities from San Jose to San
Francisco, making it one of the largest systems in the entire world.

What he should say is, this makes it one of the largest bicycle surveillance systems in the entire world! What follows, are
some of the most chilling intrusions of government spying to date. Govt spying on social media.

Page 14:

Voluminous streams of data will be generated by sensors on fixed and mobile assets and citizens themselves using apps
and social media.
Smart cities will spy on everyone's behavior and emotions.

Page 18:

To address Vision Element #9, SmartPGH will deploy our Citizens as Sensors effort aimed at extracting relevant data from
social media. Scrubbing these sites and app will provide information on what people are doing in different places across
Pittsburgh, data that can be used to infer behavior and data that can detect changes in behavior due to physical
modifications made by SmartPGH and the City of Pittsburgh.

Pittsburgh can more easily detect if the modifications it is making are producing the desired changes or if they are leading to
unanticipated outcomes or unhappy residents.

For example, changes to the number of check-ins citizens make to restaurants and retail establishments following the
parking rate change can provide evidence of how much this change has impacted dining and shopping behaviors, providing
valuable feedback not just on residents emotional reactions but also the wider economic impact of such decisions.

"Citizens as Sensors" really, means government spying on social media posts, FourSquare, Twitter etc.,. Below is an
excerpt from Page 12 of "Citizens as Sensors".

"At a different level many users volunteer information to Web 2.0 sites as a convenient way of making it available
to friends and relations, irrespective of the fact that it becomes available to all."

Govt to spy on staircases, sidewalks, bicycles, trails, buses and trains.

Pages 3 and 22:

Moreover, residents utilize the city's unique system of 712 public staircases, 40 miles of on-street bike infrastructure, 31
miles of trails, and numerous sidewalksand on a daily basis.

Companies like Sidewalk Labs, make a profit out of spying on pedestrians.

The Port Authority of Allegheny County operates a comprehensive transit network in the city, which includes 18.4 miles of
busway, 26.2 miles of light rail, 72 local bus routes and two funiculars.

Power companies and the govt collaborate to spy on everyone.

Pages 22 & 23:

The City of Pittsburgh is in conversation with Duquesne Light and partner-company DQE Communications regarding the use
of their extensive network of dark fiber. Most of the network capacity is currently dark and available for use by partners
including the City of Pittsburgh.

To make the most of their network, Duquesne Light recently built a wireless communication infrastructure to support the
increased data-flow between their electric meters and the companys centralized operating center.
This effort has evolved into a high-capacity, resilient, wireless network covering the entirety of the City of Pittsburgh and the
surrounding 817-square-mile service territory.

The grid of microgirds will spy on everyone's health, electrical and gas usage.

Page 23:

The grid-of-microgrids is designed to connect critical infrastructure like hospitals, universities, and data and
telecommunications centers. Other partners in the effort include the UPMC health system, NRG energy, Duquesne Light
and Peoples natural gas.

Govt spying on Pittsburgh residents is frightening.

Page 23:

PennDOTs Western Regional Traffic Management Center includes a fully integrated Centralized Software System, a Media
Partner room that broadcasts live on-air reports of traffic conditions, and, a state of the art video wall capable of displaying
160 video images.
The center monitors and/or controls ITS devices on 12 freeway corridors, including many within Pittsburgh's limits.

These devices include: 293 CCTV cameras, 37 Highway Advisory Radio transmitter locations, 86 Highway Advisory Radio
signs with beacons, 200 Microwave Traffic Detectors, 24 Dedicated Short Range Communication (DSRC) radios, 93 Digital
Wave Radar Vehicular Detector units and many more specific ITS-related items.

List of govt agencies spying on residents:

Allegheny County

Penn DOT and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Southwestern Pennsylvania Commission

Port Authority of Allegheny County

Pittsburgh Parking Authority

Port of Pittsburgh Commission

Pittsburgh Bike Share

Utilities including energy distribution, water, and natural gas

University Partners, particularly University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon University

Major freight operators in Pittsburgh

Representatives of the Business and Philanthropic Communities

Citizens and Community Stakeholders Industry partners

Page 24:

The model for the WPRDC is unique because it is designed to be extensible and inclusive, able to host datasets from any
municipality, non-profit, or researcher with data to share. By bringing together various levels of government, civil society,
and academia around information resources, we have begun to improve our regions capacity for innovation and evidence-
driven policy-making.

The WPRDCs web resources provide machine-readable data downloads and APIs of key administrative data on topics
such as property assessment, building inspection, public health, crime, and asset management.

Click on the image above to open a larger version in a new window

Seven companies work with Surtrac to spy on everyone.

1. Surtrac works with FLIR a thermal sensor company that specializes in identifying individual vehicles by their thermal
signature. Surtrac was developed by Carnegie Mellon University,

Surtracs' Econolite specializes in spying on motor vehicles. They also invented 'autoscope' surveillance cameras in
the early 1990's. Fyi, Surtrac's Autoscope Vision (AV) also spies on bicyclists.

AV delivers stop bar vehicle and bicycle detection, advanced vehicle detection, bicycle differentiation, traffic data collection,
and HD video surveillance.

Surtrac boasts, about they're newly-developed, full-field-of-view object-feature tracking. In other words, the government can
track an individual vehicle or bicyclist throughout an entire city!

There are plans to integrate Surtrac with the Port Authority of Allegheny County bus fleets using 'Clever Devices'. (more on
that below)

2. Citilog, is a mirror image of Econolite but specializes in spying road sensors that are imbedded in every road, highway
tunnel and bridge.
 3. Metrotech, turns current traffic intersection cameras into connected surveillance systems that spy on vehicles and
Bluetooth signals.

4. Wavetronix, can track an individual vehicles speed, even if they change lanes. Wavertronix also knows the type of
vehicle you're driving, watch the video below to find out more.

5. Traffic Control Products, bill themselves as a supplier of premium sensor equipment to the traffic industry. Currently their
vehicle surveillance equipment is being used in Ohio, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Indiana and Michigan. Traffic
Control Products boasts about having a staff of software specialists that manage, their surveillance systems.

6. Path Master, provides 'surveillance equipment' and training for their equipment.

7. Clever Devices, is a company that specializes in spying on trains and buses.

"SmartColumbus," "Smart PGH," "Smart City," "Vision Zero," CCTV cameras, license plate readers, Wi-Fi readers and
Shotspotter are turning our cities into COMPLETE surveillance centers!

What's it going to take, to motivate an apathetic populace to speak out and demand a stop to govt spying?

s Related Articles:

Klahoma Man's Tests Negate Smart Meter Safety Claims

Ontario Pulls Plug on 36,000 Rural Smart Meters: Is Big Energy Imploding?

Do Not Resist: The Police Militarization Documentary Everyone Should See

October 19 2016 | From: TheIntercept

On a sunny afternoon last summer, Craig Atkinson, a New York City-based filmmaker, stood in a
front yard in South Carolina surrounded by several heavily armed police officers.
The officers, members of the Richland County Sheriffs Department tactical team, were descending on a modest
one-story house looking for drugs and guns. The team smashed through the windows of the home with iron pikes,
then stormed the front door with rifles raised.

Related: Leaked Catalogue Reveals a Vast Array of Military Spy Gear Offered to U.S. Police

Inside, they found a terrified family of four, including an infant. As the family members were pulled outside, Atkinsons
camera captured a scene that plays out with startling regularity in cities and towns across the country, one of many included
in his new documentary, Do Not Resist, an examination of police militarization in the United States.

And it's not just hapening there.

The police begin rooting through the trash. Where the fuck is the weed? one officer asks, as the team ransacks a car
parked in the driveway. Boy that was sweet, another says, commenting on the speed of the raid. One officer finds a
backpack, which yields a bit of marijuana - its not enough to roll a joint, but its something.

The officer in charge questions the owner of the backpack, a young African-American man. In a conversation captured on
Atkinsons microphone, the young man, a local community college student, tells the officer he runs a small landscaping
business.

Knowing hes being taken into custody, with his hands cuffed in front of him, he asks the officer for a favor: Can he remove
the $876 in his pocket set aside for new lawn-care equipment and give it to one of his employees to go to the hardware
store? Instead of handing the cash to the arrestees co-worker, the tactical team seizes the money.

I never one time said youre a bad person, the officer tells the young man before hes led off. I just have
a job to do, and you happen to be in the middle of it.

The pernicious practice of civil asset forfeiture, which allows law enforcement to grab cash or property during the course of
raids, then requires people to prove the assets were not related to criminal activity in order to get them back and allows
police to keep the assets if they fail to do so - has been well documented.

Whats less common is to see one of those interactions play out on camera. Capturing those kinds of moments is what Do
Not Resist is all about.

Trailer for Do Not Resist, a New Documentary Examining Police Militarization in the United
States:

Related: There Is No Excuse For The American Police

Atkinsons directorial debut has already taken home this years prize for best documentary at the Tribeca Film Festival and
is currently making the rounds in select cities around the country.

Radley Balko, author of Rise of the Warrior Cop: The Militarization of Americas Police Forces, has called the
film terrifying, powerful, and important.

Based on substantial on-the-ground reporting, Do Not Resist is both unsettling to watch and necessary to see.
See also: DoNotResist.com

The film begins in Ferguson, Missouri, on a rainy night of protest in August 2014 that erupted into a melee of tear gas and
screaming.

It then quickly moves to a seminar with Dave Grossman, a law enforcement guru who gives trainings on lethal force and the
application of a warrior mentality in the name of the law.

The policeman is the man of the city, Grossman begins, before explaining that cops hes spoken to routinely
describe their first on-the-job kill as a prelude to the best sex of their lives.

Both partners are very invested in some very intense sex, Grossman says.

Theres not a whole lot of perks that come with this job. You find one, relax and enjoy it.

Grossman believes that a violent reckoning between law enforcement and critics of police militarization is fast approaching.

We are at war, Grossman tells the crowd, and you are the front-line troops in this war.

The language reflects a theme that runs throughout Do Not Resist.

Atkinson began the project three years ago in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombings. The images of armored cars and
commando cops in the streets resonated for him on a personal level. Atkinsons father spent 29 years as a police
officer outside Detroit - 13 of them on a SWAT team, where he held the rank of commander.

Atkinson and his brother would take part in their dads training, playing the part of hostages when they were little and mock
shooters when they were big enough to handle weapons.
Watching the footage from Boston, it was obvious to Atkinson that something profound had shifted since his dads days on
the force. He set out to create a film that would capture that shift.

The Do Not Resist crew attended expos and trade shows, community meetings and federal hearings, training seminars
and SWAT contests. All told, the team traveled to 19 states, went on roughly 20 police ride-a-longs, observed half a dozen
raids, and interacted with hundreds of police officers.

The hope was to be on-hand for an incident in which a SWAT teams use of heavy weapons would be unquestionably
warranted.

I thought the whole time I would be able to show something that would kind of reflect the entire scope of what a
SWAT officer might go through sometimes, where you actually do need the equipment, Atkinson explained.

Instead, the filmmaker repeatedly found himself watching police with military-grade weaponry executing dubious search
warrants.

The frequency of the raids was particularly shocking, with one of the officers in the film claiming his team does 200 such
operations a year.

By comparison, Atkinson notes, his father performed a total of 29 search warrant raids over his entire 13 years in SWAT -
according to some estimates, SWAT teams now carry out between 50,000 to 80,000 raids across the country annually.

The search warrants, were told, are always used for massive drug dealers and kingpins, and then we run in these
homes and we never found anything, Atkinson said.

Beyond the day-to-day breaking down of doors, Do Not Resist explores the growing role of private surveillance companies
in local policing, and law enforcements thirst for technology that can predict crimes before they happen.

An analyst inspects video feeds of a wide-scale aerial surveillance system being utilized by local police departments
The film highlights Persistence Surveillance Systems, a company offering low-cost aerial surveillance honed in Fallujah to
domestic law enforcement. Were not out to watch the whole world, just all the world thats got crime, Ross McNutt, the
president of the company, insists.

Thats the next wave in the militarization of police, Atkinson told The Intercept in an interview.

What we found was a whole slew of retired military officers now in the private sector now selling the exact same
surveillance technology that they just got back from Iraq and Afghanistan with to local law enforcement for small
money on the dollar.

The intent of Do Not Resist, Atkinson said, is to provide a glimpse inside the realities of American policing, challenge the
policing-for-profit model that has caused departments in economically depressed communities to treat their citizens as
walking ATM machines, call out a warrior culture that divides law enforcement from the public theyre sworn to serve, and
flag the dangers of war-zone technologies being applied domestically.

For the most part, the reaction from law enforcement has been positive, Atkinson said.

Ive had a lot of law enforcement really respond well to the film and say that it reflects these issues that a lot of
them have been working on themselves, he said.

As for his father, Atkinson said, watching the film stirs up uncomfortable feelings.

His major reaction was just disappointment in seeing how far the mission creep had actually gone, he said.

Its obviously disappointing to see something that you were dedicating your life to so completely, evolve into
something that you would never want to be a part of.

Related Articles:
New Zealand: Family denounces cold-blooded execution by police

Globalists are pitting blacks against whites in America to incite a bloody race war... here's how we can all win
together by refusing to be manipulated into hatred and rage

Leaked Memo Reveals Soros Plan for Federally Controlled Police

Police Murder Because They Are Trained To Murder - Paul Craig Roberts

How the Dallas Shootings Serve the Elites Race Wars and Police State Agenda

Dallas police shootings: Social Engineering and the American Police State

The Tamir Rice Story: How to Make a Police Shooting Disappear

The Police Are Victimized By Their Training

913 people shot dead by US police in 2015

Donald Trump Exposes Globalist Control & Criminal Clintons Live In Florida Speech
+ All-Out Effort To Destroy Trump Proves He's Not Part Of The Establishment
October 17 2016 | From: NextNewsNetwork / NaturalNews / Various

Do you want to see the most epic destruction of the Clintons and the Obama Administration ever
recorded? Of course you do.

There's no longer any question whatsoever about whether Trump is an insider or outsider.

Related: How Julian Assange Turned WikiLeaks Into Trumps Best Friend

This election will determine whether we are a free nation or whether we are not a democracy, but are in fact controlled by a
handful of global special interests, rigging the system, and our system is rigged."

The full speech is available here: Donald Trump Responds To False Harassment Allegations: Florida Speech

This election will determine whether we are a free nation or whether we are not a democracy, but are in
fact controlled by a handful of global special interests, rigging the system, and our system is rigged.

This is reality, you know it, they know it, I know it and pretty much the whole world knows it.
 The establishment and their media enablers, wield control over this nation through means that are very
well known. Anyone who challenges their control is deemed a sexist, a racist, a xenophobe and morally
deformed.

They will attack you, they will slander you, they will seek to destroy your career and your family, they will
seek to destroy everything about you including your reputation.

They will lie, lie, lie. And then again they will do worse than that.

They will do whatever is necessary, the Clintons are criminals, remember that. They are Criminals.

This is well documented and the establishment that protects them has engaged in a massive cover up of
widespread criminal activity at the State Department and the Clinton Foundation in order to keep the
Clintons in power.

Never in history have we seen such a cover up as this."

All-Out Effort To Destroy Trump Proves He's Not Part Of The Establishment
There's no longer any question whatsoever about whether Trump is an insider or outsider. The all-
out attack on Trump by the leftist media, democrats and the republican establishment now confirm
that the political elite are terrified of Donald Trump and will do anything to stop him.

As proof, just consider the "hot mic" lewd talking tape that was rolled out last Friday. This recording of Trump
speaking in a lewd, insensitive way about his sexual exploits with women was surreptitiously recorded over a
decade ago. It's now being seized upon by the same leftist media that whitewashes the entire history of Bill
Clinton's sexual assaults against women as well as Hillary's long history of extreme profanity and cursing at
everyone around her.
Related: The Donald Lives!

Over the last two days, many members of the Republican establishment have seized upon the tape to denounce Trump yet
again, ridiculously proclaiming they hold the moral high ground in America only because they've never yet been caught
hiring prostitutes or sodomizing little boys. (Yeah, do you really think these power-hungry Washington insiders are CLEAN
LIVING people? Get a grip...)

Fascinatingly, That's Actually Happening Right Now Across America, as Far as I Can Tell, is Three
things:

1. The people who were already opposed to Donald Trump are even more disgusted with his hot mic recording. But that
alone doesn't change the election because they weren't voting for him in the first place. Just because they hate him more
doesn't mean they get to vote twice. He lost their vote on day one when he said Rosie O'Donnell was a pig (or whatever he
said).

2. The people who have been supporting Donald Trump aren't surprised at all by his rude, crude demeanor in private.
Trump isn't the kind of president you elect when times are great and you need a polite head of state to represent your nation
with subtlety and etiquette.

Trump is an attack dog you elect as a last resort to try to save your country from being run into the ground by a
criminal cartel of government thugs. Trump, in other words, is a political SOLDIER. And soldiers talk s**t about
everybody, including men, women and especially their enemy. I don't care what he SAYS in private. I care what he DOES to
save America from being utterly overrun and destroyed.

3. People are realizing that EVERY power-seeking person has had similar moments of lewd talk in the past. From Barack
Obama's, Gotta have them ribs and p***y too! to the President's B*tch ni**a buy your own damn fries! escapade, the truth is
that everybody in power has moments of lewd, inappropriate speech.

If you think Hillary hasn't spoken this way to her own Secret Service guards, you're simply not informed about reality. Check
out 56 documented examples of Hillary Clinton cursing like mad over the last three decades.

The Trump Movement is Bigger than Donald Trump - It's Larger than Any One Person, No Matter
How Foul
The other big ah-ha in all this is that even if Donald Trump were to bow out of the election, the Trump movement
would continue to grow.

You didn't really think this was all about one man, did you? The rising up of people against the corrupt criminal elite is a
global phenomenon that's much larger than any one person.

The "Trump movement" isn't about Donald Trump the person -- who is a crude, aggressive political outsider -- it's about the
idea of demanding an end to government corruption and political elitism.

The Trump movement is about ending the Clinton nightmare for America. It's about giving the finger to Washington D.C. and
taking back our democracy from a corrupt class of professional criminals who have been in power for far too long.

Voting for Donald Trump isn't a vote for the person, it's a vote for the movement: the idea that real people across America
might regain their freedom from tyranny and oppression. It's about stopping the deliberate destruction of America by the
Obama / Clinton crime cartel, restoring accountability at the highest levels, and even indicting and imprisoning key
members of the criminal Washington elite.

A Do-or-Die Moment for America

This is a do-or-die moment for America. It's a simple choice between the ultimate corrupt insider (Hillary) vs. a total political
outsider that the entire establishment is desperately trying to destroy (Trump). If we elect Clinton, it's over for America. We
go down the rabbit hole of police state totalitarianism, the utter destruction of the Bill of Rights and will most likely end up in
a protracted civil war.
If we elect the outsider, we have one last chance to halt the tyranny, end the Clinton nightmare and send the political elite
packing.

This November 8th, we must elect the outsider regardless of how lewd, crude or insensitive he is in his private,
personal conversations. We aren't electing him to be a Saint. We're electing him to stop the Devil. Sometimes, you need a
nasty attack dog to get that job done.

Truth be told, if Donald Trump turned to Hillary Clinton and blasted her with the most vicious, horrific words imaginable,most
of America would cheer. It has really come to that.

As Zero Hedge correctly explains;

 There is a large swath of the American electorate that is simply fed up with the establishment and are intent upon
sending an outsider to shake up Washington... the more crass the better."

Curse at the man if you want, but don't abandon the movement. Vote Trump on November 8th, and stop the Clintons once
and for all. Stay informed at Trump.news

Related Articles:

Billionaire Trump Supporter Dan Pea Goes Off on Profanity-Laced EPIC RANT for Trump

The Speech That Will Make Donald Trump President

All Polls Favoring Clintons Candidacy Are Fake-Here Is How to Tell

Trump Says Federal Reserve Propped up Obamas False Economy With Cheap Money

This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected

Break-down of the second 'presidential' debate. Trump takes off shackles, delivers well deserved blows to Killary

Putin Sympathises With Trump

Aborting the Trump Revolution

Trump: Debate Was Rigged, Media Is Fabricating Stories From Inside Sources

Marcus Aurelius: Donald Trump As A giant middle finger

Bill O'Reilly: Media conglomerates have "ordered employees to destroy Trump"

Epic: Trey Gowdy Sweeps the Floop with Obama, Gets Standng Ovation

Agenda 21: Awareness And Activism + UN 2030 Agenda Decoded: Blueprint For The
Global Enslavement Of Humanity Under Corporate Masters
October 16 2016 | From: AmericanPolicyCenter / NaturalNews / Various

Sustainable Development: The Transformation of the Western World

Some think that the planet is in danger of global warming and over consumption. They really believe that the only
way to fix the problem is to control the flow of resources and wealth, which literally means changing human
civilization and the way we live.

This is an immense subject and many more articles are available in the Agenda 21 section of this website. This
article is from the US but the principles of Agenda 21 are global - it came from the UN.

The problem is, that requires a forced transformation of our entire society to comply, and that ultimately leads to a thirst for
power and topdown control that will eventually lead to tyranny.

In his book, Earth in the Balance, Al Gore warned that a wrenching transformation must take place to lead Western
countries away from the horrors of the Industrial Revolution.
Click on the image above to open a larger version in a new window

The process to do that is called Sustainable Development and its roots can be traced back to a UN policy document called
Agenda 21, adopted at the UNs Earth Summit in 1992.

Sustainable Development calls for changing the very infrastructure of the nation, away from private ownership and control of
property to nothing short of central planning of the entire economy often referred to as top-down control.

Where and when did the term Sustainable Development originate?

The term sustainable development was born in the pages of Our Common Future, the official report of the 1987 United
Nations World Commission on Environment and Development, authored by Gro Harlem Brundtland, Vice President
of the World Socialist Party.

For the first time the environment was tied to the tried and true Socialist goals of international redistribution of wealth. Said
the report;

Poverty is a major cause and effect of global environmental problems. It is therefore futile to attempt to deal with
environmental problems without a broader perspective that encompasses the factors underlying world poverty and
international inequality.

The term appeared in full force in 1992, in a United Nations initiative called the U.N. Sustainable Development Agenda 21,
or as it has become known around the world, simply Agenda 21. It was unveiled at the 1992 United Nations Conference on
Environment and Development (UNCED), ballyhooed as the Earth Summit.
In fact, the Earth Summit was one of the provisions called for in the Brundtland report as a means of implementing
Sustainable Development around the world. More than 178 nations adopted Agenda 21 as official policy. President George
H.W. Bush was the signatory for the United States.

What is Sustainable Development?

The 1989 Websters Dictionary defines Sustainable Yield as a requirement that trees cut down in a forest area be replaced
by new plantings to ensure future lumber supplies. Thats what most people think Sustainable Development means.

Proponents of Sustainable Development argue that it is about preserving resources for future generations. Whats wrong
with that? Nothing in theory.

That would be sustainable with a small s. Just common sense usage of natural resources. The problem is, major forces
now promoting it intend for Sustainable Development to be spelled with a capital S. They intend for a Socio-economic
political movement that probes, invades and changes every aspect of human civilization.

And thats the problem.

Imagine a world in which a specific ruling principle is created to decide proper societal conduct for every citizen.

That principle would be used to consider regulations guiding everything you eat, the kind of home you are allowed to live in,
the method of transportation you use to get to work, what kind of work you may have, the way you dispose of waste,
perhaps even the number of children you may have, as well as the quality and amount of education your children may
receive.

Sustainable development encompasses every aspect of our lives.

According to its authors, the objective of sustainable development is to integrate economic, social, and environmental
policies in order to achieve reduced consumption, social equity, and the preservation and restoration of biodiversity.

Top Sustainability Fallacies:

Lie: Sustainability is about protecting the environment

 Reality: It is a political movement to replace capitalism with governement control of everything

Lie: Free market capitalism is the principle cause of planetary degradation and is not sustainable

Reality: It is government control of the economy that is not sustainable

Lie: Private property is a source of social injustice, and too valuable to be subject to free markets

Reality: The right to own and use private property is a fundamental source of wealth creation

Lie: Green energy creates jobs

Reality: Green energy is unreliable, uncompetitive and renders industry unable to compete in world
parkets

Lie: C02 is a pollutant

Reality: C02 is the gas that all plants and crops breathe. More C02 = better agricultural production

Lie: The sustainability movement isn't trying to take away anyone's property rights or freedoms

Reality: The sustainability movement is relentlessly attacking property rights and freedoms

Lie: Climate change is catastrophic and anthropogenic and must be addressed through C02 abatement
schemes

Reality: Man made climate change is a hoax with numerous provable data points and thousands of
scientists going on the record - which is ignored by the cabal-controlled mainstream media

Lie: Compact development reduces pollution

Reality:Reality: Dense development is always correlated with intense pollution levels

Lie: Subways and mass transit can replace cars

Reality: They cannot. If they could there would be no cars in Manhattan

Lie: Compact urban development is more affordable for government

Reality: Empirical evidence proves compace development requires higher tax rates. Urbanisation strains
police, fire, educational and social services

Lie: Afforable housing for people of all income levels will ensure healthier better balanced
neighbourhoods
 Reality: Low income housing usually creates more problems than it solves thereby damaging
communities

The Sustainablists insist that society be transformed into feudal-like governance by making Nature the central organizing
principle for our economy and society, not human need or wants.

This idea essentially elevates nature above Humans [we are all on this planet, their premise is bullshit]. As such,
every societal decision would first be questioned as to how it might effect the environment.

To achieve this, Sustainablist policy focuses on three components; land use, education, and population control and
population reduction.

Here is a direct quote from the report of the 1976 UNs Habitat I conference which said:

Land... cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and
inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principle instrument of accumulation and
concentration of wealth, therefore, contributes to social injustice.

Some officials claim that Sustainable Development is just a local effort to protect the environment and contain development -
- just your local leaders putting together a local vision for the community.

Yet, the exact language and tactics for implementation of Sustainable Development are being used in nearly every city
around the globe from Lewiston, Maine to Singapore.

Local indeed.

In short, Sustainable Development is the process by which the world is being reorganized around a central
principle of state collectivism using the environment as bait.

One of the best ways to understand what Sustainable Development actually is can be found by discovering what is NOT
sustainable.

According to the UNs Biodiversity Assessment Report, items for our everyday lives that are NOT sustainable
include:

Ski fields

Grazing of livestock

Plowing of soil

Building fences

Industry

Single family homes

Paved and tarred roads

Logging activities

Dams and reservoirs

Power line construction

Economic systems that fail to set proper value on the environment (capitalism, free markets).
Maurice Strong, Secretary General of the UNs Rio Earth Summit in 1992 said;

Current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat intake, use of
fossil fuels, appliances, home and work airconditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable.

This goal is exactly the policies that are written into such legislation as Cap and Trade, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water
Act.

It is also the policy behind the many corporate commercials seen nightly on television which advocate Going Green".

They are all part of the efforts to modify consumer behavior to accept less, deal with higher energy prices, restrict
water use and place severe limitations on use of private property all under the environmental excuse.

And one of the most destructive tools used to enforce Sustainable Development policy is something called
the precautionary principle.

That means that any activities that might threaten human health or the environment should be stopped - even if no clear
cause and effect relationship has been established - and even if the potential threat is largely theoretical.

That makes it easy for any activist group to issue concerns or warnings by news release or questionable report against and
industry or private activity, and have those warnings quickly turned into public policy just in case.

Many are now finding non-elected regional governments and governing councils enforcing policy and regulations.

As these policies are implemented, locallyelected officials are actually losing their own power and decision-making ability in
their elected offices. More and more decisions are now being made behind the scenes in non-elected sustainability
councils armed with truckloads of federal regulations, guidelines, and grant money.

Related: Agenda 21: What Sustainable Development Really Means For You

The Three E's

According to its authors, the objective of Sustainable Development is to integrate economic, social, and environmental
policies in order to achieve reduced consumption, social equity, and the preservation and restoration of biodiversity.

The Sustainable Development logo used in most literature on the subject contains three connecting circles labeled along the
lines of Social Equity; Economic Prosperity; and Ecological Integrity (known commonly as the 3 E's).

Social Equity

Sustainable Developments Social Equity plank is based on a demand for social justice. Social Justice is described as the
right and opportunity of all people to benefit equally from the resources afforded us by society and the environment.

According to Sustainablist doctrine, it is a social injustice for some to have prosperity if others do not. It is a social
injustice to keep our borders closed.

It is a social injustice for some to be bosses and others to be merely workers. Social justice is a major premise of
Sustainable Development.

Another word for social justice is Socialism or Marxism. Karl Marx was the first to coin the phrase social justice.

Most recently the theory of social justice has been used to justify government takeover of health care. Today, the phrase is
used throughout Sustainablist literature.

The Sustainablist system is based on the principle that individuals must give up selfish wants for the needs of the common
good, or the community.

This is the same policy behind the push to eliminate our nations borders to allow the migration of those from other nations
into the United States to share our individually-created wealth and our taxpayers-paid government social programs.

Say the Sustainablists, Justice and efficiency go hand in hand. Borders, they say, are unjust.

Under the Sustainablist system, private property is an evil that is used simply to create wealth for a few. So too, is business
ownership. Instead, every worker / person will be a direct capital owner.
Property and businesses are to be kept in the name of the owner, keeping them responsible for taxes and other expenses,
however control is in the hands of the community (government).

Under Sustainable Development individual human wants, needs, and desires are to be conformed to the views and
dictates of social planners.

Harvey Ruvin, Vice Chair of the International Council on Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) said:

Individual rights will have to take a back seat to the collective in the process of implementing Sustainable
Development.

Economic Prosperity
Sustainable Developments economic policy is based on one overriding premise: That the wealth of the world was made
at the expense of the poor.

It dictates that, if the conditions of the poor are to be improved, wealth must first be taken from the rich.

[But this mandate does not apply to not the "elite" of course].

Consequently, Sustainable Developments economic policy is based, not on private enterprise, but on public / private
partnerships.

In the free-market of the past, most businesses were started by individuals who saw a need for a product or service and
they set out to fill it. Some businesses prospered to become huge corporations, some remained small mom and pop
shops, others failed and dissolved.

Most business owners were happy to be left alone to take their chances to run their businesses on their own, not
encumbered by a multiplicity of government regulations.

If they failed, most found a way to try again. In the beginning of the American Republic, governments main involvement was
to guarantee they had the opportunity to try.

In order to give themselves an advantage over competition, some businesses -- particularly large corporations
now find a great advantage in dealing directly with government, actively lobbying for legislation that will inundate
smaller companies with regulations that they cannot possibly comply with or even keep up with.

This government / big corporation back-scratching has always been a dangerous practice because economic power should
be a positive check on government power, and vise versa. If the two should ever become combined, control of such massive
power can lead only to tyranny.

One of the best examples of this was the Italian model in the first half of the Twentieth Century under Mussolinis Fascism.

Together, select business leaders who have agreed to help government impose Sustainablist green positions in their
business policies, and officials at all levels of government are indeed merging the power of the economy with the force of
government in Public / Private Partnerships on the local, state and federal levels.

As a result, Sustainable Development policy is redefining free trade to mean centralized global trade freely
crossing (or eliminating) national borders.

It definitely does not mean people and companies trading freely with each other. Its real effect is to redistribute
manufacturing, wealth, and jobs out of our borders and to lock away natural resources.

After the regulations have been put in place, literally destroying whole industries, new green industries created with federal
grants bring newfound wealth to the partners. This is what Sustainablists refer to as economic prosperity.

The Sustainable Development partnerships include some corporations both domestic and multination. They in turn are
partnered with the politicians who use their legislative and administrative powers to raid the treasury to fund and enforce the
scheme.
Of course, as the chosen corporations, which become a new elite, stamp out the need for competition through government
power, the real loser is the consumers who no longer count in market decisions. Government grants are now being used by
industry to create mandated green products like wind and solar power.

Products are put on the market at little risk to the industry, leaving consumers a more limited selection from which to choose.
True free markets are eliminated in favor of controlled economies which dictate the availability and quality of products.

Ecological Integrity

Nature has an integral set of different values (cultural, spiritual and material) where humans are one strand in
natures web and all living creatures are considered equal.

Therefore the natural way is the right way and human activities should be molded along natures rhythms. from
the UNs Biodiversity Treaty presented at the 1992 UN Earth Summit.

This quote lays down the ground rules for the entire Sustainable Development agenda.

It says humans are nothing special just one strand in the nature of things or, put another way, humans are simply
biological resources.

Funny that, the Cabal see us as "Human Resources" also. What a coincidence...

Sustainablist policy is to oversee any issue in which man interacts with nature which, of course, is literally everything.

And because the environment always comes first, there must be great restrictions over private property ownership and
control.

This is necessary, Sustainablists say, because humans only defile nature. Under Sustainable Development there
can be no concern over individual rights.
Individual human wants, needs, and desires are conformed to the views and dictates of social planners.

The UNs Commission on Global Governance said in its 1995 report:

Human activity combined with unprecedented increases in human numbers are impinging on the planets
basic life support system.

Action must be taken now to control the human activities that produce these risks.

Under Sustainable Development, limited government, as advocated by our Founding Fathers, is impossible because, we are
told, the real or perceived environmental crisis is too great.
Only government can be trusted to respond. Maurice Strong, Chairman of the 1992 UN Earth Summit said:

A shift is necessary toward lifestyles less geared to environmentally-damaging consumption patterns. The shift will
require a vast strengthening of the multilateral system, including the United Nations.

The politically based environmental movement provides Sustainablists camouflage as they work to transform systems of
government, justice, and economics.

It is a masterful mixture of socialism (with its top down control of the tools of the economy) and fascism (where
property is owned in name only with no individual owner control).

Sustainable Development is the worst of both the left and the right. It is not liberal, nor is it conservative.

It is a new kind of tyranny that, if not stopped, will surely lead us to a new Dark Ages of pain and misery yet unknown to
mankind.

UN Report: Habitat I Conference:

"Land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and
inefficiencies of the market.

Private land ownership is also a principle instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth,
therefore, contributers to social injustice."

Related: Environmentalism Is a Green Pagan Religion

The Reinvention of Government

Six months after his inauguration, President Bill Clinton issued Executive Order #12852 which created the Presidents
Council On Sustainable Development (PCSD) on June 29 1993.

The Councils Membership included:

Twelve Cabinet-level Federal Officials

Jonathan Lash, Pres. World Resources Institute

John Adams, Ex. Dir. National Resources Defense Council

Dianne Dillon-Ridgley, Pres. Zero Population

Michelle Perrault, International V.P., Sierra Club

John C. Sawhill, Pres. The Nature Conservancy

Jay D. Hair, Pres. World Conservation Union (IUCN)

Kenneth L. Lay, CEO, Enon Corporation

William D. Ruckelshaus, Chm., Browning-Ferris Industries & former EPA Administrator

Some of these members were representatives of the same groups which helped write Agenda 21 at the UN level, now
openly serving on the Presidents Council to create policy for the implementation of Sustainable Development at the federal
level.

With great fanfare the Council issued a comprehensive report containing all the guidelines on how our government was to
be reinvented under sustainable development.

Those guidelines were created to direct policy for every single federal agency, state government and local community
government. Their purpose was to translate the recommendations set forth in Agenda 21 into public policy administered by
the federal government.

They created the American version of Agenda 21 called Sustainable America - A New Consensus.

The Four Part Process Leading to Sustainable Development

So how is this wrenching transformation being put into place? There are four very specific routes being used. In the rural
areas its called the Wildlands Project.

In the cities its called Smart Growth. In business its called Public / Private Partnerships. And in government its
called Stakeholder Councils.
The Wildlands Project

"WE MUST MAKE THIS PLACE AN INSECURE AND INHOSPITABLE PLACE FOR CAPITALISTS AND THEIR
PROJECTS... WE MUST RELCAIM THE ROADS AND PLOWED LANDS, HALT DAM CONSTRUCTION, TEAR
DOWN EXISTING DAMS, FREE SHACKLED RIVERS AND RETURN TO WILDERNESS MILLIONS OF TENS OF
MILLIONS OF ACRES OF PRESENTLY SETTLED LAND.

- Dave Foremen, Earth First.

The Wildlands Project was the brainchild of Earth Firsts Dave Foreman and it literally calls for the re-wilding of
50% of all the land in every state back to the way it was before Christopher Columbus set foot on this land.

It is a diabolical plan to herd humans off the rural lands and into human settlements. Crazy you say! Yes. Impossible? Not
so fast. From Foreman, the plan became the blueprint for the UNs Biodiversity Treaty and quickly became international in
scope.

But how do you remove people from the land? One step at a time. Lets begin with a biosphere reserve. A national park will
do. A huge place where there is no human activity.

For example, Yellowstone National Park, devoid of human habitation can serve as its center. Then a buffer zone is
established around the reserve.
Inside the buffer only limited human activity is allowed. Slowly, through strict regulations, that area is squeezed until human
activity becomes impossible.

Once that is accomplished, the biosphere is extended to the former buffer zone borders and then a new buffer zone is
created around the now-larger biosphere and the process starts again. In that way, the Biosphere Reserve acts like a
cancer cell, ever expanding, until all human activity is stopped.

And there are many tools in place to stop human activity and grow the reserve.

Push back livestocks access to river banks on ranches, many times as much as 300. When the cattle cant reach the
stream, the rancher cant water them -- he goes out of business. Lock away natural resources by creating national parks.

It shuts down the mines -- and they go out of business. Invent a Spotted Owl shortage and pretend it cant live in a forest
where timber is cut. Shut off the forest.

Then, when no trees are cut, theres nothing to feed the mills and then there are no jobs, and -- they go out of business.
Locking away land cuts the tax base. Eventually the town dies. Keep it up and there is nothing to keep the people on the
land so they head to the cities. The wilderness grows just like Dave Foreman planned.

It comes in many names and many programs. Heritage areas, land management, wolf and bear reintroduction, rails to
trails, conservation easements, open space, and many more.

Each of these programs is designed to make it just a little harder to live on the land a little more expensive a little more
hopeless, literally herding people off their land and into designated human habitat areas cities.

In the West, where vast areas of open space make it easy to impose such polices there are several programs underway to
remove humans from the land. Today, there are at least 31 Wildlands projects underway, locking away more than 40
percent of the nations land.
The Alaska Wildlands Project seeks to lock away and control almost the entire state.

In Washington State, Oregon, Idaho, Montana parts of North and South Dakota, parts of California, Arizona, Nevada, New
Mexico, Wyoming, Texas, Utah, and more, there are at least 22 Wildlands Projects underway.

For example, one project called Yukon to Yellowstone (Y2Y) creates a 2000 mile no-mans land corridor from the Arctic to
Yellowstone.

East of the Mississippi, there are at least nine Wildlands projects, covering Maine, Pennsylvania, New York, West Virginia,
Ohio, Virginia, Tennessee, North and South Carolina, Georgia and Florida. Watch for names of Wildlands Projects like
Chesapeake Bay Watershed, Appalachian Restoration Project and Piedmont Wildlands Project.

How Did We Get Here? J. Gary Lawrence - Bill Clinton's Advisor for Sustainable
Development:

"Participating in a UN advocated planning process would very likely bring out many... right wing
conspiracy groups... who would actively work to defeat any elected official... undertaking Local Agenda 21.

So we call our process something else, such as "Comprehensive Planning", "Growth Management", or
"Smart Growth.""

Smart Growth
The second path is called Smart Growth. The process essentially puts a line around a city, locking off any growth
outside that line.

Such growth is disdainfully labeled Urban Sprawl. The plan then curtails the building of more roads to cut off access to the
newly created rural area. Inside the circle, concerted efforts are made to discourage the use of cars in preference to
public transportation, restricting mobility.

Because there is a restriction on space inside the controlled city limits, there is a created shortage of land and houses, so
prices go up. That means populations will have to be controlled, because now there is no room to contain more people.
Cities are now passing green regulations, forcing homeowners to meet strict guidelines for making their homes
environmentally compliant, using specific building materials, forcing roof replacements, demanding replacement of
appliances, and more.

Those not in compliance will be fined and will not be able to sell their homes. There are now efforts underway to impose so-
called smart meters which replace thermostats in homes.

Homeowners will not have control of such meters. Instead, the electric company will determine the necessary temperature
inside each home.

Government agencies or local policy boards will be tasked with the responsibility to conduct an energy audit in each home to
determine the steps necessary to bring the home into energy compliance. In Oakland, California, such restrictions will cost
each homeowner an estimated $36,000.
Related: Not So Smart Technology: Safety Inspector Blows The Whistle On Fire Hazards Of 'Smart' Electronics

The Cap N Trade bill contains a whole section on such restrictions for the nation, and most local communities are now busy
creating development plans that encompass many of the same restrictions.

There is now a new push to control food production under the label of Sustainable Farming. Food sheds are now being
advocated.

These are essentially government run farms located just outside the smart growth area circling the city.

Food is to be grown using strict guidelines which dictate what kinds of food is to be produced and the farming
practices to be used.

These are essentially based on the blue print of Chinese Agrarian villages that cannot possibly grow enough food to feed
the community unless populations are tightly controlled. True Sustainable farming programs discourage importing goods
from outside the community.

A Red Agenda Marked With a Pretty Green Name: "Sustainability"

Agenda 21 spread like an INFECTION: UN Agenda 21 > ICLEI > NGO's > Central / Regional Planners

Planning associations provide sample ordinances based on ECLEI doctin that originated in UN Agenda
21

Municipal plans become manifestos

Stake Holder Councils

Inside the cities, government is increasingly controlled by an elite ruling class called stake holder councils. These are mostly
Non-governmental organizations, or NGOs, which, like thieves in the night, converge on the community to stake their claim
to enforce their own private agendas.
The function of legitimately elected government within the system votes to create a system of boards, councils and even
regional governments to handle every aspect of day-to-day operation of the community.

Once in place, the councils and boards basically replace the power of elected officials with non-elected, appointed rulers
answerable to no one.

The councils are controlled by a small minority in the community, but they are all - powerful. They force citizens to seek
permission (usually denied) for any changes to private property.

They use such excuses as historic preservation, water use restrictions, energy use, and open space restrictions.
They will dictate that homeowners must use special green light bulbs and force stores to only use paper bags,
for example.

They over-burden or even destroy business, creating stiff regulations on manufacturing and small business in the
community. They may dictate the number of outlets a business may have in a community, not matter what the population
demands. For example, in San Francisco there can only be seven McDonalds.

They can dictate the kind of building materials owners can use in their private home or whether one can build on their
property at all.

Then, if they do grant a permit for building, they might not decide to let the property owner acquire water and
electricity for the new home and they may or may not give you a reason for being turned down.

As part of Sustainable health care, they may even dictate that you get the proper exercise as determined by the
government. Again, San Francisco has built a new federal building the greenest ever built.

The elevators will only stop on every third floor so riders are forced to use stairs for their own health, of course.

These councils fit almost perfectly the definition of a State Soviet: a system of councils that report to an apex council and
then implement a predetermined outcome. Soviets are the operating mechanism of a government-controlled economy.

So Many Things Making So Little Sense: (US)

EPA drives industries overseas where the pollution increases

EPA embraces ethanol while blaming farming for pollution

Master plans across America overtly ignore property rights

Environmental nooses rob property rights and individual freedoms based on unsettled science, distorted
 statistics and exaggerated predictions

Focus on Social Equity eclipsing life-liberty property (Why?)

Municipal master plans have become manifestos

People in tears across America

Public / Private Partnerships

The fourth path to imposing Sustainable Development is Public/Private Partnerships (PPPs). Unfortunately, today,
many Conservative / Libertarian organizations are presenting PPPs as free enterprise and a private answer for
keeping taxes down by using business to make a better society.

There are certain areas where private business contracts to do jobs such as running school cafeterias through a competitive
bid system. That type of arrangement certain does serve the tax payers and provides better services. Thats not how PPPs
are used though Sustainable Development.

In truth, many PPPs are nothing more than government-sanctioned monopolies in which a few businesses are
granted special favors like tax breaks, the power of eminent domain, non-compete clauses and specific guarantees
for return on their investments.

That means they can fix prices, charge beyond what the market demands, and they can use the power of government to put
competition out of business. That is not free enterprise. And it is these global corporations that are pushing the green
agenda.

If you can stomach reading this horse shit, click on the image above
PPPs were the driving force behind the Trans Texas Corridor, using eminent domain to take more than 580,000 acres of
private land - sanctioned by the partnership with the Texas government. And PPPs are taking over highways and local water
treatment plants in communities across the nation.

PPPs in control of the water system can control water consumption a major part of the Sustainable Development blueprint.

Fueled by federal grant programs through the EPA, the auto industry has produced and forced onto the market
green cars that no one wants to buy, such as the Chevy Volt.

For its part of the partnership, government passed regulations that keep gas prices high to make them more inviting.

The federal government has entered into many partnerships with alternative energy companies in a move to force wind
power and solar power on an uninterested public. Again, such industries only exist though the power and of government
determined to enforce a certain political agenda. They would never survive in an honest free market.

Using government to ban its own product, General Electric is forcing the mercury- laden green light bulb, costing 5
times the price of incandescent bulbs. Such is the reality of green industry, which depends more on government subsidy
and grants than on customers.

Related: These Light Bulbs Cause Anxiety, Migraines, And Even Cancer

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is the root of the Free Trade process and the fuel for PPPs between
international corporations and government, thereby creating an elite class of connected businesses or what Ayn Rand
called the power of pull.

Success in the PPP world is not based on quality of product and service, but on who you know in high places.

To play ball in the PPP game means accepting the mantra of Sustainable Development and helping to implement it, even if
it means going against your own product. Thats why Home Depot uses its commercials to oppose cutting down trees and
British Petroleum advocates reducing the use of oil.

It is not free enterprise, but a Mussolini-type fascism of government and private industry organized in a near impenetrable
force of power. And its all driven by the Agenda 21 blueprint of Sustainable Development.
 ICLEI: Charter 1.7 - Principles
The Association shall promote, and ask its individual members to adopt, the following Earth Charter
Principles to guide local action:

6. Prevent harm as the best method of environmental protection and, when knowledge is limited, apply a
precautionary approach.

7. Adopt patterns of production, consumption, and reproduction that safeguard Earths regenerative
capacities, human rights, and community well-being. (Communitarianism with forced sterilization?)
(9) Eradicate poverty as an ethical, social, and environmental imperative.

9. Eradicate poverty as an ethical, social, and environmental imperative.

10. Ensure that economic activities and institutions at all levels promote human development in an
equitable and sustainable manner.

11. Affirm gender equality and equity as prerequisites to sustainable development and ensure universal
access to education, health care, and economic opportunity.

14. Integrate into formal education and life-long learning the knowledge, values, and skills needed for a
sustainable way of life.

What Kinds of Groups Promote this in the U.S.A.?

Many people ask how dangerous international policies can suddenly turn up in state and local government, all seemingly
uniform to those in communities across the nation and around the globe.

The answer meet ICLEI, a non-profit, private foundation, dedicated to helping locally elected representatives fully
implement Agenda 21 in the community.

Originally known as the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), today the group simply calls
itself ICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability.

In 1992, ICLEI was one of the groups instrumental in creating Agenda 21.

The groups mission is to push local communities to transform the way governments operate, creating a community plan,
creating a wide range of non-elected planning and councils which then impose severe regulations and oversight policies,
affecting every homeowner, every business, every school; literally every aspect of the citizens lives.

And its having tremendous success.

Currently there are over 600 American cities in which ICLEI is being paid dues with tax dollars from city councils to
implement and enforce Sustainable Development. ICLEI is there to assure that the mayors keep their promises and meet
their goals. Climate change and the goal to cut the communities carbon footprint is, of course, the ICLEI mantra.

Heres just some of the programs ICLEI provides cities and towns, in order to spread their own particular political
agenda in the name of community services and environmental protection, they include:
 Software programs to help set the goals for community development which leads to controlling use of private
property;

Access to a network of Green experts, newsletters, conferences and workshops to assure all city employees
are in the process;

Toolkits, online resources, case studies, fact sheets, policy and practice manuals, and blueprints used by other
communities;

Training workshops for staff and elected officials on how to develop and implement the programs;

And, of course, theres Notification of relevant grant opportunities this is the important one money with
severe strings attached.

ICLEI recommends that the community hire a full time sustainability manager, who, even in small towns, can devote 100%
of his time to assure that every nook and corner of the government is on message and under control.

Using environmental protection as the excuse, these programs are about reinventing government with a specific political
agenda. ICLEI and others are dedicated to transforming every community in the nation to the Agenda 21 blueprint.

In addition to ICLEI, groups like the Sierra Club, Nature Conservancy and Audubon Society, NGOs which also helped write
Sustainable Development policy have chapters in nearly every city. They know that Congress has written legislation
providing grants for cities that implement Sustainablist policy. They agitate to get the cities to accept the grants.

If a city rejects the plan, they then agitate to the public, telling them that their elected representatives have cost the
city millions in their tax dollars. In the end, through such tactics, the NGOs usually get their way.

The NGOs are joined in their efforts by professional planning groups and associations such as the American Planning
Association (APA), The Renaissance Planning Group, and the International City/County Management association (ICMA).
IN fact there are literally hundreds, if not thousands, of non-profits, NGOs and planning groups living off the grant money,
working to enforce Sustainable Development policy at every level of government.
 The APA - Professional Planners [or Anti-Capitalist Political Advocacy?]
APA embraces ICLEI Programmes(s)

1.1 "The built envoronment is a primary contributor to climate change" ...Business as usual will not
suffice."

1.3 Social Equity and Climate CHange (&Environmental Justice)

2.4 #6: "Should reduce reliance on coal..."

2.4 #10: Growe food for local consumption(Starve the world?)

2.4 #14: Reduce VMT (Vehicle Miles Travelled)

2.4 #15: Cap & Trade for carbon ...needed.

Land Use #15: Create city-funded housing repair programs

Transportation #4: Increase CAFE standards

Here Are Just a Few to Watch For:

The American Planning Association (APA) is the nations leading enforcer of Sustainable policy. It came into being in 1978
and can be found in literally every community in the nation. It doesnt have the same open ties to the UN as does
ICLEI, but is every bit as involved, if not more so.

The APAs Growing Smart Legislative Guide Book is found in nearly every university, state and county in the
country. It is the planning guide preferred by most urban and regional planners.

The American Planning Association is one of many members of the PCSD. They partner with ICLEI & ICMA in the
implementation of sustainable development. ICMA, International City / County Management Association, is an organization
of professional local government leaders building sustainable communities worldwide.
Christchurch, New Zealand

ICMA provides technical and management assistance, training, and information resources in the areas of performance
measurement, ethics education and training, community and economic development, environmental management,
technology, and other topics to its members and the broader local government community.

They are aided in their efforts through such as the U.S. Conference of Mayors, National Governors Association, National
League of Cities, the National Association of County Administrators and several more groups that are supposed to
represent elected officials.

The Renaissance Planning Group is an urban planning firm. They played a critical role in Floridas Forever Program. The
Forever Program is Floridas premier conservation and recreation lands acquisition program. Florida Forever is the
largest public land acquisition program of its kind in the United States.

With approximately 9.8 million acres of conservation land in Florida, more than 2.4 million acres were purchased under the
Florida Forever and P2000 programs.
Propaganda from idiots for idiots

In 2007, the Virginia state legislature passed HB 3202 mandating that counties with the prescribed growth rate establish
high density urban development areas. As a result, to date, 67 counties in the Commonwealth of Virginia are required to
establish urban development areas.

The process and proposed land use planning that is being implemented, follows the very same policies called for in Agenda
21s biodiversity plan. This requirement by the state forces local governments to compromise your private property through
zoning measures called for in the Smart Growth program for sustainable development.

The American Farmland Trust (AFT) formed in 1980, works to acquire and control farmer development rights and the
purchase of Agriculture Easements which drastically reduce, if not eliminate private ownership of the land.

PlannersNetwork.org
APA embraces ICLEI Programmes(s)

Statement of Principles:

"We believe planning should be a tool for allocating resources... and eliminating the great inequalities of
wealth and power in our society... because the free market has proven incapable of doing this."

The Danger is in the Process

Sustainable policies are being sold universally to the public as a means to protect the environment and control growth. That
is simply the excuse for the policies being implemented in its name.

The real problem is the PROCESS through which Sustainable Development is being forced on unsuspecting citizens.

The comprehensive land use plans are being steered by planning groups through manipulation by facilitated stakeholder
consensus councils.

Though their meetings are open to the public, they are void of any public input.

The predetermined outcome severely restricts land use and compromises private property ownership in an already
distressed market.
They answer to no one and they are run by zealots with their own political agenda imposing international laws and
regulations.

Local homeowners have no say in the process and in most cases are shut out. Sometimes they are literally thrown
out of council meetings because they want to discuss how a regulation is going to affect their property or
livelihood.

Communities have dealt with local problems for 200 years. Some use zoning, some dont. But locally elected town councils
and commissioners, which meet and discuss problems with the citizens, are how this nation was built and prospered.

Today, under Sustainable Development, NGOs like ICLEI and the APA move in to establish non-elected boards, councils
and regional government bodies.
Despite the Senates refusal to ratify the Biodiversity Treaty in 1994, the Agenda 21 policies called for by the convention, are
being implemented nationwide. No matter where you live, rest assured Agenda 21 policies are being implemented in your
community.

Proponents of Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development attempt to ridicule those who oppose the programs as being
paranoid radicals who are spreading conspiracy theories about what they call an obscure 20 year old UN document.

Yet, in 2012 the UN sponsored Rio+20, in which 50,000 delegates from around the world to celebrate Agenda 21 and
find means to complete its implementation.

Sustainable Development is not about saving the environment. It is about a revolutionary coup. It is about establishing
global governance and abandoning the principles of Natural Law on which America was founded.

The politically-based environmental movement provides Sustainablists camouflage as they work to transform global systems
of government, justice, and economics.

Its a masterful mixture of Socialism, (with its top-down control of the tools of the economy); fascism (where property is
owned in name only with no private control); and Corporatism, (where partnerships between government and private
business create government sanctioned monopolies.)

Sustainable Development is the worst of both the left and the right. It is bad policy pushed by both liberal and
conservatives.

It is a new kind of tyranny that, if not stopped, will surely lead all human kind to a new Dark Ages of pain and
misery.

What has Sustainability Become?

Unfortunately, the environmental movement has been hijacked as a convenient excuse to attack
capitalism; blame America; transfer wealth; impinge on Constitutional rights; and install a government-run
socio-economic system.
 United Nations paradigm: Capitalism and private property rights are not sustainable, and pose the single
greatest threat to the world's ecosystem and social equity.

How to Fight Back Against Sustainable Development

Be aware of the world in which your elected officials live.

See below: ICLEI doesn't come with flashing lights that say "ICLEI".

It comes wrapped in a plain green package labelled "Smart Growth" or "Sustainability":

To begin the effort to fight back against Sustainable Development it is vital to first understand the massive structure you are
facing.

You need to know who the players are and you need to understand the political world your officials are operating in.

This may help you to understand that perhaps they arent all evil globalists, but, perhaps, good people who are
surrounded by powers that wont let them see the reality of the policies they are helping to implement.

Im certainly not making excuses for them, but before you rush in and start yelling about their enforcing UN policies on the
community, here are some things you should consider.

In most communities, you mayor, city council members and county commissioners are automatically members of national
organizations like the National Conference of Mayors, National League of Cities, and the national associations for city
council members, and the same for commissioners.

Those in the state government also have the National Governors Association and state legislators have their national
organization.

For the past twenty years or more, each and every one of these national organizations have been promoting Sustainable
Development and related policies. The National Mayors Conference and the National Governors Association have been
leaders in this agenda, many times working directly with UN organizations to promote the policy.

That is the message your local elected leaders hear; from the podium; from fellow officials from other communities; from
experts theyve been told to respect; in committee meetings; from dinner speakers; from literature they are given at such
meetings.

They are told of legislation that will be soon be implemented, and they are even provided sample legislation to
introduce in their communities.

Back home, they are surrounded by a horde of stakeholder groups, each promoting a piece of the agenda, be it policies for
water control, energy control, development control, specific building materials control, historic preservation and control of
downtown development, conservation easements and development rights for control of rural property.

These groups like ICLEI, the American Planning Association, the Renaissance Planning Group, and many more, are heavily
involved with state and federal plans. They arrive in your community with blue prints, state and federal plans, grants and lots
of contacts in high places.

There are official programs for going Green, Comprehensive land use plans, and lots of programs for the kids in the
classrooms.
There is also a second horde involved in the Sustainablist invasion state and federal agency officials including EPA
agents; air and water quality agents; Interior Department officials, HUD officials, energy officials, Commerce Department
officials, and on and on all targeting your locally elected officials with policy, money, regulations, reports, special planning
boards, meetings, and conferences, all promoting the exact same agenda.

And dont forget the news media, both locally and nationally, also promoting the Sustainablist agenda, attacking anyone not
going along, ready to quickly use the extremist label against them.

The message is clear - Sustainable Development is reality politically correct, necessary, unquestionable, and it
has consensus.

Is your head spinning yet? Think of the affect all of this has on a poor local official who just thought he would run for office
and serve his community. This is his reality. This is what he thinks government is supposed to be because, after all,
everyone he is dealing with says so.

Now, as he is surrounded by all of these important, powerful folks, along comes a local citizen who tells him that some guy
named Tom DeWeese says all of these programs are from the UN and are taking away our liberty.

Who? He said what? Come on, Im not doing that. And I dont have time to talk about it. I have another meeting to go to.

If we are going to successfully fight Agenda 21, it is vitally important that we all recognize this reality as we plan to
deal with it and defeat it. With that in mind, I offer the following ideas.

How to Fight Back

First and foremost, dont try to fight alone. If you try to attend local meetings by yourself you will be ignored. You will need
others to plan and implement strategy.

You have family and friends. Start with them. Ask them to help look into some local policies. Even if they start off skeptical
about your concerns, it wont take them long to see the truth.

Check out of there is a local tea party or even a local Republican group. Churches are a target of such policies. Alert people
at your church and ask them to help fight back.

Find people to help you!

Research: Dont even begin to open up a fight until you know certain details. First, who are the players in your
community. What privately funded stakeholder groups are there? What is their agenda?

What other communities have they operated in? What projects? What results? Who are their members in your community?

Are they residents or did they come from out of town? (That could prove to be valuable information later in the fight).
Finding this information may be the hardest of your efforts. They like to operate out of the spotlight.

Its not likely that the town will carry official documentation of who it is working with. It probably will require that you attend
lots of meetings and hearings. Take note of who is there and their role. Do this quietly. Dont announce to the community
what you are doing. Dont make yourselves a target. You may have to ask questions and that may raise some eyebrows.
But stay out of the way as much as possible.
Second, get all the details on the plans your community is working on. Has there already been legislation passed? Most of
this information can be found on the town website. Knowing this information will help you put together a plan of action.

Once you have it, you can begin to take your fight public.

With the information you have gathered, begin to examine the effect the policies will have on the community and its
residents. Find who the victims of the legislation or regulation may be. This will be of great value as you confront city council.
People understand victim stories especially if it is them. It is the best way to undermine the process and help get people
to join your cause.

You will find that Conservation Easements have raised taxes as much of the county land is removed from the tax rolls
someone has to make up for the lost revenue and the payment of easements. Are stakeholder groups helping to get
landowners to sign up for the easements and if so do they get any kind of kickbacks?

Who are getting the easements? You may find the rich land owners have found a great loophole to cut their own property
taxes as the middle class makes up the short fall. This will help bring usually disinterested people to your cause.

Does the community plan call for reduction of energy use? If so, look for calls for energy audits and taxes on energy use.
The audits mean that the government has set a goal to reduce energy use. It may follow that government agents are going
to come into your home to inspect your energy use.

Then they are going to tell you what must be done in your home to cut usage. That will cost you money. Dont fall for the line
that it is all voluntary to help you save money.

They havent gone to this much trouble to be ignored. Regulations are not voluntary.

These are just a couple of examples of what to look for as you do your research.

There are many more, including meters on wells to control water use, smart meters to take away your control of your
thermostat; non elected boards and councils to control local development and implement smart growth, leading to
population growth; Public / Private Partnerships with local and large corporations to go Green; creation of open space;
pushing back live stock from streams, enforcing sustainable farming methods that restrict energy and water use in farming
practices; and much more.
It all leads to higher costs and shortages, in the name of environmental protection and conservation and controlling growth
(anti-sprawl, they call it).

Your goal is to stop Sustainable Development in your community. That means a campaign to stop the creation of non-
elected regional government councils that are difficult to hold accountable.

It means to stop local governments from taking grants that come with massive strings attached to enforce compliance.

And it means you must succeed in removing outsider organizations and Stakeholder groups that are pressuring your elected
officials to do their bidding. Civic Action: Armed with as much information as you can gather (and armed with the ability to
coherently discuss its details) you are ready to take your battle to the public.

First, it would be better for you to try to discuss it privately with some of your elected officials, especially if you know them.
Tell them what you have found and explain why you are opposed.

First discuss the effects of the policies on the average citizen. Explain why they are bad. Only very slowly should you bring
the conversation around to the origin of such polices - Agenda 21 and the UN.

Dont start there. It is important that you build the case to show that these policies are not local, but part of a
national and international agenda. If this conversation does not go well (and it probably wont) then you have to
take it to the next level to the public.

Begin a two fold campaign. First, write a series of letters to the editor for the local newspaper. Make sure that you are not
alone.

Coordinate your letters with others who will also write letters to back up and support what you have written. These will
generate more letters from others, some for your position and other against you.

Be prepared to answer those against you as they are probably written by those Stakeholders who are implementing the
policies in the first place. This may be a useful place for you to use what youve learned about these groups to discredit
them.
Second, begin to attend Council meetings and ask questions. The response from the council members will determine your
next move. If you are ignored and your questions met with silence or hostility, prepare a news release detailing your
questions and the background you have as to why you asked those questions.

Pass the news release out to the people at the next meeting as well as the news media. Attend the next meeting and the
next demanding answers. Be sure to organize people to come with you.

Dont try this alone. If necessary, have demonstrators outside city hall carrying signs or handing out flyers with the
name and picture of the officials who wont answer your questions along with the question you asked including
the details you have about the policy.

The point in all of this is to make the issue public. Take away their ability to hide the details from the public. Expose the
hoards of outsiders who are dictating policy in your community. Force the people you elected to deal with YOU not the
army of self-appointed stakeholders and government officials. Shine a very right spotlight on the roaches under the rock.

If the newspaper is with you, great, but you will probably find it working with the other side. It may be difficult to get a fair
shake in the newspaper or on radio.
Thats why you deliver your news releases to both the media and the public. Get signs, and flyers in stores if necessary. And
keep it up for as long as it takes. Dont stop the public demonstration until you had acquired victory, or at least started a
public debate.

The final step is to use the energy you have created to run candidates for office against those who have ignored and fought
you. Ultimately, that is the office holders worst nightmare and may be the most effective way to get them to respond and
serve their constituents.

New Tactic

As mentioned in the beginning, over the past couple of years, as weve educated people on Agenda 21 and its UN origins,
the natural reaction by concerned citizens and activists has been to rush into city hall and accuse their elected
representatives of implementing international policies on the town.

This has, of course, been met with skepticism and ridicule on the part of some of the elected officials (egged on by the NGO
stakeholder groups and planning organizations).

Today, the promoters of Agenda 21, including ICLEI and the American Planning Association (APA) have worked
overtime to paint our movement as crazed conspiracy theorists wearing tin foil hats and hearing voices.

So, its time to change tactics.

Here is an undeniable fact: Agenda 21 / Sustainable Development cannot be enforced without usurping or diminishing
private property rights. So, we need to begin to challenge the plans that affect private property rights.
However, as we move in that direction, we must have a clear understanding of what property rights are. Many people today
have little or varying ideas of property rights.

Forty years ago people understood things like No Trespassing, My home is my castle, and step across that line and
suffer the consequences. Such ideas today seem quaint and antiquated to many, especially with government invading
private property at will.

Sometimes, in order to purchase property or to get access to services, we sign documents that say government or utility
agents are free to come on our property at will. The idea of Keep Out is almost unheard of.

However, to demand that your private property be honored and protected a definition must be established before you start
the effort.

As you stand in front of the elected officials at their regular meeting, ask them simply;

As you bring these planners into our community and begin to implement their programs, what guarantees do I
have that you will protect my private property rights?

At this point you havent mentioned Agenda 21, and you havent attacked planning. You are simply asking a non-
combative question.

They will assure you that they are in full support of protecting private property.

And then you say;

Well, Im happy to hear that. But, I would really like to have that in writing.

And you present the resolution to them. If you can read it aloud to the meeting, so much the better. They may say they need
to take it under consideration and will get back to you. Fine.

Make sure you are back at the next meeting to ask about it. If they say No. You simply ask Why? and take it from there.

Do not attempt this alone. The key to this effort is persistence and organization.

If they have refused to sign it then you need 5 or 10 people to stand up and ask why. You need to escalate this at each
meeting until it becomes a public issue -
 Why wont your elected officials sign a simple document that says they will protect your private property rights?
What are they hiding in the plans they are presenting to us?

This can and will lead to protests, letters to the editor and other media available to you. Put the elected officials names on
signs carried by protestors who are rallying outside the next council or planning meeting .

Make them the issue. What you are really doing is laying the ground work for a campaign to defeat them in the next election.
It is also important to do research into what planning groups, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) federal grants and
agencies may be involved in the process. All of them have a background.

Find out who they are and what they have done in the past in other communities and present that info to your fellow citizens
as a warning of what is to come. I recommend that you create a rapid response team to be prepared to immediately
respond in the media to anything they do. Make them scared to act.

ICLEI / Agenda 21 Dogma

Elevates nature above humans

40 chapters of socialist control mechanisms

Human settlements;

Educate with environment as central principle

Unsustainable: Ski lodges, Golf courses, asphalt, fossil fuels, consumerism, irrigation, commercial
farms, livestock grazing.

Fighting ICLEI

If ICLEI is in your city, the details about Agenda 21 and the UN connection is easier. Your community is paying them dues
with your tax dollars. Here is how to handle them:

If your council derides your statements that their policies come from the UNs Agenda 21, simply print out the home
page from ICLEIs web site: www.iclei.org
This will have all of the UN connections youve been talking about, in ICLEIs own words.

Pass out the web page copies to everyone in the chamber audience and say to your elected officials;

Dont call me a radical simply for reporting what ICLEI openly admits on its own web site. Im just the one pointing
it out you are the ones who are paying our tax dollars to them.

Then demand that those payment stop. You have proven your case.

Stopping Consensus Meetings

Most public meetings are now run by trained and highly paid facilitators whose jobs is to control the meeting and bring it to a
preplanned conclusion. If he is good at his job, the facilitator can actually make the audience think the consensus they
have reached on and issue or proposal is actually their idea.

This is how Sustainable Development is being implemented across the nation, especially in meetings or planning boards
that are advertised as open to the public.

They really dont want you there and the tactic is used to move forward in full view of the public without them
knowing what is happening. There is nothing free or open about the consensus process.

It is designed to eliminate debate and close discussion.

To bust up the process you must never participate, even to answer a question.

To do so allows the facilitator to make you part of the process. Instead, you must control the discussion.

Here is a quick suggestion on how to foul up the works:

Never go alone to such a meeting. You will need at least three people the more the better.

Do not sit together. Instead, fan out in the room in a triangle formation.

Know ahead of time the questions you want to ask: Who is the facilitator?

What is his association with the organizers? Is he being paid?

Where did these programs (being proposed) come from? How are they to be funded?

One question to ask over and over again, both at facilitated meetings and city council meetings, is this:

With the implementation of this policy, tell me a single right or action I have on my property that doesnt
require your approval or involvement. What are my rights as a property owner?

Make them name it.

You will quickly see that they too understand there are no property rights left. By asking these questions you are putting his
legitimacy in question, building suspicion among the rest of the audience, destroying his authority.

They will try to counter, either by patronizing and humoring you, at first, or, then becoming hostile, moving to have you
removed as a disruptive force.

Thats where the rest of your group comes in. They need to back you up, demand answers to your questions. If you have
enough people in the room you can cause a major disruption, making it impossible for the facilitator to move forward with his
agenda.

Do not walk out and leave the room to him. Stay to the end and make him shut down the meeting.

In Conclusion

These suggestions on how to fight back are, admittedly, very basic and elementary. They are meant only to be a guideline.
You will have to do your homework and adapt these tactics to your local situation.

These tactics are designed to create controversy and debate to force the Agenda 21 issue out of the secret
meetings and into public debate where they belong.

Many of these same tactics can be used at all levels of government, right up and into national legislation.

Our plan is to demand answers from elected officials who want to ignore us.

They must be taught that such actions have consequences. As we learn new, successful tactics, Ill share them
with activists across the world.

The American Policy Center is now a partner in a new effort to create tactics and provide education to activists called
Sustainable Freedom Lab - and hopefully it can serve as a resource for thw eorld, not just America. Here activists can share
their findings, successful tactics and research with the rest of the movement.

The website is www.sustainablefreedomlab.com.

The exciting news is that, finally, people are starting to understand that Agenda 21 is destroying our nations and they are
beginning to fight back. The UN Agenda 21 house of cards is being exposed and it will fall with continued efforts and
exposure by the people, and for the people - not just America - Worldwide.

The battle to stop the UNs Agenda 21 is ragging on the local level across the world.

Related Articles:

Australian Ex-Politician Whistle-Blower Ann Bressington Exposes Agenda 21

 Inevitable NIMBY Backlash Begins

Six Issues That Are Agenda 21

Palmy Beyond Petrol

Leaked plans for Auckland Suburbs: Will Apartments be Built in Your Backyard?

UN 2030 Agenda Decoded: Blueprint For The Global Enslavement Of Humanity Under
Corporate Masters

This week, Michael Snyder published an important article entitled The 2030 Agenda: This Month
The UN Launches A Blueprint For A New World Order With The Help Of The Pope.

That article references this UN "2030 Agenda" document that pushes a blueprint for so-called "sustainable
development" around the world.

Related: Agenda 2030 Translator: Decoding The UNs New Sustainable Development Goals

This document describes nothing less than a global government takeover of every nation across the planet.

The "goals" of this document are nothing more than code words for a corporate-government fascist agenda that
will imprison humanity in a devastating cycle of poverty while enriching the world's most powerful globalist
corporations like Monsanto and DuPont.

In the interests of helping wake up humanity, I've decided to translate the 17 points of this 2030 agenda so that readers
everywhere can understand what this document is really calling for.
To perform this translation, you have to understand how globalists disguise their monopolistic agendas in "feel good"
language.

Here's the point-by-point translation. Notice carefully that nowhere does this document state that "achieving human
freedom" is one of its goals.

Nor does it explain HOW these goals are to be achieved. As you'll see here, every single point in this UN agenda is to be
achieved through centralized government control and totalitarian mandates that resemble communism.

Translation of the UN's "2030 Agenda Blueprint for Globalist Government" (Controlled by
Corporate Interests)

Goal 1. End poverty in all its forms everywhere

Translation: Put everyone on government welfare, food stamps, housing subsidies and handouts that make them obedient
slaves to global government. Never allow people upward mobility to help themselves.

Instead, teach mass victimization and obedience to a government that provides monthly "allowance" money for basic
essentials like food and medicine. Label it "ending poverty."

Goal 2. End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture

Translation: Invade the entire planet with GMOs and Monsanto's patented seeds while increasing the use of deadly
herbicides under the false claim of "increased output" of food crops.
Engineer genetically modified plants to boost specific vitamin chemicals while having no idea of the long-term consequences
of genetic pollution or cross-species genetic experiments carried out openly in a fragile ecosystem.

Goal 3. Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages

Translation: Mandate 100+ vaccines for all children and adults at gunpoint, threatening parents with arrest and
imprisonment if they refuse to cooperate. Push heavy medication use on children and teens while rolling out "screening"
programs. Call mass medication "prevention" programs and claim they improve the health of citizens.

Goal 4. Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all

Translation: Push a false history and a dumbed-down education under "Common Core" education standards that produce
obedient workers rather than independent thinkers. Never let people learn real history, or else they might realize they don't
want to repeat it.

Goal 5. Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls

Translation: Criminalize Christianity, marginalize heterosexuality, demonize males and promote the LGBT agenda
everywhere. The real goal is never "equality" but rather the marginalization and shaming of anyone who expresses any male
characteristics whatsoever.
The ultimate goal is to feminize society, creating widespread acceptance of "gentle obedience" along with the self-
weakening ideas of communal property and "sharing" everything.

Because only male energy has the strength to rise up against oppression and fight for human rights, the suppression of
male energy is key to keeping the population in a state of eternal acquiescence.

Goal 6. Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all

Translation: Allow powerful corporations to seize control of the world's water supplies and charge monopoly prices to "build
new water delivery infrastructure" that "ensures availability."

Goal 7. Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all

Translation: Penalize coal, gas and oil while pushing doomed-to-fail "green" energy subsidies to brain-dead startupsheaded
by friends of the White House who all go bankrupt in five years or less.
Especially when ACTUAL "Green Energy" - actual "Free Energy" technologies and so many other advanced "Clean" technologies have been
suppressed by the Cabal to control us and give them leverage to impinge their bullshit fascist New World Order sustainablility on us. Or try, at least.

The green startups make for impressive speeches and media coverage, but because these companies are led by corrupt
idiots rather than capable entrepreneurs, they always go broke. (And the media hopes you don't remember all the fanfare
surrounding their original launch.)

Goal 8. Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and
decent work for all

Translation: Regulate small business out of existence with government-mandated minimum wages that bankrupt entire
sectors of the economy. Force employers to meet hiring quotas of LGBT workers while mandating wage tiers under a
centrally planned work economy dictated by the government. Destroy free market economics and deny permits and licenses
to those companies that don't obey government dictates.

Goal 9.) Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation

Translation: Put nations into extreme debt with the World Bank, spending debt money to hire corrupt American corporations
to build large-scale infrastructure projects that trap developing nations in an endless spiral of debt.
See the book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man by John Perkins to understand the details of how this scheme has been
repeated countless times over the last several decades.

Goal 10. Reduce inequality within and among countries

Translation: Punish the rich, the entrepreneurs and the innovators, confiscating nearly all gains by those who choose to
work and excel. Redistribute the confiscated wealth to the masses of non-working human parasites that feed off a
productive economy while contributing nothing to it... all while screaming about "equality!"

Goal 11. Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable

Translation: Ban all gun ownership by private citizens, concentrating guns into the hands of obedient government enforcers
who rule over an unarmed, enslaved class of impoverished workers.
Criminalize living in most rural areas by instituting Hunger Games-style "protected areas" which the government will claim
are owned by "the People" even though no people are allowed to live there. Force all humans into densely packed, tightly
controlled cities where they are under 24/7 surveillance and subject to easy manipulation by government.

Goal 12. Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns

Translation: Begin levying punitive taxes on the consumption of fossil fuels and electricity, forcing people to live under
conditions of worsening standards of living that increasingly resemble Third World conditions.

Use social influence campaigns in TV, movies and social media to shame people who use gasoline, water or electricity,
establishing a social construct of ninnies and tattlers who rat out their neighbors in exchange for food credit rewards.

Goal 13. Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts

Translation: Set energy consumption quotas on each human being and start punishing or even criminalizing "lifestyle
decisions" that exceed energy usage limits set by governments. Institute total surveillance of individuals in order to track and
calculate their energy consumption.

Penalize private vehicle ownership and force the masses onto public transit, where TSA grunts and facial recognition
cameras can monitor and record the movement of every person in society, like a scene ripped right out of Minority Report.

Goal 14. Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development

Translation: Ban most ocean fishing, plunging the food supply into an extreme shortage and causing runaway food price
inflation that puts even more people into economic desperation.

Criminalize the operation of private fishing vessels and place all ocean fishing operations under the control of government
central planning. Only allow favored corporations to conduct ocean fishing operations (and make this decision based entirely
on which corporations give the most campaign contributions to corrupt lawmakers).
 Goal 15. Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests,
combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss

Translation: Roll out Agenda 21 and force humans off the land and into controlled cities. Criminalize private land ownership,
including ranches and agricultural tracts. Tightly control all agriculture through a corporate-corrupted government
bureaucracy whose policies are determined almost entirely by Monsanto while being rubber-stamped by the USDA.

Ban woodstoves, rainwater collection and home gardening in order to criminalize self-reliance and force total dependence
on government.

Goal 16. Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all
and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels

Translation: Grant legal immunity to illegal aliens and "protected" minority groups, which will be free to engage in any illegal
activity -- including openly calling for the mass murder of police officers -- because they are the new protected class in
society. "Inclusive institutions" means granting favorable tax structures and government grants to corporations that hire
LGBT workers or whatever groups are currently in favor with the central planners in government.

Use government agencies to selectively punish unfavorable groups with punitive audits and regulatory harassment, all while
ignoring the criminal activities of favored corporations that are friends of the political elite.

Goal 17. Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable
development

Translation: Enact global trade mandates that override national laws while granting unrestricted imperialism powers
to companies like Monsanto, Dow Chemical, RJ Reynolds, Coca-Cola and Merck.

Pass global trade pacts that bypass a nation's lawmakers and override intellectual property laws to make sure the world's
most powerful corporations maintain total monopolies over drugs, seeds, chemicals and technology. Nullify national laws
and demand total global obedience to trade agreements authored by powerful corporations and rubber-stamped by the UN.

Total enslavement of the planet by 2030 As the UN document says, "We commit ourselves to
working tirelessly for the full implementation of this Agenda by 2030."
If you read the full document and can read beyond the fluffery and public relations phrases, you'll quickly realize that this
UN agenda is going to be forced upon all the citizens of the world through the invocation of government coercion.
Nowhere does this document state that the rights of the individual will be protected.

Nor does it even acknowledge the existence of human rights granted to individuals by the Creator.

Even the so-called "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" utterly denies individuals the right to self defense, the right to
medical choice and the right to parental control over their own children.

The UN is planning nothing less than a global government tyranny that enslaves all of humanity while calling the
scheme "sustainable development" and "equality."

1984 has finally arrived. And of course it's all being rolled out under the fraudulent label of "progress."
However, it is not too late. Awareness is required before action may be taken.

It Turns Out Assange Wasn't Kidding & NWO Hyper-Desperate Attempts To Manage
Clinton Train Wreck
October 16 2016 | From: MadMimi / Various

It turns out Assange wasn't kidding. He is delivering tranches of 1,000 or so hacked emails a day
from major political organisations and politicians.

The Anti NWO Legions worldwide are going wild with the new revelations. I am totally amazed. It's like going to a
carnival where suddenly you get to see all the clowns acting out the games you've only vaguely been told about
and a whole lot more.

Related: Assange: WikiLeaks Will Publish Docs on Elections, Oil, War & Google, Every Week for Next 10 Weeks

Some of the emails are some of the missing 30,000 emails which Hillary Clinton had scrubbed off her illegal home servers.

They include classified documents (totally illegal), declarations of her true intents to finish the job of stripping
away all border authority and regulations from the U.S. Government, as well as handling over all economic
regulatory functions to mysterious international cartels of unknown people and demonstrations of collusion with
Ivy League academics to keep the U.S. population complacent, obedient and ignorant (the Orwellian program for
mass tyranny).

Collectively some of these emails clearly demonstrate that:

Every statement ever made by Hillary Clinton about her scrubbed emails and illegal servers was a lie. She never told the
truth a single time about any of it. She lied to Congress, the FBI, the Mass Media, the public and minimally should end up
with a 20 year sentence (but watch Obama attempt to "pardon" her on his last day in office).
Ditto Libya and Syria. Clinton is the chief warwhore in the visible U.S. government officialdom other than Obama, who
supported and managed high level arrangements to take these countries down, make them failed states and create a
refugee flux into Turkey and Europe. She was number two in the chain of command and is directly responsible.

"Hillary for Prison" is exactly right and that is exactly how she will end.

Related: Arms Dealer Ties Hillary to Arming ISIS in Libya, Syria

A million people by rights ought to show up at the next presidential debate wearing Hillary For Prison t-shirts and V face
masks. They should loudly demand that the FBI immediately arrest her and her crony FBI director for High Crimes and
Misdemeanors.

Fortunately, Trump halfway rose to how he needs to be on Sunday night. He began to use some of the Assange
Ammunition and he is now daily making more and more use of it. His campaign is really just beginning.

Trump powerhouse advertising is now just starting to hit through the mass media. It is going to get pretty intense.

And very weird. The Assange document dumps also clearly demonstrate that most of Hillary's "appearances" are now just
staged promos with hired actors.
Related: Hillary Clintons Involvement with ISIS Confirmed by Wikileaks

She no longer apparently has the stamina to travel nor the tolerance to deal with live audiences, which attract so few people
they are easy to disrupt. So the entire campaign she is now running is entirely fake and is completely dependent on the
televised debates to provide her with a sense of presence with a powerful, presidential personality.

That and advertising but her promo people do not know how to connect with where the audience, the public, is going. More
important than advertising is the clear revelation that most of the major mass media organizations and personalities are
literally taking their directions about what to say about her and how and when directly from the Clintons.

In other words, the NWO shadow government has given the Clintons virtual "Goebbels-like" diktat over the U.S. Mass
Media. Clinton even gave diktat to the New York Times.

They now have a serious problem on their heads. The gofers and busybees who produce the content of the Mass Media
now know without a doubt that everything being said is "collusive", coordinated, bullyboy crap.

They are now being hit daily with the real truth and they can no longer deny they are riding with gangsters who have nothing
to say except more lies from the CIA factory. This is going to induce huge stress and confusion in the operations and
content of the Mass Media.

I suspect that it is going to be psychological malfunction which brings down the entire stinking NWO edifice.

Anderson Cooper and his cohorts in all the Warcast Media are as naked as it gets. Less than 10% of the population
believe what they say. By the end of this month it will be less than 1%.
The people are not happy

Can you imagine standing in a newsroom in New York reading a CIA-scripted or Hillary-scripted concoction of half truths
with the clear knowledge that 95% of your audience thinks you are a lying sack of jackass crap?

The lights are going out on the Warcast Media and I suspect that some individuals will blow their programs, melt their fuses
and begin to blabber incessantly about the corruptions.

Related: Trump: Hillary Meets In Secret With International Banks To Plot Destruction Of US Sovereignty

Related Articles:
Hillary Caught on Camera Admitting she Hides Information from Investigators

Wikileaks Emails Show DOJ Communicated With Clinton Campaign

Hillary Shaken by Who Trump Invited to Sit in Front Row at Debate

Wikileaks Releases Hillary's Paid Wall Street Speech Transcripts: Hundreds Of "Sensitive" Excerpts

Hillary Clinton caught using child actors to plant scripted questions

56 examples of outrageously foul, lewd language spewed by Bill and Hillary Clinton over the last three decades

Chelsea Clinton Just Got Busted

Hillary Clintons Key Aide Huma Abedin Is a Lightning Rod for Attacks
 Photos: Whats That Under Hillarys Pantsuit During Last Nights Debate?

Follow the Money: Clinton Corruption Case Study

Lester Holt Caught Violating Debate Rules

Clinton Foundation Pockets Massive Payoffs for Mining Rights - Hammond Ranch Part Of The Deal!

How many illegitimate children has Bill fathered? How many sexual assault victims has Hillary threatened?

Guccifer 2.0 Releases Clinton Foundation Docs Dems Funneled TARP Funds to their PACs

Trump: Hillary Cant Discuss The Issue Because She Created The Problems

Guccifer 2.0 Drops Alleged Clinton Foundation Documents

Bill Clintons Biggest Secret Has Been Exposed

Bill Clinton Gropes Stewardess on Plane With Cameras Rolling

Scientists cringe as Hillary claims hurricanes are caused by people - says that Trump can't stop them but she can

Hillary Shocked! By Trumps Sex Talk But Heres Video of Hillary Threatening Sex Assault Victims in 1998

Trump: WikiLeaks Emails A Window Inside Clinton Corruption

Reality Check: DNC Chair Donna Brazile Did Leak Townhall Question To Clinton Campaign

Leaked Emails Reveals Clinton Campaign Plotted Supreme Court Threat Over Obamacare

Expos On Cabal-Driven Worldwide Terrorism Implemented By The United States And

It's Allies
October 15 2016 | From: Sott / GlobalResearch / Various

J. Michael Springmann worked for the State Department in the 1980s, in Saudi Arabia. What he
witnessed and experienced did not make much sense at the time, but what he later learned put it
all in context, and helped to explain the entire course of U.S. foreign policy for the next 30 years.
In short, just as the CIA provided funding and training for radical Mujahideen to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan,
they have been doing the same thing ever since. Prior to 9/11, this legion of foreign fighters was used to destabilize
and destroy Yugoslavia. Afterward, Iraq, Libya, and today Syria.

Related: The US War on Terror Has Cost $5 Trillion and Increased Terrorism by 6,500%

For this entire period of time, al-Qaeda has been a fighting force for America, a fact that has been known for years, but
which is only now going mainstream due to American failures and Russian successes in Syria.

Today, we interview Mr. Springmann about his time at the consulate in Jeddah, and the events that led him to blow the
whistle and expose the reality of the U.S.'s creation and support of terrorism around the globe.

In the second hour of the show, we discussed the latest Trump and Clinton leaks, and how they reveal what everyone
should have already known: politicians are two-faced and corrupt, and fairly unsavory individuals. Brent closed the show
with another Police State Round-up on police un-accountability.

Running Time: 02:04:03 | Download: OGG, MP3

You can visit Mr. Springmann's website here: michaelspringmann.com

His book is Visas for al-Qaeda: CIA Handouts That Rocked the World

America: Addicted To War

Since 1776, US has been at war 93% of the time. Thats 222 out of 239 years!
The U.S. has only been at peace for 21 years total since its birth

Related: US seeks to enforce global dominance by unleashing war on countries who oppose it Assad

Since the United States was founded in 1776, she has been at war during 214 out of her 235 calendar years of
existence. In other words, there were only 21 calendar years in which the U.S. did not wage any wars.

To put this in perspective:

Pick any year since 1776 and there is a bout a 91% chance that America was involved in some war during that
calendar year.

No U.S. president truly qualifies as a peacetime president. Instead, all U.S. presidents can technically be considered war
presidents.

The U.S. has never gone a decade without war.

The Americans Stand on Our Side and Give us Weapons - Jabhat al-Nusra (Al Qaeda) Commander
in Syria

US weapons are being delivered to Al-Nusra Front by governments that Washington supports, a militant
commander has told German media. RT discusses the interview with Jrgen Todenhfer, the journalist who spoke
to the Al-Nusra commander.

Related: Al-Qaeda Leader in Syria Admits US Is Backing Them in Interview

The CIA has been coordinating weapon deliveries on the Turkey-Syria border, German journalist Jurgen Todenhofer, who
recently spoke with a Jabhat al-Nusra commander, told RT. He added that the US knows that the weapons it delivers to
rebels end up with terrorists.

This is a game everybody knows. Its very clear that the Americans know that their weapons will in the
end be in the hands of terrorists, Todenhofer said speaking to RT.
The only time in the U.S. went five years without war (1935-40) was during the isolationist period of the Great Depression.

In most of these wars, the U.S. was on the offense. Admit- tedly some of the wars were defensive. However, the above list
leaves out covert CIA operations and other acts which could be considered war.

Lets update whats happened since 2011:

2012 War on Terror in Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Syria and Yemen

2013 War on Terror in Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Syria and Yemen

2014 War on Terror in Afghanistan, Iraq, Somalia, Syria and Yemen; Civil War in Ukraine 2015 War on Terror in
Somalia, Syria and Yemen; Civil War in Ukraine

Related: The Bush / Cheney / Rumsfeld Strategy for Iraq

Related: How Intelligence Was Falsified To Support Invasion Of Iraq

So we can add four more years of war. That means that for 222 out of 239 years or 93% of the time America has been
at war. (We can quibble with the exact numbers, but the high percentage of time that America has been at war is clear and
unmistakable.)

Indeed, most of the military operations launched since World War II have been launched by the U.S. And Ameri- can military
spending dwarfs the rest of the world put together.
No wonder polls show that the world believes America is the number 1 threat to peace. Sott Comment: Rather staggering,
dont you think? Also, for many of the war years, the US had multiple opponents. After all this war practice, we might rightly
expect a simple bombing raid on ISIS to produce results.

Related: Confession of a CIA Agent: They Gave Us Millions to Dismember Yugoslavia

Americas history reflects violence. Its blood-drenched. It glorifies war. It does so in the name of
peace. However, this agenda is not driven by the American people so much as it is driven from up
on high by the Cabal leadership who manipulate the sleeping masses to buy into actions that only
appear to be "American".

The US / NATO is the tool and the scapegoat of the 'global elite's' New World Order.

America believes war is peace. Its part of the national culture. Eventually its self-destructive. Todays super-weapons make
the unthinkable possible.

Hyman Rickover knew. He knew decades ago. He founded Americas nuclear navy. In 1982, he told Congress:

I do not believe that nuclear power is worth it if it creates radiation. Then you might ask me why do I have nuclear
powered ships?

That is a necessary evil. I would sink them all. I am not proud of the part I played in it. I did it because it was
necessary for the safety of this country.

Thats why I am such a great exponent of stopping this whole nonsense of war. Unfortunately limits attempts to
limit war have always failed.

The lesson of history is when a war starts every nation will ultimately use whatever weapon it has available.
 Every time you produce radiation, you produce something that has a certain half-life, in some cases for billions of
years.

I think the human race is going to wreck itself, and it is important that we get control of this horrible force and try to
eliminate it.

In his Der Ring des Nibelungen operas (the Ring), Richard Wagner portrayed his apocalyptic version. He did so musically.
Gotterdammerung (Twilight of the Gods) prophesied the end of the world.

Related: U.S. Admits Israel Is Building Permanent Apartheid Regime - Weeks After Giving It $38 Billion

Einstein feared it. He didnt know what WW III weapons would be used. He said World War IV will be fought with sticks and
stones.

Bertrand Russell was an Einstein contemporary. He knew. He warned. No one listened. He asked:

Shall we put an end to the human race, or shall mankind renounce war. Its the only way to live in peace. The
alternative is annihilation."

The choice is clear. The wrong one assures disaster. Americas heading humanity toward it. A slow-motion train wreck
looms. The big one. Theres no second chance. Theres no coming back.

Historian Harry Elmer Barnes (1889 1968) once said:

 If trends continue as they have during the last fifteen years, we shall soon reach this point of no return, and can
only anticipate interminable wars, disguised as noble gestures for peace.

Historian Arnold Toynbee worried about WW III. Only pigmies in remote jungles, apes and ants might be left to carry on the
cultural traditions of mankind, he said.

According to HG Wells:

If we dont end war, war will end us.

Related: Pentagon Paid PR Firm $540mn to Make Fake Terrorist Videos

America wages permanent wars. It does so against enemies it creates. During the Cold War, Active Defense and AirLand
Battle prepared strategies for how America would fight.

Soviet Russia was targeted. Todays its modern day Russia. Its China. AirSea Battle targets both countries. More on that
below.

In 1998, US Space Command: Vision for 2020 discussed Americas grand strategy.

In 2000, DOD Joint Vision 2020 called for full spectrum dominance over all land, surface and sub-surface sea, air, space,
electromagnetic spectrum and information systems.
Related: Top USA National Security Officials Admit Turkey Coup

It did so with enough overwhelming power to fight and win global wars against any adversary. Nuclear and other mass
destruction weapons would be used preemptively.

In 1961, General Curtis LeMay believed nuclear war with Soviet Russia was inevitable. He wanted thousands of missiles
launched preemptively. He called retaliation against major US cities a small price to pay.

At the same time, General Lyman Lemnitzer urged a surprise nuclear attack strategy. Jack Kennedy expressed disgust. He
walked out of a National Security Council meeting. He wanted none of it.

He told Secretary of State Dean Rusk: And we call ourselves the human race.

Secretary of Defense McNamara categorically rejected LeMay and Lemnitzer. He should have fired them on the spot. Other
extremists then and later urged the same lunacy.

Crazies have great influence today. Todays weapons make earlier ones look like toys. Armageddon could happen. Rogue
states cant be trusted. America most of all.
Eisenhower warned;

Against the acquisition of unwarranted influence. He named the military-industrial complex.

The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist, he stressed.

Militarism writ large is the national pastime. Its a national addiction. The business of America is war. Its multiple wars. Its
permanent ones. Its ravaging one nation after another.

Its doing so for wealth, power, resource control, and unchallenged global dominance.

Armed Drones: President Obama's Favorite Weapon

President Barack Obama has received much credit for drawing down American involvement in Iraq and
Afghanistan, but less attention has been paid to his administration's embrace of armed drones.

Related: Armed Drones: President Obama's Favorite Weapon

His expansion of covert drone strikes goes far beyond that of former President George W. Bush, and has blurred the line
between warfare and assassination.

The classified processes used by the White House for approving these remote killings in foreign countries - countries which
the U.S. is not officially at war with - has people questioning not only the Obama administration's tactics, but also the
collateral damage of civilian casualties left in its wake.
Related: Classified U.S. Defense Network Outage Hits Air Forces Secret Drone Operations

Related: Why Elites Love Drones

America never was the land of the free and home of the brave. Its a war on humanity society. Its a let em eat
cake one.

Its an out-of-control rogue state. Its ideologically over-the-top. It spends more on militarism and wars than the rest of the
world combined.

Doing so lets war profiteers gorge themselves at the public trough. Doing so makes peace impossible. Warrior
nations eventually self-destruct. Nations that live by the sword die by it. Americas no exception.

According too Navy Live, Air-Sea Battle (ABS):

Is designed to develop force over the long-term. (It) seeks to provide decision makers with a wide range of options
to counter aggression from hostile actors.

It targets China and Russia. It reflects the US commitment to maintaining escalation advantage during conflict and
sustaining security and prosperity in the global commons.

Its interoperable air and naval forces that can execute networked, integrated attacks-in-depth to disrupt, destroy,
and defeat enemy anti-access area denial capabilities.

Paul Craig Roberts quoted Amitai Etzioni. He asked:

Who Authorized Preparations for War with China?

The Pentagon has concluded that the time has come to prepare for with China, and in a manner well beyond
crafting the sort of contingency plans that are expected for with a wide range of possible confrontations, he said.

"Its a momentous decision. It hasnt received proper attention. Americas posture is largely Pentagon driven.
 It stands out even more prominently because (a) the change in military posture may well lead to an arms race with
China, which could culminate in a nuclear war; and (b) the economic condition of the United States requires a
reduction in military spending, not a new arms race.

The start of a new term, and with it the appointment of new secretaries of State and Defense, provides an
opportunity to review the United States China strategy and the militarys role in it.

This review is particularly important before the new preparations for war move from an operational concept to a
militarization program that includes ordering high-cost weapons systems and forced restructuring.

History shows that once these thresholds are crossed, it is exceedingly difficult to change course.

In September 2001, Congress approved the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF). It did so for the use of United
States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States.

Carte blanche war-making authority was granted. Americas war on terror began. Its waged on humanity. It does so out of
control. It targets manufactured enemies at home and abroad.

It calls independent nations existential threats. Russia and China are targeted. They represent Americas [The
Cabal New World Order's] final battleground.

Challenging them risks WW III. Obamas no peacemaker. Hes a cold-blooded warrior. They threatens humanitys survival.
His 2010 Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) reflects Bush era strategy.

Related: Hillary Clintons Involvement with ISIS Confirmed by Wikileaks

Related: Military Blogger Alleges U.S. Now Aids ISIS to Oust Assad

Its old wine in new bottles. It reserves the right to use nuclear weapons preemptively. Americas only enemies
are ones it invents. Peace is verboten. So is disarmament. Theyre both non-starters.

Washington targets more nations to destroy. It invents reasons for doing so. It threatens humanity in the process.
Preemptive nuclear war assures it. Americas lunatic fringe may launch what cooler heads deplore. Elements in it have
mushroom shaped cloud delusions.
Nuclear war assures turning planet earth into an uninhabited wasteland. Toxic proliferation already is destroying life slowly.

ISIS Was Created by the CIA and Mossad

Related Articles:
Its A US-led Invasion, Not Civil War in Syria | US Peace Council

Hillary Clintons involvement with ISIS confirmed by Wikileaks

President al-Assads interview given to Associated Press

Russia Bombs 30 CIA, Qatari, Mossad Officers in Secret Allepo Bunker

Russia Ready to Confront US Plan B in Syria

Expert: Mainstream Medias Coverage of Syria Serves Power Elite

UN blames US, EU sanctions for punishing Syrian civilians, stalling aid work leaked report

The Syria White Helmets Exposed as US UK Agents Embedded with Al Nusra and ISIS

MSM Syria Lies Need to Be Exposed

How We Know ISIS was 'MADE IN THE USA

Wayne Madsen: Yes, The USA Created ISIS Along With

5 Times the United States Helped ISIS

ISIS was created by the CIA and Mossad

Govt Task Force Confirms US Intelligence Faked Reports to Manipulate Public About ISIS

Extension of the [Engineered] world conflict

The Privatization of War: Mercenaries, Private Military and Security Companies (PMSC)

The Federal Reserve Cartel: The Eight Families + 7 Not-So-Secret Homes Of Super
Secret Societies
October 14 2016 | From: GlobalResearch / AtlasObscura

The Four Horsemen of Banking (Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo)
own the Four Horsemen of Oil (Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch/Shell, BP and Chevron Texaco); in
tandem with Deutsche Bank, BNP, Barclays and other European old money behemoths. But their
monopoly over the global economy does not end at the edge of the oil patch.
According to company 10K filings to the SEC, the Four Horsemen of Banking are among the top ten stock holders
of virtually every Fortune 500 corporation.

Related: Central Banking and The Federal Reserve System

So who then are the stockholders in these money center banks?

This information is guarded much more closely. My queries to bank regulatory agencies regarding stock ownership in the
top 25 US bank holding companies were given Freedom of Information Act status, before being denied on national
security grounds. This is rather ironic, since many of the banks stockholders reside in Europe.

One important repository for the wealth of the global oligarchy that owns these bank holding companies is US Trust
Corporation founded in 1853 and now owned by Bank of America.

A recent US Trust Corporate Director and Honorary Trustee was Walter Rothschild. Other directors included Daniel Davison
of JP Morgan Chase, Richard Tucker of Exxon Mobil, Daniel Roberts of Citigroup and Marshall Schwartz of Morgan Stanley.

J. W. McCallister, an oil industry insider with House of Saud connections, wrote in The Grim Reaper that information he
acquired from Saudi bankers cited 80% ownership of the New York Federal Reserve Bank- by far the most powerful Fed
branch - by just eight families, four of which reside in the US.
Jacob Rothschild and David Rockefeller kicking it

They are the Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York; the Rothschilds of Paris and London;
the Warburgs of Hamburg; the Lazards of Paris; and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome.

CPA Thomas D. Schauf corroborates McCallisters claims, adding that ten banks control all twelve Federal Reserve Bank
branches.

He names N.M. Rothschild of London, Rothschild Bank of Berlin, Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Warburg Bank of Amsterdam,
Lehman Brothers of New York, Lazard Brothers of Paris, Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York, Israel Moses Seif Bank of Italy,
Goldman Sachs of New York and JP Morgan Chase Bank of New York.

Schauf lists William Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Jacob Schiff and James Stillman as individuals who own large shares of the
Fed. The Schiffs are insiders at Kuhn Loeb. The Stillmans are Citigroup insiders, who married into the Rockefeller clan at
the turn of the century.
The Federal Reserve Board 1913

Eustace Mullins came to the same conclusions in his book The Secrets of the Federal Reserve, in which he displays charts
connecting the Fed and its member banks to the families of Rothschild, Warburg, Rockefeller and the others.

The control that these banking families exert over the global economy cannot be overstated and is quite intentionally
shrouded in secrecy. Their corporate media arm is quick to discredit any information exposing this private central banking
cartel as conspiracy theory. Yet the facts remain.

The House of Morgan

The Federal Reserve Bank was born in 1913, the same year US banking scion J. Pierpont Morgan died and the Rockefeller
Foundation was formed. The House of Morgan presided over American finance from the corner of Wall Street and Broad,
acting as quasi-US central bank since 1838, when George Peabody founded it in London.
J.P. Morgan

Peabody was a business associate of the Rothschilds. In 1952 Fed researcher Eustace Mullins put forth the supposition that
the Morgans were nothing more than Rothschild agents. Mullins wrote that the Rothschilds;

preferred to operate anonymously in the US behind the facade of J.P. Morgan & Company.

Author Gabriel Kolko stated; Morgans activities in 1895-1896 in selling US gold bonds in Europe were based on
an alliance with the House of Rothschild.

The Morgan financial octopus wrapped its tentacles quickly around the globe. Morgan Grenfell operated in London. Morgan
et Ce ruled Paris. The Rothschilds Lambert cousins set up Drexel & Company in Philadelphia.

The House of Morgan catered to the Astors, DuPonts, Guggenheims, Vanderbilts and Rockefellers. It financed the launch of
AT&T, General Motors, General Electric and DuPont. Like the London-based Rothschild and Barings banks, Morgan
became part of the power structure in many countries.

By 1890 the House of Morgan was lending to Egypts central bank, financing Russian railroads, floating Brazilian provincial
government bonds and funding Argentine public works projects. A recession in 1893 enhanced Morgans power. That year
Morgan saved the US government from a bank panic, forming a syndicate to prop up government reserves with a shipment
of $62 million worth of Rothschild gold.
It's a little known fact the the Monopoly man was based on J.P. Morgan

Morgan was the driving force behind Western expansion in the US, financing and controlling West-bound railroads through
voting trusts. In 1879 Cornelius Vanderbilts Morgan-financed New York Central Railroad gave preferential shipping rates to
John D. Rockefellers budding Standard Oil monopoly, cementing the Rockefeller/Morgan relationship.

The House of Morgan now fell under Rothschild and Rockefeller family control. A New York Herald headline read, Railroad
Kings Form Gigantic Trust. J. Pierpont Morgan, who once stated;

Competition is a sin, now opined gleefully, Think of it. All competing railroad traffic west of St. Louis placed in the
control of about thirty men."

Morgan and Edward Harrimans banker Kuhn Loeb held a monopoly over the railroads, while banking dynasties Lehman,
Goldman Sachs and Lazard joined the Rockefellers in controlling the US industrial base.

In 1903 Bankers Trust was set up by the Eight Families. Benjamin Strong of Bankers Trust was the first Governor of the
New York Federal Reserve Bank.

The 1913 creation of the Fed fused the power of the Eight Families to the military and diplomatic might of the US
government. If their overseas loans went unpaid, the oligarchs could now deploy US Marines to collect the debts. Morgan,
Chase and Citibank formed an international lending syndicate.

The House of Morgan was cozy with the British House of Windsor and the Italian House of Savoy. The Kuhn Loebs,
Warburgs, Lehmans, Lazards, Israel Moses Seifs and Goldman Sachs also had close ties to European royalty. By 1895
Morgan controlled the flow of gold in and out of the US.

The first American wave of mergers was in its infancy and was being promoted by the bankers. In 1897 there were sixty-
nine industrial mergers. By 1899 there were twelve-hundred. In 1904 John Moody founder of Moodys Investor Services
said it was impossible to talk of Rockefeller and Morgan interests as separate.
Public distrust of the combine spread. Many considered them traitors working for European old money. Rockefellers
Standard Oil, Andrew Carnegies US Steel and Edward Harrimans railroads were all financed by banker Jacob Schiff at
Kuhn Loeb, who worked closely with the European Rothschilds.

Several Western states banned the bankers. Populist preacher William Jennings Bryan was thrice the Democratic nominee
for President from 1896 -1908. The central theme of his anti-imperialist campaign was that America was falling into a trap
of financial servitude to British capital.

Teddy Roosevelt defeated Bryan in 1908, but was forced by this spreading populist wildfire to enact the Sherman Anti-Trust
Act. He then went after the Standard Oil Trust.

In 1912 the Pujo hearings were held, addressing concentration of power on Wall Street. That same year Mrs. Edward
Harriman sold her substantial shares in New Yorks Guaranty Trust Bank to J.P. Morgan, creating Morgan Guaranty Trust.
Judge Louis Brandeis convinced President Woodrow Wilson to call for an end to interlocking board directorates. In 1914 the
Clayton Anti-Trust Act was passed.

Jack Morgan J. Pierponts son and successor responded by calling on Morgan clients Remington and Winchester to
increase arms production. He argued that the US needed to enter WWI. Goaded by the Carnegie Foundation and other
oligarchy fronts, Wilson accommodated.

As Charles Tansill wrote in America Goes to War;

Even before the clash of arms, the French firm of Rothschild Freres cabled to Morgan & Company in New York
suggesting the flotation of a loan of $100 million, a substantial part of which was to be left in the US to pay for
French purchases of American goods.

The House of Morgan financed half the US war effort, while receiving commissions for lining up contractors like GE, Du
Pont, US Steel, Kennecott and ASARCO. All were Morgan clients.
Morgan also financed the British Boer War in South Africa and the Franco-Prussian War. The 1919 Paris Peace Conference
was presided over by Morgan, which led both German and Allied reconstruction efforts.

In the 1930s populism resurfaced in America after Goldman Sachs, Lehman Bank and others profited from the Crash of
1929. House Banking Committee Chairman Louis McFadden (D-NY) said of the Great Depression;,

It was no accident. It was a carefully contrived occurrenceThe international bankers sought to bring about a
condition of despair here so they might emerge as rulers of us all.

Sen. Gerald Nye (D-ND) chaired a munitions investigation in 1936. Nye concluded that the House of Morgan had plunged
the US into WWI to protect loans and create a booming arms industry. Nye later produced a document titled The Next War,
which cynically referred to the old goddess of democracy trick, through which Japan could be used to lure the US into
WWII.

In 1937 Interior Secretary Harold Ickes warned of the influence of Americas 60 Families. Historian Ferdinand Lundberg
later penned a book of the exact same title. Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas decried;

Morgan influencethe most pernicious one in industry and finance today.

Related: America's 60 Families

Jack Morgan responded by nudging the US towards WWII. Morgan had close relations with the Iwasaki and Dan families
Japans two wealthiest clans who have owned Mitsubishi and Mitsui, respectively, since the companies emerged from
17th Century shogunates.

When Japan invaded Manchuria, slaughtering Chinese peasants at Nanking, Morgan downplayed the incident. Morgan also
had close relations with Italian fascist Benito Mussolini, while German Nazi Dr. Hjalmer Schacht was a Morgan Bank liaison
during WWII. After the war Morgan representatives met with Schacht at the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) in Basel,
Switzerland.

The House of Rockefeller

BIS is the most powerful bank in the world, a global central bank for the Eight Families who control the private central banks
of almost all Western and developing nations. The first President of BIS was Rockefeller banker Gates McGarrah - an
official at Chase Manhattan and the Federal Reserve.

McGarrah was the grandfather of former CIA director Richard Helms. The Rockefellers - like the Morgans - had close ties to
London. David Icke writes in Children of the Matrix, that the Rockefellers and Morgans were just gofers for the European
Rothschilds.
John D. Rockefeller

BIS is owned by the Federal Reserve, Bank of England, Bank of Italy, Bank of Canada, Swiss National Bank,
Nederlandsche Bank, Bundesbank and Bank of France.

Historian Carroll Quigley wrote in his epic book Tragedy and Hope that BIS was part of a plan;

to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country
and the economy of the world as a wholeto be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world
acting in concert by secret agreements.

The US government had a historical distrust of BIS, lobbying unsuccessfully for its demise at the 1944 post-WWII Bretton
Woods Conference. Instead the Eight Families power was exacerbated, with the Bretton Woods creation of the IMF and the
World Bank. The US Federal Reserve only took shares in BIS in September 1994.

BIS holds at least 10% of monetary reserves for at least 80 of the worlds central banks, the IMF and other multilateral
institutions. It serves as financial agent for international agreements, collects information on the global economy and serves
as lender of last resort to prevent global financial collapse.

BIS promotes an agenda of monopoly capitalist fascism. It gave a bridge loan to Hungary in the 1990s to ensure
privatization of that countrys economy. It served as conduit for Eight Families funding of Adolf Hitler- led by the Warburgs J.
Henry Schroeder and Mendelsohn Bank of Amsterdam. Many researchers assert that BIS is at the nadir of global drug
money laundering.
The Bank for International Settlements is the Mac Daddy at the top of the Worldwide Reserve Banking System, not just the US Federal Reserve

It is no coincidence that BIS is headquartered in Switzerland, favorite hiding place for the wealth of the global aristocracy
and headquarters for the P-2 Italian Freemasons Alpina Lodge and Nazi International. Other institutions which the Eight
Families control include the World Economic Forum, the International Monetary Conference and the World Trade
Organization.

Bretton Woods was a boon to the Eight Families. The IMF and World Bank were central to this new world order. In 1944
the first World Bank bonds were floated by Morgan Stanley and First Boston.

The French Lazard family became more involved in House of Morgan interests. Lazard Freres - Frances biggest investment
bank- is owned by the Lazard and David-Weill families - old Genoese banking scions represented by Michelle Davive. A
recent Chairman and CEO of Citigroup was Sanford Weill.

In 1968 Morgan Guaranty launched Euro-Clear, a Brussels-based bank clearing system for Eurodollar securities. It was the
first such automated endeavor. Some took to calling Euro-Clear The Beast. Brussels serves as headquarters for the new
European Central Bank and for NATO.
In 1973 Morgan officials met secretly in Bermuda to illegally resurrect the old House of Morgan, twenty years before Glass
Steagal Act was repealed. Morgan and the Rockefellers provided the financial backing for Merrill Lynch, boosting it into the
Big 5 of US investment banking. Merrill is now part of Bank of America.

John D. Rockefeller used his oil wealth to acquire Equitable Trust, which had gobbled up several large banks and
corporations by the 1920s.

The Great Depression helped consolidate Rockefellers power. His Chase Bank merged with Kuhn Loebs Manhattan Bank
to form Chase Manhattan, cementing a long-time family relationship.

The Kuhn-Loebs had financed along with Rothschilds Rockefellers quest to become king of the oil patch. National City
Bank of Cleveland provided John D. with the money needed to embark upon his monopolization of the US oil industry.

The bank was identified in Congressional hearings as being one of three Rothschild-owned banks in the US during the
1870s, when Rockefeller first incorporated as Standard Oil of Ohio.
One Rockefeller Standard Oil partner was Edward Harkness, whose family came to control Chemical Bank. Another was
James Stillman, whose family controlled Manufacturers Hanover Trust.

Both banks have merged under the JP Morgan Chase umbrella. Two of James Stillmans daughters married two of William
Rockefellers sons. The two families control a big chunk of Citigroup as well.

In the insurance business, the Rockefellers control Metropolitan Life, Equitable Life, Prudential and New York Life.
Rockefeller banks control 25% of all assets of the 50 largest US commercial banks and 30% of all assets of the 50 largest
insurance companies.

Insurance companies - the first in the US was launched by Freemasons through their Woodmans of America - play a key
role in the Bermuda drug money shuffle.

Companies under Rockefeller control include Exxon Mobil, Chevron Texaco, BP Amoco, Marathon Oil, Freeport McMoran,
Quaker Oats, ASARCO, United, Delta, Northwest, ITT, International Harvester, Xerox, Boeing, Westinghouse, Hewlett-
Packard, Honeywell, International Paper, Pfizer, Motorola, Monsanto, Union Carbide and General Foods.
The Rockefeller Foundation has close financial ties to both Ford and Carnegie Foundations. Other family philanthropic
endeavors include Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, General Education Board,
Rockefeller University and the University of Chicago - which churns out a steady stream of far right economists as
apologists for international capital, including Milton Friedman.

The family owns 30 Rockefeller Plaza, where the national Christmas tree is lighted every year, and Rockefeller Center.

David Rockefeller was instrumental in the construction of the World Trade Center towers. The main Rockefeller family home
is a hulking complex in upstate New York known as Pocantico Hills.

They also own a 32-room 5th Avenue duplex in Manhattan, a mansion in Washington, DC, Monte Sacro Ranch in
Venezuela, coffee plantations in Ecuador, several farms in Brazil, an estate at Seal Harbor, Maine and resorts in the
Caribbean, Hawaii and Puerto Rico.
Allen Dulles

The Dulles and Rockefeller families are cousins. Allen Dulles created the CIA, assisted the Nazis, covered up the Kennedy
hit from his Warren Commission perch and struck a deal with the Muslim Brotherhood to create mind-controlled assassins.

Brother John Foster Dulles presided over the phony Goldman Sachs trusts before the 1929 stock market crash and helped
his brother overthrow governments in Iran and Guatemala.

Both were Skull & Bones, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) insiders and 33rd Degree Masons.

The Rockefellers were instrumental in forming the depopulation-oriented Club of Rome at their family estate in Bellagio,
Italy.
Their Pocantico Hills estate gave birth to the Trilateral Commission. The family is a major funder of the eugenics movement
which spawned Hitler, human cloning and the current DNA obsession in US scientific circles.

John Rockefeller Jr. headed the Population Council until his death. His namesake son is a Senator from West Virginia.
Brother Winthrop Rockefeller was Lieutenant Governor of Arkansas and remains the most powerful man in that state.

In an October 1975 interview with Playboy magazine, Vice-President Nelson Rockefeller- who was also Governor of New
York- articulated his familys patronizing worldview;

I am a great believer in planning- economic, social, political, military, total world planning.

But of all the Rockefeller brothers, it is Trilateral Commission (TC) founder and Chase Manhattan Chairman David who has
spearheaded the familys fascist agenda on a global scale. He defended the Shah of Iran, the South African apartheid
regime and the Chilean Pinochet junta.
He was the biggest financier of the CFR, the TC and (during the Vietnam War) the Committee for an Effective and Durable
Peace in Asia- a contract bonanza for those who made their living off the conflict.

Nixon asked him to be Secretary of Treasury, but Rockefeller declined the job, knowing his power was much greater at the
helm of the Chase. Author Gary Allen writes in The Rockefeller File that in 1973;

David Rockefeller met with twenty-seven heads of state, including the rulers of Russia and Red China.

Following the 1975 Nugan Hand Bank/CIA coup against Australian Prime Minister Gough Whitlam, his British Crown-
appointed successor Malcolm Fraser sped to the US, where he met with President Gerald Ford after conferring with David
Rockefeller.

7 Not-So-Secret Homes Of Secret Societies

In clandestine corners of the world, the elite come together in secrecy. Some of them dont mind
that we know of these society meetings, while others maintain that they do not organize at all.
Illustration by Miss Alice Heighes Donlevy of the "Secret Society Buildings of New Haven," with the former Skull & Bones headquarters at left center
(circa 1869-1903)

Yet doormen speak to their friends, initiation rites are leaked, people peek in windows, chanting in far underground
lairs can be heard by a passerby. Conspiracy theorists have long held that someone, and not the Fates, is
manipulating our world, and perhaps in these secret societies the strings are being pulled.

Here is a list of seven groups so secret some members will never admit to their involvement, and their meeting places hiding
in plain sight.

Skull and Bones Tomb

New Haven, Connecticut

The Tomb

Ivy league Yale University is considered to be one of the most selective higher educational institutions in the United States,
if not the world. Its motto lux et veritas translates to "light and truth." On the historic campus in New Haven, Connecticut,
there is a building where "light and truth" are reserved for carefully selected members and alumni.

What is known about the Skull and Bones secret society is minimal. The organization started in 1832. An official roster of its
members was published up until 1971. Bonesmen, as members are called, have been heads of corporations, senior
government officials, Supreme Court justices, and even presidents.

Theories about what the Skull and Bones actually do range from its members controlling the Central Intelligence Agency,
being a part of a global network aimed at world domination, to being a branch of the Illuminati.
Related: The Order / Skull and Bones / Chapter 322

Its also unknown exactly what happens in The Tomb, the group's headquarters, but there are strange rumors of what is
contained in the windowless sandstone building. The Egypto-Doric style of the structure makes it appear as an immense
sepulcher.

The tomb is thought to hold secret documents containing the roster of all members, ritual details, as well as
multiple stolen relics. Some of the bones rumored to be in The Tomb include the skulls of Geronimo, Pancho Villa, Martin
Van Buren, and the gravestone of Elihu Yale, the school's founder. Bonesmen are also known to take other societies'
belongings in a show of thievery and cunning known as crooking.

Bilderberg Club: Hotel de Bilderberg

Oosterbeek, Netherlands (note that this is not the office of the organisation, but the place of it's inaugural meeting).

Hotel de Bilderberg

In November of 1954, 50 delegates from 11 countries in Western Europe and 11 Americans spent three days in Oosterbeek,
Netherlands, at the Hotel de Bilderberg.

The purpose of the meeting was said to foster conversations between Europe and North America. Those in attendance
included a prince, a prime minster, and the head of the CIA. Since that meeting, each year a group of international leaders
in the fields of politics, business, media, and communications have met to discuss were not exactly sure.

There is no agenda, no resolutions are proposed, no voting of any kind is executed, and no positions or policy statements
are issued.
Related: The True Story Of The Bilderberg Group

The meetings are held in a different location each year and each year the topics of the meeting are up for the general public
to theorize over.

The roster of attendees is never officially made public, but there have been leaks over the years. Conspiracy theories
abound, especially because of the groups intense level of secrecy. Many believe the group is conspiring to impose capital
domination, a world government, or a planned economy. What is certain is that the more prominent you are, the more likely
youll be to get an invitation to next years Bilderberg conference.

Scientology's Trementina Base

Trementina, New Mexico

Trementina Base, New Mexico

Scientology is most visible today because of celebrity members like Tom Cruise and John Travolta, yet the organization has
been aggressive over the years in tackling critics and maintaining its secrets. One of the most controversial religious groups,
some characterize the movement as a cult.

Basic Scientology belief holds that humans are immortal beings who have reincarnated and have lived on other planets
before finding themselves now on Earth. One of the things that makes the religion controversial is its assertive nature, often
turning to character assassination or litigation in dealing with skeptics and critics who question their practices. The church is
also extremely secretive, holding many of its teachings from members until they have made it through multiple levels.

Scientology operates several churches called Celebrity Centres that are opened to the public, but are primarily meant for
"anyone with the power and vision to create a better world. The Church of the Spiritual Technology, or CST, is reserved for
the most trusted of members.
Related: Going Clear: Scientology And The Prison Of Belief

Many of these members manage elaborate bases including the Trementina Base. The official word from the church is that
the base is a location used to preserve Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbards writings, which are said to be engraved on
steel sheets and encased in titanium cases. Its thought that Trementina is more than just a location to archive Hubbards
works, however.

Trementina contains underground dwellings and tunnels, but whats most interesting about the base is what you see from
the outside. Aerial photographs above the base show huge images dug into the Earth.

The images are that of the churchs logo. Former members have claimed that the symbols are to mark the return point for
members when they travel into the future. Other members have stated that this is the place where Hubbard is supposed to
go when he returns.

The Illuminati: Domus Sanctae Marthae

Vatican City, Vatican

Related: The Jesuits & The Vatican

Pope Francis entering Domus Sanctae Marthae

Established in 1776 in Bavaria, Germany, this group of freethinkers, humanists, and academics opposed superstition,
prejudice, religion, and its influence over the public, and they supported the advancement of women.

The Illuminati were a shadowy group, believed capable of influencing movements in government and the arts. The group
was infiltrated and shut down a decade after its founding, or so the official record goes. Conspiracy theorists have long been
obsessed that the world has been controlled by the Illuminati for generations.

There are many modern groups that claim to be the descendants of the original Bavarian Illuminati; they go so far as to use
the name Illuminati in their title, but there is no evidence that these recent organizations are tied to the original.

Related: The Order Of The Illuminati: Its Origins, Its Methods And Its Influence On World Events

Besides its actions, what is a major mystery of this group is the location of its headquarters. Theorists have claimed many
prominent locations are the headquarters of the Illuminati from Disney World in Orlando, Florida, the Mormon Temple in Salt
Lake City, Utah, the Statue of Liberty in New York City, Big Ben in London, the Eiffel Tower in Paris, the Pentagon in
Washington, D.C., and, among many others, the Vatican.

The theory that the Illuminati headquarters is located at the Vatican is especially interesting due to the group's opposition to
the church. It's believed by conspiracy theorists that the church was long ago infiltrated by the society and so that would
make its leader, the pope, one of the Illuminati's highest ranking members.

Today, the pope resides in a simple room at Domus Sanctae Marthae, a guest house adjacent to St. Peter's Basilica. The
five-story building containing 106 suites and 22 single rooms is for clergy who are in town on official Holy See business, or
perhaps for an Illuminati meeting or two.

Ordo Templi Orientis: Bay Area Thelemic Temple

Oakland, California

Mural of Aleister Crowley at the Abode of Chaos

The Order of the Temple of the East was founded between 1895 and 1906 in either Austria or Germany. It is believed
wealthy industrialist, Carl Kellner, began the religious movement, but it was famed occultist Aleister Crowley whose name
and additions to the group shrouded it in curiosity and mystery.

OTO was modeled somewhat after another secret society, Freemasonry. But Crowley added a layer, his own self-created
belief system called Thelema. Thelemas practices and beliefs are written out in a book titled The Book of Law and its core
belief is: Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

Ideas from occultism, and Eastern and Western mysticism, found their way into Thelema and thus OTO. The religion is
highly secretive and members move through the order in a series of rites and rituals, moving up levels in the forms of
initiations. Levels have curious names such as Minerval, Master Magician, Illustrious Knight, Grandmaster of Light, and so
on.
There are two components at the core of OTO: magical rituals, which have been rumored to include tantric sex, the
summoning of angels and demons, and astral projection.

Then there is the gnostic mass, reminiscent of a Catholic mass only because it contains a host and wine toward the end.
The gnostic mass includes elaborate costumes, and at the climax of the mass it's believed that the host turns into the Body
of God and the wine the Blood of God.

There are multiple locations of worship called camps, oases, or lodges. The majority of them keep their locations secretive
to the greater public. The relatively small location in Oakland is an oasis. They hold a weekly gnostic mass in a temple
decorated in candles and Egyptian imagery.

Its unknown exactly what takes place during initiation ceremonies and what knowledge is shared during these events.
According to Crowley's autobiography, The Confessions of Aleister Crowley: "the OTO is in possession of one supreme
secret. The whole of its system [is] directed towards communicating to its members, by progressively plain hints, this all-
important instruction.

Priory of Sion: Bibliothque Nationale de France

Paris, France

National Library of France Reading Room

The secret of this secret society is that many people believe in its existence, but scholarly claims have repetitively stated the
group is a complete myth, constructed by the imagination of a madman.

The myth begins that the Priory of Sion was a group charged with protecting the descendants of Jesus of Nazareth and
Mary Magdalene who eventually went on to settle in France.

It was leaked in the 1970s that the Bibliothque Nationale de France in Paris, the French National Library, was in
possession of a file called Dossiers Secrets d'Henri Lobineau that pointed to the Priory of Sion being located in France.

The file contained an introduction, maps of France, genealogies, newspaper clippings, letters and a list of grand masters of
the Priory of Sion that included Sir Isaac Newton, Victor Hugo, and Leonardo Da Vinci.
The authenticity of these files has been questioned ever since they were left at the library. Eventually, they were traced to
Pierre Plantard. It is believed Plantard planted the document at the library in order to perpetuate an elaborate hoax. He
himself claimed to be a descendant of Jesus' bloodline.

Academics went on to agree that the Priory of Sion was a hoax constructed by Plantard. Yet, books, articles, and movies
continue to be made about this group. Whether or not there is a secret society dedicated to protecting a family descendant
from biblical times we may never know.

Rosicrucianism: Rosicrucian Park

San Jose, California

Rosicrucian Egyptian Museum grounds

Several manifestos were anonymously published in the early 17th century that told of legends, mysticism, alchemy, and the
Order of the Temple of the Rosy Cross. One of these documents was the Fama Fraternitatis which was published in Cassel,
Germany.

The Fama spoke of the 15th century German doctor and mystical philosopher Christian Rosenkreuz who traveled through
parts of the Middle East where he learned esoteric wisdom, studying in places such as Turkey and Egypt.

There, he claimed to learn extensive knowledge regarding nature and the universe. When he returned, he attempted to
share what he learned but he was dismissed. He then formed a like-minded group called the Fraternity of the Rose Cross.
Related: The Rosicrucians

The year of his birth and death remain shadowy, but some documents claim he lived over 106 years. The group upheld
Christian beliefs, but strongly opposed Roman Catholicism, and was also said to have influenced Freemasonry along with
hundreds of other groups, many of which have adopted titles with similar names throughout modern times.

At its simplest form, the group aimed to promote a Universal Reformation of Mankind. Some reports claim that the
requirement for membership was that one must have been capable of using more than the average amount of brain power.

During Rosenkreuzs life, the group was thought to have only consisted of a handful of members, each of whom was a
doctor.

All members took an oath to remain bachelors, and also to treat the sick without payment and to find a replacement for
themselves before they died. Interest in the group peaked between 1607 and 1616 with the appearances of the anonymous
works that included the Fama Fraternitatis which ranged with content that included mysticism and apocalyptic warnings.

The Rosicricians were into their alchemy

Whether Rosenkreuzs original idea continued is unknown. One of the hundreds of groups claiming to be tied to the original
is the Ancient Mystical Order Rosea Crucis that has some connection to occultist Aleister Crowley. AMORC claims to be
devoted to the study of elusive mysteries of life and the universe.

They utilize ideas from major philosophers, including Thales and Pythagoras, healing techniques, alchemy, symbolism, and
mysticism. The group claims its history can be traced to pharaoh Thutmose III in 1477.

The AMORC headquarters is located at Rosicrucian Park in San Jose, California, which spans a city block and includes
several structures. The park is home to elaborate gardens, a research library, a planetarium, a temple, and it houses the
ashes of Harvey Spencer Lewis, founder of the secret society.
The Global Financial System Is About To Shift: Part I
October 13 2016 | From: TheMindUnleashed

Behind all the chatter of who will be the United States next President, there is something much
larger playing out. Something bigger than most people could even believe.

Though what you are about to read is indeed real and will soon be undeniable.

With almost all of the real money, that being gold, silver, metals, jewels and all the legitimate notes, bond and certificates,
the nations of the Eastern hemisphere are poised to shift the entire global financial system back to the rightful owners of this
massively large cache of assets.

What is known as the global collateral accounts, is something John F. Kennedy was working on opening up for humanity.
These accounts are what the Bretton Woods agreement was based upon (though fraudulently). These accounts are what
almost every nation and what all of the big banks have been unlawfully abusing.

Now though, an international alliance is working together to open these accounts for the benefit of humanity, which is being
spearheaded by a man known as Neil Keenan. Here are answers from Neil Keenan directly to questions we have asked
him.
Neil Keenan, John F Kennedy and President Soekarno

Related: To learn more about Neil Keenan and his work visit neilkeenan.com - in particular the History & Events
Timeline

This has been done as to educate a larger audience on what the global collateral accounts are as well as to prepare that
same audience for the large events that will be occurring in the very near future.

Q: For those that dont know what the global collateral accounts are, can you give us an explanation of what
they are and what purpose they are used for?

The term Global Collateral Accounts refers to the vast holdings of a Chinese consortium of depositors known as The Dragon
Family and their legacy is centuries old. These physical assets are for the most part located in Asia in secure underground
facilities comprising a total value in the order of 94 Quadrillion US Dollars.

Primarily the asset holdings are comprised of gold bullion, along with other precious metals and gemstones plus a great deal
of paper currency, notes and bonds.
The Silk Road or Silk Route was an ancient network of trade routes that for centuries were central to cultural interaction through regions of the
Asian continent connecting the East and West from China to the Mediterranean Sea

The accumulation of these assets began centuries ago, largely by way of the Silk Road trade routes which saw great wealth
accumulated by those in the equatorial region where there was an abundance of resources and produce, that were
purchased by people in other parts of the world in gold.

These were the days when payments were made in tangible assets with real value not FIAT currencies represented by
worthless paper. There have been many attempts to steal from the asset pool of the Global Collateral Accounts over the
centuries, and in part, the reason why these assets have come to be stored in bunkers in South East Asia, was for safe
keeping.
Count Albert of the Dragon Family with Neil Keenan

The assets are watched over and protected by local family groups who are known as The Elders.Unfortunately some of
these people, after a few generations in their role as guardians have come to confuse the terms guardian with the
depositor.

Q: Who is / are the Dragon Family? What is their role with the global collateral accounts?

The Dragon Family is, in fact, a organization that operates between old families within China and Taiwan, above the political
divide of the two independent Chinese Governments.

The Chinese are remarkable in this regard in that old family ties and functions supersede political arrangements which,
though they might last for generations, are regarded as inconsequential over the passage of time to most Chinese.

Attached to this is the wealth of several nations. The Dragon Family abstains from any public view and knowledge but acts
for the good and better benefit of the World and have had to deal with higher levels of the global financial
Organizations, Committee of 300 and in particular, the Federal Reserve System.
The Mount Washington Hotel, situated in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, United States

The Golden Dragons (Dragon Family) signed an agreement with the BIS / Bretton Woods / China in 1944 in which their
assets would be implemented as collateral in order to be used by the world at large for humanitarian purposes. At all times
the Dragon Family have been considered as being the Depositors.

This agreement was not signed by the Committee of 300 and / or the Federal Reserve or anything as of any official status,
but by the nations at large including the United States which was not a real government but a corporation controlled by
foreign interests.

Additionally, the US government borrowed a huge amount of collateral assets from the Dragon Family many years ago. The
base of the lent asset funds from the Dragon Family to the US Government were the Gold and Silver. Therefore the US
government was able to issue huge amounts of USD as currencies (FRNs) via the FRB system.

During the course of their relations over the last century, the Dragon Family has accumulated great wealth (and Trillions and
Trillions in interest payments still owing), in the form of a variety of Notes, Bonds and Certificates that are an Obligation of
the Federal Reserve System.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York

These Bonds have values ranging in the many thousand of Trillions of United States dollars. The Western nations are run at
the discretion of the Committee of 300 and a number of nefarious collectives with various factions and groups including The
hidden Hand and The Federal Reserve System and many other such criminal outfits that worked towards maintaining
control over the Western hemisphere and its people.

This essentially is where we end up with the NWO.

The Dragon Familys investment was with respect to the best interests of the UN termed Third World nations and
especially such berated nations, however the stated intentions never made it to manifestation in said lands; which was
absolutely prevented by the Khazarian-run globalists who have been hiding within Judaism as cover and leveraging the anti-
semitism as a crybaby diversion for centuries.

The Humanitarian accounts were illegally and fraudulently repatriated almost immediately upon signing of the Bretton
Woods agreement and this has continued unabatedly almost o this day.
The financial doors have been closed to the cabal for a while and we are now observing the beginnings of a resistance-
driven man-made collapse / subversion of Cabal control.

The Cabal-driven West have been laboriously attempting to engineer a financial collapse given that they control much of the
food production and finance thereby leaving you, the people with little or nothing other than starvation or slavery should
they allow you to live only to be sucked dry by financial usury, unlawful taxation and the pharmaceutical industry, to name
but three machinations within their armory of assault.

The United Nations Agenda 21, and now also Agenda 2030 states publicly and in their own writing for anyone to see that
they wish to eliminate 80% of the people on the planet.
Related: Agenda 2030 Translator: Decoding The UNs New Sustainable Development Goals

A final note here is that the theft of the Global Collateral Accounts by the West did not include the Dragon Family, therefore
the East has waited a very long time to be finally in control of their own destiny without Western interference. Although the
Cabal are attempting to create a Third World War so that everyone is taken down with them.

Q: Was JFK was working with President Sukarno of Indonesia to open the accounts?

Yes. In 1963, President John F. Kennedy entered into an Agreement with President Sukarno to provide the funds to allow
the United States Treasury to print its own currency, thus subverting the right to print the currency held by the Federal
Reserve. [Note: Some publications spell Sukarno as Soekarno but it should be made clear that both spellings refer to the
same man, unless the author of any particular piece of writing is confused.]
JFK, Soekarno and Johnson

The Agreement would have transferred some 59,000 tons of gold to underpin this currency. The problem with this was that
the US domestic currency would have then been backed by gold which would have been a violation of international
agreements meant to stabilize currencies.

Pictures dont lie. John Kennedy was emotionally high at this meeting, as was Sukarno, but unbeknownst to them, Vice
President Johnson was a member of secret societies, the likes of which Kennedy had spoken against.

My Pentagon sources advised me that Johnson was involved in the murder of JFK. The entire scenario was set up not only
because of what Kennedy was doing in terms of ending the Federal Reserve System and replacing it with the new United
States Treasury currency, but also with regards to the dismantling of the CIA.

In addition it involved both Texaco and Standard Oil and their loss of income in West Papua.

In delivering all of the information that Johnson was getting from Kennedy and Sukarno in Washington D.C. to his cabal
bosses, the Cabal managed to stop Kennedy from moving forward by assassinating him.
With their plans, the Cabal had to stop Kennedy because he wanted to take down the Illuminati et al and the Federal
Reserve System. The daily reports to the Cabal from Lyndon Johnson in Jakarta, Indonesia, doomed Kennedy to his
assassination.

For his painstaking efforts, a CIA coup saw Sukarno removed from presidency and replaced by General Suharto, who then
imposed a lifetime of home imprisonment upon Sukarno.

Upon Kennedys return to the United States, he was assassinated in Dallas, Texas, Lyndon Johnsons home state.
Furthermore it has been reported that before JFK was even officially declared dead, Lyndon Johnson himself had been
sworn in as the new President of the United States.

Now do you believe that Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK? Absolutely not. Lyndon Johnson, George H.W. Bush and the Cabal
were responsible for the assassination of JFK.
Lyndon Johnson

Eight days after signing the Green Hilton Memorial agreement with President Sukarno of Indonesia, President Kennedy was
assassinated. President Johnson suspended the EO-11110 as issued by Kennedy and transferred the bullion to the Federal
Reserve. In Indonesia, President Sukarno was gradually being placed under house arrest.

The Green Hilton Agreement was not implemented until 1968 when Sukarno fell from office and at a time when Global
Trade made it imperative to have a Global Currency.

Q: What is your role with these accounts and how were you chosen to be involved?

It all started when I (Neil Keenan) was approached by the Dragon Family (DF), through a diplomat representative named
Akihko Yamaguchi.
Akihko Yamaguchi and Neil Keenan

Because of the assistance and political connections that I had provided him with previously, Yamaguchi persistently sought
out myself to provide direct services on his behalf related to international banking and trading transactions in furtherance of
Dragon family humanitarian programs (which are to be implemented when the Global Collateral Accounts are lawfully
opened).

Q: What is the Monaco Accords and what was accomplished there?

In August of 2011, myself and a very powerful political associate arranged a secret meeting of 57 global finance ministers
(none from any Western nations) aboard a yacht in Monaco for the purpose of setting up a new worldwide, asset-backed
financial system.

Word of the gathering reached the Rockefellers, the pre-eminent U.S. clan of that oligarchy, who dispatched Senator Jay
Rockefeller to essentially crash the party as an uninvited guest.
I physically blocked Rockefeller at the gangplank. When Rockefeller demanded;

Dont you know who I am? I responded, Yes, youre exactly the person we dont want on this boat.

After Rockefellers unceremonious ejection, the yacht was then buzzed by Blackhawk helicopters before French fighter jets
gave a warning pass overhead, whereupon the helicopters retreated.

Within several months, the agreement realized from that meeting, the Monaco Accords, was made official by its co-hosts,
and that document has now been signed by over 180 countries. This was an unprecedented collective step toward wresting
control from the criminal planetary domination by the West. Out of this was born the BRICS alliance.

Note that Part 2 to this interview will be released on Thursday October 13th. Neil will answer how much gold is
actually in existence with these accounts, what role the BRICS is playing, which governments and agencies he is
working with and what role Vladimir Putin is playing on a global level.

In the meantime, check out these related articles:

The Connection Between JFK, 9/11 and the Global Collateral Accounts

The Alliance That is Taking Down The New World Order

The Most Important Meeting Since JFKs Death Just Took Place
Debate Post-Mortem: Trump Crushes Clinton - "You Should Be In Jail"
October 12 2016 | From: ZeroHedge

From the no-handshake start, following the most awkward Bill-Melania pre-debate greeting, it was
clear the gloves were off.

While Trump started apologetically, once Clinton opened up ad hominem character attacks, The Donald turned it
up to '11'.

Related: The 7 Most Savage One-Liners Trump Dropped Right to Hillarys Face at Second Presidential Debate

Lashing out at Bill's indiscretions "his actions are worse than words", Hillary's lying "you should be in jail... I will call for
a special prosecutor", and the biases of the moderators"it's one of three here" even the crowd cheered.. before being
quickly shushed. Online polls, unbiased commentators, and the Mexican Peso agreed Trump won.
A picture paints a thousand words...

Melania meets Bill...

No handshate at the start...

Hillary appeared to attract a fly...

"You should be in jail"

"I will bring a special prosecutor"

Follow

NBC News
Trump: If elected, I'd "instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor" to
investigate Clinton emails
6:45 PM - 9 Oct 2016

203203 Retweets

325325 likes

Brief Transcript:

TRUMP: "Bernie Sanders and between super delegates and Debra Wassermann Schultz and I was
surprised to see him sign on with the devil.

The thing that you should be apologizing for are the 33,000 e-mails that you deleted and you acid washed and the
two boxes of e-mails and other things last week that were taken from an office are are now missing.

I didn't knowledge I would say this, but I'm going to and I hate to say it. If I win, I am going to instruct my attorney
general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation. There has never been so many lies, so much
exception.

There has never been anything like it. We will have a special prosecutor. I go out and speak and the people of this
country are furious.

The long time workers at the FBI are furious. There has never been anything like this with e-mails. You get a
subpoena and after getting the subpoena you delete 33,000 e-mails and acid watch them or bleach them. An
expensive process.

We will get a special prosecutor and look into it. You know what, people have been -- their lives have been
destroyed for doing 1/5 of what you have done. You should be a shamed.

COOPER: "Secretary Clinton, I will let you respond."

CLINTON: "Everything he said is absolutely false. It would be impossible to be fact checking Donald all the
time. I would never get to talk and make lives better for people.

Once again, go to Hillary clinton.com. You can fact check trump in realtime. Last time at the first debate we had
millions of people fact checking and we will have millions more fact checking.

It's just awfully good that someone with the temperament of Donald Trump is not in charge of the law in our
country."

TRUMP: "Because you would be in jail."

COOPER: "We want to remind the audience to please not talk out loud. Do not applaud. You are wasting
time."
"I was surprised to Bernie sign on with you the devil..."

Trump slams Clinton over "Deplorables" comment...

The Interruption count remained high...

Online polls show it as an overwhelming win for Trump. - DrudgeReport
And then - 90 minutes after the debate ended - CNN finally releases their poll of 537 Voters!

What a total embarrassment!

Finally, the most real-time indicator of performance...

It's on like Donkey Kong.

Congressman Long Statement On Donald J. Trumps Debate Victory

America saw tonight why we cannot stand another four years of the Clinton-Obama record of stagnant economic
growth and declining respect throughout the world. Donald Trump showed tonight he understands Syria is much
more complicated than Hillary would like for it to be.

He is the only candidate with workable plans to reinvigorate our countrys economic engine by bringing back jobs,
and he is the only candidate that can help America regain its place as a strong and respected nation.

America will be a safer place to raise a family under Trump's leadership.

- Congressman Billy Long (R-MO)

Related: Jon Voight to Voters: Let Donald Trump Know We Are Completely Behind Him

Hillary Destroys Syria, Blames Russia

She fails to mention her role in funding ISIS.

Hillary Clinton is one of the founders of ISIS and almost completely responsible for the destruction of of Syria, but now shes
blaming that on Russia.
Busted! Bill Clinton's Face When Trump Brings Up The Rape Allegations is Priceless

Epic Moment. Donald Trump brought up Bill Clinton's rape allegations during the Presidential Debate as the world
is finally learning about the Clinton's lifetime pattern of abuse towards women.

Why does Hillary Clinton blame her husbands victims and then destroy their lives and reputations?

Related Articles:
Report: Trump Planned To Have Sexual Abuse Accusers Confront Bill Clinton At Start Of Debate

Paul Craig Roberts - Engage In Sex, Not War

Wanna Know How it Went? Just Look at This Picture

This Was The Week The World Got Really Anxious About Globalization's Future
October 11 2016 | From: Bloomberg

Markets might never be the same again.

Weak global trade, fears that the U.K. is marching towards a hard Brexit, and polls indicating that the U.S. election
remains a tighter call than markets are pricing in have led a bevy of analysts to redouble their warnings that a
backlash over globalization is poised to roil global financial markets - with profound consequences for the real
economy and investment strategies.

From the economists and politicians at the annual IMF meeting in Washington to strategists on Wall Street trying to advise
clients, everyone seems to be pondering a future in which cooperation and global trade may look much different than they
do now.

Brexit

Suggestions that the U.K. will prioritize control over its migration policy at the expense of open access to Europe's single
market in negotiations to leave the European Union - a strategy that's being dubbed a "hard Brexit" - loomed large over
global markets.

The U.K. government is strongly supportive of open markets, free markets, open economies, free trade, said Chancellor of
the Exchequer Philip Hammond during a Bloomberg Television interview in New York on Thursday. But we have a problem
- and its not just a British problem, its a developed-world problem - in keeping our populations engaged and supportive of
our market capitalism, our economic model."

Trade

Citing the rising anti-trade sentiment, analysts from Bank of America Merrill Lynch warned that:

Events show nations are becoming less willing to cooperate, more willing to contest," and a backlash against
inequality is likely to trigger more activist fiscal policies.

Looser government spending in developed countries - combined with trade protectionism and wealth redistribution - could
reshape global investment strategies, unleashing a wave of inflation, the bank argued, amid a looming war against
inequality.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew did his part to push for more openness. During an interview in Washington on Thursday,
he said that efforts to boost trade, combined with a more equitable distribution of the fruits of economic growth, are key to
ensuring U.S. prosperity.

Rolling back on globalization would be counterproductive to any attempt to boost median incomes, he added.

Trump

Without mentioning him by name, Lew's comments appeared to nod to Donald Trump, who some believe could take the
U.S. down a more isolationist trading path should he be elected president in November.

The emergence of Donald Trump as a political force reflects a mood of growing discontent about immigration,
globalization and the distribution of wealth," write analysts at Fathom Consulting, a London-based research firm.

Their central scenario is that a Trump administration might be benign for the U.S. economy.

However, in our downside scenario, Donald Dark, global trade falls sharply and a global recession looms. In this
world, isolationism wins, not just in the U.S., but globally," they caution.

Analysts at Standard Chartered Plc agree that the tail risks of a Trump presidency could be significant.
Related: Excellent Trump / Farage Speech & Hillary Thinks Mr. Brexit Is Just Another Right-wing, Xenophobic,
Sexist, Bigot That You Should Promptly Ignore

The main risk with potentially tough negotiating tactics is that trade partners could panic, especially if global
coordination evaporates."

They add that business confidence could take a big hit in this context.

The global trade system could descend into a spiral of trade tariffs, reminiscent of what happened after
the Smoot-Hawley tariff of 1930, and ultimately a trade war, possibly accompanied by foreign-exchange
devaluations; this would be a lose-lose deal for all."
Market participants are also concerned that populism could take root under a Hillary Clinton administration.

We believe the liberal bases demands on a Clinton Administration could lead to an overly expansive federal
government with aggressive regulators," write analysts at Barclays Plc.

"If the GOP does not unify, Clinton may expand President Obamas use of executive authority to accomplish her
goals."
Managing Risks

No matter who wins in November, Citigroup Inc. Head FX Strategist Steven Englander warns that investors are failing
to hedge against rising event risks, with the U.S. election serving as a possible stress test for global markets.

If everyone is positioning to pull the trigger on positioning as soon as they know the outcome, the repressed
volatility may emerge in a very sharp burst," he points out.
Amid political attacks on the apparent inequities generated by monetary policy in the U.K., sluggish trade challenging
Chinese growth, and the rise of populist movements in Europe, there are plenty of reasons why market players should snap
up volatility hedges, analysts say.

In our view, volatility is going to heat up in the coming months given the U.S. election, China's potential response
against a stronger currency, and Italian political risks," concluded Martin Enlund, chief currency strategist at
Nordea Markets.

The New Snowden? NSA Contractor Arrested Over Alleged Theft Of Classified Data
October 11 2016 | From: ActivistPost

A contractor working for the National Security Agency (NSA) was arrested by the FBI following his
alleged theft of state secrets.
More specifically, the contractor, Harold Thomas Martin, is charged with stealing highly classified source codes
developed to covertly hack the networks of foreign governments, according to several senior law enforcement and
intelligence officials.

Related: Snowden 2.0: New NSA Contractor Whistleblower, Arrested for Stealing Spy Malware

The Justice Department has said that these stolen materials were critical to national security.

Martin was employed by Booz Allen Hamilton, the company responsible for most of the NSAs most sensitive cyber-
operations.

Edward Snowden, the most well-known NSA whistleblower, also worked for Booz Allen Hamilton until he fled to Hong Kong
in 2013 where he revealed a trove of documents exposing the massive scope of the NSA dragnet surveillance. That
surveillance system was shown to have targeted untold numbers of innocent Americans.

According to the New York Times, the theft raises the embarrassing prospect that an NSA insider managed to steal highly
damaging secret information from the NSA for the second time in three years, not to mention the Shadow Broker hack this
past August, which made classified NSA hacking tools available to the public.
Related: NSA Contractor Arrested Over Alleged Theft Of Top Secret Material

According to a Department of Justice press release, Martins residence in Maryland was raided by the FBI on August 27th,
2016. During the raid, investigators found hard-copy documents and digital information stored on various devices and
removable digital media.

The FBI claims that a large percentage of the materials uncovered at Martins home were marked as US government
property and contained highly classified information including Top Secret and Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI).

Investigators also have claimed to have located government property with a combined value of over $1,000, which Martin
allegedly stole. If convicted, he faces up to 11 years in prison for the theft of government property and the removal of
classified material.

Snowden himself took to Twitter to comment on the arrest. In a tweet, he said the news of Martins arrest is huge and
asked, Did the FBI secretly arrest the person behind the reports [that the] NSA sat on huge flaws in US products? It is
currently unknown if Martin was connected to those reports as well.
It also remains to be seen what Martins motivations were in removing classified data from the NSA. Though many suspect
that he planned to follow in Snowdens footsteps, the government will more likely argue that he had planned to commit
espionage by selling state secrets to adversaries.

According to the New York Times article on the arrest, Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea are named as examples of the
adversaries who would have been targeted by the NSA codes that Martin is accused of stealing.

However, Snowden revealed widespread US spying on foreign governments including several US allies such as France and
Germany. This suggests that the stolen source codes were likely utilized on a much broader scale.

Surveillance-Related Articles:

Inside Menwith Hill: The NSAs British Base at the Heart of U.S. Targeted Killing

Apple Logs Your iMessage Contacts - and May Share Them With Police
 A Walking Tour of New Yorks Massive Surveillance Network

Yahoo Reportedly Spied on Millions of Users' Emails for the Government

Yahoo Caves in to NSA, FBI and Secretly Monitors its Email Accounts for US Government

Ex-Yahoo Employee: Government Spy Program Could Have Given a Hacker Access to All Email

The Clinton Chronicles

October 10 2016 | From: JeremiahFilms

The Clinton Chronicles: An Investigation into the Alleged Criminal Activities of Bill Clinton is a
1994 film that accused Bill Clinton of a range of crimes. Back in '94 these criminal psychopaths
were just getting warmed up, as history now attests...

Many people involved in the research and investigations reported by this film have been murdered or died under
questionable circumstances.

Related: 50+ Instances Anti-Clinton Activists Were Found Dead Under Mysterious Circumstances

The names and faces of the key players who Clinton used to build his Circle of Power - as well as those who got in his
way and lost their jobs, reputations, virtue and lives!

From Whitewater to ADFA (Clinton political Machine).

From millions in drug smuggling in Mena, Arkansas. To Money laundering with the BCCI.

From Gennifer Flowers to Paula Jones.

From Vince Fosters Suicide to the gangland slaying of private investigator Jerry Parks.
 The documentary uncovers the shocking truth the controlled media and Clintons dont want you to know!

Watch The Clinton Chronicles for the whole story:

Part One

Part Two

Part Three

Part Four

Related: Follow the Money: Sanders Says the Clinton Foundation's Foreign Donors "Raise Serious Questions"

Wikileaks Releases Over 2,000 Emails From Clinton Campaign Chair As State
Department Releases Deleted Emails
October 9 2016 | From: RT

The internet whistleblowing group Wikileaks released over 2,000 emails involving Hillary Clinton
campaign chairman John Podesta.
The release comes the same day the State Department published 350 emails previously deleted from Clinton's
private server.

Related: Assange: WikiLeaks to release all US election docs by November 8

WikiLeaks will release documents on the US presidential elections before November 8, the groups founder, Julian Assange,
said in an eagerly anticipated address in Berlin to mark WikiLeaks 10th anniversary.

Related:Wikileaks: Hillary Clinton Proposed Killing Assange With Drone Strike

At first inspection the emails date as far back as 2008 to 2016 and cover the gamut from the mundane like "Hillary Clintons
Chipotle Order to Call with HRC to My position on the Iran deal sent from Nancy Rotering to John Podesta.

Wikileaks said Podesta is a long-term associate of the Clintons and served as Bill Clintons chief of staff from 1998 to 2001.
The State Department released 350 pages of Clintons emails on Friday, following a court order last month.

Newly disclosed emails show top Obama administration officials in close contact with Clintons presidential campaign in
2015 about potential fallout from the former secretary of states use of a private email server.
According to those email disclosures, the White House was instructing Secretary of State John Kerry to avoid questions
about Clintons email arrangements, according to the Wall Street Journal.

The emails were obtained by the Republican National Committee as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit seeking
records of Clintons time in office.

Among them is an email in 2011 about a discussion paper from Huma Abedin on thoughts on post-Gaddafi Assistance &
Governance which talked about how to form a new Libyan government, work on a constitution, shore up oil contracts to
revenue, understand past conflicts with the Gaddafi administration and its alleged failure share hydrocarbon dollars, and the
theft of private property from members of the monarchy.
Podesta served during Bill Clinton administration. Wikileaks warned on its 10th anniversary it would be releasing more
emails.

Related: Hillary Caught on Camera Admitting she Hides Information from Investigators

How Can We Stop Drug Trafficking When Its The CIA Thats Running The Show / The
Philippines Fight The Cabal
October 9 2016 | From: Geopolitics

Historically, illegal drugs were being used to destroy sovereign countries, and by now the
Philippines war on drugs is a regular headline by CIA funded journalists and media networks, and a
constant object for criticism of the Soros Open Society Foundation funded pseudo-non-
government organizations, for being brutal and violative of human rights.
Those same critics, however, failed to put their money where their mouth is, especially when it comes to helping the
Duterte government rehabilitate close to a million drug surrendered.

Related: Duterte wants to liberate Philippines from U.S. shackles: foreign minister

They would rather focus our attention into the 3,700 deaths, some of which are the direct result of the decisive police action,
and the rest were victims of the drug syndicates who are now cleaning their own ranks from squealers, i.e. those who have
surrendered and subsequently named their suppliers.
 The same bleeding hearts who chose to ignore the fact that
the statistics related to crime are just the same as in past
administrations.

Only this time it is the criminals who are dying, because

once a poor brat is hooked into meth, he must do whatever
he can get his fix for the day, which include cell phone
snatching, daylight robbery, etc.

Other sordid crimes relating to meth addiction were also

brought to light including cannibalism, and in the realm of
politics, it has sent a former justice secretary to the present
senate, on top of congressmen and mayors who are already
funded with drug money for years.

In short, the Philippines war on drugs is a necessary

measure that must be taken before the country plunges
completely into another failed state.

Still at 100th day in office, the Duterte government is able to

reduce the crime rate to 50% nationwide using only the
national budget crafted by his predecessor.

The same budget, which does not include the establishment

of rehabilitation centers necessary to help the projected 4
million drug dependents, and for whom the US, EU and UN
human rights advocates could help more than just paying
lip service to the 3,750 so called victims of extrajudicial
killings.

To those who would rather criticize the sensible actions of the Philippine government that is enjoying 97% trust rating, are you
really raising concerns over human rights vilolations, or just in it to protect the illegal drug industry?

CIA Drug Trafficking Exposed by Political Prisoner

The Real Drug Lords: A brief history of CIA involvement in the Drug Trade

1947 to 1951, France

According to Alfred W. McCoy in The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia, CIA arms, money, and disinformation enabled
Corsican criminal syndicates in Marseille to wrestle control of labor unions from the Communist Party.

The Corsicans gained political influence and control over the docks - ideal conditions for cementing a long-term partnership
with mafia drug distributors, which turned Marseille into the postwar heroin capital of the Western world. Marseilles first
heroin laboratones were opened in 1951, only months after the Corsicans took over the waterfront.

Early 1950s, Southeast Asia

The Nationalist Chinese army, organized by the CIA to wage war against Communist China, became the opium barons of The
Golden Triangle (parts of Burma, Thailand and Laos), the worlds largest source of opium and heroin.
Related: Duterte Winning vs. NarcoPolitics Left by Pro-West Liberal Party; Crossing the Rubicon towards BRICS

Air America, the ClAs principal airline proprietary, flew the drugs all over Southeast Asia. (See Christopher Robbins, Air
America, Avon Books, 1985, chapter 9)

1950s to early 1970s, Indochina

During U.S. military involvement in Laos and other parts of Indochina, Air America flew opium and heroin throughout the area.
Many Gls in Vietnam became addicts. A laboratory built at CIA headquarters in northern Laos was used to refine heroin. After
a decade of American military intervention, Southeast Asia had become the source of 70 percent of the worlds illicit opium
and the major supplier of raw materials for Americas booming heroin market.

1973-80, Australia

The Nugan Hand Bank of Sydney was a CIA bank in all but name. Among its officers were a network of US generals,
admirals and CIA men, including fommer CIA Director William Colby, who was also one of its lawyers.
With branches in Saudi Arabia, Europe, Southeast Asia, South America and the U.S., Nugan Hand Bank financed drug
trafficking, money laundering and international arms dealings. In 1980, amidst several mysterious deaths, the bank collapsed,
$50 million in debt. (See Jonathan Kwitny, The Crimes of Patriots: A True Tale of Dope, Dirty Money and the CIA, W.W.
Norton & Co., 1 987.)

1970s and 1980s, Panama

For more than a decade, Panamanian strongman Manuel Noriega was a highly paid CIA asset and collaborator, despite
knowledge by U.S. drug authorities as early as 1971 that the general was heavily involved in drug trafficking and money
laundering.

Noriega facilitated guns-for-drugs flights for the contras, providing protection and pilots, as well as safe havens for drug
cartel otficials, and discreet banking facilities. U.S. officials, including then-ClA Director William Webster and several DEA
officers, sent Noriega letters of praise for efforts to thwart drug trafficking (albeit only against competitors of his Medellin
Cartel patrons).
The U.S. government only turned against Noriega, invading Panama in December 1989 and kidnapping the general once
they discovered he was providing intelligence and services to the Cubans and Sandinistas. Ironically drug trafficking through
Panama increased after the US invasion. (John Dinges, Our Man in Panama, Random House, 1991; National Security
Archive Documentation Packet The Contras, Cocaine, and Covert Operations.)

1980s, Central America

The San Jose Mercury News series documents just one thread of the interwoven operations linking the CIA, the contras and
the cocaine cartels. Obsessed with overthrowing the leftist Sandinista government in Nicaragua, Reagan administration
officials tolerated drug trafficking as long as the traffickers gave support to the contras.

In 1989, the Senate Subcommittee on Terrorism, Narcotics, and International Operations (the Kerry committee) concluded a
three-year investigation by stating:

There was substantial evidence of drug smuggling through the war zones on the part of individual Contras, Contra
suppliers, Contra pilots mercenaries who worked with the Contras, and Contra supporters throughout the region...
U.S. officials involved in Central America failed to address the drug issue for fear of jeopardizing the war efforts
against Nicaragua.

In each case, one or another agency of the U.S. govemment had intormation regarding the involvement either
while it was occurring, or immediately thereafter. Senior U S policy makers were nit immune to the idea that drug
money was a perfect solution to the Contras funding problems.

- Drugs, Law Enforcement and Foreign Policy, a Report of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations,
Subcommittee on Terrorism, Narcotics and Intemational Operations, 1989

In Costa Rica, which served as the Southern Front for the contras (Honduras being the Northern Front), there were several
different ClA-contra networks involved in drug trafficking. In addition to those servicing the Meneses-Blandon operation
detailed by the Mercury News, and Noriegas operation, there was CIA operative John Hull, whose farms along Costa Ricas
border with Nicaragua were the main staging area for the contras.
Hull and other ClA-connected contra supporters and pilots teamed up with George Morales, a major Miami-based Colombian
drug trafficker who later admitted to giving $3 million in cash and several planes to contra leaders.

In 1989, after the Costa Rica government indicted Hull for drug trafficking, a DEA-hired plane clandestinely and illegally flew
the CIA operative to Miami, via Haiti. The US repeatedly thwarted Costa Rican efforts to extradite Hull back to Costa Rica to
stand trial.

Another Costa Rican-based drug ring involved a group of Cuban Amencans whom the CIA had hired as military trainers for
the contras. Many had long been involved with the CIA and drug trafficking They used contra planes and a Costa Rican-
based shrimp company, which laundered money for the CIA, to move cocaine to the U.S. Costa Rica was not the only route.

Guatemala, whose military intelligence service - closely associated with the CIA - harbored many drug traffickers, according
to the DEA, was another way station along the cocaine highway.

Additionally, the Medellin Cartels Miami accountant, Ramon Milian Rodriguez, testified that he funneled nearly $10 million to
Nicaraguan contras through long-time CIA operative Felix Rodriguez, who was based at Ilopango Air Force Base in El
Salvador. The contras provided both protection and infrastructure (planes, pilots, airstrips, warehouses, front companies and
banks) to these ClA-linked drug networks.
At least four transport companies under investigation for drug trafficking received US govemment contracts to carry non-lethal
supplies to the contras. Southern Air Transport, formerly ClA-owned, and later under Pentagon contract, was involved in the
drug running as well.

Cocaine-laden planes flew to Florida, Texas, Louisiana and other locations, including several militarv bases Designated as
Contra Craft, these shipments were not to be inspected.

When some authority wasnt clued in and made an arrest, powerful strings were pulled on behalf of dropping the case,
acquittal, reduced sentence, or deportation.

1980s to early 1990s, Afghanistan

ClA-supported Moujahedeen rebels engaged heavily in drug trafficking while fighting against the Soviet-supported
govemment and its plans to reform the very backward Afghan society. The Agencys principal client was Gulbuddin
Hekmatyar, one of the leading druglords and leading heroin refiner.

CIA supplied trucks and mules, which had carried arms into Afghanistan, were used to transport opium to laboratories along
the Afghan Pakistan border.
The output provided up to one half of the heroin used annually in the United States and three-quarters of that used in Western
Europe.

US officials admitted in 1990 that they had failed to investigate or take action against the drug operabon because of a desire
not to offend their Pakistani and Afghan allies. In 1993, an official of the DEA called Afghanistan the new Colombia of the drug
world.

Mid-1980s to early 1990s, Haiti

While working to keep key Haitian military and political leaders in power, the CIA turned a blind eye to their clients drug
trafficking. In 1986, the Agency added some more names to its payroll by creating a new Haitian organization, the National
Intelligence Service (SIN).
SIN was purportedly created to fight the cocaine trade, though SIN officers themselves engaged in the trafficking, a trade
aided and abetted by some of the Haitian military and political leaders.

Washingtons Hidden Agenda: Restore the Drug Trade

In 2014 the Afghan opium cultivation has once again hit a record high, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and
Crimes 2014 Afghan Opium Survey.

In the course of the last four years, there has been a surge in Afghan opium production. The Vienna based UN
Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) reveals that poppy cultivation in 2012 extended over an area of more than
154,000 hectares, an increase of 18% over 2011. A UNODC spokesperson confirmed in 2013 that opium
production is heading towards record levels."
Source: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crimes 2014 Afghan Opium Survey.

According to the 2012 Afghanistan Opium Survey released in November 2012 by the Ministry of Counter Narcotics (MCN)
and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). potential opium production in 2012 was of the order of 3,700
tons, a decline of 18 percent in relation to 2001, according to UNODC data.

There is reason to believe that this figure of 3,700 tons is grossly underestimated. Moreover, it contradicts the UNOCDs own
predictions of record harvests over an extended area of cultivation.
While bad weather and damaged crops may have played a role as suggested by the UNODC, based on historical trends, the
potential production for an area of cultivation of 154,000 hectares, should be well in excess of 6000 tons. With 80,000
hectares in cultivation in 2003, production was already of the order of 3600 tons.

It is worth noting that UNODC has modified the concepts and figures on opium sales and heroin production, as outlined by the
European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA).

A change in UN methodology in 2010 resulted in a sharp downward revision of Afghan heroin production
estimates for 2004 to 2011. UNODC used to estimate that the entire global opium crop was processed into heroin,
and provided global heroin production estimates on that basis.

Before 2010, a global conversion rate of about 10 kg of opium to 1 kg of heroin was used to estimate world heroin
production (17). For instance, the estimated 4 620 tonnes of opium harvested worldwide in 2005 was thought to
make it possible to manufacture 472 tonnes of heroin (UNODC, 2009a).

However, UNODC now estimates that a large proportion of the Afghan opium harvest is not processed into
heroin or morphine but remains available on the drug market as opium

- UNODC, 2010a). EU drug markets report: a strategic analysis, EMCDDA, Lisbon, January 2013 emphasis added

There is no evidence that a large percentage of opium production is no longer processed into heroin as claimed by the UN.

This revised UNODC methodology has served, through the outright manipulation of statistical concepts to artificially
reduce the size of of the global trade in heroin.

According to the UNODC, quoted in the EMCDDA report:

 An estimated 3 400 tonnes of Afghan opium was not transformed into heroin or morphine in 2011. Compared with
previous years, this is an exceptionally high proportion of the total crop, representing nearly 60 % of the Afghan
opium harvest and close to 50 % of the global harvest in 2011."

What the UNODC, whose mandate is to support the prevention of organized criminal activity has done is to obfuscate the
size and criminal nature of the Afghan drug trade, intimating without evidence that a large part of the opium is no longer
channeled towards the illegal heroin marke.

In 2012 according to the UNODC, farmgate prices for opium were of the order of 196 per kg.

Each kg. of opium produces 100 grams of pure heroin. The US retail prices for heroin (with a low level of purity) is, according
to UNODC of the order of $172 a gram. The price per gram of pure heroin is substantially higher.

The profits are largely reaped at the level of the international wholesale and retail markets of heroin as well as in the process
of money laundering in Western banking institutions.

The revenues derived from the global trade in heroin constitute a multibillion dollar bonanza for financial institutions and
organized crime.

The following article first published in May 2005 provides a background on the history of the Afghan opium trade which
continues to this date to be protected by US-NATO occupation forces on behalf of powerful financial interests.

The Spoils of War: Afghanistans Multibillion Dollar Heroin Trade

Since the US led invasion of Afghanistan in October 2001, the Golden Crescent opium trade has soared. According to the US
media, this lucrative contraband is protected by Osama, the Taliban, not to mention, of course, the regional warlords, in
defiance of the international community.

The heroin business is said to be filling the coffers of the Taliban. In the words of the US State Department:
 Opium is a source of literally billions of dollars to extremist and criminal groups [C]utting down the opium supply
is central to establishing a secure and stable democracy, as well as winning the global war on terrorism,

- Statement of Assistant Secretary of State Robert Charles. Congressional Hearing, 1 April 2004

According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), opium production in Afghanistan in 2003 is estimated
at 3,600 tons, with an estimated area under cultivation of the order of 80,000 hectares. (UNODC at www.unodc.org/unodc ).
An even larger bumper harvest is predicted for 2004.

The State Department suggests that up to 120 000 hectares were under cultivation in 2004. (Congressional Hearing, op cit):

We could be on a path for a significant surge. Some observers indicate perhaps as much as 50 percent to 100
percent growth in the 2004 crop over the already troubling figures from last year.

(Ibid)

Operation Containment

In response to the post-Taliban surge in opium production, the Bush administration has boosted its counter terrorism
activities, while allocating substantial amounts of public money to the Drug Enforcement Administrations West Asia initiative,
dubbed Operation Containment.
The various reports and official statements are, of course, blended in with the usual balanced self critique that the
international community is not doing enough, and that what we need is transparency.

The headlines are Drugs, warlords and insecurity overshadow Afghanistans path to democracy. In chorus, the US media is
accusing the defunct hard-line Islamic regime, without even acknowledging that the Taliban in collaboration with the
United Nations had imposed a successful ban on poppy cultivation in 2000.

Opium production declined by more than 90 per cent in 2001.

In fact the surge in opium cultivation production coincided with the onslaught of the US-led military operation and the downfall
of the Taliban regime. From October through December 2001, farmers started to replant poppy on an extensive basis.
The success of Afghanistans 2000 drug eradication program under the Taliban had been acknowledged at the October 2001
session of the UN General Assembly (which took place barely a few days after the beginning of the 2001 bombing raids). No
other UNODC member country was able to implement a comparable program:

Turning first to drug control, I had expected to concentrate my remarks on the implications of the Talibans ban on
opium poppy cultivation in areas under their control

We now have the results of our annual ground survey of poppy cultivation in Afghanistan. This years production
[2001] is around 185 tons.

This is down from the 3300 tons last year [2000], a decrease of over 94 per cent. Compared to the record harvest
of 4700 tons two years ago, the decrease is well over 97 per cent.

Any decrease in illicit cultivation is welcomed, especially in cases like this when no displacement, locally or in other
countries, took place to weaken the achievement.

- Remarks on behalf of UNODC Executive Director at the UN General Assembly, Oct 2001

United Nations Coverup

In the wake of the US invasion, shift in rhetoric. UNODC is now acting as if the 2000 opium ban had never happened:

The battle against narcotics cultivation has been fought and won in other countries and it [is] possible to do so
here [in Afghanistan], with strong, democratic governance, international assistance and improved security and
integrity.

- Statement of the UNODC Representative in Afghanistan at the :February 2004 International Counter Narcotics
Conference, www.unodc.org/pdf/afg

In fact, both Washington and the UNODC now claim that the objective of the Taliban in 2000 was not really drug eradication
but a devious scheme to trigger an artificial shortfall in supply, which would drive up World prices of heroin.
Related: Duterte calls out devil Ban Ki-moon & EU in latest tirade

Ironically, this twisted logic, which now forms part of a new UN consensus, is refuted by a report of the UNODC office in
Pakistan, which confirmed, at the time, that there was no evidence of stockpiling by the Taliban. (Deseret News, Salt Lake
City, Utah. 5 October 2003)

Washingtons Hidden Agenda: Restore the Drug Trade

In the wake of the 2001 US bombing of Afghanistan, the British government of Tony Blair was entrusted by the G-8 Group of
leading industrial nations to carry out a drug eradication program, which would, in theory, allow Afghan farmers to switch out
of poppy cultivation into alternative crops. The British were working out of Kabul in close liaison with the US DEAs Operation
Containment.
The UK sponsored crop eradication program is an obvious smokescreen. Since October 2001, opium poppy cultivation has
skyrocketed. The presence of occupation forces in Afghanistan did not result in the eradication of poppy cultivation. Quite the
opposite.

The Taliban prohibition had indeed caused the beginning of a heroin shortage in Europe by the end of 2001, as
acknowledged by the UNODC.

Heroin is a multibillion dollar business supported by powerful interests, which requires a steady and secure commodity flow.
One of the hidden objectives of the war was precisely to restore the CIA sponsored drug trade to its historical levels and
exert direct control over the drug routes.

Immediately following the October 2001 invasion, opium markets were restored. Opium prices spiraled. By early 2002, the
opium price (in dollars/kg) was almost 10 times higher than in 2000.

In 2001, under the Taliban opiate production stood at 185 tons, increasing to 3400 tons in 2002 under the US sponsored
puppet regime of President Hamid Karzai.

While highlighting Karzais patriotic struggle against the Taliban, the media fails to mention that Karzai collaborated with the
Taliban. He had also been on the payroll of a major US oil company, UNOCAL. In fact, since the mid-1990s, Hamid Karzai
had acted as a consultant and lobbyist for UNOCAL in negotiations with the Taliban. According to the Saudi newspaper Al-
Watan:

Karzai has been a Central Intelligence Agency covert operator since the 1980s. He collaborated with the CIA in
funneling U.S. aid to the Taliban as of 1994 when the Americans had secretly and through the Pakistanis
[specifically the ISI] supported the Talibans assumption of power.

- Quoted in Karen Talbot, U.S. Energy Giant Unocal Appoints Interim Government in Kabul, Global Outlook, No. 1,
Spring 2002. p. 70. See also BBC Monitoring Service, 15 December 2001

History of the Golden Crescent Drug Trade

It is worth recalling the history of the Golden Crescent drug trade, which is intimately related to the CIAs covert operations in
the region since the onslaught of the Soviet-Afghan war and its aftermath.

Prior to the Soviet-Afghan war (1979-1989), opium production in Afghanistan and Pakistan was directed to small regional
markets. There was no local production of heroin. (Alfred McCoy, Drug Fallout: the CIAs Forty Year Complicity in the
Narcotics Trade. The Progressive, 1 August 1997).

The Afghan narcotics economy was a carefully designed project of the CIA, supported by US foreign policy.

The story of the take down of the BCCI was told in the excellent film "The International"

As revealed in the Iran-Contra and Bank of Commerce and Credit International (BCCI) scandals, CIA covert operations in
support of the Afghan Mujahideen had been funded through the laundering of drug money. Dirty money was recycled
through a number of banking institutions (in the Middle East) as well as through anonymous CIA shell companies , into
covert money, used to finance various insurgent groups during the Soviet-Afghan war, and its aftermath:
 Because the US wanted to supply the Mujahideen rebels in Afghanistan with stinger missiles and other military
hardware it needed the full cooperation of Pakistan. By the mid-1980s, the CIA operation in Islamabad was one of
the largest US intelligence stations in the World.

`If BCCI is such an embarrassment to the US that forthright investigations are not being pursued it has a lot to do
with the blind eye the US turned to the heroin trafficking in Pakistan, said a US intelligence officer."

(The Dirtiest Bank of All, Time, July 29, 1991, p. 22.)

Researcher Alfred McCoys study confirms that within two years of the onslaught of the CIAs covert operation in Afghanistan
in 1979;

The Pakistan-Afghanistan borderlands became the

worlds top heroin producer, supplying 60 per cent of
U.S. demand. In Pakistan, the heroin-addict
population went from near zero in 1979 to 1.2 million
by 1985, a much steeper rise than in any other
nation.

CIA assets again controlled this heroin trade. As the

Mujahideen guerrillas seized territory inside
Afghanistan, they ordered peasants to plant opium
as a revolutionary tax.

Across the border in Pakistan, Afghan leaders and

local syndicates under the protection of Pakistan
Intelligence operated hundreds of heroin
laboratories. During this decade of wide-open drug-
dealing, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency in
Islamabad failed to instigate major seizures or
arrests.

U.S. officials had refused to investigate charges of

heroin dealing by its Afghan allies because U.S.
narcotics policy in Afghanistan has been
subordinated to the war against Soviet influence
there.

In 1995, the former CIA director of the Afghan

operation, Charles Cogan, admitted the CIA had
indeed sacrificed the drug war to fight the Cold
War..."

"...Our main mission was to do as much damage as possible to the Soviets. We didnt really have the resources or
the time to devote to an investigation of the drug trade, I dont think that we need to apologize for this. Every
situation has its fallout.

There was fallout in terms of drugs, yes. But the main objective was accomplished. The Soviets left Afghanistan.

(McCoy, op cit)

The role of the CIA, which is amply documented, is not mentioned in official UNODC publications, which focus on internal
social and political factors. Needless to say, the historical roots of the opium trade have been grossly distorted.
- See UNODC The Opium Economy In Afghanistan

According to the UNODC, Afghanistans opium production has increased, more than 15-fold since 1979. In the wake of the
Soviet-Afghan war, the growth of the narcotics economy has continued unabated. The Taliban, which were supported by the
US, were initially instrumental in the further growth of opiate production until the 2000 opium ban.

- See UNODC The Opium Economy In Afghanistan

This recycling of drug money was used to finance the post-Cold War insurgencies in Central Asia and the Balkans including
Al Qaeda.

Narcotics: Second to Oil and the Arms Trade

The revenues generated from the CIA sponsored Afghan drug trade are sizeable. The Afghan trade in opiates constitutes a
large share of the worldwide annual turnover of narcotics, which was estimated by the United Nations to be of the order of
$400-500 billion.

(Douglas Keh, Drug Money in a Changing World, Technical document No. 4, 1998, Vienna UNDCP, p. 4. See also United
Nations Drug Control Program, Report of the International Narcotics Control Board for 1999, E/INCB/1999/1 United Nations,
Vienna 1999, p. 49-51, and Richard Lapper, UN Fears Growth of Heroin Trade, Financial Times, 24 February 2000).

At the time these UN figures were first brought out (1994), the (estimated) global trade in drugs was of the same order of
magnitude as the global trade in oil.

The IMF estimated global money laundering to be between 590 billion and 1.5 trillion dollars a year, representing 2-5 percent
of global GDP. (Asian Banker, 15 August 2003). A large share of global money laundering as estimated by the IMF is linked
to the trade in narcotics.

Based on recent figures (2003), drug trafficking constitutes:

The third biggest global commodity in cash terms after oil and the arms trade.
 - The Independent, 29 February 2004

Moreover, the above figures including those on money laundering, confirm that the bulk of the revenues associated with the
global trade in narcotics are not appropriated by terrorist groups and warlords, as suggested by the UNODC report.

There are powerful business and financial interests behind narcotics. From this standpoint, geopolitical and military control
over the drug routes is as strategic as oil and oil pipelines.

However, what distinguishes narcotics from legal commodity trade is that narcotics constitutes a major source of wealth
formation not only for organised crime but also for the US intelligence apparatus, which increasingly constitutes a powerful
actor in the spheres of finance and banking.

In turn, the CIA, which protects the drug trade, has developed complex business and undercover links to major
criminal syndicates involved in the drug trade.

In other words, intelligence agencies and powerful business syndicates allied with organized crime, are competing for the
strategic control over the heroin routes. The multi-billion dollar revenues of narcotics are deposited in the Western banking
system.

Most of the large international banks together with their affiliates in the offshore banking havens launder large amounts of
narco-dollars.

This trade can only prosper if the main actors involved in narcotics have political friends in high places. Legal and illegal
undertakings are increasingly intertwined, the dividing line between businesspeople and criminals is blurred.

In turn, the relationship among criminals, politicians and members of the intelligence establishment has tainted the structures
of the state and the role of its institutions.
Where does the money go? Who benefits from the Afghan opium trade?

This trade is characterized by a complex web of intermediaries. There are various stages of the drug trade, several
interlocked markets, from the impoverished poppy farmer in Afghanistan to the wholesale and retail heroin markets in
Western countries. In other words, there is a hierarchy of prices for opiates.

This hierarchy of prices is acknowledged by the US administration:

Afghan heroin sells on the international narcotics market for 100 times the price farmers get for their opium right
out of the field.

(US State Department quoted by the Voice of America (VOA), 27 February 2004).

According to the UNODC, opium in Afghanistan generated in 2003 an income of one billion US dollars for farmers and US$
1.3 billion for traffickers, equivalent to over half of its national income.

Consistent with these UNODC estimates, the average price for fresh opium was $350 a kg. (2002); the 2002 production was
3400 tons.

The UNDOC estimate, based on local farmgate and wholesale prices constitutes, however, a very small percentage of the
total turnover of the multibillion dollar Afghan drug trade.

The UNODC, estimates the total annual turn-over of international trade in Afghan opiates at US$ 30 billion. An examination
of the wholesale and retail prices for heroin in the Western countries suggests, however, that the total revenues generated,
including those at the retail level, are substantially higher.

Wholesale Prices of Heroin in Western Countries

It is estimated that one kilo of opium produces approximately 100 grams of (pure) heroin. The US DEA confirms that;
 SWA [South West Asia meaning Afghanistan] heroin in New York City was selling in the late 1990s for $85,000 to
$190,000 per kilogram wholesale with a 75 percent purity ratio."

- National Drug Intelligence Center

According to the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA):

The price of SEA [South East Asian] heroin ranges from $70,000 to $100,000 per unit (700 grams) and the purity
of SEA heroin ranges from 85 to 90 percent

(ibid).

The SEA unit of 700 gr (85-90 % purity) translates into a wholesale price per kg. for pure heroin ranging between $115,000
and $163,000.

The DEA figures quoted above, while reflecting the situation in the 1990s, are broadly consistent with recent British figures.
According to a report published in the Guardian (11 August 2002), the wholesale price of (pure) heroin in London (UK) was of
the order of 50,000 pounds sterling, approximately $80,000 (2002).

Whereas as there is competition between different sources of heroin supply, it should be emphasized that Afghan heroin
represents a rather small percentage of the US heroin market, which is largely supplied out of Colombia.

Retail Prices

United States
 The NYPD notes that retail heroin prices are down and purity is relatively high. Heroin previously sold for about
$90 per gram but now sells for $65 to $70 per gram or less.

Anecdotal information from the NYPD indicates that purity for a bag of heroin commonly ranges from 50 to 80
percent but can be as low as 30 percent.

Information as of June 2000 indicates that bundles (10 bags) purchased by Dominican buyers from Dominican
sellers in larger quantities (about 150 bundles) sold for as little as $40 each, or $55 each in Central Park.

DEA reports that an ounce of heroin usually sells for $2,500 to $5,000, a gram for $70 to $95, a bundle for $80 to
$90, and a bag for $10. The DMP reports that the average heroin purity at the street level in 1999 was about 62
percent.

The NYPD and DEA retail price figures seem consistent. The DEA price of $70-$95, with a purity of 62 percent translates into
$112 to $153 per gram of pure heroin. The NYPD figures are roughly similar with perhaps lower estimates for purity.

It should be noted that when heroin is purchased in very small quantities, the retail price tends to be much higher. In the US,
purchase is often by the bag; the typical bag according to Rocheleau and Boyum contains 25 milligrams of pure
heroin.( Office of National Drug Control Policy )

A $10 dollar bag in NYC (according to the DEA figure quoted above) would convert into a price of $400 per gram, each bag
containing 0.025gr. of pure heroin. (op cit). In other words, for very small purchases marketed by street pushers, the retail
margin tends to be significantly higher. In the case of the $10 bag purchase, it is roughly 3 to 4 times the corresponding retail
price per gram.($112-$153)

United Kingdom

In Britain, the retail street price per gram of heroin, according to British Police sources, has fallen from 74 in 1997 to 61 [in
2004]. [i.e. from approximately $133 to $110, based on the 2004 rate of exchange] (Independent, 3 March 2004).
In some cities it was as low as 30-40 per gram with a low level of purity. (AAP News, 3 March 2004). According to
Drugscope ( www.drugscope.org.uk ), the average price for a gram of heroin in Britain is between 40 and 90 ($72- $162
per gram) (The report does not mention purity). The street price of heroin was 60 per gram in April 2002 according to the
National Criminal Intelligence Service.

The Hierarchy of Prices

We are dealing with a hierarchy of prices, from the farmgate price in the producing country, upwards, to the final retail street
price. The latter is often 80-100 times the price paid to the farmer.

In other words, the opiate product transits through several markets from the producing country to the transshipment
country(ies), to the consuming countries. In the latter, there are wide margins between the landing price at the point of entry,
demanded by the drug cartels and the wholesale prices and the retail street prices, protected by Western organized crime.

The Global Proceeds of the Afghan Narcotics Trade

In Afghanistan, the reported production of 3,600 tons of opium in 2003 would allow for the production of approximately
360,000 kg of pure heroin. Gross revenues accruing to Afghan farmers are roughly estimated by the UNODC to be of the
order of $1 billion, with 1.3 billion accruing to local traffickers.

When sold in Western markets at a heroin wholesale price of the order of $100,000 a kg (with a 70 percent purity ratio), the
global wholesale proceeds (corresponding to 3600 tons of Afghan opium) would be of the order of 51.4 billion dollars.

The latter constitutes a conservative estimate based on the various figures for wholesale prices in the previous section.

The total proceeds of the Afghan narcotics trade (in terms of total value added) is estimated using the final heroin retail price.
In other words, the retail value of the trade is ultimately the criterion for measuring the importance of the drug trade in terms of
revenue generation and wealth formation.
A meaningful estimate of the retail value, however, is almost impossible to ascertain due to the fact that retail prices vary
considerably within urban areas, from one city to another and between consuming countries, not to mention variations in
purity and quality (see above).

The evidence on retail margins, namely the difference between wholesale and retail values in the consuming countries,
nonetheless, suggests that a large share of the total (money) proceeds of the drug trade are generated at the retail level.

In other words, a significant portion of the proceeds of the drug trade accrues to criminal and business syndicates in Western
countries involved in the local wholesale and retail narcotics markets. And the various criminal gangs involved in retail trade
are invariably protected by the corporate crime syndicates.

90 percent of heroin consumed in the UK is from Afghanistan. Using the British retail price figure from UK police sources of
$110 a gram (with an assumed 50 percent purity level), the total retail value of the Afghan narcotics trade in 2003 (3,600 tons
of opium) would be the order of 79.2 billion dollars. The latter should be considered as a simulation rather than an estimate.

Under this assumption (simulation), a billion dollars gross revenue to the farmers in Afghanistan (2003) would generate global
narcotics earnings, accruing at various stages and in various markets of the order of 79.2 billion dollars.

These global proceeds accrue to business syndicates, intelligence agencies, organized crime, financial institutions,
wholesalers, retailers, etc. involved directly or indirectly in the drug trade.

In turn, the proceeds of this lucrative trade are deposited in Western banks, which constitute an essential mechanism in the
laundering of dirty money.
A very small percentage accrues to farmers and traders in the producing country. Bear in mind that the net income accruing
to Afghan farmers is but a fraction of the estimated 1 billion dollar amount. The latter does not include payments of farm
inputs, interest on loans to money lenders, political protection, etc.

- See also UNODC, The Opium Economy in Afghanistan, The Opium Economy In Afghanistan, Vienna, 2003, p. 7-8.

The Share of the Afghan Heroin in the Global Drug Market

Afghanistan produces over 70 percent of the global supply of heroin and heroin represents a sizeable fraction of the global
narcotics market, estimated by the UN to be of the order of $400-500 billion.
There are no reliable estimates on the distribution of the global narcotics trade between the main categories: Cocaine,
Opium/Heroin, Cannabis, Amphetamine Type Stimulants (ATS), Other Drugs.

The Laundering of Drug Money

The proceeds of the drug trade are deposited in the banking system. Drug money is laundered in the numerous offshore
banking havens in Switzerland, Luxembourg, the British Channel Islands, the Cayman Islands and some 50 other locations
around the globe.

It is here that the criminal syndicates involved in the drug trade and the representatives of the worlds largest commercial
banks interact. Dirty money is deposited in these offshore havens, which are controlled by the major Western commercial
banks.
The latter have a vested interest in maintaining and sustaining the drug trade. (For further details, see Michel Chossudovsky,
The Crimes of Business and the Business of Crimes, Covert Action Quarterly, Fall 1996)

Once the money has been laundered, it can be recycled into bona fide investments not only in real estate, hotels, etc, but also
in other areas such as the services economy and manufacturing. Dirty and covert money is also funneled into various
financial instruments including the trade in derivatives, primary commodities, stocks, and government bonds.

Concluding Remarks: Criminalization of US Foreign Policy

US foreign policy supports the workings of a thriving criminal economy in which the demarcation between organized capital
and organized crime has become increasingly blurred.

The heroin business is not filling the coffers of the Taliban as claimed by US government and the international community:
quite the opposite!

The proceeds of this illegal trade are the source of wealth formation, largely reaped by powerful business/criminal
interests within the Western countries. These interests are sustained by US foreign policy.

Decision-making in the US State Department, the CIA and the Pentagon is instrumental in supporting this highly profitable
multibillion dollar trade, third in commodity value after oil and the arms trade.

The Afghan drug economy is protected.

The heroin trade was part of the war agenda. What this war has achieved is to restore a compliant narco-State, headed by a
US appointed puppet.

The powerful financial interests behind narcotics are supported by the militarisation of the worlds major drug triangles (and
transshipment routes), including the Golden Crescent and the Andean region of South America (under the so-called Andean
Initiative).

Opium Poppy Cultivation in Afghanistan

Year Cultivation in hectares Production (tons)

 1994 71,470 3,400

1995 53,759 2,300

1996 56,824 2,200

1997 58,416 2,800

1998 63,674 2,700

1999 90,983 4,600

2000 82,172 3,300

2001 7,606 185

2002 74,000 3,400

2003 80,000 3,600

Source: UNDCP, Afghanistan, Opium Poppy Survey, 2001, UNOCD, Opium Poppy Survey, 2002. Afghanistan Opium Survey
2002

See also the 2003 Survey: Afghanistan Opium Survey 2003

And: The Spoils of War: Afghanistan's Multibillion Dollar Heroin Trade

Inflation: The Most Evil Threat = Governments Robbing Their Citizens

October 8 2016 | From: FinalWakeUpCall

Inflation, is an invisible, secret tax that not even 1% of common people understand. It is dangerous
and most of the time a fatal disease.
If not under control in time, it can destroy society. No government is willing to accept responsibility for causing
inflation. They always find an excuse; such as greedy businessmen, selfish trade unions, spendthrift consumers,
Arab sheiks that have raised the price of oil, bad weather, or anything else that seems plausible.

Although all these can temporarily produce higher prices for individual items; they cannot produce continuing inflation for
one very simple reason; None of the above alleged culprits possesses a printing press, to turn out pieces of paper called
money; None can legally authorise a bookkeeper to make entries on ledgers that are the equivalent of those pieces of
paper.

Over time, the result will be an immensely lower standard of living, resulting from the declining purchasing power and
increasing commodity prices. Real wages will be much lower, as employers will not readily increase wages to keep up with
inflation.

Under a paper system without backing, the entire monetary system is controlled by the political class, which has
the power to allocate capital or to deny it.

This implies that the people heading the worlds capital markets, rather than acting as capital allocators, have become mere
speculative marionettes, whose strings are controlled by the well connected and the influential.

Inflation is a printing press phenomenon. The two important basic questions are:

Why do governments increase the quantity of money?

Why do they produce inflation when they understand the potential harm?

If the quantity of goods and services available for purchase for short-term output were to increase as rapidly as the
quantity of money, prices would tend to be stable.

Prices may fall gradually, as more became available, while people keep their wealth in the form of money. Inflation occurs
when the quantity of money rises more rapidly than output and the more rapid the rise in the quantity of money, the greater
the rate of inflation.
Output is limited by the physical and human resources available, and by the improvement in knowledge and capacity to use
them. At best the output can grow only fairly slowly. The same is the case, although always temporarily and for a brief period
of time, for money backed by a commodity. While, paper money has no limitation as does commodity-backed money.

Inflation is a Monetary Phenomenon:

In short; Inflation is primarily a monetary phenomenon, produced by a more rapid increase in the quantity of money than in
output. Excessive monetary growth produces inflation, caused by governments. In general, inflation is worse than a
financial crisis.

Taxpayers money is spent for nothing without reform in sight; Increase in unemployment, as businesses go bankrupt.
Bankers that caused the 2008 financial crisis were bailed out with peoples money and their managers were left in
charge who in turn were taking on even more risks with taxpayers deposits in order to rake up even larger
bonuses.

Eventually these schemes will result in a massive inflation, never witnessed before. The debt is structural; its irresolvable,
there is no way to repair this economy.

Inflation is Legalised Theft:

Inflation is nothing more than legalised theft by your government; inflation is only two percent, is what the Statistics suggest.
But these numbers dont show the truth. Todays real inflation rate is probably closer to 9 %, maybe even higher.

Who knows? All published inflation data are a blatant lie, as these numbers are made up to suit the government.

Showing lower inflation in statistics looks better. The theft committed by governments is concealed.

When central banks print reserves far in excess of domestic savings, the result is inevitably inflation. The more they print,
the more capital is available forinstitutions central banks to invest.
Related: Who Owns New Zealand's Banks - And Australia's Banks - Anyone's Banks?

This creates massive asset inflation, in the price of assets, as central bankers buy bonds, stocks, and real estate to push
economies upwards all around the world. Instead of triggering an immediate currency flight, as seen in Argentina or
Zimbabwe, this inflation has produced an investment-generated boom.

The ongoing financial boom is a fallacy of historic portions. Nobody knows exactly when, but eventually the world will lose
faith in central banks ability to boost markets.

A Better Way Than Creating Inflation:

If additional government spending was financed either by taxes or by borrowing from the public, that would not lead to more
rapid monetary growth. In this case the government would have more to spend, while the public would have less.

But the easy way out is increasing the quantity of money, because thats more attractive since the public doesnt understand
the severe implications, and it seems like magic, like getting something for nothing! But the fact of the matter is that the
holders of the money pay for the extra spending, as the extra money raises prices when it is injected into the economy.
Moreover, inflation indirectly yields extra revenue by automatically raising effective tax revenues, as income from the people
goes up to compensate for inflation, and people are consequently pushed into higher tax rate brackets.

Additionally, there is the benefit of paying off debt with less valuable currency less purchasing power as less valuable
units are paying for original units that were more valuable.

Reduction of Monetary Growth:

The cure for inflation is the reduction in the rate of monetary growth, as this is the cause of inflation. Eventually it is
a curable disease. Although the bad effects a temporarily lower economic growth, and higher unemployment would be felt
first, the good effects a lower to zero inflation would come later.

This would result in a healthier economy, with the potential for rapid noninflationary growth.
But as usual there is the lack of a true desire to cure the addiction of free money, resulting in this disease. In a sense people
enjoy inflation. Although they would like to see the prices of goods they buy go down, or at least stop going up, they are
more than happy to see the prices of the things they own or sell go up.

Inflation is Destructive:

One reason inflation is so destructive is because while some people benefit greatly, other people suffer. Society is divided
into winners and losers. The winners regard the good things that happen to them as the natural result of their own foresight,
prudence, and initiative.

They regard the bad things; the rise of prices of goods purchased, as caused by forces outside their control. Almost
everyone will say they are opposed to inflation. What they generally mean is that they are opposed to the bad things that
have happened to them due to certain effects of inflation.
The paper value of homes is rising. With a mortgage, the interest rate generally is below the rate of inflation. As a result of
this, inflation in effect is paying off the mortgage interest payments as well the principal. This effect is an advantage to the
home owner, as his equity in the house goes up rapidly. The flip side of the coin is that an interest rate below inflation results
in a loss for savers.

As inflation accelerates, rather sooner than later, it is causing so much damage to the fabric of society, by creating so much
injustice, and suffering.

The Side-Effects:

Everywhere one looks it is repeatedly published that unemployment and slow growth are cures for inflation; that all
alternativemeasures taken will result in more inflation or higher unemployment, which is nonsense. The truth is that slow
growth and high unemployment are not cures for inflation. They are the side-effects of a successful cure of a diseased
economy.

The general signal of increasing demand will be confused with the specific signals reflecting changes in relative demands.
That is why the initial side effect of faster monetary growth is the appearance of prosperity and greater employment.

When it is discovered that the rise in wages does not coincide with higher demand, the flaw in the system is discovered.
Wages and prices are higher not because of higher demand, but primarily to allow for the rises in the prices of goods they
buy.
Subsequently people are off on a price-wage spiral that itself effectively is inflation, and by no means the cause of it. If
monetary growth does not speed up faster, the initial stimulus to employment and output will be replaced by the opposite;
both will go down in response to the higher prices and wages.

By the way; governments can actually not create jobs, they can only steal from people and give it to others.

If it were politically profitable and feasible to generate a 10% inflation rate, the temptation would be great if inflation indeed
reached this level, to raise it to 11, or 12 or 15 %. Zero inflation is a politically feasible objective; 10% is not.

This is the verdict of experience. Nevertheless, central bankers create excessive quantities of money, as they tell us the
world needs more inflation to fight deflationary forces, which basically is nonsense as the deflationary forces are the result of
the increase of monetary supply.

The Best Solution to Create Inflation:

Moreover, if they want to create inflation, there is no need for excessive money printing. They can create inflation instantly
byraising the price of gold, which is the easiest way to create inflation.

A higher dollar price for gold is practically the definition of inflation. The Fed would just declare the price of gold to be, say,
$5,000 an ounce and make the price stick using the gold in Fort Knox assuming it is still there? Their printing press
would maintain a two-way market.
The Fed could sell gold when it hits $5,050 an ounce and buy gold when it hits $4,950 an ounce. Thats a 1% band around
the target price of $5,000 an ounce. The band and the use of physical gold would make the target price stick.

A higher price for gold is the same as a lower value for the dollar. The world of $5,000-per-ounce gold also means $10 per
gallon gas at the station and $40 for a movie ticket. Nothing happens without consequences.

Santa Claus Doesnt Exist:

Inflation, in contrast to what economic leaders lead us to believe, is not equivalent to Santa Claus. It cant bring gifts to
everyone. All it does is shift the benefits of the economy around. In the immortal words of President Obama: inflation
spreads the wealth around a little.

Inflation penalises wage earners, savers, and retirees to the benefit of asset owners. It benefits debtors at the expense of
creditors. Theres no net increase in the nations wealth. One group is merely taxed for the benefit of the other. This is sold
as a benefit to the country by governments. They have to sell it to the people because without inflation they wont be able to
pay their bills.
However, wealth cannot be created by a printing press. This will cause price inflation, asset inflation, credit collapse or a
mixture of all three. Everyone knows this. Nevertheless, our leaders pretend otherwise.

If credit is expanded in excess of savings, it historically always ends in a collapse. So there should be no surprise. When
creditors begin to ask the critical question: Can these debts really be financed? Will we get our savings back? If credit has
been expanded radically beyond savings, as is the case today in the developed world, the answer is always NO.

It is true that dramatic increases in the money supply eventually lead to inflation. But the key word here is eventually.
Sometimes it can take a while. The extent of the delay depends on general conditions, and a very important concept known
as monetary velocity.

Velocity of Money:

Inflation and deflation are not purely products of how much money is in the system. They are products of how fast this
moneyis moving through the system.

When banks are lending, businesses are borrowing, and consumers are spending, money changes hands quickly. Under
these conditions, the monetary velocity is high.

Conversely, when banks dont lend the money, businesses are hunkered down, and consumers are saving or paying down
debt, money does not change hands quickly. It moves slowly. If the economy grinds to a near halt, as is the case today,
eventually money stops changing hands completely.

Inflation is not purely from an increase in the money supply. Sufficient monetary velocity is required to spur a general and
persistent increase in the price of goods and services. Without velocity if money doesnt move through the system there
is no reason for prices to rise.

The point is that its not just about how many units are being printed. Its about where those units go and how fast they are
moving through the system. The end game may indeed be accelerating monetary velocity. The cumulative effect on the rise
in prices and a spectacular loss of faith in the system will result in a decline in the desire for owning dollars will plummet, and
that means hyperinflation.
How Much Money is in Circulation?

Ever wondered how much money exists? This video compares the worlds richest people, the biggest companies, physical
currency, the gold market, the stock market, global debt, and more to give you a sense of the quantity of money that actually
exists.

Smoking Gun For Christchurch Killer Quake: Hillary Clinton Emails Show Advance
Warning Of Christchurch Earthquake
October 7 2016 | From: MediaWhores / TheContrail

Recently releases Hillary Clinton emails show US State Department advanced knowledge of the big
Christchurch Earthquake on 22nd February 2011. This appears to be proof that the killer
earthquake was a planned disaster "And on cue..."

The first email sent by the State Department to head of the department Hillary Clinton was sent a full 6 hours before
the actual quake hit. Washington being 18 hours behind NZST. The second email was sent as the quake hit.

Related: Christchurch: The Man-Made Earthquakes - What Really Happened, How And Why

On the presumption the emails are real this proves advanced knowledge by the US State Department of the Christchurch
Earthquakes.
Click on the image above to open a larger version in a new window

Clinton Christchurch Earthquakes Emails Source, Wikileaks

Sources for these emails are being actively and aggressively blocked worldwide. It seems they even knew the size of the
quake: 6.3 a possible reference to the Freemasonic Kabbalah number 666. There is substantial evidence that the quake
was in fact much bigger than 6.3 magnitude.

Interestingly the US disaster relief team FEMA was also in Christchurch the week before the big earthquake, and they
flew out just hours before the earthquake hit leaving behind their head disaster coordinator

Related: FEMA In Christchurch At Time Of Earthquake Using Natural Disasters To Bring In A Police State?

If this all sounds unbelievable to you you probably need to do some research on HAARP the radio wave technology
being used to influence weather, storms and some say even earthquakes world wide and nothing new, Tesla was using
similar technology last century.

Related: HAARP: Earthquakes, Hurricanes and Mind Control

EMF conditions before the Christchurch Earthquake on 14/2/16

More Confessions Of An Economic Hit Man: "This Time, Theyre Coming For Your
Democracy"
October 7 2016 | From: ZeroHedge

Twelve years ago, John Perkins published his book, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man.
Today, he says things have just gotten so much worse.

Twelve years ago, John Perkins published his book, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, and it rapidly rose
up The New York Times best-seller list.

Related: The Poisoned Chalice: From Eurozone to Dead Zone

In it, Perkins describes his career convincing heads of state to adopt economic policies that impoverished their countries
and undermined democratic institutions. These policies helped to enrich tiny, local elite groups while padding the pockets of
U.S.-based transnational corporations.

Perkins was recruited, he says, by the National Security Agency (NSA), but he worked for a private consulting company. His
job as an undertrained, overpaid economist was to generate reports that justified lucrative contracts for U.S. corporations,
while plunging vulnerable nations into debt.

Countries that didnt cooperate saw the screws tightened on their economies. In Chile, for example, President Richard
Nixon famously called on the CIA to make the economy scream to undermine the prospects of the democratically
elected president, Salvador Allende.
If economic pressure and threats didnt work, Perkins says, the jackals were called to either overthrow or assassinate the
noncompliant heads of state. That is, indeed, what happened to Allende, with the backing of the CIA.

Related: London Named Most Corrupt Place on Earth by Italian Mafia Expert

Perkins book has been controversial, and some have disputed some of his claims, including, for example, that the NSA was
involved in activities beyond code making and breaking.

Perkins has just reissued his book with major updates. The basic premise of the book remains the same, but the update
shows how the economic hit man approach has evolved in the last 12 years.

Among other things, U.S. cities are now on the target list. The combination of debt, enforced austerity, underinvestment,
privatization, and the undermining of democratically elected governments is now happening here.

I couldnt help but think about Flint, Michigan, under emergency management as I read The New Confessions of an
Economic Hit Man.

I interviewed Perkins at his home in the Seattle area. In addition to being a recovering economic hit man, he is a grandfather
and a founder and board member of Dream Change and The Pachamama Alliance, organizations that work for a world that
future generations will want to inherit.

Sarah van Gelder: Whats changed in our world since you wrote the first Confessions of an Economic Hit Man?

John Perkins: Things have just gotten so much worse in the last 12 years since the first Confessions was written.
Economic hit men and jackals have expanded tremendously, including the United States and Europe.

Back in my day we were pretty much limited to what we called the third world, or economically developing countries, but now
its everywhere.

And in fact, the cancer of the corporate empire has metastasized into what I would call a failed global death economy. This
is an economy thats based on destroying the very resources upon which it depends, and upon the military. Its become
totally global, and its a failure.
Related: Why Young Americans Are Giving Up on Capitalism

van Gelder: So how has this switched from us being the beneficiaries of this hit-man economy, perhaps in the past, to us
now being more of the victims of it?

Perkins: Its been interesting because, in the past, the economic hit man economy was being propagated in order to make
America wealthier and presumably to make people here better off, but as this whole process has expanded in the U.S. and
Europe, what weve seen is a tremendous growth in the very wealthy at the expense of everybody else.

On a global basis we now know that 62 individuals have as many assets as half the worlds population.

We of course in the U.S. have seen how our government is frozen, its just not working. Its controlled by the big
corporations and theyve really taken over. Theyve understood that the new market, the new resource, is the U.S. and
Europe, and the incredibly awful things that have happened to Greece and Ireland and Iceland, are now happening here in
the U.S.

Were seeing this situation where we can have what statistically shows economic growth, and at the same time increased
foreclosures on homes and unemployment.
van Gelder: Is this the same kind of dynamic about debt that leads to emergency managers who then turn over the reins of
the economy to private enterprises? The same thing that you are seeing in third-world countries?

Perkins: Yes, when I was an economic hit man, one of the things that we did, we raised these huge loans for these
countries, but the money never actually went to the countries, it went to our own corporations to build infrastructure in those
countries.

And when the countries could not pay off their debt, we insisted that they privatize their water systems, their sewage
systems, their electric systems.

Now were seeing that same thing happen in the United States. Flint, Michigan, is a very good example of that. This is not a
U.S. empire, its a corporate empire protected and supported by the U.S. military and the CIA. But it is not an American
empire, its not helping Americans. Its exploiting us in the same way that we used to exploit all these other countries around
the world.
van Gelder: So it seems like Americans are starting to get this. What is your sense about where the American public is in
terms of readiness to do something?

Perkins: As I travel around the U.S., as I travel around the world, I see that people are really waking up. Were getting it.
Were understanding that we live on a very fragile space station, and its got no shuttles; we cant get off. Weve got to fix it,
weve got to take care of it, and were in the process of destroying it.

The big corporations are destroying it, but the big corporations are just run by people, and theyre vulnerable to us. If we
really consider it, the market place is a democracy, if we just use it as such.

van Gelder: I want to push back on that one a little bit because so many corporations dont sell to ordinary consumers, they
sell to other companies or to governments, and so many corporations have such an entrenched reward system where if one
person doesnt perform by exploiting the earth theyll simply get replaced with somebody else who does.

Perkins: Ive recently been speaking at a number of corporate conferences. I hear time after time after time that many of
them want to leave a green legacy. Theyve got children, theyve got grandchildren, they understand we cant go on like this.

So what they say is;

Go out there, start consumer movements. What I want is to receive a hundred thousand emails from my
customers saying, Hey, I love your product but Im not going to buy it anymore until you pay your workers a fair
wage in Indonesia, or wherever, or clean up the environment, or do something.

And then I can take that to my board of directors and my big stockholders, to the people who really control whether
I get hired or fired.
van Gelder: I agree, and those campaigns, as you know, have been going on for decades now, and sometimes they have
little incremental changes around the edge. But then we look back on it later and we see that theres enormous resistance
because of the profits to be made in continuing the system.

Perkins: I think weve seen tremendous changes, though. Just in the last few years, weve seen organic foods become very
big. Twenty years ago they couldnt make a go of it. Weve seen women having bigger positions in corporations, and
minorities, and we need to get better at this.

Weve seen the labeling of many foods. GMOs arent included yet, but nutrition and calories and so forth are. And what we
really need to do is convince corporations that theyve got to have a new goal.

Weve got to let corporations know what their job is: Its to serve a public interest, and make a decent rate of return for
investors. We need investors, but beyond that, every corporation should serve a public interest, should serve the earth,
should serve future generations.
van Gelder: I want to ask you about the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and other trade deals. Is there any way that we can beat
these things back so they dont continue supercharging the corporate sphere at the expense of local democracies?

Perkins: Theyre devastating; they give sovereignty to corporations over governments. Its ridiculous.

Were seeing terrible desperation from people in Central America trying to get away from a system thats broken, primarily
because our trade agreements and our policies toward Latin America have broken them.

And were seeing, of course, those similar things in the Middle East and in Africa, these waves of immigrants that are
swarming into Europe from the Middle East. These terrible problems that have been created because of the greed of big
corporations.

I was just in Central America and what we talk about in the U.S. as being an immigration problem is really a trade
agreement problem.

Theyre not allowed to impose tariffs under the trade agreements - NAFTA and CAFTA - but the U.S. is allowed to subsidize
its farmers. Those governments cant afford to subsidize their farmers. So our farmers can undercut theirs, and thats
destroyed the economies, and a number of other things, and thats why weve got immigration problems.

van Gelder: Can you talk about the violence that people are fleeing in Central America, and how that links back to the role
the U.S. has had there?

Perkins: Three or four years ago the CIA orchestrated a coup against the democratically elected president of Honduras,
President Zelaya, because he stood up to Dole and Chiquita and some other big, global, basically U.S.-based corporations.
He wanted to raise the minimum wage to a reasonable level, and he wanted some land reform that would make sure that his
own people were able to make money off their own land, rather than having big international corporations do it.

The big corporations couldnt stand for this. He wasnt assassinated but he was overthrown in a coup and sent to another
country, and replaced by a terribly brutal dictator, and today Honduras is one of the most violent, homicidal countries in the
hemisphere.

Its frightening what weve done. And when that happens to a president, it sends a message to every other president
throughout the hemisphere, and in fact throughout the world: Dont mess with us.

Dont mess with the big corporations. Either cooperate and get rich in the process, and have all your friends and family get
rich in the process, or go get overthrown or assassinated. Its a very strong message.
van Gelder: I wanted to ask about your time spent in Ecuador with indigenous people. Im wondering if you could talk about
how that experience has changed you?

Perkins: Many years ago when I was a Peace Corps volunteer in the Amazon with the Shuar indigenous people there, I
was dying.

I got very ill, and my life was saved in one night by a shaman. Id come out of business school this is 1968, 69, and I had no
idea what a shaman was, but it changed my life by helping me understand that what was killing me was a mindset - what
they would call the dream.

I spent many years studying all this, and working with many different indigenous groups, and what I saw was the power of
the mindset.

The shamans teach us - the indigenous people teach us - once you change the mindset, then its pretty easy to have the
objective reality change around it. So, instead of the kind of economy we have now, a death economy, if we can change the
mindset we can very quickly move into a life economy.
van Gelder: So what are the mechanisms by which a change in consciousness actually shifts things on the ground?

Perkins: Well, in my opinion the biggest catalyst that needs to go forward to change this is weve got to change the
corporations. Weve got to move from that goal that was stated by Milton Friedman in the 1970s, that the only responsibility
of corporations is to maximize profits regardless of social and environmental costs.

We change the big corporations by telling them were not going to buy from you anymore unless you change your goal. No
longer should your goal be to maximize profits regardless of social and environmental costs. Make a decent rate of return for
your investors, but serve us, we the people, or were not buying from you.

van Gelder : You quote Tom Paine in your book: If there must be trouble let it be in my day that my child may have
peace. Why did you decide to use that quote?

Perkins : Well, I think Tom Paine was brilliant in that statement. He understood how that would impact people. And he wrote
that statement in December 1776.

Washington had lost just about every battle he ever fought; he wasnt getting any support from the Continental Congress;
they werent giving his men guns or ammunition or even blankets and shoes, and he was bogged down at Valley Forge.
Paine realizes that hes got to somehow write something that will rally people, and theres nothing that rallies people more
than to think about their children.
That to me is where were at right now. Ive got a daughter and Ive got an 8-year-old grandson. Bring on the trouble for me,
OK, but lets create a world theyre going to want to live in. And lets understand that my 8-year-old grandson cannot have
an environmentally sustainable and regenerative, socially just, fulfilling world unless every child on the planet has that.

And this is new. It used to be all we had to worry about was our local community, maybe our country. But we didnt have to
worry about the world. But what we know now is that we cant have peace anywhere in the world, we cant have peace in
the U.S., unless everybody has peace.

Propaganda Techniques Of Empire + Politically Correct Language Control And The

Rise Of The Third Reich
October 6 2016 | From: EurasiaReview / NaturalNews

Washingtons quest for perpetual world power is underwritten by systematic and perpetual
propaganda wars.
Every major and minor war has been preceded, accompanied and followed by unremitting government propaganda
designed to secure public approval, exploit victims, slander critics, dehumanize targeted adversaries and justify its
allies collaboration.

In this paper we will discuss the most common recent techniques used to support ongoing imperial wars.

Role Reversal

A common technique, practiced by the imperial publicists, is to accuse the victims of the same crimes, which had been
committed against them.

The well documented, deliberate and sustained US-EU aerial bombardment of Syrian government soldiers, engaged in
operations against ISIS-terrorist, resulted in the deaths and maiming of almost 200 Syrian troops and allowed ISIS-
mercenaries to overrun their camp.

In an attempt to deflect the Pentagons role in providing air cover for the very terrorists it claims to oppose, the propaganda
organs cranked out lurid, but unsubstantiated, stories of an aerial attack on a UN humanitarian aid convoy, first blamed on
the Syrian government and then on the Russians.
The evidence that the attack was most likely a ground-based rocket attack by ISIS terrorists did not deter the propaganda
mills. This technique would turn US and European attention away from the documented criminal attack by the imperial
bombers and present the victimized Syrian troops and pilots as international human rights criminals.

Hysterical Rants

Faced with world opprobrium for its wanton violation of an international ceasefire agreement in Syria, the imperial public
spokespeople frequently resort to irrational outbursts at international meetings in order to intimidate wavering allies into
silence and shut down any chance for reasonable debate resolving concrete issues among adversaries.
The current US Ranter-in-Chief in the United Nations, is Ambassador Samantha Power, who launched a vitriolic diatribe
against the Russians in order to sabotage a proposed General Assembly debate on the US deliberate violation (its criminal
attack on Syrian troops) of the recent Syrian ceasefire. Instead of a reasonable debate among serious diplomats, the rant
served to derail the proceedings.

Identity Politics to Neutralize Anti-Imperialist Movements

Empire is commonly identified with the race, gender, religion and ethnicity of its practioners. Imperial propagandists have
frequently resorted to disarming and weakening anti-imperialist movements by co-opting and corrupting black, ethnic
minority and women leaders and spokespeople.

The use of such symbolic tokens is based on the assumption that these are representatives reflecting the true interests of
so-called marginalized minorities and can therefore presume to speak for the oppressed peoples of the world.

The promotion of such compliant and respectable minority members to the elite is then propagandized as a revolutionary,
world liberating historical event witness the election of US President Barack Obama.
The rise of Obama to the presidency in 2008 illustrates how the imperial propagandists have used identity politics to
undermine class and anti-imperialist struggles.

Under Obamas historical black presidency, the US pursued seven wars against people of color in South Asia, the Middle
East and North Africa.

Over a million men and women of sub-Saharan black origin, whether Libyan citizens or contract workers for neighboring
countries, were killed, dispossessed and driven into exile by US allies after the US-EU destroyed the Libyan state in the
name of humanitarian intervention.

Hundreds of thousands of Arabs have been bombed in Yemen, Syria and Iraq under President Obama, the so-
called historic black president.

Obamas predator drones have killed hundreds of Afghan and Pakistani villagers. Such is the power of identity politics that
ignominious Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
Meanwhile, in the United States under Obama, racial inequalities between black and white workers (wages, unemployment,
access to housing, health and educational services) have widened. Police violence against blacks intensified with total
impunity for killer cops.

Over two million immigrant Latino workers have been expelled breaking up hundreds of thousands of families and
accompanied by a marked increase of repression compared to earlier administrations.

Millions of black and white workers home mortgages were foreclosed while all of the corrupt banks were bailed out at a
greater rate than had occurred under white presidents.

This blatant, cynical manipulation of identity politics facilitated the continuation and deepening of imperial wars, class
exploitation and racial exclusion. Symbolic representation undermined class struggles for genuine changes.

Related: Globalists are pitting blacks against whites in America to incite a bloody race war... here's how we can all
win together by refusing to be manipulated into hatred and rage

Past Suffering to Justify Contemporary Exploitation

Imperial propagandists repeatedly evoke the victims and abuses of the past in order to justify their own aggressive imperial
interventions and support for the land grabs and ethnic cleansing committed by their colonial allies like Israel, among
others.

The victims and crimes of the past are presented as a perpetual presence to justify ongoing brutalities against
contemporary subject people.

The case of US-Israeli colonization of Palestine clearly illustrates how rabid criminality, pillage, ethnic cleansing and self-
enrichment can be justified and glorified through the language of past victimization.
Propagandists in the US and Israel have created the cult of the Holocaust, worshiping a near century-old Nazi crime
against Jews (as well as captive Slavs, Gypsies and other minorities) in Europe, to justify the bloody conquest and theft of
Arab lands and sovereignty and engage in systematic military assaults against Lebanon and Syria.

Millions of Muslim and Christian Palestinians have been driven into perpetual exile. Elite, wealthy, well-organized and
influential zionist Jews, with primary fealty to Israel, have successfully sabotaged every contemporary struggle for peace in
the Middle East and have created real barriers for social democracy in the US through their promotion of militarism and
empire building.

Those claiming to represent victims of the past have become among the most oppressive of contemporary elites. Using the
language of defense, they promote aggressive forms of expansion and pillage.

They claim their monopoly on historic suffering has given them a special dispensation from the rules of civilized conduct:
their cult of the Holocaust allows them to inflict immense pain on others while silencing any criticism with the accusation of
anti-Semitism and relentlessly punishing critics.

Their key role in imperial propaganda warfare is based on their claims of an exclusive franchise on suffering and
immunity from the norms of justice.

Entertainment Spectacles on Military Platforms

Entertainment spectacles glorify militarism. Imperial propagandists link the public to unpopular wars promoted by otherwise
discredited leaders. Sports events present soldiers dressed up as war heroes with deafening, emotional displays of flag
worship to celebrate the ongoing overseas wars of aggression.

These mind-numbing extravaganzas with crude elements of religiosity demand choreographed expressions of national
allegiance from the spectators as a cover for continued war crimes abroad and the destruction of citizens economic rights at
home.
Much admired, multi-millionaire musicians and entertainers of all races and orientations, present war to the masses with a
humanitarian facade. The entertainers smiling faces serve genocide just as powerfully as the Presidents benign and friendly
face accompanies his embrace of militarism.

The propagandist message for the spectator is that your favorite team or singer is there just for you because our noble
wars and valiant warriors have made you free and now they want you to be entertained.

The old style of blatant bellicose appeals to the public is obsolete: the new propaganda conflates entertainment with
militarism, allowing the ruling elite to secure tacit support for its wars without disturbing the spectators experience.

Do the Imperial Techniques of Propaganda Work?

How effective are the modern imperial propaganda techniques? The results seem to be mixed. In recent months, elite black
athletes have begun protesting white racism by challenging the requirement for choreographed displays of flag worship. . .
opening public controversy into the larger issues of police brutality and sustained marginalization.

Identity politics, which led to the election of Obama, may be giving way to issues of class struggle, racial justice, anti-
militarism and the impact of continued imperial wars. Hysterical rants may still secure international attention, but repeated
performances begin to lose their impact and subject the ranter to ridicule.
The cult of victimology has become less a rationale for the multi-billion dollar US-tribute to Israel, than the overwhelming
political and economic influence and thuggery of billionaire Zionist fundraisers who demand US politicians support for the
state of Israel.

Brandishing identify politics may have worked the first few times, but inevitably black, Latino, immigrant and all exploited
workers, all underpaid and overworked women and mothers reject the empty symbolic gestures and demand substantive
socio-economic changes and here they find common links with the majority of exploited white workers.

In other words, the existing propaganda techniques are losing their edge the corporate media news is seen as a sham.
Who follows the actor-soldiers and flag-worshipers once the game has begun?

The propagandists of empire are desperate for a new line to grab public attention and obedience. Could the recent domestic
terror bombings in New York and New Jersey provoke mass hysteria and more militarization? Could they serve as cover for
more wars abroad . . .?
A recent survey, published in Military Times, reported that the vast majority of active US soldiers oppose more imperial
wars. They are calling for defense at home and social justice. Soldiers and veterans have even formed groups to support
the protesting black athletes who have refused to participate in flag worship while unarmed black men are being killed by
police in the streets.

Despite the multi-billion dollar electoral propaganda, over sixty percent of the electorate reject both major party candidates.
The reality principle has finally started to undermine State propaganda.

Politically Correct Language Control And The Rise Of The Third Reich

Stunning new documentary reveals why we must stop the rise of safe spaces, social justice
warriors and progressive fanaticism.
In a stunning new documentary released just today, I reveal how politically correct speech control (thought control)
gave rise to Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich.

The film reveals how the phenomenon of progressive fanaticism -- safe spaces, social justice warriors, microaggressions,
generation snowflake crybullies -- mirrors the Brownshirts of Nazi Germany and escalates demands for obedience into
physical violence against innocents.

We're already seeing a similar phenomenon today with numerous Black Lives Matter terrorist shootings of police officers,
beatings of innocent people merely because they are white, and calls for extreme acts of violence against police officers and
Caucasians.

The aggressive, violent behavior of "progressive fanatics" is now mirroring the rise of the Third Reich that eventually led to
genocide and the mass murder of millions.
FYI, "Nazi" means "National Socialism." The Third Reich is often incorrectly described as a "far right" regime. It was actually
an extreme rendition of corporate-government fascism, a powerful centralized socialist government, and the kind of strict
demands for cultural obedience that we frequency see from the extreme left.

Some of the big issues that characterized the Nazi government were gun control, forced euthanasia, an expansion of
entitlement handouts and the invocation of "science" as the justification behind genocide. We see all these same theme
today from the political left.

California SB 277, for example, a genocidal medical experiment conducted on children by the state government, was
pushed by a radical leftist child killer named Sen. Richard Pan (who would have been right at home in the Third Reich).

America's social justice warriors are intolerant, racist bigots who are a real threat to a peaceful
society

Just as in Nazi Germany, today's "social justice warriors" are intolerant, racist, bigoted instigators of violence, and they seek
political power at the expense of innocents.

While disavowing the legitimacy of law in a peaceful society, today's P.C. fanatics - including lunatic leftist university
students - demand the mass disarmament of private citizens by a totalitarian government, following in lockstep with the early
days of Nazi Germany when gun confiscation preceded genocide.

With students in the United States now being vilified for saying that "all lives matter," we have entered a realm of extreme
leftist lunacy that cannot be ended with reason or any appeal to logic. The violent rhetoric and destructive actions of the
political left have now gone beyond the point of no return, leading America to the exact outcome desired by globalist
instigators like George Soros: civil war.

Soros and other seek to tear America apart from within. Seething with hatred for humanity, destructive people of high
influence -- like Adolf Hitler, George Soros and Barack Obama - use their positions to enslave people rather than setting
them free.

They create conflict rather than preventing it... and they use words as weapons to keep people down rather than as
tools to empower individuals.

America has now entered a very dangerous chapter of its history, and conformity to P.C. language is a surrender to the
fanaticism of the radical left. Now is the time for all Americans to reject P.C. language control, reject the leftist thought
police and assert your right to exercise cognitive diversity with a vast array of ideas and dissenting speech.

At this critical moment in history, we must defend speech freedom or lose it forever, because the Nazi-like
P.C. language police on the left demand that you either surrender to them or DIE.

Sound familiar? History has been here before, and it didn't end without massive bloodshed. Eventually, the USA, Russia
and other allies had to use kinetic weapons to destroy the Nazi regime and end its "politically correct" genocide against
humanity.

Let us hope it doesn't come to that again.

$40 Billion US In Aid To Israel: For Whom And For What? + Documentary Reveals How
Israel Convinces Americans: Palestine Occupies Israel
October 4 2016 | From: Sott / GlobalResearch / Various

Recently, the United States just renewed military aid to Israel in a decade-long, $38 billion deal -
the largest of its kind in American history.
It represents a significant increase in aid, roughly $3.8 billion a year - expected to be supplemented by additional
assistance through US Congress - up from $3 billion per year previously.

Related: Israel - A Nation Founded Upon A Monumental Lie

The Atlantic in an article titled, Why Does the United States Give So Much Money to Israel?, attempted to explain the
reasoning behind the otherwise unreasonable and unprecedented assistance by claiming:

Defenders of the deal would say it's necessary. Dalton described the uptick in spending as a natural extension of
the long-standing relationship between the United States and Israel, "as well as close ties between those countries
and their peoples."

She described the "fraught neighborhood" surrounding Israel: war-torn Syria to the northeast, Hezbollah-influenced
Lebanon to the north, and an Islamist insurgency in Egypt's Sinai to the south, all of which help explain the
historically high promise of $5 billion in missile funding over the next 10 years."

However, experienced geopolitical analysts will point out that the United States does not have "friends," "allies," or
"relationships" - only interests and those who serve them.

And while The Atlantic attempts to explain the deal as a means of maintaining a "relationship," it and other publications
admit that there are "strings attached." If examined carefully, these strings reveals just what interests this supposed
"relationship" serves.
Related: New IDF chief rabbi: Soldiers can rape Arab women to boost morale

CNBC would say just that in its article, Big US military aid package to Israel has strings attached, claiming:

...it's structured so that more Israeli defense spending goes to U.S. companies. Israel's long-standing special
arrangement for funds from the United States previously allowed Israel to spend 26 percent of the money in Israel -
on Israeli-made defense products. But that provision is being phased out over the first five years of the deal."

In other words, the ten year, $38 billion aid package is first and foremost welfare for US defense contractors, not
Israel whose own defense spending adds up to $16 billion per year - dwarfing annual US "aid." The deal is to encourage
further Israeli dependency on America - dependency that lends Washington further leverage over both Israel and the
region.

The purpose of aid and those who have arranged it on both the Israeli and American sides of the negotiating table is to
continue directing Israel's domestic and foreign policy to suit America's interests, not the Israeli people's.

An Israel at peace with its neighbors in a stable Middle East and North Africa is an Israel that negates the supposed
need of a US presence in the region. It also negates the need for such extravagant defense spending in both Israel and
the United States.
Related: $40 billion aid to Israel is largest ever to any country, says Susan Rice

CNBC would also reveal that the new assistance package would include provisions making it difficult for Israel to lobby
for additional spending unless war broke out.

Considering the track record of various Israeli regimes, does one suppose this is an incentive for Israel to avoid conflict,
or actively seek it out?

In every way the aid deal is meant to perpetuate unpopular regimes, unpopular and inhumane policies, as well as
perpetuate conflict and human misery.

The role the US plays in "stabilizing" the Middle East is revealed instead as a constant conspiracy to overturn it.

US, Israel, and Saudi Arabia - Trifecta of Conflict and Instability

The only other nation in the Middle East sowing as much conflict and instability as Israel's current regime is Saudi
Arabia. It has flooded Iraq and Syria with militant groups triggering years of devastating war as well as directly launched an
extensive air and ground war against neighboring Yemen.
Saudi Arabia - like Israel - is the recipient of extensive US backing. While the US made history by granting Israel
unprecedented foreign aid, it sealed with Saudi Arabia recently an equally historic and unprecedented weapons
deal amounting to some $60 billion - a single deal significantly larger than the 10 year aid package the US is providing
Israel.

Israel's Haaretz would report in its article, U.S. Announces $60b Arms Sale to Saudi Arabia, Says 'Israel Doesn't Object',
that:

The United States plans to sell up to $60 billion worth of military aircraft to Saudi Arabia, the U.S. State
Department announced on Wednesday in a move designed to shore up a region overshadowed by Iran.

Andrew Shapiro, the assistant secretary of state for political-military affairs, told a news conference the U.S.
administration did not anticipate any objections to the sale from Israel, traditionally wary of arms sales to nearby
Arab countries."

Indeed, Israel does not object to US weapon deals with Saudi Arabia. Despite feigned adversity between the two regimes,
the governments of Israel and Saudi Arabia work in tandem toward a singular regional vision with very few points of
contention and with the common denominator being the way each nation's role enhances their joint sponsor - the United
States - and its hegemony over the region.

It is then not surprising to see US-funded Israeli forces defending Saudi subsidized terrorists on the Golan Heights
coordinating violence against Syrian forces throughout the destructive, ongoing Syrian conflict.
Unlike Saudi Arabia, which does not exist as a functioning legitimate nation-state beyond its petrodollars and its US-backed
military power, Israel does possess the economic infrastructure and human capital to transition into a functioning,
independent nation-state - if only its population can overcome the engineered strategy of tension that has ensnared it for
decades and the regime behind it.

The United States' $38 billion is to ensure that regime remains in power for another 10 years, the strategy of tension
continues to play out, and the Israeli people, as well as their neighbors are denied any opportunity to live in peace and move
forward in progress for another decade to come.

Rather than underwriting Israel's security for the next decade, the US is ensuring Israel struggles under another 10 years
of uncertainty, perpetually impending war, all while its regime continues to partner with neighboring regimes - including
Saudi Arabia and Turkey - to undermine regional stability and further threaten the future of the Israeli people and the
survival of the Israeli nation.

The Israeli regime's signing of yet another compromising, dependency-inducing aid package with the United States is proof
once again that Israel's own government constitutes the Israeli nation's worst enemy.
Related: Top Israeli General Speaks Out Against Israels Crimes Against Palestinians + Parallels Between Israel &
1930's Germany & Ten Facts Why Netanyahu Is A Criminal And That Israel Is A Rogue State

Comment: Perhaps Israel has been given too little credit here for its manipulative controls, global infiltration and
concentration of pathocracy.

Documentary Reveals How Israel Convinces Americans: Palestine Occupies Israel

In this episode of Behind the Headline, host Mint Press Mnar Muhawesh meets Sut Jhally, an
expert on media manipulation and propaganda. In the film The Occupation of the American Mind,
Jhally and others examine how high-paid spin doctors control the media message on Israel.
Following the Holocaust, the world community - led by the United States and Britain - sought to create a European
Jewish-only state.

This humanitarian move, though, utterly failed in respecting the humanity of the lands indigenous inhabitants - Christian and
Muslim Palestinians.

Starting in December of 1947, their land and property was seized and destroyed to make way for the state of Israel, where
white only European Jews would live . Over 750,000 Palestinians were expelled and over 10,000 were killed by the British
and US armed Zionist militias, and later Israeli forces, during the Nakba, an Arabic word meaning catastrophe.

Those expelled by the Nakba and their Palestinian descendants who make up the worlds largest refugee population in the
world are not allowed to return to their land.

Yet a recent poll found that nearly half of Americans believe Palestine occupies Israel - not the other way around.

Thats because the mainstream, corporate-owned media continues to spin a propaganda wheel that dehumanizes
Palestinians and paints Israel as a beacon of democracy.
Related: Google under fire for replacing Palestine from its maps with Israel

Meanwhile, special interest groups like the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC, buy their way into the
hearts and minds of our elected officials. Ever wonder why Israel gets $3 billion in annual military funding from Uncle Sam?
Connect the dots from the campaign contributions to the spending bills.

Theres a lot riding on our relationship with Israel: Apart from serving as a proxy for U.S. relations in the Middle East and
Africa, Israel is Americas second-top destination for arms exports. Yep - the countrys thats no bigger than the state of New
Jersey is basically a black check for the military-industrial complex.

But not all Americans are on board with the notion of Israel as the victim of Palestinian oppression.

Important: Gaza In Context

Another study showed that 62 percent of the population now believes Israel gets too much foreign aid, and the Boycott,
Divestment and Sanctions movement has made waves across the world, imposing a kind of sanction against Israels
economy by targeting Israeli products.

A new documentary, The Occupation of the American Mind, brings attention to how Israels public relations campaign has
successfully manipulated the narrative of the Israel-Palestine conflict in that, its not a conflict at all but a matter of
modern-day colonialism, ethnic cleansing and apartheid.
Today Im joined by Sut Jhally, executive producer of The Occupation of the American Mind and a professor of
communication at the University of Massachusetts. The film was produced, written and directed by Loretta Alper and Jeremy
Earp.

I asked Jhally to explain how Americans are being kept in the dark about Palestine, and how that prevents a mass
movement against Israeli apartheid from forming in the U.S.

Learn more about the US war in Afghanistan fueling the worldwide heroin crisis, and Israels occupation of American minds:

Related Articles:

How Israel Benefits from Living with Terror

 The 1967 Israeli Attack on the USS Liberty

This is not Gaza After Israeli Invasion

Palestinians inside Israel Are under Attack

Whats Happening Outside Keenans Reach - The Illegal Casinos Are Closing Down
October 3 2016 | From: Farouk

Currently the global Stock Market capitalization stands about USD 69 Trillion, with an average daily
turnover of around USD 190 Billion. The size of the international Bond Markets in outstanding
issues is USD 140 Trillion and with daily trading volumes around USD 700 Billion.

Global Currency Trading dwarfs Stock and Bond Markets with an estimated turnover of USD 5.3 Trillion DAILY. And
as this is essentially an unregulated market based on pair swaps (one currency swapped for another) it is
impossible to estimate actual annual turnover and market capitalization.

The global Derivatives Market is another unregulated financial hedge market with an essentially an unknown number of bets
being placed on any number of hedging situations associated with Stock, Bond, Commodity and/or Currency Market
conditions. Global Derivative market size estimates vary between USD 800 Trillion to over USD 4-6 Quadrillion in
outstanding bets most of which are backed by NOTHING.

And to all this can be added Commodity Exchanges, Credit Card Companies and interlocking International Corporations in
various major economic sectors.
All of these markets are simple gambling operations. They produce virtually nothing except BETS in poorly or un-regulated
markets dominated by Central Banks, major international banks, large hedge funds and trusts, pension funds and insurance
companies who automatically trade using computer algorithms and direct collusions between these main traders resulting in
price fixing scams.

There is no real Free Market Trading.

It is all rigged.

What would happen if all that daily traded money were to be spent on real productive development?

OH! I can hear the screams from Wall Street! WE NEED FREE TRADING MARKETS!

1,001 Excuses will come. Rats trying to save their sinking ship and their cushy jobs that produce nothing. Most of
these shysters have never run a productive business and cannot see beyond their adrenalin gambling addictions
and money playpens.

It is clear that the World is transitioning from the Debt Slavery Model to a newer paradigm of more equitable balancing of
financial wealth, particularly within the Middle Class populations that are the productive backbone of all economies.
This will result in a reduction of funds flowing into gambling markets and an increase in funding real projects that produce
real things.

We do not expect these global markets to close completely, except for Currency and Derivative Markets, but merely down-
size their trading activities by channeling funds to productive or new investment opportunities and because currencies will be
asset (GOLD) backed in accordance with the Paris Accords.

Stock Markets that have been FIAT INFLATED by Central Banks and the FED will have to fall as stocks and companies
they represent will fall back to historic and real value levels.

Related: The Fed's destabilizing, wealth-shifting policies amount to the biggest heist in human history
Expect 50+% drops in US, European and Japanese stocks as a direct result of real revaluation and a major decline in bank
liquidity to these markets resulting in margin calls and further downward pressures.

Bond markets will also fall because of the lack of market liquidity and corporate revaluations but will rebound with higher
interest rates. Underwriting for new issues will be difficult but due to a lack of new issues, those that do get underwritten will
enjoy higher margins and increased market demand. New Bonds may face a Sellers Market if they can find underwriters.

The derivatives market is, in a word, gigantic, often estimated at more that $1.2 quadrillion. Some market analysts estimate the derivatives market at
more than 10 times the size of the total world gross domestic product, or GDP. The reason the derivatives market is so large is because there are
numerous derivatives available on virtually every possible type of investment asset, including equities, commodities, bonds and foreign currency
exchange.

We do advocate closing down the Derivative Markets entirely as these produce only hedge bets currently far beyond the
Global GDP and thus are absolutely un-recoverable. This is clearly bringing down the Too Big To Bailout Banks like
Deutsche Bank who will collapse the entire derivatives market, not IF, but When it goes into receivership or financial
restructuring.
Similarly, Currency Markets will be totally unnecessary once a countrys currency is gold backed and issues are pegged to
that value or to the value of a single international reserve currency (International Trade Dollars issued by a new International
Central Clearing Bank).

Currency Pegging eliminates trading margins and the ability of major financial players from influencing currency price
movements. Gold and real asset backing together with internationally agreed currency revaluation rates essentially freezes
exchange rates.

What these financial market changes will do is to release TRILLIONS in capital investments into real development projects
globally.
This will sprout new industries in renewable and free energy, electric autonomous vehicles, vertical farming, sea ranching,
cities in the sea, and advances in AI and virtual reality networking. These and many more are known technologies that just
have yet to be fully financed. All that is about to change.

Generally through various financial redistribution programs and the Golden Dragon Familys gold backing of all currencies,
there will be a financial re-saturation of the Middle Class on a global basis.

Not everyone will be rich all of a sudden, but wealth dispersion at all lower levels will be gradually accomplished. Happy
Days ahead for most of humanity.

Happy Days will not be coming to many Governments though. These governments will be kicked out as they were
part of the primary cause for the raping of the middle classes through ever increasing taxation and over-spending.

The announcement of the US returning to its REPUBLiC roots will be the harbinger call for global political reform.

Where does Neil Keenan come in?

To learn about Neil Keenan and Group K visit www.neilkeenan.com - particularly the History & Events Timeline

Neil Keenan is a very important pin prick in this Western Financial Fiat Bubble. His and his teams efforts to reclaim control
over the Global Collateral Accounts are fundamentally altering the Western Banking World by financially restructuring the
underlying assets that the Western Banking is based on.

Related: The Connection Between 9/11, JFK And The Global Collateral Accounts

Before the ink dried on the Bretton Woods Agreement, the Western Banksters were already stealing and illegally using
these account funds, legally negating and voiding the Agreement and any subsequently related agreements. The theft and
abuse of these GCAs is well documented, thus a day in Court can never be avoided (and that is coming soon).

Neils organizing the first BRICS boat trip has forever altered the financial World. A whole new financial structure has quickly
emerged that almost all the countries of the World have now signed onto the BRICS Group, AIIB and its secure financial
transfer network.
All countries are now well prepared for the gold backed RVs and GCRs that are to follow shortly.

Neil still has some unfinished business to attend to with officially taking charge of the Global Collateral Accounts (GCA).

That has been made much easier with the pending final ratification of the Paris Accords that now launches the global gold
and asset backed currencies, RVs and GCRs as this causes a mandatory compliance and the abandonment of issuing fiat
currencies.
Here is a primer on the BIS and the Central Banking system

The next step for Neil is to secure the GCAs which is basically a legal battle of house cleaning with the FED, Bank of
England, Bank of International Settlements, the top Swiss Banks and the rest of the European Banks and financial services
organizations that have been illegally and fraudulently feeding at this financial trough for the past 50-years.
If there has ever been a bigger ball of string to unwind, this one takes top spot.

Neils job is not to pull the financial underpinnings out from under the Western financial empire, but is more to place the
ownership of these financial institutions into the proper hands of those depositors whose money actually funded these
institutions through the GCAs.

This will most likely be some serious negotiations concerning transfers of ownership from those who illegally and fraudulent.

US Dollar Disaster Looms? China And Russian Currencies Break Away

October 2 2016 | From: TheDailyBell / Various

Russia leaves the Dollar based monetary system and adopts a system of Sovereign Currency.

The implications are phenomenal! In 1990 the first priority of Washington and the IMF was to pressure Yeltsin and
the Duma to privatize the State Bank of Russia, under a Constitutional amendment that mandated the new
Central Bank of Russia, like the Federal Reserve or European Central Bank, be a purely monetarist entity whose
only mandate is to control inflation and stabilize the Ruble. In effect, money creation in Russia was removed from
state sovereignty and tied to the US dollar.

Comment: Insiders report that the Cabal in the US is planning on dropping the US Dollar but before that they must
have control over much of the gold in the Global Collateral Accounts, however this is not going to be allowed to
happen.

Related: The Connection Between 9/11, JFK And The Global Collateral Accounts

2016: "The Stolypin club report advises to increase the investment, pumping up the economy with money from the state
budget and by the issue of the Bank of Russia. Putin decided to follow the Stolypin club advice as the new monetary policy
of the country.

Money is changing fast and the US dollar is going to crash.

Heres an excerpt from yet another recently published article (translated from the Russian) describing how the ruble may
now evolve (here).
 We must nationalize the ruble. What does it mean? It means that we must separate the internal markets from the
external ones.

Thus, the first step for Russia is secession from the IMF and others similar institutions designed to keep the
entire world in bondage. The dollar noose must be cut.

Now the amount of printed rubles will not be determined by how many dollars we have but by the actual needs of
our economy.

We have absolutely no need in the central bank in its current form, but we do need a financial regular.

Under any regime, it was the Treasury that performed this function. Let it remain the same now regardless of the
official name. It may continue to be called the Central Bank. If the essence is changed, there is no need in
changing plaques."

Related: This Is How Much Liquidity Deutsche Bank Has At This Moment, And What Happens Next

You can also see an article (here) that goes into this issue more deeply and claims that Putin has in mind backing a portion
of the ruble with gold as well. (We should note there are claims the ruble is backed by gold already.)

The dramatic historical Russian currency changes (if these articles are accurate) seem a little difficult to discern in full at
this moment, but obviously things are changing fast. And they are changing for Chinas money as well. In fact, some have
speculated China and Russia could launch a joint, gold-backed currency (here, see bottom of article).

At the beginning of October, the yuan joins the IMFs SDR basket (here). This means that major international institutions can
issue bonds payable in yuan (actually RMB, the Chinese external currency).

IMF SDR Currency Basket as at: 1 October 2016

Source: IMF
Related: IMF Launches New SDR Basket Including Chinese Renminbi, Determines New Currency Amounts

And that is just what has happened already. The World Bank is issuing a large yuan/RMB tranche and this will be the first of
many (here).

Investors who want to place funds in RMB rather than dollars will use the new yuan/RMB-based instruments. The US will
continue to print dollars but those dollars may not find a home abroad so easily. Instead they may circulate back into the US
economy creating significant price inflation.

The US was able to do so much damage domestically and abroad because of its virtually unlimited spending power. Its
been able to prosecute endless, horrible wars and imprison up to five percent of its adult population at any one time.

Now things are changing. Between the Russian announcement and yuan/RMB convertibility, the US will gradually have
more trouble printing money at will. Perhaps the corrupt military-industrial complex will be impelled to shrink and large-scale
social programs like the wretched Obamacare will have more difficulty with funding as well.

We are well aware that the same banking influences that created the monstrous, modern state is ruining US and the West
generally in order to build up a more febrile internationalism.

Related: Deutche Bank approaches catastrophic collapse - Trillions in debt exposure will burn through European
banks like a raging firestorm

It seems natural, of course, as directed historyalways does. But it is not natural in the slightest. From what we can tell, it is
pre-planned.

Remember both the IMF and the World Bank are controlled by the US. And yet it is these two organizations that are
facilitating the rise of the yuan/RMB.

[Important Point: "Pre-planned" does not always mean by the Cabal, nor that if it was the Cabal who pre-planned it,
that it will go their way - as numerous insiders will attest.]
Also, please pay attention to how Russia will issue rubles into the economic system (from the same translated article we
quoted previously):

How can we calculate [how many rubles Russia needs]? In exactly the same way as the United States calculates
the amount of dollars needed for its economy. Just as the European Union does the same.

The best justification would be that from now on Russia issues rubles based on the value (in rubles) of all natural
resources explored on its territory. It is quite amusing that subsequent steps are no rocket science; they are
dictated by common sense itself. Since we are breaking down the disadvantageous system."

Putin may be taking a big step, but by circumventing his central bank (initially imposed by the West) he can be seen as
moving toward more state control of Russian currency.

And for years, we have debated heatedly with people like Ellen Brown (here) who believe that federal governments can do a
much better job of printing money than quasi-independent central banks. Good Lord! Whats wrong with a little monetary
freedom?

All Putin has to do if he wants a healthy currency is declare that the new ruble will be backed by gold and that its issuance
will be a private or regional matter.

Related: Cryan Defends Deutsche Bank as Some Clients Pare Back Exposure

Let a thousand gold mines bloom. Let the circulation of gold and its related paper notes travel up or down depending on
quantity and demand not the determinations of yet another shadowy, elite clique.

This is the way the US ran before the Civil War and created one of the worlds most prosperous and freest cultures. Those
in the US live yet on the dregs of that golden period.
But this is not well understood. As time goes on the often-illiterate alternative media may join in hosannas for Putins
upcoming currency shift. But, again, just because Russia will now control its currency instead of a central bank reporting to
the IMF, doesnt necessarily create a better system.

Of course, the argument will be made this sort of system is what Hitler installed in Nazi Germany in order to create the
German miracle of the 1930s (which we are supposedly not able to talk about). But that system might have destroyed itself
over time. Surely it would have.

Related: Deutsche lifted by CEO letter, settlement report

To begin with, such systems may work very well. But since the money is being created by human deciders rather than the
competitive market, distortions are inevitable. Price-fixing, which is what it is, never works.

And while we are making the point that this newfound ruble freedom may not be so profound as advertised, let us note that
the advent of a currency war is being accompanied by military tension as well.

Conclusion: Whether such tensions are legitimate or dramatized is difficult to say. But given elite banking control of so
much around the world, we would not be surprised if we are simply being exposed to a gigantic performance of sorts
directed from the top down.Ironically, despite apparent setbacks, Londons City surely leads the way.

Related: Stocks jump, euro edges up as Deutsche Bank rebounds

Red Cross Built Exactly 6 Homes For Haiti With Nearly Half A Billion Dollars In
Donations
October 1 2016 | From: Propublica / Various

The neighborhood of Campeche sprawls up a steep hillside in Haitis capital city, Port-au-Prince.
Goats rustle in trash that goes forever uncollected. Children kick a deflated volleyball in a dusty lot
below a wall with a hand-painted logo of the American Red Cross.
In late 2011, the Red Cross launched a multimillion-dollar project to transform the desperately poor area, which was
hit hard by the earthquake that struck Haiti the year before. The main focus of the project called LAMIKA, an
acronym in Creole for A Better Life in My Neighborhood was building hundreds of permanent homes.

Related: Wheres the $500 mn? Red Cross promises houses for 130,000 Haitians, builds only 6

Today, not one home has been built in Campeche. Many residents live in shacks made of rusty sheet metal, without access
to drinkable water, electricity or basic sanitation. When it rains, their homes flood and residents bail out mud and water.

The Red Cross received an outpouring of donations after the quake, nearly half a billion dollars.

The group has publicly celebrated its work. But in fact, the Red Cross has repeatedly failed on the ground in Haiti.
Confidential memos, emails from worried top officers, and accounts of a dozen frustrated and disappointed insiders show the
charity has broken promises, squandered donations, and made dubious claims of success.

The Red Cross says it has provided homes to more than 130,000 people. But the actual number of permanent homes the
group has built in all of Haiti: six.

After the earthquake, Red Cross CEO Gail McGovern unveiled ambitious plans to develop brand-new communities. None
has ever been built.
Haitians outside a Red Cross field hospital in Carrefour, Haiti, on Dec. 14, 2010, 11 months after a magnitude 7.0 earthquake hit the country's capital,
Port-au-Prince

Aid organizations from around the world have struggled after the earthquake in Haiti, the Western Hemispheres poorest
country. But ProPublica and NPRs investigation shows that many of the Red Crosss failings in Haiti are of its own making.

They are also part of a larger pattern in which the organization has botched delivery of aid after disasters such
as Superstorm Sandy. Despite its difficulties, the Red Cross remains the charity of choice for ordinary Americans and
corporations alike after natural disasters.

One issue that has hindered the Red Cross work in Haiti is an overreliance on foreigners who could not speak French or
Creole, current and former employees say.

Documents: Inside The Red Cross Haiti Failures

Confidential memo warns of failed results

Report on key project finds no contributions of any sort to the well being of households

Red Cross CEO emails about wonderful helicopter idea to spend money

In a blistering 2011 memo, the then-director of the Haiti program, Judith St. Fort, wrote that the group was failing in Haiti and
that senior managers had made very disturbing remarks disparaging Haitian employees. St. Fort, who is Haitian American,
wrote that the comments included, he is the only hard working one among them and the ones that we have hired are not
strong so we probably should not pay close attention to Haitian CVs.
The Red Cross wont disclose details of how it has spent the hundreds of millions of dollars donated for Haiti. But our
reporting shows that less money reached those in need than the Red Cross has said.

Where did the half billion raised for Haiti go? The Red Cross wont say.

Related: In Search Of The Red Cross' $500 Million In Haiti Relief

Lacking the expertise to mount its own projects, the Red Cross ended up giving much of the money to other groups to do the
work. Those groups took out a piece of every dollar to cover overhead and management. Even on the projects done by
others, the Red Cross had its own significant expenses in one case, adding up to a third of the projects budget.

In statements, the Red Cross cited the challenges all groups have faced in post-quake Haiti, including the countrys
dysfunctional land title system.

Like many humanitarian organizations responding in Haiti, the American Red Cross met complications in relation
to government coordination delays, disputes over land ownership, delays at Haitian customs, challenges finding
qualified staff who were in short supply and high demand, and the cholera outbreak, among other challenges, the
charity said.

The group said it responded quickly to internal concerns, including hiring an expert to train staff on cultural competency after
St. Forts memo.
Minouche Lamour, a member of the Community Platform for Development in Campeche, says she doesn't see how millions of dollars from the Red
Cross could have been spent in her neighborhood

While the group wont provide a breakdown of its projects, the Red Cross said it has done more than 100. The projects
include repairing 4,000 homes, giving several thousand families temporary shelters, donating $44 million for food after the
earthquake, and helping fund the construction of a hospital.

"Millions of Haitians are safer, healthier, more resilient, and better prepared for future disasters thanks to generous
donations to the American Red Cross, McGovern wrote in a recent report marking the fifth anniversary of the
earthquake."

In other promotional materials, the Red Cross said it has helped more than 4.5 million individual Haitians get back on their
feet.
Oops. Busted - The Order of St. John; a secret society under deep cover - hidden in plain sight, a classic esoteric 'laughing at the goyim who are too
stupid to see' hallmark. Compare the St. John logo with the flag above. St. John is admittedly run by The Knights of Malta. Similarly, Red Cross has
it's origins in the esoteric and was influenced by John D Rockefe;ler. While the Freemasons are lees inclined to admit their stewardship directly.
Charities? Throw your money away if you like. It is quite well known nowadays that most of the money given to charity organisations never get's to
where it was intended. Those pulling the strings simply play on peoples good nature

For those interested in the occult history of the Red Cross see: The Knights Templar

It has not provided details to back up the claim. And Jean-Max Bellerive, Haitis prime minister at the time of the earthquake,
doubts the figure, pointing out the countrys entire population is only about 10 million.

"No, no, Bellerive said of the Red Cross claim, its not possible.

When the earthquake struck Haiti in January 2010, the Red Cross was facing a crisis of its own. McGovern had become
chief executive just 18 months earlier, inheriting a deficit and an organization that had faced scandals after 9/11 and Katrina.
Gail McGovern

Inside the Red Cross, the Haiti disaster was seen as a spectacular fundraising opportunity, recalled one former official who
helped organize the effort. Michelle Obama, the NFL and a long list of celebrities appealed for donations to the group.

The Red Cross kept soliciting money well after it had enough for the emergency relief that is the groups stock in trade.
Doctors Without Borders, in contrast, stopped fundraising off the earthquake after it decided it had enough money. The
donations to the Red Cross helped the group erase its more-than $100 million deficit.

The Red Cross ultimately raised far more than any other charity.
A year after the quake, McGovern announced that the Red Cross would use the donations to make a lasting impact in Haiti.

We asked the Red Cross to show us around its projects in Haiti so we could see the results of its work. It declined. So earlier
this year we went to Campeche to see one of the groups signature projects for ourselves.

Street vendors in the dusty neighborhood immediately pointed us to Jean Jean Flaubert, the head of a community group that
the Red Cross set up as a local sounding board.

Sitting with us in their sparse one-room office, Flaubert and his colleagues grew angry talking about the Red Cross. They
pointed to the lack of progress in the neighborhood and the healthy salaries paid to expatriate aid workers.

"What the Red Cross told us is that they are coming here to change Campeche. Totally change it, said Flaubert.

Now I do not understand the change that they are talking about. I think the Red Cross is working for themselves.

The Red Cross initial plan said the focus would be building homes an internal proposal put the number at 700. Each
would have finished floors, toilets, showers, even rainwater collection systems. The houses were supposed to be finished in
January 2013.
The Red Cross promised to build hundreds of new homes in Campeche but none have been built. Many residents still live in
crude shacks. (Marie Arago, special to ProPublica)

None of that ever happened. Carline Noailles, who was the projects manager in Washington, said it was endlessly delayed
because the Red Cross didnt have the know-how.

Another former official who worked on the Campeche project said, Everything takes four times as long because it would be
micromanaged from DC, and they had no development experience.

Shown an English-language press release from the Red Cross website, Flaubert was stunned to learn of the projects $24
million budget and that it is due to end next year.

"Not only is [the Red Cross] not doing it, Flaubert said, now Im learning that the Red Cross is leaving next year. I
dont understand that.

(The Red Cross says it did tell community leaders about the end date. It also accused us of creating ill will in the community
which may give rise to a security incident.)

The project has since been reshaped and downscaled. A road is being built. Some existing homes have received earthquake
reinforcement and a few schools are being repaired. Some solar street lights have been installed, though many broke and
residents say others are unreliable.

The groups most recent press release on the project cites achievements such as training school children in disaster
response.

The Red Cross said it has to scale back its housing plans because it couldnt acquire the rights to land. No homes will be
built.
Other Red Cross infrastructure projects also fizzled.

In January 2011, McGovern announced a $30 million partnership with the U.S. Agency for International Development, or
USAID. The agency would build roads and other infrastructure in at least two locations where the Red Cross would build new
homes.

But it took more than two and a half years, until August 2013, for the Red Cross just to sign an agreement with USAID on the
program, and even that was for only one site. The program was ultimately canceled because of a land dispute.

A Government Accountability Office report attributed the severe delays to problems in securing land title and because
of turnover in Red Cross leadership in its Haiti program.

Other groups also ran into trouble with land titles and other issues. But they also ultimately built 9,000 homes compared to
the Red Cross six.

Asked about the Red Cross housing projects in Haiti, David Meltzer, the groups general counsel and chief international
officer, said changing conditions forced changes in plans. If we had said, All were going to do is build new homes, wed still
be looking for land, he said.

The USAID projects collapse left the Red Cross grasping for ways to spend money earmarked for it.

"Any ideas on how to spend the rest of this?? (Besides the wonderful helicopter idea?), McGovern wrote to
Meltzer in a November 2013 email obtained by ProPublica and NPR.

Can we fund Conrads hospital? Or more to PiH[Partners in Health]? Any more shelter projects?
Jean Jean Flaubert says the Red Cross promised to transform his neighborhood. Now I do not understand the change that
they are talking about, he said. (Marie Arago, special to ProPublica)

Its not clear what helicopter idea McGovern was referring to or if it was ever carried out. The Red Cross would say only that
her comments were grounded in the American Red Cross strategy and priorities, which focus on health and housing.

Another signature project, known in Creole as A More Resilient Great North, is supposed to rehabilitate roads in poor, rural
communities and to help them get clean water and sanitation.

But two years after it started, the $13 million effort has been faltering badly. An internal evaluation from March found
residents were upset because nothing had been done to improve water access or infrastructure or to make contributions of
any sort to the well being of households, the report said.

The Red Cross says 91% of donations went to help Haitians. Thats not true.

So much bad feeling built up in one area that the population rejects the project.

Instead of making concrete improvements to living conditions, the Red Cross has launched hand-washing education
campaigns. The internal evaluation noted that these were not effective when people had no access to water and no soap.
(The Red Cross declined to comment on the project.)
The groups failures went beyond just infrastructure.

When a cholera epidemic raged through Haiti nine months after the quake, the biggest part of the Red Cross response
a plan to distribute soap and oral rehydration salts was crippled by internal issues that go unaddressed, wrote the
director of the Haiti program in her May 2011 memo.

Throughout that year, cholera was a steady killer. By September 2011, when the death toll had surpassed 6,000, the project
was still listed as very behind schedule according to another internal document.

The Red Cross said in a statement that its cholera response, including a vaccination campaign, has continued for years and
helped millions of Haitians.

But while other groups also struggled early responding to cholera, some performed well.

"None of these people had to die. Thats what upsets me, said Paul Christian Namphy, a Haitian water and
sanitation official who helped lead the effort to fight cholera. He says early failures by the Red Cross and other
NGOs had a devastating impact.

These numbers should have been zero.

So why did the Red Cross efforts fall so short? It wasnt just that Haiti is a hard place to work.

"They collected nearly half a billion dollars, said a congressional staffer who helped oversee Haiti reconstruction.

But they had a problem. And the problem was that they had absolutely no expertise.
Lee Malany was in charge of the Red Cross shelter program in Haiti starting in 2010.

He remembers a meeting in Washington that fall where officials did not seem to have any idea how to spend millions of
dollars set aside for housing. Malany says the officials wanted to know which projects would generate good publicity, not
which projects would provide the most homes.

"When I walked out of that meeting I looked at the people that I was working with and said, You know this is very
disconcerting, this is depressing, he recalled.

The Red Cross said in a statement its Haiti program has never put publicity over delivering aid.

Malany resigned the next year from his job in Haiti.

"I said theres no reason for me to stay here. I got on the plane and left.
Transitional shelters like these on the outskirts of Port-Au-Prince, paid for by the Red Cross, typically last three to five years.

Sometimes it wasnt a matter of expertise, but whether anybody was filling key jobs. An April 2012 organizational chart
obtained by ProPublica and NPR lists 9 of 30 leadership positions in Haiti as vacant, including slots for experts on health and
shelter.

The Red Cross said vacancies and turnover were inevitable because of the security situation, separation from family for
international staff, and the demanding nature of the work.

The constant upheaval took a toll. Internal documents refer to repeated attempts over years to finalize and complete a
strategic plan for the Haiti program, efforts that were delayed by changes in senior management. As late as March 2014,
more than four years into a six-year program, an internal update cites a revised strategy still awaiting final sign-off.

The Red Cross says it provided homes to more than 130,000 Haitians. But they didnt.

The Red Cross said settling on a plan early would have been a mistake. It would be hard to create the perfect plan from the
beginning in a complicated place like Haiti, it said. But we also need to begin, so we create plans that are continually
revised.

Those plans were further undermined by the Red Cross reliance on expats. Noailles, the Haitian development professional
who worked for the Red Cross on the Campeche project, said expat staffers struggled in meetings with local officials.

"Going to meetings with the community when you dont speak the language is not productive, she
said. "Sometimes, she recalled, expat staffers would skip such meetings altogether.
The Red Cross said it has made it a priority to hire Haitians despite lots of competition for local professionals, and that over
90 percent of its staff is Haitian. The charity said it used a local human resources firm to help.

Yet very few Haitians have made it into the groups top echelons in Haiti, according to five current and former Red Cross
staffers as well as staff lists obtained by ProPublica and NPR.

That not only affected the groups ability to work in Haiti, it was also expensive.

Related: Senator's Report Finds 'Fundamental Concerns' About Red Cross Finances

According to an internal Red Cross budgeting document for the project in Campeche, the project manager a position
reserved for an expatriate was entitled to allowances for housing, food and other expenses, home leave trips, R&R four
times a year, and relocation expenses. In all, it added up to $140,000.

Compensation for a senior Haitian engineer the top local position was less than one-third of that, $42,000 a year.

Shelim Dorval, a Haitian administrator who worked for the Red Cross coordinating travel and housing for expatriate staffers,
recalled thinking it was a waste to spend so much to bring in people with little knowledge of Haiti when locals were available.

"For each one of those expats, they were having high salaries, staying in a fancy house, and getting vacation trips
back to their countries, Dorval said.

A lot of money was spent on those people who were not Haitian, who had nothing to do with Haiti. The money
was just going back to the United States.

Soon after the earthquake, McGovern, the Red Cross CEO, said the group would make sure donors knew exactly what
happened to their money.
The Red Cross would lead the effort in transparency, she pledged. We are happy to share the way we are spending our
dollars.

That hasnt happened. The Red Cross public reports offer only broad categories about where $488 million in donations has
gone. The biggest category is shelter, at about $170 million. The others include health, emergency relief and disaster
preparedness.

After the earthquake, Red Cross CEO Gail McGovern unveiled plans to develop brand-new communities. None has ever been built.

It has declined repeated requests to disclose the specific projects, to explain how much money went to each or to say what
the results of each project were. There is reason to doubt the Red Cross claims that it helped 4.5 million Haitians.
 An internal evaluation found that in some areas, the Red Cross
reported helping more people than even lived in the
communities.

In other cases, the figures were low, and in others double-

counting went uncorrected.

In describing its work, the Red Cross also conflates different

types of aid, making it more difficult to assess the charitys
efforts in Haiti.

For example, while the Red Cross says it provided more than
130,000 people with homes, that includes thousands of people
who were not actually given homes, but rather were trained in
proper construction techniques. (That was first reported by the
Haiti blog of the Center for Economic and Policy Research.)

The figure includes people who got short-term rental assistance

or were housed in several thousand transitional shelters,
which are temporary structures that can get eaten up by
termites or tip over in storms.

It also includes modest improvements on 5,000 temporary

shelters.The Red Cross also wont break down what
portion of donations went to overhead.

McGovern told CBS News a few months after the quake,

Minus the 9 cents overhead, 91 cents on the dollar will be
going to Haiti.

And I give you my word and my commitment, Im banking my

integrity, my own personal sense of integrity on that statement.

But the reality is that less money went to Haiti than 91 percent.

Thats because in addition to the Red Cross 9 percent

overhead, the other groups that got grants from the Red Cross
also have their own overhead.

In one case, the Red Cross sent $6 million to the International

Federation of the Red Cross for rental subsidies to help
Haitians leave tent camps.

The IFRC then took out 26 percent for overhead and what the
IFRC described as program-related administration, finance,
human resources and similar costs.

Beyond all that, the Red Cross also spends another piece of each dollar for what it describes as program costs incurred by
the American Red Cross in managing the projects done by other groups.

The American Red Cross management and other costs consumed an additional 24 percent of the money on one project,
according to the groups statements and internal documents. The actual work, upgrading shelters, was done by the Swiss
and Spanish Red Cross societies.

"Its a cycle of overhead, said Jonathan Katz, the Associated Press reporter in Haiti at the time of the earthquake
who tracked post-disaster spending for his book, The Big Truck That Went By.

It was always going to be the American Red Cross taking a 9 percent cut, re-granting to another group, which
would take out their cut.
Given the results produced by the Red Cross projects in Haiti, Bellerive, the former prime minister, said he has a hard time
fathoming whats happened to donors money.

"Five hundred million dollars in Haiti is a lot of money, he said. Im not a big mathematician, but I can make some
additions. I know more or less the cost of things. Unless you dont pay for the gasoline the same price I was
paying, unless you pay people 20 times what I was paying them, unless the cost of the house you built was five
times the cost I was paying, it doesnt add up for me.

A resident in a Port-Au-Prince transitional shelter paid for by the Red Cross.

This story was co-published with NPR. Mitzy-Lynn Hyacinthe contributed reporting. Design direction by David Sleight,
production by Hannah Birch.

Read about how the Red Cross botched key elements of its mission after Superstorm Sandy and Hurricane Isaac in PR Over
People: The Red Cross' Secret Disaster. And about how the Red Cross' CEO has been serially misleading about where
donors' dollars are going.

If you have information about the Red Cross or about other international aid projects, please email justin@propublica.org.

Can Russia Learn From Brazils Fate? Cabal Meddling In South America
October 1 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / NewEasternOutlook / Various

William Engdahl recently explained how Washington used the corrupt Brazilian elite, which
answers to Washington, to remove the duly elected President of Brazil, Dilma Rousseff, for
representing the Brazilian people rather than the interests of Washington [see follow up article
below].

Unable to see through the propaganda of unproven charges, Brazilians acquiesced in the removal of their
protector, thereby providing the world another example of the impotence of democracy.

Everyone should read Engdahls article. He reports that part of the attack on Rousseff stemmed from Brazils economic
problems deliberately created by US credit rating agencies as part of Washingtons attack to down grade Brazilian debt,
which set off an attack on the Brazilian currency.

Brazils financial openness made Brazil an easy target to attack. One might hope that Vladimir Putin would take note of the
cost of economic openness. Putin is a careful and thoughtful leader of Russia, but he is not an economist. He has
confidence in neoliberal Elvira Nabiulina, Washingtons choice to head the Russian central bank.

...

Note: The rest of Paul Craig Robert's article has not been republished here. Whilst he is a very smart man on many matters
the rest of this article demonstrates his fundmental lack of understanding of the central banking system. His belief that
Russia needs to rely upon it's central bank, while it is still under the unfluence of the Rothschild cabal - is woefully
misinformed.

He is right in the idea that any country would be better to rely on itself for financing itself - doing that by using a privately-
owned foreign central bank is insane - and how we have come to be in this mess in the first place. Mr. Roberts is not playing
the game with all of the pieces on this matter but you can read his full article here.

Washington Tries To Break BRICS Rape Of Brazil Begins

Washingtons regime change machinery has for the time being succeeded in removing an
important link in the alliance of large emerging nations by railroading through a Senate
impeachment of the duly elected President, Dilma Rousseff.
On August 31 her Vice President Michel Temer was sworn in as President. In his first speech as president, the
cynical Temer called for a government of national salvation, asking for the trust of the Brazilian people. He
indicated plans to reform, and has also signaled his intention to overhaul the pension system and labor laws, and
cut public spending, all themes beloved of Wall Street banks, of the International Monetary Fund and their
Washington Consensus.

Related: Brazilian Senate approves Rousseffs impeachment

Now after less than three weeks at the job, Temer has unveiled plans for wholesale privatization of Brazils crown
jewels, starting with oil. The planned Wall Street rape of Brazil is about to begin.

Its important to keep in mind that elected President Rousseff was not convicted or even formally charged with any
concrete act of corruption, even though the pro-oligarchy mainstream Brazil media, led by OGlobo Group of the
billionaire Roberto Irineu Marinho, ran a media defamation campaign creating the basis to railroad Rousseff into
formal impeachment before the Senate.

The shift took place after the opposition PMDB party of Temer on March 29 broke their coalition with Rousseffs Workers
Party, as accusations of Petrobras-linked corruption were made against Rousseff and former president Luiz Incio Lula da
Silva.

On August 31, 61 Senators voted to remove her while 20 voted against removal. The formal charge was manipulation of
the state budget before the 2014 elections to hide the size of the deficit.

She vehemently denies the charge.

Indeed, the Senate issued its own expert report that concluded there was:

"No indication of direct or indirect action by Dilma in any illegal budgetary maneuvers. According to the Associated
Press, Independent auditors hired by Brazils Senate said in a report released Monday that suspended President
Dilma Rousseff didnt engage in the creative accounting she was charged with at her impeachment trial.
Under an honest system that would have ended the impeachment then and there. Not in Brazil.

In effect, she was impeached for the dramatic decline in the Brazilian economy, a decline deliberately pushed along as US
credit rating agencies downgraded Brazilian debt, and international and mainstream Brazilian media kept the Petrobras
corruption allegations in the spotlight.

Importantly, the Senate did not ban her from office for 8 years as Washington had hoped, and she has promised an electoral
return. The Washington-steered Temer has until end of 2018 to deliver Brazil to Temers foreign masters before his term
legally ends.

Related: There Has Been A Coup In Brazil

Notably, Temer himself was accused of corruption in the Petrobras state oil company investigations. He reportedly asked
the then-head of the transportation unit of Petrleo Brasileiro SA in 2012 to arrange illegal campaign contributions to
Temers party which was running a Washington-backed campaign to oust Rousseffs Workers Party.

Then this June, only days into his serving as acting president, two of Temers own chosen ministers, including the Minister
of Transparency, were forced to resign in response to allegations that they sought to subvert the probe into massive graft
at Petrobras.

One of the two, Temers extremely close ally Romero Juc, was caught on tape plotting Dilmas impeachment as a way to
shut down the ongoing Petrobras corruption investigation, as well as indicating that Brazils military, the media, and the
courts were all participants in the impeachment plotting.

In brief, the removal of Dilma Rousseff and her Workers Party after 13 years in Brazils leadership was a new form of Color
Revolution from Washington, one we might call a judicial coup by corrupt judges and congressmen.

Of the 594 members of the Congress, as the Toronto Globe and Mail reported, 318 are under investigation or face charges
while their target, President Rousseff, herself faces no allegation of financial impropriety.
And the cabal moves in - Michel Temer

Related: Brazil: Rousseff ousted, VP assembles right-wing government

The day after the first Lower House impeachment vote in April, a leading member of Temers PSDP party, Senator Aloysio
Nunes, went to Washington, in a mission organized by former Bill Clinton Secretary of State Madeline Albrights lobbying
firm, Albright Stonebridge Group.

Nunes, as president of the Brazilian Senates Foreign Relations Committee, has repeatedly advocated that Brazil once
again move closer to an alliance with the US and UK.

Madeline Albright, a Director of the leading US think-tank, Council on Foreign Relations, is also chair of the prime US
Government Color Revolution NGO, the National Democratic Institute (NDI). Nothing fishy here, or? Nunes reportedly went
to Washington to rally backing for Temer and the unfolding judicial coup against Rousseff.

A key player from the side of Washington, Rousseffs de facto political executioner, was, once again, Vice President Joe
Biden, the Dick Cheney dirty operator-in-chief in the Obama Administration.

Bidens fateful Brazil trip

In May, 2013, US Vice President Joe Biden made a fateful visit to Brazil to meet with President Rousseff. In January 2011
Rousseff had succeeded her Workers Party mentor, Luis Inacio Lula da Silva, or Lula, who constitutionally was limited to
two consecutive terms.
Related: New Political Earthquake in Brazil: Is It Now Time for Media Outlets to Call This a Coup?

Biden went to Brazil to discuss oil with the new President. Relations between Lula and Washington had chilled as Lula
backed Iran against US sanctions and came economically closer to China.

In late 2007 Petrobras had discovered what was estimated to be a mammoth new basin of high-quality oil on the Brazilian
Continental Shelf offshore in the Santos Basin.

In total the Brazil Continental Shelf could contain over 100 billion barrels of oil, transforming the country into a major world
oil and gas power, something Exxon and Chevron, the US oil giants wanted to control.
Related: Brazils Democracy to Suffer Grievous Blow as Unelectable, Corrupt Neoliberal is Installed

In 2009, according to leaked US diplomatic cables published by Wikileaks, the US Consulate in Rio wrote that Exxon and
Chevron were trying in vain to alter a law advanced by Rousseffs mentor and predecessor in her Brazilian Workers Party ,
President Luis Inacio Lula da Silva.

That 2009 law made the state-owned Petrobras chief operator of all offshore oil blocs. Washington and the US oil giants
were not at all pleased at losing control over potentially the largest new world oil discovery in decades.
Related: Another one bites the dust: Brazil's anti-corruption minister quits over leaked recordings

Lula had not only pushed ExxonMobil and Chevron out of the controlling position in favor of the state-owned Petrobras, but
he also opened Brazilian oil exploration to the Chinese, since 2009 a core member of the BRICS developing nations with
Brazil, Russia, India and South Africa.

In December, 2010 in one of his last acts as President, Lula oversaw signing of a deal between the Brazilian-Spanish
energy company Repsol and Chinas state-owned Sinopec. Sinopec formed a joint venture, Repsol Sinopec Brasil, investing
more than $7.1 billion towards Repsol Brazil.

Already in 2005 Lula had approved formation of Sinopec International Petroleum Service of Brazil Ltd as part of a new
strategic alliance between China and Brazil.

In 2012 in a joint exploration drilling, Repsol Sinopec Brasil, Norways Statoil and Petrobras made a major new discovery in
Po de Acar, the third in block BM-C-33, which includes the Seat and Gvea, the latter one of the worlds 10 largest
discoveries in 2011. USA and British oil majors were nowhere to be seen.

Bidens task was to sound out Lulas successor, Rousseff, about reversing that exclusion of US major oil companies in favor
of the Chinese. Biden also met with leading energy companies in Brazil including Petrobras.
Related: BRICS Should Prepare for 'Braxit': A Brazilian Exit

While little was publicly said, Rousseff refused to reverse the 2009 oil law in a way that would be suitable to Biden,
Washington and US oil majors. Days after Bidens visit came the Snowden NSA revelations that the US had also spied on
Rousseff and top officials of Petrobras.

She was livid and denounced the Obama Administration that September before the UN General Assembly for violating
international law. She cancelled a planned Washington visit in protest. After that, US-Brazil relations took a dive.

After his May 2013 talks with Rousseff, Biden clearly gave her the kiss of death.

Before Bidens May 2013 visit Dilma Rousseff had 70% of popularity rating. Less than two weeks after Biden left Brazil,
nationwide protests by a very well-organized group called Movimento Passe Livre, over a nominal 10 cent bus fare increase,
brought the country virtually to a halt and turned very violent.

The protests bore the hallmark of typical Color Revolution or Twitter social media destabilizations that seem to follow Biden
wherever he makes a presence. Within weeks Rousseffs popularity plummeted to 30%.

Washington had clearly sent a signal that Rousseff had to change course or face serious problems.
Related: Rousseff's impeachment may be about stopping a massive corruption investigation

The Washington regime change machine, including its entire array of financial warfare operations ranging from a leaked
PwC audit of Petrobras to Wall Street credit rating agency Standard & Poors downgrade of Brazil public debt to junk in
September 2015, went into full action to remove Rousseff, a key backer of the BRICS New Development Bank and of an
independent national development strategy for Brazil.

Selling the Crown Jewels

The man who has now manipulated himself into the Presidency, the corrupt Michel Temer, worked as an informer for
Washington the entire time.

In documents released by Wikileaks, it was revealed that Temer was an informant to US intelligence since at least
2006, via telegrams to the US embassy in Brazil classified by the Embassy as sensitive and for official
use only.
Washingtons man in Brazil, Temer, has lost no time appeasing his patrons in Wall Street. Even as acting President this
May, Temer named Henrique Meirelles as Minister of Finance and Social Security.

Meirelles, a Harvard-educated former President of the Brazilian central bank, was President of BankBoston in the USA until
1999, and was with that bank in 1985 when it was found guilty of failing to report $1.2 billion in illegal cash transfers
with Swiss banks.

Meirelles is now overseeing the planned selloff of Brazils crown jewels to international investors, a move that is intended
to gravely undercut the power of the state in the economy.

Another of Temers key economic advisers is Paulo Leme, former IMF economist and now Goldman Sachs Managing
Director of Emerging Markets Research. Wall Street is in the middle of the Temer-led economic rape of Brazil.

On September 13, Temers government unveiled a massive privatization program with the cynically misleading comment,

"It is clear the public sector cannot move forward alone on these projects. We are counting on the private sector.

He omitted to say the private sector he meant were his patrons.

Temer unveiled plans that would complete the countrys largest privatization in decades. Conveniently, the process us to be
completed by end of 2018, just before Temers term must end.

The influential US-Brazil Business Council detailed the privatization list on its website. The US-Brazil Business
Council was founded forty years ago by Citigroup, Monsanto, Coca-Cola, Dow Chemicals and other US
multinationals.
Related: Rousseff on RT, first interview since impeachment: 'Brazilian oligarchy is behind coup'

Tenders for the first round of concessions will be issued before the end of this year. They will include privatization of four
airports and two port terminals, all auctioned in the first quarter of 2017.

Other concessions include five highways, one rail line, bidding on small oil blocks and a later round for large, mainly
offshore, oil development blocks. As well the government will sell selected assets currently controlled by its Minerals
Research Department plus six electric power distributors and three water treatment facilities.

The heart of his planned privatization are, not surprisingly, Joe Bidens coveted state oil and gas companies along with
chunks of the state Eletrobrs power company. Temer plans to get as much as $24 billion from the selloff. Fully $11 billion
of the total are to come from sale of key oil and gas state holdings.
Related: Defiant Rousseff says Brazil's democracy on trial with her

Of course, when state assets such as huge oil and gas resources are sold off to foreign interests in what will clearly be a
distress sale, it is a one-off deal.

State oil and gas or electric power projects generate a continuing revenue stream many times any one-off
privatization gains. Brazils economy is the ultimate loser in such privatization. Wall Street banks and multinationals are of
course, as planned, the winner.

On September 19-21, according to the US-Brazil Business Council website, the Brazilian governments key ministers for
infrastructure including Minister Moreira Franco; Minister Fernando Bezerra Coelho Filho, Minister of Mines and Energy; and
Minister Mauricio Quintella Lessa, Minister of Transport, Ports and Civil Aviation, will be in New York City to meet with Wall
Street infrastructure investors.

This is Washingtons way, the way of the Wall Street Gods of Money, as I title one of my books. First, destroy any
national leadership intent on genuine national development such as Dilma Rousseff.
Replace them with a vassal regime willing to do anything for money, including selling the crown jewels of their own
nation as people like Anatoli Chubais did in Russia in the 1990s under Boris Yeltsins shock therapy.

As reward for his behavior, Chubais today sits on the advisory board of JP MorganChase. What will Temer and associates
get for their efforts remains to be seen. Washington for now has broken one of the BRICS that ultimately threaten her global
hegemony. It is not likely to bring any lasting success if recent history is any guide.

F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University
and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine New Eastern Outlook.

Related: The price of oil just wiped out Venezuelas economy was it orchestrated?

Presidential Debate Check: 12 Hillary Lies Debunked + Lots More

September 29 2016 | From: Lifezette

Clinton's debate performance was riddled with mistruths that got a pass from Lester Holt.
While the moderator focused on interrupting and fact-checking Trump, Hillary Clinton offered a litany of lies to the
nation on Monday night during her first debate against Donald Trump.

Related: Infowars Predicted Lester Holt Would Help Hillary Before the Debate Began

Clintons nose began to grow from the very start, as she asserted that the nation needs to finally guarantee equal pay for
equal work for women in her opening statement. The notion that women on average do not receive the same pay as men -
the 77 cents to a dollar myth - has been proven false repeatedly.

The fact is that it is already illegal to pay men and women different wages for the same work if they have the same
experience. The 77 cents myth is derived from looking merely at average income accrued over a lifetime, and ignores the
fact that men on average tend to work longer hours, often work in higher paying industries, and spend more active years in
the work force.

Related: Rigged: CNN Poll Claiming Hillary Won the Debate Sampled 41% Democrats Compared to 26%
Republicans

"When confronted by Trump about her former strong support for the Trans-Pacific Partnership, Clinton claimed that
she hoped it would be good deal.

The truth of course is that she called it the gold standard of trade deals.

Clinton also advocated raising taxes on the wealthy based on the premise that they do not currently pay enough. I think its
time to suggest that the wealthy pay their fair share, she said. The truth is that America has the most progressive tax
system in the developed world - the top 10 percent contribute over half of all income tax revenue.
Bizarrely, Clinton claimed that "slashing taxes on the wealthy hasn't worked." Her comment implied that slashing taxes on
the wealthy is why the economy is in such poor shape currently. This is an odd thing to say, considering Obama has been in
office for the better part of eight years and has done anything but slash taxes for anyone.

When Trump said he wished to lower the corporate tax rate, Hillary said: "We've looked at your tax proposals. I don't see
changes in the corporate tax rates you're referring to that would cause the repatriation."

Clinton and her team couldn't have been looking very hard, as Trump's plan to lower to corporate tax rate from 35 percent to
15 is written quite clearly on the economic plan posted on his website.

Taking time to remind the country that Clinton's success is due in large part to her surname, she asserted that "my husband
did a pretty good job in the 1990s." Clinton, like all Democrats, loves to take credit for the financial stability of her husband's
presidency. Of course, it was the Republican-controlled Congress led by Newt Gingrich that blocked Clinton's desired
spending measures and balanced the budget.

Only Hillary: With Hillary Clinton campaigning for the White House, its hard to determine the truth from the lies - especially
with the biased media. But we know the truth - it is only Hillary who has a questionable and incriminating track record.
Clinton also claimed that in being party to the Iran deal she helped "put the lid on Iran's nuclear program." But many said the
deal guarantees no such thing. Indeed, it rests entirely on Iran's acting in good faith and upholding their end of the bargain.

When Trump defended the use of stop-and-frisk policies in New York City, Clinton attacked them as unconstitutional and
asserted "it was uneffective it did not do what it needed to do."

This is simply false.

"Data from the few cities that report police stops show their effectiveness," Dennis C. Smith, professor of public policy at the
Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service at New York University, wrote in The New York Times in 2012 .

"My trend analysis with SUNY Albany professor Robert Purtell found that the increased use of stops correlated significantly
with accelerating drops in most of the major crimes. A Harvard study of policing in Los Angeles under William Bratton, when
crime dropped significantly, reported a surge in stops by the L.A.P.D. [with per capita stop rate higher than N.Y.P.D.]," Smith
continued.
Related: Who does the world vote for U.S. president? + Cast YOUR vote here

Perhaps Clinton's most egregious lies were two concerned with emails. "I made a mistake using a private email," Clinton
said.

Of course, Clinton didn't use a "private email." She used multiple private email servers. The word mistake implies
Clinton didn't know she was doing anything wrong, a claim belied entirely by the fact that so many of her aides and
associates pleaded the Fifth or were granted immunity by the FBI - not to mention the fact that many of them
engaged in the destruction of evidence and that she herself made false exculpatory statements.

Finally, in visiting her favorite Trump-Putin conspiracy theory, Clinton claimed that "Donald publicly invited Putin to hack into
Americans."

The truth, as is obvious from the context of his words, is that Trump was calling on the Russians to release Clinton's missing
emails in the event that they already had them.

Clinton may have proven her ability to hold her own against Trump one-on-one Monday night, but she also proved
her complete disregard for the truth and willingness to lie to the American people.

Related Statements:

Limbaugh: Clinton a witch with a capital B

Rudy Giuliani Statement On Donald J. Trumps Debate Victory

 Congressman Lou Barletta Statement On Donald J. Trumps Debate Victory

Congressman Frank Guinta Statement On Donald J. Trumps Debate Victory

Donald J. Trump for President Celebrates Massive $18 Million Haul After Debate Win

Another Thunderous Dump of Related Articles on The Clintons:

And these reports are increasingly taking less and less time to accumulate as more and more people wake up to
their crimes...

Lester Holt: android, wisdom figure, computer brain

Special Report: This Video Could Bring Hillary Down

FBI calls Clinton email probe different as key witness ditches House hearing

How a smartphone camera changed the discussion on Clinton's health

The Madness of Queen Hillary: Mental as Well as Physical Breakdown

"Clinton Foundation Is Charity Fraud Of Epic Proportions", Analyst Charges In Stunning Takedown

BOOM! Navy Veteran Just DESTROYED HILLARY CLINTON at Forum: I Would Have Been Prosecuted and
Imprisoned (VIDEO)

Clinton receives millions from Dow Chemical; backs away from effort to ban toxic chemical that harms women

Hillary Clinton may swap White House for prison

Heres the Proof that Hillary Clinton is a Mass Murderer

The absurdity of Hillary Clinton blaming Putin for vast 'far-right conspiracy' in the U.S.

Democratic Pundits Downplay Serious Ethical Issues Raised by the Clinton Foundation

If this doesn't disqualify Killary for president, what will?

Poll: Record High Number Of Voters Cant Stand Hillary

DONALD J. TRUMP STATEMENT ON FBI RELEASING CLINTON INTERVIEW NOTES

SEVEN MORE DISCOVERIES FROM THE FBI REPORT ON CLINTONS EMAILS

ICYMI: ALL THREE NETWORK NEWSCASTS SLAM CLINTON ON EMAILS

FBI Releases Hillary Clinton Email Investigation Files

Clinton's story is unravelling, FBI reveals Hillary's inability to recall briefings due to "blood clot" and health
problems

A Brain-damaged US President with Finger on the Nuclear Button?

Heres All 40 Times Hillary Clinton Told the FBI She Couldnt Remember Something

Hillary Threatens Russia With War - Neocon Media Doesn't Even Notice
 WIKILEAKS: Hillary Clinton Sent THOUSANDS of Classified Cables Marked (C) for Confidential

Dr. Drew threatened by CNN to retract his medical analysis of Hillary... 'scary and creepy' phone calls... then his
show was pulled

Hillary Clintons Illness Revealed

The Hillary Files: How special interests that violate health, human rights and the environment have pre-purchased
the Clinton presidency

Clinton Foundation is False Philanthropy In-depth Analysis

Over 70% Of US Doctors Surveyed Say Hillary's Health Concerns Are "Serious, Possibly Disqualifying"

Hillary the CHEAT! Clinton caught wearing covert earpiece during last night's debate with Trump... brazen
dishonesty on display yet again

John McCains Daughter Meghan Just Set Fire to Hillarys Campaign. Shes Vicious!

Trump: Hillary Running Global Criminal Enterprise And Spreading Terrorism

BREAKING: DR. TED NOEL REACTS TO 'PNEUMONIA' CLAIMS FROM CRIPPLED HILLARY'S DOCTOR

Clinton Medical Episode at 9/11 Memorial, Rushed to Hospital

Hillary Clinton Email Archive

Dr. Milton Wolf: Hillarys Doctor Claimed Hillary Got a Perfect Score on TEST THAT DOES NOT EXIST

How the Clinton Foundation, UN, NGOs Ripped off Haiti & Other HAARP Victims

Clinton Foundation Distributed Watered-Down HIV/AIDS Drugs to Patients in Africa

Nigel Farage: Hillary Clinton a Truly Horrible Candidate Quite Frankly the Worst Ive Ever Seen

Haitian President EXPOSES the Clinton Foundation: "Hillary Clinton tried to bribe me!

Obama used a pseudonym in emails with Clinton, FBI documents reveal

The War On Reality: How Globalists Occupy Your Mind To Control Everything
September 26 2016 | From: TheHealthRanger

There is a war going on for reality and the battlefield for that war is your consciousness.
Almost everything you see going on in society or frm official sources is fabricated or rigged. It's fictional. It's all
designed to weave this artifical tapestry of beliefs and ideas and truths in your mind that actually are not true. They
are not based on reality.

The point of this it to create a prison for your mind that gives you the illusion of thinking you have freedome of thought,
freedom of choice or that you live in a democracy when in reality thie entire system around you is all fabricated to force you
into making certain decisions or taking certain actions or avoiding certain actions, all of which further the desires and the
consolidation of power of the totalitarian regime in power...

Crash Predictor Ann Pettifor: 'We're No Longer Citizens, We're Customers'

September 24 2016 | From: RadioNewZealand

One of the few analysts to correctly predict the 2008 global financial crash says we need to start
worrying about the economic attempts to turn citizens into consumers.
UK economist Ann Pettifor was also one of the leaders of the Jubilee 2000 debt campaign that successfully pushed
to cancel $100 billion worth of debt owed by some of the world's poorest nations.

Ms Pettifor, the director of left-wing economic think tank Policy Research in Macroeconomics, has been in New Zealand to
deliver public lectures on the current state of the financial world.

Speaking to Nine to Noon today, she said many of the current issues facing the world came from attempts by economists
and the finance sector to 'marketise' society and to "turn us all into customers for everything".

"We're no longer citizens, we're no longer workers, we're customers, all along the line. And all of our relationships
must, they argue, be marketised.

They're also turning us into 'rentiers', so when we rent out our house as part of Airbnb, or we rent out our car as
part of Uber, we are learning that with the ownership of an asset, it becomes possible, almost effortlessly, to earn
rent."

She said the global economy was increasingly about earning rent from money, property and any other assets people owned.
 "We are using up everything we have to earn a bit more money, and that is partly because the way the system is
geared, and those who do have assets are able to earn rent on those assets, whether it's interest rates or
whatever, and those without assets are poor, and those people are cross, they are very cross."

Ms Pettifor said people were feeling increasingly desperate due to low wages and salaries.

"I'm not against people using Airbnb, and I understand why they are doing it, and the reason they are doing it is
because they are getting poorer, because they cannot live on their existing income, because we don't pay wages
or salaries that allow people to live a decent life. So they have to supplement that, with all of these additional
marginal activities.

That's what's wrong with the way we have allowed the markets to take control of our economies and for the
invisible hand to decide who gets what, is those who are left behind - and the left-behinders voted for Brexit, the
left-behinders are voting for Trump, and they're voting for Le Pen, the fascist in France - we need to worry about
that."

Related: Why working class Americans are supporting Donald Trump

Former Kissinger CEO Says The World Is Run By 30 Families

September 24 2016 | From: Hiduth

A former CEO for Henry Kissinger has said that he believes just 30 families run the world, and that
these families are the driving force behind the New World Order.
David Rothkopf, author of Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making, and former CEO of
Kissinger Associates, says that 30 families and their 6,000 minions control the entire human race of six billion
people.

Related: Obama At United Nations Calls For America To Be Bound By International Laws Give Up Control

His findings mirror a study conducted by the Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich which found that a mere 147
corporations (out of 40,000 studied) had real power and influence in the world economy. All of these 147 companies had
interlocking Boards of Directors.

Related: The 147 Companies That Control Everything

Video Rebels Blog reports:

Currently, this One World Corporatocracy uses the United States and the European Union to consolidate and wield power
over the entire globe. But there are vulnerabilities in the world of Wall Street Globalism. The EU appears to be
disintegrating.

The ECB (European Central Bank) under the ex-Goldman Sachs VP Mario Draghi seems to be as suicidal as His Japanese
counterpart. And America is stretched thin by its constant warfare. Russia Today said the US had military operations in 134
countries in 2014.

Wikileaks, Snowden and others have revealed way more truth than the public can digest.

The US has been funding Al Qaeda and ISIS. And now Putin has shown his superiority by being able to actually
find ISIS and bomb them into oblivion.
The only economic and military advantage America had is about to disappear. Dr Michael Hudson wrote Super Imperialism
in 1972. That was the year after Nixon closed the Gold Window on August 15, 1971 and the year before Henry Kissingers
invention of the Petrodollar in 1973 after the Arab-Israeli war.

Hudson went to the Pentagon and the State Department in 1972 to explain that the US was making nations overseas pay
for their occupation by American troops by accepting worthless Federal Reserve Notes in exchange for real goods and
services.

When an American general finally understood what Dr Hudson was saying about foreigners paying for their own occupation,
he exclaimed, Were ripping people off.

The days when The Federal Reserve could print stacks of dollars to the moon and the Saudis could fund the US budget
deficit with their oil revenues are rapidly coming to an end. Very soon American politicians will have to recognize that we can
no longer afford all of those wars and forget about over 700 military bases overseas.

The American consumer will have to deal with the doubling of the price of imported goods. Of course that will mean a drastic
drop in the American standard of living which will lead to instability at home. This cold light of economic reality will force
America to either start WW III or go home.
Most sane people would like to avoid either a thermonuclear war with Russia or a conventional one as they have far
superior weapons. American politicians and the Pentagon spent $400 billion on the F-35 which does not work. Russia is too
poor to spend trillions of dollars on failed projects so the Elite can line their pockets at our expense.

What would be nice is for American voters to join with the citizens of Europe, Asia, Latin America, Africa and the Mideast in
their revolt against Globalism. That is to say the workers of the world unite to end Global Occupation by Bankers.

The following describes an eleven point program to undo what has been done to us by design. But first I need to explain
what causes Depressions.

Related: Motives for the Conspiracy

Ask your friends what a Depression is. Most answers will describe the effects, such as, unemployment, starvation and
bankruptcies. Depressions are solved by cancellation of debts either through discharge in bankruptcy court or by inflation
devaluing the real value of the burden of debt.
The third alternative would be for the government to void Unpayable Debts as the Kings of ancient Babylon and Sumer did.
We would need to devise a more sophisticated plan as those were relatively simpler agricultural societies.

I would like to make 11 suggestions which can both end a Depression and take down our Banker
Occupied governments:

1) Offer $25,000 in debt cancellation to every adult US citizen who is not institutionalized. This should be an
international effort so people in foreign countries will get equivalent amounts in pounds, euros and other local currencies.

This is to be financed by seizing the assets of financial war criminals that were stashed in Liechtenstein, the Cayman Islands
and other such offshore money laundering centers.

We need to get the assets of the private banks and the account numbers of all the corporations and the trusts the criminals
who declared war against us.

2) Seize all the assets of war criminals. A lot of assets have been converted into real estate. In America we also have
problems with mortgages. To evade taxes and to intentionally create clouded titles to homes the war criminals created the
Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS). I would suggest that MERS be made illegal and require all mortgages be
registered at reduced rates at the local county courthouse. I would give everyone 90 days to register for a clear title.

I would also challenge the title to every property to show that it did not belong to a corporation or trust fund owned by a war
criminal. For example, if a shopping mall is owned by a corporation, the actual people who own the shares must identify
themselves.
The World Bank did a study of 213 banking scandals and found that 150 were traced bank to offshore trusts linked either to
drug cartels or to the 30 or so families whose wealth has been fully invested in slave trading, drug smuggling and other
crimes against humanity for centuries.

All of these assets need to be seized so we can cancel debts and get the economy moving again. We also need to take
away their assets not just because they were stolen from us but to reduce their ability to wage war against us to zero.

We can take the seized real estate and use it to fund Social Security and stolen pension funds.

The seized stock and bond assets should also be used to fund public and private pensions and to cancel government debts.
I would also use the tens of trillions of dollars in government agency assets listed at www.CAFR1.com to cancel debts and
fund pensions.

3) All federal, sate and local government debt should be made illegal. President Lincoln (and Kennedy (both
assassinated)) issued Greenbacks which bore no interest. Greenbacks eliminated the need for bonds to be issued.

4) I would issue a non-interest bearing currency in America and require the same of any foreign country that
would want our assistance to cancel their government and personal debts.

It was the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 that allowed bankers to create money out of nothing and charge us interest.

That interest was designed to transfer all wealth from us to the bankers. It created Unpayable Debts which grow at
exponential rates due to the law of compound interest.

Since prices are a ratio of the Money Supply to goods and services for sale, if we increase both at the same rate, we would
have price stability. We could at current rates spend 535 billion dollars a year into circulation. We could create 535 billion
dollars and spend it without raising taxes to pay for it. If we increased the GDP and the Money Supply to twice our current
levels, then we could spend a trillion dollars a year into circulation while maintaining stable prices.

Related: Theres something behind that

 5) I would spend 200 billion dollars a year to repair Americas infrastructure. We have spent too much money on
foreign wars so our infrastructure is collapsing.

I would divide up 100 billion dollars a year amongst the 50 states on a proportional basis so a state with 2% of the US
population would get 2 billion dollars to spend on bridges, roads, dams, levees, water purification plants, sewers and school
buildings. This would be matched by another 100 billion dollars in federal infrastructure repair.

6) I would make pensions illegal. A pension is a promise to pay you something in 20 or 30 years. These pension funds
currently attract maggots seeking to feed on your retirement funds. I would pass a law saying that your employer must pay
you this year for any money that was intended to be set aside for your retirement. This money would go into a retirement
account in your name at a local cooperative trust. Neither politicians nor anyone from Wall Street should ever be allowed to
touch your retirement funds.

7) Use those cooperative trusts to overpower Wall Street and the City of London. Allow them to offer low interest
credit cards and consumer loans.
Let them issue simple life, fire and auto insurance. Plow the profits back into retirement funds. Commercial banks would be
geared to small businesses.

8) To boost the economy release all of the secret government technology to new corporations that would receive
the patents and a 5 billion dollar grant to bring cheap and abundant energy and other advances onto the market. If
needed, they could trade patent rights for regions overseas in exchange for the machinery needed to produce products in
America.

Shares should be issued to American citizens who are over 35. If a stock valued at $50 splits 6 times in 20 years, then it will
be worth $3,200 and ten original shares would be valued at $32,000. They will need the extra growth in their stock portfolio
more than couples 18 to 30 who have longer growth curves and can expect to retire with a million dollars in stocks.

Young people would no longer contribute to Social Security. Their employer would pay into their retirement account at their
cooperative trust but they would pay nothing to Social Security.

If a married couple making no more than the minimum wage were able to set aside everything they paid into Social Security
into a mutual fund, they would retire at age 65 with a million dollars. That had to be said for the benefit of those who do not
understand money and compound growth.

9) Make fractional reserve banking illegal. In 1348 the people of Venice were on a gold standard. If you deposited one
gold coin, the banker could loan 50 certificates said to be equal to 50 gold coins. The banker was allowed to collect interest
on that paper note as if it were 50 gold coins.
This system collapsed even though the people had a gold standard. Bankers pay people to spread false doctrines about the
gold standard. The bankers have stolen most of the gold and would love a return to the gold standard. But to function as
money the medium of exchange must be plentiful enough so everyone can buy and sell.

The only way a gold standard could work is if we allowed bankers to loan out 100 or more paper certificates in exchange for
each gold coin. That would impoverish us with interest payments on money the Bankers created out of nothing. Sound
familiar?

Related: Experimental drug likely saved Ebola patients

10) Make property taxes on a primary residence illegal. A home should be one of the primary savings plans for
retirement. Taxing homes harms taxpayers. It should no longer be the policy of the government to do harm to us.

Property tax revenues would be more than balanced by the cancellation of state and local debts and 200 billion dollars a
year in federal capital grants. And all those new infrastructure workers will be paying taxes.

11) Establish an incomes policy. My goal is self-determination for the working class. The current government is
bankrupting small businesses and the middle class while encouraging welfare dependency.

I would make the first $30,000 a year on a single person or $60,000 for a married couples tax free. I would give the custodial
parent $600 a month for the first child and $400 a month for the second child. Nothing for additional children except in cases
of twins and triplets.

I would also change the name of the IRS to Internal Revenue and Benefits Services. I would also take away their armed
agents and their police powers. A separate police force would be responsible for arresting tax cheats. The IRS has killed too
many innocent Americans for them to survive without a serious overhaul.
I would also pass a negative income tax. Under this system a person making $8.50 an hour would be paid $1.50 an
additional hour by the employer from federal sources. Under this plan a married couple both working 40 hours a week would
earn a guaranteed $40,160 a year tax free. If they had 2 children, they would receive $1,000 a month or $12,000 a year for
a total of $52,160 tax free.

I would pay for this in part by ending the wars and the surveillance state. Someone said we spent 7 trillion dollars on wars
we did not need after we allowed Israel to blow up the World Trade Center. I also would no longer allow bankers to steal 3
billion or more dollars a week from unaudited federal spending.

We should also eliminate a lot of federal, state and local jobs and even entire departments. We currently have 30 million
federal, state and local government workers if you count contractors.
I would eliminate most tax deductions. I would trade your interest rate deduction on a home mortgage for the elimination of
property taxes on a principal residence. And I would trade your tax exemptions for children by paying you $12,000 a year for
the first two children.

Eliminating tax deductions would pay for a greater part of the reforms we need. Any deduction that gives you a thousand
dollars gives others $100,000 in tax breaks.

An oil man once paid $17.95 in federal income tax on an income of $75,000,000. That was when tax rates were higher but
deductions still shifted the burden to the middle class. By giving married couples $12,000 for children, we will make the flat
rate tax fair for the middle class.

We need strong middle and working classes to counter the power of Wall Street. By creating our own currency and making
home ownership more affordable and getting control of our retirement funds and savings in co-operative trusts, we will
guarantee that the Elite stop all this nonsensical talk of killing a few billion of the common people.

Syria: Attack on Aid Convoy Kills Twenty, Destroys Aid, And Obliterates US War
Crimes In Support Of ISIS-Daesh Terror Group?
September 23 2016 | From: GlobalResearch

The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military
attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the
nation. Candidate Barack Obama, December, 2007

As the US heaps blame and accusations on Russia and Syria for the alleged air strike on the aid convoy on Monday
19th September, as ever there are more questions than answers and whatever US spokespersons state,
absolutely no certainties.

Related: Voices from Syria: This Country is being Violated by Terrorists who Destroy History, and People
The only undeniable fact is that another tragedy killed at least twenty Syrian Arab Red Crescent volunteers and the
organisations local Director Omar Barakat, father of nine. At least eighteen of the thirty one-truck convoy were destroyed
with the warehouse where humanitarian aid was stored.

The Russian Defence Ministry has categorically denied any attack and claims the convoy caught fire:

"We have studied video footage from the scene from so-called activists in detail and did not find any evidence that
the convoy had been struck by ordnance, commented Igor Konashenkov, a Ministry spokesman.

There are no craters and the exterior of the vehicles do not have the kind of damage consistent with blasts caused
by bombs dropped from the air.

Related: Russian defense ministry confirms US drone was present in area of attack on UN convoy

His observations are hard to challenge, anyone who has studied the assaults of the "international community" on far away
countries over the last decades knows what a bombed truck looks like, what fragments remains of it .

Photographs of the affected lorries show burned out vehicles, metal skeleton intact.

Related: After Bombing Syrian Army, US Accuses Russia of Bombing Aleppo Aid Convoy

Konashenkov said that damage visible in footage was instead the result of cargo igniting oddly occurring at the same
time as militants (formerly Nusra Front) had started a big offensive in nearby Aleppo, backed by tanks, artillery and other
heavy equipment.

He added:
 "Only representatives of the White Helmets organization close to the Nusra Front who, as always, found
themselves at the right time in the right place by chance with their video cameras can answer who did this and
why.

Indeed the White Helmets boasted in a video of being on the scene within moments.

The White Helmets who have had the gall to entitle themselves the Syrian Civil Defence Force are seemingly neither
Syrian, nor Civil, nor Defence. Vanessa Beeley who has meticulously charted their antics points out:

"This is an alleged non-governmental organization that so far has received funding from at least three
major NATO governments, including $23 million from the US Government and $29 million (19.7 million)
from the UK Government, $4.5 million (4 million) from the Dutch Government.

In addition, it receives material assistance and training funded and run by a variety of other EU Nations.

Related: Ceasefire in ruins: Putin - the US can not separate "healthy" opposition in Syria from terrorists

She informs of such concerns regarding the organization that:

"A request has been put into the EU Secretary General to provide all correspondence relating to the funding and
training of the White Helmets. By law this information must be made transparent and available to the public.

Beeley points out: There has been a concerted campaign by a range of investigative journalists to expose the true roots of
the White Helmets. The most damning statement, however (comes from) their funders and backers in the US State
Department who attempted to explain the US deportation of the prominent White Helmet leader, Raed Saleh, from Dulles
airport on the 18th April 2016.

Of the incident, Mark Toner, State Department spokesman stated:

"And any individual again, Im broadening my language here for specific reasons, but any individual in any group
suspected of ties or relations with extremist groups or that we had believed to be a security threat to the United
States, we would act accordingly. But that does not, by extension, mean we condemn or would cut off ties to the
group for which that individual works for.

Figure that one, Dear Reader.

The Ron Paul Institute has pointed out:

"We have demonstrated that the White Helmets are an integral part of the propaganda vanguard that
ensures obscurantism of fact and propagation of Human Rights fiction that elicits the well-intentioned and
self righteous response from a very cleverly duped public.

A priority for these NGOs is to keep pushing the No Fly Zone scenario which has already been seen to have
disastrous implications for innocent civilians in Libya, for example.

What better chance to push the No Fly Zone scenario than arriving within moments of the convoy tragedy, filming it and
creating a propaganda scenario before any meaningful forensic investigation could even be started, since the trucks were
still burning. And of course, the White Helmets, aka Syrian Defence Force, were filming rather than attempting to put out
the fire and rescue those in the burning trucks.

The Russian Defence Ministry subsequently caused outrage by claiming that Drone footage: shows bombed Syrian aid
convoy included truck full of militant fighters carrying mortar guns.

However: The footage emerged as the United Nations rowed back from describing the attack on the aid convoy as air
strikes, saying it did not have conclusive evidence about what had happened.
It must be asked, why on earth, after long and protracted negotiations over the convoy would Syria and or their
Russian ally risk the wrath of US and coalition further decimation of the country by laying themselves open to
accusations of bombing and aid convoys?

The tragedy has emphatically achieved one thing, however. Wiped from the headlines is another atrocity the US bombing
which killed over sixty Syrian soldiers and wounded over a hundred others just two days earlier, on Saturday
17th September, causing Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova to comment:

We are reaching a really terrifying conclusion for the whole world: That the White House is defending
Islamic State. Now there can be no doubts about that, according to the RIA Novosti news agency.

Again Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

Who will guard the guards?

UN Security Council Holds High-Level Meeting On Syria

The United Nations Security Council is held a high-level meeting on Syria in New York on
Wednesday, September 21, on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly.

The meeting, chaired by New Zealands Prime Minister John Key, started with a briefing on Colombia, followed by a
discussion of the situation in the Middle East, with special focus on Syria, after the US-Russia brokered ceasefire collapsed
due to US bombing of Syrian government forces, and the subsequent attack on the Aleppo aid convoy.
Why Washington Had To Wreck The Syrian Ceasefire

Finian Cunningham explains that the CIA and Pentagon had to wreck the Syrian ceasefire in order
to prevent the world discovering that there are no moderate Syrian rebels.

All of the so-called rebels are part of a US organized group of jihadists tasked with bringing chaos to Syria.

Cunningham makes clear that the US has no print and TV media, just a collection of whores who lie for their living. For the
article visit: StrategicCulture

Related: Lavrov Makes History: 'Ceasefires' were bogus, nixes future 'unilateral measures'

Paul Craig Roberts "Russia Didn't Attack The UN Aid Convoy, It's A False Flag"!
Related: Russian Defense Ministry: Aid convoy in Aleppo followed by terrorists truck with mortar

Unlawful Killing - The Murder Of Princess Diana And Why It Matters

September 23 2016 | From: Sott / Various

The mystery surrounding the deaths of Princess Diana and Dodi al-Fayed 22 years ago
was revived by the claims of a British SAS sniper whose testimony was part of the trial of another
SAS soldier who was convicted of illegal weapons possession.

The parents-in-law of the SAS sniper in question, known only as "Soldier N", claim that he boasted to his wife that
the "SAS was behind Princess Diana's death".

Unsurprisingly, the media reaction to the story has been to dismiss it, citing, incorrectly, that the investigation into Diana and
Dodi's deaths was conclusive, that it was an accident, and that there was "no evidence of conspiracy".

In fact, this alleged "new evidence" has done little more than provide the media with an opportunity to, once again, ridicule
any idea that there was anything strange about the events in Paris that night.
The general consensus among the great British and world public seems to be that Diana and Dodi and their driver Henri
Paul died as a result of a car crash caused by pursuing paparazzi.

It's rather perplexing that this should be the case because the jury in the official 3-month-long inquiry into their
deaths returned a verdict of "unlawful killing" and the paparazzi were exonerated .

How does this happen? Well, how did it come to pass that 50% of American citizens believed that Saddam Hussein was
involved in the 9/11 attacks, despite the fact that no one, not one person, ever made such a statement publicly?

Answer: The mainstream media's real job is not to report the news but to 'catapult the propaganda' that the 'elite'
hope will become the new 'reality' or historical record .

Five years ago British film director Keith Allen made an attempt to release a documentary about the death of Diana and
Dodi. Due to the content of the film however, Allen was legally prevented from making it widely available to the public.

Attempts to upload it to video hosting sites like Youtube and Vimeo have also been thwarted. The documentary provides
fairly damning evidence that Diana and Dodi were murdered by the British 'elite', with the support and connivance of their
French counterparts.

Just some of the details revealed in the documentary include:

All CC TV cameras at the entrance to the Alma tunnel in Paris (alma means 'soul' in Spanish) were mysteriously switched
off at the time of the 'crash'.

The seat-belts in the back of the Mercedes in which Diana and Dodi were traveling may have been tampered with to make
them inoperable.
 The paparazzi were left far behind Diana and Dodi's Mercedes by the time they entered the Alma tunnel. However, four
motorbikes and a white Fiat Uno car surrounded the Mercedes in the tunnel. One of these vehicles (or one of the drivers)
emitted an intensely bright flash of light (similar to a strobe light). The Fiat Uno then hit the Mercedes from the side, causing
it to crash violently into one of the central pillars of the tunnel.

French doctor Jean Marc Martino took immediate control of the crash scene and the victims. It took him 37 minutes,
however, to extract the still conscious Diana from the back of the car, despite the fact that the back of the car was
undamaged, so there should have been no significant delay in removing her.

81 minutes elapsed before the ambulance departed the scene of the crash for the nearest hospital.

It was 103 minutes (a further 22 minutes) before the ambulance arrived at the nearby hospital (a journey that should
have taken no more than 5 minutes).

At the official inquest, experts agreed that Diana's life could have been saved if she had received normal and
prompt medical attention.

The doctors Dr. Pepin and Professor LeComte who conducted tests on the blood samples of the driver Henri Paul appear
to have used someone else's blood to determine that Paul was drunk, when he was not. Both of these doctors were legally
required to attend the inquest, but refused to appear. The French Ministry of Justice protected them, citing reasons of
"public order" for their refusal to attend and officially the reason was "protection of state secrets and the essential
interests of the nation."
A government that withholds information in the interest of "national security" or to "protect state secrets" is essentially
saying that they realise that if the information became publicly available, it could provoke mass public
disturbances, or even revolution. In short, "protecting state secrets" and "national security" are euphemisms for
protecting the 'elite' from the people, and what the people might do if they knew the truth.

In 2006, a team of scientists offered to conduct tests on the samples to determine who they belonged to. The French
government declared, however, that the blood samples in question "no longer existed". There is also clear evidence that
French police planted alcohol in Paul's apartment to support the claim that he was an alcoholic.

British intelligence had developed a plan to assassinate a Serbian politician by causing his car to crash in a tunnel by
flashing a strobe light at the driver.

Many members of the British establishment, including the judiciary, police force and politicians, conspired to cover up the
truth about the crash and the fact that Diana suspected she was going to be killed.

British MP Nicholas Soames appears to be a psychopathic misogynist (one among many in the British establishment) who
hated Diana. Soames was British Defence Minister under Conservative Prime Minister John Major (1994-97). Soames
threatened Diana that she should back off from her high-profile campaign to end the use of land mines in third world
countries and warned her that "accidents can happen". Soames is the Chairman of Aegis Defence Services, a British private
mercenary company with overseas offices in Afghanistan, Bahrain, Iraq, Kenya, Nepal and the United States. As evidenced
by video footage released in 2005, Aegis mercenaries were involved in the indiscriminate shooting and murder of Iraqi
civilians during 'Operation Iraqi Freedom'.

According to the book Women in Parliament published in 2005, Soames has been named as the 'most sexist' MP, with
several female MPs stating that he has made vulgar comments to them. In other accusations of sexual harassment, it has
been alleged that Soames makes repeated cupping gestures with his hands, suggestive of female breasts, when women
are trying to speak in parliament, in order to distract them.
Nicholas Soames: a repellant excuse for a human being

If there is a flaw in Keith Allen's excellent documentary investigation into the murder of Diana and Dodi, it is the emphasis
given to the role of the British monarchy in the murder. It is unlikely that the British royals had any significant role in the
murder of Diana and Dodi because the British royals do not wield significant power in the UK, and have not done so for
centuries.

Since the de facto end of absolutist monarchy in England at the turn of the 18th century, the role of British royalty has been
one of serving the interests of the established lay authorities, a.k.a. 'the elite'.

Diana and Dodi were murdered to "protect the British monarchy" only insofar as the continued existence of the British
monarchy is important to the civilian 'elite' because it lends legitimacy to their claim of 'natural' or 'divinely ordained'
superiority over the inferior rabble.
It is, after all, the Queen that appoints governments and bestows knighthoods, peerages and other 'honors' on the chosen,
and thereby confers 'regal legitimacy' on those so honored and appointed.

Of course, behind the scenes, it is 'her majesty's government' (i.e. the self-same civilian 'elite') that advises the sovereign
on who gets what and when. Without this royal pomp and circumstance, the bestowing of titles by civilians on
other civilians would look, for all the world, like a bunch of undeserving bureaucrats pumping themselves up far
beyond their station. And the people may not be so eager to sanction it.

Diana's divorce from Charles, her impending marriage to Dodi al-Fayed (a Muslim) and the possibility that she might expose
some of the less than regal goings-on inside Windsor Castle threatened the public image, reputation and very existence of
the British Royal establishment, but the threat was felt most keenly among the high-level securocrats in Whitehall
and assorted pedophile peers who jealously guard their immoderate privileges and lifestyles.
Dodi al-Fayed was a film-maker (he produced the multi-Oscar-winning Chariots of Fire). His father was a wealthy man. Had
he and Diana been allowed to live, we can only imagine what kind of films or documentaries he may have turned his hand to
with Diana as his wife and inspiration.

Given Diana's outspoken and compassionate nature, combined with her world-wide public appeal, what might she have said
or done, and what might she have achieved had she been allowed to live?

With the world as her stage and having the ears of billions, might the last 16 years that have brought us the interminable
'war on terror', the invasions of other nations, the slaughter of so many innocents and the institution of a global police state,
have been any different?
But it is certainly a sad indictment on the nature and structure of our modern society that an open and loving heart coupled
with a natural and widespread popularity is perceived as such a threat by our entrenched 'leaders' that their minds invariably
turn to murder and cover-ups to 'solve the problem'.

But that appears to be precisely what happened in the case of Diana, and she was certainly not the first victim. This
particular story of the summary assassination of a popular hero is anything but new. Julius Caesar was one such hero, and
there have been many others over the course of the last 2000 years.

Unfortunately, their lives all seem to tell the same story of unfulfilled potential for themselves, the millions they could have
inspired, and human society in general.

Watch the 'Unlawful Killing' documentary for yourself below:

The Real Reason Why Princess Diana Was Assassinated: Ex MI5 Agent Testifies

The Ritualistic Assassination of Princess Diana - David Icke

Italians Blow Chemtrails Secret War Lid Off With Film
September 21 2016 | From: PakAlertPress

A new Italian film, Chemtrails: The secret war has been released showing a disturbing covert
military agenda behind the sinister phenomenon, one that according to evidence presented
includes far more than weather manipulation for climate change.

Lets stand up and defend our rights! say Italian filmmakers Antonio and Rosario Marciano.

Related: NASA admits to spraying Americans with poisonous chemtrails

The Marcianos, of the Italian website Tanker Enemy (Tanker-Enemy.eu) have produced the documentary film, Chemtrails:
the secret war (below) to show scientific evidence related to the chemtrails phenomenon. While much of the documentation
has been presented in previous years by Professor Michel Chossudovsky, head of Global Research, no film captures the
covert war against We the People as well as the Marcianos do.

Weather manipulation is only one (collateral) aspect of this phenomenon, say the Marcianos. What is at stake is a covert
military agenda.

This HD documentary film is the first Italian professional film on illegal geo-engineering aka chemtrails.

It has been realized thanks to many friends and collaborators. For years this issue has been denied and mocked but the
chemical spraying of our sky is still happening, the couple say.

In September 2014, Jacques Daidi, a French activist, went to Italy where he met the Marcianos, well-known Italian activists
against geo-engineering. The French translation was born from that meeting and then, produced by several members of the
French association Ciel voil, (www.cielvoile.fr).

Other contributors of the films translation include Jacques, Dominique from Avignon, Mary from Monteux, Sebastien from St
Firmin in Valgaudemard and Danielle from Gap.
In 2012, Dupre reported in the article, Geoengineered climate change heats up debate:

The US Air Force has the capability of manipulating climate either for testing purposes or for outright military-
intelligence use, economist Chossudovsky wrote. These capabilities extend to the triggering of floods, hurricanes,
droughts and earthquakes."

In recent years, large amounts of money have been allocated by the US Department of Defense to further developing and
perfecting these capabilities.

Christchurch, New Zealand, 2011

Ironically, Chossudovsky remarked, the Pentagon, while recognizing its ability to modify the Worlds climate for military
use, has joined the global warming consensus." (This disguises the Pentagons perfidy.) In a major study (now mysteriously
unavaliable), the Pentagon has analyzed in detail the implications of various global warming scenarios.

Weather-modification, according to US Air Force document AF 2025 Final Report, offers the war fighter a wide range of
possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary and, it says, extend to the triggering of floods, hurricanes, droughts and
earthquakes:

Weather modification will become a part of domestic and international security and could be done
unilaterally It could have offensive and defensive applications and even be used for deterrence purposes. The
ability to generate precipitation, fog, and storms on earth or to modify space weather, and the
production of artificial weather all are a part of an integrated set of technologies which can provide
substantial increase in US, or degraded capability in an adversary, to achieve global awareness, reach, and power.
Air University at Maxwell Air Force Base in Alabama provides the full spectrum of Air Force education, from pre-
commissioning to the highest levels of professional military education, including degree granting and professional continuing
education for officers, enlisted and civilian personnel throughout their careers.

AUs PME programs educate Airmen on the capabilities of air and space power and its role in national security. AU conducts
research in air, space and cyberspace power, education, leadership and management. AU also provides citizenship
programs and contributes to the development and testing of Air Force doctrine, concepts and strategy.

The significant expansion in Americas weather warfare arsenal, which is a priority of the Department of Defense
is not a matter for debate or discussion, stated Chossudovsky in 2004, calling the subject matter a scientific
taboo.

This taboo constitutes a human rights violation as much as fossil fuel companies and other polluters dismissing climate
change today. The Marcianos hope their new movie, Chemtrails, the secret war, will catapult chemtrail deniers out of their
comfort zone and into reality, at least for more open public debate if not action against the covert war.

Related Articles:
Geoengineering Watch Global Alert News, September 3, 2016

High Bypass Turbofan Jet Engines, Geoengineering, And The Contrail Lie
What Do Smart Meters And Vaccinations Have In Common? + Another Vaccine Dump
September 20 2016 | From: NaturalBlaze / Various

Jerry Day of Freedom Taker.com has produced an exceptional new video wherein he explains in
detail what Smart Meters and Vaccinations have in common.

Its called Conditional Acceptance, a term and a legal tactic whereby you can refuse anyone who pressures you
to sign either an opt-out agreement for a Smart Meter or demands you to accept a vaccination.

Related: Del Bigtree: Our Children Are Being Sold To The Pharmaceutical Industry

Opt-out contracts are ones big corporations give you when you refuse corporate offers. Jerry explains what he calls
highway robbery in this video.

Listen carefully to what Jerry explains, plus take notes, because his logic may be one that you can utilize under Right of
Contract. Jerry says;

Always remember that you have Right of Contract. That is the legal term used to describe the fact that on any
contract or agreement your signature must be fully voluntary and not coerced in any way. If youre pressured into
signing or agreeing, your signature and agreement technically have no authority or effect."

And legally, there is no contract or agreement if you can show there was coercion or pressure causing you
to sign that contract. So your Right of Contract means that you and only you may decide whether you
sign something or not. And you may not be penalized in any way for refusing to sign anything.

They [utilities and governments] are criminally violating utility customers and they know it. So when they
refuse to insure the damage, their equipment will cause to you, you have every right to refuse that equipment.

If the equipment they are installing was really not harmful and did not violate your rights, the insurance would cost
almost nothing. But electronic utility meters are known to be hazardous and harmful so much so that no
insurance company will provide insurance for any price [more about insurance here], because they know
that advanced utility metering is a ticking time bomb of damages and litigation. Vaccinations represent a
very similar situation to utility metering.
Listen intently to what Jerry says about Conditional Acceptance because thats the bargaining chip in the song and dance
you will have to engage in to protect yourself and your family from AMI Smart Meter RFs/EMFs, dirty electricity they produce
, plus possible fire loss to your home from Smart Meters proclivity to malfunction.

The same logic regarding Right of Contract and Conditional Acceptance applies with regard to vaccinations. Jerry delves
into vaccinations like you may not have heard before.

Homeowners insurance and health insurance do not cover you for losses from AMI Smart Meters or injured health from
receiving a vaccine! The unfair fact about bullying and harassment from utilities and the medical profession has to be
understood fully for what it is: You are liable for all damages unless you are prepared not to be left helpless and demand
your legal rights by taking Jerrys advice into consideration.

After listening to the above video, please be certain to check out thedownloadable documents A-2 and A-4 regarding Smart
Meters. Theres also a Vaccination Notice Jerry talks about. All are offered as templates at www.FreedomTaker.com.

Related Articles

Yes, they just keep coming - the evidence is in the order of a flood of biblical proportions for this with the eyes to see:

Shocking research confirms vaccines are contaminated with Monsanto's RoundUp herbicide

Anthony Samsel on Vaccines contaminated with Glyphosate

Vaccines: Prevention or Curse?

Vaccination: Serious Concerns

Another Vaccine Bombshell Glyphosate Think Monsantos Roundup Confirmed in Most Vaccines

Intelligent Parents are Refusing Vaccinations

The Average Flu Shot Left This 9-Year-Old Girl Paralyzed And Non-Verbal

Flu deaths continue to mount in people vaccinated against it

Vaccine Quackery Bombshell: Key studies cited to 'prove' vaccines are safe were funded almost entirely by
vaccine manufacturers

New vaccines will permanently alter human DNA

New Vaccine Whistleblower Film Premieres To Standing Ovation

How Big Pharma Targets Your Kids!

Actor Rob Schneider Speaks Out Against the Dangers of Vaccines

Shock Report: Testing Reveals Glyphosate Present in Childhood Vaccines

Shocking Research Confirms Vaccines Are Contaminated With Monsanto's RoundUp

Herbicide

Folks, I have written about the problems with vaccines in previous blog posts. Now, a new serious
contamination problem with our vaccines has been identified.
Researcher Anthony Samsel has published five peer-reviewed articles on the herbicide Glyphosate (the active
ingredient in Roundup). A yet-to-be published sixth paper found various commonly-used vaccines contaminated
with the herbicide glyphosate.

Yes, you read that correctly: Our vaccines are contaminated with an herbicide that the World Health Organization
characterized as"probably carcinogenic to humans."

How can this happen? That answer is easy.

Many vaccines contain animal byproducts such as gelatin, bovine casein, bovine serum, bovine calf serum, or chicken egg
protein. The animals from which these products come from are fed grains sprayed with glyphosate. It does not take a rocket
scientist to come to the conclusion that these animals, fed glyphosate in their diet, would contain glyphosate in their
byproducts.

Samsel sent a letter to Congress that stated:

I have run numerous groups of vaccines and identified several vectors of contamination. These include the
excipient gelatins, egg protein and or similar substrates used to grow vaccines.

I have found gelatins and egg proteins contaminated with Glyphosate-based herbicides from animals fed a
glyphosate contaminated diet.

This contamination carries into thousands of consumer products i.e. vitamins, protein powders, wine, beer and
other consumables which use gelatins as part of the product or in fining and processing."

What did Samsel hear back?

He heard nothing.

In other words, our do-nothing Congress, so far, has failed to respond. In his letter to Congress, Samsel also stated that
Glyphosate is a synthetic amino acid. It bioaccumulates and is found in all tissue types, particularly the bone and marrow of
animals fed a diet contaminated with Glyphosate residues.
You can see Dr. Samsel talk about his research by clicking here.

The following vaccines were found to be contaminated with the herbicide glyphosate:

1. MMR

2. Varicella (chicken pox)

3. Zostavax (shingles)

4. Proquad (MMR, rubella, varicella)

5. Fluzone Quad (flu vaccine)

6. Hepatitis B (B Energix-B)

Multiple vaccines from different manufactures were found to be contaminated. Folks, this is a big deal. Injecting a
vaccine contaminated with a known herbicide that is "probably carcinogenic to humans" should be prohibited. We need a
Congressional investigation into our vaccines.

We keep hearing the mantra that vaccines are safe. Injecting a vaccine containing an herbicide is safe? Give me a break!
It is time to call your political representatives and tell them to investigate this matter. I can assure you that it is not safe to
inject a known neurotoxin such as mercury or aluminum. Nor is it safe to inject a known carcinogen such as formaldehyde.

Guess what? It is not safe to inject an herbicide that is a probable human carcinogen.

Follow Dr. Brownstein's blog for more great articles by clicking here.

Anthony Samsel on Vaccines contaminated with Glyphosate

Scientists Anthony Samsel and Stephanie Seneff have just gotten the fifth peer reviewed paper on Glyphosate published. Its
named "Glyphosate pathways to modern diseases V: Amino acid analogue of glycine in diverse proteins".

In this regard Tony Mitra interviewed Anthony Samsel, to cover the newly emerging scientific findings on Glyphosate and
how it can and does hurt creatures including humans.

In the course of the interview, Anthony Samsel mentioned the issues being covered in their next paper, the 6th one. This
covers a number of vaccines that use animal byproducts such as egg protein and gelatine. He suspected these products
might be contaminated with Glyphosate, if the vaccine makers were using factory farmed animals fed with Glyphosate laced
GMO feed.

To verify, he got a large number of vaccines that do use egg proteins and gelatine and got them analyzed in multiple labs.
The results confirmed his doubt. The vaccines themselves are largely contaminated with Glyphosate and pose serious
hazard to those that are and will be vaccinated using these products.

US Global Hegemony Is Officially Dead

September 18 2016 | From: Geopolitics

Humanity is now in the cusp for a massive globalwide revolution in engineering and scientific
development as divisively regressive geopolitics are being shamed in the global stage, and
instigations for new wars are effectively suppressed.
For the last 4 years, or so, railways and sea/airports were being built across Asia, and these projects will only
accelerate in the coming months as the Khazarian transnational crime syndicate is being pinned down at every
level.

Related: The Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (TTIP) Is Dead + Earthquakes

The Khazarian Mafias attempts at controlling governments through the TTIP was, in multiple occasions, rejected and rightly
so.

Related: The Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (TTIP) Is Dead

The Clinton Foundations false philanthropy is being exposed,

Related: Clinton Foundation is False Philanthropy | In-depth Analysis

and Wikileaks will be releasing more expos very soon, as former DND Secretary Colin Powell is being dragged to the
Clinton email controversy.
Hitlery is just getting the update...

The massive resignations of bankers have already occurred four years ago, as punctuated by the World Bank president
Zoellicks own resignation months later and the Papal resignation in 2013.

And no matter how much it tries, NATO could not start a new war anywhere in the world. All of Eurasia are now poised to
give their full support to the China-led One Belt, One Road massive economic programs to redevelop the planet for the
benefit of all its inhabitants.

Related: The Ultimate 21st Century Choice: One Belt One Road or War

To White Houses surprise, Turkey pivoted towards its rival Kremlin in the middle of this year. The subsequent CIA military
coup in cooperation with embedded 5th columnists inside Turkey was unsuccessful, due in part to a timely Russian
intelligence report which gave Erdogan the upperhand early on.

But so far, the biggest geopolitical event this year is the epic expressed rejection of US interference in the ASEAN-China
region.
US President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) look on after formally joining the Paris Climate deal at Ruyi Hall at the West Lake
State House in Hangzhou on September 3, 2016.The United States and China on September 3 formally joined the Paris climate deal, with US
President Barack Obama hailing the accord as the moment we finally decided to save our planet. World leaders are gathering in Hangzhou for the
11th G20 Leaders Summit from September 4 to 5. / AFP / SAUL LOEB (Photo credit should read SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images)

Xi officially denied Obama the luxury of insulting Asia right on its doorsteps. The phrase This is our country. This is our
airport being shouted against Obamas entourage should summarize Chinas assertion of its geopolitical and financial
sovereignty. Forcing Obama to descend through the ass of Air Force One was just the icing on the cake.

China positively responded to the ASEAN Communitys establishment of a well-defined Code of Conduct in the West
Philippine Sea to avoid miscommunications in the area, and all parties have agreed that the best way to find resolution in
the conflict zone where an estimated $5 trillion of physical commerce passes annually, is only through dialogue, trade
cooperation, and the sharing of natural resources in these contested areas, as it had been done for thousands of years prior
to Westerns divide and conquer intervention.

The straight talking Duterte complemented the whole covert and not-so-covert anti-Khazarian advances in the region by
directly confronting Obama and Ba Ki Moon during the East Asian Summit, with photos of human rights violation against
600,000 Muslim Moro, 6,000 of whom were massacred and buried in a common pit, at the turn of the 20th century, which is
the root cause of the secessionist movements in Southern Philippines.
Obama and Ban Ki Moon were caught off guard and the two found themselves out of ammunition to respond accordingly.
Heres the mainstream media summary of the event:

All headline hugging Duterte tirades prior to the ASEAN Summit 2016 were meant to underscore the fact that the
Philippines is no longer a US vassal state.

To Dutertes credit, Indonesia is buying up weapons after its Police Anti-Narcotics Chief Budi Waseso announced that the
largest Muslim country in the region will duplicate Dutertes methods of dealing with drug trafficking.

Duterte has just visited Indonesia in order to discuss the two countries coordination in the field of economics and terrorism.
Both countries share a border where CIA-ISIS affiliated Abu Sayyaf is operating.
Here in the Philippines, it is our understanding that the Chinese government will eventually abide by the UNCLOS arbitral
ruling in the future when the subject is already properly explained to its people, and if the Philippines maintains its
independence from the US beyond Dutertes presidency.

Ironically, China is a signatory to the UNCLOS, but not the perennial conflict instigator known as the United States.

All of these great milestones occurred while Americans were busy watching the Kardashians.

The official declaration of the Fall of the US Empire has been held in the peace loving countries of Asia.

It is now up to the Americans, and the entire Western population, to reciprocate what has been made here .

Global Financial Meltdown - One Of The Best Financial Crisis Documentary Films
September 17 2016 | From: RebelMystic

Meltdown is a four-part investigation into a world of greed and recklessness that brought down the
financial world. The show begins with the 2008 crash that pushed 30 million people into
unemployment, brought countries to the edge of insolvency and turned the clock back to 1929.

It's a bloody good watch and goes into specific detail as to how the house of cards was built and
subsequently fell.

Caveat Emptor.
But how did it all go so wrong? Lack of government regulation; easy lending in the US housing market meant
anyone could qualify for a home loan with no government regulations in place. Also, London was competing with
New York as the banking capital of the world. Gordon Brown, the British finance minister at the time, introduced
"light touch regulation" - giving bankers a free hand in the marketplace.

Related: The Reasons Why The Globalists Are Destined To Lose

Meltdown moves on to examine the epidemic of fear that caused the world's banks to stop lending and how the people
began their fight back. Finally, it asks how the world can prepare for the next crisis even as it recognises that this one is far
from over.

We hear about the sheikh who says the crash never happened; a Wall Street king charged with fraud; a congresswoman
who wants to jail the bankers; and the world leaders who want a re-think of capitalism.

'They [Parliamentary Service] Have No Right To Be Screening Emails' - Hipkins

September 15 2016 | From: RadioNewZealand

Parliament's Speaker is expected to report back to an urgent request about MPs emails being
monitored, and even blocked, by Parliamentary Service.
Labour's chief whip Chris Hipkins says Parliamentary Service told him it had blocked one of his emails because of
a security classification of the attached document, which he says is 'outrageous'.

Related: Speaker to investigate whether MP's emails are monitored

Mr Hipkins has asked the Speaker of the House to urgently investigate what he says is a clear breach of parliamentary
privilege.

He told the House that Parliamentary Service was monitoring, and in some cases blocking, emails to and from MPs based
on government security classifications.

When he sought clarification from Parliamentary Service, Mr Hipkins said he was told they had blocked it on the basis the
document attached to his email contained "sensitive words" that were in violation of government security classifications.
 And therefore I was not allowed to send the email - that's outrageous, they have no right to be screening the
emails being sent by Members of Parliament."

He said the incident had "tipped us [Labour] off" to the fact MPs emails were being monitored. Mr Hipkins said the document
he was sending to a journalist had been released under the Official Information Act.

Speaking to Morning Report today, Mr Hipkins said there was room for abuse in the new system.

He said other MPs and staff have had emails blocked in the last two months, but no-one was informed about a new system.

"They shouldn't be monitoring the emails that I am sending and receiving anyway. I'm not a member of
government, I'm an opposition member of the parliament, and from time to time we will be handling information that
is embarrassing to the government, that's the nature of what we do."

Mr Hipkins said he expected the Speaker David Carter, to come to the House with a response today, as it was a breach of
Parliament's rules, even if software was being used to screen communications.

And it's something he needs to put an immediate stop to."

The Speaker is responsible for Parliamentary Service, which provides administrative and management services to
Parliament.

Mr Hipkins said since he raised it in Parliament, Labour Party staff had been contacting him with other examples of their
emails being blocked. Those had all been in the last few weeks so he was not sure how far back this went.

Parliament's Privilege Committee considered how Parliamentary Service handled MPs information, in the wake of the
controversy over Peter Dunne and the journalist Andrea Vance.

Mr Hipkins, who was on that committee, said there was discussion among committee members during those hearings about
the fact Parliamentary Service should not be monitoring either the metadata or content of MPs communications, and to do
so could be matter of privilege.
The National Party's senior whip said it would be concerning if Parliamentary Service has overstepped the mark when
dealing with MPs' communications.

Tim Macindoe said he would be interested to hear the Speaker's response this afternoon.

I think all MPs would be concerned to ensure their legitimate activities are not being interfered with, so I'm hoping
that the issue will be resolved quickly."

Parliamentary Service said it had no comment to make, except that it was working with the Speaker on the matter and would
know more in the next couple of days.

10 Biggest Corporations Make More Money Than Most Of World Combined

September 15 2016 | From: RT / Various

The worlds top ten corporations, including Apple, Shell and Walmart, have a combined revenue
that is greater than the combined income of the 180 poorest countries out of the worlds total
195 sovereign states.
The figures, which reveal that Walmart, Apple and Shell alone are now richer than Russia, Belgium and Sweden,
were released by the campaign group Global Justice Now.

Related: The United Nations 2030 Agenda decoded: It's a blueprint for the global enslavement of humanity under
the boot of corporate masters

Sixty-nine of the worlds 100 top economic entities are now corporations instead of countries a rise from last years
staggering figure of 63. Out of the top 200 entities in the world, a whopping 153 were found to be corporations.

The US, China, Germany, Japan, France and the UK comprise the top six economic entities followed by Italy, Brazil and
Canada.

The vast wealth and power of corporations is at the heart of so many of the worlds problems like inequality and
climate change, said Nick Dearden, director of Global Justice Now.

The drive for short-term profits today seems to trump basic human rights for millions of people on the planet.
These figures show the problem is getting worse, he added.
Related: Revealed: the biggest companies in the world in 2016

The London-based campaign group released the figures in an effort to put increased pressure on the British government
ahead of their working group with the UN.

The meeting, led by Ecuador, was established with the aim of working towards a binding treaty that would
ensure transnational corporations abide by the full range of human rights responsibilities.

The UK government has facilitated this rise in corporate power through tax structures, trade deals and even aid
programmes that help big business, said Dearden.

Related: No compromise from US, no TTIP with EU this year France & Germany on trade deal

The Corporation

The Corporation is a Canadian documentary film written by Joel Bakan, and directed by Mark
Achbar and Jennifer Abbott. The documentary examines the modern-day corporation, considering
its legal status as a class of person and evaluating its behavior towards society and the world at
large as a psychiatrist might evaluate an ordinary person.
This is explored through specific examples. Bakan wrote the book, The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of
Profit and Power, during the filming of the documentary.

Further to this, the documentary provides insighst into very poignant hostorical points, including the role of IBM in providing
computational hardware and services to the Nazis - and some very interesting truths about the Nazi creation of Coca Cola's
Fanta. Enjoy. If possible.

We Are The Death Merchant Of The World: Ex-Bush Official Lawrence Wilkerson
Condemns Military-Industrial Complex
September 14 2016 | From: Salon / Various

The military-industrial complex "is much more pernicious than Eisenhower ever thought," says the
retired US colonel.
Col. Lawrence Wilkerson is tired of the corporate interests that we go abroad to slay monsters for.

Related: Who Really Owns and Controls the Military-Industrial Complex and What Are They Doing? An Extensive
Research Report

As the former chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell, Wilkerson played an important role in the George W. Bush
administration. In the years since, however, the former Bush official has established himself as a prominent critic of U.S.
foreign policy.

I think Smedley Butler was onto something, explained Lawrence Wilkerson, in an extended interview with Salon.

In his day, in the early 20th century, Butler was the highest ranked and most honored official in the history of the U.S. Marine
Corps. He helped lead wars throughout the world over a series of decades, before later becoming a vociferous opponent of
American imperialism, declaring war is a racket.
Wilkerson spoke highly of Butler, referencing the late generals famous quote:

Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in
three districts. I operated on three continents.

I think the problem that Smedley identified, quite eloquently actually, Wilkerson said, especially for a Marine - I
had to say that as a soldier, the retired Army colonel added with a laugh;

I think the problem is much deeper and more profound today, and much more subtle and sophisticated.

Today, the military-industrial complex is much more pernicious than Eisenhower ever thought it would
be, Wilkerson warned.

In his farewell address in 1961, former President Dwight D. Eisenhower famously cautioned Americans that the military and
corporate interests were increasingly working together, contrary to the best interests of the citizenry. He called this
phenomenon the military-industrial complex.
As a case study of how the contemporary military-industrial complex works, Wilkerson pointed to leading weapons
corporations like Lockheed Martin, and their work with draconian, repressive Western-allied regimes in the Gulf, or in
inflaming tensions in Korea.

Was Bill Clintons expansion of NATO - after George H. W. Bush and [his Secretary of State] James Baker had
assured Gorbachev and then Yeltsin that we wouldnt go an inch further east - was this for Lockheed Martin, and
Raytheon, and Boeing, and others, to increase their network of potential weapon sales? Wilkerson asked.

You bet it was, he answered.

Is there a penchant on behalf of the Congress to bless the use of force more often than not because of the
constituencies they have and the money they get from the defense contractors? Wilkerson continued.

Again, he answered his own question: You bet.

Its not like Dick Cheney or someone like that went and said lets have a war because we want to make money for
Halliburton, but it is a pernicious on decision-making, the former Bush official explained.

And the fact that they donate so much money to congressional elections and to PACs and so forth is another
pernicious influence.

Those who deny this are just being utterly naive, or they are complicit too, Wilkerson added.

And some of my best friends work for Lockheed Martin, along with Raytheon, Boeing and Halliburton, he
quipped.

Wilkerson - who in the same interview with Salon defended Edward Snowden, saying the whistle-blower performed an
important service and did not endanger U.S. national security - was also intensely critical of the growing movement
to privatize public functions, like prisons.
Col. Lawrence Wilkerson

I fault us Republicans for this majorly, he confessed - although a good many prominent Democrats have also
jumped on the neoliberal bandwagon.

In a 2011 speech, for instance, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton declared, Its time for the United States to start
thinking of Iraq as a business opportunity for U.S. corporations.

Wilkerson lamented, Weve privatized the ultimate public function: war.

In many respects it is now private interests that benefit most from our use of military force, he continued.

Whether its private security contractors, that are still all over Iraq or Afghanistan, or its the bigger-known defense
contractors, like the number one in the world, Lockheed Martin.

Journalist Antony Loewenstein detailed how the U.S. privatized its wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in another interview with
Salon. There are an estimated 30,000 military contractors working for the Pentagon in Afghanistan today;
they outnumber U.S. troops three-to-one. Thousands more are in Iraq.

Lockheed Martin simply plans to sell every aspect of missile defense that it can, regardless of whether it is needed,
Wilkerson said. And what is best to maximize corporate interest is by no means necessarily the same as what is best for
average citizens.

We dwarf the Russians or anyone else who sells weapons in the world, the retired Army colonel continued.
 We are the death merchant of the world.

Related: The Greatest Threat to Our Freedoms: Governments of Scoundrels, Spies, Thieves, Ruffians, Rapists and
Killers

Putin Bans Rothschilds From Russia + Hungary Becomes First European Nation To
Ban Rothschild Banks
September 13 2016 | From: NosComunicamos / WakingTimes / Various

Brave Vladimir Putin has banned Jacob Rothschild and his New World Order banking cartel family
from entering Russian territory under any circumstances.

Putin recently reminded his cabinet that he paid off the Rothschilds debt and grabbed them by the scruff of the
neck and kicked them out Russias back door.

Related: Vladimir Putin to George Soros: Thank God we kicked you out of Russia

This meeting featured the President pounding his fist on the table and vowing to destroy the New World Order, and
according to a Kremlin source Putin is making great strides towards this goal.
 They do not own the world, and they do not have carte blanch to do whatever they want. If we do not challenge
them there will be other issues. We will not be bullied by them.

It is understood that the Rothschild banking racket was a noose tied around the neck of the Russian economy. Once the
knot was tightened, the economy would struggle and choke.

Early in his presidency he made a priority of uniting Russia socially, spiritually, and economically. He ordered the arrest of
the Rothschild backed oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky who had made Rothschild, Henry Kissinger and Arthur Hartman
directors of the Open Russia foundation.

He was so upset with the banksters in his temple, he tipped over their tables and drove them out with a whip.
A keen student of history, well versed in world affairs, the Russian President has studied the history of the worlds most
elusive organisation and understands the central role their financial collaborators have played in fomenting the major
international conflicts of the 20th century.

Mikhail Khodorkovsky

Related: Leaked Memo Exposes George Soros' Plan To Overthrow Putin & Destabilise Russia

Now they want to plunge us into World War III.

The New World Orders invasive roots and branches keep spreading around the world, but President Putin has stopped
them expanding into Russia. This is a major blow to their plans for world domination and now they view him as a real threat.
Hes got them running scared, which is why he is degraded in the Western media at every opportunity.

The reality is that Putin is leading us towards a multi-polar world, far from the one government, one religion future plotted by
the New World Order. When he took his forces into Syria to protect a sovereign state he further enhanced his reputation as
a powerful leader.
People around the world have started to wake up and notice.

Putin's Eye-Opening Speech About US Foreign Policy

This video goes back to a Russian TV show in 2011, when Putin's foreign policy wasn't quite as clear to the Russian public
as it is today. Nevertheless, he makes his stance known on US foreign policy, and notably, his feelings toward Mr McCain.

Related: Putin Politely Expresses His Amazement At Western Stupidity

Related Articles:

Related: Leaked Memo Proves Soros Ruled Ukraine In 2014: Minutes From "Breakfast With US Ambassador Pyatt"

Related: Russian Doping Scandal Orchestrated to Isolate Russia

Related: Breedlove and His Gang of Russophobes on their way to Start World War III

Related: Russian Su-34 kills ISIS leader

Related: ITCCS Directorate to issue a public appeal to President Vladimir Putin: Help us stop the child killers

Related: Putin Speaks at the Meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club

Related: Secret History Revealed - Putin Played Critical Role After The Pre-Planned Collapse Of The USSR

Hungary Becomes First European Nation To Ban Rothschild Banks

The name Rothschild is literally associated with wealth. This is because for over 200 years, the
family has remained the most powerful and wealthy family in the world.
The head of Hungarys central bank has called for the International Monetary Fund to close its office in Budapest

Most of the Rothschild fortune has been made in the world of banking, but investments in other industries, such as
coal, real estate, and construction, have helped secure the familys wealth and immense power.

Related: An Illustrated History Of The House Of Rothschild: 1743 - 2006 & The Illuminati Grand Plan

One of the banks owned by the Rothschild group (the biggest banking group in the world) is the International Monetary
Fund (IMF), AKA Imposing Misery and Famine.

Not only does the group make money off usurious interest rates at the misfortune of crumbling economies, it literally owns
Governments and people of power. Because its nearly impossible to escape the clutches of the banking group, news
of IMF being booted from Hungary is being heralded as a victorious happening.

Related: Capitalism Has Become Socially Dysfunctional - How We Have Fallen Victim To "Economic Hit Men"

TapNewsWire reports that in 2008, Hungary survived economic turmoil by relying on a 20 billion ($26 billion) loan from the
IMF and aid from the EU. This was before Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbn was elected into office.
In 2013, however, the former economy minister and current central bank governor, Gyorgy Matolcsy, wrote a letter to IMF
Managing Director Christine Lagarde calling for the fund to close its representative office in Budapest. Matolcsy noted that it
was not necessary to maintain it any longer. In addition, he said in July of 2016 that Hungary would repay the 2008 loan in
full by the end of the year.

Prime Minister Orbn hasnt had a good relationship with IMF since taking office, and this latest move has taken it to a new
low. However, many are hailing Hungarys decision to boot the IMF from the country as an intelligent decision.

NeonNettle reports:

Paying the loan back early has meant Hungary have saved 11.7 million worth of interest expenses, but Gordan
Bajnai, leader of the electoral alliance E14-PM, claimed that they had actually lost 44.86 million by March 2014
because of the early repayment as all they did was replace the loan from the [IMF] with a more expensive one,
labelling the stunt as Propaganda.

And what made further nonsense; another loan at high interest rates was signed to finance a nuclear upgrade,
which will mean not only higher repayments but also high electricity costs. But they do have economic sovereignty
now.

The central bank governor says that the government succeeded in pushing its budget deficit below the EU ceiling of 3% in
GDP and reduced government debt. Though the EU Commission expected it to return to weak growth shortly after the
decision, the unorthodox system of imposing heavy special taxes on large companies seems to be working for the country.

YourNewsWire relays that Iceland joined Hungary in 2014 when it paid back its $400 million loan ahead of schedule after
the collapse of the banking sector in 2008.

In addition, Russia has refused to bow down to any Western puppeteer and gained financial independence in 2005.

Reportedly, this is the FIRST time a European country has stood up to the international fund, since Germany did so in the
1930s.
Race Relations In New Zealand
September 12 2016 | From: NZPCR

Last week the Race Relations Commissioner Dame Susan Devoy wrote an open letter to all New
Zealanders. She wants to hear your views on racism in New Zealand. The letter is part of the Human
Rights Commissions first nationwide anti-racism campaign.

Dame Susan says the Thats Us campaign, which asks Kiwis to share their own stories about racism, intolerance
and hatred in New Zealand, is about the kind of people we want to be, and the kind of country we want our kids
growing up in.

If you would like to reply to Dame Susans letter to you, her email address is SusanD@hrc.co.nz or feedback can be
provided through the special website www.thatsus.co.nz.

The Human Rights Commission has justified the campaign on the basis that New Zealand is an extremely diverse society,
and since diverse societies elsewhere have become more racially intolerant, they expect it to occur here too. With around
400 formal complaints about racism received every year, the Commission wants public feedback: if were going to better
understand racism then we need to know what it is which in itself seems extraordinary!

In particular, they highlight casual or quiet racial intolerance the type that they say occurs in everyday life and often goes
unreported. As an example they cite the case of a woman registering students at a university, who smiles at every other
student but the brown ones.
Clearly this campaign is an exercise in redefining racism to become substantially wider than what most rational people would
assume it to be. It is a further example of the arrant nonsense emanating from the Race Relations Commissioner and the
Human Rights Commission.

This weeks NZCPR Guest Commentator, broadcaster Lindsay Perigo, who shares with us a speech he delivered at
a recent debate with Dame Susan Devoy, believes the Race Relations Commissioner and the Human Rights
Commission should be abolished:

Id abolish Dame Susan. Nothing personal! Id just abolish the office of Race Relations Commissar and with it, the
entire Human Rights Commission, to which I routinely refer as the Human Wrongs Commissariat.

This cossetted coterie of taxpayer-supported fascists of the left just want to impose their precious, prissy,
puritanical Political Correctness upon all of us. Theyre our Thought Police, prattling on about diversity when
theyre attempting to outlaw the most important diversity of all, ideological diversity and make their Political
Correctness compulsory.

Everything in their universe would be either illegal or compulsory. In my universe theyd have to find real jobs and
the legislation that set them up would be repealed.

The legislation under which the Race Relations Commissioner and the Human Rights Commission operate is the Human
Rights Act 1993, which essentially enshrines the United Nations human rights agenda into our domestic law.

As a result, the Commission is now promoting the highly controversial United Nations Declaration on the Rights of
Indigenous Peoples, which Helen Clarks Labour Government considered too radical to support.

While the National Government signed up in 2010 at the behest of the Maori Party Prime Minister John Key went to some
lengths to assure the New Zealand public that it was a non-binding aspirational goal. Yet here we are with the Human
Rights Commission now proactively promoting the Declaration, including through brochures which advocate Maori self
determination and self government.

One of the Human Rights Commissions main roles is to pursue those they claim are discriminating against others.
 Dr Paul Moon, a professor of history at the Maori
Development Unit of the Auckland University of
Technology, explained how, as a result of the publication of
his book, This Horrid Practice, in 2008 which portrayed
cannibalism as a violent and widespread practice among
traditional Maori he was the subject of an anonymous
complaint to the Human Rights Commission.

But it doesnt even need a person to lay a complaint for the

Human Rights Commission to act as the Thought Police
as a former Massey University Economist, Dr Greg
Clydesdale found out.

The Commission got so worked up about a research paper

he had prepared from Statistics New Zealand data, showing
that Polynesian immigration was fuelling an underclass, that
a 69 page report was compiled on his case without a
single complaint about his paper ever being received.

Such investigations, supposedly to prevent discrimination,

can not only destroy reputations and careers, but they
create an atmosphere of fear and intimidation that seriously
undermines our fundamental right to free expression a
freedom, that is especially critical in an academic
environment.

There also remains an on-going concern that these

government officials are overly biased in favour of
minorities. This was certainly the case back in 1988, when a
scandal over a Maori activists call to kill a white, forced the
government to change the law.

According to the Hansard of the Parliamentary debates at the time, the Race Relations conciliator refused to censure
Hannah Jackson, who made her inflammatory statement at the University of Auckland marae he only censured a
newspaper editor for reporting the event.

The incident was considered to be so serious, that it caused Parliament to repeal section 9A of the Race Relations Act,
which made it illegal to publish, broadcast or make public statements likely to excite hostility or ill-will against, or bring into
contempt or ridicule, any group of persons on the ground of their colour, race, or ethnic or national origins, since it did not
apply on a marae.

As Winston Peters, then MP for Tauranga, explained in the debate;

The Race Relations Conciliator, when asked to consider an offensive statement Go out and kill a white and be
a hero did nothing.

He said that he had no role whatever to play. He then attacked the Auckland Star. A person in Auckland made a
totally outrageous statement that offended 99 percent of New Zealanders, and said that someone should go out
and kill a white and be a hero.

The Race Relations Conciliator could not be moved to say one word of opprobrium about it The view and the
myth that if one belongs to a minority one cannot be guilty of racist behaviour are being reinforced, and they are
rubbish.

As a result of that controversy, Section 9A of the Race Relations Act was eventually replaced by Sections 61 and 131 of the
Human Rights Act 1993.
Section 61 addressed the kill a white issue by prohibiting the use of words which are threatening, abusive, or insulting or
likely to excite hostility against any group of persons on the ground of race, not only in public places, but also in any place
where the person using the words knew or ought to have known that the words were reasonably likely to be published

In addition, the new law clarified the fact that the media can legally report on such matters.

Section 131 of the Act established the fact that inciting racial disharmony is a criminal offence punishable by a fine of up to
$7,000 or imprisonment of up to 3 months. As a safeguard, however, under Section 132, the consent of the Attorney General
is needed before any prosecution can be instituted.

However, in spite of there being a high threshold for prosecution, the activities of the Race Relations Commissioner continue
to have a chilling effect on free speech especially their media monitoring project, aimed at naming and shaming news
outlets critical of Maori rights.

Over the years, vested Maori interests have learnt to use human rights laws to seek advantage, by using accusations of
racism or intolerance to close down the debate, whenever anyone speaks out against their agenda.

The New Zealand Centre for Political Research has been the subject of such accusation when commenting on important
matters such as the governments plan to establish iwi control of the countrys fresh water. More recently we have been
criticised for publishing details of where local body candidates stand on the vexed question of unelected representatives
with voting rights being appointed onto Councils.

As an independent organisation we remain undeterred, and congratulate our newsletter readers, who are also standing up to
the racism being expressed by iwi and the likes of Dame Susan.
Our Local Government Election Project is a community service thanks to the help of newsletter readers, the Vote 2016
index HERE provides details of which candidates around the country oppose the appointment of unelected representatives
who cannot be held to account by their local community onto their councils.

With voting papers due to be sent out next week, we are encouraging readers to visit the website and vote for candidates
brave enough to stand up against iwi control of councils. The direct link to this resource is www.nzcpr.com/local-body-
elections-2016 so please feel free to spread the word and help assist others in making their voting decisions.

Some iwi regard the notion that only elected representatives should have the right to vote on councils as old world thinking.
They seem to believe that Treaty settlement money and resources gives them a supreme right to by-pass democracy and
have their representatives appointed to sit and vote at council decision-making tables.

They are not only pressuring councils for this, but some are threatening them as well:

If iwi are not valued by their local community and encouraged, rather than discouraged, to participate and invest in
decision-making at all levels of council they will rightfully invest their economic and political influence in other
regions.

But in our view it is tribalism that is old world thinking, not democracy. A progressive society needs to respect cultural
differences but move into the future as one society with one sovereign and common laws. That view will no doubt continue to
attract the criticism of those who profit from a separatist agenda, and those like the Race Relations Office who are part of
that industry.
Iwi are also pushing for seats on local councils through the Treaty settlement process and central government is
capitulating with legislation to that effect.

Probably the best known case is that of the Independent Maori Statutory Board, which was established during Aucklands
amalgamation in 2010. The legislation states that the nine member board was set up as an advisory body with a
maximum of 2 persons to sit as members on each of the Auckland Councils committees that deal with the management and
stewardship of natural and physical resources.

The new Auckland Council however, appointed members onto many other Council committees and gave them voting rights.

The interesting question, therefore, is whether the candidates standing for the new Auckland Council would support a motion
to return the Statutory Board to the advisory role envisioned by the Government when the legislation was drawn up. In other
words, would they be prepared to take away the Boards representation on many of the Council committees and their voting
rights?

The reality is that New Zealand society does not want to be divided by race, even though this is being aggressively
promoted by the Human Rights Commission including putting increasing pressure on every local authority in the
country to adopt Maori wards.

While this move might find favour with the iwi elite, it most certainly is not supported by the vast majority of
communities, who simply want to keep race out of local politics.

So back to Lindsay Perigos question should our Human Rights laws be axed?

Its also question that is being asked in Australia and in Britain, where there is a growing recognition that there is no need to
protect individuals from the actions of others through human rights legislation.

With New Zealand already having an established Bill of Rights to limit the power of the state and protect our freedom, surely
its now time to abandon the legislative human rights approach, which is increasingly doing the opposite expanding the
power of the state and limiting our freedom!

The Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership (TTIP) Is Dead + Earthquakes

September 12 2016 | From: Geopolitics / VeteransToday

This is one of those incremental changes that we can celebrate on, but it doesnt mean that we can
let our guards down already.

The enemy is very cunning and knows how and when to play dead only to rise at some opportune time in the
future.

Related: Good News for the People of Europe: The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) Is Dead:.
Negotiations have Failed

This has been the case of the banishment of the Jesuits in the mid-18th century. Look where in the pyramid they are now.
Mass actions against corporate tyranny should be decisive and perpetual. Even better, refuse all rigged political exercises,
and legalized extortions.

Good News for the People of Europe: The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) Is Dead. Negotiations
have Failed.

The German Minister of Economy and Vice-Chancellor, Mr. Sigmar Gabriel, a few days ago has declared that the
European Union should not submit to the demands of the United States, referring to the negotiations on the TTIP
(Transatlantic Trade and Investments Partnership). He said the negotiations failed. By saying so, he joined French
Prime Minister, Manuel Valls, as well as French Secretary of State for External Trade, Mr. Matthias Fekl.

Related: The [Attempted] Final Control: TPP, TTIP, TISA Global Corporate Takeover

Negotiations started in 2013. After 14 rounds of talks dealing with 27 points, no agreement has been reached, none
whatsoever, leading to the conclusion that the deal is dead. Even though Mme. Merkel defended the treaty with all her heart
up to the end of July 2016, both Germany and France now request a definite end to the negotiations.

The collapse of the TTIP is one of the best news for Europe and I mean the people of Europe in recent times; an
initiative of the two major players in the EU.

This decision has several meanings:

1. European countries are gradually taking back their sovereignty from Brussels and decide for themselves what
is good for them and for Europe;

2. With a failed TTIP Europe escapes, or avoids, being enslaved by US corporatism, financial institutions and US
legislation;

3. Europe may now continue making its proper policies on socioeconomy, environment, food safety, agriculture -
and
 4. Europe is now freer to pursue its own monetary policy. Under the grip of the TTIP, it would have been difficult,
say impossible, to adopt a monetary policy outside of the Euro which many countries would like, openly or covertly
some without making a lot of noise for fear of being reprimanded by Brussels.

Related: The TPPA Is Worse Than We Thought: Environmental Risks, Runaway Corporate Power, Weakened
Democracy: A Total Corporate Power Grab

The fact that authorities of both, France and Germany, stated in unison that the negotiations failed, is a sign that there is still
a spirit of autonomy in Europe.

What is called negotiations were never really negotiations a give and take between equal partners. It was from the
beginning a one-way street, where the exceptional nation imposed its rules. There was no way of getting the slightest
concession from them not an iota.

No doubt Washington had no intention to share any of the benefits of this Free Trade Agreement with Europe.
The exceptional people wanted it all. For example, the term Appelation Contrle for wine and cheese in France and other
European countries, used to protect the farmers of a given region would have disappeared. The US wanted everything to
be open for the ever dictating market.

Nothing was to be clearly defined, as far as Europe was concerned. No transparence just a vast base for cheating,
consumers and nations.

TTIP talks were held in top secret, behind closed doors. Not even politicians, let alone the public at large which eventually
would have had to bear the consequences of the deal, had access to the documents being negotiated. It showed the
Machiavellian nature of empire at its best.

Related: TPP Posing Serious Threat To Global Internet Users

China knew very well why they were not even interested in participating in the TPP (Transpacific Partnership), a similar
trade agreement with eleven Pacific nations and the US.

Lets recall the key point that would have meant disaster for Europe:
 A private corporate tribunal that would have had supremacy over sovereign government legislation. For example,
the tribunal could have imposed sanctions or fines on governments, whose legislation, say for health, environmental
protection and other social reasons, would have reduced corporations profit margins.

Similar in the banking sector, monetary policy would have been firmly dictated by the FED, Wall Street (i.e.
Goldman Sachs see Greece and the head of the ECB, a former GS exec) and the European Central Bank. This for
now is still the case, but with an unsustainable and unreformable EU and Euro, both are destined to disappear sooner or
later. It is likely that many countries are already quietly and clandestinely arranging for Plan B preparing exit strategies.
Indeed, since BREXIT, there are numerous political movements to this effect under way and this not only in the most
devastatingly affected southern European countries, but also in northern Europe.

Agriculture policy would have been dictated by Washington, especially with regard to GMOs and ag-subsidies.
Monsanto and the like would have had free access to all of Europe, and none of the EU members could have passed
legislation prohibiting genetically modified seeds.

Standards for health and nutrition would have been imposed by Washington, i.e. by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA). Most of these standards are considerably weaker than European equivalents, potentially exposing
European citizens to greater health risks than current EU standards foresee.

Labor laws would have been weakened in according to US standards which foresee virtually no protection for
workers. The Brussels imposed new labor law in France, dubbed as the El Khomri law, after the French Minister of Labor,
Myriam El Khomri, would reduce significantly French labor rights, fought for and attained with decades of efforts literally
sweat and tears by French workers and unions.

Related: Auckland University Law Professor Jane Kelsey: Government Spin Won't Stop TPP Facts Emerging

The new French labor law, signed as a decree by PM Manuel Valls under a dubious special provision in the Constitution
(instead of being passed through Parliament), was a precursor for things to come in the rest of Europe had the TTIP gone
forward.

This controversial law is currently at the demand of more than 60 French Parliamentarians being reviewed by the
French Conseil dEtat (equivalent to other countries Supreme Court) and may quite possibly be either canceled or sent to
Parliament for a decision. Now that the TTIP is dead, it is possible that the law will be repealed.

Related: The Final Leaked TPP Text Is All That We Feared / What We Always Knew: The TPPA Is An Attack On
Sovereignty, Intellectual Property And Healthcare Just For Starters

The day the TTIP died was a great day for Europe. Although Europe is far from being out of the woods. Her own problems
keep piling up, many of them also a direct or indirect consequence of empire.
To mention just a few:

Immigration from US-NATO war-destroyed countries;

The never ending financial cum economic crisis;

The complete absence of solidarity among EU nations;

The lack of EU countries sovereignty; the missing EU Constitution giving member countries a common
perspective and political agenda;

The increasing (false flag) terror attacks throughout Europe; and not least NATO which through its
aggression towards Russia is increasingly becoming a risk of war of WWIII that would for the third time in 100
years devastate Europe.

Related: Obama Tries To Sneak Through TPP In Lame-Duck Congress

This time the rest of the world would very likely not be spared. Many countries are conscious of this danger and would like to
get out of NATO, but dont dare say so, because of fear from the boots of Washington.

Lets hope the death of the TTIP will bring a new breeze of fresh air and ideas into European sovereignty.

Related: The TPPA: New Zealands Democracy

Italy, The Phillipines And Oklahoma Get An Earthquake

If the tsunami in Sumatra in 2004 and the earthquakes in the Pacific Rim during 2011- 2012 taught
me anything, it is that tsunamis and earthquakes happen for a reason.

Related: Countries Sign The TPPA: Whatever Happened To The 'Debate' We Were Promised Before Signing?
As a recap, with regard to the former. The northern part of Sumatra was going to break away from the southern part
and nationalize their oil resources and free themselves from ExxonMobil. They were the worst hit in the tsunami of
2004. To quote from Wikipedia:

"Aceh has substantial natural resources, including oil and natural gas; some estimates put Aceh gas reserves as
being the largest in the world. Aceh was the closest point of land to the epicenter of the 2004 Indian Ocean
earthquake and tsunami, which devastated much of the western coast of the province.

Approximately 170,000 Indonesians were killed or went missing in the disaster. The disaster helped precipitate the
peace agreement between the government of Indonesia and the Free Aceh Movement (GAM).

A little bit too convenient dont you think?

With regard to the latter, the Pacific Rim and the countries within it just happen to also be party to the TPP agreements
which Obama is attempting to get signed and sealed before he leaves office.

Christchurch earthquake, New Zealand

I have to conclude that the earthquakes and tsunamis that hit this region, two examples being Christchurch in February
2011 and Fukushima in March and April of that year, were and in many instances still are weather warfare and methods of
persuasion against those who have attempted to resist the Pivot to Asia and the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement.

With regards to the Fukushima catastrophe, most people outside the loop cannot conceive or accept that such evil could be
perpetrated against the Japanese people. Those within the loop, many considered to be the tin foil hat brigade, are fully
aware that such evil intentions are not out of the realm of the global, corporate fascists agenda.

Japan, the only country who has experienced a full frontal nuclear attack, not once, but twice, in spite of being in the process
of surrendering at the end of WW2, has no such illusions.
For an in depth analysis of the TPP see: In The Court That Rules The World by Chris Hamby. Here is an extract:

Imagine a private, global super court that empowers corporations to bend countries to their will.

Say a nation tries to prosecute a corrupt CEO or ban dangerous pollution. Imagine that a company could turn to this super
court and sue the whole country for daring to interfere with its profits, demanding hundreds of millions or even billions of
dollars as retribution.

Imagine that this court is so powerful that nations often must heed its rulings as if they came from their own
supreme courts, with no meaningful way to appeal. That it operates unconstrained by precedent or any significant
public oversight, often keeping its proceedings and sometimes even its decisions secret.

That the people who decide its cases are largely elite Western corporate attorneys who have a vested interest in
expanding the courts authority because they profit from it directly, arguing cases one day, and then sitting in
judgment another. That some of them half-jokingly refer to themselves as The Club or The Mafia.

And imagine that the penalties this court has imposed have been so crushing - and its decisions so unpredictable - that
some nations dare not risk a trial, responding to the mere threat of a lawsuit by offering vast concessions, such as rolling
back their own laws or even wiping away the punishments of convicted criminals.

This system is already in place, operating behind closed doors in office buildings and conference rooms in cities
around the world. Known as investor-state dispute settlement, or ISDS, it is written into a vast network of treaties
that govern international trade and investment, including NAFTA and the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which
Congress must soon decide whether to ratify.

On the 24th of August 2016 an earthquake hit central Italy.

My condolences and sympathies go out to the Italians. But what interests me more here is the political and economic
background noise. On the 5th of July an Italian minister said:

"A free trade deal being negotiated by the European Union and the United States is at a dead end and an
agreement with Canada is also at risk.

I think (the TTIP deal) will fall through, and the agreement with Canada is at risk of doing the same. We have been
negotiating it for too long, Carlo Calenda, Italys industry minister said at an event in Rome.

Calenda said confidence in the negotiations was lacking.

The TTIP is the EU-US equivalent of the Pacific Rim/ Pivot to Asia/ TPP agreements.

On the 8th of July Alessandro Nicolette pointed out that the TTIP would be a disaster for the Italian economy.
 "The TTIP approval would see European markets invaded by approximately 1,300 chemical substances which are
forbidden by European law. In fact, there are more than 80 pesticides that are used in the US whose production
was blocked by the European Commission for being hazardous.

Moreover, there are animal growth hormones and genetically modified organisms among the banned substances
which are allowed in the US. Other EU banned practices, such as feeding antibiotics to animals or washing
chickens with chlorine are also permitted in the US

As the Italian Department of Economic Development pointed out, it entails the counterfeiting of Italian products in
the US and pushing the consumer to associate such products with the Italian original ones. According to the official
body, about 75% of Italian products abroad are not authentic, and it damages Italian production. The signing of
TTIP would bring Italian sounding products to Europe: another blow to Italian agro-food producers.

With regard to the Phillipines they have had ongoing weather disasters.
Philippines' President Rodrigo Duterte

Before Typhoon Hagupit struck in 2014, the government voted not to allow a US military base in their country. Shortly
afterwards a US military base was established. Since then they have had a number of earthquakes. The most recent on the
4th of September 2016.

Newly elected President Rodrigo Duterte is a mixed bag. He is cracking down on illegal drug trafficking, possibly paving the
way for Big Pharma patents on narcotics such as opium. Heroin junkies that are increasing world wide are not the only
market for this commodity, opium is an essential component in health care medication and pain relief for those who really
need it.

It is also big money for anyone with a patent on this product and when freely available through drug traffickers undermines
their profit margins.

So you have to wonder about the Philippine governments war on narco-politics, and the killing of over 400 drug dealers
that has reportedly led to an additional 500,000 turning themselves in

Duterte: Ill really have you killed My order is shoot to kill you. I dont care about human rights, you
better believe me.my mouth has no due process.

Duterte has also promised the voters free wi-fi (more opportunity for Google and social media brainwashing), lower taxes,
polygamy being legalised, (will pedophilia and child marriages also be included considering that child sex trafficking is rife in
Asia?) and higher wages for government employees.
He wants to lift foreign investment limitations and join the TPP. This is in stark contrast to current legislation:

Duterte has expressed interest in granting foreign investors access to sectors currently restricted to
Philippine nationals and allowing them to own at least 70 percent and possibly up to 100 percent of
companies they establish in the country, up from the current limit of 40 percent. Getting rid of the so-
called 60:40 rule should pose a challenge, however, as it requires amending the countrys 1987
constitution."

Sectors that are currently heavily restricted to foreign access include:

Mass media and broadcasting

Retail trade

Domestic shipping

Pharmaceuticals

Advertising

Public services

Small-scale mining

Private security

Utilization of marine resources

While there is no guarantee that all or even many currently restricted industries will be opened to foreign investment if
Duterte successfully amends the constitution, there could still be significant opportunities on the horizon in these largely
untapped sectors.

Further, Duterte has also indicated support for joining the TPP, which in itself could require altering the constitution due to
foreign ownership restrictions. However, it appears that he will maintain restrictions on foreign ownership of land, which is
currently limited to long-term leasing.

Which makes me conclude that Duterte is a Trojan Horse.

In many of his campaign promises he has said that he will make congress illegal. This would pave the way towards getting
rid of major obstacles and politicians that currently block TPP agreements and getting rid of foreign investment limitations as
they currently stand.

If the newly appointed President, who shows all the signs of becoming yet another CIA Kissingertype dictator and
Pinochet/ Videla/ Suharto clone, does not succeed in bringing the country into compliance with corporate fascist
monopolistic globalist ambitions, then a few more earthquakes and a couple more tornadoes just might be needed in order
to get the message across.

Weather Warfare

"The significant expansion in Americas weather warfare arsenal, which is a priority of the Department of Defense
is not a matter for debate or discussion.

While, environmentalists blame the Bush administration for not having signed the Kyoto protocol, the issue of
weather warfare, namely the manipulation of weather patterns for military use is never mentioned."

The US Air Force has the capability of manipulating climate either for testing purposes or for outright military-intelligence
use. These capabilities extend to the triggering of floods, hurricanes, droughts and earthquakes.
In recent years, large amounts of money have been allocated by the US Department of Defense to further developing and
perfecting these capabilities.

"Weather modification will become a part of domestic and international security and could be done unilaterally It
could have offensive and defensive applications and even be used for deterrence purposes.

The ability to generate precipitation, fog, and storms on earth or to modify space weather, and the production of
artificial weather all are a part of an integrated set of technologies which can provide substantial increase in US, or
degraded capability in an adversary, to achieve global awareness, reach, and power."

- US Air Force, Air University of the US Air Force, AF 2025 Final Report

Dady Chery (News Junkie Post) who has investigated the activities of the Clinton Family Foundation, the
earthquake and the rape of Haiti said in a recent interview @ 85 mins:

I think the reason that they do not want people to look too closely at Haiti is because Haiti is such a perfect
example of what a Clinton administration would be. And I want people to keep in mind that we are heading toward
a situation where we are going to have more planetary change disasters.

We are going to have more floods, we are going to have more hurricanes if Clinton becomes president and stays
president for the next eight years.

We can expect that there might be a major hurricane that causes a major disaster in the Gulf for example and
other kinds of disasters in the United States. In Haiti we have a pretty good idea how the Clintons would handle
this
On the Saturday the 3rd of September an earthquake struck Green County Oklahoma.

The strongest out of hundreds that have occurred since 2009. Other than their land what else does the Pawnee nation have
that anyone could possibly want? Or have the Pawnee been too active in stopping the Dakota oil pipeline for comfort and is
this an earthquake war?

Dakota Access Pipeline Sage Turns Violent Amid Largest Gathering Of Native Americans Since The Little
Bighorn

In what has become the largest gathering of Native Americans in more than 100 years, a coalition of dozens of
tribes across the country oppose the pipelines construction, citing concerns that it would put the Missouri River
as well as the network of lakes and tributaries that the Big Muddy is connected to at risk of contamination via oil
spill and lead to the destruction of culturally significant sites for the Sioux tribes in the area.

Saturdays clash began when a group of several hundred protestors gathered near construction crews on Saturday
afternoon at a site close to the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation. The demonstrators aimed to act as a human
shield against the pipelines further development, after the removal of topsoil from a 150-feet wide and 2-mile long
portion of land caused devastating damage to the tribes sacred lands.

Stop construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline which endangers the water supply to Native American
reservations.

The Dakota Access pipeline is set to be constructed near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation in North
Dakota, crossing under the Missouri River which is the only source of water to the reservation. The
 pipeline is planned to transport approximately 470,000 barrels of crude oil per day. The potential of oil
leaks would contaminate the only source of water for the reservation.

While Dakota Access claims oil leaks are unlikely, an oil leak from a separate pipeline in North Dakota was
discovered (8/15/16) to have leaked over 500 barrels of oil since the leak began on July 19, 2016. You can
read the article here: http://bit.ly/2aVm5cv. A leak like this from the Dakota Access pipeline would leave the
Standing Rock Sioux without any clean water.

Or - are we talking natural gas reserves and Fracking in Green County, which the Pawnee would be correct in resisting.

Space Weather makes an oh so brief reference to it when covering the earthquake in Oklahoma at 1.50 mins and if you
are not up to speed on the damage that Fracking does to the groundwater, soil, air and contributes to health hazards
causing cancer for one, here is what Bernie Saunders thinks of it.

The 5th Eye

September 11 2016 | From: NZIFF / CutCutCut

This densely packed doco from the directors of Operation 8 questions the price of New Zealands
involvement in the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, and relates the improbable tale of its 2008
sabotage by the Waihopai Three.
If our PM or the relevant public servants feel truly comfortable about New Zealands participation in the Five Eyes
intelligence alliance, it doesnt show when they are seen explaining it, defending it, or downright refusing to talk
about it in this documentary.

The disavowals we see are a matter of public record, but filmmakers Errol Wright and Abi King-Jones (Operation 8) embed
those TV interviews, parliamentary declamations and media ops in a concise history of New Zealands post war dependency
on the United States.

For lucid, more confidently-held commentary, the filmmakers turn to inveterate watchdogs such as Nicky Hager, Jane
Kelsey, Murray Horton and Paul Buchanan, but evolve a position of their own through the accumulation and agile
juxtaposition of some very telling material.

They also thread an unlikely tale of protest through this scenario, following the actions of the three earnest bumblers who,
against all odds, successfully damaged the Waihopai spy station in 2008. A priest, a subsistence farmer and a teacher, they
acted out of Christian conviction, claiming Five Eyes implicated New Zealanders in the murder of children in Iraq.
When they ran that argument in court, the jury acquitted them. No Crown witness was summoned to contradict them. When
the GCSB has been so often in the news, with Kim Dotcom frequently in tow, theres likely to be an audience, less heroic
perhaps, thats simply grateful to this film for providing a blow-by-blow account of the GCSBs misadventures and their
expanding powers to make suspects of all of us.

For screening information visit: NZIFF

Jeremy Corbyn: 9/11 Was 'Manipulated' + Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK
And Israel As Being The Actual 9/11 Terrorists & RT Declares 9/11 An Inside Job
September 29 2015 | From: TheTelegraph / MethodicalDeception / WorldTruthTV / RT

In comments that will raise questions about his suitability to lead the Labour Party, Mr Corbyn
appeared to blame George Bush and Tony Blair for using the September 11 attacks in New York to
allow them to go to war. Comment: If you are like me you are sick of the flogging of the 9/11 horse -
however busting this wide open is a key necessity and the developments just keep coming...
Jeremy Corbyn has claimed that 9/11 was "manipulated" to make it look like Osama Bin Laden was responsible to
allow the West to go to war in Afghanistan. [And he has the corrupt cabal-western governments crapping
themselves].

Note: This article and the following article are archival

They have been reposted because of their importance and significance given the date today. Anybody who
now cannot see that the events of September 11 2001 were visited upon the world by 'the cabal' is either in
dential or they have rocks in their head.

New Related Articles:

Scientific Study: Towers Collapsed Due To Controlled Demolition

The Tyranny of 9/11: The Building Blocks of the American Police State from A-Z

9/11 Unanswered Questions: Mysterious September 11, 2001 Breakfast Meeting on Capitol Hill

The Destruction of All Three World Trade Center Skyscrapers on September 11, 2001, The Collapse of
WTC 7

The Post 9/11 Era: Fifteen Years of Americas War on Terror. Years of Horror inflicted on the People of
the Middle East

Video: 9/11 Opens up an Era of Crisis, Social Upheaval and Global Warfare. The Crimes Committed in the
Name of 9/11

September 11, 2001: The 15th Anniversary of the Crime and Cover-up of the Century

Saudi Arabias Alleged Involvement in the 9/11 Attacks and the 28 Pages: Red-Herring, Propaganda Ploy
 The Propaganda Preparation of 9/11: The Mysterious Death of John ONeill, FBI Counterterror Chief in
Charge of the Osama bin Laden Investigation

Given the exceptionally grave nature of this admission and its repercussions, one would suppose that Baer has
been questioned by other media and/or the FBI and made to discuss in detail precisely who it was who cashed out
and how he knew about the 9/11 plot in advance. But one would be wrong. Since making this stunning admission to
the cameras of We Are Change Los Angeles, no one has ever asked Baer for more information about the case.

In comments that will raise questions about his suitability to lead the Labour Party, Mr Corbyn appeared to blame George
Bush and Tony Blair for using the September 11 attacks in New York to allow them to go to war.

In a series of further articles, Mr Corbyn also appears to endorse controversial conspiracy theories about a New World
Order.

...

Mr Corbyn was heavily criticised in the days before winning the Labour leadership after suggesting that the [apparent] death
of Osama Bin Laden was a tragedy. In the 2003 article for The Morning Star newspaper, Mr Corbyn wrote:

"Historians will study with interest the news manipulation of the past 18 months. After September 11, the claims
that bin Laden and al-Qaida had committed the atrocity were quickly and loudly made.

This was turned into an attack on the Taliban and then, subtly, into regime change in Afghanistan.

However, in previous years he wrote a series of articles which appear to have endorsed the conspiracy theory about the New
World Order.

The New World Order conspiracy is frequently linked to theories about the so-called Illuminati and claims about a
totalitarian world government.

In an article for Labour Briefing in 1991, Mr Corbyn wrote:

"We now know that the Gulf War was a curtain-raiser for the New World Order: the rich and powerful, white and
western will be able to maintain the present economic order with free use of all the weapons they wish for.

That same year, he said in Socialist Campaign Group News:

"The aim of the war machine of the United States is to maintain a world order dominated by the banks and
multinational companies of Europe and North America.
The following year, in a piece for Labour Peace Action, Mr Corbyn said:

"What is required now is a bold, democratic alternative to the New World Order. The US veto at the Earth summit
in Rio... shows just who calls the shots in this New World Order and who will be asked to foot the bill.

Mr Corbyn has previously shared a platform with Ken O'Keefe, who has alleged that President Bush was a member of The
New World Order who had orchestrated the September 11 attacks for personal gain.

The phrase was also used in a speech by George H.W Bush. Mr Corbyns spokesman refused to deny that the new Labour
leader was referring to the New World Order conspiracy theory in his articles.

Related: Gordon Campbell on the PMs TPP concessions on medicines

9/11: From Cheney to MOSSAD

From: MethodicalDeception

On Thursday, September 9, 2015 author Rebekah Roth was interviewed about her new book 'Methodical Deception'.
New information she has recovered about the 9/11 false flag event will shock you to your core. This bombshell
evidence destroys the "official story", forever. Israeli Mossad involvement in the 9/11 false flag attacks can no longer
be denied.

Further Related Detail: Preparing the WTC for Destruction

To watch the FULL 75+ minute SGT Report interview click here.

Russia Presents Evidence Against US, UK And Israel as Being The Actual 9/11
Terrorists
Undoubtedly the 9/11 attacks on New York City and Washington DC are the most misrepresented by officialdom in
US history.
 "9/11 was an Anglo-American black operation executed in collusion with Israeli Secret Services and Saudi Arabian
financiers.

- 9/11 Investigator

Whereas the assassination of John F. Kennedy is now understood to have been a classic CIA Execution Plan, it does not
come close to 9/11 in terms of the number and magnitude of outright falsehoods, misleading statements, fake science and
fraudulent facts submitted by officials and agents of the US Government.

The official 9/11 Commission Report stands as the most fabricated document ever produced by US tax dollars. Not only did
the investigation avoid every serious inquiry about how two steel frame building came down after being dustified in NYC, it
also subverted every initiative to ferret out the truth.

It appears that Russia has been conducting systematic data dumps on 9/11, the release of which represents more factual
information on the attacks than any US Government source. In the wake of the Anglo-American coup dtat conducted by the
CIA and MI6 in Kiev, it appears that Russia has no more patience for Western interference.

Especially when nations are destabilized on Russias borders do the stakes in this highly consequential geopolitical chess
match go up.

Since Vladimir Putin has no intention of starting World War 3, he can only respond to US-EU meddling by using asymmetric
warfare on the internet. Were the American people to understand that the US Federal Government perpetrated the 9/11
destruction, everything would change in a heartbeat.

Because the Obama Administration has shown no sign of aborting its planned takeover of the Ukraine, Russia is left with very
few, but still quite potent options.
 Operation Terror
The 9/11 story you are not supposed to
know.
Based on actual under-reported 9/11 events.

James McCullough from the mysterious "Council" gives

a special assignment to CIA agent Aaron Delgado to
attack the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and
pin the blame on Muslim Terrorists.

Delgado and fellow agents, Phillip Singer and Chase

Jordan, work with a group of unsuspecting engineers to
develop unmanned jets that will hit their assigned
targets.The Army and the FBI begin to uncover the plot,
forcing Delgado to intervene.

The CIA agents also have to deal with an increasingly

suspicious George Poole, the lead engineer working on
the drones, who becomes skeptical on how the remote
controlled planes will be used. A

battle between good and evil ensues as the plot to

attack America becomes a hard-hitting reality.

See the trailer below and the full movie

at: OperationTerror

The following excerpt recently appeared on an alternative news website - Veterans Today - under the subtitle Too Classified
to Publish. Essentially this unprecedented release of ultra-secret and highly classified information illustrates Putins new tack
toward Western intractability. Simply put, Russia will no longer stand by idly while the Anglo-American Juggernaut projects it
power wherever it so chooses.

"Too Classified to Publish"

According to a retired FXX agent specializing in Israeli counter intel: The type of nuclear devices used on 911 were a modified
version of the W-54 nuclear artillery shells that were covertly provided to the Israelis between 1988 and 1998 from US surplus
stockpiles illegally exported during the Bush/Clinton era.

Chemical analysis done by DOE Sandi was able to identify the chemical/radiation footprint or fingerprint of the warheads
based on samples taken after 911 of the fallout at ground zero. (Editors note: Nuclear weapon use at ground zero is
confirmed from multiple sources)

All plutonium based warheads have a chemical fingerprint that can identify the type of design and where the PU was made
and how old it is. This was the 911 blackmail on Bush 1 and 2, the illegal transfer of surplus US nuclear weapons to the
Israelis and why the continued cover up, along with the stolen gold and stock fraud that was going on Wall Street etc.
According to file ENW57.pdf on page 66. (Editors note: Document received and confirmed)
Only a 2 kiloton device was needed to drop the buildings. A 2 kiloton device will produce a fireball of apx 150 to 200 feet in
diameter at over 4000 degrees Centigrade. Just large enough to melt the I beams of the central core of the building and drop
them in place.

The light flash would last less than 1 second and primarily be in the UV light range. Overpressure would only be at 60PSI max
and directed upwards with the blast. See underground effect.

Fallout would be minimal and located to within ground zero range only. Radiation would drop to acceptable levels within 72
hrs. after the blast. Most fall out was trapped in the cement dust thus causing all of the recent cancer deaths that we are now
seeing in NYC amongst first responders. (Editors note: Consistent with site data)
High FluxIsotope Reactor Core Cross Section

Melted steel and iron oxide or nano thermite is a byproduct of the very high gamma ray / Neutron flux induced into the
central steel core. The radiation dissolves the steel into iron oxide consuming the carbon and silicone in the steel.

This explains the missing steel columns and the very important clue of the vaporized 20 ton antenna tower atop the south
tower. The upward blast of radiation literally vaporized it. Video evidence proves this to be true. (Editors note: Tower issue a
vital one.)

The total XXOO data file from DOE Sandia on the 911 event is well over 72 MB. P.S. Snowden didnt have a Q clearance so
he missed this one. Carnaberry had a pretty good stash of documents on the subject. (All under the transit stuff.) The entire
nuclear nonproliferation story of stolen nuclear material coming from Russia was an Israeli cover story to hide the original
source of weapons material coming from the US stock piles. (Editors note: Fully confirmed)

Illegal distribution of US nuclear material to foreign allies was not limited to Israel. Virtually all NATO allies were in on this
scam too. Dick Cheney was the bad guy on this one. Bush2/Cheney traded nuclear pits to foreign country as IOUs in order to
get what they wanted. Tom Countryman a well-known Israeli operative is curiously now in charge of N.N.P. at the State
Department under Obama.(?) He was put there by Ram Emanuel.
 It appears that the weapon of choice for the Israelis were
the W-54 and follow on series of nuclear pits taken from the
Amarillo TX storage dump. This was what Carnaberry was
working on for Bush senior in Houston.

A total of over 350 pits were transferred to the Israelis over

a 10 to 20 year period of time. The W-54 type of pit design
were the most desirable due to the 2 point implosion pit
design.

This is the easiest to re manufacture and modify as

compared to other circular pit designs.

The pill shaped design of the W-54 type weapon contains

over 1.5 times more plutonium than a standard pit. This
Early Israeli core model would allow enough Plutonium to be recovered that was still
of weapons grade use even after 32 plus years of age.
Americium build up in the pit over time eventually makes the Pit unusable as a weapon so they have a limited shelf life based
on how fast or slow the Plutonium was produce in the reactor at Stanford.

Usually it was about 150 days max. Irradiation time in the reactor during production determines the shelf life of the pit as
weapons grade material. All of the micro nukes used by the Israelis are re-manufactured W-54 type series devices.

Khazelov confirmed this a micro nuke bombing

These devices were used in the Bali bombing and the London bombing and in Japan on their reactors. (Editors note: Nuclear
weapon use in Bali confirmed) Also used in Damascus, Iraq and Afghanistan by the US. (Editors note: Multiple confirmation
including site samples.)
These are stored in most Israelite embassies for ease of deployment. The ones used on 911 were kept at the Israeli
consulate in NYC until put in place. After 911 the FBI now checks all diplomatic pouches with a Geiger counter before
entering or leaving the US.

The South African weapons were also surplus W-54 artillery shells acquired from Israeli and final assembly and testing was
done in South Africa with Israel assistance. (Editors note: This explains Pelendaba production issues.)

Note the melted rock under the foundations of the WTC in the two images above - this can only be caused by the extremely intense heat generated in
a nuclear detonation

This was done because the Israelis needed a testing ground in order to make sure that there rebuilt weapons would work as
designed. (Editors note: Testing on Sept. 22, 1979 multiple confirmations.) The North Korean weapons are also of the 155
mm artillery design as provided by Israel.

The true North Korean nuclear weapons program is based on nuclear artillery use and not missiles. The plan is to use a
massive artillery barge on South Korea if war breaks out this include the use of small nuclear artillery shells to counter US
tanks rockets and artillery.

The Saudis also have a stash of W-54s acquired from the US under Bush2. (Editors note: Confirmed) The Israelis have also
provided them to India, Brazil, China, Taiwan, Japan, North and South Korea etc. (Editors note: All but South Korea
confirmed. Canada had been believed to be the source of Brazilian nuclear weapons.) Dimona is a standard 75 megawatt
thermal open top reactor as used in France for their plutonium weapons production program, their version of
Stanford (Editors note: Probably Hanford).
Dismona, Israel

Due to over use as a fast breeder reactor by the Israelis, Dimona suffered a steam explosion IE a flash over indecent due to
neutron criticality back in the late 1980s under Bush 1. This shut down its operation for many years until repairs could be
made.

It know only operates at very low power levels due to neutron absorption damage to the containment vessel. Now mainly use
for isotope production. This forced the Israelis to turn to stolen nuclear stock piles from the US for the continuation of their
nuclear program.

The Israelis knowing that the nuclear material that they had acquire only had a limited shelf life left before it was no longer
usable as weapons grade then tried to dump it on the surplus market as fast as possible before it was of no use to them. So
they dumped it on unsuspecting nations who would only sit on it and not be able to test it. These were the fissile tests in North
Korea. (Editors note: Confirmed, multiple sources)

When everybody caught on to the scam such as Japan and Korea. (IE the Korean sub sinkings etc) they were angry because
they paid big bucks for junk. This started a mini cold war with Israel and her old clients. However with micro nukes even as
the plutonium ages it will still fissile producing a smaller size detonation well under 2 kiloton in size.
So they can still be used as small dirty bombs or as very small tactical nukes such as the nuclear artillery strikes on
Damascus with rocket assisted W-54s. (Editors note: Confirmed strike, May 4, 2013) On the W-54 pit design it is pill shaped
and it is only about 4 inches in diameter and weighs about 24 pounds.

Most of the fuel is consumed in the plasma fire ball when detonated so there is very little plutonium fallout left to escape. If it is
salted with other materials the fallout can be even reduced to lower levels such as in an enhanced radiation device or the so
called neutron bomb. This is what was used on 911.

The primary purpose of the nuclear weapon used on 911 was to produce a massive Gamma ray / neutron flux that would
vaporize about 150 to 300 feet of 6 inch thick steal I-beams that constituted the central core of the WTC buildings. This
created a free fall event as seen on TV that day.
Evidence was also found of demolition charges being placed on an angle on key structural suports. This was confirmed by demolition experts as being
a technique used to generate a free-fall demolition within a buildings own footprint

The flash would be hidden from sight due to the underground detonation. Most of the light was in the non-visible light
spectrum any way. Over pressure would be reduced to 6 psi due to the blast traveling up the central core and neutron
radiation vaporizing the TV antenna at the top of the building as see on TV.

The fallout would be mainly vaporized concrete cement and iron oxide. This is why after 911 they told everyone on TV that
the beta radiation burns that people were getting were due to the caustic cement dust and not due to the radiation effects
from the radioactive cement fallout. (Editors note: Fully confirmed)
The iron oxide found all over the place was what was left of the steel I beams. This was the so called Nano Thermite that was
found everywhere. Fallout was limited to a 1 mile area around down town NYC. See charts. (Editors note: Received)

Radiation decay was reduced to safe low levels after 72 hrs., (Editors note: Fully confirmed) outside of ground zero its self.
This is why the area was blocked off from the public for 3 days after the event, in order to let the radiation drop to safe levels.

If you read this excerpt closely, you can clearly see that Russia means business. It is what they did not say - directly - that
makes this data-dump so poignant and dangerous to the Anglo-American power structure.

RT Declares 9/11 Was An Inside Job

United States Government Intentionally Destroyed 9/11 Evidence

June 9 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / WashingtonsBlog

If the story that the US government told us about 9/11 were true, why did the government destroy
the evidence, lie to the 9/11 Commission, and prevent a real investigation?

The clear and indisputable answer is that if the evidence had not been destroyed and a real investigation had
occurred, the conclusion would have been that 9/11 was an inside job designed to give the neoconservatives their
new Pearl Harbor necessary to launch their wars in the Middle East.

Related: Is the War on Terror a Falsity?

The extraordinary gullibility of the American people is responsible for 15 years of warfare, destroyed countries, and millions
of dead, maimed, orphaned, and displaced people, and for the rise of a police state in the United States. The ignorance and
gullibility of the American people are responsible for these massive crimes against humanity and for Americans loss of their
constitutionall protections.

Presumption of a Cover-Up

Judges and lawyers know that if someone intentionally destroys evidence hes probably trying to hide his
crime. American law has long recognized that destruction of evidence raises a presumption of guilt for the person who
destroyed the evidence.

So what does it mean when the US government intentionally destroyed massive amounts of evidence related to 9/11?

Related: CIA Veteran Announces Live on RT That All Terrorist Attacks in US Are False Flags

Judge and Prosecutor Destroy Evidence

For example, it was revealed last week that the judge overseeing the trial of surviving 9/11 suspects conspired with the
prosecution to destroy evidence relevant to a key suspects defense. And see this.

(The Defense Department has also farmed out most of the work of both prosecuting and defending the surviving 9/11
suspects to the same private company. And the heads of the military tribunal prosecuting the 9/11 suspects said that the
trials must be rigged so that there are no acquittals.)

Destruction of Videotapes

The CIA videotaped the interrogation of 9/11 suspects, falsely told the 9/11 Commission that there were no videotapes or
other records of the interrogations, and then illegally destroyed all of the tapes and transcripts of the interrogations.
Related: Obama Administration Caught Conspiring to Destroy Key 9/11 Evidence in Trial at Gitmo

9/11 Commission co-chairs Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton wrote:

Those who knew about those videotapes - and did not tell us about them - obstructed our investigation."

And:

Daniel Marcus, a law professor at American University who served as general counsel for the Sept. 11
commission and was involved in the discussions about interviews with Al Qaeda leaders, said he had heard
nothing about any tapes being destroyed."

If tapes were destroyed, he said, its a big deal, its a very big deal, because it could amount to obstruction of
justice to withhold evidence being sought in criminal or fact-finding investigations."

Related: How the CIA Writes History

Destruction of Air Traffic Control Tapes

The tape of interviews of air traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11 was intentionally destroyed by crushing the cassette by hand,
cutting the tape into little pieces, and then dropping the pieces in different trash cans around the building as shown by this
NY Times article (summary version is free; full version is pay-per-view) and by this article from the Chicago Sun-Times.
Black Boxes

The FBI long ago found and analyzed the black box recorders from the airplanes which hit the Twin Towers, but
has consistently denied that they were ever found.

Pentagon Fibs

The 9/11 Commissioners concluded that officials from the Pentagon lied to the Commission, and considered
recommending criminal charges for such false statements.

Soviet-Style Minders

The chairs of both the 9/11 Commission and the Official Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 said that Soviet-style government
minders obstructed the investigation into 9/11 by intimidating witnesses (and see this).

In other words, the minders obstructed witnesses from openly and candidly talking about what they knew.

Undermining Investigation

President Bush and Vice-President Cheney took the rare step of personally requesting that congress limit all 9/11
investigation solely to intelligence failures.
The administration also opposed the creation of a 9/11 commission. Once it was forced (by pressure from widows of 9-11
victims) to allow a commission to be formed, the administration appointed as executive director an administration insider,
whose area of expertise is the creation and maintenance of public myths thought to be true, even if not actually true, who
was involved in pre-9/11 intelligence briefings, and who was one of the key architects of the pre-emptive war doctrine.

This executive director, who controlled what the Commission did and did not analyze, then limited the scope of the
Commissions inquiry so that the overwhelming majority of questions about 9/11 remained unasked (see this and this).

The administration then starved the commission of funds. The government spent $175 million over $300 million in todays
dollars investigating the Challenger space shuttle disaster. It spent $152 million on the the Columbia disaster
investigation. It spent $30 million investigating the Monica Lewinsky scandal. But the government only authorized $15
million for the 9/11 Commission.
The government also failed to provide crucial documents to the 9/11 investigators. And see this.

The government refused to share much information with the Commission, refused to force high-level officials to testify under
oath, and allowed Bush and Cheney to be questioned jointly.

Moreover, as reported by ACLU, FireDogLake, RawStory and many others, declassified documents shows that Senior
Bush administration officials sternly cautioned the 9/11 Commission against probing too deeply into the terrorist
attacks of September 11, 2001.

The 9-11 Commission took this warning to heart, and refused to examine virtually any evidence which contradicted the
administrations official version of events. As stated by the State Departments Coordinator for Counterterrorism who was
the point man for the U.S. governments international counterterrorism policy in the first term of the Bush administration
there were things the [9/11] commissions wanted to know about and things they didnt want to know about.

Saudi Role
Investigation into Saudi government aid to 9/11 conspirators was also obstructed.

For example, Philip Shenon the 20-year New York Times reporter who wrote a book on the 9/11 Commission reports:

The [911] commissioner said the renewed public debate could force a spotlight on a mostly unknown chapter of
the history of the 9/11 commission: behind closed doors, members of the panels staff fiercely protested the
way the material about the Saudis was presented in the final report, saying it underplayed or ignored
evidence that Saudi officials especially at lower levels of the government were part of an al-Qaida
support network that had been tasked to assist the hijackers after they arrived in the US.

In fact, there were repeated showdowns, especially over the Saudis, between the staff and the
commissions hard-charging executive director, University of Virginia historian Philip Zelikow, who joined
the Bush administration as a senior adviser to the secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, after leaving the
commission.

The staff included experienced investigators from the FBI, the Department of Justice and the CIA, as well as the
congressional staffer who was the principal author of the 28 pages.

Zelikow fired a staffer, who had repeatedly protested over limitations on the Saudi investigation, after she
obtained a copy of the 28 pages outside of official channels.

Other staffers described an angry scene late one night, near the end of the investigation, when two
investigators who focused on the Saudi allegations were forced to rush back to the commissions offices
after midnight after learning to their astonishment that some of the most compelling evidence about a
Saudi tie to 9/11 was being edited out of the report or was being pushed to tiny, barely readable footnotes
and endnotes.
 The staff protests were mostly overruled.

***

But Kean, Hamilton and Zelikow clearly do not speak for a number of the other commissioners, who have
repeatedly suggested they are uncomfortable with the perception that the commission exonerated Saudi
Arabia and who have joined in calling for public release of the 28 pages."

Indeed, an FBI informant hosted and rented a room to two hijackers in 2000. Specifically, investigators for the Congressional
Joint Inquiry discovered that an FBI informant had hosted and even rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when
the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and
that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House.

As the New York Times notes:

Senator Bob Graham, the Florida Democrat who is a former chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee,
accused the White House on Tuesday of covering up evidence.

The accusation stems from the Federal Bureau of Investigations refusal to allow investigators for a Congressional
inquiry and the independent Sept. 11 commission to interview an informant, Abdussattar Shaikh, who had been the
landlord in San Diego of two Sept. 11 hijackers."
Letting Terrorists Go Free

A former FBI translator who Senators Leahy and Grassley, among others, have claimed is credible, and who the
administration has gagged for years without any logical basis - has stated that this administration knowingly and
intentionally let many directly or indirectly involved in that terrorist act [September 11th] go free untouched and
uninvestigated?

Destruction of Physical Evidence

The former head of fire science and engineering for the agency responsible for finding out why the Twin Towers and World
Trade Center 7 collapsed on 9/11 (the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology) who is one of the worlds
leading fire science researchers and safety engineers, with a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering wrote that evidence
necessary to determine the cause of the collapse of the World Trade Centers was being destroyed. And see this.

Note the demolition charges going off...

In addition, the official investigators themselves were largely denied access to the site and the evidence contained there, or
even access to such basic information as the blueprints for the World Trade Center.

The government has also refused to release the computer models showing how the trade centers fell, making it impossible
for anyone to double-check its assumptions.
Whether you believe the Twin Towers and World Trade Center building 7 were brought down with explosives or by airplanes
and fires, destroying evidence prevented engineers and scientists from figuring out what went wrong to prevent
skyscrapers from collapsing in the future.

9/11 Commissioners Disgusted and Call For a New Investigation

The 9/11 Commissioners publicly expressed anger at cover ups and obstructions of justice by the government into
a real 9/11 investigation:

9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says I dont believe for a minute we got everything right, that the
Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, and that the 9/11 debate
should continueThe 9/11 Commission chair said the Commission was set up to fail

The Commissions co-chairs said that the CIA (and likely the White House) obstructed our investigation
 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative
to what we outlined in our version . . . We didnt have access . . . .

9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were
getting

9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: It is a national scandal; This
investigation is now compromised; and One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11
issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up. When asked in 2009 if he thought
there should be another 9/11 commission, Cleland responded: There should be about fifteen 9/11 commissions

The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) who led the 9/11 staffs inquiry said At some level
of the government, at some point in timethere was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened. He
also said I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described. The tapes told a radically
different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. This is not spin. This is not true.

The Co-Chair of the congressional investigation into 9/11 Bob Graham and 9/11 Commissioner and former
Senator Bob Kerrey are calling for either a PERMANENT 9/11 commission or a new 9/11 investigation to get to
the bottom of it

9/11 Commissioner John Lehman says that a new investigation should be vigorously pursued

Planting False Evidence

Planting false evidence is another act which creates presumption of guilt.

The type of torture used by the U.S. on alleged surviving 9/11 co-conspirators is of a special type. Senator Levin revealed
that the the U.S. used Communist torture techniques specifically aimed at creating FALSE confessions. (and
see this, this, this and this).

According to NBC News:

Much of the 9/11 Commission Report was based upon the testimony of people who were tortured

At least four of the people whose interrogation figured in the 9/11 Commission Report have claimed that they told
interrogators information as a way to stop being tortured

One of the Commissions main sources of information was tortured until he agreed to sign a confession that he
was NOT EVEN ALLOWED TO READ

The 9/11 Commission itself doubted the accuracy of the torture confessions, and yet kept their doubts to
themselves

Pulitzer-prize winning reporter Seymour Hersh who broke the Iraq torture and Vietnam massacre stories writes:

Many of the investigators believe that some of the initial clues that were uncovered about the terrorists identities
and preparations, such as flight manuals, were meant to be found.

A former high-level intelligence official told me, Whatever trail was left was left deliberately - for the F.B.I. to
chase.

I Am A Syrian Living In Syria: It Was Never A Revolution Nor A Civil War: The
Terrorists Are Sent By Your Government
September 10 2016 | From: GlobalResearch

"Your Obama and whoever is behind him or above him are supporting al Qaeda and leading a
proxy war on my country. We thought you are against al Qaeda and now you support them."
Two years ago, Majd wrote these words on a Facebook posting:

Related: 10 Facts the Mainstream Media Wont Tell You About the War in Syria

I am Syrian living in Syria in the middle of everything. We have seen horrors. It was never a revolution nor a civil
war. The terrorists are sent by your goverment.

They are al Qaeda Jabhat al Nusra Wahhabi Salafists Talibans etc and the like extremists jihadists sent by the
West and the Saudis and Qatar and Turkey.

Your Obama and whoever is behind him or above him are supporting al Qaeda and leading a proxy war on my
country. We thought you are against al Qaeda and now you support them.

The majority here loves Assad. He has never committed a crime against his own peoplethe chemical attack was
staged by the terrorists helped by USA and UK etc..everyone knows that here. American soldiers and people
should not be supporting barbarian al Qaeda terrorists who are killing Christians, Muslims in my country and
everyone.

Every massacre has committed by them. We were all happy in Syria= we have free school and university
education available for everyone, free healthcare, no GMO, no fluoride, no chemtrails, no Rothschild IMF-
controlled bank, state owned central bank which gives 11% interest, we are self-sufficient and have no foreign debt
to any country or bank.

Life before the crisis was so beautiful here. Now it is hard and horrific in some regions.

I do not understand how the good and brave American people can accept to bomb my country who has never
harmed them and therefore help the barbarian al Qaeda . These animals slit throats and behead for pleasure
they behead babies and rape young kids.

They are satanic. Our military helped.by the millions of civilian militias are winning the battle against al Qaeda..but
now the usa want to bomb the shit out of us so the al Qaeda can get the upper hand .

Please help us American people. They are destroying the cradle of civilization. Stop your government.
 Impeach that bankster puppet ape you have as president support Ron Paul or Rand or anyone the like who are
true American patriots. but be sure of one.thing.. if they attack and I think they will.it will be hell.

Be sure that it be world war and many many will die. Syria can and will defend itself and will sink many US ships.
Iran will go to war..Russia and China eventually if it escalates and all this for what ? For the elites who created al
Qaeda through the US gvt and use it to conduct proxy wars and destabilize countries who do not go along with
their new world order agenda !!!?!!

American peopleyou gotta regain control of your once admirable country. Now everyone hates you for.the.death
you bring almost everywhere.

Ask the Iraqisthe Afghansthe Pakistanisthe Palestiniansthe Syriansthe Macedonians and Serbsthe
Libyansthe Somalisthe Yemenis .all the ones you kill with drones everyday. Stop your wars stop wars.
Enough wars. Use diplomacy..dialoguehelp..not force.

Consistent testimonies from Syrians, as well as well-documented, open-source Western sources, and historical memory, all
serve to reinforce the accuracy of the aforementioned testimony.

Syrians are living the horror brought to them by the criminal West. They can not afford the complacency of shrugging their
shoulders in indecision, not when their lives and their ancient civilization is being threatened by Western-paid terrorist
mercenaries of the worst kind.

Related: Washingtons Attempted Murder Of Syria

Our proxies, slit throats, chop heads, and take no prisoners as we waffle in indecision, ignore empirical evidence, and take
the comfortable easy road of believing the labyrinth of lies promulgated by Western media messaging.

The veil of comfortable confusion, nested in an unconscious belief that our government knows best or that it is patriotic to
believe the lies and fabrications implicit in the hollow words of politicians (who no longer represent us) and the false
pronouncements of Imperial messengers, is concealing an overseas holocaust.
Western societies are rotting from the inside out because of these lies and this barbarity. We are protecting a criminal cabal
of corporate globalists who do not serve our interests and never will.

Related: US Admits Paying Terrorists For Services Rendered In Syria

Our democracies, which we should be protecting, have long disappeared except in the hollow words of newspaper
stenographers. Instead we are supporting transnational corporate elites and their delusional projects.

Poverty and disemployment are all soaring beneath the fakery of government pronouncements, as the public domain
evaporates beneath words like efficiency or the economy - all false covers that serve to enrich elites and destroy
us. Internal imperialism at home is a faded replica of the foreign imperialism abroad.

As countries are destroyed, and its peoples are slaughtered - think Syria, Libya, Ukraine, and others - by abhorrent Western
proxies - public institutions are contaminated, and ultimately replaced by parasitical privatized facsimiles.

Public banking is looted and destroyed in favour of transnational banksterism, World Bank funding, and IMF usury.

Food security is destroyed and replaced by biotech tentacles and engineered dependencies on cash crops and unhealthy
food. Currencies are destroyed, sanctions are imposed, and the unknown, unseen hand of totalitarian control imposes itself,
amidst the cloud of diversions and confusions, aided by comprador regimes, oligarch interests, and shrugging domestic
populations.

Syria refuses to submit. That is why the West is taught to hate her, and the rest of the world learns to love and respect her.
Related: Liberating Syrias Ancient Pentagram Vortex & Its Geopolitical Effects

Yet, Syrias struggles are our struggles. Syria represents international law, stability, and integrity: the same values that
western peoples overtly cherish but stubbornly reject, as our countries wilt beneath suffocating veils of lies and delusions.

I support Syria, because I respect what remains of international law.

I support Syria because I reject Wahhabism, Sharia law, and terrorism.

I support Syria because I reject the undemocratic, transnational oligarchies that are subverting our once
flourishing, now dead, democracies.

I reject the lies of our propagandizing media, the hollow words of our politicians, and the fake humanitarian messaging
that demonizes non-belligerent countries and their populations.
In the name of justice, humanity, and the rule of law, I support the elected government of Syria led by its President, Bashar
al-Assad. Syria, an ancient cradle of civilization, is leading the way towards a better future for all of us.

All we have to do is open our eyes.

Related: We Know About The Lies Over Iraq But What About Syria?

The Tide Is Turning: The Official Story Is Now The Conspiracy Theory + A Conference
To Clear The Mind Of The 9/11 Brainwashing
September 10 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts

Tomorrow it will be the 15th anniversary of 9/11, and this November 22 will be the 53rd anniversary
of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas. These two state crimes against
democracy destroyed American democracy, accountable government, and the Constitutions
protections of civil liberty.
Years after the damage done by these events the American people no longer believe the official stories. Neither
does the government, but the government will never validate the distrust that Americans now share of the
oligarchs government by acknowledging the truth.

Related: Architect Richard Gage On 9/11: TVNZ Close Up

The official explanation of the assassination of President Kennedy never made any sense. Videos of the assassination
contradicted the official story, as did witnesses, and many credible people challenged the governments story.

The CIA was faced with the official explanation becoming unglued and launched its media program stigmatizing doubters as
conspiracy theorists.

Related: Are You A Mind-Controlled CIA Stooge?

The CIAs psych warfare against the public succeeded at the time and for a number of years during which witnesses had
mysterious deaths and the trail grew cold. But by the late 1970s there was so much public skepticism of the official story that
the US Congress took the risk of being labeled conspiracy kooks.

The House Select Committee on Assassinations reopened the inquiry into JFKs murder. The House Committee concluded
that the Warren Commissions investigation was seriously flawed, that there was more than one person firing at President
Kennedy and that there was a conspiracy to assassinate JFK.
Related: Lee Harvey Oswald Innocent

The corrupt US Department of Justice (sic) contradicted the House Select Committees report. However, the American
people believed the Select Committee and not the corrupt Justice (sic) Department, which never tells the truth about
anything.

By 2013 polls showed that most Americans are conspiracy kooks who do not believe the official government line on JFKs
assassination. So with regard to JFKs assassination, the conspiracy theorists are in the majority. The minority are the
Americans who cannot escape their brainwashing.

Related: Poll: 62 percent believe broader plot killed Kennedy

In a few days it will be the 15th anniversary of the alleged al Qaeda attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, and
we are witnessing the fading protection that the charge of conspiracy theorist provides for the officlal government story.
Indeed, the official 9/11 story is collapsing before our eyes.

Europhysics, the respected publicaton of the European physics community has pubished an article by scientists who
conclude that:
 The evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three [World Trade Center] buildings were
destroyed by controlled demolition.

Few American scientists can admit this, because their careers depend on US government and military/security complex
research contracts. Independent scientists in the US are a vanishing breed, an endangered species.

The scientists say that in view of their findings, it is morally imperative that 9/11 be the subject of a truly scientific and
impartial investigation by responsible authorities.

Related: 15 Years Later: On The Physics Of High-Rise Building Collapses

So now we are faced with a peculiar situation. The scientifically ignorant two-bit punk American presstitutes claim to know
more than the editors of the journal of the European physics community and the scientists who did the investigation.

Dont you think it farfetched that ignorant, corrupt, and cowardly American journalists who lie for money know
more than physicists, chemists, 2,700 high-rise architects and structural engineers who have called on the US
Congress to launch a real investigation of 9/11, firefighters and first responders who were on the WTC scene,
military and civilian pilots and former high government officials, all of whom are on record challenging the
unbelievable and physically impossible official story of 9/11?

What kind of a dumbshit moron does a person have to be to believe that the United States government and its media
whores know better than the laws of physics?

The ability of the presstitutes to influence Americans seems to be on the decline. The media ganged up on Donald Trump
during the Republican primaries, intending to deny Trump the nomination.

But the voters ignored the presstitutes. In the current presidential campaign, Hillary is not the run-away winner that the
presstitutes are trying to make her. And despite the propaganda ministry, the legs under the official 9/11 story are wobbly, to
say the least.
Indeed, the official 9/11 story already has lost credibility with the American public. Last April a Rasmussen Poll found that
Americans doubt theyve been told all the facts about the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States and
strongly believe the government should come clean.

Related: Americans Want Government To Tell All About 9/11

A YouGov poll in 2013 found that 50 percent of Americans have doubts about the governments account of 9/11, which
shows that the public is far more intelligent and less corrupt than the presstitutes who are paid to lie to the public.

This poll also found that as a consequence of the cover-up job performed by the American presstitutes, 46 percent of
Americans were not even aware that a third WTC building, Building 7, collapsed on September 11. After viewing films of
WTC 7s collapse, 46 percent saw it as a controlled demolition.

By a margin of two to one, poll respondants support a new investigation of Building 7s collapse.

So, in America today conspiracy kooks outnumber those who believe the official lies.
As the official lies are themselves conspiracy theories, Americans who disbelieve the official conspiracy theories outnumber
Americans who believe official conspiracy theories.

The question is: who are the real conspiracy kooks, the majority who disbelieve the official lies or the minority who
believe the official lies?

It is curious that the CIAs psych-op mind-controll has broken down in the cases of the JFK assassination and 9/11, but is
still effective in more recently orchestrated events, such as San Bernardino, Orlando, Paris, and Nice. Perhaps this is
because not enough time has passed for the public to pay attention to the vast difference between the stories and the
evidence.

The Internet offers many refutations of the official accounts. With regard to Nice, France, the Nice police officials themselves
are having problems with the official story. The French Anti-Terrorist Sub-Directorate in Paris has ordered the public
authorities in Nice to delete the video recordings from security cameras of the Nice Terror Truck Attack. The Nice
authorities refused on the grounds that this would be destruction of criminal evidence.

Related: French Anti-Terrorist Police Demand Destruction Of Nice Evidence

This story has disappeared from the news. I have asked friends in France how this conflict was resolved and have not heard
anything. The French like to live life well and faced with the refugees from Washingtons wars, they seem to be focused on
living life well while it can be done. If I hear anything, I will pass it on.

Apparently, the order to delete the video evidence of the attack was not sufficient for the French Ministry of the Interior.
According to a senior Nice police officer, Sandra Bertin, the Interior Ministry pressured her to falsify her police report on the
Nice truck massacre.

Officer Bertin told the Journal du Dimanche that he ordered me to put in [the report] the specific positions of the national
police which I had not seen on the screen.
Related: French officer claims interior ministry made her alter Nice attack report

The Interior Minister, Bernard Cazeneuve is suing the Nice police official for defamation, as if it is possible to defame any
politician anywhere in the corrupt West.

Related: French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve To Sue Police Officer Over Nice Attack Claims

Moreover, why would a senior Nice official make up a story about being ordered to change a report? It doesnt make any
sense, does it? Clearly, the central government is trying to hide the evidence against the official story.

Related: French government denies cover-up of Nice police deployment

It seems that the French media is disposing of the Nice police official by branding her a rightwing racist opposed to the
current government.

Related: Nice attack CCTV manipulation controversy a new blow to French govt

How the "Nice Truck Attack Hoax" was Orchestrated

Watch this video and ignore the narrators four-letter vocabulary.

What you will learn is that all those people you saw running in the presstitute TV reports had no idea why they were
running. The presstitutes created the impression that they were running away from the truck.

However, as the interviews show, they were running because other people were running, because the police told them
terrorists, run, and because they heard shots (apparently police firing blanks). Those interviewed reported;

You run with them even though you have no idea what you are running from. You cant help it, you run with them.
None of those running away ever saw a truck.

According to the foul-mouthed narrator, the film of the people running away was taken prior to the time the truck allegedly
mowed down 185 people, killing 85 of them.

The narrator appears to be correct if the time stamps on videos are correct. The narrator says the streets needed to be
cleared for the crisis actors to put on their show that is used to control our minds about what happened.

I have pointed out that a truck that hit 185 people, killing 85 of them would be covered in blood and that bodies would be
splattered all over the street with blood everywhere. Yet, the photos and videos that we are shown show no such evidence.
The stopped truck on which police are directing gunfire is as white as snow.

Independently of the vast analysis online of the video evidence of the alleged Nice attack, I suspect the Nice terror
attack for the same reason that the Pentagon attack is suspect.

Despite all the contrary evidence against the official stories, the authorities refuse to release the video evidence that, if it
shows what the authorities claim, would shut up the skeptics and prove the official story.

When a government claims it has video evidence that proves its official story but refuses to release it, indeed, demands the
destruction of the video evidence, we know for an absolute fact that the video evidence totally contradicts the official story.
That is the only possible conclusion.

My readers will write to me asking how the government expects to get away with its faked, and in the case of 9/11 false flag,
terror orchestrations?
The answer, perhaps, is that just as it took a long time for the JFK assassination and 9/11 lies to catch up with the
government, the recent orchestrations will also take some time for a slowly awakening public to catch on.

In the meantime the orchestrated events will serve the agendas that they are intended to serve, and by the time that the
public sees through the orchestrations, a new situation will be in place with new orchestrations.

Keep in mind that the public thinks it is shown evidence.

Newspapers need photos to give a visual dimension to their coverage, and TV needs videos of the events. News
organizations are under a time pressure, and they have to use what they are handed or what is at hand. There is no time to
scrutinize the visual material or to raise questions about it.

Most of the public thinks that the photos and videos shown to them are evidence or would not be shown and accepts the
visual evidence without question. In an earlier column I linked to the vast array of Nice photos provided in the UK Daily Mail.
The photos show a calm situation.
There are a few people lying in the street without any sign of bodily damage or blood and there are covered objects that the
public assumes are dead people. But the streets are devoid of the splattered blood and mangled bodies that would be the
consequence of a truck hitting 185 people.

Similarly, we have been shown very few videos and their origin is unknown except for the one attributed to Richard Gutjahr
who was apparently pre-positioned to film inconclusively both the Nice and German terror attacks.

Online analysis of the videos shows that the videos are not evidence for the storyline. The real question is why the
French Interior Minister has prevented the release and demanded destruction of the security camera videos that
filmed the entire event, an order that brought the central government in Paris in conflict with the public authorities
in Nice.

There has been no US media interest whatsoever in this very strange event. It is not a conspiracy theory to ask why the
public cannot see the video evidence that shows what actually happened.

Related: Frances Minister of the Interior Is Withholding All Security Camera Evidence of the Nice Truck Massacre
and Demands that the Evidence be Destroyed
Related: Weapon Used in November 13 Paris Attacks Came From CIA-linked Arms Dealer

What agenda is served by the Paris and Nice attacks? This is the question everyone should be asking and the media, if we
had one, should be investigating. With the information currently available to me, my answer is this. Of all the peoples of
Western Europe, the French are the most independently minded. French independence has taken a number of recent hits
from Washington:

The largest French bank was forced to hand over $9 billion to Washington for doing business with a country on
Washingtons disapproval list.

Washington forced France to cancel a lucrative ship-building program for Russia, to the detriment of French companies and
shipyard workers.

Related: France Moves To Strip Citizens Of Civil Liberties After Paris Attacks

Washington has forced France into a diplomatic conflict with Russia that the French do not want and into a looming military
conflict which the French want even less, as the conflict would mean the vaporization of France. As one Russian SS-18 can
wipe out three-fourths of the state of New York, how many do you think it would take to wipe France off of the face of the
Earth? Not even a handful.

Keep in mind that in 1966 President Charles de Gaulle pulled France out of NATO on the grounds that it was necessary to
preserve French independence in world affairs. France did not again submit to Washingtons control until 2009 when
Washington-owned Nicolas Sarkozy, put into the French presidency by Washingtons money, followed his orders and
rejoined NATO.
The Paris and Nice orchestrated events serve to scare France back into Washingtons arms. Dreams of independence
become nightmares when independence leaves the French people at the mercy of both terrorists and Russians.
Washington, who owns Sarkozy, who is once again Washingtons candidate for president of France, intends to keep France
in NATO.

The article in Europhysics pointing out the impossibility of the official 9/11 story could possibly lead to a rebirth of skepticism
among Europeans. Only a skeptical media willing to investigate government storylines can bring a halt to the staged terror
events that serve secret agendas.

Keep in mind that the US government has plentiful video evidence of the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon but refuses to
release the evidence that it says support its story.

Similarly, the French federal government has prohibited Nice authorities from releasing the security camera videos of the
Nice truck attack and has ordered the video evidence destroyed. How can we believe governments that refuse to show us
the hard evidence?

Related: A Brief 100 Year History Of 9/11 And The Jekyll Island Banks

A Conference To Clear The Mind Of The 9/11 Brainwashing

If any of my readers are still brainwashed about 9/11, they need to attend this conference. Tickets
are still available.
A 2-Day Symposium | Sept. 10-11, 2016 | Cooper Union New York City

Fifteen years after the events of 9/11, wars and cultural conflicts caused by the U.S. response and questionable alliances
continue to create global tensions. Furthermore, questions of how the attacks took place continue to surface. For these
reasons, a historic event highlighting the blatant discrepancies of the official narrative will be held to critique science-based
evidence of the most consequential event of our time.

A stellar lineup of credentialed experts will also review new evidence of a cover up such as is revealed in the declassification
of the 28 pages, and raise the bar literally, with an unprecedented level of legal analysis. As youll see, this event has an
international component, since 9/11 was such a world-changing event. Full details and tickets are
at www.911justiceinfocus.org.

The Day 1 Program will feature:

Keynote address by renowned public interest attorney, Daniel Sheehan, who litigated the Pentagon Papers case, the
Karen Silkwood case, Iran/Contra scandal, and Three Mile Island.

Keynote address by Judge Ferdinand Imposimato, head of the Supreme Court of Italy, with experience prosecuting
conspiratorial crimes, notably Operation Gladio.

Richard Gage, AIA, founder of Architects & Engineers For 9/11 Truth, which currently has over 2,600 professionals from
the building trades as signatories
.
Professor Leroy Hulsey, from the University of Alaska, who is conducting a unique, unbiased, independent modeling of the
collapse of WTC 7.

Unique analysis of ISIS, the latest on the secret 28 pages and related legislation which has begun to reveal the official
deceptions and questionable geopolitical alliances to the widest audience ever reached in this 15-year effort.
 The 9/11 Truth Action Project the next level of national organizing.

Speakers include:

Government whistleblowers Wayne Madsen, former NSA analyst, and J. Michael Springmann, former State Department
foreign services officer.

TV news personality, media critic, and attorney known as Lionel.

Bob McIlvaine, 9/11 family member.

Dylan Avery, creator of the globally renown 9/11 documentary Loose Change.

Master of Ceremony will be Mark Crispin Miller, professor of Media, Culture and Communication at New York University.

For the Day 2 Program there will be a sequence of legal presentations analyzing key strategies and many yet-
unaddressed evidentiary issues. These include:

Presentation of Legal Standards and Key Evidence.

9/11 Related Litigation to Date.

Pending and Planned FOIA Requests, Appeals, and Litigation.

Future U.S. Litigation Options.

Potential for an International Investigation.

Speakers include:

Public interest attorney , Daniel Sheehan.

Judge Ferdinand Imposimato, Honorary President of the Supreme Court of Italy.

Mick Harrison, whistleblower litigation expert.

William Veale and Mustapha Ndanusa, attorneys for April Gallop, Pentagon survivor.

David Meiswinkle, New Jersey litigator and former police officer.

Barbara Honegger, State Department whistleblower, author of October Surprise.

Andrew Kreig, journalist and attorney.

Engineers David Chandler, Jonathan Cole, Tony Szamboti.

Architect Richard Gage, AIA.

Master of Ceremony will be Dr. William Pepper, international civil rights attorney, litigator for the family of Martin Luther
King, and author of Act of State.

Why should you attend this powerful event? Since justice and rule of law is the foundation of any civilized society, the
commitment to face all the facts of 9/11 will empower us as a culture to move forward and re-establish our position of trust
and integrity in the world. In so many ways, our future depends on it. Make plans today.

Sept. 10 & 11, 2015 | 10am 6:30pm | Cooper Union,

7 East 7th Street, Manhattan
(7th St. and 3rd Avenue)

For more details and tickets: www.911justiceinfocus.org

Does John Key Run The NZ Meth Trade?
September 9 2016 | From: MediaWhores

Meth has never been so big in New Zealand, and John Key is the man pretending to lead the
Country so this seems like a fair question in our view, does John Key run the NZ meth industry?

Lets look at the evidence: New Zealand now has one of the highest meth usage rates in the World.

Obviously meth was introduced here prior to the bankers putting their puppet John Key in power, but it has grown and grown
under the John Key regime, presumably because the John key regime wants it that way.

New Zealand has very easy borders to protect, being a small island Nation. There is no cocaine flooding the streets of NZ,
because the shadow Government/ bankers do not want cocaine flooding the streets.

Same goes for ecstasy and other drugs, if the shadow government do not want it here, it is policed and kept out.

They even do a pretty good job policing marijuana, a weed that can be grown in the backyard, investing 10s of millions each
year in helicopters and police pulling out those plants Nationwide.

Somehow though they just cant seem to be able to keep out the meth, or the precursors to make meth. Strange
isnt it?

Meth is obviously a huge business, not just in the estimated $50 million each week generated in cash sales, but it also
creates a huge state / Crown run business in terms of policing, mental health, WINZ (the governments biggest business),
courts and jails.

An estimated $900 million generated in burglaries, crime, policing, court and jails each year as a direct result of the meth
trade in NZ. Not to mention the insurance companies who make a killing off the burglaries and ever increasing premiums.
Its big big business, and the last thing the Crown wants, is for it to end.

Indeed in recent years the Nazi like government of John Key, along with all the other puppet Zionist regimes controlling the
Western World, have implemented sweeping new spy laws which gives them the right to spy on their own citizens.

Cell phone towers in every neighborhood pick up all text messages and cell phone calls made in that region, and
the police & GCSB now have software which can go through and pick up any keywords they plug into the system
e.g. meth, bag, hundy bag, point, puff, fire, burn, pipe, gram etc etc.

Not to mention the ability to categorize and identify those who regularly send strange text messages all night another
indication of possible meth dealers. Yet with all of those new spy laws and technology, the Government cant seem to get the
problem under control.

Ridiculous isnt it. They could be doing huge busts everyday with that technology and quickly clean up every major
dealer in every town but they clearly choose not to.

Because business is good!

So clearly the state is allowing the meth trade in NZ if not directly encouraging it via their WINZ payments and by allowing
the same dairies Nationwide to sell the glass pipes for the past 15 + years but that alone is not evidence that John Key
runs the meth trade.

So is there any real evidence of this?

The Government clearly allows the meth trade, but could John Key be the man actually running it?
Numerous stories have made it clear that the Auckland Casino is a central hub for meth trafficking and money laundering
the Casino being one of John Keys favorite projects, giving them tax cuts, funding and special grants to build bigger and
bigger. Key is also a regular to the place, where many of NZs biggest meth lords gather to buy and sell and launder their
profits.

Many of these meth lords are Chinese of course, and we all know John Key does a lot of business with the Chinese, selling
us out to them each week. We also see wealthy Chinese businessmen paying off and bribing our pathetic corrupt Justice
system these days.

Related: William Yan agrees to pay $43 million

Still- that is not hard evidence that John Key is running the meth trade in NZ. Lets look at more evidence.

The posts below came from a Facebook thread doing the rounds the other week (source withheld for obvious reasons -
these bastards are very dangerous people).

Meth in New Zealand: All the meth leaders who have gangs underneath are meeting in the elite VIP sky casino
room like citizen tan in yesterdays herald 11/20 of Chinas most wanted are now in New Zealand like citizen tan.

Shun Key knows they are here because they pay $ to meet him and approve their visas.

Shun Key knows what they are doing also. You cant tell me Shun Key didnt know Dotcom existed. Why is shun
key protecting Chinese meth leaders? The bust on northland beach was sacrificed to get people off what is really
happening with meth and Chinese in VIP room at casino

Again Auckland VIP casino room is potentially the most powerful meeting room in the country because they own
MPs politicians and control Chinese policy by buying national party!

So the national party not winston in my opinion set that meth bust up to get heat off with meth because you have to
show the media some wins now and then Correct?

I dont trust anything re Key he knows about the Auckland vip casino he knows about citizen bill spending
$128m at casino in a year he could have shut him down and sent him to China then for extradition why didnt he ?
Because the govt is in bed with these meth pushers at VIP casino somehow.

A lot of them are Chinas fugitives committing money fraud and cleaning their dirty money here in housing and
 meth ! Two very very profitably industries monopolized by these wealthy Chinese fugitives who use front men
trusts etc and they are controlling it all, while the national government protect them and even represent them in the
media.

So that blogger seems pretty sure John Key is in with the Chinese meth gangs. Still - no hard evidence of such.

The record bust of meth in Northland mentioned in the above posts seemed to go nowhere didnt it? There was talk of a few
arrests, then no court trial we have heard of. If the police were doing their jobs they should have been able to clean up the
whole ring, but dont think they did.

Related: More arrests made in country's record meth haul

Someone also reported that one of the cars pulled up during that accidental bust was registered to the Masala restaurant
chain. Winston Peters is apparently a good mate of many of those Indian businessmen, who are also famous for running visa
and illegal worker scams. Perhaps the Indians are into the meth business also?

Seems everyone is really. Also interesting Winston Peters never mentioned NZs largest meth haul in his own electorate
(having taken over post Mike Sabin). Perhaps Northland is the main gateway for the meth trade, and the bankers just put
Winston in there to keep things going? Certainly strange he never mentioned it.

Perhaps someone should have searched Winstons boat also?

And lets not forget the previous top cop in Northland, Michael Blowers in charge of the regions organised crime unit lol
who stole millions of dollars of meth from a police evidence room and tried to sell it. What a bloody joke.

Related: Cop swapped meth for salt, says Crown

Presumably the latest record haul will also find its way onto the streets of NZ, with the help of more corrupt cops.

In fact there have been numerous NZ police busted both taking and selling meth even police prosecutors working straight
out of the court room.

Related: Police prosecutor sold meth during court breaks

And top lawyers:

Related: Former senior lawyer sentenced over meth possession

It seems fairly clear that meth is here because the establishment is hooked on both the money and the actual drug.
Fucking meth heads running the country.

And what about Mike Sabin?- Mike Sabin was the Governments lead man in the war on meth via MethCon a government
subsidized company.

Probably no accident they called it Meth Con in our view. Sabin was also chairman of the governments powerful Law and
Order Select Committee which meets with police each month to discuss problems and strategy.

He then went on to become the National MP for Northland but suddenly stepped down under a cloud of allegations and court
appearances, all the details of which were suppressed. There was then a secret trial, more name suppression and eventually
a promotion to a job running an International/ luxury gold course in the Far North, for a Chinese company.

The judiciary, media and government all did a stellar job keeping that whole story suppressed. Still no hard evidence linking
Mike Sabin to John Key and the meth trade. Just speculation and name suppression really.

Oddly enough, it was NZ author Greg Hallett who first said the NZ police and judiciary run the meth trade in NZ. This was
before John Key came along, so perhaps it is possible that Key just took over the management of the meth trade from Hellin
Clark (another criminal posing as a leader)? Lets look at that video...

Greg Hallett has also claimed online that Winston Peters was involved with the real Mr Asia that being Peter Williams QC,
and his heroin trafficking operations. No mention of Winston or John Key and the meth trade though.

So no hard evidence that it is John Key running it all it appears more that it is the judiciary, Criminal Bar Association and
the police who run the meth trade in NZ, and have done so since before John Key was placed here by the foreign bankers as
a smiling dictator.

Having said that it is impossible to think that John Key doesnt know how the trade works and who is running it. Perhaps he
even smokes it himself? His son Max Key has lost enough weight to be on meth, and his favorite DJ track is called Cut me
another line (by his own admission).

Our conclusion is that there is reasonable grounds to suspect John Key is very close to the meth trade and meth traffickers
operating in NZ giving them a free pass to operate here and destroy our communities and Kiwi lives, because it is all just
good business at the end of the day.

But we have no direct evidence yet that John Key is actually running the whole business.

Much like the Opium Wars in China, where the Zionist controlled British Government used opium to take over China and
destroy their royal family, it seems clear that meth is being used to do the same in NZ - wiping out Kiwis and their
communities while John Key sells everything off to the Chinese, on the instruction of his Zionist handlers the Zionists being
the people who have run the illicit drugs trades around the globe for at least the past 200 years and John Key himself
being a Zionist puppet leader in NZ.

And why are the Zionists selling NZ off to China you ask? Because it fits their globalization agenda, destroying all
sovereign nations around the world, bringing them all under their new global corporate (fascist) control.

In other news: Young National Part member close to

John Key dies suddenly recently.

RIP #SarahHiggins, poor girl was mixing with the

mafia.

But dont panic John Key had an alibi he got his Son
Max Key to film him cleaning his cars and put it online as
soon as he heard the news .so he clearly had nothing to do
with her death.

Left: Sarah Higgins and John Key.

Did The Neocon Criminal Cabal Just Send A Message To President Vladimir Putin?
September 9 2016 | From: MilleniumReport

Vladimir Putins official car is involved in a head-on crash in Moscow which killed the Russian
presidents favourite chauffeur.

The offending Mercedes Benz S Class

Its not very often that the head of state of a superpower nation is sent such a dramatic and violent message.

Related: Putin Politely Expresses His Amazement At Western Stupidity

That appears to have just happened with the killing of Russian President Vladimir Putins favorite chauffeur while he was
driving the presidents official automobile.

Such an audacious threat to the life of President Putin can only be coordinated by an inside group of foreign secret service
agents who have proxies operating within Moscow. Moscow is so large that the agents themselves may have planned and
carried out the attack from right inside of the city.

In any event it is quite clear that those who reside at the peak of the pinnacle of the Anglo-American Axis (AAA) power
pyramid will stop at nothing to control Russia and its destiny.

They know that as long as Putin remains at the helm of the Russian government, there is very little they can do to stealthily
usurp the sovereignty of that nation. Nevertheless, they have continued to attempt to chip away at Russian territorial
integrity by employing Islamic extremism and ISIS terrorism in countries that are located on the outskirts of the Russian
Federation.

Putin's BMW 7 Series

The AAA leadership has shown time and again that they are populated by a number of criminally insane psychopaths who
will stop at nothing until they have taken back Russia (they owned it once under the rubric of Soviet communism as the
USSR). Now the same misguided cabal wants to take ownership again by way of a capitalistic political economy.

Through a combination of predatory capitalism, economic sanctions, monetary sabotage, financial terrorism, weather
warfare, as well as strategically located unprovoked wars of aggression and jihadi terrorism, they are focused on bringing
down the present government.

Is There Anything The Criminal Cabal Will Not Do?

Because of the grave state of the Global Economic & Financial System (GE&FS), those who control the underlying control
matrix are in an extremely desperate condition. Although they have somehow been successful at artificially propping up the
whole House of Cards for decades, there is now a mathematical certainty of a global collapse.

There is simply no stopping it.

Given the enormity and profundity of the coming breakdown (economic, financial and social), this misguided crowd is
looking to steal everything in sight before anarchy takes over.

They know that there is no bigger prize than the Russian Motherland. Even as it shrunk substantially from its previous
boundaries delineated by the borders of the old Soviet Union, Russia is still a humongous landmass.
From the Pacific Ocean to the Gulf of Finland, from the Arctic Ocean to the Caspian Sea, Russia is by far the largest country
on Earth at over 17 million square km. Thats almost twice as large as Canada, China and the USA.

Much of the Russian Motherland is uninhabited and rich in natural resources. Oil and gas, gold and silver, uranium and coal,
diamonds and various precious gems, timber and granite, marine life and other wildlife, are all available in great
abundance.

Each of these is greatly coveted by the AAA cabal since they have sold most of their natural resource assets off since the
very beginning of the Industrial Revolution.

Hence, they are making extremely desperate moves in every direction at the present moment, from deepening the Second
Great Depression to triggering World War III. Taking out their arch-enemy Vladimir Putin, then, pales in comparison to the
vast amount of death and destruction that they have already caused around the world.

The ongoing cold phase of WW3 has, in fact, produced pain and suffering on a massive scale. Because the global
population is larger than ever, it is fair to say that the planet has never seen so much adversity on every continent.

Conclusion
Putin and his Kremlin team represent the greatest obstacle [or one of them at least] to the ever-unfolding New
World Order agenda.

In fact the current round of unlawful economic sanctions by the U.S., Canada, EU member nations and others were
instituted in order to target many of the key players in Putins inner circle.
The cabals immediate goal was to soften up as many Putin loyalists as possible thinking that some might leave the Russian
establishment. However, they greatly underestimated the determination of the people of Russia to reassert their sovereignty
and take back their power from the Western banksters.

This is why the cabal has now gotten much closer to Putin himself with the premeditated car crash.

With each passing month the Russian president upstages the AAA leaders, as he just did at the G20 meeting in China.

Not only did Putin make Obama look like a foolish child, he has continually won the chess games being played out on the
global geopolitical chessboard since he first became prime minister. While Putin plays world-class chess, his Western
counterparts look like they are barely playing checkers.

The bottom line here is that the Neocon criminal cabal is always willing to do something very stupid, regardless of the
consequences.
Few geopolitical analysts truly understand that a cabal of criminally insane psychopaths will only mutually reinforce each
others psychopathology until they collectively do something really stupid like start WW3, after plunging the entire planetary
civilization into an even deeper phase of the 2nd Great Depression - unless We the People unite, arrest them, try them
by jury on land jurisdiction, and incarcerate them,

Welcome to 2016! The year of the grand finale of The Greatest Show on Earth, taking place in real time and in living color
on a TV set or computer screen near you.

Notes:

The reality here is that the ruling cabal has had the entire planet hardwired for millennia. As such they can perpetrate any
crime, any time, any where and get away with it. Taking out Putins own chauffeur and personal conveyance is quite easy
for them.

They know it. Putin knows it. They know that Putin knows it, and Putin knows that they know it.

Therefore, the real $64,000 question that must be asked is just how far will these perps go? They know Putin has a
conscience. Theyre also aware of his unusual magnanimity which they continually exploit by creating desperate situations
around the world.

In this way, Putin commits himself to putting out one fire after another. Now the fire is very close to home right down the
road from the Kremlin itself. Therefore, its quite likely that things will get very ugly, before they get better.

Lets face it, during the final decline and fall of the Anglo-American Empire anything goes. From 2016 onward, things will get
even more unpredictable and surprising.

Some of those surprises will be very good for the 99%. Many of them will be very disheartening for the 1%. After all, the
wealthy elites have everything to lose and very little to acquire, whereas the 99% have much to gain since they have already
lost practically everything.

The critical point here is that Vladimir Putin has been held up extremely high by the Universe itself as a glowing example of
detachment and grace under pressure.

As President of Russia, he just puts his head down, charges ahead and does his work. Putin knows all there is to know
about the existential threats that he faces, that Russia faces and that the whole of civilization faces.
Yeah, hes got access to the best intel in the world since Russian technology can systematically hack the NSA, CIA, DIA,
etc. And yet he seems unfazed and yogically dispassionate even knowing what he knows.

Putin is also standing up quite well to all the assaults and attempted takedowns that are aimed at him and his nation.
Perhaps its about time that the rest of the world followed his exemplary self-sacrifice and enlightened leadership,
unparalleled equanimity and ever-present equipoise.

The Anglo-American Axis is represented, first and foremost, by the major English-speaking countries of
the world: USA, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel.

The European member nations of NATO, such as Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Belgium, Luxembourg
and the Netherlands are also closely aligned with the AAA as are all the Scandinavian countries.

So are the Asian Pacific Rim nations of Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and the Philippines. Saudi Arabia, Turkey,
Egypt, Pakistan, Kuwait, Jordan, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates, and Qatar also owe their allegiance to the AAA
but some of these may be changing.

The World Shadow Government is an ultra-secret, supranational organization which completely controls
the Anglo-American Axis, as well as the European Union, NATO, among many other institutional entities
which constitute the Global Control Matrix."

Source: Vladimir Putins Russia: Perfect Foil To The Anglo-American Axis And Their New World Order

Who Is Obamas Boss? And Why It Matters

September 8 2016 | From: JonRappoport

Its called the Trilateral Commission, and its original stated goal was to create a new international
economic order"
Here is another question that has the same answer: who is in charge of destroying economies? Who keeps
pushing new economy-destroying trade treaties, like the upcoming TPP? Who is in the business of killing jobs and
hope? Who demands that these treaties must be ratified?

Related: The Conspiracy to Rule the World: #58. The Trilateral Commission

Who is breathing down Obamas neck, as he stages a last-ditch effort to ratify the TPP and further bury US sovereignty
under the weight of global corporations? Who demands that more US jobs disappear overseas and never come back?

One group has been virtually forgotten. Its influence is enormous. It has existed since 1973. Its called the Trilateral
Commission (TC).

Keep in mind that the original stated goal of the TC was to create a new international economic order.

In the run-up to his inauguration after the 2008 presidential election, Obama was tutored by the co-founder of the
Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski.

Four years before birthing the TC with his boss of bosses, David Rockefeller, Brzezinski wrote:

[The] nation state as a fundamental unit of mans organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force.
International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the
political concepts of the nation state.

Goodbye, separate nations.

Any doubt on the question of TC goals is answered by David Rockefeller himself, the founder of the TC, in his Memoirs
(2003):

Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my
family and me as internationalists and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political
and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.
Patrick Wood, author of Trilaterals Over Washington, points out there are only 87 members of the Trilateral Commission
who live in America. Obama appointed eleven of them to posts in his administration.

For example:

Tim Geithner, Treasury Secretary

James Jones, National Security Advisor

Paul Volker, Chairman, Economic Recovery Committee

Dennis Blair, Director of National Intelligence

Here is the payoff. The US Trade Representative (appointed by Obama in 2013), who is responsible for negotiating the TPP
with 11 other nations, is Michael Froman, a former member of the Trilateral Commission.

Dont let the word former fool you. TC members resign when they take positions in the Executive Branch of government.
And when they serve in vital positions, such as US Trade Representative, they arent there by accident. Theyre TC
operatives with a specific agenda.
Im now going to print a stunning piece of forgotten history, a 1978 conversation between a US reporter and two members of
the Trilateral Commission. (Source: Trilateralism: The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management; ed.
by Holly Sklar, 1980, South End Press, Pages 192-3).

The conversation was public knowledge at the time. Anyone who was anyone in Washington politics, in media, in think-
tanks, had access to it. Understood its meaning.

But no one shouted from the rooftops. No one used the conversation to force a scandal. No one protested loudly.

The conversation revealed that the entire basis of the US Constitution had been torpedoed, that the people who were
running US national policy (which includes trade treaties) were agents of an elite shadow group. No question about it.

And yet: official silence. Media silence. The Dept. of Justice made no moves, Congress undertook no serious inquiries, and
the President, Jimmy Carter, issued no statements.

Carter was himself an agent of the Trilateral Commission in the White House. He had been plucked from obscurity by David
Rockefeller, and through elite TC press connections, vaulted into the spotlight as a pre-eminent choice for the Presidency.
The 1978 conversation featured reporter, Jeremiah Novak, and two Trilateral Commission members, Karl Kaiser and
Richard Cooper. The interview took up the issue of who exactly, during President Carters administration, was formulating
US economic and political policy.

The careless and off-hand attitude of Trilateralists Kaiser and Cooper is astonishing. Its as if theyre saying;

What were revealing is already out in the open, its too late to do anything about it, why are you so worked up,
weve already won

NOVAK (the reporter): Is it true that a private [Trilateral committee] led by Henry Owen of the US and made up of [Trilateral]
representatives of the US, UK, West Germany, Japan, France and the EEC is coordinating the economic and political
policies of the Trilateral countries [which would include the US]?

COOPER: Yes, they have met three times.

NOVAK: Yet, in your recent paper you state that this committee should remain informal because to formalize this
function might well prove offensive to some of the Trilateral and other countries which do not take part. Who are
you afraid of?

KAISER: Many countries in Europe would resent the dominant role that West Germany plays at these [Trilateral]
meetings.

COOPER: Many people still live in a world of separate nations, and they would resent such coordination [of policy].

NOVAK: But this [Trilateral] committee is essential to your whole policy. How can you keep it a secret or fail to try
to get popular support [for its decisions on how Trilateral member nations will conduct their economic and political
policies]?

COOPER: Well, I guess its the press job to publicize it.

NOVAK: Yes, but why doesnt President Carter come out with it and tell the American people that [US] economic
and political power is being coordinated by a [Trilateral] committee made up of Henry Owen and six others? After
all, if [US] policy is being made on a multinational level, the people should know.

COOPER: President Carter and Secretary of State Vance have constantly alluded to this in their speeches. [a lie]

KAISER: It just hasnt become an issue.

This interview slipped under the mainstream media radar, which is to say, it was buried.

US economic and political policy run by a committee of the Trilateral Commission - the Commission had been created in
1973 by David Rockefeller and his sidekick, Zbigniew Brzezinski.

When Carter won the presidential election, his aide, Hamilton Jordan, said that if after the inauguration, Cy Vance and
Brzezinski came on board as secretary of state and national security adviser, Weve lost. And Ill quit.

Lost because both men were powerful members of the Trilateral Commission and their appointment to key positions would
signal a surrender of White House control to the Commission.

Vance and Brzezinski were appointed secretary of state and national security adviser, as Jordan feared. But he
didnt quit. He became Carters chief of staff.
 The nation state as a fundamental unti of man's organized life has ceased to be the principal creative
force: Internaiotnal banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in
advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.

- 1972, 'Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era

Now consider the vast propaganda efforts of the past 40 years, on so many levels, to install the idea that all nations and
peoples of the world are a single Collective.

From a very high level of political and economic power, this propaganda op has had the objective of grooming the
population for a planet that is one coagulated mass, run and managed by one force. A central engine of that force is the
Trilateral Commission.

How does a shadowy group like the TC accomplish its goal?

One basic strategy is: destabilize nations; ruin their economies; ratify trade treaties that effectively send millions and millions
of manufacturing jobs off to places where virtual slave labor does the work; adding insult to injury, export the cheap products
of those slave-factories back to the nations who lost the jobs and undercut their domestic manufacturers, forcing them to
close their doors and fire still more employees.

And then solve that economic chaos by bringing order. What kind of order?
Related: The Round Table: The Hub Of The CFR, Trilateral Commission, RIIA, Club Of Rome, Bilderberg Group And
The UN

Eventually, one planet, with national borders erased, under one management system, with a planned global economy, to
restore stability, for the good of all, for lasting harmony.

The top Trilateral players, in 2008, had their man in the White House, another formerly obscure individual like Jimmy Carter:
Barack Obama. They had new trade treaties on the planning table. Obama was tasked with doing whatever was necessary
to bring those treaties, like the TPP, home. To get them passed. To get them ratified. No excuses.

Thats why, over a year ago, when anti-TPP criticism and rhetoric were reaching a crescendo, when Obama was seeking
Congressional fast-track authority for the treaty, he was in a sweat and a panic.

He and his cabinet were on the phones night and day, scrambling and scraping for votes in Congress. This was the Big
One. This was why he was the President. To make this happen.

His Trilateral bosses were watching. These men run US policy, when and where it counts. They dont like failure.

This is also why, after Obama was inaugurated for his first term, he shocked and astonished his own advisors, who
expected him, as the first order of business, to address the unemployment issue in America.
He shocked them by ignoring the number-one concern of Americans, and instead decided to opt for his disastrous
national health insurance policy - Obamacare.

Obama never had any intention of trying to dig America out of the crash of 2008.

That wasnt why he was put in the Oval Office. He could, and would, pretend to bring back the economy, with
fudged numbers and distorted standards.

But really and truly, create good-paying jobs for many, many Americans? Not on the TC agenda. Not in the cards.

It was counter-productive to the TC plan: torpedo the economy further.

Obama is on the move. Hes traveling to far-flung places, trying to shore up global consensus on the TPP treaty. His people
are working around the clock to round up the necessary votes for TPP ratification in Congress.

Obama plans to sneak through the treaty during Congress lame-duck session after the November election, before newly
elected Congressional members take office.

Pushing through Globalist trade treaties: this is why he was put in the White House. This is his appointed task. This
is his real job. His bosses are watching.

I pledge allegiance to the Trilateral Commission, and to the domination for which it stands, one planet, indivisible,
with tyranny and poverty and top-down order for all

Related: An Expose: The Council On Foreign Relations (CFR) & The Trilateral Commmission

Xis Epic Snub Of Obama At G20 Summit + After Snubbing Obama, China Gives Putin
Red Carpet Treatment, Warns Against Protectionism At G-20
September 7 2016 | From: Geopolitics / ZeroHedge
Xis Epic Snub vs. Obama at G20 Summit Reflects Asias Collective Wrath Over US Interference in
the Region.

Every high-profile meeting like the G20 involves an elaborate preparation, from security down to the minutest detail
of providing the red carpet welcome to every invited leader of member countries and guests.

Related: Philippines President Duterte Calls Obama 'Son Of A Whore'

It would be unthinkable to not provide a mobile staircase to stick onto the side of a presidential plane that would led the
guests to the red carpet down below.

Thats exactly what happened to the arrival of the US president Barack Soetoro Obama.

Chinas leaders have been accused of delivering a calculated diplomatic snub to Barack Obama after the US president was
not provided with a staircase to leave his plane during his chaotic arrival in Hangzhou before the start of the G20.

Chinese authorities have rolled out the red carpet for leaders including Indias prime minister, Narendra Modi, the Russian
president, Vladimir Putin, the South Korean president, Park Geun-hye, Brazils president, Michel Temer, and the British
prime minister, Theresa May, who touched down on Sunday morning.
But the leader of the worlds largest economy, who is on his final tour of Asia, was forced to disembark from Air Force One
through a little-used exit in the planes belly after no rolling staircase was provided when he landed in the eastern Chinese
city on Saturday afternoon.

Campaigners hail key moment in battle against global warming as presidents Obama and Xi announce deal on eve of G20
summit in Hangzhou

When Obama did find his way on to a red carpet on the tarmac below there were heated altercations between US and
Chinese officials, with one Chinese official caught on video shouting:

This is our country! This is our airport!

 The reception that President Obama and his staff got when they arrived here Saturday afternoon was bruising,
even by Chinese standards, the New York Times reported.

Jorge Guajardo, Mexicos former ambassador to China, said he was convinced Obamas treatment was part of a calculated
snub.

These things do not happen by mistake. Not with the Chinese, Guajardo, who hosted presidents Enrique Pea
Nieto and Felipe Caldern during his time in Beijing, told the Guardian.

Ive dealt with the Chinese for six years. Ive done these visits. I took Xi Jinping to Mexico. I received two Mexican
presidents in China. I know exactly how these things get worked out. Its down to the last detail in everything. Its
not a mistake. Its not.

Guajardo added: Its a snub. Its a way of saying: You know, youre not that special to us. Its part of the new
Chinese arrogance. Its part of stirring up Chinese nationalism. Its part of saying: China stands up to the
superpower. Its part of saying: And by the way, youre just someone else to us. It works very well with the local
audience."

Why [did it happen]? the former diplomat, who was ambassador from 2007 until 2013, added. I guess it is part of
Xi Jinping playing the nationalist card. Thats my guess.

Bill Bishop, a China expert whose Sinocism newsletter tracks the countrys political scene, agreed that Obamas welcome
looked suspiciously like a deliberate slight intended to make the Americans look diminished and weak.

It sure looks like a straight-up snub, Bishop said. This clearly plays very much into the [idea]: Look, we can
make the American president go out of the ass of the plane.

Related: Barack Obama 'deliberately snubbed' by Chinese in chaotic arrival at G20

The pro-Western medium South China Morning Post [here] tried to attenuate the glaring snub by saying that it was the US
delegation who requested to not provide the ramp in the first place.

You have a lot of scuzzy sort-of thieves for whom this is a way to hit the jackpot.

It was Washingtons decision to have US President Barack Obama disembark from his plane through a small bare metal
stairway instead of the usual rolling red-carpet staircase that state leaders get, a Chinese foreign ministry official has
revealed.

Related: G20 staircase snub for Obama was United States decision, reveals Chinese official

But what about the shouting, This is my country and my airport?

Related: Row on tarmac an awkward G20 start for U.S., China

Did the US delegation requested that, too?

The truth of the matter is, theres now a consensus in Asia not to welcome anymore geopolitical inference from the United
States government, or its Khazarian benefactors.

Indonesia has known early on that it was the US extortionists who caused the Indian Ocean Tsunami. Its very consistent in
its refusal against more Western company mining on it soil.

For Japan, it was a frontal extortion with Fukushima nuclear tsunami right from the start. Thats why it is now collaborating
with Russia and other stakeholders in the establishment of a unified alternative energy grid in order to defeat the financial
backbone of the Khazarian oil financiers causing wars for oil in the Middle East.

In late March, Russias Rosseti Company, the China State Grid Corporation, the Korea Electric Power Corporation and
Japans Softbank Group agreed to establish and interconnected energy system to encompass the entire region of
Northeastern Asia and eventually to build a number of separate energy bridges, including one between Russias Sakhalin
Island and Japan.

Speaking on the sidelines of a GAZTECH conference earlier this year, the International Energy Agencys former director
Tanaka Nobuo said that after the disaster at Japans Fukushima nuclear power plant in March 2011, Japan shut down
almost all its nuclear power stations, thus making the country dependent on energy supplies from abroad.
 Without nuclear energy we have become too dependent on fuel supplies, above all from the Middle East, but the
current political instability there is a big risk, thats why we are diversifying both our energy resources, such as oil,
gas and coal, and the countries where we are buying fuel.

Staking on natural gas imports, we could shift our focus from the Middle East to suppliers in North America,
Australia, the ASEAN countries and Russia, which could become a major supplier, he said.

Related: Asian Energy Super Ring Opens Up New Horizons for Economic Growth

This level of cooperation ensures that no wars of aggression will ever be permitted just so another Khazarian oil pipeline is
laid on anypart of Eurasia.

On the other hand, Duterte has acknowledged in one media ambush interview that he is more excited of meeting Vladimir
Putin than Obama, when asked about his talking points with the latter once they met at the outset of the ASEAN Summit in
Laos this month.

This statement came hours after he confirmed to have talked with the Chinese ambassador to the Philippines for 4 straight
hours. Obviously, they were not talking about Pokemon Go.

It would be wrong to assume that terror and earthquake attacks could change the current Philippine geopolitical trajectory.
The Asian leaderships are now visibly standing up to the arrogance of the Exceptionalists who still think the rules
do not apply to them.

Change is Ongoing!

After Snubbing Obama, China Gives Putin Red Carpet Treatment, Warns Against
Protectionism At G-20

Roughly at the same time as China's infamous snub of Obama's arrival at Hangzhou for the G-20
summit, when the G-20 host nation's delegation first made sure there was no staircase for Obama
to exit the plane and descend on the red carpet; forcing the president of the world's most powerful
nation to use an emergency exit...

...followed by a shouting match by a Chinese official who unleashed on the US Press corps and national security
advisor Susan Rice, blocking them from crossing a blue rope holding back press and saying "This is our country.
This is our airport", Chinese officials had no such problems greeting Russian president Vladimir Putin with full
honors, whose arrival - on the red carpet - took place without a glitch.
The favor was returned: according to RT, Putin brought a box of Russian ice-cream as a gift to Chinese leader Xi Jinping:

I promised you Id bring some ice-cream, Putin said. Ive brought for you a box of it as a gift.

Xi Jinping is a real fan of Russian ice-cream.

Thank you very much for the gift, for the tasty ice-cream. In my every trip to Russia I always ask to buy Russian
ice-cream. And then, at home, we eat it, the Chinese leader said.
 You have the best cream, and it makes it so tasty. I like it very much. Thank you for this courtesy, he added.

Having brought no ice cream of his own, and his embarrassing arrival in China making front page news over the weekend,
Obama quickly tried to talk down the embarrassing incident, saying the tensions were the result of different approaches to
the media, as well as the sheer scale of the US operation when he travels, according to AFP.

Obama pivoted away from the snub, instead accusing China of once again showing little respect for human rights:

Washington stands up for press freedom and human rights and - whatever the fallout - does not leave our values
and ideals behind when we take these trips" he said.

"It can cause some friction. The seams are showing a little more than usual in terms of some of the
negotiations and jostling that takes place behind the scenes," Obama told reporters on Sunday.

The justification continued: "Part of it is we also have a much bigger footprint than a lot of other countries. And
we've got a lot of planes, a lot of helicopters, a lot of cars, a lot of guys. You know, if you're a host country,
sometimes it may feel a little bit much."
Obama said it was not the first time Washington's differences with Beijing had erupted during a visit, and that clashing
values were also on display in his discussions with Xi.

Obama concluded by expressing hope the world would quickly move on and forget China's snub of Obama on his last
official visit to the country:

"And so I wouldn't over-crank the significance of it," he said.

"None of this detracts from the broader scope of the relationship (with China)," he told a news conference.

"The bilateral discussions that we had yesterday were extremely productive and continue to point to big areas of
cooperation."

Obama's "explanation" aside, China took the initiative to continue piling its critisim of the US, when Chinese President Xi
Jinping said at the open of a two-day G-20 summit that the global economy is being threatened by rising
protectionism and risks from highly leveraged financial markets.

He was referring to recent US trade war escalations, and Washington's recent response to Chinese dumping with duties
on cold-rolled steel as high as 522%. As for highly leveraged financial markets, pretty much anyone could be at fault there.
His warning on Sunday followed bilateral talks with Barack Obama that the U.S. president described as "extremely
productive", but which failed to bring both sides closer on thornier topics such as tensions in the South China Sea.

In addition to the previously leaked communique details, which as reorted last night will call for more fiscal and monetary
stimulus, observers expect G20 leaders to mount a defense of free trade and globalization and warn against isolationism,
eyeing Britain's vote in June to exit the
European Union and before the U.S. presidential election in November. The global economy has arrived "at a crucial
juncture", Xi said, in the face of sluggish demand, volatile financial markets and feeble trade and investment.

"Growth drivers from the previous round of technological progress are gradually fading, while a new round of
technological and industrial revolution has yet to gain momentum," he said.

Xi's speech:

As Reuters confirmed last night's report, G20 countries are set to agree in a communique at the end of the summit that all
policy measures - including monetary, fiscal and structural reforms - should be used to achieve solid and sustainable
economic growth, Japanese Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Koichi Hagiuda said.

Commitment will be made to utilizing all three policy tools of monetary and fiscal policies and structural reforms to
achieve solid, sustainable, balanced and inclusive growth," Hagiuda told reporters on the sidelines of the summit.
What he was really doing is hinting that the BOJ may no longer abide by the demands of the US Treasury to not
engage in significant currency devaluations potentially leading to a major surprise announcement out of the BOJ in
its September meeting.

Xi also called on G20 countries to match their words with actions.

We should turn the G20 group into an action team, instead of a talk shop," he said.

Considering that the G-20 has been equated with the UN in terms of efficiency, we hope Xi isn't holding his breath.

Meanwhile, some of the G20 leaders have begun drawing battle lines in disputes over issues ranging from trade and
investment to tax policy and industrial overcapacity, suggesting there was far less smiling by world leaders going on behind
the scenes.

According to Reuters, Xi held talks with Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and told him he hoped Australia would
continue to provide a fair, transparent and predictable policy environment for foreign investors.

China was angered when Australia blocked the A$10 billion ($7.7 billion) sale of the country's biggest energy grid to
Chinese bidders last month.

China has accused Australia of bowing to protectionist sentiment in blocking the bid for Ausgrid, as well as an earlier one by
a China-led consortium to buy cattle company Kidman & Co. Beijing has also criticized Australia, a staunch U.S. ally, for
running surveillance flights over disputed islands in the South China Sea.

Meanwhile, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker shot back at China saying the G-20 host nation must set
up a mechanism to address its problem of industrial overcapacity, adding it was "unacceptable" the European steel industry
had lost so many jobs in recent years.

Overcapacity is a global problem but there is a particular Chinese element," he told a news conference.
Britain's future after its departure from the European Union was also subject to discussion. Obama reassured Prime Minister
May that Britain's closest political, commercial and military ally would stand by her, tentatively backing off his infamous line
that Brexit would leave the UK "in the back of the queue."

However, Obama did not shrink away from his stance that Brexit was a mistake and that London would not be able to jump
the queue to arrange a bilateral trade deal.

Juncker said that if Britain wanted access to the European Union's common market, it needed to respect the rules of the
common market.

Turnbull, meanwhile, said Australia wanted an early free trade agreement with Britain so markets could remain open
between them when Britain formally left the European trading bloc.
Jean-Claude Juncker is a Luxembourgish politician who has been President of the European Commission, the executive branch of the European
Union, since 2014

Snubbed or not, Obama held talks with Xi on Saturday that ran late into the night focusing mostly on the recent geopolitical
tensions surrounding the disputed islands. He urged Beijing to uphold its legal obligations in the disputed waters of the
South China Sea, and stressed U.S. commitments to its regional allies.

Xi responded by saying China would continue to safeguard its sovereignty and maritime rights in the South China Sea. But
China is keen to keep the summit focused on economic issues and to prevent other disputes from overshadowing it.

According to a "fact sheet" on China-U.S. relations issued on Sunday, the two sides agreed on a range of issues, including
avoiding competitive currency devaluations and not limiting deal opportunities for foreign information and communication
technology providers.
Obama, in the last five months of his presidency, is using the visit to put a final stamp on his signature policy shift toward the
Pacific, setting the tone for his White House successor, who will be elected in November and take office on Jan. 20. Judging
by this weekend's incidents, Chinese opinion of the highest US political institutions has never been lower.

Perhaps just as bizarre as the now infamous Obama snub, however, was China's decision to convert parts of the city of
Hangzhou, with its 9 million people, into a virtual ghost town as China sought to ensure that the G20 summit stays incident-
free.

The Court That Rules The World

September 7 2016 | From: Buzzfeed

A parallel legal universe, open only to corporations and largely invisible to everyone else, helps
executives convicted of crimes escape punishment.
Part one of a BuzzFeed News investigation - Read the whole series here.

Imagine a private, global super court that empowers corporations to bend countries to their will.

Say a nation tries to prosecute a corrupt CEO or ban dangerous pollution. Imagine that a company could turn to this super
court and sue the whole country for daring to interfere with its profits, demanding hundreds of millions or even billions of
dollars as retribution.

Imagine that this court is so powerful that nations often must heed its rulings as if they came from their own supreme courts,
with no meaningful way to appeal.

That it operates unconstrained by precedent or any significant public oversight, often keeping its proceedings and sometimes
even its decisions secret.

That the people who decide its cases are largely elite Western corporate attorneys who have a vested interest in expanding
the courts authority because they profit from it directly, arguing cases one day and then sitting in judgment another.

That some of them half-jokingly refer to themselves as The Club or The Mafia.

And imagine that the penalties this court has imposed have been so crushing - and its decisions so unpredictable - that some
nations dare not risk a trial, responding to the mere threat of a lawsuit by offering vast concessions, such as rolling back their
own laws or even wiping away the punishments of convicted criminals.
This system is already in place, operating behind closed doors in office buildings and conference rooms in cities around the
world.

Known as investor-state dispute settlement, or ISDS, it is written into a vast network of treaties that govern international trade
and investment, including NAFTA and the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which Congress must soon decide whether to ratify.

These trade pacts have become a flashpoint in the US presidential campaign. But an 18-month BuzzFeed News
investigation, spanning three continents and involving more than 200 interviews and tens of thousands of documents, many
of them previously confidential, has exposed an obscure but immensely consequential feature of these trade treaties, the
secret operations of these tribunals, and the ways that business has co-opted them to bring sovereign nations to heel.

The BuzzFeed News investigation explores four different aspects of ISDS. In coming days, it will show how the mere threat
of an ISDS case can intimidate a nation into gutting its own laws, how some financial firms have transformed what was
intended to be a system of justice into an engine of profit, and how America is surprisingly vulnerable to suits from foreign
companies.

The series starts today with perhaps the least known and most jarring revelation:

Companies and executives accused or even convicted of crimes have escaped punishment by turning to this special forum.
Based on exclusive reporting from the Middle East, Central America, and Asia, BuzzFeed News has found the following:

A Dubai real estate mogul and former business partner of Donald Trump [not that that means anything, he's had
hundreds of business partners] was sentenced to prison for collaborating on a deal that would swindle the Egyptian
people out of millions of dollars - but then he turned to ISDS and got his prison sentence wiped away.

In El Salvador, a court found that a factory had poisoned a village - including dozens of children - with lead, failing
for years to take government-ordered steps to prevent the toxic metal from seeping out. But the factory owners
lawyers used ISDS to help the company dodge a criminal conviction and the responsibility for cleaning up the area
and providing needed medical care.

Two financiers convicted of embezzling more than $300 million from an Indonesian bank used an ISDS finding to
fend off Interpol, shield their assets, and effectively nullify their punishment.

When the US Congress votes on whether to give final approval to the sprawling Trans-Pacific Partnership, which President
Barack Obama staunchly supports, it will be deciding on a massive expansion of ISDS. Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton
oppose the overall treaty, but they have focused mainly on what they say would be the loss of American jobs.
Clintons running mate, Tim Kaine, has voiced concern about ISDS in particular, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren has lambasted
it. Last year, members of both houses of Congress tried to keep it out of the Pacific trade deal. They failed.

ISDS is basically binding arbitration on a global scale, designed to settle disputes between countries and foreign companies
that do business within their borders. Different treaties can mandate slightly different rules, but the system is broadly the
same.

When companies sue, their cases are usually heard in front of a tribunal of three arbitrators, often private attorneys. The
business appoints one arbitrator and the country another, then both sides usually decide on the third together.

Conceived of in the 1950s, the system was intended to benefit both developing nations and the foreign companies
that sought to invest in them.

The companies would gain a fair, neutral referee if a rogue regime seized their property or discriminated against them in
favor of domestic companies. And the countries would gain the roads or hospitals or industries that those foreign
corporations would, as a result, feel confident building.

It works, said Charles Brower, a longtime ISDS arbitrator. Like any system of law, there will be disappointments;
youre dealing with human systems. But this system fundamentally produces as good justice as the federal courts
of the United States. [Not a benchmarch which should be aspired to.]
 He defended the lawyers who often serve as arbitrators, saying
they:

"Are very aware of their responsibilities. Unlike

politicians, we are up for election every minute of
every day - somewhere in the world, somebody is
trying to figure out whom to appoint in a case. Were
only as good as our reputations.

As proof that ISDS delivers justice, Brower pointed to a wave of

nationalizations by the Venezuelan government, many while
Hugo Chvez was in charge, that led to:

"Huge awards against them for uncompensated

expropriation.

ISDS has not only put rapacious leaders on notice, its

defenders say, but it has also encouraged investment,
especially in poor countries, helping to raise overall economic
development.
Charles Brower
Some even say that it helps avoid gunboat diplomacy and tense
international showdowns because countries have agreed on a
forum where they can resolve disputes involving major
investments.

But over the last two decades, ISDS has morphed from a rarely used last resort, designed for egregious cases of
state theft or blatant discrimination, into a powerful tool that corporations brandish ever more frequently, often
against broad public policies that they claim crimp profits.

Because the system is so secretive, it is not possible to know the total number of ISDS cases, but lawyers in the field say it is
skyrocketing. Indeed, of the almost 700 publicly known cases across the last half century, more than a tenth were filed just
last year.

Driving this expansion are the lawyers themselves. They have devised new and creative ways to deploy ISDS, and in the
process bill millions to both the businesses and the governments they represent. At posh locales around the globe, members
of The Club meet to swap strategies and drum up potential clients, some of which are household names, such as
ExxonMobil or Eli Lilly, but many more of which are much lower profile.
In specialty publications, the lawyers suggest novel ways to use ISDS as leverage against governments. Its a sort of
sophisticated, international version of the plaintiffs attorney TV ad or billboard: Has your business been harmed by an
increase in mining royalties in Mali? Our experienced team of lawyers may be able to help.

A few of their ideas: Sue Libya for failing to protect an oil facility during a civil war. Sue Spain for reducing solar energy
incentives as a severe recession forced the government to make budget cuts. Sue India for allowing a generic drug company
to make a cheaper version of a cancer drug.

In a little-noticed 2014 dissent, US Chief Justice John Roberts warned that ISDS arbitration panels hold the alarming power
to review a nations laws and effectively annul the authoritative acts of its legislature, executive, and judiciary. ISDS
arbitrators, he continued, can meet literally anywhere in the world and sit in judgment on a nations sovereign acts.
That fate has not yet befallen the United
States - but largely because of sheer luck,
former government lawyers said.

In theory, ISDS arbitrators must follow the

rules laid down in trade pacts.

But in practice, they have interpreted the

vague language of many treaties as
enshrining broad, unwritten rights far beyond
protections against property seizures and
blatant discrimination - even finding, in one
case, a right to a reasonable rate of return.

Some entrepreneurial lawyers scout for ways

to make money from ISDS.

Selvyn Seidel, an attorney who represented

clients in ISDS suits, now runs a specialty
firm, one that finds investors willing to fund
promising suits for a cut of the eventual
award.

Some lawyers, he said, monitor

governments around the world in search of
proposed laws and regulations that might
spark objections from foreign companies.

"Huge awards against them for

uncompensated expropriation.

You know its coming down the

road, he said, so, in that year
before its actually changed, you
can line up the right claimants
and the right law firms to bring a
number of cases.

The US officials who negotiated the Trans-

Pacific Partnership have argued that it
contains new ISDS safeguards, including
opening up hearings and legal filings to the
public.

The changes, however, have loopholes, and

lawyers at some big firms are already
advising clients how they might use the new
deal to their benefit.

Opposition to ISDS is spreading across the

political spectrum, with groups on the left
and right attacking the system.

Around the world, a growing number of

countries are pushing for reforms or pulling
out entirely.

But most of the alarm has been focused on

the potential use of ISDS by corporations to
roll back public-interest laws, such as those
banning the use of hazardous chemicals or
raising the minimum wage.
The systems usefulness as a shield for the
criminal and the corrupt has remained
virtually unknown.

Reviewing publicly available information for

about 300 claims filed during the past five
years, BuzzFeed News found more than 35
cases in which the company or executive
seeking protection in ISDS was accused of
criminal activity, including money laundering,
embezzlement, stock manipulation, bribery,
war profiteering, and fraud.

Among them: a bank in Cyprus that the US

government accused of financing terrorism
and organized crime, an oil company
executive accused of embezzling millions
from the impoverished African nation of
Burundi, and the Russian oligarch known as
the Kremlins banker.
Some are at the center of notorious scandals, from the billionaire accused of orchestrating a massive Ponzi scheme in
Mauritius to multiple telecommunications tycoons charged in the ever-widening 2G scam in India, which made it
into Time magazines top 10 abuses of power, alongside Watergate.

The companies or executives involved in these cases either denied wrongdoing or did not respond to requests for comment.

Most of the 35-plus cases are still ongoing. But in at least eight of the cases, bringing an ISDS claim got results for the
accused wrongdoers, including a multimillion-dollar award, a dropped criminal investigation, and dropped criminal charges. In
another, the tribunal has directed the government to halt a criminal case while the arbitration is pending.

Of course, there are governments that dont have clean hands themselves, and some claims by businesses have been
justified. The legal systems of some countries are flagrantly unfair or riddled with corruption.

Moreover, authoritarian or kleptocratic regimes sometimes do use their justice systems as political weapons. For example,
arbitrators ordered Russia to pay compensation after finding that Vladimir Putin and his administration had used criminal and
tax proceedings to destroy his political rival Mikhail Khodorkovskys oil company.

Lawyers say that some governments, faced with a legitimate ISDS claim, will even trump up a criminal charge to deflect from
their own wrongdoing. For example, arbitrators found there was evidence suggesting that Bolivia had launched a fraud case
against mining-company executives as a ploy to get the companys ISDS claim thrown out.

But even some members of The Club said they were concerned by how often credible allegations of criminality arise. Many
ISDS lawyers say that the system helps promote the rule of law around the world.

If ISDS is seen as protecting criminals, they fear, it could delegitimize a system that is working well for many others.

One lawyer who regularly represents governments said hes seen evidence of corporate criminality that he
couldnt believe.

Speaking on the condition that he not be named because hes currently handling ISDS cases, he said;
 You have a lot of scuzzy sort-of thieves for whom this is a way to hit the jackpot.

Read the full accounts of what happened in the cases of Egypt, El Salvador and Indonesia at: Buzzfeed

Be advised: If the TPPA / TTIP et al were ratified, it would be these pricks coming to rape our countries.

1080: NZ Animals Killed For No Reason In $80m Yearly 1080 Drops

September 6 2016 | From: Various

Over 80 million dollars, including farmers hard earned cash, is spent every year eradicating a
disease, that by World standards, doesn't exist...

The Agency considered that acute exposures to 1080 in humans and animals may give rise to irreversible adverse,
target organ [heart and brain] effects. These effects are severe.

Related: Satanists Escape Plan Involves Killing Natives Of New Zealand

Continued presence of predators (rats, mice, cats, stoats) [on Rangitoto Island after 1080 cereal operation]..ongoing
predation..less than expected bird population recoveries (2004)

Related Links & Information on 1080:

What DOC doesnt want you to know about 1080 Poison

"The recent post about 89 dead Kiwis that DOC didnt bother to test for 1080 poisoning relates to this report of birds that
actually were tested. Thanks to the person with a conscience who let the public know what is going on!"

TVwild.co.nz

More 1080 videos + If you have your pets, farm stock, deer, trout or eels, native wildlife (including birds), poisoned on or
near your property or have any information to share with regard to aerial 1080 poison drops taking place near you, please let
us know
1080Science.co.nz

Introduction Environmental Risk Management Authoritys 1080 Documents + factual evidence against 1080.

Monsanto Promoting Worldwide Infertility? + Academic GMO Shills Exposed: Fraud

And Collusion With Monsanto
September 6 2016 | From: Sott / NaturalNews

Monsanto has a long and infamous history of manufacturing and bringing to market such
chemicals as DDT, Agent Orange, aspartame, Roundup and dioxin - chemical compounds from
which society continues to feel the effects.

In an effort to distance the current corporation from past deeds, Monsanto refers to the company prior to 2002 as
"the former Monsanto" in their news releases. However, nothing has really changed aside from their PR machine.
While Monsanto has branched into genetic engineering (GE) of plants, the sale of patented GE seeds simply feeds the need
for the company's pesticides. Monsanto is STILL primarily a purveyor of toxins, not life.

Monsanto began forging a unique and financially advantageous relationship with the U.S. government starting with the
company's involvement in the Manhattan Project that produced the first nuclear weapons during World War II. During the
Vietnam War they were the leading producer of Agent Orange.

Related: The Complete History Of Monsanto, The Worlds Most Evil Corporation

The specialization in the production and distribution of toxic chemicals continues today.

Their influence over government runs so deep that despite the fact 64 other countries have been labeling genetically
engineered (GE) foods for years, the U.S. now has the distinction of being the first country to un-label GE foods at
the urging of a company producing mass amounts of GE seeds.

Monsanto and Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)

In the latter part of the 1920s, Monsanto was the largest producer of PCBs. This chemical was used in lubricant for electric
motors, hydraulic fluids and to insulate electrical equipment. Old fluorescent light fixtures and electrical appliances with PCB
capacitors may still contain the chemical.

During the years PCB was manufactured and used, there were no controls placed on disposal. Since PCBs don't break
down under many conditions, they are now widely distributed through the environment and have made the journey up the
food chain.

Between the inception and distribution of the product and its subsequent ban in the late 1970s, an estimated 1.5 billion
pounds were distributed in products around the world.

Monsanto was the primary manufacturer of PCBs in the U.S. under the trade name Aroclor. Health problems associated
with exposure to the chemical were noted as early as 1933 when 23 of 24 workers at the production plant developed
pustules, loss of energy and appetite, loss of libido and other skin disturbances.
According to Monsanto's public timeline, it was in 1966 that "Monsanto and others began to study PCB persistence in the
environment." However, seven years earlier, Monsanto's assistant director of their Medical Department wrote:

... [S]ufficient exposure, whether by inhalation of vapors or skin contact, can result in chloracne which I think we
must assume could be an indication of a more systemic injury if the exposure were allowed to continue."

In 1967, Shell Oil called to inform Monsanto of press reports from Sweden, noting that PCBs were accumulating in
mammals further up the food chain. Shell asked for PCB samples to perform their own analytical studies.

With full knowledge of the devastation expected to the environment and humanity, it wasn't until 11 years later, in 1977, that
Monsanto reportedly pulled production on PCB.

PCBs Are Probable Human Carcinogens

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the National
Toxicology Program, and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIEHS) have identified PCBs as either
probable, potential or reasonably likely to cause cancer in humans.

If it seems like these agencies are couching their words, they are. Human studies have noted increased rates of liver
cancer, gall bladder cancer, melanomas, gastrointestinal cancer, biliary tract cancer, brain cancer and breast
cancer when individuals had higher levels of PCB chemicals in their blood and tissue.

However, the EPA limits the ability of researchers to link a chemical as a carcinogen unless there is conclusive proof. While
this proof is evident in animal studies, you can't feed these chemicals to humans and record the results. Thus PCBs are a
"probable" carcinogen in humans.

Other health effects from PCBs include:

Babies born with neurological and motor control delays including lower IQ, poor short-term memory and poor
performance on standardized behavioral assessment tests
 Disrupted sex hormones including shortened menstrual cycles, reduced sperm count and premature puberty

Imbalanced thyroid hormone affecting growth, intellectual and behavioral development

Immune effects, including children with more ear infections and chickenpox

Once PCBs are absorbed in the body they deposit in the fat tissue. They are not broken down or excreted. This means the
number of PCBs build over time and move up the food chain. Smaller fish are eaten by larger ones and eventually land on
your dinner table.

Chemical Poisoning Begins Before Birth

A recent study at the University of California demonstrated that PCBs are found in the blood of pregnant women. Before
birth, the umbilical cord delivers approximately 300 quarts of blood to your baby every day.

Not long ago, researchers believed the placenta would shield your developing baby from most pollutants and chemicals.
Now we know it does not.

The umbilical cord is a lifeline between mother and child, sustaining life and propelling growth. However, in recent research
cord blood contained between 200 and 280 different chemicals; 180 were known carcinogens and 217 were toxic to the
baby's developing nervous system.

The deposits of chemicals in your body or the body of your developing baby are called your "body burden" of chemicals and
pollution.

A steady stream of chemicals from the environment during a critical time of organ and system development has a
significant impact on the health of your child, both in infancy and as the child grows to adulthood.

Tracey Woodruff, Ph.D., director of the University of California San Francisco Program on Reproductive Health and the
Environment, was quoted in a press release, saying:

It was surprising and concerning to find so many chemicals in pregnant women without fully knowing the
implications for pregnancy. Several of these chemicals in pregnant women were at the same concentrations that
have been associated with negative effects in children from other studies.
 In addition, exposure to multiple chemicals that can increase the risk of the same adverse health outcome can
have a greater impact than exposure to just one chemical."

Butyl Benzyl Phthalate - Another Monsanto Product

Butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP), also manufactured by Monsanto, was recently implicated in cell fat storage. This specific
phthalate was found in human fluids and had an effect on the accumulation of fat inside cells.

BBP is used in the manufacture of vinyl tile, as a plasticizer in PVC pipe, carpets, conveyer belts and weather stripping in
your home and office.

Like other phthalates used in the production of plastics, BBP is not bound to the product and can be released into your
environment. It may be absorbed by crops and move up the food chain. The biggest source of exposure is food.

Drive-through hamburgers and take-out pizzas may be increasing your intake of phthalates. The danger is not in the food
itself but in the products used to handle it. The study analyzed data from nearly 9,000 individuals, finding the one-third who
had eaten at a fast food restaurant had higher levels of two different phthalates.
Potentially, BBP may adversely affect your reproductive function. However, at lower doses it also has an effect on your
kidneys, liver and pancreas. Increased risks of respiratory disorders and multiple myelomas have also been reported in
people who have exposure to products manufactured with BBP. An increasing waistline from BBP exposure may also
reduce your fertility.

Low Sperm Count and Infertility Affecting Animals and Humans

A 26-year study of fertility in dogs, published recently, has distinct similarities to infertility rates in humans. In this study,
researchers evaluated the ejaculate of nearly 2,000 dogs. Over the 26 year period, they found a drop in sperm motility of 2.4
percent per year.

Additionally, both the semen and the testicles of castrated dogs contained by PCBs and phthalates, implicated in other
studies to reduction in fertility. Phthalates have been implicated in both decreased sperm motility and quality of your sperm,
affecting both fertility and the health of your children.

Researchers used dogs in this study as they live in the same environment as their owners, and often eat some of the same
food. This correlation between sperm function and concentration, and environment and food in dogs and humans is
significant.

In those 26 years there was also a rise in cryptorchidism in male pups (a condition where the testicles don't descend into the
scrotum) born to stud dogs who experienced a decline in sperm quality and motility.
Cryptorchidism and undescended testicles, occurs at a rate of 1 in 20 term male human infants and 1 in 3 pre-term babies.

Problems with infertility are also affecting marine animals at the top of the food chain. In the western waters of the Atlantic,
the last pod of Orcas are doomed to extinction. High levels of PCB have been found in the fat of over 1,000 dolphins and
Orcas in the past 20 years. Now taking a toll on the animal's fertility, this pod of Orcas has not reproduced in the 19 years it
has been under study.

Orcas were living in the North Sea until the 1960s. At that time PCB pollution peaked in the area and the Orca whales
disappeared. The same happened in the Mediterranean Sea, where the whales flourished until the 1980s. This pod off the
coast of the U.K. is the last living pod in that area.

Monsanto's Argument in PCB Lawsuits

Although Monsanto denies culpability and knowledge of the danger behind the chemical PCB, you'll discover internal
documentation in this video that they did, in fact, know of the danger while manufacturing and distributing the product.
Monsanto is currently embroiled in several lawsuits across eight cities and the argument is over who owns the rain. The
cities are suing Monsanto in Federal Court, saying PCBs manufactured by Monsanto have polluted the San Francisco Bay.

Monsanto attorney Robert Howard argues that because the city does not own the water rights, the city does not have the
right to sue. And, because the PCBs have not damaged city property, such as corroding pipes, Howard claims it is a state
problem. Scott Fiske, attorney for three cities, countered with the city's regulatory interests in management of storm water as
a fundamental function of the city.

While Fiske claims he can prove Monsanto knew the product was hazardous as early as 1969, Howard maintains the
company should not be liable for the use of the chemicals it produced.

In 2001, Monsanto attorneys in the Owens v. Monsanto case, acknowledged only one health threat from exposure to PCBs:
chloracne, and instead argued that since the entire planet has been contaminated, they are innocent of all liability. The
attorney for Monsanto was quoted in the Chemical Industry Archives, saying:
 The truth is that PCBs are everywhere. They are in meat, they are in everyone in the courtroom, they are
everywhere and they have been for a long time, along with a host of other substances."

The cities currently engaged in lawsuits against Monsanto for damage to the environment and waterways include Berkley,
Oakland, San Jose, Portland, Spokane, Seattle, Long Beach and San Diego. All eight cities attempted to combine their
cases against the agrochemical giant but were unsuccessful when one judge found the issues were different enough to
warrant separate cases.

Monsanto's Deep Pockets

Monsanto petitioned the Federal Court to dismiss Portland's lawsuit, claiming it would countersue, adding years to the
process. It is likely Monsanto would increase the scope of the case and include companies who used the product and
released the PCBs.

Meanwhile, three plaintiffs in St. Louis received better news in May 2016 when a jury awarded them a total of $46.5
million, finding Monsanto negligent in the production of PCBs.

This suit claimed Monsanto sold PCBs even after it learned about the dangers, bringing to court internal documents dated
1955, which stated: "We know Aroclors [PCBs] are toxic but the actual limit has not been precisely defined."33 To date this
win over Monsanto has been rare. Williams Kherkher, attorney for the plaintiffs, explained in EcoWatch:

The only reason why this victory is rare is because no one has had the money to fight Monsanto."

Kherkher and other firms pooled their resources in this case and expect wins in upcoming lawsuits. The firm has
accumulated the names of approximately 1,000 plaintiffs with claims against Monsanto and PCBs.
Related: The Daily Show takes on Monsanto

SAD NEWS: House Passes DARK Act Compromise

The House passed a compromise to the DARK Act that will force food distributors to disclose the presence of genetically
engineered (GE) ingredients with a smartphone scan code. President Obama has signed the bill that removes states' rights
for labeling GMOs. The bill is full of loopholes, which may allow genetically modified ingredients to slip through
unannounced.

Genetically modified organisms (GMOs), aka GE foods, are live organisms whose genetic components have been artificially
manipulated in a laboratory setting through creating unstable combinations of plant, animal, bacteria and even viral genes
that do not occur in nature or through traditional crossbreeding methods.

GMO proponents claim that genetic engineering is "safe and beneficial," and that it advances the agricultural industry. They
also say that GMOs help ensure the global food supply and sustainability.

But is there any truth to these claims? I believe not. For years, I've stated the belief that GMOs pose one of the
greatest threats to life on the planet. Genetic engineering is NOT the safe and beneficial technology that it is touted
to be.

Related: GMO ban expands in Russia as Putin halts all production and imports

The FDA cleared the way for GE Atlantic salmon to be farmed for human consumption. Thanks to added language in the
federal spending bill, the product will require special labeling so at least consumers will have the ability to identify the GE
salmon in stores. However, it's imperative ALL GE foods be labeled clearly without a smartphone scan code because not
everyone owns a smartphone.

The FDA is threatening the existence of our food supply. We have to start taking action now. I urge you to share this article
with friends and family. If we act together, we can make a difference and put an end to the absurdity.

Related: Venezuela passes new law rejecting GMOs and seed patents nationwide

Boycott Smart Labels Today

When you see the QR code or so-called Smart Label on a food product, pass it by. Products bearing the Grocery
Manufacturer's Association's (GMA) Smart Label mark are in all likelihood filled with pesticides and/or GMO ingredients.

The GMA's 300-plus members include chemical technology companies, GE seed and food and beverage companies.
Monsanto, Dow and Coca-Cola are just some of the heavy-hitters in this powerful industry group, which has showed no
qualms about doing whatever it takes to protect the interest of its members.

Don't waste your time searching through their website, which may or may not contain the information you're looking for. If
they insist on wasting your time and making your shopping difficult, why reward them with a purchase?

A little known fact is that the GMA actually owns the "Smart Label" trademark that Congress has accepted as a so-called
"compromise" to on-package GMO labeling, and that's another reason why I believe the Smart Label mark is the mark of
those with something to hide, such as Monsanto.

Will you financially support a corrupt, toxic and unsustainable food system, or a healthy, regenerative one? There are many
options available besides big-brand processed foods that are part of the "GMA's verified ring of deception."

You can:

Shop at local farms and farmers markets

Only buy products marked either "USDA 100 percent Organic" (which by law cannot contain GMOs), "100 percent
Grass-Fed" or "Non-GMO Verified"

If you have a smartphone and you don't mind using it, download the OCA's Buycott app to quickly and easily
identify the thousands of proprietary brands belonging to GMA members, so you can avoid them, as well as
identify the names of ethical brands that deserve your patronage

Last but not least, encourage good companies to reject QR codes and to be transparent and clear with their labeling. This
will eventually ensure that all GMO foods can easily be identified by the GMA's "verified ring of deception" mark that is the
Smart Label.

Campbell's, Mars, Kellogg's, ConAgra and General Mills all vowed to voluntarily comply with Vermont's GMO labeling law by
labeling all of their foods sold across the U.S.

Will their plans change now that the law has been passed by Congress and signed by the President? That remains to be
seen, but if you like these companies, I would encourage you to reach out to them and ask them to remain steadfast in their
promise.

Non-GMO Food Resources by Country

If you are searching for non-GMO foods, here is a list of trusted sites you can visit:

Organic Food Directory (Australia)

Eat Wild (Canada)

Organic Explorer (New Zealand)

Eat Well Guide (United States and Canada)

Farm Match (United States)

Local Harvest (United States)

Weston A. Price Foundation (United States)

Comment: Check out the informative videos in the following article America's monster: Monsanto

Few corporations in the world are as loathed - and as sinister - as Monsanto. But the threat it poses to people and planet
could be reaching new heights, as the World Health Organization has recently upgraded Monsanto's main product as
carcinogenic to humans. With protests against the agrochemical giant held in more than 40 countries in May, learn why the
global movement against Monsanto is of critical importance to our future.

In this episode of The Empire Files, Abby Martin issues a scathing expose on the corporate polluter, chronicling it's rise to
power, the collusion of its crimes by the US government and highlighting the serious danger it puts us in today.
Academic GMO Shills Exposed: Once-Secret Emails Reveal Gross Collusion With
Monsanto, Academic Fraud At The Highest Levels Inside U.S. Universities
U.S. Right to Know (USRTK), a non-profit organization dedicated to exposing the fraud and
corruption surrounding the food industry, launched an investigation into the intimate and
unethical relationship between the biotech industry and university faculty and staff, which is used
to manipulate public opinion about GMOs and to coerce the government into passing legislation
supportive of Big Ag's patented seeds and pesticides.

The investigation, which is still ongoing, reveals how biotech industry giants Monsanto, DuPont, Syngenta, Dow
AgroSciences and others, buy academics employed by taxpayer-funded universities to push GMOs and lobby
Congress to pass legislation favorable of their products, with one of the most high-profile examples including
attempts to derail states' rights to enact GMO-labeling laws.

The collusion between Big Food, its front groups and university staff has been exposed through thousands of emails and
documents obtained through a USRTK Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, which was meticulously filed over a six-
month period.

USRTK: Public deserves to know about flow of money and level of coordination between Big Ag
and public university scientists

The FOIA request sought to obtain emails and documents from 43 public university faculty and staff to learn more about the
biotech industry's public relations strategies. Records were requested from scientists, economists, law professors, extension
specialists and communicators, all of whom are employed by taxpayer-funded public institutions and steadily promote GMO
agriculture under the "independent" research.

Currently, USRTK has received thousands of documents in nine of their requests; however, much more information is
expected to be released as FOIA requests continue to be answered.

The documents received thus far expose how the biotech industry funds expenses for university faculty to travel the globe
promoting and defending GMOs and their associated pesticides, highlighting the shift that scientists have made from being
researchers to being actors in Big Ag PR campaigns.
Named the "Biofortified boys" by Alicia Maluafiti, executive director of Hawaii Crop Improvement Association (HCIA), a
biotech front group, the academics were awarded thousands, and in some cases, hundreds of thousands of dollars in
unrestricted grant money.

Dr. Kevin Folta, professor and chairman of the Horticultural Sciences Department at the University of Florida, Gainesville, is
one of the biotech industry's most cooperative "Biofortified boys." Emails show that Folta was enlisted to travel to Hawaii and
later to Pennsylvania to "testify to government bodies to oppose proposed mandatory genetically modified labeling
measures."

Folta has repeatedly denied ties to Monsanto or having accepted funds from them; however, newly released documents
prove otherwise, exposing him as a bald-faced liar and attack dog for the biotech industry.

Sponsored and organized by the HCIA, which includes Monsanto, DuPont, Dow AgroSciences, Syngenta and BASF, Folta
and others were recruited to meet with local business execs to lobby against Hawaii's proposed GMO-labeling law.

HCIA's Maluafiti writes:

"So please know that you are part of our overall public education strategy and specifically how do we use your
valuable time wisely while you are here in Hawaii (besides hitting the beaches!) I'd love to hear your thoughts.
Aloha!"

A second email authored by Renee Kester, wife of Dow AgroSciences R&D Leader Kirby Kester, who is also president of
the HCIA, thanks them for their support:

"First off I would like to thank you for all of the support you have given us over here in Hawaii with regards to our
recent legislative battles, it means a lot to all of us over here."
Monsanto asks academics to author articles promoting GMOs

In an effort to influence "thought leaders and influencers," Monsanto reached out to Dr. Folta and other academics, asking
them to author a series of pro-GMO policy briefs to be used for "outreach and engagement with policy makers and
consumers." The briefs were to be promoted as being authored by "independent scientists."

Eric Sachs, the chief of Monsanto's global scientific affairs group wrote:

"The key to success is participation by all of you recognized experts and leaders with the knowledge,
reputation and communication experience needed to communicate authoritatively to the target groups."

"You represent an elite group whose credibility will be strengthened by working together."

Recognizing participants' careers are at stake, Sachs offers the academics assurance by promising that he will protect their
"independence," as well as their reputations.

Some of the topics the academics were asked to write on include:

Meeting World Challenges (discuss how GMOs will save the world by addressing shrinking agricultural resources, food
security, food affordability and environmental sustainability).

Stifling Innovation (discuss how GM crop regulations stifle technological advancements and prevent GMOs from
improving overall quality of life).

Holding Activists Accountable assigned to Kevin Folta (discuss how anti-GMO activist campaigns spread false
information and if left unchallenged will limit consumer choice, increase food prices, decrease farmer viability and undermine
global food security).

GM Crop Safety (address consumer and policy maker concerns that GM crops aren't tested for safety, convince public
that they are proven safe).
 Consequences of Rejecting GM Crops (address public health fears and political resistance and concerns about
biodiversity and biological safety and intellectual property rights that create barriers to GM acceptance).

Sustainable Crop Systems (discuss how GM crop technology provides environmental benefits, increases yields and
improves productivity).

Responsible Choice (highlight the role GM crop technology plays in ensuring increase production and how it balances
our needs for food, feed, fiber and fuel). Academics were asked to include a "call to action," which would be used in the
briefs to influence the public on a variety of platforms including social media, blogs, websites and allied organizations.

Montano enlists university scientists to pressure EPA to abandon proposed pesticide regulations

Documents reveal that Monsanto also used academics to put pressure on regulatory agencies like the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) in one instance pressuring the EPA to abandon its proposal to tighten regulations regarding
pesticide use on insect-resistant crops.

"Is there a coordinated plan to maintain pressure and emphasis on EPA's evolving regulations?" asked Sachs in
an email to Dr. Bruce Chassy, a professor emeritus at the University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign.

Sachs continued, "Have you considered having a small group of scientists request a meeting with Lisa Jackson
[referring to the EPA's administrator at the time]?"

With the help of an industry lobbyist, Chassy was eventually able to set up a meeting with Jackson, after which the agency's
proposal was ultimately dropped.

Stay tuned for more as Natural News continues to dissect documents exposing the incestuous relationship between the
biotech industry and university scientists.

Related Articles:
The sheer volume of information exposing Monsanto is overwhelming - yet where are the mainstream media on
this?

Owned and censored is where - impotent to report on anything but PR spin, lies, fluff and sports.

World Health Organization Admits Roundup Probably Causes Cancer

MIT Researcher: Glyphosate Herbicide Will Cause Half Of All Children To Have Autism By 2025

Union Of 30,000 Doctors In Latin America Wants Monsanto Banned!

Zika HOAX exposed by South American doctors: Brain deformations caused by larvicide chemical linked to
Monsanto; GM mosquitoes a 'total failure'

The Case of Glyphosate: Product Promoters Masquerading as Regulators?

Bill Gates, Monsanto & Saudi Arabia are Raping Nigeria with Terror & GMO

Monsanto Exposed as Source for White Phosphorus Used in Gaza Massacre

Glyphosate Herbicide Found in 14 Popular Beer Brands from Germany

Venezuela passes new law rejecting GMOs and seed patents nationwide

Glyphosate: Pathways to Modern Diseases

Supermodel Christie Brinkley Christie Brinkley Slams Monsanto, Speaks Out in Favor of GMO Labeling

Genetically Engineered Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation

 How GMO Foods Turn Your Intestines Into an Insecticide Factory

Oakland sues Monsanto for long-standing contamination of San Francisco Bay

EPA Raises Alarm Over GMO Crops that Are Breeding Swarms of These Mutant Bugs

Academic GMO shills exposed: Once-secret emails reveal gross collusion with Monsanto, academic fraud at the
highest levels inside U.S. universities

New England Journal of Medicine article calls for labeling of GM foods

Avengers actor Mark Ruffalo is aggressively fighting the Bayer, Monsanto merger

Zika virus or insecticide Pyriproxyfen - which is behind rise in microcephaly cases?

What is the Zika Virus Epidemic Covering Up?

Autism - Made in the U S A - Gary Null's Remarkable Documentary

MIT States That Half of All Children May be Autistic by 2025 due to Monsanto

Bayer defies critics with $62 billion Monsanto offer

Nazi-founded Bayer chemical company wants to buy Satan-inspired Monsanto for $42 billion... it's a perfect match
made in chemical Hell

How Monsanto stifles criticism

Monsanto To Merge With Whole Foods For New Health Store 365

The War On Cash & The Politics Of Negative Interest Rates

September 4 2016 | From: FinalWakeUpCall / ProjectSyndicate

Wealth confiscation: The War on Cash and negative interest rates are radical and insane
measures. They are a sign of desperation.
They are also huge threats to your financial security. Central planners are playing with fire and inviting a currency
catastrophe. Most people have no idea what really happens when a currency collapses, let alone how to prepare.

Related: The Real Reasons Behind Negative Interest Rates And Banning Cash

Throughout the Western world the financial system has become an exploiter of the people and a deadweight loss on
economies. There are only two possible solutions. One is to break the large banks up into smaller and local entities such as
existed prior to the bank deregulation. The other is to nationalise them and operate them solely in the interest of the general
welfare of the population.

However, the TBTF-banks are too powerful for either solution to be allowed to occur. But the greed, fraud, and self-serving
behaviour of Western financial systems, aided and subsidised by governments, could be leading to such a complete
breakdown of economic life, that the idea of a private financial system will become as unacceptable in the future as Nazism
is today.
Meanwhile, it should be clear that the RKM-cabal want you to use money that they can easily control, tax, and confiscate
and paper currency is getting in their way. Governments are instructed to confiscate your wealth, by steadily debasing the
currency via printing money or in other words inflation. Its a stealthy way to confiscate from savers and hard working
people.

Imagine the car you have paid to someone before driving off. Imagine the rent to be paid to someone before moving into a
home. When you pay someone to take their claim off your hands, you experience how much your money really is worth.

Eliminate Paper Currency:

Governments might collectively attempt to eliminate paper currency in favour of an electronic currency transferred from
party to party solely through licensed banks. Sound farfetched? Well, maybe, but what if the U.S. and EU agreed on an
overall plan, and then suggest it to other governments?

On the face of it, this may seem like a conspiracy theory, but all governments would benefit from this control and would be
likely to get on board. They might say that this will prove to be the only way out of their present economic problems.
And when your bank the RKM-cabal wants to confiscate your money, who will stop them from implementing the P-R-
S myth: Problem Reaction Solution, that links the free movement of cash to terrorism, creating a consciousness that any
movement of large sums of money suggests criminal activity?

Designate a maximum amount of money that may be moved without reporting to some government investigatory agency;
Periodically lower these limits; Accustom people to making all purchases, however small or large, with a bank card; Create a
consciousness that the mere possession of cash is suspect, since its no longer necessary.

And thus start; the War on Cash.

Running out of Time:

Governments are running out of time. The one reason why theyd rush a programme that normally would be given more time
for people to accept, is that they see a crash coming before the completion of their new programme to be implemented.

The next step is the intent of creating a definitive false flag event that demonstrates how physical cash is the primary means
of funding evil acts in the world so that they can declare a date on which paper currency will become illegal. Until that date, it
may be deposited into a bank.

Thereafter, it will become criminal to possess it. Once all cash has been deposited in the banks, negative interest rates
will be increased, as interest rates can only be lowered further if cash currency is banned; Confiscation of deposits can
then be implemented, as desired by banks, because recently the confiscation of deposits has been legalised in Canada, the
U.S., New Zealand, the EU and other countries.;
Confiscate contents of selected safe deposit boxes; End voluntary taxation. All taxation will in future be by direct debit;
Declare money to be the property of the State that issued it, as people are only allowed to trade with it, but it is not truly
theirs. The State therefore can freeze or confiscate the funds in any account, if any crime is suspected.

Once completed, state wealth control will exist. This may seem a mere fiction. But then, less than a year ago, the War on
Cash was regarded by only a few as being even within the realm of possibility, let alone right around the corner. Now it is
accepted as being an unsettling reality.

If you have cash in a bank, dont think of it as your own. This is not the case. It is wealth that you have loaned to the bank.
In the near future, the bank, with governmental approval, will have the power to decide if and when they return all, or a part
of this cash to you. They will set the rules as to how this decision will be determined and the rules will be changed
periodically.

At least if you possess your money in cold, hard cash, they will have to come and physically get it from you. When it is in
the bank existing in the form of electronic account balances all they have to do is push a button.
Thats what happened in Cyprus. The banks were about to fall off the cliff so they confiscated deposits to help make
themselves whole again. Who will stop the same thing from happening again wherever you may reside?

The judge is RKM appointed. The police are on the RKMs payroll. The politicians are RKM bought and paid-off to do what is
required by them. When cash is outlawed, only outlaws will have cash. And the best advice to you is; intend to be among
them.

Escape Confiscation:

Seek alternatives, the War on Cash will be international, but it wont be fully global. There will still be jurisdictions that,
following tradition, will not fall in line with the worlds foremost powers. They will not wish to go off the same cliff as the
others and will take a different course. They will be the safe havens for those people who seek to escape the collapsing
system.

If youre a resident of any country thats presently going down this anti-cash road, move your money to a jurisdiction that has
a consistent history of a stable government, low, or no direct taxation, and minimal interference or regulation of wealth;
Convert your wealth into those forms of assets that are most difficult for greedy governments to confiscate, like foreign-held
precious metals and real estate.
Only a tiny fraction of the population owns gold. This wasnt the case in 1933, when the U.S. was still on a variation of the
original gold standard. This is why the government will probably not repeat the 1933 rip-off. Its simply not worth the effort.

If governments want to confiscate wealth, its far more likely they will go for the easy option, by steadily debasing the
currency by printing money, in other words: Inflation. Its a stealthy way of confiscating from savers. This does not mean
gold owners are invincible.

This time, governments are likely to try a new scam: taxing windfall profits on gold. This would make it much easier for
governments to accomplish something similar to its 1933 heist. In short, they will apply a windfall taxation on profits they
dont like.
Click on the image above to open a larger version in a new window

The whole concept is a scam. It is camouflaged, legalized theft. If the price of gold explodes, Parliaments will pass a Fair
Share Gold Windfall Profit Tax Act, levying a tax of 80%, to 90%, or more on gold profits.

Fortunately, there are some practical steps be taken in order to protect yourself from this form of politically motivated
expropriation. When such a law is discussed in Parliament, its time to sell your gold, or better still, move your gold
beforehand into a tax-free jurisdiction zone.

What is most important is that governments cannot destroy golds value with reckless policies. Their destructive actions only
lead people to buy more gold.

Ousting the Cabal:

Germany, after Turkey has turned its back on the Khazarians and NATO, with its largest European base in Ramstein, now
the 2nd closure is, after the NATO base in Turkey, both of which are actively used by the Bushes and Clinton for drugs
smuggling activities include opium from Afghanistan into Western markets to prop up finances.

The Germans decided for this decisive break with the RKM-mafia, after receiving a request for a massive false flag attack on
its territory involving Angela Merkel, creating the argument for attacking Russia and start WW3.

Good willing leaders in Germany decided to refuse this request and to allying themselves with the Russians. Effectively,
joining the UK and Turkey in a Western led move against the RKM controlled US-government, while ordering citizens to
stockpile 10 days worth of emergency food supplies in preparation for a war of independence, for which the German
government is mobilising 600,000 militias.

So the good news is; Germany separates itself as a Khazarians vassal state.

Schnell! Schnell!
That is a huge blow to the RKM, after the first failed coup in Turkey earlier on. Expect similar moves in many other countries
during this autumn, watch France, Italy, Japan, Saudi Arabia and Brazil among other countries that are going to follow.

Russia is aware of all this, and has mobilised itself too. Merkel appears to have lost effective power, accordance to
statements made by her vice president on Sunday, and the Minster of Trade who said that TTIP is finished and off the table.

Mr. Brexit Nigel Farage Speaks at Donald Trumps Rally in Jackson, MS - USA:

There is hope, as the ordinary people stand up and fight the big banks. We did it on June 23rd when we smashed the
establishment. Not wanting to be run by a bunch of unelected old men in Brussels. They told us our economy would fall off a
cliff. We might even well get WW3.

We reached those people that felt let down by government. We have taken back our country and our borders and self
respect.

Related: Excellent Trump / Farage Speech & Hillary Thinks Mr. Brexit Is Just Another Right-wing, Xenophobic,
Sexist, Bigot That You Should Promptly Ignore

Obama came to tell the Brits not to leave. If I was an American citizen, I wouldnt vote for Hillary Clinton, not even if she paid
me. You can defeat Washington, by doing what we did in Britain by voting for change, and remember anything is possible, if
enough decent people are prepared to stand up against the establishment.

U.S. Elites Are Losing All Their Power:

In the video below, Dr Willie explains that not if, but WHEN the United States Dollar loses its status as the Global Reserve
Currency, the U.S. government will be forced to increase its activities in an area most dont like to talk about: its narcotic
sales.

The United States government does a tremendous amount of narcotic trafficking around the world, but it will be forced to do
even more so, because their economy is already in a shambles, and their military still devours over $800 BILLION per year
to be maintained.
Under Obama the economy has grown at an average of 1.5% annually, and that is using the numbers Obama provides,
which means in all likelihood, that the economy has actually been shrinking throughout his entire term. It is known that
Obama tends not to be honest about much of anything.

Turkey has quietly turned East, and Germany is slowly following suit, frustrating NATO in the process, eliminating the
largest NATO base in Europe, in Ramstein, Germany. This will be the second base to be withdrawn after Turkey, both
bases heavily involved in drug trafficking for the Bushes and Clintons.

The Politics Of Negative Interest Rates

Yanis Varoufakis: Objects of desire come at a cost. Only bad things, like toxic waste, have a
negative price, the equivalent of a fee payable to anyone willing to make them disappear. Does this
mean that negative interest rates embody a new perspective on money that it has gone bad?
In market economies, money is the measure of the value of goods and services. And the interest rate is the price of
that metric of money itself. When the price is zero, it makes no difference whether money is kept under a mattress
or lent, because there is no cost to holding or borrowing cash.

Related: DiEM25: Bring it on!

But how can the price of money which, after all, makes the world go round, or, as Karl Marx put it, transforms all my
incapacities into their contrary be zero? And how can it possibly ever become negative, as it now is in much of the global
economy, with the worlds moneyed people bribing governments to borrow from them more than $5.5 trillion?

The answer can only be of a type that economists loathe: philosophical, political, and thus irreducible to neat positivist
explanation. In other words, the answer must concern the essence of money.

In a farmers market, sellers with many unsold potatoes start dropping the price until a level is reached (possibly very low,
but still positive) at which all of the potatoes are bought. In contrast, since the 2008 global financial crisis, every time the
price of money has been reduced, demand for it falls and excess savings rise. Clearly, money is not like potatoes or any
other well-defined thing.
To understand how money can be our societies supreme good while fetching a negative price, it helps to start with the
realization that, unlike potatoes, money has no intrinsic private value. Its utility comes from what its holder can make others
do. Money, to recall Lenins definition of politics, is about who does what to whom.

Imagine you are an entrepreneur with money in the bank, or have a bank eager to lend large sums to invest in your
business. You spend sleepless nights wondering whether you should invest in a new product that is, whether you should
exploit your access to money to cause an array of others to work on your behalf.

In our current Great Deflation, what worries you most is your customers future purchasing power and sentiment. Will they
be able and willing to buy your new product at high enough prices and quantities?

Suppose that, sleep-deprived, you then switch on the radio or TV only to hear that US Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen
and European Central Bank President Mario Draghi are considering reducing interest rates further. Will you rejoice at the
prospect that your financing costs will fall? Will you be motivated to invest your own money now that it earns lower (perhaps
even negative) interest?
No and no. Your reaction is most likely to be one of alarm: Oh, my God! If Janet and Mario are considering another interest-
rate cut, they must have good reason to believe that demand will remain low!

So you abandon your investment plan. Better to borrow money at almost no cost, you think, and buy back a few more of
my companys shares, boost their price, earn more on the stock exchange, and bank the profits for the rainy days that are
coming.

And so it is that the price of money falls, even as the supply of it burgeons. Central bankers who never predicted the Great
Deflation are now busily trying to find a way out with economic and econometric models that could never explain it, let alone
point to solutions.

Unwilling to question the political dogma that central banks must be apolitical, they refuse to think of money as more than a
thing. And so they continue the search for a technocratic fix to a problem crying out for a philosophically astute political
solution.
Its a futile quest. Once the price of money (interest rates) hit zero, central banks tried buying mountains of public and
private debt from commercial banks to give them an incentive to lend freely. The ECB went so far as to pay banks to lend to
business while, at the same time, punishing them for not lending (via negative interest rates for excess reserves).

But bankers and businesses, viewing these measures as desperate responses to self-fulfilling deflationary expectations,
went on an investment strike, while using the central-bank money to inflate the prices of their own assets (stocks, art, real
estate, and so forth).

This did nothing to defeat the Great Deflation; it only made the rich richer, an outcome that somehow reinforced central
bankers belief in central bank independence.

Not all central bankers, thankfully, are incapable of responding creatively to the Great Deflation. Andy Haldane, Chief
Economist at the Bank of England, has courageously suggested that all money should become digital, which would permit
real-time negative interest rates to be imposed on all of us, thus forcing everyone to spend at once.
John Williams, President and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, recently argued that the Great Deflation
could be beaten only by targeting the price level and nominal national income simultaneously a New Deal-like approach
featuring joint action by the Fed and the government.

What separates these central bankers from the herd is their readiness to jettison the myth of independent monetary policy,
to accept that money is the most political of commodities, to challenge the sanctity of cash, and to concede that defeating
the Great Deflation requires a progressive policy agenda.

Simone Weil once said, If you want to know what a man is really like, take notice of how he acts when he loses money.

Likewise, if we want to know what our societies are really like, we must take notice of how they react to negative interest
rates.

Related: Shocking Government Report Finds $6.5 Trillion In Taxpayer Funds "Unaccounted For"

Farage: Establishment Losing Control Over The People

September 3 2016 | From: Infowars

The Empire didnt believe Brexit was possible, Farage pointed out.

Brexit leader Nigel Farage said the globalist establishment is bewildered over Brexit and clueless on how to regain
control.

The Empire is befuddled, he said on The Alex Jones Show Tuesday. The Empire doesnt get Brexit because the
Empire didnt believe Brexit was possible. Now the Empires problem is that its fighting this argument on several
 fronts at once.

Weve got the American elections going on, weve got a big referendum coming up in Hungary on migrant quotas
from Germany, weve got a rerun of the Austrian presidency where the right-wing candidate was cheated by false
votes, Farage said.

So theyve got a real problem, theyre fighting us now on a whole series of fronts. What will they do to fight back? I
dont know the answer to that yet, and you know something? Nor do they.

And the real takeaway from Brexit? Its the first victory, Farage pointed out.

Brexit is the first strike-back against this phenomenon of the big banks, the big businesses, effectively owning
politics, willfully destroying nation-state democracy, getting rid of that thing our forbearers actually fought and shed
their blood to create and to preserve our liberties and our freedoms, he continued.

All of that being taken away and suddenly in a referendum that no one said we could win, and weve done it.What
weve done is given inspiration to freedom fighters right across the Western World.

Farage then broke down how Hillary is aligned with the globalist agenda and how the US elections are crucial to the fight
against globalism.

Related: Nearly Naked Hillary Clinton Portrayed as the "Beast" in Hollywood Street Art

Hillary represents everything that has gone wrong in our lives over the last couple of decades, he said. She is
part of that phenomenon where all that seems to matter now is corporatism.

The big, global companies who want to set the rulebooks to effectively put out of business any small or medium-
size competitors.
And Hillary loves the supranational global-type bodies which are accountable to nobody, Farage continued.

I think she sees the European Union as a prototype for an even bigger form of world government, he stated.

If you want nothing to change at all, if you want to continue with the kind of cronyism that we see with the Clinton
Foundation, if you want things to stay the same, vote for Hillary.

Farage went on to clarify his decision to leave UKIP and take the fight for national sovereignty worldwide.

Im not retiring, Im not living in a tin shed, but Im going to step back from leadership and its going to leave me
free to make this argument not just in the United Kingdom, not just in the EU Parliament, but around other parts of
the Western world.

Farage also commented on Hillarys public criticism of his recent US visit to speak at a Trump rally in Mississippi.

Can I please use this opportunity to thank Hillary Clinton from the bottom of my heart for doing what shes
done? asked Farage with a chuckle. Shes raised my profile massively in this presidential election. So Hillary,
thank you.
New Zealand Intelligence And Security Bill
September 3 2016 | From: TheContrail

This draconian Bill, currently in the process of being passed by our Parliament, effectively merging
the GCSB and SIS intelligence agencies, and giving them greatly increased surveillance powers
with the police - operating independently of the normal judicial system; has all happened before
and is further linked to the Kim Dotcom appeal trial at the High Court in Auckland at present.

Basically it is transferring the entire country into a police surveillance state, such as was previously operated in
Nazi Germany.

Related: New Zealand Intelligence and Security Bill

New Zealand Intelligence and Security Bill - First Reading

While this process is happening in many other countries at present as well, that is no excuse for us here in NZ to be
indifferent about it.

I thought I would briefly summarize what is happening using a brief timeline of short YouTube
clips:

On September 2012, after Kim Dotcom had been illegally arrested through the SIS and GCSB spying on him on behalf of
the American NSA, he attended the New Zealand Parliament hearing on a new intelligence Bill grilling John Key about it.
In July 2013, Kim Dotcom, while his extradition battle was continuing, spoke to Parliaments Intelligence and Security Select
Committee & NZ PM John Key arguing against the increased draconian extension of GCSB powers.

Here is a brief clip of the Kim Dotcom Protest and his speech July 27, 2013:

Here is the Campbell Live TV program dissecting the GCSB Bill with Kim Dotcom Scandal. (This is in part why John
Campbell is no longer employed on NZ public television!):

Hitlers police state gained so much evil power by merging the SS and Gestapo (secret intelligence agencies and private
police) (as is recommended in this evil NZ Bill).

This allowed them to arrest anyone SEPARATE from the normal judicial system which, was allowed to continue to
operate and coexist making Germans think they were still living in a democracy when the truth was it was a brutal
dictatorship.

Following the merger of the intelligence agencies under the SS, they were then linked with the Gestapo (private secret
police) who arrested anyone they liked, and brought them before a new, special court called the Peoples Court
(Volksgerichtshof) in Berlin.

This court wickedly condemned thousands of good people to death as Volk Vermin for even briefly criticizing Hitler. That is
what they are trying to do with Kim Dotcom and his colleagues now by having them extradited to the United States where
they will be tried by a kangaroo court.

Fascism is very cunning isnt it? We often think Germans en mass were incredibly stupid to follow Hitler and Fascism. But
now, we, the WW2 victor nations, are doing it ourselves. What a pack of idiots!

The New Zealand Prime Minister, John Key, is the son of a Jewish Holocaust Survivor [supposed son, supposed holocaust].
What a disgrace. He, above all of us, should know more about the full implications of what he is doing!

In Nazi Germany, the great paradox was that many of those who were most loyal to the Fuhrer were the first to get a
bullet in the back of the head, not only the Jews.

On both counts, the New Zealand Prime Minister should know better. This is what a career in banking does to the mind.
Other than filthy lucre severe amnesia!

So yes. Just carry on watching the football on TV you men, and Soaps on TV you women and one chilling evening [should
they have their way] there might be a brisk knock on your door from the new resurrected SS or New World Order Gestapo to
take you or your children away forever, for being a threat to national security using the new GCSB / SIS draconian
warrants.

This is the option they want to be able to exercise.

Inquisition 2.0: The Internet Is Being Taken Hostage By The NWO
September 2 2016 | From: Infowars

The globalists may have officially obtained total control of the internet?

Lets go over the mounting evidence that the internet as we know it will be commandeered by globalist censors
beginning midnight October 1st, when an entirely new era of the internet will begin.

Originally, President Obama promised that the Feds handover of the antitrust protected Internet Corporation for Assigned
Names and Numbers or ICANN would not involve the United Nations.

Was this, yet again, a naive move by an incompetent President of the United States?

Or has this been the plan all along?

Are You A Mind-Controlled CIA Stooge? + The Term Conspiracy Theory Was
Invented By The CIA In Order To Prevent Disbelief Of Official Government Stories
September 2 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts

Do you smirk when you hear someone question the official stories of Orlando, San Bernardino,
Paris or Nice? Do you feel superior to 2,500 architects and engineers, to firefighters, commercial
and military pilots, physicists and chemists, and former high government officials who have raised
doubts about 9/11?
If so, you reflect the profile of a mind-controlled CIA stooge.

The term conspiracy theory was invented and put into public discourse by the CIA in 1964 in order to discredit the many
skeptics who challenged the Warren Commissions conclusion that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated by a lone
gunman named Lee Harvey Oswald, who himself was assassinated while in police custody before he could be questioned.

The CIA used its friends in the media to launch a campaign to make suspicion of the Warren Commission report a target of
ridicule and hostility. This campaign was one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.

So writes political science professor Lance deHaven-Smith, who in his peer-reviewed book, Conspiracy Theory in
America, published by the University of Texas Press, tells the story of how the CIA succeeded in creating in the
public mind reflexive, automatic, stigmatization of those who challenge government explanations.

This is an extremely important and readable book, one of those rare books with the power to break you out of The Matrix.

Professor deHaven-Smith is able to write this book because the original CIA Dispatch #1035-960, which sets out the CIA
plot, was obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request. Apparently, the bureaucracy did not regard a document
this old as being of any importance.

The document is marked Destroy when no longer needed, but somehow wasnt. CIA Dispatch #1035-960 is reproduced in
the book.
The success that the CIA has had in stigmatizing skepticism of government explanations has made it difficult to investigate
State Crimes Against Democracy (SCAD) such as 9/11.

With the public mind programmed to ridicule conspiracy kooks, even in the case of suspicious events such as 9/11 the
government can destroy evidence, ignore prescribed procedures, delay an investigation, and then form a political committee
to put its imprimatur on the official story.

Professor deHaven-Smith notes that in such events as Kennedys assassination and 9/11 official police and
prosecutorial investigations are never employed. The event is handed off to a political commission.

Professor deHaven-Smiths book supports what I have told my readers: the government controls the story from the
beginning by having the official explanation ready the moment a SCAD occurs. This makes any other explanation a
conspiracy theory. This is the way Professor deHaven-Smith puts it:

A SCAD approach to memes assumes further that the CIA and other possibly participating agencies are
formulating memes well in advance of operations, and therefore SCAD memes appear and are popularized very
quickly before any competing concepts are on the scene.

The CIAs success in controlling public perception of what our Founding Fathers would have regarded as suspicious events
involving the government enables those in power positions within government to orchestrate events that serve hidden
agendas.

The events of September 11 created the new paradigm of endless war in behalf of a Washington-dominated world. The
CIAs success in controlling public perceptions has made it impossible to investigate elite political crimes. Consequently, it is
now possible for treason to be official US government policy.
Professor deHaven-Smiths book will tell you the story of the assassination of President Kennedy by elements of the US
military, CIA, and Secret Service. Just as the Warren Commission covered up the State Crime Against Democracy,
Professor deHaven-Smith shows why we should doubt the official 9/11 story. And anything else that the government tells us.

Read this book. It is short. It is affordable. It is reality preparation. It will innoculate you against being a dumbshit, insouciant,
brainwashed American. I am surprised that the CIA has not purchased the entire print run and burned the books.

Perhaps the CIA feels secure from its success in brainwashing the public and does not believe that American democracy
and accountable government can be restored.

The Term Conspiracy Theory Was Invented By The CIA In Order To Prevent Disbelief
Of Official Government Stories
The Term Conspiracy Theory Was Invented by the CIA In Order To Prevent Disbelief of Official
Government Stories
Ron Unz reports on the cold shoulder given to an extensively researched book that concludes that World War II
hero General George Patton was murdered by the CIA because he became a powerful critic of Washington.

The book was ignored because the US media and public have been programmed to regard the US government as a truth-
teller and those who expose government crimes as conspiracy theorists.

In 2013 Professor Lance Dehaven-Smith in a peer-reviewed book published by the University of Texas Press showed that
the term conspiracy theory was developed by the CIA as a means of undercutting critics of the Warren Commissions
report that President Kennedy was killed by Oswald. The use of this term was heavily promoted in the media by the CIA.

See: Conspiracy Theory in America (Discovering America)

It is ironic that the American left is a major enforcer of the CIAs strategy to shut up skeptics by branding them conspiracy
theorists.

Kim Dotcom Wins Bid To Livestream On YouTube His Extradition Appeal

September 1 2016 | From: TVNZ

Internet entrepreneur Kim Dotcom has won a bid to livestream on YouTube his battle against
extradition to the United States.
The 42-year-old Megaupload founder has this week returned to court to appeal a decision allowing him to be
extradited from New Zealand over criminal copyright charges.

Related: Genius move: Live-stream file-sharing chaos will play into Dotcoms hands

Comment: The final outcome of this court case here in New Zealand right now ultimately will decide the freedom
of the entire global Internet as we know it!

On top of that, at issue is national sovereignty, and whether multinational corporations can be allowed to
manipulate the sovereign laws of one country or through international trade agreements etc. to take precedence
over the sovereign laws of another independent country in this case New Zealand.

Incredibly, against strong opposition from the US Government yesterday, the judge is allowing this appeal trial to
be live-streamed to the world on YouTube, starting today, but as yet, I havent been able to find it.

So all this means, if the live-streaming goes ahead, the multinational corporate media cannot CENSOR the truth
about the case as they have been.

Today, the presiding judge gave permission for the entire six weeks of the appeal hearing to be broadcast on YouTube by a
cameraman hired by Dotcom.

Between the direct effect on millions of Megaupload users as well as the precedent the case would set, the public interest
merited complete coverage standard media channels could not provide, Dotcom's lawyer, Ron Mansfield, had argued at the
High Court in Auckland.
Advertisement
 This is a case of the internet age," he said.

Lawyers for the United States oppose the livestream, saying Dotcom was not sufficiently accountable for the coverage - as a
media organisation would be - and that the footage could prejudice a criminal case in the US if the extradition went ahead.

But Justice Murray Gilbert allowed the stream to go ahead, on the grounds the comments and live-chat features for the
video were disabled, the video was taken down after the trial and the broadcast was delayed for 20 minutes to avoid
publishing of sensitive material.

"This is breaking new ground. New Zealand at the forefront of transparent justice! Leadership!" Dotcom tweeted
moments later.

The livestream will start tomorrow. In December, Judge Nevin Dawson ruled Dotcom and his three associates - Mathias
Ortmann, Finn Batato and Bram van der Kolk - had criminal charges to face in the US over their part in running file-sharing
website Megaupload.

The four men face charges of conspiracy to commit racketeering, conspiracy to commit money laundering, wire fraud and
two kinds of criminal copyright infringement based on an FBI investigation going back to 2010.

If extradited and found guilty in the US, the men could be up for decades in jail.

The Overthrow Of America - By Its Enemies Within

August 30 2016 | From: Sott

My recent article exposes a brand new propaganda infomercial starring Angelina Jolie and 15
other high profile card-carrying members of the treasonous elitist "think tank" the Council on
Foreign Relations.

I outed the its obvious attempt at an image makeover, upgrading its Mr. Burns-David Rockefeller image of wrinkled,
old white men ruling the world to a new generation of bright young stars brilliantly working together to solve the
planet's most daunting challenges and problems facing humanity in the 21st century.

Yet a brief US history of the last 100 years with a more detailed focus on the last decade and a half since 9/11 reveals the
true story in plain sight of how infiltrated traitors within our own government have long had scheming eyes on their sinister
prize of one world government tyranny.

Council on Foreign Relations' new PR video - that still can't undo its NWO one world government agenda

This article will demonstrate how a subhuman class of murderous psychopaths epitomized in the modern day era by the
likes of the Bush-Clinton-Obama-CIA crime cabal family have treasonously overthrown America's democratic republic and
replaced it with today's technocratic fascist totalitarian police state oligarchy.
But the story could just as easily begin the same year America's Founding Fathers signed the Declaration of Independence
in July 1776. Another historically significant figure in Bavaria in southern Germany barely two months earlier was busy
founding the secret Order of the Illuminati.

The son of a rabbi but trained in Jesuit tradition he later came to despise, German philosopher Adam Wieshaupt dabbled in
Freemasonry and the Cabbala before developing his own secret society. With fellow Jewish [read: Khazarian
Zionist] Rothschild money, they plotted an ambitious, highly subversive plan for their anti-Catholic secret society of elitists to
implement global governance.

Influenced by both ancient Talmudic roots and Egyptian occult nearly two and a half centuries ago, prior to the United States
even becoming a sovereign, independent nation, Weishaupt and his "illumined" order already identified the three major
barriers deemed the true enemy of one world government.

For well over a century traitors within the US federal government have persistently sought to undermine and vanquish
Weishaupt's three declared enemy obstacles to one world government - American citizens' love of God and their
predominant Christian religion, patriotic love of country and national sovereignty, and love of family and parents that include
private property inheritance.
What is striking is that Karl Marx in his Communist Manifesto also calls for abolishment of family, private property,
countries/nationalities and religion as well. One world government is the fait accompli umbrella that unites Marxists, Zionists,
Fabian Socialists, the United Nations, the EU, the Parliamentary Group for World Government, Trilateral Commission, CFR,
Bilderberg Group, Trans-Pacific Partnership, the TTIP, the Vatican and the World Council of Churches.

Obviously this globalist agenda has been winning on all accounts, overcoming aforementioned barriers targeted centuries
earlier. Subsequently with the direction this nation has taken since 9/11 under the Bush-Obama regime, the US populace is
more confused, polarized and conflicted than ever before.

The ruling elite has historically used US Empire to do its dirty bidding as both global bully and nation exterminator. From
behind a thinly veiled curtain, the CFR's been the Intel handler directing all US wars in a nonstop foreign policy conquest
of global unipolar hegemony for the last 95 years now.

The same founders of the 1921 Council on Foreign Relations a few years earlier had deceitfully snuck through their secret
Jekyll Island masterplan called the Federal Reserve Act as its financial WMD on the eve of Christmas Eve 1913 right after
most Congress members had already left Washington on holiday break.
Thus a band of powerful thieves was stealthily successful in infiltrating the government and hijacking America on their way
to destroying our democratic republic. For good measure, during that same fateful year that our republic took it first fatal
blow, they also finagled passage of their unconstitutional "1%" Federal Income Tax Act when they took license to begin
stealing, misappropriating and bleeding working class Americans dry while monopolizing mega-giant corporations enjoy tax-
free, corporate welfare subsidies.

The US government oligarchy squeezes ten times more out of overburdened taxpayers for obscene corporate welfare
programs than for welfare for America's most poverty-stricken families. The rich get richer while a growing disenfranchised
class of Americans are thrown to the Wall Street wolves as purged useless eaters as part of the elite's eugenics endgame.

Once their Ponzi schemed 1913 Federal Reserve Act was in place, it took the parasitic traitors only a few months
to began what was to become history's deadliest "war to end all wars" killing 17 million people. Little more than a decade
later the bankers' intentionally manipulated the Great Depression and the treasonous failed coup of 1934 that "war is a
racket" General Smedley Butler heroically stopped and exposed.
Then the banking vultures like George W's grandpa Prescott Bush turned to financing Hitler's rise to power in order to cause
history's bloodiest of all wars in WWII killing over 60 million, followed immediately by the elite's contrived cold war against
their next bankrolled enemy the Communists that included both the Korean and Vietnam Wars.

Fact based evidence clearly shows time and time again that all of America's wars have been brought to us exclusively by
the bankster gangsters who hijacked our government a century ago and been in the driver's seat ever since.

Related: All Wars Are Bankers' Wars

In 1913 private bankers were able to seize control over America's money supply, allowing them to print it out of thin air and
over the years loaning the government trillions of dollars the US taxpayers would forever be footing the bill to pay
off interests on all those war loan debts and big government pork barrel spending that keep mounting into the colossal,
unpayable US debt (standing at near $20 trillion that's doubled under Obama to match all previous presidencies
combined!).

The corrupt system of thievery has taxpayers paying for wars that bankers create, always financing both sides as in
Germany's pre-WWI militarization and the Bolshevik Revolution and later Hitler's prewar rise to power. Washington and its
allies have been busted for all along secretly funding America's so called war on terror enemy - the al Qaeda/ISIS terrorists.
By elite design, virtually every military conflict in US history has been intentionally started by bankers using false flag
operations as their deceptive pretext for nonstop war 93% of the time.

After inventing al Qaeda (then mujahedeen) as paid CIA mercenaries that proved instrumental in breaking up the Soviet
Empire in the "graveyard of empires" Afghanistan throughout the 1980's, and again throughout the 90's balkanizing a
shattered Yugoslavia into a half dozen broken pieces, Washington's Zionist neocons in control of foreign policy then decided
to reinvent al Qaeda and their hitherto proxy war ally Osama bin Laden as the latest post-Soviet era bogeymen - Islamic
terrorists.

Using 19 box-cutting patsies on 9/11 led not by Osama but by CIA and 9/11 mastermind and former CFR president who was
then Vice President Dick Cheney, with direct assistance from both Israel's Mossad as well as the Saudi government, the
infamous Bush regime traitors sloppily staged their pre-plotted PNAC "new Pearl Harbor" as the biggest false flag in history
on 9/11 murdering 3,000 of their own citizens and, in one fell swoop, began scapegoating over 2 billion Muslims worldwide
in order to launch their "endless war on terror" that's still raging stronger than ever today.
Their inside 9/11 job along with their anthrax terrorism (produced in a federal lab) was then used to rush through their Patriot
Act, already pre-penned by the Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld war criminal chain gang to finish the task begun back in 1913
to destroy the US as a democratic republic . The same secret societies like the Freemasons, Skull and Bones disciples and
CFR lifers that infiltrated and hijacked our federal government a century earlier are even more firmly in control today.

The Bush-Clinton-Obama crime cabal dynasty has been calling the shots ever since the assassination of John F. Kennedy,
and they're currently in the final stages of implementing their long awaited one world government tyranny. Recognizing that
Americans are finally catching on to their endless crime cabal debauchery, the globalists are rushing to their NWO finish
line.

A year after 9/11-Patriot Act inside job, the Department of Homeland Security artificially emerged to ostensibly protect
Americans, but like all things Orwellian, does exactly the opposite. As part of the bloated, self-serving, bureaucratic security
state apparatus, and terminal cancer to our lost democratic republic, it's done little to none in stopping terrorism.

What it does do is purge any records linking the Muslim Brotherhood to terrorism. Local San Bernardino and nearby Orlando
Fort Myers mosques that had connections to the alleged false flag shooters were ordered erased. DHS has been repeatedly
caught bussing unvetted illegal aliens from Somalia and who knows where else.
The Orlando shooter was employed for nearly a decade at the world's largest private security company GS4 that's under
contract with DHS transporting illegals from the border into America's heartland as part of its catch and release policy.

An eyewitness video captured a UPS plane under the cover of darkness flying in human cargo presumably from the Middle
East, loading them onto 30 busses and whisking them away from the Harrisburg, PA airport. State governors are
complaining Obama is secretly sending refugees into states without even notifying the governors.

With 6,227 Syrian refugees arriving this year as of July, Obama promised the UN he'd take in an additional 10,000 Syrians
by the end of next month. Fulfilling promises to the global elite and UN obviously mean everything, unlike all his broken
campaign promises like transparency to the American people. During Obama's first five years in office alone, green cards
were issued to 680,000 immigrants arriving from Muslim nations.
Each year the US admits a quarter million Muslim migrants. Thanks to our treasonous commander-in-chief, unvetted and set
free, ISIS cells in America are alive and well.

For the first time in a decade, near half the total refugees arriving in the US this year are Muslims outnumbering Christians.
Obama's open border policy has DHS ordering Border Patrol officers to stand down, permitting known drug traffickers and
MS13 criminal gang members to freely enter and commit crimes against Americans.

DHS is treasonously working with the UN to allow criminals and potential terrorists into our country at the same time DHS is
targeting law abiding citizens who happen to be patriots, veterans, gun owners, constitutionalists and dissidents as its
homegrown enemy.

Meanwhile, returning to those three sworn Illuminati enemies, through mass media propaganda and the likes of fourth wave
feminism and the LBGT-PC agenda, the elite's been busily engaging in social engineering that has globally undermined
male-female relations, confused gender roles and sexuality, and subsequently by design seriously weakened the family
bond.

As a former licensed therapist working within the child welfare system, I can attest to deep state authoritarianism
perpetrated by overzealous child protective services Nazis that wrongfully break up families and further abuse children who
were my victimized clients.

Oppressive overreach in both education and social services at federal, state and county levels has clearly usurped
autonomous rights of America's parents. The "progressive" idea being pushed nowadays insists that children no
longer belong to their parents but the globalized community.
Much has been written about the subversive forces of social indoctrination heavily tainted in communist and socialist
ideology now being so aggressively deployed by the so called progressive left. As an example, the Obama
administration coerced 46 out of 50 states into accepting Common Core standards as a condition to receiving much needed
federal aid funding.

The systemic brainwash of today's youth through a purposely dumbed down public education system is insidiously polluting
impressionable young minds with Common Core garbage.

The collectivist dogma frowns upon individuality and individual achievement as one's value is only as good as one's
contribution and benefit toward the collective group. Unthinking conformity, group mindset and the Political Correctness
agenda have suppressed, stifled and supplanted critical thinking, innate creativity and natural inquiry in pursuit of truth that
dare questions authority.

The brainwash factory in America goes to work early on in our schools to churn out mindless little robots who simply do what
they're told as zombified cogs in the factory wheel, only to find out that when they graduate the factory's been
closed, outsourced overseas for cheaper slave labor.
For over a decade US Homeland Security Department and FEMA have been recruiting and training America's clergy to align
as deep state propagandist oppressors during a national emergency under martial law. Many religious leaders have sold out
on both God and their flock of worshippers to covertly join forces with the feds' treasonous authoritarian tyranny.

In order to retain their 501c3 IRS tax-exempt status, churches, synagogues, temples and mosques across America have
been co-opted into nefariously leading their religious followers to the eugenics slaughterhouse, consequently forcing pastors
and clerics to betray their own spiritual principles and teachings as taught by Jesus, Muhammad, Buddha.

Per a whistleblowing pastor, FEMA enlisted the biblical passage Romans 13 as the preaching talking point to use in
sermons to brainwash their congregations into blindly obeying both them and the federal authorities as preparation for the
[intended] coming crises.

It's an over-the-top, all too obvious government ploy to turn community religious leaders into secret police enforcers,
rehearsing preparedness for potential bio-terrorist attacks, natural as well as unnatural disasters, declared national
emergencies and martial law.
Religious leaders will be counted on by the feds to help tame the "cowboy mentality" of American citizens determined to
stand up for their property and Second Amendment rights when by executive order under martial law forced relocation, gun
confiscation and property and livestock confiscation will be enforced.

The training sessions call upon the religious community to preach subservience well in advance of what's coming and that
the planned forced relocation of citizens will be "for their own good," evoking benevolent Orwellian Big Brother assurance of
guaranteed safety and protection as the lure to foster sheep-like obedience.

FEMA trainers emphasize that the program is part of a nationwide preparedness directive under the umbrella of the National
Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster (NVOAD) and ten years ago already had over 13,000 counties in the US on
board. FEMA reps also reassure the religious leaders that they will receive full backup and cooperation from law
enforcement at all levels when and where citizen resistance is encountered.

A year after this story broke mainstream television station KSLA 12 confirmed the existence of these Clergy Response
Teams operating as extensions of the federal government to help quell civil unrest and rebellion under national emergency
conditions.

Meanwhile while the feds have been brainwashing pastors to become martial law pacifiers, Obama's practically made it a
sin to be a Christian in America. In the US military it literally is against the law to openly share your Christian faith,
punishable by court martial. Obama has destroyed troop morale and devastated retention rates in the armed forces.
Biblical scenes and Merry Christmas greetings as an annual Americana tradition has been outlawed in communities across
America, replaced by the contrite PC clich "happy holidays." Daily prayer and a "God"-less Pledge of Allegiance has been
surgically removed from every public education classroom across America.

The rigid intolerance enforced in the name of PC radicalism that's taken hold of America today shuns any display remotely
Christian while going to extreme lengths not to offend Muslims seems oddly hypocritical, one-sided and unfair.

And to those who succumb to ignorance and hate toward 2 million plus Muslims around the world because the US
hired a few Godless mercenary thugs to commit heinous atrocities for the US Empire of Chaos and Destruction of
course makes no logical or moral sense either.

Obama's bizarre reaction last year to a Jordanian pilot burned alive by the Islamic State terrorists that he and Hillary created
and the slaying and selling of children by ISIS is very telling.

He told Christians to "get off your high horse" in response to the ISIS savagery, adding that Christians committed terrible
deeds in the name of Christ referring to the Crusades and Inquisition against Islam and hanging blacks during Jim Crowism.

But an astute critic asked, "Has he ever said ISIS has committed terrible deeds in the name of Muhammad?"

Despite his repeated actions that indicate otherwise, Obama insists that he's a Christian. But he has many doubters. In a
poll taken last September, 29% of Americans (43% of the Republicans) think Obama is a Muslim while 43% of Americans
believe he's a Christian.

Having been caught telling over a thousand proven lies, Obama is a pathological liar and psychopath. His notorious
character is shady from the get-go, a complete fraud demonstrated by his refusal to produce a valid birth certificate to
illegally using a dead immigrant's social security number issued in Connecticut where he's never lived. But then
psychopaths lie all the time.

Barry and Micheal

It's their second nature, their Modus Operandi and a primary symptom of their mental illness that only feeds their self-
serving drive for power, advantage and self-aggrandizement. Incapable of possessing either empathy or a moral
conscience, hence Obama the actor's only capable of shedding those crocodile artificially induced tears.

As a condition of his and others like the Clintons and the Bushes, their callous, coldhearted, destructive actions that have
harmed and murdered millions of humans produce zero guilt or remorse.

So no matter how many times Obama attempts to explain he's really a Christian, people pay far more attention to his actions
speaking louder than any of his deceitful words. In a C-SPAN speech last year in Turkey as well as a 2008 ABC interview
with George Stephenopoulos, Obama momentarily let his guard down and rare honest words slipped out. The 2008 "my
Muslim faith" admission was immediately corrected by Democratic faithful George.

In addition to these faux pas, Obama once assured an Egyptian foreign minister that "I am a Muslim" and at another Islamic
State dinner he uttered, "I am one of you." And once a Pakistani government minister asked Obama to be the world leader
for all Muslims.

His alleged Kenyan biological father was Muslim and in his youth from 6-10 he lived as Barry Soetoro in the most Muslim
populated country on earth Indonesia with a Muslim stepfather. His third grade teacher told the LA Times he was a Muslim,
stating that he registered as such in school and attended Muslim classes.
Obama repeatedly omits Christian references to God and Creator when reciting historic passages like the Declaration of
Independence. On a number of occasions he has mocked biblical scripture but even more frequently defends Islam. Before
speaking at Georgetown and Notre Dame Universities, he ordered that the cross and religious symbols be covered yet
whenever he visits mosques, he never requests a dcor adjustment where Allah is posted everywhere.

Vatican court's highest ranking Cardinal Raymond Burke accuses Obama of being "hostile toward Christian civilization" and
"promotes anti-life and anti-family policies." Recall Illuminati and Marxist foremost NWO enemies - family and religion.

If that's not enough to question where Obama's loyalty lies, his Kenyan half-brother Malik Obama is a known Muslim
Brotherhood member affiliated with a group the State Department classifies as terrorist. That might also explain why
Obama's DHS is wiping clean all incriminating records linking terrorism to Muslim Brotherhood.

Additionally, Obama's longtime senior advisor perhaps exerting the most influence and control over the president is Iran-
born Muslim Valerie Jarrett.
Through a freedom of information request, Judicial Watch obtained FBI investigative files showing that Jarrett's father,
father-in-law and maternal grandfather are/were Communists.

Fellow Chicagoan Valerie Jarrett and her family also have ties to Obama's old mentors terrorist Bill Ayers and Communist
Frank Marshall Davis as well as the Muslim Brotherhood.

Last year former Admiral James "Ace" Lyons, Jr. went public accusing Barack Hussein Obama as anti-American, pro-
Islamic, pro-Muslim Brotherhood, outing both Valerie Jarrett as well as CIA director John Brennan as Muslims.

According to a former FBI agent, Obama's choice of CIA director John Brennan converted to Muslim while stationed in
Saudi Arabia years ago. A military intelligence whistleblower also outed the Muslim Brennan while he was CIA station chief
in Jeddah maintaining that Brennan approved visas for the [supposed] 19 alleged 9/11 terrorists.

A couple of other credible sources have also come forth to further corroborate the veracity of these Muslim claims, among
them former naval intelligence officer turned investigative journalist Wayne Madsen. Madsen contends that there's "growing
evidence" the CIA director's a Wahhabist convert.

Also recall the highly suspicious death in June 2013 of muckraking journalist Michael Hastings who at the time was writing
an expose on Brennan and US intelligence when his car was very likely remotely hacked and accelerated up to 80 MPH on
an LA surface street before it suddenly exploded blowing the engine 100 feet from the charred body and vehicle.
A WikiLeaks leak from Stratfor, a CIA linked global intelligence firm, mentioned how Brennan was on "a witch hunt" against
snooping journalists. A nervous Hastings knew he was being investigated by the FBI and even had asked a friend to borrow
her car earlier that same day. Michael Hastings had written two very high profile, unflattering Rolling Stone articles on two
prominent generals in charge of the Afghanistan War.

General Stanley McChrystal lost his job over Hastings' revealing portrayal and then a second piece on General David
Petraeus who seven months earlier was forced to resign as Brennan's CIA predecessor after Petraeus' scandalous
affair with his biographer broke. Again, truth becomes the enemy to dark evil forces.

Having a standing US president and US head of intelligence both treasonous Muslims covertly promoting terrorism around
the world amounts to the worst breach of both national as well as global security this planet's ever known.

Understanding the profound damage being done to the world by these two partners-in-crime working in tandem, this The
New York Times article noting how close Obama and Brennan are suddenly makes more sense:

"In the 67 years since the CIA was founded, few presidents have had as close a bond with their intelligence
chiefs."

Other deeply disturbing influences on Obama's life are his mentors. His longtime mentor Bill Ayers who first got him started
in politics is a well-known terrorist from the Weather Underground back in the 1960's and 70's that somehow managed to
avoid jail time. Ayers told an FBI informant that had infiltrated his group that once Weather Underground overthrew the US
government, 50 million Americans would need to be rounded up and taken to re-education camps.

If re-education failed, Ayers estimated that 25 million Americans would need to be exterminated. The informant was
interviewed revealing Ayers diabolical plan in the 1982 documentary No Place to Hide: The Strategy and Tactics of
Terrorism.

With his white mother a CIA employee, his grandparents CIA assets and raised among CIA handlers in both Hawaii,
Indonesia and perhaps his entire life, Obama was carefully groomed as the Manchurian president selected by the elite to
suddenly catapult out of obscurity onto the national stage.
Early in Obama's life from adolescence into young adulthood his closest mentor (and possibly his biological father) was
African American Communist, poet and journalist Frank Marshall Davis. Davis was a victim of racism and hated it and
America for that reason. As an alternative to the racist pecking order of imperialistic elitism, Frank Marshall Davis turned to
Communism Soviet Stalinism style where he believed a black man would be on a more equal footing.

During the time Obama knew him he'd become old and bitter. How much of that resentment and political ideology rubbed off
on the young impressionable mulatto Barack struggling to find his blackness growing up in a white family without a black
father? Probably quite a bit.

Obama mentions Frank (only by his first name) in his autobiography Dreams from My Father 22 times. But when it came
time for his book to go audio in 2005 leading up to his run for presidency, Obama cunningly chose to totally erase Frank the
Communist out of his life.
With a violent subversive white radical terrorist and an angry bitter black Stalinist Communist most influential in making him
the man he is today, steeped and bred in Manchurian CIA candidacy to become the most "powerful" front man in the world
as long as he on cue successfully destroys racist Christian America for his ruling masters, I'd say he's followed his script like
the dutiful puppet he is to the T.

His horrendous track record at deceit speaks volumes that only his demonic handlers can be proud of.

By the way, as power hungry puppets spawned from the same criminally psychopathic pond, the Muslim
Brotherhood waters still run deep in crime boss Hillary's shady world as well. Look no further than her right hand Muslim gal-
pal who's been her top aide the last 20 years - Huma Abedin. When Huma was two-years old her family moved from
Michigan to Saudi Arabia where she lived until 18, returning to America to attend college.
It turns out all the while Huma was working for Clinton, she also had a gig as assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim
Minority Affairs from 1995 through 2008, a radical Sharia law publication where her Pakistani-born mother is editor out of
offices in Jeddah. Mama Abedin also sits on the staff of an organization run by the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood.

The New York Post just ran a detailed article uncovering the family's extremist views endorsing female circumcision,
opposing women's rights, attributing domestic violence to men's stress in the world and blamed 9/11 on the US. This
shocker is just the latest from the scandal-ridden Clinton campaign.

While using a private internet server, Abedin helped Hillary sell off America to dangerous foreign interests. For more than a
dozen years Huma Abedin worked for an organization whose stated objective is to infiltrate and conquer the West in the
name of Islam.

The elite has seen to it that all its major players are in place to destroy the United States from within by traitors who secretly
hate America. Welcome to New World Disorder [but it won't be allowed to run it's course].
While practicing Christianity openly under Obama's watch is becoming criminalized, or even displaying the American flag in
front of your home on Flag Day can get you arrested, Obama and his Attorney General Loretta Lynch are making the politics
of Political Correctness the new American law and religion.

Uttering statements that may potentially offend someone in the universe is fast becoming a crime. Being critical of Muslims,
apartheid Israel, the LGBT agenda or the federal government are increasingly construed as so called hate crimes that could
land you in prison, especially if uttered by potential "homegrown extremists" deemed enemies of the state.

Even filming the police in a police state can get you arrested.

The assault on free speech and flagrant violations of the US Constitution that they took sworn oaths to uphold and protect is
overwhelming. The First Amendment right of free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly for peaceful protest
are no longer recognized as our rule of law, and exercising those rights increasingly runs the risk of being beaten, thrown in
jail or even killed. Freedom of press amongst the 6-oligarch owned MSM mega-media corporations is completely
nonexistent.

MSM puppets on each network read from the same disinformation script. And if the Trans-Pacific Partnership passes, the
last vestige of a free press and free speech that still can be found on the internet will be totally censored, banned and lost. In
this age of tyrannical deceit, truth becomes the enemy.

Our Fourth Amendment rights to unreasonable search and seizure as well as the right to privacy have been completely
obliterated with electronic tracking and storing our every move, communicated utterance and transaction. Through civil asset
forfeiture laws, police are able to legally rob us blind without warrants or probable cause, literally stealing our cash with no
connection to any crime.

But now since May law enforcement has taken it a step further with new scanning devices electronically capable of
snatching money right out of our bank accounts. Cops took more assets from Americans in 2014 than all the burglars
combined. Eminent domain allows the government at any level from local to federal to steal our home and property not
always for public use but for private development as well.

Executive Order 13603 authorizes Obama and his traitors to confiscate our 2nd Amendment right to bear firearms, to
confiscate our stored food and water, our vehicles and all our property. Without pay until further notice, the presidential
dictator can also literally conscript Americans into slavery.
2012 NDAA ended the 1878 Posse Comitatis law that prohibited US military from interfering in civil affairs. It authorizes
military troops to break into our homes without warrant, without charges, arrest and imprison citizens without due process,
without legal representation and without trial for an unlimited length of time... Gulag USA.

Bail-in laws give the criminal banksters the right to literally steal all our life savings right out of our "private" unsecured bank
accounts. We're now living in a lawless age of New World Disorder where grand theft rape and pillaging everything
American citizens always cherished as our freedoms are gone.

The treasonous traitors from within our own government have openly declared an apartheid war on Americans of every
persuasion, color, creed, criminalizing anyone who demands accountability for the egregious acts of treason committed by
agents from the federal as well as state and municipal levels.

After decades of war in the Middle East and North Africa, the globalists manufactured the migration crisis of near two million
and counting (1.3 million in 2015 alone) in Europe and per Obama many more to come to America. The globalist plan is to
weaken and destroy the West, creating such a clash of civilizations that a volatile enough racial and religious divide will
foment race/religious civil wars.

Speaking of race war, in addition to being a top financier of Hillary's crooked path to a rigged presidency, billionaire George
Soros first helped fund her and her assistant Nuland's illegal 2014 Ukraine coup, singlehandedly ushering in cold war 2
against Russia.
Related: Dark Lord: Hacked Documents Reveal Magnitude Of George Soross Domestic Influence

Backing the fascist corrupt Kiev regime, Soros, Hillary and Obama have caused the bloody civil war still raging in eastern
Ukraine that could easily ignite World War III that Hillary promises to deliver. And in recent weeks the war in the Donbass
region is intensifying.

A recently released CIA report has surfaced pointing the finger at Soros financing a series of bombing attacks in
Czechoslovakia during 1986 and 1987 in efforts to overthrow the then Communist government. Meet the terrorist behind the
terrorists who's been free to operate his paid for violence evil with impunity throughout the world now for 30 years.

Let us not forget Soros' evil misdeeds in America with his intention to incite race wars on US soil. He dropped 33 million in a
single year to deploy his paid army of bussed in agitators and co-opted Black Lives Matter protesters to invade inner cities
whenever Obama's coldblooded police force murder another unarmed black man.
With near weekly incidents now of police killing unarmed Americans and Intel handled MK Ultra patsies killing police, at this
point Obama, Hillary and Soros' wet dream has almost been fulfilled. While racism exists in America, deep state is using it
as an exploited, divide and conquer weapon to intentionally cause such out of control civil and racial violence that it will then
be used as the convenient trigger for dictator Obama or dictator Hillary to declare martial law.

Comment: While it is true that police state USA is exacerbating racial tensions we would be doing BLM an injustice if we
were to paint its existence with one Soros-dipped brush stroke. See this.

With ma and pa neighborhood stores selling made-in-America products long dead now, and America's malls fast
becoming dying ghost towns minus a disappearing, once vibrant middle class, times ahead look mighty grim for America.
All 133 Target stores in Canada were closed last year and 154 Walmarts in the US are boarded up under contract
with Homeland Security, most likely waiting to be reopened when the SHTF as FEMA roundup processing centers.

With Obama dropping doom and gloom hints ominously warning Americans to be prepared for impending coming disasters,
get ready for a series of rapid fire false flag crises, like a so called massive cyber-hack attack breaching America's bank
security declaring on Friday a banker's holiday and inaccessibly frozen ATM's and private bank account assets on Monday.

Or an EMP attack that's been waiting to happen on America's extremely vulnerable power grid that the feds have known
about for years but refuse to invest in infrastructure to protect the 90% of Americans who would likely die without electricity
within 12 months.

Or the highly amplified weaponized cell towers capable of delivering non-thermal, radioactive heat that could fry us in our
own backyard neighborhoods. Or the black ops Tesla inspired pulsar weapons technology related
to HAARP weather warfare through diabolically staged unnatural disasters like earthquakes, volcanos, tsunamis, floods and
droughts, combined with towers that resonate with brain frequencies for massive mind control using heavy metals as EMF
conductors from geoengineered chemtrails.

Or any fake or real human-made Zika, Ebola or any other virus in the military's vast array that can easily be aerially
launched as biological and/or chemical warfare on large swaths of the human population.

Nuclear weapons could begin disappearing in Turkey into unaccounted hands potentially with ISIS fingerprints on them.
After all, the US has consistently been the main supplier of terrorists' weapons - always "mysteriously" ending up in their
hands.

Speaking of weapons and supplies, recent sightings of massive movement of UN military vehicles and weapons in the US
have been sighted perfectly timed with recent authorization for UN troop deployment on US soil under backdoor stipulation
to "protect" civilians but could just as easily kill us under martial law orders when they come to lock us up and confiscate our
guns.

Or another flimsily veiled executive order signed on July 1st that authorizes new rules of engagement for deadly drones
eradicating declared combatants moving amongst civilian populations that under Obama's loose definition could easily be
applied to homegrown civilians believing in the sanctity of our US Constitution and national sovereignty.
The most eminent danger of them all posed by the elite's meticulously planned perfect storm of global economic
collapse co-timed with World War III against Russia, China and Iran carrying the very real threat of nuclear annihilation [but
again, this is very unlikely to eventuate].

This growing collection of extremely plausible doomsday scenarios seem as endless as the globalists' war on terror, except
the terror being perpetrated on us is nothing short of premeditated human genocide by a Satan worshipping, pedophilia-
addicted, trans-human elitist crime cabal syndicate.

When history keeps repeating itself, more than convincingly demonstrating that the ruling elite possesses both the criminal
means and willful intention to purge 90% of the global population, while enslaving the rest under absolute tyrannical one
world government control, it's time to wake up from this nightmare and start fighting back for our very lives.
Comment: Ultimately - the wost case scenario simply will not be allowed to happen. There are far too many contingency
plans in place - BUT the masses need to be awakened to the full gravity of the situation and what was planned for them.

Joachim Hagopian is a West Point graduate and former US Army officer. He has written a manuscript based on his unique
military experience entitled "Don't Let The Bastards Getcha Down." It examines and focuses on US international relations,
leadership and national security issues. After the military, Joachim earned a master's degree in Clinical Psychology and
worked as a licensed therapist in the mental health field with abused youth and adolescents for more than a quarter century.
In recent years he has focused on his writing, becoming an alternative media journalist. His blog site is
at: empireexposed.blogspot.co.

Does The Local Government Act Amendment Bill Result In Amalgamation By Stealth?
Local Body Developments
August 29 2016 | From: KiwiWatch / NZPCR

After Amalgamation failures in Northland, Hawkes Bay and Wellington is the National government
attempting to do this via the backdoor while everyone was watching the Rio Olympics?
It seems that Hastings Mayor and Mr. UN Agenda 21 / UN Agenda 30 New Zealand Laurence Yule is planning to
force amalgamation on Hawkes Bay. The following letter was in the Dominion Post:

Submitted by a reader:

Letters to the Editor

Dominion Post
2 August 2016

Local Govt Bill

At the recent local government conference widespread concern was expressed about the potential loss of local
democracy if a revamped Local Government Commission (LGC) is authorised to amalgamate various bodies and
require the establishment of commercial agencies with little if any elected directors.

Discussion almost entirely ignored the most radical proposal now before the House: to make the LGC a Crown
agent (that is, subject to explicit direction by a minister) and to exempt from the Official Information Act any
information from or about the process leading to a decision of the LGC, for example, to amalgamate.

Perhaps the bill is just provocative; perhaps fears of making local government a creature of the central executive
are groundless. If not, this is a significant constitutional change.

Judith Aitken
Retiring Wellington Regional Councillor
Te Aro

I do not recall seeing anything in the HB Today about submissions which have, of course, closed. The bill is before
parliament on its second reading before reaching a Select Committee.

This is of great concern because, once again, our democracy is being challenged BEHIND CLOSED DOORS and the
unwanted result will be presented to us as fait accompli too late for us to do anything, again.

This is the Link sent to me from parliament: Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Bill (No 2)
Local Body Developments
"If at first you dont succeed, try, try again. Then quit. Theres no point in being a damn fool about
it!" - W.C. Field, American comedian

Not content with the failure of the Local Government Commission to merge councils in Northland, the Hawkes Bay,
and Wellington, National is now proposing to put their amalgamation agenda into effect via the back door, by using
a new local government bill to increase the power of the Commission, while removing important democratic rights.

The Local Government Act 2002 Amendment Bill (No 2) is now in front of Parliaments Local Government and Environment
Select Committee and is open for submissions until Thursday 28 July full details can be seen here.

The Bills preamble explains that it aims to lift local authority performance, as part of the Governments overall objective of
improving public services and building a more productive and competitive economy. It does this by streamlining the process
for combining and co-ordinating services, infrastructure and resources across regions and towns, through a greater use of
Council-Controlled Organisations (CCOs).

As the Local Government Minister Sam Lotu-Iiga explained in his first reading speech:

"Communities in Northland, Hawkes Bay, and Wellington have told us that they do not want full-scale
amalgamation, but this bill provides a middle ground. Communities will retain their elected councils; the councils, in
turn, will be able to work more collaboratively to manage infrastructure and services across our regions. This will
deliver more joined-up, cost-effective services and better value for our ratepayers.

So while the present legislation promotes council amalgamations as the way to gain the scale required to combine services,
the new Bill facilitates the sharing of services between councils, without the need for amalgamation unless it is agreed by
all councils.
While under the present law only individuals, groups, councils, and the Minister can propose amalgamations, the Bill
extends that power to the Local Government Commission. To balance that, the Bill includes an automatic poll of citizens
over any Commission-led re-organisation proposal, including the transfer of water, transport, or Resource Management Act
functions from one local authority to another.

However, theres a catch. The Bill removes an important democratic safeguard, namely the automatic right of residents and
ratepayers to petition councils for a binding poll on any amalgamation proposal if supported by 10 percent of electors.

As a result, under the new Bill, if a number of councils jointly agree on amalgamation, local citizens will have no
right to call for a poll. This has already led to speculation that councils might be encouraged to collude in order to
circumvent a public poll.

We strongly recommend that the ability of residents and ratepayers to petition their local authority for a poll
on any amalgamation or reorganisation proposals should either be re-instated, or the provision for an automatic poll on
Commission-led changes should be extended to cover all amalgamation and re-organisation proposals.

The point is that local ratepayers have a fundamental right to have a say in the structure of representative decision-making
in their communities, since they are the ones who fund council infrastructure and assets.

There is also a concern that a central requirement in the current law, that there must be demonstrable community support
for an amalgamation proposal to proceed, has been removed. Instead, the new Bill focuses on the likelihood of
significantcommunity opposition to any reorganisation

In effect, this change in presumption from an amalgamation needing community support to proceed, to the lesser hurdle that
it should go ahead, unless there is significant opposition, dramatically lowers the threshold.

We suggest that the old standard is the correct one new local government re-organisation proposals should have to
demonstrate that they have the support of their community in order to proceed.

When community support was used as a benchmark by the Commission in the last three amalgamation attempts,
the results were conclusive: in Northland, 93 percent of submitters opposed a single council, in Wellington, 89
percent were opposed, and in the Hawkes Bay, where a poll was held, 66 percent of voters were opposed.

In defence of the new Bill, the Local Government Minister explained:

"The projected costs of maintaining and building core infrastructure such as water, sewerage, flood protection and
roading are growing exponentially faster than the ability of local ratepayers to bear.
 The bill enables the development of shared infrastructure ownership and management across regions. This is
essential for developing regions and communities.

But this is also a key reason why communities should remain closely involved in the reform process the creation of CCOs
for the delivery of water and roading services, could remove a major part of the budget of many small councils, signalling
their radical downsizing into largely regulatory agencies.

Further, since concerns remain that the Commission, on behalf of the Minister, could create CCOs, without the approval of
the council or the community, it is imperative that community involvement and support remains a priority in the Bill
especially given the dreadful problems that are still evident in Auckland, where residents and ratepayers had
amalgamation forced upon them.

Meanwhile, the Local Government Commission is wasting no time. Although their plans for Auckland-style super cities and
Maori Statutory Boards in Northland, Wellington and the Hawkes Bay were rejected, they are now informing councils that
they intend to reconsider other restructuring options to promote greater efficiencies in the regions. They plan to progress
their re-organisation proposals under the new law.

If you are concerned about the potential erosion of local democracy, and the failure of the proposed law to adequately
safeguard public involvement in major council reorganisation decision-making, we would urge you to send in a quick
submission on the Bill outlining your concerns by Thursday.

With local body elections just weeks away, local government reform is not the only thing being dumped on councils.

This weeks NZCPR Guest Commentator, Fiona Mackenzie, an Auckland-based political commentator, outlines how
councillors in the region are having to battle against a power grab by tribal interests for control of the crucial Hauraki Gulf.
The Hauraki Gulf is a massive coastal area covering 1.2 million hectares from Mangawai in the North, to Waihi in the South,
and Great Barrier Island in the East, encompassing Auckland, the Hauraki Plains and the Coromandel Peninsula. It includes
the Ports of Auckland, shipping routes, marinas, fisheries, marine farms, and other commercial and recreational facilities.

At the present time, as Fiona explains, the area is controlled by the Hauraki Gulf Marine Park Act:

"Since 2000, the Gulf has been managed by the Hauraki Gulf Forum with Auckland Council as its administering
authority. Its 21-member board includes Ministry bureaucrats, elected representatives of all the regions councils,
plus 6 self-nominated tribal representatives appointed by the Minister of Conservation.

She outlines how, at their meeting last month, iwi tried to force through a re-organisation proposal for a new 16-member
Board, constituted on the 50:50 Maori sovereignty co-governance model, whereby 8 members would represent Maori and 8
members would represent everyone else, giving tribes unassailable control of the Board and the Hauraki Gulf.

Under their scheme, the number of iwi representatives on the new Forum would be increased from 6 to 8. The number of
councillors representing the vast Auckland region would be cut from 7 to 1. Representatives of the five other councils in the
area the Hauraki District Council, the Matamata-Piako District Council, the Thames-Coromandel District Council, the
Waikato District Council, and the Waikato Regional Council would be cut from 5 to 2.

And the number of public servants representing the Minister of Maori Affairs, the Minister of Conservation, and the Minister
of Fisheries, would be increased from 3 to 5.
All in all, only 3 of the 16 representatives on the proposed new governance body would be elected to represent the public
interest and the almost 2 million people who live in the area.

Under the proposal the new iwi-controlled Board would demand statutory authority to enact legislation over the entire area.

Why, in a democracy based on equal rights and the rule of law, such a racist proposal could have progressed to the point
where it is being seriously considered, is hard to fathom although its not altogether surprising, given that the long-term
agenda of Maori tribal leaders is to gain sufficient status and power to control the countrys major resources.

According to Fiona:

"The meeting became rather acrimonious when some expressed concern at this attempt to shove the
recommendations through. Understandably, they wished to have it reviewed by their respective organisations and
obtain a mandate before voting. The inevitable claims of racism were made.

She is concerned that those in positions of power on the Auckland Council, who support the sovereignty cause, might
manipulate the process so the proposal may not be decisively defeated, as it should be:

"At the time of writing, the Forums Auckland City Councillors did not yet know if this Report would be reviewed and
voted on by their Councils governing body. Theres a chance it could be directed to a sub-committee for an easier
passage from carefully selected participants, plus the two votes from the unelected, unaccountable and totally
conflicted members of the Independent Maori Statutory Board.
It is clear that the group wanting control of the Gulf were pushing Forum members to approve their new governance model
on the spot, ahead of the local body elections, as they clearly believe they have the numbers to get their proposal through
and do not want to risk having their compliant representatives replaced by others who might oppose their plan.

If they succeed in gaining support for their 50:50 Maori sovereignty-style co-governance proposal, the next step in their
march for tribal control of the Hauraki Gulf, will be to seek the approval of the Government for a change to the Act. With the
National Partys history of caving in to iwi demands, whether they would stand up against this blatant power grab is anyones
guess.

This whole debacle shows only too clearly how important it is that our local body representatives are prepared to act on
principle and stand up for the public interest against radicals.

By offering themselves for office, candidates are pledging to work in the best interests of their community. That means
opposing anyone threatening the principle of one person one vote.

With an on-going campaign underway to pressure councillors to support the appointment of un-elected iwi representatives
with voting rights onto local authorities, it is important that potential candidates are well prepared. Standing up to iwi and
their supporters is not always easy, so we suggest the following questions should be asked:

1. If you are elected would you oppose iwi representatives being appointed onto your Council with voting rights?

2. If you are elected and a proposal to appoint iwi representatives with voting rights onto your Council wins majority
support, would you propose that the final decision should be made by local electors through a public referendum
process?

3. If your Council has already established iwi representatives with voting rights, will you move that the positions be
disestablished so they can be reconsidered by the new council?

If you send email responses from candidates to us, we will add the details to our website here as a public service in the
run up to the elections.

New Zealand needs strong local government politicians. But be warned as Fionas article indicates only too clearly, you
need to be prepared to stick to your principles and not cave in to bullying or intimidation.
Most of all you must never forget that you are there to represent the best interests of your community and those
who voted you into office.

Excellent Trump / Farage Speech & Hillary Thinks Mr. Brexit Is Just Another Right -
Wing, Xenophobic, Sexist, Bigot That You Should Promptly Ignore + Brexit: Worst
Case Scenario For EU; Armageddon Promise Now Exposed As Pack Of Lies
August 29 2016 | From: KiwiWatch / ZeroHedge

Hillary Clinton is feeling some pressure. Not only is she caught in the cross-hairs of alternative
media that is now gaining strength almost daily in bringing the truth to people about what is really
going on in societies, particularly in regard to her undisclosed health issues, actually naming and
criticising InfoWars and Brietbart in her criticism.

It seems her incessant lies are catching up to her in regard to the FBI actually being the discloser of the fact that
she uses BleachBit to eradicate emails forever from the prying eyes of authorities.

Now BleachBit is claiming that they stifled the FBI investigation into Clintons private server (nothing like publicity they say)
just showing how completely corrupt and farcical the U.S. elections really are.

From ZeroHedge:

It seems that a speech made by Nigel Farage (or Mr. Brexit as the Trump campaign has named him) at a Trump rally a
couple of days ago in Jackson, Mississippi may have struck a nerve with the Clinton camp. Well, Clinton was not amused by
Mr. Brexit.
As pointed out by Breitbart, Clinton took the opportunity at an event yesterday to seemingly suggest that Farage is just
another right-wing, xenophobic, sexist, bigot that you should all promptly ignore. Frankly, were in awe of how succinctly
Clinton is able to identify all of Farages multiple character flawsit really is masterful speech writing.

Lest we forget, Hillary pointed that, because his opinions differ from her own, Farage is necessarily just another one of
Putins useful idiots:

"The godfather of this global brand of extreme nationalism is Russian President Vladimir Putin.

For his part, Farage suggested that Hillary spend a little more time speaking to normal, working people in her country
rather than attacking him with dodgy half-quotes.I think Hillary Clinton is running scared. Her attacks on me are
completely baseless. She sounds rather like Bob Geldof and cant accept Brexit.

"Perhaps Mrs. Clinton should spend more time speaking to normal, working people in her country than trying to
attack me using dodgy half-quotes.

Per Breitbart, Farage suggests that he did not say that children of legal immigrants be banned from public schools, but
rather suggested that people who have not paid in to the UK tax system not be the beneficiaries of public money until they
have paid in.

Farage also noted that he has previously pointed out that women who take maternity leave are perceived by employers to
be worth less than men, though never opined on whether or not that was fair or just. Farage also supported scrapping EU
discrimination law, noting that the British parliament could easily enact these laws, if necessary, themselves.
If you havent seen itits worth a view:

Nigel Farage Excerpt:

Full Event: Donald Trump Rally in Jackson, Mississippi (August 24, 2016) Trump Live Speech

The biblical deluge of expose, evidence and narrative on Hillary and the Clinton Foundation shows
no sign of slowing:
Julian Assange: Hillary Clinton is Protected by Elite Immunity from Prosecution

Trump vs. Hillary: A Summation - Paul Craig Roberts

Emails reveal how foundation donors got access to Clinton and her close aides at State Dept.

The Democrats Have Chosen A First Class Crook As Their Presidential Candidate

Secret Service Agent Tells All - Hillary Clinton is CRAZY - Gary Byrne - Full Interview

Reality Check: Emails Prove Clinton Foundation WAS Getting Favors From Hillary's State Department

Joint FBI-US Attorney Probe Of Clinton Foundation Is Underway

Sources claim Hillary Clinton is planning to use food as a weapon to starve political dissenters into submission

Roger Stone Breaks Down Hillarys Kill Count

TOP PHYSICIAN: Hillary Clinton Has Parkinsons Disease

CIA Finds Dead Mans Switch Linked To Hillary Clinton: Who Are Daniel And Vincent Fleck?

House Republicans Pursue Perjury Charges Against Hillary

Google Hides Clinton Body Count Search Suggestions

State Department: Nearly 15,000 new Clinton emails gleaned in FBI's closed investigation

EXHAUSTED HILLARY Is Taking Off Weekends - And Media Is Covering It Up

Hillary Just Took A Private Jet For 20 Mile Ride to Rothschild Fundraiser

More Evidence of Clinton Foundation Pay-to-Play Scheme Discovered

RIPPED FROM THE HEADLINES: HILLARY CLINTONS HORRIBLE DAY

The Attack On The Free Press Will Only Make It Stronger

James Tracy: Hillary Clinton is ILL This is SERIOUS - In Hiding? Wearing a Medical Device?

Clinton Foundation Scandal Over Foreign Donors Blows up on National Television

PUBLIC CALLS TO SHUT DOWN THE CLINTON FOUNDATION INTENSIFY

Time to arrest and prosecute Hillary Clinton for deep corruption... Clinton Foundation a bribery and racketeering
scheme of astonishing scale

FBI Reports Linking Hillary To Vince Foster "Suicide" Disappear From National Archives

Still a Conspiracy? Bill Clinton Thought Hillary Was Too Sickly to Run for President

HILLARY CLINTON SHORT CIRCUITS TRYING TO DEFEND THE CLINTON FOUNDATION

Another Damning Email: Crown Prince of Bahrain Donated $32M To Clinton Foundation, Got Access to Secretary of
State

Hillary Clinton Is Spreading Islamist Extremism, Hillarys Saudi Sponsors Support Terrorism

FBI Admits Clinton Used Software Designed To "Prevent Recovery" And "Hide Traces Of" Deleted Emails

BENGHAZI DOCUMENTS Found in Deleted Hillary Clinton Email Files: State Dept

Why Did the Saudi Regime and Other Gulf Tyrannies Donate Millions to the Clinton Foundation?

Democratic Pundits Downplay Serious Ethical Issues Raised by the Clinton Foundation

Brexit: Worst Case Scenario For EU; Armageddon Promise Now Exposed As Pack Of
Lies
Project Fear predicted economic meltdown if Britain voted leave. Where are the devastated high
streets, job losses and crashing markets?

In other Brexit news, Sweden warns the UK about cutting corporate taxes. How should the UK respond? Who is in
control?

What Happened to Promised Armageddon?

The Guardian reports: Brexit Armageddon was a Terrifying Vision but it Simply Hasnt Happened.

"Unemployment would rocket. Tumbleweed would billow through deserted high streets. Share prices would crash.
The government would struggle to find buyers for UK bonds. Financial markets would be in meltdown. Britain
would be plunged instantly into another deep recession.

Remember all that? It was hard to avoid the doom and gloom, not just in the weeks leading up to the referendum,
but in those immediately after it. Many of those who voted remain comforted themselves with the certain
knowledge that those who had voted for Brexit would suffer a bad case of buyers remorse.

The financial markets are serene. Share prices are close to a record high, and fears that companies would find it
difficult and expensive to borrow have proved wide of the mark. Far from dumping UK government gilts, pension
funds and insurance companies have been keen to hold on to them.

City economists had predicted an immediate rise in the claimant count measure of unemployment in July. That
hasnt happened either. This weeks figures show that instead of a 9,000 rise, there was an 8,600 drop."

Pack of Lies Clearly Visible

Armageddon fears were purposely over-hyped from the beginning. Now reality has set in.

Project fear backfired. People can easily see what liars David Cameron and the nannycrats in Brussels were.

Project Remain: Where are the admissions We were wrong?

Worst Case Scenario for EU

That the UK has gone on as normal has to be one of the worst fears for the nannycrats in Brussels. There is life, not death
after Brexit. What country will be next to figure that out?

Some rough times are likely ahead for the global economy, including the UK. But in the long run, Brexit will be a good thing
for the UK, which means it will be a bad thing from the point of view of Brussels.

Sweden Warns U.K. Against Aggressive Tax Cuts Amid Brexit Talks

The nannycrats are now worried that the UK will do something smart, like lower corporate taxes again.

Today, Sweden Warns U.K. Against Aggressive Tax Cuts Amid Brexit Talks.

"The U.K. should avoid any drastic steps to cut corporate taxes, or similar measures, as it prepares to start talks on
leaving the European Union, Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Loefven said.

If the U.K. wants some time to think about the situation, this will also give EU countries some time, Loefven told
Bloomberg after giving a speech in Stockholm on Sunday. On the other hand, you hear about plans in the U.K. to,
for example, lower corporate taxes considerably. If they, during this time, begin that kind of race, that will of course
make discussions more difficult.

Stellar Opportunity for UK to Set Example for the World

By all means the UK should precisely make things more difficult.

Everyone says, Brexit terms need to be negotiated. Actually, the UK can pick up its marbles and go home. Who could stop
the UK from doing just that?

On July 11, I wrote Stellar Opportunity for UK to Set Example for the World.

In that post I proposed among other things a recommendation The UK should preemptively stick it to the EU by slashing its
corporate tax rate to 10%, lower than any country in the EU.

I was unaware at the time that UK chancellor George Osborne had already decided to cut taxes, but by a lesser amount
than I suggested.

Precise Way to Start Negotiations with EU Mules: Get France to Piss and Moan

In a follow-up post I wrote Precise Way to Start Negotiations with EU Mules: Get France to Piss and Moan.

Michel Sapin Pisses and Moans:

First Step in Training a Mule

Theres an old saying The first step in training a mule is to hit it as hard as you can in the head with a stick.

I dont really advise that with mules, but it is the precise thing to do to EU nannycrats.

Reflections on Clearness

Its clear that the UK cant participate in the big decisions involving the EUs future, said Emmanuel Macron, Frances
economy minister.

Well, its equally clear the EU cannot participate in big decisions involving the UKs future.
And with his plan to cut corporate taxes, chancellor Osborne just hit nannycrat mules in Germany, France, and Belgium in
the head with not a stick, but a brick.

Trade War the Right Way

The UK should preemptively stick it to the EU by slashing its corporate tax rate to 10%, lower than any country in the EU.

Set Example for the World

Shed of inane EU rules and regulations coupled with the freedom to do anything it wants, the UK has a golden opportunity
to embrace the benefits of genuine free trade and growth via low taxes.

I have often stated the first country that fully embraces free trade, regardless of what any other country does, will come out
stunningly ahead.

The UK now has that chance.

Negotiation Progress

I suggest the UK cram it straight down their throats by lowering taxes to 10% right now. This will set proper the
negotiation tone and inform the nannycrats in Brussels who calls the shots.

France and Germany threatened to make things difficult for the UK. But as I have stated all along, the UK, not the EU, has
the upper hand in these negotiations.

Import/export math proves the point. The UK imports more from the the EU than it exports to them.

For details, please see No Cherry Picking Says Merkel; Risk of Global Trade Collapse says Mish.

The more the EU pisses and moans, the more successful Brexit will be for the UK.

Why Are Prices So High In New Zealand? + Homeless In New Zealand - Thousands
Living In Garages And Cars
August 27 2016 | From: MediaWhores / Aljazeera
Dear Leader Knows Best and the Stats (Satanists) dont lie.

Luciferian Zionists are incapable of speaking the truth

The media today are debating why prices are so high in New Zealand. They have decided to ask the experts. The
experts are all pretty sure there is no inflation. The Government told us so. And the experts all work for the
Government or for the banks, who run the Government.

Related: The British Banking Conspiracy Part 2 - America, Israel and The Federal Reserve (9/11)

Sounds like a story out of Soviet Russia doesnt it?

Prices in NZ have in fact risen by at least 200% since the 2008 Global financial crisis. 400+ % on my favorite cheese, and
my honey for example. 200% plus on housing, and power bills some say also. Yet somehow the Government and the
corporate media all agree that there hasnt really been any inflation at all in the past 10 years.

It should be noted that wages and salaries are almost unchanged in that same period in economics speak, this translates
to lower real wages or the amount of purchasing power of your money / pay.

If prices are 200% or more up, and your wages remain the same you might be experiencing budgeting problems.

And the bottom 5% will all be living in their cars. Which is precisely the case under this Soviet like John Key regime who
pose as capitalists.
We need to explain why those prices have been rising (money counterfeiting by the banks essentially) but first, lets consider
the other thing putting upwards pressure on our prices exports.

New Zealand is now feeding upwards of 60,00, 000 people overseas. That is how much food we produce a massive
amount. One of the biggest food producers per capita in the entire World.

We are a giant farm really, with some traffic jams in the middle. All of the very best food is exported to the likes of 5 star
hotels across Asia and Europe, and thousands of tonnes more to supermarkets and chain stores all over.

You can of course buy anything you want here but you just have to pay the same price as top corporate executives are
offering for it in Tokyo and London.

If that makes you feel a little queasy, also keep in mind that most of the corporates shipping all of our food and resources
overseas, are paying almost no tax these days. They all have advanced offshore licensing fees and trusts to launder the
profit through to.
Assholes like Graeme Hart (above) are held up for us as some kind of hero when he is in fact one of the single biggest
causes of poverty in our modern day history.

In fact - Kiwis are now not only dealing with 100-200 % lower real wages these days but are also paying around 65% net
taxes on their salaries and wages. That includes 20-30% income tax, 15% GST, ACC rates, petrol taxes, tobacco taxes,
alcohol taxes, local rates, and on and on. Then thanks to privatisation you have to pay for most Government Services
anyway.

It is in fact beyond madness it is looking more and more like some type of Corporate Fourth Reich. A corporate holocaust
being run by our Government in conjunction with their Corporate partners.

The Corporate Fourth Reich is apparently well underway in New Zealand and under a Prime Minister who claims to be
Jewish oddly enough. Zionists I hear some people refer to them as. Which looks suspiciously like the word Nazi to me.
Turns out now the experts in the media want to tax sugar as well. The poor can only afford cheap foods full of sugar these
days. So the new tax is clearly designed to make their lives even harder. Fact is, if they had any interest in keeping people
healthy, they would simply remove taxes off fruit and vegetables.

That is the reality of New Zealand these days a small handful of apparently very well connected and financed people are
doing just great, overseas trips, baches, overseas homes, etc and everyone else is being slowly killed off via a
scientifically designed and deployed corporate extermination program.

The others have nice large distilled water (h2o) treatment plants for them and their family, and everyone else is drinking
sodium fluoride and chlorine if they are lucky the unlucky rate payers are actually dying from preventable diseases in
their water supplies. This is apparently the new standard.

Interesting to note that no one has been held responsible for the Havelock North Water Crisis these leaders are
now poisoning everyone and still get to keep their jobs.

Hapless sellout idiot and Mr. Agenda 21 New Zealand, Lawrence Yule expects to be re-elected and he cannot even tell 5,000 + people why they are
sick for weeks from a poisoned water supply
One wonders how bad it is going to get?

One thing is for sure the amount of crap that Kiwis are prepared to put up with has increased exponentially in just 25
years. Probably at the same rate as the size of their TV screens.

And why do we have inflation on our remaining food ? Mostly due to the money printing / counterfeiting operations of the
foreign banks that money you sign for and they lend you, at interest?

Yeah, it came out of thin air... a very sophisticated magic trick, that only certain qualified magicians are apparently allowed
to do.

Homeless In New Zealand - Thousands Living In Garages And Cars

Once a pioneer of the social welfare state, New Zealand now has over 40,000 people who are
homeless, forced to live in their cars and in garages as a result of rapid house price and rent rises
and a shortage of social housing.

Al Jazeera correspondent Tarek Bazley visits South Auckland and meets two families one with six children living
in a derelict garage, the other who lived with three teenagers for months in their car and charts the countrys fall
from and egalitarian society to one with deep divisions of wealth.

Finally, The CIA Admits Covering Up JFK Assassination

August 26 2016 | From: TrueActivist / Politico

Yes, the CIA Director Was Part of the JFK Assassination Cover-Up: Even if you have to wait over 50
years, eventually the truth will out. [While they have not admitted to everything - the red links below
fill in the gaps.]
Suspicions that the CIA covered up JFKs murder have finally been confirmed, according to an explosive Politico
report (further below) out this week.

Related: JFK Jr. Told The World Who Murdered His Father - But Nobody Was Paying Attention

Fifty-two years after the Presidents death, declassified documents show that the CIA were in communication with alleged
assassin Lee Harvey Oswald before JFKs murder in 1963, and they were monitoring his mail since 1959.

Not only that but John McCone, who was Chief of the CIA at the time, allegedly hid evidence from the Warren commission,
set up by Lyndon Johnson to investigate JFKs assassination. The spymaster and other senior CIA officials are accused of
withholding incendiary information from the commission and therefore perverting the course of justice.

The CIA has admitted this.

The Politico report is based on evidence given by CIA historian David Robarge. He has claimed the cover-up was intended to
keep the commission focused on:

"What the agency believed at the time was the best truth - that Lee Harvey Oswald, for as yet undetermined
motives, had acted alone in killing John Kennedy.

McCone directed the CIA to provide only passive, reactive and selective assistance to the Warren commission, meaning the
investigation was severely compromised and did not follow up any other leads which may have been crucial in the search for
truth.

Robarge also believes that John McCone, who died in 1991, withheld vital information relating to various CIA plots to
assassinate Fidel Castro. The historian points out that these plots may well be linked to JFKs assassination - theres a strong
chance his murder was a revenge attack for CIA operations in Cuba - but McCones unwillingness to explore other
potentialities outside of prime suspect Lee Harvey Oswald could have resulted in a grave miscarriage of justice.

JFK was Americas youngest ever and most charismatic President, and his death shocked the nation. Alternative murder
theories are popular across the States:

A 2013 poll found that only 30% of Americans believe Oswald shot JFK, and that he acted alone. 61% believed that
others were involved in a conspiracy (see the embedded video to find out why).

David Robarge first published these exclusive claims in a secret internal CIA magazine in 2013. His claims have now been
declassified and can be publicly accessed here on the George Washington Universitys National Security Archive.

Robarge has also written a biography of John McCone, but his book continues to be classified. What else might the historian
have uncovered? Heres hoping that the full truth of what happened in Dealy Plaza on that fateful day will very soon be
common knowledge.

Yes, The CIA Director Was Part Of The JFK Assassination Cover-Up

John McCone was long suspected of withholding information from the Warren Commission. Now
even the CIA says he did.

John McCone came to the CIA as an outsider. An industrialist and an engineer by training, he replaced veteran
spymaster Allen Dulles as director of central intelligence in November 1961, after John F. Kennedy had forced out
Dulles following the CIAs bungled operation to oust Fidel Castro by invading Cubas Bay of Pigs.

McCone had one overriding mission: restore order at the besieged CIA. Kennedy hoped his management skills might prevent
a future debacle, even if the Californian - mostly a stranger to the clubby, blue-blooded world of the men like Dulles who had
always run the spy agency - faced a steep learning curve.

After JFKs assassination in Dallas in November 1963, President Lyndon Johnson kept McCone in place at the CIA, and the
CIA director became an important witness before the Warren Commission, the panel Johnson created to investigate
Kennedys murder.
McCone pledged full cooperation with the commission, which was led by Chief Justice Earl Warren, and testified that the CIA
had no evidence to suggest that Lee Harvey Oswald, the assassin, was part of any conspiracy, foreign or domestic.

In its final report, the commission came to agree with

McCones depiction of Oswald, a former Marine and self-
proclaimed Marxist, as a delusional lone wolf. But did
McCone come close to perjury all those decades ago?

Did the onetime Washington outsider in fact hide agency

secrets that might still rewrite the history of the
assassination?

Even the CIA is now willing to raise these questions.

Half a century after JFKs death, in a once-secret report

written in 2013 by the CIAs top in-house historian and
quietly declassified last fall, the spy agency acknowledges
what others were convinced of long ago:

That McCone and other senior CIA officials were

complicit in keeping incendiary information from the
Warren Commission.

According to the report by CIA historian David Robarge,

McCone, who died in 1991, was at the heart of a:

"Benign cover-up at the spy agency, intended to

keep the commission focused on what the Agency
believed at the time was the best truth - that Lee
Harvey Oswald, for as yet undetermined motives,
had acted alone in killing John Kennedy.

The most important information that McCone withheld from the commission in its 1964 investigation, the report found, was the
existence, for years, of CIA plots to assassinate Castro, some of which put the CIA in cahoots with the Mafia. Without this
information, the commission never even knew to ask the question of whether Oswald had accomplices in Cuba or elsewhere
who wanted Kennedy dead in retaliation for the Castro plots.

While raising no question about the essential findings of the Warren Commission, including that Oswald was the gunman in
Dallas, the 2013 report is important because it comes close to an official CIA acknowledgement - half a century after the fact -
of impropriety in the agencys dealings with the commission.

The coverup by McCone and others may have been benign, in the reports words, but it was a cover-up nonetheless,
denying information to the commission that might have prompted a more aggressive investigation of Oswalds potential Cuba
ties.

Initially stamped SECRET/NOFORN, meaning it was not to be shared outside the agency or with foreign governments,
Robarges report was originally published as an article in the CIAs classified internal magazine, Studies in Intelligence, in
September 2013, to mark the 50th anniversary of the Kennedy assassination.

The article, drawn from a still-classified 2005 biography of McCone written by Robarge, was declassified quietly last fall and
is now available on the website of The George Washington Universitys National Security Archive.
In a statement to POLITICO, the CIA said it decided to declassify the report to highlight misconceptions about the CIAs
connection to JFKs assassination, including the still-popular conspiracy theory that the spy agency was somehow behind the
assassination. (Articles in the CIA magazine are routinely declassified without fanfare after internal review.)

Robarges article says that McCone, quickly convinced after the assassination that Oswald had acted alone and that there
was no foreign conspiracy involving Cuba or the Soviet Union, directed the agency to provide only passive, reactive and
selective assistance to the Warren Commission.

This portrait of McCone suggests that he was much more hands-on in the CIAs dealings with the commission - and in the
agencys post-assassination scrutiny of Oswalds past - than had previously been known. The report quotes another senior
CIA official, who heard McCone say that he intended to handle the whole (commission) business myself, directly.

The report offers no conclusion about McCones motivations, including why he would go to lengths to cover-up CIA activities
that mostly predated his time at the agency. But it suggests that the Johnson White House might have directed McCone to
hide the information.

McCone;shared the administrations interest in avoiding disclosures about covert actions that would
circumstantially implicate [the] CIA in conspiracy theories and possibly lead to calls for a tough US response
against the perpetrators of the assassination, the article reads.

If the commission did not know to ask about covert operations about Cuba, he was not going to give them any
suggestions about where to look.

In an interview, David Slawson, who was the Warren Commissions chief staff investigator in searching for evidence of a
foreign conspiracy, said he was not surprised to learn that McCone had personally withheld so much information from the
investigation in 1964, especially about the Castro plots.

"I always assumed McCone must have known, because I always believed that loyalty and discipline in the CIA
made any large-scale operation without the consent of the director impossible, says Slawson, now 84 and a
 retired University of Southern California law professor.

He says he regrets that it had taken so long for the spy agency to acknowledge that McCone and others had
seriously misled the commission. After half a century, Slawson says, The world loses interest, because the
assassination becomes just a matter of history to more and more people.

Related: The Connection Between 9/11, JFK And The Global Collateral Accounts

The report identifies other tantalizing information that McCone did not reveal to the commission, including evidence that the
CIA might somehow have been in communication with Oswald before 1963 and that the spy agency had secretly monitored
Oswalds mail after he attempted to defect to the Soviet Union in 1959.

The CIA mail-opening program, which was later determined to have been blatantly illegal, had the code name HTLINGUAL.
 "It would be surprising if the DCI [director of central intelligence] were not told about the program after the
Kennedy assassination, the report reads.

If not, his subordinates deceived him. If he did know about HTLINGUAL reporting on Oswald, he was not being
forthright with the commission - presumably to protect an operation that was highly compartmented and, if
disclosed, sure to arouse much controversy.

John McCone

In the 1970s, when congressional investigations exposed the Castro plots, members of the Warren Commission and its staff
expressed outrage that they had been denied the information in 1964. Had they known about the plots, they said, the
commission would have been much more aggressive in trying to determine whether JFKs murder was an act of retaliation by
Castro or his supporters.

Weeks before the assassination, Oswald traveled to Mexico City and met there with spies for the Cuban and Soviet
governments - a trip that CIA and FBI officials have long acknowledged was never adequately investigated. (Even so, Warren
Commission staffers remain convinced today that Oswald was the lone gunman in Dallas, a view shared by ballistics experts
who have studied the evidence.)

In congressional testimony in 1978, after public disclosures about the Castro plots, McCone claimed that he could not have
shared information about the plots with the Warren Commission in 1964 because he was ignorant of the plots at the time.
Other CIA officials;

"Withheld the information from me, he said. I have never been satisfied as to why they withheld the information.

But the 2013 report concluded that McCones testimony was neither frank nor accurate, since it was later
determined with certainty that he had been informed about the CIA-Mafia plots nine months before his appearance
before the Warren Commission.

Robarge suggests the CIA is responsible for some of the harsh criticism commonly leveled at the Warren Commission for
large gaps in its investigation of the presidents murder, including its failure to identify Oswalds motive in the assassination
and to pursue evidence that might have tied Oswald to accomplices outside the United States.
Dealey Plaza

For decades, opinion polls have shown that most Americans reject the commissions findings and believe Oswald did not act
alone. Four of the seven commissioners were members of Congress, and they spent the rest of their political careers
badgered by accusations that they had been part of a coverup.

"The decision of McCone and Agency leaders in 1964 not to disclose information about CIAs anti-Castro schemes
might have done more to undermine the credibility of the commission than anything else that happened while it
was conducting its investigation, the report reads.

In that sense - and in that sense alone - McCone may be regarded as a co-conspirator in the JFK as sassination
cover-up.

If there was, indeed, a CIA cover-up, a member of the Warren Commission was apparently in on it: Allen Dulles, McCones
predecessor, who ran the CIA when the spy agency hatched the plots to kill Castro.

"McCone does not appear to have any explicit, special understanding with Allen Dulles, the 2013 report says. Still,
McCone could rest assured that his predecessor would keep a dutiful watch over Agency equities and work to
keep the commission from pursuing provocative lines of investigation, such as lethal anti-Castro covert actions.

(Johnson appointed Dulles to the commission at the recommendation of then-Attorney General Robert Kennedy.)
In fact it is doubtful that Castro had anything to do with the assassination of JFK other than being used as false flag cover. See the red related links for
more detail

The 2013 report also draws attention to the contacts between McCone and Robert Kennedy in the days after the
assassination. In the wake of the Bay of Pigs disaster in 1961, the attorney general was asked by his brother, the president,
to direct the administrations secret war against Castro, and Robert Kennedys friends and family acknowledged years later
that he never stopped fearing that Castro was behind his brothers death.

"McCone had frequent contact with Robert Kennedy during the painful days after the assassination, the report
says. Their communication appears to have been verbal, informal and, evidently in McCones estimation, highly
personal; no memoranda or transcripts exist or are known to have been made.

Because Robert Kennedy had overseen the Agencys anti-Castro covert actions - including some of the
assassination plans - his dealings with McCone about his brothers murder had a special gravity, the report
continues.

Did Castro kill the president because the president had tried to kill Castro? Had the administrations obsession
with Cuba inadvertently inspired a politicized sociopath to murder John Kennedy?

The declassification of the bulk of the 2013 McCone report might suggest a new openness by the CIA in trying to resolve the
lingering mysteries about the Kennedy assassination.

At the same time, there are 15 places in the public version of the report where the CIA has deleted sensitive information -
sometimes individual names, sometimes whole sentences. It is an acknowledgement, it seems, that there are still secrets
about the Kennedy assassination hidden in the agencys files.

Related: The Most Important Financial Meeting Since JFKs Death Just Took Place
Hollywood Sci-Fi Filmmakers Tapped To Dramatize Fictional Climate Change To Scare
Everybody Into Voting For Climate Totalitarians
August 26 2016 | From: NaturalNews

I'm almost rolling with laughter watching all this unfold: Because democrats refuse to face the real
threats facing America - Islamic terrorism, debt spending, illegal immigration and job-crushing
federal mandates like Obamacare - they have to invent their own fake emergencies to try to win the
votes of people who don't have any clue about the real world.

So-called "climate change" - previously known as "global warming" but renamed after the data revealed no
warming trend at all - is entirely rooted in false mythologies, official narratives and creative storytelling.

Related: Engineer: Decarbonization Will Result in Mass Starvation, Poverty, Civil Strife

That's precisely why democrats had to hire James Cameron, Arnold Schwarzenegger and Sigourney Weaver to present a
climate change scary in a new short film. These are the very same people whose films depict time-traveling Terminator
robots, interplanetary aliens with green acid blood, and poltergeists that could be captured with vacuum cleaners (the
original "Ghostbusters" movie... the one that didn't suck).

If you believe in time-traveling robots from the future, you might also believe in the climate change narrative, too.

That narrative is based entirely on ridiculous, absurd, make-believe notions such as:

The hilariously ignorant idea that polar bears can't swim (or even that their numbers are plummeting). In truth,
polar bears are champion swimmers, and their population numbers are on the rise.

The scientifically illiterate notion that carbon dioxide is bad for the planet. In reality, it's the No. 1 nutrient source
of all forests, food crops, herbal plants and green zones across the planet. CO2 reforests deserts and amplifies
food production.

It's also impossible for humans alone to raise CO2 levels much at all for the simple reason that plants are starving for it
and keep consuming it as fast as we can make it. (This is Botany Science 101.)

The laughably anti-science narrative that says oceans are going to rise so quickly, they'll drown out coastal cities
and devastate human civilization. In reality, even during warming periods of Earth's history, oceans barely creep up at the
pace of only about 1-2mm per year. That's about 1-2 DECADES for a single inch of ocean level rise. (Yep, not exactly the
tidal wave apocalypse depicted in climate change scare films, is it?)
There is no man made climate change
You have hopefully realized by now that everything the democrats invoke in their political campaigning is based on lies.Man
made climate change is a cult science myth rooted in a convenient political narrative, not scientific facts.

That's why their climate change scare film had to be made: to stir up the imagination of climate change and make it seem
visually real even though it is scientifically false. It sort of reminds me of the original "Reefer Madness" film which was also
created as a propaganda political film to scare people away from medical marijuana.

That film was also based on quack science hysteria, just like the climate change films being made today.

Yep, you heard me right: There is no legitimate scientific evidence whatsoever to support their climate change
narrative. The data that have been presented to the public are all "corrected" (i.e. fraudulent altered) to artificially insert new
"data points" that fit the political narrative we're all being spoon fed by the corrupt democrats.

Remember: The climate changing pushing politicians are all exactly the same people who lie to us all about vaccines,
GMOs, fluoride, government debt and antidepressant drugs.
Why on Earth would anyone believe they are magically and selectively telling the truth only about climate change
when we all know they are constantly lying about everything else?

The pro climate change position is truly just climate superstition masquerading as science. It should be obvious at this
point, but everything the democratic establishment insists is TRUE is almost certainly FALSE.

Read this excellent article entitled Climate Superstition Is Weaponizing The Ignorant.

It states, "Climate alarmists are no different from 16th century Europeans who burned 15,000 witches for 'cooking
the weather.' They observe ordinary events, and convince themselves that it is unprecedented and somebody's
fault."

From this 2014 Natural News article:

"Planetary temperatures have remained largely stable throughout the past several decades, according to new data
released by the Remote Sensing Systems (RSS) satellite.

Mean temperatures gauged across multiple measurement platforms including GISS, HadCRUt4, NCDC, UAH and
RSS definitively show that the planet has not been warming for nearly 18 years, taking the wind out of the sails of
the global warming fallacy.

And from another Natural News article:

"The US government's Global Historical Climate Network reversed the results of temperature recordings to
suggest that the temperature was rising through 60 years of research. These recordings were amplified by two
official surface records.

The Goddard Institute for Space Studies and the National Climate Data Center amplified surface records to
estimate temperatures across entire regions of the Earth where temperatures aren't even recorded. By falsifying
 records and then amplifying the data, these large data centers misrepresented temperatures records across an
entire region of the earth.

And finally, from Global warming data FAKED by government to fit climate change fictions:

"Now, in what might be the largest scientific fraud ever uncovered, NASA and the NOAA have been caught red-
handed altering historical temperature data to produce a "climate change narrative" that defies reality.

We now know that historical temperature data for the continental United States were deliberately altered
by NASA and NOAA scientists in a politically-motivated attempt to rewrite history and claim global
warming is causing U.S. temperatures to trend upward.

The data actually show that we are in a cooling trend, not a warming trend (see charts below).

This story is starting to break worldwide right now across the media, with The Telegraph now reporting, "NOAA's
US Historical Climatology Network (USHCN) has been 'adjusting' its record by replacing real temperatures with
data 'fabricated' by computer models."

Because the actual historical temperature record doesn't fit the frenzied, doomsday narrative of global warming
being fronted today on the political stage, the data were simply altered using "computer models" and then
published as fact.

Related: Bill Gates backs climate scientists lobbying for large-scale geoengineering

Here's the actual scientific temperature data BEFORE the data were altered:

And here's the "official narrative" version of the data AFTER they were altered for political reasons:
And here is the EPA's own chart depicting heat waves throughout U.S. history. Notice that the heat waves were far, far
worse in the 1930's than they are today?
How to counter the climate change narrative with actual logic and real data

From RealClimateScience.com (go there to see all the graphs and charts that accompany this text):

1) There is no 97% consensus of scientists. In a 2013 survey of the professional members of the American
Meteorological Society, only 52% believed that global warming was primarily man-made much less dangerous. No group
in the survey came anywhere close to reaching 97%.

2) Heatwaves are not getting worse. According to the EPA, the worst heatwaves in the US (by far) occurred during the
1930's - when the Midwest commonly saw temperatures over 110 degrees, and as high as 120 degrees.

3) Droughts are not getting worse. According to NOAA, the US has been getting steadily wetter over the past century. In
the 1930's, drought covered 80% of the US, as poignantly described by John Steinbeck in "The Grapes of Wrath."

4) Scientists say that California has had much more severe droughts in the past, lasting as long as 200 years. The
past 100 years was the wettest century on record in California.

5) Hurricanes are not getting worse. The US is experiencing a record quiet period for hurricanes.

6) According to the Danish Meteorological Institute, the Arctic Ocean is full of thick ice. There is more ice on the
Russian side than there has been in years, and a group of global warming sailors are currently blocked by impenetrable ice
in the Northeast Passage.
 7) Polar Bear populations are not decreasing. (They are steadily rising, year after year.)

8) Sea level has been rising for 20,000 years, since the end of the last ice age. Most of that time much faster than
now. It has nothing to do with humans.

9) According to NOAA, sea level is only rising 1.7 to 1.8 mm/year. At that rate, it will take thousands of years for
Manhattan to drown.

10) According to NOAA, sea level at Manhattan has been rising at about the same rate (2.8 mm/year) since the
1850's. There is no indication that humans are affecting the rate of sea level rise.

11) Glaciers have been melting for a very long time. In 1879, John Muir (founder of the Sierra Club) found that Alaska's
largest glacier had retreated 48 miles since 1794. Twenty thousand years ago, Chicago was buried under a mile of glacial
ice.

12) Forest fires are not getting worse over the long term. According to USDA, the US had five times as much burn
acreage in the 1930's as we do now. The New York Times confirmed this.

13) Climate models have failed, and greatly over-predict warming.

14) Our most accurate systems for measuring global temperature, satellites, show that this year is no warmer
than 1998.

15) NASA shows that global surface temperatures have fallen 0.54 degrees C over the last four months. The
largest drop on record in such a short time.

Sites to visit where you can get educated about climate change:

ClimateDepot.com

RealClimateScience.com

In fact, the biggest threat to our climate is Geoengineering.

Western Propaganda - So Simple But So Effective

August 25 2016 | From: JournalNeo

When some time ago Noam Chomsky and I met at MIT, in order to write a book On Western
Terrorism: From Hiroshima to Drone Warfare and to produce a film with the same title together,
the topic we mainly aimed at discussing was that of the countless genocides the West has
committed all over the world since the end of the WWII. The second topic was impunity.

But no matter what atrocities we re-visited, our conversation kept slipping towards one crucial theme: the
propaganda that has been manufactured in media centers like New York, Paris, London and other North American
and European cities; the propaganda created in order to twist both the past and the present.

Related: Trump: The Media is Rigged

Without such brainwashing and the almost total indoctrination of the Western general public and the elites in all of the
client states, no imperialist and neo-colonialist policies would have become truly successful.

We spoke about US commercial advertising and its influence on German Nazi propaganda, and about Nazi propaganda
influencing by return both the US and European propaganda-makers.

Noam kept asking me about my childhood in socialist Czechoslovakia, and I explained to him, honestly, how indoctrinated I
was as a teenager: not by the Communist dogmas, but by the BBC, the Voice of America and the Radio Free Europe all of
them relentlessly spreading the Western political and market gospel to all corners of the socialist world.

Both Noam and I have created dozens of essays on the topic, as well as several books. My latest one, basically written
about all the corners of the world where the Empire is spreading destruction and followed by indoctrination, has more than
800 pages, and is called Exposing Lies of the Empire.
And I always feel that even this massive book just touches the tip of the iceberg, that it is only a beginning!

Western propaganda is actually a perfect apparatus! It is effective and it is almost fully bulletproof. It works! European
empires have been refining it for many long centuries, and the European offspring the United States has elevated it to
almost total perfection.

One precondition for its success is, of course, that the Western political and economic regime owns almost all the major
media channels and distribution outlets of the world. Diversity can never be tolerated. It could smash the idiocy! Once this
prerequisite is completed, things get relatively relaxed and cozy for the demagogues in Washington, London and Paris.

Here is just an example of how easy it is to smear a world leader who resists the imperialist designs of the Empire:

Imagine that one sunny morning, some 10 major newspapers and television stations declare that various
anonymous but highly reliable sources in Moscow have informed them that the Russian President Vladimir Putin is
a vampire!
This news would fly all over the world. Many readers and viewers would at first roll around on the floor laughing, but some
would not. And even several of those who found the information thoroughly bizarre and unbelievable would at some point
realize that seeds of doubt were beginning to grow inside their brains: OK, it is absurd, of course, but what if? What if? How
awful that would be!

But how can one really prove that he or she is not a vampire? Or how can one prove that he or she has not been visited by
some evil extra-terrestrial flying saucers on several occasions?

At some point, the Russian President would feel that he had enough of the charade. Hed go to the best university clinic in
Moscow, and ask for a certificate that clearly stated that he is not a vampire. Several leading academics and doctors would
get involved and produce a complex and thorough scientific conclusion, resolutely stating that President Putin is not a
vampire.

Shocked by and reacting to the vulgarity demonstrated by the Western propaganda tsars, most of the Russian media outlets
would offer some commonsense and logic:

"Cant we all see clearly that he cannot be a vampire? All his teeth are of approximately equal length, he socialized
during the day, he does not sleep in a coffin, he eats garlic and he is not scared of crosses; be they Orthodox,
Protestant or Catholic ones!

Others would argue that there are actually no real vampires inhabiting our Planet.

This is when the Western mass media would go into overdrive. Sarcastically it would declare that the Russian
academia, Russian doctors and Russian media cannot be trusted they are all under the heel of the state, and on
top of it they have been infiltrated by nations secret services and former KGB agents.

"And doesnt Vlad sound somehow similar to Bran, which is the castle in Romania, which in turn used to be the
home base of the commander-in-chief of all militant vampires - Count Dracula?
There would still be some rational resistance: No, Vlad does not really sound like Bran, and anyway, nobody in Russia
calls Mr. Putin Vlad only the Western media does. But such voices of reason would never reach the general public all
over the world! And on it goes.

In the end, a few billions of human brains would register and subconsciously store the vampire theory, and they would
never again look at the President of Russia, or at his country, with the same eyes!

Of course the Russian leadership is not the only one that the West is targeting. There is a relentless flow of shocking
rumors and derogatory remarks made by the mainstream media against the President of China, of Byelorussia, against the
leadership of Iran, South Africa, Eritrea, Zimbabwe, Syria, and North Korea as well as against all the left-wing governments
of Latin America.

After being repeated hundreds of times, the rumors, at least for many people, get confused with facts, and get
accepted as facts.

When still leading Cuba, Fidel Castro was constantly dying or disappearing. The North Korean government has been
relentlessly portrayed as a desperate gang of bloodthirsty sexual maniacs, executing and raping all that moves.

The ANC and especially President Zuma have done nothing to close that staggering social divide in South Africa. In South
America, the pro-Western media outlets invented and then perfected a new lucrative industry: manufacturing corruption
scandals and implicating in them virtually all of the popular socialist leaders.

Nihilism, darkest news, and scenarios have been force-fed to the public, in order to eradicate all zeal and optimism that
comes when one is building a great independent and egalitarian nation.
 "I never forget that day, an Eritrean cameraman exclaimed, during my visit to his country. I had just finished an
assignment inside the Presidential Palace. Then I met my friends and we were having coffee in front of the main
gate. Suddenly the Western networks began broadcasting that there is a coup in Asmara.

Social media went bananas. It was the Breaking News story everywhere. And here we were, right there, on a
lazy sunny afternoon, in front of the Palace I had just seen the President. All was quiet!

They just invented it, in order to get people out onto the streets! They were trying to manufacture a coup via their
media outlets.

It is mainly fear, implanted into the brains of its subjects and slaves; fear that allows the Empire to control almost the entire
Planet. Often it is subconscious fear, but it is fear nevertheless. Fear can be that of the Empire as a whole, or of its might
and brutality, or even of the alternatives, portrayed in the most unsavory and frightening colors by the propaganda.

In order to rule unopposed, one has to be feared! And one has to smear the alternatives. The task to spread fear, slander
diversity and dissent, was given to the official media, academia and artists.

Of course the biggest threat to the Empire has been the two sisters who were born under the same star, from the same
mother called Humanism. Their names are Communism and Socialism. And I am not only talking about the Western Marxist
concept. There are many great concepts that put life and the well-being of the people first, all over the world!

In fact, a few decades ago, it was becoming crystal clear that Western colonialism, imperialism and capitalism were finished.
Their time was up! Socialism was the natural and logical way forward for most of humanity.
Realted: 25 Rules Of Disinformation, Propaganda, PSYOPS, Debunking Techniques

But then the West and its Empire fought back. They employed extreme violence and brutality, as well as cunning divide and
rule tactics. Tens of millions died, and progress was stopped, although hopefully, only for a limited period of time. And not
everywhere!

One of many reasons why Russia is perceived as a great threat is because it inherited the humanist and internationalist
foreign policy of the Soviet Union. But, also because it itself is actually becoming socialist again (although it is moving in that
direction by taking extremely short steps). Russia is recovering irreversibly from those dark days of the free marketer and
Wests lackey, Boris Yeltsin.

Russia is also hated because it is setting the wrong example; proving to the world that one can develop and prosper
without taking orders from the West, without serving its governments and corporations. Or more precisely: it can do it
exactly because it broke itself free!
The demonization of Russia is relentless. Every little negative detail is multiplied and magnified by the mainstream media
and film industry. The worlds public is being nourished by bizarre stereotypes and fabrications. And so one of the most
compassionate, deep, artistic and passionate nations on Earth, Russia, is depicted as being cold, robotic, heartless and
inherently evil.

Massive NATO military forces are now dispatched along Russias western border, and they include German troops.
Periodically there are maneuvers and exercises, not far from the borderline.

It is clearly a provocation, and it all brings back the horrific memories of the years right before World War II, the war in which
the Russian nation lost between 25 and 30 million lives. A few hundred kilometers south, an old ally, in fact a Slavic sister,
Ukraine, is being forced to confront Russia by its Western handlers, something that is being done against the will of the
great majority of the Ukrainian people.

The US is heavily involved in the destabilizing of Central Asia, including a group of nations that used to form part of the
Soviet Union. But thanks to Machiavellian Western propaganda, it is actually Russia that is being portrayed as the aggressor
and a danger to world peace!

And it is China, which is being depicted as some kind of a ruthless and unpredictable monster that is now ready to swallow
the world! In fact China is an extremely predictable country, and any unbiased student of world history would clearly see
how peacefully it has been behaving, for centuries!

But to prove that China is not a Communist country, anymore, and at the same time that it is one of the greatest threats to
world peace and stability (read: to Western control of the World), is one of the most important tasks given to the Western
media, academia and propaganda tsars by the Empire.
And they are succeeding! Indoctrination tactics are working flawlessly. The Western pubic is by now thoroughly brainwashed
(at worst) or confused (at best) when it comes to China.

In recent years I engaged hundreds of French, Italian, Spanish, German, British and Czech people in discussions about
China, just to receive (with extremely few exceptions) a barrage of standardized, patronizing, mass-produced opinions.

It often felt like talking to the people who were forced to live for decades under the Taliban or under the spiritual guidance
of some fundamentalist evangelical Protestant sect.

In fact, China is both Communist (Communism or Socialism, but with Chinese characteristics) as it is breathtakingly
successful! Analyzing this marvelous country, together with my China-based colleagues and comrades, I am coming to the
conclusion that Beijing often uses capitalist means in order to achieve socialist goals (to borrow a quote from Jeff J Brown,
which is actually the sub-title of his latest book).

And an enormous, independent, successful Communist or Socialist country that is absolutely the worst nightmare for the
Empire! It is something that has to be stopped, derailed, destroyed, isolated and demonized by all means! Chinas
Communist success
You would never hear about that on CNN, BBC or Fox TV! Just as you would never hear that Indonesia, India, Rwanda and
any of the other Empires allies and client nations, are in fact the most brutal fascist failed states, and that the genocides in
Papua, Kashmir and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) are the bloodiest extermination campaigns anywhere in the
world.

I have worked in all these countries, intensively, I can testify. As this is being written, the people of Kashmir are being
murdered and tortured. Right at this moment! I am wondering how many of my readers are aware of it?

Perhaps Im obsessed with exposing lies of the Empire. A second volume will soon follow my 820-page long book. I cannot
stop travelling, investigating and amassing the evidence. Because I am shocked; because I am outraged and because there
are so few, so desperately few people that are actually working in the most desperate parts of the world!

Virtually all stereotypes about the world that have been domesticated in the West are wrong, terribly wrong.

The story of the Russian Revolution is told in the most twisted way, and so is the story of the Ukrainian famine and of the
gulags. Not everything is wrong, of course, but the facts and numbers are twisted. I will soon resume my work in the
Russian Far East, to write on this subject.
The story of China is grotesquely wrong, from the Great March to the present day!

The story of Cambodias Commie slaughter under the Khmer Rouge is a thoroughly idiotic manipulation! The slaughter
was there, but more people died from the US carpet-bombing, and then from being displaced from their farms by US mines
and cluster bombies, than from Pol Pots atrocities.

The great majority of Khmer Rouge men and women had nothing to do with Communism. They were just settling scores
with the capital, which they saw as responsible for selling the country to the US, and for the bombing of the countryside. In
the jungle, I recently met Pol Pots personal guard.

He told me frankly that he was simply pissed off (the bombing killed his relatives), and had no clue what Communism was:

Pol Pot came and said Communism! Lets fight the traitors! And we did. How could someone call us a
Communist country if we did not even know what Communism was?

What we hardly ever hear is the most important story of mankind: the story of Western colonial plunders, of imposed
slavery, genocides that lasted for centuries, of British-triggered famines that killed tens of millions in the Sub-Continent, of
virtually the entire Europe and Christianity systematically committing global holocaust.
We are not told that it actually happened, and that it is still going on and on and on! In order to shelter the Western public
from the horrendous truth about the past and the present of their countries and culture, new and newer stories about those
evil others are being invented and circulated.

Perhaps, soon, we will be really told that Mr. Putin is a vampire, or that Kim Jong Un is eating Korean virgins for breakfast.
We may not be far from such a new wave of propaganda zeal. It all makes sense: the more evil the Empire becomes; the
more it has to smear its adversaries.

The mass media and Hollywood are asked to perform. And they do! Reality and fiction are now being systematically mixed,
and everything gets blurred and finally the great confusion and intellectual chaos are managing to overwhelm both reason
and logic.
The Empire is killing millions and destroying countries and continents. But California is falling off a cliff, and clouds of huge
insects are invading the entire North America. While millions of alien terrorists are now engulfing the tolerant and
democratic Europe! So what is more terrible?

Plus there are those sinister monsters like Count Vlad and Comrade Kim, waiting with their daggers behind a corner!
Therefore, The Empire and its people have to protect themselves. They have to be tough, even tougher than before! And to
put their interests first! America (North America) first! Germany first! France first!

Primitive? Does it all sound primitive? Yes, certainly. But it works! At least for the Europeans and North Americans it does.
And the rulers dont give a damn what works or doesnt for the rest of the Planet.

The Truth Of ISIS Exposed In Four Minutes + Leaders On Both Sides Have Already
Exposed The Truth - Where Is The Mainstream Media On This?
August 24 2016 | From: GlobalResearch / AustralianNationalReview / Geopolitics / Various

They never attack Israel. The evidence that ISIS is a Zionist creation of the cabal that runs the US
(and the Western allies) and Israel (using radical Islam as a scapegoat) is overwhelming - And
here's a data dump.

British Labor Leader Corbyn: ISIS Created by UK and US: British Labor leader Jeremy Corbyn has risked
sparking fresh controversy after blaming the rise of ISIS on Britain and the United States.

Related: Tracking ISIS to DCs Doorsteps

The veteran anti-war campaigner said ISIS hadnt come from nowhere and was partly a creation of Western interventions
in the region.
The Truth Of ISIS Exposed In Four Minutes

Related: British government IPs found linked to ISIS Twitter accounts

Corbyn, 66, said attacking the fanatical group would only make things worse and instead claimed Britain would be safer it if
declared that it supported the diversity of faith and diversity of aspirations around the world.

Corbyn was roundly condemned on for refusing to sing the national anthem at a memorial to Battle of Britain heroes. The
veteran socialist, speaking to the obscure website Middle East Eye, said Labor needed to stick to its principles and vowed
to stay on as Labor leader for the next five years.

But he risks a major rebellion over a proposed vote on extending the military action against ISIS into Syria.

In 2013 Cameron was left humiliated after MPs including Corbyn rejected airstrikes. Speaking in 2015, Corbyn said he
would not change his position.

Corbyn said:

"ISIS did not come from nowhere. They have got a lot of money thats come from somewhere. Theyve got a huge
supply of arms that have come from somewhere. They are not in total, but in part a creation of Western
interventions in the region.

What I would do is try to economically isolate them. And also try to unite the other groups in the region by
supporting autonomy for the Kurdish groups and recognize the vast amount of arms that we have sold
particularly to Saudi Arabia end up somewhere and those are now being used.

Bombing by the West in Syria now would create more mayhem. Its very unclear who the alliances would be with
and it would make the situation worse. I opposed the bombing of Syria in that historic 2013 vote and would
continue that position."

Despite his position Corbyn insisted he would keep Britain safe. He said:

"We make ourselves safer by not being part of US foreign policy at every single turn. We make ourselves safer by
saying we understand the diversity of faith and diversity of aspirations around the world. And also by becoming a
force for human rights rather than military interventions around the world. I think that would make us safer.

Corbyn has previously sparked fury by comparing ISIS brutality to US military action in Iraq; Daily Mail reported.

Related: Israeli Colonel Caught with IS Pants Down

ISIS Leader Admits to Being Funded by the US

In early 2015, Yousaf al Salafi, a man believed to be the Pakistani commander of the Islamic State,
confessed during investigations that he has been receiving money through the United States.
"Captured" US military hardware

A few months after al Salafi revealed the funding he was receiving was routed through the United States, Michael
Flynn, former director of Obamas Defence Intelligence Agency, said he warned the Obama administration three
years ago that the groups they were funding in Syria were actually Islamic jihadists.

Related: Guess Who is Behind the Islamic State: Israeli IDF Colonel Leading ISIS Terrorists Arrested in Iraq

Now, a group of 50 intelligence analysts working out of the U.S. militarys Central Command have complained that their
reports on Islamic State and the Syrian branch of Al-Qaeda were being incorrectly changed by senior officials.

On January 22, law enforcing agencies in Pakistan claimed they arrested not only al Salafi, but also two other people during
a raid in the city of Lahore. A source familiar with the investigation told Daily Express that during the investigation al Salafi
admitted he received funding to run the organisation in Pakistan and recruit young people to fight in Syria.

The Pakistani-Syrian entered Pakistan via Turkey last year, but it was previously reported that he crossed into Turkey from
Syria, was caught there but managed to escape and went to Pakistan to establish ISIS in the region.

Daily Express cited sources as saying that John Kerry, the U.S. Secretary of State was familiar with al Salafis revelations
and so was CENTCOM chief General Lloyd Austin. Al Salafi confessed he was recruiting people with a Pakistani
accomplice to send them to Syria and was receiving around US$600 per person.

ISIS was created by the CIA and Mossad

A recently declassified 2012 document shows that Salafist, the Muslim Brotherhood and AQI [Al-Qaeda in Iraq] were listed
as the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria. The document also revealed that the West, Gulf countries and Turkey
support the opposition while Russia, China and Iran support the regime.

According to the declassified document, the Obama administration was warned in 2012 that these Islamic jihadists wanted
to create a:

"Salafist principality in eastern Syria and that ISI [Islamic State of Iraq] could declare an Islamic State through its
 union with other terrorist organizations in Iraq and Syria, which will create grave danger in regards to unifying Iraq
and the protection of its territory.

Now, over 50 intelligence analysts have formally claimed their reports on Islamic State and al-Qaedas branch in Syria were
altered by senior officials, The Daily Beast reported. An investigation into the alleged manipulation of intelligence has been
opened.

More "Captured" US military hardware

A couple of months ago, two senior analysts at CENTCOM claimed in a written complaint to the Defence Department
inspector general that the reports described the terror groups as weaker than they believe they are.

The reports, some of which were briefed to the U.S. president, were altered by CENTCOM senior officials to make sure it
adheres to the presidential administrations public line that the United States is winning the fight against Islamic State and an
al-Qaeda branch in Syria named al-Nusra, the analysts told the publication. The written complaint was supported by 50
other intelligence analysts.

In recent months, members of the Obama administration have tried to convince the population that the fight against ISIS
may soon be over. ISIS is losing, John Allen, retired Marine general charged with coordinating the Islamic State campaign
said in July.

Related: Reality Check: Proof U.S. Government Wanted ISIS To Emerge In Syria

We Fabricated ISIS CIA Contractor

Former CIA contractor Steven Kelley has said on record that ISIS/ISIL are a fabricated terrorist
group made and funded by the CIA in the United States.
According to the video description: This is a completely fabricated enemy, he said in a phone interview with
Press TV from Anaheim, California on Thursday.

Related: Twenty-six Things About the Islamic State (ISIS) that Obama Does Not Want You to Know About

"The funding is completely from the United States and its allies and for people to think that this enemy is something
that needs to be attacked in Syria or Iraq is a farce because obviously this is something that we created, we control
and only now it has become inconvenient for us to attack this group as a legitimate enemy, Kelley added.

He made the remarks as US President Barack Obama is under pressure to seek congressional approval before expanding
Washingtons military air campaign against ISIL targets from Iraq into neighboring Syria.

The Pentagon has already launched at least 100 airstrikes on ISIL positions in northern Iraq since Obama authorized the
use of force against the terrorist group earlier this month.
The White House insists it does not need explicit congressional authorization for those operations because they are
intended to protect American personnel and interests inside the Arab country.

White House press secretary Josh Earnest said Monday that Obama will not hesitate to use his authority to keep
Americans safe, but added that the president was committed to coordinating and consulting with Congress on a decision to
hit ISIL targets in Syria.

If you want to get to the root of the problem and remove this organization, the first thing they need to do is to
remove the funding and take care of entities responsible for the creation of this group, Kelley said.

I believe that this ISIS group would probably go away, would be easily defeated by the armies of [Syrian
President] Bashar Assad, he said.

ISIS fabricated by US!: Former CIA contractor

Related: Delivery of US Weapons and Ammunition to ISIS: Iraqi Commander Wiretaps ISIS Communications with
US Military
Everything the West has done was to create ISIS - John Pilger

Related Articles:

Shock Report: Pentagon Defies Obamas Policy of Arming ISIS Jihadists

Everything the West has done was to create ISIS John Pilger

Breaking Bullcrap - Episode 1: ISIS Islamic State Worldwide Deception Exposed

Rouhani calls on Muslims to correct image of Islam worldwide

Bombshell! Norway Confirms ISIS Oil Sold into Turkey at Low Prices

Why is a Hate Campaign being Waged against Muslims?

Israel is the Main Purchaser of ISIS Oil

ISIS vows to destroy New Zealand and other enemies in new propaganda video

How Turkey Exports ISIS Oil To The World: The Scientific Evidence

Humanitarian Supplies for the Islamic State (ISIS): NATOs Terror Convoys Halted at Syrian Border

The Unexpected Explanation How "That Ford Truck" Ended Up In ISIS Hands

Israeli military showcases 3-year-long medical support operations for Islamic State terrorists

Saving their sworn enemy: Heartstopping footage shows Israeli commandos rescuing wounded men from Syrian
warzone - but WHY are they risking their lives for Islamic militants?

Obama Tries To Sneak Through TPP In Lame-Duck Congress / Trade Deals Getting
Derailed
August 24 2016 | From: JonRappoport / TheGuardian / Various

First: know that the TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) is a huge Globalist trade deal among 12
nations that would a) phase out thousands of tariffs (NY Times, 6/1/16) and b) set up corporate
tribunals to punish nations that refuse to import goods (e.g., toxic pesticides, toxic medical drugs,
GMOs).
In short, its a nightmare. Wiping out tariffs is the cornerstone of the Globalist agenda. It allows companies in
industrial countries to move their factories to Third World hell holes, pay slave wages, ignore environmental
conditions, and then export their products back to the countries they abandonedwith no tariffs. No taxes. No
penalties.

Related: 8 Terrible Things About the Trans-Pacific Partnership

The absence of tariffs is the gift that keeps on giving. Its the ONLY way these corporations can exports products from their
factories in the Third World and make a profit. Its the un-level playing field. It creates a world run by and for mega-
corporations.

Obama is the Rockefeller Globalists man in the White House. Hes tasked with pushing through Congressional ratification of
the TPP, come hell or high water.

He sees hell on the horizon and the water is rising. If Trump wins, the TPP is likely toast. If Hillary wins, who knows whatll
happen? Her latest flip-flop was to come out against the TPP. That was her strategy as she tried to win over Bernie Sanders
supporters. Sanders was virulently against the TPP treaty.

SoObama is aiming to have Congress ratify the TPP during its lame-duck session, which takes place after the November
election and before new winners assume office in January.

In other words, during the lame-duck session, all members of Congress who occupy office at this current moment will still be
there, before the newly elected Congress (whoever they are) takes over. Obama calculates his best chance of passing the
TPP is with the present membership of Congress.
Twilight Zone? You bet. Heres the picture: the election is over, the newly elected Congress is ready to take charge in
January, but in November, with the old Congress still there (the lame ducks), Obama will make his last-ditch stand to leave
the US and 11 other Pacific nations with one final exploding disaster, as he moves to a lavish home near one of his favorite
golf courses.

As we speak, hes on a nationwide tour, drumming up support among recalcitrant Congressional members and fence sitters,
offering whatever he can to turn the tide in his favor.

Imagine this: youre a member of Congress whos just been voted out of office. Youre still there in November, though, one
of the lame ducks sitting in chambers, sipping good scotch, watching Law&Order reruns, boxing up mementos, playing
poker, running out the string on your expense account. One of Obamas people drops by to convince you to vote for the
TPP.

What can he offer you? Youre done in Congress.

So whatever the deal is, chances are its going to be sleazy. Maybe youd like a cushy gig with a big pharmaceutical
company. Maybe youd like a seat on the board of a Wall St. firm. Maybe you can score a great price on a house in the
Bahamas. Maybe your neer-do-well son can get into Harvard, once hes out of drug rehab. Maybe the video of you and that
three-thousand-dollar hooker in a DC hotel will vanish Whatever it takes.
Because of these Globalist trade deals, good jobs in the US have been running away like marathon runners from the
starting line. But who cares? The sinking US economy is a fact of life. Youre a lame duck. You need comfort and gifts in
the next phase of your life. Inside the Beltway, its make-a-deal all the time. Nothing new.

You need to grab whatever is on the table before you go out the door. By the process of Washington DC alchemy, lame
ducks can become vultures and buzzards and even eagles.

Thank you, Mr. President. Your mission is nearly done. Thank you for this one final messianic miracle. The American worker
is in your debt. Literally.

Protest Never Changes Anything? Look At How TTIP Has Been Derailed
People power has taken on big business over this transatlantic stitch-up and looks like winning.
We should all be inspired
For those of us who want societies run in the interests of the majority rather than unaccountable corporate
interests, this era can be best defined as an uphill struggle.

So when victories occur, they should be loudly trumpeted to encourage us in a wider fight against a powerful elite of big
businesses, media organisations, politicians, bureaucrats and corporate-funded thinktanks.

Today is one such moment. The Transatlantic Trade Investment Partnership (TTIP) that notorious proposed trade
agreement that hands even more sweeping powers to corporate titans lies wounded, perhaps fatally. It isnt dead yet, but
TTIP is a tangled wreckage that will be difficult to reassemble.

Those of us who campaigned against TTIP not least fellow Guardian columnist George Monbiot were dismissed as
scaremongering. We said that TTIP would lead to a race to the bottom on everything from environmental to consumer
protections, forcing us down to the lower level that exists in the United States. We warned that it would undermine our
democracy and sovereignty, enabling corporate interests to use secret courts to block policies that they did not like.
Scaremongering, we were told. But hundreds of leaked documents from the negotiations reveal, in some ways, that the
reality is worse and now the French government has been forced to suggest it may block the agreement.

The documents imply that even craven European leaders believe the US demands go too far. As War on Want puts it, they
show that TTIP would open the door to products currently banned in the EU for public health and environmental reasons.

As the documents reveal, there are now irreconcilable differences between the European Unions and Americas positions.
According to Greenpeace, the EU position is very bad, and the US position is terrible.

The documents show that the US is actively trying to dilute EU regulations on consumer and environmental protections. In
future, for the EU to be even able to pass a regulation, it could be forced to involve both US authorities and US corporations,
giving big businesses across the Atlantic the same input as those based in Europe.

With these damning revelations, the embattled French authorities have been forced to say they reject TTIP at this stage.
President Hollande says France would refuse the undermining of the essential principles of our agriculture, our culture, of
mutual access to public markets. And with the countrys trade representative saying that there cannot be an agreement
without France and much less against France, TTIP currently has a bleak future indeed.

"David Cameron is [was] happy to undermine British sovereignty and democracy, as long as it is corporate
interests who benefit"

There are a number of things we learn from this, all of which should lift hopes. First, people power pays off. European
politicians and bureaucrats, quite rightly, would never have imagined that a trade agreement would inspire any interest, let
alone mass protests.

Symptomatic of their contempt for the people they supposedly exist to serve, the negotiations over the most important
aspects of the treaty were conducted in secret. Easy, then, to accuse anti-TTIP activists of scaremongering while revealing
little of the reality publicly.

But rather than give up, activists across the continent organised. They toxified TTIP, forcing its designers on the defensive.
Germany the very heart of the European project witnessed mass demonstrations with up to 250,000 people
participating.

For all President Obamas hope-change rhetoric, his administration which zealously promoted TTIP has all too often
championed corporate interests. However, though Bernie Sanders is unlikely to become the Democratic nominee, the
incredible movement behind him shows particularly among younger Americans a growing desire for a different sort of
US.
Protesters wear masks of Barack Obama and Angela Merkel as they demonstrate against TTIP free trade agreement

In the coming months, those Europeans who have campaigned against TTIP should surely reach out to their American
counterparts. Even if TTIP is defeated, we still live in a world in which major corporations often have greater power than
nation states: only organised movements that cross borders can have any hope of challenging this unaccountable
dominance.

From tax justice to climate change, the protest never achieves anything brigade have been proved wrong. Heres a
potential victory to relish, and build on.

Related Articles:

72,000 New Zealanders sign a petition against the TPPA. Here is a video about some of them

TPPA: Re-Colonisation of New Zealand: Guest article by Alan Hamilton, Australia

Republicans drop TPP from platform

TPP The Economic Case

Leaked TTIP documents cast doubt on EU-US trade deal

Our people powered submission on the TPPA

Regulation of financial industry is history if Trade In Services Agreement passes

One Million Anti-TPP Petitions Delivered to Congress

The NSA Leak Is Real, Snowden Documents Confirm
August 23 2016 | From: TheIntercept

Last Monday a group calling itself the ShadowBrokers announced an auction for what it claimed
were cyber weapons made by the NSA. Based on never-before-published documents provided
by the whistleblower Edward Snowden, The Intercept can confirm that the arsenal contains
authentic NSA software, part of a powerful constellation of tools used to covertly infect computers
worldwide.

The provenance of the code has been a matter of heated debate this week among cybersecurity experts, and while
it remains unclear how the software leaked, one thing is now beyond speculation: The malware is covered with the
NSAs virtual fingerprints and clearly originates from the agency.

The evidence that ties the ShadowBrokers dump to the NSA comes in an agency manual for implanting malware, classified
top secret, provided by Snowden, and not previously available to the public.

The draft manual instructs NSA operators to track their use of one malware program using a specific 16-character string,
ace02468bdf13579. That exact same string appears throughout the ShadowBrokers leak in code associated with the same
program, SECONDDATE.

SECONDDATE plays a specialized role inside a complex global system built by the U.S. government to infect and monitor
what one document estimated to be millions of computers around the world.
Its release by ShadowBrokers, alongside dozens of other malicious tools, marks the first time any full copies of the NSAs
offensive software have been available to the public, providing a glimpse at how an elaborate system outlined in the
Snowden documents looks when deployed in the real world, as well as concrete evidence that NSA hackers dont always
have the last word when it comes to computer exploitation.

But malicious software of this sophistication doesnt just pose a threat to foreign governments, Johns Hopkins University
cryptographer Matthew Green told The Intercept:

"The danger of these exploits is that they can be used to target anyone who is using a vulnerable router. This is the
equivalent of leaving lockpicking tools lying around a high school cafeteria. Its worse, in fact, because many of
these exploits are not available through any other means, so theyre just now coming to the attention of the firewall
and router manufacturers that need to fix them, as well as the customers that are vulnerable.

So the risk is twofold: first, that the person or persons who stole this information might have used them against us.
If this is indeed Russia, then one assumes that they probably have their own exploits, but theres no need to give
them any more. And now that the exploits have been released, we run the risk that ordinary criminals will use them
against corporate targets."

The NSA did not respond to questions concerning ShadowBrokers, the Snowden documents, or its malware.

A Memorable SECONDDATE

The offensive tools released by ShadowBrokers are organized under a litany of code names such as POLARSNEEZE and
ELIGIBLE BOMBSHELL, and their exact purpose is still being assessed. But we do know more about one of the weapons:
SECONDDATE.

SECONDDATE is a tool designed to intercept web requests and redirect browsers on target computers to an NSA
web server. That server, in turn, is designed to infect them with malware. SECONDDATEs existence was first reported
by The Intercept in 2014, as part of a look at a global computer exploitation effort code-named TURBINE.
The malware server, known as FOXACID, has also been described in previously released Snowden documents.
Other documents released by The Intercept today not only tie SECONDDATE to the ShadowBrokers leak but also provide
new detail on how it fits into the NSAs broader surveillance and infection network. They also show how SECONDDATE has
been used, including to spy on Pakistan and a computer system in Lebanon.

The top-secret manual that authenticates the SECONDDATE found in the wild as the same one used within the NSA is a
31-page document titled FOXACID SOP for Operational Management and marked as a draft. It dates to no earlier than
2010. A section within the manual describes administrative tools for tracking how victims are funneled into FOXACID,
including a set of tags used to catalogue servers. When such a tag is created in relation to a SECONDDATE-related
infection, the document says, a certain distinctive identifier must be used:

The same SECONDDATE MSGID string appears in 14 different files throughout the ShadowBrokers leak, including in a file
titled SecondDate-3021.exe. Viewed through a code-editing program (screenshot below), the NSAs secret number can be
found hiding in plain sight:
All told, throughout many of the folders contained in the ShadowBrokers package (screenshot below), there are 47 files with
SECONDDATE-related names, including different versions of the raw code required to execute a SECONDDATE attack,
instructions for how to use it, and other related files.

After viewing the code, Green told The Intercept the MSGID strings occurrence in both an NSA training document and this
weeks leak is unlikely to be a coincidence.

Computer security researcher Matt Suiche, founder of UAE-based cybersecurity startup Comae Technologies, who has
been particularly vocal in his analysis of the ShadowBrokers this week, told The Intercept there is no way the MSGID
strings appearance in both places is a coincidence.
Where SECONDDATE Fits In

This overview jibes with previously unpublished classified files provided by Snowden that illustrate how SECONDDATE is a
component of BADDECISION, a broader NSA infiltration tool. SECONDDATE helps the NSA pull off a man in the middle
attack against users on a wireless network, tricking them into thinking theyre talking to a safe website when in reality theyve
been sent a malicious payload from an NSA server.

According to one December 2010 PowerPoint presentation titled Introduction to BADDECISION, that tool is also designed
to send users of a wireless network, sometimes referred to as an 802.11 network, to FOXACID malware servers.

Or, as the presentation puts it, BADDECISION is an 802.11 CNE [computer network exploitation] tool that uses a true man-
in-the-middle attack and a frame injection technique to redirect a target client to a FOXACID server. As another top-secret
slide puts it, the attack homes in on the greatest vulnerability to your computer: your web browser.

One slide points out that the attack works on users with an encrypted wireless connection to the internet.

That trick, it seems, often involves BADDECISION and SECONDDATE, with the latter described as a component for the
former. A series of diagrams in the Introduction to BADDECISION presentation show how an NSA operator uses
SECONDDATE to inject a redirection payload at [a] Target Client, invisibly hijacking a users web browser as the user
attempts to visit a benign website (in the example given, its CNN.com).

Executed correctly, the file explains, a Target Client continues normal webpage browsing, completely unaware, lands on a
malware-filled NSA server, and becomes infected with as much of that malware as possible - or as the presentation puts it,
the user will be left WHACKED! In the other top-secret presentations, its put plainly: How do we redirect the target to the
FOXACID server without being noticed? Simple: Use NIGHTSTAND or BADDECISION.

The sheer number of interlocking tools available to crack a computer is dizzying. In the FOXACID manual, government
hackers are told an NSA hacker ought to be familiar with using SECONDDATE along with similar man-in-the-middle wi-fi
attacks code-named MAGIC SQUIRREL and MAGICBEAN. A top-secret presentation on FOXACID lists further ways to
redirect targets to the malware server system.

To position themselves within range of a vulnerable wireless network, NSA operators can use a mobile antenna system
running software code-named BLINDDATE, depicted in the field in what appears to be Kabul.

The software can even be attached to a drone. BLINDDATE in turn can run BADDECISION, which allows for a
SECONDDATE attack:
Elsewhere in these files, there are at least two documented cases of SECONDDATE being used to successfully infect
computers overseas: An April 2013 presentation boasts of successful attacks against computer systems in both Pakistan
and Lebanon.

In the first, NSA hackers used SECONDDATE to breach targets in Pakistans National Telecommunications Corporations
(NTC) VIP Division, which contained documents pertaining to the backbone of Pakistans Green Line communications
network used by civilian and military leadership.

In the latter, the NSA used SECONDDATE to pull off a man-in-the-middle attack in Lebanon for the first time ever, infecting
a Lebanese ISP to extract 100+ MB of Hizballah Unit 1800 data, a special subset of the terrorist group dedicated to
aiding Palestinian militants.
SECONDDATE is just one method that the NSA uses to get its targets browser pointed at a FOXACID server. Other
methods include sending spam that attempts to exploit bugs in popular web-based email providers or entices targets to click
on malicious links that lead to a FOXACID server.

One document, a newsletter for the NSAs Special Source Operations division, describes how NSA software other than
SECONDDATE was used to repeatedly direct targets in Pakistan to FOXACID malware web servers, eventually
infecting the targets computers.

A Potentially Mundane Hack

Snowden, who worked for NSA contractors Dell and Booz Allen Hamilton, has offered some context and a relatively
mundane possible explanation for the leak: that the NSA headquarters was not hacked, but rather one of the computers the
agency uses to plan and execute attacks was compromised.

In a series of tweets, he pointed out that the NSA often lurks on systems that are supposed to be controlled by others, and
its possible someone at the agency took control of a server and failed to clean up after themselves. A regime, hacker group,
or intelligence agency could have seized the files and the opportunity to embarrass the agency.
Documents

Documents published with this story:

NSA Central Security Service: FOXACID SOP for Operational Management of FOXACID Infrastructure (Draft)

Wireless LAN / CNE Tool Training Course and Evaluation

Course introduction
Introduction to WLAN / 802.11 Active CNE Operations
Introduction to BADDECISION

NSA: Expeditionary Access Operations: NSAs Close Access Network Exploitation Program (CNO Course EAO)

NSA Remote Operations Center: FOXACID Overall Briefing

NSA SIGINT Development (SIGDEV): SIGINT Development Support II Program Management Review, 24 April 2013
(select slides)

The Raid: In Bungled Spying Operation, NSA, GCSB & SIS Targeted Pro-Democracy
Campaigner
August 22 2016 | From: TheIntercept

Tony Fullman ia a middle-aged former tax man and a pro-democracy activist. But four years ago, a
botched operation launched by New Zealand spies meant he suddenly found himself deemed a
potential terrorist - his passport was revoked, his home was raided, and he was placed on a top-
secret National Security Agency surveillance list.
The extraordinary covert operation, revealed Sunday by Television New Zealand in collaboration with The Intercept,
was launched in 2012 after New Zealand authorities believed they had identified a group planning to violently
overthrow Fijis military regime.
As part of the spy mission, the NSA used its powerful global surveillance apparatus to intercept the emails and Facebook
chats of people associated with a Fijian thumbs up for democracy campaign. The agency then passed the messages to its
New Zealand counterpart, Government Communications Security Bureau, or GCSB.

One of the main targets was Fullman, a New Zealand citizen, whose communications were monitored by the NSA after New
Zealand authorities, citing secret evidence, accused him of planning an an act of terrorism overseas.

But it turned out that the claims were baseless - Fullman, then 47, was not involved in any violent plot. He was a long-time
public servant and peaceful pro-democracy activist who, like the New Zealand and Australian governments at that time, was
opposed to Fijis authoritarian military ruler Frank Bainimarama.

Details about the surveillance are contained in documents obtained by The Intercept from NSA whistleblower Edward
Snowden. More than 190 pages of top-secret NSA logs of intercepted communications dated between May and August 2012
show that the agency used the controversial internet surveillance system PRISM to eavesdrop on Fullman and other Fiji pro-
democracy advocates Gmail and Facebook messages.

Fullman is the first person in the world to be publicly identified as a confirmed PRISM target.

At the time of the spying, New Zealands surveillance agency was not permitted to monitor New Zealand citizens. Despite
this, it worked with the NSA to eavesdrop on Fullmans communications, which suggests he is one of 88 unnamed New
Zealanders who were spied on between 2003 and 2012 in operations that may have been illegal, as revealed in an explosive
2013 New Zealand government report.

In response to questions for this story, the NSA declined to address the Fullman case directly. A spokesperson for the
agency, Michael Halbig, said in a statement to The Intercept that it works with a number of partners in meeting its foreign-
intelligence mission goals, and those operations comply with U.S. law and with the applicable laws under which those
partners operate.

Antony Byers, a spokesperson for New Zealands intelligence agencies, said he would not comment:

"On matters that may or may not be operational. The countrys spy agencies operate within the law, Byers said,
adding: We do not ask partners to do things that would circumvent the law, and New Zealand gets significant
value from our international relationships.
A Fijian military soldier stands guard on Parliament grounds

Unexpected Twist

Fullman was born in Fiji in 1965 and emigrated to New Zealand when he was about 21. He became naturalized as a New
Zealand citizen and spent most of his working life in the country, including more than 20 years in various roles at the
governments tax department, where he was based out of offices first in Auckland and later in the capital city of Wellington.

In his spare time, Fullman worked as an amateur boxing judge and referee and helped out once a month at a Wellington
soup kitchen run by a Christian charity. Between 2001 and 2003, he attended graduate school, earning two masters degrees:
one in public management, the other in information systems. And in 2009, he decided to return to Fiji after he was offered a
job as chief executive of the Fiji Water Authority.
The move back to Fiji, however, led to a dramatic and unexpected twist in the course of his life - partly due to an old
childhood friend.

Fullman had grown up in Fiji in the port town of Levuka. There, during the 1960s, his mother had worked as secretary to
Kamisese Mara, an influental local politician who went on to serve as Fijis prime minister between 1970 and 1992. Kamisese
had a young son - Ratu Tevita Mara - who was about the same age as Fullman. The two boys became best friends, together
attending school, playing rugby, and going on trips.

"Weekends we would go fishing or go up to his mothers farm, help out on the farm, Fullman recalled in an
interview with The Intercept. We spent a lot of time together. He was like a brother to me.

When Fullman left Fiji for New Zealand in his early 20s, he kept in contact with Mara through phone and email. And by the
time Fullman returned to Fiji in 2009 to take the water authority job, Mara had become a powerful military officer, serving as
the Fijian armys chief of staff.

But the political situation in Fiji was now highly unstable, and Mara was at the center of some of the tensions. The country
had experienced three military coups between 1987 and 2006 that were rooted in ethnic and religious divisions.

Following the latest coup in 2006, which had brought authoritarian ruler Bainimarama to power, the military government and
police were accused of systematically cracking down on freedom of speech and arresting critics and human rights defenders.
 Mara was dissatisfied with the leadership and, in May 2011, he
became embroiled in a high-profile dispute with the
Bainimarama regime.

He was accused of plotting to overthrow the government and

charged with uttering a seditious comment.

He was hauled before a court, where he was threatened with

imprisonment for allegedly uttering the words, This government
is fuck all.

Mara was freed on bail while the case against him remained
ongoing. But he was concerned about the prospect of ultimately
receiving a lengthy jail term.

He decided to take a drastic course of action - and fled Fiji,

Fullman (left) and Mara having dinner in Fiji, December 2005
escaping on a boat to nearby Tonga

Following Maras dramatic getaway, Fullman was questioned by the Fijian military. It had found records of phone calls
between him and Mara dated from shortly before Mara had left. Facing potential punishment over allegations that he helped
Mara escape, Fullman decided that he too would have to promptly leave Fiji.

The NSA surveillance file shows a photo of Fullman that he uploaded to Facebook

NSA Spying
By 2012, Fullman had moved to Sydney, Australia, where he was living with his sister and her family. Alongside Mara and
other former Fiji residents, he was working with a group called the Fiji Movement for Freedom and Democracy, which was
campaigning against the Bainimarama regime.

In early July 2012, Fullman and Mara traveled to New Zealand, where they held meetings with some of the groups
supporters in Auckland. The meetings appear to have attracted the attention of New Zealands spies- and culminated in an
extraordinary sequence of events: Fullmans home was raided, his passport revoked, and both he and Mara were put under
top-secret NSA surveillance.

A New Zealand government source familiar with the operation that targeted the democracy group, who spoke on condition of
anonymity to discuss classified information, told The Intercept that an investigation was launched after New Zealands
equivalent of the FBI, the Security Intelligence Service, bugged telephone calls in which it believed it heard people discussing
a plot to violently overthrow Bainimarama.

According to the source, security officials were very excited,

thinking they finally had some baddies, real live terrorists in
New Zealand.

At the time, the New Zealand government had been keeping

close tabs on the political situation in Fiji, which consists of
some 333 small islands located about a three-hour flight north
of Auckland.

Fiji has historically maintained strong trading and tourism links

with New Zealand, but the relationship had soured in the
aftermath of the 2006 military coup.

The New Zealand government expressed its opposition to the

Bainimarama regimes takeover, placing sanctions on Fiji and
Ratu Tevita Mara pictured in a video made for the pro-democracy calling for the restoration of democracy. By mid-2012, however,
campaign relations between the countries were beginning to thaw.

New Zealand government officials were openly discussing the possibility of ending the sanctions, in part because they may
have been concerned that Fiji seemed to be moving closer to forming an allegiance with China and other Asian nations.

At 7am on July 17, 2012, about a week after Fullman had returned to Australia from the trip to New Zealand, a team of more
than a dozen Australian security agents and two Australian federal police detectives arrived at his sisters home in Sydney
looking for weapons and other evidence of the suspected plot.

They seized computers, phones and documents from the premises and confiscated Fullmans passport on behalf of the New
Zealand authorities.
Teams of New Zealand Security Intelligence Service officers and police simultaneously raided Fullmans former apartment in
the Wellington suburb of Karori and the homes of at least three other Fiji Freedom and Democracy movement supporters in
Auckland, seizing their computers and other property.

The same day that the raids took place, New Zealand Minister of Internal Affairs Chris Tremain signed a notice canceling
Fullmans passport. The notice said the minister had canceled the passport based on secret details provided by the Security
Intelligence Service:

"The majority of [the] information is classified but in summary I have good reason to believe that you are
involved in planning violent action intended to force a change of Government in a foreign state; and you intend to
engage in, or facilitate, an act of terrorism overseas.

Fullman was baffled by the allegations, which he denied, and sought legal advice to challenge them. At the same time,
unknown to him, he had also entered onto the radar of the worlds most powerful surveillance agency: the NSA.

Between early July and early August 2012, New Zealand spies appear to have requested American assistance to obtain the
emails and Facebook communications of Fullman and Mara, including from a democfiji email address used by Fullman to
organize events for the campaign group, whose slogan was thumbs up for democracy.

The NSAs documents contain a priority list that names the two men as Fiji targets alongside their Gmail addresses and
an account number identifying Fullmans Facebook page.

The documents indicate that the NSA began intercepting messages associated with Maras accounts on about the July 9,
2012 and on August 3 started spying on Fullmans messages. The agency also obtained historic messages from the two
men dating back to the beginning of May 2012.
A slide from a leaked NSA document about PRISM, published by the Washington Post in 2013

To conduct the electronic eavesdropping, the NSA turned to one of its most controversial surveillance programs: PRISM. The
agency uses PRISM to secretly obtain communications that are processed by major technology companies like Google,
Apple, Microsoft, and Yahoo, as the Washington Post and The Guardian first reported in 2013.

Almost all of the more than 190 pages of intercepted Gmail and Facebook messages from Fullman and Mara is headed US-
984XN, the code for surveillance that is carried out under PRISM. The pages reveal that the legal justifications NSA cited for
the surveillance were selected inconsistently. Most of Fullmans emails and Facebook messages were obtained as foreign
government targets, while others such as his bank statements and Facebook photographs were collected under the
category of counter-terrorism.

The classification markings on some of the files - REL TO USA/NZ - make clear that the intercepted communications were
to be released to New Zealand spies.

In one of the files showing Fullmans intercepted emails and Facebook chats, the NSA explicitly noted that the intercepted
material had been forwarded to its New Zealand intelligence counterpart, the GCSB.

(New Zealand is a member of the Five Eyes, a surveillance alliance that also includes electronic eavesdropping agencies
from the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia.)

Related: Full Disclosure: The Internet Dark Age - Five Eyes Sources And Methods Uncovered Disabling The FVEY
ECHELON / GCHQ / NSA / CSEC / DSD / GCHB Systems
The NSA collected Fullmans bank records (Reproduced here with Fullmans consent)

The NSA surveillance, however, produced no evidence of a plot. The intercepted messages contained personal information
and typical Facebook chit chat. The NSA collected Fullmans bank statements, which were attached to his emails and
showed his visits to a coffee shop, a pharmacy, and purchases at a shoe store.

There was correspondence about Fullman working to establish a tourism venture on an island in Tonga, emails about a
birthday party, many communications about the Fijian pro-democracy groups blog posts, and details about alleged abuses
committed by Fijian military officials.
Fiji Parliament

There were discussions about an unwell mother and a young relative with a confidential health problem. A top-secret
intelligence document even reproduced a photograph of Fullmans silver Mitsubishi station wagon alongside details of its
precise location. But there was not a single hint of any plans for violence or other clandestine activity.

It would soon become clear that there was no evidence to support the New Zealand authorities suspicions. And gradually,
their case would fall apart.

On 16 April, 2013, the internal affairs minister, Tremain, wrote again to Fullman. Contrary to the earlier notice he had issued,
Tremain now said that based on advice provided by the Security Intelligence Service, there were no longer national
security concerns about Fullman.

The cancellation of his passport was lifted without requiring an application for a replacement, or payment of a fee. The
change of position followed Fullman initiating legal action against the New Zealand government in the Wellington High Court
two months earlier.
Another of the pro-democracy members whose home was raided during the operation was former Fiji sports minister and
then-grocery store owner Rajesh Singh. After his home was searched by police and security agents, Singh complained to
New Zealands inspector general of intelligence and security, Andrew McGechan, who questioned the officers involved and
reviewed the investigation.

His report said the Security Intelligence Service had applied for a domestic intelligence warrant against a number of
individuals because of suspicions of a plan to inflict violence.

But McGechan identified neither unlawful behavior by Singh nor evidence of the supposed terrorist plot. His May 2014 report
said:

"There is nothing in the issue of the Warrant itself or in the questions and answers that followed which comes
even near to approaching proof of criminal activity or participation in terrorism.

He noted that no police activity has resulted, or charges been laid.

The Intercept asked Fullman if he or Mara had ever heard of - or been involved in - discussions about overthrowing or
assassinating Bainimarama.
Frank Bainimarama

Far from denying it, he said that sort of talk happened frequently within Fijian pro-democracy circles. However, he said it was
just angry ranting, when the alcohol was flowing, something completely different from real plans.

"People would say things like, Please can we just hire the Americans to send one drone to Fiji to get rid of those
bastards, or Let me go back to Fiji and Ill just get a knife and stab him! Fullman said.

Its venting. Its our way of maintaining sanity - we just sit and bitch about everything. We dont want violence. We
want something where theres control, a planned approach.

More to the effect where its the people who protest and say, Enough is enough. This is wrong. We want to go
back to the old constitution and have elections.

The New Zealand security agency may not have recognized the difference between eavesdropped venting and an actual
plot, prematurely launching its raids and broad secret surveillance operation without any clear evidence.

Four days after the raids on Fullman and his fellow campaigners, New Zealand foreign minister Murray McCully traveled to
Fiji for trade talks. Fullman believes that the timing was no coincidence - and that the raids targeting the pro-democracy
group were used by the New Zealand government as a bargaining chip to curry favor with the Bainimarama regime.
 The minister can go to Fiji and say, look we saved you, lets be friends again, lets start talking about how we can
help each other again, Fullman says. It was part of the frame up.

No charges were ever brought against any of the Fiji campaigners, yet the ramifications of the case are still felt. Fullman says
he gets pulled out of airline queues for security searches every time he travels, and he has had trouble finding work since
news reports following the raids in 2012 linked him to a Fiji assassination plan.

He told The Intercept that he was never notified that his private communications had been monitored by New Zealand with
the help of American counterparts at the NSA - possibly illegally - nor did he ever receive an apology or compensation for his
treatment.

As he recalls the saga, there is no anger in Fullmans voice, only disappointment. Since the affair, he has not felt like
returning to live in New Zealand and plans to stay in Australia for the foreseeable future.

"To be betrayed by your own country, its really hard, he says, letting out a sigh. It puts a sour taste in your
mouth.

Documents published with this story: Tony Fullman NSA files

Globalism: A Psychological GPS System For The Masses
August 20 2016 | From: JonRappoport

Globalism presents a conception of space, in which billions of people fit into their best slots.
Thats the theme. Thats the construct.

Of course, its proponents and bosses sell it as if the world couldnt exist in any other form.

Related: The [Attempted] Final Control: TPP, TTIP, TISA Global Corporate Takeover

All isms operate in this fashion. Once the definition is laid down, the fictional field is laid out, and people are urged to
navigate to their places.

If you dont, dire things will happen. People arent generally aware of fictional spaces and their psychological impact.
Therefore, they go along.

This is why a museum can be so instructive. A thousand paintings, each with its own area. Im not talking about a place on a
wall, Im talking about interior space, which the artist invents and shapes on the canvas.

With Globalism, the space is all about establishing control and distribution points for goods and services. Its about erasing
borders and nations. Its about co-opting the notion of a unified planet, in order to broadcast fake cheesy messages of
universal share and care. Its about every individual having his place.
When I began painting in 1962, one of the first things I noticed was the abundance of space - on each canvas. Waiting to be
shaped. The psychological carry-over was enormous. The notion of fitting into a position in life disintegrated. It made no
sense and had no impact.

Globalism is a hustle in a long, long line of planetary hustles. It erects a space and claims it is the future for all. Its a minor,
minor painting by a group of minor artists, hardly worthy of a spot on the wall of a second-rate museum.

If we were living in a reasonably aware society, many people would be asking themselves: What space do I want to invent,
and for what purpose?

Which of course takes things back to the individual and his inner resources. And away from overarching ideologies
with their perverse themes.

If you were a painter, what would you paint? That question is a lot like asking: if you could invent your future and all the
space that comes with it, what would you do?

To come up with an answer, you dont need any of the GPS reference points of Globalism. They would only be a hindrance.

They would be delusions, masking your power.

Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States,
characterizing my family and me as internationalists and of conspiring with others around the world to build a
more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty,
and I am proud of it.

- David Rockefeller, Memoirs, 2002

The man who wrote those words represents a family that has dominated banking, oil, modern medicine, behind-the-scenes
politics, and powerhouses of Globalism (e.g., the Council on Foreign Relations) for a century.

Globalism asserts that no nation can be independent from the family of other nations, as if it were a matter of fact
beyond dispute. A nation claiming its sovereignty thus becomes a lunatic traitor to the natural order of things.

What really binds nations to one another is propaganda, and treaties which are based on the same propaganda,
resulting in engorged super-profits for mega-corporations.

Globalism is a secular piece of messianic hype. A Disneyesque altruism is the prow of the ship. Spend 10 minutes
educating any street hustler on Globalist principles, and he would recognize it as a standard con.

Obamas warning to the Brits, that their withdrawing from the Globalist European Union would put them at the back of the
line in negotiating a separate trade treaty with the United States, was sheer fiction.
Britain, or any nation, that has goods to sell and a desire to buy will find trade partners. An agreement could be scratched
out on a napkin over dinner.

Impending trade deals like the TPP and TTIP are thousands of pages and take so long to negotiate, because the heavy
hitters at the table are looking for new ingenious ways to cut and paste the world into larger profits for themselves.

Globalism, hiding behind thousands of academic analyses, picks up jobs from one nation, where wages are reasonable and
working conditions are tolerable, and dumps them in hell holes where wages are nearly invisible and conditions are
poisonous.

Its that simple, and any moron could see how the job-exporting nations would sufferif by nations we meant people.

Instead of criminal corporations and criminal investors. But all this is layered over with share and care sop.

The United States government could repeal the NAFTA, CAFTA, and GATT trade treaties tomorrow, and throw current TPP
and TTIP negotiating documents out the windowand all would be well. Better. Much better.
Related: Globalisation, Urban Transformation And The Destruction Of Local Economies

For instance, without NAFTA, US producers wouldnt have been able to flood Mexico with cheap corn, throwing 1.5 million
Mexican corn farmers into bankruptcy, leading many of them to cross the border and come to the US to find work.

No US President since Nixon has disturbed the march of Globalist free trade. All Presidents since then have been on
board with the Rockefeller plan. And the US economy - which is to say, jobs - has thus faltered.

The 2008 financial crash was only one factor in the decline. The promise of cheap imports for sale in the US - the
justification for free trade - doesnt work when people here have no jobs and no purchasing power.

Major media, fronting for free-trade, have panicked over Donald Trumps claim that hell reject Globalism. They would have
panicked over Bernie Sanders similar promise, if they thought he had any chance of defeating Hillary Clinton for the
Democratic nomination. The media have their orders from on high - the deck is stacked, the cards were dealt long ago.
Hillary Clinton mouths pathetic and empty generalities about creating jobs. Small tax breaks for small businesses
that share profits with employees, the removal of government red tape, funding breakthroughs in scientific
and medical research, expanding job training opportunities - the truth is, her basic method for stimulating the
economy has always been: find a war, any war, and fight it.

Now, let us consider The Individual. Is he just a tiny force pitted against a colossus?

No. Unless he sees himself that way. But what can he do?

First: find the thing within himself that defies the odds, supersedes the normal response, casts aside all ordinary
formulations of what he is.

That thing, that power is imagination. Imagination has the ability to come up with solutions and strategies - on both a
personal and planetary level - that have never been considered before. Imagination is the wild card.

Imagination belongs to The Individual.

The individual is not the group.

Exercises and techniques for accessing and deploying imaginationthese would be essential. Exercises that
allow the individual to reinstate his basic creative position in life. Exercises that allow the individual to use his
imagination in many different ways. Ramping up power.

- Preliminary notes for Exit From the Matrix, Jon Rappoport

What does the individual have to offer? He has everything he is capable of doing, when he liberates himself from petty ideas
and limitations about what he is. That journey of liberation is his own. It isnt anybody elses.

It is, as Ive pointed out many times, a journey of imagination. Imagination lets a person know what could exist but doesnt
now exist. Imagination lets a person know what he could invent. Imagination lets a person know that, despite claims to the
contrary, the future is open and unwritten.

Imagination lets a person know that he can think thoughts that have never been thought before. The journey of individual
liberation is, therefore, much more than discovering what already exists in ones own mind.

The world as it is, things as they are, Globalism as it is, collectivism, the group - this is the sensation of depleted
imagination.

Of course, imagination never diminishes, it just waits. For you.

The deployment of imagination unlocks hidden energies. A power, sought after and never found in other endeavors,
appears.

Imagination is larger than any universe. It needs no sanction from the world. It is not some secret form of physics. It is not
religion. It is not cosmology. It is not any one picture of anything. Its what you invent.

The Collective does not have imagination. It poaches on individuals with imagination. The Collective is a graveyard where
imagination has been downgraded and forgotten.

Imagination soars. It is the individual at the edge of his own exploration.

Imagination was the source for the building of modern civilization. But then civilization became dedicated to itself AS THE
GROUP.

The individual never goes away, and neither does his imagination. Imagination can light up a room, a house, a city, a nation,
a planet, a galaxy, a universe.

So what will the individual do about Globalism?

The challenge isnt going to be resolved by taking mere traditional approaches. It isnt going to be solved by thinking along
traditional lines. People tend to ask for answers - but what if the ordinary answers dont work?

What if something else has to happen?

What if many individuals have to wake up to the range and scope and power of their own imaginationsand come up with
new answers? What if thats the case?

What if thats the exit from the situation in which we find ourselves?

It IS the exit.

Soros Hacked: US Billionaire Manipulated Europeans Into Accepting Maidan

The bulk of George Soros' documents hacked and published on DC Leaks website shed the light on the magnates'
meddling into Ukrainian affairs and shaping public opinion in Western Europe regarding the February coup of 2014
in Kiev through a series of projects and media campaigns.

DC Leaks' release of almost 2,576 files from groups run by US billionaire George Soros, has exposed the magnate's
involvement in Ukraine's Euromaidan affairs as well as manipulation of public opinion in Western and Southern Europe in
order to "legalize" the February 2014 coup in Kiev.

"The emergence of a New Ukraine carries with it the opportunity to reinvigorate the European project," read a 2015
document by the Open Society Initiative for Europe (OSIFE) entitled "The Ukraine debate in Western Europe."

"However, this is complicated by the reluctance of some EU actors to accept the Maidan revolution as democratic
and the Ukrainian government as legitimate.

These actors have their own agendas - related to geopolitical and economic considerations with Russia - and will
therefore be difficult to influence," the OSIFE document underscored, adding that "for other groups and individuals,
on the political left and across various social movements, one can detect confusion regarding the state of affairs in
Ukraine."

OSIFE specified that this "second group" comprised key opinion-makers, a number of traditional mainstream players,
emerging political parties - especially in Southern Europe - such as M5S in Italy, Podemos in Spain and Syriza in Greece,
and "a wide range of liberal NGOs in western Europe."
In order to tackle the "problem," the organization offered to kick off a series of initiatives aimed at shaping public opinion in
the West regarding the Ukrainian affairs.

The document revealed that OSIFE pursued three major objectives.

First, it sought to "stimulate debate and doubt in those democratic left movements, parties and audiences of
Western Europe where a negative perception of the transformation of Ukraine is hegemonic, or very preponderant."

Second, it wanted to "discredit the idea that the independence and integrity of Ukraine is an ideological cause of
the Right."

Third, OSIFE intended to "influence the way information about Ukraine is heard and perceived in Southern
Europe, especially among the group of doubters."

The issue was dramatically complicated by the fact that the major driving forces of the so-called "Euromaidan Revolution" of
February 2014 were the Ukrainian far-right groups, most notably the nationalist All-Ukrainian Union Svoboda and Right
Sector, founded by ultra-right Trident and the Ukrainian National Assembly-Ukrainian National Self-Defense (UNA-UNSO)
paramilitary group.

Related: Globalists Intend To Use Food As Key Weapon In World Takeover

Youre Looking At The Greatest Monetary Policy Experiment In History:

Lord Rothschild
August 19 2016 | From: Geopolitics

Currently, the world is experiencing the greatest financial experiment ever in history. Those are the
words of a Rothschild referring to the low interest rates, negative yields on government debt and
quantitative easing

that have been implemented throughout their entire fiat banking system, i.e. most central banks on the planet, in
order to mitigate the effects of the switch to asset-based financial instruments initiated by the BRICS Alliance.

Related: The Khazarian Global Checkmate Has Been Sealed

RT reports:

Low interest rates, negative yields on government debt and quantitative easing are part of the biggest financial experiment
in world history, and the consequences are yet unknown, says RIT Capital Partners Chairman Lord Rothschild.

The six months under review have seen central bankers continuing what is surely the greatest experiment in
monetary policy in the history of the world. We are therefore in uncharted waters and it is impossible to predict the
unintended consequences of very low interest rates, with some 30 percent of global government debt at negative
yields, combined with quantitative easing on a massive scale, Rothschild writes in the companys semi-annual
financial report.

The banker notes this policy has led to a rapid growth of stock markets US stocks have grown threefold since 2008 with
investments growing and volatility remaining low.

However, the real sector of economy didnt enjoy such a profit, as growth remains anemic, with weak demand and deflation
in many parts of the developed world, according to Rothschild.
The billionaire underlined that many risks remain for the global economy with the deteriorating geopolitical situation. Among
those risks Rothschild included Britains vote to leave the European Union, the US presidential election, and Chinas slowing
economic growth. Another risk is global terrorism, which Rothschild says is a consequence of the continuing conflict in the
Middle East.

According to a Bank of America Merrill Lynch report in June, interest rates in developed countries, in particular Americas
0.5 percent, are now at the lowest level in 5,000 years. In their battle against deflation, countries such as Sweden,
Switzerland or Japan have even turned to negative key lending rates.
Another woe is negative yields on government bonds. In June, 10-year German government bonds dipped below 0 percent
for the first time in history. Janus Capital has estimated that global yields are the lowest in 500 years, and the total amount
of such bonds is $10 trillion. The investment groups lead portfolio manager, Bill Gross, is calling it a supernova that will
explode one day.
They can admit the experiment theyre doing on your lives because they know [most of you] you would do nothing about it.

An amusing but little known fact is that the characher of Montgomery Burns from The Simpsons was actually based on Jacob Rothschild

And Now The Government Are Coming For Whistleblowers: New Law Targets People
Who Leak Classified Information
August 18 2016 | From: TheDailyBlog / NewZealandHerald

The National Government will imprison whistleblowers - if your enemy is people telling the truth,
then you have deep deep deep problems. It just got far, far worse.
The new spy powers dont just allow the SIS and GCSB vast new access to your Government files, gives them
warrantless spying for 24 hours which allows them to break into our homes, plant cameras and spy on us and all
they need is the pretence of national security to do it all.

Related: John Key: You Want To Spy? You Make The Business Plan, Ill Change The Law!

The SIS wont be allowed to break into your computers remotely and the GCSB wont be able to break into your house, BUT
(and heres the joke) if they are operating under a joint warrant, they can do all those things.

These new powers follow up the mass surveillance legislation National rammed through Parliament that allowed agencies to
ask the GCSB to spy on NZers. These new powers allows the GCSB to do that all on their own.

A department that has been caught being racist in private will have huge unchecked powers but it gets so much worse.

Now any whistleblower detailing illegal spying to the media will be punished with up to 5 years in prison.

[This reeks of a tantrum-like response from a government that is on the back foot because people are waking up to
institutionalised criminality and they are losing control of information and the ability to control the narrative.]
Nicky Hager would have been prosecuted. [Nicky Hager was the person who exposed the existence of the GCSB. Until
he did so it was completely secret] Andrea Vance could have been prosecuted. Jon Stephenson could have been
prosecuted. This blog could have been prosecuted.

The National Government will imprison whistleblowers - if your enemy is people telling the truth, then you have deep deep
deep problems.

No Government Left or Right should ever be given this level of power. Using terrorism to justify this erosion of our
civil liberty is unacceptable.

Once more for the breach of data dear friends, once more for the breach.

We simply can not and must not allow this to stand, its a direct threat to the medias role of holding the Government to
account. Losing that would damage our democracy far more than a lone wolf fanatic going on a rampage.

Protest actions will start being planned now.

New Law Targets People Who Leak Classified Information

People who leak Government information will be targeted with a new offence that carries a
maximum sentence of five years in jail.

Prime Minister John Key has announced legislation that will also let the Government Communications Security
Bureau spy on New Zealanders' private information.

Related: Unleashing GCSB To Spy On Kiwis One More Step On Road To Police State

The bill comes in the same week that information leaked by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden
resulted in media reports about the GCSB's monitoring of a Fiji democracy activist.

The Government denied the new power to target whistle blowers was related to the Snowden leaks.

Its introduction is a response to a broad-sweeping intelligence review by Sir Michael Cullen and Dame Patsy Reddy,
released in March with 107 recommendations.
A new offence will be created for people who hold a government security clearance, or those given access to classified
information, who wrongfully communicate, retain or copy it. Intelligence agency employees who encounter evidence of
wrong-doing can make a protected disclosure to the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security.

But if they give information to others or the media they face a prison sentence of up to five years in jail.

The new legislation will cover both the SIS and GCSB, and accepts one of the most controversial recommendations -
allowing the GCSB to spy on Kiwis. That breaks a longstanding split between the SIS and GCSB, under which the GCSB
could only spy on foreigners and the SIS on New Zealanders.

The current law already allows the GCSB to spy on behalf of other agencies, with an approved warrant.

However, in releasing his review in March, Sir Michael said the GCSB had become hesitant to legally assist other agencies
in such spying. That happened after it was found to have possibly unlawfully spied on New Zealanders due to confusion
over its powers when acting on behalf of other agencies.

The review recommended a single warranting regime that would have resulted in the SIS and GCSB having the same
powers to collect intelligence.

The new legislation does not go quite that far - it will limit the GCSB to conduct remote searches of a computer, for example,
while the SIS will be permitted to carry out a physical search of a private property. If the agencies are operating under a joint
warrant they will both be able to carry out all activities, including interception of communications, searching including of
private premises, seizure and surveillance.
The new law would establish a single warranting framework for both agencies. New Zealanders will be targeted only to
protect national security or where they are an agent of a foreign power.

A "Type 1" intelligence warrant would be needed to target New Zealanders using otherwise unlawful activities, such as
intercepting phone calls.

It would need approval from the Attorney-General and a Commissioner of Intelligence Warrants and will be subject to review
by the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security. This has been called a "triple lock" process.

There will also be new flexibility in terms of getting warrants, including allowing warrants for classes of people and "purpose-
based" warrants. The Government gave the example of the intelligence agencies being alerted to a group of unidentified
New Zealanders in Syria. A group warrant would allow them to target those people without having exact information on their
identities.

A purpose-based warrant would specify the type of information sought - for example, a warrant to intercept communications
to find out if New Zealanders are fighting with Isis in Syria.
Finally, urgent warrants can be sought in special cases, including where someone's life is at stake or there is a serious
threat to New Zealand's national security. In such cases, a warrant must still be applied for within 24 hours and if it is not
authorised all information collected would be destroyed.

While allowing the GCSB to spy on New Zealanders, the Government says both it and the SIS will only be allowed to do so
on the grounds of national security.

Labour leader Andrew Little said the definition of national security was too broad and "must be narrowed down to actual
threats to security and government". The party will support the legislation at the first hurdle, but wants that and other
changes before it would support it further.

Little said it was also concerning that the legislation appeared to have ignored recommendations related to protections for
personal information.

These are vital and must be a part of the legislation. In today's world it is too easy to ignore privacy concerns and
we have seen what happens in the past when protections aren't clear."

Under the legislation, intelligence agencies would have direct access to other Government database information including
birth, death, marriage, name change, citizenship, immigration and Customs information.

A warrant is needed to access IRD records, numbers assigned to tertiary students and driver licence photos. The SIS wants
to access private student numbers so they can catch spies posing as international students.
Key, who cited the threat from terrorism during a press conference on the changes, said political parties needed to think
carefully about opposing the changes.

It is going to be very difficult for political parties if they don't vote for this legislation and there was ultimately an
issue in New Zealand, then clearly fingers would be pointed about whether we could have done more to stop it."

The legislation will be introduced to the House on Thursday.

Related: Five Eyes Spy Fee: New Zealand Annually Forks Out Over $100 Million For Intelligence Funding

The CFR Releases A Promotional Video Trying To Appear Friendly But Its NWO
Propaganda
August 17 2016 | From: VigilantCitizen

The Council on Foreign Relations tweeted a video promoting its merits using all kinds of
celebrities and powerful people. If it tried to appear friendlier to the masses, it failed. It only proved
that a select elite truly congregates behind closed doors to push a New World Order agenda.
If you know anything about international politics or the plan for a New World Order, you surely know about the
CFR. It was often deemed the most influential foreign policy think tank in the world by international journalists.

Related: From: The Conspiracy To Rule The World: The Council On Foreign Relations

The list of its members is astonishing, to say the least, as it includes gigantic names in the corporate, financial and political
world. Some examples of corporations: ABC News, American Express, Boeing, Coca-Cola, Ford Motor, Google, Halliburton,
Heinz, IBM, Nike, Sony Corporation America and Visa.

Examples of members: Barack Obama, Zbigniew Brzezinski (Obamas advisor), Hilary Clinton, Dick Cheney, John
McCain and David Rockefeller.

Researchers have observed that these figures are working towards a world government and members never
truly denied this fact.

Shortly after his election, Obama selected the president of the Council on Foreign Relations Richard Haass, along with
senior CFR-members Richard Holbrooke and Dennis Ross as special Foreign Envoys/ Foreign Policy Advisors.

Heres the promotional video posted by the CFR.

While this video attempts to put a friendly face on the CFR by using TV celebrities and movie stars, it only ultimately proves
that this globalist organization (created by JP Morgan and john D. Rockefeller) is more powerful (and less democratic) than
ever. The video basically says:

The world is complex and geared towards globalization... and were the only ones who can deal with this.

By showcasing its members, the video also showcases who and what the elite truly owns.

Here are some of the people seen in the video:

Juliette Kayyem CNN National Security Analyst,

 Robert Rubin Former Treasury Secretary , Co-Chair CFR

Juju Chang, ABC News Anchor

Dina Habib Powell, Global Head of Impact Investing, Goldman Sachs

Condolezza Rice, Former Secretary of State

Angelina Jolie, Actress

Jon Meacham, CEO Random House Publishing

Rev. Chloe Breyer, Interfaith Center of New York

Rabbi Elliot Cosgrove, Park Avenue Synagogue

Richard Plepler, CEO HBO

Jared Cohen, President of Jigsaw

Random House is the largest general-interest trade book publisher in the world. Goldman Sachs is one of the largest
banking firms in the world (it was rescued as part of a massive U.S. government bailout). CNN, ABC and HBO are some of
the largest TV stations in the world. This gives you an idea of the reach of the CFR.

By including Rev. Chloe Breyer, who works at the Interfaith Center of New York, you get a glimpse of the one world
religion agenda of the NWO. The center is headquarter at the St John the Divine Cathedral in New York a NWO-friendly
sinister site Ive previously analyzed in this article.

Jared Cohen is the founder and President of Jigsaw (previously Google Ideas). Hes also an Adjunct Senior Fellow at the
Council on Foreign Relations. Previously, he served as a member of the Secretary of States Policy Planning Staff and as a
advisor to Condoleezza Rice and later Hillary Clinton.Initially brought in by Condoleezza Rice as a member of the Policy
Planning Staff, he was one of a few staffers that stayed under Hillary Clinton.
The video shows Henry Kissinger next to a pile of Foreign Affairs publications (published by the CFR). In case you didnt know, Henry Kissinger
basically shaped the world as we know by dictating the US foreign policy for decades.

In short, this CFR video gives you a glimpse of the tentacular reach of this elite-created organization and how it is pushing
towards a world government despite its claims of not having agenda. Its founding members never shied away from the fact
that they DID have an agenda. Proof of this can be found in the following short video about the CFR.

The News Definers: The Truth about the Council on Foreign Relations

The Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) is often mentioned on this site as it is one of the major elite organizations
pushing for a New World Order.

Related: One World Governance and the Council on Foreign Relations.We Shall have World Government by
Conquest or Consent.

Corporate Members
(As of August 16, 2016)

Founders

Abraaj Group, The

Bank of America Merrill Lynch
Chevron Corporation
Citi
Exxon Mobil Corporation
First Eagle Holdings, Inc.
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
Google, Inc.
Hess Corporation
JPMorgan Chase & Co
McKinsey & Company, Inc.
Morgan Stanley
Nasdaq OMX Group, The
PepsiCo, Inc.
Shell Oil Company

President's Circle

Alcoa, Inc.
American Express
BlackRock
Bloomberg
BP p.l.c.
Bridgewater Associates, LP
Coca-Cola Company, The
Credit Suisse
Dell Inc.
Deutsche Bank AG
Eni
Generali
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Glenview Capital Management
GoldenTree Asset Management
Johnson Controls, Inc.
Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.
Lazard
Lockheed Martin Corporation
MetLife
Moody's Corporation
Newmont Mining Corporation
Noble Energy Inc.
Parsons Corporation
Pearson
Pitney Bowes Inc.
Prudential Financial
Reliance Industries Limited
S&P Global
Soros Fund Management
Standard Chartered Bank
Thomson Reuters
Toyota Motor North America, Inc.
Veritas Capital Fund Management LLC

Affiliates

Airbus Group, Inc.

Allen & Overy LLP
Allied World Assurance Company, Ltd.
American International Group
Apollo Management, LP
AT&T
Baker, Nye Advisers, Inc.
Baldwin-Gottschalk Group, The
Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, The
BASF Corporation
Blackstone Group L.P., The
Boeing Company, The
Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.
Bunge Limited
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
Caterpillar Inc.
Caxton Associates
Centerview Partners, Inc.
Chiomenti
Chubb Limited
Cigna Corporation
CNA
Colliers International
ConocoPhillips Company
Control Risks Group
Corsair Capital
Covington & Burling
Craig Drill Capital Corporation
Crdit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank
Deere & Company
Deloitte.
DNB Bank ASA
EMD Serono, Inc.
Energy Intelligence Group, Inc.
Este Lauder Companies Inc.
Facebook
FedEx Corporation
Fitch Ratings
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
General Atlantic LLC
General Electric Company
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP
Granite Associates LP
Hitachi, Ltd.
Houlihan Lokey
IBM Corporation
Indus Capital Partners, LLC
Investcorp International, Inc.
Invus Group, LLC
ITOCHU International
Jacobs Asset Management, LLC
Johnson and Johnson
KPMG, LLP
MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated
Mannheim LLC
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
Marubeni America Corporation
Mercantil Servicios Financieros
Merck & Co., Inc.
Microsoft Corporation
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP
Mitsubishi Corporation (Americas)
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc.
Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc.
Moore Capital Management L.P.
Northrop Grumman
Olayan Group, The
Palantir Technologies
PayPal, Inc.
Pfizer Inc.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC)
Raytheon Company
Rubicon Global
salesforce.com, inc.
Siguler Guff & Company L.P.
Silver Lake Partners
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Sony Corporation of America
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
T. Rowe Price Group
Tata Group, The
Telefonica Internacional U.S.A.
Terna
Time Warner Inc.
Tishman Speyer Properties, Inc.
TOTAL S.A.
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Vornado Realty Trust
Walmart
Warburg Pincus LLC
Wells Fargo
Western Union
White & Case LLP
WIND Telecomunicazioni S.p.A.
WPP
Xerox Corporation
Zurich Insurance Group

A quote from CFRs website:

The goal should be to redefine sovereignty for the era of globalisation, to find a balance between a world
of fully sovereign states and an international system of either world government or anarchy.
George Soros Hacked, Thousands Of Open Society Foundations Files Released
Online
August 16 2016 | From: RT

More than 2,500 files from the raft of organizations run by billionaire George Soros have been
leaked by hackers.

Saturdays leak, published by DC leaks, includes hundreds of internal documents from multiple departments of
Soros groups, predominantly the Open Society Foundations.

Related: How George Soros Singlehandedly Created The European Refugee Crisis - And Why
The files are grouped into sections such as geographical region, the World Bank and the Presidents Office, and cover the
period from 2008 up until 2016, according to The Daily Caller.

They reveal work plans, strategies, priorities and other activities by Soros, and include reports on European elections,
migration and asylum in Europe.
DC Leaks claims to be the work of American activists who want to present the truth about the US decision-making process
as well as about the key elements of American political life.

US security experts however are blaming the leak on Russian hackers, according to Bloomberg, in a similar reaction seen in
the wake of the DNC leaks.

Related: Absurd election rhetoric: Kremlin, Assange slam Clinton for blaming DNC leaks on Russia

The DC Leaks hackers previously released data from the Open Society Foundations in June, a breach that was reported to
the FBI, according to spokeswoman Laura Silber.
She said an investigation by a security firm found the intrusion was limited to an intranet system used by board members,
staff and foundation partners.

DC Leaks also revealed emails from former NATO general Philip Breedlove which showed he tried to provoke President
Obama to start US conflict against Russia. Breedlove claimed to CNN in July that the emails were stolen as part of a state-
sponsored intelligence operation.
An email leaked by WikiLeaks earlier this week showed Soros had advised Hillary Clinton during her tenure as Secretary of
State on how to handle unrest in Albania advice she acted on.

Related: US government, Soros funded Panama Papers to attack Putin WikiLeaks

Soros Open Society Foundations provides funding to the International Consortium for Investigative Journalists, which came
under the spotlight earlier this year after the release of the Panama Papers, which included millions of records from law firm
Mossack Fonseca showing how the wealthy are using tax havens.

The Panama Papers leak came under criticism from WikiLeaks, who claimed the US government and Soros funded the
project to attack Russia and President Vladimir Putin.

Related: George Soros: A Psychopaths Psychopath

Political Crimes & Criminals

 Part One: Click here

Part Two: Click here

Part Three: Click here

Part Four: Click here

Part Five: Click here

Part Six: Click here

Part Seven: Click here

Part Eight: Click here

http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/political-crimes-criminals-8.shtml

Political Crimes & Criminals

Part One: Click here

Part Two: Click here

Part Three: Click here

Part Four: Click here

Part Five: Click here

Part Six: Click here

Part Seven: Click here

Part Eight: Click here

Banker John Keys Corporate Repackaging Of War

August 15 2016 | From: EnviroWatchRangitikei

With the upcoming celebrations around the 2016 NZ DIA (NZ Defense Industry Association) Forum
being held in Auckland on 16 - 17 November in conjunction with the RNZN 75th Anniversary
celebrations, Operation Neptune, I took a peek at their website.

You can reserve your sponsorship spot with cocktails and trimmings for just $10,000.

Related: NZ Defence Force To Get $20bn Upgrade + More To Planned US Warship Visit Than Mere Celebration

This is an issue which has been raised on numerous occasions with progressive organizations and WSF activists: you cannot
effectively confront neoliberalism and the New World Order elites and expect them to finance your activities.
 The NZ DIA was formed in 1993, as an industry development initiative. Its major emphasis today is on networking,
and encouraging the membership to work together on developing joint approaches to defence projects in NZ and
overseas

Right there in the DIAs mission statement is the strategic use of the word defence. The corporate bankers have need of
war, its an integral part of the Rothschild banking empire, however, in order to not be too obvious, they need to sanitize it with
nicer words.

Profiteering from war is no conspiracy but documented fact.

Related: All Wars Are Bankers' Wars

Cheneys Halliburton made $39.5 billion on the Iraq war. My elderly father who fought in one of the World Wars and was
fortunate enough to return alive, had worked out that fact later in life that wars would never end because wars make
money. His oldest brother, a machine gunner, so deeply affected, he wept whenever he talked about war.
So, there on the DIAs website is the standard tribute of poppies to these brave men who served as basically cannon fodder
for the war machine, a machine peopled by those who never spent one minute in trenches and never experienced the terror
of combat.

Remember Mrs Rothschilds infamous words if my sons did not want war there would be none.

Returning to the planned forum for November this year, Keys corporation parading as a government (NZ is a US SEC
registered corporation) put out a White Paper that was compiled we are told from the publics and the academic communitys
views, involving over 300 written submissions and meetings around the country. (See White Paper info here also).
Related: New Zealands Homegrown Military-Industrial Complex

I dont particularly recall the road show, perhaps other readers do. Note the Ministry of Defence administers the Defence Act
1990, the era shortly after our nation became corporatized courtesy of Rogernomics.

Corporations are about profits. We are told in the White Paper that terrorism remains an enduring global problem.

Those who do their own research will know that the so called war on terror has been effectively drummed up since the very
dodgy 9/11 attack that looked extremely like a controlled demolition.

And the current threat to security, ISIS, has equally dodgy

origins (watch Truth Media: the Origin of ISIS for more info on
that).

The war industry is ticking along quite nicely in Aotearoa with

banker Key at the helm, and synchronising equally as nicely with
his growing partnership with the US.

"The Government[corporation] says Key, has provided

the Defence Force with a degree of funding
certainty [$20 billion] that enables it to plan with
confidence out to 2030 and beyond.

[Agenda 2030, see also Agenda 21/2030 in NZ] Download the White Paper and see what Key and Brownlee are spending
your $20 billion on.

Remember how well theyve managed the Christchurch disaster that they refer to in there. Its an integral part of defence.

The interdependence of planned global governance under Agenda 21/2030, already operative in both your Government and your Local Government

What I find particularly distasteful about this whole affair is the spin. One of my favourite investigative journalists John Pilger,
describes their convoluted rhetoric so well in his essay, Arming the World (in his book Hidden Agendas p 115). Describing
the weapons (defence) industry he says:
 Refined absurdity is always close at hand in the arms business. It squeezes into bed with secrecy, corruption and
stupendous greed.

Asking what a British cluster bomb does (gleaming under soft backlight, like the latest showroom Jaguar) he is told they
need his request in writing for MOD approval as the information is classified, the reason for which is also classified.

The cluster bomb, Pilger explains:

Is not really a bomb at all, but an area denial sub-munition, a land mine in all but name. It is dropped from the air
and explodes into forty-seven little mines, which are shaped like spiders."

These are scattered over a wide area and deny life to anything that moves or grows. Theyve been found says Pilger, in
Bosnia and Croatia where between two and four million mines threaten to main and kill long after the war ends.

These salesmen he says, have great difficulty saying words like people, maim and kill. Describing a cluster
bombs effectiveness he cites the little girl who in a Vietnam village lost her family

My mother and father were lying there covered in blood, and my sister had pieces of metal in her, and so did
her doll.

The corporates know it is wrong, trading in weapons (theyre not averse to supplying both sides), this is why they have
difficulty with these words.

There is enough of old fashioned conscience there for them to need to cover their wording well, however not enough to stop
the killing by curtailing their obscene greed.
They are therefore very adept at reframing and repackaging. And so the weapons trade becomes the defence trade.

Now if you have any doubt still about the money involved here, check out the these two exmples of sponsorhip pages for the
upcoming conference. Corporate sponsorship of cocktails and food depending on your budget:

However, if youre a bit strapped for cash, theres always the $5,000 slot minus cocktails and food.
A list of members of the NZ DIA can be seen here. You will see Fulton Hogan (that company that liberally sprays your streets
and public places with carcinogenic glyphosate) along with Lockheed Martin and others. All proudly members of the Defence /
Industry partnership.

And to put the proverbial icing on the cake, there are even awards for improvement to defence industry relationships.

The Award will identify the Defence person or persons who have best contributed to building or improving the
Defence / Industry relationship.

The aim of the Award is to publicly recognise good performance in this area and provide the opportunity for the NZ
DIA and Defence to promote constructive and collegial relationships between Defence and Industry."

Your PM Key continues to tax himself and friends at 2.8%, continues to profit from your countrys indebtedness and the so
called global war on terrorism, and is intent on the TPPA agreement which will give both he and his corporate friends even
more control. Lets face it, he is likely not too interested in changing any of the current status quo.

Related: Banker Key is Quietly Oiling the US War Machine

Related: UK Minister Holds Top-Level Defence Talks In Wellington + John Key Called Out
Trump Is Right: Proof Hillary & Obama Founded ISIS & Obama Admits Were Training
ISIL + Hillarys Medical Records Revealed -This Is What Shes Hiding
August 14 2016 | From: Infowars / Infowars / JoeForAmerica / Various

Hillary even admitted U.S. created al-Qaeda, the precursor of ISIS.

Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are founding members of ISIS by bankrolling, arming and supporting jihadists in
Syria and Libya to both destabilize the Middle East and expand the domestic police state.

Related: 2012 Pentagon report warned Obama was creating ISIS

Clinton even even admitted in 2009 that the U.S. government staffed with many of her closest allies was responsible for
al-Qaeda, which morphed into ISIS.

I mean, lets remember here: The people we are fighting today we funded 20 years ago, and we did it because we were
locked in this struggle with the Soviet Union, she said.

Clinton continued:

They invaded Afghanistan, and we did not want to see them control central Asia, and we went to work, and it was
President Reagan, in partnership with the Congress, led by Democrats, who said, You know what? Sounds like a
pretty good idea!

Lets deal with the ISI and the Pakistani military, and lets go recruit these Mujahedin! Thats great! Lets get some
to come from Saudi Arabia and other places, importing their Wahhabi brand of Islam, so that we can go beat the
 Soviet Union!

And guess what? They retreated, they lost billions of dollars, and it led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. So
theres a very strong argument, which is: It wasnt a bad investment to end the Soviet Union, but lets be careful
what we sow, because we will harvest.

Shes right: al-Qaeda was created by Western intelligence and has always been under the influence of the West, starting
with al-Qaedas precursor, the Mujahideen of Afghanistan.

In 1979 the Mujahideen was Americas secret weapon in Operation Cyclone, the CIA project to arm and finance Jihadi
warriors in a proxy war against the USSR.

It was geopolitical strategist and Clinton ally Zbigniew Brzezinski, then National Security Advisor under President Jimmy
Carter, who used the Mujahideen to draw the Soviet Union into an unwinnable war in Afghanistan.

To aid in this endeavor, U.S. intelligence picked a mujaheddin fighter named Osama bin Laden to lead the Afghan
resistance against the USSR and gave him the codename Tim Osman.
He was chosen primary because his wealthy family was connected to the Bush family as a long-term business partner in the
West.

The CIA also paid Osama to operate a charity front called the Maktab al-Khidamat (also known as the as Al-Kifah) which
funneled recruits and money to the Mujahideen, and the US government later said MAK was the precursor organization to
al-Qaeda.
And a few decades later, in 2012, Clintons State Dept. was backing al-Qaeda in Iraq, which morphed into ISIS, and other
Islamic extremist groups as a proxy army to topple Syrian President Bashir al-Assad, a close ally to Russia and an enemy to
Saudi Arabia, an Obama administration ally.

The Salafist [sic], the Muslim Brotherhood and AQI [al-Qaeda in Iraq] are the major forces driving the insurgency in Syria,
a leaked memo between her State Dept. and the Pentagon stated. The West, Gulf countries, and Turkey support [this]
opposition, while Russia, China and Iran support the [Assad] regime.

This secret document confirms that Clintons State Dept. and the Obama administration in general was directly
responsible for the rise of ISIS.

The former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency, Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, confirmed the documents
importance.

Former DIA Director Admits Obama Created ISIS:

I dont know that [the Obama administration] turned a blind eye [to ISIS], I think it was a decision; I think it was a
willful decision, he said.

The document likely stemmed from a discussion during the 2012 Bilderberg conference held in Chantilly, Virginia, in which
participants envisioned a Syrian puppet government taking orders from the U.S. State Department, the European Union and
NATO.
A couple years later, in 2014 a $1.1 trillion federal spending bill rammed through Congress provided a half-billion dollars to
arm and train ISIS-linked Syrian rebels.

The spending bill authorized the Secretary of Defense $500,000,000 to equip appropriately vetted elements of the Syrian
opposition who will defend the Syrian people from attacks by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, but a few months
before, ISIS signed a truce with the remaining rebel groups and they began working together against the Syrian
government.

That, however, didnt stop Obama; on Oct. 1, 2015, he authorized a shipment of guns to ISIS-linked militants in Syria.

The approval came at a National Security Council meeting on Thursday, CNN reported at the time. The
President also emphasized to his team that the U.S. would continue to support the Syrian opposition as Russia
enters the war-torn country.

Once again, it should be emphasized that the so-called Syrian rebels were either ISIS militants or allied with ISIS.

We are collaborating with the Islamic State and the Nusra Front by attacking the Syrian Armys gatherings in
Qalamoun [in Syria], Bassel Idriss, the commander of a Free Syrian Army rebel brigade, told the Lebanese Daily
Star in 2014. ISIS wanted to enhance its presence in the Western Qalamoun area.

After the fall of Yabroud and the FSAs retreat into the hills, many units pledged allegiance to ISIS.

Another rebel, Abu Ahmed, also said his unit was willing to collaborate with ISIS and its affiliates.

Fighters feel proud to join al-Nusra [an ISIS affiliate] because that means power and influence, he told the
Guardian.
In fact, at least 29 different Syrian rebel groups had pledged allegiance to the al-Nusra Front.

Clinton even admitted to BBC that these Syrian rebels serving the administrations interests in Syria are terrorists.

We have a very dangerous set of actors in the region, Al-Qaeda, Hamas, and those who are on our terrorist list, to
be sure, supporting claiming to support the opposition in Syria, she said.

But that didnt stop the Obama administration from saving ISIS militants from U.S. airstrikes by giving them a 45-
minute warning prior to an airstrike on their oil tankers.

Get out of your trucks now, and run away from them. Warning: air strikes are coming. Oil trucks will be destroyed.
Get away from your oil trucks immediately. Do not risk your life, the warning leaflets given to ISIS read.

U.S. military pilots also confirmed they were ordered not to drop 75% of their ordnance on ISIS targets because they
couldnt get clearance from their superiors which is exactly the kind of order the Obama administration would give to
protect ISIS.

We cant get clearance even when we have a clear target in front of us, said House Foreign Affairs Committee
Chairman Ed Royce (R-Calif.)
One of the reasons why the Obama administration sponsored and protected ISIS was because Assad stood in the way of a
critical natural gas pipeline that would have deposed Russia as Europes primary source of energy.

Syria is the site of the proposed construction of a massive underground gas pipeline that, if completed, could
drastically undercut the strategic energy power of U.S. ally Qatar and also would cut Turkey out of the pipeline
flow, Aaron Klein of WND reported. Dubbed the Islamic pipeline, the project may ultimately favor Russia and
Iran against Western energy interests.

In other words, ISIS is a tool used to geopolitically isolate Russia, which under Putin has deflected attempts by the global
elite to bring the country under their control disconnected from the will of the people.

Additionally, due to the centuries-old conflict between Sunni and Shia Muslims, Sunni-dominated Saudi Arabia, a close
Obama ally, wants Assads Shia government out of power.

Theres also trillions of dollars in potential oil and gas revenue in Syria that Saudi Arabia could tap into if a Western puppet
is placed into power in Syria.

Donald Trump is spot-on: Clinton and Obama have aided and abetted ISIS to achieve their geopolitical objectives
shared by their close allies and their predecessors who also created the precursors of ISIS.

Related: Trump Doubles Down On Obama Is The Founder Of ISIS Comment

Flashback: Obama Admits Were Training ISIL

"Were speeding up training of ISIL forces"

Donald Trump is taking heat for claiming President Obama and Hillary Clinton are the co-founders of ISIS, but in a
speech from July 2015 the president admitted to supporting the terror group.
 As Ive said before, this aspect of our strategy was moving too slowly. But the fall of Ramadi has galvanized the
Iraqi government. So, with the additional steps I ordered last month, were speeding up training of ISIL forces,
including volunteers from Sunni tribes in Anbar Province.

- Barack Obama

The White House later changed its transcript of the speech online putting the word Iraqi in brackets after the word
ISIL, correcting Obamas mistake.

Hillarys Medical Records Revealed -This Is What Shes Hiding

No one is promised tomorrow, anything could take place to bring your life to an end. Some people
like Hillary run out of time sooner than others, she has debilitating problems that have just been
revealed to the media.
When youre in the public image there is no secret you can keep, and we all know Hillary has tried to live a double
life. Who does she think she is, God?

This small piece of information will have a HUGE impact on whether or not voters will bubble her name in the ballot come
this November. When it comes to personal health issues, Hillary has plenty, usually, people want to keep things like this
hush hush, especially this witch.

This leaked letter from Hillary Clinton's Doctor has casused much concern recently also:
Click on the image above to open a larger version in a new window

Related: Man Who Leaked Clintons Medical Records Found Dead

She doesnt have that privilege, though, when she is trying to take on the most important job one can acquire in the
United States.

Would you want to vote for someone who cant do their job correctly because theyre too sick? We need to spread
this news around so people have an idea just who they are inviting into the White houseshes pretty much a
walking corpse.

FOX News Sean Hannity sets up the photo and the Clinton response:
The picture, which shows Hillary Clinton apparently needing assistance to climb a flight of stairs at a campaign stop back in
February was picked up by the Drudge Report, which posted the headline over the weekend, details Hillary Clintons history
with falls and speculating that the former Secretary of State could be experiencing a serious undisclosed medical condition.

Earlier today we reached out to the Clinton campaign for a statement, and a spokesman told us that the Drudge Report is
shameful, and anyone who buys into that medical condition shameful, what is missing is a statement about the health
issues.

Dr. Marc Seigel said the public has a right to know and speculated on what the issue could be but was more interested in
previous spills and a concussion she had in 2012.

I think the public has a right to know, Seigel said. Were talking in 2008, Sean, I looked over a thousand pages of
John McCains records because of a melanoma he had 10 years ago. What about Hillary? In 2009, a severe fall.
She breaks her elbow. In 2011, she boards a plane, falls. In 2012 she has a severe concussion which Bill Clinton
says took her six months to recover from."

"Then she ends up with a blood-clot in the brain and a lifetime of blood thinners, Seigel said.

Just that point alone - if shes prone to falling, you can see from that picture up there that it looked like she can
barely get upstairs without two people carrying her. Guess what if she falls and hits her head? Shell get a blood-
clot.

I want to know what her neurological records show, he added.

The picture going up the stairs speaks a million words, Dr. David Samadi said.

Is she fatigued? Is she dehydrated? One of the main reasons she fell in 2012 and had the concussions was
severe dehydration. Theyre holding her and going up the stairs. So she may be really dehydrated, she may have
arthritis, she may have back pain, she may have fallen again. We dont know.

There are questions that are unanswered. What we know today is shes on thyroid medication, she suffers from
hypothyroid, low thyroid, that can cause fatigue and gaining weight and all of that.
Why are we asking a woman who can hardly take care of herself to take care of the entire United States? This
makes no sense.

Dr. Seigel went on to say:

I think a traumatic brain injury with symptoms down the road is very, very likely here especially since she had a
blood-clot on her brain. As David mentioned that could lead to a seizure problem. Someone is carrying a
[diazepam]pen that youd use in case of a seizure, a Valium pen, that makes me wonder about that.

It is hard to pick just one reason Hillary shouldnt be president but this is close to the top of the list I would say! Watch below
to discover more secrets uncovered about Hillarys health issues.

What is with Hillary's Recent Bizzarre Behaviour?

Related: Wikileaks Releases New Emails Showing Hillary Taking Orders From George Soros

Rockefeller, Ford Foundations Behind World Social Forum (WSF): The Corporate
Funding Of Social Activism
August 14 2016 | From: GlobalResearch

This year the World Social Forum is being held in Montreal, regrouping committed social activists,
anti-war collectives and prominent intellectuals.

Most of the participants are unaware that the WSF is funded by corporate foundations including Ford, Rockefeller,
Tides, et al. Much of this funding is channelled to the WSF organizers under the helm of the WSF International
Council.

This is an issue which has been raised on numerous occasions with progressive organizations and WSF activists: you
cannot effectively confront neoliberalism and the New World Order elites and expect them to finance your activities.

The World Social Forum operating under the banner of Another World is Possible was founded in 2001 at its inaugural
venue of Porto Alegre. Brazil.

From the outset in 2001, the WSF has been upheld as an international umbrella representing grassroots peoples
organizations, committed to reversing the tide of globalization. Its stated intent is to challenge corporate capitalism and its
dominant neoliberal economic agenda.

The World Social Forum at its inaugural meeting defined itself as a counter-offensive to the World Economic Forum (WEF)
of business leaders and politicians which meets annually in Davos, Switzerland. The 2001 Porto Alegre WSF was held
simultaneously with that of the WEF in Davos.

While there have been many important accomplishments of the WSF, largely as a result of the commitment of grassroots
activists, the core leadership of WSF rather than effectively confronting the New World Order elites has (often
unwittingly) have served their corporate interests. In this process, co-optation has been achieved through the corporate
funding of the WSF.

Among the two major accomplishments are the participation of the WSF in the February 2003 Worldwide protest against the
US led war on Iraq. The WSF has also supported progressive movements and governments, particularly in Latin America.

In contrast, at the Tunis 2013 WSF, the final declaration paid lip service to to the US sponsored Syrian opposition.
Similarly the Al Qaeda affiliated Libya Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) which allegedly led the Arab Spring against the
government of Muammar Gaddafi was tacitly upheld as a revolutionary force. Several workshops on Libya applauded
Western military intervention.

A session entitled Libyas transition to democracy focused on whether Libya was better off without Muammar Gaddafi.
Funding Dissent

From the outset in 2001, the World Social Forum was funded by governments and corporate foundations, including the Ford
Foundation which has ties to US intelligence.

The anti-globalization movement is opposed to Wall Street and the Texas oil giants controlled by Rockefeller, et al. Yet the
foundations and charities of Ford, Rockefeller et al will generously fund progressive anti-capitalist networks as well as
environmentalists (opposed to Wall Street and Big Oil), etc. with a view to ultimately overseeing and shaping their various
activities.

The mechanisms of manufacturing dissent require a manipulative environment, a process of arm-twisting and subtle co-
optation of a small number of key individuals within progressive organizations, including anti-war coalitions,
environmentalists and the anti-globalization movement. Many leaders of these organizations have in a sense betrayed their
grassroots.

The corporations are funding dissent with a view to controlling dissent.

The Ford Foundation (which has links to the CIA) provided funding under its Strengthening Global Civil Society program
during the first three years of the WSF.

When the WSF was held in Mumbai in 2004, the Indian WSF host committee declined support from the Ford Foundation.
This in itself did not modify the WSFs relationship to the donors. While the Ford Foundation formally withdrew, other
foundations positioned themselves.

The WSF (among several sources of funding is supported by a consortium of corporate foundations under the advisory
umbrella of Engaged Donors for Global Equity (EDGE).

This organization, which previously went under the name of The Funders Network on Trade and Globalization (FTNG),
has played a central role in the funding of successive WSF venues. From the outset in 2001, it had an observer status on
the WSF International Council.
In 2013, the Rockefeller Brothers representative Tom Kruse co-chaired EDGEs program committee. At the Rockefeller
Brothers Fund, Kruse was responsible for Global Governance under the Democratic Practice program. Rockefeller
Brothers grants to NGOs are approved under the Strengthening Democracy in Global Governance program, which is
broadly similar to that put forth by the US State Department.

A representative of the Open Society Initiative for Europe currently sits on EDGEs Board of directors. The Wallace Global
Fund is also on its Board of Directors. The Wallace Global Fund is specialized in providing support to mainstream NGOs
and alternative media, including Amnesty International, Democracy Now (which supports Hillary Clintons candidacy for
president of the US).

Several members of the EDGE BoD, however, are from non-corporative and family foundations with a social mandate. (see
below).
In one of its key documents (2012), entitled Funders Network Alliance In Support of Grassroots Organizing and Movement-
Building (link no longer available)EDGE acknowledged its support of social movements which challenge neoliberal market
fundamentalism. including the World Social Forum, established in 2001:

From the Zapatista uprising in Chiapas (1994) to the Battle in Seattle (1999) to the creation of the World Social
Forum in Porto Alegre (2001), the TINA years of Reagan and Thatcher (There Is No Alternative) have been
replaced with the growing conviction that another world is possible.

Counter-summits, global campaigns and social forums have been crucial spaces to articulate local struggles, share
experiences and analyses, develop expertise, and build concrete forms of international solidarity among
progressive movements for social, economic and ecological justice.

But at the same time, there is an obvious contradiction: another world is not possible when the campaign against
neoliberalism is financed by an alliance of corporate donors firmly committed to neoliberalism and the US-NATO military
agenda.

The following is the EDGE Montreal WSF Communique. The donors not only fund the activities, they also influence the
structure of the WSF venue, which was determined in Puerto Alegre in 2001, namely the decentralized and dispersed
mosaic of do it yourself workshops.
Click on the image above to open a larger version in a new window

With regard to the Montreal WSF, the Consortium of Donors (EDGE) intent is:

to develop an intersectional space for funders and various movement partners organizers thought leaders and
practitioners to build alignment by cultivating a shared understanding of the visions, values, principles and
pathways of a just transition. (See edgefunders.org)

Just Transition implies that social activism has to conform to a shared vision with the corporate foundations, i.e. nothing
which in a meaningful way might upset the elite structures of global capitalism.

From the standpoint of the corporate donors investing in the WSF constitutes a profitable (tax deductible) undertaking. It
ensures that activism remains within the confines of constructive dialogue and critique rather than confrontation. Any
deviation immediately results in the curtailment of donor funding:

Everything the [Ford] Foundation did could be regarded as making the World safe for capitalism, reducing social
tensions by helping to comfort the afflicted, provide safety valves for the angry, and improve the functioning of
government (McGeorge Bundy, National Security Advisor to Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson
(1961-1966), President of the Ford Foundation, (1966-1979))

The limits of social dissent are thereby determined by the governance structure of the WSF, which was tacitly agreed
upon with the funding agencies at the outset in 2001.

No Leaders
The WSF has no leaders. All the events are self-organized. The structure of debate and activism is part of an an open
space (See y Francine Mestrum, The World Social Forum and its governance: a multi-headed monster, CADTM, 27 April
2013, at cadtm.org).

This compartmentalized structure is an obstacle to the development of a meaningful and articulate mass movement.

How best to control grassroots dissent against global capitalism?

Make sure that their leaders can be easily co-opted and that the rank and file will not develop forms of international
solidarity among progressive movements (to use EDGEs own words), which in any meaningful way might undermine the
interests of corporate capital.

The mosaic of separate WSF workshops, the relative absence of plenary sessions, the creation of divisions within and
between social movements, not to mention the absence of a cohesive and unified platform against the Wall Street corporate
elites, against the fake US sponsored global war on terrorism, which has been used to justify and US-
NATOs humanitarian R2P interventions (Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, Libya, Ukraine, etc).

The corporate agenda is to manufacture dissent.The limits of dissent are established by the foundations and
governments which ultimately finance this multimillion dollar venue.

The financing is twofold:

1. Core financing of the WSF Secretariat and the Costs of the WSF venue.

2. Many of the constituent NGOs which participate in the venue are recipients of donor and / or government
support.

3. The WSF venue in Montreal also receives funding from the Government of Canada as well as from the Quebec
provincial government.
What ultimately prevails is a ritual of dissent which does not threaten the New World Order. Those who attend the WSF from
the grassroots are often misled by their leaders. Activists who do not share the WSF consensus will ultimately be excluded:

By providing the funding and the policy framework to many concerned and dedicated people working within the
non-profit sector, the ruling class is able to co-opt leadership from grassroots communities,

and is able to make the funding, accounting, and evaluation components of the work so time consuming and
onerous that social justice work is virtually impossible under these conditions

- Paul Kivel, You Call this Democracy, Who Benefits, Who Pays and Who Really Decides, 2004, p. 122

Another World is Possible is nonetheless an important concept, which characterizes the struggle of the peoples
movements against global capitalism as well as the commitment of thousands of committed activists who are currently
participated in the Montreal 2016 WSF.

Activism is being manipulated: Another World is Possible cannot, however, be achieved under the auspices of the WSF
which from the outset was funded by global capitalism and organized in close liaison with its corporate and government
donors.

The important question for activists in Montreal:

Is it possible to build an Alternative to global capitalism, which challenges the hegemony of the Rockefellers et al
and then asks the Rockefellers et al to foot the bill?

We call upon participants of the Montreal World Social Forum (WSF) to raise and debate these issues: the campaign
against neoliberalism is financed by corporate foundations (and governments) which are firmly committed not only to the
tenets of neoliberalism but also to the US-NATO led military agenda.

Why would they fund organizations which are actively campaigning against war and globalization? The answer is obvious.

Varoufakis Alert: Financialized Capital May Choose To Support Fascists + On The

Need To Re-Boot The World Economy
August 12 2016 | From: KiwiWatch / YanisVaroufakis / SOTT

Yanis Varoufakis had the audacity to tell the European banking and political elite something
everyone else knows is true. Greece is bankrupt we cannot pay! Lets negotiate our way out of
this.
He was forced to resign after being let down by the current Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras who came to power to
fight austerity and who folded to German banking demands. His thinking however is clear.

Varoufakis alert: financialized capital may choose to support fascists

Eric Draitser sits down with economist, and former Greek finance minister, Yanis Varoufakis to discuss the shifts in the
political landscape of both Europe and the US, and what they mean for political activism and progressive politics.

Eric and Yanis discuss the nature of the EU and whether it can be reformed or democratized, as well as the forces at play
within it. The conversation also touches on the US election as Yanis and Eric debate the utility of lesser evil politics, while
also examining the ascendance of the fascist right in Europe and the US, with particular attention to the Brexit vote and its
implications.
The bond bubble and potential economic collapse, the long view of the 2008 crisis, the importance of addressing climate
change, the necessity of internationalism, and many other topics are discussed in this wide-ranging interview with one of the
best economic minds in the world today.

- GlobalInfoFreeExchange

Some interesting parts of Varoufakis comments:

Brexit is also an economic phenomenon. Its not just a political revolt against the elites, against the EU, against the city of
London the bankers. The main reason why the English, not the British, the English working class voted to get out of the
EU, is the slow burning recession.

The fact that living standards in almost every town outside of London, within England is depressed. You walk through city
centers in Doncaster, in Leeds, in York and all you find is misery and desperation. A whole working class feels utterly
abandoned by the elites, even by the Labor Party, the Social-Democrats, and this is the reason why Brexit won.

The period between 2010 and today can be seen from a Greek perspective as an experiment. Greece was a laboratory in
which the globalized/financialized elites experimented with how they would try to deal with a crisis of their own making. And
the experiment produced monsters.
One of these monsters is the neo-nazis of Golden Dawn. The Donald Trump experience is also quite intimately connected.
The very notion that you have somebody like Trump running as candidate of one of the two major political parties in the US,
back in 2010-2012 it would be absurd.

The cruel, vicious austerity policies that were created in the Greek laboratory were then exported to the rest of Europe. This
experiment backfired because you can never deal with financial crisis through austerity.

This is one thing weve learned from the early 1930s which gave rise to the nazis in Germany. A period of deflation gave rise
to the worst kind of xenophobic Right-Wing populism. And this is what we have in the form of the Golden Dawn thugs hitting
Greece, Donald Trump in the US, the Right-Wing Brexiters in Britain.

What we have now is a bifurcation, word-wide not just in Greece, we are seeing the formation of two political blocs. One is
very similar to the troika of creditors that we had to deal with in Greece last year, who crushed us in the end.

Its a technocracy of globalized, financial capital, together with bureaucrats that want to spread their wings and
power globally.
They also corporate Atlanticists, those who want to utilize brute force in order to become, or remain the policemen of the
Cosmos. This political bloc of globalized, financialized Atlanticists have developed a capacity to be more tolerant with
minorities, less tolerant with racism, quite relaxed about migration, as long as it doesnt threaten their political capital.

In opposition to that, we have the xenophobic Populist Right, which is investing on racism, fear and nativist myths about the
return to some kind of kingship within the nation-state where you erect walls around your country the riffraff away. It is this
toxic confrontation between the nativists xenophobic Populist Right and the financialized, globalized Atlanticists pack who
dont even know how to stabilize the world that they aspired to create.

This conflict is always going to give rise to rather unpleasant developments for the whole of humanity. Hillary Clinton never
was and never will be part of the Left. The Social-Democrats in Germany are part of the problem, not part of the solution.

We have an opportunity now to cease upon the way this global economic and political crisis is developing, in order to do
what we failed to do in the 1930s. In other words, to create a solid, internationalist, progressive bloc that opposes the vicious
cycle between the globalization elites and the xenophobic populist reaction to it.
Hillary Clinton is part of the problem. Hillary Clinton run an outrageously, scandalously, sinister campaign against Bernie
Sanders. Hillary Clinton is in the pocket of the establishment. Hillary Clinton will probably start another war.

The crisis that hit us in 2008 has never gone away. It is simply transforming itself taking different guises and different parts
of the world even within our own countries. One day its the crisis of banks, the next day its the crisis of real investment, the
third day its the crisis of deteriorating the jobs quality and so on. But the crisis of Capitalism that hit us in 2008, just like the
crisis of Capitalism that hit in 1929 did not go away until the beginning of the WWII.

If you look at the 1920s and 1930s, fascism became dominant, hegemonic and took over governments with mass support,
only when industrial capital, at some point, in order to stem the rise of the Left Wing that was antithetical to capitals
interests, threw their lot in with the fascists. It was the support of industrialists in Germany and Italy that gave rise to the
nazis and the fascist governments.
So far, the establishment, the financialized capital, military-industrial complex and so on, have not thrown the lot in with the
fascists movements. Its what keeping them from power, but we should not take it for granted that this wont happen and we
should be prepared.

For the full ull interview visit: CounterPunch

The next step in the KM take-down plan for America is to build up a big totalitarian internal police force, which can
be turned upon the American Masses to oppress and tyrannize them, when necessary."

On The Need To Re-Boot The World Economy

Interviewed by David de Jong, Bloomberg News

We spoke to Yanis Varoufakis about what it would take to get the global economy back on track and restore investor
confidence. As you might expect, he had a very original perspective, and the economics to back it up.

Yanis Varoufakis on the European Constituion, Economic Disintegration and

Orwellianism

In this video the former finance minister of Greece and founder of DiEM25 (Democracy in Europe Movement 2025), Yanis
Varoufakis, provides us an insight into why the European constitution does not represent the people of Europe and lacks
substance.
He also talks about disintegration of the European Union, what forces are driving its demise and how Orwellian language is
used to hide this.

Do we have a constitution that represents the voice of the European people?

Could the EU disintegrate in the near future?

What are the observations that are pointing towards a disintegrating European Union?

Is Orwellianism being employed to deceive the population?

These questions and more are addressed in this video.

NZ Judge Lowell Goddard Quits As Head Of UK Inquiry Into Child Sex Abuse
August 10 2016 | From: Stuff

New Zealand judge Lowell Goddard has quit as head of a independent UK inquiry into child sex
abuse.

The IICSA was announced in July 2014 by then British prime minister David Cameron to interrogate previously
covered-up cases of child abuse in hospitals, care homes, churches and schools.

Related: There are so many paedophiles we can't jail them all, warns police chief as he calls for softer approach at
'lower levels' of crime

Related: VIP child sex abuse: 14 new corruption inquiries leveled against London police

Goddard's performance had been under scrutiny during her first year in the role and there has been criticism of the rate of
progress and the parameters of such a wide-reaching investigation.
Dame Lowell Goddard has quit as the head of UK independent inquiry into child sexual abuse. She's been criticised for her high salary - and her
holidays

She had asked for help with the "local law" and has said she needed "to know the local scene".

A 'Legacy of Failure'

Goddard said in a statement that deciding to take on the inquiry after it was beset with problems last year "was a huge step
to take as it meant relinquishing my career in New Zealand and leaving behind my beloved family".

She said the inquiry had a "legacy of failure" which had been "hard to shake off".

"With hindsight it would have been better to have started completely afresh. While it has been a struggle in many
respects I am confident there have been achievements and some very real gains for victims and survivors of
institutional child sexual abuse in getting their voices heard."

UK Home Secretary Amber Rudd confirmed Goddard wrote to her to offer her resignation as Chair.

"I want to assure everyone with an interest in the inquiry, particularly victims and survivors, that the work of the
inquiry will continue without delay and a new chair will be appointed," Rudd said.

Rudd said she knew it was a "difficult decision" for Goddard to make and was "grateful" for her experience, in a letter of
response.
 "I know how personally committed you have been to ensuring that the Inquiry is a success for those at its heart: the
survivors and victims."

Inquiry in 'Crisis'

Abuse victims have felt "betrayed" by the resignation, saying the inquiry has "descended into farce".

The BBC labelled Goddard's resignation as a "crisis" for the inquiry, while the Guardian said her departure is a "critical blow"
for sexual abuse victims who believed their truths of their experiences would finally be revealed.

Salary Scrutiny

Lowell Goddard's resignation letter to the UK Home Secretary Amber Rudd

Intense scrutiny for such a highly paid public position is the norm and her remuneration package is more than twice the
amount paid to the British prime minister.

This week, reports surfaced that Goddard had spent three months on holiday or overseas during her first year in the
$660,000 job, and was tipped to become the United Kingdom's highest paid public servant.

Goddard's basic salary was around 360,000 (NZ$660,000) a year, topped up with perks such as free business class flights
home, a 110,000 a year rental allowance, and a car and a driver, all paid for by the Home Office.
A UK child abuse support group hopes the inquiry into child sexual abuse won't be derailed by Lowell Goddard's sudden resignation

She spent 44 working days in New Zealand and Australia after becoming chair of the inquiry, the Times reported.

The time spent abroad was on top of her annual leave entitlement of 30 working days, an entitlement arranged when she
was appointed by Theresa May, the British home secretary at the time.

A spokesman for the inquiry said the judge was on inquiry business in New Zealand and in Australia, she remained "in
constant contact" with her London office and conducted "day to day" business.
She also worked with the Australian Royal commission on child abuse to learn about its experiences, the spokesman said.

The Australian commission said meetings were held with the [inquiry] on two occasions during 2015 and 2016, the report
said.

She also received a 12,000 (NZ$25,000) utilities allowance and the British Home Office pays for four return flights to New
Zealand per year for Lowell and her husband, Christopher Hodson QC.

The report said no evidence has been heard yet and aspects of the fledgling investigation were delayed by months.

Acting chair of the Minister and Clergy Sexual Abuse Survivors group Phil Johnson said he was surprised Lowell had spent
so much time abroad.

"The inquiry has already spent more than a year without hearing any evidence and we heard last week that
hearings on the Anglican church would not take place until late 2017. The immediate imperative should be
speeding up its work at home."

Third Chair to Resign

Goddard's appointment followed two former chairwomen stepping down owing to potential conflicts of interest.

At the time, Goddard said the inquiry would be long, challenging and complex.

Goddard has had a trailblazing career as one of the first women appointed a Queen's Counsel in New Zealand in 1988, and
in 1992 was made deputy solicitor-general overseeing prosecution of serious crime.

It's believed Goddard was the first High Court judge of Maori descent when she was appointed in 1995.

Related Articles:
 Police find 30 million images of child abuse in major anti-paedophile operation

VIP child sex abuse: 14 new corruption inquiries leveled against London police - accused of coverup

NZ judge could be United Kingdom's highest paid civil servant

Judge aims to bring truth and justice to UK sex abuse inquiry

NZ's Justice Lowell Goddard to head UK sex abuse inquiry

Jimmy Savile hospital abuse inquiry widens

Wikileaks Confirms Hillary Sold Weapons To ISIS + Wikileaks Will Release More
Emails On The Clinton Foundation FBI Has Enough Evidence To Indict
August 9 2016 | From: TheFreeThoughtProject / Infowars / Various

WikiLeaks Exposes Hillarys Stunning Connection to ISIS - Mainstream Media Blackout Ensues.

Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, claimed during the Democratic National Convention (DNC) that, We have
more material related to the Hillary Clinton campaign.

Related: DNC Insider: Clinton Being Pounded in Polls Dont Believe Mainstream Media!

Related: We Will Release More Emails on the Clinton Foundation FBI Has Enough Evidence to Indict
Staying true to their word, WikiLeaks, with one simple tweet, dropped another bomb on the Clinton campaign one so
damaging it will almost surely be ignored by the mainstream media.

The latest revelation by the whistleblower organization reveals Hillary Clinton was a director of, and received over $100,000
from, French industrial giant Lafarge, which was recently exposed as secretly sponsoring the Islamic State for profit.

These latest revelations expose the deep relationship between Hillary Clinton and Lafarge - a company proven to be
working with and funding ISIS. The information was released one week after a statement made by Wikileaks founder Julian
Assange, during an interview with Democracy Now, implicated Clinton as being connected to arming terrorists.

Hillarys hacked emails include info on Hillary arming jihadists, Assange said.

According to an investigative report in The Canary by respected academic and journalist Nafeez Ahmed:

Related: Paris strikes astonishing partnership with secret Isis sponsor tied to Hillary Clinton

Related: Media lie about Hillarys severe health condition

 "Documents obtained by several journalistic investigations reveal that Lafarge has paid taxes to the terror group to
operate its cement plant in Syria, and even bought Isis oil for years

Lafarge also has close ties to Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Apart from being a regular donor to
the Clinton Foundation, Clinton herself was a director of Lafarge in the early 1990s, and did legal work for the firm
in the 1980s. During her connection to Lafarge, the firm was implicated in facilitating a CIA-backed covert arms
export network to Saddam Hussein.

Among its earliest benefactors was former First Lady and current presidential hopeful, Hillary Clinton. From 1990
to 1992, Clinton served on Lafarges Board of Directors. Under her tenure, Lafarges Ohio subsidiary was caught
burning hazardous waste to fuel cement plants. Clinton defended the decision at the time.

Then just before her husband, Bill Clinton, was elected president in 1992, Lafarge was fined $1.8 million by the
Environmental Protection Agency for these pollution violations. Hillary Clinton had left the board of Lafarge in
spring, just after her husband won the Democrat nomination. A year later, under Bills presidency, the Clinton
administration reduced Lafarges EPA fine to less than $600,000.

This type of quid-pro-quo is found to be common throughout the whole of the political apparatus in the U.S. However, it has
become a specialty of the Clintons, a la the Clinton Foundation/State Department pay for play schemes, which
we highlighted in a recent article.

The investigative report by The Canary goes on to reveal the nefarious nature of the Clinton/Lafarge connection:

"In the late 1980s, according to an archived investigative report in the American Spectator, Hillary Clinton was
connected to Lafarge when the firm was involved in facilitating CIA support for Saddam Husseins secret weapons
programme.
 The American Spectator report from November 1996 cited sources confirming that Hillary Clinton did legal work for
Lafarge in the late 1980s before she became a director. The report also claimed that Lafarges US subsidiary:

provided key services for the covert arms export network that supplied Saddam Hussein. To prevent
exposure of that secret supply line, and collateral damage to Hillary Clinton who joined Lafarge board in
1990, just as the arms pipeline was being shut down the Justice Department was told to bury the
investigation But investigators from other US government agencies who worked on the case say they
were waved off whenever they got too close to exposing the direct involvement of the intelligence
community in the arms export scheme.

Lafarge remains close to the Clintons to this day. In 2013, Lafarges Executive Vice President for Operations, Eric
Olson, was a featured attendee at the Clinton Global Initiatives annual meeting.

The company is a regular donor to the Clinton Foundation the firms up to $100,000 donation was listed in its
annual donor list for 2015. Lafarge is also listed again as a donor to the Clinton Foundation for the first quarter of
2016."

The dark reality of these connections to the Clinton apparatus should raise serious red flags, and must be brought to light for
the American public to see.

The American people have a right to see the types of activities that have been carried out by Hillary Clinton and her cronies.
Since the mainstream corporate media refuses to provide a modicum of in-depth investigative coverage of the nefarious
deeds undertaken by the Clintons, it is up to citizens on social media to help awaken the sleeping masses.

Please share this critical information far and wide and help expose the depths of Hillarys corruption!

Related: WikiLeaks CONFIRMS Hillary Sold Weapons to ISIS Then Drops Another Bombshell

Related: Trump Savages Clinton on Short Circuit Remarks: Not Fit, Very Dangerous!

Hillarys Top 10 Accomplishments

Ever wondered what Hillary Clinton has accomplished in her decades-long career in public
service? Heres a list of some of her greatest achievements:
Related: Hillary Clinton's health in rapid collapse... voters in shock after photos show her unable to walk up small
flight of stairs

1) Avoided being charged for sharing classified information over her private email server including a list of undercover
intelligence agents who were likely killed after their identities were compromised

2) Receives protection from the mainstream media which attacks Donald Trump for controversies that amount to anthills
when compared to the mountain range of her scandals

3) Not questioned by the mainstream media over her poor health and coughing fits

4) Avoided being charged for her role in Benghazi which directly led to the death of four Americans

5) Went nearly a year without holding a press conference and answering questions from reporters

6) Outright stole the presidential nomination from Bernie Sanders, the most popular Democrat in the race who held more
influence than President Obama

7) Never held accountable for terrorizing women sexually assaulted by Bill Clinton

8) Avoided being charged for violating the Freedom of Information Act by using a private email server

9) Rarely if ever criticized by the mainstream media for her lies and unethical behavior while serving on the Watergate
impeachment staff

10) Transformed her failed law career into a political career by marrying Bill Clinton, who gave her name recognition and
connections

Related: Clinton Murder: Bernie Supporter With Fraud Lawsuit vs. DNC Suddenly Dies
13 Important Elements To Look For In Every Staged Shooting Event
August 8 2016 | From: ZenGardner

People who dont trust government, those who think on their own and tend to question what they
hear, by now are all becoming experts at identifying false flag staged events. With so many recent
staged psyop events in the news lately many of us are getting a lot of practice at this.

But have you considered that the script has become more complex than you think? Have you considered that you
(we) are being fooled in some way as we speak? Have you taken into account that the events happening today are
all happening in a post-Jade Helm revelation AI era? Todays events are happening in a very sophisticated world of
unimaginably deep levels of political corruption actively at work and deeply focused on removing all of our rights
and freedoms and cementing their new global order.

Related: The First Question To Ask After Any Terror Attack: Was It A False Flag?

This complex and deep reality alone is something many people refuse to face; and without facing this youll never be able to
peel and dig deeper into the deep states structure, mind and mechanisms that are behind these chaotic staged psyop false
flag events.

Notice Im using the terms false flag and staged events interchangeably because at times its difficult to determine which
one is actually happening. So its fair to say that false flags are types of staged events. Were all familiar with the different
types of events; mass shooting attacks by crazed supposed lone gunmen who are the selected patsies for the event.

We also see shootings where the government conveniently retroactively tells us the shootings are courtesy ISIS, ISIS
inspired or ISIS related. In recent events we also saw a focus on the paid-for engineered race war where the selected
shooters are looking to shoot ONLY police or only white police (Dallas sniper, Baton Rouge shooting).
Conveniently these shootings work great for fanning the flames of race and class tension and division while conveniently
boosting the police state and public sympathy for police.

Whatever the type of event, notice we rarely if ever get to see any evidence whatsoever of the actual accused patsy shooter
at the scene of the crime. For example, consider that its been weeks and still no one has any actual evidence of Omar
Mateen physically entering the Pulse night club in Orlando and physically firing and killing people.

Where are these videos? Yet the majority of people have him at the scene because thats how the story goes, and
apparently its almost too stressful to believe something no one else is saying. The same could be said of the accused truck
driver terrorist in Nice, France or the actual sniper (supposed) lone gunman shooter in Dallas, Texas. You get the picture.

This anomaly only scratches the surface on what this article is about. The fact is we are all now getting used to these events,
for better or for worse, and there are many elements being shown to us that most of us are not paying attention to.
The events themselves are huge to us only because the mainstream media puts them in our faces 24/7. They are important
because the government and their mass media says they are. They (the government and their media) say this because the
events are always part of a greater agenda.

The agenda and the event itself are inseparable in a world today where the masses are conditioned into reacting to a
presented problem whose solution is later sold to them. This process of problem, reaction, solution is undeniable and
obvious to all today.

The mechanisms of the script are openly available for all to see; but, as mentioned earlier, have you considered how deep
this staged event mechanism goes? Hopefully the following 13 elements were about to point out will bring more awareness
to these additional possibilities, agendas and factors which are quietly hidden in these events but as you will see are actually
hidden in plain view.

1: The Breaking News trigger phrase

The first thing I want to point out is the whole breaking news psyop phrase. Any professional hypnotist will tell you trigger
words and phrases are important when it comes to putting someone under your spell, so it shouldnt surprise us that
mainstream media would resort to using key trigger words on the general public.
They would definitely do this because it works. And this is precisely what they do, and breaking news is probably as clever
and effective a trigger word as there is in America today. It stops you in whatever you are doing and forces you to pay
attention to new information that may change your life.

Im sure that if you monitored someones vital signs and visceral response under controlled conditions you will find a direct
response to trigger phrases like breaking news when used in the right context. Lets be aware of this trigger phrase which
always sets the initial tone with typical staged false flag events.

2: Mainstream media voice tone, speech pattern and neuro-linguistic effect

Subliminal informational submission is accomplished with classic mainstream media authority speech patterns and key use
of neuro-linguistic terms (as discussed above) that many of us dont pay attention to. Go watch any segment of mainstream
media news and see how they all talk in a certain form.

There is a certain official pattern of speech that subliminally tells the audience this is official and true certified
informational. Heres a Wikihow page discussing this very topic and notice how news reporters go through a training process
to sound official and convincing.
This speech pattern, the use of key words and overall mannerism all contributes to the early hypnotic phase when the initial
story is being officially constructed and delivered to the public.

Look for it the next time you are watching mainstream media news. Notice how the pattern of the speech is similar with all
news anchors and presenters in all the mainstream media related networks.

3: Body count used to psychologically manipulate eventual reaction

Moving on to the events themselves, notice how the Illuminati CIA controlled media especially lately is using the body count
to attach political urgency to each shooting. They are implying that if only 1, 2 or 3 people die then its a boring maybe not so
important shooting, but if 50 die then we need to get all worked up and act more urgently with political interest and legislation
to match the body count somehow.

Dont fall for the body count psyop. They are also using the body count psyop to engage you emotionally in their misery and
fear as if to imply that a higher body count means this could have been you, which, again, somehow implies that a lower
body count is maybe not so likely to have involved you and thus less worthy of your emotional attention.

4: Overly-detailed eyewitness accounts containing compelling Hollywood-style human interest

elements

We are now seeing staged interviews with poor-acting crisis actors giving us Hollywood-style details of what they
experienced during the shooting event. Crisis actor Patience Carter, one of many actors who inexplicably packed out the
Pulse night club bathrooms instead of actually leaving the club during the Orlando shooting, dramatically tells of how she was
lying on the floor when the gun fight broke one of the water pipes and she thought she was going to drown.

This segment of the story is inserted only to draw your human interest and compel you to empathize with her.
 We have also seen the famous Gene Rosen interview
during Sandy Hook when he tells of 6 children who came to
his house speechless, telling him our teacher is dead and
how he followed up by giving them cookies and crying with
them.

Again this segment which was proven a lie with countless

inconsistencies, was inserted to add Hollywood-style
compelling human interest elements to the story. In the
case of Rosen, he ended up getting his own song written
after him!

And how about the testimony given by the sobbing 15-year-

old Kuwaiti girl, Nayirah, following the Iraq invasion of
Kuwait in 1990 when she testified:

"They took the babies out of the incubators, took the incubators, and left the babies on the cold floor to die."

Notice it wasnt just the floor it had to be the cold floor. All of this is staged propaganda just to compel human emotion, a
tactic that worked nicely in this case as it triggered the invasion of Iraq. Lets not fall for this element of the psyop now being
used regularly, and lets be on the lookout for it.

5: Control of the information at the ground level usually assigned to a key actor

With every event we are seeing someone at the ground level, usually a head police officer, now claiming that any
information not confirmed by them should be assumed to be false until they (and only they) say its true. We saw just this in
the recent Baton Rouge shooting and the Dallas, Texas sniper shooting.

Classically this brings to mind the one and only Lieutenant Paul Vance during Sandy Hook who declared himself the
information czar and bearer of truth and reality for the Sandy Hook show.

Again, lets not fall for the delusion that somehow police has a handle on what is real and verified truth surrounding any
event as if anyone trusts police. Since the beginning of the modern-day concept of police, police always get their information
from the people who were there not the other way around. The police themselves have never been assigned the controllers
of information for any crime scene.

So why are we suddenly deferring the details of the event to the police? But its not just police, at the Orlando nightclub
shooting we saw a team of doctors led by doctor Michael Cheatham controlling the information on behalf of hundreds of
people who would have been at the hospital.

We didnt hear from any maintenance person, nurse assistant, nursing student, radiology tech or anyone else at the hospital
in Orlando. Notice only Cheatham (and to a lesser extent his short list of fellow doctors who briefly spoke to the media) was
assigned to deliver the carefully controlled information.

Lets realize that information is now entirely controlled and the controllers are now appointing key players at the ground level
to control that information. With this control comes the threat of jail for anyone interfering with the official narrative. So in the
next event be on the lookout for the ground-level information gatekeeper.

6: Great fluctuations and changes of the narrative in the early phases of the story

Were all familiar with this next element. We listen to the initial version of the official account only to see the body count or
number of shooters change dramatically. This goes on until the authorities finally agree on the official version of what
happened.

The important thing to take notice of is that often well see the death count go from a higher number to a lower number, a
clear medical impossibility. Think to yourself, how can a body count go from higher to lower all the time? Shouldnt it be the
other way around?

And its not just the body count, the number of shooters (if there are any real shooters at all) always seems to be a problem
for the controllers, and in the end the smaller number usually works best once the assassins (if there are truly any) are
cleared to leave the scene as weve seen so many times.

7: Conflicting components potentially deliberately put out to authenticate the reality of the event

This next element is one of the most important and I urge truth seekers to pay close attention. We all saw the mysterious
man running through the woods at Sandy Hook wearing camouflage. Yet to this day no one really knows what was his role at
Sandy Hook which we now have reason to believe was not an operational school according to research done by Wolfgang
Halbig.

So why was this man briefly shown to us on TV in an era where information is so tightly controlled? Did they WANT you to
see the man running through the woods just to give the story authenticity? These are the questions we should be asking.
Why were 2 gas masks purposely left on the floor outside the theater at the Aurora Colorado shooting a few years back?
Why was even the mainstream media so quick to point out that Omar Mateen had been tracked by FBI and they knew about
him? Do you really think that the mainstream media wants you to see that the FBI is incompetent? I discussed this issue in
the context of the Orlando shooting before.

Regarding the Orlando night club event, ask yourself, why did CNN and the rest of the mainstream media allow the segment
to leak out about someone holding the door shut at the Orlando shooting so that no one can get out?

This segment should have shocked everyone. And why would the mass media then interview a man named Luis Burbano
who admits on camera that he was the one holding the door? This without question is one of the deep mysteries of the
Orlando shooting event which everyone by now has forgotten. See image below.

The point is that I firmly believe that elements are now being inserted that have several distinct effects. They serve the
purpose of authenticating the story. Even the alternative media quickly concluded that the event was real only it was a real
false flag narrative as in we believe the event happened, but it was done by paid government mercenaries or operatives.

This narrative may be entirely false but the additional segments that give it reality make it more believable. This again serves
the purpose of making the event real in one way or another to everyone but in different ways (divide and conquer) so that
those calling the entire event fake thus stand alone isolated in their views. Perhaps this is the point, again think in terms of
divide and conquer.

8: Obviously fake elements deliberately inserted to subliminally mock truth seeking community

Heres another element few are paying attention to. At this point I dont think theres any doubt that the controllers know that
a large segment of humanity has caught on to their staged events. So ask yourself, how would they use this information
against us?

How about creating an event with possible real components and then float out the obviously fake crisis actors to essentially
mock truth seekers. Again, this is a topic Ive hit on following the landmark Orlando shooting event that needs to be
reiterated.

Crisis actor victims were magically transported one block down the road only to stage a walk BACK TOWARD the Pulse
night club in front of the CNN cameras.

Why? We should all be asking this very important question. As I said in my previous articles did they WANT us to see
these obvious crisis actors? The goal is no less than to cause confusion and to potentially mock those who are looking for
the truth.

How about the crisis actor eyewitness posing for the camera at the Dallas, Texas sniper shooting practically wearing the
exact same American flag t-shirt as Christopher Hansen, the key crisis actor story teller of the Orlando event? Coincidence?
You decide.
We must now become aware of all of these elements to stay on top of the next false flag psyop event.

9: Staged cell phone footage to authenticate the story delivered by specific individuals

After doing some research Im very skeptical of the cell phone footage released during the Dallas sniper shooting. Listen to
the narrator of the video posted below and notice how he carefully narrates to point out where the shooter is.

Listen to him saying things like you see him moving around? and this guy is evil sorry, this guy needs to be killed even
though there is no way that he could know this information from the distance he is located.

According to the person who made the video below the narrator even claims to have footage of the actual shooting.
Conveniently that footage is missing and the channel he claims to have the video MK7Wolf conveniently is vanished from
YouTube.

Can it be because this video never existed? Calling for the shooters death again just seems to add to the authenticity of the
story and stirs up emotion. Watch the video for yourself beginning at around 12:40 and see what you think. Either way
(multiple shooter false flag or staged event) the video as a whole proves that the official story is a lie.

We saw similar conveniently timed sketchy cell phone footage taken of the chase at San Bernardino. Authenticating
segments of the chase was critical to the official story and the character who filmed the video, I believe, was staged there to
capture blurry indistinguishable footage that nonetheless lent authenticity to the story. We saw similar seemingly staged cell
phone footage segments at the Paris concert shooting as well.

So in the next psyop event dont fall so quickly for the ONE cell phone footage segment. Remind yourself that everyone has
a cell phone with a camera and we should be seeing massive amounts of cell phone footage of these events from many
different angles not just one.

10 Retroactive construction of the final story often takes days or weeks (or longer)
Does everyone know what stage we are in when it comes to the Orlando shooting event? Right now we are in what I will call
for the sake of this article the extended retroactive story construction period. This is the period of weeks and months
following a staged event when the controllers can roll out other events and stories to capture your attention and get your
attention away from the story.

During this period they can construct all the evidence they need but, unlike the early moments following the event, they can
actually take their time and construct this evidence with more precision and care.

For example, during this period they can construct additional surveillance camera video footage, they can pull out new
images that show the attacker entering the building, they can pull out new documents that support the official story, set up
their fake death certificates and much more.

Recall following 9/11, much later on the government released controlled images of the never before seen plane wreckage
at the Pentagon (see below) which of course on the day of the event there was not a sign anywhere of any plane having
crashed there to paraphrase Fox news own reporter on the scene.

Realize that you (we) are all being played and that with every day that goes by something else is being done to fool you. We
know they cant possibly have all their evidence ready at first and that is why they need time to synthesize their evidence.

This is what is currently happening for all the staged events weve witnessed in the recent past (June-July 2016) or so, and
Im not even going to get into the long distance story construction (think: I shot Bin Laden) and the eventual Hollywood
movie they will release to reinforce the story much later down the road.

11: Long and detailed narration of the aftermath by the mass media

Following every breaking news 24/7 psyop event notice how for the next week or two well get daily if not hourly fine tuning
of the story with lots of behind-the-scenes segments being added like for example mother of shooter apologizes, didnt see
this coming or girlfriend of shooter says he hated white people or gays or whatever it may be.

These aftermath segments are all designed to pad the official narrative and make you digest the reality of the context of the
event. As time goes on, of course, well always get details of the gun purchase, how the shooter obtained training and much
more. Obviously were all familiar with the usual manifesto as well.

12: Early reaction to the event, televised ceremonies create backdrop for multi-million dollar
funding campaigns and call for new legislation

Ive already discussed this element in previous articles but its worth mentioning again here. The long emotional and morality
based ceremonies talking about god and the lord, love, forgiveness at a time like this, are all part of the period setting
up the big money train and legislation that is to follow.
The ceremonies thus act as a calm before the storm and charges up the participants into an emotional state where they are
prepared to take action. Who can forget Sandy Hook crisis actor and fake FBI agent David Wheeler (along with his wife)
touring the country telling his compelling story, desperately calling for gun control.

13: Subsequent psyop staged false flag events are used as opportunities to rekindle the reality
of past events

Finally, we are now seeing how staged false flag events are being used as golden opportunities to rekindle the memory of
other staged events just in case you have forgotten.

Look for this tactic which they are using every time now. This is a reminder that the gun control agenda is a process. Its not
about one event, they are in a mission filled with many events that need reinforcement. The events are playing out differently.
Some may have elements of reality and others not.

They are potentially mixing realities and challenging you to guess which one it is. Confusion and chaos, as I pointed out in a
recent article, are the goal and now the norm.
Plain and simple, as I continue to warn, were all being played in one way or another. The deception is so deep I can only
present, as I see it, the various segments of these ongoing deceptions. No one said this information war and defending
freedom would be easy and for anyone still in the old model of real event versus false flag real event you are falling
behind in the information war.

As I said earlier, the tactics are now much more sophisticated and the game has changed. The goal is to confuse you into
submission and we have to look at all elements of these events in the context of our new reality.

If you agree please share this message.

Related: People Are Finally Learning About False Flag Terror

Propaganda War Raging

August 7 2016 | From: KiwiWatch

A war has already commenced and it is dangerous as any war in history with the U.S. and western
subservient countries on one side with Russia & China on the other. The pitch for our minds is in
full motion and nothing will stop this media onslaught aimed at ensuring populations meekly if not
blindly follow our leaders to an eventual real shooting war.
Joe Biden wasnt calling in to just say Hi to John Key for the sake of it. He was here to enforce the TPPA deal from
foundering as it appears to struggle for traction in the U.S. itself plus negotiate to send (nuclear armed) warships to
our waters that encircles New Zealand as a U.S. ally and regrettably therefore potential target.

All the years of New Zealand standing up and being counted against nuclear weapons is now put on the line by John Key.
Of course U.S. warships will come, who is he kidding that he is considering the situation, the invitation has been sent!

The beat-up by the U.S. in the South China Sea is very dangerous as the aim is to force China to back down over the
reclaimed atolls pitching the U.S. against China aiming to enforce U.S. domination in Asia and the Pacific.

China views the South China Sea as its backyard and sphere of influence, is nuclear armed and on high alert. Its one of
New Zealands largest trading partners without which we become massively poorer. This is a nuclear armed confrontation
for power.
Meanwhile, the anti Russian media frenzy about banning all Russian Olympic athletes from Rio is disgusting hypocrisy.
Stirred as always from the U.S. that has politicised the Olympic movement like none other, it is out of control. Has any
reporter in New Zealand investigated the report contents? I suggest not, this is pure U.S. media driven propaganda.

Canadian lawyer Richard McLaren the author of the so called damning report issued by WADA, himself says in an
interview to RT (and available for anyone to view if they care to listen to McLaren speak himself) that he only had 57 days
to write the report. The implication is that a comprehensive report actually requires a longer time frame.

More importantly McLaren says he did not go to Russia to interview anyone and spoke to no Russian officials or athletes at
all. Excuse me, but surely if you are going to make a whole range of accusations that are going to impact hundreds of
athletes you would actually go and see for your self just what is going on before judgement?
Apparently not, so how can this be a credible report? Its massively damaging to Russia but that is the objective of this
whole exercise. Demonize and damage Russia however you can.

The McLaren report was commissioned in response to accusations made by Grigory Rodchenkov, the former head of the
Moscow Anti-Doping Laboratory to the New York Times. Rodchenkov alleged that he switched the athletes samples as he
dumped tainted urine into a nearby toilet, washed out the bottles, dried and filled them with clean samples.

McLaren calls Rodchenkov a credible and truthful person, even though he is facing criminal proceedings in Russia on
charges by Russias Investigative Committee. Of course, he absconded to the U.S. and is continuing the same line of
practice in Los Angeles that he was responsible for in Russia.

Someone facing criminal charges in Russia is not an unbiased witness but the blanket ban of all Russian athletes is the
outcome based on a report delivered to satisfy the expectations of American and Canadian interests intending to politicise
the Olympic movement.
I agree absolutely that doping in sport must be eliminated if at all possible and I have no doubt that there are plenty of
Russian drug cheats but this is different, the media frenzy over Russian State Sponsored doping is a charge that is far
higher yet McLaren hasnt talked to any Russian.

Its easy to poke accusations at anyone, make them out to be the worst possible beings and that is what has been achieved
in everyones mind whatever the truth is about Russian sport. Hypocritically the United States and Canada are far from
immune from drug cheating and no doubt some of their athletes will reappear as cheats again.

Americans Carl Lewis, Marion Jones, Flo Jo, Tyler Hamilton, Tyson Gay and Canadian Ben Johnson were all drug cheats
with Jones, Johnson, Gay and Hamilton all losing their Olympic medals but that is only scratching the surface. The
propaganda has worked.

Dying Of Thirst: Privatization Of Water As An Owned Commodity Rather Than A

Universal Human Right
August 6 2016 | From: Sott

There is no greater natural resource on this earth than water. As the sustenance of all life, water
keeps every living and breathing organism, every plant, every animal and every human being on
this planet alive. In the same way that without air to breathe, without water we humans cannot
sustain life for more than a few days.
Due to "global warming", widespread drought [Read: Geoengineering] and increasingly polluted water systems, the
projected availability of clean freshwater in years to come to meet the rising demands of a growing global
population is among the most daunting human challenges of this century.

Related: Elation As Ashburton Council Backs Out Of Controversial Water Bottling Deal

By 2015 a 17% increase in global water demand is projected just for increasing agriculturally produced food. By the same
year 2025, the growing global population will increase water consumption needs by a whopping 40%. While oil played the
keenly critical role during the twentieth century, water is being deemed the most valued precious natural resource
of the twenty-first century.

As such, several years ago the United Nations declared access to clean drinking water a universal human
right. Conversely, willfully denying it is considered a serious human rights violation that denies life itself. And any calculated
decision denying people their universal right to life is nothing short of a murderous, shameful crime against humanity.

Despite the human air pollution that has long been dirtying our lungs, while also causing global warming, climate change
and increasing catastrophic natural disasters, not to mention the growing global health hazard for us humans, the very
thought of making clean air a precious commodity that can opportunistically be packaged and sold by the same corporations
that have been ruining our air, that very notion would instantly be criticized, scorned and ridiculed.

Yet that is exactly what has been happening for the last thirty years now all over this planet with the earth's preciously
dwindling freshwater drinking supply. The World Bank has been financing global privatization of the earth's water supply
making clean water that is so necessary for survival an unaffordable private commodity for the poorest people on earth to
even access.
They are literally dying of thirst and disease because of greedy psychopathic corporate profiteers once again
placing theft and greed over human welfare and life itself.

But then that is the globalist agenda - thinning the human herd down from near seven billion currently to as low as just half a
billion. That means 13 out of 14 of us alive today according to their diabolical oligarch plan simply must die within the next
few years. And what better way to rapidly kill off the human population than taking full ownership and control over the earth's
limited diminishing water supply.

More people on this planet are dying presently from waterborne disease from dirty water than are dying from all wars and
violence worldwide combined. Every hour 240 babies die from unsafe water. 1.5 million children under five years of
age die every year from cholera and typhoid fever due to unsanitary water conditions.

These incredibly sad, alarming facts illustrate just how significant and critical a clean freshwater supply is to staying alive on
this planet. Taking control over the earth's clean water supply is achieved by turning water into a privately owned commodity
that only the largest corporations and banks control.

Simply making water unaffordable and thereby inaccessible to the poorest people on the planet is one extremely effective,
albeit most sinister way to reduce the so called overpopulation problem.

Three primary ways that the human population decreases significantly every year is death caused by starvation
and malnutrition (including lack of drinkable water) at between seven to eight million people, diseases that kill
between two to three million (with mounting threats of infectious diseases becoming pandemics) and upwards of
near a half million dying each year from war.

Behind closed doors oligarchic globalists periodically meet and discuss what is best for humanity and the planet according
to them and their megalomaniacal self-interests.

For many years now this all important topic of water privatization and control as a convenient and most effective means of
addressing the overpopulation problem has been regularly tabled for discussion... along with related topics like geo-
engineering, GMO's, vaccines, overuse of antibiotics, planned wars over oil and water, devising global policies designed to
increase political destabilization, poverty and undermine economies, nuclear radiation and a host of other means for culling
the human population.
Time Magazine reported how the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been financing research at the University of North
Carolina among 78 others to develop ultrasound infertility contraception techniques to sterilize male sperm.

At a 2010 TED conference Bill Gates spoke openly of depopulating the total of 6.8 billion people living on earth by up to "10
to 15%" using both of his heavily funded vaccine and contraception programs that will render much of the global population
infertile.

Meanwhile, billionaire Ted Turner went even further, offering his public opinion to decrease the world population by 70%
down to "two billion." It too is on tape.

Calls to begin sterilizing the human population began surfacing back in the mid-1970's with Henry Kissinger as former
Secretary of State and high ranking Bilderberg member in his declassified National Security Council document (1974)
entitled "The Implications of World-wide Population Growth on the Security and External Interests of the United States."

This document emphasized highest priority given to implementing birth control programs targeting thirteen Third World
nations mostly in South America. Extraordinary resources were allocated through the U.S. Agency for International
Development (USAID) pushing the carrot stick of additional financial aid to countries willing to enact sterilization and
depopulation programs.

More overt evidence of the callous contempt that globalist oligarchs have toward us 99%-ers is captured in a statement
written by Prince Phillip, Queen Elizabeth II's husband in the forward of his book, "I must confess that I am tempted to ask
for reincarnation as a particularly deadly virus" to reduce the human population.
It seems readily discernable that an explicit globalist agenda for a New World Order openly propagated with repeated
references by President Goerge Bush senior includes depopulation through various means, water control through
privatization just one of many in the power elite's arsenal.

Humans have been dying from lack of clean water for a long time now and will only continue dying at an even greater
frequency if the plan to privatize water continues to unfold unchecked and without opposition. Fortunately forces have been
mobilizing to combat water privatization.

Just last week on the heels of the World Bank annual convening in Washington DC for several days of conferencing, an
international coalition of anti-privatization water rights groups from India and America sent a formal message calling on the
World Bank to end its destructive practice of privatizing water around the world under the guise of developmental progress.

The Bank's DC meetings had been touting lies and disinformation in an attempt to paint a glowing report showcasing the so
called efficacy and successes that turning water rights over to the private sector have accomplished in recent years.

The World Bank's International Finance Corporation (IFC) as the planet's largest funding source for water
privatization provides loans and financing to Third World nations for private water management companies to take
charge of municipal, regional and national water rights.

The director of a global advocacy group called Corporate Accountability International, Shayda Naficy, pointed out that 75%
of expenses for running a water utility company should go to infrastructure. In nation after nation private companies have
placed the priority of making a profit over the need to invest in necessary infrastructure to connect and adequately service
water customers.

In efforts to maximize cost efficiency as well as profits, water prices invariably go up and fast become out of reach for
poorest customers. Cutting off the water supply to thousands of low income families unable to pay for their rising costs has
become the all too frequent inevitable result.

The World Bank's 34 percent failure rate for all private water and sewerage contracts between 2000 and 2010 far surpasses
its single digit failure rates in the telecommunications, energy and transportation industries.

Critics maintain that the public sector is far more accountable to its public constituents than private sector businesses that
only answer to its board of directors to show sufficient profits.
Corruption becomes commonplace. Additionally, a conflict of interest exists when the IFC acts as both a money lender and
consultant to foreign municipalities in assigning no bid contracts to favored private water utility companies.

To best illustrate typical scenarios where water privatization is either not working or already proved a failure deserve close
examination. The good news is that in recent years people in various parts of the world have been mobilizing successful
efforts and campaigns to stop water privatization in their own backyards.

Presently in a number of regions in India, citizens are banding together to confront and fight the myriad of problems with
water privatization in their country.

Recently in Nagpur, central India's largest city where the country's first municipal partnership with a private utility company is
being played out, major tensions have erupted. Three years ago the city signed a 25-year contract with Veolia Water to
supply the city of 2.7 million residents with 24 hour-7-days a week water service.

Instead unforeseen delays driving up prices manyfold along with unfair water distribution and frequent service breakdowns
have led to widespread angry protests in the streets and charges of corruption. City officials point to a series of serious
contract violations.

Again cutting corners by refusing to invest in the needed infrastructure appears to be the primary cause for this failed
project. The Corporate Accountability International's 2012 report called "Shutting the Spigot on Private Water: The Case for
the World Bank to Divest" cites a number of similar cases where privatization has proven ineffective.

Bold and empowered citizens in Bolivia in the year 2000 made headlines around the globe when they were victorious in
kicking out privatized water there in the form of the Bechtel, the fifth largest private corporation on the planet. Impassioned
protestors in Bolivia's third-largest city managed to oppose Bechtel's increasing prices and demanded that the company
abandon its hold on their city's municipal water supply, eventually driving the powerful scandalous giant out of the country.

Though big business efforts to buy and control water rights in many Latin American nations have each had their turn in
nations like Equator and Brazil, only Chile water services are privatized.

Ultimately local residents virtually everywhere privatization has attempted to take hold has been met with such strong
resistance from consumers who realize their private utility company has failed miserably in delivering quality service at
affordable prices.

The story is always the same. That is why advocacy groups like Corporate Accountability International is proactively working
toward educating governments and citizens worldwide to ensure water remains under the public domain.

The exhaustive and expensive legal process of ending long term contracts and successfully removing privatized foreign
corporations once established in a city, state or country is formidable. It is obviously in the best interests of people around
the world to ensure privatization of their water supply never gets a local foothold in the first place.

Nestl corporation's marketing campaign targeted wealthy Pakistanis in Lahore, and its brand of bottled water 'Pure Life'
became a status symbol for the rich. To bottle its product, Nestl busily dried up local underground springs that
subsequently caused the village poor unable to buy the bottled water stolen from their springs to end up consuming
contaminated water.
Nestl went on to extracting water from two deep wells in Bhati Dilwan village, forcing them to turn to bottled water. A similar
story emerged from Nigeria where a single bottled water exceeds the average daily income of a Nigerian citizen. Nestl is
notorious for draining local water supplies used to bottle its water brands, then charge unaffordable prices to the
local population whose clean water supply was stolen from them.

Corporate Watch released a report exposing some of the unethical and illegal practices that Nestl has long been
committing around the globe, completely disregarding public health concerns while destroying natural environments to
ensure huge annual profits of $35 billion just from water bottle sales alone.

In Brazil's Serra da Mantiqueira region where the groundwater is rich in mineral content containing medicinal properties,
over-pumping has depleted its valuable water resources and caused permanent damage to the natural environment. and
long-term damage.

Nestl has also allegedly been involved in human trafficking of child slave labor. A BBC investigative report claimed that:

"Hundreds of thousands of children in Mali, Burkina Faso and Togo were being purchased from their destitute
parents and shipped to the Ivory Coast to be sold as slaves to cocoa farms."

Yet Nestl likely bought the cocoa from the Ivory Coast and Ghana knowing it was produced using child slaves.

Finally, Nestl owns or leases fifty spring sites throughout America. Nestl controls a third of the domestic market for bottled
water in the US. The company is notorious for unlawful extraction of spring water while engaging in price-gouging and
reeking havoc in numerous communities.

An example of the trouble Nestl typically causes is Colorado where 80% of the citizens of Aurora were opposed to Nestl's
presence, fully aware of the company's terrible reputation for damaging communities and natural environments. Yet the city
council voted in favor 7 to 4 to let the devastation begin and over the next decade Nestl extracted 650 million gallons of
precious Arkansas River valley water that went into its Arrowhead Springs brand of bottled water.

For years the embattled townspeople of Aurora fought to rid the company predator from destroying their precious aquifers.
Additionally, the plastic non-biodegradable bottles are major pollutants that stay toxically intact for a full millennium.

Related: Profits for psychopathic corporations! Nestl CEO says water should be privatized - not a basic human
right
The cumulative grave effects of privatizing water as a global commodity are appalling. The underprivileged residents of
Jakarta, Manila and Nairobi pay 5 to 10 times more for water than those living in high-income areas of those same cities.
People living in the Third World slums even pay more for water than upscale New Yorkers and Londoners.

This kind of unfairness and inequity is obscene. Women in places in Africa where privatized water is beyond their limit walk
miles to obtain dirty water from rivers and then too often die along with their children from contamination and disease. Asian
farmers are losing their livelihoods if they are unable to receive state funded irrigation.

The human suffering caused globally by wealthy private corporations from North America and Europe exploiting people from
Third World nations for pure profit is nothing less than pure psychopathic evil.

Taking on global privatization of water for the well being and greater good of the people is but an example of the
monumental work that needs to be done. Only if informed, caring and committed human beings collectively come together
worldwide to take a global stand against this gravest of life and death issues facing humanity can this oligarch agenda be
stopped dead in its tracks.

As global human rights activists it is up to us to end the global corporate malevolence and malfeasance from further
damaging and afflicting our planet like never before.
With the recent formal finding that the western world no longer lives in a democracy but an oligarchy, as if we did not already
painfully know, it becomes even more "formally" imperative now that we as ordinary citizens of the world take the vested
interest in preserving life on our only planet before it becomes too late.

It is high time we take back our planet once and for all from the oligarchic corporatocracy bent on insidiously making our
earthly home increasingly uninhabitable for all life forms.

Mass extinction of plant and animal species that have thrived on this planet for millions of years is silently, invisibly taking
place every single day right before our eyes.

At ever-perilous stake now is our own human species as well as all living species inhabiting this earth, suffering at the hands
of national governments that have corruptly co-opted with the banking cabal-owned transnational corporations and for too
many decades been systematically destroying the richly diverse natural ecosystems of all earthly life forms on an
unprecedented scale.
Since governmental co-opting with global fortune 500 corporations has been polluting and poisoning the earth's skies, its
waters, food sources and seeds for so long, global theft and destruction has us humans and all life forms teetering now on
the brink of complete self-annihilation and extinction, human-induced for the first time on a massive never before seen scale.

It is time to hold the oligarchy in the form of corporations responsible for all the damage they have reeked on this earth.

No more grotesque "Abama-nations" of bank and Wall Street bailouts at taxpayer expense. Since the 99% in debt to the hilt
have been squeezed dry, while the 1% have made this planet nearly unlivable as the only ones filthily richly profiting from
their plundering this earth, the transnationals are the sole entities with the financial capital and means to clean up the very
mess they created.

It is only fair then that after an entire century of mucking the planet up at our expense, that they now need to finally be held
accountable for repairing the destruction they directly caused and obscenely profited from.

FLOW - For the Love of Water

Irena Salina's award-winning documentary investigation into what experts label the most important political and
environmental issue of the 21st Century - The World Water Crisis.
Salina builds a case against the growing privatization of the world's dwindling fresh water supply with an unflinching focus on
politics, pollution, human rights, and the emergence of a domineering world water cartel.

Interviews with scientists and activists intelligently reveal the rapidly building crisis, at both the global and human scale, and
the film introduces many of the governmental and corporate culprits behind the water grab, while begging the question "CAN
ANYONE REALLY OWN WATER?"

Beyond identifying the problem, FLOW also gives viewers a look at the people and institutions providing practical solutions
to the water crisis and those developing new technologies, which are fast becoming blueprints for a successful global and
economic turnaround.

New Zealand Troops To Stay In Iraq For Another 18 Months: John Key
August 5 2016 | From: KiwiWatch

John Key and his government is going to retain New Zealand troops in Irag for another 18 months
also deploying them to a second military base with the total associated costs now reaching
$50million for the New Zealand taxpayer to fork out. He says, according to the Hawkes Bay
Today item of June 21st that the Work in Iraq is not done, that it would be difficult to do nothing
when 66 other countries were contributing.
This is rubbish and must be condemned. Contributing to what?

Related: Exposed - Iraq War Was A Lie: The Invasion Of Iraq Took Place Under False Pretences

The disaster impacting Iraq and costing millions of Iraqi lives either dead, maimed or now displaced and homeless is entirely
an American war of aggression, an illegal invasion based on lies (weapons of mass destruction of which there were
none) and into which the U.S. has dragged a number of subservient countries like New Zealand that acquiesce to American
commands. John Key is one foreign Prime Minister who serves U.S. expectations at our expense.

Defence Minister Gerry Brownlee says we are training Iraqis to be able to take control of their own lands and fight Islamic
State, but this is also a lie. NZ is involved in Iraq because we were pressured to get involved by America so as to make the
destruction of this once proud country seem like all of the West (the coalition of the willing) is there fighting terrorism.
Rubbish.
Related: Message From Iraqi Children To America And The World + Israeli IDF Colonel Leading ISIS Terrorists
Arrested in Iraq

The terrorist is the United States itself driven by Washington neocons (predominantly Zionist Jews) with one objective; a
destabilised and weakened Middle East being part of the Greater Israel policy, part of the original vision enunciated by the
founding father of Zionism Theodore Herzl now promoted by the Israeli government and supported in the U.S. by the Jewish
Lobby, an immensely powerful political group in the U.S. politics.

Greater Israel consists of an area from the Nile to the Euphrates and involves the exclusion of Palestinians from their own
lands and the Jewish settlement in occupied Palestinian lands.

Related: Top Israeli General Speaks Out Against Israels Crimes Against Palestinians + Parallels Between Israel &
1930's Germany & Ten Facts Why Netanyahu Is A Criminal And That Israel Is A Rogue State

Iraq is predominantly Islamic so which part of Iraqi Islamists are we training? Are they Sunni or Shia and then which sect of
these Islamic divisions? Out of the vacuum of destruction delivered by U.S. bombs rose Islamic State, the violent group that
the CIA secretly funded for years in Libya and continue to do so now in neighbouring Syria.

These are indisputable facts not reported by mainstream to keep us in the dark about American objectives. Among others, it
is to grab the oil, oil that is now reported recently contracted by the newly U.S. installed puppet government of Iraq to U.S.
oil companies.

I wonder why Gerry Brownlee recently visited Israel in early May? The visit was kept pretty quiet, the Blog site Whale
Oil being the first to reveal the news. Perhaps to discuss trade? Or perhaps to discuss new farming techniques? Its
doubtful that any of these things were discussed.
It is far more likely that Brownlee was there to be bought off by the Israeli government to become a strong advocate of
continuing war in Iraq and Syria. This is how they operate.

So here we are: New Zealand doing its bit helping the big players in their dirty war of attrition in Arab lands where we blame
the Arabs for all the wrongs in the world as we crush them one country after another creating crises the world over.

Maybe even Brexit is an unexpected outcome to the global elites that is a response to the refugee crisis created by the
bombing and destruction of Syria.

Even more importantly, how many more schools or hospitals are New Zealanders forgoing to remain entrenched, indeed
trapped into an American war that is none of our doing or business? Our media and the entertainment dished up nightly on
Television is all about numbing minds to expect war, indeed to glorify war.
It is outrageous that we are involved with troops in Iraq training the locals to in fact continue to kill even more of themselves
because this work will never be complete. There are much bigger agendas in play, none of which are our business accept to
object to these policies of destruction, much less to be part of them. We should indeed choose to do nothing.

Bring our troops home now and condemn American led hostilities in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, indeed anywhere in the world.

Related: Israel - A Nation Founded Upon A Monumental Lie

NATO Information Operations: War Is Peace, Freedom Is Slavery

August 3 2016 | From: SouthFront

Psychological Operations or PSYOP are planned operations to convey selected information and
indicators to audiences to influence their emotions, motives, objective reasoning, and ultimately
the behavior of organizations, groups, and individuals.
The beginning of interest in post-Cold War information operations can be traced to the UN intervention in Somalia
and the Rwanda Genocide. Relatively honest and direct reporting from these war zones meant that the public
opinion of Western countries was a factor that had to be considered by the political classes.

Hence the complaining at the time about the so-called CNN Effect which forced the politicians to send and/or withdraw
troops irrespective of what the elites actually wanted to happen at the time.

The early methods of influencing the public opinion by manipulating the media, though reasonably effective, were not
enough.

We have seen their strengths and limitations during both wars against Iraq, in which the bulk of the media was effectively
co-opted through the process of frequent press briefings (featuring no shortage of videos showing NATO bombs unerringly
falling toward their obviously evil targets) and later by embedding the mostly male reporters in military units, which
naturally had the dual effect of stroking their egos and adopting the militarys point of view.

Still, in spite of all that, it proved impossible to control the narrative, and the public support for the various US and NATO
wars collapsed under the pressure of inconvenient news coming even from mainstream media which clearly maintained a
degree of independence.

But if you fast-forward a decade, to the current wars in Libya, Syria, Yemen, Iraq, Ukraine, and others, it is clear that
something has changed. There is one dominant narrative that is being pushed by literally every mainstream media source,
irrespective of their ostensible ideological bent.
No matter where you turn, you read or hear about Assads barrel bombs, Gaddafis massacres, or Russian aggression.

These reports invariably represent a point of view that is not only completely one-sided, but also factually wrong, even on
the most basic of issues. How did US and NATO manage to achieve such an amazing discipline within the supposedly free
and independent Western media?

There are essentially three parts to the answer: state oversight of the media; co-opting individual reporters; disseminating
propaganda through covert means.

The first two are obvious enough and have long been practiced. Media corporations are just that corporations, subject to
variety of laws and regulations whose enforcement can be used to steer individual outlets toward adopting a desired point of
view.

Individual reporters coin of the realm is access to privileged information, which may be granted or withheld depending on
their effectiveness as government propagandist. The third, the covert dissemination of propaganda, is new, and that factor
likely explains the lack of variation from one media outlet to the next.

The media are no longer merely encouraged to toe the official linethey have the stories planted for them to pick up through
social media and other unofficial channels.
The so-called investigations of the MH17 disaster is a case study, though a fairly crude one due to Ukraines crude methods
of information warfare.

But it is evident that nearly all the evidence implicating Russia or the Novorossia insurgents was prepared by Ukrainian
secret services, then laundered through social media, before being presented to Western audiences as the truth, the only
truth, and nothing but the truth.

NATO is conducting similar operations which are harder to identify and counter because they are more sophisticated, better
institutionalized, and provided with higher levels of funding. The United Kingdom, for example, maintains the 77th Brigade
whose subunits include the Media Operations Group and the shadowy 15th Psychological Operations Group that has been
dubbed the Twitter detachment.

Germany has established the ZOpKomBw, or the Bundeswehr Rapid Communications Center. In the US, information
operations against the US population appear to be the responsibility of the intelligence community, which is understandable
considering the taboo on US military operations on US territory.
As such, they remain largely out of public scrutiny, though their handiwork can be readily seen in the form of unverifiable
reports from a variety of war zones, and even placing specially prepared witnesses in front of Congressional committees.
Even non-NATO countries like Sweden are following suit by establishing their own information operations units intended for
waging information war on its own population.

At the NATO level, information operations are coordinated by NATO doctrine JP 13-3 Information Operations, with practical
applications honed by alliance-wide exercises such as the Multinational Information Operations Experiment (MNIOE).

Western voters have been accepting of all these measures because they were sold to them as part of their countries
counter-terrorism measures.

What they failed to take into account is that terrorism is a phenomenon that knows no borders, with the enemy already
present among Western societies.
Which means that, if counter-terrorist information operations are to be effective, they also have to be aimed at
Western publics.

In the short-term, information operations may be effective in manufacturing popular support for policies that otherwise no
free society would accept. In the longer term, bypassing the public opinion means the elites are now more free than ever to
embark on highly dangerous international adventures that will likely backfire and lower even further the already low standing
of the elites.

Therefore the fact that the so-called free world elites increasingly have to resort to such dirty tricks in order to
stay in power means that their grasp on power is slowly weakening.

"The End Game Is A New World Order"- Former Canadian Minister Of Defence Speaks
Out + The Globalists Say It In Their Own Words
August 1 2016 | From: EMN / AustralianNationalReview / Various

"They decided to use the monetary system to crush countries instead of armies." - Paul Hellyer

Paul Hellyer is one of Canadas best known and most controversial politicians. As Former Minister Of Defence,
Hellyer has been exposed to the inner workings of Canadas political and military systems.

Related: Ex Canadian Minister Of Defence Hon. Paul Hellyer Calls On Citizens To Oust The Cabal

At The Hearing on UFO Disclosure sponsored by the Alien Cosmic Expo in Brantford, Ontario this past June 25, 2016,
Hellyer addressed a filled convention hall of people, cameras and reporters, asking the question; Who is the next Empire?

Pointing to the cabal of banking cartels, the oil cartel, big transnational corporations, the trilateral commission, intelligence
agencies in the USA, UK, Israel, and the American military who are working in concert to crush countries economically and
rule the world, Hellyer states that the cabal is running the US for the last half century to the point where Presidents have
been little more than talking heads with the Congress being clueless as to what is going on.
 The end game is a world government, the New World Order, unelected and accountable only to them. Heller
exclaims.

Thats what they are doing. They decided to use the monetary system to crush countries instead of armies.

If what we are seeing in Europe with BREXIT and the entire European Union experiencing financial turmoil, Paul Hellyer
and his message needs to be heard!

And here's Obama's video, sheesh why don't you say what you really think, Barack?

"And for the international order that we have worked for generations to build.

Ordinary men and women are too small minded to govern their own affairs.

That order and progress can only come when individuals surrender their rights to an all-powerful
sovereign."

- Barack Obama [See video below]

And if we haven't got your attention yet, here's this original old doozey from George H.W. Bush on
September 11, 1991:

Followed By This synopsis - David Rockefeller & Co: The One World Order Theory Is True

David Rockefeller, one of the oldest billionaires in the world who is turning 101 this June, has said that he is proud to be
accused of creating a One World Order, a group of selected elites who planned to exploit America for their own interests.

Some even believe [the Rockefellers] are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United
States, characterising my family and me as internationalists conspiring with others around the world to build a
more integrated global political and economic structure one world, if you will. If thats the charge, I stand guilty,
and Im proud of it.

- David Rockefeller, 2002.

Enjoy some more juicy NWO quotes here: 150+ New World Order Quotes
David Rockefeller, whose family has been one of the most influential ones in the US - to the extent that they were
equated as the Royal Family of the US- does not regret the charges. Nor does he regret that his family has been at the
receiving end of the conspiracy theory.

Governor Nelson Rockefeller of New York

In an article entitled "Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite: Calls at Harvard for Drive to Build New World Order"
New York Times, February 1962

The United Nations, he told an audience at Harvard University, "has not been able - nor can it be able - to shape
a new world order which events so compellingly demand." ...

The new world order that will answer economic, military, and political problems, he said, "urgently requires, I
believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and
aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach."

Senator Jay Rockefeller

John Davison " Jay " Rockefeller IV roasts Pat Buchanan in 1991 shows his true colors of a globalist psychopath out to
manipulate and control the world:

On the other hand, David Rockefeller says he is happy that his familys name has been dragged into the conspiracy theory,
which wants to establish that the Rockefellers and other rich and famous wanted to benefit at the expense of the poor.

The only billionaire in the world over 100 years old, Davids family has a tradition of being involved in such
controversies. His grandfather John D Rockefeller who died in 1937 was the founder of Standard Oil and the worlds
richest individual at that time.

Over the years, the family has had its own time under the sun and was associated with wealth, power, politics, finance,
diplomacy, philanthropy, marijuana prohibition, aliens, UFOs and finally the infamous conspiracy theories.

Of course the NWO is not just about the Rockefellers, they an American offshoot - and have probably been more loose-
lipped about the NWO agenda than others.

In Europe of course we have the Rothschilds along with a number of other "Illuminati" / Khazarian Zionist families with
many interrelated factions and networks.

Related: The Top Of The Pyramid: The Rothschilds, The Vatican And The British Crown Rule World

Congressman Larry P. McDonald

US Rep. , Killed in Korean Air Lines 007, 1983 - killed in the 747 that was shot down by the Soviets

"The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and
Communism under the same tent, all under their control....
 Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in
planning, and incredibly evil in intent."

As per the purported One World Order, the elites have been accused of setting up institutions such as the 'Trilateral
Commission and the Bilderberg Group among others to advance their interests nationally and globally.

The Bilderberg Group is a good example of part of the NWO network - the connections are quite clear visually:

Just how hyperbolic are allegations that the Bilderbergs run the world? To help readers decide, here is a chart laying out the
linkages and various connections - financial, political, statutory and otherwise - between the handful of people who comprise
the Bilderberg core and the rest of the world:

Click on the image above to open a larger version in a new window

Their aim is to create an international world order to deal with global issues, initiated and controlled by western countries.
The order was accused of trying to dominate and manipulate the weak and the fragmented people of the world.

Related: The Conspiracy To Rule The World - An Interactive History

Even though the Rockefellers were the most prominent family during their heydays, David is [supposedly] only 603rd among
the list of top billionaires in the world.
His grandfather John D Rockefeller, in contrast, has assets equal to 1.5 per cent of US GDP. The falling wealth and
prospects of the family have not stopped the Rockefellers from donating to charity and even last year, he donated USD79m
and is believed to have donated USD900m over his life time. [These figures are grossly under reported, and in any case the
vast majority of funding goes towards Gloablist projects - under the guise of "philanthropy" and "charities."]

David Rockefeller
Founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, Baden-Baden,
Germany, June 1991 (a meeting also attended by then-Governor Bill Clinton and by Dan Quayle)

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications
whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years.

It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of
publicity during those years.

But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational
sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination
practiced in past centuries."

Five of his siblings are dead and David is the last one left and perhaps the most influential of them all. As a child, David was
reserved and solitary, with a passion for collecting beetles. As an adult, he is believed to be suave and non-confrontational.

During his youth, he knew every politician who mattered on the planet and a journalist and former LBJ aide Bill Moyers once
called him the unelected but indisputable chairman of the American establishment.

Above: Jacob Rothschild with David Rockefeller

The left saw the rich mans club, promoted by Rockefeller, as promoting free markets and perhaps that is how the rumours
spread. However, the Rockefellers have taken the criticism in their stride and are even proud of it.
 David Rockefeller
In a statement to the United Nations Business Council, 1994

"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the
New World Order."

Related: Who / What is "The Crown"?

Related: Holy Smoke And Mirrors - The Vatican Conspiracy

Checkmate! U.S. Loses Syria & Turkey; Erdogan Will Visit Putin + John McCain Is
Directly Responsible For ISIS
July 30 2016 | From: Geopolitics / Sputnik / Various

Its confirmed: the United States is being checkmated in Syria and in Turkey. Now, Erdogan is set
to visit Moscow early next month.

They will be talking about how to dispense with the CIA moderate rebels we know as Daesh Islamic State
terrorists.

Commenting on the results of the recent meeting on Syria in Geneva between Russia, the UN and the US and on
the prospects of a possible ending of the Syrian war, Russian political expert Vyacheslav Matuzov suggests that
much will now depend on the talks between Russia and Turkey: if they agree, the rebels and their US / Israeli
masters will lose the war.

Turkish President Erdogan is set to visit Moscow on August 9. Prior to his meeting with President Putin there have
 already been a number of announcements on the joint economic projects and the readiness to open Turkey
for Russian tourists, Matuzov, former diplomat and an expert in Arab studies told Russias Izvestiya newspaper.

This means that certain political agreements are also being prepared, he added.

The political analyst further explained that first of all, it could be about closing the Turkish-Syrian border and, as a
result, cutting-off of the influx of rebels and arms into war-torn Syria.

Matuzov suggested that the issue might have been already been agreed upon.

If the border is closed, the opposition and their American masters will lose the war in Syria.

Syria: Before and After 'American Dermocracy'

In any further intra-Syrian talks, which could be scheduled at the end of August in Geneva, the US and their so-called
allies will have no grounds to dictate any conditions.

This point of view has been echoed by Dr. Bassam Abu Abdallah, Director of the Center for Strategic Studies at Damascus
University, who told the newspaper that Syria is not counting on the negotiations in Geneva, but rather on a rapprochement
between Russia and Turkey.
 The Riyadh-formed High Negotiations Committee (HNC) is prone to US influence and the influence of the Middle
Eastern states and is not acting in the interests of Syria, he said.

While he does not expect any progress in the negotiations, the expert suggests that the failed coup attempt in Turkey will
push Ankara to reconsider its foreign policy objectives.

The US has been accused of being behind the attempted military overthrow, he said. Washington is also for the further
break up of Syria and for creating Kurdish autonomy.

All the above, he said, is unacceptable to Turkey, and so it will try to get closer to Russia and Iran and might make the
decision to close its border with Syria which will result in a dramatic change in the balance of powers on the battlefield, he
concluded.

Recent reports suggest that the next round of intra-Syrian talks could be scheduled for the end of August.

The Syrian government delegation, as well as three opposition groups - the Riyadh-formed HNC, the Moscow-Cairo and the
Hmeymim groups - have been taking part in the UN-mediated Geneva talks on the peaceful settlement of the conflict.

The latest round of talks took place in Geneva on April 13-27. The HNC walked out of the negotiations, citing the continuous
fighting in Syria and the lack of progress on humanitarian issues.

Both Russia and Syria are now conducting a large scale humanitarian operations after a successful establishment
of humanitarian corridors for the civilians trapped inside Aleppo.

Russia and Syria are launching a large-scale humanitarian operation for Aleppo residents, Russias Defense Ministry said.
Corridors for civilians and militants ready to lay down arms will be created to exit the city, which was Syrias largest before
the war.
 We have repeatedly called on the warring parties to reconcile, but the militants violated the silence mode each
time, shelled villages, attacked the positions of government troops. As a result, a tough humanitarian situation has
developed in the city of Aleppo and its suburbs, Russian Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu said on Thursday.

To assist civilians taken hostage by terrorists, as well as militants who chose to lay down their weapons, the
Russian center for reconciliation of the warring parties, together with Syrian authorities, will open three
humanitarian corridors there, Shoigu added.

I want to emphasize that we are taking this step, first and foremost, to ensure the safety of Aleppo residents, the
minister said. He has also urged international organizations to take part in the humanitarian operation in Aleppo.

According to the minister, the fourth corridor for the passage of fighters in Aleppo is being set up only because the
US has not provided Russia with data on the al-Nusra Front terrorist group, which has recently been attempting to
merge with other armed opposition groups in Syria.

Obama is also preventing another Saigon-like withdrawal from Afghanistan by not bringing all US soldiers home
until he steps down from office.

John McCain Is Directly Responsible For ISIS

Related: Turkeys secret pact with Islamic State exposed by operative behind wave of ISIS attacks
Welfare Cull 'Pushing Vulnerable Off The Books'
July 30 2016 | From: NewZealandHerald

A welfare advocacy group is warning that thousands of Kiwis will suffer under newly implemented
changes to the beneficiary system.

Auckland Action Against Poverty said the latest round of reforms, which require all sickness beneficiaries, sole
parents and widows with no children under 14 to look for fulltime employment like other job seekers, would have a
brutal impact on the wellbeing of hundreds of thousands of children and adults who are dependent on the state for
survival.

Related: PM's homeless remarks untrue - Sallies

The reforms, which came into force on July 15, represent the biggest upheaval in the welfare state since the Social Security
Act was passed by the first Labour Government in 1938.

Other new obligations include drug-testing for jobseekers in relevant industries.

Auckland Action Against Poverty spokeswoman Sarah Thompson said the changes were aimed at decreasing the number
of beneficiaries in New Zealand, rather than job creation.

All New Zealanders who end up on welfare will have more hoops to jump through or face punitive measures as
the Government attempts to push them into low-paid insecure work - no matter what the downstream cost.

This is not about getting people into decent work [and] it's not about job creation. It's about cutting costs by
pushing vulnerable people off the books,'' she said.
The group will hold information stalls outside three Work and Income offices in Auckland today.

Ms Thompson said there had been an increase in the number of beneficiaries who had been "sanctioned'' for slip-ups in the
last two months.

Some had also had their benefits reduced due to Work and Income errors.

What are the changes?

The reforms represent the biggest upheaval in the welfare state since the Social Security Act was passed by the first Labour
Government in 1938.

All sickness beneficiaries, and sole parents and widows with no children under 14, are now subject to the same requirement
to look for fulltime work as other jobless people, although sickness may be accepted as a valid reason to postpone work
temporarily.

Other new obligations include drug-testing for jobseekers in relevant industries, which is expected to trigger benefit cuts for
up to 5800 people, and a requirement for beneficiaries to clear outstanding arrest warrants.

About 8000 beneficiaries have arrest warrants outstanding for issues such as unpaid fines. Unless they clear them within 38
days, their benefits will be halved if they have children, or stopped completely if they don't, in what is likely to be the biggest
single purge of the benefit rolls since the system was created.

Papakura case study

The co-ordinator of the Pikorua Community House in a low-income part of Papakura, Michelle Neho, said many people with
outstanding warrants would go back to drug-dealing rather than pay their fines.

A Herald investigation into how the changes will affect people's lives in Papakura, as a case study of a high-welfare area,
has found widespread fear of the reforms even among those who are supposed to be exempted from the work-search
requirements.
 A lot of people are scared about the warrants to arrest," Ms Neho said. "There's a lot of people that have
thousands of dollars of fines outstanding." Some would rather come off the benefit than pay all their fines.

The huge reorientation of welfare shifts the focus from the short-term unemployed, which largely left other beneficiaries
alone, to a new "investment approach" aimed at finding work for those who are likely to stay on benefits the longest and cost
taxpayers the most - mainly the sick, disabled and sole parents.

Work and Income chief Debbie Power said 85,000 people - mainly the sick, long-term unemployed, and sole parents and
widows with no children under 14 - would move today into intensive "work-focused case management" with 760 personal
case managers to help them find jobs and overcome barriers such as transport and childcare costs, addictions, debts and
workplace attitudes to mental illness and other conditions.

A further 1000 sole parents and 1000 people with mental health problems will be handed over to contractors who will be
paid from $2250 to $16,500 for each person they place in employment for at least a year.

From earlier in the month: Sallies' disagreement over homeless action

After the Prime Minister told reporters that people living in cars were refusing help, a rift has opened up between
the government and the Salvation Army.

New Zealand Researcher Malcolm Scott - New Zealand's Climate Of Secrecy

July 29 2016 | From: SageOfQuay

As part of his post graduate work, Malcolm Scott is writing a thesis on whether New Zealands
Ministry for the Environment is engaged in a practice of intentional disinformation regarding the
ongoing and persistent aerosol program in New Zealand.
Malcolm is a post-graduate student and researcher at the University of Canterbury. He is recognized by the New
Zealand Tertiary Education Commission. Prior to joining the University of Canterbury Malcolm has held academic
appointments with the University of Otago, Christchurch College of Education and the Christchurch Polytechnic
Institute of Technology.

Related: Anti-Geoengineering Legal Alliance Files US 60 Day Notice Of Legal Action

Malcolms interest was piqued when after submitting a freedom of information request known as an OIA in New Zealand
he received back, by accident, an internal document detailing how the Ministry responds to geoengineering inquiries. That
response entailed denying that any such program exists.

That document has lead Malcolm to conclude that the New Zealand government is aware and complicit in covering up the
covert operation to geoengineer the atmosphere.
Malcolm is a post-graduate student and researcher at the University of Canterbury. He is recognized by the New Zealand
Tertiary Education Commission. Prior to joining the University of Canterbury Malcolm has held academic appointments with
the University of Otago, Christchurch College of Education and the Christchurch Polytechnic Institute of Technology.

New Zealand Ministry for the Environment Document

Declassified: Naval Concepts of Chemical and Biological Warfare Department of Defense (1952)

Weather Forecaster Discusses Military Chaff (Chemtrails)

Leaked DNC Emails Prove Once And For All That The Conspiracy Theorists Were
Right All Along + FBI Source: Clinton Foundation Can Bring Down Entire Government
July 28 2016 | From: NaturalNews / Infowars / Breitbart

To anyone who has ever been called a "conspiracy theorist," the world owes you a massive
apology. As the leaked DNC emails now exhaustively prove, Hillary Clinton and the DNC actually
did conspire to destroy Bernie Sanders.
It was a genuine conspiracy involving a multitude of people who acted in coordinated secrecy to deceive the
public, destroy a candidate and coronate their chosen evil globalist (Hillary Clinton) as President.

Related: The Clinton Presidential Campaign just went Kaboom!

The only thing that makes this conspiracy any different than all the other true conspiracies happening right now is that they
got caught.

And now, the entire leftist media -- which is also part of the very same conspiracy to thrust Clinton into office -- is trying to
distract you from all this by invoking their own hilarious conspiracy theory: The Russians did it!

Yep, suddenly now the same leftist media skeptics who ridiculed anyone even hinting that the DNC was running a
conspiracy to destroy Sanders is floating its own tin foil hat theories in a desperate bid to hope you won't read any of the
emails that actually leaked. Those emails, it turns out, expose the DNC and Hillary Clinton as a cabal of corrupt political
mafia bosses who deeply hate voters, democracy and a free press.

The DNC even rewarded top donors with political appointments to the boards of federal organizations. If you give them
enough money, they'll make sure Hillary lands you a spot in your favorite federal bureaucracy (the United States Postal
Service is apparently in need of several BORED members... ha ha).
Check out some of these email findings for yourself:

All the dirt (so far) from the 19,000 leaked emails: TheGatewayPundit

DNC staffers revealed as total bigots who tried to destroy Bernie Sanders by attacking his religion: GovtSlaves

Obedient MSNBC morons report "cheers" when the audience is BOOING Debbie Wasserman Schultz off the stage:
(see the text along bottom of the video): ZeroHedge

It Was the Russians!

But you're not supposed to pay any attention to all the admissions of crime and corruption found in these emails. Never mind
the fact that all these DNC members need to be arrested, indicted and put behind bars for 20 years to life. They're all
corrupt criminals who despise democracy and use the power of their positions to rig elections and place sleazebag
politicians into public office. The voters be damned!

No, you're supposed to think to yourself, "It was the Russians!" And right on cue, the leftist media is now floating the
ludicrous idea that Putin loves Trump and wants Trump to win the presidency. Why is this idea so ludicrous?

Because Hillary Clinton is the sellout who approve the selling of America's uranium reserves to Russian mining
companies, sacrificing a strategic national resource so she and her husband Bill could collect a few more million dollars in
"speaking fees." (Source: CLINTON CASH book and documentary.)

In other words, the Russians get everything they want when democrats are in power, because democrats are corrupt
criminals who are willing to sell anything to the Russians (as long as the donation fee is high enough to the Clinton
Foundation). Thus, the idea that Putin wouldn't want Clinton in the White House is absurd.

But this is all best said by none other than Patrick Buchanan in this WND.com editorial which I offer here as a partial reprint:

Waving off the clerics who had come to administer last rites, Voltaire said: "All my life I have ever made but one
prayer to God, a very short one: 'O Lord, make my enemies look ridiculous.' And God granted it."

The tale of the thieved emails at the Democratic National Committee is just too good to be true.

For a year, 74-year-old socialist Bernie Sanders has been saying that, under DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman
 Schultz, the party has been undercutting his campaign and hauling water for Hillary Clinton.

From the 19,200 emails dumped the weekend before Clinton's coronation, it appears the old boy is not barking
mad. The deck was stacked; the referees were in the tank; the game was rigged.

For four decades, some of us have wondered what Jim McCord, security man at CREEP, and his four Cubans
were looking for in DNC Chair Larry O'Brien's office at the Watergate. Now it makes sense.

Among the lovely schemes the DNC leaders worked up to gut Sanders in Christian communities of West Virginia
and Kentucky, was to tell these good folks that Sanders doesn't even believe that there is a God. He's not even an
agnostic; he's an atheist.

The idea was broached by DNC chief financial officer Brad Marshall in an email to DNC chief executive officer Amy
Dacey:

"Does [Bernie] believe in a God. He has skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist.
This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference
between a Jew and atheist."

Dacey emailed back, "Amen."

In 1960, John F. Kennedy went before the Houston ministers to assert the right of a Catholic to be president of the
United States. Is the "Marshall Plan," to quietly spread word Bernie Sanders is a godless atheist, now acceptable
politics in the party of Barack Obama?

If Marshall and Dacey are still around at week's end, we will know.

The WikiLeaks dump came Friday night. By Sunday, Clinton's crowd had unleashed the mechanical rabbit, and the
press hounds were dutifully chasing it. The new party line: The Russians did it!

Clinton campaign chief Robert Mook told ABC, "experts are telling us that Russian state actors broke in to the
DNC, took all these emails, and now they are leaking them out through the Web sites. some experts are now
telling us that this was done by the Russians for the purpose of helping Donald Trump."

Monday, Clinton chairman John Podesta said there is a "kind of bromance going on" between Trump and Vladimir
Putin. Campaign flack Brian Fallon told CNN, "There is a consensus among experts that it is indeed Russia that is
behind this hack of the DNC."

Purpose: Change the subject. Redirect the media away from the DNC conspiracy to sabotage Sanders' campaign.

Assange: "A Lot More Material" Will Be Released"

FBI Source: Clinton Foundation Can Bring Down Entire Government

The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the email servers, source reveals.
The Clinton Foundation is a massive spider web of connections and money laundering implicating hundreds of
high-level people, according to an anonymous insider who revealed why the FBI stopped short of indicting Hillary
Clinton.

Related: IRS Launches Investigation Of Clinton Foundation

Before FBI Director James Comey announced the FBI wouldnt recommend pressing charges against Clinton, an insider
with intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case hosted an little-publicized AMA session on 4Chan, and
the statements he made on July 2 corroborate with later developments of the scandal.

There is enough for her and the entire government to be brought down, he revealed.

People do not realize how enormous this whole situation actually is.

Whether she will be [indicted] or not depends on how much info others involved gets out, and there are a lot of
people involved.

Since then, both the FBI and the DOJ declined to press charges against Clinton, and other sources revealed the Clinton
Foundation is now under scrutiny.

The problem is with the Clinton Foundation as I mentioned, which you should just imagine as a massive spider
web of connections and money laundering implicating hundreds of high-level people, the source said.

Though I do not have a high opinion of Hillary, she is just a piece albeit a big piece of this massive sh*tstorm."
Those implicated extends to the Justice Dept.

The DOJ is most likely looking to save itself, he continued.

Find everyone involved in the Clinton Foundation, from its donors to its Board of Directors, and imagine they are
all implicated.

This would explain why Bill Clinton forced himself on Attorney General Loretta Lynchs plane at the Phoenix Sky Harbor
International Airport last week; Clinton insider Larry Nichols said blackmail was likely involved.

Bill Clinton met with Lynch, and he was there to assure her that when Hillary gets to be president shell be able to
keep her job, said Nichols on the Alex Jones Show Friday.

I would imagine he gave Lynch a slip of paper that had on it a couple of things about the career prosecutors that
are working the case. What was on that? The things they have on them. The drugs, women, men, whatever.

The source indicated the Clinton Foundation is likely a nexus of blackmail material keeping everyone in D.C. in line
behind the Clintons even those with tremendous influence.

The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the email server, he said.

We received the server from Benghazi, then from the server we found data on the Clinton Foundation.

Then we realized the situation is much worse than previously thought.

The server was in Benghazi? Was that one of the reasons why the embassy was attacked, to destroy evidence on the
Clinton Foundation?

Additionally, the source said the investigation took so long because FBI Director James Comey didnt want to face
the Clinton Machine and the rest of Washington D.C.

This case would explode into a million other cases if fully brought to light, and then we would be one
agency competing against the entire government and a hoard of other interests, he continued.

It is a very tense and uncomfortable position.

Interestingly, the insider spoke more about Clintons relationship with President Obama, which seems frosty at times despite
Obama currently campaigning for his former Secretary of State.

The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the email server, he said. We received the server from
Benghazi, then from the server we found data on the Clinton Foundation.

Then we realized the situation is much worse than previously thought.

Obama and Hillary do hate each other, he said. Hillary hates black people and Obama dislikes recklessness.

On Thursday, Breitbart reported the FBI is is still investigating Hillary Clinton in connection with possible
corruption related to the Clinton Foundation.

Clinton Cash Movie Surpasses 500,000 Views In 48 Hours

News showed the motion picture adaptation of Clinton Cash three times in three-hour windows. In
those total nine hours of Saturday and Sunday viewing, there were 290,000 video views.

Pirated versions of the film have already begun sprouting up online, with one YouTube upload alone currently
showing more than 215,800 views.

In total, more than 500,000 people have pressed play on this film. But, of course, that half million views number does not
take into account the massive amount of people who held watch parties or watched Clinton Cash with their family and
friends during the weekend.

Indeed, several comments have been posted on Breitbart.com and various social media platforms from people saying they
and their friends and family were watching the Clinton Cash movie together in groups.

Its hard to know just how many millions of Americans may have tuned in to watch Clinton Cash during its two-day global
release.

As Breitbart News reported, the film was pushed heavily on social media by more than 283,000 dyed-in-the-wool Bernie
Sanders supporters, who helped catapult Clinton Cash to the top of Facebooks trending topics list on Sunday.

Related: 21 New Clinton Cash Revelations That Have Imperiled Hillary Clintons Campaign

Related: 11 Explosive Clinton Cash Facts Mainstream Media Confirm are Accurate
Due to overwhelming response and request, Breitbart News has decided to make Clinton Cash available for free forever.

Clinton Cash was directed by M.A. Taylor and was written and produced by Danny Fleurette and Breitbart News Executive
Chairman Stephen K. Bannon.

The film exposes the alarming pattern of record-high speaking fees to Bill Clinton and donations to the Clinton Foundation
from foreign contributors, which coincided with favors for those closest to the Clintons and their foundation donors while
Hillary Clinton served as secretary of state.

Related: Historic Civil Law Suit against Alleged War Criminal George W. Bush in California: Chilcot Report
Submitted to the Ninth Circuit Court

The Atlantic Council: The Marketing Arm Of The Military / Security Complex
July 27 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts

How much did the military-security complex pay the Atlantic Council to publish this sales pitch to
Poland to load up on US weapons systems? The sales pitch was written by arms salesmen
Richard Shirreff, a partner at Strategia Worldwide Ltd., and Maciej Olex-Szczytowski, a business
adviser specializing in defense.

The sales pitch is titled Arming For Deterrence. The Kremlin is unpredictable, say the arms salesmen, and could
at any moment decide to attack Poland. However the Russian regime respects a show of force and would back
down if Poland has a sufficient inventory of US weapons.

Related: The Conspiracy to Rule the World #50: The Atlantic Council

The sales pitch encourages Poland to take many aggressive and dangerous steps toward Russia, such as targeting Russia
cities and facilities including RT. But before provoking the Bear like this, Poland needs to join the tactical nuclear capability
scheme within NATO, so enabling its F-16s to be carriers of tactical nuclear ordnance.
Poland also needs to be able to strike deep inside Russia and for this needs to purchase American long-range JASSM air-
launched cruise missiles, the Navy Strike missile coastal missiles, and the Guided Multiple Launch Rocket Systems.

Poland also needs offensive cyber operations and more tandem-warhead Anti-Tank Guided Missiles (ATGMs) capable of
penetrating reactive armor, and also anti-aircraft (including anti-helicopter) and anti-UAV missiles.

The bill for this deterrence against non-existent Russian aggression comes to some US $26 billion on top of planned
expenditures of US $34 billion.

Poland should move forward expeditiously with procurements, say the arms salesmen or risk being attacked by
superior Russian forces.

The zionist neocons get away with their warmongering because it is profitable for the US military/security complex. Whereas
the crazed neocons want real war, the military / security complex only wants the propaganda threat of war. The numerous
military / foreign policy think tanks funded by the military / security complex provide the propaganda and made-up threat.

This is a dangerous game, because the Russians see a real threat in the hostility that is directed at them.
The anti-Russian propaganda is universal and includes the Olympic Games. Washington wants Russia excluded based on
the allegation that only Russians take performance-enhancing substances.

What extraordinary nonsense.

I have a relative who travels widely to test athletes of every sport, even golf, for the use of performance-enhancing
substances.

It is not the Russians who have corrupted clean sports. It is the money that the corrupt Americans have poured into
sports. To be a champion, to win the Masters at Augusta National, to win a gold medal means to be a multi-millionaire.

Sports that people once played for enjoyment are now a lucrative profession.

Money corrupts everything, and it is capitalism that turns everything into a commodity that is bought and sold. In capitalist
regimes everything is for sale: honor, integrity, justice, truth.

Everything is reduced to the filthy lucre.

Related: Putin to Western 'Elites': Play-Time is Over

Why Does New Zealand Still Fluoridate? TV Commercial From FFNZ
July 25 2016 | From: VinnyEastwood

Why Does NZ Still Fluoridate?

TV Commercial FFNZ

WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange Says His Next Leak Will virtually Guarantee An
Indictment Of Hillary Clinton
July 25 2016 | From: ScienceIsConsent

In a recent interview with ITV, Assange said the whistleblowing website will soon be leaking
documents that will provide enough evidence for the Department of Justice to indict the
presumptive Democratic nominee.
WikiLeaks has already published 30,322 emails from Clintons private email server, spanning from June 30, 2010 to
August 12, 2014. While Assange didnt specify what exactly was in the emails, he did tell ITV that WikiLeaks
had accumulated a lot of material about Hillary Clinton, which could proceed to an indictment.

Related: WikiLeaks posts 20,000 DNC Emails

The founder Sharon Tennison has focused on making people-people connections including the business community, Rotary
clubs, etc..This delegation was organized because of concern about escalating international tensions and the danger of a
drift toward world threatening military conflict.

Assange hinted that the emails slated for publication contain additional information about the Clinton Foundation. He also
reminded ITVs Robert Peston that previously released emails contained one damning piece of communication from Clinton,
instructing a staffer to remove the classification settings from an official State Department communication and send it
through a nonsecure channel.

Related: Berto Jongman: 20,000 DNC Emails Showing Malfeasance Now Posted by WikiLeaks with Thanks to
Guccifer
Assange then pointed out that the Obama administration has previously prosecuted numerous whistleblowers for violating
the governments procedures for handling classified documents.

In regard to the ongoing FBI investigation, however, Assange expressed a lack of confidence in the Obama administrations
Justice Department to indict the former Secretary of State.

[Attorney General Loretta Lynch] is not going to indict Hillary Clinton. Its not possible that could happen. But the FBI could
push for new concessions from the Clinton government in exchange for its lack of indictment.

WikiLeaks has long been a thorn in the side of the former Secretary of State, who called on President Obama to prosecute
the whistleblowing site after its 2010 leak of State Department cables. Julian Assange remains confined to the Ecuadorian
Embassy in downtown London, as Ecuador has promised to not hand over the WikiLeaks founder to US authorities.

Relayted: Leaked DNC Emails Confirm Democrats Rigged Primary, Reveal Extensive Media Collusion

Related: 10 ways the Democratic primary has been rigged from the start

The Myth Of Aggressive Russia

July 23 2016 | From: GlobalResearch

Recently I went on a 15 day visit to Russia organized by the Center for Citizen Initiatives.The group
visited Moscow, the Crimean peninsula, Krasnodar (southern Russia) and St. Petersburg.
In each location we met many locals and heard diverse viewpoints. CCI has a long history promoting friendship
and trying to overcome false assumptions between citizens of the USA and Russia.

The founder Sharon Tennison has focused on making people-people connections including the business community, Rotary
clubs, etc..This delegation was organized because of concern about escalating international tensions and the danger of a
drift toward world threatening military conflict.

We were in Russia in late June as they were commemorating the 75th anniversary of the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union.

They call it the Great Patriotic War where 27 million Soviet citizens died. In Russia its a very sober occasion in which they
pay tribute to the fallen, acknowledge the heroes and underscore the horrors of war. Virtually everyone in Russia lost family
members in World War 2 and there seems to be a deep understanding of what war and invasion mean.
It is alarming to see the constant drumbeat in Western media that Russia is aggressive, Russia invaded Crimea, Russia is a
threat. Hardly a day goes by that the New York Times does not have an editorial or news story with the assertion or
insinuation that Russia is aggressive.

Todays op-ed by Andrew Foxall is an example. The think tank director bemoans the British departure from the European
Union and suggests that Russian President Putin may be behind it:

"Mr. Putin has spent the past 16 years trying to destabilize the West.. After Brexit, the union has lost not only
one of its most capable members, but also one of its two nuclear powers and one of its two seats at the United
Nations Security Council...

Mr. Putin checked the European Unions expansion when he invaded Ukraine in 2014. The Continents security
order is now in a perilous plight: If Mr. Putin senses weakness, he will be tempted into further aggression."
It is now common to hear the claim that Russia invaded Ukraine and is occupying Crimea.

The US and allies have imposed sanctions because of the Crimean decision to separate from Ukraine and rejoin Russia.
Tourist cruise ships no longer stop at Crimean ports and international airlines are prohibited from flying directly to the
international airport at the Crimean capital, Simferopol. Students from Crimean universities cannot transfer their academic
credits to universities internationally.

Despite the sanctions and problems, Crimea appears to be doing reasonably well. In the past two years, the airport has
been rebuilt and modernized. The streets of Balaclava, Sevastopol, Simferopol and Yalta are busy and bright. No doubt
things could be much better and residents want the sanctions lifted, but there were no evident signs of shortages or
poverty.

On the contrary, kids were enjoying ice cream, parks were full and streets busy late into the night. The famous Artek Youth
Camp near Yalta is being refurbished with new dormitories, state of the art swimming pool and gymnasium. Right now they
are handling 3,000 youth in the camp at one time with 30,000 kids from all over Russia this year.

A 12 mile bridge connecting Crimea to southern Russia is now half complete. A impressive video showing the design
is here.

After 22 years as part of independent Ukraine following the breakup of the Soviet Union, what drove the people of Crimea to
overwhelmingly support a referendum calling for re-unification with Russia? Was this the result of intimidation or an
occupation by Russia?
We received a very strong sense from talking with many different people in Crimea that they are happy with their decision.
The impetus was not aggression from Russia; the impetus came from the violence and ultra-nationalism of the foreign
backed coup in Ukraine.

Protests against Ukraines Yanukovych government began in November 2013 in the Maidan (central square) in Kiev.
Protesters included right wing nationalist and Nazi sympathizers hostile to the Yanukovych government. A significant faction
glorified the Ukrainian Nazi collaborator Stepan Bandera.

The US was deeply involved in promoting the Maidan protests and strategizing how to bring in a new government.
Assistant Secy of State Victoria Nuland demanded the Yanukovych government do nothing to stop or prevent the increasing
vandalism, attacks and intimidation.

With thugs in the street increasingly clashing with police, the US pressed the Ukrainian government to break economic ties
with Russia as a condition for closer relations with Europe and loans from the International Monetary Fund.

On the surface, the US was encouraging Ukraine to strengthen ties with the European Union but in reality Nulands goals
were about the US, NATO and undermining Russia. This was dramatically revealed in a secretly recorded phone
call between Nuland and the US Ambassador to the Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt.
Nuland and Pyatt discussed who should and should not be in the coup government two weeks before the coup happened.
As they conspired over the phone, Nuland expressed her displeasure with the EUs reluctance to push the coup...

Fuck the EU said the woman who six weeks earlier spoke glowingly of Ukraines European aspirations.

Prior to the coup, Nuland spoke of the high US investment in promoting democracy in Ukraine. In a December
2013 speech she said:

Since Ukraines independence in 1991 the United States has supported Ukrainians as they build democratic skills
and institutions, as they promote civic participation and good governance, all of which are preconditions for
Ukraine to achieve its European aspirations.

We have invested over $5 billion to assist Ukraine in these and other goals (approx 7:30 into the recording / US-
Ukraine Foundation, 13 December 2013).

In mid December hundreds of Crimeans traveled to Kiev in buses to join peaceful protests in opposition to the Maidan
protests seen on television. They stayed in Kiev through January and into February until the violence exploded on February
18 (2014). Altogether, 82 persons were killed including 13 police and 1100 injured.

At that point, the Crimeans decided peaceful protest was useless and to return home. The bus caravan departed Kiev on
Feb 20 but was stopped at night near the town of Korsun.

The buses were torched and the Crimean travelers brutalized, beaten and seven killed. When news of this reached Crimea,
it was yet another cause for alarm.

A video titled The Crimes of Euromaidan Nazis documents the events and includes interviews with numerous passengers.
These atrocities against unarmed Crimeans were done on a public highway with no intervention from local Ukrainian police.
On Feb 21 the existing government came to a compromise agreement. But that did not appease the most violent protesters
or their supporters. A parliamentarian was beaten in broad daylight and threats issued. President Yanukovych fled for his life
and a new government, led by Victoria Nulands choice Arseniy Yatsenyuk, took charge.

The US and western allies quickly recognized the new government while Russia objected it was an illegal coup. In the first
days of the new government a bill was passed to make Ukrainian the sole official language of the country.

Indeed there was aggression and violence in Ukraine but it was not from Russia. Rather, evidence indicated the violence
was from the forces which led the coup. This was revealed in an intercepted phone conversation between British
representative to the European Union, Catherine Ashton, and the Estonian Foreign Minister, Urmas Paet.

Paet reported that he had been to Kiev and;

There is a stronger and stronger understanding that behind snipers it was not Yanukovych, it was somebody from
the new coalition.

Instead of probing into the facts behind this dramatic information, Ashton said Oh gosh. We will need to look into that and
quickly moved on.

Crimeans we spoke with described their shock and outrage at the events. In just four months they witnessed violent Maidan
protests, the overthrow of the elected government, beatings and killings of citizens returning from Kiev, and then the removal
of Russian as an official language.

In response, local leaders recommended a Crimea wide referendum with the option to officially re-unite with the country that
Crimea had been part of for over two centuries. A referendum was held on March 16. Turnout was 89% with 96% voting in
favor of the reunification of Crimea with Russia.

With the violent overthrow of the Kiev government and clear proof of US involvement in the coup it seems highly inaccurate
to say that Russia invaded or is occupying Crimea. On the contrary, it seems to be the USA and allies which are
aggressive.
The same reversal of reality is going on with the expansion of NATO. In recent weeks NATO has placed armed forces in
Poland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. NATO military expenses are already 13 times greater than that of Russia yet NATO
plans to increase military spending even more.

Meanwhile the US unilaterally withdrew from the Anti Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty in 2002 and is busy building and
installing ABM sites in Alaska and now eastern Europe. With a serious face they have previously claimed these sites are
being installed because of the danger of Iranian missiles but only a fool could take that seriously.

There is the additional risk that the same sites could be converted from anti ballistic missiles to contain nuclear warheads.

Are NATO and the US preparing for war? The public should be asking hard questions to our political and military leaders as
they waste our tax dollars and risk global conflagration.

When the audio recording of Nuland and Pyatt discussing how to midwife the Kiev coup was revealed, the State Dept
spokesperson was grilled about it. She responded Thats what diplomats do.

Enough of the nonsense that Russia is aggressive when the evidence indicates its the USA and allies who are
destabilizing other countries, escalating a new arms buildup and promoting conflict instead of diplomacy.

Why The Whole Banking System Is A Scam - Godfrey Bloom MEP

July 22 2016 | From: Europarle / UKIPMEPS

Strausberg, 21 May 2013.

Joint debate: Banking Union: Single national supervisory mechanism.

You might also like: Nigel Farage Q&A at the RNC in Cleveland - Donald Trump Brexit

The Reasons Why The Globalists Are Destined To Lose

July 19 2016 | From: ActivistPost

Under the surface of almost every sociopolitical and economic event in the world there burns an
ever-raging, but often unseen, war. This war, for now, is fought with fiction and with truth, with
journalistic combat and with quiet individual deeds. It is defined by two sides which could not be
more philosophically or spiritually separate.
On one side is a pervasive network of corporate moguls and elites, banking entities, international financial
consortiums, think tanks and political puppets.

They work tirelessly to reshape public psychology and society as a whole into something they sometimes call the New
World Order; a completely and scientifically centralized planet in which they control every aspect of government, trade, life
and even moral compass. I often refer to them simply as the Globalists, which is how they at times refer to themselves.

On the other side is a movement that has developed organically and instinctively, growing without direct top-down
leadership, but still guided through example by various teachers and activists, driven by a concrete set of principles based
in natural law. It is composed of the religious, the agnostic and even some atheists.

It is soldiered by people of all ethnic and financial backgrounds. These groups are tied together by a singular and
resounding belief in the one vital thing they can all agree upon - the inherent and inborn rights of freedom. I call them the
Liberty Movement.

There are those who think they do not have a dog in this fight, those who ignore it and those who are completely oblivious to
it. However, EVERYONE can and will be affected by it, no exceptions. This war is for the future of the human race.

Its consequences will determine if the next generation will choose the conditions of their environment and maintain the
ability to reach their true potential as individuals or if every aspect of their lives will be micromanaged for them by a faceless,
soulless bureaucracy that does not have their best interests at heart.
As you can probably tell, I am not unbiased in my examination of these two sides. While some of the more academically
minded cynics out there do attempt to marginalize the entire conflict by accusing both sides of simply trying to impose their
ideology on the rest of humanity, I would say that such people are generally ignorant of what is at stake.

There is in fact an elemental force behind this war. I would even call it a conflagration between good and evil. For a more in-
depth analysis on the evil behind globalism, read my article Are Globalists Evil Or Just Misunderstood?

Some people dont adhere to such absolutes or they think good and evil are fantasies created by religion to keep society in
check. I have no intention of trying to convince them otherwise. All I can say is, I have seen and experienced these
absolutes first hand and, therefore, I have no choice but to remain a believer.

I would also point out that the general experience of most men and women is that the act of organized and legitimate
oppression is inherently evil and such actions in the name of satisfying delusional elitist narcissism are even more evil.

While these experiences are subjective, they are also universal, regardless of the culture, place or time in history. Most of us
feel the same horror and the same defiance when presented with rising tyranny. We cant necessarily explain why, but we
all know.
While I am firmly on the side of liberty and am willing to fight and trade my life to stop the New World Order the globalists
are so obsessed with, I will not turn this examination of their tactics into a blind or one-sided farce. I will point out where the
elites are effective just as I will point out where they are ineffective.

It would do more harm than good to portray the globalists as stupid or bumbling in their efforts. They are not stupid. They
are actually astonishingly clever and should not be underestimated.

They are indeed conniving and industrious, but they are not wise. For if they were wise, they would be able to see the
ultimate futility of their goal and the world would be saved decades of tragedy and loss. Their cultism has dulled their senses
to reality and they have abandoned truth in the name of control.

Here are some of the primary strategies that the globalists are using to gain power and work towards total centralization and
why their own mindset has doomed them to failure.

Globalism vs. Populism

The globalists have used the method of false dichotomies for centuries to divide nations and peoples against each other in
order to derive opportunity from chaos. That said, the above dichotomy is about as close to real as they have ever
promoted.
As I explained in my article "Globalists Are Now Openly Demanding New World Order Centralization." the recent passage of
the Brexit referendum in the U.K. has triggered a surge of new propaganda from establishment media outlets. The thrust of
this propaganda is the notion that populists are behind the fight against globalization and these populists are going to
foster the ruin of nations and the global economy.

That is to say - globalism good, populism bad. There is a real fight between globalists and those who desire a free,
decentralized and voluntary society. They have just changed some of the labels and the language. We have yet to see how
effective this strategy will be for the elites, but it is very useful for them in certain respects.

The wielding of the term populist is about as sterilized and distant from freedom and liberty as you can get. It denotes not
just nationalism, but selfish nationalism. And the association people are supposed to make in their minds is that selfish
nationalism leads to destructive fascism (i.e. Nazis). Therefore, when you hear the term populist, the globalists hope you
will think Nazi.

Also, keep in mind that the narrative of the rise of populism coincides with grave warnings from the elites that such
movements will cause global economic collapse if they continue to grow. Of course, the elites have been fomenting an
economic collapse for years.
We have been experiencing many of the effects of it for some time. In a brilliant maneuver, the elites have attempted to re-
label the liberty movement as populist (Nazis), and use liberty activists as a scapegoat for the fiscal time bomb THEY
created.

Will the masses buy it? I dont know. I think that depends on how effectively we expose the strategy before the breakdown
becomes too entrenched. The economic collapse itself has been handled masterfully by the elites, though. There is simply
no solution that can prevent it from continuing.

Even if every criminal globalist was hanging from a lamp post tomorrow and honest leadership was restored to government,
the math cannot be changed and decades of struggle will be required before national economies can be made prosperous
again.

Communism vs. Fascism

This is a classic ploy by the globalists to divide a culture against itself and initiate a calamity that can be used as leverage for
greater centralization down the road. If you have any doubts about fascism and communism being engineered, I highly
suggest you look into the very well-documented analysis of Antony Sutton. I do not have the space here to do his
investigations justice.

Today, we see elites like George Soros funding and aiding the latest incarnation of the communist hordes - namely social
justice groups like Black Lives Matter.

The collectivist psychosis and Orwellian behavior exhibited by race junkies like BLM and third-wave feminists is thoroughly
pissing off conservatives who are tired of being told what to think and how to act every second of every day. And this is the
point
If you want to get a picture of America in 2016, look back at Europe during the 1930s. Communist provocateurs, some real
and some fabricated by the establishment itself, ran rampant in Europe creating labor disintegration and fiscal turmoil. The
elites then funded and elevated fascism as the solution to communism.

Normally even-handed conservatives were so enraged by the communist spitting and ankle biting that they became
something just as evil in response.

The U.S. may be on the same path if we are not careful. The latest shootings in Texas will make hay for the globalists. Think
about this for a moment - on one side you have Obama telling the liberals that the answer to police brutality is to federalize
law enforcement even more that it already is.

On the other side, you have some Republicans arguing that a more militarized police presence will help prevent groups like
BLM from causing more trouble. Notice that the only solution we are being offered here is more federal presence on our
streets?
I do see, though, a rather large weakness in the plan to ignite a communist vs. fascist meltdown in the U.S., and that
weakness is the existence of the Liberty Movement itself. The movement has grown rather sophisticated in its media
presence and prevalent in influence. It does have enough sway now to defuse some aspects of a rise to fascism in the
political Right.

The only option the elites have is to find a way to co-opt us. If they can manipulate the Liberty Movement into supporting a
fascist system, then they would be very close to winning the entire fight. This would be highly unlikely given the
stubbornness of liberty proponents when adhering to their principles.

The 'elites' might be able to get a large part of the public to take sides in their false paradigm, but if they cant con the
millions that make up the Liberty Movement into the fold, then their job becomes much harder.

Moral Compass vs. Moral Relativism

Moral relativism is perhaps the pinnacle goal of the globalists. Why? Because if you can convince an entire society that their
inherent conscience should be ignored and that their inborn feelings of morality are open to interpretation, then eventually
ANY evil action can be rationalized. When evil becomes good, and good becomes evil, evil men will reign supreme.

The problem is, conscience is an inborn psychological product, a result of inherent archetypal dualities universal to almost
all people. It is ingrained in our DNA, or our very souls if you believe in such a thing. It cannot be erased easily.

Moral relativism requires a person to treat every scenario as a gray area. This is not practical. Conscience dictates that we
treat every situation as potentially unique and act according to what we feel in our hearts is right given the
circumstances. This does not mean, though, that there is no black and white; or that there are no concrete rules.
There is almost always a black and white side to any situation dealing with right and wrong. Moral dilemmas are
exceedingly rare. In fact, I dont think I have ever encountered a real moral dilemma in history or in personal experience.
The only time I ever see moral dilemmas is in movies and television.

Only in television fantasy is moral relativism ever the only way to solve a problem. And despite the preponderance of moral
relativism in our popular culture, the ideology is still having trouble taking hold. If it was so easy to undermine conscience,
then the NWO would have already achieved complete pacification. We are still far from pacification. Whoever hardwired our
conscience should be applauded.

Collectivism vs. Individualism

The very core of globalism and the NWO is the position that sovereignty and individualism must be sacrificed for the good
of the group; in other words, they promote collectivism. Of course, groups by their very nature are abstractions; they only
exist as long as the individuals within them recognize them as viable.

Unfortunately, collectivists do not accept this fact because it would mean that the group, no matter how utopian, is not the
pinnacle of human existence rather, the individual is and always will be the pinnacle of human existence.

The elites MUST convince people that individualism is dangerous and that collectivism is the only way to prevent the
tragedies wrought by those who wish to be separate.

Of course, most of the tragedies we experience on a national or global scale are actually engineered by the elites, not by
wild individuals or sovereign nations looking for trouble. They then blame the very concept of sovereignty as a barbaric
ritual from the past that must be abolished for the sake of all.

In order for the globalists to reinforce the need for collectivism, though, they must engage people on an individual
psychological level.

Most human beings have an inherent desire to interact with their fellow man, but they also have an inherent identity and
drive to pursue their own development without interference. We like to be a part of a group as long as our participation is
healthy and voluntary and our associations are a matter of choice.
Human beings are instinctively tribal, but we have psychological and biological limits to the size of the tribe we prefer to be a
part of. Robin Dunbar, a professor of evolutionary psychology prevalent in the 1990s, found that there is a cognitive limit to
the number of individuals any one person can maintain stable relationships with.

Dunbar found this number to be between 100 200 people. A limitation also extends to the size of effective groups versus
ineffective groups. He found that effective tribes and communities tend to remain between 500 - 2500 people.

The human mind does not adapt well to vast tribal groups, and recoils from the idea of a global tribe. The truth is, human
beings function far better in smaller groups and they do not like to be forced into participating in any group, let alone larger
groups.

This may account for the feeling of isolation that is common among people who live in metropolitan areas. They are
surrounded by millions of neighbors and perhaps hundreds of associates yet they still feel alone because they do not have a
functioning tribe of acceptable size.
Vast numbers of people can be tied together by an ideal that resonates with them, which is the only purpose for nations to
form (to protect that ideal), but that is as far as the voluntary association goes.

Globalist collectivism is simply unnatural. People know it unconsciously, they know it is an act of force and oppression, and
will invariably move to sabotage its false tribalism as they begin to see its true colors.

Total Control vs. Reality

This is where the globalist philosophy really begins to break down. The elitist pursuit of total information awareness and total
social control is truly perverse and insane, and insanity breeds delusion and weakness. The fact is, they will NEVER
complete the goal of complete micro-control. It is mathematically and psychologically impossible.

First, in any system, and in complex systems most of all, there are always elements that cannot be quantified or predicted.

To understand this issue, I recommend studying the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. To summarize, the uncertainty
principle dictates that anyone observing a system in action, even from a distance, can still affect the behavior of that system
indirectly or unconsciously in ways they could never predict.

They are also limited by their ability to objectively perceive all available elements of what they observe. Unknown quantities
result, predictability goes out the window and total control of that system becomes unattainable.

This principle also applies to human psychology, as numerous psychoanalysts have discovered when treating patients. The
doctor, or the observer, is never able to observe their patient without indirectly affecting the behavior of their patient in
unpredictable ways. Therefore, a completely objective analysis of that patient can never be obtained.

What the elites seek is a system by which they can observe and influence all of us in minute detail without triggering a
reaction that they wouldnt expect. The laws of physics and psychology derail this level of control. There will always be
unknown quantities, free radicals, wild cards, etc. Even a seemingly perfect utopia can be brought down by a single
unknown.

To break this down even further to the level of pure mathematics, I recommend study into Kurt Godel and
his Incompleteness Proof. This, I believe is the ultimate example of the elites struggling against the fact of unknown
quantities and failing.

Godels work revolved around either proving or disproving the idea that mathematicians could define infinity in
mathematical terms. For, if infinity can be defined, then it can be understood in base mathematical axioms, and if infinity can
be understood, then the universe in its entirety can be understood.
Godel discovered the opposite - his Incompleteness Proof established once and for all that infinity is a self-inclusive paradox
that CANNOT be defined through mathematics. Keep in mind that a proof is a set of mathematical laws that can never be
broken. Two plus two will always equal four; it will never equal anything else.

Well-known globalist Bertrand Russell worked tirelessly to show that the entirety of the universe could be broken down into
numbers, writing a three-volume monstrosity called the Principia Mathematica. Russells efforts were fruitless and Godels
proof later crushed his theory. Russell railed against Godels proof, but to no avail.

Now, why was an elitist like Russell who openly championed scientific dictatorship so concerned by Godel? Well, because
Godel, in mathematical terms, destroyed the very core of the globalist ideology.

He proved that the globalist aspirations of godhood would never be realized. There are limits to the knowledge of man, and
limits to what he can control. This is not something globalists can ever accept, for if they did, every effort they have made
for decades if not centuries would be pointless.

As mentioned earlier, the issue is one of unknown quantities. Can human society ever be fully dominated? Or, is the act of
rebellion against stagnating and oppressive systems a part of nature? Is it possible that the more the elites wrap the world
in a cage, the more they inspire unpredictable reactions that could undermine their authority?

This might explain the establishments constant attention to the idea of the lone wolf and the damage one person acting
outside the dictates of the system can do. This is what the elites fear most: the possibility that despite all their efforts of
surveillance and manipulation, individuals and groups may one day be struck by an unpredictable urge to pick up a rifle and
put the globalists out of everyones misery. No chatter, no electronic trail, no warning.
This is why they are destined to lose. They can never know all the unknowns. They can never control all the free radicals.
There will always be rebellion.

There will always be a Liberty Movement. The entirety of their utopian schematic revolves around the need to remove
unknowns.

They refuse to acknowledge that control at these levels is so frail it becomes useless and mortally dangerous. In their
arrogance, they have ignored the warnings of the very sciences they worship and have set their eventual end in stone.
While they may leave a considerable path of destruction in their wake, it is already written; they will not win.

The Nice Terror Attack, Frances Prime Minister Manuel Valls: We Must Learn To Live
With The Terror, Like Israel
& The Nice Terror Attack: Towards A Permanent State Of Emergency?
July 17 2016 | From: GlobalResearch / GlobalResearch / Various

In the aftermath of the tragic terrorist attack in Nice, France, one of the most popular talking
points which has emerged throughout much of the western media coverage is the idea that
terrorism is now a normal part of our everyday lives and that a permanent state of military alert at
home is something the public needs to get used to.
One of the central voices of this police state talking is French Prime Minister and avid Israeli advocate Manuel
Valls. Earlier today Valls stated that, France has to learn to live with terrorism.

Related: Nice, 14th of July Massacre: Towards Martial Law? The Islamic State (ISIS-Daesh) Claims Responsibility?

In this way, the security state is attempting to integrate terrorism as a day-to-day 24/7, 365 day per week agenda issue
which is said to require a hyper-militarized security state, just like Israel (notice how Israel is invoked by neoconservatives
and western Zionist supports ad nauseam in the security conversation), to deal with the threat.

This seems to be the cornerstone of Valls political relevance, which he has basically repeated over and over, for the better
part of the last two years despite the fact that both the Charlie Hebdo and Paris Bataclan events exhibited very clear signs
of GLADIO-style domestic terror stage play.

Back in February, at the Munich Security Conference he stated the exact same thing:

We have entered we all feel it a new era characterised by the lasting presence of hyper-terrorism.

We must be fully conscious of the threat, and react with a very great force and great lucidity. There will be
attacks. Large-scale attacks. Its a certainty. This hyper-terrorism is here to stay.
In January 2016, while addressing an Israeli lobby delegation, Valls read off a list of ISIS terrorist attacks along with other
terrorist incidents in Israel, claiming that this was proof that, we are in a world war, while not ever uttering a word about
Israels brutal, militarized occupation and their systematic ethnic cleansing regime waged against the native Palestinian
residents since the creation of the State of Israel in 1948.

Israeli CRIF spokesman Roger Cukierman applauded Vallss single-sided adherence to the Israeli lobby, by saying, On a
number of occasions, you said very powerful things: That anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism, that France without its Jews is no
longer France, Cukierman said. This makes you a dear politician.

Is this a case of the state and its transnational security conglomerates manipulating the public into unquestioningly
accepting an indefinite siege mentality and a permanent, full-blown police state?

It appears once again, that we are witnessing an attempt to transform large parts of western society through a further
realignment of public and state political and economic priorities into what is commonly referred to as security
theatre, which, in reality, has nothing to do with actual security, and everything to do with domestic political and geopolitical
theatre.

Nice Terror Attack: What Theyre NOT Telling You

How many dead bodies on the streets of Europe will it take for leftists to realize that we are at war?

The Nice Terror Attack: Towards A Permanent State Of Emergency?

The death toll from the Nice attacks on the 14th of July, 2016 is rising. Latest reports suggest 84
deaths and possibly one hundred more injured. There have been reports of gunfire and the driver
of the truck which drove into the crowd near the beach in Nice is reported to have been shot dead.

Once again (as with the Charlie Hebdo and Bataclan attacks) there is no-one to stand trial and truthfully answer the
questions that need to be asked who and why?

At this point, there is not much that can be verified about the attack.

One cannot exclude the possibility that it may have simply been the action of an insane individual. Atrocities of that type are
rare but have happened in the past. But there is, however, the strong suggestion and indeed likelihood that this atrocity is a
terrorist attack by Islamists. So, what does all this mean?

French domestic intelligence (DGSI) chief Patrick Calvar warned on the 26th of June 2016 that an Islamist attack on
French children would be the trigger for a civil war. He said France was currently on the brink of that civil war.

Calvar also predicted that ISIS (Daesh) would use trucks as weapons. It is not unusual in the never-ending war on terror to
hear accurate predictions by intelligence officials before attacks, with the same officials seemingly powerless to prevent
them.
This uncanny coincidence could be the defining event of our time.

French Prime Minister, Manuel Valls is on record stating that the state of emergency in France would be permanent.

There has been increasing pressure on the Hollande regime in France to change course in the Middle East. Attempts to
reconcile with Russia and lift the sanctions have been blocked by Hollande and Valls.

I believe this is the trigger for a civil war French intelligence warned us about. The question is whether the war will become
high intensity or continue on a relatively low-intensity trajectory. There have been police whistleblowers in France who have
warned of huge caches of arms in major cities, capable of arming hundreds of thousands of men.

However, one must be cautious in referring to such whistleblowers as they have proven to be highly unreliable and may be
spreading disinformation.

In any case, the publics belief that we are in a state of war and that all military interventions abroad are therefore
necessary will be enough to make citizens look to the state for protection an oligarchic state which is currently
pursuing a brutal class war against workers.

As 90 percent or more of intelligence operations today involve media disinformation, we cannot possibly assume that any of
the reports we are hearing are accurate. However, it is hard to see how a psyop could have been carried out in the
Promenade des Anglais which is so central in Nice. What we can say for sure is that the attack serves the two constants of
the war on terror dialectic. The narrative would read as follows:

1. Make the state of emergency permanent, empowering the oligarchic state and further demoralising citizens by
dividing the working class along religious and racial lines. This is part of NATOs strategy of tension in accordance
with the longstanding intelligence operation Gladio. Citizens must turn to the anti-social state for security, thus
precluding social revolt.

2. Justify an all out attack on Syria to finish the job of destroying Arab civilisation, in accordance with US-NATO-
Israel geopolitical interests. Only the willfully ignorant could possibly believe that ISIS is an enemy of France when
 the French have never had better relations with the country which openly backs them Saudi Arabia. The
intelligence reports, declassified documents and admissions of the highest officials of the French and American
governments all confirm that ISIS is Israels Arab legion.

Both those two above-mentioned goals serve the interests of US-NATO-Israel and until the French people liberate
themselves from its yoke, Zionism will continue to poison the minds of men, making them consent to policies that no honest
and compassionate human being would countenance.

An awakening of working-class militancy is occurring but the labour movement in France remains divided and led by social-
democratic reformists. Now, more than ever, seeing the link between terrorism and class war is essential if any political and
social change is to occur.

In an era of high-finance treason, oligarchy, austerity, and the triumph of avarice, terror increasingly becomes a feature of
the normal rather than an exceptional exercise of state power.

Brexit And The Matrix & The Sun Sets On The British Empire: Northern Irish Want Out
After Brexit
July 16 2016 | From: JonRappoport / Sputnik / Various

'Elites': How horribly stupid Brexit people are. The European Union and its associated financial
institutions were built on the premise that no one would escape. Thats the long and short of it.
But of course, nations could get out if they decided to. Which is what just happened in Britain.

Related: Brexit-Beleaguered Banksters Back to Begging for Bailouts!

And now that it has, elites and their fear-mongering press outlets are moaning and shouting and whining: You fools, do you
have any idea what youve just done? Youve thrown a wrench into the structure. Are you crazy?

Translation:

Were in charge. Were the lords in the castles. Youre the peasants in the fields.

Of course, all along, the cover story has been: the EU is a step toward paradise; it bestows grace and beauty on humanity; it
erases ugly borders; it makes people One; it fosters share and care; it smooths out conflicts; it makes us brothers and
sisters.

Sure it does. Thats what all huge faceless bureaucracies accomplish. When theyre exposed, all that fake goodness
suddenly goes away. They spew hate. And they scream in anguish.

Whats occurring at the moment is very much like an old horror movie, where the humanoid villain is backed up against the
wall, and someone tears his face away and exposes machinery. Nothing but little wheels and cogs and wires and tubes.
The truth is out.

What a monstrous joke it is that the young, in Britain, voted to remain in the EU. The EU is a right arm of Globalist forces.
The same young people yammer and protest against Globalism, but because theyre absolutely clueless, they want to stay
in the EU. The young: turned into hypnotic products of the education system.
There was a day, not so long ago, when the phrase decentralization of power meant something. Its not used anymore.
The press has it on their no-fly list.

Governments, major media, large foundations have worked the phrase out of existence. Instead, theyve helped create
every kind of special interest group under the sun - theyve taken people who might actually want decentralization and
shoved them into various groups, according to gender, race, religion, needs, and so on and promised them equality and
special helpas long as they go along with big governmentthereby strengthening Control Central.

(And theyve taken people who already want decentralization and propagandized them as outliers, criminals, psychiatric
patients, terrorists, and racists.)

Thats the psyop game.

Were talking to you helpless masses now. You might want to decentralize government power? No, no, no, no.
Youre looking at things the wrong way.

First of all, who are you? Whats your religion, race, gender, disability? We have the right group for you. You can
achieve all your aims that way, because we help groups.

You see? Were on your side. We, the government, are rebels, too. But we need our power to make change
happen. Revolutionary change.

Dont rebel against us. Dont try to diminish our strength. Join us. Benefits are waiting for you. Lots and lots. Get
it?

For a moment in time, a lot of people in Britain didnt get it. They went the other way. They peeled off one layer of
centralized control over their lives.
This now sets up a classic dialectic situation. Two opposing forces in conflict. And not just in England. The same sort of
reaction is peaking in other European countries who want to test the waters of defection from the EU; and of course, in the
US, Trump vs. Hillary represents a perfect polarization. Whether or not these oppositions were covertly built in the first
place behind the scenes, their existence now makes them ripe for overarching manipulation.

What shape would that manipulation take?

Among other maneuvers, such as new reports of increasing unemployment, trading-market chaos and downward trends,
we would see an escalation of riots, protests, clashes.

And the solution, for sake of the population, would be restoration of order. Translation: even more centralized
power.

However, plans dont always work. Dont imagine that control from above is always flawless and god-like. Defection from
centralized power can take many forms, exposing many cracks in the foundation. Pillars can fall.

Major media are already on oxygen life-support. The Vatican and other crusty mainstay institutions are also sucking some of
that oxygen. Because of the Web, untold numbers of people are waking up, in ways too numerous and varied to catalog.
Even a few minor whiffs of freedom have their own power, and individual freedom is contagious beyond any kind of political
drug or vaccine developed to stop it.

The game is afoot.

Even the most cynical interpretation of Brexit - that it was set up from behind the curtain as a way to flush out rebellion,
which would then be squashed - doesnt fully explain what just happened in Britain.

People can decide theyve had enough of tyranny. They can take their suspicion of their leaders to a level where palliatives
dont work anymore. They can see the shape of the future that is being created for them, and they can toughen their
refusal.
They can push away from the table loaded with goodies and freebies, feeling sick, feeling patronized, feeling diminished.
They can turn off the talking heads that preach Official Messages. They can discover further ways their freedom is being
stolen from them, and they can rebel more deeply.

Eventually, they can come to a place where they rediscover their own existence as individuals, inviolate, alive, absent of the
need for a bloated super-structure of support.

As this rediscovery happens, you wont see it reflected in charts of trending stories. Newly awakened individuals will be
thinking and creating and muscling their way through the decaying anatomy of the Deep State, making futures that cut away
the tissues of connections that formerly bound them.

But bind them no more. No more.

Related: Italy Faces Economic Collapse, Considers Cyprus-Style Bail-Ins

Sun Sets On The British Empire: Northern Irish Want Out After Brexit

Renewed calls for Irish unity are receiving mass public approval as the UK is in danger of losing
more than one province in the wake of their decision to abandon Europe.

The residents of Northern Ireland are lining the streets of Belfast to receive Irish passports and Catholic
nationalists once relegated to the backbench of public opinion are now proudly calling for a united Ireland in the
wake of the ill-fated Brexit vote that may see a complete unravelling of the United Kingdom.

Northern Ireland, like neighboring Scotland, voted to stay in the European Union with 56 percent in favor despite Britain as a
whole voting in favor of leaving the political-economic bloc. The chasm in national vision between the various parts of the
United Kingdom are beginning to push even Protestant unionists who have long stood against Irish reunification to call
for an exit from Britains reach.

I was always a 'small u' unionist. But I could not in all good conscience say I could vote for Northern Ireland
to remain a member of the United Kingdom," said Christopher Woodhouse, a 25-year-old from Belfast.

"I am softening to the idea of Irish unity, purely on economic issues. I am a European."
For years, a vast majority of Northern Irelands residents many Catholics and virtually all Protestants favored remaining
part of the United Kingdom citing the economic stability compared to joining hands with their southern kin.

The fallout from Britains June 23 vote trounced that tried-and-true status quo calculation sending world markets reeling and
erasing trillions of dollars in British wealth overnight while many wonder just what the next shoe to drop will be.

People are saying for the first time in their life they would vote for united Ireland, having never contemplated it
before," said Steven Agnew, the leader of Northern Irelands Green Party.

The decision by many of Northern Irelands residents to embrace unification is not based on ethnic pride, but rather on the
economic calamity that looks to punish the UKs most impoverished province more than any other.

Northern Irelands largest financial institution, Ulster Bank, is already warning that the uncertainty surrounding the terms
of Brexit are hindering foreign direct investment into Northern Ireland and look likely to trigger a recession and a surge
in unemployment.
A danger also exists, much different than reunification, that in the wake of Brexit that the loss of EU funds for former
militants, victims groups, and cross-community youth work tied to the reconciliation between Northern Ireland and the
country of Ireland following years of bloody battle may tip the scales to a renewed conflict between north and south.

We are in danger of a return to conflict at a low intensity level if those funds are taken away," said Robert
McClenaghan, an Irish Republican Army member turned community worker.

"My stomach is churning at all that is happening."

The trigger for renewed fighting among the Irish may ultimately not be the removal of the so-called "peace dividend"
distributed by the EU on the condition that the two sides not resume battle, but instead the re-installation of the border
checks and military checkpoints of yesteryear which will almost certainly occur to prevent illegal travel by non-EU citizens
in the event that Northern Ireland is carried out of the European Union by Westminster.

This was hardly what the Irish nationalist Sinn Fein party had in mind calling on its supporters to go to the polls
and vote to remain in the European Union while the largely Protestant unionist DUP party campaigned for Britain
to leave the EU knowing full well it would run roughshod on the existing peace arrangement."
Sinn Feins party chairman blasted the unionists and Westminster saying that the Brexit vote meant Britain had "forfeited
any mandate to represent the interests of people here."

A decision to carry out a referendum remains in the future, but if the vote were carried out today many believe that Northern
Ireland would vote in favor of reunification by a small margin.

Unionists would have to rely on Catholics not wanting to be part of a united Ireland. That has been the trend up to
last Friday," said Peter Shirlow, head of the Institute of Irish Studies at the University of Liverpool.

"But I think that trend is changing now."

Washington Has Been Obsessed With Punishing Secrecy Violations - Until Hillary
Clinton + FBI Director Comey Grilled At Congressional Hearing On Clinton Emails
July 15 2016 | From: TheIntercept / JonRappoport / Various

As has been widely noted, the Obama administration has prosecuted more leakers under the 1917
Espionage Act than all prior administrations combined. Secrecy in D.C. is so revered that even the
most banal documents are reflexively marked classified, making their disclosure or mishandling a
felony.
As former CIA and NSA Director Michael Hayden said back in 2000, Everythings secret. I mean, I got an email
saying, Merry Christmas. It carried a top-secret NSA classification marking.

Related: Hillary Clinton disqualifies herself

Related: The head of the FBI's shocking admission: You are no longer under any moral or ethical obligation to obey
any federal laws whatsoever... the rule of law is now vacated across America

People who leak to media outlets for the selfless purpose of informing the public - Daniel Ellsberg, Tom Drake, Chelsea
Manning, Edward Snowden - face decades in prison.

Those who leak for more ignoble and self-serving ends - such as enabling hagiography (Leon Panetta, David Petraeus) or
ingratiating oneself to ones mistress (Petraeus) - face career destruction, though they are usually spared if they are
sufficiently Important-in-D.C.

For low-level, powerless Nobodies-in-D.C., even the mere mishandling of classified information - without any intent to
leak but merely to, say, work from home - has resulted in criminal prosecution, career destruction, and the permanent loss of
security clearance.

This extreme, unforgiving, unreasonable, excessive posture toward classified information came to an instant halt in
Washington - just in time to save Hillary Clintons presidential aspirations.
FBI Director James Comey, an Obama appointee who served in the Bush DOJ, held a press conference earlier this
afternoon in which he condemned Clinton on the ground that she and her colleagues were extremely careless in their
handling of very sensitive, highly classified information, including top-secret material.

Comey also detailed that her key public statements defending her conduct - i.e., that she never sent classified information
over her personal email account and had turned over all work-related emails to the State Department - were utterly false;
insisted:

That any reasonable person in Secretary Clintons position should have known that an unclassified system was
no place for that conversation; and argued that she endangered national security because of the possibility that
hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clintons personal email account.

Comey also noted that others who have done what Clinton did are often subject to security or administrative sanctions -
such as demotion, career harm, or loss of security clearance.

Despite all of these highly incriminating findings, Comey explained, the FBI is recommending to the Justice Department that
Clinton not be charged with any crime.

Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified
information, he said, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.

To justify this claim, Comey cited the context of a persons actions and her intent. In other words, there is evidence that
she did exactly what the criminal law prohibits, but it was more negligent and careless than malicious and deliberate.

CBS: FBI Director Grilled Over Clinton Email Investigation

Looked at in isolation, I have no particular objection to this decision. In fact, I agree with it: I dont think what Clinton did rose
to the level of criminality, and if I were in the Justice Department, I would not want to see her prosecuted for it.

I do think there was malignant intent: Using a personal email account and installing a home server always seemed to be
designed, at least in part, to control her communications and hide them from FOIA and similar disclosure obligations.

As the New York Times noted in May about a highly incriminating report from the State Departments own Auditor General:

Emails disclosed in the report made it clear that she worried that personal emails could be publicly released under
the Freedom of Information Act.

Moreover, Comey expressly found that - contrary to her repeated statements -

The FBI also discovered several thousand work-related emails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were
returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014.

The Inspector Generals report similarly, in the words of the NYT, Undermined some of Mrs. Clintons previous
statements defending her use of the server.

Still, charging someone with a felony requires more than lying or unethical motives; it should require a clear intent to break
the law along with substantial intended harm, none of which is sufficiently present here.

But this case does not exist in isolation. It exists in a political climate where secrecy is regarded as the highest end,
where people have their lives destroyed for the most trivial - or, worse, the most well-intentioned - violations of
secrecy laws, even in the absence of any evidence of harm or malignant intent.

And these are injustices that Hillary Clinton and most of her stalwart Democratic followers have never once opposed - but
rather enthusiastically cheered.

In 2011, Army Private Chelsea Manning was charged with multiple felonies and faced decades in prison for leaking
documents that she firmly believed the public had the right to see; unlike the documents Clinton recklessly
mishandled, none of those was top secret. Nonetheless, this is what then-Secretary Clinton said in justifying her
prosecution:
 I think that in an age where so much information is flying through cyberspace, we all have to be aware of the fact
that some information which is sensitive, which does affect the security of individuals and relationships, deserves
to be protected and we will continue to take necessary steps to do so."

Comeys announcement also takes place in a society that imprisons more of its citizens than any other in the world by far,
for more trivial offenses than any Western nation - overwhelmingly when they are poor or otherwise marginalized due to
their race or ethnicity.

The sort of leniency and mercy and prosecutorial restraint Comey extended today to Hillary Clinton is simply unavailable for
most Americans.

What happened here is glaringly obvious. It is the tawdry byproduct of a criminal justice mentality in which - as I documented
in my 2011 book With Liberty and Justice for Some - those who wield the greatest political and economic power are virtually
exempt from the rule of law even when they commit the most egregious crimes, while only those who are powerless and
marginalized are harshly punished, often for the most trivial transgressions.

Trump Releases Devastating Video Showing Hillary Lie About Classified Information

FBI Director James Comey completed his investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server. His agency recommended to
the Justice Department that Clinton not face criminal prosecution, despite calling Clinton and staff, 'extremely careless.'
Shortly after that, Donald Trump released this video through Facebook.
Had someone who was obscure and unimportant and powerless done what Hillary Clinton did - recklessly and secretly
install a shoddy home server and work with top-secret information on it, then outright lie to the public about it when they
were caught - they would have been criminally charged long ago, with little fuss or objection.

But Hillary Clinton is the opposite of unimportant. Shes the multimillionaire former first lady, senator from New York, and
secretary of state, supported by virtually the entire political, financial, and media establishment to be the next president,
arguably the only person standing between Donald Trump and the White House.

Like the Wall Street tycoons whose systemic fraud triggered the 2008 global financial crisis, and like the military and political
officials who instituted a worldwide regime of torture, Hillary Clinton is too important to be treated the same as everyone else
under the law.

Felony charges appear to be reserved for people of the lowest ranks. Everyone else who does it either doesnt get
charged or gets charged with a misdemeanor, Virginia defense attorney Edward MacMahon told Politico last year
about secrecy prosecutions.
Washington defense attorney Abbe Lowell has similarly denounced the profound double standard governing how the
Obama DOJ prosecutes secrecy cases: Lower-level employees are prosecuted because they are easy targets and lack
the resources and political connections to fight back.

The fact that Clinton is who she is: that is undoubtedly what caused the FBI to accord her the massive benefit of the doubt
when assessing her motives.

Her identity, rather than her conduct, was clearly a major factor in his finding nothing that was - in the words of Comey -

Clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such
a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or
efforts to obstruct justice.

But a system that accords treatment based on who someone is, rather than what theyve done, is the opposite of one
conducted under the rule of law. It is, instead, one of systemic privilege. As Thomas Jefferson put it in a 1784 letter to
George Washington, the ultimate foundation of any constitutional order is the denial of every preeminence.

Hillary Clinton has long been the beneficiary of this systemic privilege in so many ways, and today, she received her biggest
gift from it yet.

The Obama-appointed FBI director gave a press conference showing that she recklessly handled top-secret
information, engaged in conduct prohibited by law, and lied about it repeatedly to the public. But she wont be
prosecuted or imprisoned for any of that, so Democrats are celebrating.

But if there is to be anything positive that can come from this lowly affair, perhaps Democrats might start demanding the
same reasonable leniency and prosecutorial restraint for everyone else who isnt Hillary Clinton.

FBI Director Comey Grilled At Congressional Hearing On Clinton Emails

Congress Representatives Jason Chaffetz then Trey Gowdy ask questions of FBI Director James Comey about
Hillary Clinton, her emails, her server, and her suitability to handle classified information ever again.

But also point out the double standard of Clinton being caught in lies and gross negligence (who clearly has a long record of
knowing how to properly handle classified material) vs anyone else who would get (and has got) prosecuted for less.

3 Mind Boggling Facts in the Hillary Email Cover-up / Dallas Shooting

Arch-Globalist Hillary Clintons no-prosecution, the recent exit of Britain from the EU which torpedoed the
unchecked advance of Globalism, the current Presidential campaign which features a candidate (formerly two
candidates) attacking Globalism as no major candidate ever has before - all this suddenly fades from public
consciousness in the specter of the Dallas shootings - the racial conflict that has been decades in the making -
made in America, by Globalists, for the express purpose of Divide and Conquer -
I know full well how incompetent, stupid, amateurish, and ill-prepared government employees can be. But the dog and pony
Hillary show of the last few days is truly staggering.

If the effort was to exonerate Hillary Clinton, it was done so badly the American people are more certain than ever that she
is guilty as sin.

Here are the top three actions of the past few days that conspired to free her, while actually revealing how culpable she is,
to anyone with a few working brain cells:

One: Just by chance, US Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, the highest law-enforcement official in the land, runs
into Bill Clinton at the Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport.

They talk in secret, as the FBI is wrapping up its email-scandal probe and is preparing to present its findings. This
Lynch-Clinton meeting assures one and all that the fix is in. Hillarys guilty, but were going to find her innocent.

Two: In an unprecedented move, FBI Director Comey holds a global press conference. He runs down a massive
list of Hillarys actions, leaving no doubt she is guilty of gross negligence in her handling of classified materials. But
then he does an abrupt turn and recommends no prosecution, because the Bureau found no evidence she
intended to do harm.

Comey knows, and ensuing press reports emphasize, that intent is not the legal issue. The Federal Penal Code
(Title 18, section 793f) makes that clear. Gross negligence is sufficient for prosecution, conviction, and a sentence
of up to ten years in prison.

Furthermore, why is FBI Director making his recommendation in public, before the world? His job is simply to
turn over the evidence to his boss, Attorney General Lynch, who will decide whether prosecution is the
next step. But since, a day earlier, Lynch inexplicably said she would blindly follow the FBIs recommendation -
thereby abdicating her duty as Attorney General - Comey is suddenly doing her job and occupying her position. He
is, for the moment, the US Attorney General.
 As any fool can see.

Comey is also an appellate judge, because he is interpreting Title 18 of the Federal Penal Code - and interpreting
it falsely.

As any fool can see.

Three: Comey then appears before the Congress for a grilling. Are we to assume he expected to get off easily?

Of course not. He knew he would be raked over the coals, and in the process he would reveal more clearly
how Hillary had violated the law.

Comey would continue to assert there was no need for prosecution, while showing the world that prosecution was
exactly the proper path. And thats what happened, during Comeys conversation with Rep. Trey Gowdy.

Four main facts emerged out of Comeys mouth:

When Hillary said she didnt use her personal server to send or receive emails marked classified, she lied.

When Hillary said she didnt send classified material, she lied.

When Hillary said she used only one device that was connected to her personal server, she lied. She used four.

When Hillary said she returned all work-related emails from her personal storage to the State Department, she
lied. She didnt return thousands of emails.

Comey admits all this under questioning. He further concedes that lies of this nature would normally be used to mount a
prosecution.

Not only that, these lies would be used to form a circumstantial case for intent, the very issue on which Comey found Hillary
innocent.

Could Comey, Loretta Lynch, and Obama have figured out a worse way to exonerate Hillary? Its hard to imagine.
More likely, Obama and Lynch decided to put the egg on Comeys face. He would have to take one for the team.

Comey, in turn, decided that if he was going to be the fall-guy, he would, in the process, lay out the details showing how
guilty Hillary was. After all, his own people, his own FBI investigators, had assembled an air-tight case against Hillary.
Comey knew they would boil with rage when he exonerated her.

So he threw a bone to his team. In effect, he said to them: I have to recommend no prosecution, but Ill expose
some of what you discovered.

The question now is, will one or more of Comeys FBI investigators leak further devastating facts, revealing Hillarys guilt, to
the press?

By chance, this whole travesty of justice was suddenly overshadowed by the events in Dallas, where snipers shot 12 police
officers and killed five.

Putin Begs Media To Wake Up + The Demonization Of Vladimir Putin

July 13 2016 | From: Infowars / Counterpunch / Sott / Various

"How do you not understand the world is being pulled in an irreversible direction?"
The growing tension between East and West is especially worrisome in light of the general publics departure from
political awareness and its inability to survive outside of the government system.

Related: Russian President Putin signs law banning GMO production

The Demonization Of Vladimir Putin

Vladimir Putin is probably the most popular Russian leader there has ever been, polling up around
a phenomenal 80% as recently as November 2015 in a study carried out by a team of American
researchers.
This makes him inarguably the most popular world leader today, though you would think the opposite given the
way hes routinely depicted and demonized in the West.

Paradoxically, the main reason for Putins popularity in Russia is the same reason hes so reviled in the US and Western
Europe.

It comes down to the simple but salient fact that when it comes to leadership and political nous Vladimir Putin is playing
chess while his counterparts in London, Washington, and Paris are playing chequers .

This is not to ascribe to the Russian leader the moral virtues of Nelson Mandela or the humanitarian instincts of Mahatma
Gandhi. But neither is he the caricature regularly and vehemently described in the UK and US media.

Putin is not a villain straight from a Bond movie, sitting in a spooky castle somewhere in deepest Russia planning and
plotting world domination. For that kind of Masters of the Universe malarkey you need to take yourself to the White House
in Washington, or maybe CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia.
No, the Russian President is a man who knows his enemy better than they know themselves, and who understands and has
imbibed the truth of former Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchevs statement that:

If you live among wolves you have to act like a wolf.

What those Western ideologues and members of the liberal commentariat whove been lining up to attack him in their
newspaper columns fail to appreciate, not to mention the army of the authors whove been churning out books painting Putin
as a latter day Genghis Khan, is the deep scars left on the Russian psyche by the countrys exposure to freedom and
democracy Western-style upon the collapse of the Soviet Union in the 1990s.

Canadian journalist and author Naomi Klein lays it out in forensic detail in her peerless work, The Shock Doctrine (Penguin,
2007). The impact of free market shock therapy on Russia under Boris Yeltsins presidency, Klein describes thus:

In the absence of major famine, plague or battle, never have so many lost so much in so short a time.

By 1998 more than 80 percent of Russian farms had gone bankrupt, and roughly seventy thousand state factories
had closed, creating an epidemic of unemployment. In 1989, before shock therapy, 2 million people in the Russian
Federation were living in poverty, on less than $4 a day.

By the time the shock therapists had administered their bitter medicine in the mid-nineties, 74 million Russians
were living below the poverty line, according to the World Bank.

Klein also reveals that by 1994 the Russian suicide rate had doubled and violent crime increased fourfold.

Given the devastation wrought on the Russian economy and society by Western free market gurus and their Russian
disciples during that awful period, the countrys recovery to the point where it is now able to contest and resist Washington-
led unipolarity where before it existed unchecked, has to count as a staggering achievement.
Putin rose to power in Russia on the back of his role in violently suppressing the Chechen uprising, which began amid the
chaos of the Soviet Unions dissolution. It was a brutal and bloody conflict in which atrocities were undoubtedly committed,
as they are in every conflict, until the uprising was finally crushed and Moscows writ restored.

The former KGB officer was thrust into the spotlight as a key member of Boris Yeltsins team thereafter, viewed as a safe
pair of hands, which propelled him onto the political stage and his first stint as president in 2000, when he was elected for
the first time.

Some maintain that during his time with the KGB that Putin made it as far as New Zealand:

Since then Putin has worked to restore the Russian economy along with its sense of national pride and prestige on the world
stage. The loss of that prestige as a result of the demise of the Soviet era had a cataclysmic effect on social cohesion in a
country that had long prided itself on its achievements, especially its role in defeating the Nazis in the Second World War.

The new Russian president is credited with returning the country to its former status as a respected power that cant and
wont be bullied by the West. The attempt to use Georgia as a cats paw in 2008 was swiftly dealt with, and so has the
attempt to do likewise with Ukraine in 2014.

All this baloney about Putin having expansionist aims is an attempt to throw a smokescreen over the Wests own
expansionist agenda in Eastern Europe with the goal of throwing a cordon sanitaire around Russia in pursuit of a cold war
agenda.
Russias current game changing role in the Middle East, along with Chinas ferocious economic growth and growing
influence, is proof that the days of unipolarity and uncontested Western hegemony are drawing to a close. This more than
any other factor lies at the root of the irrational Russophobia being peddled so passionately in the West.

The most populous country in Europe is not and never will be a Western colony or semi colony. For those Western
ideologues that cannot conceive of any relationship with Russia other than as a deadly or defeated foe, accepting this reality
is a non-negotiable condition of achieving a semblance of stability and peace in the world.

While Vladimir Putin and his government are not beyond criticism in fact, far from it their misdeeds pale in comparison to
the record of Western governments in destroying one country after the other in the Middle East, presiding over a global
economy that has sown nothing but misery and despair for millions at home and abroad, leading in the last analysis to the
normalization of crisis and chaos.

Their deeds, as the man said, would shame all the devils in hell.

Related: Hysterical demonization campaign of Putin and Russia - The Pentagon's empire of whining

German Green Party Politician Speaks Out Against Demonization Of Putin

The former green state minister Ludger Volmer strongly criticizes his party's Russia policy and
warns against a one-sided image of Putin. The former Minister of State in the Foreign Office,
Ludger Volmer (Green), has sharply attacked his party's Russia policy.
The 64-year-old, who served under the aegis of Joschka Fischer and retired from the Bundestag in 2005, now
castigates the Greens in an open letter for demonizing the Russian President Vladimir Putin and "meekly reciting
NATO slogans."

This just increases the danger of escalation. This is "disgraceful for a peace party" that it is "stuck in silence."

Although it is correct to consider Putin critically according to Volmer, yet Putin's image in Germany is "one-sided."

And: "The vast majority of Russians want him." In addition, one does not have to "love the Russian national character, but
when it comes to any other questionable ideology, you try to deal constructively with them, political Islamism for instance - in
some instances too much so."

The former member notes: "Putin may be no role model for a libertarian democracy. But he is not a warmonger."

At the same time some aspects of the Orange Revolution in Ukraine get downplayed, such as the participation of
fascists in it, while the annexation of the Crimea is not so clear a violation of international law, as the Greens insist.

Comment:On several occasions, Putin has managed to successfully outmanoeuvre the psychopathic western
powers both in the Ukraine and in Syria, and by doing so has preserved countless numbers of lives. His actions
here have been a display of courage, discipline and determination.

A feat like this must have also required a great deal of strength and strategic insight. Unsurprisingly, his abilities
and success as a leader are reflected in his approval ratings and popularity (which significantly outweigh those of
any 'leader' in the West), throughout both Russia and the rest of the world.

Aside from political skill, Putin's numerous acts of generosity toward his people demonstrate humility and kindness,
both of which are qualities that are now exceedingly rare among politicians in this day and age.

In the face of constant lies spread by the West and blatant acts of aggression, Putin appears to exercise a
significant degree of self-control by maintaining respectful communication, utilising an approach which is calm and
collected.
Incorrect threat assessment?

Related: Vladimir Putin Is The Only Leader The West Has

Above all, there is "no serious reason to assume that Russia wants incorporate Poland or the Baltic states.
An incorrect threat assessment is as dangerous as a real threat,"

Volmer therefore asks: "Why are you, except for some individual voices, being silent about the NATO / EU
escalation on the eastern borders?"

The letter follows on the heels of statements by Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier (SPD), who had accused the
West of "sabre rattling" and had gotten criticized for it. And representatives of the Left party had attacked the Greens with
arguments comparable to Volmer's.

On Wednesday of last week word came from the Greens that it was working up a response to the letter, which was received
on the Monday. The foreign policy Group spokesman Omid Nouripour told the Frankfurter Rundschau: "It's never good style
to publicly criticize the work of your own successor, without first dealing with them or seeking contact with them. We are fine
with the line on de-escalation, but we are not with Ludger Volmer on relativizing the breach of international law by the
Kremlin."

Related: NATO focuses on "containment" of non-existing "threat from East" - Russian diplomat

Top Israeli General Speaks Out Against Israels Crimes Against Palestinians +
Parallels Between Israel & 1930's Germany & Ten Facts Why Netanyahu Is A Criminal
And That Israel Is A Rogue State
July 12 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / GushShalom / GlobalResearch / Various

Top Israeli General Speaks Out Against Israels Crimes Against Palestinians.
General Golan, Deputy Chief of Staff of the Israeli Army, on Holocaust Memorial Day, said:

If there is something that frightens me about the memories of the Holocaust, it is the knowledge of the awful
processes which happened in Europe in general, and in Germany in particular, 70, 80, 90 years ago, and finding
traces of them here in our midst, today, in 2016.

Related: The Jewish Colonization of Palestine

Related: Roger Waters on Why More Artists Dont Speak Out Against Israel: Theyre Terrified

Israeli Uri Avnery, a former member of the Israeli parliament, who as a boy lived in Germany during the rise of the Nazis,
has come to the support of General Golan.

General Golan, who was slated to be the next Chief of Staff of the Israeli Army, and Uri Avnery, one of the bravest men on
the planet, are being demonized as self-hating Jews.

No one is permitted to mention any truth about Israels genocide against the Palestinians or the support for this
genocide by the two American political parties and presstitute media, not even former President Jimmy Carter.

When Carter mentioned the apartheid that characterizes present-day Israel in his book, the Jewish members of the Carter
Center resigned.

Uri Averny: I Was There

"Please Don't write about Ya'ir Golan!" a friend begged me, Anything a leftist like you writes will
only harm him!"
Uri Avnery

Related: The Hidden History Of The Incredibly Evil Khazarian Mafia [Illuminati Cabal Zionists...]

So I abstained for some weeks. But I can't keep quiet any longer.

General Ya'ir Golan, the deputy Chief of Staff of the Israeli army, made a speech on Holocaust Memorial Day. Wearing his
uniform, he read a prepared, well-considered text that triggered an uproar which has not yet died down.

Dozens of articles have been published in its wake, some condemning him, some lauding him. Seems that nobody could
stay indifferent.

The main sentence was: "If there is something that frightens me about the memories of the Holocaust, it is the knowledge of
the awful processes which happened in Europe in general, and in Germany in particular, 70, 80, 90 years ago, and finding
traces of them here in our midst, today, in 2016."

All hell broke loose. What! Traces of Nazism in Israel? A resemblance between what the Nazis did to us with what we are
doing to the Palestinians?
Related: Shymaa's story from GAZA - "We Are the Ones"

90 years ago was 1926, one of the last years of the German republic. 80 years ago was 1936, three years after the Nazis
came to power. 70 years ago was 1946, on the morrow of Hitler's suicide and the end of the Nazi Reich.

I feel compelled to write about the general's speech after all, because I was there.

As a child I was an eye-witness to the last years of the Weimar Republic (so called because its constitution was shaped in
Weimar, the town of Goethe and Schiller). As a politically alert boy I witnessed the Nazi Machtergreifung ("taking power")
and the first half a year of Nazi rule.

I know what Golan was speaking about. Though we belong to two different generations, we share the same background.
Both our families come from small towns in Western Germany. His father and I must have had a lot in common.

There is a strict moral commandment in Israel: nothing can be compared to the Holocaust. The Holocaust is
unique. It happened to us, the Jews, because we are unique. (Religious Jews would add: "Because God has chosen
us".)

I have broken this commandment. Just before Golan was born, I published (in Hebrew) a book called "The Swastika", in
which I recounted my childhood memories and tried to draw conclusions from them. It was on the eve of the Eichmann trial,
and I was shocked by the lack of knowledge about the Nazi era among young Israelis then.

My book did not deal with the Holocaust, which took place when I was already living in Palestine, but with a question which
troubled me throughout the years, and even today: how could it happen that Germany, perhaps the most cultured nation on
earth at the time, the homeland of Goethe, Beethoven and Kant, could democratically elect a raving psychopath like Adolf
Hitler as its leader?

The last chapter of the book was entitled "It Can Happen Here!" The title was drawn from a book by the American novelist
Sinclair Lewis, called ironically "It Can't Happen Here", in which he described a Nazi take-over of the United States.
In this chapter I discussed the possibility of a Jewish Nazi-like party coming to power in Israel. My conclusion was that a
Nazi party can come to power in any country on earth, if the conditions are right. Yes, in Israel, too.

The book was largely ignored by the Israeli public, which at the time was overwhelmed by the storm of emotions evoked by
the terrible disclosures of the Eichmann trial.

Now comes General Golan, an esteemed professional soldier, and says the same thing.

And not as an improvised remark, but on an official occasion, wearing his general's uniform, reading from a prepared, well
thought-out text. The storm broke out, and has not passed yet.

Israelis have a self-protective habit: when confronted with inconvenient truths, they evade its essence and deal with a
secondary, unimportant aspect. Of all the dozens and dozens of reactions in the written press, on TV and on political
platforms, almost none confronted the general's painful contention.

No, the furious debate that broke out concerns the questions: Is a high-ranking army officer allowed to voice an opinion
about matters that concern the civilian establishment? And do so in army uniform? On an official occasion?
Should an army officer keep quiet about his political convictions? Or voice them only in closed sessions - "in relevant
forums", as a furious Binyamin Netanyahu phrased it?

General Golan enjoys a very high degree of respect in the army. As Deputy Chief of Staff he was until now almost certainly
a candidate for Chief of Staff, when the incumbent leaves the office after the customary four years.

The fulfillment of this dream shared by every General Staff officer is now very remote. In practice, Golan has sacrificed his
further advancement in order to utter his warning and giving it the widest possible resonance.

One can only respect such courage. I have never met General Golan, I believe, and I don't know his political views. But I
admire his act.

(Somehow I recall an article published by the British magazine Punch before World War I, when a group of junior army
officers issued a statement opposing the government's policy in Ireland. The magazine said that while disapproving the
opinion expressed by the mutinous officers, it took pride in the fact that such youthful officers were ready to sacrifice their
careers for their convictions.)
The NAZI march to power started in 1929, when a terrible world-wide economic crisis hit Germany. A tiny, ridiculous far-right
party suddenly became a political force to be reckoned with. From there it took them four years to become the largest party
in the country and to take over power (though it still needed a coalition).

I was there when it happened, a boy in a family in which politics became the main topic at the dinner table. I saw how the
republic broke down, gradually, slowly, step by step. I saw our family friends hoisting the swastika flag. I saw my high-school
teacher raising his arm when entering the class and saying "Heil Hitler" for the first time (and then reassuring me in private
that nothing had changed.)

I was the only Jew in the entire gymnasium (high school.) When the hundreds of boys all taller than I raised their arms to
sing the Nazi anthem, and I did not, they threatened to break my bones if it happened again.

A few days later we left Germany for good.

General Golan was accused of comparing Israel to Nazi Germany. Nothing of the sort. A careful reading of his text shows
that he compared developments in Israel to the events that led to the disintegration of the Weimar Republic. And that is a
valid comparison.
Things happening in Israel, especially since the last election, bear a frightening similarity to those events. True, the process
is quite different. German fascism arose from the humiliation of surrender in World War I, the occupation of the Ruhr by
France and Belgium from 1923-25, the terrible economic crisis of 1929, the misery of millions of unemployed.

Israel is victorious in its frequent military actions, we live comfortable lives. The dangers threatening us are of a quite
different nature. They stem from our victories, not from our defeats.

Indeed, the differences between Israel today and Germany then are far greater than the similarities. But those similarities
do exist, and the general was right to point them out.

The discrimination against the Palestinians in practically all spheres of life can be compared to the treatment of the Jews in
the first phase of Nazi Germany. (The oppression of the Palestinians in the occupied territories resembles more the
treatment of the Czechs in the "protectorate" after the Munich betrayal.)
The rain of racist bills in the Knesset, those already adopted and those in the works, strongly resembles the laws adopted by
the Reichstag in the early days of the Nazi regime. Some rabbis call for a boycott of Arab shops. Like then. The call "Death
to the Arabs" ("Judah verrecke"?) is regularly heard at soccer matches.

A member of parliament has called for the separation between Jewish and Arab newborns in hospital.

A Chief Rabbi has declared that Goyim (non-Jews) were created by God to serve the Jews.

Our Ministers of Education and Culture are busy subduing the schools, theater and arts to the extreme rightist line,
something known in German as Gleichschaltung. The Supreme Court, the pride of Israel, is being relentlessly attacked by
the Minister of Justice. The Gaza Strip is a huge ghetto.

Of course, no one in their right mind would even remotely compare Netanyahu to the Fuehrer, but there are political
parties here which do emit a strong fascist smell.

The political riffraff peopling the present Netanyahu government could easily have found their place in the first Nazi
government.
One of the main slogans of our present government is to replace the "old elite", considered too liberal, with a new one. One
of the main Nazi slogans was to replace "das System".

By the way, when the Nazis came to power, almost all high-ranking officers of the German army were staunch anti-Nazis.
They were even considering a putsch against Hitler.

Their political leader was summarily executed a year later, when Hitler liquidated his opponents in his own party.
We are told that General Golan is now protected by a personal bodyguard, something that has never happened to a
general in the annals of Israel.

The general did not mention the occupation and the settlements, which are under army rule. But he did mention the episode
which occurred shortly before he gave this speech, and which is still shaking Israel now: in occupied Hebron, under army
rule, a soldier saw a seriously wounded Palestinian lying helplessly on the ground, approached him and killed him with a
shot to the head.

The victim had tried to attack some soldiers with a knife, but did not constitute a threat to anyone any more. This was a clear
contravention of army standing orders, and the soldier has been hauled before a court martial.
A cry went up around the country: the soldier is a hero! He should be decorated! Netanyahu called his father to assure him
of his support. Avigdor Lieberman entered the crowded courtroom in order to express his solidarity with the soldier. A few
days later Netanyahu appointed Lieberman as Minister of Defense, the second most important office in Israel.

Before that, General Golan received robust support both from the Minister of Defense, Moshe Ya'alon, and the Chief of
Staff, Gadi Eisenkot. Probably this was the immediate reason for the kicking out of Ya'alon and the appointment of
Lieberman in his place. It resembled a putsch.

It seems that Golan is not only a courageous officer, but a prophet, too. The inclusion of Lieberman's party in the
government coalition confirms

Golan's blackest fears. This is another fatal blow to the Israeli democracy. Am I condemned to witness the same process for
the second time in my life?

It is this incident that aroused the general to speak out and warn the country. I can only salute him.
Related: ISIS is a US-Israeli Creation: Top Ten Indications

Related: The West has a terrorist "catch and release" program, admits proxy army is geopolitical strategy

Ten Facts Why Netanyahu Is A Criminal And That Israel Is A Rogue State

All of the following facts are verifiable in the public domain:

1. Netanyahu heads the only undeclared nuclear weapons entity on the planet yet still ludicrously alleges that non
nuclear Iran is trying to exterminate the state of Israel with its 100s of warheads in its Dimona secret arsenal, (all of which
are outside the inspection of the IAEA), in an abortive effort to damage the agreed Iran peace deal, painstakingly negotiated
by the UN Security Council members and the EU. His convoluted political machinations, in Washington and Europe, have
resulted in ignominious failure as Iran rejoins the international community.

2. His government also refuses to be a party to both the Chemical and Biological Weapons Conventions (CWC /
BWC) to which all EU members and most other UN states are signatories

3. His rightwing, extremist government supports the continued illegal occupation and settlement of the Palestinian
West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights in violation of international law, in addition to continuing a blockade of
essential materials to 1.8 million in Gaza that has received global condemnation.

4. He exerts a wholly undemocratic influence over the Republican AIPAC dominated US congress in Washington thereby
disproportionately skewing American foreign policy in favour of Israel

5. His family background includes a documented association with terrorist organisations notably the Irgun Zvai Leumi
paramilitaries

6. His government is in continued breach of the human rights provisions of the EU Association Agreement that affords Israel
free trade access to the European single market

7. He allows the socalled pricetag terrorists to continue to persecute Arab residents in the Occupied Territories by the
burning and destruction of olive groves and businesses in a program of uncontrolled intimidation and violence

8. He continually threatens to restrict access to Jerusalems Al Aqsa mosque as did his failed predecessor, Ariel Sharon,
apparently in a bid to provoke violence and dissent

9. He is the leader of a party whose published charter requires the ethnic cleansing of all indigenous Palestinians in
order to establish a Greater Israel in all of former Palestine
10. Likuds official agenda to establish the socalled facts on the ground is a blatant attempt to abort the establishment of an
independent Palestinian state. This illegal program has recently been condemned by China as well as by the EU, Russia
and the US and is now expected to lead to economic, political and sporting sanctions.

How George Soros Singlehandedly Created The European Refugee Crisis - And Why
July 11 2016 | From: GarretGalland

Rothschild bag man George Soros could seamlessly step into the role as the real-life version of a
super-villain in a James Bond novel. To give credit where credit is due, Stephen did the
considerable leg work for this article and what he uncovered surprised even me.
George Soros is trading again. The 85-year-old political activist and philanthropist hit the headlines post-Brexit
saying the event had unleashed a financial-market crisis.

Related: George Soros: A Psychopaths Psychopath

Well, the crisis hasnt hit Soros just yet. He was once again on the right side of the trade, taking a short position in troubled
Deutsche Bank and betting against the S&P via a 2.1-million-share put option on the SPDR S&P 500 ETF.

More interestingly, Soros recently took out a $264 million position in Barrick Gold, whose share price has jumped over 14%
since Brexit. Along with this trade, Soros has sold his positions in many of his traditional holdings.

Soros had recently announced he was coming out of retirement, again.

Click on the image above to see Soros lates trades online

First retiring in 2000, the only other time Soros has publicly re-entered the markets was in 2007, when he placed a number of
bearish bets on US housing and ultimately made a profit of over $1 billion from the trades.

Since the 1980s, Soros has actively been pursuing a globalist agenda; he advances this agenda through his Open Society
Foundations (OSF).

What is this globalist agenda, and where does it come from?

The Humble Beginnings

The globalist seed was sowed for young George by his father, Tivadar, a Jewish lawyer who was a strong proponent of
Esperanto. Esperanto is a language created in 1887 by L.L. Zamenhof, a Polish eye doctor, for the purpose of transcending
national borders and overcoming the natural indifference of mankind.

Tivadar taught young George Esperanto and forced him to speak it at home. In 1936, as Hitler was hosting the Olympics in
Berlin, Tivadar changed the family name from Schwartz to Soros, an Esperanto word meaning will soar.

George Soros, who was born and raised in Budapest, Hungary, benefited greatly from his fathers decision.

Allegedly, in 1944, 14-year-old George Soros went to work for the invading Nazis. It is said that until the end of the war in
1945, he worked with a government official, helping him confiscate property from the local Jewish population.

In an 1998 interview with 60 Minutes, Soros described the year of German occupation as the happiest time in my life.

Soross Venture into Finance

When the war ended, Soros moved to London and in 1947 enrolled in the London School of Economics where he studied
under Karl Popper, the Austrian-British philosopher who was one of the first proponents of an Open Society.
Soros then worked at several merchant banks in London before moving to New York in 1963. In 1970, he founded Soros
Fund Management and in 1973 created the Quantum Fund in partnership with investor Jim Rogers.

The fund made annual returns of over 30%, cementing Soross reputation and putting him in a position of powerone he
utilizes to this day to advance the agenda of his mentors.

The Currency Speculations That Threw Britain and Asia into Crisis

In the 1990s, Soros began a string of large bets against national currencies. The first was in 1992, when he sold short the
pound sterling and made a $1 billion profit in a single day.

His next big currency speculation came in 1997. This time Soros singled out the Thai baht and, with heavy short-selling
volume, destroyed the bahts artificial peg to the US dollar, which started the Asian financial crisis.

Humanitarian Efforts

Today, Soross net worth stands at $23 billion. Since taking a back seat in his company, Soros Fund Management, in 2000,
Soros has been focusing on his philanthropic efforts, which he carries out through the Open Society Foundations he founded
in 1993.
So who does he donate to, and what causes does he support?

During the 1980s and 1990s, Soros used his extraordinary wealth to bankroll and fund revolutions in dozens of European
nations, including Czechoslovakia, Croatia, and Yugoslavia. He achieved this by funneling money to political opposition
parties, publishing houses, and independent media in these nations.

If you wonder why Soros meddled in these nations affairs, part of the answer may lie in the fact that during and after the
chaos, he invested heavily in assets in each of the respective countries.

He then used Columbia University economist Jeffrey Sachs to advise the fledgling governments to privatize all public assets
immediately, thus allowing Soros to sell the assets he had acquired during the turmoil into newly formed open markets.

Having succeeded in advancing his agenda in Europe through regime change - and profiting in the process - he soon turned
his attention to the big stage, the United States.

The Big Time

In 2004, Soros stated;

"I deeply believe in the values of an open society. For the past 15 years I have been focusing my efforts abroad;
now I am doing it in the United States.

Since then, Soros has been funding groups such as:

The American Institute for Social Justice, whose aim is to transform poor communities through lobbying for increased
government spending on social programs

The New America Foundation, whose aim is to influence public opinion on such topics as environmentalism and global
governance

The Migration Policy Institute, whose aim is to bring about an illegal immigrant resettlement policy and increase social
welfare benefits for illegals
Soros also uses his Open Society Foundations to funnel money to the progressive media outlet, Media Matters.

Soros funnels the money through a number of leftist groups, including the Tides Foundation, Center for American Progress,
and the Democracy Alliance in order to circumvent the campaign finance laws he helped lobby for.

Why has Soros donated so much capital and effort to these organizations? For one simple reason: to buy political power.

Democratic politicians who go against the progressive narrative will see their funding cut and be attacked in media outlets
such as Media Matters, which also directly contribute to mainstream sites such as NBC, Al Jazeera, and The New York
Times.
Apart from the $5 billion Soross foundation has donated to groups like those cited above, he has also made huge
contributions to the Democratic Party and its most prominent members, like Joe Biden, Barack Obama, and of course Bill and
Hillary Clinton.

Best Friends with the Clintons

Soross relationship with the Clintons goes back to 1993, around the time when OSF was founded. They have become close
friends, and their enduring relationship goes well beyond donor status.

According to the book, The Shadow Party, by Horowitz and

Poe, at a 2004 Take Back America conference where
Soros was speaking, the former first lady introduced him
saying;

"[W]e need people like George Soros, who is

fearless and willing to step up when it counts.

Soros began supporting Hillary Clintons current presidential

run in 2013, taking a senior role in the Ready for Hillary
group.

Since then, Soros has donated over $15 million to pro-

Clinton groups and Super PACs.

More recently, Soros has given more than $33 million to the
Black Lives Matter group, which has been involved in
outbreaks of social unrest in Ferguson, Missouri, and
Baltimore, Maryland, in 2015.

Both of these incidents contributed to a worsening of race

relations across America.

The same group heavily criticized Democratic contender

Bernie Sanders for his alleged track record of supporting
racial inequality, helping to undercut him as a competitive
threat with one of Hillary Clintons most ardent
constituencies.

This, of course, greatly enhances the clout Soros wields through the groups mentioned above. It is safe to assume that he is
now able to drive Democratic policy, especially in an administration headed by Hillary Clinton.

Simply, what Soros wants, he gets. And its clear from his history that he wants to smudge away national borders and create
the sort of globalist nightmare represented by the European Union.
In recent years, Soros has turned his attention back to Europe. Is it a coincidence that the continent is currently in economic
and social disarray?

Another Home Run: the Ukrainian Conflict

Theres no doubt about Soross great influence on US foreign policy. In an October 1995 PBS interview with Charlie Rose, he
said, I do now have access [to US Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott]. There is no question. We actually work together
[on Eastern European policy].

Soross meddling reared its ugly head again in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which began in early 2014.

In a May 2014 interview with CNN, Soros stated he was responsible for establishing a foundation in the Ukraine that
ultimately led to the overthrow of the countrys elected leader and the installation of a junta handpicked by the US State
Department, at the time headed by none other than Hillary Clinton:

CNN Host: First on Ukraine, one of the things that many people recognized about you was that you during the
revolutions of 1989 funded a lot of dissident activities, civil society groups in Eastern Europe and Poland, the
Czech Republic. Are you doing similar things in Ukraine?

Soros: Well, I set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of Russia. And the foundation
has been functioning ever since and played an important part in events now.
The war that ripped through the Ukrainian region of Donbass resulted in the deaths of over 10,000 people and the
displacement of over 1.4 million people. As collateral damage, a Malaysia Airlines passenger jet was shot down, killing all 298
on board.

But once again Soros was there to profit from the chaos he helped create. His prize in Ukraine was the state-owned energy
monopoly Naftogaz.

Soros again had his US cronies, Secretary of the Treasury Jack Lew and US consulting company McKinsey, advise the
puppet government of Ukraine to privatize Naftogaz.

Although Soross exact stake in Naftogaz has not been disclosed, in a 2014 memo he pledged to invest up to $1 billion in
Ukrainian businesses, but no other Ukrainian holdings have since been reported.

His Latest Success: The European Refugee Crisis

Soross agenda is fundamentally about the destruction of national borders. This has recently been shown very clearly with his
funding of the European refugee crisis.
The refugee crisis has been blamed on the civil war currently raging in Syria. But did you ever wonder how all these
people suddenly knew Europe would open its gates and let them in?

The refugee crisis is not a naturally occurring phenomenon. It coincided with OSF donating money to the US-based Migration
Policy Institute and the Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants, both Soros-sponsored
organizations.

Both groups advocate the resettlement of third-world Muslims into Europe.

In 2015, a Sky News reporter found Migrant Handbooks on the Greek island of Lesbos. It was later revealed that the
handbooks, which are written in Arabic, had been given to refugees before crossing the Mediterranean by a group
called Welcome to the EU.

Welcome to the EU is funded by - you guessed it - the Open Society Foundations.

Soros has not only backed groups that advocate the resettlement of third-world migrants into Europe, he in fact is the
architect of the Merkel Plan.
The massive Muslim integration into Europe is a Trojan Horse plan

The Merkel Plan was created by the European Stability Initiative whose chairman Gerald Knaus is a senior fellow at none
other than the Open Society Foundations.

Related: Atlantic Puppeteers: Who is Behind 'The Merkel Plan' and EU Refugee Policy

The plan proposes that Germany should grant asylum to 500,000 Syrian refugees. It also states that Germany, along with
other European nations, should agree to help Turkey, a country thats 98% Muslim, gain visa-free travel within the EU starting
in 2016.

Political Discourse

The refugee crisis has raised huge concern in European countries like Hungary. In response to 7,000 migrants entering
Hungarian territory per day in 2015, the Hungarian government reestablished border control in order to keep the hordes of
refugees from entering the country.
Of course this did not go down well with Soros and his close allies, the Clintons.

Bill Clinton has since come out and accused both Poland and Hungary of thinking democracy is too much trouble and
wanting to have a Putin-like authoritarian dictatorship.

Seeing through Clintons comments, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbn responded by saying:

"The remarks made about Hungary and Poland have a political dimension. These are not accidental slips of the
tongue.

And these slips or remarks have been multiplying since we are living in the era of the migrant crisis.

And we all know that behind the leaders of the Democratic Party, we have to see George Soros.

He went on to say that although the mouth belongs to Clinton, the voice belongs to Soros.

Soros has since said of Orbns policy toward the migrants:

His plan treats the protection of national borders as the objective and the refugees as an obstacle.

Our plan treats the protection of refugees as the objective and national borders as the obstacle.

Its hard to imagine that he could be any clearer in his globalist intentions.

Related: Shots Fired: Wikileaks Accuses Panama Papers' Leaker Of Being "Soros-Funded, Soft-Power Tax Dodge" +
Rothschild's Primer: How To Launder Money In U.S. Real Estate And Avoid "Blacklists"
The Profit Motive

So why is Soros going to such lengths to flood Europe with hordes of third-world Muslims? We cant be sure, but it has
recently come to light that Soros has taken a large series of bearish derivative positions against US stocks. Apparently, he
thinks that causing chaos in Europe will spread the contagion to the United States, thus sending US markets spiraling
downward.

The destruction of Europe through flooding it with millions of unassimilated Muslims is a direct plan to cause
economic and social chaos on the Continent.

Another example of turmoil equaling profit for George Soros, who seems to have his tentacles in most geopolitical events.

We all understand correlation is not causation. However, given Soross extraordinary wealth, political connections, and his
long track record of seeing and profiting from chaos, he is almost certainly a catalyst for much of the geopolitical turmoil now
occurring.

He is intent on destroying national borders and creating a global governance structure with unlimited powers.

From his comments directed toward Viktor Orbn, we can see he clearly views national leaders as his juniors, expecting them
to become puppets that sell his narrative to the ignorant masses.

Soros sees himself as a missionary carrying out the globalist agenda taught to him by his early mentors. He uses his vast
political connections to influence government policy and create crises, both economic and social, to further this agenda.

By all appearances, Soros is conspiring against humanity and is hell-bent on the destruction of Western
democracies.

To any rational thinker, some global events just dont make sense. Why, for example, would Western democracies take in
millions of people whose values are completely incompatible with their own?

When we look closely at the agenda being actively promoted by the leading globalist puppet master, George Soros, things
become a little clearer.
On Soros & Gold

There is a naturally occurring and constant collaboration about shared interests occurring amongst the heads of governments,
corporations, investment managers and all of the bottom feeders that survive off their scraps.

What is so interesting about Soros is that he is so obvious in his intentions and persistent in their pursuit. Given the
consequences of his actions, it is also clear hes a believer in moral relativism and that the ends justify the means.

That he turns a nice buck in his crusade for what certainly rhymes with a one-world government is a Soros hallmark.

It allows me the money needed to fund my philanthropies he might answer to the charges he is profiting from blood in the
streets he was instrumental in spilling.

Going forward when something big is happening geopolitically, I am going to start my analysis by checking under rocks for
signs of Soros.

At the beginning of this article we noted that Soros has gone big into American Barrick (ABX), a leading gold producer. As of
the end of March it was his single largest holding at 7.36% of his overall portfolio.

As telling, he has dumped a lot of his more conventional stocks in recent months.

Related: George Soros Sells All Shares Of Citigroup, Bank Of America And JP Morgan
Given the mans inside track and active manipulations you might want to take the hint and pick up some physical gold as
an insurance policy against a systematic shock.

If you already own gold, I probably wouldnt chase it here as it has had a good run of late. Ditto silver which is up 46% year to
date. But if you dont own some, adding precious metals to your portfolio as a long-term holding, even at todays prices,
makes sense.

As always with gold shares, it is important to remember a few things:

In most cases, these are speculations. Thats because their financial metrics often dont line up with anything looking like
a good value. What you are really betting on is a revaluation of the ounces of gold or silver a company is sitting on. Thus, if a
company is sitting on one million ounces of gold and gold goes up by $100, the company just got a lot more valuable.

Never fall in love with a gold stock. Set a rational return goal and once hit, at least scrape your original investment off the
table. That way you are playing with the casinos money.

Also per my article last week, keep in mind that should gold stocks buck the trend in a future global equities correction, the
money managers who own big positions in gold stocks will almost certainly dump their holdings in order to dress up the rest of
their portfolios. As the trading volume in precious metals share is relatively thin, you want to beat them out the door.

Embrace the volatility. The low trading volume of most of these stocks is a key reason they have such explosive upside.
Any significant uptick in investor interest can send a stock soaring.

Here Come the Clowns

Nothing comes close to the Get Out of Jail card handed by the clowns at the FBI to Hillary over her private email servers. This
despite pretty much no one disputes she broke any number of federal laws of the sort which would have landed a lesser
clown in jail.
To quote FBI Director James Comey;

"Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information,
our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.

There is nuance in that statement. For starters, that there is evidence of violations. But also the stark political reality that no
reasonable prosecutor would enforce the laws, considering who the perp is: the standard bearer for the Democrats going
into this election.

Besides, going after Clinton means crossing swords with Soros and no reasonable prosecutor would want to do that.

Related: Wikileaks Asks If This Is The "Smoking Gun" Email That Will Bring Down Hillary + The Full List Of 92
Paychecks Hillary Collected From Wall Street

New Zealand Considers Taxing Sugar While New Zealand Government Invests $240m
In Coca Cola And Fast Food Chains
July 10 2016 | From: Yahoo

New figures reveal the New Zealand Superannuation Fund and ACC have invested millions of
dollars of taxpayers' money into several global fast food and soft drink companies.

Releasing details of the large-scale government investments on Wednesday, RNZ News reported that, as of May 31,
the New Zealand Superannuation Fund and ACC had $110 million invested in The Coca-Cola Company and its
global subsidiaries.
Related:

They also invested $70m in the The Coca-Cola Company's main rival, Pepsico.

Additionally, $38m was invested into McDonalds in America and Japan, and $17m into Domino's Pizza in Britain and
Australia.

In New Zealand, the Super Fund has $5m invested in Restaurant Brands, which owns restaurant chains KFC, Pizza Hut,
Carl's Junior and Starbucks.

Responding to the newly released figures, Labour Party MP Jenny Salesa reiterated the widespread impact obesity is
having on the country.

"Oh c'mon why is ACC & the Superfund here investing Millions in soft drinks companies when NZ has the 3rd
highest obesity rate in the OECD?," she said on Twitter.
Dental Association spokesperson Rob Beaglehole told RNZ News he was shocked to learn of the "inappropriate"
investments.

Related: MP slams fat portrayal of Maui in new Disney film

Related: Is sugar tax the answer to New Zealand's obesity epidemic?

"New Zealand is the third fattest country and has the third highest consumption of sugar in the OECD, after Mexico
and the United States. The number one source of sugar for those aged 30 and under comes from sugary
drinks," he said.

A Super Fund spokesperson told RNZ News that while it recognised nutrition was a public health issue there are no plans to
introduce any divestment strategies.
 "We have engaged with a number of companies on this matter and will continue to do so. We are not aware of any
mainstream funds which are excluding companies on these issues," the spokesperson said.

The Ministry of Health currently injects $60m each year into obesity prevention programmes.

Related: Little evidence sugar tax works, think tank says

Related: Government not persuaded by health professors lobbying to introduce sugar tax

Related: Medical experts push for sugar tax

A further $40m funds dental care for children.

Exposed: The Invasion Of Iraq Took Place Under False Pretences

July 9 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / Various

More Obscuration From The British Establishment: Sir John Chilcot, a member of the British
establishment and also a member of the Butler Inquiry, the responsibility of which was to
determine if the so-called intelligence used as the excuse for the US/UK invasion of Saddam
Husseins Iraq was fixed to justify the invasion, has, after seven years of delay, finally issued its
report.
Remember, there was a leaked memo from the head of British intelligence that the intelligence justifying the Iraqi
Invasion was fixed or orchestrated to produce the justification for the invasion, a war crime under the Nuremberg
standard established by the United States.

Related: Invasion of Iraq, The Secret Downing Street Memo: Intelligence and Facts were being Fixed

Chilcots job was to make this fact go away or assume less importance and to protect the Butler Inquirys orchestrated
verdict that, despite the word of the head of British intelligence, the intelligence was not fixed.

In other words, Sir Johns assigned task under the guise of an impartial inquiry was to absolve former UK PM and war
criminal Tony Blair not of all responsibility but of all responsibility deserving of prosecution.
Sir Johns report is akin to FBI director Comeys report on Hillary: They did it but they didnt do it enough to be prosecuted.

Related: Crimes Against Peace: The Chilcot Inquiry, Tony Blair and Iraq

Related: The Truth About Chilcot: The Inquiry, Whos Who?

In the context of democratic politics, if such existed in England, Tony Blair would be in the crosshairs of the ruling UK party,
the Tories or Conservatives. Yet, as both parties represent the same private interest groups, the Conservative Prime
Minister, David Cameron, who has announced his resignation effective next October, rushed to the opposition partys
defense and gave in Parliament what former British Ambassador Craig Murray calls a;

"Dishonest, apologia for the invasion that bore no relationship to the Chilcot report.

The UK media, for the most part, also came out in defense of Tony Blair, the war criminal and liar, providing, according to
Amb. Murray;

"Uunlimited airtime to Blair and his defender Alastair Campbell and almost no airtime to those who campaigned
against the war.

Here is the judgement of a British Ambassador, Craig Murray:

Blair is still a creature of absolute self-serving slime.

You could make the same judgment on almost every member of the Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama regimes.

And Hillarys regime would be even worse. My prediction is that life on earth would not survive Hillarys first term.

Related Articles:

Is the Coup Against Corbyn a Plot to Spare Tony Blair from War Crimes Probe?

ICC Wont Try Blair for War Crimes In Spite of Damning Chilcot Report, Heres Why

Tariq Ali on Chilcot Iraq Report: Tony Blair is a War Criminal for Pushing Us into Illegal War

Behind the Headlines: Britain's Secret Wars: Interview with T.J. Coles

Chilcot, Israel and the Lobby

From Winston Churchill to Tony Blair: How British Leaders Destroyed Iraq for over a Century

WikiLeaks Rolls Out Archive Of Over 1,200 Clinton Iraq War Emails: FBI
Recommends "No Charges" Against Hillary Clinton
July 7 2016 | From: RT / ZeroHedge / Various

Surprise, surprise. The establisment want Hitlery in office no matter what. In a surprising
statement, FBI director James Comey announced that Federal officials have decided not to pursue
federal charges against Hillary Clinton for her private email setup, an announcement that will send
a shockwave throughout national politics.
The now-infamous whistleblowing website has published an archive of what is said to be over 1,200 of Hillary
Clinton's private emails pertaining to the Iraq War. Julian Assange previously said that the release would be
enough to indict her.

Related: Trump Launches LyingCrookedHillary.com + A Clinton Expose

On Monday, WikiLeaks tweeted a link to a search aggregate of 1,258 emails that Clinton wrote or received discussing US
engagement in Iraq while she headed the State Department. The Iraq War email bundle is part of a trove of Clinton's
correspondence that was released by the State Department in February, under the Freedom of Information Act..

In March, WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive consisting of 30,322 emails from Hillary Clintons private email server
that she used while serving as Secretary of State. The 50,547 pages of documents cover Clinton's correspondence from 30
June 2010 to 12 August 2014. Out of that number, 7,570 of the documents were sent by Hillary Clinton.

The use of private email for state-run business has become a thorn in the side of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign.
With Democratic convention just weeks away, the public eye is following a close watch of a potential grand jury indictment.

Related: After FBI grilling, Hillary Clinton calls husband's chat with Attorney General 'chance meeting'

This past weekend, the FBI spent more than three hours questioning Clinton about the email scandal, but as elections loom,
the Bureau has yet to issue a report on its findings.

It has been a year since inspectors general from the State Department and federal intelligence agencies referred the case of
Clintons server to the Justice Department last July.

The FBI questioning fell days after it was reported that former president Bill Clinton had held talks with Attorney General
Loretta Lynch, responsible for the governments investigation of Hillary Clintons emails. Clinton denied that her husband's
meeting with Lynch had anything to do with the email investigation.

Many believe that the former Secretary of State will not be indicted for her use of private email.
 "Thats just not going to happen," Senator Cory Booker of New Jersey, told CNN's State of the Union program
Sunday. "Thats something that, to me, is not within the realm of possibility."

"I am not worried about it," Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown told ABCs This Week on Sunday.

"There will not be an indictment, and that means she did what many secretaries of state have done in the past."

Prior to Monday's release, the founder of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange warned that "upcoming leaks in relation to Hillary
Clinton" would be enough to indict her.

"We've accumulated a lot of material about Hillary Clinton. We could proceed to an indictment," Assange told ITV.

Yet at the same time, the whistleblower said that despite overwhelming evidence calling for an indictment, Lynch will
never proceed with the charges.

Related: Americans React With Fury: If Hillary Doesnt Follow the Law, Why Should I?

FBI Recommends "No Charges" Against Hillary Clinton

FBI director James Comey announced that Federal officials have decided not to pursue federal
charges against Hillary Clinton for her private email setup, an announcement that will send a
shockwave throughout national politics.
What is shocking is Comey's admission that Clinton used not one but several different email servers, adding that 110
emails contained classified information and 8 contained top secret information, he also reported that Clinton did
not turn over "several thousand" emails to the FBI and added that due to Hillary's sloppy set up, it is possible that
"hostile actors" got access to Clinton's emails.

Related: Why Hillary Clinton Won't Allow Her Corporate Speeches to be Published

Yet, despite all these "facts", the FBI has decided not to proceed with recommending charges.

It appears that the FBI is implying that the only reason why no charges will be filed is because there was no "intent", and yet
according to the US criminal code, specifically U.S. Code Section 793 - "Gathering, transmitting or losing defense
information" subsection (f), intent in this case is not required for prosection:

"Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal
book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or
information, relating to the national defense,

(1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to
anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or

(2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to
anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such
loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer

- Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both."

As the Hill adds, the juxtaposition is likely to inflame White House critics, who have insisted that political pressures would
prevent any chance of an indictment for Clinton, regardless of the damage to national security. Obama has previously
weighed in to dismiss concerns about the investigation - to the ire of Republicans and federal investigators.

Last week, Attorney General Loretta Lynch said that she would defer judgment to the FBI and career Justice
Department prosecutors, following a private and extremely controversial 30-minute meeting with former President
Bill Clinton.
The decision left Comey as the public face of the investigation, in what some viewed as an opportunity for the hard-nosed
maverick to buck political pressures and act against Clinton.

It is impossible for the FBI not to recommend criminal charges against Hillary Clinton,her presumptive
general election opponent, Donald Trump, said on Twitter this weekend.

What she did was wrong! What Bill did was stupid!

The FBI began its probe connected to Clinton last summer, when inspectors general at the State Department and federal
intelligence agencies referred Clinton's "homebrew" email arrangement to the Justice Department for review. The bespoke
setup might have jeopardized sensitive national secrets, investigators warned.

Roughly one-in-15 of the work-related messages that Clinton sent or received on the private server have been classified at
some level, according to the trove of 30,000 emails that she handed over to the State Department. Twenty-two emails were
classified as top secret - the highest level of secrecy.

In May, the State Department's inspector general released a scathing report claiming that Clinton had never asked to use
the unconventional setup while in office, and that the request would have been denied if she had. Comey has been under
the gun to finalize the investigation before the presidential nominating conventions later this month.

While the FBI director has insisted that he had no deadline to complete the probe, a delay past the end of the month would
have been interpreted as a sign of trouble for her campaign.

Some of the initial reactions were less then excited by the FBI's admission that while Clinton may have been "extremely
careless" she did not commit a crime:

Read more at: ZeroHedge

Related Articles:
Attorneys, Media Dumbfounded Hillary Got Off; Obama Says No one is more qualified To Be President

What Is Hillary Clinton Hiding?

Trump: On Nov. 8, Hillary Will Pay for her Sins

Heres why FBI didnt Indict Hillary Clinton

Trump Ad Features Comey Exposing Hillarys Lies

Switzerland Follows Iceland In Declaring War Against The Banksters & Switzerland
Withdraws Longstanding Application To Join EU
July 6 2016 | From: WakingTimes / RT

If you want to continue to be slaves of the banks and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let
bankers continue to create money and control credit. - Josiah Stamp

Iceland has gained the admiration of populists in recent years by doing that which no other nation in the world
seems to be willing or capable of doing: prosecuting criminal bankers for engineering financial collapse for profit.

Their effective revolt against the banking class, who drove the tiny nation into economic crisis in 2008, is the
brightest example yet that the world does not have to be indebted in perpetuity to an austere and criminal wealthy elite. In
2015, 26 Icelandic bankers were sentenced to prison and the government ordered a bank sale to benefit the citizenry.

Inspired by Icelands progress, activists in Switzerland are now making an important stand against the banking cartels and
have successfully petitioned to bring an initiative to public referendum that would attack the private banks where it matters
most: their power to lend money they dont actually have, and to create money out of thin air.

"Switzerland will hold a referendum to decide whether to ban commercial banks from creating money.
 The Swiss federal government confirmed that it would hold a plebiscite, after more than 110,000 people signed a
petition calling for the central bank to be given sole power to create money in the financial system.

The campaign led by the Swiss Sovereign Money movement and known as the Vollgeld initiative is designed to
limit financial speculation by requiring private banks to hold 100pc reserves against their deposits.

- The Telegraph

Switzerland is in a key position to play a revolutionary role in changing how global banking functions. In addition to being the
worlds safest harbor for storing wealth, it is also home to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), a shadowy private
company owned by many of the worlds central banks, and acting as a lender to the central banks.

The BIS is the very heart of global reserve banking, the policy that enables banks to lend money that does not actually exist
in their bank deposits, but is instead literally created electronically from nothing whenever a bank extends a line of credit.

Reserve banking is the policy that guarantees insurmountable debt as the outcome of all financial transactions.

The Sovereign Money initiative in Switzerland aims to curb financial speculation, which is the intended and inevitable result
of reserve banking, the tool that makes financial adventurism possible by supplying the banks with endless quantities of fiat
money.

Limiting a banks ability to produce money from nothing would be a direct blow to the roots of the banking cartel, and would
cripple their ability to manipulate the world economy. Heres how it works, in rather simplified terms:
 "if we had access to the same computer terminals the banks have, we could magic in or out of existence all the
imaginary stuff we are trained to think of as important money in whatever quantities we liked.

This is how it works: when they print quite a lot of this stuff there is a boom. When they print too much of it, there is
inflation (actually, the printing of money is inflation). When they stop printing it or simply hold on to it, there is a
depression.

- Source

In Switzerland, 90% of all money in circulation is electronic, and for this, The National Bank of Switzerland has become the
direct target of the Sovereign Money Campaign.

Swiss law has in the past required required banks to back all currency creation with collateral assets like physical silver or
gold, however in recent decades the climate has changed, and, due to the emergence of electronic payment
transactions, banks have regained the opportunity to create their own money.

The grass roots campaign said in a public statement regarding the intentions of the referendum, banks wont be able to
create money for themselves any more, theyll only be able to lend money that they have from savers or other banks.

Related: Former Presidents Warn About the Invisible Government Running the United States

This is an interesting twist in the human saga of man vs. banks, and while it remains to be seen if the referendum passes or
not, it must be pointed out that it does have its own problems, articulated by Sam Gerrans:

" it does say that the central bank should be given sole right to create money. This would essentially leave the
creation of money in the same hands as those who control the Federal Reserve or the Bank of England rather than
 allow them to farm out the process. But at least it shows that people are beginning to wake up to where the true
power lies.

In the unlikely event that this grass-roots movement in Switzerland should get its way and its proposed legislation
be enacted, and then begin to morph into something which really does threaten the banking elite, we must not be
surprised if Switzerland is shortly discovered to be harboring weapons of mass destruction, or to have
masterminded 9/11, or to be financing Islamic State.

Part of the cultural conditioning of our time is an ingrained, pre-assumed dependency on sacred cow institutions like
banking. Just like it is impossible for most Americans to envision a world without Democrats and Republicans, it is difficult
for most people to imagine a world without predatory global banking.

Yet, there are a number of other possibilities for trading, storing wealth, and facilitating development in the world.

This is not the only economic system we can imagine, and as Iceland has proven, people can regain control of their
collective wealth, so perhaps this revolution will foment further in Switzerland, presenting a chance to at least bring greater
awareness to the truth about central banking.

Switzerland Withdraws Longstanding Application To Join EU

The upper house of the Swiss parliament on has voted to invalidate its 1992 application to join the
European Union, backing an earlier decision by the lower house.

The vote came just a week before Britain decided to leave the EU in a referendum.

Related: Euro-court outlaws criticism of EU

Twenty-seven members of the upper house, the Council of States, voted to cancel Switzerlands longstanding EU
application, versus just 13 senators against. Two abstained.

In the aftermath of the vote, Switzerland will give formal notice to the EU to consider its application withdrawn, the countrys
foreign minister, Didier Burkhalter, was quoted as saying by Neue Zrcher Zeitung.

The original motion was introduced by the conservative Swiss Peoples Party MP, Lukas Reimann. It had already received
overwhelming support from legislators in the lower house of parliament in March, with 126 National Council deputies voting
in favor, and 46 against.

Thomas Minder, counsellor for the state of Schaffhausen and an active promoter of the concept of Swissness, said he was
eager to close the topic fast and painlesslyas only a few lunatics may want to join the EU now, he told the
newspaper.

Hannes Germann, also representing Schaffhausen, highlighted the symbolic importance of the vote, comparing it to
Icelands decision to drop its membership bid in 2015.

"Iceland had the courage and withdrew the application for membership, so no volcano erupted,he said, jokingly.

Switzerlands longstanding application to join the EU has not had a significant impact on the countrys politics for more than
20 years, as its accession negotiations have been suspended since 1992 in the wake of a referendum to join the European
Economic Area, when the Swiss voted down the idea of closer ties with the EU.

Some politicians even argued that the vote was an unnecessary formal procedure that didnt make much sense as
Switzerland is no longer regarded by the EU as an official candidate to join the bloc.

Related: Brexit, austerity & refugee crisis knock Britain out of global soft power ranking lead

Filippo Lombardi, from the Christian Democratic Peoples Party, said that it was not very clever to discuss it once
again, calling the debate about Switzerlands accession at this stage a bit ridiculous, Neue Zrcher Zeitung
reported.

Switzerland, never a member of EU, shares free trade with the union and free movement of people as part of the Schengen
zone.

The timing of Switzerlands reassurance of its sovereignty and independence from the EU institutions, if accidental, may
come in handy for campaigners in the UK advocating a British exit from the EU. Polls show the UKs referendum on EU
membership, to be held in a week on June 23, as being extremely close, with Leave slightly in the lead.

Related: Reality Check: Brexit is about taking a step away from "globalism" and toward "individualism"
Junk Science Week: Science Is On The Verge Af A Nervous Breakdown
July 4 2016 | From: TheFinancialPost

Welcome to FP Comments 18th annual Junk Science Week, dedicated to exposing the scientists,
NGOs, activists, politicians, journalists, media outlets, cranks and quacks who manipulate
science data to achieve their objectives.

Our standard definition over the years has been this: junk science occurs when scientific facts are distorted, risk is
exaggerated and the science adapted and warped by politics and ideology to serve another agenda.

Much of our content over the past 18 years has focused less on science itself and more on the NGOs, politicians and others
who have found it convenient to use and abuse science as a springboard to political action.

It is easy, perhaps too easy, to follow the empty-headed foibles of a media culture that mindlessly recycles reports that
bacon may cause heart disease or that cell phones cause cancer. Less easy is dealing with the much bigger problem: the
break down of science itself.

In The Guardian last week, Jerome Ravetz, considered one of the worlds leading philosophers of science, reviewed what
he and many others describe as the crisis in science. Ravetz, who has been warning of the emerging internal conflicts in
science for decades, sees the crisis is spreading to the general public.

"Given the public awareness that science can be low-quality or corrupted, that whole fields can be misdirected for
decades (see nutrition, on cholesterol and sugar), and that some basic fields must progress in the absence of any
 prospect of empirical testing (string theory), the nave realism of previous generations becomes quite Medieval in
its irrelevance to present realities.

Present reality is that science is on the verge of a nervous breakdown. Thats the not-so-tongue-in-cheek message in
Science on the Verge, a new book by European scientist Andrea Saltelli and seven other contributors. Science on the Verge
is a 200-page indictment of what to the lay reader appears to be a monumental deterioration across all fields, from climate
science to health research to economics.

The mere idea that most published research results are false should be cause for alarm.

But it is worse than that. The crisis runs through just about everything we take for granted in modern science, from the use
of big data to computer models of major parts of our social, economic and natural environment and on to the often absurd
uses of statistical methods to fish for predetermined conclusions.

Examples from the book help prove the point. In a chapter titled Numbers Running Wild, one of the books authors, Jeroen
P. van der Sluijs of the University of Bergen, asks how is it possible for a paper in Science magazine to claim that precisely
7.9 per cent (not eight per cent or seven per cent) of the worlds species would become extinct as a result of climate change
- when the total number of species is unknown?

Even odder, the species study concluded that the 7.9 per cent demonstrates:

"The importance of rapid implementation of technologies to decrease greenhouse gas emissions and strategies
for carbon sequestration.

How, asks van de Sluijs, do the researchers jump from species extinction to carbon sequestration?

"This sounds like an opinion for which the underlying arguments are not even given.
Others examples come from economics, a science filled with unwarranted claims to certainty and predictability. Science on
the Verge recalls Nobel economist Robert Lucass 2003 declaration that the -

"Central problem of depression-prevention has been solved.

Also noted is the 2004 claim by former Fed chairman Ben Bernanke that the volatility of business cycles had been tamed.

These and other economic blunders lead critics to suspect the discipline of economics:

"Had reverted to (or never developed beyond) a state of immaturity.

Few fields and practices are exempt from scrutiny in Science on the Verge. In a chapter on evidence-based science, Andrea
Saltelli - also at the University of Bergen - spreads the net wide:

"It is futile to expect, for example, that modelling approaches which have failed to predict a purely financial and
economic crisis will be able to inform us accurately about the behaviour of a system involving institutions, societies,
economies and ecologies.

Yet this is what we do when we apply the technique of cost benefit analysis (CBA) to dimensions of climate
change
 This kind of quantitative approach to complex systems, says Saltelli, can only foster abuse and corruption.

- Excerpt from Science on the verge here.

It would be wrong to suspect that Science on the Verge is the work of right-wing activists, climate skeptics and hide-bound
traditionalists.

It is the work, rather, of scientists with a range of ideological views despairing over what appears to be a fundamental
breakdown as science has become more and more enmeshed in the business of providing evidence for policy-making.

Science, in short, has already been corrupted. We explore just some of the examples in this years Junk Science Week,
including the GDP factory myth, sugar scares, the social cost of carbon, the last pesticide Roundup, killer lipstick, and our
annual Rubber Duckies awards.

Former CIA Agent: It's Time To Talk About Whats Really Causing Terrorism & Elites
Openly Calling To Rise Up Against 'Ignorant Masses"
July 3 2016 | From: TheAntiMedia

In the wake of yet another terrorist attack, a former CIA counterterrorism agent has shared her
insight into what causes such tragic, intentional carnage. Amaryllis Fox spoke for the first time
publicly with Al Jazeera Plus (AJ+) about terrorism, misguided narratives on why it happens, and
the underlying motivators driving it - ultimately urging Americans and those in power to adopt a
different approach in combating the ongoing violence.

If I learned one lesson from my time with the CIA, it is this: everybody believes they are the good guy, says Fox,
who is currently in the process of getting her CIA cover rolled back, AJ+ reports. She is now a peace activist and
runs Mulu, an e-commerce company supporting at-risk communities around the world.

Fox worked as a counterterrorism and intelligence official for the clandestine services during the 2000s. In her first public
statement on her time there, she discussed the limitations on the American publics perception of the war on terror:

"The conversation thats going on in the United States right now about ISIS and about the United States overseas
is more oversimplified than ever. Ask most Americans whether ISIS poses an existential threat to this country and
theyll say yes. Thats where the conversation stops.

Indeed, while a majority of Americans fear terrorism, reaching a consensus on how to tackle ISIS has proved contentious.
Fox explained the simplicity of the way the conflicts are viewed on both sides:

"If youre walking down the street in Iraq or Syria and ask anybody why America dropped bombs, you get: They
were waging war on Islam.

In America, the question is: Why were we attacked on 9/11?

Fox says if you pose this question, You get: they hate us because were free.

However, she contests the validity of these assumptions, pointing to the powerful forces that drive conflict in the
first place:
 "Those are stories manufactured by a really small number of people on both sides who amass a great deal
of power and wealth by convincing the rest of us to keep killing each other.

Indeed, both sides of the conflict expend significant effort campaigning to prove their crusades are justified. In the United
States, after decades of prolonged conflict, the populace is largely desensitized to war and often ignorant of
its current manifestations.

Fox challenges this paradigm:

"I think the question we need to be asking, as Americans examining our foreign policy, is whether or not were
pouring kerosene on a candle. The only real way to disarm your enemy is to listen to them.

If you hear them out, if youre brave enough to really listen to their story, you can see that more often than not, you
might have made some of the same choices if youd lived their life instead of yours.

Of course, as Americans mourn the most recent mass shooting, it is doubtful many citizens are well-versed in the U.S.
foreign policy that provokes such terrorism.

Rather, they focus, understandably, on the wrong done to their nation. But Fox offered a unique perspective that lends
insight to the enemy.

"An Al-Qaeda fighter made a point once during debriefing, she recounted.
 He said all these movies that America makes - like Independence Day, and the Hunger Games, and Star Wars -
theyre all about a small scrappy band of rebels who will do anything in their power with the limited resources
available to them to expel an outside, technological advanced invader.

And what you dont realize, he said, is that to us, to the rest of the world, you are the empire, and we are Luke
and Han. You are the aliens and we are Will Smith.

However, she also challenged the Al-Qaeda fighters take, arguing that on both sides of conflict, those fighting on the
ground often provide the same reasons for doing so:

"But the truth is that when you talk to people who are really fighting on the ground, on both sides, and ask them
why theyre there, they answer with hopes for their children, specific policies that they think are cruel or unfair, she
says.

And while it may be easier to dismiss your enemy as evil, hearing them out on policy concerns is actually an
amazing thing, because as long as your enemy is a subhuman psychopath thats gonna attack you no matter what
you do, this never ends. But if your enemy is a policy, however complicated - that we can work with.

As terror attacks become an increasingly normal occurrence in the West - and as Western intervention trudges
ahead unabated - hearing out enemies concerns may, at this point, be the most effective counterterrorism gesture the
United States can make; that is, if it is truly determined to bring an end to the violence.

Elites Openly Calling To Rise Up Against 'Ignorant Masses"

In this video Luke Rudkowski covers the brazen admission from James Traub a CFR member and
heir to the Bloomingdale empire.

Traub recently wrote an article for ForeignPolicy openly calling for the elites to rise up against the "fist shaking,
mindless, angry, ignorant, know nothing masses.

Victorious Nigel Farage Addresses EU Assembly: Youre Not Laughing Now Are
You?
July 2 2016 | From: TheGatewayPundit

UKIP leader Nigel Farage stood in front of the European Union Tuesday for the first time since the
Brexit results were announced last week.
Nigel told the assembly, How things have changed Isnt it funny. When I came here 17 years ago and I said I
wanted to lead a campaign to leave the European Union, you all laughed at me. Well I have to say youre not
laughing now are you?
The British Woke Up - Can The Americans?
June 30 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts

Many thanks for the support that you give to the website and for the words of encouragement and
appreciation that you send to me. The website resulted from you calling me out of retirement. It is
widely read and translated into foreign languages.
I try to read every email, but it is not possible for me to read and comment on the many articles and books that you
send or to respond to your questions over a wide range of issues, not all of which I know anything about.

This website is a great deal of work. In our time to be truthful is to be provocative. To write provocatively leaves little room
for error or mistatement as todays euphemism terms it. I could shill for the establishment and be wrong 98% of the time and
nothing ever would be said about it. But there is no forgiveness for a provocative truth-teller.

You have open inquiring minds and you want to know. Your motives are not to protect your illusions and delusions or to
reinforce your emotional needs. This is why I write for you.

If no one knows or respects truth, the world is lost. But it only takes a few to change the world. The cultural anthopologist
Margaret Mead said:

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, its the
only thing that ever has.

Change can be for better or worse. President Reagan and a committed few overcame the resistance of the CIA and military-
security complex and reduced tensions among nuclear powers by negotiating the end of the Cold War with Soviet leader
Gorbachev.

During the reign of the last three US presidents, a few neoconservatives resurrected the nuclear tensions and took them to a
higher level than at the peak of the Cold War.

There are hopeful signs that the neoconservative drive to World War III can be derailed. It seems that finally the Russians
have caught on that America is not the Holy Grail but a government reminiscent in its aggression of Nazi Germany.
Hopefully, Russian countermeasures will make even the crazed neocons think twice.

The British people, or rather a majority of those who voted, surprised the Establishment, which was confident of the success
of its propaganda, by voting to save their ancient and distinguished country, the font of liberty, from disappearing into the
EU, a dictatorship ruled by unaccountable appointees.

The British had enough of that with kings and decided that the future did not lie in going backward. The British vote to exit
the EU could bring the unintended consequence of unravelling the EU and NATO, thus reducing Washingtons ability to
foment war.
Americans need to decide that they, like the British, do not appreciate being led backward to worse times.

The Clintons and the Republican Senator from Texas, Phil Gramm, led America back to Robber Baron days by deregulating
the financial system.

Related: 25 People to Blame for the Financial Crisis

The senator was rewarded with a multi-million dollar banking job for overturning Great Depression era legislation that made
financial capitalism workable. Americans need to understand that capitalists do not care if capitalism works for you as long
as it works for them.

The collapse of the Soviet Union, due to the arrest of Gorbachev by hardline elements in the Communist Party, gave rise to
the American Neoconservatives, a double handful of people closely tied to the Israeli government. These few people have
involved America, for Israels benefit, in 15 years of warfare that has destroyed seven counries, with the cost to Americans
of approximately $7 trillion dollars, according to Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes.

The obviously false excuse for this destruction of peoples and resources is the myth of terrorism. Most terrorist events in
the US have been sting operations organized by the FBI in order to collect the multi-billion dollar bounty that Congress gives
for preventing terrorist events.
How best to keep this bounty flowing than to organize a terrorist event and prevent it? It is debatable whether such events
as 9/11, the Boston Marathon bombing, Sandy Hook, San Bernandino, and Orlando are false flag events or drills staged by
crisis actors and presented to the public as real.

The debt associated with 15 years of Washingtons wars is now being used to attack Social Security and Medicare. The One
Percent and their free market apologists are determined that the elderly will pay for the wars that enabled Israel to reduce
Palestine to a ghetto and for the wars that enriched the profits and power of the military-secutity complex, while inflicting a
massive refugee problem on Europe.

If the British, or enough of them, woke up, perhaps something similar can happen in America.

From many of you I hear your frustrations with family, friends, and associates who are content with what they hear from the
BBC, Fox News, CNN, and the New York Times. Obviously, if everyone was intelligent and could think for themselves or
even had time to consider what they are told, we would not be in the state that we are in.

Our job is to get enough people into the habit of thinking for themselves that we have the few required to change the world.
(Few is relative. In a country of 300 million people, few is probably several million.)

Arguing with friends doesnt work. Arguments generate hostility and competitiveness. Avoid arguing. Your friends and family
do not know anything. They sit in front of Fox News and CNN.

They are brainwashed.

Perhaps one way to approach friends and family is to ask questions. For example, how can there be 103 casualties in
Orlando and no visible evidence of the massive number of ambulances and EMT personnel necessary to deal with such a
massive number of casualties?

I asked my readers to help me prove the official story line, and no one could come up with convincing visible
evidence. How can there be such a massive event without abundant evidence?

How can powerfully constructed skyscrapers, built to withstand airplane collisions, suddenly explode allegedly as a result of
minor asymmetrical damage and scattered low temperature office fires? How can the entire contents of the towers be
pulverized when there is insufficient gravational energy to accomplish such pulverization?

How is it possible that WTC 7 came down in free fall acceleration in the absence of controlled demolition? Why doubt that
there was controlled demolition when the owner of the WTC said on TV (still available online) that the decision was made to
pull the building?
In case you have forgotten, you pull a building with controlled demolition. It takes a long time to wire a building for
demolition. Obviously, Building 7 was not wired on September 11, 2001.

We are constantly informed by the President, Vice President, Secretary of State, numerous senators and representatives,
by NATO commanders, by EU politicians, by presstitutes, and others, that Russia has invaded Ukraine.

Take a minute and think about this extraordinary lie. Clearly, evidence is no longer a factor in determining what is
occuring. Assertion only rules. Take a second to look outside The Matrix. Is it really possible that Ukraine would still exist if
Russia invaded? I would bet my life that within 60 hours of a Russian invasion of Ukraine, Ukraine would again be part of
Russia.

Remember August 2008 when the US and Israeli trained and equipped Georgian army invaded the peacekeeping realm of
South Ossetia, killing Russian peace-keeping troops and Ossetian civilians. Putin was at the Beijing Olympics, but Russian
armed forces quickly smashed the American/Israeli trained and equipped Georgian army. Putin held Geogia in his palm.

What did Putin do after delivering this lesson in the superiority of Russian arms? He released Georgia and returned home.

So how is it that Putin, according to the entirely of the Western political establishment and media whores, is determined to
rebuild the Soviet Empire? Putin held Georgia. No power on earth could have forced him to release Georgia.

But Putin withdrew Russias forces and released the country. The former Georgian president is now an American operative
in Ukraine.

If you consider the number of outsiders, including US citizens and the former president of Georgia, who serve in the
Ukrainian government, it raises questions about the so-called Maidan Revolution in February 2014.

If this really was a popular uprising, and not a Washington orchestrated coup, why is there such a shortage of Ukrainians to
form the new government that foreign citizens have to be brought in to rule the country?

Do not believe any official explanation of anything. Things are not true just because the government and presstitutes say
so.

Keep in mind that official explanations can be cover for hidden agendas. If Washington and the media have their way, we
will live in a world constructed out of lies designed to hide from us the real interests being served.
That is not the kind of world that any of us want to live in.

Ex-CIA Spy: A Global Open Source Revolution Is About To Begin

June 29 2016 | From: TheSpiritScience

When Robert David Steele speaks, people listen. Especially those within the military and
intelligence communities around the world.

With his continued rhetoric on the open source everything manifesto as a way to positively transform this world for
all, Mr. Steele has additionally begun discussing the worlds largest financial/gold cover-up story which has ties to
JFKs assassination and 9/11: That is, the global collateral accounts.

As a former CIA spy who has trained over 7,500 officers from over 66 countries, Robert Steele has over 18 years
experience across the U.S. Intelligence community and an additional 20 years experience in commercial intelligence and
training. He is also a former Marine and he is the co-founder of the Marine Corps Intelligence Activity.

He has also written several books, which include, The Open Source Manifesto and Intelligence For Earth: Clarity, Diversity,
Integrity and Sustainability, among others.

In accord to open source everything, Roberts motto is: The truth at any cost, lowers all other costs.

Essentially, when information, technology and resources are opened up as the commons to all, the true cost plummets and
the well-being of our planet and all living beings here begin to thrive, as well as our social, political and financial systems.
In Roberts own words, the open source revolution will transform our world for the better and for all.

"Sharing, not secrecy, is the means by which we realize such a lofty destiny as well as create infinite wealth. The
wealth of networks, the wealth of knowledge, revolutionary wealth- all can create a nonzero, win-win Earth that
works for 100% of humanity. This is the utopia that Buckminster Fuller foresaw, now within our reach.

Similar models to Steeles open source everything also include The Venus Project: Beyond Politics, Poverty and War,
which calls for a holistic approach to changing the systems on this planet in a way that utilizes technology and human
ingenuity to provide a high standard of living for every person by opening the planets resources for the use of all in a
strategically sustainable and efficient manner.

Another model that is similar is Sustainable Humans gift-based community in which all who participate are volunteers and
everything created is done to spread knowledge, ideas and alternative ways of living that enable humanity to live in
harmony with the rest of life on Earth.

All of these models are wonderful and appropriate to envision, and what is certain is that most of the social systems we have
in place currently, must go. Fundamental change is necessary.

In an interview with The Guardian, Robert David Steele was asked his opinion on the idea that the U.S. is on the verge of
revolting against the elitist 1%:
 "The preconditions for revolution exist in the UK, and most Western countries [including the U.S].

The number of active pre-conditions is quite stunning, from elite isolation to concentrated wealth to inadequate
socialization and education, to concentrated land-holdings to loss of authority to repression of new technologies,
especially in relation to energy, to the atrophy of the public sector and spread of corruption, to media dishonesty, to
mass unemployment of young men and on and on and on.

What then needs to happen for this to begin? Steele says:

"Preconditions are not the same as precipitants. We are waiting for our Tunisian fruit seller. The public will endure
great repression, especially when most media outlets and schools are actively aiding the repressive meme of you
are helpless, this is the order of things.

When we have a scandal so powerful that it cannot be ignored by the average Briton or American, we will have a
revolution that overturns the corrupt political systems in both countries, and perhaps puts many banks out of
business. Vaclav Handel calls this The Power of the Powerless. One spark, one massive fire.

Interestingly, this interview was conducted almost exactly 2 years ago. Have we not seen the divide between the 99% and
the 1% continue to grow in that time? Humanity will not remain quiet for much longer. We are indeed close to some big and
positive changes.

Perhaps this massive scandal/event we are waiting for is the conclusion of the FBIs investigation of Hillary Clinton and the
Clinton Foundation or maybe it is Britains vote to leave the EU, potentially triggering a cascade of revolts throughout Europe
and then the world, or perhaps it will be a large enough group of people becoming aware of the global collateral accounts,
the worlds largest financial/gold cover-up which has relation to JFKs death and the events of 9/11; a story which just three
weeks ago Robert David Steele started to write about publicly:
 "It never occurred to me that accidentally becoming the top Amazon reviewer for non-fiction, partially associated
with my being the lead for Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) for 25 years across 66+ countries, would be vastly
more important than everything I ever learned across multiple graduate degrees, as a former spy, and as co-
founder of the Marine Corps Intelligence Activity (MCIA).

As I encounter disbelief about Neil Keenan and his role as the main juncture between the Dragon Society and the
West as we move toward a global economic re-set, I have to remind myself that 80% of the public still thinks JFK
was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald; J. Edgar Hoover was a moral man; the Israelis attacked the USS Liberty
by accident, and 9/11 was carried out by a bunch of rag heads armed with box cutters.

I must emphasize that it was not the books that underlay my absolute confidence in Neil Keenan and the Dragon
Society and the broad outlines of the coming global re-set, but rather the people behind the books that I have
taken the trouble to meet, sometimes under quasi-clandestine circumstances. Sterling and Peggy Seagrave -
Peggy has passed - stand out.

Their book, Gold WarriorsAmericas Secret Recovery of Yamashitas Gold, came with a CD containing 60,000
additional documents including maps and photographs. That led me to a quasi-clandestine meeting in France to
interview them for the 2004 offering of my international conference - the transcript is online - and a deep continuing
relationship of trust."

The public endorsement of Neil Keenan and his teams efforts to open the global collateral accounts from Robert David
Steele is another clear indication that these accounts are indeed real and that those who are working with Neil Keenan
(positive factions within The Pentagon and CIA, Russian Intelligence, presidents and prime ministers of multiple South
American countries and several Asian countries, among many other political, financial and intelligence and military
groups who are all quietly and sometimes openly working for humanitys best interest) are legitimate.
The global collateral accounts have such a deep and complex history, which can be read in great detail here. In short, they
are off-ledger accounts backed by gold, silver and many other assets which were originally intended for humanitarian
projects.

JFK signed what is known as the Green Hilton Memorial Agreement with President Sukarno of Indonesia, which was to use
these accounts to issue a new US Treasury Note (backed by gold and silver) and end the Federal Reserves control over
the global financial system.

Neil Keenan is now getting very close to opening these accounts for the intended purposes of transforming our world for the
better through many humanitarian projects as well as the release of free energy technologies and an overhaul in the global
financial system. Russia, China, Iran, Indonesia and almost the entire Eastern hemisphere is supporting this plan in one way
or another.

Perhaps Robert David Steeles ideas on an open source world will be part of the coming humanitarian projects.

As almost anyone can see when they look around either at their own lives or the world at large, everything is changing.
Everything is in flux. Everything happens in cycles. The time for positive global change is now.
For more information on some of the topics mentioned above, check out these articles:

The Inevitability of Peaceful Revolution

We Need A New, Beneficial Global Economy

The Connection Between 9/11, JFK and the Global Collateral Accounts

The Most Important Financial Meeting Since JFKs Death Just Took Place

The Alliance That Is Taking Down The New World Order

Trump: America Has A Chance To Reject Rule By Global Elite & More
June 28 2016 | From: Geopolitics

Trump on Brexit: "Basically, they took back their country.

Presidential candidate Donald Trump on Friday congratulated the UK for voting to assert its independence from the
European Union, and encouraged the American people in November to also assert their independence from the
global elite.

Related: All Polls Favoring Clintons Candidacy Are Fake-Here Is How to Tell

Following the British vote to exit the EU, Trump said the election results marked a shift toward more nationalistic tendencies.
"Come November, the American people will have the chance to re-declare their independence, the Trump
campaign said in a statement. Americans will have a chance to vote for trade, immigration and foreign policies
that put our citizens first.

They will have the chance to reject todays rule by the global elite, and to embrace real change that delivers a
government of, by and for the people.

I hope America is watching, it will soon be time to believe in America again.

Asked by reporters in Scotland what he thought about the Brexit vote, Trump said the British people took back control of
their country. Its a great thing.
Ahead of the vote, Trump had told reporters he was for the Brexit if it meant less bureaucracy for the UK.

"I would personally be more inclined to leave, for a lot of reasons, like having a lot less bureaucracy, he said in
May.

The shock results have led many to predict Trump will be elected president in November.

Republican pollster Frank Luntz said he believed the mass populist uprising happening globally could push Trump into the
White House.

"Populism is rising everywhere as people decide that government does not listen and does not care, said Luntz.

But this is even more significant, because Britain has never been the source of populist uprisings like this. If
Britain can vote itself out of Europe, America can vote itself in for Trump.

Nigel Farage, the leader of the UKs Independence Party which played a huge part in mobilizing UK citizens behind the
Brexit, also speculated the momentum behind the results could usher in a Trump presidency.
 "There is something happening in American politics that is perhaps a bit of a mirror of whats happening here, a
feeling in much of America, that what happens in Washington is too detached and too remote and Trump is
cashing in on some of it, said Farage, adding, He must have a chance of winning.

As Infowars has reported, the idea for the European Union globalist superstate came directly out of discussions held at the
secretive Bilderberg Group conference in 1955, at which European politicians considered The necessity to bring the
German people into a common European market as quickly as possible.

Watch: Alex congratulates the people of the United Kingdom for throwing off the shackles of the globalists and making their
break for freedom from the oppressive EU.

This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected - If It Goes Viral

This is why Donald Trump should be president

The American people need to realize that Donald J. Trump is our last hope. He is the only person who is capable of
saving America and the Western World as a whole from falling into the depths of despair due to globalist agendas
and a crippling political correctness era.

Related: George Carlin and Donald Trump Political Correctness is fascism pretending to be Manners

These clips show Donald Trump from all the way back in 1986 up until present day, and they do a fantastic job at
demonstrating the kind of person Trump is, and why he deserves to be the next president.

Time stamps to each segment:

1980 Rona Barrett Interview 00:10

1987 Oprah Interview 00:47

1988 GOP Convention 01:58

1989 Interview 02:55

1991 C-Span Interview 04:59

1999 Press Interview 06:05

2004 CNN Interview 06:27

 2007 Larry King Live 07:00

2011 Steve Forbes Interview 07:27

2012 CNN Comments on Romney 09:08

2012 CNBC Interview on Economy 09:22

2014 Speaking at CPAC 11:18

2015 Press Event 14:17

Brexit Is Sending Shockwaves Across The Atlantic

June 27 2016 | From: Geopolitics

EU leaders cannot hide their panic as they confront the prevailing reality that Europeans are now
questioning the validity of a Centralized Europe that is far from what was being advertised prior to
its birth.

Frankly, just a few days ago we were deeply concerned that the Brexit campaign would lose after the false flag
murder of Labour MP Jo Cox.

It was very astounding how the majority of the British people were able to figure out the fact that its too absurd to kill
someone from the other side when your position is winning in all the surveys, independent or otherwise.

That needless murder should be the primary reason why a David Cameron resigned from the leadership this early.
Remember, he did say prior to the referendum that he wont resign even if the Remain campaign is defeated.

The only conclusion we can draw from the historic results would be that those who voted for Brexit were doing it for the sake
of principle and to protest the dictatorial behavior of those unelected personalities holed up in Brussels.
Principled protest vote, of course, cannot be intimidated and subdued. They grew more emboldened as the opposition
began to use dirty tactics and covert maneuvers.

Make no mistake about it, the Rothschild dynasty has profited heavily through George Soros Fund Management, in
compliance to their age old tradition of betting both sides of the conflict.

Last May 16th of this year, Bloomberg reported;

"Billionaire George Soros prepared last quarter for gloomy times, dialing back his U.S. stock investments by more
than a third, betting against the equities while banking on gold.

Soros also bought bullish options contracts on 1.05 million shares in the SPDR Gold Trust, which tracks the
price of bullion. Whats more, the fund took a stake in the worlds biggest producer of the metal, Barrick Gold
Corp., worth $264 million at the end of March, the filing showed. Soros acquired 1.7 percent of Barrick, making it
the funds biggest U.S.-listed holding.

Soross former chief strategist, billionaire investor Stan Druckenmiller, is also bullish on gold. Earlier this
month he called the yellow metal his largest currency allocation as central bankers experiment with the absurd
notion of negative interest rates.

Gold for immediate delivery jumped 16 percent in the first three months of the year, the biggest quarterly surge
since 1986, according to Bloomberg generic pricing. Shares of Toronto-based Barrick have more than doubled this
year as the miner accelerates cost-cutting efforts and reduces debt. Barrick is up 39 percent since March 31."

- Bloomberg

Now, they are reaping the benefits of their having access to privileged information about the real British pulse weeks prior to
yesterdays Brexit vote.

"Bullish positions in gold and volatility and well-timed short bets on China and emerging markets, among other
areas, were some of the trades that benefited hedge funds on Friday as markets digested Britons surprise
decision to exit the European Union, according to people familiar with the matter.

so-called macro fund managers George Soros and Stanley Druckenmiller, who run private firms managing
family money through investments in a range of assets, appeared to be benefiting from long positions in gold,
according to filings, though their overall performance numbers werent clear."

- CNBC

Another reason for a David Cameron to feel nothing more than a whore wearing a very expensive neck tie. Why would he
feel otherwise, when even his own master is just another errand boy for the real power behind it all?
Evelyn de Rothschild pokes Prince Charles. And as anyone who knows their cabal history will attest, the Rothschild bloodline is above the Windsor
(Saxe-Coburg-Gotha) bloodline. The british [read: German] royal family are but underlings (and for a large part inbred impostors - but that is another
kettle of fish.)

Now that we gain more understanding of how they played the last Brexit game, its time to savor on the positive prospects of
where Britain will be heading in the next few years, and why the Brexit is indeed the Independence Day for the Brits

The global implication of the successful Brexit referendum cannot be overestimated. This i s sending ripples of resistance
across the Eurozone and in the United States.

"Polls recently conducted in Italy, France, Germany, Sweden, the Netherlands, Czech Republic and
Hungary also showed that these countries could follow Britain if it succeeds in leaving the EU. Euroskeptic
politicians in these countries have been adding fuel to the fire, stepping up their calls for EU-exits in light of the
British referendum."

- Geopolitics

"Following the referendum in Britain, in which a majority of its residents voted for the country to withdrawal from the
EU, Eurosceptic politicians in other European countries have intensified their calls to follow suit, the German
magazine Spiegel Online wrote."

- Sputnik
Moreover, Brexit has put in jeopardy Obamas pet TTIP project

"Britains decision to leave the European Union has damaged the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership,
Francois Asselineau, chairman of Frances Popular Republican Front, told Sputnik."

- Sputnik

We cant talk about the UK anymore because it will soon be entertaining another round of Scotland Independence
referendum which was also rigged the last time.

In the immediate future though, heres whats going to happen next.

Across the Atlantic, talks of secession is beginning to unravel

While secession of American states is often dismissed as absurd, there are few reasons to believe that a
state like Texas to name just one example could not immediately transition from state to nation-state.

With a large economy, port cities, oil, and easy access to European, Latin American, and even Asian
economies by sea, economics arguments against such a separation fall flat.

And of course, the success of smaller states like Norway, Denmark, and Switzerland illustrate that bigness is truly
unnecessary.

Naturally, many other states even beyond the biggest states- such as Pennsylvania, New Jersey, North Carolina
and others - could do the same. These states would all be among the largest economies on earth were they to
leave the US.

But what about national defense! some may argue. Wouldnt Texas be constantly at war with the United
States? Experience suggests that Texas would be at war with the United States about as frequently as Canada
has been at war with the United States: zero times since 1815.

International wars rarely erupt between countries with common languages, common histories, and common
economic interests. Should Scotland secede, the UK wont be sending in the tanks, and Scotland could
easily join the realm of independent nation states, just as many American states could do the same.

- Zerohedge

Above all, this historic event should be viewed in the larger geopolitical context beyond the Eurozone and the United States
alone.

Already, there are major actions against Western hegemony elsewhere in Eurasia, and Latin America, e.g.:

Successful St. Petersburg International Economic Conference which is forcing progressive industrial entities to
form a coherent scientific and technological collaboration to create a better future free of wars and conflicts;
 The historic signing of peace agreement between the government of Colombia and leftist FARC rebels, ending
five decades of armed struggle that arrested development in the country;

The recently concluded Sulong Pilipinas 2-day workshop between the incoming Duterte cabinet and 500
representatives from the business sectors and related stakeholders, which among others, discussed the
independent position of the Philippines with regards to the Spratlys that the United States has been using as a
major fulcrum in its Pivot to Asia, a war plan to encircle China and wage war thousands of miles away from home
just for the sake of freedom of navigation, would you believe it?

Heres Duterte narrating his conversation with US ambassador to the Philippines Philip S. Goldberg, with regards to the
West Philippine Sea China issue at large.

Aside from choosing the Maritime Silk Road of the BRICS instead of the endless US imperialistic aggression, Duterte has
already accomplished so much even before his inauguration to the presidency on June 30th, e.g.:

Thousands of drug peddlers and users have already surrendered opting for rehabilitation instead of fighting it out
with the police;

Formally reopened peace talks with the Communist Party of the Philippines which has been waging wars with the
government for five decades;

Organized a Moro Convention to restart the peace process with various rival secessionist groups sitting on the
same table, to end the 400+ year rebellion in Muslim Mindanao [the longest in the Muslim world], once and for all.

The most radical appointment as of late is the anti-mining crusader Gina Lopez, from a family of oligarchs, to the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources.

A known tactician, Duterte is surely pitting the oligarchs against each other on this one, as the mining stocks start
to plummet.

What these events illustrate is that even if the enemy may seem capable of exercising great power over a great multitude of
the worlds population, that enormous power is quickly eroded once the people begin to see things as they really are, i.e. a
grand charade of lies, treachery, deceptions and murder.

Together, we can change the rules of the game, and end the age of genocide and technocratic slavery. With our collective
persistence, the Rothschild Khazarian Empire will fall.

Trump Launches LyingCrookedHillary.com + A Clinton Expose

June 25 2016 | From: Infowars / Various

A large percentage of Americans already see Hillary as "crooked."

The Trump campaign has launched LyingCrookedHillary.com which showcases Crooked Hillarys 10 Legendary
Lies and a notification service for Hillarys next lie.

Related: Stanford Study Confirms Election Fraud - She is backed by the cabal establishment - what more does it take to
destry the facade?

LyingCrookedHillary.com is rolling out a list of Hillary lies over time, and the first lie listed is Hillary Lies to Benghazi
Families.

Hillary has no shame! The Benghazi attacks were a preventable tragedy disgraced further by Hillarys web of
lies, the site published by Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. states.

She knew within hours that the attacks in Benghazi were a terrorist attack, and not a spontaneous protest due to a
You Tube Video, but she lied anyways.

She stood in front of the flag-draped coffins of four Americans that died serving their country and peddled the lie
that the video was to blame both to the victims families and the American public.

Trump, however, doesnt have to do much to paint Hillary as crooked; a Gallup poll revealed that a huge portion of
Americans not just Trump supporters view Hillary as a liar.
 When asked what comes to their mind when they think of Hillary Clinton, the most
common unprompted responses are dishonest, liar or dislike her, Zero Hedge reported in Feb.

What is perhaps more troubling is that in addition to the 21% of responses in the dishonest/dont trust her
category [by far the highest percentage], another 7% of Americans use even stronger words in a similar negative
vein, including criminal, crooked and thief.

In comparison, only 3% of poll respondents described Hillary as a good politician.

The perceptions of Hillary Clinton as dishonest are not new, Zero Hedge continued. When Gallup asked the
same question in 2008, dishonest was Americans most frequent response.

And, in a Gallup poll conducted in September 2015, Americans overwhelmingly referred to the email
scandal when asked to mention what they had read or heard about Clinton.

Donald Trump's Full Anti-Hillary Clinton Speech in NYC

Wednesday 22 june 2016
When Bill Clinton was President

Related: Secret Service Agent Exposes the Clintons Blood-soaked Political Career in a Book

When Bill Clinton was president, he allowed Hillary to assume authority over a health care reform. Even after threats and
intimidation, she couldn't even get a vote in a democratic controlled congress.

This fiasco cost the American taxpayers about $13 million in cost for studies, promotion, and other efforts.

Then President Clinton gave Hillary authority over selecting a female attorney general. Her first two selections were Zoe
Baird and Kimba Wood - both were forced to withdraw their names from consideration.

Next she chose Janet Reno - Bill Clinton described her selection as "my worst mistake."

You may not remember that Reno made the decision to gas David Koresh and the Branch Davidian religious sect in Waco,
Texas resulting in dozens of deaths of women and children.
Bill Clinton allowed Hillary to make recommendations for the head of the Civil Rights Commission. Lani Guanier was her
selection. When a little probing led to the discovery of Ms. Guanier's radical views, her name had to be withdrawn from
consideration.

A slow learner, Bill Clinton allowed Hillary to make some more recommendations. She chose former law partners Web
Hubbel for the Justice Department, Vince Foster for the White House staff, and William Kennedy for the Treasury
Department.

The result: Hubbel went to prison, Foster (presumably) committed suicide, and Kennedy was forced to resign.

Many younger votes will have no knowledge of "Travelgate." Hillary wanted to award unfettered travel contracts to Clinton
friend Harry Thompson - and the White House Travel Office refused to comply.

She managed to have them reported to the FBI and fired. This ruined their reputations, cost them their jobs, and caused a
thirty-six month investigation. Only one employee, Billy Dale was charged with a crime, and that of the enormous crime of
mixing personal and White House funds. A jury acquitted him of any crime in less than two hours.

Still not convinced, Hillary was allowed to recommend a close Clinton friend, Craig Livingstone, for the position of Director of
White House security.
When Livingstone was investigated for the improper access of about 900 FBI files of Clinton enemies (Filegate) and the
widespread use of drugs by White House staff, suddenly Hillary and the president denied even knowing Livingstone, and of
course, denied knowledge of drug use in the White House. Following this debacle, the FBI closed its White House Liaison
Office after more than thirty years of service to seven presidents.

Next, when women started coming forward with allegations of sexual harassment and rape by Bill Clinton, Hillary was put in
charge of the "bimbo eruption" and scandal defense.

Some of her decisions in the debacle were:

She urged her husband not to settle the Paula Jones lawsuit. After the Starr investigation they settled with Ms.
Jones.

She refused to release the Whitewater documents, which led to the appointment of Ken Starr as Special
Prosecutor.

After $80 million dollars of taxpayer money was spent, Starr's investigation led to Monica Lewinsky, which led to Bill lying
about and later admitting his affairs.

Hillary's game plan resulted in Bill losing his license to practice law for 'lying under oath' to a grand jury and then his
subsequent impeachment by the House of Representatives.

Hillary avoided indictment for perjury and obstruction of justice during the Starr investigation by repeating, "I do
not recall," "I have no recollection," and "I don't know" a total of 56 times while under oath.

After leaving the White House, Hillary was forced to return an estimated $200,000 in White House furniture, china, and
artwork that she had stolen.
Now there is destruction of possibly incriminating emails while Hillary was Secretary of State and the "pay to play" actions of
the Clinton Foundation.

What will be next?

Hillary Clinton: A Career Criminal

Related Articles:

FBI Gets Smoking Gun Evidence in Clinton Email Scandal

Wikileaks Drops Hillary Email Bomb That Could End Her Campaign but FB Censored It

Wikileaks will publish enough evidence to indict Hillary Clinton, warns Assange

Clinton Foundation "Hacked By Russians", "Foundation Vulnerabilities" Document Leaked

Hillary Clintons Neocon Resum

Can Brexiters Overcome False Flag Murder & Rothschild UK Collapse

Fearmongering? + Soros, Rothschild Warn Of Brexit Doom; Osborne Threatens With
"Suspending" Market
June 24 2016 | From: Geopolitics / ZeroHedge

We believe that the UK Brexit is just a small yet very important step towards freedom from the
SuperState European Union that is managed by non-elected Khazarian Nazionists.
If successful, the people still have to deal with the bogus Saxe-Coburg- Gotha UK monarchy.

Related: EU referendum live: David Cameron resigns as UK shocks the world by voting for Brexit

Related: Heres Why Britons Must Vote for Leave EU Today

Nevertheless, the big guns of the Khazarian Mafia are in full force in making statements aimed at sowing fear into the public
who will suffer from an immediate and dramatic impact on financial markets, investment, prices and jobs, once the Brexit
campaign succeeds.

These doom and gloom scenario is peddled on top of the recent false flag murder of a drugged man who, according to
mainstream press, even shouted Britain First in reference to the most radical group among the Brexit campaigners.

Related: UK Labour MP Jo Coxs Murder: A Desperate Anti-Brexit Psyop

Truth be told, most citizens of the corporate monarchy of the United Kingdom dont have enough information about the true
purpose of the European Union. This topic is summarily dismissed in the mainstream media as being just another
conspiracy theory.

Thats why a mere statement of economic consequences from a George Soros is enough to tremble the hell out of them.
According to him;

As opinion polls on the referendum result fluctuate, I want to offer a clear set of facts, based on my six decades of
experience in financial markets, to help voters understand the very real consequences of a vote to leave the EU.

The Bank of England, the Institute for Fiscal Studies and the IMF have assessed the long-term economic
consequences of Brexit. They suggest an income loss of 3,000 to 5,000 annually per household once the
British economy settles down to its new steady-state five years or so after Brexit. But there are some more
immediate financial consequences that have hardly been mentioned in the referendum debate.

To start off, sterling is almost certain to fall steeply and quickly if there is a vote to leave even more so after
yesterdays rebound as markets reacted to the shift in opinion polls towards remain.
 - TheGuardian

Remember, this is just a poll which they control and not the actual voting sentiments. But they are now conditioning the mind
of a failure for the Brexit.

Now, if that is true, why would the likes of Soros and his master issue statements urging the people against Brexit if indeed
the Leave campaign is losing?

I would expect this devaluation to be bigger and more disruptive than the 15% devaluation that occurred
in September 1992, when I was fortunate enough to make a substantial profit for my hedge fund investors, at the
expense of the Bank of England and the British government.

It is reasonable to assume, given the expectations implied by the market pricing at present, that after a Brexit vote
the pound would fall by at least 15% and possibly more than 20%, from its present level of $1.46 to below $1.15
(which would be between 25% and 30% below its pre-referendum trading range of $1.50 to $1.60).

If sterling fell to this level, then ironically one pound would be worth about one euro a method of joining the euro
that nobody in Britain would want.

Brexiters seem to recognise that a sharp devaluation would be almost inevitable after Brexit, but argue that this
would be healthy, despite the big losses of purchasing power for British households. In 1992 the devaluation
actually proved very helpful to the British economy, and subsequently I was even praised for my role in helping to
bring it about.

But I dont think the 1992 experience would be repeated. That devaluation was healthy because the government
was relieved of its obligation to defend an overvalued pound with damagingly high interest rates after the
breakdown of the exchange rate mechanism. This time, a large devaluation would be much less benign than in
1992, for at least three reasons.

Today, there are speculative forces in the markets much bigger and more powerful. And they will be eager to
exploit any miscalculations by the British government or British voters. A vote for Brexit would make some people
very rich but most voters considerably poorer.

- TheGuardian

The logic being that he is the expert in currency manipulation and people should listen to him. Against that rationale is the
Iceland experience when they severed their monetary policies away from the vulture bankers.

Once the initial disruptions are contained, the more independent economy will strengthen itself as the fundamentals are
stabilized.

And he is not part of the speculative forces he is talking about, that will be eager to exploit any miscalculations by the
British government or British voters.

Yes, he considers a vote for Brexit as a miscalculation, as if he is really good with math when even his rise to prominence in
world finance is only by the virtue of his having privileged access to information within a system that has been rigged also by
his cohorts.
George Soros talks with Jim Flaherty, centre, and Peter Munk, right. Soros spoke to a crowd of Canada's business elite on Monday at the Canadian
International Council gala.

The truth of the matter is, these Khazarian Mafiosi are afraid that the Brexit campaign might just win because their Brexit
arguments are more level headed, and for the open minded thats a positive way to move forward.

While the Remain campaign are dwelling mostly on pessimism as if the world would end with Brexit.

This Jacob Rothschild opinion piece came much earlier

 Success stories in any field are built on one great idea. This was certainly the case with my forebear Mayer
Amschel Rothschild, who at the end of the 18th century sent his five sons to the five financial capitals of Europe to
set up the first truly international banking system, a common market.

Operating from London, Paris, Vienna, Naples and Frankfurt, the brothers, working together to exchange
information and ideas, built an extraordinary business that operated across boundaries and cultures.

A hundred and fifty years later, the foundation of the EEC operated on similar principles, namely that we are
stronger

- TheTimes

With reference to the articles title, when does evidence come before the action, i.e. Brexit?

The key message right there is the statement We shouldnt accept a diminished role on the world stage, which is not
addressed at the great people of great Britain but could only mean that the Rothschild dynasty is not ready yet to have a
diminished role on their lives.

Heres the kicker: Great Britain was already great before the European Union came into being. Most of all, the EU is
collapsing whether Bexit succeeds or not. The only difference is, with Remain, Britons will be at the front seat when it
happens.

This is the reason why the Rothschild camp is campaigning for Remain, for the UK taxpayers to absorb a major portion of
the impact of the impending EU economic collapse.
To put it simply, the Rothschild dynasty is far more concerned on the accelerated collapse of their brainchild European
Union through the Brexit, than being genuinely troubled over the fate of the UK.

Bear in mind, the collapse of these megacorporations masquerading as government entities doesnt necessarily mean the
collapse of your ability to survive. In fact, your life would be a lot better without these bankers and their stooges in your
midst.

So, while the Remain campaigners are focusing on fear and pessimism, the Leave campaign is straightforward in reminding
that Britain will become great again, alone.

It would become even greater once the true blooded Britons kicked out their bogus and useless monarchy, together with the
Rothschild banking system, after the Brexit.

Of course, thats a tall order, but as we say here in Asia,A journey of a thousand miles, begins only with a single step.

That single step, my British friends, is the Brexit.

Related: Brexit: What Is It About? - Paul Craig Roberts

The Big Guns Are Out: Soros, Rothschild Warn Of Brexit Doom; Osborne Threatens
With "Suspending" Market

Recently, we recounted the story of "Black Wednesday" when on September 16, 1992, the UK was
forced out of the EUs exchange-rate mechanism, or ERM, when the BOE tapped out and allowed
the British pound to float freely, leading to 15% losses in the sterling. As we noted, this was
George Soros' infamous trade which "broke the Bank of England" and made the Hungarian richer
by over $1.5 bilion.
24 years later Soros is back, and this time he is warning against the kind of devaluation that made him a billionaire
and which he believes will be unleashed by Brexit, when in a Guardian Op-Ed he wrote that U.K. voters are grossly
underestimating the true costs of a vote to leave the EU, saying that there would be an "immediate and dramatic
impact on financial markets, investment, prices and jobs."

He predicts that the pound would decline "precipitously", seeing a gargantuan drop of at least 15% and possibly >20% to
below $1.15. Considering it has now become trendy for analysts to come up with ever "doomier" forecasts of just how low
cable would plunge in case of Brexit, we are surprised Soros stopped there.
Here Soros makes the distinction how the collapse in cable would be different from the one that made him richer by saying
that this devaluation wouldnt be healthy like the one in 1992 because BOE wouldnt cut rates, U.K. has large current
account deficit and devaluation unlikely to improve manufacturing exports this time. Just don't tell that to the BOJ, which
would gladly leave the EU - twice if it had to - if it meant a 20% devaluation.

Brexit would make some people very rich - but most voters considerably poorer; there are speculative forces in the,
markets much bigger and more powerful" than the speculators that profited from the 1967 devaluation at Britains
expense. "A vote to leave could see the week end with a Black Friday, and serious consequences for ordinary people."

Here is the gist of Soros' scaremongering, from the Guardian op-ed titled "The Brexit crash will make all of you poorer
be warned":

David Cameron, along with the Treasury, the Bank of England, the International Monetary Fund and others have
been attacked by the leave campaign for exaggerating the economic risks of Brexit.

This criticism has been widely accepted by the British media and many financial analysts. As a result, British voters
are now grossly underestimating the true costs of leaving.

As opinion polls on the referendum result fluctuate, I want to offer a clear set of facts, based on my six decades of
experience in financial markets, to help voters understand the very real consequences of a vote to leave the EU."

Of course, Soros' set of facts may be clouded by his far greater equity stake in equity interests around Europe, and the
globe, which would be drastially impacted by not only a Brexit, but by a European Union which is suddenly on the rocks.

From that point on, Soros' entire analysis is on the "worst case" scenario centered around a collapsing pound, something
which most ironically every other central bank around the globe is so desperate to achieve:
 ... Sterling is almost certain to fall steeply and quickly if there is a vote to leave even more so after yesterdays
rebound as markets reacted to the shift in opinion polls towards remain.

I would expect this devaluation to be bigger and more disruptive than the 15% devaluation that occurred in
September 1992, when I was fortunate enough to make a substantial profit for my hedge fund investors, at
the expense of the Bank of England and the British government."

At least he is honest.

It is notable that Soros' warning comes just days after that of Jacob Rothschild himself who said in another Op-Ed, this time
for The Times, that leaving the EU could lead to a "damaging and disorderly situation" in the UK as he urged Britons to vote
'remain'.

Just like Soros, Lord Rothschild, suddenly exhibiting a rare strain of humanitarian concern, said readers should not "risk the
wellbeing of our country" and European countries are "better off together".
He said that "at present we enjoy being a permanent member of the UN security council and we are essential to the G8 and
Commonwealth. But diplomacy, defence, the environment and our values of being a liberal democracy will all be at
risk" adding that "I can see no good reason why we should accept our playing a diminished role on the world
stage," especially if his own personal fortune would be jeopardized.

...

Finally, completing the doom loop, was none other than Chancellor George Osborne who, according to the Telegraph,
"refused to rule out suspending trading on the London stock market if Britons vote to leave the European Union on
Friday morning...

The threat from the Chancellor, made in an LBC radio interview on Monday evening, after the market had closed
could force shares down in London as early as Tuesday morning."

Iain Dale, the presenter, asked Mr Osborne: If the financial markets do plummet on Friday would you have to
consider suspending trading on the FTSE?

The Chancellor responded: Well look, the Bank of England and the Treasury Governor Carney and myself we
have of course discussed contingency plans.

But the sensible thing is to keep those secret and make sure you are well prepared for whatever happens
but if you set them all out in advance then you rather undermine the power of those plans.

Pushed again on the contingency plans, Mr Osborne said: I have a responsibility to the people listening to this
programme to do all I can to protect them. But I have to tell you that you cannot in the end protect people
from the economic shock that leaving the EU would bring about.

And in case the threat of shuttered markets was not enough, Osborne also hinted at imminent mass layoffs, suggesting that
redundancy notices could be issued hours after Britons vote to leave the EU at the vote.
 Mr Osborne pointed to warnings from the London Stock Exchange there would be 100,000 job losses in the City
after a Brexit.

Mr Osborne was challenged about whether redundancies warned by the bank JP Morgan could come as early as
Friday the day after the referendum. Mr Osborne replied: I think that will start to happen very quickly,
sadly.

Amid all this gloom, Osborne presented the "only" alternative that would not lead to the imminent economic collapse he so
forcefully imagines:

He added that if the UK voted to remain there would be a quick snap back for the British economy, he said that
decisions will be taken and investment will come in.

Asked if these redundancy notices would be issued on Friday morning if Britons vote to leave, Mr Osborne said:
That will start to happen very quickly sadly.

Now if only the people will do what these noble public servants tell to do in their own best interest...

Finally, Osborne also played down claims he could be forced to leave the Treasury after the referendum amid anger form
Tory backbenchers over the way he has campaigned, saying: Its really not about my job.
Oh but is George, just like it is in Soros and Rothschild's own self interest for the people to vote "Remain." To suggest
otherwise is naive, but it may also be irrelevant.

With very little time until the vote, the scaremongering tactic, not to mention the murder of an innocent woman, may have
already done its job judging by the reveral in public opinion.

In any case, one can only hope that unlike the case of the failed Greek referendum where the people voted one way only to
get the opposite, no matter how the Brits vote, it will truly represent the democratic will of the majority and that particular
outcome is what they get.

New Zealand Defence Force To Get $20bn Upgrade + More To Planned US Warship
Visit Than Mere Celebration
June 20 2016 | From: RadioNewZealand / Various

The government will spend $20 billion on the Defence Force in a long-term investment plan that
includes a new cyber security system for defence networks.
The $20bn spend outlined in the White Paper will be spread over 15 years

A new White Paper, which updates the Defence Force's policy, was released on June 8th that detailed plans to
replace the Air Force Boeing 757, the C130-Hercules, the Orion maritime patrol aircraft and the ANZAC frigates,
over the next 15 years.

It also said work was well under way to consider whether the existing Light Armoured Vehicles might be modernised, or
replaced.
The plan allows for the replacement or review of the Defence Force's aircraft, frigates and Light Armoured Vehicles

While New Zealand did not face the prospect of an imminent military attack, there were growing threats as a result of failing
states and pressure on food and water resources, the paper said.

Prime Minister John Key said the new policy was being launched at a time of "increasing uncertainty and instability in the
international environment".

"The emergence of ISIL (Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant), heightened tensions in the East and South China
seas, increases in military spending across South East Asia, and the rapid evolution and spread of cyber threats
are just a few examples," he said.

New Zealand's geographical isolation did not provide the protection it once did, Mr Key said.

"As a maritime nation dependent on open trade routes, our security and prosperity is inextricably linked to events
occurring far from our shores.

New Zealand needs a defence force than can protect New Zealand and also contribute to international security
and stability," he said.
Prime Minister John Key presents the White Paper at Parliament

This included responding to activities in New Zealand's Exclusive Economic Zone, Antarctica and the Southern Ocean, Mr
Key said.

Cyber security was also identified as a major new risk, and a new defence cyber support network would be developed.

More intelligence personnel would be hired to help analyse and distribute information collected from surveillance. The paper
noted demand for disaster relief and and recovery efforts in the South Pacific would increase in coming decades.

Cyber Attacks 'As Effective a Weapon as a Bomb'

The White Paper noted increasing reliance on technology and information was creating "new vulnerabilities".

The threat to systems relying on networked technologies had increased "markedly" since 2010, it said.

"New Zealand therefore has an interest in contributing to international cyberspace and space efforts to protect this
infrastructure from being exploited or disrupted."

Defence Minister Gerry Brownlee would not give specific details about the resourcing for the boosted cyber security system,
as that had not yet been determined.
Defence Minister Gerry Brownlee also spoke at the paper's presentation

"But it will be a significant number of people who are deployed into the armed forces or from the armed forces who
will specialise in, to a greater extent, in this sort of deterrent."

Mr Brownlee said cyber weapons were now significant, as evidenced by the reliance of individuals on a multitude of
technologies.

"Now you can multiply that across a whole economy, or a whole set of economies and see what the potential might
be to turn an attack on that - we all know about this - cyber attacks into an effective a weapon as a bomb.

So it's a much wider concept than just saying it's to protect, or it's to attack - we need to know what other people
are up to, particularly in a military sense."

When asked how closely the Government Communications Security Bureau would be involved, Mr Brownlee said there
would be a "high level of co-operation".

Maritime Threats and Illegal Fishing

As activity in New Zealand's waters increased, the White Paper warned incidents that required a New Zealand response
were more likely to occur.

It said the size, intrinsic value and challenges associated with managing the country's large maritime domain underlined the
significance of maritime threats to New Zealand.
The White Paper highlighted the Defence Force's activities and responsibilities in Antarctica and the Southern Ocean

New Zealand had a direct interest in the stability of Antarctica and the Southern Ocean, including its preservation, and the
Defence Force must continue to monitor illegal, unregulated and unreported fishing, the paper said.

Mr Brownlee said illegal fishing came at a great cost to the country.

"Illegal fishing is one of the things that troubles us the most. It is an attack on our economy.

Similarly throughout the Pacific when you have unregulated fishing in some of our Pacific neighbours, that is also
an attack on their economy and comes at a cost to us and our partner nations," Mr Brownlee said.

The White Paper also raised concerns about escalating tensions in the East and South China seas.

Over half of the country's maritime trade passed through the South China Sea, and the paper predicted that, over the
coming decades, it was likely to remain a contested environment.

There would be serious implications for trade routes, and New Zealand's ability to service markets, should major instability
occur in the region, it said.

"A secure maritime environment is vital to ensure our continued prosperity through maritime trade, as it is
estimated that 99 percent of New Zealand's exports and imports are delivered by sea transport," Chief of the
Defence Force Lieutenant General Tim Keating said.
 "We just can't leave maritime security responsibilities to others without having a credible contribution
ourselves," he said.

Funding Not Broken Down

A $20bn price tag over the next 15 years would be needed to implement the plan, but the White Paper did not contain a
specific breakdown of costs.

Related: Defence White Paper 2016

Mr Key said the money would have to be appropriated through the normal budget process.

"So Budget 2016 had the forecast period where there was some obviously increase but also base allocation
for [the Defence Force].

Secondly, there is some that can be funded through their depreciation allowance but over time, future budgets will
have to make bigger allowances, both capital and operating, for Defence's capability."

The level of military spending was justified, Mr Key said.

"Well, firstly, it's over a long period of time... Secondly, if you look at our spending at about 1.1 percent of GDP, it's
at the more modest end of spending when nations allocate resources towards our military capability."

More To Planned US Warship Visit Than Mere Celebration

Nicky Hager writes "Let the US send a warship" to be part of the NZ Navy's 75th birthday in
November because the Nuclear-Free Act will not be threatened by such a visit.

The United States nuclear powered warship Texas arrives in New Zealand, in August 1983

The response of Auckland Peace Action is that it is not okay for any warships from anywhere to come to New
Zealand, nuclear-armed or not.
Related: New Zealand To Abandon Its Hard Fought Nuclear Free Stance?

The aspirations of the nuclear-free movement of the 1970s and 1980s did not come from a selfish desire to be safe from
nuclear war and fallout. It was a powerful political movement that demanded a different kind of world: one entirely free of
nuclear weapons, and one in which New Zealand set an example as a neutral, non-aligned, peacemaking country.

What Nicky Hager failed to mention and what people need to know today about the proposed visit of some 30 navies
(including the US Navy) is that this event, billed as a "celebration", is part of an enormous arms fair sponsored by the world's
largest weapons manufacturers - including nuclear weapons makers - and a military recruiting and public-relations campaign
that will involve New Zealand in future wars.

The nuclear-free legislation isn't threatened; it has just been sidelined.

The week of events planned for Auckland in November is sponsored by many companies who directly profit from war,
including Lockheed Martin, Thales, Babcock, ThyssenKrupp, and Cubic Defence (all in the top 100 list of international arms
companies), along with the NZ Defence Industry Association, itself an industry trade promotion group consisting of another
60-odd members involved in weapons and military-related production.

Lockheed Martin is the world's largest weapons manufacturer and supplier to such regimes as Saudi Arabia, a country that
today stands accused of using these very weapons to commit war crimes.

Along with the "International Fleet Review" which is essentially a parade of military hardware, a two-day arms fair at the ANZ
Viaduct Events Centre is planned. Lockheed Martin is the principle sponsor and more than 500 delegates and weapons
company representatives are expected. Here, military men can make deals to buy all the naval hardware and other
weaponry on display.

Unsurprisingly, Lockheed Martin currently has a $446 million contract with the NZ Navy to upgrade New Zealand's two
frigates, Te Mana and Te Kaha, boats the Government has already indicated it plans to replace as part of its $20 billion
boost to the NZ Defence Force announced as part of last week's Defence White Paper.

This enormous injection of cash into the military is happening despite the NZDF's own evidence that "the country does not
face a direct military threat in the foreseeable future".

The NZDF and those who support New Zealand's involvement in US wars, however, clearly do see a threat - a threat
to their public support and, thus, continued operations.

This is the real reason behind the Navy's 75th birthday.

Their "celebration" is a stage-managed marketing event to secure public support for future wars, ever-increasing
budgets and the recruitment of young men and women to fight and die.

The Navy says so itself: its four goals for the event are "reputation, relationships, retention and recruiting".

The New Zealand military has been continuously at war in Afghanistan alongside the US for 15 years; it is conducting
regular training with the US Marine Corp, and it participates in the largest maritime war exercises in the world, the US-led
Rimpac.

Related: RIMPAC, the Rim of the Pacific Exercise, is the world's largest international maritime warfare exercise

Instead of leading us to complacency because the Nuclear-Free Act is still intact, Hager could have taken the opportunity to
encourage a redoubling of the efforts of the thousands of people who worked to make New Zealand nuclear-free and the
necessity of expanding that position.

That movement was brave, capable and courageous 30 years ago. It is a movement to truly celebrate, but its work remains
unfinished.

It is that work that is now urgently necessary.

Related: Fully Loaded: The Ten Biggest Gun Manufacturers in America

UK Labour MP Jo Coxs Murder: A Desperate Anti-Brexit Psyop

June 19 2016 | From: Geopolitics

The Brexit Referendum will be held on June 23, and one British MP Jo Cox, a staunch anti-Brexit
proponent, was shot and killed by a man with psychological issues [read: drugged] and who
happened to shout Britain First just before the murder.

Yes, its not Allahu Akbar, this time around. As can be expected, the social media and the mainstream media are
now being flooded with the pro Brexit are extremists branding to ruin the growing pro-Leave EU sentiments as
shown by recent polls.

Related: Some may already be using the murder of MP Jo Cox for political gain

Make no mistake, it wasnt the deranged Thomas Mair who murdered Cox but those who drugged him to madness. And
there was no shouting of Britain First either, as new witnesses are now saying.
Heres the strong motivation of why a sacrificial lamb must be used. From Reuters;

"Britains Leave campaign opened up a 7-point lead over Remain ahead of a referendum on membership of
the European Union an opinion poll showed late Monday, while the nations biggest-selling newspaper urged
readers to vote to quit the bloc.

The result of the June 23 referendum will have far-reaching consequences for politics, the economy, defense,
migration and diplomacy in Britain and elsewhere.

Recent polls are suggesting that momentum has swung towards the Leave camp, or a so called Brexit, unsettling
investors. Leave in recent days has focused its campaign on the issue of immigration.

According to the YouGov poll for The Times, Leave held 46 percent support compared with 39 percent support
for Remain. Undecided voters were 11 percent, while 4 percent wont vote.

Last Monday The Times/YouGov had reported a 1 percent lead for the Remain campaign.

In another, though not unexpected, boost for Leave, media tycoon Rupert Murdochs Sun newspaper called on its
readers to vote to quit the 28-member EU.

The Sun urges everyone to vote Leave. We must set ourselves free from dictatorial Brussels, said the tabloid,
which has a circulation of 1.7 million."

- Reuters

It used to be as high as 10% lead for Leave EU campaign.

Bloomberg tracker indicates 3.3% lead for Leave EU campaign [here], while the Rothschilds Economist gave it a statistical
tie [here]
 which should make it easy for the globalists to sway the votes in their favor, i.e. the preservation of the European
SuperState.

The recent murder of Jo Cox is an indication that the anti-Brexit camp are so desperate, they believe they could easily use it
to reverse the sentiment of the people, or at the very least, they could use the murder to mask the rigging of the votes on
June 30, just like they employed fear mongering during the last Scotland referendum.

Scotland Referendum Fraud Exposed

The bigger picture, however, will always be that the Sheeples are subjected to constant flow of distraction to preoccupy
them with issues that that have nothing to do with real freedom. The limited choices of the people will always confine them
to that same divide and rule control system that has worked for thousands of years and has continued to enslave them
even today.

There must be a more decisive action from those who see things as they truly are.

Aside from the fiat monetary scam and bloodsoaked petrodollar, another significant source of funds for the Nazionist
Khazarian Mafia is the healthcare industry which registered a whopping $3.09 trillion in 2014, and is projected to soar to
$3.57 trillion in 2017, in the US alone. We believe that this is just a conservative figure.

We can avoid using drugs, defeat any viral attack and scaremongering, like the Zika virus, easily by knowing how to build
our own comprehensive antiviral system. Find more about it here.

New Zealand To Abandon Its Hard Fought Nuclear Free Stance?

June 18 2016 | From: KiwiWatch
How disgraceful it is that Prime Minister Key in considering U.S. navy ship visits. For New Zealand
this is a deplorable betrayal of the years of stiff arming by the U.S. against New Zealand because
our nation stood up for peace and was counted as being against the proliferation of nuclear
weapons demonstrating that we have an independent voice in world affairs.

Discussing this issue Hawkes Bay Today May 31 states that a new poll shows 75% of New Zealanders agree with
Key. Lets see the poll, its news to me! Even if it was true it doesnt mean New Zealand should abandon the policy.

Related: A NuclearFree Moment

The article states the U.S. navy has boycotted NZ ports since 1986 and even after the ban of mutual navy exercises with the
U.S. was lifted in 2010 the U.S. still blocked our navy from berthing at naval base yards in Pearl Harbour forcing our wee
frigate to berth in a domestic wharf. How ridiculous! Call this country a friend, an ally?

The U.S. policy of hegemony over any country that displays independence from Washington neocon control, stops at nothing
to force servitude over any nation.

The abandonment of our nuclear free status immediately places our sovereign nation at risk in the incidence of a nuclear war
and believe me when I say this is the madness that is driving Washington policy right now. John Key has no right to be
pandering to Washington demands and expectations giving away New Zealands years of hard fought independent nuclear
free policy.
Wake up readers to the fact that right now the U.S. is placing right along the borders of Russia, in Poland, Romania and the
Latvian countries a massive military build up including thousands of U.S. personnel, tanks, armoured vehicles and missiles
aimed at Russia.

The madmen/women of Washington believe they can win a nuclear war with Russia! These insane people are agents of the
U.S. military/industrial complex and this policy is to force Russia into submission to Washington control over its resources
and is being repeated also with China in regard to the man made islands in the South China Sea.

The United States treats any independence from its dominance as unacceptable and will not allow independent policy
without punishing that country in some way, just as it has attempted to do with New Zealands nuclear free policy, a
laughable response really to such a small country saying no not here thanks.
Servitude is delivered by way of economic sanctions to weaken a nations economy as it was with Iran over nuclear energy
policy when there was no threat (New Zealand had to abandon its burgeoning trade with Iran for years until sanctions were
lifted) and again with Russia over the western media trumped up lie that Russia had invaded the Ukraine when all along it
was Washington and the CIA that was funding and supporting the coup in Ukraine in February 2014.

Or it is direct military intervention as in Afghanistan, chasing Osama bin Laden who from a cave managed to out smart the
most sophisticated air defense system in the world on 9/11, or Iraq with the weapons of mass destruction lie, or Libya where
Colonel Gadaffi dared to suggest that Arab nations should trade their oil in anything but U.S. dollars, or Syria where the U.S.
seeks regime change as once parroted by John Key after one of his Obama golf games, or Yemen where its agents in Saudi
Arabia are causing genocide against Shia Muslims or in Somalia.
 No one in their right mind could believe the U.S. is battling
around the world to spread freedom and democracy
because the freedom and democracy of the last Bush
administration retained by Obama has resulted in millions
dead or maimed, whole countries of Arab lands destroyed
and refugee crisis that is changing the face of European
life.

The U.S. military / industrial complex and the politicians that

pay homage to it deliver death all over the world wherever it
is engaged. We should not be re-engaging with them now!

Key is a product of Wall Street, his millions were made

trading in U.S. financial circles.

While this is not a criticism he is well schooled, has been

well paid to deliver New Zealand into servitude to
Washington influence and policy.

Little by little New Zealand succumbs to U.S. influences that

prepare us only for war and death.

Just take a look at your TV tonight, any night, to hear the news.

It is virtually 100% feed from U.S. mainstream, propaganda fed right to your lounge every night, missing out the real things
going on in the world and serving up lightweight trivia of no importance, accept to vilify Russia and cast a bad light upon
China, worse for North Korea.

The trash that is served up as programming entertainment is all about conflict, murder and dominant military prowess as
brave Americans save the downtrodden in foreign lands.

We are being slowly submersed into servitude once more regarding our nuclear free stance and as an aside to the nuclear
warship issue this is happening with the TPPA, a treaty (called a partnership, the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement)
between nations that our local MP still calls a trade agreement.

The word trade doesnt get a look in with the title! It is a treaty outlining the way American corporates can over ride the
wishes of an electorate in tribunals outside the jurisdiction of sovereign nations This is the economic part of hegemony, to
completely dominate and control a foreign country but our western politicians are too blind or stupid to see this.

That is why any move to embrace more U.S. influence is something to be rejected, it can only lead to our nation becoming a
target more than it is with the established surveillance posts being a target already.
The Destructive Effects Of Negative Interest Rates
June 14 2016 | From: KiwiWatch

One of the best things that ever happened to me was my mother taught me to save from a very
young age. Indeed when I first started primary school we had school banking where every pupil
had a small Post Office bank book and every week someone from the Post Office appeared to do
school banking.

We were encouraged to save our threepences (3 cents), sixpences (6 cents) and shillings (10 cents) from what ever
jobs we had done for mum & dad over the past week. House jobs were normal play, no house keepers where we
lived.

In those days my parents had lived through two world wars and the great depression of the 1930s. They knew hardship and
struggle. Our family was working class but in business albeit one that required hard labour.

They knew what thriftiness was all about, just to get by to raise their three children as best they could and school banking
was part of that era of saving for a rainy day. They had lived through a period where the rainy day lasted years and years
and poverty was reality for a huge number of people.

I can still recall the pleasure that I got once I was old enough to know what was going on from seeing the amount in my
deposit book build up. Even more fun was it when at the end of the year someone else added some more shillings on top of
my savings, my introduction to interest.

But this is no longer the way it is, central bankers have embarked on a grand manipulation, a manipulation that
destroys the centuries old paradigm that those that save and accumulate savings are rewarded with interest by
depositing the savings with institutions that are able to lend it to someone else who needs additional capital to
expand a business or purchase a property and who will pay interest for the privilege of using funds they dont
have.
The paying of or charging of interest becomes a silent arbitor of risk: when interest is added to an investment decision by a
borrower it has a governing effect on investment decision making.

But now in some countries banks are paying people to borrow whilst not rewarding the savers upon whose funds the
advances are made. This is an absurdity.

Central bankers have manufactured a distortion and it simply doesnt make sense. I still cant get my head around it, even
worse try to explain it to others.

Sure, Im not an economist but I live in the real world and logically know that this financial experimentation will deliver
unintended consequences and like all experiments those consequences will only become apparent after the fact. I never
thought negative interest rates were even possible.

It is as though central bank activity is criminally working against everyones interests accept their own.
Such is the desperation of central bankers to avoid a recession or even another depression that they are simply doing
everything they can to rig market outcomes, simultaneously not allowing the markets to be the free regulator of risk. Indeed
so many comment that free markets no longer exist.

Financial derivatives appear to be the only instruments that can generate a positive return because you can bet against the
market. Now central bankers, cornered by their own stupidity will watch as fundamental rules of saving, investment and
return are destroyed.

We need to question why they would allow this to happen and who is going to profit from this. One thing I know is that they
will be safe if a major blow out occurs.
 Perhaps you'd like to email the Reserve Bank of New Zealand and ask them to explain tis dubious scenario and
how it might impact New Zealand?

For you can be sure that if he was not on board with the privately owned Rothschild-driven central banking
system that he WOULD NOT be the Governor of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand.

It makes saving for your retirement a questionable activity as the return on saved capital has been stolen by bankers from
those who have saved or invested and effectively disbursed to the bankers all around the world. They pay virtually nothing
now on deposits but they can embark on riskier lending activity that result in distortions and bubbles, particularly in asset
markets.

Bonds, a conventional financial asset that are an integral part of any diversified portfolio now yield negative returns
completely destroying the historical actuarial calculations that superannuation funds rely on to pay superannuitant pensions.
This too forces the funds to invest into riskier assets for return. Many super funds have calculated return in the 6-8%pa
range but because the funds can barely generate yield they are now massively underfunded. Central banker manipulation of
interest rates is responsible for this.

Peter Schiff of Euro Pacific capital sums negative interest rates:

Negative interest rates are a disaster. Its not working in Japan, its not working in Europe, its not going to work
here. Just because it doesnt work doesnt mean were not going to do it, because everything we do doesnt work
and we do it anyway.

It shows desperation, that youve had all these central bankers lowering interest rates and expecting it to revive the
economy. And then when they get down to zero, rather than admit that it didnt work, because clearly if you go to
zero and you still havent achieved your objective, maybe it doesnt work.

Instead of admitting that they were wrong, theyre now going negative.

It has allowed the distortion to impact global share markets and created a misallocation of capital such as acquisitions
(companies taking over a competitor) and companies purchasing their own shares to (falsely) show an increase in earnings
per share. In other words markets become distorted from reality bloated by cheap money that disguises underlying a
competitive reality.

While US acquisition activity is through the roof it rarely adds value often muddying the earnings quality of the acquirer. With
interest rates so low, companies are overpaying to grow. This poses problems for investors as it makes it more difficult to
value a company that is bolted together with acquisitions.
Related: Babylonian Money Magic & How Modern "Commercial Law" Is Based On Ancient Babylonian Codes

Low interest rates have also led companies to spend money to buy back shares, often using cheap debt. Revenue growth
has been anemic and the only way to grow earnings per share is by lowering the share count but those buybacks have
added future trouble.

Instead the balance sheet of buy-back corporates holds a whole lot more debt that may backfire if / when interest rates are
allowed to rise back to normal levels. It now appears that companies that have completed aggressive share buy backs
have actually under performed since 2011. Hard to explain.
Another unintended consequence is that is that it encourages banks to go out and make as many loans as they can forcing
money to be lent to risky borrowers, presumably to fight the global deflationary environment.

Its hard to see how this will end well. We are truly in uncharted territory. The bankers are well educated, but theyre doing
something thats never been done before. No one knows exactly whats going to happen when they try to unwind it, but it
stands to reason that it wont be pretty.

Related: Financial Feudalism & The Economics Of Control

White House Calls FBI Probe Into Clinton's Classified Emails A 'Criminal Investigation'
To Glee Of Republicans On The Same Day Obama Endorses Her
June 12 2016 | From: TheDailyMail

Barack Obama's spokesman described the FBI's probe into Hillary Clinton's classified email
scandal as a 'criminal investigation' on Thursday, less than an hour after the president endorsed
his embattled former secretary of state to succeed him.

Josh Earnest told reporters during a White House press briefing that Obama was committed to keeping his hands
off the investigation, trusting career investigators and prosecutors to follow evidence wherever it leads.

Within an hour of Barack Obama's endorsement of Hillary Clinton, his spokesman acknowledged that she faces a
'criminal investigation'

The misstep sent Republicans cackling to reporters

Clinton faces the possibility of prosecution for housing classified documents on a private email server

She used the homebrew setup for all her emails including sensitive government matters when she was
secretary of state
 White House press secretary Josh Earnest insisted that the endorsement wouldn't be interpreted inside the FBI as
a signal to let her off the hook

See more of the latest news on the FBI probe into Hillary Clinton's emails

That's what their responsibility is,' Earnest said. 'And that's why the president, when discussing this issue in each
stage, has reiterated his commitment to this principle that any criminal investigation should be conducted
independent of any sort of political interference."

OOPS: White House press secretary Josh Earnest said Thursday that President Obama won't interfere with 'any
criminal investigation' like the one Hillary Clinton faces over classified documents in her private emails.

Related: Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange: Google Is Working With Hillary Clinton
HE SAID WHAT? Clinton has referred to the FBI probe as a routine 'security inquiry,' resisting the idea that she
could face criminal charges as she makes her run for the White House

A search Thursday through White House briefing transcripts for similar acknowledgements turned up none.

Republican National Committee spokesman Michael Short crowed to reporters that 'the White Houses admission that the
FBI is investigating Hillary Clintons email server as a "criminal" matter shreds her dishonest claim that it is a routine
"security inquiry".'

This is another reminder of her reckless conduct as Obamas secretary of state, where her attempt to skirt
government transparency laws exposed highly classified information and put our national security at risk."

Obama gave Clinton his official nod Thursday in a video message, saying: "I know how hard this job can be. That's
why I know Hillary will be so good at it. In fact, I don't think there's ever been someone so qualified to hold this
office."

In the press briefing that followed, a Fox News Channel reporter challenged Earnest on the question of whether civil
servants in the U.S. Department of Justice might see the presidential endorsement as a signal that it was time to wrap up
their investigations.

Clinton has been dogged for more than a year by charges that she exposed state secrets to hackers and foreign
governments by keeping all her email correspondence on a private homebrew server while she was secretary of state from
2009 to 2013.

Depending on evidentiary nuances, that could violate the U.S. Espionage Act and subject Clinton to 10 years in prison, even
if she put classified documents in an 'unsecured' location through simple negligence.

Clinton said Wednesday that she 'absolutely' will not face a criminal indictment.

More than 2,000 such documents have been identified in State Department reviews of emails that Clinton turned over in late
2014 nearly two years after she was supposed to. She also deleted more than 32,000 messages, unilaterally deeming
them 'personal' in nature.

Earnest insisted that 'the reason that the president feels confident that he can go out and make this endorsement and record
a video in which he describes his strong support for Secretary Clinton's campaign is that he knows the people who are
conducting the investigation aren't going to be swayed by any sort of political interference.'

Related: Assange Says Google Secretly Boosts Hillarys Campaign

They aren't going to be swayed by political forces. They know that their investigation should be guided by the facts
and that they should follow the evidence where it leads. The President has complete confidence that that's exactly
what they'll do," he said.

The reporter asked Earnest whether or not Obama had ever discussed the FBI investigation with Clinton, who is now the
Democratic Party's presumptive nominee.

'He has not,' the president's spokesman answered.

Riding Roughshod Over Middle New Zealand - Fiona MacKenzie

June 12 2016 | From: BreakingViews

Our politicians, bureaucrats and journalists are struggling to stay in touch with Middle New
Zealand. Many of them think its unnecessary. After all, they hold the power to tell us what we
ought to think and what we should endure.
The system usually works well for them. The Middlers keep to themselves, too busy with the day-to-day.

Related: Undemocratic Mayors

The problem arises when the people are actually allowed a voice. Referendums must be so frustrating to those who
think they know whats good for us.

Thanks to the binding nature of a couple of recent ones, New Zealand rejected a tea-towel flag and the New Plymouth
Council wont have race-based wards. If only citizen-initiated referendums didnt have to jump so many hurdles and had the
same binding status. The country might then get a few other things right.

Lets Hear from Middle Maori

Another group we dont hear much from are Maori. We certainly hear them referenced by those who want unquestioned
control over government, natural resources and taxpayer funds, but it is hard to know who (other than themselves) these
articulate and manipulative spokespeople actually represent.

Herald columnist, John Roughan, recently railed against Middle New Zealand for not getting with the programme and
accepting that Maori should be granted easy access to government power and control.

So again I ask, who are these Maori who are entitled to unearned privilege and want to be separated out from the
rest of us?

In photos from the latest family wedding, shes fair and beautiful, hes dark and handsome. So do they want to be separated
within our very blended country? Their marriage suggests not.

We are bombarded with what the politically devious, the self-serving and the disaffected think, but is it possible that Middle
Maori could want and believe much the same as other Kiwis?

Mix of World Views

In New Zealand, ethnic-based differences are less obvious than economic ones. Our many skins tones mix and mingle.
People classified as Maori (by themselves or others) range widely from very dark brown to red haired and blued eyed!
There are those who work hard, those who never lift a finger.

There are those who help their families, their communities and New Zealand to prosper. Then there are others who prefer to
obstruct, intimidate and bully. Some want to embrace opportunities to create regional jobs; others resist any change or
cooperation.

Yet were constantly told that Maori have a superior world view to the rest of us and are more entitled. Sure, we could just
take this as gospel (which its fast becoming), but such a mantra can be difficult to fathom.

Is the superior world view that of the guy throwing litter from a car, or of the bloke claiming to have a guardianship role over
the environment? Is it that of a parent who neglects or abuses a child, or that of the dad coaching his kids sports team?

And are the world views of New Zealanders volunteering to plant trees, deal to possums, save Kiwis or provide community
services any less valuable because they have no Maori blood?
There are all sorts in our country and while our politicians, bureaucrats and journalists only listen to the noisy activists, they
may just be missing out on what the people in the middle really think.

Term Limits & Referenda

People in the middle tend to be the steady voice of practical reason those who keep a country functioning and growing
good future citizens. They know how things work and what goes on in real life.

Theyre not so easily persuaded by the latest trends and propaganda, being more interested in what people do than what
they say. If only, the politicians, bureaucrats and journalists would listen to them and work in their best interests rather
than ride roughshod over them.
Perhaps term limits would facilitate this. Imagine if all our politicians and bureaucrats had to give up their day jobs after so
many years at the trough. What a great leveller that would be! They could hit the streets, get an ordinary job and live on an
ordinary income anything that helps them reconnect.

More binding referendums on really important matters might help too. How about the fundamental issue of who should
control water?
Or whether investors should be able to create city housing crises? And whether all references to race and culture should be
removed from the statute books?

If this could be achieved, we might well start living in a true democracy, where every person is equal to his/her neighbour.

Bilderberg Leak: Secretive Group To Discuss Internet ID, Global Tax + Attendees List
June 10 2016 | From: Infowars / BilderbergMeetings

The secretive Bilderberg Group is set to discuss plans to implement an Internet ID to eviscerate
anonymity on the web as well as a global tax on financial transactions and air travel, according to
an inside source who spoke to Infowars.
The clandestine organization is set to begin its annual meeting tomorrow at the Taschenbergpalais Kempinski
hotel in Dresden, Germany.

Related: Global Elite Begin Barricading Site of Bilderberg 2016

According to our source, the creation of a virtual passport that web users will need to obtain before they can use many
Internet services is high on the agenda.

The Internet ID will be justified under the guise of cybersecurity and creating a convenient method for citizens to access
government services, but free speech advocates will view the proposal with deep suspicion as it would threaten online
anonymity and possibly chill dissent.

Services such as Facebook, YouTube and Twitter could also use the online passport to revoke posting permission if a user
violates terms of agreement, another obvious threat to the free flow of information that has made the web what it is today.
Related: The Bilderberg Group: An Offshoot of the Venetian Black Nobility

As we reported last week, a project by the European Union Commission which is being spearheaded by former communist
official Andrus Ansi is pushing an Internet ID system that will track what people buy and what they say online.

Last year, it also emerged that the Communist Chinese government was involved in setting up a huge social credit
database that would rank citizens based on their trustworthiness. A pilot project called Sesame Credit, run by Chinese
corporate giant Alibaba, is already monitoring social media activity to give citizens a social credit score based on their
buying history and, according to come critics, their political views.

Bilderberg globalists are also set to re-invigorate momentum behind another long term goal a global tax system presided
over by the UN.
Related: The Round Table: The Hub Of The CFR, Trilateral Commission, RIIA, Club Of Rome, Bilderberg Group And
The UN

Efforts to introduce a global tax, which Bilderberg has attempted in the past, will be focused around three possibilities a tax
on oil at the well-head, a supplementary charge for international financial transactions, and a green tax on all air and sea
travel.

The Panama Papers will also be cited as a reason to impose the global tax on large corporations, although the costs will
inevitably be passed on to the public. The first incarnation of the project will take the form of a global body on tax
cooperation, which will be overseen by the United Nations.

The tax will be sold to the public as a means of addressing environmental concerns and helping destitute people in the third
world, although whether those reasons are enough to convince anyone remains to be seen.
The topic of Brexit Britains vote to leave the European Union will also be a key focal point of Bilderbergs discussions.

Specifically, Bilderberg will explore what options it has should the leave camp emerge victorious. The European Union has
previously quashed national referendums on further EU political integration by either changing the name and making
citizens vote again, or simply ignoring their vote altogether.

Infowars reporters will be in Dresden all week covering the Bilderberg conference.

Bilderberg Meeting 2016: Attendees List

Dresden, Germany 9-12 June

CHAIRMAN
Castries, Henri de (FRA), Chairman and CEO, AXA Group

Aboutaleb, Ahmed (NLD), Mayor, City of Rotterdam

Achleitner, Paul M. (DEU), Chairman of the Supervisory Board, Deutsche Bank AG
Agius, Marcus (GBR), Chairman, PA Consulting Group
Ahrenkiel, Thomas (DNK), Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Defence
Albuquerque, Maria Lus (PRT), Former Minister of Finance; MP, Social Democratic Party
Alierta, Csar (ESP), Executive Chairman and CEO, Telefnica
Altman, Roger C. (USA), Executive Chairman, Evercore
Altman, Sam (USA), President, Y Combinator
Andersson, Magdalena (SWE), Minister of Finance
Applebaum, Anne (USA), Columnist Washington Post; Director of the Transitions Forum, Legatum Institute
Apunen, Matti (FIN), Director, Finnish Business and Policy Forum EVA
Aydin-Dzgit, Senem (TUR), Associate Professor and Jean Monnet Chair, Istanbul Bilgi University
Barbizet, Patricia (FRA), CEO, Artemis
Barroso, Jos M. Duro (PRT), Former President of the European Commission
Baverez, Nicolas (FRA), Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
Bengio, Yoshua (CAN), Professor in Computer Science and Operations Research, University of Montreal
Benko, Ren (AUT), Founder and Chairman of the Advisory Board, SIGNA Holding GmbH
Bernab, Franco (ITA), Chairman, CartaSi S.p.A.
Beurden, Ben van (NLD), CEO, Royal Dutch Shell plc
Blanchard, Olivier (FRA), Fred Bergsten Senior Fellow, Peterson Institute
Botn, Ana P. (ESP), Executive Chairman, Banco Santander
Brandtzg, Svein Richard (NOR), President and CEO, Norsk Hydro ASA
Breedlove, Philip M. (INT), Former Supreme Allied Commander Europe
Brende, Brge (NOR), Minister of Foreign Affairs
Burns, William J. (USA), President, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Cebrin, Juan Luis (ESP), Executive Chairman, PRISA and El Pas
Charpentier, Emmanuelle (FRA), Director, Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology
Coeur, Benot (INT), Member of the Executive Board, European Central Bank
Costamagna, Claudio (ITA), Chairman, Cassa Depositi e Prestiti S.p.A.
Cote, David M. (USA), Chairman and CEO, Honeywell
Cryan, John (DEU), CEO, Deutsche Bank AG
Dass, Marta (ITA), Senior Director, European Affairs, Aspen Institute
Dijksma, Sharon A.M. (NLD), Minister for the Environment
Dpfner, Mathias (DEU), CEO, Axel Springer SE
Dyvig, Christian (DNK), Chairman, Kompan
Ebeling, Thomas (DEU), CEO, ProSiebenSat.1
Elkann, John (ITA), Chairman and CEO, EXOR; Chairman, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles
Enders, Thomas (DEU), CEO, Airbus Group
Engel, Richard (USA), Chief Foreign Correspondent, NBC News
Fabius, Laurent (FRA), President, Constitutional Council
Federspiel, Ulrik (DNK), Group Executive, Haldor Topse A/S
Ferguson, Jr., Roger W. (USA), President and CEO, TIAA
Ferguson, Niall (USA), Professor of History, Harvard University
Flint, Douglas J. (GBR), Group Chairman, HSBC Holdings plc
Garicano, Luis (ESP), Professor of Economics, LSE; Senior Advisor to Ciudadanos
Georgieva, Kristalina (INT), Vice President, European Commission
Gernelle, Etienne (FRA), Editorial Director, Le Point
Gomes da Silva, Carlos (PRT), Vice Chairman and CEO, Galp Energia
Goodman, Helen (GBR), MP, Labour Party
Goulard, Sylvie (INT), Member of the European Parliament
Graham, Lindsey (USA), Senator
Grillo, Ulrich (DEU), Chairman, Grillo-Werke AG; President, Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie
Gruber, Lilli (ITA), Editor-in-Chief and Anchor Otto e mezzo, La7 TV
Hadfield, Chris (CAN), Colonel, Astronaut
Halberstadt, Victor (NLD), Professor of Economics, Leiden University
Harding, Dido (GBR), CEO, TalkTalk Telecom Group plc
Hassabis, Demis (GBR), Co-Founder and CEO, DeepMind
Hobson, Mellody (USA), President, Ariel Investment, LLC
Hoffman, Reid (USA), Co-Founder and Executive Chairman, LinkedIn
Httges, Timotheus (DEU), CEO, Deutsche Telekom AG
Jacobs, Kenneth M. (USA), Chairman and CEO, Lazard
Jkel, Julia (DEU), CEO, Gruner + Jahr
Johnson, James A. (USA), Chairman, Johnson Capital Partners
Jonsson, Conni (SWE), Founder and Chairman, EQT
Jordan, Jr., Vernon E. (USA), Senior Managing Director, Lazard Frres & Co. LLC
Kaeser, Joe (DEU), President and CEO, Siemens AG
Karp, Alex (USA), CEO, Palantir Technologies
Kengeter, Carsten (DEU), CEO, Deutsche Brse AG
Kerr, John (GBR), Deputy Chairman, Scottish Power
Kherbache, Yasmine (BEL), MP, Flemish Parliament
Kissinger, Henry A. (USA), Chairman, Kissinger Associates, Inc.
Kleinfeld, Klaus (USA), Chairman and CEO, Alcoa
Kravis, Henry R. (USA), Co-Chairman and Co-CEO, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co.
Kravis, Marie-Jose (USA), Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute
Kudelski, Andr (CHE), Chairman and CEO, Kudelski Group
Lagarde, Christine (INT), Managing Director, International Monetary Fund
Levin, Richard (USA), CEO, Coursera
Leyen, Ursula von der (DEU), Minister of Defence
Leysen, Thomas (BEL), Chairman, KBC Group
Logothetis, George (GRC), Chairman and CEO, Libra Group
Maizire, Thomas de (DEU), Minister of the Interior, Federal Ministry of the Interior
Makan, Divesh (USA), CEO, ICONIQ Capital
Malcomson, Scott (USA), Author; President, Monere Ltd.
Markwalder, Christa (CHE), President of the National Council and the Federal Assembly
McArdle, Megan (USA), Columnist, Bloomberg View
Michel, Charles (BEL), Prime Minister
Micklethwait, John (USA), Editor-in-Chief, Bloomberg LP
Minton Beddoes, Zanny (GBR), Editor-in-Chief, The Economist
Mitsotakis, Kyriakos (GRC), President, New Democracy Party
Morneau, Bill (CAN), Minister of Finance
Mundie, Craig J. (USA), Principal, Mundie & Associates
Murray, Charles A. (USA), W.H. Brady Scholar, American Enterprise Institute
Netherlands, H.M. the King of the (NLD)
Noonan, Michael (IRL), Minister for Finance
Noonan, Peggy (USA), Author, Columnist, The Wall Street Journal
O'Leary, Michael (IRL), CEO, Ryanair Plc
Ollongren, Kajsa (NLD), Deputy Mayor of Amsterdam
zel, Soli (TUR), Professor, Kadir Has University
Papalexopoulos, Dimitri (GRC), CEO, Titan Cement Co.
Petraeus, David H. (USA), Chairman, KKR Global Institute
Philippe, Edouard (FRA), Mayor of Le Havre
Pind, Sren (DNK), Minister of Justice
Ratti, Carlo (ITA), Director, MIT Senseable City Lab
Reisman, Heather M. (CAN), Chair and CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc.
Rutte, Mark (NLD), Prime Minister
Sawers, John (GBR), Chairman and Partner, Macro Advisory Partners
Schuble, Wolfgang (DEU), Minister of Finance
Schieder, Andreas (AUT), Chairman, Social Democratic Group
Schmidt, Eric E. (USA), Executive Chairman, Alphabet Inc.
Scholten, Rudolf (AUT), CEO, Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AG
Schwab, Klaus (INT), Executive Chairman, World Economic Forum
Sikorski, Radoslaw (POL), Senior Fellow, Harvard University; Former Minister of Foreign Affairs
Simsek, Mehmet (TUR), Deputy Prime Minister
Sinn, Hans-Werner (DEU), Professor for Economics and Public Finance, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
Skogen Lund, Kristin (NOR), Director General, The Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise
Standing, Guy (GBR), Co-President, BIEN; Research Professor, University of London
Svanberg, Carl-Henric (SWE), Chairman, BP plc and AB Volvo
Thiel, Peter A. (USA), President, Thiel Capital
Tillich, Stanislaw (DEU), Minister-President of Saxony
Vetterli, Martin (CHE), President, NSF
Wahlroos, Bjrn (FIN), Chairman, Sampo Group, Nordea Bank, UPM-Kymmene Corporation
Wallenberg, Jacob (SWE), Chairman, Investor AB
Weder di Mauro, Beatrice (CHE), Professor of Economics, University of Mainz
Wolf, Martin H. (GBR), Chief Economics Commentator, Financial Times

Related: The True Story Of The Bilderberg Group

UN Adopts Global Common Core Education To Ensure Their Vision Of Global

Totalitarianism
June 9 2016 | From: VLA / TheNewAmerican

The UN Agenda 21, a world wide program that has been executed bottom up and top down for
many years is now executing a plan of Global education to further push its false sustainable
program to protect the worlds common wealth.
Aside from the trade agreements to ensure world homogeneity, It is one of the prongs to ensure the manifestation
of a One World Government. However, globalists and the UN know that to achieve their vision of global
totalitarianism, the minds of the young must be captured via education.

Common Core Going Global:

The UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, or UNESCO, is at the center of the UNs global education
machinations. In addition to a partnership signed with Common Core-financier Bill Gates, UNESCO has been hard at
work in its efforts to standardize and dumb-down education around the world.

Among other schemes, it runs global programs on Education for Sustainable Development, Educational for Global
Citizenship, and much more. It also has a World Core Curriculum, dedicated to and inspired by influential occultist
Alice Bailey, that it hopes will guide schooling around the world in the years to come.

UN Adopts Education Plan to Indoctrinate Children in Globalism

A United Nations summit in Korea this week adopted a global action plan demanding a planetary education regime to
transform children around the world into social-justice warriors and sustainability-minded global citizens.

Among other elements, that means the UN-directed global education must promote integrated development of the whole
person, including the formation of their ethics, values, and spirituality, the final document declared.
The global-citizenship programs, with definitions to be incorporated in curricula worldwide, should also indoctrinate children
so that they understand their responsibilities to protect the planet, and promote what the UN and its member governments
consider to be the common good.

The controversial action plan, approved by the UN's propaganda department and a group of largely government-funded
non-governmental organizations (NGOs) on June 1 in Gyeongju, Republic of Korea, is aimed at helping the UN impose
its Agenda 2030 scheme to transform the world.

In fact, the title of the summit gave away the agenda: Education for Global Citizenship: Achieving the Sustainable
Development Goals Together. As The New American has documented extensively, the UN Agenda 2030 plan, also known
as the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), was approved by governments and dictators last year as a road map
toward global control (tyranny).

From national and international wealth redistribution to government healthcare and legal abortion for all, the controversial
Agenda 2030 vows repeatedly to leave no-one behind.

However, globalists and the UN know that to achieve their vision of global totalitarianism, the minds of the young must be
captured via education.
Agenda 2030 actually has an entire goal dedicated to UN-guided education. And so the latest summit in Korea, organized
for NGOs by the UN Department of Public Information, or UN DPI, was aimed at defining what that education regime will
look like - and how NGOs can help.

Education is a human right, essential to well-being and dignity, and is key to achieving Agenda 2030, reads the
action plan adopted this week.
 Further, an ethos of global citizenship is required in order to fulfil [sic] this bold, people-centered, universal, and
planet-sensitive development framework.

In the spirit of global citizenship, the document declares that our primary identity is that of human beings. But the agenda
is much broader than attacking nationalism and patriotism.

The UN DPI and the Astro-Turf NGOs that surround it, styling themselves "Civil Society," explained that what they call
education must also be about more than what people normally think of as education - literacy, numeracy, and so on. In the
UN's view, according to the Gyeongju Action Plan adopted in Korea;

Education must advance the cause of global citizenship.

That means a lot more than one might think, too.

Among other points, this education for global citizenship must promote integrated development of the whole
person emotionally, ethically, intellectually, physically, socially, and spiritually, the action plan declares. (Emphasis added.)
Of course, parents, families, communities, tribes, churches, and more have traditionally been responsible for much of that.

When or under what authority government-run, UN-approved schools became responsible for children's physical, ethical,
spiritual, emotional, and social development was not made clear. The implications, though, should trouble anyone who
values liberty, diversity, national sovereignty, and parental rights.

The education pushed by the UN must also be imbued with an understanding of our roles, rights and responsibilities for
the common good in service to humanity and the advancement of a culture of peace, non-violence, freedom, justice, and
equality, the action plan continued, using rhetoric about the "common good" that has been the rallying cry of countless
tyrants.

The globo-education must inculcate a sense of care for the earth, reverence for the interdependent kinship of all life, and
stewardship of all ecological systems for future generations.

It should also strengthen the societal relationships among individuals, institutions, communities, states, humanity, and the
planet. And finally, it should nurture a sense of solidarity and empathy in order to end poverty, protect the planet, ensure
human rights, and foster prosperous and fulfilling lives for all.
To those not well-versed in globalist-speak, that all might sound fine and dandy. However, when the UN's agenda is
examined more closely, the real agenda becomes more clear. Consider, as just one point among many, what the UN means
when it speaks of human rights.

In Article 29 of the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the government signatories claim "rights" can be limited
by law under the guise of everything from public order to the general welfare.

In other words, you have no rights, only privileges.

Separately, the same article claims that everyone has duties to the community and that rights and freedoms may in no
case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations. Compare that to the U.S. Constitution and
the Declaration of Independence, which outline and protect God-given, inalienable rights.

Further down, the global action plan explains that the education agenda intends to shape every aspect of human life and
civilization.

Education for global citizenship is an essential strategy to address global challenges as well as to promote gender
equality, facilitate the eradication of poverty and hunger, build skills, eliminate corruption, and prevent violence,
including violent extremism, the document says.

It promotes truly sustainable production and consumption, mitigating climate change and its effects, protecting our
waters and biodiversity, and preserving indigenous knowledge.

If tradition and individual cultures get in the way of that agenda for UN-defined human rights and global citizenship, then
educational understandings of those things will have to be enhanced, the action plan declares.

The document also makes clear that this must be a worldwide effort, saying the global-citizenship scheming must be
incorporated in school curricula worldwide and that equitable quality education, as defined by the UN, must be provided to
all people."
The signatories vowed to work at the local level, too, to incorporate education for global citizenship in educational systems.

The signatories of the action plan, developed at the 66th United Nations Department of Public Information (DPI)/Non-
Governmental Organization (NGO) Conference, also committed to pushing global education that promotes a number of
controversial concepts.

We commit to an education that teaches conflict resolution, a deep appreciation for diversity, ethical reasoning,
gender equality, human rights and responsibilities, interdependence, multilingual and multicultural competence,
social justice, sustainable development, and values, it said.

Those values, of course, are very unlikely to reflect the values of most parents around the world, whether they be Christian,
Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, or any other major religious tradition. Instead, the values will be the values guiding the UN:
globalism, pseudo-environmentalism, socialism, and more.

The UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, or UNESCO, is at the center of the UN's global education
machinations. In addition to a partnership signed with Common Core-financier Bill Gates, UNESCO has been hard at work
in its efforts to standardize and dumb-down education around the world.
Among other schemes, it runs global programs on Education for Sustainable Development, Educational for Global
Citizenship, and much more. It also has a World Core Curriculum, dedicated to and inspired by influential occultist Alice
Bailey, that it hopes will guide schooling around the world in the years to come.

At a previous UN education summit, held last year in Korea, UNESCO boss Irina Bokova, a Bulgarian Communist Party
operative who PR agents claim is among the frontrunners to lead the broader UN, also declared the UN's intentions.

We have the collective duty to empower every child and youth with the right foundations - knowledge, values and
skills - to shape the future as responsible global citizens, building on the successes of the past 15 years, she said,
adding that education would:

"Ttransform lives and contribute to breakthroughs on all the proposed sustainable development goals.

In other words, the UN - not parents, families, or communities - believes that it has not just the right, but
thecollective duty, to shape your childrens values.

The latest conference on pushing Agenda 2030 through globalist indoctrination of children masquerading as education is a
crucial follow-up to the adoption of the agenda itself.

Children and young women and men are critical agents of change and will find in the new Goals a platform to
channel their infinite capacities for activism into the creation of a better world, the official Agenda 2030 agreement
explains.
The sort of activists that the UN hopes to make your children into is also explicitly defined in the agreement.

By 2030, ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development,
including, among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles, human rights,
gender equality, promotion of a culture of peace and non-violence, global citizenship and appreciation of cultural
diversity and of cultures contribution to sustainable development, the global plan for 2030 states.

Considering what the UN means by sustainable development-population control, central planning, global governance, and
more - the agenda for your children takes on an even more sinister tone.

Sustainable children for global citizenship in the new order will be accomplished via what the UN, the Obama
administration, and others misleadingly refers to as education.

In the UN document the word education alone is mentioned more than 20 times. And throughout the agreement, the UN
openly advocates the use of schools to indoctrinate all of humanity into a new set of values, attitudes, and beliefs in
preparation for the new green and sustainable world order.
The UNs education agenda also puts sex education front and center.

By 2030, ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health-care services [abortion and contraception],
including for family planning, information and education, the document also explains.

For now people around the world still have many options to protect their children from the global brainwashing campaign
being pushed by the UN - home education, private schools, Christian schools, and more.

However, the UN realizes that, too. And so, in recent years, under the phony guise of human rights, the UN has started
agitating for government control and regulation of private and alternative forms of education in addition to its grip on "public"
schools.

The UN also continues to push international education agreements and schemes on everything from sex education and
reading pedagogy to values and beliefs.
There is a good reason the UN is ridiculed by critics as the dictators club. Most of its member governments cannot be
considered free, even under the most generous definition of the term.

Allowing the UN to make and shape education policy is not just dangerous, then, it is crazy.

Instead, education should be a job for families, communities, churches, charities, schools, and more - but primarily parents.

The future of liberty literally depends on it.

United States Government Intentionally Destroyed 9/11 Evidence

June 9 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / WashingtonsBlog

If the story that the US government told us about 9/11 were true, why did the government destroy
the evidence, lie to the 9/11 Commission, and prevent a real investigation?
The clear and indisputable answer is that if the evidence had not been destroyed and a real investigation had
occurred, the conclusion would have been that 9/11 was an inside job designed to give the neoconservatives their
new Pearl Harbor necessary to launch their wars in the Middle East.

Related: Is the War on Terror a Falsity?

The extraordinary gullibility of the American people is responsible for 15 years of warfare, destroyed countries, and millions
of dead, maimed, orphaned, and displaced people, and for the rise of a police state in the United States. The ignorance and
gullibility of the American people are responsible for these massive crimes against humanity and for Americans loss of their
constitutionall protections.

Presumption of a Cover-Up

Judges and lawyers know that if someone intentionally destroys evidence hes probably trying to hide his
crime. American law has long recognized that destruction of evidence raises a presumption of guilt for the person who
destroyed the evidence.
So what does it mean when the US government intentionally destroyed massive amounts of evidence related to 9/11?

Related: CIA Veteran Announces Live on RT That All Terrorist Attacks in US Are False Flags

Judge and Prosecutor Destroy Evidence

For example, it was revealed last week that the judge overseeing the trial of surviving 9/11 suspects conspired with the
prosecution to destroy evidence relevant to a key suspects defense. And see this.

(The Defense Department has also farmed out most of the work of both prosecuting and defending the surviving 9/11
suspects to the same private company. And the heads of the military tribunal prosecuting the 9/11 suspects said that the
trials must be rigged so that there are no acquittals.)

Destruction of Videotapes

The CIA videotaped the interrogation of 9/11 suspects, falsely told the 9/11 Commission that there were no videotapes or
other records of the interrogations, and then illegally destroyed all of the tapes and transcripts of the interrogations.
Related: Obama Administration Caught Conspiring to Destroy Key 9/11 Evidence in Trial at Gitmo

9/11 Commission co-chairs Thomas Keane and Lee Hamilton wrote:

Those who knew about those videotapes - and did not tell us about them - obstructed our investigation."

And:

Daniel Marcus, a law professor at American University who served as general counsel for the Sept. 11
commission and was involved in the discussions about interviews with Al Qaeda leaders, said he had heard
nothing about any tapes being destroyed."

If tapes were destroyed, he said, its a big deal, its a very big deal, because it could amount to obstruction of
justice to withhold evidence being sought in criminal or fact-finding investigations."

Related: How the CIA Writes History

Destruction of Air Traffic Control Tapes

The tape of interviews of air traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11 was intentionally destroyed by crushing the cassette by hand,
cutting the tape into little pieces, and then dropping the pieces in different trash cans around the building as shown by this
NY Times article (summary version is free; full version is pay-per-view) and by this article from the Chicago Sun-Times.
Black Boxes

The FBI long ago found and analyzed the black box recorders from the airplanes which hit the Twin Towers, but
has consistently denied that they were ever found.

Pentagon Fibs

The 9/11 Commissioners concluded that officials from the Pentagon lied to the Commission, and considered
recommending criminal charges for such false statements.

Soviet-Style Minders

The chairs of both the 9/11 Commission and the Official Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 said that Soviet-style government
minders obstructed the investigation into 9/11 by intimidating witnesses (and see this).

In other words, the minders obstructed witnesses from openly and candidly talking about what they knew.

Undermining Investigation

President Bush and Vice-President Cheney took the rare step of personally requesting that congress limit all 9/11
investigation solely to intelligence failures.
The administration also opposed the creation of a 9/11 commission. Once it was forced (by pressure from widows of 9-11
victims) to allow a commission to be formed, the administration appointed as executive director an administration insider,
whose area of expertise is the creation and maintenance of public myths thought to be true, even if not actually true, who
was involved in pre-9/11 intelligence briefings, and who was one of the key architects of the pre-emptive war doctrine.

This executive director, who controlled what the Commission did and did not analyze, then limited the scope of the
Commissions inquiry so that the overwhelming majority of questions about 9/11 remained unasked (see this and this).

The administration then starved the commission of funds. The government spent $175 million over $300 million in todays
dollars investigating the Challenger space shuttle disaster. It spent $152 million on the the Columbia disaster
investigation. It spent $30 million investigating the Monica Lewinsky scandal. But the government only authorized $15
million for the 9/11 Commission.
The government also failed to provide crucial documents to the 9/11 investigators. And see this.

The government refused to share much information with the Commission, refused to force high-level officials to testify under
oath, and allowed Bush and Cheney to be questioned jointly.

Moreover, as reported by ACLU, FireDogLake, RawStory and many others, declassified documents shows that Senior
Bush administration officials sternly cautioned the 9/11 Commission against probing too deeply into the terrorist
attacks of September 11, 2001.

The 9-11 Commission took this warning to heart, and refused to examine virtually any evidence which contradicted the
administrations official version of events. As stated by the State Departments Coordinator for Counterterrorism who was
the point man for the U.S. governments international counterterrorism policy in the first term of the Bush administration
there were things the [9/11] commissions wanted to know about and things they didnt want to know about.

Saudi Role
Investigation into Saudi government aid to 9/11 conspirators was also obstructed.

For example, Philip Shenon the 20-year New York Times reporter who wrote a book on the 9/11 Commission reports:

The [911] commissioner said the renewed public debate could force a spotlight on a mostly unknown chapter of
the history of the 9/11 commission: behind closed doors, members of the panels staff fiercely protested the
way the material about the Saudis was presented in the final report, saying it underplayed or ignored
evidence that Saudi officials especially at lower levels of the government were part of an al-Qaida
support network that had been tasked to assist the hijackers after they arrived in the US.

In fact, there were repeated showdowns, especially over the Saudis, between the staff and the
commissions hard-charging executive director, University of Virginia historian Philip Zelikow, who joined
the Bush administration as a senior adviser to the secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, after leaving the
commission.

The staff included experienced investigators from the FBI, the Department of Justice and the CIA, as well as the
congressional staffer who was the principal author of the 28 pages.

Zelikow fired a staffer, who had repeatedly protested over limitations on the Saudi investigation, after she
obtained a copy of the 28 pages outside of official channels.

Other staffers described an angry scene late one night, near the end of the investigation, when two
investigators who focused on the Saudi allegations were forced to rush back to the commissions offices
after midnight after learning to their astonishment that some of the most compelling evidence about a
Saudi tie to 9/11 was being edited out of the report or was being pushed to tiny, barely readable footnotes
and endnotes.
 The staff protests were mostly overruled.

***

But Kean, Hamilton and Zelikow clearly do not speak for a number of the other commissioners, who have
repeatedly suggested they are uncomfortable with the perception that the commission exonerated Saudi
Arabia and who have joined in calling for public release of the 28 pages."

Indeed, an FBI informant hosted and rented a room to two hijackers in 2000. Specifically, investigators for the Congressional
Joint Inquiry discovered that an FBI informant had hosted and even rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when
the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and
that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House.

As the New York Times notes:

Senator Bob Graham, the Florida Democrat who is a former chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee,
accused the White House on Tuesday of covering up evidence.

The accusation stems from the Federal Bureau of Investigations refusal to allow investigators for a Congressional
inquiry and the independent Sept. 11 commission to interview an informant, Abdussattar Shaikh, who had been the
landlord in San Diego of two Sept. 11 hijackers."
Letting Terrorists Go Free

A former FBI translator who Senators Leahy and Grassley, among others, have claimed is credible, and who the
administration has gagged for years without any logical basis - has stated that this administration knowingly and
intentionally let many directly or indirectly involved in that terrorist act [September 11th] go free untouched and
uninvestigated?

Destruction of Physical Evidence

The former head of fire science and engineering for the agency responsible for finding out why the Twin Towers and World
Trade Center 7 collapsed on 9/11 (the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology) who is one of the worlds
leading fire science researchers and safety engineers, with a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering wrote that evidence
necessary to determine the cause of the collapse of the World Trade Centers was being destroyed. And see this.

Note the demolition charges going off...

In addition, the official investigators themselves were largely denied access to the site and the evidence contained there, or
even access to such basic information as the blueprints for the World Trade Center.

The government has also refused to release the computer models showing how the trade centers fell, making it impossible
for anyone to double-check its assumptions.
Whether you believe the Twin Towers and World Trade Center building 7 were brought down with explosives or by airplanes
and fires, destroying evidence prevented engineers and scientists from figuring out what went wrong to prevent
skyscrapers from collapsing in the future.

9/11 Commissioners Disgusted and Call For a New Investigation

The 9/11 Commissioners publicly expressed anger at cover ups and obstructions of justice by the government into
a real 9/11 investigation:

9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says I dont believe for a minute we got everything right, that the
Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, and that the 9/11 debate
should continueThe 9/11 Commission chair said the Commission was set up to fail

The Commissions co-chairs said that the CIA (and likely the White House) obstructed our investigation
 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative
to what we outlined in our version . . . We didnt have access . . . .

9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were
getting

9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: It is a national scandal; This
investigation is now compromised; and One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11
issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up. When asked in 2009 if he thought
there should be another 9/11 commission, Cleland responded: There should be about fifteen 9/11 commissions

The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) who led the 9/11 staffs inquiry said At some level
of the government, at some point in timethere was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened. He
also said I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described. The tapes told a radically
different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. This is not spin. This is not true.

The Co-Chair of the congressional investigation into 9/11 Bob Graham and 9/11 Commissioner and former
Senator Bob Kerrey are calling for either a PERMANENT 9/11 commission or a new 9/11 investigation to get to
the bottom of it

9/11 Commissioner John Lehman says that a new investigation should be vigorously pursued

Planting False Evidence

Planting false evidence is another act which creates presumption of guilt.

The type of torture used by the U.S. on alleged surviving 9/11 co-conspirators is of a special type. Senator Levin revealed
that the the U.S. used Communist torture techniques specifically aimed at creating FALSE confessions. (and
see this, this, this and this).

According to NBC News:

Much of the 9/11 Commission Report was based upon the testimony of people who were tortured

At least four of the people whose interrogation figured in the 9/11 Commission Report have claimed that they told
interrogators information as a way to stop being tortured

One of the Commissions main sources of information was tortured until he agreed to sign a confession that he
was NOT EVEN ALLOWED TO READ

The 9/11 Commission itself doubted the accuracy of the torture confessions, and yet kept their doubts to
themselves

Pulitzer-prize winning reporter Seymour Hersh who broke the Iraq torture and Vietnam massacre stories writes:

Many of the investigators believe that some of the initial clues that were uncovered about the terrorists identities
and preparations, such as flight manuals, were meant to be found.

A former high-level intelligence official told me, Whatever trail was left was left deliberately - for the F.B.I. to
chase.

Panama Papers Show How Rich United States Clients Hid Millions Abroad
June 8 2016 | From: NewYorkTimes

Over the years, William R. Ponsoldt had earned tens of millions of dollars building a string of
successful companies. He had renovated apartment buildings in the New York City area.
Panama City, Panama, home to the law firm Mossack Fonseca. A trove of the firms internal documents, known as the Panama Papers, have
shaken the financial world.

Bred Arabian horses. Run a yacht club in the Bahamas, a rock quarry in Michigan, an auto-parts company in
Canada, even a multibillion-dollar hedge fund.

Related: IRD poised to pounce as Panama Papers go public

Now, as he neared retirement, Mr. Ponsoldt, of Jensen Beach, Fla., had a special request for Mossack Fonseca, a
Panama-based law firm well placed in the world of offshore finance: How could he confidentially shift his money into
overseas bank accounts and use them to buy real estate and move funds to his children?

He is the manager of one of the richest hedge funds in the world, a lawyer at Mossack Fonseca wrote when the
firm was introduced to Mr. Ponsoldt in 2004.

Primary objective is to maintain the utmost confidentiality and ideally to open bank accounts without disclosing his
name as a private person.

In summary, the firm explained: He needs asset protection schemes, which we are trying to sell him.

Thus began a relationship that would last at least through 2015 as Mossack Fonseca managed eight shell companies and
a foundation on the familys behalf, moving at least $134 million through seven banks in six countries - little of which could
be traced directly to Mr. Ponsoldt or his children.

These transactions and others like them for a stable of wealthy clients from the United States are outlined in extraordinary
detail in the trove of internal Mossack Fonseca documents known as the Panama Papers. The materials were obtained by
the German newspaper Sddeutsche Zeitung and the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, and have now
been shared with The New York Times.
Related: How Mossack Fonseca Helped Clients Skirt or Break U.S. Tax Laws With Offshore Accounts

How the Panama-based law firm set up offshore corporations, foundations and bank accounts for wealthy clients:

In recent weeks, the papers revelations about Mossack Fonsecas international clientele have shaken the financial world.
The Timess examination of the files found that Mossack Fonseca also had at least 2,400 United States-based clients over
the past decade, and set up at least 2,800 companies on their behalf in the British Virgin Islands, Panama, the Seychelles
and other jurisdictions that specialize in helping hide wealth.

Many of these transactions were legal; there are legitimate reasons to create offshore accounts, particularly when setting
up a business overseas or buying real estate in a foreign country.

But the documents - confidential emails, copies of passports, ledgers of bank transactions and even the various code
names used to refer to clients - show that the firm did much more than simply create offshore shell companies and
accounts. For many of its American clients, Mossack Fonseca offered a how-to guide of sorts on skirting or evading United
States tax and financial disclosure laws.

Primary objective is to maintain the utmost confidentiality and ideally to open bank accounts without disclosing his
name as a private person.

- An email from a Mossack Fonseca lawyer

These included locating an individual from a tax-convenient jurisdiction to be the straw man owner of an offshore account,
concealing the true American owner, or encouraging one client it knew was a United States resident to use his foreign
passports to open accounts offshore, again to avoid scrutiny from regulators, the documents show.

If the compliance department at one foreign bank contacted by Mossack Fonseca on behalf of its clients started to ask too
many questions about who owned the account, the firm simply turned to other, less inquisitive banks.

And even though the law firm said publicly that it would not work with clients convicted of crimes or whose financial
activities raised red flags, several individuals in the United States with criminal records were able to turn to Mossack
Fonseca to open new companies offshore, the documents show.
Related: Auckland PR queen and Kiwi billionare named in Panama Papers web

Federal law allows United States citizens to transfer money overseas, but these foreign holdings must be declared to the
Treasury Department, and any taxes on capital gains, interest or dividends must be paid - just as if the money had been
invested domestically. Federal officials estimate that the government loses between $40 billion and $70 billion a year in
unpaid taxes on offshore holdings.

Experts in federal tax law, money laundering and offshore accounts - asked by The Times to examine certain documents or
at least to identify legal issues raised by the money management techniques that Mossack Fonseca advocated - said the
law firm at times had come up with creative, but apparently legal, strategies to save clients money.

A common tactic: selling real estate as a shift of corporate assets, instead of as a piece of property subject to transfer
taxes.

While the experts were reluctant to declare that the law firm or its clients had broken any laws given that no charges have
been filed, they said they were surprised at how explicitly Mossack Fonseca had offered advice that appeared carefully
crafted to help its clients evade United States tax laws.
For many of its American clients, Mossack Fonseca offered a how-to guide of sorts on skirting or evading United States tax and financial disclosure
laws.

The more correspondence that you have between a U.S. person and a bank or law firm discussing tax issues and
efforts at concealment, the stronger the government will see it as a potential case worth prosecuting, said Kevin
M. Downing, the lead Justice Department prosecutor in the UBS offshore banking and tax evasion cases, now at
the Washington law firm Miller & Chevalier.

Mossack Fonseca has said repeatedly in recent weeks that its lawyers and staff members have honored international tax
and banking laws, and that it is the victim in this case of an illegal hacking attack.

But presented with summaries of several cases by The Times, Mossack Fonseca did not try to explain its actions. It simply
said that its standards had improved in recent years, as rules internationally had tightened.

Our significantly expanded compliance office today not only evaluates new client candidates, but also existing
accounts, and especially those that were established prior to the new international regulatory regime coming into
effect, a spokeswoman said in a written statement, referring to a 2010 law passed by Congress.

It wasnt always this way.

The firms American client list does not appear to include the sort of high-profile political figures who have emerged from
reporting on the Panama Papers in many other countries around the world.

But the services offered by Mossack Fonseca, with 500 employees in more than 30 offices worldwide, were in high
demand by the rich and famous in the United States.
In 2001, Sanford I. Weill, then the chief of Citigroup, set up an offshore account called April Fool for his yacht. Alfonso
Soriano, a former Major League Baseball All-Star player with the Yankees and other teams, had a Panamanian corporation
created for him.

John E. Akridge III, a leading real estate developer in Washington, flew to Panama to meet with Mossack Fonseca lawyers,
who in 2011 created the Cyclops Family Foundation in Panama, along with a related bank account.

A spokesman for Mr. Weill said the accounts were used for legitimate purposes, and appropriate disclosures were filed.
Mr. Akridge and Mr. Soriano did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

Related Document: William Ponsoldt and Mossack Fonseca

For its best customers, like the Ponsoldts, who declined repeated requests to discuss their work with Mossack Fonseca,
the firms ministrations went far beyond legal services and banking.

It acted as a concierge for all details regarding your properties and worldwide business affairs, for example, helping the
family confidentially purchase (and dispose of) luxury condominiums at resort destinations and even arranging repairs for a
car stored at a vacation home and hiring a contractor to fix broken poolside tiles, the documents show.

You deserve the best Mr. Ponsoldt, and we will try to help you the most we can, the firm explained in an email.

The firms American clients often expressed disbelief at how much they could lighten their tax burden by using the
techniques advocated by Mossack Fonseca.

At hearing that he can make nearly $8 million per year just on tax savings, a client from Pennsylvania was now
wide awaken, a Mossack Fonseca staff member wrote.

I could even detect sweats coming down from his forehead and his cheeks were beginning to blush with crimson
excitement. Noticing his interest, I went in for the kill.
Black Hole for Assets

In 2006, using a secret email account set up by Mossack Fonseca so his correspondence would not be traced by the
authorities, a businessman from Washington State asked a common question among the firms potential American clients:

How does a US citizen legally get funds to Panama without the knowledge of the US government and how can
those funds be profitably invested without the US government knowing about them?

The reply came from Ramss Owens, then a partner who helped run the firms trust division, offering clients effective
solutions to enhance your privacy, protect your wealth. Mr. Owens laid out a basic menu of services: a package deal
setting up an offshore company in what he promised would be a relatively cheap and quick transaction.

We have right now a special offer by which we create a Private Foundation/company combination for a flat fee of
US$4,500.00, Mr. Owens said.

It includes Charter Documents, Regulations, nominee officers and directors, bank account and management of
funds, provision of authorized signatories, neutral phone and fax numbers and mail forwarding services for both
the private foundation and its underlying company.

With this legal structure in place, Mr. Owens went on to explain, any money placed in these accounts would essentially go
into a black hole.

If we create a Private Foundation and the underlying company for you, the funds become completely private (US
cannot know) as soon as the funds are deposited under a bank account or investment account in the name of the
underlying company or the private foundation, he wrote.

The benefits of such an arrangement were numerous, he added, detailing how the client could effectively evade United
States tax laws while protecting himself - and the firm.

You can take the money in cash, you can do a bad investment; you can purchase something and not receive
anything (an expensive piano, an expensive software), Mr. Owens wrote.

You can receive an invoice from Panama or any other location and that would justify some of the outgoing
moneys. You can also declare everything to the tax administration.

Any decision you make, please be aware that you will have to sign a disclaimer to us. We can only suggest, but
the final decision to take the money out of the country is fully yours, and under the professional opinion of
someone in USA.
This was the sort of menu sold to the Ponsoldt family - in a very big way.

William Ponsoldt, now 74, had come to Mossack Fonseca with hundreds of millions of dollars in assets, the firms staff
estimated in due diligence memos that also laid out how he had become so wealthy.

He has started off in the seventies purchasing run-down apartment buildings in New York, in order to refurbish
and sell them off, noted one memo from 2007, shortly after the firm had started to handle the familys investment
accounts.

Having done this for a while he spread out to various businesses and his CV is the typical profile of a serial
entrepreneur.

The memo went on to list nine businesses he had created, taken over or helped run, including Glas Aire Industries Group,
an automotive parts supplier; Zeus Energy Resources, a Texas oil-drilling company; Regency Affiliates, which owned a
Michigan rock mine; and Pegasus Ranch, one of the countrys largest Arabian-horse-breeding operations.

Few American clients, the records show, demanded and received as much attention as Mr. Ponsoldt and two of his
children, Tracey and Christopher, each of whom was assigned a secret email account and a code name - father,
daughter and son. Mossack Fonsecas V.I.P. service consisted of everything from securing lunch reservations at a
popular French bistro in Panama City to pressing the government to make an exception and grant Mr. Ponsoldt and his
wife Panamanian passports.

Over the years, tens of millions of dollars flowed into a series of shell companies - Escutcheon Investment, with its money
at the Banca Privada in the Pyrenees principality of Andorra; Probity Investments, with deposits at Andbanc Grup Agricol,
also in Andorra; Royal Pacific Investments, with deposits at Balboa Securities in Panama; and Valdano Investments Group,
with deposits at Berenberg Bank in Switzerland, among others, the bank records and other documents show.
An email from Christopher Ponsoldt, code-named son, to a Mossack Fonseca lawyer. Employees of the Panama law firm were named as officers
of shell companies created to conceal any links between the assets and the Ponsoldt family.

Mossack Fonseca employees were named as the companies officers, avoiding whenever possible any link to the Ponsoldt
family. The firm even asked a Hong Kong branch of Barclays, the international bank, to override its rules for proof of the so-
called beneficial owners of the accounts.

This is a very special client of ours, a Mossack Fonseca lawyer wrote, conceding that the firm had intentionally created
such a maze of companies so it leaves us in the position to legally argue that our client is NOT the owner of the
structure. It was not clear if the bank complied.

The most important part of this elaborate structure was an entity called the Edenstone Foundation.

Panama has long specialized in creating unusual foundations like Edenstone that are neither subject to Panamanian taxes
nor required to support charitable causes. They do, however, allow the investors who contribute their financing to shield
themselves from legal claims in the United States.

Related: Party donor named in Panama Papers for the Greens

In secret meetings documented in the Panama Papers, Mossack Fonseca named the Ponsoldt family as the beneficiary,
through the foundation, of the money placed in bank accounts around the world.

Among the early requests: confidentially transfer $800,000 from father to son, meaning moving the money to yet
another offshore account - called LBFH of Panama - which Mossack Fonseca had set up on Christopher Ponsoldts behalf
with bank accounts in Andorra and Panama.

One motivation for Christopher Ponsoldt to stash money overseas in accounts not traceable to him: He owned a dirt
racetrack in Florida, and he was concerned racers may get hurt and might then try to sue him for damages, the law firm
notes on his case file said.

Please notify me when the money is deposited in American dollars, Christopher Ponsoldt wrote to the law firm a
few months after his fathers accounts had been set up and $800,000 was in the process of being transferred to
another offshore account Christopher Ponsoldt controlled via the firm.

I want to have U.S. dollars, Australian Dollars, Indian Reals and some kind of China index, to be determined.

Mossack Fonseca agreed to prepare a service agreement between two of the legal entities it managed for the family, to
make it look as if there were an actual expenditure of money for a business purpose.

After receiving the money, we will explain to them the nature of this transaction without giving details of your
name, the firm explained to William Ponsoldt, regarding the Caribbean bank through which the money was
moving to his son.

Please let us know if you agree with this and if you will instruct the relevant parties to execute the wire transfer.

Federal law generally limits such tax-free transfers between family members to $14,000 a year.

But for this transfer, described as a pre-inheritance distribution, the documents give no indication that any United States
gift taxes were paid, as would most likely have been required, said Jack Blum, a lawyer and expert in international tax
evasion who served for more than a decade as a consultant to the Internal Revenue Service.

This is one way in which people with a lot of money step away from being average, Mr. Blum said after reviewing
the documents.

- Jack Blum, a former I.R.S. consultant

Christopher Ponsoldt declined to comment. I am sorry, I cant help you, he said before hanging up.

Tracey Ponsoldt Powers, William Ponsoldts daughter, approached the firm in October 2008 with an urgent request for help
in secretly moving some of her familys money to Panama and then into gold coins. She feared political developments at
home.

I feel VERY unsettled with this election and how the media is censoring information and spinning the American
Public to vote Obama, she wrote to Mr. Owens at Mossack Fonseca.

It is so obvious to me, that they are setting us up with a Socialist - but most people cant see it happening before
their eyes! Its like propaganda that is brainwashing Americans to forget the Principles of Hard Work, Ingenuity,
Risk and Boundless Success!
Mr. Owens suggested shifting the money into a charity account, controlled by the firm on the familys behalf, in
increments of less than $100,000, so it would not be detected.

Tracey Ponsoldt Powers, code-named daughter, approached Mossack Fonseca in October 2008 because she was concerned about the potential
election of Barack Obama as president. Around then, William Ponsoldt had the firm move $100,000 to a Swiss account for his daughter.

Separately, that same month, William Ponsoldt moved $100,000 from a company Mossack Fonseca controlled on his
behalf into the name of his daughter. This was confirmed in an email from Mossack Fonseca to the code name daughter.

The USD 100.000 is deposited as call Money with high liquidity at Berenberg Bank Schweiz, Zrich, said the
email, which added: Your Father initiated this process as you know. We will treat you with the same esteem and
conditions and service as the family is used to.

The subsequent series of complicated transfers - money from the account would eventually be used by Mossack Fonseca
in 2013 at Ms. Powerss request to buy real estate - would be a challenge for American enforcement authorities, Mr. Blum
said.

Simply by constructing all this in such a complex way, they make it extremely hard for enforcement officials to
ever have resources to reconstruct what taxes should have been paid, he said. What this is all about is obscuring
the trail.

Ms. Powers did not respond to a series of calls and emails, and then declined to answer questions when reached on a
cellphone.

I have no idea what you are talking about, she said before hanging up.

Live This Potential Risk

Across the United States, Mossack Fonseca picked up clients who had similarly urgent and delicate demands.

For more than 30 years as the founder of Boston Capital Ventures, Harald Joachim von der Goltz has built a reputation as
a savvy investor in emerging companies.

What few know, however, is that over roughly that same span of time and with the help of Mossack Fonseca, Mr. von der
Goltz has also come to command a vast offshore empire: interconnected corporations, foundations and bank accounts with
about $70 million in assets, according to internal emails.
Related Document: Harald Joachim von Der Goltz and Mossack Fonseca

A lawyer for Mr. von der Goltz said the beneficial owner of all of the trusts and accounts is Mr. von der Goltzs 100-year-old
mother, who resides in Guatemala. One document also suggests that the tens of millions of dollars in the accounts
originally came from businesses operated by Mr. von der Goltzs father.

But numerous other documents prepared by Mossack Fonseca and signed by Mr. von der Goltz list him as the founder,
manager and first beneficiary of the foundation that controls most of the familys wealth. Mr. von der Goltz also put assets
from companies he helped operate into the accounts, documents show.

Most important, Mossack Fonseca registered Mr. von der Goltz as a resident of Guatemala, which tax experts said could
help him protect the family money from certain United States tax obligations.

MF Trust has registered Harald Joachim von der Goltz as a client of Guatemala. However, we know he lives in
Miami; and makes his residence for 5 months of the year in Boston, Mr. Owens, the Mossack Fonseca
partner, wrote in an email in 2009 to top executives at the firm.

The firm recognized that claiming the Guatemala residency represented a risk, but considered it a risk worth taking, given
Mr. von der Goltzs importance to the firm.

My suggestion: Leave everything as it is with von der Goltz, i.e. stay and live this potential risk, we might prefer to
send money orders and cashiers checks, which have a slightly lower risk than bank transfers. Its all well done,
customer understands well and accepts it as is, Mr. Owens wrote.

I agree with your suggestion on my part, responded Ramn Fonseca, one of the firms founders.
Ramn Fonseca, one of the firms founders, in April in his office in Panama City. Documents show he agreed with a suggestion to accept a clients
residency in Guatemala despite the risk and the knowledge that the client lived in the United States.

Money was frequently transferred from several of the offshore accounts to accounts in the United States to fund
investments at Mr. von der Goltzs firm, the documents show. A foundation paid for his daughters education, as well as his
granddaughters high school tuition.

In a 2008 email, Mr. von der Goltzs Boston-based accountant asked executives at Mossack Fonseca to wire money from
Mr. von der Goltzs mother, Erika.

Erika would like to make a gift to Tica of $100,000 for his birthday. She hadnt given him anything, the email said,
providing an account for Mr. von der Goltz at Esprito Santo Bank in Miami.

Ohh, yes, I know ERIKA wants it to be done quickly, we will proceed, Mr. Owens responded before confirming
that the money should be moved as requested.

Legal experts consulted by The Times said it was difficult to determine definitively if the arrangements related to Mr. von
der Goltz violated United States laws. But they said such moves were commonly used by investors seeking to hide their
assets and evade federal taxes.

There is reason to question if she was really directing that shift of money, Mr. Blum said, referring to Mr. von der
Goltzs mother.

In a statement, Mr. von der Goltz said the companies were established for legal purposes, and that both he and
the companies were compliant with United States tax and reporting requirements.
 There has never been any illegal activity associated with these companies, the statement said.

Other case files examined by The Times show how Mossack Fonseca may have turned a blind eye in the vetting process
while helping Kjell Gunnar Finstad, a Texas resident, set up an oil company offshore in 2013.

Mossack Fonseca has long maintained that it will not work for individuals with criminal records or whose conduct raises
red flags during its due-diligence process. But the firm somehow either missed or overlooked Mr. Finstads past when it
conducted a background search of potential directors for the new offshore oil company, OK Terra Energy, which was run
out of Houston but registered in the British Virgin Islands.

Three years earlier, Mr. Finstad, the companys controlling partner and lead investor, had been convicted in Norway for
various breaches of securities and accounting laws involving a company called Norex Group. The case was major news in
Norway.

The records examined by The Times show that Mossack Fonseca collected a copy of Mr. Finstads passport, and
conducted a basic internet search and a cursory background check. But there is no mention of the fraud case, and no
discussion of whether to proceed with setting up the new company, in light of Mr. Finstads involvement.

Reached at his office in Texas and asked about the Panama Papers, Mr. Finstad said only, I dont want to talk about that.

For another client, Mossack Fonseca offered a special service for a premium price.

Marianna Olszewski, the New York City-based author of Live It, Love It, Earn It: A Womans Guide to Financial Freedom,
wanted to shift $1 million held by HSBC in Guernsey to a new overseas account. The catch? She did not want her name to
appear anywhere near the transaction.
Mr. Owens, the Mossack Fonseca lawyer, again offered a solution. Mossack Fonseca would locate what he called
a natural person nominee in a tax-convenient jurisdiction to stand in for Ms. Olszewski as the owner of the account.

The Natural Person Trustee is a service which is very sensitive, Mr. Owens wrote.

We need to hire the Natural Person Nominee, pay him, make him sign lots of documents to cover us, make him
sign resignations, make him get some proofs evidencing that he has the economic capacity to place such amount
of moneys, letters of reference, proof of domicile, etc., etc.

The process, he suggested, would cost her at least $17,500.

Ms. Olszewski approved the maneuver - only to see the firm, at one point, accidentally disclose her name to the banks
involved.

Ramses, Please call me ASAP!! This is important!!!! she wrote to Mr. Owens.

HSBC said someone said marianna olszewski is the principal / beneficary! Who has done this!! I need you to call
me immediately and tell them hsbc that was a mistake!!!!!!!!!! This is not good and I asked you NOT to do this! this
is why we have this structure.

Mr. Owens sought to calm her down, saying that Mossack Fonseca could tell the bank that the natural person nominee
actually controlled the account. This can be solved, he wrote.

Ramss Owens, then a lawyer with Mossack Fonseca, explained the concept of a natural person trustee to Marianna Olszewski in an email.
Ms. Olszewski sent a panicky email to Mr. Owens upon discovering that her name had been disclosed to a bank involved in a transfer of her
assets.

Mr. Owens did not tell his client the identity of the natural person nominee, saying simply;

We would appoint a UK citizen residing in Panama since 50 years ago, engineer, entrepreneur, as they needed
someone who would be expected to have such a large amount of money available to transfer.

Twelve days later, Mr. Owens sent HSBC a copy of a passport for a man named Edmund James Ward.

Kindly please find hereto attached the due diligence documents of the beneficial owner, said the email sent to
HSBC, noting that the documents duly correct.

The $1 million from Ms. Olszewski was then transferred to the new accounts, with an assurance that she need not worry.

If for any reason something happens, please also bear in mind that Mossfon is covered by insurance policies for
US$10 Million (per event), Mr. Owens wrote. We have never used our insurance policy to cover a fraud, or
something like this.

The use of a stand-in to hide the true ownership of an account is one of the remaining illegal ploys favored by Americans
today as international banks, under pressure from the United States, demand proof of account ownership, said Jeffrey
Neiman, a former federal prosecutor from Miami who specialized in criminal tax offenses, adding that he could not
comment directly on this case. The fact that a law firm was willing to do this legitimizes the process for their clients, he
said.

A Firms Inner Doubts

Many of the client files - like those for Mr. Weill, the banker; Mr. Soriano, the ballplayer; and Mr. Akridge, the developer -
contain little information on the purpose of the offshore accounts, or how they were used after they were set up, making it
impossible, based on the records available, to assess whether they were used legitimately.

But the experts who reviewed some of the documents related to the Ponsoldts, Mr. von der Goltz and Ms. Olszewski said
that the firm itself seemed to realize it was taking risks.

They were not always sure themselves which side of the line they were on at any given moment, said Ross S.
 Delston, a former federal banking regulator who now specializes in combating money-laundering efforts.

It is apparent that members of the firm were aware they were treading very close to the line.

In fact, the files contain instances, beginning before the Panama Papers came to light, of Mossack Fonseca lawyers
second-guessing their actions. (In recent weeks, the firm has shut down many of its operations in Nevada, as well as
British locations in Jersey and the Isle of Man, and is closing the asset-management division that served many of its United
States clients.)

In 2013, Mossack Fonseca advised Ms. Olszewski to seek outside counsel and consider reporting herself to the I.R.S.,
warning of possible severe repercussions if she did not. The warning came in the wake of a Justice Department
investigation of the role that certain Swiss banks had played in helping United States citizens evade federal taxes.

Records show that Mossack Fonseca had been paid at least $102,000 over nine years to help Ms. Olszewski handle
various transactions.

Ms. Olszewski took the firms advice, and belatedly disclosed her accounts to the I.R.S., the documents show. And by
2014, she asked Mossack Fonseca to shut down her accounts and offshore entities, which collectively held at least $1.7
million.

Im in complete compliance with all my U.S. tax and reporting requirements, Ms. Olszewski said in an emailed
statement when The Times asked about the accounts.

In a second statement, she said she had relied on the advice of legal counsel to establish a trust for her family
while living abroad. I am confident that I have acted properly, she added, and any insinuation otherwise is false.

Reached by telephone in late May, Mr. Owens, who is no longer with the law firm, said only, Regretfully, I cannot
speak about individual clients or my time at Mossack Fonseca.

Mossack Fonseca sent a series of similar and increasingly dire warnings to the Ponsoldts in 2013 and 2014, telling them
that they had to provide a Swiss bank with documentation that they had paid all required United States taxes - or face
possible investigation.

Neither your ex Trustees nor us would like to be involved into any measure the US Department of Justice might
try to enforce, the firm wrote. In this regard, again we strongly urge you to take the necessary steps to avoid any
negative consequences for you as well as us.

The records examined by The Times give no indication whether the Ponsoldts complied, and family members would not
say when asked.

I dont know what you are talking about, Christopher Ponsoldt said in a second brief conversation before he again
hung up.

Related Articles:

Panama Papers Include Dozens of Americans Tied to Fraud and Financial Misconduct
Panama Papers reveal George Soros' deep money ties to secretive weapons, intel investment firm

Former Morgan Stanley Chief Asia Economist: "Don't Listen To The Ruling Elite, The
World Economy Is In Real Trouble"
June 6 2016 | From: ZeroHedge

Andy Xie says the world's elite that are attending the G7, G20, Davos and other wasteful meetings
are wrong to try to pin the blame for the turmoil on peoples psychology; all signs point to a
prolonged period of global stagnation and instability.

Authored by Andy Xie, the former Morgan Stanley chief Asia-Pacific economist, originally posted Op-Ed at The
South China Morning Post.

Andy Xie says the world's elite that are attending the G7, G20, Davos and other wasteful meetings are wrong to try to pin
the blame for the turmoil on peoples psychology; all signs point to a prolonged period of global stagnation and
instability.

Before the current G7 meetings waste of time, The G20 working group meeting in Shanghai didnt come up with any
constructive proposals for reviving the global economy and, instead, complained that the recent market turmoil didnt reflect
the underlying fundamentals of the global economy.

The oil price has declined by 70 per cent since June 2014, while the Brazilian real has halved, and the Russian rouble is
down by 60 per cent. The global economy is on the cusp of another recession, and these important people blamed it
all on some sort of psychological problem of the people.
Over the past two decades, the global economy has been blessed with the entry and participation of 800 million hard-
working Chinese, plus the information revolution. The pie should have increased enough in size to make most people
happier. Yet, the opposite has happened.

The world has gone from one crisis to another. People are complaining everywhere. This is due to mismanagement
by the very people who attend the G20 meetings, the Davos boondoggle, and so many other global meetings that
waste taxpayers money and put inept leaders in the limelight.

One major complaint that people have is that the system is rigged that is, the rising income concentration is not due to free
market competition, but a rigged system that favours the politically powerful.

This is largely true. The new billionaires over the past two decades have come mostly from finance and property. Few made
it the way Steve Jobs or Bill Gates did, creating something that makes people more productive.

The most important factor in the rigged system is monetary policy being used to pump up financial markets in the
name of stimulating growth for peoples benefit.

This is essentially the trickle-down wealth effect, that is, making some people in the financial food chain rich while the
spillover gives people a few crumbs.
Yet, instead of crumbs, the wealth effect has pumped up property prices in Manhattan, London and Hong Kong, as well as
the price of modern art. Essentially, the wealth effect has stayed within the small circle of the wealthy. And these people
show up at Davos to congratulate policymakers on their successes.

Wasting resources is an equally important factor in making the global economy weak and prone to crisis. After the
2008 financial crisis, the US government and Federal Reserve spent trillions of dollars to bail out the people who created the
crisis. Instead of facing bankruptcy and jail, these people have become richer than ever. Predictably, they have used their
resources to rig the system further.

After 2008, when Beijing launched a massive investment push, the global ruling elite all praised China for saving the global
economy. China has increased credit by over US$20 trillion to finance the construction of factories and homes.
However, investment does not guarantee final demand.

The process of building up a factory creates demand. But, when it is completed, it needs to sell its goods to someone. What
China did was build even more factories to keep this factory occupied. This Ponzi scheme couldnt last long. We are just
seeing the beginning of its devastating consequences.

Chinas overinvestment has pumped up commodity prices, which has led to another Ponzi scheme. As major central
banks cut interest rates to zero, credit demand didnt respond in general, as businesses didnt see growing demand from
people who were suffering income erosion.
The commodity boom justified credit demand for the time being. Trillions of dollars were poured into the energy sector, and
trillions more into other commodity industries. Businesses in emerging economies that were pumped up by rising commodity
prices borrowed US$9 trillion.

This mountain of debt is floating on a commodity Ponzi scheme that is floating on Chinas investment Ponzi
scheme. Its bursting is just the beginning. Its impact on the global financial system could be bigger than the 2008
financial crisis.

In addition to the bursting of the global commodity bubble, Chinas overcapacity bubble will kill global capital
expenditure for many years to come. Even though Chinese investment isnt growing like before, investment at half of
gross domestic product is still adding overcapacity by over US$1 trillion per year the problem is getting bigger.

All indications are that China wants to export the overcapacity. And why not? China overinvested to bail out the
global economy. It shouldnt pay the whole price for the mistake.
Chinas strategy would lead to de-industrialisation in most of the world, in particular middle-income emerging
economies. Weak capital expenditure would lead to weak employment and labour income. The resulting bankruptcies may
further weaken the global credit system.

The global economy is facing years of stagnation, deflation and financial crises. The current economic managers will
resort to the same tricks of pumping up the financial markets with liquidity, to no avail. In the meantime, political instability
will spread around the world. It will take a long time for the right leaders to emerge.

Initially, populists will win. Their policies, unfortunately, will focus on protectionism and rolling back the World Trade
Organisation system.

That will lead to further economic turmoil in the global economy. Protectionism may suddenly jump-start inflation
that will quickly become hyperinflation, which would certainly lead to violent revolutions.
The world is on the cusp of a prolonged period of stagnation and instability. Our ruling elite is blaming it on people
seeing things. Their strategy is to change peoples psychology. Unfortunately for them, the world is catching fire
and that fire will eventually reach their Davos chalets.

Weaponized Cell Towers Are Directly Related To Why Chemtrails Are Sprayed
June 5 2016 | From: StateOfTheNation

Beginning with his 1905 United States patent number 787,412, Nikola Tesla pioneered the use of a
certain type of electromagnetic energy called extremely-low frequency (ELF). This is a specific type
of energy known to be used in the New Manhattan Project; the other being very-low frequency (VLF)
electromagnetic energy.

If youve read the following two articles already, then youll know all about the nefarious nature of where this is all
leading

Related: Why Are Weaponized Cell Phone Towers Being Constructed Everywhere?

Related: More on Why Weaponized Cell Phone Towers Are Popping Up Everywhere

Related: Claim: Cell towers across the USA are broadcasting brain resonance frequencies to disrupt human minds,
says former DARPA scientist
The previous post titled, More on Why Weaponized Cell Phone Towers Are Popping Up Everywhere covered the first
two important following topics in PART I & PART II. This post will contain PART III: The involvement of Chemtrails
and the role they play.

Before diving headfirst into those topics, check out, Chemtrails: The Secret War, for a background on the chemtrail
phenomena.

Related: Chemtrails the Secret War

If you remember nothing else about all of this technology, remember this: Be afraid. Be very, very, afraid. There simply is no
better way to sum up everything that follows better than those few words.

This is the mother load of all posts dealing with Chemtrails and related matters. Brace yourselves. My post will draw from two
previously written and well footnoted articles written by Peter A. Kirby at Activist Post.

As for any skeptics you hear jawing about conspiracy this, or conspiracy that, usually know-it-all pilots in my experience,
hand them all the footnotes to both articles and ask that they please place ALL the footnotes in their mouths to prevent
spreading their ignorance until theyve read the material.

There is no question that the U.S. government is presently involved in various forms of Geo-Engineering around the world,
and we know that because at different times, various government agencies have admitted to doing as much, contrary to what
every pilot you know [less ONE maybe - You know who you are!] has to say on the issue of Chemtrails.

How many times have you heard, Well Im a pilot, and I know for a fact there is no such thing as Chemtrails, only contrails,
and you people are a bunch of tin foil hat wearing conspiracy loons
No. You're just an uninformed boob that flies. Remind any skeptics to put the footnotes in their mouths.

You dont have to be a pilot to recognize whether a trail in the sky is or is not a Chemtrail any more than you need to be an
ant to determine if a little grey pile of sand between sidewalk blocks with ants pouring out of it is an anthill.

With all that said, unfortunately for We the People, is the fact that our governments have a very lousy track record of being
honest, so, whatever the government admits to doing, multiply that number times several factors of 10 to get the magnitude of
what is really going on, and as for the motives, prepare to be horrified.

All kidding aside, the remainder of this posting gets REAL dark, so try to hang in there. In a previous article by Peter A.
Kirby at Activist Post, Kirby revealed the following that ought to definitely shut up any of those loud pilots still pissing and
moaning about your tin foil hat:

U.S. patent #4,686,605 Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earths Atmosphere, Ionosphere
and/or Magnetosphere shows how stratospheric and tropospheric aerosols can be manipulated using
electromagnetic energy in order to modify the weather.

The ground-based antennas (known as ionospheric heaters) needed to produce the appropriate electromagnetic
energy exist. For a detailed discussion, please see the authors previous article:

Smoking Gun: The HAARP and Chemtrails Connection.

To fully comprehend what Kirbys new article has to say, it really helps to have already read his previous post
titled, Chemtrails Exposed: A History of the New Manhattan Project.

Before getting into Peters most recent findings, which are in keeping with research Ive done very recently and will share as
well, first Ill briefly summarize the previous article, and you can watch the video titled Chemtrails: The Secret War. After the
video, Ill highlight the areas covered in the remainder of this article.
The main topics dealt with in Kirbys previous post titled, Chemtrails Exposed: A History of the New Manhattan Project, are
as follows:

The Origins of Weather Modification

Early American Involvement

Nikola Teslas Role

The Beginning of the Scientific Era and Weather Modification

 The Origins of Weather Modification:

The idea of man controlling the weather is far from new. Its been around as long as man. Early efforts were attempted by
mystics or local shaman, perhaps rain dances, or even animal sacrifice, but the point is, this is not a new idea. As for the
origins of weather modification from a militaristic sense, Kirby says the following:

The 1996 U.S. military document Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 outlines a program
using aerosols sprayed from airplanes which are then manipulated with electromagnetic energy in order to modify
the weather. This document will be discussed shortly.

The common thread here is weather modification; or as the Library of Congress calls it, weather control. Lots of
other evidence supporting this assertion exists as well, but these two documents are the most salient.

Motives are plenty. Most notably, significant direct benefits can be gained by playing financial markets which rise
and fall with the weather such as the weather derivatives and catastrophe reinsurance mark

Early American Involvement in DARPA / HAARP / Weather Control:

In essence, since America has been the worlds technological leader; especially in the area of military technology, America
has been the one leading the way on the New Manhattan Project from the beginning, and continues to do so to this day.
 Nikola TeslaS Role:

Beginning with his 1905 United States patent number 787,412, Nikola Tesla pioneered the use of a certain type of
electromagnetic energy called extremely-low frequency (ELF). This is a specific type of energy known to be used in the New
Manhattan Project; the other being very-low frequency (VLF) electromagnetic energy.

If youve read the following two articles already, then youll know all about the nefarious nature of where this is all leading

Why Are Weaponized Cell Phone Towers Being Constructed Everywhere?

More on New Slow-Kill Directed Energy Weapons Appearing On Fake Cell Towers

More on Why Weaponized Cell Phone Towers Are Popping Up Everywhere (Video)
 The Beginning of the Scientific Era:

The scientific era of weather modification began famously in 1946 with a trio of scientists from General Electric Laboratories:
Irving Langmuir, Vincent Schaefer and Bernard Vonnegut. Leading the group was the world famous Nobel Peace Prize
winning scientist Irving Langmuir (1881-1957)

So far we have only discussed the New Manhattan Projects most obvious aspect: weather control. Just in that aspect alone,
the New Manhattan Project is easily the biggest scientific endeavor in Human history. Believe it or not, it appears that quite a
few other massive projects have been piggybacked upon this global weather modification scheme.

They are already spraying us with megatons of aluminum, barium, and strontium. That right there is enough to put people
away in prison for the rest of their lives, or worse. So why stop there? The people responsible for the New Manhattan Project
(NMP) have apparently gone for broke.

What else might one accomplish by spraying stuff all over Gods creation and/or shooting electromagnetic energy all over the
place? What else have these mad scientists been up to? As opposed to the more understandable weather modification
aspects of the NMP, this article examines the NMPs more unbelievable aspects.
From mind control to Morgellons to Nikola Teslas death ray and more, this article examines the New Manhattan Projects
other agendas.

If you do not know what the New Manhattan Project is, please refer to the authors previous article "Chemtrails Exposed: A
History of the New Manhattan Project."

Chemtrails Used to Aid in Mind Control:

Other than weather modification, the most probable purpose of the New Manhattan Project is mind control. It is well
documented that certain types of electromagnetic energy waves can remotely manipulate peoples thoughts and feelings. The
relevant field here is known as psychotronics and psychotronic weaponry.
A cursory overview is presented here with an emphasis upon the potential use of these technologies as part of the New
Manhattan Project.

Attempts to Control the Minds of the American Public Not New to the US Government:

If anyone has ever called you a Conspiracy Theorist, then you are almost certainly already familiar with Operation
Paperclip , a crime against humanity perpetrated by the United States government in the aftermath of World War II that still
continues to plague the world today both in its lingering affects on victims, and also in what some would say is the continuity
of many of those programs to this day operating as black ops.
If youre not already familiar with Operation Paperclip, you can follow the link for a detailed article, or even the most basic
Google search will provide realty crushing truth for some people about just how evil the U.S. government can be. Once you
know the truth, consider how much technology has evolved since Operation Paperclip.

Arguably, the MK Ultra mind control program is the most well known program to come out of Operation Paperclip, largely
because of references to it in modern pop culture movies and television hits like The X-Files.

The following video also gives a horrifying, but brief, overview of the program, which should begin to put the Fake
Cell Phone Towers into context. In the video below, Youtuber Dark5 gives a breakdown of the 5 Most Shocking CIA
Experiments of Project MKULTRA (that weve been able to uncover).

Not only can electromagnetic frequencies influence ones mind, they can also affect the rest of our bodily functions. Research
by Dr. Robert Becker, Dr. Thomas Valone, and many others have strongly correlated the Human bodys functions to
electromagnetic fields. This correlation is due to the fact that the Human body is a complex bioelectric organism highly
susceptible to electromagnetic energies and fields.

The ionospheric heaters used as part of todays New Manhattan Project can produce the extremely low frequency (ELF)
signals that affect our moods, thoughts and bodily functions. Not only that, but the two most important New Manhattan Project
scientists (Bernard Vonnegut and Gordon J.F. MacDonald) were into it.

The ELF waves referred to are something I covered in detail in my post titled: Why Are Weaponized Cell Phone
Towers Being Constructed Everywhere? In that post, prior to the following video I said:

One thing thats important to note up front: Whether were talking about weaponized cell phone towers, Googles
Humanoid Robots That Can Hunt Down Humans Even in Dense Woods, or were talking about one of Googles
otherMachines Designed to Hunt Humans (both shown below), all were designed with the same outcome in mind,
and thats total control over their subjects.

The US militarys involvement in these types of technologies originated with something called Project Sanguine. Project
Sanguine was a proposed, mid- to late-1950s Navy project developing a long-distance submarine communications system.
The proposed project involved burying tens of thousands of miles of wires a few feet underground.

These wires were to send extremely low frequency (ELF) signals to submerged submarines many thousands of miles away.
Although Project Sanguine was never implemented, a similar type of operation (this time using above ground wires) in
northern Michigan and Wisconsin exists today and has been in use since the mid-1970s.
Project Sanguine and todays facilities in Wisconsin and Michigan was and are not about mind control; only Naval
communications. But Project Sanguine was the first inkling of what was to come.

Some years later in 1961, along with two other scientists, that great pioneer of the New Manhattan Projects weather
modification aspects, Bernard Vonnegut also laid the groundwork for future mind control experiments. He conducted
experiments pertaining to the effects of electromagnetic energy, propagated through an aerosol, upon the effigy of a mans
head. In their 1961 report titled Research in Electrical Phenomena Associated with Aerosols, the trio wrote:

"One can make an estimate of the concentration of the field around an object or man by considering the potential
in space in which it exists. For example, in a field of 100 volts cm a mans head is in a region where the potential
is about 20,000 V with respect to ground. Because of the relatively high conductivity of the body the mans head is
at ground potential and therefore a corresponding amount of charge has passed from the ground up to his head.

If we approximate the head as a sphere of 10 cm radius, its capacity is about 10 farads so the induced charge
on it is about 2 x 10 coulombs and the field at its surface is approximately 2000 volts cm. Accordingly, we see
that the field and hence the rate of aerosol deposition should be about 20 fold greater on the mans head than on
the ground."

Seven years later, that other great scientific champion of the New Manhattan Project, Dr. Gordon J.F. How to Wreck the
Environment MacDonald wrote:

"The enhanced low-frequency electrical oscillations in the earth-ionosphere cavity relate to possible weapons
systems through a little-understood aspect of brain physiology.

Electrical activity in the brain is concentrated at certain frequencies, some of it extremely slow, a little around five
cycles per second, and very conspicuous activity (the so-called alpha rhythm) around ten cycles per second. Some
experiments have been done in the use of a flickering light to pull the brains alpha rhythm into unnatural
synchrony with it; the visual stimulation leads to electrical stimulation.

There has also been work on direct electrical driving of the brain. In experiments discussed by Norbert Wiener, a
sheet of tin is suspended from the ceiling and connected to a generator working at ten cycles per second. With
large field strengths of one or two volts per centimeter oscillating at the alpha-rhythm frequency, decidedly
unpleasant sensations are noted by human subjects.

The Brain Research Institute of the University of California is investigating the effect of weak oscillating fields on
human behavior. The field strengths in these experiments are of the order of a few hundredths of a volt per
centimeter. Subjects show small but measurable degradation in performance when exposed to oscillating fields for
periods of up to fifteen minutes.

The field strengths in these experiments are still much stronger, by a factor of about 1000, than the observed
natural oscillations in the earth-ionosphere cavity. However, as previously noted, the intensity of the natural
fluctuations could be increased substantially and in principle could be maintained for a long time, as tropical
thunderstorms are always available for manipulation.

The proper geographical location of the source of lightning, coupled with accurately timed, artificially excited
strokes, could lead to a pattern of oscillations that produced relatively high power levels over certain regions of the
earth and substantially lower levels over other regions. In this way, one could develop a system that would
seriously impair brain performance in very large populations in selected regions over an extended period.

The scheme I have suggested is admittedly far-fetched, but I have used it to indicate the rather subtle connections
between variations in mans environmental conditions and his behavior. Perturbation of the environment can
produce changes in behavior patterns.

Since our understanding of both behavioral and environmental manipulation is rudimentary, schemes of behavioral
alteration on the surface seem unrealistic. No matter how deeply disturbing the thought of using the environment to
manipulate behavior for national advantage is to some, the technology permitting such use will very probably
develop within the next few decades."
The mind control technologies detailed here by MacDonald have been in development by the Stanford VLF Group.

In 1978, electromagnetics expert Robert C. Beck penned a paper titled Mood Modification with ELF Magnetic Fields in which
he writes:

"Coherent ELF energies have the unique and interesting property of almost lossless propagation within the earth-
ionosphere cavity waveguide, and attenuation of these signals due to distance from transmitter sites is negligible.
Power losses are .8 dB per Mm (million meters). The magnetic vectors, unlike electrical (E-wave) components,
permeate any substance and cannot be effectively shielded, even by iron, mu-metal, lead, copper, Faraday
cages, etc.

The established physics of radio propagation therefore suggests that vast geographical areas can be readily
mood-manipulated by transmissions of EM energy within the earth-ionosphere cavity waveguide."

The 1986 book Low-Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology features a paper by Navy Captain Paul E. Tyler titled The
Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low-Intensity Conflict.

This paper is all about using electromagnetic energy against

an enemys mind. Shortly after referencing a Southwest
Research Institute document speaking to the ability of
radiofrequency radiation to, completely interrupt mental
functioning and, sensitize large military groups to
extremely dispersed amounts of biological or chemical
agents to which the unirradiated population would be
immune., Captain Tyler writes:

"Some of these potential uses include dealing with

terrorist groups, crowd control, controlling breeches
of security at military installations, and antipersonnel
techniques in tactical warfare. In all of these cases
the EM systems would be used to produce mild to
severe physiological disruption or perceptual
distortion or disorientation.

In addition the ability of individuals to function could

be degraded to such a point that they would be
combat ineffective.

Another advantage of electromagnetic systems is

that they can provide coverage over large areas with
a single system. They are silent and
countermeasures to them may be difficult to
develop.

The 1995 paper On the Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain by Electromagnetic Induction of Fundamental
Algorithms by Professor Michael A. Persinger, PhD says that relatively weak atmospheric signals (such as those used for cell
phone communications) can have a great influence upon the way people think and feel. The New Manhattan Projects
ionospheric heaters can produce such signals.

A most recent addition to this body of evidence is very thorough. Michael Aquino, PhD penned a 2013 tome titled Mind
Wars in which he writes:
 EMR [electromagnetic radiation] in the brain occurs in waves measured according to cycles per second (Hz). 1-3
Hz = delta waves, characteristic of deep sleep. 4-7 Hz = theta waves, characteristic of high emotion, violence, and
frustration. 8-12 Hz = alpha waves, characteristic of meditation, relaxation, and searching for patterns. 13-22 Hz =
beta waves, characteristic of frontal brain activity, deliberate effort, and logical thought.

He failed to mention Gamma waves (22-80 Hz) which are produced by the brains of experienced meditators and are
associated with enhanced neuro-plasticity (brain changes). Mr. Aquino continues:

EMR [electromagnetic radiation] in the brain occurs in waves measured according to cycles per second (Hz). 1-3
Hz = delta waves, characteristic of deep sleep. 4-7 Hz = theta waves, characteristic of high emotion, violence, and
frustration. 8-12 Hz = alpha waves, characteristic of meditation, relaxation, and searching for patterns. 13-22 Hz =
beta waves, characteristic of frontal brain activity, deliberate effort, and logical thought.

Brain waves are subject to the principle of resonance. Energy-waves reaching the brain through any medium eyes, ears, or
flesh will tend to induce the brain-waves to cycle at the same wavelength.

A Human brain resonating with externally produced energy waves is known as brain entrainment. He then goes about
describing how this knowledge might be applied to a Mind War scenario:
 Brainwave resonance (BWR) is significant to SLIPC [subliminal involuntary psycontrol] in both passive and active
contexts. Passively a human-interactive environment may be permeated with EMS [electromagnetic spectrum]
waves at one or more of the BWR ranges, inclining those within it to their induced characteristics without their
conscious awareness.

Attempting a relaxed, pleasant, cooperative discussion of a mutual problem is more possible in an alpha BWR than
in a non-BWR one, and much more possible than in a beta one. Trying to accomplish anything complex or create
immersed in delta is exhausting and fruitless.

Lastly, Dr. Aquino discloses how these energies might be applied remotely:

Active employment of BWR utilizes frequency generators to project desired BWR into a MW [mind war] operational
environment, to adjust the emotions and awareness of all individuals therein.

Such generators may be strategic satellite-based platforms which transmit BWR both directly and through intrusion
into existing, localized electronic media systems. BWR can, for instance, be inserted into the Internet to be
passively and indetectably (absent such sensors) received and radiated by any accessing device, from television
station to desktop computer or cellular telephone.

Michael Aquino is a very interesting character. As of Jan. 1, 2015, his extremely extensive bio notes his latest position as Lt.
Colonel, Psychological Operations, First Special Forces Regiment, U.S. Army. He has since been sheep dipped retired from
this position. He is a Knight Eagle of the Boy Scouts of America.
His Ph.D. dissertation was on the neutron bomb. He has served as a Space Activities Officer. He has been given many
military decorations and awards. He goes by the title of the 13th Baron of Rachane. He writes that he is a first degree
satanist, a second degree warlock, and the high priest of the Temple of Set.

The following video also comes from my post titled: Why Are Weaponized Cell Phone Towers Being Constructed
Everywhere?

The first video from that post (directly above) spent everything after the 1:45 mark of the video explaining how powerful some
of these new cell phone towers are, and how their current configuration with mega cables is NOT set up for
telecommunications or data transfer.

After watching the video, and considering what the video makers said in conjunction with all the other information weve
covered, I certainly wouldnt put ANYTHING past the uber global elites. or the board rooms of multinational corporations, but
Im not so gullible that Ill believe anything, so I kept digging.

It was not easy to find information, and a few of the articles I found were several years old and most likely outdated, but I did
find a few worth noting. The best one included the following video which does an EXCELLENT job of putting the highly
technical supporting information below into laymans terms.

I n short: The video gives you an idea of the full scope of how powerful these towers are, whether you understand the
technical mumbo jumbo below or not.
Heres the Takeaway from All This: The U.S. Government is Obsessed with Mind Control

Those last few distinctions are the ones which have given him the most notoriety. The Temple of Set is a satanic church
operating in the authors hometown of San Francisco, CA. San Francisco is also where Dr. Aquino says he lives. You can visit
the Temple of Set website if you dare: www.xeper.org

In the late 1980s, Dr. Aquino became embroiled in a highly publicized satanic ritual abuse scandal which, among other things,
landed him on the Oprah Winfrey Show and the Geraldo Rivera Show. These interviews are available on YouTube. He
published a 2014 book all about it titled Extreme Prejudice: The Presidio Satanic Abuse Scam.

Voice to Skull:

Making people hear things that no one else around them

can hear through the use of atmospheric radio waves is
called voice to skull technology.

This technology involves beaming sounds and speech

directly into a subjects head. This technology is well
documented and well known.

It has been demonstrated in many movies and television

shows such as the movie Kingsman: The Secret
Service and the TV show The X-Files.

The New Manhattan Projects ionospheric heaters can do

this.

An early book titled Microwave Auditory Effects and

Applications by James C. Lin, Ph.D. revealed the method.
1989s U.S. patent #4,877,027 Hearing System defines
this technology. Many scientific papers on the subject are
available.
Voice to skull technology has been weaponized into the Navys MEDUSA program. Click here for the Wikipedia listing.

Light From the Gods:

My science advisor Ginny Silcox mentions current research into how ionospheric heaters such as HAARP could be used in
combination to produce lightning or lightning-like energy beams capable of completely destroying individuals, buildings or
large areas. This type of technology was first hypothesized by Nikola Tesla and is commonly referred to as his death ray.

There are a few ways Teslas death ray might be accomplished. It may be accomplished by tapping into the ionosphere,
generating it independently, or a combination of both.

The ionosphere (about 50-375 miles above earths surface) is home to Earths auroral electrojet. The auroral electrojet is
comprised of extremely powerful magnetic energy encircling our planet. If lightning taps into that power by creating a circuit
from the auroral electrojet down to the Earth, it will be incredibly powerful.
This may happen naturally. A 1982 article co-written by the great New Manhattan Project scientist Bernard Vonnegut recounts
the experiences of pilots who have witnessed lightning extending upwards, above storm clouds, presumably to the
ionosphere.

Man might also make this happen. It is conceivable that the New Manhattan Projects ground-based ionospheric heaters
(possibly in conjunction with other, similar space-based antennas) could induce lightning from the ionosphere. These antenna
arrays could create a conductive path known as a waveguide which would cause the ionospheres energy to flow down to
Earth.

These waveguides can also direct the energy more accurately. The metals found in todays chemtrails allow for better
propagation of these energy waves. The Stanford VLF Group has been active in this area as well.

Teslas death ray may also be entirely man-made. As part of the proposed overhaul of Air Force (USAF) operations outlined
in the 1996 Air Force 2025 documents, the UASF produced a paper titled Space Operations: Through the Looking Glass
(Global Area Strike System). Air Force 2025 is the set of documents containing the infamous Weather as a Force Multiplier:
Owning the Weather in 2025 paper. The authors describe Nikola Teslas death ray as a probable future Air Force capability.
The report reads:

"Once again a small but capably armed country is threatening to seize its smaller but resource-rich neighbor. The
Global News Network reports that the border has been violated. "

The same old story? No, the plot twists as a sophisticated satellite surveillance and reconnaissance system tracks the
belligerent nations leader. As he steps to the podium to incite his troops to greater violence, a blinding light from above
vaporizes him and his podium leaving even his bodyguards untouched.

His smarter brother, the second in command, countermands the invasion orders and in 12 hours the borders are restored.
Stability, if not peace, reigns again.

This is not science fiction, but a mission well within the capabilities of Space Operations in 2025.

A little later in the piece, the authors expound upon the usefulness of such a weapon. Although they are writing about a laser
generated from a space-based platform as opposed to the NMPs network of ground-based ionospheric heaters, the concept
is the same and ground-based ionospheric heaters can do similar things.

As previously noted, lasers from satellites may also be used as waveguides which can increase the accuracy of
electromagnetic waves produced from the more powerful, terrestrial ionospheric heaters. They explain:

At slightly higher powers, the enhanced heating produced by the laser can be used to upset sensitive electronics (temporarily
or permanently), damage sensor and antenna arrays, ignite some containerized flammable and explosive materials, and
sever exposed power and communications lines.

The full power beam can melt or vaporize virtually any target, given enough exposure time.
Comment: And with the two hundred year old archaic technology we have been landed with there are so many ways that this stone age tech can be
interfered with it is beyond a joke. Seriously - we are still dealing with aerodynamics and the principles of negative pressure for lift? Fuck off - what an
absolute degenerate crock of arse. Your Lear jet, your Gulfstream G5 is an antiquated piece of shit...

Related: Explosive Expos: The Secret Government, Anti-Gravity Technology And Black Budget Projects

With precise targeting information (accuracy of inches) and beam pointing and tracking stability of 10 to 100 nanoradians, a
full-power beam can successfully attack ground or airborne targets by melting or cracking cockpit canopies, burning through
control cables, exploding fuel tanks, melting or burning sensor assemblies and antenna arrays, exploding or melting munitions
pods, destroying ground communications and power grids, and melting or burning a large variety of strategic targets (e.g.,
dams, industrial and defense facilities, and munitions factories) - all in a fraction of a second.

Space Operations: Through the Looking Glass also speaks to ground-based antennas capable of producing electromagnetic
pulses that can disable electronic devices and jam communications known as high-power microwave weaponry. The
ionospheric heaters of todays New Manhattan Project can be used in this capacity. The authors write:

"A high-power microwave (HPMW) device also employs electromagnetic radiation as its weapon effect. Not as
powerful as nuclear-driven EMP weapons, HPMW weapons create a narrower band of microwave electromagnetic
radiation by coupling fast, high energy pulsed power supplies to specially designed microwave antenna arrays.

Microwave frequencies (tens of megahertz to tens of gigahertz) are chosen for two reasons: the atmosphere is
generally transparent to microwave radiation (all-weather capability) and modern electronics are particularly
vulnerable to these frequencies."

They continue:

"The level of pulsed, electrical power required to produce weapon-level microwave fluxes is now becoming
 available (for ground-based systems).

Compact, scaleable [sic] laboratory sources of narrow-band, high-power microwaves have been demonstrated that
can produce gigawatts of power for 10 to a few hundred nanoseconds. Ultrawideband microwave sources are less
well developed, but research in this area appears promising. A HPMW weapon should, however, be able to
temporarily disrupt circuits and jam microwave communications at low-power levels."

Lastly, the authors of Space Operations: Through the Looking Glass specifically mention the Iridium satellite constellation as
one that would be suitable for producing high-power microwaves. The Iridium satellite constellation is noted in the authors
previous work "C4: Command, Control, Communications, and Computers of the New Manhattan Chemtrail Project"as
particularly suitable for the New Manhattan Projects remote sensing needs.

Microwave energy, like that which is employed in the New Manhattan Project, can also be weaponized into systems like
Raytheons heat ray. Here is the Wikipedia listing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Denial_System

Judy Wood, PhD in her book Where Did the Towers Go?, documents 1400 burned cars up to one half mile away from
ground zero. Nothing else near them was damaged. Trees still had leaves on them. There were reams of unburned sheets of
paper. Though they were covered with ash, no humans were burned.

The exceptional thing about the cars, she notes, was the fact that they were not grounded while everything else was. Was
some sort of electromagnetic weapon used on 9/11? If so, how did cave dwellers from Afghanistan get one of those?

Maybe the original purpose of Raytheon is to come up with just such a weapon. Raytheon means light from the gods.
Raytheon has been all about microwave technologies all along. Raytheon acquired E-Systems; the company that built
HAARP.
Genetic Modification Using Microwaves and Chemtrails:

"Somebody has apparently been planning ahead. If, from the megatons of aluminum and other toxins released into
our biosphere, our environment becomes wrecked beyond being able to sustain life as we know it, dont worry!
People have been genetically modifying plants to be able to thrive in an aluminum-ravaged biosphere! Aluminum is
the number one chemtrail ingredient.

A certain genetically modified sorghum seed has been developed to thrive in aluminum contaminated soils.

The makers of this sorghum seed reassure us that this type of genetic manipulation may also work well with many
other food crops such as: wheat, barley, rice, maize, cotton, peanut, sunflower, tobacco, rye, alfalfa, tomato,
cucumber, soya, sweet potato, grapes, rapeseed, sugar beet, tea, strawberry, rose, chrysanthemum, poplar,
eggplant, sweet pepper, walnut, pistachio, mango, banana, and potato. It appears that sorghum is just the
proverbial camels nose under the tent."

The abstract of U.S. patent #7,582,809 Sorghum Aluminum Tolerance Gene, SBMATE reads:

"The major aluminum tolerance gene, the SbMATE gene, encodes a root citrate efflux transporter that is Al-
inducible at the level of gene transcription and is also Al-activated at the level of protein function. High level of
expression of the SbMATE gene and the protein was found in roots.

SbMATE orthologs with high degree of sequence homology were found in other higher plants, including rice.
 Successful transformation of Arabidopsis provides strong evidence that SbMATE can work across species to
enhance tolerance to Al in other important crops grown in localities worldwide where Al3+ cations are present in
acid soils and are toxic to plants."

It is curious that this patent is assigned to (along with Brazilian officialdom) the United States of America as represented by
the Secretary of Agriculture. One might think that this would be right up Monsantos alley. There may be some sort of
deception going on here.

We do know that historically the Department of Agriculture has acted like it works for Monsanto. As described in Marie-
Monique Robins 2010 masterpiece The World According to Monsanto, the collusion between our Department of Agriculture
and Monsanto has been pervasive.

Maybe some sort of back room deal has been struck between Monsanto and corrupt elements of our federal government
enabling Monsanto to profit from the rollout of these aluminum resistant seeds; a rollout designed to appear as a benevolent
government action.

If you noticed, one of the plants mentioned in patent #7,582,809 is poplar; a tree. If food crops dont grow in an aluminum-
ravaged environment, one can expect that trees wont either. This is why we can thank our lucky stars that there is a
corporation called ArborGen producing and selling genetically modified trees.

They arent saying that their trees are specifically resistant to aluminum contaminated soils yet, but its good to know that they
might help us in our future hour of need.

Lastly, you can bet that the geoengineers will be here to help too. Our friends have developed wholly mechanical trees that
can do what natural trees have traditionally done; remove CO2 from the atmosphere. For confirmation, search carbon
capture trees. Who needs Mother Nature? We can have giant multinational corporations that will take care of everything!
 Other Sprays Emitted in Chemtrails:

We are all but guinea pigs in their satanic Human experimentations. While todays super-secret New Manhattan Project
saturates our atmosphere with aluminum, barium, and strontium, the conventional weather modifiers have also admittedly
been spraying us with a myriad of substances (other than silver iodide) ranging from urea (urine) to carbon black to lead
iodide and much more.

The books Clouds of Secrecy by Leonard A. Cole and In the Name of Science by Andrew Goliszek document hundreds of
open air tests of all types of chemicals and biologicals on unsuspecting American citizens. In fact, our militarys position is that
they get to spray us with whatever they want, whenever they want as long as they classify their activities as research.

Knowing this, it is understandable that, for many decades now, we have been getting hit with everything under the sun.

Title 50, chapter 32, subsections 1520a & b of United States Code (law) state:

(a. Prohibited Activities:

The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contact)

(1. any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a

civilian population; or

(2. any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects.

(b. Exceptions:

Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e) of this section, the prohibition in subsection (a) of this section does not apply to a test
or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes:

(1. Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity.
 Thats right. As long as they classify their mass murder as
a, peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic,
pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity, they
get to legally spray us with whatever they want whenever they
want.

As we can see now, this is exactly what they have done.

It is interesting to note that this law was passed in 1997; right

around the time that the New Manhattan Projects large-scale
spraying operations began.

But thats probably just a coincidence.

Dont think too much. Its not healthy for the establishment.

Reports of all types of strange substances apparently being

sprayed from aircraft are abundant and readily available.

William Thomas groundbreaking 2004 book Chemtrails

Confirmed provides early examples.

The book reads:

"Human blood cells were found by a hospital lab

technician in samples of gel-like material dropped over
the tiny town of Oakville, Washington (pop. 665),
covering a 20 square-mile area three times within a six-
week period."

It continues:

"Officer David Lacey was on patrol with a civilian friend at 3 am when the sticky downpour began. We turned our
windshield wipers on, and it just started smearing to the point where we could almost not see, Lacy said. We both
looked at each other and we said, Gee this isnt right. Were out in the middle of nowhere, basically, and where did
this come from?"

Pulling into a gas station, officer Lacey pulled on a pair of latex gloves to clean his windshield. Lacey: The substance was
very mushy, almost like if you had Jell-O in your hand. Within hours, Lacey was in hospital unable to breathe.

Chemtrails Confirmed goes on to recount multiple other instances of this human blood cell goo (presumably dropped from
airplanes) splattering all over people, property, and the Earth.

Thomas book also references a 2001 World Net Daily article titled Californians Confused Over Chemtrails. In this article, as
reproduced in Chemtrails Confirmed, reporter Lance Lindsay recounts the experience of a former military radar technician
named Gene Shimer. It reads:

One morning, about two years ago, Shimer spotted a long, thin string resembling a spider web floating in the sky, he said. It
was about 20 feet in length and could only be seen in the reflection of the sun. He looked up, saw trails, and then saw
something that appeared to be a glob of foam falling from the sky.
 "It came floating down, free-floating, Shimer says. I caught it with a spatula, scooped it off the ground, and I
watched it as it shrank. It was about the size of my fist when it first started. It looked like a cross between soap
bubbles and cotton candy."

What Mr. Shimer described is not unlike something that was captured on video. You truly have to see it to believe it. Behold
the first cloud that fell to earth:

What was captured on video looks like what might be causing one of the most widely documented other sprays; chem-webs.
As noted in William Thomas book and in a myriad of online reports (the author has even been told this by people with first-
hand experiences), a spider web-like substance is sometimes found covering grass, bushes, and trees.

The substance is usually described as completely foreign to the particular environments; i.e., it is not spider webs. Despite
what the shills claim, this stuff was probably sprayed from an airplane.

If all this isnt weird enough, our United States Air Force has written about spraying what is commonly referred to as smart
dust. The seminal 1996 Air Force document Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather 2025 mentions using
smart materials for the purpose of weather modification. On page 17 it reads:

"With regard to seeding techniques, improvements in the materials and delivery methods are not only plausible but
likely. Smart materials based on nanotechnology are currently being developed with gigaops computer capability at
their core. They could adjust their size to optimal dimensions for a given fog seeding situation and even make
adjustments throughout the process.

They might also enhance their dispersal qualities by adjusting their buoyancy, by communicating with each other,
and by steering themselves within the fog. They will be able to provide immediate and continuous effectiveness
 feedback by integrating with a larger sensor network and can also change their temperature and polarity to
improve their seeding effects."

As mentioned above, UAVs [unmanned aerial vehicles] could be used to deliver and distribute these smart materials.

Anything that contains semi-conductor material is laced with dangerously toxic elements like cadmium and germanium. If
these particles are small enough to float in the air, they will be inhaled by people and animals.

This type of technology is also known as microelectromechanical systems. Although the current, known state of the art
pertaining to smart dust is motes (pieces of smart dust) as small as a few millimeters in size, secret technologies bringing the
size of such machines down to the micrometer scale may be available. As one can see from the above passage, they are
working on it.

In fact, in this area, a PhD scientist is claiming a breakthrough. In his report titled Global Environmental MEMS Sensors
(GEMS): A Revolutionary Observing System for the 21st Century, John Manobianco, PhD writes:

Technological advancements in MicroElectroMechanical Systems (MEMS) have inspired a revolutionary observing system
known as Global Environmental MEMS Sensors (GEMS). The GEMS concept features an integrated system of MEMS-based
airborne probes that will be designed to remain suspended in the atmosphere for hours to days taking in situ measurements
over all regions of the Earth with unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution.

Related:

The GEMS concept is revolutionary because it foresees the future integration of evolving technologies to realize an observing
system with scalability and applicability over a broad range of weather and climate phenomena. GEMS have the potential to
expand our understanding of the Earth and improve weather forecast accuracy and efficiency well beyond current capability.

Resulting improvements in forecast accuracy will translate directly into cost benefits for weather-sensitive industries
worldwide, and mitigate the risk factors associated with life-threatening weather phenomena.
Lastly, other engineered particles called niobate ring resonators could conceivably be sprayed from aircraft for surveillance
purposes. Lithium is highly toxic to Humans and can cause tremors, nervous-system collapse, and death.

Morgellons:

Reports of fibers growing out of peoples skin along with sores and subdermal crawling sensations have been pouring in.
According to the Mayo Clinic, these symptoms generally occur along with severe fatigue, difficulty concentrating and short-
term memory loss.

The Mayo Clinic also notes that this, is a relatively rare condition that most frequently affects middle-aged white women.
Although the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) officially categorizes it as an Unexplained Dermopathy, amongst us
common folk, this disease is being called Morgellons.

Many people are claiming that Morgellons disease is caused by chemtrails. Whether or not Morgellons is caused by the usual
chemtrails consisting of aluminum, barium, and strontium, or is caused by other sprays is unclear. But people have been
drawing connections between heavy chemtrail spraying and Morgellons. There is an overwhelming amount of information
available online.

A man named Clifford Carnicom has been at the forefront of investigating Morgellons. He suggests that a substance at least
similar if not identical to the aforementioned goo consisting of Human blood cells may be causing Morgellons.

He suggests that Morgellons is not a skin condition, but rather a systemic condition not limited to our bodies. He suggests that
every living thing on this planet is currently being affected by whatever is causing Morgellons.
The possibilities here are absolutely terrifying, mind-boggling, and currently beyond the scope of this investigation.
Regrettably, this area of research promises to be greatly expanded in years to come. This may have been what George Bush
Sr. was talking about when he said, If the American people knew what we have done, they would string us up from the lamp
posts.

Along with his other continuing research, Mr. Carnicom is conducting a study by providing a web-based form for actively
infected individuals to fill out.
Related: CarnicomInstitute

Holography, Project Blue Beam, and the Great Deception

First: A Little Background on Holograms and Blue Beam:

New Manhattan Project operations create a situation conducive to the production of holograms. The substances sprayed into
our atmosphere (particularly barium) can act as a three dimensional reflective screen onto which beams of electromagnetic
energy can be projected. This is how holograms are made.

As weapons of deception, the aforementioned document Space Operations: Through the Looking Glass (Global Area Strike
System) has a small section devoted to holography. The authors write:

It is certainly possible to make holograms of troop concentrations, military platforms, or other useful objects, although the
larger the scene the more difficult it is to produce the proper conditions to create a convincing hologram. No credible
approach has been suggested for projecting holograms over long distances under real-world conditions, although the
Massachusetts Institute of Technologys Media Lab believes holographic color projection may be possible within 10 years.
Holographic and other, less high-technology forms of illusion may became [sic] a potent tool in the hands of the information
warriors

Not long before his death, Canadian journalist Serge Monast made public something he said he had uncovered called Project
Blue Beam. He said it was an establishment plan to destroy all national sovereignty and religions; replacing them with a
dictatorial one world government and a satanic one world religion.

This was largely to be accomplished, he claimed, by the use of incredibly realistic holographic imagery, projected in the sky
and on the Earth, depicting an alien invasion. This fake alien invasion was to be used as a catalyst for all the people of the
world to give up their countries and religions in favor of only one religion and only one government in order to unite against
the perceived alien threat.

The chemtrails sprayed as part of todays New Manhattan Project have the potential to serve as the screen upon which the
Project Blue Beam movie is projected. The aforementioned voice to skull technology could be broadcast over the audience as
well to create a show with both images and sound.

Global Depopulation Agenda

We know that mass murder is taking place. We also know that two of the worlds most prominent geoengineering advocates
are also population reduction advocates.

There are also abundant calls for depopulation from many high-ranking establishment types. Considering all this in total, it is
reasonable to believe that the many deaths caused by geoengineering are not simply an unfortunate side-effect, but rather
part of a global depopulation agenda.

Just in America alone, it is reasonable to assert that at least hundreds of thousands of people have been murdered by
geoengineering activities. This is probably a very conservative estimate. This estimate is simply what the best available
information shows. This is simply what can be proven at this time. Please see the authors previous article "New Manhattan
Chemtrail Project Biological Impacts."
Related: Sinister Sites: The Georgia Guidestones

John P. Holdren is the sitting Presidential science advisor. He is also a geoengineering advocate. He regurgitates the same
talking points that the geoengineers do. Without admitting that solar radiation management geoengineering (chemtrails) is
currently happening, he says that it might be a good thing to do because global warming is such a big problem. He, of course,
couches this assertion in all sorts of disclaimers just like the geoengineers do.

But the fact remains that, under certain circumstances, he recommends it. There are many reports of Mr. Holdrens position
available online.
John Holdren is also a population reduction advocate. In fact, he is possibly the most prominent population reduction
advocate. Back in 1977, Holdren co-authored a book called Ecoscience. In this book, he and his co-authors advocate for
population reduction; a.k.a. mass murder. Holdren and his cohorts call for forced abortions, mass sterilizations, and a United
Nations Planetary Regime with the power of life and death over American citizens.

William Gates III, the co-founder of Microsoft, is another geoengineering advocate of the highest profile also advocating for
population reduction.

Bill Gates funds geoengineering. On Stanford Universitys website, it says that Bill Gates funds solar radiation management
geoengineering research through something called the Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research (FICER).

His geoengineering advocacy is further detailed in a 2012 Guardian article.

Like John Holdren, Bill Gates also advocates for population reduction. He has stated this position many times in many venues
such as on CNN and during a TED talk. He says vaccines and other so-called health care services such as those embodied
in Obamacare can help in this area. For confirmation, go to YouTube and search Bill Gates population reduction.

His father was the head of Planned Parenthood; an organization that has been reducing the population quite effectively for
many years now.

Now that Mr. Gates has conquered the world of business, he has apparently become a philanthropist. He wants to help all
right. He wants to help us into our graves.
Bill Gates isnt the only top-level crony capitalist calling for population reduction. Hes got plenty of company. Prince Philip,
Duke of Edinburgh, leader of the World Wildlife Fund said, If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a
killer virus to lower human population levels.

Ted Turner, the founder of CNN said, A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would
be ideal. There are many other examples.

Depopulation is a theme common among the socio-economic elite and their brainwashed sycophants. What most of these
people fail to understand is that the problem is not overpopulation. The problem is the establishments extremely poor
management. It is a known fact that better education results in fewer births and smaller family sizes while they promote
dumbed-down garbage like Common Core.

Clean, free energy technologies have been brutally suppressed for over 100 years in favor of their pollution-spewing
multinational oil and gas conglomerates while they tell us we have to give up our quality of life because of pollution and the
supposedly resultant Global Warming. Many other examples of the establishments extreme mismanagement abound.
Another book could be written.

The Georgia Guidestones is a massive monument located in Elbert County, Georgia. Consisting of 5 granite slabs (plus a
capstone) over 19 feet high and weighing over 21 tons each, the same message to Humanity is carved in 8 different
languages. Along with some other rubbish, the stones read, MAINTAIN HUMANITY UNDER 500,000,000 IN PERPETUAL
BALANCE WITH NATURE.

The current population of the Earth is over 7,000,000,000. Maybe if the makers of the Georgia Guidestones do a really good
job with vaccines and other health care services like Bill Gates suggests, they can kill 6.5 billion people.

Be Sure to Check Out the Following:

What Dark Secrets Are The Georgia Guide Stones Hiding From Humanity

Secret Identity of Georgia Guide Stones Founder Revealed

As shown in the above information, geoengineering is apparently not the only way the establishment is going about mass
murdering us. But it sure is an effective one. In fact, short of thermonuclear war, the most effective way to mass murder a
population is to spray megatons of toxic garbage all over them and their land. This is what the geoengineers are doing, and
probably a lot more.

Peter A. Kirby is a San Rafael, CA researcher, writer, and activist. Check out his ebook Chemtrails Exposed: A New
Manhattan Project.

Notes:

The Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of Life a book by Robert Becker and Gary Selden, published
by William Morrow, 1998 Bioelectromagnetic Healing: A Rationale for its Use a book by Thomas Valone, published by
Integrity Research Institution, 2000

Bioeffects of Selected Non-lethal Weapons an addendum to Nonlethal Technologies Worldwide (NGIC-1147-101-98) by

the Department of Defense
Mega Brain: New Tools and Techniques for Brain Growth and Mind Expansion a book by Michael Hutchison, self-
published, 2013 Angels Dont Play this HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology a book by Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane
Manning, published by Earthpulse Press, 1995

Extremely Low Frequency Transmitter Site Clam Lake, Wisconsin a report by the United States Navy, 2001

Sending Signals to Submarines an article by David Llanwyn Jones, published in New Scientist, July 4, 1985

Signaling Subs an article by T.A. Heppenheimer, published in Popular Science, April, 1987

Research in Electrical Phenomena Associated with Aerosols a report by Bernard Vonnegut, Arnold W. Doyle, and D. Read
Moffett, produced and published by Arthur D. Little, Inc., 1961

How to Wreck the Environment a paper by Gordon J. F. MacDonald as it appeared in Unless Peace Comes: A Scientific
Forecast of New Weapons a book edited by Nigel Calder, published by The Viking Press, 1968

Mood Modification with ELF Magnetic Fields a paper by Robert C. Beck, published in Archaeus, 1986

The Electromagnetic Spectrum in Low-Intensity Conflict a paper by Captain Paul E. Tyler as it appeared in Low-Intensity
Conflict and Modern Technology a book edited by Lt. Col. David J. Dean, USAF, Published by the Air University Press,
Center for Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, 1986

Final Report on Biotechnology Research Requirements for Aeronautical Systems Through the Year 2000 a report by the
Southwest Research Institute, published by the Southwest Research Institute, 1982

On the Possibility of Directly Accessing Every Human Brain by Electromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorithms a
paper by Professor Michael A. Persinger, published in Perceptual and Motor Skills, June 1995

Mind Wars a book by Michael A. Aquino, Ph.D., self published, 2013

Michael A. Aquino Vitae, 2015

Extreme Prejudice: The Presidio Satanic Abuse Scam a book by Michael A. Aquino, self published, 2014 Microwave
Auditory Effects and Applications a book by James C. Lin, Ph.D., published by Charles C. Thomas, 1978

U.S. patent #4,877,027 Hearing System by Wayne B. Brunkan, 1989

Auditory Response to Pulsed Radiofrequency Energy a paper by J.A. Elder and C.K. Chou, published
by Bioelectromagnetics, 2003

Transmission of Microwave-Induced Intracranial Sound to the Inner Ear Is Most Likely Through Cranial Aqueducts a paper
by Ronald L. Seaman

Tesla Man Out of Time a book by Margaret Cheney, published by Simon & Schuster, 1981 Planet Earth: The Latest
Weapon of War a book by Rosalie Bertell, published by Black Rose Books, 2001

Lightning to the Ionosphere? an article by Otha H. Vaughn, Jr. and Bernard Vonnegut, published by Weatherwise, 1982

Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 by Col. Tamzy J. House, Lt. Col. James B. Near, Jr., LTC
William B. Shields (USA), Maj. Ronald J. Celentano, Maj. David M. Husband, Maj. Ann E. Mercer and Maj. James E. Pugh,
published by the United States Air Force, 1996

Space Operations: Through the Looking Glass (Global Area Strike System) a paper by Lt Col Jamie G.G. Varni, Mr. Gregory
M. Powers, Maj Dan S. Crawford, Maj Craig E. Jordan, and Maj Douglas L. Kendall, published by the United States Air Force,
1996

Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11a book by Judy Wood, published by
The New Investigation, 2010
U.S. patent #7,582,809 Sorghum Aluminum Tolerance Gene, SBMATE by Leon Kochian, Jiping Liu, Jurandir Vieira de
Magalhaes, Claudia Teixeira Guimaraes, Robert Eugene Schaffert, Vera Maria Carvalho Alves, and Patricia Klein

The World According to Monsanto: Pollution, Corruption, and the Control of the Worlds Food Supply a book by
Marie-Monique Robin, published by The New Press, 2010

Weather Modification Programs, Problems, Policy, and Potential a report by the Congressional Research Service, published
by the University Press of the Pacific, 2004, reprinted from the 1978 edition

Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences reports 1960-1978, published by the Federal Council for Science and
Technology

Clouds of Secrecy a book by Dr. Leonard A. Cole, published by Rowman & Littlefield, 1988 In the Name of Science a book
by Andrew Goliszek, published by St. Martins Press, 2003 Chemtrails Confirmed a book by William Thomas, published by
Bridger House Publishers, 2004

Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 by Col. Tamzy J. House, Lt. Col. James B. Near, Jr., LTC
William B. Shields (USA), Maj. Ronald J. Celentano, Maj. David M. Husband, Maj. Ann E. Mercer and Maj. James E. Pugh,
published by the United States Air Force, 1996

The Environmental Applications of Wireless Sensor Networks a paper by Ima Ituen and Guno Sohn

Global Environmental MEMS Sensors (GEMS): A Revolutionary Observing System for the 21st Century a report by John
Manobianco, PhD, prepared for NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts, published by ENSCO, Inc., 2002

Electro-optically Tunable Microring Resonators in Lithium Niobate a paper by Andrea Guarino, Gorazd Poberaj, Daniele
Rezzonico, Riccardo DeglInnocenti, and Peter Gunter of the Nonlinear Optics Laboratory, Institute of Quantum Electronics,
Zurich, Switzerland, published by Nature, July, 2007

Ecoscience a book by Paul R. Ehrlich, Anne H. Ehrlich, and John P. Holdren, published by W.H. Freeman, 1977 The
Georgia Guidestones a book by Bill Bridges, published by Elberton Granite Finishing, 1981

Wikileaks Asks If This Is The "Smoking Gun" Email That Will Bring Down Hillary + The
Full List Of 92 Paychecks Hillary Collected From Wall Street
June 4 2016 | From: ZeroHedge / NewPatriotsBlog

All along Hillary Clinton has pled that when it comes to her violation of Federal regulations, she
was at worst naive, hardly malicious and - as of recently - merely doing what each of her state
department predecessors has done.
And she has been very careful to make it clear that she never purposefully and intentionally "stripped"
confidentialdata in order to send it through her unsecured server as such an act would imply not only a breach of
email retention policy, but a willful abuse of confidential documents.

Well, moments ago Wikileaks unveiled what it believes may be the FBI's "smoking gun" in its case against Hillary. In a
tweet, Wikileaks highlights one specific email and asks "Is this email the FBI's star exhibit against Hillary Clinton
("H")? "

The email in question (link)

The full email chain is below (link):
The Full List Of 92 Paychecks Hillary Collected From Wall Street
The medias going nuts that Hillary Clinton took three big paychecks for three speeches at Goldman Sachs. At $225,000 a
pops thats pretty good scratch but its just the tip of the iceberg.

Shes been very, very busy, raking in millions in a three-year stretch since she left her post as the Secretary of State. Her
defense? It varies from Its what they offered me to the hilarious, I happen to think we need more conversations about
whats going on in the world.

Pricey conversations indeed.

Heres a list of the 92 conversations that Clinton has had in just the past three years. The total: $21.7 million.
Click on the image above top open a larger version in a new window

Shes been very, very busy. What did Hillary promise in all these speeches?

What was her advice to Deutche Bank, Cisco and the Council of Insurance Agents? What did she tell eBay? Or the
American Camping Association and why on earth would the American Camping Association pay $260,000 to hear from
Hillary?

Has she ever been camping? We may never know because she refuses to tell us.

What Hillary discloses to us peasants is on a need to know basis only. H/T: zerohedge, Hannity.com

Related Articles:

Digging Deeper on Hillary Clinton

Hillary Clintons Energy Initiative Pressed Countries to Embrace Fracking, New Emails Reveal

Hillary Clinton's Pathological Lying and Erratic Behavior, Is it Due to Drug and Alcohol Addiction?

Chelsea Clinton: Scalias Out of the Way, so now we can gut the Second Amendment

Throw her in jail: State Dept. says Killary violated federal rules using private email server

First "Shocking" Deposition In Clinton Email Case Reveals She Did Not Use A Password

The Criminalization of Politics: Hillary Accused of Racketeering by the FBI, Will She be Dumped from the
Presidential Race?

Hillary's Response When Asked If She Will Release Her Goldman Sachs Speech Transcripts

Huffington Post Caught Deleting an Article Claiming Hillary Clinton is About to Be Indicted
Not Just Surveillance: 3 Current Phenomena Exposing 1984 As An Instruction Manual
For The State
June 3 2016 | From: TheFreeThoughtProject

Assessing current conditions in the United States, it would be next to impossible not to grasp
innumerable parallels to George Orwells dystopic portent, 1984.

Though other fictional dystopias could similarly elicit comparisons to the dark turn taken by American empire,
aspects of 1984s creepy authoritarian nightmare ring all-too-true.

And Big Brother-like surveillance - though undoubtedly relevant - imparts only the most obvious, and therefore least
pertinent, connection on the list.

War Is Peace

Oceania was at war with Eastasia: Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia, Orwell wrote of two of the three
remaining nation-states on the planet. Though it analogizes Russias mercurial relationship with Nazi Germany, the same
volatility aptly fits U.S. involvement in the Middle East - where, though propaganda would purport a decisive enemy, the truth
remains far murkier.

A constant state of undeclared but active war rules foreign policy - driven almost exclusively by the war machines
profiteering from plundering of foreign lands natural resources.

Big Oil, Big Pharma, and the multi-faceted defense industry have experienced exponential profits since perpetual war
became the de facto basis of foreign policy - and Big Banks share in the reward. But all of this war requires the U.S.
government maintain support from the public - and what better way to win them over than appeal to fear of the Other?
When John Brady Kiesling, a career diplomat, tendered his letter of resignation to Secretary of State Colin Powell, he
piercingly criticized the warped factors driving both American domestic and foreign policy surrounding the needless war in
Iraq - with barbs unfortunately equally applicable today:

We spread disproportionate terror and confusion in the public mind, arbitrarily linking the unrelated problems of terrorism
and Iraq. The result, and perhaps the motive, is to justify a vast misallocation of shrinking public wealth to the military and to
weaken the safeguards that protect American citizens from the heavy hand of government. September 11 did not do as
much damage to the fabric of American society as we seem determined to [do] to ourselves []

Has oderint dum metuant [Let them hate so long as they fear] really become our motto?

After the attacks of September 11, 2001, it became immediately evident American government had its jackpot ticket for war
in perpetuity - the only necessary condition being wool sufficiently ambiguous to cover the publics eyes in fear.

Since that time, under the guise of national security, Big Brother-like domestic surveillance has become so thoroughly
entrenched in our lives as to be virtually ignored by the general populace.
As a necessary and insidious outgrowth of massive spying, the government attempts to cultivate fearful citizen-spies, by
employing the not-at-all ominous If You See Something, Say Something catchphrase-titled program. Of course, the
government arm responsible for this and other programs - the overarching Department of Homeland Security - seems ripped
directly from the pages of 1984.

"Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of
solidity to pure wind,Orwell noted in his 1946 essay, Politics and the English Language.

This observation aptly summarizes U.S. war propaganda in its entirety - with a constant government-backed corporate media
blitz surrounding the war on terror shaping public perception of what constitutes terrorism, and who, a terrorist.

Betting on Americans cognitive dissonance, historical amnesia, and tacit acceptance of spoon-fed, baseless patriotism, the
government doesnt often find barriers to inculcating a blanket support for obtuse military missions. War so saturates every
aspect of life, when the Pentagon announced last week forces had already been on the ground in Yemen for two weeks, the
public instead trained its focus to the latest installation of Captain America.
And nevermind the detail that ground support of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates in Yemen would be allocated for
fighting al-Qaeda - a different faction of the same group the U.S. currently employs as somehow less dangerous terrorists to
assist deposing Syrian president Bashar al-Assad.

Moderate rebels is thus the Newspeak term for terrorists the American empire finds usable - making terrorist and terrorism
utterly conditional terms.

Of course, the government failed to explain how a war on the concept of terrorism should play out if that terrorism depends
on circumstance - or, more accurately, whim - but once instituted, paranoia surrounding the word opened the floodgates for
battling terrorism inside the United States.

Exactly as Orwell cautioned in 1984 - and precisely as Kieslings foreboding resignation letter predicted it would.

Freedom Is Slavery

How does a government persuade its citizens their enslavement would be desirable and beneficial? Frame it as necessary
protection against any threat to their fundamental security - and implement more contentious aspects of said servitude in
palatable microsteps.

Fear of terrorism - or, more directly, xenophobia - constitutes

sufficient reason for many to cast off basic human rights
through increasingly invasive laws and governance.

Legislation, however, isnt by far the sole vehicle available to

the government.

In a culture so utterly imbued in paranoia, neighbors arent only

willing to spy on neighbors - or complete strangers, to that end -
theyre willing to alert law enforcement should they observe
Something.

One perfect example of the absurdity of the If You See

Something, Say Something citizen spy program occurred this
week when a woman, suspicious of cryptic notes penned by the
person seated next to her on an American Airlines
flight, decided to Say Something.

The flight was delayed for over two hours, the FBI was called,
and an egregious commentary on paranoia and xenophobic
profiling in the U.S. became one of an unfortunate many for the
history books.

This unbelievably unaware woman told on acclaimed University

of Pennsylvania economics professor, Guido Menzio - who had
been scribbling a complex math formula in a notebook.

Menzio posted his experience on Facebook, describing his

encounter with the FBI after being briefly pulled from the plane,
writing:

They ask me about my neighbor. I tell them I noticed nothing strange. They tell me she thought I was a terrorist
because I was writing strange things on a piece of paper. I laugh. I bring them back to the plane. I show them my
math.

Menzio, to the unnamed woman, was guilty of terrorism because his Italian ancestry gifted him with darker complexion and
hair, and because her lack of education and state conditioning caused her to see dark terrorist plots in mathematical
formulae - possibly, and disturbingly, because she mistook it for Arabic.

Restrictions on travel arent limited to fearful passengers, either, as the notoriously invasive Transportation Security
Administration has made air travel an almost unbearably onerous task. A recent report predicts grueling airport delays due to
the combination of a 10 percent reduction in TSA staff and a 15 percent increase in the number of expected travelers.

Though a PreCheck program is offered by the TSA, people simply arent signing on - likely because theyre forced to submit
to an even more invasive background check. And it isnt as if the TSA has a stunning success rate in thwarting terror attacks,
either - though it does have a successful track record for restricting freedom of travel.
While the government would like you to believe TSA safety measures protect the country from terrorism, evidence lies with a
far more laughable reality - like the time a CNN journalist once had her container of pimento cheese confiscated by agents.
Another report indicated the underpaid and understaffed TSA is largely incompetent. Congressman Stephen Lynch
explained;

We had folks - this was a testing exercise, so we had folks going in there with guns on their ankles, and other
weapons on their persons, and there was a 95 percent failure rate.

Essentially, terrorist paranoia is working exactly per the Dept. of Homeland Securitys design - otherwise ordinary Americans
are now guilty, simply by being present. Guilty of being non-white. Guilty of speaking a language other than English. Guilty of
math. Guilty of possession of cheese spread.

But most of all, guilty under the system that would rather pit neighbor against neighbor - lest those neighbors realize they
have more in common with one another than with the powers claiming to have their security in mind - because that
realization might bring anger, dissent, and potentially action to topple those powers-that-be.

And entirely different dystopic restrictions on travel - harkening almost exactly to the 1930s Nazi Germany that so influenced
Orwell - can be found in police checkpoints.
 Of dubious legality, law enforcement checkpoints for
everything from drunk driving to heroin - to seatbelts - have
become commonplace around the U.S.

In the name of safety, police bottleneck traffic, test sobriety,

search cars, write revenue-generating tickets, and even
arrest those found guilty or who try to avoid the trap.

And this lack of the ability to travel freely- the basic right to
mobility without restriction - is only one highly specific
example of coercion as the new norm.

Entire books could be justifiably penned to discuss

the ridiculousness of licensing requirements - summarized
briefly as the state taking a right away from you in order to
give it back to you at an often red-tape-heavy price.

In the dystopic new millennium, the State requires children

to seek permitting for such traditional activities as shoveling
snow or setting up their own lemonade stands - and
alarmingly have been shut down for failing to do so.

You dont even have to be accused, much less charged,

with a crime to have your own property and cash seized - or
more accurately, stolen - by the State, which it then may
use for whatever shady purpose it chooses.

This unchecked policing-for-profit scheme has created a

freakishly telling figure, as described by The Free Thought
Project, law enforcement in America has stolen
$600,000,000 more from Americans than actual criminal
burglars.

Freedom to simply live ones life, without harming another, has been co-opted by a State hell bent on maintaining slavish
control of its people.

Ignorance Is Strength

Considering at least one of the aforementioned examples would be sufficiently blood-boiling to even those who consider
themselves law-abiding or patriotic, the State also has in place multiple strategies to thwart the dissemination of accurate,
truthful information - thus preemptively quashing dissent.
State indoctrination begins early with compulsory schooling beating the victors history into impressionable, young minds.
William Blum, journalist, author, and CIA and U.S. foreign policy critic, describes in his book, Americas Deadliest Export:
Democracy - The Truth About US Foreign Policy and Everything Else, how indoctrination has so insidiously usurped
education as to be imperceptible to the unaware [emphasis added]:

"American leaders have convinced a majority of the American people of the benevolence of their governments
foreign policy. To have persuaded Americans of this, as well as a multitude of other people throughout the
world - in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary - must surely rank as one of the most
outstanding feats of propaganda and indoctrination in all of history []

It is not at all uncommon to grow to adulthood in the United States, even graduate from university, and not be
seriously exposed to opinions significantly contrary to these prevailing myths, and know remarkably little about the
exceptionally harmful foreign policy of the government.
 Its one thing for historical myths to rise in the absence of a written history of a particular period, such as our beliefs
concerning the Neanderthals; but much odder is the rise of such myths in the face of a plethora of historical
documents, testimony, films and books.

Indoctrination stands as perhaps the most powerful tool a State could wield without imposing actual, physical violence.
Patriotism often acts as a means of self-policing - whereby a populace relentlessly criticizes any segment not wholly on
board with devotion to that State.

Orwell also keenly understood this, as is clear in 1984s protagonist, Winston Smiths description of the youngest citizens of
Ingsoc (an abbreviation for English Socialism - the governmental ideology firmly entrenched in that fictional time period).

Nearly all children nowadays were horrible. What was worst of all was that by means of such organizations as the
Spies they were systematically turned into ungovernable little savages, and yet this produced in them no tendency
whatever to rebel against the discipline of the Party.

On the contrary, they adored the Party and everything connected with it. The songs, the processions, the banners,
the hiking, the drilling with dummy rifles, the yelling of slogans, the worship of Big Brother - it was all a sort of
glorious game to them.

When the State manages to hoodwink millions of people, facilitating an imperialist empire isnt a cumbersome task. Blum
analogizes the American people to the children of a Mafia boss who do not know what their father does for a living, and
dont want to know, but then wonder why someone just threw a firebomb through the living room window.

Endlessly frustrating those who have taken advantage of self-education in the age of information, arguments proffered by
government propaganda - such as waging wars to bring about peace, or that the U.S. aggressively and violently invades
other countries for democracy and freedom - take root with no basis in reality.
Belief other nations will steal our (already nonexistent) Democracy if we dont invade them first insidiously infiltrates even
learned segments of the population.

Though such inexplicable reasoning readily evidences justifications necessary for popular support when the U.S.
spontaneously violates international law concerning war, the people still believe the lie - in great part, thanks to corporate
medias incessant confirmation of American exceptionalism.

Ignorance of the breadth of American imperialism - the reality of its plundering resources around the planet, its actions as an
enforcement arm of the plutocratic corporatocracy, and the violence it employs on innocent civilians wherever it chooses -
remain unknown to the majority in this country.

With essentially all information available a click away, this ignorance amounts to little more than a flat denial of reality. Saying
my government would never do that might be one thing, but refusing to investigate whether or not the statement holds
weight is essentially admitting the government takes precedence over truth.

Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating?" Orwell wrote in the dystopic classic.
 It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and
treachery and torment, a world of trampling and of being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more
merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain."

But the American indoctrination of ignorance most chillingly corresponds with a particular passage from 1984 - one marking
the self-imposed homogeneity of a people scrambling over one another to exemplify patriotism.

The ideal set up by the Party was something huge, terrible, and glittering - a world of steel and concrete, of
monstrous machines and terrifying weapons - a nation of warriors and fanatics, marching forward in perfect unity,
all thinking the same thoughts and shouting the same slogans, perpetually working, fighting, triumphing,
persecuting - three hundred million people all with the same face.

Much of what Orwell proffered as dystopic fiction has since manifested - perhaps not so much, as is popularly believed,
because the government took the novel as an instruction manual. But because 1984s dire warning seems so inconceivable,
perhaps most people have yet to realize its darker portents have already come to pass.

Protagonist Winston Smith ultimately succumbs to the lure of Big Brother and the State - but it remains up for debate whether
the authoritarian nightmare will take as firm a chokehold on the United States.
To resist such a reality is the work of a true protagonist - not through violence or destruction, but through seeking a lesser
ignorance. The lynchpin to Orwells dystopia, and to the current one, is the perception of ignorance as strength. War is most
certainly not Peace to a well-informed populace, nor is Freedom Slavery.

It is up to us to plant the seeds of knowledge which will inevitably grow into that well-informed populace who will then see
the reality of the horrid path weve since embarked. Tis the nature of humanity to err, but weve managed to be resilient
nonetheless - sometimes the hardest path is the only way there.

Keynes Must Die

June 2 2016 | From: Mises

In 2012, Barack Obama warned that the United States would fall into a depression if Ron Pauls plan
to cut $1 trillion from the federal budget were enacted.
Wait, I beg your pardon. It wasnt Obama who warned that budget cuts would lead to a depression.

It was Mitt Romney. Romney went on to become the nominee of the self-described free-market party.

An ideological rout is complete when both sides of respectable opinion take its basic ideas for granted. Thats how complete
the Keynesian victory has been.

In fact, Keynesianism had swept the boards a decade before Romney was even born.

The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, the seminal treatise by John Maynard Keynes, appeared during the
Great Depression, a time when a great many people were beginning to doubt the merits and resilience of capitalism.

It was a work of economic theory, but its boosters insisted that it also offered practical answers to urgent, contemporary
questions like: how had the Depression occurred, and why was it lasting so long?

The answer to both questions, according to Keynes and his followers, was the same: not enough government intervention.
Now as Murray N. Rothbard showed in his 1963 book Americas Great Depression, and as Lionel Robbins and others had
written at the time, the Depression had certainly not been caused by too little government intervention. It was caused by the
worlds government-privileged central banks, and it was prolonged by the various quack remedies that governments kept
trotting out.

But that wasnt a thesis governments were eager to hear. Government officials were rather more attracted to the message
Keynes was sending them:

The free market can lead to depressions, and prosperity requires more government spending and intervention.

Lets say a brief word about the book that launched this ideological revolution. If I may put it kindly, the General Theory was
not the kind of text one might expect to sweep the boards.

Paul Samuelson, who went on to become one of the most notable American popularizers of Keynesianism, admitted in a
candid moment that when he first read the book, he did not at all understand what it was about. I think I am giving away no
secrets, he went on, when I solemnly aver - upon the basis of vivid personal recollection - that no one else in Cambridge,
Massachusetts, really knew what it was all about for some twelve to eighteen months after publication.

The General Theory, he said;

"Is a badly written book, poorly organized; any layman who, beguiled by the authors previous reputation bought
the book, was cheated of his five shillings. It is not well suited for classroom use.
 It is arrogant, bad-tempered, polemical, and not overly generous in its acknowledgments. It abounds in mares
nests and confusions. In short, it is a work of genius."

Murray N. Rothbard, who after the death of Ludwig von Mises was considered the dean of the Austrian school of economics,
wrote several major economic critiques of Keynes, along with a lengthy and revealing biographical essay about the man.

The first of these critiques came in the form of an essay written when Murray was just 21 years old: Spotlight on Keynesian
Economics. The second appeared in his 1962 treatise Man, Economy and State,and the third as a chapter in his book For a
New Liberty.

Murray minced no words, referring to Keynesianism as:

"The most successful and pernicious hoax in the history of economic thought.

All of the Keynesian thinking, he added, is a tissue of distortions, fallacies, and drastically unrealistic
assumptions.

Beyond the problems with the Keynesian system were the unfortunate traits of Keynes himself. I will let Murray describe
them to you:

"The first was his overweening egotism, which assured him that he could handle all intellectual problems quickly
and accurately and led him to scorn any general principles that might curb his unbridled ego. The second was his
strong sense that he was born into, and destined to be a leader of, Great Britains ruling elite...

The third element was his deep hatred and contempt for the values and virtues of the bourgeoisie, for conventional
morality, for savings and thrift, and for the basic institutions of family life."
While a student at Cambridge University, Keynes belonged to an exclusive and secretive group called the Apostles. This
membership fed his egotism and his contempt for others. He wrote in a private letter:

"Is it monomania - this colossal moral superiority that we feel? I get the feeling that most of the rest [of the world
outside the Apostles] never see anything at all - too stupid or too wicked.

As a young man, Keynes and his friends became what he himself described as immoralists. In a 1938 paper called My
Early Beliefs, he wrote:

"We entirely repudiated a personal liability on us to obey general rules. We claimed the right to judge every
individual case on its merits, and the wisdom to do so successfully.

This was a very important part of our faith, violently and aggressively held, and for the outer world it was our most
obvious and dangerous characteristic. We repudiated entirely customary morals, conventions and traditional
wisdom. We were, that is to say, in the strict sense of the term, immoralists."

Keynes was 55 years old when he delivered that paper. And even at that advanced stage of his life he could affirm that
immoralism is:

"Still my religion under the surface I remain and always will remain an immoralist.
In economics, Keynes exhibited the same kind of approach he had taken toward philosophy and life in general. I am afraid
of principle, he told a parliamentary committee in 1930. That, of course, is the attitude of anyone who craves influence and
the exercise of power; principle would only get in the way of these things.

Thus, Keynes supported free trade, then turned on a dime in 1931 and became a protectionist, then during World War II
favored free trade again. As Murray puts it, Never did any soul-searching or even hesitation hobble his lightning-fast
changes.

The General Theory broke down the worlds population into several groups, each with its own characteristics. Here Keynes
was able to vent his lifelong hatreds.

First, there was the great mass of consumers, dumb and robotic, whose consumption decisions were fixed and determined
by outside forces, such that Keynes could reduce them to a consumption function.

Then there was a subset of consumers, the bourgeois savers, whom Keynes especially despised. In the past, such people
had been praised for their thrift, which made possible the investment that raised living standards.

But the Keynesian system severed the link between savings and investment, claiming that the two had nothing to do with
each other. Savings were, in fact, a drag on the system, Keynes said, and could generate recessions and depressions.
 Thus, did Keynes dethrone the bourgeoisie and their
traditional claim to moral respectability. Thrift was
foolishness, not wisdom.

The third group was the investors. Here Keynes was

somewhat more favorable. The activities of these people
could not be reduced to a mathematical function.

They were dynamic and free. Unfortunately, they were also

given to wild, irrational swings in behavior and outlook.
These irrational swings set the economy on a roller coaster.

And now we arrive at a fourth and final group. This group is

supremely rational, economically knowledgeable, and
indispensable to economic stability.

This group can override the foolish decisions of the others

and keep the economy from falling into depressions or
inflationary excess.

You probably wont be shocked to learn that the far-seeing

wizards who comprise Keyness fourth group are
government officials.

To understand exactly what Keynes expected government

officials to do, lets say a brief word about the economic
system Keynes developed in the General Theory.

His primary claim is that the market economy is given to a

chronic state of underemployment of resources.
If it is not to descend into and remain mired in depression, it
requires the wise supervision and interventions of the
political class.

Again, we may safely reject the possibility that the political classes of the Western world embraced Keynesianism because
politicians had made a profound study of the works of Keynes. To the contrary, Keynesianism appealed to two overriding
motivations of government officials: their need to appear indispensable, and their urge to wield power.

Keynesianism dangled these ideas before the political class, who in turn responded like salivating dogs. There wasnt
anything more romantic or dignified to it than that, I am sorry to report.

By the early 1970s, however, Keynesian economics had suffered a devastating blow. Or, to adopt Murrays more colorful
phrase, it had become dead from the neck up.

Keynesianism could not account for the stagflation, or inflationary recession, that the US experienced in the 70s.
 It was supposed to be the role of the Keynesian planners to
steer the economy in such a way as to avoid the twin
threats of an overheating, inflationary economy and an
underperforming, depressed economy.

During a boom, Keynesian planners were to sop up excess

purchasing power by raising taxes and taking spending out
of the economy.

During a depression, Keynesians were to lower taxes and

increase government spending in order to inject
spending into the economy.

But in an inflationary recession, this entire approach had to

be thrown out.

The inflationary part meant spending had to be reduced, but

the recession part meant spending had to be increased.

How, Murray asked, could the Keynesian planners do both

at once?

They couldnt, of course, which is why Keynesianism began

to wane in the 1970s, though it has made an unwelcome
comeback since the 2008 financial crisis.

Murray had dismantled the Keynesian system on a more

fundamental level in Man, Economy, and State.

He showed that the relationships between large economic aggregates that Keynesians posited, and which were essential to
their system, did not hold after all. And he exploded the major concepts employed in the Keynesian analysis: the
consumption function, the multiplier, and the accelerator, for starters.

Now, why does any of this matter today?

The errors of Keynes have empowered sociopathic political classes all over the world and deprived the world of the
economic progress we would otherwise have enjoyed.

Japan is a great example of Keynesian devastation: the Nikkei 225, which hit 38,500 in 1990, has never managed to reach
even half that level since. A quarter century ago the index of industrial production in Japan was at 96.8; after 25 years of
aggressive Keynesian policy that gave Japan the highest debt-to-GDP ratio in the world, the index of industrial production is
still 96.8.

The United States, meanwhile, has had sixteen years of fiscal stimulus or preposterously low-interest rates, all of which
Keynesians have cheered. The result? Two million fewer breadwinner jobs than when Bill Clinton left office.

No amount of stimulus ever seems to be quite enough. And when the stimulus fails, the blinkered Keynesian establishment
can only think to double down, never to question the policy itself.
 "Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things
for the greatest good of everyone.

- John Maynard Keynes

But there is an alternative, and its the one Murray N. Rothbard and Ludwig von Mises championed: the Austrian school of
economics and its analysis of the pure market economy.

Against the entire edifice of establishment opinion, the Mises Institute stands as a rebuke. To the dissidents, to the
intellectually curious, to those inclined to be skeptical of so-called experts who have brought us nothing but ruin, the Mises
Institute has been a beacon.

We have trained an entire generation of Austrian scholars, journalists, and financial professionals. We put in the hard work
so that when a catastrophe like the 2008 crisis occurred, an Austrian response was ready.

But with your help, we can do so much more. The Keynesians are pretending they have everything under control, but we
know thats a fantasy.
An even greater opportunity than 2008 awaits us, and we want to help guide public opinion and train a cadre of bright young
scholars for that day. With your help, we can, at last, awaken from the Keynesian nightmare.

As the Korean translator of an Austrian text put it;

"Keynes must die so the economy may live.

With your help, we can hasten that glorious day.

UK Trains Or Arms Half The Countries On Its List Of Human Rights Abusers
May 29 2016 | From: Anitmedia

New research has shown the U.K. is providing military training and support to over half the
countries named on its own watchlist of human rights abusers. An investigation by Campaign
Against Arms Trade (CAAT) and The Independent has revealed U.K. armed forces have trained
security and armed forces personnel from 16 of 30 regimes who are on a Foreign Office (FCO)
watch list for use of torture and violence.
The FCO publishes an annual report on Human Rights and Democracy that lists countries of wide-ranging
concern. While it is no secret the interests of the military-industrial complex come before human rights,
information obtained from the Ministry of Defence could arguably be satire if it werent so appalling.

The discovery that British soldiers have trained armed forces in over half the countries on its own human rights
watchlist warrants an even slower hand clap than Tony Blairs admission, weeks ahead of the Chilcot Inquiry, that his
understanding of the Middle East is a lot deeper today than when he was Prime Minister.
Despite horrific human rights records, the countries of concern benefiting from support from the British war machine
are listed as Afghanistan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Burma, Burundi, China, Colombia, Egypt, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, Saudi
Arabia, Somalia, Sudan, Yemen, and Zimbabwe. Andrew Smith from CAAT said Britain should not be colluding with
countries it knows are led by authoritarian regimes, adding that the U.K. army has provided training to some of the most
authoritarian states in the world.

Further, evidence of the U.K governments support for violations of international humanitarian law by Saudi forces in Yemen
came to light through a British-made cluster bomb found in a Yemeni village. Despite the use of cluster bombs being banned
under the Convention on Cluster Munitions (to which the U.K. is a State Party) the unexploded munition was discovered
by Amnesty International during the inspection of a village in northern Yemen.
Originally manufactured in the 1970s, the weapon contains 147 bomblets that scatter across a wide area and often do not
detonate until disturbed at a later date.

The U.K. is thought to have sold large numbers of cluster munitions to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE)
since the 1980s. Even if the weapons were sold before Britain became a signatory to the Convention, Britain should take
responsibility for weapons previously supplied. Better still, the country should honour its claim to have one of the most
robust arms export controls in the world - and at least attempt to rein in the industry profiting from death and destruction all
over the world.

Saudi Press: The United States Blew Up World Trade Center To Create War On Terror
May 25 2016 | From: Breitbart

This is happening in real time. Last week the US Senate voted to allow the Saudi's to be sued for
9/11. Now we have Saudia Arabia coming out and saying the US alone created 9/11. Cabal
infighting escalating?
The Saudi press is still furious over the U.S. Senates unanimous vote approving a bill that allows the families of
9/11 victims to sue Saudi Arabia. This time, the London-based Al-Hayat daily has claimed that the U.S. planned the
attacks on the World Trade Center in order to create a global war on terror.

Related: Hyping of Saudi role in 9/11 a diversionary tactic by U.S. and Israel

The article, written by Saudi legal expert Katib al-Shammari and translated by MEMRI, claims that American threats to
expose documents that prove Saudi involvement in the attacks are part of a long-standing U.S. policy that he calls victory
by means of archives.

Al-Shammari claims that the U.S. chooses to keep some cards close to its chest in order to use them at a later date. One
example is choosing not to invade Iraq in the 1990s and keeping its leader, Saddam Hussein, alive to use as a bargaining
chip against other Gulf States. Only once Shiism threatened to sweep the region did America act to get rid of
Hussein since they no longer saw him as an ace up their sleeve.
[Comment: This is not to say that 9/11 was solely a machination of the United States Government. The Saudi's were
involved - but it was not them alone of course. Israel and it's Mossad were also involved. Ultimately, it was not so
much an effort of particular countries, rather it was driven by the 'Illuminati' NWO 'Cabal' agenda which operates
beyond national boundaries.]

He claims that the 9/11 attacks were another such card, enabling the U.S. to blame whoever suited its needs at a particular
time; first it blamed Al-Qaeda and the Taliban, then Saddam Husseins regime in Iraq, and now Saudi Arabia.

September 11 is one of winning cards in the American archives, because all the wise people in the world who are
experts on American policy and who analyze the images and the videos [of 9/11] agree unanimously that what
happened in the [Twin] Towers was a purely American action, planned and carried out within the U.S.

Proof of this is the sequence of continuous explosions that dramatically ripped through both buildings Expert
structural engineers demolished them with explosives, while the planes crashing [into them] only gave the green
light for the detonation they were not the reason for the collapse.

But the U.S. still spreads blame in all directions."

Related: Saudi Press Just Accused US Govt of Blowing Up World Trade Centers as Pretext to Perpetual War

The intention of the attacks, writes al-Shammari in his conspiracy article, was to create an obscure enemy terrorism
which became what American presidents blamed for all their mistakes and that would provide justification for any dirty
operation in other countries.

The terror label was applied to Muslims even though it was Muslims who helped America defeat the Soviets and bring an
end to the Cold War, he writes.

The problem, asserts al-Shammari, is that the U.S. must always find a new impetus to have an adversary, for the
nature of the U.S. is that it cannot exist without an enemy.

Al-Shammaris article comes amid a torrent of vociferous articles in the Saudi press that range from accusing the U.S. of
being schizophrenic and in cahoots with Iran to publishing warnings that if passed, the Satanic bill would open the gates
of hell.

David Rockefeller Gloats About 9/11 in 1967

Related Articles:

WTC cameras, locks, electricity turned off weekend before 9/11

Fourteen Incredible Facts About 9/11

CIA Threatens 9/11 Researchers Who Discover Explosive Evidence

9/11 - Mission Accomplished

Trump: Bush Had Advanced Notice of 9/11

What Happened on the Planes on September 11, 2001? The 9/11 Commission Script Was Fabricated

Incontrovertible

"We're Running A F**king Casino" Congressman Admits Washington DC Is A

"Sinkhole Of Leeches"
May 23 2016 | From: NewYorkPost

An anonymous congressman has dropped a bombshell election-year book that confirms why
Americans hate their national government and have rallied to anti-establishment presidential
candidates like Donald Trump.

The veteran politician lays bare a rotten and corrupt Congress enslaved by lobbyists and interested only in re-
election in an anonymous, 65-page manifesto called The Confessions of Congressman X.
Related: This US Government Is The Most Corrupt In History

Like most of my colleagues, I promise my constituents a lot of stuff I can never deliver, he admits.

But what the hell? It makes them happy hearing it . . . My main job is to keep my job.

The House member - a Democrat who is either still in Congress or served sometime over the past two decades - says more
time is spent fundraising than reading bills and calls Washington a sinkhole of leeches.

The title of one chapter sums up his view of congressional leaders: Harry Reids a Pompous Ass, he says of the Senate
Democratic leader.

Harry Reid

The book, published by the small Mill City Press, is based on years of transcribed private discussions, which the
congressman last November gave editor Robert Atkinson.

Senate Majority Leader Harry ReidPhoto: Getty Images Atkinson declined to say whether Congressman X is a current or
former House member.

X says the cloak of anonymity gave him the freedom to expose secrets, including how the publics money is wasted.
 We spend money we dont have and blithely mortgage the future with a wink and a nod. Screw the next
generation. Its about getting credit now, lookin good for the upcoming election, he says.

He said he and his colleagues often lie to try to be all things to all people instead of tackling the nations problems .

I contradict myself all the time, but few people notice, X says.

One minute I rail against excessive spending and ballooning debt. The next minute Im demanding more spending
on education, health care, unemployment benefits, conservation projects, yadda, yadda, yadda.

Voters are described as gullible, know-nothing jerks, while the only people who count are the big donors who pour billions of
dollars into lobbying.

Voters are incredibly ignorant. Its far easier than you think to manipulate a nation of naive, self-absorbed sheep
who crave instant gratification ..., vents Congressman X.

He says money corrupts and House members are puppets to lobbyists who bankroll their campaigns.
 Business organizations and unions fork over more than $3 billion a year to those who lobby the federal
government. Does that tell you something? Were operating a fking casino, he says.

He describes himself as a closet moderate who supports charter schools and tax vouchers to allow poor kids to go to
private schools. But students take a back seat to partisan politics.

Our educations in the toilet, and all we do is snipe at each other, he says.

Congress is too polarized and partisan to get anything done, by the congressmans account.

There seems to be a complete disintegration of confidence in government. A fear that government is its own
special interest, he says.

Americas on an irreversible decline and no one in Washington seems to care . . . God help us.

The controversial book set off a guessing game in the political world about the authors identity.

New York sources speculated its Rep. Steve Israel (D-LI), a moderate who announced hes retiring and who has
complained about the constant need to fundraise to finance re-election campaigns. But Israel, a novelist, denied that he took
pen to paper this time.

Absolutely not true, never heard of it before. And frankly, now that Im leaving Congress, if I were to write a book
like that, I would put my name on it, Israel said in a statement.
The American Spin On Democracy
May 18 2016 | From: AustralianNationalReview

Many feel that the American government has for years, overstepped its democratic mandate to
secure Americans. It has perpetuated crimes that are purported to be focusing on securing the
safety of the citizens.

In his opinion piece, John W Whitehead has suggested that the American government has for years broken all laws
of civility for its own narrow ends. It does this by brainwashing Americans and making them feel that the moves of
the government are aimed at enhancing the quality of life of Americans.

Related: Hyping of Saudi role in 9/11 a diversionary tactic by U.S. and Israel

Comment: It is important to clarify that this is not a sleight on the American people, but rather on the Khazarian
Nazi-Zionists that had taken over that country. Note: Had.

According to the author, the government has a spin operation in place that camouflages the ulterior motives of the
government and presents them as legitimate actions of a government which is enthusiastic about the interests of the
people.

In his book, Battlefield America: The War on the American People, the author says that the government has no interest in
the people and is pursuing secret programmes for its own betterment or to assuage the concerns of a few who are destined
to rule.

The author says that the government considers the citizen as cannon fodder and is not worried that its actions could cause
untold misery among people. The recent war propaganda, the enhanced security measures that followed and coordinated
measures that stifled the freedom of expression of Americans were all aimed at furthering the interest of the government, he
claims.

He says;

"There is no way the government had our best interests at heart when it passed laws subjecting us to all manner of
invasive searches and surveillance, censoring our speech and stifling our expression, rendering us anti-
government extremists for daring to disagree with its dictates, locking us up for criticizing government policies on
social media, encouraging Americans to spy and snitch on their fellow citizens, and allowing government agents to
grope, strip, search, taser, shoot and kill us.

The author also goes on to make serious allegations that successive governments in the US have been conducting secret
experiments that have subjected US citizens to miseries that are at par with cruelties inflicted on people in Hitlers camps.

For example, in Alabama, about 600 black people were subjected to syphilis and in California; older prisoners were also
subjected to crimes in the name of medical testing aimed at enhancing security or preventing biological attacks.

These tests increased even as pharmaceutical companies made profits, which points to a commercial angle to the whole
story. At least half the states in the nation used prisoners for probing medical conditions.

While some may dismiss these reports as propaganda, there are many analysts who continue to prove that the government
has been imposing blocks on privacy and curbs on freedom in the modern world.
While some might argue that even if these acts were confirmed, they were conducted by old US governments and not the
new US governments. However, the author claims that there are reports that the government is checking new countries
where it can test medicines and drugs on people.

The author concludes that while it is shameful that the government, which has ascended to power on the virtues of
democracy is doing such nefarious activities, it is even more disdainful that the people are believing the US government and
expecting it to live up to its false promises.

He concludes;

"In other words, we are citizens of a government that has dehumanized us and reduced us to little more than
faceless numbers, statistics and economic units

Whats in it for the government? Money and power. Or as John Lennon summed it up, I think were being run by
maniacs for maniacal ends and I think Im liable to be put away as insane for expressing that.
Khazarian Crime Syndicate: The Rotten Society We Live In
May 17 2016 | From: FinalWakeUpCall

An Evaluation of Crimes Against Humanity:

Jacob Rothschild lounging with David Rockefeller. Sorry to fuck up your shit boys.

Most of the Khazarian committed crimes over the last centuries are ingrained in humanity and are seen as business
as usual. These crimes are so unbelievable deceitful and corrupt why they require additional explanation in waking
up everyone, because we all are victim of this grand scale fraud on a daily basis.

Related: The Globalist Agenda

Frauds that have been set in motion so long ago that nobody even recognise these as crime.

The real power in the world is not the elected government that is employed by the people to serve the people, but it is
the Illuminati controlled banking world that manipulates every one of us. Politicians supported by party funds, big business
contributions, campaign funds, etc. are owned and controlled by these criminals.

They are hired and brainwashed being motivated to support new rules of law that facilitate the Khazarians to penetrate their
network into society even deeper, and secure continuation of their fraud.
Their fake money represents priority; keeping revenue short ensures laws are revised and the money from the middle class
flows to the rich.

Contrary real money has to have value of itself, as it is used as exchange for other things of value. This kind of money
cannot be manipulated.

Inconceivable Fraud;

Inconceivable quantity of fraud has engulfed the world over the last hundreds of years, enacted in particular through the
criminal banks and governmental services corporations, with extended tentacles to the farthest reaches of the globe.

This vast criminality cannot be defeated by the efforts of one or even thirty nations, as these crimes have been replicated in
almost all countries throughout the world with the same results, those must be addressed as a global issue and resolved in
favour of the people, because the people have not authorised nor benefited from these criminal activities caused by the
Central Banksters and their corporate affiliates.
All people have been victimised along with the rest of the world, by the wrong doings and fiduciary trust fraud on an
inconceivable scale.

The people of the western world, Japan and Australia have been all but destroyed by the British Controlled Federal United
States and their endless warmongering and deceitful deliberate money value manipulations through inflation.

Over the last one hundred years alone the US dollar, and mutatis mutandis all other major paper currencies have been
devalued by over 98%, as direct result of reckless, criminal, unlawful and fiduciary trust fraud on the part of central
banksters and their banking cartels.

In order to grasp the enormity of the perpetuated crime and fraud upon all of us, it is important to know that most of it is
accomplished through the corporate banks and government services corporations, presented as legalised banking
institutions and the so called elected governments that instead of serving the people, are simply hired contractors of the
British Crown in the City of London.
All these corporations are owned by foreign Bloodline families. They are private corporation, most of them franchisees of
the privately owned Bank of London located in the City of London, a private Khazarian Mafia nation-state with its own
ambassadors and police. The City of London is not part of the UK and doesnt pay taxes.

The Rothschild Banking family used covert maleficent operations to extract illegally enormous amounts of money with which
they bought the UK. They expanded their private central banking kingdom, and became the functional head of the Khazarian
Mafia, the Worlds leading Organised Crime Syndicate.

It is known that the RKM private central banking system is international, and functions like an octopus with many tentacles.
The only reason people pay taxes is because the RKM Banksters have transformed each country into their own police state
with their owned judicial system, and their ability to use their unbridled power of the boot in your face and threatened
imprisonment to force compliance.

It is of the highest priority to rooting out these criminals and imposters responsible for all of todays misre the world is in.
These banks and governments are all foreign Khazarian controlled corporations, contractors, and agencies that are
responsible for the mismanagement of the greatest part of the world.

Royalty is Involved:

Her Royal Majesty Elizabeth II and her predecessors with the Lords of the Admiralty, the Lord Mayor of London, and their
predecessors have betrayed their Sacred Trust and have been in breach of trust with respect to the corporate Nations Trust
for at least over the last 150 years.
Sorry if this bursts anyone's bubble but the supposedly lovely, harmless, perfunctual old woman is in actual fact a viscious bitch that finds it most
pleasing that everyone loves her; despite the fact she and her duplicitous, inbred family of criminals have been fucking you over for as long as they
have been around. It's an illuminati-type thing that will not make any sense to most, but hey that's what these hapless charlatans do. Not to mention
the most hideous posit that they do indeed want 90% of you dead. These people are not "elite" - they are nothing more than common
psychopathic criminals.

Comment: The Rothschilds sit above the Windsors in the scheme of things. Matters are becoming unstuck. And oh,
how unbecoming. It has come to our attention that a leading member of the Rothschild family noted that it seemed
a shame that the family had put so much effort into forming a world only to destroy it. Interesting. Not all is in
alignment.

And as all western nations are involved in this same fraud scheme, this demonstrates the international conspiracy to control
and defraud entire nations.

Insomuch the Holy See has declared and strived to build a Global Estate Trust on the Convocation of 1537 that includes all
nations within that trust and endeavour to establish Global Jurisdiction and common government services for all nations,
with other words the New World order.

In fact, this obliges the Holy See to obtain a peaceful resolution and enforce the return of peoples property assets. If the
Holy See doesnt correct and stop this systematic fraud against humanity the Global Estate Trust will also stand in breach of
trust.

The Vatican:

Actually the Holy See and the Vatican have been instrumental in converting all national governments on the planet into
national corporations deceitfully with the same name in capital letters, operating in the international jurisdiction of the sea
and the Roman Curia that made all those fraudulent manipulations a legal fiction.

It now is the unique responsibility of the Holy See and Pope Francis to correct this breach of trust and the mismanagement
of the corporate nations, as they in the first place are responsible for their creation.

Debt Fraud:

The private Federal Reserve bank, the United States Inc. the United Nations Inc. and their agents and contractors have
acted as criminals and these companies should be liquidated with their offending subcontractors and agencies. Because
these enterprises have never been authorised by the people to offer us credit or using our assets or private estates for the
security of debts of any governmental services corporation whatsoever.

They pretend that we the living people are responsible for paying of their debts as they made us deceptively corporations
named trust, with the same name in capital letters, to be plundered by the banking cartels, when in fact those that created all
this are responsible.
They are merely using deceptively similar names and exercising what appears to be public office for their private
benefit.

The Federal Reserve and central banks are running the bankrupt incorporated nations as a bankrupt pass-through to
purposefully advance vast sums of credit based on peoples assets and their respective earthly nation, and use this fraud
scheme in exchange for establishing unseen bonds against us the people, while our property and assets serve as security
as part of the overall fraud designed to entrap peoples assets and credit for the benefit of the criminals.

For this scheme they literally stole peoples identity by using their names for the creation of companies to claim they own
and control each individual person.

Complex Fraud Scheme:

They made the fraud scheme complex and long term, hidden by deceptive covers of sham to create lucrative fraud
schemes, carried out over decades and even centuries on a mindboggling scale.
The Federal Reserve and central banks unlawfully converted private accounts of millions of people into corporate accounts,
technically belonging to corporate contractors simply named after living people, to facilitate the seizure of these accounts
that banks unlawfully convert into accounts belonging to the central banks without disclosure, and eventually being
converted into ownership of the IMF, all executed without peoples knowledge or consent.

Fortunately, the Germans are beginning to understand that their country is not sovereign as it should be, but a corporate
vassal state of Washington DC, and that their chancellor Angela Merkel serves those crooks and their financial interests,
and not the interests of the Germans.

The Holy See:

The abuses of the corporations continue and have reached legendary proportions while still there is no comprehensive
statement from the Holy See revealing the fictitious nature of these entities that have been spawned under its auspices and
without public denunciation of criminality, and there is no visible undertaking to punish, regulate, or liquidate them.
The Holy See officially has been informed for about a decade of the illegal and immoral actions against humanity and
against humanitys lawful government, which has been on going since the 1800s, as all these acts have been accomplished
by fraud and deceit.

All these illegally established corporations must be liquidated without harming the millions of innocents who have been
misrepresented and mischaracterised by them as willing contractors. Unfortunately, many people still dont have a clue
what has been done in their names and assets, and never have had the opportunity to respond.

It is at the Popes discretion that these evil men continue their actions unopposed and each day drag more innocent people
into the web as accomplices-after-the-fact and still many others fall victim to this system of lies.

Mortgage Lending:

As a matter of fact the bank also unlawfully has converted your mortgage and mortgage contract into negotiable
instruments showing your signature. You may have noticed that nobody representing the bank ever signed any of this type
of paperwork. The only signatures appearing are yours.

The first thing the bank does beyond stealing your mortgage contract, is qualifying it to be a Promissory Note,
underconditions of deceit and non-disclosure in order to create a conduit loan not a home loan between you and
unknown investors, usually money markets or institutional investors, and then they place you in default by never transferring
your mortgage into a Real estate mortgage investment conduit, called REMIC.
This negligence on their part means that you are always in default from the moment the paperwork is signed no matter
what you do or how much you pay or how timely you are about paying.

It also means that they arent providing you with a home loan, but they also are cheating the institutional investors. The
banks play both ends of the loan game. They are cheating you and are cheating the investors and they get away with this
because politicians are stupid, corrupt, and most of the time bought.

Corrupt politicians and governmental services corporations run by banks have sold us out. The bankers make money at
our expense. They steal people blind, and enslave them for their profit, and invent legitimacy by buying the judges. So it is
time to permanently shut down these banks.

Did You Know?

Did you know that your national identity theft has occurred?

Did you know that all the mortgages already have been paid off, but these bankster crooks are continuing to bill
clients for non-existent debts and to take them to phoney corporate courts and steal their private property and
deceive investors on the stock market?
Did you know that they are using private commercial mercenaries paid for with our taxes to steal us blind and instigate
wars? This isnt a matter of politics. This is crime and conflict of interest, pure and simple, committed against humanity.

Wake Up folks and lets get our legitimate world back out of the hands of these criminals!

Promissory Note and Mortgage Contract Fraud:

A promissory note is basically an IOU that contains the promise to repay the loan, as well as the terms for repayment. The
purpose of the mortgage or deed of trust is to provide security for the loan that is evidenced by a promissory note.

It is legitimately proven that banks and lending institutes organised under the same system, never give anything of
equitable value in exchange for the Promissory Notes and mortgage contracts that they obtain.
And this relates to debt collectors as well. Under contract law all you have to do is ask them to show you the contract that you signed with them
agreeing you are liable to any debt. No contract. No debt. F*ck off. The entire debt collection industry is a SCAM

This demonstrates the basic fraud process; the banks create the credit for they loan out of thin air simply by entering
numbers in a ledger and that credit is based on the borrowers own assets not the banks assets.

The bank loans nothing of value of its own! All these institutions act under the same system. As evidenced by jurisprudence
from a court case that confirms that banks gave no equitable consideration, and that no valid contract ever existed. This
establishes the motive for the banks deceit.

They were able to obtain funds equal to the entire amount of the loan from the borrower without his/her knowledge. This
enabled the banks to deposit the borrowers own funds in a bank account and write a check off those funds back to the
borrower, thus creating the illusion that they gave the borrower a loan of the banks own assets.

For moneylending is this common practice, its an on going systematic fraud, committed by the crime syndicate in
cooperation with the courts, law enforcement agencies, and magistrates.

5 Most Powerful Families that Control the World:

Farage: The peoples army of bloggers will prevail over anti-democratic but fascist EU

How A Secretive Elite Created The EU To Build A World Government

May 15 2016 | From: TheTelegraph

Voters in Britain's referendum need to understand that the European Union was about building a
federal superstate from day one.

As the debate over the forthcoming EU referendum gears up, it would be wise perhaps to remember how Britain
was led into membership in the first place. It seems to me that most people have little idea why one of the victors of
the Second World War should have become almost desperate to join this "club".
That's a shame, because answering that question is key to understanding why the EU has gone so wrong.

Most students seem to think that Britain was in dire economic straits, and that the European Economic Community as it
was then called - provided an economic engine which could revitalise our economy.

Others seem to believe that after the Second World War Britain needed to recast her geopolitical position away from empire,
and towards a more realistic one at the heart of Europe. Neither of these arguments, however, makes any sense at all.

The EEC in the 1960s and 1970s was in no position to regenerate anyones economy. It spent most of its meagre resources
on agriculture and fisheries and had no means or policies to generate economic growth.

"When we entered the EEC our annual growth rate was a record 7.4 per cent. The present Chancellor would die
for such figures"

When growth did happen, it did not come from the EU. From Ludwig Erhard's supply-side reforms in West Germany in 1948
to Thatcher's privatisation of nationalised industry in the Eighties, European growth came from reforms introduced by
individual countries which were were copied elsewhere. EU policy has always been either irrelevant or positively detrimental
(as was the case with the euro).

Nor did British growth ever really lag behind Europe's. Sometimes it surged ahead. In the 1950s Western Europe had a
growth rate of 3.5 per cent; in the 1960s, it was 4.5 per cent.

But in 1959, when Harold Macmillan took office, the real annual growth rate of British GDP, according to the Office of
National Statistics, was almost 6 per cent. It was again almost 6 per cent when de Gaulle vetoed our first application to join
the EEC in 1963.
In 1973, when we entered the EEC, our annual national growth rate in real terms was a record 7.4 per cent. The present
Chancellor would die for such figures. So the economic basket-case argument doesnt work.

What about geopolitics? What argument in the cold light of hindsight could have been so compelling as to make us kick our
Second-World-War Commonwealth allies in the teeth to join a combination of Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg,
France, Germany and Italy?

Four of these countries held no international weight whatsoever. Germany was occupied and divided. France, meanwhile,
had lost one colonial war in Vietnam and another in Algeria. De Gaulle had come to power to save the country from civil war.
Most realists must surely have regarded these states as a bunch of losers.

De Gaulle, himself a supreme realist, pointed out that Britain had democratic political institutions, world trade links, cheap
food from the Commonwealth, and was a global power. Why would it want to enter the EEC?

"Harold Macmillan and his closest advisers were part of an intellectual tradition that saw the salvation of the world
in some form of world government."
Harold Macmillan, here with Edward Heath, couldn't get a free-trade deal

The answer is that Harold Macmillan and his closest advisers were part of an intellectual tradition that saw the salvation of
the world in some form of world government based on regional federations. He was also a close acquaintance of Jean
Monnet, who believed the same.

It was therefore Macmillan who became the representative of the European federalist movement in the British cabinet.

In a speech in the House of Commons he even advocated a European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) before the real
thing had been announced.

He later arranged for a Treaty of Association to be signed between the UK and the ECSC, and it was he who ensured that a
British representative was sent to the Brussels negotiations following the Messina Conference, which gave birth to the EEC.
In the late 1950s he pushed negotiations concerning a European Free Trade Association towards membership of the EEC.

Then, when General de Gaulle began to turn the EEC into a less federalist body, he took the risk of submitting a full British
membership application in the hope of frustrating Gaullist ambitions.

His aim, in alliance with US and European proponents of a federalist world order, was to frustrate the emerging Franco-
German alliance which was seen as one of French and German nationalism.
The French statesman Jean Monnet, (1888 - 1979), who in 1956 was appointed president of the Action Committee for the United States of Europe

Monnet met secretly with Heath and Macmillan on innumerable occasions to facilitate British entry. Indeed, he was informed
before the British Parliament of the terms in which the British approach to Europe would be framed.

Despite advice from the Lord Chancellor, Lord Kilmuir, that membership would mean the end of British parliamentary
sovereignty, Macmillan deliberately misled the House of Commons - and practically everyone else, from Commonwealth
statesmen to cabinet colleagues and the public - that merely minor commercial negotiations were involved.

He even tried to deceive de Gaulle that he was an anti-federalist and a close friend who would arrange for France, like
Britain, to receive Polaris missiles from the Americans. De Gaulle saw completely through him and vetoed the British bid to
enter.
de Gaulle

Macmillan left Edward Heath to take matters forward, and Heath, along with Douglas Hurd, arranged - according to the
Monnet papers - for the Tory Party to become a (secret) corporate member of Monnets Action Committee for a United
States of Europe.

According to Monnets chief aide and biographer, Francois Duchene, both the Labour and Liberal Parties later did the same.
Meanwhile the Earl of Gosford, one of Macmillans foreign policy ministers in the House of Lords, actually informed the
House that the aim of the governments foreign policy was world government.

"The Anglo-American establishment was now committed to the creation of a federal United States of Europe."

Monnets Action Committee was also given financial backing by the CIA and the US State Department. The Anglo-American
establishment was now committed to the creation of a federal United States of Europe.

Today, this is still the case. Powerful international lobbies are already at work attempting to prove that any return to
democratic self-government on the part of Britain will spell doom. American officials have already been primed to state that
such a Britain would be excluded from any free trade deal with the USA and that the world needs the TTIP trade treaty
which is predicated on the survival of the EU.
Fortunately, Republican candidates in the USA are becoming Eurosceptics and magazines there like The National
Interest are publishing the case for Brexit. The international coalition behind Macmillan and Heath will find things a lot more
difficult this time round - especially given the obvious difficulties of the Eurozone, the failure of EU migration policy and the
lack of any coherent EU security policy.

Most importantly, having been fooled once, the British public will be much more difficult to fool again.

Ten Years On: Al Gore's 'Inconvenient Truth' Propaganda Film Turns Out To Be Total
Bunk - How Is His Profit From Carbon Taxes Not Criminal Fraud?
May 15 2016 | From: NaturalNews

Ten years after the release of Al Gore's Inconvenient Truth, none of the film's dire climate change
predictions have come to pass.
However, in the decade since the documentary was produced, its creator has raked in millions of dollars from the
entire "global warming" scam, and is now poised to become "Our first carbon billionaire."

Related: Climatologist Breaks the Silence on Global Warming Groupthink

In the 2006 film, Gore made a number of wild claims regarding what we could expect to see happening over the next few
years due to global warming, but virtually all of his alarmist prognostications have turned out to be false.
Arctic Didn't Melt, Polar Bears are Thriving

For instance, the film predicted that that the Arctic could become ice-free within the next decades, and that polar bears
would begin drowning. Both claims were untrue.

As reported by Investor's Business Daily:

"In the mid- to late-2000s, Gore repeatedly predicted that an ice-free Arctic Ocean was coming soon. But as usual,
his fortune-telling was wrong. By 2014, Arctic ice had grown thicker and covered a greater area than it did when he
made his prediction."

And the polar bears?

The Daily Caller reports:

"A new study by Canadian scientists once again debunks the notion polar bears are currently being harmed by
global warming. Researchers with Canada's Lakehead University found 'no evidence' polar bears are
currently threatened by warming.""

Kilimanjaro's Snow Hasn't Disappeared

Another prediction made in the film was that Mt. Kilimanjaro would be snow-free "within the decade." But in fact:
 "In 2014, ecologists actually monitoring Kilimanjaro's snowpack found it was not even close to being gone. It may
have shrunk a little, but ecologists were confident it would be around for the foreseeable future."

Extreme Weather Has Failed to Materialize

Related: Climate Change is Unfaslifiable Woo-Woo Pseudoscience

In Inconvenient Truth, Gore also forecasted that storms would begin occurring more often and at higher intensities.

Wrong again, Al:

"Gore's claim is more hype than actual science, since storms aren't more extreme since 2006. In fact, not even
findings from the United Nations's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) support Gore's claim.

"The IPCC found in 2013 there 'is limited evidence of changes in extremes associated with other climate variables
since the mid-20th century.'

The IPCC also found 'no significant observed trends in global tropical cyclone frequency over the past century' and
'[n]o robust trends in annual numbers of tropical storms, hurricanes and major hurricanes counts have been
identified over the past 100 years in the North Atlantic basin.'

"Gore should probably take these findings seriously since he shared the Nobel Prize in 2007 with the IPCC for its
work on global warming."
Despite False Claims, Gore Grows Richer from Climate Change Myth

Related: The '97% consensus' of scientists on climate change is complete bunk... fraudulent statistic repeated
everywhere is based on blatant scientific fraud

Although Gore's claims have been thoroughly debunked by a number of experts, he has been quietly amassing a huge
fortune based on the climate change scam.

Mad World News reports:

"Gore's wealth went from $700,000 in 2000 to an estimated net worth of $172.5 million by 2015 thanks to his
environmentalist activism. Gore and the former chief of Goldman Sachs Asset Management made nearly $218
million in profits between 2008 and 2011 from a carbon trading company they co-founded. By 2008, Gore was able
to put a whopping $35 million into hedge funds and other investments."

Gore Accused of Massive Fraud

Related: 300 Scientists Want NOAA To Stop Hiding Its Global Warming Data

There is a growing consensus that Al Gore has perpetrated a massive fraud against the the public, and many believe that he
should be held accountable.
From Conservative Base:

"It has been reported that 30,000 scientists, including a top-tier leader of the science community as well as the
founder of The Weather Channel, have come forward to sue Al Gore for fraud.

Al Gore has made massive profits in the promotion of the global warming mythology, and he played a key role in
getting the 'Cap and Trade' legislation passed. ...

"Perhaps this lawsuit will finally give the thousands of 'dissenting' scientists a voice again."

Ten years later, Al Gore needs to finally be exposed for the lies that have made him a very rich man.

MP Nick Smith Hires Lawyer To Silence Child Abuse Ring Rumours

May 14 2016 | From: RealNewsNZ

Member of Parliament Nick Smith hired Nelson lawyer Nigel McFadden to serve papers on the man
who runs the Awake and Aware NZ Facebook page recently.
He was apparently upset about the post below which states that 5 sitting MPs have name suppression for child
abuse, and features a picture of Nick Smith.

If you read the full poster, it does not actually say Nick Smith is one of them, it simply highlights the fact that Kiwis do not
know which MPs it is.

Five sitting / current New Zealand Members of Parliament have name suppression for child abuse
convictions.

Source: WhaleOil

The problem is obviously - the public have no idea who.

But is there more to this story?

Facebook whistle blower Justin Davis has also stated publicly that Nick Smith is in fact involved in a child abuse ring being
operated from his Nelson office.

Justin Davis allegation is posted below and is taken from a total of 58 pages of allegations Justin has made about child
abuse rings operating across various NZ Crown agencies with the full protection of the NZ police and judiciary.

"Make no mistake the pedophiles have police and CYFS in there pockets.

M.P. Nick Smith got a child rape club running right out of his office by a guy called Dan Dolejs, who has links to the
most powerful pedophiles in this country.

If the head of the wellington hospital emergency department Dr Paul Quigley is getting away with drugging and
raping children, which is filmed , what else do you think might be going on ?
 - Justin Davis

It could be noted that Tax Payer Union leader Jordan Williams is also a close friend of Dan Dolejs on Facebook.

Justin Davis full 58 page transcript of these allegations is available for download below. It is a pdf document so cannot harm
your computer. Its a must read for all good Kiwis.

It names many top politicians, doctors, dentists, and powerful businessmen as being involved in kiddie rape rings nationwide
all apparently with the protection of NZ media, police and judges.

It even names the Childrens Commissioner Dr Russell Wills as being involved in the cover up of these rings, as
well as Sensible Sentencing Trust head, Garth McVicar also covering it up.

Warning: The information provided in the following is illicit and highly distrurbing. It names many well-
known New Zealand people and institutions:

You can download a PDF of the raw information claims made by Justin Davis here

Please visit Justin Davis on Facebook- add as friend read his posts check out his photo album ask
him questions- and show your support- his life is in danger.

It seems astounding doesnt it? Is it possible that those in the highest positions of power and prestige in our little Nation are
in fact pedophiles?

Yet if we look over to the UK at the recent Westminster Scandal we in fact see that their Government has been run by
pedophiles and pedophile rings, which have operated for at least 40 years with the apparent full protection of the UK
Judiciary and power structure.

Over 100,000 children have come forward and claimed they were raped (or worse) by British Lords, judges, celebrities and
MPs, and yet there has still not been one arrest. In fact, NZ Judge Lowell Goddard has been put in charge of that
investigation which is of course just another cover up.

It seems that this is the way that our Governments are controlled, by promoting then bribing and controlling pedophiles into
positions of power.
John Key pictured feeling up Ponytails at every opportunity.

Related: On Pony Tails And Cherries On Top Or Why This Is Getting Way Worse For John Key

We should make it clear here that we have no hard evidence that Nick Smith or anyone else named in the Justin Davis files
are directly involved in NZ pedophile rings but if you read the document, the level of detail is astounding. It is almost
impossible to think it is all made up, in our opinion.

Perhaps one clue as to this alleged situation, is to look at the portfolios these MPs are given to manage. Nick Smith has of
course been put in charge of Auckland Housing and we have seen that market destroyed by foreign buyers and immigration
since the Key regime came to power, leaving almost an entire generation of Kiwis out of the market.
Smith has been kicked out of parliament because of his screw ups, but as in the case with others such as Judith Collins -
after a few months in the dog box (or more to the point when the sheeply have forgotten about their past crimes) they get
shoe-horned back into parliament!

Nick Smith has been fronting that entire scam - possibly one of the biggest scams of any NZ government in history, and Nick
Smith is there in front of the cameras making excuses and telling lies day after day. How do you make someone do that?

His other portfolio is the Environment, as we have seen our lakes and rivers be destroyed by intensive dairy farming to feed
Chinese babies.
Related: River Stance: Water Pollution In New Zealand

Again, there is MP Nick Smith on the news telling lies and helping cover up the extent of the damage. How does the shadow
government convince someone to make such a complete asshole out of themselves day after day? And could that be
related to the allegations above?

We have also seen at least one MP stand down suddenly in recent years, in a swirl of allegations, that being Northland MP
Mike Sabin. The public were left guessing what that was all about.

Then there is PM John Keys numerous pedophilia gaffs from pulling little girls ponytails at primary schools up and down
the Nation, to making jokes about escaped pedophile and murderer Phillip Smith at the G20 meeting in Brazil a couple of
years ago. John Keys killer pedophile joke disgusts family .

John Keys own daughter Stephanie Key is now doing soft porn in Paris, which looks very much like a cry for attention and
help in our view.

Stephanie key - also known as"Cherry Lazar":

This is classic MK Ultra mind control symbolism

Related: Monarch Mind Control & The MK-Ultra Program

This is Stephanie Key also:

Nothing like a smattering of Satanism

In our opinion- the question must be asked, are we governed over by an elite group of child sex offenders and perverts who
are all being bribed and controlled into taxing us all to fund the Rothschild bank debt we have been laden with in recent
years?
Are we indeed Governed by a Global gang of inbred Rothschild pedophiles? Many across the internet seem to agree that
we are. just chuck Rothschild pedophiles into Youtube and Google and read the evidence all day long.

And hugging Bill Clinton, a serial rapist named in the Epstein pedophile ring court documents. Also Stephanie Keys art or cry for help?)

Related Research and Docos:

NZ author Greg Hallett alleges the NZ judiciary is a pedophile movement:

Greg Hallett NZ a Blackmailers Guide

"The judiciary shows itself to be a paedophile and crime creation movement whose primary goal is fatherless
families.

Brendon OConnell exposes pedophile Freemasons in the Australian Government and Councils:
Only Half Of Americans Realise Election System Is Rigged + Why Vote When Our
Votes Really Dont Count?
May 14 2016 | From: TheDailySheeple / ActivistPost

In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.

According to a Reuters/Ipsos poll, about half of American voters believe that the system U.S. political parties use to
pick their candidates for the White House is rigged and more than two-thirds want to see the process changed.

Only half?

One would think that, by now, most (if not all) people would realize that the entire voting system is a sham.

From Reuters:

"The United States is one of just a handful of countries that gives regular voters any say in who should make it
onto the presidential ballot. But the state-by-state system of primaries, caucuses and conventions is complex.

The contests historically were always party events, and while the popular vote has grown in influence since the
mid-20th century, the parties still have considerable sway.

One quirk of the U.S. system and the area where the parties get to flex their muscle is the use of delegates,
party members who are assigned to support contenders at their respective conventions, usually based on voting
 results. The parties decide how delegates are awarded in each state, with the Republicans and Democrats having
different rules.

The delegates personal opinions can come into play at the party conventions if the race is too close to call an
issue that has become a lightning rod in the current political season.

Another complication is that state governments have different rules about whether voters must be registered as
party members to participate. In some states, parties further restrict delegate selection to small committees of party
elites, as the Republican Party in Colorado did this year.

In other words: the establishment selects two candidates and allows us to choose from them on election day. Same deal
everywhere. Do you want the blue party or the red party? Same agenda - different muppets to the fore.

Third-party candidates? Forget about it. The mainstream media largely ignores them. Suggest voting for one, and most
Americans will tell you that you are wasting your vote. Unfortunately, they arent wrong: the elite will never allow a third-
party non-establishment candidate a real shot at the presidency.

In the recent article The System Is Rigged: Widespread Dissatisfaction Among US Voters, The Guardian says:

"The rise of anti-establishment candidates like Sanders and Trump has thrown into sharp relief the mess of rules
and processes deliberately designed to keep these candidates from clinching the nomination.

For these voters, and the many more across the political spectrum just waking up to the ground rules of the
highest-stakes game in the country, the primary races can seem horribly unfair.

The Guardian also polled Americans to ask what they think about the election system. More than 300 readers responded,
and many expressed their misgivings about the way the parties select nominees, describing the modern primary process as
rigged, undemocratic, and a charade.
The Manchurian Canditate is an excellent film - if you want to put your thinking cap on, delving into Monarch MK Ultra mind control

Their comments are quite telling:

"Why should the states, the party organizations and the voters go through all the hype, expense and time to have a
 primary when the party poobahs make the ultimate decision?

- Don Grafues

Now that we have true grassroots, anti-establishment, populist candidates on both sides [Sanders and Trump],
the political machine is in full survival mode to maintain the status quo. Party leaders sense a real and direct threat
from both campaigns

and both major parties are going to use every tool they have to block what they feel is a threat to their very
existence.

- Chris Ritz

The reason I never voted is because I thought of corruption. I thought maybe I was wrong or unfair, but its [the
electoral process this year] kind of making me think theres a lot of corruption and your voice doesnt count.

- Wendy Kranmer

Earlier this month, RT discussed the rigging of elections with Dr. Ron Paul, who called the system rotten and a charade:

In the article Illusion of Choice, Bernhard Guenther says:

"as the saying goes, the path to hell is paved with good intentions. In a ponerized society with a corrupt political
system, good intention, hope and voting dont result in positive change, but merely wishful thinking and denial.

There are no free elections in this country. There hasnt been in a long time. The Voting System is a fraud sold to
the public to give them the illusion of choice. The same goes for the two-party set-up. Democrats and Republicans.
Back and forth. Two sides of the same coin. Despite popular belief we actually dont live in a democracy anymore.
People are so caught up in this left/right tunnel vision that they dont see how theyre being duped and played
with.

Elections are nonsense. They serve to maintain the illusion that we actually have a say in selecting a new master every four
years. Participating in this system gives it validity voters are giving their permission to keep the current system in place.

Why Vote When Our Votes Really Dont Count

For years I never could understand why people said it was not worth voting and that things were
rigged. I found that to be anathema to both my studies and beliefs.
However, the last several general election cycles seem to have impressed upon me and others, apparently, that
there may be some validation for such remarks.

Personally, Im a registered Independent! Im not very impressed with party politics, since Democratic candidates usually
are, or have been, Republicans who switched parties, and vice versa. Current political shenanigans only leave me cold
since the political agenda de jour is about political correctness and memes restructuring society into a moral morass, in
my opinion, rather than dealing with real issues that are pushing us into a Corporatocracy. But thats my opinion!

One of the more famous political party fence jumpers was the late Ronald Reagan, the Republican 40th President of the
USA, who started out as a registered Democrat and an FDRs New Deal supporter in California.
Hillary Clinton - yes - the 2016 Democratic presidential nominee hopeful campaigned for Republican presidential
campaigner Richard Nixon, and also worked for Barry Goldwaters campaign in 1964.

Hillary even was elected president of Wellesley Colleges Young Republican Club!

Leon Panetta joined the Nixon (R) administration as director of the Office of Civil Rights only later to become Bill Clintons
(D) White House Chief of Staff!
Condoleezza Rice was a registered Democrat, who voted for Jimmy Carter (D) but switched and became a rather high
ranking Republican in the George W Bush (R) administration.

Former NYC mayor Michael Bloomberg was a lifelong Democrat, who became the Republican mayor of New York City. The
late Senator Arlen Spector represented the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in the U.S. Senate as a Republican from 1981
to 2009, but was a Democrat from 2009 to 2011.

Democratic political gadfly Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts was a Republican at one time too! Arianna
Huffington of The Huffington Post also is a political fence jumper. Former Secretary of Labor Elizabeth Dole switched from
being a Democrat in 1969, and eventually wound up being in Republican president Reagans administration and Cabinet.

This website lists 21 of the most famous political party switchers of all time.

Those who bang political party drums seem not to see the forest for the trees, in my opinion. Party politics infighting and
voting party lines really leave me to wonder;

"Cant anyone think outside the box he or she has pledged their loyalties and surrendered their minds to?

All the above leads up to this overlooked theme regarding politics, elections, and voting: Party politics rule-making and
rigging! A friend recently emailed James Perloffs Blog wherein Perloff tells the story of what happened to a 2012 alternate
delegate at the Republican convention in Tampa, Florida, who was representing candidate Ron Paul.

Delegate Rachel McIntosh obviously had a very rude awakening about the dark, stinky underside belly of presidential
campaign politics, conventions, and party national committees, which I think you will find equally disturbing after your read
about her experiences here.
The upshot of McIntoshs story is how Ron Paul was railroaded at the convention and Mitt Romney wound up being the
favorite son and nominee of the Republican Party. It would seem that the very same shenanigans are going on now and
the RNC is between a rock and a hard place regarding Donald Trumps popularity, including his majority of pledged
delegates.

Frankly, what I dont understand is how voters will allow party bosses to manipulate who becomes any partys presidential
nominee, instead of what the people decide.

Whats the use of holding caucuses, primaries, or even general elections, if its all rigged? I think all that political BS boils
down to whom they - the controllers - can control while in the White House. The current president seems to be the ideal
example. Hillary would be the perfect follow through president to sink the U.S. ship of state, in my opinion.

However, with twelve FBI agents investigating her State Department emails, theres a possibility that her derriere may wind
up in Quantico or somewhere like that, I offer. Since most legal minds agree there are legal problems for Hillary, see what
you think after this news analyst explains.
Hillary, like Barack Obama has, will rubber stamp the New World Order-Rockefeller-Rothschild-U.N. Agenda. However, Ron
Paul would not march to party bosses dictums or the New World Order contingents plans and dreams for our future.

Will The Donald or Bernie?

As Perloff says;

"If you want to glimpse how far back this sort of power-brokering goes, read Ferdinand Lundbergs 1937
classic Americas Sixty Families.

He related how, a century ago, the rich were scorning voters and maneuvering their own choices into nominations,
whether a Democrat like Woodrow Wilson in 1912 or a Republican like Herbert Hoover in 1928.

So, shouldnt we be asking, Whats voting all about, and do our votes really count?

This YouTube video, wherein a computer programmer, Clinton Eugene Curtis, under oath in Florida says that in October of
2000 he was asked to write a program to rig elections; that would flip the vote 51-49; and confirmed that there is vote
rigging software.

His testimony will make you cringe when you hear him say, to control the votes in South Florida. The 2000 presidential
election is the one the U.S. Supreme Court decided! What happened to the voters votes?

Can, or will, that happen again, especially in 2016? The inside word would suggest no, not this time. Game's up and shortly
to be out.

Political Crimes & Criminals

Part One: Click here

Part Two: Click here

Part Three: Click here

Part Four: Click here

 Part Five: Click here

Part Six: Click here

Part Seven: Click here

Part Eight: Click here

http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/political-crimes-criminals-7.shtml

Political Crimes & Criminals

Part One: Click here

Part Two: Click here

Part Three: Click here

Part Four: Click here

Part Five: Click here

Part Six: Click here

Part Seven: Click here

Part Eight: Click here

Foreign Control Of New Zealand: Key Facts
May 13 2016 | From: CAFCA

Foreign direct investment (ownership of companies) in New Zealand increased from $15.7 billion in
March 1989 to $110.6 billion at March 2015 over seven times.

As a proportion of the total output of the economy, Gross Domestic Product, it has risen from 22% to 46%.

Ownership of overseas companies by New Zealand residents has not grown as fast over that period (over five times) so net
foreign direct investment has grown eight and a half times from a net liability of $8.8 billion to $74.6 billion, and as a
percentage of GDP multiplied two and half times from 13% of GDP to 31%.

Foreign Direct Investment from International Investment Position, National Accounts, Statistics New Zealand, InfoShare series IIP088AA. GDP from
National Accounts, Statistics New Zealand, InfoShare series SNE038AA.

Foreign owners controlled 33% of the share market in 2015. In 1989, the figure was 19% and it was estimated to be below
5% in 1986.

At March 2014, they owned an estimated 29% of all equity (shareholdings) and 37% of privately owned equity, including
shares not listed on the stock exchange.

Foreign investors owned 27% (or $355 billion) of wealth in New Zealand whose commercial net value totalled $1.3 trillion at
March 2015.
This comprised housing, land, other property, plant, equipment and financial assets owned directly or indirectly by
households, government and foreign investors. New Zealand residents owned a further $202 billion of investments abroad.
(These totals exclude wealth held by non-profit organisations, shared natural wealth such as rivers, and human and social
capital.)

1986, 1987, 2012, 2014: "Brian Gaynor: New Zealanders buy back their sharemarket", New Zealand Herald, 19 October 2013; and "Brian Gaynor:
Potential problems in NZX's high level of foreign investment", New Zealand Herald, 31 January 2015; 1989-1997: "Corporate Governance Research
on New Zealand Listed Companies", by Mark Fox, Gordon Walker and Alma Pekmezovic, Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law Vol.
29, No. 1, 2012, Table 4, p.16. 1997-2010: "Savings and the Equity Market" - JBWere submission to the Savings Working Group, November 2010,
p.2. 2011: GS Annual NZX ownership survey. 2013, 15: "Who We Are - NZ's Capital Markets - NZX", accessed 3 April 2016. Equity estimates are
non-official estimates provided by Statistics New Zealand. Wealth is calculated from Reserve Bank series C22: Household balance sheet;
Treasury's Fiscal Time Series; Statistics New Zealand's International Investment Position: Directional basis stock of direct investment by country
(Annual-Mar), InfoShare series IIP081AA.

In 2015, the OIO approved the sale of 75,008 hectares of freehold rural land and 4,889 hectares of leases and other
interests in land to foreigners. About 43,000 hectares of the freehold land and 4,000 hectares of the leases and other
interests in land were from one foreign investor to another.
In the decade 2006 to 2015, the average was 124,012 hectares of freehold and 42,044 hectares of leases and other
interests in land approved for sale. Statistics on sales of land to overseas interests are poorly recorded and incomplete.

Our best estimate is that in 2011 at least 8.7 percent of New Zealand farmland including forestry, or 1.3 million hectares,
was foreign-owned or controlled and it could have reached 10 percent.

Overseas Investment Commission and Overseas Investment Office. Overseas Ownership Of Land: Far Greater Than The 1% The PM Claims, by
Bill Rosenberg

In 2014, the OIO approved the sale of 38,120 hectares of freehold rural land and 2,671 hectares of leases and other
interests in land to foreigners. About 12,000 hectares of the freehold land and 1,000 hectares of the leases and other
interests in land were from one foreign investor to another.

In the decade 2005 to 2014, the average was 131,488 hectares of freehold and 43,162 hectares of leases and other
interests in land approved for sale. Statistics on sales of land to overseas interests are poorly recorded and incomplete. Our
best estimate is that in 2011 at least 8.7 percent of New Zealand farmland including forestry, or 1.3 million hectares, was
foreign-owned or controlled and it could have reached 10 percent.

Overseas Investment Commission and Overseas Investment Office.

"Overseas Ownership Of Land: Far Greater Than The 1% The PM Claims", by Bill Rosenberg (www.converge.org.nz)

Statistics NZ figures, as of March 2015, list the biggest foreign owners of New Zealand companies as being from, in
decreasing order: Australia, US, Hong Kong, UK, Singapore, Japan, Canada, Netherlands, British Virgin Islands, Ireland,
Cayman Islands, China, Switzerland, Norway and France.

All had over $160m in foreign direct investment in New Zealand. These accounted for 96% of foreign direct investment in
New Zealand and Australia alone accounts for 52%. British Virgin Islands and Cayman Islands are tax havens, and a
Statistics New Zealand study showed that in 2010, large proportions of the foreign direct investment from the Netherlands,
Singapore, Hong Kong and tax havens was in fact from other countries, led by the UK, US, Germany and Canada.

In 2015, Other tax havens with investments in New Zealand companies include Vanuatu, Channel Islands, Liechtenstein,
Bermuda and the Bahamas, but for all except Bermuda, the value of their holdings has been suppressed as confidential.

Bermuda has shown a negative investment in New Zealand companies since 2009 (negative $1.8 billion in 2015). So has
Germany since 2013. Negative investment suggests that the companies may have been loaded with debt to their parents or
are technically insolvent.

International Investment Position, Statistics New Zealand: Directional basis stock of direct investment by country (Annual-Mar), InfoShare series
IIP081AA. Note that these statistics are compiled on a different basis from those also from Statistics New Zealand above, so the total, $97.4b, does
not match. These are compiled on a "directional" basis, based on ultimate nationality of ownership; the above are on a "balance sheet" basis, based
on residency of the company. Industry statistics below are also compiled on a directional basis.

Mallika Kelkar. (2011). "The ultimate sources of foreign direct investment (p. 19). Presented at the New Zealand Association of Economists (NZAE)
Conference, Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved from stats.govt.nz

The Financial and insurance services sector, which includes the four big Australian owned banks, accounted for by far the
biggest part of foreign ownership of New Zealand companies by industry in March 2015, with $32.1 billion. Next was
Manufacturing at $14.7 billion.

Other industries having more than $1 billion of foreign investment were in decreasing size, Agriculture, forestry, and fishing;
Retail trade; Wholesale trade; Electricity, gas, water and waste services; Rental, hiring and real estate services;
Professional, scientific and technical services; Mining; Information media and telecommunications; and Health care and
social assistance.

$16.6 billion was unable to be allocated to an industry because of the way foreign direct investment is estimated, or was
suppressed as being confidential.

Source: International Investment Position, Directional basis stock of direct investment by industry (Annual-Mar), InfoShare series IIP080AA -
Statistics New Zealand. See note regarding country statistics.

Transnational corporations (TNCs) make massive profits out of New Zealand. These can truly be called New Zealand's
biggest invisible export. In the year to March 2015, they were $9.0 billion. Over the last decade they have averaged more
than the combined exports of seafood and milk powder.
In the decade 2006-2015, TNCs made $77.5 billion in profits from New Zealand, an average rate of profit after tax on their
shareholdings of 12.5% (12.0% in the year to March 2015). Only 26% was reinvested (only 15% in the year to March 2015).
Profits have averaged twice the increase in foreign direct investment holdings each year.

Balance of Payments: Current account primary income (Annual-Mar), InfoShare Series BOP058AA; Current account investment income by sector
(Annual-Mar), InfoShare series BOP059AA; and Balance of payments major components (Annual-Mar), InfoShare series BOP055AA Statistics
New Zealand.

Another $7.9 billion left New Zealand in the year to March 2015 made up of investment income from debt and smaller
shareholdings (portfolio investment), making a total $16.9 billion. Over the last decade this has averaged more than the
combined dairy and forest product exports.

Related: International Ownership of New Zealand Banks

More than two out of every five dollars of the $16.9 billion went to the owners of New Zealand's banking sector: $6.9 billion.
The investment income from overseas ownership of the banking sector ("Deposit taking corporations") after taking account
of its small investment income from abroad, accounted for four out of every five dollars of New Zealand's current account
deficit in the year to March 2015: $6.5 billion compared to $8.1 billion.

The investment income deficit (income on New Zealand investment overseas less income on foreign investment in New
Zealand) has been greater than the current account deficit for all but two years since 1989, which further increases New
Zealand's foreign liabilities.

Exports: Key Statistics Table 7.04 - Value of principal exports (excl re-exports), InfoShare series EXP005AA - Statistics New Zealand.

Foreign investors are not great for employment - they only employ 17% of the workforce (down from 21% in 2000), despite
owning a large proportion of the economy. Foreign ownership does not guarantee more jobs. In fact, it quite often adds to
unemployment. TNCs have made tens of thousands jobless.
Business demography statistics: Enterprises by industry and overseas equity 2000-15, Statistics New Zealand, available in NZ.Stat.

Related: New Zealand National Debt Clock

Foreign ownership does nothing to improve New Zealand's foreign debt problem. In 1989, total private and public foreign
debt stood at $47.5 billion, equivalent to about two-thirds of New Zealand's Gross Domestic Product, and worth $86.4 billion
in March 2015 dollars.

As of March 2015, it was $246.2 billion (or $270.9 billion including derivatives), equivalent to 102% of New Zealand's Gross
Domestic Product despite being helped out temporarily by $20.2 billion of insurance claims for the Canterbury earthquakes
and all of the asset sales and takeovers.

Source: Statistics New Zealand as follows: International investment position (IIP) (Annual-Mar) InfoShare series IIP088AA; External lending and
debt by sector and relationship (Annual-Mar) InfoShare series IIP078AA; International non-equity financial instruments by sector (Annual-Mar)
InfoShare series IIP074AA;

New Zealand's A&L - Level 3 Components (Discontinued March 2000) (Annual-Mar) InfoShare series IIP007AA; GDP(P), Nominal, Actual, Total
(Annual-Mar) InfoShare series SNE038AA; overseas reinsurance claims from the Canterbury earthquakes http://tinyurl.com/j9kmree

Downloads:

Graphs to accompany the Key Facts information shown below are available to download in Microsoft PowerPoint (.PPT) or
Adobe Acrobat (.PDF) format.

Each page of the Adobe Acrobat version has a small square in the top left corner. Hovering the mouse over this square
shows the source of the information in more detail.

Key Facts graphs (PPT 151KB)

Key Facts graphs (PDF 306KB)

Note that there are often revisions to official data, leading to some changes to reported data for past years.

The Khazarian Mafias System Of Cartels

May 13 2016 | From: VeteransToday

There is no naturally occurring terrorism - it is only violence and wars engineered by the Worlds
largest organized crime syndicate.

The 'Khazarian Mafia' often resemble their 'global control' in the form of an Octopus. This was, ad nauseum, evidenced yet again in the latest James
Bond film which was about a secret cabal running the world...

Thus, we now are aware that the so-called problem of terrorism is really a problem of organized crime that is
initiated and deployed by the worlds largest organized crime syndicate.

Never before in history has an organized crime syndicate become so large with global reach, and never before so powerful
and evil, specializing in the frequent mass-murder of innocent people solely to enhance its power and riches.

This largest global organized crime syndicate is best identified as the Khazarian Mafia (KM). This name is appropriate,
because its origins go back in history to the period 700-1200 AD in the nation of Khazaria, which is approximately the same
area as Ukraine.

Related: The Hidden History Of The Incredibly Evil Khazarian Mafia [Illuminati Cabal Zionists...]
Mike Harris uncovered a sinister history related to this Khazarian Mafia - one of committing genocide against
Armenians in 1915, and mass-murdering over 100 million innocent Russian civilians in the Bolshevik Revolution.

The KM also mass-murdered at least that many Chinese during the Khazarian Mafia directed Maoist takeover in
China in 1945.

Mike Harris also uncovered the longstanding blood feud of the Khazarian Mafia (aka the Bolsheviks, or Zionists) against the
Russian people for destroying Khazaria in 1240 AD.
It is clear that the Khazarian Mafia has also had a longstanding blood feud against America the Constitutional
Republic for breaking away from their City of London establishment that the KM had infiltrated and hijacked via the
Rothschild banksters.

This KM blood feud against America has been conducted with the usual methods involving infiltration of key institutions,
followed by their hijacking. This has been done within each of the largest US Corporations, which are further consolidated
into several larger corporations that cooperate together against consumers and buyers of their products and services.

The application of several key KM processes have resulted in the hijacking and consolidation of most institutions
and large corporations.

These key processes, infiltration, hijacking and consolidation of major institutions, corporations and even most governments
worldwide, has been repeated over and over in many nations around the world.
This has resulted in the stealing of huge amounts of wealth from people and resulting in a worldwide KM hierarchy of
control, best described as the Establishment Hierarchy.

In essence, these cooperating corporations function as a cartel or an illegal monopoly. This makes it quite easy for the KM
to control entire industries and sectors of society, because they ensure that the leaders of the corporations have been
initiated into their hierarchy of control and have a personally vested interest in following KM wishes and directives.

This same process has been enacted in every sector of American society after 1913, and we discover that every major
institution of government and private industry, as well as most large church systems have been infiltrated and completely
hijacked to be under the spell and control of the top leadership of the KMs hierarchy.

Here is a brief list of the various interlocked Cartels that the Khazarian Mafia has created that control most of the
world and have been placed under the control of the Establishment Hierarchy, (and not necessarily in the order of
importance).

Each of these Cartels is organized into a large system best referred to as the Hierarchy, and the several wrinkled-up old
men in wheelchairs that control it are called the Select Few by insiders.

1. The Money Cartel

Otherwise known as the Reserve Banking System - and in the US as the Federal Reserve System. It is nothing more than a
fraudulent illegal unConstitutional system that prints fake money debt-notes instead of real Gold or Silver Certificates.
This is the epitome of RICO crime and fraud. Of course there is no statute of limitations on fraud, and all assets illegally
asset stripped can be clawed back some day using the US military, if necessary.

Related: Babylonian Money Magic & How Modern "Commercial Law" Is Based On Ancient Babylonian Codes

2. The Energy Cartel

The Petro Cartel which has provided the linchpin of the US Petro Dollar.
3. The Knowledge Cartel

Otherwise known as the educational system including public schools, private and public universities.

Rigid controls have been imposed which prevent free thought and investigation or teaching about certain forbidden subjects
like the Federal Reserve System or all the secretly run illegal, unConstitutional practices of the Establishment Hierarchy.

4. The Military and Intel Cartel

This has served as the Worlds policemen and used the soldiers of most countries as disposable cannon-fodder.

This itself is one of the most sinister crimes against all of us and is a well-planned attempt to destroy Goyim men and
prevent them from defending America from the KMs final solution and final revenge for ever leaving England which is the
mass-murder of 90% of all people worldwide - not just Americans; a repeat of what they did in Russian in 1917 and China in
1945.

5. The Judiciary, Corrections and Police Cartel

This is used to run interference and cover-ups for the Establishment Hierarchy.
It America it is staffed by mostly Israeli-American Israeli-first Dual Citizens and ex-Jag Officers who serve the
Establishment Hierarchy no matter what.

6. The Big Medicine Cartel

Controls all medical schools, all medical, dental and nursing degrees, the CDC, the FDC and all health policies.

Like all other Establishment Hierarchy Cartels it serves the Hierarchys needs and serves up limited truth about all health
problems and is oriented to making people sick in order to gain maximum profits and control of the masses by weakening
them and asset stripping them.
7. The Big Pharma Cartel

This cartel has been designed to work closely with the Big Medicine Cartel in a symbiotic arrangement where each feeds the
other and increases business for each other.

This is a sinister result of what good be an asset that has turned bad, becoming a tool to gain major profits at the expense of
the health and financial well-being of people.

8. The Agricultural Cartel

This cartel has been created by infiltrating and hijacking corporations that buy, broker and process grains and produce.
It is associated with the banks in various financing schemes designed to result in the loss of family farms to become part of
large corporate farms.

9. The Major Mass Media Cartel

This is best described as the Controlled Major Mass Media (CMMM). It uses an Intel proprietary to vet every single story
carried by the news networks which actually function as a virtual and illegal Monopoly.
This KM proprietary is a major Investment House that claims to be on the Vanguard of progressive investments.

10. The Entertainment Cartel

This is based on the sophisticated mind-kontrol served up by Hollywood and the Television networks and movie theaters. It
controls the culture, values and mores of the group mind and and keeps the massed sedated and satiated.

When folks experience frequent shoot em up action scenarios sitting in front of large screen TVs and in movie theaters
and frequently see the impossible, this satiates their expectations and exhausts their motivation to actually change society
for the better.
Many have become so programmed mentally by the TV and movies that they have trouble distinguishing between fantasy
and reality and easily accept their mind-kontrolled state.

11. The Bread and Circuses Cartel

This is Big Sports designed to keep the masses appeased so they dont have time to become concerned about how the
Establishment is ripping them off at every level nor any inclination to be motivated to stop them from doing so.

The Romans came up with the idea that if you keep the people fed, watered and entertained - distracted - the 'elite' can get away with anything,
behind the scenes. Today we have professional sports hysteria, mass media movies, mindless reality TV and music filling that role nicely, while
subconsciously programming the masses with the themes and thoughtforms the elite decide on to further their agendas

"Bread and circuses" (or bread and games; from Latin: panem et circenses) is metonymic for
 a superficial means of appeasement. In the case of politics, the phrase is used to describe the
generation of public approval, not through exemplary or excellent public service or public
policy, but through diversion; distraction; or the mere satisfaction of the immediate, shallow
requirements of a populace, as an offered "palliative."

Its originator, Juvenal, used the phrase to decry the selfishness of common people and their
neglect of wider concerns. The phrase also implies the erosion or ignorance of civic duty amongst the
concerns of the commoner.

Much of the violence and filth we have to live with can be directly attributed to this powerful mind-kontrol system which
operates by the power of 60 HZ conditioned susceptibility, hypnosis for many. Hollywood superstars are paid big money
because what they do is important to the Establishment Hierarchy, in terms of mind-kontrolling the masses and much of the
world.

12. The Religious Cartel

Sad to say that the KM has infiltrated and hijacked almost every major religion in the World, including the Vatican and
Catholicism, Lutheranism and all the rest.

The illegal, unConstitutional tax exempt status regulation for churches has kept them in line and restricted them from getting
involved in politics or preaching much truth related to evil in the highest echelons of their own governments, local, state and
federal.

13. The Secret Society Cartel

The KM has established a worldwide network of secret occult-based societies which form the secret associations that
control almost every major Institution from the top echelons.
This network is closely associated with Intel groups and actually has been secretly deputized as agents of national security
which gives them immunity from any prosecution.

This Cartel uses various occult groups in its network such as satanic cults like the Process to do its dirty work, often
assassinations, gang-stalking, secret break-ins and other crimes for the Intel Agencies who want distance and deniability.

There are cases where certain occult members who have embarked on missions to assassinate targeted individuals who
have been clipped by a well-trained intended target and these incidents never get into the light of day for what really
happened.

As more and more Americans are becoming armed under the new concealed carry shall issue laws, it is not so easy
anymore for these occult groups to assassinate targeted individuals without getting clipped in the process.

14. The Government and Politics Cartel

This involves a coordinated system that controls all governments.

Various manipulations are used to bring conformity to the wishes and edicts of the Establishment Hierarchy such as political
favors, bribery, human compromise and even harassment, threats and assassinations often disguised as medical illnesses.

15. The Arms Cartel

This is one of the biggest money makers for the wealthy KM families that own large blocks of stock in these defense
contractors, especially those with no-bid contracts which are also involved in kidnapping and sex-slavery.

War is extreme profitable for the FRS Banks and these KM investor Families.

And that is why the Hierarchy pulls so many strings to hire mercenaries to conduct Gladio-style, inside-job false-flag attacks
in order to start illegal, unConstitutional, unprovoked, undeclared, unwinnable, perpetual foreign wars.
Because the Russian Republic has checkmated this war-making process in the Mideast, it is likely that the KM is planning
on transforming America into a large GAZA II war-zone and eventually into the Worlds largest open-aired prison camp while
they complete their goal to depopulate America by 90%.

16. The Narcotics Cartel

This is the most lucrative KM Cartel of all, next to the Money Cartel, which is the head of the snake. Retired DEA officials
have privately spoken out and claimed that most of the large Wall Street banks would go under in a month unless they could
launder the vast fortunes obtained from the Establishments with their international drug trafficking, especially into America.

The richest, top Establishment Hierarchy (KM) families who are in the upper crust dress with the most expensive clothes,
live in big mansions, and attend charity events and give token amounts from their vast tax exempt charitable foundations
pretending to be caring folks, when they are actually the most two-faced and evil of all, and directly gain from the enormous
drug cartel profits which they hid in these tax exempt foundations and draw money out as long term loans and operating
expenses.

This vast illegal drug income is split with the Intel agencies, who use it for black ops money and personal gain.

There is some good news with all this bad news.

Recently the KM has been completely checkmated for the very first time, and this has been accomplished in Syria by Putin
and the Russian Federation with its use of superior state of the art air power at its ally Syrias request.

Not only that, numerous new economic, trade and monetary coalitions have developed, which in time will sink the US Petro
Dollar as the Worlds Reserve Currency, maybe sooner than later.

Thus we see the BRICS Development Bank emerging, followed by the Chinese AIIB System and CIPS, the Chinese version
of the Swift money-wire system.

Already most of the worlds governments (except the USA and Israel) have either signed up for BRICS or sent letters of
intent.

Private trade deals have been negotiated between China, Russia and other nations, which are for the first time conducting
trade without the use of the US Petro Dollar. Even Saudi Arabia is beginning to negotiate with the Chinese about mutual
new trade deals without using the US Petro Dollar.

The die is set, and no matter how much the Federal Reserve System and its partner in crime the US Department of the
Treasury monetize the US foreign debt by buying it back with newly issued but worthless debt-notes, it is only a matter of
time until the whole global Reserve Banking system collapses under its own massive Ponzi scheme of financial fraud and
fake money.

Conclusion

How can we stop this insidious monster the KM and its Establishment Hierarchy that has hijacked almost every American
institution using the extreme power of its debt-note counterfeit money-magick? They have done this by buying or bribing
almost every single government official and Judge including five of the now eight US Supreme Court Justices?

This is a difficult question to be sure. The best way is for the spontaneous emergence of a large scale mass populist
awareness all over America at every level. This is in process now thanks to the increasingly negative economic situation and
the alternative news on the Worldwide Internet, the Worlds New Gutenberg Press.

Worldwide now there are coodinated efforts to take this cabal down and recently huge advancements in these
areas have been made that are not permitted to be spoken of in the mainstream media- yet.

As more and more people worldwide wake up to this and find out about the KM, the Establishment Hierarchy and the Select
Few that run it, more and more of us will become motivated to dissent, protest and work hard to change this at every level
instead of wasting most of their free time on TV entertainment and bread and circuses.

Abject secrecy is necessary for the KMs survival and power. Up until recently, any presentation of such realities to ones
family or friends usually resulted in the accusation that such was conspiracy theory or crackpot Internet stuff.
Lately with all the government lies exposed even in the CMMM, especially when economic statistics are reported that
everyone knows are clearly lies, folks are catching on and beginning to listen to such talk and believing it for the first time.

The best way would probably be for a patriotic faction of the US Military High Command to stage a coup dtat and cut the
head off of the snake by arresting all of the top Hierarchy members for Treason, Sedition and RICO crimes against America,
especially the Select Few.

The problem is that the Hierarchys control over all institutions has reached the point that we are possibly going to
have to see the Hierarchy and the KM destroyed by the geopolitical and geo-economic manipulations of Russia,
China and its new economic allies all around the world.

As this new reordering of monetary systems and trading nations emerges, the death of the US Petro Dollar is imminent,
and when that happens the power of the KM and its Establishment Hierarchy and system of interlocked Cartels will collapse.
In fact, every single one of the KM Cartels listed above is being exposed and many are being checkmated by dissident
people from all walks of life, including retired Intel, government officials and many of the now well-informed public.

In addition, the Russian Federation, China and their new associations with BRICS nations and AIIB participants are seeding
the complete disempowerment and destruction of the KM and the Establishment Hierarchy.

The KM knows its end seems imminent, and had built Malaysia and China into economic powerhouses to later parasitize as
their new hosts after they had reduced the USA to rubble and dead bodies.

But the Chinese have very long memories and their leaders have connected the dots and are hip to this and working
closely with Putin and the Russian Federation to prevent this.

In the not too distant future, there will likely be no place to hide for the KM and their Establishment Hierarchy.

Stay tuned, because in a future article, an attempt will be made to explain why the KM members are so two-faced and so
remarkably inhuman and evil. We need to explore why they are able to order individual murders and mass-murders of
innocent civilians in war at the drop of a hat with absolutely no remorse.

We need to learn why they enacted extreme rules of engagement with We The People, while never expecting that
someday the same rules of engagement could be directed back at them systematically at all levels.

Obama Speech: Does He Hint At His Premature Resignation And Pending Death
Penalty?
May 12 2016 | From: Ellaster

May 5th 2016, Neil Keenan placed a statement and video message on his blog with a remarkable
message: Obama surrendered, secretly resigned and handed over his power to the General
Joseph Dunford.
This information was handed to Keenan through various sources, yet it might be dis-info deliberately disclosed to
him, a common Cabal tactic. However given Obamas speech he gave at the White House Correspondents Dinner,
a couple of striking remarks makes you wonder what is going on behind the scenes.

Related: Neil Keenan: Obama Out / Cabal Surrender / Currency Revaluation In Progress

At The White House Correspondents Dinner (WHCD) is a yearly event for journalists associated with the White House, and
is attended by the president and vice president. This dinner traditionally takes place at the Washington Hilton since 1920. It
is organised by the White House Correspondents Association, an organisation of journalist who cover the White House and
the President of the United States.

On April 30th 2016 Obamas final WHCD took place and traditionally he gave a speech in advance.
The tone of the speech was more like a performance of a stand-up comedian rather than a presidential speech. Most likely
the text was not written by Obama himself and it was full of jokes.

Various people within journalism and politics were either taken the piss out of, or put in the spotlight in a comical way.
Obama himself looked drugged, although he was still capable to give the speech. All this made the audience euphoric and
they began to laugh heartily once Obama started his recitation.

Obama started by saying:

"It is an honor to be here at my last, and perhaps the last White House correspondents dinner.

Is this the first hint at the big changes that are taking place? Why would this be the last WHCD? Why would this yearly
tradition not take place with the newly elected president next year?

According to Neil Keenans sources prior to the WHCD dinner a back room deal was made in which Obama had handed
over his power. Obama was cornered in such a way that he surrendered and handed over the control to General Dunford.

Whether this really took place was contradicted by Drake Bailey, who is however closely involved with The Plan to arrest
many political figure heads in the US for high treason, including Obama.
The many insinuations made by Obama during his WHCD speech, do imply that something is going on behind the scenes.
Obama continued his speech by saying:

"You all look great. The end of the Republic has never looked better.

The end of the republic? Which republic? The republic of the United States incorporated? Or is it an implication to the end of
another republic?

Obama continued his talk: I do apologize. I know I was a little late tonight. I was running on CPT Does he imply he was
running on drugs?

Or should we have heard I was running on Cpt. (Captain) and what does this mean then? But to exhilarate his speech
everything was wrapped up in a joke, and he continued by saying CPT which stands for jokes that white people should
not make. The unsuspecting audience doubled up with laughter.

Around 3:20 minuted in the video below, again Obama made a remarkable comment. He looked back at his 8 years as
president and compared his earlier looks with his present looks.

"Eight years ago, I was a young man full of idealism and vigor. And look at me now, I am gray, grizzled and just
counting down the days to my death panel.

Despite this Obama kept his crowd laughing and read the rest of his speech, which was by no doubt prepared by an entire
team in the weeks prior to the dinner.

Around 23:45 minutes a funny video in MTV style was shown about the departure of the president. At 24:30 minutes there is
a scene where the president makes a phone call in search for a job for after his resignation.
Satanic much?

He calls the Washington Lizards and asked them whether they need a coach. Around 25 minutes there is another peculiar
fragment in the video. Obama makes a selfie with Michelles phone, using the app Snapchat, which allows you to morph
your portrait into another creature.

Interestingly enough Obama is shown as a shape-shifter with a clear resemblance to scenes in the (disclosure) movie "They
Live."

They Live was a movie that was more a disclosure documentary rather than fiction. In the movie the main character
discovers that when people look at the elite through specific glasses, they discover that they are a different species.

At the end of the speech (32:25 minutes in the Youtube-video) Obama says: With that I just have two more words to say:
Obama out.

He then makes a Freemason hand gesture with two fingers on his lips while he drops the microphone with his other. This
Freemason symbol means it is my duty to keep the secret.

It is also a sign to other members of the secret society to remain silent. I interpret the dropped microphone as a sign I will
make no public announcement.
According to Neil Keenans sources Obama had not returned to the White House since and no longer lives there. To keep
up appearances he pretends he is still commander-in-chief although he will solely remain the spokesperson.

Allegedly the real person in charge is General Dunford. However, it is the intent to keep things business as usual for the
outside world, while General Dunford is in charge of the Republic until the presidential elections have taken place.

The claim that Dunford is in charge is contradicted by Thomas Williams, who together with Drake Bailey presents the weekly
Cosmic Voice radio show. He says about the alleged take over: General Dunford is like the Magic Man, he seems to
appear in all kinds of events, but nothing ever comes off of it".

On the Cosmic Voice Facebook page Thomas Williams wrote: keep hearing for over 12 months that Dunford is doing this
and that with zero evidence of any of it.

It is remarkable that Drake Bailey, with his many [supposed] contacts at the Pentagon and American army, cannot confirm
Neil Keenans claim.

As this is confusing enough in itself, the big question remains why was this information leaked to Neils team and not shared
by Drakes sources? Is it deliberate dis-info disclosed to Group-K (Keenans team), and if so, what is the hidden agenda?
\

According to Thomas Williams there is raging a fierce inner battle between the various factions of the Illuminati behind the
scenes. He thinks that the story that Neil Keenan has brought out is the script of the Asian faction who think they can
become the new NWO (New World Order).

It has now become very clear that both Drake Bailey and his assistant Thomas Williams are woefully out of their depth.

Given all the debts that the US has with the Chinese, could it be possible that Obama is put under pressure and might have
changed sides, perhaps the side of the Asian Cabal?

Lets not forget that April 30th is an occult date with great importance to the Satanists, so why was this specific date chosen
for the alleged power transfer?

For now, the claims about the power transfer and Obamas speech raise more questions than it clears things up.

One thing is clear though, things do not quite look like business as usual due to another significant fact. Obama has signed
a premature Executive Order (Facilitation of a Presidential Transition) on May 6th to transfer his control, something that
normally would take place after the presidential elections. So who did he transfer his control to?
The exact meaning of the recent events will get clear as more information will come out. That something is brewing is one
thing that is for sure.

External links:

Did Obama Sign A Presidential Transition EO Specifically For Gen. Joseph Dunford?

Neil Keenan: Obama out

UN Climate Deal: The Joke Is On Us
May 12 2016 | From: 21stCenturyWire

On Friday April 22nd, the historical climate deal better known as Paris Agreement was
signed by 174 member states of UN, with moderate fanfare. The atmosphere around the event was,
of course, forcibly euphoric if tad awkward with new designated climate groupie, Leonardo di
Caprio, chanting the spent we must act now! mantra, and UN luminaries jumping around in
somewhat masturbatory orgy of self-congratulating.

However, all this serves to hide the fact that, from the stand point of catastrophic global warming fan club, the deal
is a failure. Namely, the main drive behind the 21st Conference of the Parties (meaning: sovereign member states
of UN participating in UNFCC) in Paris, which ended on 12.12.2015, producing a 31 page draft agreement, was to
impose a binding treaty and not merely an agreement; something that apparently did not materialize.

The proceedings of COP21 and presentation of historical climate deal came to pass in a surreal atmosphere of feigned
urgency and strange mixture of ecstatic delight which, however, was confined to a tiny circle of participants, environmentalist
activists and their mainstream media entourage.

This strange display of few chosen men and women rejoicing at imaginary solution to imaginary crisis was largely
overlooked by populous which is, at least semi-consciously, becoming resistant to climate alarmism, if for nothing else, then
because every lie has its expiration date and global warming scare is approaching 27th anniversary of its grand entry into
mass media channels.

Be that as it may, Paris agreement is a compilation of shoulds while it was obviously meant to be a legally binding
codification of shalls: while sovereign state is an endangered species in this world, it is obviously not yet extinct to such an
extent that majority of world leaders would ratify the treaty that would de jure install the apparatus of global governance on
pretext of combating ecological crisis.

The Paris Treaty is, in this authors opinion, falling short of this aim miserably as it could have been anticipated even in the
September of last year, when UN presented its latest Agenda, the so called Agenda 2030.

Namely, doctrine of sustainable development, and not empirical research of esoteric climate science, is a main purpose,
and consequently: the main drive, behind the climate scare road show.

This doctrine, under various names, is being steadily pushed as an official ideology of Euro-Atlantic Bloc from early
Seventies of the previous century, and it doesnt really require global warming to make it work upon the minds of gullible.

If theres any solid constant in protean enemy image upon which the system of sustainable development must be built,
then it would be overpopulation, the inherently genocidal idea pervading all flavors of this doctrine.

Sustainable development is, simply put, a system of world encompassing control conceived to automatically self-
differentiate and develop its functions on the basis of fear.

All it really requires is one absolute outside threat which cannot be removed but only infinitely mitigated by unified action of
mankind.

This enemy image is, of course, just an image, because such threat doesnt exist and every basis chosen by sustainability
programmers has a definite expiration date. On closer analysis, the Agenda 2030 document already indicated that global
warming scare is reaching this date.

It was not very prominent among other 17 sustainability goals and now it is slowly giving way to another cosmic Osama bin
Laden, invoked to make us survey and control ourselves through fear: global or to be more precise: European-based
terrorism.

Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) in reducing greenhouse gases, which serve as a basis of reaching
the goal of keeping the global average temperature whatever the hell that is under 2 C above pre-industrial levels and
pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 C above pre-industrial levels, recognizing that this would
significantly reduce the risks and impacts of climate change. (PA, 2.1. (a)), are far cry from what global warming dupes
would like to see implemented.
 "The fact that solar warming is heating up all the planets strongly suggests that global warming on our planet is not
being caused by human activity at all. "

Related: The Global Warming Scam, Paris Climate Agreement And NWO Global Rule

While we can detect some sporadic attempts to link climate catastrophe with demographical shifts from Middle East
towards Europe, it is all too obvious, even to the dupes, that those shifts, while obviously man-made, have nothing to do with
climate.

Moreover, while until now each and every draught, warm winter or forest fire was pointed out as an unmistakable sign of
coming end times, the warm European winter of 2015/2016. apparently flew under the radar of alarmists.

This is also one of the clear signs that climate scare is finally spent, admittedly not by efforts of critics, nor by crumbling of
pseudo-scientific edifice of advocates, but simply by quite banal passage of time.

However, here we are presented with difficulty. The publicly visible world leaders, grouped roughly around UN and Davos
summits, are acting as if everything is still business as usual. The situation is surreal: while majority of people are ridiculing
them that is, those that pay them any attention at all individuals like Christina Figuerres or Bill Gates are still chanting
their same old mantras.

This is quite worrisome. Namely, someone could infer that they are simply delusional, finalizing their detachment from
reality, and leave it at that. However, this is only half-true.

The whole truth, as it seems, is that their detachment from reality is the result not of mere mental blindness, but of power
inflicted darkening of the minds. This is unmistakable sign of complete detachment of power from the people, i.e. masses
of humanity or self-conscious groups in their midst.
The global elites are not deluded by their stupidity, but by their confident belief that they cannot be challenged. And, judging
by signs of the times, they are quite right. So, when they continue to push global warming scare despite the fact that most
people are becoming conscious of it being a sham, this could very well mean that they dont feel any need to deceive
anyone anymore.

Moreover, sustainable development is a true reason for existence of global warming scare and it is a doctrine that can
gradually discard it for the sake of some better and more convincing principle, if need be. After all, this is why the Paris
treaty exists in the first place:

This Agreement, in enhancing the implementation of the Convention, including its objective, aims to strengthen the global
response to the threat of climate change, in the context of sustainable development and efforts to eradicate
poverty () (PA, 2.2)
The main novelty of Agenda 2030 is the first of its 17. sustainable development goals: 1. End poverty in all its forms
everywhere (A2030, pg. 12), which is to be accomplished until 2030. So we are expected to believe that the main
constituent of human condition namely, material misery will be decommissioned from existence in 14 years period.

Those who believe that UN luminaries really buy into this crap are sporting minds of ten to twelve years old children;
anyone, with just a modicum of common sense, must conjecture that something else is afoot here.

However, for our purpose, it is sufficient to point out that intersection of climate change, sustainable development and final
solution of poverty is a basis for Paris Treaty.

And in this intersection, there exists hierarchy where sustainable systematization of world resources human,
environmental and economical is at the top, encompassing the other two. Both lower aims are expendable, because theyre
merely pretexts for accomplishing sustainable development world-wide.

The very fact that globalist spokespersons are seriously spinning yarns no one in his right mind can believe in, goes to show
that the power of lower strata of society and thats approximately everybody under the level of mainstream media pundits
and professional politicians eligible for employment in global institutions is at the all times low. And the members of higher
strata are, explicitly or implicitly, aware of it.

So theres no reason to gloat about idiocy of our rulers, because it is not really an idiocy but just a normal conduct stemming
from the fact that they are not paying us any attention anyway.

Admittedly, the stories are getting thinner and narratives crumble as they are being written.

But is it because we are so smart?

Or is it because we are so detached from any kind of control over our livelihoods that those that have a firm grip on it, via
control of media, politics and finance, really dont bother to deceive us anymore?
To learn more about Agenda 2030, listen to this interview with Branko Mali on the Sunday Wire radio show with
host Patrick Henningsen

Key Responds To Cook Islands Allegation By Panama Papers Leaker

May 10 2016 | From: NationalBusinessReview

Prime Minister John Key took the unusual step of arranging a 1pm Saturday press conference to
respond to allegations from the anonymous source behind the Panama Papers.

This morning, the source named only as John Doe released an 1800 word statement on the website of the
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), the group that has released various documents leaked
from Panama-based law firm and foreign trust specialist Mossack Fonseca.

Related: Mossack Fonseca's man in New Zealand denies any wrongdoing

Mr Key was the only world leader named in the statement.

"I have as much responsibility for tax in the Cook Islands as I do for Russia," said Mr Key this afternoon.
 "Prime Minister John Key of New Zealand has been curiously quiet about his countrys role in enabling the financial
fraud Mecca that is the Cook Islands," John Doe wrote (in his statement's only reference to Mr Key or New
Zealand).

But at his 1pm press conference, the PM said, "The whistleblower has got confused about my responsibilities. I
have no responsibilities fro the tax jurisdiction of the Cook Islands. New Zealand has responsibilities for foreign
policy and defence of the Cook Islands, but not for tax. I have as much responsibility for tax in the Cook Islands as
I do for tax in Russia."

Video of Key's full stand-up:

Closed Down After 1988

Asked about why the Panama Papers leaker would tie the Cook Islands to Mr Key, he said he asked tax officials about it this
morning and they replied with the theory that "He or she is likely to be European, and Europeans get terribly confused about
the Cook Islands because they use New Zealand dollars."

It's also possible, however, that the "confused" European was making a reference to the winebox controversy.

Comment: As has been previously observed, this whole 'Panama Papers' debacle is clearly being implemented to
expose and wipe out some of the lower minions within the cabal. Very interesting indeed; that Mr Key should have
the distinction of being the only western political figure to have been publicly named.

Key did make an oblique reference to thr Cook Islands scandal, saying: "Prior to 1988, there were issues with New
Zealanders avoiding their tax by having a structure in the Cook Islands," he told reporters at his 1pm stand-up. In 1988 that
all closed down and subsequently there have been no issues.

Since 1988, New Zealanders have been taxed on their worldwide income, the prime minister noted. He also added that the
Cook Islands tax controversy was before his time.

No Responsibility, but Some Care [!?]

Commentator Bernard Hickey was quick to take issue with the prime minister on social media, saying;

Has New Zealand pressured the Cook Islands to change its trust secrecy/info sharing laws? If not, why not? The
Cook Islands uses the New Zealand dollar and Cook Island citizens are New Zealand citizens."

Mr Hickey added, If New Zealand is serious about not being tarred with the tax haven brush, why not stop the
Cook Islands from being a tax haven?"

"New Zealand does actually try to support the Cook Islands in improving its tax and the way it operates its
system," Mr Key said this afternoon, though qualifying, "It has its own double tax agreement, its own tax sharing
agreement and, over the years since 1988, New Zealand's been working with the Cook Islands to make sure
they've got a better structure, and that they're operating in a way with much greater transparency."

The New Zealand government doesn't get directly involved but officials try to provide support and encourage the Cook
Islands to have best practice, Mr Key said.
Earlier today, the Prime Minister's office released a statement saying an independent review of foreign trust disclosure rules
is now under way by former PwC chairman John Shewan. Mr Shewan is due to report on June 30. Additionally, Inland
Revenue is participating in an OECD review of international tax arrangements.

Overnight, there was more Panama Papers grief for the prime minister, with the Australian Financial Review name-checking
his personal lawyer, Ken Whitney, in an extended report on how a controversial Mexican construction tycoon put $100
million into three tax-free New Zealand trusts.

More to Come

Today, Mr Key called New Zealand a "footnote" in the Panama Papers. That may be true so far but more could be revealed
when a fully searchable version of the leaked Mossack Fonseca papers is released on May 9.

Peter Bale, the New Zealander behind the ICIJ, has already said he thinks there is more to come on New Zealand in the
Panama papers.

And this morning on the Nation (where he was interviewed on the same programme as Mr Bale), Winston Peters said he
agreed and hinted he was ready to reopen his winebox.
 Well, I said some time ago that these papers would be very, very serious revelations because 11 and a half million
documents and New Zealand mentioned 60 times and us being positioned here in the South Pacific giving aid to
countries who were at the same time running tax haven utilities or using all sorts of fancy phrases for cheating and
fraud and money laundering, I think that the mention of Mr Key relates to where theyre going to go in one part of
the world on this matter," Mr Peters said.

For his part, John Doe said he (or she) was willing to cooperate with authorities "to the extent that I am able", expressing a
willingness to help authorities but also noting actions taken against recent whistleblower including Edward Snowden,
currently exiled in Russia.

Related: Is John Key Inside Trading with New Zealands Debt?

Hundreds Of Skull And Bones Secret Society Docs Set To Be Released

May 9 2016 | From: Infowars

Over 1,500 documents related to the secretive Yale fraternity Skull and Bones are set to be made
public within the next few months under a Freedom of Information Act request.
The trove of letters, memos, a draft speech and other materials are set for release in July by the National
Archives and Records Administration unless President Obama or former President George W. Bush object,
reports Politico.

Additional records include vetting materials, emails related to scheduled events, a phone message, a press
briefing on Turkey, a register of Frederick Law Olmsteds papers at the Library of Congress, requests for
comments from the press, and a request for Vice President Richard B. Cheney to attend William F. Buckleys
memorial service, the FOIA states.

Founded in 1832, the secret society has been a gateway for the elite and boasts three US presidents, with other members
taking up prominent roles in state and federal governments, the intelligence community, academia, industry and finance.

In 2004, for instance, both Democrat and Republican presidential candidates, John F. Kerry and George W. Bush, were
members of the Yale fraternity. George Ws father, George H.W. Bush, and his grandfather, Prescott Bush, were also
members.

The groups Tomb, a windowless building located at the southwest end of the campus, is reportedly decorated with skulls
and filled with rooms where members are rumored to conduct macabre rituals and initiation ceremonies, one of which may
include the reciting of past sexual experiences, according to journalist Ron Rosenbaum.
 You could ask Averell Harriman whether theres really a sarcophagus in the basement and whether he and young
Henry Stimson and young Henry Luce (Time magazine) lay down naked in the coffin and spilled the secrets of
their adolescent sex life to 14 fellow Bonesmen, Rosenbaum wrote for Esquire in 1977.

The club was also sued in February 2009 by descendants of the Apache hero Geronimo, whom alleged in a federal lawsuit
that the group was in possession of their ancestors skull which members have posed with in group photos for decades.
The skull was reportedly stolen from the warriors grave at Fort Sill by members of Skull and Bones who were stationed at
the base, with some accounts alleging Prescott Bush played a role in the theft. The lawsuit was dismissed the following
year.

Rosenbaum and a team in 2001 were able to film rituals being conducted in the inner courtyard of the Tomb, where
members acted out the tableau of a throat-cutting ritual murder, according to the journalist.

Of course, there is more to Skull and Bones than the mystical mumbo-jumbo of its rituals, Rosenbaum wrote for
the New York Observer at the time.

The rituals are less important than the relationshipsthe bonds of power and influence that develop between Skull
and Bones initiates after they graduate.

Politico reports the latest FOIA request was put forth by author and researcher Robert Gaylon Ross Sr., who has in the past
published an expos on the Whos Who of the Elite, and written books regarding the elites role in the JFK and MLK
assassinations.

Panama Papers: The Gift That Keeps On Giving & The Controversial Mexican
Construction Tycoon Put $100m Into New Zealand Trusts, Report Says
May 8 2016 | From: NationalBusinessReview / Various
Controversial Mexican construction magnate Juan Armando Hinojosa Cantu put around $US100
million into three tax-free trusts in New Zealand, according to a report by Neil Chenoweth - the only
Australasian journalist who has been granted access to documents leaked from law firm Mossack
Fonseca and known as the Panama Papers.

Correspondence published by Mr Chenoworth indicates Mr Hinojosa's $US100 million in three trusts (formed in
2015) could be just the tip of the iceberg.

Related: And the deluge of details showing NZ is a tax haven has begun wheres your messiah John Key now
National voters?
Related: How Mass Media is Spinning the Panama Papers to the Elites Advantage

Mossack Fonseca [apparently actually only one of the smaller players in tax haven schemes] has been on a marketing drive
to promote NZ trusts, he says.

He also highlights a letter from Ken Whitney (Prime Minister John Key's personal lawyer at the time) in which Mr Whitney
offered a professional endorsement for Auckland law firm Cone Marshall, which was seeking professional accreditation with
Mossak Fonseca.

Mr Chenoweth doesn't make any accusation that any laws were broken, and NBR politics editor Rob
Hosking says allegations of Mr Whitney's influence on foreign trust policy don't stack up. Nevertheless, Mr Chenoweth's
article has become a fixture in the Australian Financial Review's top five most-read list - provides another spotlight on the
foreign trust issue that the government will find unwelcome.

UnitedFuture leader Peter Dunne says ongoing Panama Papers revelations - and more are expected involving NZ once the
ICIJ's database becomes searchable on May 9 - are potentially very negative.

If the label tax haven is being bandied about now as it is, sticks, then thats extremely damaging. You think of the
way we perceive other countries that weve historically labelled as tax havens. We dont view them credibly, and I
think thats the big risk to New Zealand," he says, closely echoing concerns raised by IRD in 2013.

According to a New York Times report, Mr Hinojosa has been close to Mexican President Enrique Pena Neito since
Mr Pena Neito was a young political aide.

Mr Hinojosa struck controversy in early 2015 after he built a $US7 million house for Mr Pena Neito's wife, but only $US3
million was paid upfront (the balance was covered by a promissory note).
Juan Armando Hinojosa Cantu

Around the same time, media highlighted that Mr Hinojosa had been awarded several large government contracts that did
not go to tender. Several ran way over budget, to the benefit of his companies.

Mr Hinojosa was not charged with any wrongdoing, but companies associated with him did subsequently see several of their
government contracts cancelled, including a $US3.7 billion rail contract.

The government has drafted former PwC chairman John Shewan to review rules around foreign trust disclose. He is due to
report on June 30.

Related articles:

Panama Papers Become a Three Ring Circus

Confessions Of A Panama Papers Hitman

Bombshell: Panama Papers Expose Clintons Elite and Criminal Campaign Donors

Jonathan May, Economic Hitman

Silent Coup Beginning To Overtake America Now

May 8 2016 | From: USAwatchdog

Former Clinton insider Larry Nichols has worked with, and now against, the Clintons. Nichols has
some of the top political and financial connections on the planet.
Nichols hopes the public is finally realizing the enormous power struggle going on. Nichols explains;

There is no two-party system in the United States of America. Lets get that straight. There is no two-party system,
there is one. Part of it is a red team and part of it is a blue team.

You think you have a choice, but as you know you only have a choice between the two they give you to vote for,
but here comes Trump.

Trump doesnt need their money . . . he will bust up the system, and he will not only bust up the system for the
Republican Party, but he will bust up the system (for both parties).

So, there are many establishment Republicans that have said they would rather vote for Hillary than Trump. . . .

They must maintain status quo of the system for these power elite people to stay where they want to be.

Nichols goes on to say, We are at the beginning of a velvet or silent coup. Its been going on for years. Theres been a
slow subtle takeover of our form of government, starting years and years ago, but it is coming to an end. Thats why there is
this power play now.

Its more aggressive than you have seen before. If we dont stop Hillary, its over.
Is Trump the answer to all of our problems? I dont know. Heres what I do know about Donald Trump. Donald Trump is
not in the system. How do I know that? As hard as they are working to keep him out is a pretty good recommendation for
me.

Hes not one of them. He might be a good president. When you mention Hillary or the establishment, there is no
might. With them, we would get what we have been getting but only worse. There is not a might there.

Nichols says the good news might come in the general election in November. Nichols explains;

The American voters vote counts in the general election.

Remember that.

The play in the system has always been to trick it in the primaries and get both people that are the same but
different colors. The general election has always been set up where people do get to vote, and they will get to pick
the lessor of two evils.

This time, its different. This time, the American voters can make a difference if Trump can stay in and actually get
the nomination.

On the teetering financial system, Nichols says;

One of the five major banks has way too much of that $72 billion Puerto Rican debt. It might not sink them, but it
may cause a problem. If one of the major banks took a hit like that... The FDIC just said it does not have enough
liquidity if two major banks went into default.

If one of the major banks falls or if one major bank was getting ready to take a nose dive, people would run on all
the banks wouldnt they? If everybody tried to cash their money out of the banks at one time, they would get about
6 cents on the dollar. You think you got a $100,000 protected in the bank - you dont.
Nichols, who is currently undergoing treatments for lung cancer, also says, I believe President Obama doesnt really want
to leave. Now, how could he stay? It only takes a crisis. If a national crisis is declared . . . FEMA comes in.

Most people dont even know about the FEMA provisional plan. In case a meteor hits America and we go into a national
crisis, FEMA has already got a plan in place ready to go where they will set up a provisional government. So, if the banks
were to start collapsing, guess what Obama would do?

Hed go to Congress and get them to vote and boom, in comes the provisional FEMA government, which makes the
president . . . king.

Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with former Clinton insider Larry Nichols.

There is much, much more in the extensive video interview.

Had Enough Of Government Corruption Kiwis? Here Is A Venue For Reporting,

Exposing & Taking Action: The Citizens Government Corruption Watchdog
Commission
May 7 2016 | From: EnviroWatchRangitikei

By making these reports you are adding to a database of complaints that documents multiple
violations. This makes the case for change much stronger and if the department concerned
doesnt act then we can take it to media for publication and to pressure change.

Mainstream media will probably be either forced to print our exposes or lose their place as Mainstream Media and
those who DO share it will become the new Mainstream Media!

Those of you who think beyond the mainstream media or even those who dont youve probably noticed a few things
are not ticking the boxes lately regarding democratic processes.
Local Government

One example would be the way District Councils appear to have minds of their own and increasingly they are failing to
consult those who elect them regarding decisions that will be affecting them. Recently the Whaleoil blog featured the
growing problem of local government breaking the law and points out that they get away with it because nobody is policing
it. Check out the blog as there are many examples cited of things folks are encountering with their DCs.

Here is a recent example in Shannon where locals were consulted by their representing Councillor Ross Campbell on
whether they wanted yet another liquor outlet licensed overwhelmingly more were against than for (309 to 3) yet the
DC has gone right ahead and issued the liquor license anyway.

So who is this council batting for? Their constituents, or the liquor industry? No prizes for guessing. Shannon has also had
recent issues with discharge by Council of raw sewage into the local waterways, an ongoing issue with many DCs NZ
wide. Cr Campbell was trespassed for two years by HDC for filming the discharge of raw sewage into the towns waterways.
Shutting down dissent!

The street poll by Cr Ross Campbell in the Horowhenua district the poll overwhelmingly against the issuing of yet another liquor license in
Shannon, and the DC has gone and issued the one anyway

The Rangitikei DC was also exposed last year with regard to their long standing non compliance in relation to pollution of its
waterways with leachate. They too shut down dissent by failing to accept the recommendation of their own Community
Committee!
For further examples of local government corruption see our Local Govt Watch pages.

Health and Related Services

Then we have many services (formerly government, now corporate departments) that blatantly ignore the rules and run
rough shod over people. I heard of one for instance just recently. An older woman who was admitted to A & E at a public
hospital, left in a cold corridor, no warm blanket, no buzzer, calling for the toilet, left for hours in her own feces then loudly
told off! The patient was too sick to respond.
With recent events in our corporatized government departments we need a watch on our health care providers and their
protocols, particularly with the elderly and the dying

Also, on the hospital subject, I heard recently of a dying patient on nil by mouth, without the familys knowledge. On this
horrific subject please google Liverpool Care Pathway the thin end of the wedge in my opinion, to euthanasia. Now theres
huge debate as we know about that, however, since when do we administer nil by mouth without explaining the rationale to
the distressed relatives, whose loved one is crying out for water? And since when has this become the norm? Dying of
thirst? I dont recall any public discussion around this.

Weather Modification Practices

The other glaring elephant in the room on the topic of flagrancy is the practice of geoengineering ie spraying us all daily
with toxic chemicals then telling us it is only steam or condensation.

Or worse, nothing doing here please move along you conspiracy theorists'.

There will be many more issues and other departments that spring to mind that need policing.

Reporting and Taking Action

When these various events happen were often left standing, mouth open, grasping for who to tell, or, were so deep in grief
were unable to act. And from my experience, often nobody knows just who to tell anyway. Many have tried for instance in
the geoengineering domain to approach the various authorities charged with protecting us from unhealthy toxic
environments only to be told theres nothing doing.

Denial, yet all the while scientific testing is revealing high levels of toxic chemicals in water and soils. These authorities need
to be held to account.

So here is a venue for you to report these various incidents. Its easy to do, simply go to the site (links below) and fill in the
appropriate form online (more forms to come).
The reports will be collated to reveal the extent of the respective complaints, all documented in reports and kept for evidence
when confronting the department concerned, and/or for timely publishing on this and other websites, and on social
media. Since our so called mainstream media is displaying a growing reluctance to fully air the truth, we can become a
force to be reckoned with. This is people power!

By making these reports you are adding to a database of complaints that documents multiple violations. This
makes the case for change much stronger and if the department concerned doesnt act then we can take it to
media for publication and to pressure change.

Mainstream media will probably be either forced to print our exposes or lose their place as Mainstream Media and
those who DO share it will become the new Mainstream Media!

Here are links to both the site and the new Facebook page (head there and like the page, and get reporting. You can also
report historic incidents).

What Democracy Really Means, According To One Of Its Most Outspoken Champions
May 5 2016 | From: HuffingtonPost

Its not just about the will of the majority, said Yanis Varoufakis.
When Greeces European creditors cut off emergency assistance to the beleaguered countrys banks last summer,
bringing its financial system to the brink of collapse, it was only a matter of weeks before the Greek government
capitulated to their demands.

Related: Time Is Running Out (Again) for Greece

When Greeces European creditors cut off emergency assistance to the beleaguered countrys banks last summer, bringing
its financial system to the brink of collapse, it was only a matter of weeks before the Greek government capitulated to their
demands. A band of radical socialist politicians elected to upend the status quo agreed to the most onerous austerity
package the country had yet experienced, in exchange for emergency loans it needed to repay mountainous debts to those
same official lenders.

Greeces sympathizers around the world called the result a coup dtat - the result of extortion akin to the gunboat
diplomacy of the imperial era.

Yanis Varoufakis, a progressive economist, who as finance minister had been the most visible face of Greeces new
government and remains one of the countrys highest-profile political figures, resigned his cabinet post under pressure
shortly before the deal was signed.

After leaving public office, he founded the Democracy in Europe Movement 2025. The goal of the pan-European initiative is
to democratize the European Union institutions that enabled the financial blackmail against Greece last summer. Absent
such change, DiEm25 argues, the united, peaceful and prosperous post-Cold War Europe will disintegrate in no more than
a decades time.

But what exactly is undemocratic about the duly elected governments of the other 18 nations in the euro currency area
imposing their will on the duly elected government of Greece? After all, in a democracy, the majority rules.

Varoufakis was in Washington on Wednesday to plug his new book about the European debt crisis, And The Weak Suffer
What They Must? Europes Crisis And Americas Economic Future, so I asked him just that.

Let me remind you that democracy is not the same thing as majoritarianism, Varoufakis responded.

If the majority decides to have the minority tortured, this is a tyranny of the majority and it has absolutely nothing
to do with democracy. Democracy needs to combine majority with due process and with rights.

Ex-Greek finance minister Yanis Varoufakis appears at an encampment of protesters in Paris opposed to neoliberal labor reforms. He believes the
EU is undemocratic in its current form.

In Greeces case, the analogy to torture is presumably leveraging Greeces reliance on the European Central Bank to keep
its troubled banks afloat to force it to accept painful economic measures rejected by its voters.

To illustrate his point, Varoufakis recounted a story from his first days as finance minister in January 2015. He met with
Dutch finance minister Jeroen Dijsselbloem, the president of the Eurogroup, the powerful council of the individual eurozone
nations finance ministers.

Dijsselbloem, according to Varoufakis, asked Varoufakis what his governments intentions were for fiscal policy.

Varoufakis claims he gave a very nuanced answer.

I said, Well, we were elected to challenge that and to change that fiscal policy, Varoufakis recalled.

In Varoufakis mind, even this was a major compromise, since the previous six years of top-down European austerity
policies imposed on Greece and other struggling countries on the European periphery had been a macroeconomic failure
greater than that in the history of humankind.

Nevertheless, lets sit down and re-think this and find common ground, Varoufakis remembered telling him. I thought this
was a very moderate thing to say. And its the minimum that respect for Greek democracy required.

There is much to support Varoufakis economic critique of the eurozones actions up to that point. The drastic fiscal austerity
Germany and other wealthy European nations had demanded from Greece since 2010 in exchange for emergency loans
had succeeded in shoring up the German and French banks with Greek debts on their books, but had plunged Greece into a
deep depression and state of political crisis. Nearly one in four Greeks is unemployed and its economy has shrunk
by roughly one-third since 2008.

Now the only way of describing this is as a coup dtat, as the dissolution of every democratic principle that has
ever been withheld in Western civilization."
Worse still, the money is not even enough to allow it to pay off its creditors. The Mediterranean nation has had to return to
the bargaining table on multiple occasions to ask for more cash, only to repeat the same never-ending cycle of re-payment,
economic contraction, crisis and begging.

But Djisselbloem, Varoufakis said, was not having it. He reminded Varoufakis right away who held the poker chips, in a
preview of the drama that would occur in late June and early July.

If you insist on re-negotiating the fiscal policy of the previous government, your banks will be closed by the end of
the month, Djisselbloem said, according to Varoufakis.

Now the only way of describing this is as a coup dtat, as the dissolution of every democratic principle that has
ever been withheld in Western civilization, Varoufakis said.

Greek voters re-elected Syriza, Varoufakis former political party, in September. Only this time, prime minister Alexis Tsipras
campaigned on the promise of distributing the burden of austerity as equitably as possible, rather than reversing the
approach entirely.

And there have been signs in recent months that the Greek government still has some fight left in it. It publicly tussled with
the IMF in January over the need to cut pensions to reach its budget targets, rather than raising taxes to do so.

It also took the Fund to task in early April for a leaked conversation in which IMF officials implied that only a crisis-inducing
credit event would prod Greece to do what is necessary.

Meanwhile, news outlets reported on Tuesday that talks between Greece and its international creditors had once again
reached a standstill over reforms required to unlock a tranche of loans the country needs to make upcoming debt payments.
Greeces compliance with this round of demands is the price of opening up discussion of debt restructuring, according to the
lenders.

Varoufakis, however, dismissed the idea that Greece has any say in the matter.

The Greek government surrendered last July. This is why I resigned, he said. The Greek government will do anything that
creditors ask it to do. They are just waiting for the creditors to decide what they want to impose upon Greece.
Instead, the delays are due to a disagreement between Germany and the IMF, according to the former finance chief.

There is no way they can agree, because the IMF understands that without a sensible debt restructure and a
diminution in the primary surplus target, Greece is finished, Varoufakis said.

In fact, while Greeces ongoing influence is a matter of debate, the dispute between the IMF and Germany is no secret. The
IMF - along with its largest shareholder, the United States - insists that Germany grant Greece debt relief and lower the
budget targets it must meet, in order for Greece to regain its financial independence. Germany remains resistant to the idea.

The Greek prime ministers office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Varoufakis characterization.

Varoufakis argued that German officials had made debt relief politically impossible for themselves by falsely selling the
original loans to Greece as a bailout for the Greek people, rather than as a bailout of the German and French banks, which
stood to collapse if Greece could not pay up. Now the German parliament, with the backing of a bitter, tax-paying public, has
no interest in cutting Greece any additional slack.

There is no way they can agree, because the IMF understands that without a sensible debt restructure and a
diminution in the primary surplus target, Greece is finished, Varoufakis said.

The creditors are now in a trap of their own making, he concluded. And Greece is fading into oblivion and into its awful,
debt-deflationary crisis, while waiting for Washington, D.C., and Berlin to decide what to do.

Related: Greece 'could leave eurozone' on Brexit vote

Boycott Tourism In NZ: More Fluorides?

May 4 2016 | From: JonRappoport

Recently, Ive written several articles about toxic fluorides (archive: here). The case is clear:
cancer, lower IQ, other varieties of severe damage.
I became aware of a group in New Zealand, Fluoride Free NZ. Theyve had remarkable success working with local
communities to ban fluorides in water supplies.

Related: Stop Giving Fluoride Toothpaste to Children

But now, in response, the New Zealand government has decided to make fluoridation a federal issue and take choice out of
the hands of locals. Predictable. Tyrannical. The usual.

Well fluoridate everybody, and theres nothing you can do about it. We rule, you obey.

So I suggested people should write to the tourism authority in New Zealand. You know - Hi, guess what? My money isnt
coming to your country. More fluorides? Im not traveling to your paradise.

This is the best contact address Ive been able to come up with so far:

Associate Minister of Tourism

Paula Bennett

paula.bennett@ministers.govt.nz

Jump in. Go for it. Send a message. A reader emailed me the letter he just wrote:

Dear Tourism New Zealand executive staff,

 My name is Michael Blanshan. I am a naturopathic doctor in New Mexico, U.S.A. Years ago a group of friends and
I were discussing New Zealand and all it has to offer as a country. Many of our group travelled to New Zealand and
two families moved there, one to Nelso and one to Christchurch. These were good families with children and much
to offer their local communities, not retirees looking for a country in which to retire.

In my own travels I often run into New Zealanders (aka kiwis). They are generally great travelers, good people,
kind, open-minded, intelligent, and generally fun. The very spirit of New Zealand which most kiwis embody seems
to me to serve as New Zealands best advertising.

Being a naturopath, I am keenly aware of the history of the fluoridation of drinking water, those who promoted this
policy, their motivations for doing so, and the forms of pressure they use to continue the policy despite compelling
scientific opposition. A local organization in New Zealand calling itself Fluoride Free NZ has worked tirelessly with
communities to educate them on this issue.

They worked diligently and the majority of those communities have chosen not to fluoridate their local water
supplies. In response to this groups effectiveness, the NZ federal government is now acting to take the decision
making authority away from local councils and communities and put the power into the hands of District Health
Boards (DHB), who are under the direct control of Central Government.

This action has profound implications, though it may seem inconsequential to you, especially considering that you
are a department for tourism. Though I stated that the people of New Zealand are its best feature, this is a black
mark on New Zealand as a country. It points to a corruption of your federal government and its purported goals of
serving its people. To the contrary, the government is showing that it has a will of its own and that it acts in the
interests of other parties.

The policy of fluoridation originated in the U.S.A. in the 1940s. Many European countries have rejected this policy,
knowing it was not about health but rather that it was the result of corrupt influences. For the New Zealand
government to force this policy shows that theyre not interested in science or the natural rights of the people and
worse, that the New Zealand government is caving to pressure from either American or UK interests.

Please understand that the irony of an American writing about corruption in government does not escape me.
Educated Americans know all too well the workings and techniques of a dictatorship which presents itself as a
democracy. It is as a result of the extreme corruption of the leadership of Western countries that we look to New
Zealand and still see it to be a land of free individuals who can run their local communities as they like.

If the New Zealand federal government goes ahead with this decision, I personally will not visit New Zealand in the
future. If any of my friends or clients discuss the possibility of travelling to New Zealand, I will do my best to
dissuade them.

Potential visitors to New Zealand should know that all is not well in paradise and that behind the scenes you have
the same dictatorship we see in the [rest of the] West. Despite all its physical beauty I still contend that the best
part about New Zealand is its people.

If the people of New Zealand are forced to stand in the shadow cast by a dictatorial federal government, something
vital and essential will have been lost.

Sincerely,

Michael Blanshan

Thank you,

Michael.

Thank you, Fluoride Free NZ, for showing the way.

I keep hearing this thing called the Internet is a wonderful apparatus with many uses. Well, heres one.

Boom.

Jon Rappoport

Comment: What does it take to wake these intentionally distracted master chef cooking-show home renovation
watching reality -television watching idiots up already? Time is up!

Related: U.K. Town Moves Forward with Fluoridated Milk for Children

Switzerland Follows Iceland In Declaring War Against The Banksters

May 3 2016 | From: AustralianNationalReview

"If you want to continue to be slaves of the banks and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let
the bankers continute to create money and control credit." - Josiah Stamp
Iceland has gained the admiration of populists in recent years by doing that which no other nation in the world
seems to be willing or capable of doing: prosecuting criminal bankers for engineering financial collapse for profit.

Their effective revolt against the banking class, who drove the tiny nation into economic crisis in 2008, is the
brightest example yet that the world does not have to be indebted in perpetuity to an austere and criminal wealthy elite. In
2015, 26 Icelandic bankers were sentenced to prison and the government ordered a bank sale to benefit the citizenry.

Inspired by Icelands progress, activists in Switzerland are now making an important stand against the banking cartels and
have successfully petitioned to bring an initiative to public referendum that would attack the private banks where it matters
most: their power to lend money they dont actually have, and to create money out of thin air.

Switzerland will hold a referendum to decide whether to ban commercial banks from creating money.

The Swiss federal government confirmed on Thursday that it would hold a plebiscite, after more than 110,000
people signed a petition calling for the central bank to be given sole power to create money in the financial system.

The campaign led by the Swiss Sovereign Money movement and known as the Vollgeld initiative is designed to
limit financial speculation by requiring private banks to hold 100pc reserves against their deposits. [The
Telegraph]

Switzerland is in a key position to play a revolutionary role in changing how global banking functions. In addition to being the
worlds safest harbor for storing wealth, it is also home to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), a shadowy private
company owned by many of the worlds central banks, and acting as a lender to the central banks.

The BIS is the very heart of global reserve banking, the policy that enables banks to lend money that does not actually exist
in their bank deposits, but is instead literally created electronically from nothing whenever a bank extends a line of credit.

Reserve banking is the policy that guarantees insurmountable debt as the outcome of all financial transactions.

The Sovereign Money initiative in Switzerland aims to curb financial speculation, which is the intended and inevitable result
of reserve banking, the tool that makes financial adventurism possible by supplying the banks with endless quantities of fiat
money.
Limiting a banks ability to produce money from nothing would be a direct blow to the roots of the banking cartel, and would
cripple their ability to manipulate the world economy. Heres how it works, in rather simplified terms:

if we had access to the same computer terminals the banks have, we could magic in or out of existence all the
imaginary stuff we are trained to think of as important money in whatever quantities we liked.

This is how it works: when they print quite a lot of this stuff there is a boom. When they print too much of it, there is
inflation (actually, the printing of money is inflation). When they stop printing it or simply hold on to it, there is a
depression. [Source]

In Switzerland, 90% of all money in circulation is electronic, and for this, The National Bank of Switzerland has become the
direct target of the Sovereign Money Campaign. Swiss law has in the past required required banks to back all currency
creation with collateral assets like physical silver or gold, however in recent decades the climate has changed, and, due to
the emergence of electronic payment transactions, banks have regained the opportunity to create their own
money.

The grass roots campaign said in a public statement regarding the intentions of the referendum, banks wont be able to
create money for themselves any more, theyll only be able to lend money that they have from savers or other banks.

Related: Former Presidents Warn About the Invisible Government Running the United States

This is an interesting twist in the human saga of man vs. banks, and while it remains to be seen if the referendum passes or
not, it must be pointed out that it does have its own problems, articulated by Sam Gerrans:

if we had access to the same computer terminals the banks have, we could magic in or out of existence all the
imaginary stuff we are trained to think of as important money in whatever quantities we liked.
 This is how it works: when they print quite a lot of this stuff there is a boom. When they print too much of it, there is
inflation (actually, the printing of money is inflation). When they stop printing it or simply hold on to it, there is a
depression. [Source]

Part of the cultural conditioning of our time is an ingrained, pre-assumed dependency on sacred cow institutions like
banking. Just like it is impossible for most Americans to envision a world without Democrats and Republicans, it is difficult
for most people to imagine a world without predatory global banking.

Yet, there are a number of other possibilities for trading, storing wealth, and facilitating development in the world. This is not
the only economic system we can imagine, and as Iceland has proven, people can regain control of their collective wealth,
so perhaps this revolution will foment further in Switzerland, presenting a chance to at least bring greater awareness to the
truth about central banking.

John Key: Land Tax Plan Could Happen By 2017

May 1 2016 | From: TheContrail

You may have heard the banker-controlled media report over the past few days that PM John Key
is considering introducing a new land tax on foreign property speculators similar to Victoria in
Australia to supposedly help suppress the house and property price rises bubble.

Well, unlike everyone else, it seems, I thought I would take the time this evening to research what it involves in
Victoria by the COMMUNIST/FASCIST Victorian State Government.

Much to my surprise (really not a surprise), it is very nasty indeed, and is in the early stages of confiscating everyones
properties with an exemption for you own home and a few others. Here are the current rates in Victoria:

See: Victoria Land Tax Current Rates

The threshold for individuals is $250,000, but for Trusts is just $25,000. There is a massive attack against trusts! At
present primary land is exempt if not in a trust - but of course, the present list of exemptions and relatively low Land Tax
rates are only the beginning, and I predict will lead to full property confiscation.
I will predict in a relatively short space of time the rates in Victoria will go up ten-fold! Its based on the old banking pirate
strategy for introducing tolls on new privatized highways. First you open the new road with a low $2 toll to get all the masses
used to it.

Then when youve got all the sheep regularly using it, you increase the toll to $12 then $20 and in no time all of a sudden
you realize the sheep have all been fleeced of their last dimes!

A few years ago, the NZ Treasury (run by devious foreign banking pirates here) proposed a similar tax called a Residential
Property Equity Tax that would apply to all property including all homes and farmland WITH NO EXEMPTIONS FOR
THE FAMILY HOME (unlike Australia at present) but fortunately, it was firmly rejected then by the then government.

Now theyre coming back again, cunningly trying to introduce it as Land Tax (but at first only for greedy foreign speculators
who are being blamed for pushing house prices up) when in reality, it is easy credit, low interest rates and excessive
immigration that is the real cause of rapidly pushing house prices up being pushed by the banking pirates themselves.

Of course, the banker-controlled media will never blame the banking pirate crooks who in effect are mortgaging the whole
country lock, stock and barrel to themselves. While this is not only unique to Australia and New Zealand May I ask the
profound question?

Are we all so downright apathetic and mentally retarded to just sit back and put up with all this tyranny without even ushering
a single word? What a Socialist madhouse? All totally designed to destroy the wealth of those who work hard!

Related: John Key: Land tax plan could happen by 2017

New Zealand Government Plans To Drown Its Citizens In Toxic Fluorides

April 30 2016 | From: JonRappoport / Infowars

Why should a government be permitted to dump poison into the water and call it medical
treatment?
Oh, I love New Zealand. Its one of the most beautiful places on Earth. Itswhat? What did you say?No, thats
impossible. That couldnt be happening. Theyre doing what??

Related: Fluoride Now Linked to Neurotoxicity Pandemic and Development of the A-Bomb

The strategy of the New Zealand government is simple.

A series of local movements is successful. So kill them off by claiming decision-making must occur at a higher level. Take
power out of the hands of locals.

The people cant represent themselves. Thats dangerous. No, big government will represent the people - by squashing
what the people want.

The issue is fluorides. I recently wrote two articles demonstrating the extreme toxicity of this substance, which of course is
dumped in water supplies as a medical treatment. (fluoride archive here).

In New Zealand, a group called Fluoride Free NZ has been highly successful working with town councils to ban fluorides
from local communities.

Related: No fluoride for Whakatane District water supplies

But these successes are a threat, because they contradict the lies medical authorities spew about how safe fluorides are,
and because grass-roots victories erode blind faith in centralized government.
Here are quotes from Kane Titchener, who represents the group, Fluoride Free NZ, in New Zealand. His remarks lay out
whats happening behind the scenes in that natural paradise:

the fluoridation issue has been brought to a head. The NZ Government is proposing that the [bigger] District
Health Boards take over the decision making [about] fluoridation [in water supplies] as opposed to the local
councils. This is because we have been very good at winning at the local council level.

Fluoride Free NZ was formed in 2003. Since that time we have had many substantial victories in local Councils
throughout New Zealand. Local Councils that have stopped [fluoridating water supplies] as a result of Fluoride
Free NZs lobbying efforts: New Plymouth; Taumarunui; Waipukurau; Far North

Related: Fluoride Officially Classified as a Neurotoxin in Worlds Most Prestigious Medical Journal

In summary, the Government is planning to implement mandatory fluoridation to the whole of New Zealand.
Currently, only around 50% of households are on fluoridated water, with only 23 out of 67 local councils still
fluoridating, while voicing their growing concerns about fluoridation risks and dangers.

In response to more and more councillors and mayors deciding against fluoridation, the Government is now taking
the decision away from local councils and communities and putting the power into the hands of District Health
Boards (DHB), who are under the direct control of Central Government.

If you think Fluoride Free NZs successes working with town councils is a walk in the park, think again. This group has
scored victories against long odds. This group is smart, dedicated, and effective.

They represent what can happen when strong, clear-sighted, creative individuals band together to accomplish a righteous
goal.

And the tyrannical response of big government is predictable.

However, there is going to be blowback against that government in New Zealand.

The degree and power of the blowback is going to depend, in part, on the response of people around the world who become
aware of the situation and make their voices heard.

Contact Fluoride Free NZ. Help them. Spread their press releases all over the world.
Why should a government be permitted to dump poison into the water and call it medical treatment?

And having called it medical treatment, by what power can a government mandate it for all citizens without informed
consent, without the explicit permission of those millions of patients? Yes, patients, because thats what they are. Theyre
being treated every day.

By what power can this happen? Dictatorship calling itself democracy.

A note to tourists: how do you feel about traveling to New Zealand and bathing in, and drinking, poison? Do you like that
bonus for spending your good money in paradise?

If not, you might want to contact the New Zealand tourism authority (newzealand.com) and let them know about your
change of plans.
Such organizations are always interested in money, where its coming fromand where it wont be coming from.

Related: US government actually admits: Americans have been overdosed with fluoride

Censored, Surveilled, Watch Listed And Jailed: The Absurdity Of Being A Citizen In A
Police State
April 29 2016 | From: InformationClearingHouse

In the police state, the price to be paid for speaking truth to power (also increasingly viewed as an
act of treason) is surveillance, censorship, jail and ultimately death.
However, where many go wrong is in assuming that you have to be doing something illegal or challenging the
governments authority in order to be flagged as a suspicious character, labeled an enemy of the state and locked
up like a dangerous criminal.

MIn fact, as I point out in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, all you really need to do is use
certain trigger words, surf the internet, communicate using a cell phone, drive a car, stay at a hotel, purchase materials at a
hardware store, take flying or boating lessons, appear suspicious, question government authority, or generally live in the
United States.

With the help of automated eyes and ears, a growing arsenal of high-tech software, hardware and techniques, government
propaganda urging Americans to turn into spies and snitches, as well as social media and behavior sensing software,
government agents are spinning a sticky spider-web of threat assessments, flagged words, and suspicious activity
reports aimed at snaring potential enemies of the state.
Its the American police states take on the dystopian terrors foreshadowed by George Orwell, Aldous Huxley and Phillip K.
Dick all rolled up into one oppressive pre-crime and pre-thought crime package.
Whats more, the technocrats who run the surveillance state dont even have to break a sweat while monitoring what you
say, what you read, what you write, where you go, how much you spend, whom you support, and with whom you
communicate.

Computers now do the tedious work of trolling social media, the internet, text messages and phone calls for potentially anti-
government remarks - all of which is carefully recorded, documented, and stored to be used against you someday at a time
and place of the governments choosing.

While this may sound like a riff on a bad joke, its a bad joke with we the people as the punchline.

The following activities are guaranteed to get you censored, surveilled, eventually placed on a government watch list,
possibly detained and potentially killed.

Laugh at your own peril.

Use harmless trigger words like cloud, pork and pirates:

The Department of Homeland Security has an expansive list of keywords and phrases it uses to monitor social networking
sites and online media for signs of terrorist or other threats such as SWAT, lockdown, police, cloud, food poisoning, pork,
flu, Subway, smart, delays, cancelled, la familia, pirates, hurricane, forest fire, storm, flood, help, ice, snow, worm, warning
or social media.

Use a cell phone:

Simply by using a cell phone, you make yourself an easy target for government agents - working closely with corporations -
who can listen in on your phone calls, read your text messages and emails, and track your movements based on the data
transferred from, received by, and stored in your cell phone.

Mention any of the so-called trigger words in a conversation or text message, and youll get flagged for sure.

Drive a car:

Unless youve got an old junkyard heap without any of the gadgets and gizmos that are so attractive to todays car buyers
(GPS, satellite radio, electrical everything, smart systems, etc.), driving a car today is like wearing a homing device: youll be
tracked from the moment you open that car door thanks to black box recorders and vehicle-to-vehicle communications
systems that can monitor your speed, direction, location, the number of miles traveled, and even your seatbelt use.
Once you add satellites, GPS devices, license plate readers, and real-time traffic cameras to the mix, theres nowhere you
can go on our nations highways and byways that you cant be followed.

Attend a political rally:

Enacted in the wake of 9/11, the Patriot Act redefined terrorism so broadly that many non-terrorist political activities such as
protest marches, demonstrations and civil disobedience were considered potential terrorist acts, thereby rendering anyone
desiring to engage in protected First Amendment expressive activities as suspects of the surveillance state.

Express yourself on social media:

The FBI, CIA, NSA and other government agencies are investing in and relying on corporate surveillance technologies that
can mine constitutionally protected speech on social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter and Instagram in order to
identify potential extremists and predict who might engage in future acts of anti-government behavior.
Serve in the military:

Operation Vigilant Eagle, the brainchild of the Dept. of Homeland Security, calls for surveillance of military veterans
returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, characterizing them as extremists and potential domestic terrorist threats because they
may be disgruntled, disillusioned or suffering from the psychological effects of war.

Disagree with a law enforcement official:

A growing number of government programs are aimed at identifying, monitoring and locking up anyone considered
potentially dangerous or mentally ill (according to government standards, of course). For instance, a homeless man in New
York City who reportedly had a history of violence but no signs of mental illness was forcibly detained in a psych ward for a
week after arguing with shelter police.

Call in sick to work:

In Virginia, a so-called police welfare check instigated by a 58-year-old mans employer after he called in sick resulted in a
two-hour, SWAT team-style raid on the mans truck and a 72-hour mental health hold.
All of this was done despite the fact that police acknowledged they had no legal basis nor probable cause for detaining the
man, given that he had not threatened to harm anyone and was not mentally ill.

Limp or stutter:

As a result of a nationwide push to certify a broad spectrum of government officials in mental health first-aid training (a 12-
hour course comprised of PowerPoint presentations, videos, discussions, role playing and other interactive activities), more
Americans are going to run the risk of being reported for having mental health issues by non-medical personnel.

For instance, one 37-year-old disabled man was arrested, diagnosed by police and an unlicensed mental health screener as
having mental health issues, apparently because of his slurred speech and unsteady gait.

Appear confused or nervous, fidget, whistle or smell bad:

According to the Transportation Security Administrations 92-point secret behavior watch list for spotting terrorists, these are
among some of the telling signs of suspicious behavior: fidgeting, whistling, bad body odor, yawning, clearing your throat,
having a pale face from recently shaving your beard, covering your mouth with your hand when speaking and blinking your
eyes fast.

Allow yourself to be seen in public waving a toy gun or anything remotely resembling a gun, such as a water nozzle
or a remote control or a walking cane, for instance:

No longer is it unusual to hear about incidents in which police shoot unarmed individuals first and ask questions later.

John Crawford was shot by police in an Ohio Wal-Mart for holding an air rifle sold in the store that he may have intended to
buy. Thirteen-year-old Andy Lopez Cruz was shot 7 times in 10 seconds by a California police officer who mistook the boys
toy gun for an assault rifle.
Christopher Roupe, 17, was shot and killed after opening the door to a police officer. The officer, mistaking the Wii remote
control in Roupes hand for a gun, shot him in the chest. Another police officer repeatedly shot 70-year-old Bobby
Canipe during a traffic stop. The cop saw the man reaching for his cane and, believing the cane to be a rifle, opened fire.

Appear to be pro-gun, pro-freedom or anti-government:

You might be a domestic terrorist in the eyes of the FBI (and its network of snitches) if you: express libertarian philosophies;
exhibit Second Amendment-oriented views; read survivalist literature, including apocalyptic fictional books; show signs of
self-sufficiency (stockpiling food, ammo, hand tools, medical supplies); fear an economic collapse; buy gold and barter
items; voice fears about Big Brother or big government; or expound about constitutional rights and civil liberties.

Attend a public school:

Microcosms of the police state, public schools contain almost every aspect of the militarized, intolerant, senseless,
overcriminalized, legalistic, surveillance-riddled, totalitarian landscape that plagues those of us on the outside.
Additionally, as part of the governments so-called ongoing war on terror, the FBI - the nations de facto secret police force -
is now recruiting students and teachers to spy on each other and report anyone who appears to have the potential to be
anti-government or extremist as part of its Dont Be a Puppet campaign.

Speak truth to power:

Long before Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden were being castigated for blowing the whistle on the governments war
crimes and the National Security Agencys abuse of its surveillance powers, it was activists such as Martin Luther King Jr.
and John Lennon who were being singled out for daring to speak truth to power.
These men and others like them had their phone calls monitored and data files collected on their activities and associations.
For a little while, at least, they became enemy number one in the eyes of the US government.

Theres always a price to pay for standing up to the powers-that-be.

Yet as this list shows, you dont even have to be a dissident to get flagged by the government for surveillance, censorship
and detention.

All you really need to be is a citizen of the police state.

Open Source Government: True Government Of The People, By The People And For
The People
April 28 2016 | From: Geopolitics

Government models have not evolved that much since the days of Platos Socratic Republic.
Instead, they have all deteriorated, corrupted, and have failed on many occasions to address and mitigate the most
fundamental failing of man, i.e. greed for absolute power.

Members of Secret Societies claimed they have been raised and trained to properly handle power and authority, and yet we
know how many times this hasnt been the case.

Power is toxic and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

The only way power be prevented from being misused is when it is distributed to as many as possible. By then, power will
cease to be more than just a routine exercise of collective free will.
Until today, the concept of collective free will has been nothing more than illusory at best. We call it democracy, the rule of
the mob, or the tyranny of the majority. And rightly so, because we let sheer numbers decide who and whats best for us,
instead of high quality ideas taken and decided directly from each member of our society.

In order to create the illusion of direct participation, the elite minority devised a periodic ritual where we can all choose
directly from preselected individuals out of a pool of nominees, i.e. club members, as our potential leaders, neither of whom
is committed to serve the peoples interests, but the club.

Preselection is enforced by making each outsider poor enough to barely afford financing a political campaign. The reign of
inbred mentally retarded families is thus maintained by default.
The fragile House of Cards is surprisingly, yet effectively sustained just by the mere satisfaction of earthly desires of the few
below the pyramid. The entire system is self-sustaining in its corruption of the entire fabric of our miserable existence.

This stupidity cannot go on.

The Solution

We cannot solve any problem by using the same mindset that created it in the first place. That is a Universal Truth.

Hundreds of years ago, this concept would have been impossible, but true democracy is being exercised daily in the
realm of Open Software Development for decades now, and the cost is only as high as your monthly ISP bill, something
that you are already doing now, as you read this article.

Therefore, it is a huge mistake to abandon this idea as merely Utopian. Labeling, or branding, has gotten us nowhere. Its
time to confront the systemic problem head on.

Open Source Government ensures that only the best solution survives while keeping the cost close to nil as everybody
would be willing to volunteer their services as is already done in Open Source Communities.

Goodbye, Mr. Congressman. And that is only the beginning.

The Next OSG Evolution

It is only natural that the next evolution of Open Source Government is the establishment of a direct link between people
formulated and approved policies and controls, which serves as the programming instructions into the machines that will do
the actual dirty repetitive work of sustaining life on the planet.

By that time, real-time formulated policies will be translated as the macro firmware instructions that sits at the lowest level by
which they can override all embedded intelligence, to maintain the superiority of man over machines.

Goodbye, Mr. President.

While possible, it is highly improbable that the majority will give machine instructions to kill themselves. Sustainability and
security are therefore inherently built into the system.

Goodbye, FBI and NSA.

Recognizing the fact that money is just a form of control to our access to basic resources, and not a true manifestation of
tangible wealth, there will be a time along the way when the majority decide that this Babylonian paper magik, too, could go
away. And thats when slavery is finally defeated.
Goodbye, Goldman Sachs, Federal Reserve, IMF-WB and Rothschild dynasty.

Understandably, government as we know it will lose its meaning and will cease to exist. Goodbye, representative United
Nations!

Again, the template for Open Source Government is existing and is being used continuously by Google and Mozilla, to name
just a few. We just have to migrate it into governance.

Automation and robotics technology is already being applied to replace humans in the realm of manufacturing. Why not link
it with OSG to have a completely responsive government that responds in real-time?

Comment: Okay, so that comment above might sound a bit transhumanist. But the gist of this article is to inspire
thinking. We collectively need to figure a way out of this paradigm and to determine what we move on to from here.
Sitting around going "well this is shit" is not going to help us move forward in an upward, positively driven fashion.

Open Collaboration is the only feasible system that is already proven to sustainably work. It is the only government model
where the highest quality of public services are guaranteed, transparency and peaceful interaction are built-in, all at the
lowest cost possible.

What are we waiting for?

Silencing Free Speech

April 26 2016 | From: NZCPR

In this politically correct world, our right to free speech is increasingly being eroded by the
apparent rights of others who disagree with our views.

State broadcaster Television New Zealand came under attack last month, when they were accused of including
a racist question in their new KiwiMeter survey.

KiwiMeter, a 10-minute on-line questionnaire, which examines what being a New Zealander means to different people,
places participants in one of six groups according to their views patriot, globalist, egalitarian, loyalist, traditionalist, or
sceptic.
TVNZs Head of News and Current Affairs, John Gillespie, explained that KiwiMeter is a scientific study designed to provide
a data-driven picture of New Zealands national identity in order to help the broadcaster stay connected to the issues their
audience most cares about. It was put together by the same team that developed their Vote Compass election survey, and
was preceded by a local pilot study of 11,000 of those 300,000 participants.

Over 220,000 New Zealanders have completed KiwiMeter, and with the flag question accurately predicting the results of the
final referendum, the data will indeed give TVNZ a real understanding of the views of our population.

But it didnt take long for the critics to emerge. Within days of the survey being launched, the Labour Partys MP for Te Tai
Tokerau, Kelvin Davis, claimed that KiwiMeter was inciting racial intolerance.

There are three questions that touch on Maori culture, where respondents are asked to agree or disagree with a
statement:

Maori culture is something that all New Zealanders can take pride in, no matter their background

A history of discrimination has created conditions that make it difficult for Maori to be successful

Maori should not receive any special treatment

Mr Davis claimed the question that included the statement, Maori should not receive any special treatment, was out and
out racism. He demanded it be removed from the survey, stating, It just evokes images of Don Brash 2004: implying that
Maori have special treatment, Id like to know what special treatment theyre talking about.

Well, lets try to answer that question for Mr Davis and lets begin with his Te Tai Tokerau electorate seat.
The Maori seats were created as a temporary measure in 1867 when gender, age, and private land title were the criteria
used to determine voting eligibility. Since much of the land held by Maori was in common ownership, rather than private title,
the Maori seats were introduced to ensure all Maori men had the right to vote a privilege not enjoyed by those non-Maori
men, who held land jointly or not at all.

In 1879, when all men gained the vote, the Maori seats should have been abolished, but as a result of strong advocacy
and weak politicians they were retained.

It was the same in 1996, when MMP was introduced. The Royal Commission on the Electoral System had recommended
that the Maori seats be abolished if MMP was adopted to prevent an over-representation of Maori in Parliament. But Jim
Bolgers National Party retained the seats to appease Maori leaders, and as a result, the predicted over-representation of
Maori in Parliament has now occurred, with twenty-three percent of current MPs claiming Maori descent.

These reserved seats, of which Kelvin Daviss electorate seat is one, are a fine example of Maori privilege. Mr Davis is in
Parliament because of Maori special treatment.

As a result of the Parliamentary leverage created by the race-based Maori seats, there are a plethora of race-based
legislative initiatives that give Maori special rights. These include:

Maori-only schools

Special Maori content in the education curriculum

Maori-only education scholarships

Maori-only housing projects

Maori-only health initiatives

Maori-only welfare initiatives

Maori-only prisoner programmes

 Maori-only positions on government agencies

Maori-only consultation rights under the Resource Management Act

Maori-only co-management of parks, rivers, lakes, and the coastline

Maori-only ownership rights to the foreshore and seabed

A special Maori Authority tax rate of 17.5 percent

A special Maori-only exemption to allow blood relatives to qualify for charitable status

Maori language funding

Maori radio and TV

Maori-only seats on local councils

Maori-only appointments onto local government committees

Maori-only local government Statutory Boards

Maori-only local government advisory committees

Maori seats in Parliament

The list of statutory Maori privilege is increasing all the time, as the governments current plans to confer race-based rights
to control fresh water demonstrates only too clearly.

As justification for Maori privilege, Mr Davis and others point to so-called Maori disadvantage. But they should remember
that the statistics on these matters are no longer clear-cut.

Back in the seventies, when widespread intermarriage was resulting in a sharp decline in the number of people who could
be categorised as Maori, the Labour Government changed the rules. Through the 1974 Maori Affairs Amendment Act, the
racial classification of Maori based on someone having 50 percent or more of Maori blood was changed to one based on
self-identification and ethnic affiliation in other words, having a Maori descendent.
This guaranteed that the number of people being classified as Maori would continue to grow, since anyone with even a
smidgeon of Maori blood could, for official purposes, be counted as Maori.

In 2000, Simon Chapple, a senior researcher with the Department of Labour, used 1996 census data to examine the impact
of these new definitions. He found that instead of the 273,693 New Zealanders who indicated they were Maori-only being
recognised as Maori for statistical purposes, the new policy of adding everyone who included Maori as one of their ethnic
groups into the final count, boosted the official tally to 580,374.

In other words, that change in methodology effectively doubled the official number of Maori. Simon Chapple recommended
to the Government that the Maori ethnic group should be restricted to those who identify as Maori-only in the Census, with
everyone else allocated to their other major ethnic group. But his suggestion was ignored. As a result, so-called Maori
disadvantage is overstated.

In addition, a fact that Mr Davis and others like to conveniently forget, is that while people who claim Maori ancestry might
appear to be over represented in our worst social statistics, the causes are well documented and include long-term welfare
dependency, solo parenthood, child abuse, and educational failure. Skin-colour does not predetermine ones future.

TVNZ denied the accusations of racism being made against it. The Canadian firm Vox Pop Labs, which helped to design
KiwiMeter along with input from Auckland and Victoria University political scientists refuted the racist allegations
as categorically false.

But Mr Davis, no doubt with his own self-interest in mind, remained adamant: I think its offensive, I think its racist, and I
think it should be pulled.

While Labour leader Andrew Little also condemned the question, the Prime Minister defended it, saying it was a legitimate
question to ask. There was nothing wrong with asking a question, to get a sense of what peoples views are. People ask
questions all the time about potentially controversial things, we live in an open society and people are free to ask a
question.

John Key is right. In this country at least at the present time our rights to free speech are protected by law and
guaranteed under Clause 14 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act:

"Everyone has the right to freedom of expression, including the freedom to seek, receive and impart information
and opinions of any kind and in any form.
However, the right to say whatever we like is tempered by the Human Rights Act, which makes it an offence to express
opinions that could be deemed to be threatening, abusive, or insulting on the grounds of colour, race, or ethnic or national
origins.

While the Human Rights Commission indicated they were looking into complaints of racism against TVNZ, their
website explains, that our right to the freedom of expression means that people can make highly controversial or unpopular
remarks, and while they may be regarded as offensive, unless they are likely to cause or exacerbate serious ethnic tension
or unrest, no action will be taken:

"Only where there is the potential for significant detriment to society can the right to freedom of expression be
limited.

The right to offend is at the heart of robust debate about controversial matters. As British comedian Rowan
Atkinson explained;

"The freedom to criticise or ridicule ideas even if they are sincerely held beliefs is a fundamental freedom of
society. In my view the right to offend is far more important than any right not to be offended.

The right to ridicule is far more important to society than any right not to be ridiculed because one in my view
represents openness and the other represents oppression.

David Round, a law lecturer at Canterbury University and this weeks NZCPR Guest Commentator with a speech he
delivered at the Universitys commemoration of the 800th anniversary of the Magna Carta is no stranger to free speech
and controversy.

He remains undaunted, upsetting many sensitivities when he used his address to denounce the deplorable
shortsightedness and stupidity on the part of our political and intellectual class, who claim the Treaty of Waitangi is a Maori
Magna Carta:

Now ~ in our own day, and in our own country, there is a mythologizing and a flagrant misinterpretation, as
notable and as bizarre as any seventeenth century deification of Magna Carta, of a certain document.

That document is of course the Treaty of Waitangi, sometimes referred to as the Maori Magna Carta.

This brief general memorandum of understanding recorded ~ not just in the English translation but in the Maori
original ~ an agreement that the Queen should be sovereign over New Zealand and that Maori should be her
subjects, with the rights and privileges of British subjects ~ a position of equality before the law.

By some mysterious alchemy the document has come to be widely understood to mean the exact opposite ~ to
establish some as yet undefined Maori sovereignty or at the least a partnership between the Crown and Maori,
or between part-Maori New Zealanders and those not of Maori descent.

This process is at least as remarkable as anything that happened in the seventeenth century. It is complete
nonsense to describe the current misinterpretation of the Treaty as anything remotely like Magna Carta.

Davids full speech can be read here.

Feigning offence is a tactic commonly used by those who want to close down a debate. By using this strategy and playing
the race card, Kelvin Davis was able to divert attention away from the real issue of Maori privilege onto the question of
whether or not KiwiMeter and TVNZ is racist.

Maori sovereignty activists are increasingly targeting the media in an attempt to prevent them from publishing anything that
doesnt suit their separatist agenda.

It is going on right now, with some of the newspapers around the country that are currently running the NZCPRs public
information advertisement calling for submissions on Nationals plan for the race-based control of fresh water, being
targeted and accused of racism including by the taxpayer funded Maori TV.

By using bully-boy tactics, they no doubt hope to intimidate newspapers and discourage them from running such ads in the
future.

And with the Human Rights Commission maintaining a register of media that publish material they deem to be unfavourable
to Maori, it is clear that our fundamental right to the freedom of speech is under serious threat.

If, as a society, we value free speech, we must not allow ourselves to be intimidated into silence. For silence is interpreted
as approval. In the present debate over fresh water, the government will think that those who are not speaking out condone
tribal control when that is the very thing that most will oppose.

Speaking up is vital in a democracy. Your single voice is critical. Together many voices can move a nation.

If you havent put in a submission opposing all race-based proposals for fresh water reform, this is our last reminder. People
power is the only way to stop this a simple email stating your position and sent to watersubmissions@mfe.govt.nz is all
that is needed. And why not send your thoughts on to all National MPs (their addresses are here), as they are the only ones
who can stop this.

From The Archives For ANZAC Day: All Wars Are Bankers' Wars
April 14 2015 | From: MichaelRivero / Various Sources

A very eloquent and relatively concise video discourse on how and why the title of this piece is so
tragically true, followed by a very detailed article for those who wish to read more.

This really is a must see / must read piece to be aware of the real history of banking and
warmongering over the last 100 years - along with the how and why such nefarious plans were
implemented; and to what ends.
This exposes the same plan that is being rolled out globally, not just in the United States.

"The common enemy of all human kind are private central banks issuing the public
currency as a loan at interest, and as history will show, they will do anything up to, and
including global war - to keep their lock on yours and your children's economic wellbeing
and productivity.

We are not a free society. Media will tell us that we are free, but we are not free.

We are slaves, our slave chains are made of paper - and that paper is the Federal Reserve
note [including the central bankster issued debt-based-notes of every other country]."

Too few of our leaders have tried to stand up to this system of enslavement, usually with lethal results. But if all of the people
of the world stood up at the same time and said "No more private central banks", it will come crashing down, just as slavery
did, just as rule by divine right did and we will be embarking on a new era in human history where the emphasis on human
development is on the people and not on the money junkies.

Related: Nothing To Celebrate In ANZAC: The Bloody History Of The British Empire

[Note: This does not mean we should not remember the dead, who were duped into giving their lives for lies.]

"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. The Bankers own the Earth. Take it away from them, but
leave them the power to create deposits, and with the flick of a pen they will create enough deposits to buy it back
again.

However, take it away from them, and all the fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought to disappear, for this
world would be a happier and better world to live in. But if you wish to remain slaves of the Bankers and pay for the
cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits."
 - Sir Josiah Stamp, President of the Bank of England in the 1920s, the second richest man in Britain

I know many people have a great deal of difficulty comprehending just how many wars are started for no other purpose than to
force private central banks onto nations, so let me share a few examples, so that you understand why the US Government is
mired in so many wars against so many foreign nations. There is ample precedent for this.

The United States fought the American Revolution primarily over King George III's Currency act, which forced the colonists to
conduct their business only using printed bank notes borrowed from the Bank of England at interest.

Interest Bearing bank note from the Bank of England, 1764

"The bank hath benefit of interest on all moneys which it creates out of nothing."

- William Paterson, founder of the Bank of England in 1694

 After the revolution, the new United States adopted a
radically different economic system in which the government
issued its own value-based money, so that private banks like
the Bank of England were not siphoning off the wealth of the
people through interest-bearing bank notes.

"The refusal of King George 3rd to allow the

colonies to operate an honest money system, which
freed the ordinary man from the clutches of the
money manipulators, was probably the prime cause
of the revolution."

- Benjamin Franklin, Founding Father

Following the revolution, the US Government actually took

steps to keep the bankers out of the new government!

"Any person holding any office or any stock in any

institution in the nature of a bank for issuing or
discounting bills or notes payable to bearer or order,
cannot be a member of the House whilst he holds
such office or stock."

- Third Congress of the United States Senate,

23rd of December, 1793, signed by the
President, George Washington

But bankers are nothing if not dedicated to their schemes to

King George III
acquire your wealth, and know full well how easy it is to
corrupt a nation's leaders.

Just one year after Mayer Amschel Rothschild had uttered his infamous "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care
not who makes the laws", the bankers succeeded in setting up a new Private Central Bank called the First Bank of the United
States, largely through the efforts of the Rothschild's chief US supporter, Alexander Hamilton.
 Founded in 1791, by the end of its twenty year charter the
First Bank of the United States had almost ruined the
nation's economy, while enriching the bankers.

Congress refused to renew the charter and signaled their

intention to go back to a state issued value based currency
on which the people paid no interest at all to any banker.

This resulted in a threat from Nathan Mayer Rothschild

against the US Government, "Either the application for
renewal of the charter is granted, or the United States will
find itself involved in a most disastrous war."

Congress still refused to renew the charter for the First

Bank of the United States, whereupon Nathan Mayer
Rothschild railed, "Teach those impudent Americans a
lesson! Bring them back to colonial status!"

The British Prime Minister at the time, Spencer Perceval

was adamently opposed to war with the United States,
primarily because the majority of England's military might
was occupied with the ongoing Napoleonic wars.

Spencer Perceval was concerned that Britain might not

prevail in a new American war, a concern shared by many
in the British government.
Alexander Hamilton

The First Bank of the United States

Then, Spencer Perceval was assassinated (the only British Prime Minister to be assassinated in office) and replaced by
Robert Banks Jenkinson, the 2nd Earl of Liverpool, who was fully supportive of a war to recapture the colonies.

Click for larger image of the Geneva Gazette for July 1, 1812, reporting
on the assassination of Spencer Perceval together with the declaration
of the War of 1812
Once again, private bankers were in control of the nation's money supply and cared not who made the laws or how many
British and American soldiers had to die for it.
The Second Bank of the United States
"If my sons did not want wars, there would be
none."
- Gutle Schnaper, wife of Mayer Amschel
Rothschild and mother of his five sons
Financed at virtually no interest by the Rothschild controlled
Bank of England, Britain then provoked the war of 1812 to
recolonize the United States and force them back into the
slavery of the Bank of England, or to plunge the United
States into so much debt they would be forced to accept a
new private central bank.
And the plan worked. Even though the War of 1812 was won
by the United States, Congress was forced to grant a new
charter for yet another private bank issuing the public
currency as loans at interest, the Second Bank of the United
States.
Bank Note from the Second Bank of the United States

Once again the nation was plunged into debt, unemployment, and poverty by the predations of the private central bank, and in
1832 Andrew Jackson successfully campaigned for his second term as President under the slogan, "Jackson And No Bank!"
True to his word, Jackson succeeds in blocking the renewal of the charter for the Second Bank of the United States.

"Gentlemen! I too have been a close observer of the doings of the Bank of the United States. I have had men
watching you for a long time, and am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the
breadstuffs of the country.

When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me
that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true,
gentlemen, but that is your sin!

Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and
thieves. I have determined to rout you out, and by the Eternal, (bringing his fist down on the table) I will rout you
out!"

- Andrew Jackson, shortly before ending the charter of the Second Bank of the United States.

From the original minutes of the Philadelphia committee of citizens sent to meet with President Jackson (February
1834), according to Andrew Jackson and the Bank of the United States (1928) by Stan V. Henkels

News report of Jackson shutting down the Second Bank of the United
States, Geneva Gazette, October 2, 1833
Shortly after President Jackson (the only American President
to actually pay off the National Debt) ended the Second
Bank of the United States, there was an attempted
assassination which failed when both pistols used by the
assassin, Richard Lawrence, failed to fire.
Lawrence later said that with Jackson dead, "Money would
be more plenty."
President Zachary Taylor opposed the creation of a new
Private Central Bank, owing to the historical abuses of the
First and Second Banks of the United States.
"The idea of a national bank is dead, and will not be
revived in my time."
- Zachary Taylor
Taylor died on July 9, 1850 after eating a bowl of cherries
and milk rumored to have been poisoned. The symptoms he
displayed are consistent with acute arsenic poisoning.
President James Buchanan also opposed a private central
bank. During the panic of 1857 he attempted to set limits on
banks issuing more loans than they had actual funds, and to
require all issued bank notes to be backed by Federal
Government assets.
He was poisoned with arsenic and survived, although 38
other people at the dinner died.
The public school system is as subservient to the bankers'
wishes to keep certain history from you, just as the corporate
media is subservient to Monsanto's wishes to keep the
dangers of GMOs from you, and the global warming cult's
wishes to conceal from you that the Earth has actually been
cooling for the last 16 years.
Thus is should come as little surprise that much of the real
reasons for the events of the Civil War are not well known to
the average American.
"The few who understand the system will either be
so interested in its profits or be so dependent upon
its favours that there will be no opposition from that
class, while on the other hand, the great body of
people, mentally incapable of comprehending the
tremendous advantage that capital derives from the
system, will bear its burdens without complaint, and
perhaps without even suspecting that the system is
inimical to their interests."
- The Rothschild brothers of London writing to
associates in New York, 1863
President Zachary Taylor, ca 1850 When the Confederacy seceded from the United States, the
bankers once again saw the opportunity for a rich harvest of
debt, and offered to fund Lincoln's efforts to bring the south
back into the union, but at 30% interest.

Lincoln remarked that he would not free the black man by

enslaving the white man to the bankers and using his
authority as President, issued a new government currency,
the greenback. This was a direct threat to the wealth and
power of the central bankers, who quickly responded.

Lincoln's Greenback - Click for larger image

President James Buchanon

"If this mischievous financial policy, which has its

origin in North America, shall become endurated
down to a fixture, then that Government will furnish
its own money without cost.

It will pay off debts and be without debt. It will have

all the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It
will become prosperous without precedent in the
history of the world.

The brains, and wealth of all countries will go to

North America. That country must be destroyed or it
will destroy every monarchy on the globe."

- The London Times responding to Lincoln's

decision to issue government Greenbacks to
finance the Civil War, rather than agree to
private banker's loans at 30% interest.

In 1872 New York bankers sent a letter to every bank in the

United States, urging them to fund newspapers that opposed
government-issued money (Lincoln's greenbacks).

"Dear Sir: It is advisable to do all in your power to sustain

such prominent daily and weekly newspapers... as will
oppose the issuing of greenback paper money, and that you
also withhold patronage or favors from all applicants who are
not willing to oppose the Government issue of money. Let
the Government issue the coin and the banks issue the
President Abraham Lincoln paper money of the country...

[T]o restore to circulation the Government issue of money, will be to provide the people with money, and will therefore
seriously affect your individual profit as bankers and lenders."

- Triumphant plutocracy; the story of American public life from 1870 to 1920, by Lynn Wheeler
"It will not do to allow the greenback, as it is called, to circulate as money any length of time, as we cannot control that." --
Triumphant plutocracy; the story of American public life from 1870 to 1920, by Lynn Wheeler "Slavery is likely to be abolished
by the war power, and chattel slavery destroyed.

This, I and my European friends are in favor of, for slavery is but the owning of labor and carries with it the care for the
laborer, while the European plan, led on by England, is for capital to control labor by controlling the wages. THIS CAN BE
DONE BY CONTROLLING THE MONEY."

- Triumphant plutocracy; the story of American public life from 1870 to 1920, by Lynn Wheeler

Goaded by the private bankers, much of Europe supported the Confederacy against the Union, with the expectation that
victory over Lincoln would mean the end of the Greenback. France and Britain considered an outright attack on the United
States to aid the confederacy, but were held at bay by Russia, which had just ended the serfdom system and had a state
central bank similar to the system the United States had been founded on.

Left free of European intervention, the Union won the war,

and Lincoln announced his intention to go on issuing
greenbacks.

Following Lincoln's assassination, the Greenbacks were

pulled from circulation and the American people forced to go
back to an economy based on bank notes borrowed at
interest from the private bankers.

Tsar Alexander II, who authorized Russian military

assistance to Lincoln, was subsequently the victim of
multiple attempts on his life in 1866, 1879, and 1880, until
his assassination in 1881.

With the end of Lincoln's Greenbacks, the US could no

longer create its own interest free money and was
manipulated during the term of President Ruthford B. Hayes
into borrowing from the Rothschilds banking system in 1878,
restoring to the Rothschilds control of the US economy they
had lost under Andrew Jackson.

Messrs. Rothschild & Sons to Mr. Sherman.

[Cable message.]

April 12,1878.
Tsar Alexander II of Russia, who prevented France and Britain from Hon. John Sherman,
invading the US during the civil war. Secretary of the Treasury, Washington D. C.:

Very pleased we have entered into relations again

with American Government. Shall do our best to
make the business successful.

ROTHSCHILDS.

James A. Garfield was elected President in 1880 on a

platform of government control of the money supply.

"The chief duty of the National Government in

connection with the currency of the country is to coin
money and declare its value.
 Grave doubts have been entertained whether
Congress is authorized by the Constitution to make
any form of paper money legal tender.

The present issue of United States notes has been

sustained by the necessities of war; but such paper
should depend for its value and currency upon its
convenience in use and its prompt redemption in
coin at the will of the holder, and not upon its
compulsory circulation.

These notes are not money, but promises to pay

money. If the holders demand it, the promise should
be kept."

- James Garfield

"By the experience of commercial nations in all ages

it has been found that gold and silver afford the only
safe foundation for a monetary system.

Confusion has recently been created by variations in

the relative value of the two metals, but I confidently
believe that arrangements can be made between
the leading commercial nations which will secure the
general use of both metals.

President James Garfield Congress should provide that the compulsory

coinage of silver now required by law may not
disturb our monetary system by driving either metal
out of circulation.

If possible, such an adjustment should be made that

the purchasing power of every coined dollar will be
exactly equal to its debt-paying power in all the
markets of the world."

- James Garfield

"He who controls the money supply of a nation

controls the nation."

- James Garfield

President William McKinley

Garfield was shot on July 2, 1881 and died of his wounds several weeks later. Chester A. Arthur succeeded Garfield as
President.
In 1896, William McKinley was elected President in the middle of a depression-driven debate over gold-backed government
currency versus bank notes borrowed at interest from private banks.

McKinley favored gold-backed currencies and a balanced government budget which would free the public from accumulating
debt.

"Our financial system needs some revision; our money is all good now, but its value must not further be
threatened.

It should all be put upon an enduring basis, not subject to easy attack, nor its stability to doubt or dispute. Our
currency should continue under the supervision of the Government.

The several forms of our paper money offer, in my judgment, a constant embarrassment to the Government and a
safe balance in the Treasury."

- William McKinley

McKinley was shot by an out-of-work anarchist on September 14, 1901, in Buffalo, NY, succumbing to his wounds a few days
later. He was suceeded in office by Theodore Roosevelt.

Finally, in 1913, the Private Central Bankers of Europe, in particular the Rothschilds of Great Britain and the Warburgs of
Germany, met with their American financial collaborators on Jekyll Island, Georgia to form a new banking cartel with the
express purpose of forming the Third Bank of the United States, with the aim of placing complete control of the United States
money supply once again under the control of private bankers.

Owing to hostility over the previous banks, the name was changed to "The Federal Reserve" system in order to grant the new
bank a quasi-governmental image, but in fact it is a privately owned bank, no more "Federal" than Federal Express.
The Federal Reserve; it is neither "Federal" nor does it have any actual "Reserves", creating as it does money out of thin air.

In 2012, the Federal Reserve attempted to rebuff a Freedom of Information Lawsuit by Bloomberg News on the grounds that
as a private banking corporation and not actually a part of the government, the Freedom of Information Act did not apply
to the "trade secret" operations of the Federal Reserve.

"When you or I write a check, there must be sufficient funds in our account to cover the check; but when the
Federal Reserve writes a check, there is no bank deposit on which that check is drawn. When the Federal Reserve
writes a check, it is creating money." -- From the Boston Federal Reserve Bank pamphlet, "Putting it Simply."

"Neither paper currency nor deposits have value as commodities. Intrinsically, a 'dollar' bill is just a piece of paper.
Deposits are merely book entries."

- "Modern Money Mechanics Workbook" - Federal Reserve of Chicago, 1975

"I am afraid the ordinary citizen will not like to be told that the banks can and do create money. And they who
control the credit of the nation direct the policy of Governments and hold in the hollow of their hand the destiny of
the people."

- Reginald McKenna, as Chairman of the Midland Bank, addressing stockholders in 1924

"States, most especially the large hegemonic ones, such as the United States and Great Britain, are controlled by
the international central banking system, working through secret agreements at the Bank for International
Settlements (BIS), and operating through national central banks (such as the Bank of England and the Federal
Reserve)...

The same international banking cartel that controls the United States today previously controlled Great Britain and
held it up as the international hegemon.
 When the British order faded, and was replaced by the United States, the US ran the global economy. However,
the same interests are served.

States will be used and discarded at will by the international banking cartel; they are simply tools."

- Andrew Gavin Marshall

1913 proved to be a transformative year for the nation's economy, first with the passage of the 16th "income tax"
Amendment and the false claim that it had been ratified.

"I think if you were to go back and and try to find and review the ratification of the 16th amendment, which was the
internal revenue, the income tax, I think if you went back and examined that carefully, you would find that a
sufficient number of states never ratified that amendment."

- U.S. District Court Judge James C. Fox, Sullivan Vs. United States, 2003.

Later that same year, and apparently unwilling to risk another questionable amendment, Congress passed the Federal
Reserve Act over Christmas holiday 1913, while members of Congress opposed to the measure were at home.

This was a very underhanded deal, as the Constitution explicitly vests Congress with the authority to issue the public
currency, does not authorize its delegation, and thus should have required a new Amendment to transfer that authority to a
private bank.

But pass it Congress did, and President Woodrow Wilson signed it as he promised the bankers he would in exchange for
generous campaign contributions.
 Woodrow Wilson later regretted that decision.

"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined

my country.

A great industrial nation is now controlled by its

system of credit.

We are no longer a government by free opinion, no

longer a government by conviction and the vote of
the majority, but a government by the opinion and
duress of a small group of dominant men."

- Woodrow Wilson 1919

Thomas Edison, arguably the most brilliant man of the age,

was also well aware of the fraud of private central banks.

"People who will not turn a shovel full of dirt on the

project nor contribute a pound of material, will collect
more money from the United States than will the
People who supply all the material and do all the
work.

This is the terrible thing about interest ...

News report of Wilson's signing the Federal Reserve Act. Under the
Constitution, only a new Amendment could transfer the government's
But here is the point: If the Nation can issue a dollar
authority to create the currency to a private party. bond it can issue a dollar bill.

The element that makes the bond good makes the

bill good also.

The difference between the bond and the bill is that

the bond lets the money broker collect twice the
amount of the bond and an additional 20%.

Whereas the currency, the honest sort provided by

the Constitution pays nobody but those who
contribute in some useful way.

It is absurd to say our Country can issue bonds

and cannot issue currency.

Both are promises to pay, but one fattens the usurer

and the other helps the People.

If the currency issued by the People were no good,

then the bonds would be no good, either.

It is a terrible situation when the Government, to

insure the National Wealth, must go in debt and
submit to ruinous interest charges at the hands of
men who control the fictitious value of gold."

- Thomas A. Edison

The next year, World War One started, and it is

important to remember that prior to the creation of the
 Federal Reserve, there was no such thing as a world
war.

President Woodrow Wilson

In 1913, the Rothschild KM was able to establish a beachhead by bribing crooked, treasonous members of Congress to pass the illegal,
Unconstitutional Federal Reserve Act on Christmas Eve without a required quorum. The Act was then signed by a crooked, bought off President, who
was a traitor to America, like the members of Congress who voted for it.
 World War One started between Austria-Hungary and
Serbia with the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand.

Although the war started between Austria-Hungary and

Serbia, it quickly shifted to focus on Germany, whose
industrial capacity was seen as an economic threat to Great
Britain, who saw the decline of the British Pound as a result
of too much emphasis on financial activity to the neglect of
agriculture, industrial development, and infrastructure (not
unlike the present day United States).

Although pre-war Germany had a private central bank, it

was heavily restricted and inflation kept to reasonable
levels.

Under government control, investment was guaranteed to

internal economic development, and Germany was seen as
a major power.

So, in the media of the day, Germany was portrayed as the

prime opponent of World War One, and not just defeated,
but its industrial base flattened.

Following the Treaty of Versailles, Germany was ordered to

pay the war costs of all the participating nations, even
though Germany had not actually started the war.

This amounted to three times the value of all of Germany

Archduke Franz Ferdinand, whose assassination triggered World War
One
itself.
Germany's private central bank, to whom Germany had
gone deeply into debt to pay the costs of the war, broke free
of government control, and massive inflation followed
(mostly triggered by currency speculators), permanently
trapping the German people in endless debt.

When the Weimar Republic collapsed economically, it

opened the door for the National Socialists to take power.

Their first financial move was to issue their own state

currency which was not borrowed from private central
bankers.

Freed from having to pay interest on the money in

circulation, Germany blossomed and quickly began to
rebuild its industry.

The media called it "The German Miracle".

TIME magazine lionized Hitler for the amazing improvement

in life for the German people and the explosion of German
industry, and even named him TIME Magazine's Man Of
The Year in 1938.

Once again, Germany's industrial output became a threat to

Great Britain.

Germany's state-issued value based currency was also a

direct threat to the wealth and power of the private central
banks, and as early as 1933 they started to organize a
global boycott against Germany to strangle this upstart
ruler who thought he could break free of private central
bankers!

Hitler as TIME's man of the year

 "Should Germany merchandise (do business) again in the next 50 years we have led this war (WW1) in vain."

- Winston Churchill in The Times (1919)

"We will force this war upon Hitler, if he wants it or not."

- Winston Churchill (1936 broadcast)

"Germany becomes too powerful. We have to crush it."

- Winston Churchill (November 1936 speaking to US - General Robert E. Wood)

"This war is an English war and its goal is the destruction of Germany."

- Winston Churchill (- Autumn 1939 broadcast)

Click on the image above to view a larger version in a new window

As had been the case in World War One, Great Britain and other nations threatened by Germany's economic power looked
for an excuse to go to war, and as public anger in Germany grew over the boycott, Hitler foolishly gave them that excuse.
Years later, in a spirit of candor, the real reasons for that war were made clear.

"The war wasn't only about abolishing fascism, but to conquer sales markets. We could have, if we had intended
so, prevented this war from breaking out without doing one shot, but we didn't want to."

- Winston Churchill to Truman (Fultun, USA March 1946)

"Germany's unforgivable crime before WW2 was its attempt to loosen its economy out of the world trade system
and to build up an independent exchange system from which the world-finance couldn't profit anymore. ...We
butchered the wrong pig."

-Winston Churchill (The Second World War - Bern, 1960)

As a side note, we need to step back before WW2 and recall Marine Major General Smedley Butler. In 1933, Wall Street
bankers and financiers had bankrolled the successful coups by both Hitler and Mussolini. Brown Brothers Harriman in New
York was financing Hitler right up to the day war was declared with Germany.

And they decided that a fascist dictatorship in the United

States based on the one on Italy would be far better for their
business interests than Roosevelt's "New Deal" which
threatened massive wealth re-distribution to recapitalize the
working and middle class of America.

So the Wall Street tycoons recruited General Butler to lead

the overthrow of the US Government and install a
"Secretary of General Affairs" who would be answerable to
Wall Street and not the people, would crush social unrest
and shut down all labor unions.

General Butler pretended to go along with the scheme but

then exposed the plot to Congress. Congress, then as now
in the pocket of the Wall Street bankers, refused to act.

When Roosevelt learned of the planned coup he demanded

the arrest of the plotters, but the plotters simply reminded
Roosevelt that if any one of them were sent to prison, their
friends on Wall Street would deliberately collapse the still-
fragile economy and blame him for it.

Roosevelt was thus unable to act until the start of WW2, at

which time he prosecuted many of the plotters under the
Trading With The Enemy act.
Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler

The Congressional minutes into the coup were finally declassified in 1967, but rumors of the attempted coup became the
inspiration for the movie, "Seven Days in May" but with the true financial villains erased from the script.

"I spent 33 years and four months in active military service as a member of our country's most agile military force -
the Marine Corps.

I served in all commissioned ranks from second lieutenant to Major General. And during that period I spent more of
my time being a high - class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the bankers.
 In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. "I suspected I was just a part of a racket at the time.

Now I am sure of it.

Like all members of the military profession I never had an original thought until I left the service. My mental
faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of the higher-ups. This is typical with
everyone in the military service.

Thus I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti
and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in.

I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. The record of
racketeering is long.

I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-12. I brought light to the
Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916.

In China in 1927 I helped see to it that the Standard Oil went its way unmolested. During those years, I had, as the
boys in the back room would say, a swell racket.

I was rewarded with honors, medals and promotion. Looking back on it, I feel I might have given Al Capone a few
hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three city districts. I operated on three continents."

- General Smedley Butler, former US Marine Corps Commandant,1935

President John F. Kennedy

As President, John F. Kennedy understood the predatory nature of private central banking. He understood why Andrew fought
so hard to end the Second Bank of the United States. So Kennedy wrote and signed Executive Order 11110 which ordered
the US Treasury to issue a new public currency, the United States Note.
Presidents Kennedy and Soekarno

Kennedy was working with President Soekarno of Indonesia who was at that time the signatory for the Global Collateral
Accounts which were intended to be used for humanitarian purposes but which were subverted at the time of the Bretton-
Woods agreement at the end of WWII.

The intention of Kennedy and Soekarno was to end the reign of the globalist privately owned central banking system
- which is the main reason that Kennedy was killed, and for his part Soekarno remained under house arrest for the
rest of his life.

The efforts to regain control of the Global Collateral Accounts are now being led by Neil Keenan.

The West had been stealing from the Collateral Accounts for nearly 100 years but this has now been stopped by Neil Keenan
and his associates, who have gone to considerable expense and risk in their mission to ensure the Global Collateral Accounts
are accessible - for the humanitarian purposes for which they were established.
Kennedy's United States Note - with the lack of reference to the FEDERAL RESERVE

Kennedy's United States Notes were not borrowed from the Federal Reserve but created by the US Government and backed
by the silver stockpiles held by the US Government. It represented a return to the system of economics the United States had
been founded on, and was perfectly legal for Kennedy to do.

All told, some four and one half billion dollars went into public circulation, eroding interest payments to the Federal Reserve
and loosening their control over the nation. Five months later John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas Texas, and
the United States Notes pulled from circulation and destroyed (except for samples held by collectors).

John J. McCloy
John J. McCloy, President of the Chase Manhattan Bank, and President of the World Bank, was named to the Warren
Commission, presumably to make certain the banking dimensions behind the assassination were concealed from the public.

As we enter the eleventh year of what future history will most certainly describe as World War Three, we need to examine the
financial dimensions behind the wars.

Towards the end of World War Two, when it became obvious that the allies were going to win and dictate the post war
environment, the major world economic powers met at Bretton Woods, a luxury resort in New Hampshire in July of 1944, and
hammered out the Bretton Woods agreement for international finance.

The British Pound lost its position as the global trade and reserve currency to the US dollar (part of the price demanded by
Roosevelt in exchange for the US entry into the war). Absent the economic advantages of being the world's "go-to" currency,
Britain was forced to nationalize the Bank of England in 1946.

The Bretton Woods agreement, ratified in 1945, in addition to making the dollar the global reserve and trade currency,
obligated the signatory nations to tie their currencies to the dollar. The nations that ratified Bretton Woods did so on two
conditions. The first was that the Federal Reserve would refrain from over-printing the dollar as a means to loot real products
and produce from other nations in exchange for ink and paper; basically an imperial tax.

That assurance was backed up by the second requirement, which was that the US dollar would always be convertible to gold
at $35 per ounce.

The Bretton Woods resort, New Hampshire

The Federal Reserve, being a private bank and not answerable to the US Government, did start overprinting paper dollars,
and much of the perceived prosperity of the 1950s and 1960s was the result of foreign nations' obligations to accept the paper
notes as being worth gold at the rate of $35 an ounce.

Then in 1970, France looked at the huge pile of paper notes sitting in their vaults, for which real French products like wine and
cheese had been traded, and notified the United States government that they would exercise their option under Bretton
Woods to return the paper notes for gold at the $35 per ounce exchange rate.

The United States had nowhere near the gold to redeem the paper notes, so on August 15th, 1971, Richard Nixon
"temporarily" suspended the gold convertibility of the US Federal Reserve Notes.
Nixon announced the end of gold convertability

Later termed the "Nixon shock", this move effectively ended Bretton Woods and many global currencies started to delink from
the US dollar.
The "Nixon Shock"

Worse, since the United States had collateralized their loans with the nation's gold reserves, it quickly became apparent that
the US Government did not in fact have enough gold to cover the outstanding debts.

Foreign nations began to get very nervous about their loans to the US and understandably were reluctant to loan any
additional money to the United States without some form of collateral.

So Richard Nixon started the environmental movement, with the EPA and its various programs such as "wilderness zones",
Roadless areas", Heritage rivers", "Wetlands", all of which took vast areas of public lands and made them off limits to the
American people who were technically the owners of those lands.

But Nixon had little concern for the environment and the real purpose of this land grab under the guise of the environment was
to pledge those pristine lands and their vast mineral resources as collateral on the national debt. This was part of the
forerunner to the UN Agernda 21 "Sustainability" farce.

The plethora of different programs was simply to conceal the true scale of how much American land was being pledged to
foreign lenders as collateral on the government's debts; eventually almost 25% of the nation itself.

All of this is illegal as the Enclave Clause of the Constitution limits the Federal Government to owning the land under Federal
Government buildings and military bases, and that Enclave Clause was written into the Constitution by the Founding Fathers
to specifically to prevent the Federal Government simply seizing the land belonging to the people to sell off, pledge as
collateral, or rent!
With open lands for collateral already in short supply, the US Government embarked on a new program to shore up sagging
international demand for the dollar.

The United States approached the world's oil producing nations, mostly in the Middle East, and offered them a deal. In
exchange for only selling their oil for dollars, the United States would guarantee the military safety of those oil-rich nations.

The oil rich nations would agree to spend and invest their US paper dollars inside the United States, in particular in US
Treasury Bonds, redeemable through future generations of US taxpayers.

The concept was labeled the "petrodollar". In effect, the US, no longer able to back the dollar with gold, was now
backing it with oil.

Other peoples' oil. And that necessity to keep control over those oil nations to prop up the dollar has shaped America's foreign
policy in the region ever since.

But as America's manufacturing and agriculture has declined, the oil producing nations faced a dilemma. Those piles of US
Federal Reserve notes were not able to purchase much from the United States because the United States had little (other
than real estate) anyone wanted to buy.

Europe's cars and aircraft were superior and less costly, while experiments with GMO food crops led to nations refusing to buy
US food exports.

Israel's constant belligerence against its neighbors caused them to wonder if the US could actually keep their end of the
petrodollar arrangement. Oil producing nations started to talk of selling their oil for whatever currency the purchasers chose to
use.
Saddam Hussein

Iraq, already hostile to the United States following Desert Storm, demanded the right to sell their oil for Euros in 2000 and in
2002, the United Nations agreed to allow it under the "Oil for food" program instituted following Desert Storm.

One year later the United States re-invaded Iraq under the lie of Saddam's nuclear weapons, lynched Saddam Hussein,
and placed Iraq's oil back on the world market only for US dollars.

The clear US policy shift following 9-11, away from being an impartial broker of peace in the Mideast to one of unquestioned
support for Israel's aggressions only further eroded confidence in the Petrodollar deal and even more oil producing nations
started openly talking of oil trade for other global currencies.

Gaddafi

Over in Libya, Muammar Gaddafi had instituted a state-owned central bank and a value based trade currency, the Gold Dinar.
Also see: Libya: From Africas Richest State Under Gaddafi, to Failed State After NATO Intervention

Gaddafi announced that Libya's oil was for sale, but only for the Gold Dinar. Other African nations, seeing the rise of the Gold
Dinar and the Euro, even as the US dollar continued its inflation-driven decline, flocked to the new Libyan currency for trade.

This move had the potential to seriously undermine the global hegemony of the dollar. French President Nicolas
Sarkozy reportedly went so far as to call Libya a threat to the financial security of the world.

So, the United States invaded Libya, brutally murdered Qaddafi (the object lesson of Saddam's lynching not being enough of
a message, apparently), imposed a private central bank, and returned Libya's oil output to dollars only. The gold that was to
have been made into the Gold Dinars is, as of last report, unaccounted for.
General Wesley Clark blew the whistle on US plans to conquer the oil-rich Middle East, to attack and take over 7 countries in 5 years.

According to General Wesley Clark, the master plan for the "dollarification" of the world's oil nations included seven targets,
Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran (Venezuela, which dared to sell their oil to China for the Yuan, is a late
addition).

What is notable about the original seven nations originally targeted by the US is that none of them are members of the Bank
for International Settlements, the private central bankers private central bank, located in Switzerland.

This meant that these nations were deciding for themselves how to run their nations' economies, rather than submit
to the international private banks.

Now the bankers' gun sights are on Iran, which dares to have a government central bank and sell their oil for whatever
currency they choose.

The war agenda is, as always, to force Iran's oil to be sold only for dollars and to force them to accept a privately
owned central bank.

Malaysia, one of the few remaining nations without a Rothschild central bank, is now being invaded by a force
claimed to be "Al Qaeda" and has suffered numerous suspicious losses of its commercial passenger jets.

With the death of President Hugo Chavez, plans to impose a US and banker friendly regime on Venezuela are clearly being
implemented.
Germany's gold bullion. Where is it?

The German government recently asked for the return of some of their gold bullion from the Bank of France and the New York
Federal Reserve. France has said it will take 5 years to return Germany's gold. The United States has said they will need 8
years to return Germany's gold.

This suggests strongly that the Bank of France and the NY Federal Reserve have used the deposited gold for other
purposes, most likely to cover gold futures contracts used to artificially suppress the price of gold to keep investors in the
equities markets, and the Central Banks are scrambling to find new gold to cover the shortfall and prevent a gold run.

So it is inevitable that suddenly France invades Mali, ostensibly to combat Al Qaeda, with the US joining in. Mali just
happens to be one of the world's largest gold producers with gold accounting for 80% of Mali exports. War for the
bankers does not get more obvious than that!

Mexico has demanded a physical audit of their gold bullion stored at the Bank of England, and along with Venezuela's vast oil
reserves (larger than Saudi Arabia), Venezuela's gold mines are a prize lusted after by all the Central Banks that played fast
and loose with other peoples' gold bullion.

So we can expect regime change if not outright invasion soon.

You have been raised by a public school system and media that constantly assures you that the reasons for all these wars
and assassinations are many and varied.

The US claims to bring democracy to the conquered lands (they haven't; the usual result of a US overthrow is the imposition
of a dictatorship, such as the 1953 CIA overthrow of Iran's democratically elected government of Mohammad Mosaddegh and
the imposition of the Shah, or the 1973 CIA overthrow of Chile's democratically elected government of President Salvador
Allende, and the imposition of Augusto Pinochet), or to save a people from a cruel oppressor, revenge for 9-11, or that tired
worn-out catch all excuse for invasion, weapons of mass destruction. Assassinations are always passed off as "crazed lone
nuts" to obscure the real agenda.

The real agenda is simple. It is enslavement of the people by creation of a false sense of obligation.

That obligation is false because the Private Central Banking system, by design, always creates more debt than money with
which to pay that debt.

Private Central Banking is not science, it is a religion; a set of arbitrary rules created to benefit the priesthood, meaning
the owners of the Private Central Bank.

The fraud persists, with often lethal results, because the people are tricked into believing that this is the way life is suppoed to
be and no alternative exists or should be dreamt of.

The same was true of two earlier systems of enslavement, Rule by Divine Right and Slavery, both systems built to trick people
into obedience, and both now recognized by modern civilizatyion as illegitimate.

Now we are entering a time in human history where we will recognize that rule by debt, or rule by Private Central Bankers
issuing the public currency as a loan at interest, is equally illegitimate.

It only works as long as people allow themselves to believe that this is the way life is supposed to be.

But understand this above all; Private Central Banks do not exist to serve the people, the community, or the nation. Private
Central Banks exist to serve their owners, to make them rich beyond the dreams of Midas and all for the cost of ink, paper,
and the right bribe to the right official.

Behind all these wars, all these assassinations, the hundred million horrible deaths from all the wars lies a single policy of
dictatorship. The private central bankers allow rulers to rule only on the condition that the people of a nation be enslaved to
the private central banks.

Failing that, said ruler will be killed, and their nation invaded by those other nations enslaved to private central banks.

The so-called "clash of civilizations" we read about on the corporate media is really a war between banking systems, with the
private central bankers forcing themselves onto the rest of the world, no matter how many millions must die for it.

Indeed the constant hatemongering against Muslims lies in a simple fact. Like the ancient Christians (prior to the Knights
Templars private banking system) , Muslims forbid usury, or the lending of money at interest. And that is the reason our
government and media insist they must be killed or converted. They refuse to submit to currencies issued at interest. They
refuse to be debt slaves.

So off to war your children must go, to spill their blood for the money-junkies' gold. We barely survived the last two world wars.
In the nuclear/bioweapon age, are the private central bankers willing to risk incinerating the whole planet just to feed their
greed?

Apparently so. This brings us to the current situation in the Ukraine, Russia, and China.

The European Union had been courting the government of the Ukraine to merge with the EU, and more to the point, entangle
their economy with the private-owned European Central Bank.
The government of the Ukraine was considering the move, but had made no commitments. Part of their concern lay with the
conditions in other EU nations enslaved to the ECB, notably Cyprus, Greece, Spain, and Italy. So they were properly
cautious.

Then Russia stepped in with a better deal and the Ukraine, exercising the basic choice all consumers have to choose the best
product at the best price, dropped the EU and announced they were going to go with Russia's offer.

It was at that point that agents provocateurs flooded into the Ukraine, covertly funded by intelligence agency fronts like
CANVAS and USAID, stirring up trouble, while the western media proclaimed this was a popular revolution. Snipers shot at
people and this violence was blamed on then-President Yanukovich.

However a leaked recording of a phone call between the EU's Catherine Ashton and Estonia's Foreign Minister Urmas Paet
confirmed the snipers were working for the overthrow plotters, not the Ukrainian government. Urmas Paet has confirmed the
authenticity of that phone call.

This is a classic pattern of covert overthrow we have seen many times before.

Since the end of WW2, the US has covertly tried to overthrow the governments of 56 nations, succeeding 25 times.

Examples include the 1953 overthrow of Iran's elected government of Mohammed Mossadegh and the imposition of the Shah,
the 1973 overthrow of Chile's elected government of Salvador Allende and the imposition of the Pinochet dictatorship, and of
course, the current overthrow of Ukraine's elected government of Yanukovich and the imposition of the current unelected
government, which is already gutting the Ukraine's wealth to hand to the western bankers.

Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa have formed a parallel financial system called BRICS, officially launched on
January 1, 2015. As of this writing some 80 nations are ready to trade with BRICS in transactions that do not involve
the US dollar.
Despite US economic warfare against both Russia and China, the Ruble and Yuan are seen as more attractive for
international trade and banking than the US dollar, hence the US attempt to fan the Ukraine crisis into war with Russia, and
attempts to provoke North Korea as a back door to war with China.

The US Corporate Government: "These are the enemies of everything we hold dear in America: Your
children must kill them for us..."

Flag waving and propaganda aside, all modern wars are wars by and for the private bankers, fought and bled for by
third parties unaware of the true reason they are expected to gracefully be killed and croppled for.

The process is quite simple. As soon as the Private Central Bank issues its currency as a loan at interest, the public is forced
deeper and deeper into debt.

When the people are reluctant to borrow any more, that is when the Keynesian economists demand the government borrow
more to keep the pyramid scheme working.

When both the people and government refuse to borrow any more, that is when wars are started, to plunge everyone even
deeper into debt to pay for the war, then after the war to borrow more to rebuild.

When the war is over, the people have about the same as they did before the war, except the graveyards are far larger and
everyone is in debt to the private bankers for the next century. This is why Brown Brothers Harriman in New York was funding
the rise of Adolf Hitler.

As long as Private Central Banks are allowed to exist, inevitably as the night follows day there will be poverty,
hopelessness, and millions of deaths in endless World Wars, until the Earth itself is sacrificed in flames to Mammon.
The path to true peace on Earth lies in the abolishment of all private central banking everywhere, and a return to the
state-issued value-based currencies that allow nations and people to become prosperous.

"Banks do not have an obligation to promote the public good."

- Alexander Dielius, CEO, Germany, Austrian, Eastern Europe Goldman Sachs, 2010

"I am just a banker doing God's work."

- Lloyd Blankfein, CEO, Goldman Sachs, 2009

From the film "The International" which tells the story of the take-down of the corrupt Bank of Credit and Commerce International which was the 7th
largest private bank in the world.

'The question the people of the world should be asking is not whether to raise debt
ceilings, but rather why our governments, which are authorised to create and issue
interest-free money, instead borrow that money at interest from a privately-owned central
banking system, thereby plunging future generations into debt slavery to that bank?'

Three steps from Private Central Bank to World War:

Step 1: Enslave the nation to a private Central Bank issuing the public currency as a loan at interest to trap the
people in unpayable debt

Step 2: When the people cannot borrow any more, have the government borrow on their behalf (and without their
permissiono) to keep the pyramid scheme working

Step 3: When both the people and the government can no longer borrow, start a world war to conquer other
nations wealth to "balance the books"

An Revealing Look at the Interests of the United Nations bodies of NATO and the WTO:
Click the image above to open a larger version in a new browser window

Washington Launches Its Attack Against BRICS

April 24 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts

Having removed the reformist President of Argentina, Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner, Washington
is now disposing of the reformist President of Brazil, Dilma Rousseff.
Washington used a federal judge to order Argentina to sacrifice its debt restructuring program in order to pay US
vulture funds the full value of defaulted Argentine bonds that the vulture funds had bought for a few pennies on the
dollar.

TheGuardian: US vulture fund ruling pushes Argentina towards second bankruptcy

TheIntercept: After Vote to Remove Brazils President, Key Opposition Figure Holds Meetings in Washington

These vultures were called creditors who had made loans regardless of the fact that they were not creditors and had
made no loans. They were opportunists after easy money and were used by Washington to get rid of a reformist
government.

President Kirchner resisted and, thus, she had to go. Washington concocted a story that Kirchner covered up an alleged
Iranian bombing in Buenos Aires in 1994.

This implausible fantasy, for which there is no evidence of Iranian involvement, was fed to one of Washingtons agents in the
state prosecutors office, and a dubious event of 22 years ago was used to clear Kirchner out of the way of the American
looting of Argentina.

In Brazil, Washington has used corruption insinuations to get President Rousseff impeached by the lower house. Evidence
is not necessary, just allegations. It is no different from Iranian nukes, Saddam Husseins weapons of mass destruction,
Assads use of chemical weapons, or in Rousseffs case merely insinuations.

The Secretary General of the Organization of American States, Luis Almagro, notes that Rousseff hasnt been accused of
anything. The American-backed elites are simply using impeachment to remove a president who they cannot defeat
electorally.

In short, this is Washingtons move against the BRICS. Washington is moving to put into political power a rightwing party
that Washington controls in order to terminate Brazils growing relationships with China and Russia.
The great irony is that the impeachment bill was presided over by the corrupt lower house speaker, Eduardo Cunha, who
was recently discovered to have stashed millions of dollars in secret Swiss bank accounts (perhaps his pay-off from
Washington) and who lied under oath when he denied having foreign bank accounts. You can read the sordid story here:

GlobalResearch: US Complicity? After Vote to Remove Brazils President, Key Opposition Figure Holds Meetings in
Washington

Pro-government deputies hold a banner that reads in Portuguese Cunha out! behind the table of House speaker Eduardo Cunha, seated center,
during a voting session on the impeachment of President Dilma Rousseff, in Brasilia, Brazil, April 17, 2016.

Kirchner and Rousseffs crimes are their efforts to have the governments of Argentina and Brazil represent the Argentine
and Brazilian peoples rather than the elites and Wall Street. In Washington these are serious offenses as Washington uses
the elites to control South American countries. Whenever Latin Americans elect a government that represents them,
Washington overthrows the government or assassinates the president.

Washington is close to returning Venezuela to the control of the Spanish elite allied with Washington.

Related: New Coup Plot Hatched in Venezuela

Venezuelan President Nicols Maduro

The presidents of Ecuador and Bolivia are also targeted. One reason Washington will not permit its British lapdog to honor
the asylum Ecuador granted to Julian Assange is that Washington expects to have its own agent back in as President of
Ecuador, at which time Assanges asylum will be repealed.

Washington has always blocked reform in Latin America. Latin American peoples will remain American serfs until they elect
governments by such large majorities that the governments can exile the traitorous elites, close the US embassies, and
expel all US corporations. Every Latin American country that has an American presence has no future other than serfdom.

Mainstream Media Achieve Historic Milestone + Trust This: New Zealanders Don't
Trust MPs, Bloggers, The Media
April 24 2016 | From: Geopolitics / AP / RadioNewZealand

The mainstream media has achieved a new historic milestone lately: Only 6% Americans trust
them, which means 94% are now asking relevant questions that are pushing them away from the
lies and deceptions that mainstream media are all about.
Trust in the news media is being eroded by perceptions of inaccuracy and bias, fueled in part by Americans
skepticism about what they read on social media.

Just 6 percent of people say they have a lot of confidence in the media, putting the news industry about equal to Congress
and well below the publics view of other institutions. In this presidential campaign year, Democrats were more likely to trust
the news media than Republicans or independents.

But trust today also goes beyond the traditional journalistic principles of accuracy, balance and fairness.

Faced with ever-increasing sources of information, Americans also are more likely to rely on news that is up-to-date, concise
and cites expert sources or documents, according to a study by the Media Insight Project, a partnership of The Associated
Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research and the American Press Institute.

They want to be able to navigate the news app or website easily and quickly, without having to wade through intrusive or
annoying ads.

The skill set that journalists have to master is bigger, said Tom Rosenstiel, executive director of the American Press
Institute. Thats because the expectations of news consumers have increased.
The poll shows that accuracy clearly is the most important component of trust.

Nearly 90 percent of Americans say its extremely or very important that the media get their facts correct, according to the
study. About 4 in 10 say they can remember a specific incident that eroded their confidence in the media, most often one
that dealt with accuracy or a perception that it was one-sided.

The news media have been hit by a series of blunders on high-profile stories ranging from the Supreme Courts 2012 ruling
on President Barack Obamas health care law to the Boston Marathon bombing that have helped feed negative perceptions
of the media.

Download the survey results and analysis from here.

The establishment is definitely feeling the crunch as of late. But, they are still in control of the system, and they are still
rigging it.

A New York City elections official has been suspended without pay after a bureaucratic error allegedly resulted in
the removal of over 100,000 Brooklyn voters names from the city rolls during the states presidential primary,
according to a report.
 Sources told the Daily News that Borough Office Chief Clerk Diane Haslett-Rudianoshe skipped one of the steps
meant to stop the system from purging eligible voters.

The voting books need to be purged from time to time to eliminate people who pass away, move to new locations
or become ineligible for other reasons. This eventually resulted in voters being improperly removed.

She was suspended without pay, effective immediately, pending an internal investigation into the administration of
the voter rolls in the Borough of Brooklyn, the citys Board of Elections (BOE) reportedly said in a statement.

- RT

This disenfranchisement of 100,000 voters was claimed to have tip the balance towards Clintons favor.

So, not only that both parties are owned and controlled by the same puppet masters, the process of selecting party
candidates itself is also a game of survival of the fittest.

And as the masses are fully entertained by this periodic game of musical chairs, the Western economy is left burning without
the mainstream media telling like it is.

Theyre not only in utter denial, but they are wary more of their own irrelevance as the internet-based alternative
media is now virtually certified as the new mainstream media.

Humanity has definitely achieved something significant right here. And we can still achieve more if we continue to work
together in spite of our cultural differences.

Trust This: New Zealanders Don't Trust MPs, Bloggers, The Media
New Zealanders are trusting politicians less and less, according to a new survey. Just 8 percent of people
questioned said they trusted MPs, while government ministers edged up towards 9 percent.
The survey, carried out by Colmar Brunton for Victoria University's Institute for Governance and Policy Studies, asked 1000
people across the country about their confidence in government ministers, academics, judges, churches and the media,
among others.

Medical practitioners scored highest with 56 percent trusting them "lots" or "completely", followed by police (53 percent).
Judges and courts had a 34 percent rating.

But there was little faith in politicians, nor in media, with print and broadcast media at 9 percent, and last on the list,
bloggers, trusted by 5 percent in the survey.

Not only do people have little trust in their elected officials, they're trusting them less.

The survey showed trust in MPs and government ministers fell over the last three years more than any other group, with 58
percent saying they trust them less.

ACT party leader David Seymour said the survey was concerning, though not surprising.
"It was already starting from a low base, so that is very disappointing."
New Zealand First leader Winston Peters said once politicians get into parliament, they forgot the people who elected them.

Many MPs are living evidence that New Zealanders can take a joke. You've seen their behaviour - their egregious,
self-serving behaviour [and] the fact they get outside their electorate and forget their people."

Green Party co-leader James Shaw said politicians tended to come across as a "self-interested political class" who
had "nothing better to do than throw insults at each other."

In order to fix that image, the processes in Parliament needed to change.

The way that we examine bills breaks the process down in such a way that MPs, they show up, they make a five-
minute speech and they go away again. That is clearly not a real debate.

There are some things that the Speaker can do to lift standards of behaviour [and] I think we should have a code of
ethics for politicians and political operators that is way more rigorous than the one we currently have."

Institute for Governance and Policy Studies director, Professor Michael Macaulay, said the rankings offered a snapshot of
the current political climate, which was "typified by low voter turn out and a public largely disengaged with politics."

The survey revealed numbers but did not go into the reasons for people's lack of confidence, and he wanted it to be used as
a basis for further research.

Related: Politicians, media least trusted - study

9/11 Cover-Up Imploding As Mainstream Media Forced To Report Saudi Link
April 23 2016 | From: Infowars / FreeThoughtProject / Various

Establishment media finally coming clean about attack: New evidence reveals a link between Saudi
Arabia and 9/11, according to an international newspaper.

Ghassan Al-Sharbi, a Saudi bombmaker, is said to have taken flying lessons with the 9/11 hijackers and U.S.
investigators found his flight certificate in an envelope from the Saudi embassy in Washington, D.C., the
Australianreported, citing a recently declassified U.S. memo.

Related: Its Time to Admit: The 9/11 Truthers Were Right

The envelope points to the fundamental question hanging over us today: to what extent was the 9/11 plot
facilitated by individuals at the highest levels of the Saudi government? Asked Brian McGlinchey, the activist who
uncovered the 2003 memo known as Document 17.

Al-Sharbi was captured in Pakistan in 2002 and has since been held in Guantanamo Bay, which may indicate why President
Obama has kept the detention center open despite promising he would close it immediately during his 2008 presidential
campaign.

And Document 17 may explain why Saudi Arabia is freaking out right now, including the recent threat to dump nearly $750
billion in U.S. Treasury bonds and other assets if Congress passes a popular bill that would allow 9/11 victims to sue the
country.
And it may also explain why both House Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell are trying to
derail the bill, but they face a losing battle in the long-run: other mainstream outlets are finally coming clean about the Saudi
connection to 9/11.

The kingdoms involvement was deliberately covered up at the highest levels of our government, and the coverup
goes beyond locking up 28 pages of the Saudi report in a vault in the US Capitol basement, Paul Sperry of the
N.Y. Post reported. Investigations were throttled, co-conspirators were let off the hook.

Case agents Ive interviewed at the Joint Terrorism Task Forces in Washington and San Diego, the forward
operating base for some of the Saudi hijackers, as well as detectives at the Fairfax County (Va.) Police
Department who also investigated several 9/11 leads, say virtually every road led back to the Saudi Embassy in
Washington, as well as the Saudi Consulate in Los Angeles.

After 60-Minutes Bombshell, White House Says Secret 9/11 Docs Could Be Declassified In 60 Days

Related: Censored 28 Pages of 911 Half Truths Plaguing Mainstream Media

On a recent episode of 60-Minutes, former Florida governor, Democratic U.S. Senator and onetime chairman of the Senate
Select Committee on Intelligence, Bob Graham implicated a US ally for their role in the September 11th attacks.

I think its implausible to believe that 19 people, most of whom didnt speak English, most of whom had never
been in the United States before, many didnt have a high school education, could have carried out such a
complicated task without some support from within the United States, says Graham in the interview, implicating
Saudi Arabia for thier role in 9/11."

CBS reported that Graham and his Joint Inquiry co-chair in the House, former Representative Porter Goss (R-FL) - who
went on to be director of the CIA - say the 28 pages were excised from their report by the Bush Administration in the interest
of national security.
Graham wouldnt discuss the classified contents, but says the 28 pages outline a network of people he believes supported
hijackers in the U.S. He tells Steve Kroft he believes the hijackers were substantially supported by Saudi Arabia. Asked if
the support was from government, rich people or charities, the former senator replies, all of the above.

Until now, anyone who questioned the highly suspect official narrative on the 9/11 attacks has been labeled a conspiracy
theorist or a kook. But when current and former members of Congress, U.S. officials, and the 9/11 Commissioners
themselves call for the release of these 28-pages, which tells a different story of what happened that fateful day - people will
listen - and listen, they did.

On Tuesday, after Grahams appearance on 60-Minutes, he says he received a phone call - from the White House.

The Tampa Bay Times then spoke with Graham about that call.

Graham told the Tampa Bay Times that Brett Holmgren, a senior policy adviser to the assistant to the president
for Homeland Security, told him the declassification review of the documents withheld from a report issued by a
Joint Congressional Commission in 2003 will soon be completed.

Graham, who asked the president to declassify the records more than two years ago, said he asked how soon he
could expect a decision and was told one or two months.

Graham was co-chairman of a joint congressional committee that investigated the attacks.

The 28 pages were classified at the request of the FBI. Graham has been pushing for release of the documents since 2011
when he learned that the FBI had failed to disclose part of its investigation that included reports that high-ranking Saudi
Arabian officials provided financial aid and other help to the 19 hijackers who flew airplanes into the World Trade Center and
the Pentagon.
He says the FBI initially denied there were such reports but has since turned over 80,000 pages in a federal lawsuit seeking
the release of all reports on the investigation.

The decision makers at the White House have realized the public cares about it and there is an urgency to come to
a decision, Graham said, noting that he appearance on 60-minutes prompted the White House to finally address
the issue.

For over a decade, the families of the victims have demanded the full story on what happened and have only been met with
ridicule and closed doors.

This information being aired on mainstream television followed by an official response and plan to declassify the
information is historical and heartening news to those seeking the truth. Now, we the people may finally receive more insight
into the murderous actions on that day, bringing us closer to the closure we so sincerely deserve.

9/11 Commission Members Call For Release Of 28 Pages

Related: The Smoking Gun: "Document 17" Links Saudi Embassy In Washington To Sept 11

Saudi Arabian connection soon to be brought to light: Two months ago when Donald Trump said the release of the
28 classified pages of the 9/11 report would show the involvement of the Saudi government, NATIONAL REVIEW
called him a 9/11 Truther and said Trump turned into an ALEX JONES SHOW caller.
Now CBS 60 Minutes, along with former Senator Bob Graham, Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
and former members of the 9/11 Commission like Sen Bob Kerrey and John Lehman, Reagans Secretary of the Navy ,have
joined Trump and Alex Jones Show callers in demanding the classified information be released.

Saudi Arabia is a Cancer on the World

Related: U.S. House of Representatives to introduce resolution to investigate Obama Administrations high crimes
and misdemeanors

Saudi Arabia is the worst country in the world, bar none. If it disappeared off the map tomorrow, the planet would hold the
biggest party youve ever seen.

So why does Obama bow to Saudi royals like hes their house bitch every time he visits?

Related: As Oil Prices Fall, Saudi Arabia Borrows $10 Billion to Stay Afloat

When Idiots Control Technology, This Is What Happens

April 23 2016 | From: Geopolitics / Sputnik

Here on this planet exists one giant multi-layered corporation comprising of thousands sub-
corporations, with each layer promoting and protecting each own interests which when summed
up lead only to one definite conclusion, i.e. self-destruction.
We are part of that multi-layered corporation, whether by sheer ignorance, or through lies and deception.

However methods used that brought us together up to this giant control structure, we dont have any excuse whatsoever
why we should not correct the present trajectory before this present path reach its disastrous end.

We are aware of one of the most obvious misapplications of science and technology which is the continued establishment of
surveillance system far bigger than its predecessors. This is to be used to merge humanity to machines to facilitate AI
control later on.

The Colossal Costs of Building UKs Monster Surveillance Network

The proposal, which the Home Office wants to rush through the House of Commons just after Easter, will cost the country
billions of pounds. The centers will be required to keep large databases of all the connections made by UK Internet users
for one year - and to share them automatically with the UKs government and intelligence agencies.
The government is bracing itself for the vote as the news arrives that the only other country in the world to have ever tried a
similar approach - Denmark - has just decided to abandon the plan, for the second time in ten years.

The first Danish session logging system was put into place in 2007, but was abandoned in 2013 after the countrys police
and security services found it to be practically useless - besides being very expensive for Internet providers to install and
operate.

Another attempt to build an improved system, carried out by the Danish Ministry of Justice at the start of March 2016 also
appears to have foundered.

Before the final decision was taken, the Danish government asked accounting firm Ernst & Young to ascertain how much
the new surveillance network would cost.
The experts found that total expenses would be around one billion Danish Krone (US$150 million). The Danish government
decided that the costs were too high for the country and its tech sector.

In the UK, the costs are likely to be much-much higher. If in Denmark - a country of 5.6 million people - the government
estimated that each citizen would produce about 62,000 records every year, in Britain, whose population is about ten times
the size of Denmarks, the final annual database would have to include about four trillion a year.

Other estimates suggest that the sheer amount of records could even hit tens of trillions every year. That is because each
of those records, as per the law, would have to contain: a customer account reference or device identifier; the date and time
of the event; the duration; the source and destination IP and port number of each session; the domain name or linked URL;
the volume of data; and the name of Internet service you connected to.
The UK will have to find a way to store an enormous amount of information every day even if each records weight was
brought down to 100 bytes, on a yearly level, we are talking exabytes (thousands of petabytes).

The only surefire way to deal with this information is by building new massive data centers, which will need at least US$140
million in equipment to handle each exabyte. Add the building, as well as cooling and electricity management and you have
only started understanding the eventual costs of the UKs new monster surveillance plans.

Thats Fust the Tip of The Iceberg

The AI control mechanism itself requires the merging of different sciences which when all tied in together also explains the
physics behind all the myths, legends and conspiracies that ultimately define our present reality as it is today.

If you are not turned off by its title, the video above will surely reinforce what youve learned so far, and hopefully
convince you that all the madness that is still going on around the world today needs to end.

More importantly, dont allow yourself to get distracted over by any Gladio type operations wherever they may occur. Just
stay within the course of your own evolution.

Self-evolution is the most powerful revolution.

Henry Kissinger, War Criminal Extraordinaire: What You Need To Know About His Real
History - And Why The Sanders / Clinton Exchange Matters
April 22 2016 | From: Sott / Various

Sanders was right about Kissinger. His civilian death toll nears 4 million, his policies built today's
Middle East. Vote Hillary, get Henry. That seemed to be the message Hillary Clinton wants to send;
she's spoken highly of Kissinger in her last two debates with Bernie Sanders.

Sanders fired back at Clinton for seeking foreign-policy wisdom from the Vietnam-era secretary of state. "I find it
rather amazing," Sanders said, "given that I happen to believe that Kissinger was one of the most destructive
secretaries of state in the modern history of this country. I am proud to say that Henry Kissinger is not my friend. I
will not take advice from Henry Kissinger."

Maybe Kissinger will be the Dick Cheney of this campaign, angling for a shot at a dark-lord VP, you know, like Cheney
himself. I doubt it. Though, at 92 and still a congenital publicity seeker, he must be enjoying himself.
In my most recent book, Kissinger's Shadow, I tried to use Kissinger as a window onto both the collapse of the national
security state, brought about by Vietnam, its reconstruction on new footings reading to meet the challenges of 1970s and
beyond.

It is in that reconstruction, in which Kissinger was key, that one can find the beginning of the militarization of the Persian Gulf
- that is, the seeds sprouting the catastrophe we now find ourselves in.

As I wrote a few months ago for TomDispatch:

Similarly, each of Kissinger's Middle East initiatives has been disastrous in the long run.

Just think about them from the vantage point of 2015: banking on despots, inflating the Shah, providing massive
amounts of aid to security forces that tortured and terrorized democrats, pumping up the U.S. defense industry with
recycled petrodollars and so spurring a Middle East arms race financed by high gas prices, emboldening
Pakistan's intelligence service, nurturing Islamic fundamentalism, playing Iran and the Kurds off against Iraq, and
then Iraq and Iran off against the Kurds, and committing Washington to defending Israel's occupation of Arab
lands.

Combined, they've helped bind the modern Middle East into a knot that even Alexander's sword couldn't sever."

At the debate, Bernie went on the offensive. He not only called Kissinger one of the most destructive secretaries of state in
our modern history, he explained some of the history.

"In fact, Kissinger's actions in Cambodia, when the United States bombed that country, over - through Prince Sihanouk,
created the instability for Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge to come in who then butchered some 3 million innocent people - one
of the worst genocides in the history of the world."
I have no doubt that the fact-checkers are going to mangle Sanders' claims here, but he is pretty much right.

Kissinger didn't create the Khmer Rouge, but his mad and illegal bombing of Cambodia created the conditions
where the most genocidal, militant faction of a broad and diverse insurgency could seize control of first the
insurgency and then the state.

So for the sake of fact-checking Kissinger's genocide in Cambodia for millennial supporters of Sanders, who weren't yet alive
when Kissinger was acting with his full power, here's how I describe his responsibility in Kissinger's Shadow, with the help of
Ben Kiernan, a professor of history at Yale:

That Kissinger, along with Nixon, presided over the bombing of Cambodia, and had done so since March of 1969,
is now well known. Less so is that the worst of his bombing started in February 1973, a
month after Washington, Hanoi, and Saigon signed the Paris Peace accords.

In 1972, the U.S. dropped, in total, 53,000 tons of bombs on Cambodia. Between February 8 and August 15, 1973,
that number increased nearly five-fold and targeted not just enemy "sanctuaries" in the country's east but the
whole country.

In other words, Washington dropped the same amount of explosives on Cambodia in these six months as it
did in the entire previous four years. Think of it as an accelerando climax to Nixon and Kissinger's epic bombing
opera.

"We would rather err on the side of doing too much," Kissinger said to his envoy in Cambodia the day after the
escalation began, referring to the bombing, than too little. "I see no reason not to really whack the hell out of them
in Cambodia," Nixon said to Kissinger a few days later.

The nominal reason for this intensified bombing was the same as it ever was: to save face. Years of bombing had,
as discussed earlier, created an untenable situation in the country, leading to a 1970 coup that, in turn, broadened
the social base of the insurgency to include communists, "Sihanoukists" (supporters of deposed Prince Sihanouk
(whom Sanders mentioned in the debate) and other non-communists.

Nixon and Kissinger's solution to this crisis caused by bombing was more bombing, including phosphorous
explosives and cluster bombs that each released thousands of either ball bearings or darts.
The assault was meant to force the insurgency to the bargaining table, or force North Vietnam or China to force the
Cambodian insurgents to the table. And, as always, there were domestic calculations: bombing Cambodia might
distract from the Watergate scandal. It didn't.

The historian Ben Kiernan calls this intensified phase of the bombing a "watershed in Kampuchean history."
Kiernan is now a professor of history at Yale University and head of its Genocide Studies Program.

In the 1970s, he learned the Khmer language and interviewed hundreds of Cambodian refugees, including victims
and former members of the Khmer Rouge. Based on those interviews, as well as extensive documentary research,
including Air Force bombing data, he drew the following three conclusions:

First: The bombing caused "enormous losses" of Cambodian "life and property" on an almost unimaginable scale,
across the country. The campaign was indiscriminate, with rural civilians the primary victims. As many as three
million people were forced out of their homes during the war, almost half the country's population.

It's impossible to read the testimonies taken by Kiernan and others and not be stunned: twenty people killed in one
raid, thirty in another, entire families obliterated, hundreds of acres of crops scorched, whole villages destroyed.
"They hit houses in Samrong," one survivor recalls, "and thirty people were killed:"

Another said that the "bombing was massive and devastating, and they just kept bombing more and more
massively, so massively you couldn't believe it, so that it engulfed the forests, engulfed the forests with bombs,
with devastation."

Second: The bombing was an effective recruitment tool for the Khmer Rouge. Propaganda doesn't seem like quite
the right word, since it implies some form of deception or manipulation. Object lesson might be a better description
of the service Kissinger provided to Pol Pot. Here's a former Khmer Rouge cadre describing the effect of the
bombing:

"The ordinary people sometimes literally shit in their pants when the big bombs and shells came. Their minds just
froze up and they would wander around mute for three or four days.

Terrified and half crazy, the people were ready to believe what they were told. It was because of their
dissatisfaction with the bombing that they kept on co-operating with the Khmer Rouge, joining up with the Khmer
Rouge, sending their children off to go with them . . .

Sometimes the bombs fell and hit little children, and their fathers would be all for the Khmer Rouge."
Another told a journalist that his village, Pursat, had been destroyed by U.S. bombs, "killing 200 of its 350
inhabitants and propelling him into a career of violence and absolute loyalty" to the Khmer Rouge. One elderly
woman said she had never met a "Khmer Rouge" until her village was destroyed.

The propaganda was strategic but the fury and confusion real: "The people were very angry with the U.S., and that
is why so many of them joined the Khmer communists," reported one witness. Another said that after the bombs
destroyed a number of monasteries, "people in our village were furious with the Americans; they did not know why
the Americans had bombed them."

Third: The bombing that took place between February and August 1973 had two consequences: It delayed a
Communist victory while at the same time radically transformed the nature of that victory when it did come two
years later.

Had Lon Nol fallen in early or mid-1973, the insurgent victors would have been comprised of diverse factions,
including moderates and Sihanouk loyalists. By the time Lon Nol did fall in early 1975, not only had the Khmer
Rouge come to dominate the insurgency but a radical faction had come to dominate the Khmer Rouge.

Nixon and Kissinger's intensification of the bombing killed or scattered much of the anti- Lon Nol opposition, driving
the insurgency into siege mode and giving the upper hand to a hardened corps of extremists circling around Pol
Pot.

The bombing sanctioned their extremism: when political-education cadre pointed to charred corpses and limbless
children and said this was a "manifestation of simple American barbarism," who could disagree? And it made them
even more extreme: in the villages, "people were made angry by the bombing and went to join the revolution," and
so it followed that those who didn't join the revolution were "CIA agents" and targeted for reprisal.

The destruction of the countryside also brought out a "revival of national chauvinism," which included anger toward
the Vietnamese for abandoning the struggle even as Cambodia was being devastated. Sihanouk supporters,
Vietnamese, and other moderates were purged from opposition forces.
 At the same time, the strain of living under constant bombardment forced those areas under Khmer Rouge rule
into an accelerated program of peasant collectivization, justified by the demands of having to survive during
wartime. Emerging from the carnage was fury directed not just at United States imperialism but at the capital
"Phnom Penh," the city as a symbol of decadent, urban and industrial modernity.

On April 17th, 1975, the Khmer Rouge took Phnom Penh, and Pol Pot declared "Year Zero." His cadre
immediately began to empty out the capital and other cities, deporting millions of urban dwellers to the country's
northwest.

Cambodia's new rulers targeted for persecution Buddhist monks, ethnic minorities, former government loyalists,
intellectuals, moderate Communists, and anyone who would stand in the way of establishing their agrarian utopia.
Nearly the entire population of Cambodia was forced into rural labor camps.

By the time a now unified Vietnam invaded the country in 1979, overthrew the Khmer Rouge, and put an
end to the madness, as many as two million people, perhaps more, had been killed - of starvation,
exhaustion, disease, or murdered.

And of course, not just Cambodia. I was queried about how I came up - in a Nation piece last week - with these numbers:

"A full tally hasn't been done, but a back-of-the-envelope count would attribute 3 million, maybe 4 million deaths to
Kissinger's actions," in my post on Hillary Clinton's pride in being tutored by Henry Kissinger. More sources can be found
in Kissinger's Shadow, but here it goes:

Kissinger's hardline in southern Africa - in response to movements of national liberation in Angola and Mozambique and anti-
white supremacy struggles in Rhodesia and South Africa - led him to support allied insurgencies.

We might wish," Ford's secretary of defense James Schlesinger said during one 1975 strategy session, "to encourage the
disintegration of Angola."

And that's what Kissinger did. In July, he stepped up covert aid to UNITA, a pro-American, anti-MPLA insurgency in Angola
that he had already been running.
Likewise in Mozambique. All told, historians guess that these wars killed between 1,750,000 and 2 million people. Neither
country "disintegrated." But they were devastated, their infrastructure ruined, their governments militarized and bankrupted,
their hospitals and morgues filled beyond capacity. Mozambique's civil war ended in 1992, while fighting in Angola dragged
on for yet another decade.

Related: The Hidden History Of The Incredibly Evil Khazarian Mafia [Illuminati Cabal Zionists...]

Pakistan's genocide in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh), which Kissinger green-lighted: Between 300,000 and a million.

The U.S.'s illegal bombing campaign in Cambodia: 100,000 civilians dead in the bombing. 1,671,000 killed in the resultant
genocide.

Indonesia's invasion and occupation of East Timor, which Kissinger greenlighted: 200,000 dead

Chile: at least 3,000

The Guatemalan genocide is an atrocity often not associated with Henry Kissinger, since the worst of its slaughter came in
1978-1983, a few years after he left office. But here, too, his fingerprints show.
In 1970, Kissinger and his military aide Alexander Haig were involved in passing the names and addresses of
"Guatemalan terrorists" to security forces, even though Washington was well aware that that the government was
using its U.S.-funded counter-terror program to eliminate not just armed insurgents but all political opposition and
that the great majority of political prisoners taken were summarily executed.

Shortly thereafter, repression in Guatemala got so out of hand that a member of Kissinger's NSC staff urged that the so-
called "40 Committee" - the committee chaired by Kissinger that brought together various arms of the national security state,
which helped organize the campaign to overthrow Allende in Chile - reconsider U.S. support for the Guatemalan
government.

Kissinger, as chair, didn't think it was an issue worth taking up and robust military support continued, paving the way for the
killing of over 100,000 people.
Senior war criminal Henry Kissinger and war criminal apprentice Hillary Rodham Clinton interviewed by media shill Charlie Rose

So, to sum up, using the lower estimates above: Kissinger's policies resulted in at least 4,124,000 civilian deaths,
probably many times that number of wounded and refugees - and that doesn't include Kissinger's victims in
Vietnam - a war that he (and Nixon) helped prolong for five years when they sabotaged 1968 peace talks - Laos, or
Argentina, Uruguay, the Middle East and Persian Gulf, at the hands of Kissinger's partners, such as the Shah and
the Saudis.
 "Should Hillary Clinton be basking in Henry Kissinger's
praise," Michael Tracey, at the New Republic asked
Clinton's team.

This was after the candidate, at the previous debate,

seemed to think that Kissinger's approval was evidence of
her "progressivism." Joel Benenson, a Clinton "surrogate,"
said: "People generally believe that Henry Kissinger was a
good secretary of state . . . I think he's respected."

Clinton's campaign manager, John Podesta, said: "Here's a

guy who's certainly knowledgeable about what it takes to
manage the State Department."

Considering the carnage Secretary of State Clinton left in

her wake in Libya, Mali and Honduras (and, as a senator, in
Iraq), there's much truth in that statement.

Greg Grandin is a professor of history at New York

University and the author of Kissinger's Shadow: The Long
Reach of America's Most Controversial Statesman. He is
the author of a number of prize-winning books,
including The Empire of Necessity: Slavery, Freedom, and
Deception in the New World, which won the Bancroft Prize
in American History.

He is also the author of Fordlandia: The Rise and Fall of

Henry Ford's Forgotten Jungle City (Metropolitan 2009), a
finalist for the Pulitzer Prize in History, as well as for the
National Book Award and the National Book Critics Circle
Award.

Henry Kissinger's Legacy of War Crimes Exposed by Secret Yale Visit

Abby Martin speaks about how Yale University's secret invite to Henry Kissinger has shined a new light into the former
Secretary of State's long list of criminality, by helping facilitate US war crimes in South East Asia, South America and the
Middle East, which resulted in the deaths of millions of civilians.

Of course there is also those famous Kissinger quotes:

"Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy."

and

"Control oil, and you control nations; control food and you control the people."
Further reading (if you can stomach it):

The Grievous Return of Henry Kissinger

Released transcript of phone conversation between Nixon and Kissinger reveals U.S. intervention in Chile to block Allende
began long before September 1970 election

'The illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer': 'Kissinger Cables' among latest and biggest
WikiLeaks documents release to date

Debacle, Inc.: How Henry Kissinger helped disorder the world

Intelligence officers confirm Kissinger role in Turkish invasion of Cyprus and Chilean coup

Psychopathic birds of a feather flock together: Hillary Clinton and Henry Kissinger

Emergency Meetings, Banker Summits, Crashing European Banks, And The Worst
Bank Reports Since The Great Recession
+ Is The American Debt-Note Factory Nearing Its End?
April 21 2016 | From: ActivistPost / PoliticalVelCraft / VeteransToday / Various

Just about every major banker and finance minister in the world is meeting in Washington, DC, last
week, following two rushed, secretive meetings of the Federal Reserve and another instantaneous
and rare meeting between the Fed Chair and the president of the United States.

These and other emergency bank meetings around the world cause one to wonder what is going down. Lets start
with a bullet list of the weeks big-bank events:

The Federal Reserve Board of Governors just held an expedited special meeting on Monday in closed-door
session.

The White House made an immediate announcement that the president was going to meet with Fed Chair Janet
Yellen right after Mondays special meeting and that Vice President Biden would be joining them.

The Federal Reserve very shortly posted an announcement of another expedited closed-door meeting for
Tuesday for the specific purpose of bank supervision.

A G-20 meeting of finance ministers and central-bank heads starts in Washington, DC, on Tuesday, too, and
continues through Wednesday.

Then on Thursday the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund meet in Washington.

The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta just revised US GDP growth for the first quarter to the precipice of recession
at 0.1%.

US banks are widely expected this week to report their worst quarter financially since the start of the Great
Recession.

The European Unions new bail-in procedures for failing banks were employed for the first time with Austrian
bank Heta Asset Resolution AG.

Italys minister of finance called an emergency meeting of Italian bankers to engage last resort measures for
dealing with 360-billion euros of bad loans in banks that have only 50 billion in capital.

Related: Fiat Dollar Collapse: Are these signs that BRICS will pull it soon?
 China Launches Yuan Gold Fix
Its official. Overnight, China launched its gold-backed Yuan to boost its control over the gold and paper
currency market at the same time. Although, mainstream media are saying that it is a Yuan gold fix
where gold has a fix Yuan units equivalent, its basically the same banana.

Earlier, Deutsche Bank was forced to admit its culpability in rigging the prices of gold and silver in connivance with
other players in the precious metals market, which put resource rich countries at a gross disadvantage.

With Yuan basically the same as gold, and worthless fiat dollar not allowed to swap with Yuan, this is the beginning
of the end for the Federal Reserve fiat dollar.

Read more at Geopolitics / Reuters

Related: China Launches Yuan Gold Fix To "Exert More Control Over Price Of Gold"

President Obamas meeting with Fed Chair Yellen

It is rare for presidents to meet with the chair of the Federal Reserve. The last time President Obama met with Janet Yellen
was in November of 2014, a year and a half ago. It is even more rare for the vice president of the United States to join them.
In fact, Ive heard but havent verified that it has never happened in a suddenly called meeting with the Fed before.

For security reasons, the president and vice president dont regularly attend the same events.

There are, of course, many planning sessions or emergency meetings where they do get together, but not with the
head of the Federal Reserve.

Emergency meetings where the VP is included in the planning session would include situations related to dire national
security in case the VP winds up having to take over.
(George Bush and Dick Cheney were exceptional to the point that everyone commented on how often the VP was included
in meetings with the president, but I always figured that was because George Bush couldnt think and speak without Cheney
acting as the ventriloquist.)

In fact the meeting with the prez and vice prez is so rare that the White House is bending over backwards to assure the
entire nation that the president is not meeting with Yellen to try to influence the Fed, which is required to act independently of
politics (so they claim).

According to the White House, President Obama is meeting with the Fed chair and Biden to discuss the nations longer-term
economic outlook, even though Yellen just told the entire nation that the economy was strong and had arrived nearly back
at full health. The president says they will be comparing notes. Do their notes about the nations outlook
disagree? Compare notes sounds sufficiently vague to cover everything imaginable.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest said both Obama and Yellen are focused on ways to expand economic
opportunities for the U.S. middle class. He called the meeting an opportunity for the two to trade notes while
emphasizing that Yellen makes decisions about monetary policy independently."

Either such meetings are, indeed, extremely rare, or the White House doth protest to much because they spent more time
this week emphasizing what the president was not going to do than what he was going to do in assuring us all that the
president will not try to influence Yellen.
 The president has been pleased with the way that she has fulfilled what is a critically important job, Earnest said.
He added that Obama has the utmost respect for the independent nature of her role.

Earnest also said that, even in a confidential setting Obama would not have a conversation that would undermine the
Feds ability to make critical financial decisions independently.

Im waiting to here the next words - trust us!

If such meetings with the Fed are so rare they require careful defensive explanation, why the sudden call of the meeting,
oddly timed between two specially called, emergency meetings of the Fed - or, at least, expedited meetings of the Fed.

It cant just be that the president wants to plan what he will be saying at this weeks G-20 conference, if hes to speak there.
That kind of planning would happen in advance because one knows the conference is coming.
One striking peculiarity of the presidents meeting with the Fed is that it appeared to have been called immediately after the
Fed announced Mondays expedited meeting of the Board of Governors.

We are in an election cycle, and I already speculated in my last article that, with the anti-establishment, Fed-hating
candidates Sanders and Trump doing so well in their bids for the presidency, we could be sure the Administration would be
doing all it can with the Fed to put some accelerant on this economy and forestall the recession that I believe we have
already begun.

Read more at: ActivistPost

Another Point to Consider: Shanghai Shock April 19, 2016: Yuan Based Gold Standard

Chinas new gold-backed Yuan was issued on Tuesday April 19, 2016; the entire world now has the choice of a new
currency to use for international trade: The old US Dollar which is backed by nothing, or the new Chinese Yuan, which is
backed by gold. Which currency would YOU use?

The Great Tectonic Shift of Gold from West to East:

Switzerland plays a key role in the gold market because it is home to many big gold refiners, so its report confirms what
weve been saying about golds move out of the West to the strong hands of the East. Swiss report showed an incredible 80
percent of gold shipments went to Asia.

Bloomberg states that theres no evidence that China seeks to adopt a traditional gold standard. 6/5/2015

China is warning foreign banks that they must participate in Yuan-based gold price fixing. The first-ever Chinese
benchmark is set to launch in April of this year. 1/5/2016

If China were to partially back its yuan with gold it would require a gold price of $64,000 per ounce, 50 times gold bullions
price today, according to a recent article from respected Bloomberg Intelligence.

China has been quietly accumulating a significant amount of gold bullion in recent years. They are now the top producer and
top consumer of gold in the world. They are believed to keep all of their domestic production, plus import significant amounts
from other nations. In addition, they have been buying up gold mines around the globe at steep discounts and bringing home
gold they had stored in London, New York and Switzerland.

After accumulating all of this gold, along with their close ally Russia, many believe they will eventually break the metal free
from the price manipulation undertaken by the banks/governments in the United States and United Kingdom. Once price
discovery moves from West to East, they will allow the price to float to free-market levels and the value of all the gold they
have been accumulating will skyrocket.
Removing the gold price suppression will be accompanied by wholesale dumping of U.S. treasury bonds and test the worlds
faith in the US dollar debt-based fiat currency system.

This will give China, Russia and others a greater influence in world financial markets and better stability in their currencies. It
may give them a considerable strategic advantage over the United States, a nation that many believe no longer has the
gold that they claim.

Indeed, with a lack of a comprehensive audit and unwillingness of officials to allow one, many believe the gold is no longer in
Fort Knox.

Now we move to the really interesting part of this story. Not only has China been accumulating huge amounts of gold (on and
off record), but they also launched their own international gold trading platform on the SGE. It has become the largest
physical gold exchange in the world, with an estimated 52 times more physical gold withdrawals versus the predominantly
paper exchange of the COMEX.

Read more at: PoliticalVelCraft

Is the American debt-note Factory nearing its end?

It's becoming pretty obvious that the days of Federal Reserve System hegemony are now limited, in that much of
the world is dumping the US Petro Dollar and plans to shift to direct trade and use of Gold, Silver and commodity-
backed real currencies.

Everyday more and more people that didnt already know are now finding out that the Federal Reserve System is a
private corporation, owned by foreign Bloodline families, and is neither Federal nor a Bank.

They are finding out it is a private corporation, a franchisee of the privately owned Bank of London located in the City of
London, a private Khazarian Mafia nation-state with its own ambassadors and police.

The City of London is not a part of the UK and pays no taxes to England.

Related: What / Who is "The Crown"

It was infiltrated and completely hijacked by the Rothschild Banking family by use of some crafty covert operations.
Click on the image above to open a larger version in a new window

The most notable major covert operation by the Luciferian Rothschild money-changers was a stock price suppression
operation which allowed them to buy up vast quantities of stock at fire-sale prices. This was based on a false announcement
a victory of Napoleon in the Battle of Waterloo, when it was just the opposite.

Another lessor but still very important covert operation was the use of Rothschild money power to place Oliver Cromwell in
power in England. This prepared the way for the Rothschilds to deeply infiltrate the City of London.

Cromwell was a Rothschild family puppet who was willing to harass, abuse and even murder Rothschild opposition which
allowed them to complete their hijacking of the City of London financial and Banking enterprises and make England the
center of their ancient Luciferian dark-side Babylonian Talmudic black-magick powers.
From their new home base in England they were able to expand their private central banking kingdom as a
replacement for the eroded and dying British Empire which when at it peak was claimed that the Sun never set upon
it it was so worldwide and vast.

It was the Rothschilds who were allegedly anointed by Lucifer (Satan) to become the functional head of the Khazarian Mafia,
the Worlds biggest Organized Crime Syndicate based on the power of the dark side.

Those who run the dark side using the RKM and its Worldwide occult network of Evil must first give up their souls to Lucifer
and must function as non-humans dedicated to living in an occult world of secret evil dedicated to performing the opposite of
everything that is good, loving, just and righteous.

Hierarchy advancement to the higher positions of extreme power, privilege, wealth and status is based on participation in evil
initiation rites based on deviant, perverted criminal acts such as satanic black masses, drug usage, pedophilia, child torture,
child-hunting at private hunting lodges, child sacrifice, and human vivisection all secretly videoed for later blackmail purposes
in the initiate ever goes outside their allowed behavioral parameters.

The RKM learned of the addictive nature of Turkish Opium and its medicinal and intoxicating powers, and its ability
to temporarily stop time and remove all worldly cares.
Battle between the British war ships and the Chinese junks from the first Opium War it is interesting that the RKM used its proprietary cutout the East
India company as its chief opium trafficker

The English had been buying a lot of tea, spices and silk from China and had paid them a lot of silver and gold in exchange
for these products which the English people demanded and paid high prices for.

The Rothschild decided they would traffick opium into China to create massive addictions and thereby recover all the silver
and gold they had paid out to the Chinese for tea, spices and silk. Opium was deployed by the Khazarian mafia associated
bloodline families as a weapon of covert economic war.

It didnt take too long for the Chinese warlords to figure this all out and fight back. Thus the Opium Wars occurring. English
troops prevailed but because they had suffered some losses negotiated treaties allowing some opium sales but with
significant curtailment.

Ever since, at various times, the Khazarian Mafia has continued to deploy illegal, habit forming narcotics that are able to steal
a persons very soul and dirty them up for life in most cases, an addiction that usually takes everything they have including
their life itself.

The Rothschild Khazarian Mafia (RKM) Beast is centered in the City of London (COL) and is run by the Luciferian
Rothschilds.

It is these Banksters who are reputed to have been anointed and empowered directly by Lucifer who are the head of the
occult beast known as the Hierarchy which uses the High Freemasonry, and the Worldwide Satanic and occult networks as
cover, and has continually trafficked illegal habit forming narcotics.
The RKM have trafficked numerous illegal drugs into America as covert weapons of war to not only destroy America the
Constitutional Republic but to raise vast off the books black funds for various worldwide covert criminal activities as well as
to make the Bloodline families participating in the drug trade rich beyond reason.

Many of these funds are used to finance vast mercenary operations of mind-kontrolled dupes pretending to be and acting like
bloodthirsty terrorists who have lost their souls and are no longer functionally human.

Because the RKM basically owns and control every head of most of the American Intel and Law Enforcement
Agencies they are basically immune from any arrest and prosecution for their massive illegal drug trafficking into
and across America and much of the World.

Only their small time cutouts are ever arrested as token LE prosecutions to fool everyone.

After many years of failed attempts, the Rothschild COL Banksters were able to buy off most members of the US Congress
and the sitting US President and were able to establish a foothold inside America with their passage of the Federal Reserve
Act of 1913.
President Andrew Jackson a true Constitutional Populist

President Andrew Jackson had driven the RKM Banksters out of America and felt they were evil. He was correct. He
fully understood that these COL Banksters were foreign based vipers and parasites.

Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the
bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when
you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I
shall ruin ten thousand families.

That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and
that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves.

If Congress has the right under the Constitution to issue paper money, it was given to be used by themselves, not
to be delegated to individuals or corporations.

These are quotes from Andrew Jackson, who was a distinguished Constitutional President of the United States 1829-1837,
and who killed the RKM Bank and drove it out of America. Sadly, it successfully bribed its way back into America in 1913,
this time to last for over 100 years; and the RKM bank effectively parasitized millions of American soldiers lives and health,
along with most Americans earned wealth and assets.

Once these COL RKM Banksters were able to set up their stateside franchise, they were able to slowly and
systematically change the US Dollar from Gold and Silver Certificates (real money) to their own FRS Fiat
(counterfeit) money better known as Federal reserve notes.

These FRS notes are actually pernicious interest bearing debt-notes and slowly but surely all Gold and Silver backing was
removed in 1971 by Richard Nixon and they became debt-notes only.

This final act of the JFK Assassination coup detat occurred in 1971 by the man Richard Nixon who was deeply involved in
what he called that Bay of Pigs Thing with GHWB.

It was GHWB who served as the titular head of the Bush Crime cabal which ran the CIA as its personal tool on behalf of the
Fourth Reich and it was he who planned and ran the JFK assassination of the behalf of the Fourth Reich which was
functioning as a part of the RKM.

The Federal Reserve Board, 1913

This seems so counter-intuitive but when one pulls back the curtain one finds the RKM Babylonian Talmudic
Zionists at the core of the RKM who work with every other major crime syndicate including the Fourth Reich which
they set up and ran in the first place.

Henry Kissinger, Nixons national security advisor and high ranking secret RKM appointee of David Rockefeller and former
Soviet Mole (Soviet secret code-named according to FBI files of Bor).
David Rockefeller has been the head of the American RKM franchise. Kissinger negotiated the US Petro Dollar deal with the
Mideast Oil producers. The deal was the US Military and NATO will protect you and will make sure you have plenty of
profitable western markets only if you agree to accept US Dollars for your oil sales.

If you want to know the ugly truth about Heinz Kissinger (Bor) invest about 8 hours listening to Kay Griggs video affidavit, a
truly great American Hero like Gwenyth Todd and Sibel Edmonds.
This deal was made and soon the US Petro Dollar became the Worlds Reserve Currency, a distinct advantage for the FRS
franchisee of the COL RKM private central Banking System.

We now know for certain that the RKM private central banking system is international, and functions like an octopus
with many tentacles.

That is why insiders have called it both the Octopus and the Baby which is short for the current form of the ancient
Babylonian Talmudic black magick money from nothing Zionist system (aka the secret Sionist Luciferian occult black-
magick money-creation system).

Related: Babylonian Money Magic & How Modern "Commercial Law" Is Based On Ancient Babylonian Codes
And we know that without question a strong association between the RKM private banking octopus has always been
associated with both illegal narcotics and drug trafficking and the massive Rockefeller created oil cartel which started out as
the Seven Sisters and has now morphed into a smaller number of much larger corporations.

We know that one of the main methods used by the RKM to infiltrate and hijack many nations has been through the
infiltration and capture of control over the underworld or criminal organizations in each nation, as well as by
infiltrating their banking and corporations and consolidating them.

All the significant RKM leaders are initiated into secret societies using criminal, sadistic and highly deviant rituals, which
increase in intensity and severity at each higher level as one become initiated to move up to the next higher level in the RKM
system (aka the Hierarchy). Once the RKM gains control over the leaders in every sector, the rest is relatively easy.

And if these leaders go outside their prescribed and allowed parameters, they are sanctions and sometimes their evil
activities during initiations are weakened to the public through Press stooges for the Hierarchy.

We now have gained a simple understanding of how the RKM buys its way into (infiltrates), then hijacks large
corporations and then consolidates them into larger and larger entities that operate as virtual monopolies in
function only but not corporate structure.

The joke was on us, the American people with the Bankster Bailouts. The FRS threatened that there would be blood in the streets and martial law
would have to be declared unless the FRS and the too big to fail Wall Street Banks were bailed out by the US Taxpayers. This trick was successfully
pulled off TWICE

Once an industry is consolidated, be it oil, manufacturing or entertainment or media, it is easy for the RKM to exercise control
over these virtual monopolies because all of the CEOs are owned and controlled by the RKM or its Cutouts one way or
another.

Despite the incredible power and control the RKM has exercised over every American institution including the Pentagon,
Intel, Law Enforcement, Congress, the Judiciary and almost every administration, their system has been exposed and such
knowledge is rapidly diffusing to the masses who are beginning to connect the dots and have now had about enough.

The question of how long the American masses are going to continue to allow several wrinkled up old Luciferian
occult masters in wheel chairs to run their lives and destroy everything they ever worked for and America too, is
now becoming a prominent issue.

These wrinkled up old Satanic pedophile mass-murderers and child-sacrificers have run the Hierarchy and gained reach all
the way down to your street level through their control of local police, and state and federal agencies.

The answer seems to be not much longer. Why does this now seem a certainty? The answer will surprise many.

The private Federal Reserve System as well as it franchiser the City of London RKM are both nearing complete
collapse.

And this is all due to a strange convergence of different factors including the end of the US Petro Dollar as the oil sales
medium and the Worlds reserve Currency, the emergence of the BRICs Development bank, the Chinese AIIB and their new
swift type electronic exchange system, and numerous direct trade agreements between nations that avoid any use of the US
Dollar at all.

FRS insiders know that the days of the FRS are limited and because they realize the whole RKM system is collapsing under
a web of debt and runaway oil based derivatives that are now collapsing thanks to the Russians lowering their price of oil and
collapsing the price down to reasonable levels.

The FRS has been buying up US Treasury notes from the Chinese and other nations who
fear they are soon approaching a complete loss of value. Thus the FRS and the US
Treasury are monetizing debt, which means they are kiting up the whole system to
manipulate the statistics to look good, while the whole system nears ultimate collapse.

The top FRS officials know this as do the real owners of the FRS, who are the Bloodline families who have made immense
unjustified riches off of the American taxpayer and renter of their fake FRS Debt-notes, which are little more than mere
promises to repay the debt with pernicious accrued interest.

Obviously it is clear that the FRS is seeing themselves in a serious emergency state and is seeking consultations with the
Administration about it. After the special FRS Board Meeting this last Monday April 11th, FRS Chief Janet Yellon met with
President Obama. This itself seemed quite irregular and suggests something big is in the wind.

How can we be sure that the FRS nears complete collapse?

Their Controlled Major Mass Media have not been telling us the truth.

These six Major Media News Outlets who are a virtual monopoly claim in unison that the US unemployment rate is 5% or
less when it is at or near 40% or over 95 million able workers who are out of work.

This 40% figure does not include the many millions that are grossly under-employed.

Recently an associate of the FRS approached several key members of Congress and proposed that the USG
federalize the Federal Reserve System and take ownership for it.

Certainly this is some kind of an admission of near complete FRS insolvency and a coming financial storm.
 But it is also a request for a get out of jail free card and an
apparent attempt to shift responsibility from the Bloodline
owners of the FRS to the US Public.

This is a crafty new way to monetize the debt by shifting

ownership of it to the American people.

It is being proposed because the FRS Bloodline families who

are the true stockholders and owners of the FRS realize that
they cannot squeeze much more value out of it anymore.

The FRS was used to covertly kite the system through built-in
inflation by using each local member bank loan to create money
from nothing and then charging pernicious usury to use what
should have been owned by the American people directly
themselves in the first place.

Soon there will be no alternative but to set up a new

American monetary system.

Most of the BRICS and AIIB members have already discussed

in secret that these various new currencies will have to be
linked to gold, silver and commodities as their backing for
money.

Some believe it will end up being digitally based but still linked
to Gold, Silver and commodities.

And there will have to be trade boards to adjust exchange rates

between trading countries in a mutually agreeable fashion.

It was all the unConstitutional Free trade Agreements and the mad addiction by Wall Street Banks to various pyramid Ponzi
scams such as the S&L scam and the Enron scam (CIA black fundraisers), the Mortgage balloon Scam, and addiction to out
of control derivatives and their continual repackaging and fraudulent sales as equity backed securities when they were
anything but securitized by equity, and actually were fraudulent paper.

And we still have numerous top corporate leaders claiming on behalf of the RKM that
America has a shortage of educated skilled workers and are continually begging for more
H1B foreign visad immigrant workers.

This claim is of course based on a lie and is designed to keep the wages low and to destroy America the Republic by
removing jobs from mainstream highly educated American workers.

And that the lies surrounding free trade and unrestricted immigration that Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders are
now exposing is just one major reason why their words are resonating with so many Americans.

Many Americans are starting to envision the new dream team of Trump for President with Bernie Sanders as his VP running
mate. Actually they agree on most of the most important issues. If both are cheated out of becoming their party candidates,
they should quit their parties and join forces to become independents which both have been before. This team if they could
iron out their differences would be unbeatable.

Bernie Sanders is popular among college students and the younger, and Donald Trump is popular among a wide spectrum,
including many African Americans and Hispanics which is turning out to be a surprise to many so-called political experts.

The American masses do not want the sleazy Clintons back in the White House with all Bills un-prosecuted rapes and
sexual abuse incidents, and Hillarys Whitewater scam, the Web Hubbell love child in the former First Family, the Vince
Foster murder and being rolled up in the W.H. rug incident, and her W.H. Waco bloodfest tantrum.
Hitlery is the Satanic RKMs choice, and we shall see if their current diminished state of American political power is great
enough to keep her out of jail for running a company covert op on her email, while getting a big chunk of money for herself or
enough fake votes to get her elected as POTUS.

So far, her course has been completely protected, and she has been promoted to a status similar to the Queen of England.

No wonder she acts so haughty and laughs off every good question without answering it.

Related: Shocking Hillary Quotes + Hillary's Emails Confirm France And US Killed Qaddafi For His Gold And Oil

She has the whole Hierarchy leadership behind her and is serving as a major Cutout right now. Of course they want her to be
elected POTUS. If elected, she will be open for Hierarchy business 24/7.

With Hillary everything is always for sale, everything to anybody with enough money, and believe you me, it takes a lot to get
what you want in DC these days.

But there are other secret forces at work here to expose her and block her, and these go deep within certain secret factions
in the Pentagon and some powerful Intel agencies, and even Majesty, the beyond-black group that is alleged to handle the
most sensitive Alien ET matters including secret negotiations and treaties with some such groups.

Far too many of their crimes were covered up and went unprosecuted because of their
being appointed by the RKM Hierarchy to serve as master RKM puppets.

The Establishment wants the Clintons back in power because with them everything is for sale 24/7 and this is what the RKM
members want so they can remain feeding off USG pork like pigs at the taxpayer trough.

Conclusion
As the RKM is now cornered by the rest of the World that is tired of their debt note private central Banksters Fiat
counterfeit currency scam, it is becoming obvious by the day that the RKM is losing power and soon the Hierarchy itself will
be taken apart at the seams.
Top Hierarchy members know this is happening and are scrambling to shift the FRS into the USG as a US Federal Agency
owned by We The People to create cover and provide an escape from the peasants and their pitchforks.

Many Americans are now learning that the US Congress is spending about 40% more than it takes in in Tax revenues.

This means that it must borrow more and more FRS Petro-Dollar debt-notes from the unending, elastic American Money
Factory which is a true monopoly and completely illegal and unConstititional.

If a law is unConstitutional, it is by definition illegal and no American has any obligation to obey it.

The only reason that 'We The People' pay taxes is because the RKM Banksters have
transformed this world into their own police state with their owned judicial system, and
their ability to use their unbridled power of the boot in your face and threatened
imprisonment to force compliance.

[They know that. Now you know that. Wake up and stand up.]

This year it has been reported tax revenues are up. This is of course due to the secret actions of the Plunge Protection
team which kites up stock with direct secret purchases and intercepts electronic trades using A.I. algorithms to make profits
not otherwise available.

You can bet the Plunge Protection team has also been making secret tax deposits through various complex means to kite up
the system and fool everyone.
When any government reached such a state that it has to borrow 40% or more money to balance its books, this is a scenario
that is certainly a formula for complete financial collapse.

And when you add so-called Free Trade Agreements, massive foreign immigration into the picture, H1B visas and a World
increasingly saturated in US Petro Dollars that are losing value by the day, you can see this is a formula for coming
catastrophe.

The rest of the World is now catching on and is deeply committed to constructing serious firewalls against the US Petro
Dollar such as BRICs, AIIB and direct trade agreements without the use of the US Petro Dollar.

The handwriting is on the wall, the days of the FRS and RKM World hegemony are now limited, and the end for them
is near.

100 Days - Claiming Back New Zealand

April 20 2016 | From: 100DaysToDemocracy

Horrified and shocked-she isnt the only one: This isnt the New Zealand our parents and
grandparents lived in* - and were certainly not the better for it.
So isnt it high time we started holding to account the politicians whove been so very largely responsible for this,
and for the fact that many New Zealanders are now finding it difficult to afford living here in what is (or was?)
our own country?

Its not a good sign when those returning from the UK, for example, comment on how much more expensive everything is
now food, electricity, very basic living costs.

Even more crucially, we now have the least affordable houses of any country in the world in relation to income although
we all remember Prime Minister John Key blatantly denying there was even a housing shortage in Auckland. How could he
have not known?

NZ Herald: Home truths: Can you afford to buy in New Zealand?

So perhaps its not surprising that PM John Key has been so very keen to get rid of the flag that they* and we have long
lived underthe one flying over us all. John Key wanted the Union Jack removed, and apparently, the politicized Chinese
with whom he gets on so very well agreed with him. Of course.
Related: What Is The Real Agenda Behind John Key's Drive To Change The New Zealand Flag: Due Authority - A
Very Silent Coup?

But not Hong Kong Chinese, fighting for basic freedoms against their predatory neighbour. Hong Kong Chinese apparently
value the Union Jack, saying it represents the freedoms they had under the British and no longer have, and that it expresses
the difference in values between Hong Kong and its over-authoritarian Communist government.

All the nonsense talked by Key and parroted by the inner circles of government about New Zealanders needing to discover
our national identity and our own place in the world is basically manipulation.

How many of us go to sleep fretting about our national identity?

Mind you, as its increasingly not being seen as our own country any more, this question is going to be raised but not as
the PM apparently wants. We pretty well knew our own place in the world in fact we owned our own place. But do we
now?

Increasingly New Zealanders feel that we dont. Nor will many of us have been impressed by learning that Key also sent a
text to former All Blacks captain Richie McCaw (whom weve recently seen in an advertisement for an Australian-owned
bank) and his team-mate, Dan Carter, asking them to watch his video promoting a flag change.
Whether this is appropriate behaviour for a Prime Minister, and whether sporting figures would be wiser to refrain from being
lured into looking too close to powerful politicians is another issue.

The PM, of course, has his devoted cheerleaders among the media, so perhaps its not so extraordinary as it would
otherwise be that we can guarantee many of them are managing not to look too closely at the essentially vulgar antics which
have been his trademark at a personal level.

However, more worryingly, what should be a proudly independent fourth estate manages to pretty well look the other way
and to barely, if at all, mention happenings which are so extraordinary that they should have us all shocked and horrified
not just the individual who heard, second-hand, of the one below.

It has been, culpably, so little reported that we should be doubly grateful to Senior Herald reporter, David Fisher, for making
us aware that the Prime Minister was the guest of honour at a private fundraising lunch held at an Auckland Chinese
restaurant.

The point is that it was hosted by the Change the Flag lobby group to raise cash from wealthy Chinese donors who
supported the flag change. A small handful of Nationals MPs were there, too.

It was all to fund a last-minute push for votes, including a pamphlet to send out just days before the voting started.
This small, exclusive lunch was not publicly advertised, and the Change the Flag chairman, Lewis Holden,
confirmed not the names of the donors, but that over $100,000 was raised for the entire campaign.

He admitted that some was donated by the Chinese donors who wanted the Union Jack gone from the New Zealand ensign,
Mr Holden commented naively, some would say.
In January, Taiwan elected its first female president after a furoreWe knew there was support in the Chinese community
because of the Union Jack" just before Election Day when a 16 year old Taiwanese singer for a girl band was forced to give
a forlorn apology for holding a Taiwanese flag on a TV show. China has refused to allow the 7.2 million people of Hong
Kong a free vote next year on deciding who will lead the city.

And reportedly, an uproar in Hong Kong over the disappearance of five dissident booksellers believed to be in the hands of
the Chinese security services has also understandably a had huge impact on public opinion in Taiwan.

This of course, is typical behaviour from a brutal Communist rgime which imprisons, tortures and even executes
dissidents (let alone its continued opposition to Chinese Christians, and its appalling record of farming the Falun
Gong to forcibly remove their organs for live transplants organs.

Not that New Zealand ever officially and publicly protests any more than many countries similarly turned a blind eye to the
appalling and barbarous treatment that Nazi Germany showed to its Jewish population, in World War 11.

And yet, does or does not a country have a moral responsibility to make its views publicly known about a trade partners
oppression of its own people? Is it okay to just look away, to pretend it isnt happening or doesnt really count?

Mr Holden should have specified that he was referring only to the increasingly large Communist Chinese community in this
country.
Other long-settled Chinese in New Zealand would not only disagree (including a highly respected academic who protested
in his youth at the butchery of Tiananmen Square) but are deeply concerned at the influence that Communist Chinese
interests are apparently having on our National Party government, dominated by its acknowledged authoritarian leader.

In fact, Mr Holden admitted he was pretty surprised that John Key agreed to come. Concerned New Zealanders who have
been asking what is happening to this country, and why we have the state we are now in, are not all surprised. After all, the
buck stops at the top.

Interestingly enough, too, back in November, 2015, a Facebook user John Miller spotted another flag design one of those
proposed appearing on the labelling for New Zealand apples in Shanghai. He asked, Do the Chinese know something
about the outcome of our flag referendum that we dont know yet?"

NZ Herald: Alternate flag design used in Shanghai

The same flag was reported as being flown at a butchers shop in the United Arab Emirates. Somebody must have been
pretty certain that the flag change was a done deal.

Three cheers for the New Zealanders who got the whiff, from somewhere, of a decaying rat, and put a stop to this attack on
a heritage we can be proud of, in spite of all the unfair, and highly suspect, disparaging of colonialism.

As Hong Kong can testify, and as other African nations show us, its a wise observation that there are far worse things than
colonisation, and that post-colonisation is apparently one of them.
Similar to the Prime Ministers former denial of any problem with the Auckland current housing market has been his
repudiating any connection with the uncontrolled immigration flooding the country.

The migration influx is breaking all records with, as reporter Hamish Rutherford informs us, the net gain last year being
equivalent to a city the size of Nelson. In one year alone

John Keys simplistic assertion that unrestricted immigration is of economic benefit to the country has long been
disproved. So why does he keep repeating it?

As Westpac senior economist Anne Boniface says, record immigration:

"Is helping to maintain a semblance of strong economic growth but the preponderance of people in the labour
market is keeping wage growth lower than would otherwise be.

And of course it is the unprecedented demand for housing from those flooding into the country, plus the ability of far more
wealthy immigrants to outbid New Zealanders for our own houses, which has us at crisis point although the government of
course is not acknowledging this.

Nor is the building of new houses anywhere near able to compensate for the extraordinary demand, not with virtually 68,000
in the year ended in February this year.

The result is not only a dramatic shortage of houses but of decent jobs (some now observably preferentially offered to
Chinese workers paid less by Chinese business owners and employers).

The flow-on effect includes shortages not only of housing and of wealthy property investors outbidding New Zealanders to
rent back what should be their own houses to them.
Theres now an unprecedented exodus to the provinces with a leap of house-buying driving house prices outside Auckland
up beyond the reach of local residents.

Pressure has increased on land, on hospitals and all other social services

So the questions are being asked:

Why is National, under its leader, John Key, more interested in protecting the interests of potential NZ migrants and
offshore investors over and above the large and growing number of Kiwis priced out of the market?

The comments keep coming that National has been in Government for 9 years and it has the power to effect change, but
that it wilfully does not because John Key thinks that rising house prices are good politics.

But if it isnt being brought home to more and more New Zealanders that it is shameful for our government to protect the
interests of people who dont even live here above those of New Zealanders themselves -then it should be.

But is there more to all this than a seemingly nave National Party leader having his own way? In the real world, where the
uber-wealthy are looking for bolt-holes to escape the increasing scrutiny of their governments, New Zealand has long been
viewed as a ripe plum ready for the picking.

Super-rich overseas owners, with obliging specialists lawyers to hand, have already hoovered up our high country sheep
stations and farms, some owning multiple properties, including our scenic assets and, seemingly whatever takes their
fancy (in spite of the OIOs supposed scrutiny of the value of these land grabs to New Zealanders).
It doesnt take anything more than commonsense to take on board the fact as more and more of our farms, our land and our
houses are bought up by immigrants or pass into overseas ownership, more and more New Zealanders are being squeezed
out of owning these.

Its a depressing scenario for the dairy sector as banks face possible billions in write-offs. John Key admits that low dairy
prices may see banks facing losses with farmers forced to sell, but, in a cavalier fashion dismisses the prospect as
normal for businesses.

This sort of pragmatism, an indifferent approach to those facing the devastating prospect of losing their family farms and
homes, walks past the point of who is going to be in a position to actually buy the land particularly when the Reserve Bank
states that under its severe scenario it is unclear whether there would be sufficient cash among buyers to absorb the added
number of farms which would inevitably be put up for sale.

Unclear in relation to New Zealand buyers, perhaps, but there is no shortage of finance from Chinese sources.

While a number of foreign nationals have been busy acquiring what they can, more or less under the radar, it is the very real
threat to our sovereignty from Communist Chinese interests underpinning Chinese investment which is most ominous.
A Financial Times article of March 2016 by Lucy Hornsby The Great Land Rush: Chinas Pengxin hits overseas hurdles
points to the marketing of Theland with where cows gaze on emerald grass below white clouds shaped like New Zealand.

It makes the point that Pengxin;

"A little-known Shanghai real estate developer that owns Theland, will become the worlds largest private
landowner if Australias authorities clear its most ambitious bid yet, to gain control of the grazing lands of the S
Kidman & Co cattle empire. That, plus holdings in New Zealand, makes Pengxin the boldest of Chinese
corporations investing in land, and has helped trigger a backlash."

It continues: The financial Times, in a series of reports, is examining governments and private investors
increasing interest in grand scale land deals. With the commodity supercycle ending, land the ultimate resource
could either become the next big thing or the source of cross-border disputes In November, Australia blocked
the A$350 million sale on security grounds. But there are further complications.

Pengxins bid for Kidman draws on its experience as Chinas largest land investor in New Zealand. However,
(reportedly) its expansion there has reached a limit only months after it announced plans to double its Kiwi assets
to NZ$1bn, or 50 farms. In reply to written questions from the FT, Terry Lee, the president of overseas investment
for Pengxin, wrote that investing in New Zealand farmlandhas been more challenging than we thought.

This is excellent news and is no doubt due to those very few reporters and columnists to whom New Zealanders owe
a great deal for their spotlighting of these issues as well as to those who have been asking the questions that our
government would apparently prefer not to answer.

What the Financial Times also noted was the understandable rising resentment in this country;

"After property documents, leaked to New Zealand media, showed buyers with Chinese surnames accounted for
half the purchases of Auckland homes worth more than NZ$1m.
Meanwhile, in Australia. Canberra is reviewing foreign investment rules, and has cut the threshold for approval of foreign
acquisitions of rural land from A$252m to A$15m.

Moreover, a new registry of foreign-owned agricultural land goes public this year. Already, in Australia, there is much more
scrutiny of foreign investors wanting to buy Australian housing stock, and each application must undergo appropriate review.

The paper further states that as Chinas urban sprawl consumes and pollutes farmland, Beijing has given tacit blessing to
agricultural investment overseas.

This is a considerable understatement. As a 60 Minutes programme pointed out, Chinese investors are being financially
equipped by the Chinese government to buy up as much in the way of productive farmland, stock, and business fed by this
industry as well as means of transport, including shipping for the benefit of China alone.

"Australia and New Zealand are top destinations because foreigners can own land outright, but resentment over
Chinese investors buying residential property has curdled the political environment.

In the eyes of New Zealanders it hasnt curdled it enough, given that the government has not moved to protect New
Zealanders from being disadvantaged in our own land.

Moreover, as one of the three primary obligations of government is the defence of the realm, it can be legitimately argued
that the government is failing in its responsibility to defend New Zealanders from these takeovers.

Why, it is increasingly asked, can foreigners still buy up own land outright? Why is it is still being allowed to
happen?

Reportedly, wooing Maori sellers and flying well-heeled Chinese tourists around New Zealand has paid well for those
promoting sales of our assets. It can also be legitimately argued that enthusiastically promoting Chinese tourism may be
working to our own disadvantage, for obvious reasons.

The fact, too, that Pengxin is reportedly building its own integrated dairy business, is a direct challenge to our already
struggling Fonterra, our major dairy exporter upon whom thousands of New Zealand farmers depend.

No wonder that global market forces are coming into conflict with local populations, given the fact that nobody is making
more land (except, in fact, the Communist Chinese, arousing disquiet through their aggressive military expansions as well
as through attempts to circumvent legal requirements within a host country) .
Yes, this comes from another political party. But don't let that fool you - notice how it doesn't matter which party is in power, they all follow the same
agenda. And so while Labour is critical as the opposition - nothing would change under their leadership

Kerry Brown, Professor of Chinese studies at Kings College London, points out that China is a real problem for Australia
and New Zealand with its huge markets growth potential and very real needs. His warning is timely, namely, that
underneath;

China remains alien in terms of fundamental values and political beliefs."

The implications are clear, and as has been well stated, those who do not know their history are doomed to repeat it. The
lesson of the Trojan horse Timeo Danaos, et dona ferentes
I fear the Greeks, especially when they are bringing gifts is to all intents and purposes ignored by the John Key
government enthusing over a damaging flood of immigration and a level of foreign investment which threatens our own
productive economy.

A recent National Business Review editorial points out Chinese companies have so far this year bought more foreign
companies than during the whole of last year.

In the past few years, most of the interest has been in agri-business. Recent deals in New Zealand have included
dairy farms and factories, meat companies and horticultural ventures as well as companies such as PGG
Wrightson

The Chinese are also seeking high technology companies but this is proving difficultthe wave of purchases has
spread to the hospitality sector and entertainment.

An additional NBR editorial, discussing the revelations of the Panama Papers, notes that a third of the business of a law firm
involved has been in helping Chinese clients ship their money overseas and out of reach of the Communist regime.

A BBC report How Chinas wealth is sneaked abroad, implicates New Zealand as a major target for a property-
buying spree totalling US$ 32 billion around the world last year.

A featured comment will have resonated with many:

 The government should be embarrassed by this not only have they turned a blind eye to the Communist
Chinese money coming into NZ (despite the anti-money laundering rules), they have allowed the Auckland
property market to be grossly inflated by a Chinese investors.

Where to from here? The lesson from all this is that China is trouble. Not only are its Communist values in direct contrast to
those of the democratic West, it is notorious for its electronic spying, including attempting to hack into government and
defence security systems.

This of course, will predictably, include our own a fact which raises the question: What was former left-leaning Prime
Minister Helen Clark thinking when she allowed, in fact welcomed a procession of top-ranking Chinese military officials
coming to be shown around New Zealand inspecting our military bases, our equipment and familiarising themselves with
our obvious inability to defend this small country?

Does anyone really believe she was simply ignorant of Communist Chinas ambition in this area? If not, what was
her motive in doing so?

And now, at the very time when concern about Chinese military aggression in the Pacific has America considering setting up
military bases in Australia, it needs to be far more widely known that that late in 2015, National s Defence Minister, Gerry
Brownlee, farcically lectured our giant, predatory neighbour, exhorting it to behave like a big country in the South China
sea (where it is causing tension with other regional powers, and with the USA.)

Sent of course by our Prime Minister, he thought it fit to sign a five-year military defence alliance with this Communist
country, while clumsily stating that New Zealands relationships with Chinese and US defence forces are not mutually
exclusive.

But in fact they are. Its almost incomprehensible that we should have signed such a military defence pact with this
aggressively confrontational country. Chinas Communist leadership, with its natural affinity for North Korea, is, for all its
trade alliances, no friend to the West a fact that most New Zealanders perceive even though Keys National government
is apparently determinedly avoiding facing this fact.
As a consequence, and given the weakness of what should be our major Opposition party, New Zealanders are well and
truly on the way to becoming tenants in our own country.

For this reason, even those who do not support the left-wing Chris Trotters political views, may well agree with his
statement that New Zealanders disengagement from the political process (in which we were once among the worlds most
enthusiastic participants) has been accompanied, and justified, by the widely held belief that politics has become an almost
entirely disreputable profession.

His vague assertion that the answer lies with, and in us the New Zealand electorate suggests no concrete solution.

But there is one. It does not matter that it would be a most unwelcome one to by far the majority of our politicians, and to
those with the money and influence to assist the government in its decision-making. And here I recall former Finance
Minister Ruth Richardson thanking millionaire Doug Myers, then Chairman of the New Zealand Business Roundtable for his
valuable help to her in her portfolio)

We all know that we have moved a long way from being a far more democratic country that we once were. The loss of our
freedoms has been gathering pace even freedom of speech let alone the ability to be genuinely involved in the decision-
making of our governments although this very much affects us.

Reforms are undertaken from time to time as with the now signalled, but well overdue simplification of our tax system. Too
little, too late for so many. But apart from our ability to routinely throw out governments which have caused perceivable
damage to our country, in the interval between our elections the government elected as the lesser of two evils inevitably
claims a mandate for actions for which it has no genuine mandate at all.

The solution? It is what the highly intelligent Swiss have long insisted on the reform of our political system so that any
legislation passed by Parliament, no matter what party is in power, nor what deal-making has gone on behind the scenes,
has to wait for 100 Days.
This mandatory stop on all proposed laws gives the people of the country time to examine it for fishhooks. If satisfied, they
allow it to pass. If they are not, it takes a very small proportion of their electorate (50,000 in a county with double our
population) to call for a special kind of referendum, the results of which are binding on their government.

The fact that this provision is there puts a stop to constant trade-offs, in contrast to the never-ending passing of legislation
which pours forth from our own government whereas Swiss parliamentarians meet only once a week, and are able to hold
down day jobs.

For more information on how the Swiss govern themselves, visit our website at www. 100days.co.nz

Above all, we need to remember that there is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come and there is
nothing more effective than individuals joining together to achieve a tipping point to insist on being genuinely part
of our countrys decision-making.
Controlling our politicians though the eminently achievable 100 days initiative, now well under way, is available to each of
us.

Each of us not everybody else. If you are concerned about what is happening to our country, please support us! We need
you all.

Amy Brooke, Convener. See my book 100 Days Claiming Back New Zealand what has gone wrong, and how we can
control our politicians. Available through www.copypress.co.nz or HATM Publishers.

NSW Bar Association Warns Against New Police Powers

April 20 2016 | From: AustralianNationalReview

The New South Wales Bar Association has warned against a move to give more powers to the
police at the detriment of citizens independence.

The new powers could see bans being placed on citizens in New South Wales. They could also face restrictions on
movement and face curfews without even having committed a crime. The association said that the proposals would
create a rival criminal justice system that could harm people on mere suspicion.

The NSW government had made the proposals as part of introducing new powers to the police. Called serious crime
prevention orders, it would offer unprecedented rights to the police to interfere in the affairs of the citizen, the bar association
claimed.

If such powers are given to the police, they would be able to invoke the same powers to seek and impose control over
alleged criminals as they do on terrorism suspects. That the police would have so much power in their hands without
needing to prove the crime of a suspect makes the law dangerous and amenable to manipulation.

Police would be able to restrain any citizen and interfere with his/her basic rights. Even when a person is acquitted of a
criminal offence, police could still seek such an order to treat him or her as per the provisions of the controversial rule.

The penalty for breaching an order could be up to five years imprisonment or AUD33,000 as fine for an individual. In the
case of corporate entities, the fine would be AUD165,000.
In a submission, the NSW Bar Association criticised the governments hurry in pushing through the legislation. It said:

No evidence has been cited as to the ineffectiveness of the administration of criminal justice by a process of trial
for reducing serious and organised crime in New South Wales.

The bill effectively sets up a rival to the criminal trial system and interferes unacceptably in the fundamental human
rights and freedoms of citizens of NSW.

The association also said that it was at loss to explain why the government wanted the new norms in the place of long-
settled principles.

Police minister, Troy Grant, said that the measures were aimed at reducing serious and organised crime. The new
provisions would allow the NSW police, the NSW Crime Commission and the NSW director of public prosecutions to seek
orders from a judge to impose the restrictions on citizens or corporations.

The judge must be satisfied there are reasonable grounds for the request. However, the bar association said that while the
laws could be applied to individuals who had been convicted of a serious criminal offence, they would also be applicable to
behaviour that was considered serious crime-related activity.

It went on to allege that the new rules interfered with rights of the citizens and had doubtful constitutional validity.

The Trillion Dollar Lawsuit

April 19 2016 | From: Ellaster

Part One: Neil Keenans battle Against the World Wide Conspiracy of Bankers
End of 2011 the Irish-American businessman Neil Keenan (agent of the Asian Dragon family) filed a claim in the
Federal court in New York. [1] Neil Keenans lawsuit is not just about the stolen bonds with a face value of 134,500
billion dollars.

Related: Neil Keenan / Group K: History & Events Timeline

It entails the largest fraud in the financial world. The story behind the claim exposes the corruption within the banking
industry. It also uncovers the involvement of world leaders with these corrupt practises and unveils the sinister agenda of the
Cabal (secret ruling elite, also called Illuminati). Furthermore it reveals the true motivations behind the Second World War
and 9/11.

And if the claimed amount of more than a trillion dollar is not spectacular enough, the list of defendants is at least as
impressive: Dal Bosco (financial advisor of the Vatican), the Italian government, Prime Minister Berlosconi, the United
Nations, Ban Ki-moon (UN), World Economic Forum and the Federal Reserve Bank in New York. [1]

One would almost think that this is not a serious case, but nothing could be further from the truth. This case is dead serious
and everything indicates that this story is the absolute truth. A chilling truth, at least for the Cabal, as this most likely will be
the sword of Damocles that hangs over their head.

The Claim

In June 2009 two Japanese men were arrested in the Italian Chiasso, near the Swiss border. The two Japanese, Yamaguchi
and Watanabe, carried in the double bottom of their suitcase Federal Reserve Bonds with a face value of 134,500 billion
dollar. [2]

The two were accused of having counterfeits in their possession and after the arrest their bonds were confiscated by the
Italian police. After they were brought before the court, they were quickly released and there is no police or legal report
anywhere to be found, neither in the Italian police record, nor at the Financial Police, nor at Interpol.

However, the confiscated bonds remained in the hands of the Italians and there is proof that they have been redeemed by
the Italian government and the Federal Reserve Bank in new York and placed in a financial program of the United Nations.
The History of the Dragon Bonds

In order to understand the origin of these bonds and their astronomical value, one needs to go back to the time of the silk
route. For thousands of years the West is engaged in trade with the East and particularly since the era of the East Indian
Trading Company this trade intensified.

Merchandise like silk, ceramics, spices and other valuable goods were imported from Asia. The Asians only accepted gold
as payment and this is how 85% of the worldwide gold ended up in the East.

This gold belonged to the Dragon family - Chinas dynastic rulers before the communists came to power - and is now spread
over various Asian countries: Indonesia, Thailand, South-Korean, Japan, the Philippines, Malaysia and Taiwan. [3]

In order to regain this gold, the Cabal in the West made a secret agreement to plunder it from Asia by means of three world
wars. This plan dates from 1776, the year that the Illuminati was founded as well.

Later on in 1921, 18 years prior to when World War II would start, another secret agreement was signed by the American,
British and French government, the future Japanese Emperor Hirohito and the Chinese communist leaders, to start the
Second World War and steal the gold of the Dragon family. A copy of this agreement will be submitted in Neil Keenans
lawsuit.

Part of the plan was a false flag attack by a Japanese proxy that stole part of the gold in China in the twenties. [5] This
convinced the Dragon family to safely put away part of their gold in the Federal Reserve Bank in the US. The first part was
shipped in 1934 and in 1938 seven tankers fully loaded with gold-bars left for the US.
Example of Federal Reserve bond with face value of $ 100,000. Bonds with higher values, half a million to 100 million per bond, were also issued

In exchange the Dragon family received Federal Reserve Bonds with gigantic values, varying from a million to 100 million
dollar per bond. A condition of this deal was that the gold would be used to finance humanitarian projects to develop and
modernize Asia and Africa.
Bretton Woods Agreement

In 1944 the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank were founded as part of the Bretton Woods agreement.
[6] This was the start of the current worldwide financial system. The US demanded that from then on the Federal Gold
Reserve would form the basis of the monetary system.

The 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement: Power Bloc Coup

At the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference held in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, from July 1 to
July 22, 1944. The agreement included the formation of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and, most importantly, the proposed introduction of an
adjustable pegged foreign exchange rate system.

Currencies were pegged to gold and the IMF was given the authority to intervene when an imbalance of payments
arose.

The truth is that in 1944, Britain, France and United States were given a fifty-year term of Global Control over the
global financial system. The Agreement was supposed to develop and modernize the planet, when in fact,
Roosevelt was poisoned (assassinated) and then most of the worlds gold was taken off-market, blacklisted or
hidden in caves.

This allowed the fascist coup to finalize their fiat currency system control over the world. The military-industrial
complex, instead of developing the planet, would actually start controlling and stealing from the world.

It was a clever ruse to make sure that a large part of the gold in the hands of the Dragon family that was not part of the
Federal Reserve, would this way be non-tradable. The gold that was handed over to the Federal Reserve Bank was lent for
a period of 60 years. When this term ended in 1994 for the 1934 bonds the Dragon Family demanded their gold back.

Because the promises made by the West to modernize the third world by humanitarian projects were not kept and
furthermore the funds were used to finance various wars.
9/11 Was Related to 200,000 Tons of Gold

Because the Federal Reserve Bank did not want to return the gold, the Dragon family filed a lawsuit at the International
World Court in The Hague. The trial took place behind closed doors and when the Dragon family won the case the Federal
Reserve Bank was obligated to return 200,000 tons of gold.

The deadline when this gold had to be sent back was September 12 2001, the day after 9/11. The gold was stored in the
vaults in the basement of the World Trade Centre, and has disappeared ever since the attacks. Cantor Fitzgerald Securities
the shipping company that was in the possession of the insurance and transportation documents was located in WTC 1.

During the 9/11 attacks all 600 employees were killed and all documents vanished. The Treasury Police was located in WTC
7 and when this building came down, their documents disappeared as well.

The message to the Dragon family was loud and clear; the Fed did not have the intention to return the gold. [3]

The gold that had to be sent back was stored in the vault below the WTC. The shipping and insurance documents were
destroyed after WTC 1 and WTC 7 came down after the 9/11 attacks

The Chiasso Incident

In 2009 the Dragon family appointed the Irish-American businessman Neil Keenan to help them with the bonds. This
successful international businessman was experienced with negotiating with top diplomats and heads of state and was
known for his integrity. Keenan was also granted a mandate of the DFFI (Dragon Family Financial Instruments).
Yamaguchi and Keenan reviewing bonds and notes

According to Neil Keenan, also spokesperson for the Dragon family, another lawsuit took place after 9/11. Again the Federal
Reserve Bank was obligated to return the gold. Thereon the US sent false gold bars back to China, made of a worthless
tungsten covered by a layer of gold. [7]

In the meantime the Federal Reserve Bank neglected to pay the (full) interest over the bonds since the sixties. The yearly
interest is significantly higher than the value of the bonds when redeemed, where just a small part of the face value would
be paid out. Despite this, Keenan and the Dragon Family decided to redeem part of their bonds on a trial basis.
With the first part of bonds, just a very small amount, all the required authorisations were provided, a procedure that could
take a number of weeks. Then two representatives of the Dragon Family, the Japanese Yamaguchi and Watanabe travelled
to Italy with 134,500 billion dollar bonds in their possession.

After the arrest of the Japanese and the confiscation of their bonds a news paper article was published in an Italian
newspaper that the two had carried counterfeits. However, these bonds have never been formally declared false.

Furthermore, Neil Keenan has proof that Prime Minister Berlosconi redeemed these bonds and shared half of the loot with
the Federal Reserve Bank in New York. The redeemed bonds are placed in a program of the United Nations. This program
had a revenue of 20-30% and this profit went directly to the defendants.
Italian police with confiscated bonds. After Yamaguchis and Watanabes arrest an article in the Italian press claimed that the two were taken into
custody because they carried counterfeits.

Lies and Deceit at the Highest Level

That the bonds were secretly and illegitimately redeemed [8] would be discovered by Neil Keenan much later in the game.
After the arrest of Yamaguchi and Watanabe, Neil Keenan travelled to Italy and Switzerland to mediate with representatives
of the Italian government.

There he also met Dal Bosco that promised to help him to redeem the bonds through the Italian Treasury Police. Dal Bosco
was a financial advisor of the Vatican and treasurer of the P2 lodge in Rome. [9]
As part of the negotiations Keenan always took his own stack of bonds with him, a set comparable with Yamaguchis
confiscated set of bonds and with a face value of 145,500 billion dollars.

To make sure they would not be stolen when traveling he entrusted them with Dal Bosco, also knowing they could not be
redeemed without the required signature of Yamaguchi. At least, that is what he thought

However, a dirty game was played and Dal Bosco offered Neil Keenan a 100 million dollar bribe in return for transferring the
mandate of the DFFI (Dragon Family Financial Instruments) to them. The DFFI have an actual value of several trillions. Dal
Bosco assured Neil Keenan that it was safe to go along with the proposed deal and implied that the Italian government,
Vatican and P2 lodge agreed with the deal.

Dal Bosco:

So you see there is no possible way we can have a problem. We can cloak ourselves with the immunity shield
and everyone will go away. Just another day in the UN!

Ban Ki-moon of the UN had stated: From the very top were protected. There is no reason for anyone, including
Keenan, to worry about any sort of repercussions. The Federal Reserve Bank had no problems with the actions
about to be taken so long as some candy was tossed to them." [10]

Implications of Neil Keenans Lawsuit

The above story became the basis of Neil Keenans claim against the Federal Reserve Bank in New York and the other
defendants.

This will by no doubt become one of the most outstanding lawsuit of all times and the implications of this lawsuit are
enormous.
It will irrevocably lead to the Federal Reserve Banks bankruptcy. Many whistle-blowers have stated that the Federal
Reserve no longer has the gold and by no means can return it.

Furthermore, through the submitted evidence a network of large scale financial fraud will be exposed, a criminal cartel at the
highest level. A team of experts around Keenan, who call themselves Group K, prepares the final death blow. Group K
claims to have truck loads of evidence that irrefutably prove their claims. There are documents, audio recordings, bank
statements, etc.

Beginning of 2012 Neil Keenan redrew the lawsuit after the first judge was replaced by a corrupt judge with close
connections to Washington DC.

Moreover there was a jurisdiction problem, because part of the claim was addressed to several Italian parties and the
International United Nations, but filed in the US. Meanwhile Keenan now has collected enough evidence to undoubtedly
prove the complicity of the Federal Reserve Bank in New York.

He expects to refile the case this year, first in New York, later in Europe. Hopefully the case will lead to many arrests and will
end the era of financial tyranny, the financial system as we know it today. [11]

Footnotes and External Links

1 Lawsuit is filed on November 23 2011 through Bleakley, Platt & Schmidt in White Plains, N.Y., responsible attorney
William H. Mulligan Jr.

1 Copy of legal complaint:

2 Japan Probes Report Two Seized With Undeclared Bonds (Update2)

3 In China the gold was in hands of the Kuomintang, who fled to Taiwan and took a large part of their gold with them, after
the communists came to power

3 David Wilcock & Benjamin Fulford FULL INTERVIEW 12-02-2011

4 Glenn Beck | FOX News 134 Billion Dollar in US Bond seized at Italian border

5 Japan was allied to the British & Rothschilds. The Rothschilds built Japan as a military colony to combat China

6 Bretton Woods agreement

7 False gold bars:

Chinese Discovered Fake Gold Bars of Tungsten in 2009

Germany tests US stored Gold, says no Tungsten

8 Yamaguchi was the signatory of the stolen bonds. Legally the bonds were not allowed to be redeemed without his
signature, yet were illegitimately redeemed anyway

9 P2 lodge

10 Quotes made by defendants as stated in the legal complaint by Neil Keenan. Page 91 from the legal document:

Keenan Complaint - United States District Court, Southern District of New York

BAN KI-moon stating: (i) from the very top we were protected; (ii) there is no reason for anyone, including KEENAN, to
worry about any sort of repercussions

Powers that be in New York had no problems with the actions about to be taken so long as some candy was tossed to
them.

11 Interview of Neil Keenan and Group-K by Pete Santilli

Pete Santilli Episode #960 Neil Keenan The Interview The Global Elite Never Want You To Hear

(Neil Keenan case from 0:33 min. Skip long commercial breaks: part 2 from 1:06:30 min.,
part 3 from 1:20:20, part 4 from 1:32:50)

Pete Santilli Episode #1039 Neil Keenan: Jesuit Pope Will Shock The World In September

(Neil Keenan case from 1:06:00. Skip long commercial breaks: part 2 from 1:23:00,
part 3 from 1:43:00, part 4 from 2:06:00)

12 The link between 9/11 John F Kennedy and the Global Collateral Accounts

Part Two: The End of Financial Tyranny is the Beginning of the Golden Age
Neil Keenans lawsuit was initially a claim and request for compensation for the stolen bonds. Now it has become a case
about the future of the world. There is something fundamentally wrong and that needs to be rectified. Team-K, a team of
experts like: former bankers, financial and legal advisors, assist Keenan in his mission to expose the Cabal (secret ruling
elite) and cut off their funds.

Keenan:

The Cabal has built the financial system and were trying to tear it down because its just no damn good. Because
they wanted to kill 5-6 billion people, out of 7 billion people. We woke up in time. [1]

Benjamin Fulford, investigative journalist and spokesperson for the White Dragon Society (an Asian secret society) verified
this. Members of the White Dragon Society eavesdropped on one of the conversations at the Bohemian Grove conference
and heard about their plans to start World War III and reduce the world population through a created pandemic (by means of
the SARS or Ebola virus). [2]

Subsequently Benjamin Fulford suggested that the Asians could stop this insane plan by cutting off their funds, because it
could not be executed without Chinese and Japanese money.

Keith Scott (former member of Group K) confirms this:

If you take the money away from them, you take away their chance to do anything. [] This lawsuit is the key to
doing that. Its like a key to Pandoras box that we are going to open.

The world is then going to see what is really going on. Then people will see that the entire system is corrupt. [3]

Chris Bosnahan (former top banker and now assisting Team-K) about the banking industry: The amount of corruption its
absolutely completely and utterly rotten with corruption. Its a dangerous machine to stop. [4]

Black Book of Codes

How corrupt the financial system really is becomes evident now Team-K gained access to the black banking system. Since
they got hold of a copy of the Black Book (also called the Book of Codes) they can get access to this black shadow
economy, which in size is at least as big as the official world economy.
Group K has a certified copy of the JP Morgan Blue Book with an overview of the Cabal families that illegally controlled the black shadow economy.

Chris Bosnahan:

The Black Books got the codes to open the black screens. [] You have to be a government level or royal family
to open up a black screen.

With the codes from the Black Book heads of state and royal families have access to add millions, even billions to
their own bank account. The black screens are a high-tech network where all the black money is been kept
hidden.

Bosnahan: The Black Books have the full history of every government that has been using leased gold [through
the Federal Reserve]from 1934 to today. The Black Book is the key to open everything that can not be argued with
and Neil has those books secured." [5]

95% of the money is nothing more than numbers in the computer. Just 5% of the money is physical money. Digital codes
provide access to this money and bankers do not want to give up these codes.

Through the codes in the Black Book and opening the black screens bankers have added ridiculous amounts of trillions of
dollars to their accounts; 33 times more than is present as capital in the total world economy. This happened especially
when the US went off the gold standard. According to Chris Bosnahan the current monetary system is rotten to the core and
can not be repaired.

With the codes to open these black screens, Group K can demonstrate that the gold of the Dragon family that was lent to
the Federal Reserve Bank and meant for humanitarian purposes, in reality was used for military and industrial purposes.
With the Black Book Keenan has a powerful weapon in his possession to prove the corruption of the Cabal.
An Indictment Against the Bilderberg Group and Other Secret Societies

The Cabal is not one group, but a number of various factions like the Illuminati, the Nazis, the Zionists and Jesuits, that
gather in secret societies used to roll out their world agenda.

These secret societies are also guilty of stealing large sums of money as becomes evident in an additional claim by Team-K
that was filed against all 12 Federal Reserve Banks in the US. [6] Quote:

All persons from several organizations of persons who consider themselves to be the global elite have illegally
used these assets - making fortunes for themselves, or otherwise benefiting from the illegal use of these accounts.

Key among these are members of (but not limited to):

The Committee of 300

Skull and Bones Society

The Bilderberg Society

The Trilateral Commission

Council on Foreign Relations"

The hidden agenda of these secret societies like the Bilderberg Group, is to create a world government and total control of
their own banking system. Dismantling the current socio-economic structures and destruction of the society as we now know
it, are part of this occult agenda.

The Dutch Royal family founded the Bilderberg Group. In an additional claim that Neil Keenan filed against the 12 Federal Banks in the US, the
Bilderberg Group is mentioned to be one of the secret societies that through the black screens large sums of money were credited to their own bank
accounts.

Murder and Bribes

As to no ones surprise, there were several murder attempt on Neil Keenans life and his team members. At least one person
from Team-K got killed, another survived a staged car accident.5 Additionally large sums of bribes were offered to Keenan
again and again to withdraw himself from the case or sell the Black Book of codes.

Amounts of 15 to 20 trillion were offered, even though its a mystery how one thinks to pay these amounts. But it doesnt
matter, as Keenan is not interested. This is a battle between good and evil.

He will not give up until the Federal Reserve Bank is brought down. After that he will target the European Union & the
European Central Bank. Neil Keenan:

We have a bunch of counterfeit notes and we want to be compensated for them. Were not talking a trillion or two,
were talking tons. And if they cant do it, well throw them into bankruptcy. End of European Union, bye bye. [7]

Neil Keenan

It is evident that something is at stake in the financial world. This is also illustrated by the large number of suicided bankers
since 2013. Suicided is a term used for people forced to commit suicide when put under enormous psychological pressure,
or being killed where their death appears the be the result of either suicide or a tragic accident.

This faith happened to at least 72 bankers. [8] Whether these people had to be eliminated as potential witnesses or if these
bankers are in any way related to Neil Keenans case is not clear, but it is an indication of major changes in the financial
world.

A Financial Reset and Mass-Arrests

Neil Keenans case will irrevocably lead to a reset of the world wide financial system. Besides this case there are other
initiatives to remove the power from the Cabal. Much of the world capital, placed in a Central World Fund, has been used for
their own benefit by the Cabal. They played Money Magick by means of computer games and created money based on a
gold reserve they in fact had no access to.

In the past years these financial institutes have been heavily infiltrated by White Hats (opponent of the Cabal), whereby
certain transactions by the Cabal could no longer go through the system and had their funds confiscated.

Thereby the Cabal has lost their access to the Central World Fund. This has caused huge panic among the Cabal. This was
also a reason for the 3/11 Fukushima attack and had everything to do with a confiscated banking transaction. [9]

When all secrets will be revealed through the trillion dollar lawsuit: the actual gold reserve, the fraud with the bonds, the
financing of wars, the truth behind 9/11, the fraud with the black screens, then the entire system comes crashing down.
Thats why a plan for a financial reset was developed.

This plan for the reset goes hand in hand with the plan of the freedom movement in the US and other countries to overthrow
the government and restore justice. There is a concrete mass arrest plan that includes hundred thousands of bankers and
politicians to be arrested.

According to Drake bailey - contact of whistle-blowers within the American military, the Pentagon, CIA and other government
agencies, as well as the US Militias - there are sufficient legal grounds to arrest (former) political leaders like Bush and
Obama. Neil Keenan is well connected with Drake Bailey to prepare this final death blow. [10]

Benjamin Fulford, investigative journalist, broke the story about the stolen bonds and the pending lawsuit.

Reason for Optimism: A New Golden Age

During the financial reset the banks will close down for a while. During this time the Cabals bank accounts will be frozen.
That will also be the end of the debt crisis. According to Benjamin Fulford (former bureau chief of Forbes Asia Pacific
edition) a financial reset will lead to the blossoming of the economy. He states that there is enough capital to completely
solve world poverty and environmental pollution.

Besides the capital in the current world economy, Asia is perched on top of a gold mine. [11] The amount of gold present in
Asia is not even closely related to the official gold standard. Most of the gold was never made part of the Federal Reserve
and has been deliberately kept off the books.
The exact amount of gold is up for debate, some claim it is 10 times larger, some even claim it is 100 time larger than the
official gold reserve.

The Dragon family who are the guardians over a large part of this gold reserve, wish to use it through the Global Collateral
Accounts for humanitarian purposes, but only after the Cabal is arrested.

It will be a big shock to many people when they realize how much gold there really exist and how this has been
systematically plundered from mankind. There is so much gold. And when this gold is being put into the system in a dosed
and responsibly fashion, there is enough capital to have 7 billion people live in prosperity.

That will be a major paradigm shift. There is no scarcity. And that is perhaps the Cabals biggest secret. Because once that
sinks into the peoples mind, they will demand their piece of the pie.

Footnotes and External Links

1 Interview with Neil Keenan during weekly radio show of Drake Bailey and Thomas Williams

Audio fragment around 2:17:55 minutes.

Neil Keenan: Well you know Drake, they do own the system. They still got all the money. But the bottom line is the money
is fake, most of it nowadays. At one time it used to be real. They built the system. And were trying to tear it down because
its just no damn good. Because they wanted to kill 5-6 billion people, out of 7 billion people. We woke up in time. That
lawsuit that I filed opened up a lot of eyes and caused a lot of trouble. Wait til they see the one were going to refile.

2 David Wilcock & Benjamin Fulford FULL INTERVIEW 12-02-2011

Transcript here.

3 2012-05-02 Keith Scott Re Keenan Trillion Dollar Lawsuit on Project Camelot Radio

(Quotes by Keith Scotts audio fragment around 1:11:00 min.)

4 Pete Santilli Episode #960 Neil Keenan The Interview The Global Elite Never Want You To Hear

(Quotes by Chris Bosnahan audio fragment around 1:08:00 min.)

5 Black Book is available

(Quotes by Chris Bosnahan audio fragment around 2:12:00.)

 6 Pledge:

In law, a lien is a form of security interest granted over an item of property to secure the payment of a debt or performance
of some other obligation.

Quote from this claim: All persons from several organizations of persons who consider themselves to be the global elite
have illegally used these assets making fortunes for themselves, or otherwise benefitting from the illegal use of these
accounts. Key among these are members of (but not limited to) :

The Committee of 300

Skull and Bones Society
The Bilderberg Society
The Trilateral Commission
Council on Foreign Relations

Copy of claim here.

7 Interview with Neil Keenan during weekly radio show of Drake Bailey and Thomas Williams

(Audio fragment around 2:13:30 minutes.)

8 72 bankiers suicided

9 Interview with Thomas Williams by Open Your Mind Radio. Listen to this audio fragment from 1:23:10 min

10 OffPlanet TV-08-19-15- Drake Bailey & Thomas Williams: The Plan

(Video fragment about Neil Keenan around 1:34:00 minutes.)

11 Article by David Wilcock about Neil Keenans lawsuit

12 The link between 9/11, JFK and the Global Collateral AccountsMulligan Jr.

Hypocrisy And The Water Debate

April 19 2016 | From: NZPCR

The water debate is heating up, with orchestrated attacks on water bottling companies. Maori
leaders want a price on water.
With the resource estimated to be worth $35 billion a year, they know that once National give them control of fresh
water, they will be able to claim royalty payments for future use and compensation for lost revenue.

As the Maori Council chair Maanu Paul said on Tuesday;

Any commercial operation will have to pay a fee, and that is the issue as far as the council is concerned
because these people are profiting from the use of a common good that belongs to Maori.

Previous governments have rejected such opportunistic claims by Maori leaders. But in an astonishing act of hypocrisy, the
National Party MP, who is advancing the current attempt by Maori to control fresh water, led the campaign against their
attempt to control the foreshore and seabed.

While Nick Smith is now turning a blind eye to New Zealanders concerns over Maori control of water, in 2003 he stood up
for the public. During a protest march down the main street of his Nelson electorate, he said;

Ordinary New Zealanders, who have shown a huge degree of tolerance to treaty claims and spending on Maori
issues, have had enough.

Dr Smith claimed that while senior Labour Government ministers were negotiating with Maori over the ownership of the
foreshore and seabed to find a win-win solution, the answer was very simple:
 The Government should pass legislation confirming the Crown as owner on behalf of all New Zealanders. Anyone
who wants to divide up the shoreline for one exclusive group of citizenship must be stopped.

In 2004, the National Party published a newspaper advertisement opposing the Governments bill to give Maori control of
the foreshore and seabed, calling on the public to send in submissions.

Their ad criticised the Government for giving Maori special rights:

Labours basic message to Kiwis is: if youre not Maori, then no matter how long you live here, you can never love
this land as deeply or care for it as responsibly as Maori. Provisions like these will disempower your family
forever

National opposed Labours plan to give Maori the power of veto over resource consent applications:

You know what that means. You want to build a boat ramp. But the local iwi says Not so fast. Your ramp will have
a significant adverse effect on our customary rights. You then have two choices. A court case (bound to be long
and expensive). Or a bribe (merely expensive). You pay the koha. Nothings changed. New name, same old
scam.

The ad opposed Maori being given joint management rights, saying the new law would give Maori strengthened
ability to participate in decision-making processes. Strengthened ability? That means only one thing. Joint
management.

They complained that Maori claims to the foreshore and seabed would be hard to oppose:
 The Government has created a situation where these orders will be rubber-stamped by the Maori Land Court a
judicial jack-up. Say an iwi applies for an order. You can bet no-one will object. Why? Because they wont even
know about it No hearing. No debate. No comeback.

National warned that under Labours new bill, The koha racket will continue. Part-Maori descendents of
signatories to the Treaty of Waitangi will still be able to hold up any development until their terms are met.
Theres only one word for that. Extortion.

And they claimed the new law was divisive: This legislation will divide our country, not bring it together. This is not
the way to build a better future for all of us. National says the foreshore and seabed is Kiwi property. Not iwi
property.

Nationals present position, as outlined in Dr Smiths consultation document on fresh water reform, reeks of double
standards.

Maori tribes will be given joint management rights and the power of veto over councils the very things National objected to
in Labours foreshore and seabed legislation.

Their plan to pass the responsibility for rubber stamping iwi claims to fresh water onto local authorities, will make such
deals hard to oppose again something National complained about in their fish hook ad.

And with multiple tribal groups involved in the control of freshwater in any catchment, iwi consultation and the whole koha
racket will skyrocket.

Comment: The 'racial divide' call is made often. The truth is however that the corruprtion is equally represented on
both sides. Whether referencing political parties, Iwi, Maori, Pakeha - there are those on both "sides" who are more
than happy to screw over their "own people" in the interests of themselves and / or their globalist handlers.
Back in 2003, with local authorities spending $3.4 million a year consulting with iwi, and the Corrections Department alone
spending $2.2 million consulting iwi over three new prisons, National spoke out strongly against the rising cost of iwi
consultation.

Nick Smith also objected to the inclusion of Maori spiritualism in the RMA:

It is political correctness gone mad when key decisions on infrastructure are made on the basis that it will
adversely affect Maori spiritual beliefs and self-esteem. This decision is an invitation for backhanders

He said;

There can be no certainty of property rights when the fantasy world of Hollywood starts being given credibility by
our courts. This example follows previous rulings by the Environment Court about diverted waters adversely
affecting Maori self esteem, and motorways and prisons being diverted or held up over taniwha. It shows just how
politically correct and stupid the Resource Management Act has become and highlights the desperate need for
reform.

He made a promise:

National is committed to a thorough cleanup of the Resource Management Act to remove any references to the
spiritual world. This sort of hocus pocus has no place in the courtroom.

After eight years in government, not only has the hocus pocus not been cleaned up, but Dr Smith is about to make it a
whole lot worse. Through sweeping co-governance rights and the power of veto over democratically elected local
authorities, the radical Iwi Participation Agreements proposed for the RMA will condemn councils into endless consultation
with multiple tribal groups.

The result will be more and more abandoned projects as property owners decide its not worth the hassle.

Bob Jones explained what it was like consulting with iwi in 2014, when he wanted to restore a window in a commercial
building in central Auckland that had been removed by a tenant.

Since the building was within 50 metres of one of thousands of new designated Maori heritage sites introduced by the
Auckland Councils Maori Statutory Board, under the Draft Unitary Plan, it needed a resource consent. To gain that consent,
Sir Bob had to seek the approval of 13 iwi, ranging from Taranaki to Whangarei. Letters were duly written.
Sir Bob explains:

Five replied stating they had no concerns while others said they were considering the matter, presumably calling
huis to weigh up this window crisis. One respondent bearing that fine old Maori name of Jeff Lee, representing
something called Ngai Tai Ki Tamaki, contacted the planner

After advising the planners verbally that no Cultural Impact Assessment Report was required for the window, he
nevertheless asked them to consider it brace yourselves given his ancestors, centuries ago, gathered in the
vicinity. Lee then wrote, outlining his terms for assessing the windows cultural impact which, he said, would take
him a total of six to eight hours. For this he sought $90 per hour plus GST and travel expenses of 0.77c per km.

Unsurprisingly, Mr Lee was told to get stuffed.

Treaty Settlement Acts are now littered with requirements to involve iwi in decision-making. Anyone wanting resource
consents in the vast number of areas where statutory acknowledgements exist must consult all iwi individually with each
no doubt charging substantial fees for their pro-forma cultural assessments.

In fact, stories of RMA rorts are everywhere and National knows it has become legalised corruption. But rather than taking
a principled approach and removing race-based requirements from the law to create a much-needed level playing field
they clearly intend making the problem a whole lot worse.

Further, instead of fulfilling his promise to take spiritualism out of the RMA, Nick Smith embedded it, through Te Mana o te
Wai, in the 2014 National Policy Statement on Fresh Water.

Dr Smith should know only too well how inappropriate it is to include cultural spiritualism in water quality controls but such
is his hypocrisy that he intends strengthening the concept in the forthcoming reforms:

When Te Mana o te Wai is given effect, the water body will sustain the full range of environmental, social, cultural
and economic values held by iwi and the community.

In his fresh water consultation document, Dr Smith proposes to require regional councils, when setting freshwater
objectives, to identify the values of the iwi and hapu that have associations with those freshwater bodies.
Hand-in-hand with recognition of their association with water bodies, there needs to be ways for iwi and hapu to participate
in decision-making about those water bodies. This decision making occurs through development of regional policy
statements, regional plans, catchment plans, and consenting.

His approach will result in Maori tribes controlling waterways throughout New Zealand, clipping the ticket whenever anyone
applies for consents and, if a price is put on water, pocketing a royalty every time a tap is turned on.

The Northland Regional Council has spoken out against plans to give Maori authority over freshwater bylaws, consents and
other statutory responsibilities. They are adamant that decision-making is the job of elected councillors.

Chairman Bill Shepherd also explained how the governments use of the word iwi in consultation documents was
problematic for Northland, where the landowners were primarily hapu and there were 190 of them.

Imagine having to negotiate with 190 tribal groups every time you want to make a decision! Nationals approach highlights
the absolute hypocrisy of the claims by Minister Nick Smith, that their RMA reforms will bring consistency into local
government.

This weeks NZCPR Guest Commentator, former Judge and law lecturer Anthony Willy, has been examining the powerful
forces behind the fresh water reforms:

""Nick Smith the Minister responsible for the governments fresh water policy said at a recent public meeting in
Auckland called to discuss the matter, There would be an obligation on local councils to consult with iwi about the
use of water in which they might have a special interest, but there was to be no suggestion of co-governance

Anthony refutes these claims, quoting from a memorandum filed by the governments lawyers in the Waitangi
Tribunal Registry should there be a need for a resumed hearing.

He concludes, This puts it beyond doubt that the government is open to discussing both co governance with the
Iwi Leaders Group and the allocation of fresh water to persons of Maori blood on a race basis.

The document confirms that the Crown worked closely with Iwi Leaders throughout 2015, developing fresh water policy
proposals to be included in the public consultation process. It states their priority for 2016 will be Economic Development.
 They intend developing a range of mechanisms to enable iwi/hapu to access fresh water in order to realise and
express their economic interests.

He concludes, This puts it beyond doubt that the government is open to discussing both co governance with the
Iwi Leaders Group and the allocation of fresh water to persons of Maori blood on a race basis.

What this means, is that once National gives iwi control of fresh water, they intend to develop mechanisms to generate
economic returns. As sure as night follows day, there will be an iwi levy on water.

If you havent put in a submission opposing all race-based proposals for fresh water reform, then please do so as numbers
really matter on issues like this. A simple email to watersubmissions@mfe.govt.nz stating your position is all that is needed.
Click on the image above to open a PDF version in a new wondow

And why not send it on to all National MPs (their addresses are here), as they are the ones who are responsible for these
dreadful proposals, and they really need to hear what the public thinks.

If you believe that other New Zealanders should be informed about whats going on, so they too can send in submissions
and contact MPs, then please support our ad here. Its not too late. The ads will start running this weekend and if we have
enough support, next weekend as well.

Panama Papers Have Caught UK Politicians Off Guard + John Key Testy With Media
Over Link To Foreign Trust?
April 17 2016 | From: VeteransToday / TVNZ / Various

Oh my, our prayers have been answered. The Panama Papers scam is being burned down as I
type, and with it what little reputation that corporate media and the think tank subverts thought
they might still have.

London has shot itself in both feet on the Panama Papers scam

The British papers were nothing more than a lynch mob with their over-the-top coverage that Putin was the new
Midas in Russia, when they never met a Russian thieving oligarch whom they did not love on sight, no matter how
unscrupulously they have obtained their wealth.

Related: The Panama Papers: The people have been deceived; a who's who and what's what

The idea of moral leadership coming out of Britain itself is a bad joke, as it treats its own people like coolies while being a
purveyor of modern colonialism to the best of its ability. This includes wanting to spend tens of billions on their Trident
nuclear submarine upgrade, so they can have their version of Teddy Roosevelts Big Stick.
The City of London is the unofficial pirate base of Europe, even having special laws passed to not have its
financial independence fiddled with. This is a more polished version of when the Italian-Jewish mob in the US
tried to take over Cuba to have their own country to operate from with diplomatic immunity. They forgot to get
Castro on board that effort.

VT will have its teeth in this story until there are none of the hypocritical scoundrels left to eat. I have an new submission in
NEO on the Brookings Institution assigning one of their in-house hacks, Clifford Gaddy, to do a damage control piece
that was out of this world.

Here we have AIPAC Zionist Martin Indyk hosting Erdogan last week at the Brookings Institution

He actually was pitching Putin as being behind the document release as a Russian psyop on the West, and Gaddy included
some of his friends as a smokescreen cover which he knew would not hurt him.

It was slickly done, but made the mistake of revealing how even the most prestigious Washington think tanks involve
themselves in major intelligence psyops as part of their team dues.

We published NEO - Christopher Blacks article yesterday that just nailed the uber Washington insiders who are behind
the funding of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), which is now tainted forever Jim W. Dean.

John Key Testy With Media Over Link To Foreign Trust?

'You don't want to get your arses sued off you.' The Prime Minister has hit back at attention on whether he has
financial interests with a firm that specialises in setting up foreign trusts in New Zealand.

Related: New Zealand Prime Minister John Key declares deposit in trustee firm specialising in foreign trusts
The Prime Minister has been questioned about his links to Antipodes Trust Group, and is not happy about it

John Key has a short term deposit with Antipodes Trust Group to cover the costs of a family trust.

Mr Key says he has no foreign trust interests and his deposit is handled by Antipodes Trust Group because his long-time
personal lawyer moved to the firm.

"I don't deal with people unless they're highly ethical and they do things well. He's (Mr Key's lawyer, Ken Whitney)
changed firms and that might get everyone else excited but from my point of view it's just situation normal," said Mr
Key.

Asked if Mr Key would prefer that Antipodes Trust Group didn't advertise itself as being able to help out people wanting to
set up foreign trusts here, Mr Key said;

"There's a legitimate place, as I've been saying, for financial services when it comes to foreign trusts."

Addressing journalists after a business lunch in Wellington, Mr Key went on to say;

"As you guys were very careful last night, I think, in your coverage of these matters; the reason you were is
because you don't want to get your arses sued off you because actually they are a legitimate business. They're not
the Devil incarnated."

"I mean, if a political party wants to say, 'I'm no longer going to have foreign trusts being allowed to be registered
 and supported in New Zealand' that's a call they can make. I mean, I think there'd be significant implications of
that."

It has been estimated that foreign trust business earns New Zealand around $24 million annually.

Focus on foreign trusts has arisen after the leak of the so-called Panama Papers suggesting that, in some cases, such
trusts are used to avoid paying tax.

Although Washington is using the so-called Panamanian Papers to wage a

propaganda war against politicians it despises, especially in Russia and China, this
operation has recently come to a screeching halt due to the lack of convincing
evidence in those papers.

So what we are witnessing now is simple allegations that the political elites of the two above mentioned countries
are engaged in some inappropriate financial activities.

Related: Journalist asserts Panama Papers are an inside job to eliminate tax haven competitors to the U.S.

However, this recent information attack has already backfired against Washington itself along with its closest allies. For
instance, weve learnt from these papers that London is most probably the global capital of money-laundering.

The responsibilities of Mossack Fonseca were reduced to purely technical functions while the actual transfer and
concealment of money was carried out by a number of banks and law firms.

The Times would note in one of its articles:

 "Almost 2,000 British middlemen helped to create a network of offshore companies and move billions of pounds
secretly around the world, according to the Panama papers. Lawyers, accountants, banks and company formation
agents based in Britain were involved in setting up 32,000 of the 200,000 offshore companies incorporated by
Mossack Fonseca, the Panamanian law firm."

Furthermore, as it follows from yet another publication of The Times for over 16 years thousands of offshore companies that
own property in the Great Britain were providing the addresses of the largest UK largest law firms in the City like Clifford
Chance, Farrer & Co and Withers as their own.

For instance, A British banker Nigel Cowie who resided in North Korea for over two decades created an offshore finance
company that was allegedly used by the Pyongyang regime for arms trade and be able to carry on developing its nuclear
program, says The Guardian.

According to the released documents, Nigel Cowie was behind a Pyongyang front company, DCB Finance Limited,
registered in the British Virgin Islands.

The full responsibility for the unprecedented scale of shadowy business scheme being pulled out in the UK is being placed
on the British Prime Minister David Cameron. For instance, The Independent took a somewhat straightforward approach,
claiming:

"Whats most stinging is the sheer hypocrisy of Cameron. After all, this is the man who made great efforts to
increase funding for HMRC tax inspectors; abolished permanent non-dom status from April 2017 and proposed an
international anti-corruption drive in the light of the Fifa scandal.

David Cameron is a man with a reputation seemingly made of titanium. Really, who does this guy have to piss off
to merit serious calls for his resignation Considering its just been revealed that he did actually have a stake in his
fathers offshore investment fund, the lack of outrage is astonishing."

Related: Panama Papers: Why Arent There More American Names?

Its now clear that Ian Cameron was part of the scheme as a director of Blairmore Holdings Inc. On top of it The Guardian,
one of the 109 international media sources that was granted access to the Panamanian Papers, claims that over the past 30
years Blairmore Holdings Inc. hasnt been paying any taxes to the British treasury.

Moreover, in a brochure for investors released back in 2006 it would state (emphasis added):

"The directors intend that the affairs of the fund should be managed and conducted so that it does not become
resident in the UK for UK taxation purposes Accordingly the fund will not be subject to UK corporation tax or
income tax on its profits."

Those facts manifest the blatant hypocrisy of the British Prime Minister. After all, he publicly opposed offshore practices
back in May at the recent Anti-Corruption Summit in London, while claiming that his supporters would develop a
comprehensive legislation that will put an end to the illegal activities of the so-called British tax haven.

Back in 2012 David Cameron criticized offshore structures, while claiming that they are definitely not fair and not right. At a
G8 summit in Enniskillen three years. ago, he demanded even more transparency, claiming that:

"Ill continue to make the case for transparency with international partners, including the British overseas territories
and crown dependencies and I am willing to go further, and take concrete steps to force the pace."

Under these conditions, the British society seems to be determined to pursue the resignation of the vicious Prime
Minister, forcing a vote of no confidence to be taken.

Several British parliamentarians said that after the scandal with offshore companies, David Cameron should leave the
position of the deputy chairman of the Labour Party, while Labours deputy leader Tom Watson urged Cameron to hand over
all the money that he received through offshore companies to the British treasury.
But the Panamanian Papers have not simply exposed the shadow schemes that are constantly being at play in London, that
Washington and London have been desperate to impose upon the Middle East and Africa and other regions around the
world along with the so-called Western style democracy.

It also makes one to wonder why in recent decades the UK has become a safe heaven for numerous political foundations
for the struggle for democracy (such as The National Endowment for Democracy and the likes of it), and whether those are
also involved in such financial scams under the guise of fighting for the right cause?

Related: The Game is Rigged: The 1% hide their money offshore - then use it to corrupt our democracy

The Truth Is Coming And It Cannot Be Stopped

April 16 2016 | From: TheSpiritScience

Shortly after Edward Snowden went public with his findings on the NSAs surveillance program, he
uttered some very powerful words: All I can say right now is the US Government is not going to
be able to cover this up by jailing or murdering me. Truth is coming, and it cannot be stopped.
Truth is coming, and it cannot be stopped.Exciting words for most of the general population, but troubling for a
select few in Washington, New York, London and Brussels.

From Snowdens testimony, he covertly said from the very beginning that there was and is an end-game in play. Whos?
That is not yet made known.

What he is describing, believe it or not, is the true definition of Apocalypse The Lifting of the Veil, when all truths
become known and public Hidden information revealed, including, that pertaining to the purposeful use and abuse of the
common people of earth.

From Snowdens testimony, he covertly said from the very beginning that there was and is an end-game in play. Whos?
That is not yet made known.

Graffiti that is sympathetic to NSA leaker Edward Snowden is seen stenciled on the sidewalk on June 11, 2013 in San Francisco
In other words, there are white hats (good guys) within the matrix aimed at taking down the banking / political cabalists.

Though it may be difficult for many to believe that such powerful forces will see the darkness and corruption of their actions
and rituals exposed, the world is already seeing the beginning of such things come to lightand with much more to come.
For those who are interested, here is some key ingredients in the current dramas are unfolding.

Putin

In middle November of 2015 at the G-20 Summit in Antalya, Turkey, Vladimir Putin surprised most of the world when he
announced that Russias collected data showed that ISIL was (and probably still is at the time of this writing) being financed
by 40 countries and that some of those countries were G-20 members.

In other words, he stated at the G-20 Summit that members present at the gathering were helping to fund ISIL.

This call-out is of extreme magnitude.

What is most important to evaluate from this disclosure is that this situation is also still in play. Since that time, Russia has
publicly presented evidence that Turkey is one of those countries, but has not listed the other 39. Are we really to believe
Putin and Russia will just forget about this and not reveal the other 39 countries?

It seems much more likely that a chess game is being played behind the geopolitical scenes of the world and that Putin may
be simply waiting for the right time to reveal such things.
Imagine the ramifications, especially in the United States and Europe, when this high-level disclosure takes place. It is truly
not difficult to see why we are seeing the elite panic in so many different directions right now, as well as continue to
unsuccessfully attempt to propagandize Putin as the bad guy.

In reality, Putin could have several aces up his sleeves and the global elite know it.

FBI and Hillary Clinton

Related: Bringing Down Hillary

In early January 2016, former US attorney Joe Digenova stated that the FBI is coming to a critical mass point in its
investigation of Hillary Clinton. He followed that by saying that if the Department of Justice does not indict, the FBI is in a
position to basically revolt.

More easily put, the global elite are in a very difficult spot. Let the DoJ indict their preferred choice for president (Hillary), or
do not allow an indiction and watch the FBI and other intelligence agencies begin coming forth to the public en masse with
their evidence on this case and most likely evidence of even deeper stories.
Related: Former US Attorney: Grand Jury IS Investigating Hillary

Since January, much more has come to light as over 30,000 emails have been released. Just a few of the biggest
stories within these emails, as Wikileaks has revealed, include Hillarys extremist role in Libya, her push to privatize oil
Mexico, claiming a Sunni-Shiite war would be good for the West and Israel.

They also included her suggestion to overthrow a sovereign government in Syria and remove Assad.

Though some people believe all of this will lead to nothing and to her getting off the hook, that scenario is becoming
increasingly less likely as the Washington Post just a few days ago reported that at least 147 FBI agents are investigating
this case. Even if the DoJ would choose not to indict, do you really believe these 147+ FBI agents (and probably many other
intelligence agency members) would simply stay quiet? Or would they indeed revolt as Joe Digenova stated earlier?

The Dam Is About To Break

As we can see, there are huge stories all still in play and all affecting each other in different ways. What is clear is that we
are indeed in the quickening of this entire scheme and that the truth is continuing to come out at an ever-increasing rate.

In fact, we may already be at the critical mass point in relation to disclosures of truth occurring.

As Charlie Munger has said;

"The notion of critical mass-that comes out of physics is a very powerful model. Adding success factors so that a
bigger combination drives success, often in a non-linear fashion, as one is reminded by the concept of breakpoint
and the concept of critical mass in physics. You get a little bit more mass and you get a lollapalooza result.

Pillow talk these nights in Washington, New York, London, Brussels and elsewhere must be getting very interesting.
These stories are all incredibly important and deserves questioning and investigation, though one must ask what Snowden,
Wikileaks and Anonymous know on an even bigger story most media outlets have yet to touch:

The Global Collateral Accounts and their relation to global finance, politics and gold.

Lots of gold.

Shocking Hillary Quotes + Hillary's Emails Confirm France And US Killed Qaddafi For
His Gold And Oil
April 15 2016 | From: HillaryClintonQuotes / Sott / Geopolitics

Get to know the psychopath known as Hillary Clinton a little better.

These are 100% sourced and verified quotes. We recommend you share these far and wide.

Related: Clinton Email Server Greatest Intel Disaster in History-Scott Uehlinger

Quote# 1:
 "Who is going to find out? These women are trash. Nobodys going to believe them.

- On Bill Clintons bimbo eruptions, regarding the women he brutalised and raped.

Hillary Clinton has consistently trashed, attacked and harassed the countless women who have accused her husband of
rape and sexual assault.

Source: PoliticalHumour

Quote# 2:
 "Ain't nobody got time for that.

- When asked if she will see the film "13 hours" about the Benghazi attack.

Hillary also claimed she was too busy to go see 13 Hours, the film about the Benghazi attack.

Source: WashingtonTimes

Quote# 3:
 "Fuck off! Its enough I have to see you shit-kickers every day, Im not going to talk to you too!! Just do
your Godamn job and keep your mouth shut.

- As quoted in Arizona State Trooper Chris Anderson's book "American Evita", when a trooper said, "Good
morning" to Mrs. Clinton.

Hillary Clinton has been a notoriously vicious bitch to her Secret Service and State Trooper protectors.

Source: BloodOnHerHands

Quote# 4:
 "Look, the average Democrat voter is just plain stupid. They're east to manipulate. That's the easy part.

- As told to Dick Morris in his book "rewriting History", 2005.

Hillary Clinton tells close former aide Dick Morris what she Really thinks of her supporters.

Source: "RewritingHistory"

Quote# 5:
 "I don't give a fuck about them. Get them out of here and get them away from me.

- Hillary Clinton talking about Secret Service agents in the book "First Family Detail" by Ron Kessler.

Hillary Clinton is well known for treating her Secret Service protectors like complete trash.

Source: "FirstFamilyDetail"

Quote# 6:
 "Maybe Mr. Stevens should have contacted me if he wanted to live, if he wanted security. He should have
thought about that.

- Hillary Clinton, Benghazi hearings, October 2015.

Hillary Clinton suggests Ambassador Stevens death was his fault. (Ambassador Stevens requested increased security over
300 times).

Source: Politico

Quote# 7:
 "I will get the NRA shut down for good if I become President. If we can ban handguns we will do it.

- Hillary Clinton, in an interview with the Des Moines Register, August 8 2015.

Hillary Clinton declares all out war on the 2nd Amendment.

Source: DesMoinesRegister

Quote# 8:
 "Yeah, I got him off. So what? Who cares? We got the evidence thrown out, so he walked. (laughs) I mean,
sure, we knew he did it (laughs) but it didn't matter.

- Audio recording from 1982 discussing a child rapist she defended when she was a criminal defense attorney in
Araksas.

Hillary Clinton laughs about getting child rapist off charges and setting him free (he was later convicted, no thanks to her).

Source: FreeBeacon

Quote# 9:
 "What the hell are we doing here? There's no money here. Get me the hell out of here.

- While driving through upstate New York as a Senator in the book "First Family Detail" by Ronald Kessler.

Hillary Clinton snarls when she realizes Upstate New York doesnt have any [donor] money.

Source: FirstFamilyDetail

Quote# 10:
 "The Benghazi thing will fade, the public isn't interested .

- As reported in TIME Magazine, July 2014.

Hillary Clinton dismisses the Benghazi tragedy, thinks public has no interest in it.

Source: Time

Quote# 11:
 "I believe the primary role of the state is to teach, train and raise children. Parents have a secondary role.

- In the book, "It Takes A Village"..

Hillary Clinton believes the government should raise a child, not the parents.

Source: ItTakesAVillage
 Quote# 12:

"My accomplishments as Secretary of State? Well, I'm glad you asked! My proudest accomplishment in which I
take the most pride, mostly because of the opposition it faced early on, you know

The remnants of prior situations and mind-sets that were too narrowly focused in a manner whereby they may
have overlooked the bigger picture, and we didn't do that, and I'm proud of that.

Very proud. I would say that's A major accomplishment."

- Hillary Clinton 11 March 2014

Hillary's Emails Confirm France And US Killed Qaddafi For His Gold And Oil
Related: President Killary - Paul Craig Roberts

With the recent release of Hillary Clinton's emails by Wikileaks, the public now knows exactly how the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization (NATO) went from a collective defense organization to the new Barbary Coast Pirates of imperialism.
G8 Summit, Italy, 2009

During the 2011 Libyan uprising, the United Nations Security Council passed Resolution 1973 which called for a ceasefire
and authorized military action to protect civilian lives. A coalition formed, centered around NATO with the March 17, 2011
passing of the Resolution. Its purpose -- a so-called "no-fly zone" over Libya.

The irony that the U.S.-dominated NATO military organization would be concerned with "protecting" Arab civilians
is all too obvious since the United States is the nation most responsible for killing Arab civilians.

The real reasons for the attack have been dealt with most directly by America's famous reformed "economic hitman," John
Perkins.

Perkins points out that the attack on Libya, like the attack on Iraq, has to do with power and control of resources, not
only oil, but gold. Libya has the highest standard of living in Africa. "According to the IMF, Libya's Central Bank is 100%
state owned. The IMF estimates that the bank has nearly 144 tons of gold in its vaults," Perkins wrote.
NATO went there like modern Barbary Coast Pirates -- to loot Libya's gold. The Russian media, in addition to Perkins,
reported that the Pan-Africanist Qaddafi, the former President of the African Union, had been advocating that Africa use the
gold so plentiful in Libya and South Africa to create an African currency based on a gold dinar.

"It is significant that in the months running up to the UN resolution that allowed the U.S. and its allies to
send troops into Libya, Muammar al-Qaddafi was openly advocating the creation of a new currency that
would rival the dollar and the euro.

In fact, he called upon African and Muslim nations to join an alliance that would make this new currency, the gold
dinar, their primary form of money and foreign exchange.

They would sell oil and other resources to the US and the rest of the world only for gold dinars,"Perkins
explained.

Revelation in Email to Hillary Clinton

Wikileaks released an unclassified U.S. Department of State document emailed to Hillary dated April 2, 2011, key
Clinton aide Sidney Blumenthal confirmed that the Perkins was right and the attack on Libya had nothing to do with
Qaddafi being a threat to the United States and NATO and everything to do with looting his gold.

"Qaddafi's government holds 143 tons of gold, and a similar amount in silver. During late March, 2011, these
stocks were moved to Sabha (south west in the direction of the Libyan border with Niger and Chad); taken from the
vaults of the Libyan Central Bank in Tripoli," Blumenthal reported to Clinton.

Blumenthal pointed out the purpose of Qaddafi's precious metal:

 "This gold was accumulated prior to the current rebellion and was intended to be used to establish a pan-African
currency based on the Libyan golden Dinar. This plan was designed to provide the Francophone African Countries
with an alternative to the French franc (CFA)."

Blumenthal spells out the reason for NATO's attack and France's imperial plunder;

"French intelligence officers discovered this plan shortly after the current rebellion began, and this was one of the
factors that influenced President Nicholas Sarkozy's decision to commit France to the attack on Libya."

There were five reasons for France's illegal war with NATO against Libya. Sarkozy sought, according to
Blumenthal:

"a. A desire to gain a greater share of Libyan oil production, b. Increase French influence in North Africa, c.
Improve his internal situation in France, d. Provide the French military with an opportunity to assert its position in
the world, e. Address the concern of his advisors over Qaddafi's long term plans to supplant France as the
dominant power in Francophone Africa."

Under the neo-colonialism favored after World War II during the period of the Cold War, we preferred to bribe various
African leaders to help us loot their nation's resources. The U.S., of course, killed any Pan-African aspirations as well as
potential leaders like Patrice Lumumba.

This highjacking of Arab and African resources and slaughtering of Arab civilians is a long-standing plan put forth
by neo-conservatives in the United States. The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) has had a "hit list" of
Arab nations and little regard for Arab casualties.

General Wesley Clark wrote in "Winning Modern Wars" that "As I went back through the Pentagon in November 2001, one
of the senior military staff officers had time for a chat. Yes, we are still on track for going against Iraq, he said. But there was
more. This was being discussed as part of a five-year campaign plan, he said, and there was a total of seven countries
beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia, and Sudan.

What we witnessed in Libya was old-fashioned 19th century imperialism -- the deliberate plundering of a sovereign
nation-state's resources by more powerful Western conquistadors.

Clintons Leaked eMails Confirm Libya Plunder by Killing Qaddafi

It was broad daylight robbery and murder when US , France, and the rest of NATO, hunted down Muammar Qaddafi, and
destroyed the most prosperous nation in Africa, i.e. Libya., in 2011.

The picture at the top of this article was taken during the G8 Summit Italy, in 2009.

Libya used to be one of few countries with sovereign central banks. Muammar Qaddafi, President of the African Union at
that time, was planning to issue gold denominated African dinar to replace Francs in Francophone Africa, to help his African
brothers from centuries of economic plunder.

But thats not all.

The West just hated Muammar Qaddafis internal policies which were kept from the rest of the world by Rothschild
controlled mainstream media.

Heres some of them:

There is no electricity bill in Libya; electricity is free for all its citizens.

There is no interest on loans, banks in Libya are state-owned and loans given to all its citizens at zero percent
interest by law.

Having a home considered a human right in Libya.

All newlyweds in Libya receive $60,000 dinar (U.S.$50,000) by the government to buy their first apartment so to
help start up the family.

Education and medical treatments are free in Libya. Before Gaddafi only 25 percent of Libyans were literate.
Today, the figure is 83 percent.

Should Libyans want to take up farming career, they would receive farming land, a farming house, equipments,
seeds and livestock to kickstart their farms are all for free.

If Libyans cannot find the education or medical facilities they need, the government funds them to go abroad, for
it is not only paid for, but they get a U.S.$2,300/month for accommodation and car allowance.

If a Libyan buys a car, the government subsidizes 50 percent of the price.

The price of petrol in Libya is $0.14 per liter.

 Libya has no external debt and its reserves amounting to $150 billion are now frozen globally.

If a Libyan is unable to get employment after graduation the state would pay the average salary of the profession,
as if he or she is employed, until employment is found.

A portion of every Libyan oil sale is credited directly to the bank accounts of all Libyan citizens.

A mother who gives birth to a child receive U.S.$5,000.

40 loaves of bread in Libya costs $0.15.

25 percent of Libyans have a university degree.

Gaddafi carried out the worlds largest irrigation project, known as the Great Manmade River project, to make
water readily available throughout the desert country.

These things Qaddafi was doing while the West maintains its exceptionalist mindset of being the epitome of freedom and
democracy throughout the globe. Nothing could be farther from the truth.

These are the faces of the people that would murder him more than a year later.
Now, with the fall of CIA Daesh Islamic State in Syria, Libya is hosting the highest population of ISIS terrorists, and added
itself to a growing number of failed states in the region.
ISIS Massacred Over 300 West African Migrants In Libya

The Khazarian Nazionist agenda in the Middle East, and the methods being used against the Arabs and Africans, are still
the same methods that were used by Western pirates not too long ago in the Pacific, which includes:

Bribery of local overlords to help them loot the country; Saudi Arabia is a perfect example; Leaders in Latin
America were also subjected to the same attacks by economic hitmen;

Removal of uncooperative leaders through color revolutions;

Total destruction of the State through divide and conquer using multiple warlords and pitting each other;

For the last 400 years, another resource rich country like the Philippines fall victim to all three methods.

The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) has a hit list of Arab nations to conquer obviously with little regard for
Arab casualties. Such hit list includes a total of seven countries beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran,
Somalia, and Sudan.

The leaked Clinton email confirms that what they did and continue to do in Libya is the fulfillment of this hit list:

Frances Client & Quaddafi's Gold

From: Sidney Blumenthal

To: Hillary Clinton
Date: 2011-04-01 21:00

Subject: FRANCES CLIENT & QADDAFIS GOLD

UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05785522 Date: 01/07/2016

RELEASE IN FULL CONFIDENTIAL April 2, 2011

For: Hillary
From: Sid
Re: Frances client & Qaddafis gold

A high ranking official on the National Libyan Council states that factions have developed within it. In part this
reflects the cultivation by France in particular of clients among the rebels. General Abdelfateh Younis is the leading
figure closest to the French, who are believed to have made payments of an unknown amount to him. Younis has
told others on the NLC that the French have promised they will provide military trainers and arms.

So far the men and materiel have not made an appearance. Instead, a few risk assessment analysts wielding
clipboards have come and gone. Jabril, Jalil and others are impatient. It is understood that France has clear
economic interests at stake. Sarkozys occasional emissary, the intellectual self-promoter Bernard Henri-Levy, is
considered by those in the NLC who have dealt with him as a semi-useful, semi joke figure.

Rumors swept the NLC upper echelon this week that Qaddafi may be dead or maybe not.

Qaddafi has nearly bottomless financial resources to continue indefinitely, according to the latest report we
have received:

On April 2, 2011 sources with access to advisors to Saif al-Islam Qaddafi stated in strictest confidence that while
the freezing of Libyas foreign bank accounts presents Muammar Qaddafi with serious challenges, his ability to
equip and maintain his armed forces and intelligence services remains intact.

According to sensitive information available to this these individuals, Qaddafis government holds 143 tons of
gold, and a similar amount in silver.

During late March, 2011 these stocks were moved to SABHA (south west in the direction of the Libyan border
with Niger and Chad); taken from the vaults of the Libyan Central Bank in Tripoli. This gold was accumulated prior
to the current rebellion and was intended to be used to establish a pan-African currency based on the Libyan
golden Dinar.

This plan was designed to provide , the Francophone African Countries with an alternative to the French
franc (CFA). (Source Comment: According to knowledgeable individuals this quantity of gold and silver is valued
at more than $7 billion.

French intelligence officers discovered this plan shortly after the current rebellion began, and this was one of the
factors that influenced President Nicolas

UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05785522

Date: 01/07/2016

Sarkozys decision to commit France to the attack on Libya. According to these individuals Sarkozys plans are
driven by the following issues:

A desire to gain a greater share of Libya oil production,

Increase French influence in North Africa,

Improve his internal political situation in France,

Provide the French military with an opportunity to reassert its position in the world, address the concern of his
advisors over Qaddafis long term plans to supplant France as the dominant power in, Francophone Africa. )

On the afternoon of April 1, an individual with access to the National Libyan Council (NLC) stated in private that
senior officials of the NLC believe that the rebel military forces are beginning to show signs of improved discipline
and fighting spirit under some of the new military commanders, including Colonel Khalifha Haftar, the former
commander of the anti- Qaddafi forces in the Libyan National Army (LNA). According to these sources, units
defecting from Qaddafis force are also taking a greater role in the fighting on behalf of the rebels.

- Source: Wikileaks
They were monitoring where the gold is heading, and they got what they wanted.

Fortunately for us, they were interrupted in Syria and Iran as the BRICS, and 180 more allied countries, decided to stand up
to these few old men and women with kleptocratic and eugenics tendencies.

But it is extremely important to remind ourselves that the United Nations and mainstream media were complicit to all of
these high crimes committed against the sovereign people of Libya, and other countries.

We cannot afford to lower our guards however the covert NWO geopolitical game is played.

Related: Clinton Promises to Give Illegal Immigrants More Tax Money

Why Is April Always A Big Month For Illuminati Mischief?

April 14 2016 | From: CosmicConvergence

First things first, when referring to the mythology of Aries, it is important to note that there are two
distinctions to make. Myths about Aries, the Ram are different from myths about Aries, the
Greek god (whose name is more often spelled Ares).
In Greek mythology Ares is the god of war. It is important to make a distinction between the role that Ares (Greek
mythology) plays and the role that his sister Athena (Greek mythology) plays. Athena was also a god (goddess) of
war, but unlike Ares, Athena was strategic and disciplined, where Ares was chaotic and destructive.

Having these two Greek gods represent the two different sides of war is very telling as to how the ancient Greeks viewed
war. If Athena was Napoleon then Ares was Rambo. Ares was known for his lust for blood, his chaotic nature, and his
thoughtless aggression.
 "Interestingly enough some of these characteristics (to a much lesser extent) are attributed to those born under
Aries, the Ram, in astrology."

- The Mythology of Aries

Very few residents are aware but those who truly run the world consult astrology and mythology, numerology and mythology
just as much (and even more) than they refer to the hard sciences.

TPTB who rule the entire planet via a World Shadow Government (WSG) have always conceived and timed their major
events according to the stars. They employ the very best astrologers in existence and conduct their many enterprises
according to the arcana of occult astrology and numerology.
Its now quite obvious to those who have researched these matters that the very business of the ruling elites is perfectly
timed according to the confluence of astrology (e.g. Aries), numerology (e.g. power numbers 11, 22, and 33) and
chronology (e.g. Shemitah phenomenon).

Remember, the same cabal set up every major chronological system in use today. The World Shadow Government, in fact,
is quite meticulous about executing their black operations and implementing their false flag terror attacks on specific dates
and in certain places in order to greatly intensify their impact and desired effects on the planetary civilization.

Your Birth Date and Location, Your DNA and Bloodline

Did you know that those who own and operate Planet Earth, Inc. have access to the birth date and birth location of every
human born ever born here? They also have a massive database of the DNA records and bloodline history of every single
person alive today. All the birth records, which they have quick and easy access to, provide them with this information and
much, much more.
You see, in this way TPTB leave absolutely nothing to chance. On a certain level, that is, they know everything they
think they need to know about each one of us. Our karmic blueprints are revealed by our astrological birth chart just as our
destinies are carried through our bloodlines.

Of course, nature is only one piece of this very complicated puzzle of destiny. Its well known that nurture can change the
future of one whose nature is to do good or do evil. Nurture is really the controlling factor here, but not when the nature is so
strong that it cannot be overridden. This will occur when the karmic influences are so heavy that the destiny is literally
carved in stone.

Hence, they (TPTB) know - without any doubt - exactly who those old souls are who will be as predictably incorrigible as
they are intractable. As they say in America, theyve got their number - ALL OF THEM -both literally and figuratively. In so
doing the ruling cabal is quite aware of who precisely will give them problems and how they might do so.

If the renegades chart shows much promise as a writer or speaker, that individual will most likely become a Thomas Paine
or Thomas Jefferson or Sir Thomas More or Thomas Merton or Thomas Mann or Thomas Becket.
Yes, TPTB are also obsessed with onomastics which concerns itself with the esoteric meaning of ones personal name.
Both the numerology of a persons full name and its etymological origin reflect the energetic imprint associated with the
individuals current incarnation. If they happen to be born in the month of Aries they will be courageous and bold, impulsive
and pioneering. They will charge ahead with the missions in life like a battering ram.

What Does All of this Have to do With April of 2016?

The forgoing revelations were only presented in order to impress upon the reader that they really do have your number just
as they use their various numerological systems to control the Global Economic & Financial System.

Everything the ruling cabal does is perfectly timed and coordinated for maximum effect on human consciousness with the
explicit purpose of exerting complete control over the entire Earth realm. This is their domain, so they think, and they are
determined to keep the place in total lockdown - 24/7.
Toward that end they routinely use certain months to accomplish certain goals. The month of April has always been one of
their favorites for many reasons.

Not only is the weather very nice with Spring in full bloom, many folks around the world have full-blown Spring
Fever. However, it is the astrological energies associated with Aries which they really like to exploit.

They do this by capitalizing on the vibrations of war that are inherent in the very astrology and numerology of the month of
April. The window of April 15th through the end of April is usually a very active time for these inveterate war-makers.

"Were one to deeply research the individual astrology and numerology of all the government soldiers and
mercenary soldiers of fortune, it would become apparent how they have all been corralled on this battle flied or that
battleground in order to fight it out in good fashion.

Since most 'Men are originally from Mars' just as most 'Women are from Venus', it ought to be clear how easy it
has always been to move the warmongering males to just about any theater of war in Creation.

Likewise, TPTB are fully cognizant of how easy it is to ramp up the war cries with this battle cry or that battle hymn,
this military-adnminstered vaccine or that recreational war drug."

CAPTAGON: Tons Of Amphetamine Drugs Smuggled Into Syria To Fuel ISIS Terrorism

Now many will ask the question about Aries officially ending on or about April 19th or 20th from year to year. And, yes, thats
correct, except that there are different astrological systems at work here. As follows:

"Under the tropical zodiac, the Sun transits this sign mostly between March 20 and April 19 each year. This time
duration is exactly the first month of Solar Hejri calendar (Farvardin). Under the sidereal zodiac, the sun currently
transits Aries from April 15 to May 15 (approximately)."

- Aries (astrology)
Heres an historical example of how TPTB use the earlier Aries energies to wage their wars of aggression around the globe.

"The 2003 invasion of Iraq lasted from 20 March to 1 May 2003 and signaled the start of the Iraq War, which was
dubbed Operation Iraqi Freedom by the United States (prior to 19 March, the mission in Iraq was called Operation
Enduring Freedom, a carryover from the War in Afghanistan)."

- 2003 invasion of Iraq

Not only was that war of conquest and control deliberately initiated on March 20, it was started on that date in order to
inaugurate a multi-year campaign of war and terrorism to transform the whole Middle East in to a regional theatre of war and
conflict.

Related: The New Atlantis rises and then falls, after being halted by the epochal wars of the Kali Yuga and Iron
Age conflicts

What Else has the Controlling Cabal Done During the Month of April?

Make no mistake about it, from the 15th to the 30th of April is the real playtime for the mischievous elites. This is when they
line up their battle plans for optimal effect both locally and globally.

The "Germans introduced poison gas on Apr 22, 1915" which was the first time chemical weapons had been
known to be used on a wide-scale basis.
 Its also interesting that Adolf Hitler allegedly committed suicide on April 30 in 1945.

The Falklands War was officially begun on Friday, 2 April 1982.

On April 30, 1975 Saigon falls and the North Vietnamese take Saigon; the war in Vietnam ends.

The whole orchestrated Arab Spring was actually timed around the bellicose frequencies of the main month of
Spring - April.

Many countries throughout the Mideast saw the most violent protests and revolutions during March and April of
both 2011 and 2012.

The ongoing Syrian War began on 15 March, 2011.

The civil war in the Ukraine was started on 6 April 2014.

What follows is another list of momentous April events which fall into the very same April timeline. Each of these
meticulously manufactured happenings was highly consequential and fabricated to produce a desired outcome by the WSG.
- All Hell BreakS Loose in 2014

Back to April of 2016

April 17th has already been placed very high on the radar screen by various astrologers. Not only does this date fall
squarely within the preferred range of the ruling elites to make war or perpetrate crimes against humanity, it also serves as a
HUGE trigger point.

That does not necessarily mean that Sunday, April 17th will see a major earth-shattering event; rather, only that it may
trigger the energies toward a future conflagration of some sort. It may manifest as a single short-term calamitous event or
function as the start date for a long-term march to a World War III.

Heres what one astrologer (a practitioner of Jyotish) has written about this April:
- Vedic Astrologer Put The World On Notice For April 17th, 2016

The same Vedic astrologer had earlier presented her predictions about this April during her 2016 Forecast as follows:
- 2016 Vedic Astrology World Predictions

Whats the Real Point of this Discussion?

Whenever humanity sheds the light of awareness on a predicted event, they hold the power to transform it, for good or for ill.

This is exactly what happened with last years widely prophesied Shemitah financial breakdown and economic crash.

Yes, it happened in various ways, but was significantly diminished in its effects because so many had written and spoken
about it.

As follows:

"If, during the years leading up to 9/11, there were books written about a scheme to take down the Twin Towers via
a controlled demolition, would the false flag operation still have been executed?

If the internet was abuzz with conspiracy theories - before September 11, 2001 - about a cruise missile from the
U.S. military arsenal being fired at the Pentagon, would the perpetrators still have followed through?

If the modern-day prophets and televangelists, rabbis and ministers were warning the people of a grave event that
would close the stock market for a week and shut down the airline industry, would the conspiracy proceed as
planned?

The point is that the September Shemitah is very much a manmade event that would only have proceeded if there
was no likelihood of exposure. If those who conceive and coordinate the 7 year Shemitah crashes and collapses
dont want to be known, would they still implement their conspiratorial plot?

Particularly during the month of September of 2015 - the prognosticated biggest month of the millennium, why
would they dangerously give themselves away?"

- Septembers Shemitah: What really happened? What will the 2016 Super Shemitah bring?

Conclusion

Change your mind, change the world you live in.

Should you change your attitude toward whatever befalls you or your community, the whole world will conform itself to your
positive and life-affirming posture. The heavens will support your every effort to overcome the seemingly insurmountable
obstacles.

Whenever the light of consciousness is directly aimed at a particular worry or concern, an anxiety about the future or regret
about the past, it will slowly defuse it. The sheer knowledge of a prognosticated event can either magnify it or minimize it.

By facing the upcoming challenges of 2016 and beyond with great courage and undeterrable resolve, the unseen forces of
the Universe will congregate in your corner.

The more one understands that the predominant collective awareness, which is held around any specific prophecy, will
either bring it into Creation or keep it from manifesting. By becoming aware of these possibilities, much can be done to
prevent many of the more severe prophecies from occurring. After all, True Prophecy Is Always Uttered To Avert
Catastrophe, NOT Predict It.

True, there is no stopping some of the earth-shaking changes which are nearly upon us, but they can be alleviated. The
more we pay attention to the cosmic messages being delivered from on high daily, the more compelled we will be to make
the necessary alterations in behavior, both individually and collectively.

Geo-Engineering Now Confirmed To Be Very Real, And It's Definitely Not Good For
The Environment
April 12 2016 | From: NaturalNews

If you mention geoengineering to people you know, you're liable to either get a blank stare or an
eye roll.
To most, the term is foreign, but to some who have heard about the concept as a "conspiracy theory to control the
weather," they'll dismiss you as a loon.

Related: Chemtrails, Geoengineering, Weather Modification & Weather Warfare

But the fact is, their denial makes them look foolish, since not only is geoengineering very real, but it's been looked at as a
way to control weather and climate for decades.

In fact, as reported by The Daily Sheeple, President John F. Kennedy proposed creating the technology to control the
weather back in 1961;

"We shall propose further cooperative efforts between all nations in weather prediction and eventually in weather
control," he said in a speech to the United Nations General Assembly on Sept. 25 of that year.

Control Remains in the Conversation About Weather, Climate

In the 1990s there was a renewed effort by the U.S. government and, in particular, the Pentagon, to devise technology that
would enable the military to use weather control as a weapon in certain theaters of operation.

An August 1996 research paper [PDF] presented to the Air Force's "Air Force 2025" project and titled, "Weather as a Force
Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025," noted in the executive summary:

"In 2025, US aerospace forces can 'own the weather' by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing
development of those technologies to war-fighting applications. Such a capability offers the war fighter tools to
shape the battlespace in ways never before possible.

It provides opportunities to impact operations across the full spectrum of conflict and is pertinent to all possible
futures. The purpose of this paper is to outline a strategy for the use of a future weather-modification system to
achieve military objectives rather than to provide a detailed technical road map.
 A high-risk, high-reward endeavor, weather-modification offers a dilemma not unlike the splitting of the atom. While
some segments of society will always be reluctant to examine controversial issues such as weather-modification,
the tremendous military capabilities that could result from this field are ignored at our own peril.

From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of
natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-
modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary."

The paper also added that, at some point, "weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both
domestic and international applications."

And remember, that was 20 years ago. Today, geoengineering remains a thing, and as documented
at GeoEngineeringWatch.org is damaging our planet.

Today, as reported by the Christian Science Monitor, interest in geoengineering continues. Scientists say that one way to
combat climate change is through geoengineering, or "reshaping the planet in a substantial way," the news site reported.

But should we even want that? After all, who decides what the benefits would be, and could we even trust that the effort
wouldn't backfire, thereby substantially polluting or otherwise harming the planet?

CSM further notes, for instance:

"Geoengineering typically refers to mitigating global climate change either by removing carbon dioxide from the
atmosphere or by preventing sunlight from warming the surface by reflecting it back into space."

Wait! Maybe Man is Causing Climate Change

Carbon dioxide, contrary to what the so-called "global warming hoaxers" would have you believe, is vital to sustaining life
on our planet.

Think about it if CO2 were really a poison, why does it help plants grow so much?
Why is it a key part of the fundamental equation of biology: sugar + oxygen = carbon dioxide + water + heat?

How is it that those in the environmental movement are ignorant of basic biology?

As the website PlantsNeedCO2.org states, the more CO2 around, the better plants grow:

In Idso and Idsos (1994) analysis of soil nutrient limitations, the percentage growth enhancement due to a 300-
ppm rise in the airs CO2 content actually did exhibit a slight (but statistically non-significant) decline, dropping from
51% to 45% when nutrients went from non-growth-limiting to limiting in a group of 70 experiments.

But when the atmospheric CO2 enrichment was 600 ppm, this slight negative trend reversed itself, going from a
CO2-induced growth stimulation of 43% when nutrients were present in abundance to a 52% enhancement when
their supply was sub-optimal.

And for a 1200-ppm increase in atmospheric CO2, the percentage growth enhancement jumped from 60% when
the soil nutrient supply was adequate to 207% when it was less-than-adequate.

Without it, every living thing dies. What happens of geoengineering removes too much carbon dioxide, so that trees don't
have enough to convert into oxygen?

"Some argue we shouldn't even contemplate [geoengineering], as it's too dangerous to the planet," admits Dr.
Karen Pinkus, incoming chair of the Faculty Advisory Board at the Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future, at
Cornell University, in an interview with the CSM.

But she goes on to say that it should be part of the conversation: "Climate change itself is the biggest
geoengineering project ever undertaken, anyway, if you take 'mitigation' out of the definition."

If you take into consideration the length of time geoengineering and "weather control" have been discussed by our own
government probably in conjunction with other governments as well then maybe Mankind is causing climate change
after all, just not in the way we're being told.

Combating The Elite Rulers Divide And Conquer Tactics

April 11 2016 | From: WakingTimes

Six Examples Of Divide And Conquer And What You Can Do.
In order to keep the populace deceived into believing that the theatre of illusion world they live in is real, it has
been necessary for those controlling the show - the worlds ruling elite with their stage con artists to artfully
invent a number of distractions. These distractions are designed to keep the populaces focus away from the ruling
elites deceptions so that they dont get worked out and become exposed.

One of the ruling elites most effective pieces of distraction woven and spun, socially engineered into the fabric of the fake
world for controlling the populace, is the divide and rule tactic.

Be it in politics, business, banking, finance, science, religion, race relations, the military, medicine, drugs, etc. the divide and
rule tactic continues to have a massive controlling effect on a deceived populace as they bicker, argue, take sides and fight
amongst each other, never joining the dots, never seeing the bigger picture, never realizing how theyre being played by
distraction

In the Divide and Rule Clash of Viewpoints a Number of Common Patterns Recur:

1. All sides, each with their conflicting views and ideals, have been secretly manufactured or funded and
controlled by the ruling elite. In effect, the ruling elite are the invisible 3rd party in the conflicts.

2. Thus, no side is the one thats got it right.

3. or has the truth.

5. No side will ever win. The Hegelian Dialectic conflict will continue here on out. Even if it morphs into a different
dialectic the same old conflicts will occur.

6. The destabilizing weakening us versus them scenario prevents those divided and ruled from realizing just
how powerful they could be together. How together they could topple those puppet masters at the top of the
hierarchical tree...

In light of the above here are 6 examples of divide and conquer:

1. My Political Party Versus Yours

Getting closer to Election Day, the unfolding 2016 US Presidential campaigning has shown us how increasingly politically
divided the nation is, as in the case of a recent Donald Trump rally in Chicago. It was reported that a large number of anti-
Trump protesters turned out to disrupt the occasion. After a number of fights broke out and arrests were made, the event
was eventually cancelled. Because of the disruption and further threat, Trump decided not to show up at the event to speak.

Yet another case where rigidly dogmatic people act out their mental software programmes not realizing that the
Republican/Democrat 2-horse race is backed, owned and controlled by the ruling elite, so it doesnt matter who gets into
office, voting will change nothing.

Yes, I know that many of you realize no matter what country it is general elections are a farce. They exist to give the masses
the illusion of democracy. However, many in the know still fall for the same traps by voting for one party because theyve
been offered an incentive such as a tax cut
Voting for a major political party in this way is a short-term payoff.What then comes with it is a far greater and awful long-
term cost. That long-term cost being the advancement of the dehumanising New World Order (NWO) agenda: The major
parties corrupt puppet politicians who you voted for will only be too happy to carry out the wishes of their lords and masters
the ruling elite, to slyly advance their NWO agenda and the further enslavement of you, your family and friends.

People, wake up!

2. Divide and Rule by Manufacturing Wars

Certain events over time, secretly planned, have currently manifested into what looks like the brink of World War 3. Dont
become a sucker for the ruling elites secretly manufactured wars.

The real reasons for wars are not given to you in the history books. Truth is, wars were (and are) secretly manufactured by
the ruling elite for political gain, huge profits for their corporations like the weapons industry, population reduction and
advancement of the NWO enslavement agenda. In short, wars are a massive deception. If only those countless millions who
had died fighting had known about these ulterior motives

Question everything. Question the ulterior motives: get the who, what, when and why..? if a military conflict breaks out.
3. The Wars On

The truth is that anything declared a war on is designed to fail. People in high places overseeing the funding while playing
all sides to deal with the related problems know that they fund ineffective approaches that will never get to the root cause
and win the wars. This allows these people in high places to continually profiteer here on out from never-ending wars.

Thus, the different approaches coming from divided opinions on how we should tackle certain problems such as those
related to 'the war on cancer, the war on drugs.' or the war on war etc. are essentially nothing more than deliberate
distractions to lead nowhere while the real solutions have been hidden, suppressed and if exposed are unjustly ridiculed by
a bought-off mainstream media.

4. Controlled Opposition

The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.

- Vladimir Lenin
Beware of a number of charismatic deceptive wolves in sheeps clothing in positions of authority connected to 3. Playing the
pied piper making empty promises, apparently expressing the same sentiment as we-the-people, they attract many
followers who have no idea that their nothing more than controlled opposition.

5. Stirring up Political / Religious Differences

The ruling elite running the planet and their Masonic lackeys: presidents, prime ministersand other serial liars, traitors to
humanity leaders could lead us into World War 3.

The desire to stir things up and make 3 world wars happen began as far back as the mid- to late-1800s. A documented
example as proof of this can be found in the form of a letter written by Albert Pike, a world leading Freemason and agent of
the worlds hidden controllers running the planet.
Basically, the letter to fellow Freemason Guiseppi Mazzini (Mafia founder) outlines the need to secretly manufacture three
world wars by dividing and stirring up religious and political differences between nations and encourage involvement from
allies, sympathisers i.e., those taking sides then joining in with the conflict

Pike stated there would be mutual destruction of the many nations involved. A social cataclysm and godless world
disillusioned with religion would soon follow.

6. Divide and Conquer Through Simplistic Reduction

Be it concerning political, financial, ethnic, educational or other matters the Western world powers that be want you to take
sides through their simplistic reduction of liberal versus conservative issues.
This age-old political stratagem has the effect of creating divided people fighting against each other instead of turning
against their oppressors, the ruling elite.

That concludes just 6 of indeed a countless number of examples of divide and rule.

What You Can Do

Educate yourself. Know your enemy. Find out who they are and what they stand for. Spread the word to others on your
findings on how weve been broken up into weak and powerless pieces.

You see, the real enemy is not some ethnic, political, or religious individual or group; the only real enemy, the only
us against them is we-the-people against the ruling elite.
All else is mere deliberate distraction.

Discernment is needed every step of the way to becoming one collective entity to take back our power.

Beware Modern-Day Doublespeak

April 11 2016 | From: ActivistPost

Top 20 Modern Doublespeak Terms To Be Aware Of.

Doublespeak is a language that is alive and well in our world today. Doublespeak can refer to terms that
are euphemisms (mild expressions designed to hide harsher or more direct ones), deliberately
ambiguous (expressions designed to hide the truth) or actual inversions (outright lies which state the opposite of
the truth).

Although he never used the term doublespeak in his book 1984, many associate doublespeak with George Orwell. After all,
it was Orwell who famously wrote that the motto of the totalitarian ruling party in 1984 was War is Peace, Freedom is
Slavery, Ignorance is Strength an example of an inversion.

Orwell did however use the term newspeak to refer to a new kind of language which drastically reduced the scope of
available words and terms, so as to concurrently reduce the scope of possible free thought among the ruled population.

Many doublespeak terms in the following list are oxymorons, meaning that the term itself is contradictory. Many hide the
truth because it is too raw, unpalatable, uncomfortable or outright horrifying. It is vitally important we watch our language,
because it plays a great part in how we shape our world and in how we create our reality.

In many ways, by unconsciously using these terms instead of more accurate or truthful ones, we are quietly lying to
ourselves, or at a minimum acquiescing to the process of being lied to and programmed. Political correctness is a great
example of how language control, thought control and doublespeak can be introduced to an entire population without people
realizing they are being deceived and manipulated.

Below is list of the top 20 modern Orwellian doublespeak terms, with the first half focusing on military and geopolitical terms.

Orwellian Doublespeak Terms #1: War on Terror, Terrorism, Terrorist, Enemy Combatant

The war on terror is an utterly fake and fraudulent construct. It has largely been invented and hyped to provide an excuse for
the NWO (New World Order) manipulators to override things like human rights, natural law and the Constitution
domestically, as well as to invade, infiltrate and overthrow other nations abroad.
The US has struggled to define the term terror ever since it declared the war on terror. Funnily enough, the US cant even
reach a consensus on what terrorism exactly is; so we have another nebulous war on a concept that is different to everyone.
Here is the core of the FBIs definition of terrorism, whether it be domestic or international:

"Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law;

Appear intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by
intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination. or
kidnapping;"

By its own definition, the US is the biggest terrorist in the world, since it frequently acts dangerously to human life (bombs,
missiles, drones, war), kills civilians, influences foreign governments (when it is not outright overthrowing them Iraq, Libya,
Ukraine) and has been assassinating foreign governmental officials since at least 1953 via the CIA.

Politicians use the term terrorist or enemy combatant to essentially describe a foreign militia member or soldier that has
been designated as the enemy and whom they want to destroy or kill. Islamic terrorism is just the latest flavor, although a
better term may be Zio-Islamic terrorism, since Zionist Israel is behind the creation, funding and operation of radical
Islam (or as I call it radical Zio-Islam) as well as many of the so-called Islamic false flag attacks like 9/11 and Paris.
Look at the DHS list of extremists

Orwellian Doublespeak Terms #2: Extremism, Extremist

The would-be word controllers have gone one step further than terrorism by adopting the term extremism. Extremism is the
new terrorism, because its more broad and can be used to marginalize or criminalize dissidents. After all, ANYONE could
be accused of being extreme in some way, right? Who is exactly in the middle of the spectrum on every single issue?
As the DHS manual in the image above states, an extremist could be a patriot, veteran, alternative media journalist, border
control advocate, animal rights advocate, gun control advocate and a host of other people just about anyone who
questions the official version of reality. Are you an extremist?

Orwellian Doublespeak Terms #3: Freedom Fighter, Moderate Rebel

On the other side of the coin, of course, are those mercenaries, soldiers, military men and other guns for hire who are
branded as our allies and not our enemy. In essence, someone we are paying to do our dirty work. Those guys are not
terrorists; they are freedom fighters or moderate rebels! As George Carlin said:

"Israeli terrorists are called commandos; Arab commandos are called terrorists. Contra killers are called freedom
fighters; if crime fighters fight crime, and fire fighters fight fire, what do freedom fighters fight?"

Orwellian Doublespeak Term #4: Ethnic Cleansing

Ethnic cleansing is another horrific example of doublespeak. The word genocide is too direct and confrontational, so the
controllers have felt the need to tone it down with the horrible choice of the word cleansing. Since when did mass murder
have anything to do cleaning or cleansing? This is a total inversion of reality.

Orwellian Doublespeak Term #5: Enhanced Interrogation

Enhanced interrogation is a fancy way of saying something far more brutal and honest: torture. Its another lie. In normal
English, to interrogate is to ask, not to push someone faces down in water with the intent of scaring them almost to the point
of death, nor to shove food up their rectum.
Yet we know from US government documents that waterboarding, rectal feeding and a host of other atrocities were in fact
performed at places like Guantanamo Bay.

Orwellian Doublespeak Term #6: Extrajudicial Killing

Just like the above 2 terms, extrajudicial killing is another attempt at adding more words and syllables to a term in the
hope of hiding the raw, brutal truth behind it. We all know it means assassination. Its another deceptive euphemism to
conceal and downplay the truth. In a free, fair and open world, no one would have the right to take anothers life, let alone
outside of some kind of justice process.

Orwellian Doublespeak Terms #7: Humanitarian Intervention, Responsibility to Protect (R2P)

The Rockefeller-created United Nations is the intended vehicle to usher in the One World Government of the NWO. It is no
surprise, then, that they would foster the use of doublespeak terms and policies such as humanitarian intervention (a
blatant oxymoron) and the responsibility to protect (R2P).
An intervention is an invasion or pre-emptive attack, and is obviously illegal and unjust period. Theres nothing
humanitarian about militarily invading another sovereign nation.

The US, UK and other powers have gotten away with this kind of mass murder by controlling the narrative through the
mainstream media and drumming up pretexts, such as the fake story of WMDs (Weapons of Mass Destruction) and the fake
story of rescuing a nations people from a supposedly dangerous leader. The latter trick seems to work almost every time.

Orwellian Doublespeak Term #8: Collateral Damage, Useless Eaters

A hallmark of these kind of military doublespeak terms is dehumanization turning other people and other lives into
something sub-human or non-human.
How often have we heard that people killed in a raid, strike, incursion, invasion or battle are just collateral damage? It
sounds like a financial asset or a lowly piece of possession. Perhaps the only way hardened military men with a deadened
conscience and ability to feel or empathize can function is to make their victims into things.

War criminal and big-time NWO insider Henry Kissinger is reported to have called Africans useless eaters, which makes
sense given the fact he scripted the NSSM 200 during his time in the Nixon Administration the official US policy of
depopulation towards the 3rd world.

Orwellian Doublespeak Term #9: Eliminate, Neutralize, Depopulate

Speaking of depopulation, there are a lot of euphemistic and doublespeak terms for killing and murder. As well as
to depopulate, we also hear to eliminate, to neutralize, to bump off and to take out. More dehumanization and the further
attempt to sugar coat killing and make murder more palatable.

Orwellian Doublespeak Term #10: Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security,

Intelligence

Government is the seat of control, so of course we can expect its name to reflect doublespeak deception. Isnt it funny how
nations like the US and UK (and others) have some version of the Ministry or Department of Defense, when they are usually
the aggressors and invaders?
I suppose Department of Attack is not PR-friendly enough. The DHS (Department of Homeland Security) is a joke; it does
nothing to make the average person more secure, but only the 1% of 1% of the controllers whom it serves. Intelligence is
information about a potential enemy gained through spying, but is it really smart or wise to go around making enemies, first
in your mind and then in the world?

Military intelligence is another oxymoron. Is spying real intelligence? What about emotional intelligence? The heart is bigger
and more powerful than the brain

Orwellian Doublespeak Term #11: WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction)

Why talk about WMDs (Weapons of Mass Destruction) instead of just saying, in a more straightforward manner, chemical
weapons or nuclear weapons? The US has more WMDs than anyone.

The UK has a lot, too, and Israel its sitting on what some think is a 300-400 strong undeclared nuclear arsenal in the volatile
Middle East. Why dont enough people talk about the WMDs these nations hold, and either use as threats or in reality to
achieve their imperialistic and terroristic goals?

Orwellian Doublespeak Term #12: Anti-Semitism

Sooner or later, all researchers exposing the worldwide conspiracy have to face the fact that Israel is a rogue nation (owned
by the Rothschilds) that exerts an inordinate and disproportionate influence on the world, while committing daily genocide
(sorry, ethnic cleansing) against the Palestinians.

We need to rise above the stigma of anti-semitism, which is clearly a term thrown around to divert attention and criticism
away from Israel. Its a cunning trick to try to equate the recipient with intolerance and to falsely paint the recipient as racist.
Heres what an Israeli official (former Israeli Minister Shulamit Aloni) said about it:

Well, its a trick. We always use it. When from Europe someone criticizes Israel, then we bring out the Holocaust. When in
this country (USA) when they criticize Israel, they are anti-semitic its very easy to blame people who criticize certain acts
of the Israeli Government that justifies everything we do to the Palestinians.
 Orwellian Doublespeak Term #13: Conspiracy Theorist

As I covered in the article 7 Massive Misconceptions Many Never Question, most people are unaware that the
term conspiracy theorist originated with the CIA who was trying to cover up genuine examination into the JFK
assassination.

As I wrote there:

"[Conspiracy theory and conspiracy theorist] are weaponized terms which represent a cunning method to
discredit truthseekers, truthtellers and investigators. This diversionary scheme has worked well people often shut
down once they hear this phrase and stop thinking critically. These terms have become falsely associated, in
popular culture, with madness, craziness and deluded thinking.

Of course, the corollary to the idea of so-called deluded conspiracy theories is that things just happen by chance.
Thus, those who deride conspiracy theories, often with little or no investigation, can be labeled coincidence
theorists. They adhere to coincidence theory which blindly believes there is no New World Order agenda;
events just occur randomly."

Labeling a truthseeker or truthteller as a conspiracy theorist has been a great way to hide the truth, but is usefulness is
running out.

Orwellian Doublespeak Term #14: Quantitative Easing

Ben Bernanke, former chairman of the Illuminati-owned Federal Reserve, earned the name Helicopter Ben with his
suggestion that the Government throw paper currency out of a helicopter to the people below.
Quantitative easing was another intellectual and deceitful doublespeak term to hide devaluation and inflation. The basic
laws of economics dictate that the mass printing of paper money (with no real growth in wealth to back it) will inevitably
lead to inflation and a devaluation of the existing money in circulation.

Orwellian Doublespeak Term #15: Bulk Collection

Remember when Obama and the US Government tried to take the heat off the whole NSA surveillance scandal? They
deliberately changed the widely-used term mass surveillance to bulk collection.

This was more subtle PR doublespeak, but those who closely watch the government know it was another attempt at
obfuscation and denial.
 Orwellian Doublespeak Term #16: Negative Cash Flow, Negative Patient Care Outcome

These 2 doublespeak terms come from George Carlin. Again, we have to ask ourselves, why are we so afraid of being
honest and direct? Why cant we call a spade a spade?

Why do we have to turn everything into a military or economic term? Are we aware that our society has militarized,
weaponized and commercialized just about everything?

Orwellian Doublespeak Term #17: Reasonable Suspicion

Remember when then-NSA chief Michael Hayden tried to convince reporters and the world that there was a new benchmark
in the privacy and surveillance debate. It was no longer the benchmark of probable cause as spelled out in the 4th
Amendment. It was now reasonable suspicion. This is called making-it-up-as-you-go-along, and represents a clear sign
that the previous benchmarks, rights and limitations upon centralized power (that our ancestors fought so hard for) are being
eroded.

Orwellian Doublespeak Term #18: Climate Change Denier

Manmade global warming or AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming) is another giant scam designed to bring in a world
carbon tax, world currency and world government. If you arent with the program, youll be labeled a climate change
denier.
The word denier carries inherent negative connotations with it, which is why it has been chosen to try to corral the
unbelievers into the fold. Unfortunately for the NWO manipulators, there are many scientists refuting AGW and many who
have seen through the propaganda and realized that the environmental movement has been hijacked.

Orwellian Doublespeak Term #19: Sustainable Development

There are so many examples of doublespeak in the hijacked environmental movement that it would be a full-time job just to
list them all.
However, they can all be summarized by the dangerously deceptive term sustainable development, a catch cry of the UN
and ICLEI-controlled green movement, which promises the world and cloaks its agenda of control under a green veneer. For
more on this, take a close look at Agenda 21 and its newly updated cousin, Agenda 2030.

Orwellian Doublespeak Term #20: Globalism

Finally, the term globalism itself is another umbrella term of modern doublespeak. Those challenging the globe earth
model assert that globalism is an attempt to trick people into unconsciously assuming the Earth is a globe. Regardless of
whether that turns out to be true or not, we can say for sure that globalism has become a cover for the
growing centralization of power in the push towards a NWO World Government.
To the NWO manipulators, their doublespeak PR term globalism means free trade deals like the TTP, unfettered access to
3rd world nations to exploit new markets with no protections, and a one world army, currency and government all under their
control.

Conclusion: Beware of Doublespeak

We live in a world of doublespeak. As George Carlin exposed during his performance, the Pentagon really did measure
radiation in sunshine units! Its important to be aware of modern doublespeak, and in most cases, consciously use
alternative terms and phrasings so as to avoid the perpetuation of these lie-enabling terms.
In many ways, we create our world with language. Let us also remember the wise words of George Orwell:

"Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an
appearance of solidity to pure wind."

Shots Fired: Wikileaks Accuses Panama Papers' Leaker Of Being "Soros-Funded,

Soft-Power Tax Dodge" + Rothschild's Primer: How To Launder Money In U.S. Real
Estate And Avoid "Blacklists"
April 10 2016 | From: ZeroHedge / ZeroHedge / Various

The Panama Papers are yet another example of how the 'Elite's' little games are being exposed in
increasingly shorter amounts of time. One almost wonders why they even bother.
There is actually too much to cover here, but following are a couple of articles to begin with and number of links
with further elaboration.

Related: Wikileaks Accuses Panama Papers Leakers of Being Funded by Western Billionaires

Related: US Government, Soros funded Panama Papers to attack Putin WikiLeaks

Earlier this week, for the first time we got a glimpse into some of the American names allegedly contained in the "Panama
Papers", largest ever leak. "Some", not all, and "allegedly" because as we said yesterday;

"one can't help but wonder: why not do a Wikileaks type data dump, one which reveals if not all the 2.6
terabytes of data due to security concerns, then at least the identities of these 441 US-based clients. After
all, with the rest of the world has already been extensively shamed, it's only fair to open US books as well."

The exact same question appeared in an interview conducted between Wired magazine and the director of the organization
that released the Panama Papers, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, or ICIJ, Gerard Ryle.
This is what Ryle said:

"Ryle says that the media organizations have no plans to release the full dataset, WikiLeaks-style, which
he argues would expose the sensitive information of innocent private individuals along with the public
figures on which the groups reporting has focused.

Were not WikiLeaks. Were trying to show that journalism can be done responsibly, Ryle says. He says he
advised the reporters from all the participating media outlets to go crazy, but tell us whats in the public interest for
your country.

Question aside about who it is that gets to decide which "innocent private individuals" are to be left alone, Wikileaks clearly
did not like being characterized as conducting "irresponsible" journalism - and to the contrary, many in the public arena have
called for another massive, distributed effort to get to the bottom of a 2.4TB treasure trove of data which a handful of
journalists will simply be unable to dig through - and on Twitter, accused the ICIJ of being a "Washington DC based Ford,
Soros funded soft-power tax-dodge" which "has a WikiLeaks problem."
Moments later, in a subsequent tweet it added that the "Putin attack was produced by OCCRP which targets Russia &
former USSR and was funded by USAID & Soros."
And so, a new contest is born: one between the "old" source of mega leaks, and the new one. We wonder if and when
Edward Snowden and/or Glenn Greenwald will also chime in.

But we are far more interested if now, that there appears to be a war brewing between Wikileaks and ICIJ, who what
"information" will be released next, and whether whatever comes out will put the entire Panama Papers project in a different
perspective, one which, as even Bloomberg has hinted, may have been to benefit the last remaining global tax haven
around, the United States itself, as well as the most notorious provider of "tax haven" services in in said country: Rothschild.

Here Is Rothschild's Primer How To Launder Money In U.S. Real Estate And Avoid
"Blacklists"

Anyone closely following the Panama Papers tax haven story, is by now familiar with the role that Rothschild plays
in providing virtually identical services right inside the US by the Rothschild Trust, as explained in our recent
article "Rothschild Humiliates Obama, Reveals That "America Is The Biggest Tax Haven In The World."

Related: New Zealand Government ignored foreign trust threat for over 15 years Transparency International NZ

They are also probably familiar with the name Andrew Penney profiled in January by Bloomberg as follows:

"Rothschild, the centuries-old European financial institution, has opened a trust company in Reno, Nev., a few
blocks from the Harrahs and Eldorado casinos. It is now moving the fortunes of wealthy foreign clients out of
offshore havens such as Bermuda, subject to the new international disclosure requirements, and into Rothschild-
run trusts in Nevada, which are exempt.

...

For financial advisers, the current state of play is simply a good business opportunity. In a draft of his San
Francisco presentation, Rothschilds Penney wrote that the U.S. "is effectively the biggest tax haven in the
world." The U.S., he added in language later excised from his prepared remarks, lacks the resources to enforce
foreign tax laws and has little appetite to do so.

So for all those now former Mossack Fonseca clients, or their "Panamanian" peers who have not been rooted out yet, or for
anyone else who wishes to open a domestic "trust", here is the primer straight from Rothschild Trust.
Key highlights:

In the year since we opened Rothschild Trust North America in Reno, Nevada, we have discovered the versatility
of Nevada trusts and their usefulness within the context of our international business.

Rothschild Trust has long embraced clients with US connections and the complexity this brings to planning. Our new US
offering has enabled us to offer creative solutions not only to anticipated situations, but also to unusual or complex scenarios
that require bespoke structures.

In our experience, Nevada trusts can be useful planning tools not only for onshore or first generation American
families, but also for foreign offshore families looking to invest in the US.

Such structures maintain privacy and block US estate tax liability, but are subject to two layers of income tax (at both
the corporate and shareholder level) as well as high levels of both income and capital gains tax, making them inefficient for
appreciating or income-generating property.
Worried about FATCA exposure abroad? Just use Rothschild domestically:

In the build-up to FATCA implementation, some US clients who had assets in offshore trusts for historic reasons
have decided to domesticate these structures to lower the burden of reporting. These domestications form part of the
general trend we have seen towards moving structures onshore.

The US, and Nevada in particular with its favourable trust laws and attractive state tax regime, offers a variety of
planning opportunities that can achieve complex planning aims with simplified reporting obligations and
compliance concerns.
Here Rothschild explains to foreigners how to launder money using U.S. real estate:

The foreign company contributes its shares to the US LLC and then liquidates, and the US corporate subsidiary it owns
elects to be treated as a qualifying sub-chapter S subsidiary. The end result is a single layer of US income tax and
reduced rates on income and capital gains tax, though in the case of property that has appreciated greatly in value
such as, for example, prime New York condominiums there can be a significant tax cost to the liquidation.

We have recently seen the usefulness of foreign Nevada trusts for offshore foreign investors in US real estate.
The appointment of a foreign protector to a trust that would otherwise qualify as a US domestic trust causes the trust to fail
the control prong of the US court and control test for trust situs, and therefore prevents the trust from qualifying as tax-
resident for US federal income tax.

Generally, this type of structure is useful for foreign offshore investors in US real estate (or other US situate
assets) who do not wish to file US tax returns in their own name and who, having no personal US nexus, would like to
minimize the amount of US tax payable on the investments.

This, of course, would not be possible if the National Association of Realtors was not complicit. Which it is, as we have
covered since 2012:

"Many of you reading this will undoubtedly have spent time in an international bank and been forced to sit through
countless hours of know your client and AML training. Fascinating to note that the National Association of
Realtors lobbied for and received a waiver from such regulation.
 Thats right, realtors actually went to the U.S. government and said: we want to be able to help foreign
business oligarchs and other nefarious business people launder money through the real estate markets of
the United States and prevailed.

Here's their official position:

"NAR supports continued efforts to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism through the regulation
of entities using a risk-based analysis. Any risk-based assessment would likely find very little risk of money
laundering involving real estate agents or brokers.

Regulations that would require real estate agents and brokers to adopt anti-money laundering programs
may prove to be burdensome and unnecessary given the existing ML/TF regulations that already apply to
United States financial institutions."

So far, regulations that prevent foreigners from laundering money in the US have indeed proven "burdenseome." The result:
record high luxury real estate prices which is now used by foreign oligarchs and money launderers as the modern day
"Swiss bank account", and which make this particular sector of US housing accessible only to other foreigners.

If you are still not convinced to use Rothschild, here is one more reason: to avoid a "blacklists" - after all, everyone
is anonymous:

Nevada foreign trusts may also prove attractive to settlors from politically sensitive countries who are
grappling with blacklists and strict CFC regulations as they seek to structure their assets.

And here is where Rothschild comes as close as it possibly could to putting that US-based tax havens are used for tax
evasion:

"The use of Nevada foreign trusts avoids blacklists and the stigma that can come with placing assets in
jurisdictions typically viewed as tax havens, without creating exposure to US income tax on non-US
income.

As more countries adopt blacklists, strict CFC regimes and other measures designed to shut-down perceived tax
havens, the flexibility and higher degree of certainty afforded by US trusts may become increasingly
attractive."\

The question, then, is why does the US not adopt such a regime which makes money laundering impossible for both
foreigners and in more limited instances, residents? For now, however, it hasn't and probably won't, despite Obama's
heartfelt appeal on Tuesday that "Tax avoidance is a big, global problem."

So for all those who can't wait to use Rothschild for all their "Trust" needs, here is your contact:
The Rothschild Primer:
Click on the image above to open a larger version in a new window
Click on the image above to open a larger version in a new window
Click on the image above to open a larger version in a new window

Further Related Articles:

Panama Papers: U.S. intel op to solidify western elite's global domination?

US effectively the biggest tax haven in the world

 Disinfo campaign commences: Panama 'leaks' target West's enemies, ignore NATO criminals

Pepe Escobar: Panama leaks a 'limited hangout' psy-op set up by US intelligence

Soros and Rockefeller control the Panama papers Leak

Mossack Fonseca Documents, Computers Seized in El Salvador Raids

One Day After the Panama Papers were Leaked, IRS Headquarters Closes then Catches Fire

Kiwi at heart of Panama Papers leak 'certain' New Zealanders will be named

Britons Call for David Camerons Resignation re Panama Papers

The Evil Empire [Would Like To Think It] Has The World In A Death Grip
April 9 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts / Various

In my archives there is a column or two that introduces the reader to John Perkins important
book, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. An EHM is an operative who sells the leadership of a
developing country on an economic plan or massive development project.

The Hit Man convinces a countrys government that borrowing large sums of money from US financial institutions
in order to finance the project will raise the countrys living standards. The borrower is assured that the project will
increase Gross Domestic Product and tax revenues and that these increases will allow the loan to be repaid.

Related: "There's An Insurrection Coming... The American People Are Sick & Tired Of Crony Capitalism"

However, the plan is designed to over-estimate the benefits so that the indebted country cannot pay the principal and
interest. As Perkins puts it, the plans are based on distorted financial analyses, inflated projections, and rigged accounting,
and if the deception doesnt work, threats and bribes are used to close the deal.

The next step in the deception is the appearance of the International Monetary Fund. The IMF tells the indebted country that
the IMF will save its credit rating by lending the money with which to repay the countrys creditors. The IMF loan is not a form
of aid. It merely replaces the countrys indebtedness to banks with indebtedness to the IMF.

To repay the IMF, the country has to accept an austerity plan and agree to sell national assets to private investors. Austerity
means cuts in social pensions, social services, employment and wages, and the budget savings are used to repay the IMF.
Privatization means selling oil, mineral and public infrastructure in order to repay the IMF.

The deal usually imposes an agreement to vote with the US in the UN and to accept US military bases.

Occasionally a countrys leader refuses the plan or the austerity and privatization. If bribes dont work, the US sends in the
jackals - assassins who remove the obstacle to the looting process.

Perkins book caused a sensation. It showed that the United States attitude of helpfulness toward poorer countries was only
a pretext for schemes to loot the countries. Perkins book sold more than a million copies and stayed on the New York Times
bestseller list for 73 weeks.

Now the book has been reissued with the addition of 14 new chapters and a 30-page listing of Hit Man activity during the
years 2004-2015.

Perkins shows that despite his revelations, the situation is worse than ever and has spread into the West itself. The
populations of Ireland, Greece, Portugal, Spain, Italy, and the United States itself are now being looted by Hit Man activity.

Perkins book shows that the US is exceptional only in the unbridled violence it applies to others who get in its way. One of
the new chapters tells the story of France-Albert Rene, president of Seychelles, who threatened to reveal the illegal and
inhumane eviction of the residents of Diego Garcia by Britain and Washington so that the island could be converted into an
air base from which Washington could bomb noncompliant countries in the Middle East, Asia, and Africa.
Washington sent in a team of jackels to murder the president of Seychelles, but the assassins were foiled. All but one were
captured, tried and sentenced to execution or prison, but a multi-million dollar bribe to Rene freed them. Rene got the
message and became compliant.

In the original printing of his book, Perkins tells the stories of how jackals arranged airplane crashes to get rid of Panamas
non-compliant president, Omar Torrijos, and Ecuadors non-compliant president, Jaime Roldos.

When Rafael Correa became president of Ecuador, he

refused to pay some of the illegitimate debts that had been
piled on Ecuador, closed the United States largest military
base in Latin America, forced the renegotiation of
exploitative oil contracts, ordered the central bank to use
funds deposited in US banks for domestic projects, and
consistently opposed Washingtons hegemonic control over
Latin America.

Correa had marked himself for overthrow or assassination.

However, Washington had just overthrown in a military coup
the democratically elected Honduran president, Manuel
Zelaya, whose policies favored the people of Honduras over
those of foreign interests.

Concerned that two military coups in succession against

reformist presidents would be noticed, to get rid of Correa
the CIA turned to the Ecuadoran police.

Led by a graduate of Washingtons School of the Americas,

the police moved to overthrow Correa but were
overpowered by the Ecuadoran military.

However, Correa got the message. He reversed his policies

toward American oil companies and announced that he
would auction off huge blocks of Eucadors rain forests to
the oil companies.

He closed down, Fundacion Pachamama, an organization

with which a reformed Perkins was associated that worked
to preserve Ecuadors rain forests and indigenous
populations.
Western banks backed up by the World Bank are even worse looters than the oil and timber companies. Perkins writes:

"Over the past three decades, sixty of the worlds poorest countries have paid $550 billion in principal and interest
on loans of $540 billion, yet they still owe a whopping $523 billion on those same loans.

The cost of servicing that debt is more than these countries spend on health or education and is twenty times the
amount they receive annually in foreign aid.

In addition, World Bank projects have brought untold suffering to some of the planets poorest people.

In the past ten years alone, such projects have forced an estimated 3.4 million people out of their homes; the
governments in these countries have beaten, tortured, and killed opponents of World Bank projects.

Perkins describes how Boeing plundered Washington state taxpayers. Using lobbyists, bribes, and blackmail threats to move
production facilities to another state, Boeing succeeded in having the Washington state legislature give the corporation a tax
break that diverted $8.7 billion into Boeings coffers from health care, education and other social services. The massive
subsidies legislated for the benefit of corporations are another form of rent extraction and Hit Man activity.

Perkins has a guilty conscience and still suffers from his role as a Hit Man for the evil empire, which has now turned to the
plunder of American citizens. He has done everything he can to make amends, but he reports that the system of exploitation
has multiplied many times and is now so commonplace that it no longer has to be hidden. Perkins writes:

"A major change is that this EHM system, today, is also at work in the United States and other economically
developed countries. It is everywhere. And there are many more variations on each of these tools. There are
hundreds of thousands more EHMs spread around the world.

They have created a truly global empire. They are working in the open as well as in the shadows. This system has
become so widely and deeply entrenched that it is the normal way of doing business and therefore is not alarming
to most people.

People have been so badly plundered by jobs offshoring and indebtedness that consumer demand cannot support profits.
Consequently, capitalism has turned to exploiting the West itself. Faced with rising resistance, the EHM system has armed
itself with:

"The PATRIOT Act, the militarization of police forces, a vast array of new surveillance technologies, the infiltration
and sabotage of the Occupy movement, and the dramatic expansion of privatized prisons.

The democratic process has been subverted by the Supreme Courts Citizens United ruling and other court decisions, by
corporate-funded political action committees, and by organizations such as the American Legislative Exchange Council
financed by the One Percent.

Cadres of lawyers, lobbyists, and strategists are hired to legalize corruption, and presstitutes work overtime to convince
gullible Americans that elections are real and represent the workings of democracy.
In a February 19, 2016 article in OpEdNews, Matt Peppe reports that the American colony of Puerto Rico is being driven into
the ground in order to satisfy foreign creditors.

The airport has been privatized, and the main highways have been privatized in a 40-year lease owned by a consortium
formed by a Goldman Sachs infrastructure investment fund. Puerto Ricans now pay private corporations for the use of
infrastructure that tax dollars built. Recently Puerto Ricos sales tax was raised 64% to 11.5%. A sales tax increase is
equivalent to a rise in inflation and results in a decline in real incomes.

Today the only difference between capitalism and gangsterism is that capitalism has succeeded in legalizing its gangsterism
and, thus, can strike a harder bargain than can the Mafia.

Perkins shows that the evil empire has the world in the grip of a death economy. He concludes that we need a
revolution in order to bury the death economy and birth the life economy. Dont look to politicians, neoliberal economists,
and presstitutes for any help.
Related: Varoufakis: Capitalism Will Eat Democracy - Unless we Speak Up

Assange on 'US Empire', Assad Government Overthrow Plans & New Book 'The WikiLeaks Files'

For Sale: 40 Billion Litres Of Canterbury's Purest Water

April 7 2016 | From: Stuff

A council in the drought-prone Canterbury plains is selling the right to extract 40 billion litres of
pure, artesian water to a bottled water supplier.

The Ashburton District Council is selling a section in its business estate, known as Lot 9, for an undisclosed sum.
It comes with a valuable resource consent that allows abstraction of water from aquifers beneath the town.

The council has refused to publicise information about the deal, which is understood to be with an overseas company. It has
outraged some residents, who say water is desperately needed locally.

Related: Hawke's Bay company's first shipment of drinking water

The area's artesian water is increasingly popular in overseas markets such as China, with its New Zealand origin often
featuring in branding and marketing.

The consent allows the holder to take 45 litres of water a second from local aquifers, totalling more than 1.4 billion litres
a year. It expires in 2046, meaning the buyer will gain access to more than 40 billion litres of Ashburton's pure water.
It was approved in 2011 by Environment Canterbury and includes a recharge consent, meaning all water taken must be
replaced from other sources.

In a statement, the council confirmed it was in the process of selling the site;

"The parcel of land includes an existing consent for water abstraction from local aquifers," it said.

"The prospective buyer is interested in setting up a water-bottling plant."

Council chief executive Andrew Dalziel would not answer questions about the sale, citing commercial sensitivity. Standing
orders prevented councillors from discussing the sale, which is expected to be finalised in June.

It is understood there has been no consultation with ratepayers or other interested parties, such as iwi, about the deal.

Sir Mark Solomon, chairman of Te Runanga o Ngai Tahu, said it was "disappointing" the iwi had not been informed.

"Twenty years ago the Ashburton region had reasonably good water quality, but it is now an over-allocated
catchment and faces some of the most pressing water quality challenges in our takiwa [tribal region]," he said.

"It seems incredible that the council wouldn't think more broadly about the future of its existing consents."

A premises in the Ashburton Business Estate, where the Ashburton District Council is in the process of allowing a bottled water company to extract
40 billion litres of water.

Ashburton resident Jen Branje is leading community opposition, and said the lack of transparency raised alarm bells.
 "We live in a drought-prone area - farmers aren't given consent to bore for water for their crop-growing, so why on
Earth are we selling it off-shore?"

The Ashburton groundwater zone is over-allocated, meaning water allocated to consent holders exceeds the amount
available for use. New groundwater consents are difficult to acquire, making existing consents more valuable.

Branje said a lack of consultation did not give locals faith the sale was in their best interest.

"This whole thing has gone on behind the ratepayers' backs. No-one has any clue about it whatsoever.

It's a blimmin' lot of water, and it shouldn't be allowed to go off-shore. If anything, that water should be sustaining
our own economic backbone."

Ashburton often has issues supplying water during the summer. In some areas, water restrictions banned residents from
using hoses to water their gardens.

When applying for the consent, the council came to an arrangement with meat processor Silver Fern Farms, allowing it to
deepen its bore if Lot 9's water abstraction caused groundwater levels to reduce.

Key Says Clark Has 'Skills And Experience' For UN's Top Post
April 6 2016 | From: NationalBusinessReview

Prime Minister John Key has officially kicked off Helen Clarks campaign to become the next UN
secretary-general.
The nomination means Ms Clark can present her credentials to the UN General Assembly along with other
candidates in a beauty parade from April 12.

Related: New Zealand - A Blackmailer's Guide

Ms Clark, who has been administrator of UN Development Programme for the past seven years, will be up against
Bulgarias Irinia Bokova, who runs another major UN agency, Unesco, among half a dozen or so other declared candidates.

"I'm running because I believe my style of leadership is needed and will help the United Nations face the serious
challenges ahead," she told a media conference in New York this morning.

She says she is not campaigning as a woman but because she is "the best person for the job."

"Our world is facing so many crises and challenges and I think the background, experiences, pragmatism and
focus I have are what the UN needs right now.

The UN needs to be organisationally effective if it has to carry out its mission. As an administration it can be a little
old-fashioned and clunky. I think I can bring a modernising touch to that."

Backing for Campaign

Announcing the nomination, Mr Key says the campaign will be backed by New Zealand diplomats and the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs and Trade.
 Helen has the right mix of skills and experience for the job," he says.

She is well placed to bridge divisions and indeed to get results. There are major global challenges facing the world
today and the United Nations needs a proven leader who can be pragmatic and effective."

Ms Clark was prime minister for three consecutive terms from 1999 to 2008.

She has a vast amount of experience in international affairs which will be hard for other candidates to match.
Shes a great listener and communicator, and I know she will make a difference if elected.

Mr Key has submitted New Zealands nomination letter to the presidents of the UN General Assembly and the UN Security
Council.

The new secretary-general will be appointed at the end of the year by the UN General Assembly on the recommendation of
the UN Security Council.

The Very Nasty Truth About The Panama Papers?

April 6 2016 | From: ZeroHedge

This is a curly one. This topic is incredibly devisive and so this informaiton is offered only for your
consideration. The truth will out eventually. Given to the Mossad... to seed, fabricate and censor...
just like Wikileaks?

Last week when VT published information gotten during the interrogation of a Turkish intelligence agent, Sawash
Yeldiz, captured by Popular Party of Kurdistan (PPK) militia inside Syria, information tying Turkish President
Erdogan to the Brussels terror attacks, we saw how real leaks are dealt with.

The conduit for this information, European Department for Security and Information (DESI) Secretary General
Haissam Bou Said, was threatened by Israeli security agents who may have had a part in the Brussels attacks and,
moreover, DESI, an EU organization was threatened with sanctions for the leak. This is real investigative
journalism

Related: The Panama Papers

Related: Massive Disclosures: Panama Papers, CIA Haitian Eugenics, IMF Greek Credit Event

"The Panama Papers are a scam". This is one claim, another is that this is that: "They are clearing house. The
people on the top are cleaning out the bottom and raising a lot of hell while at it."

These 'leaks" always seem to target the US Dtate Department's foreign policy enemies. Any prominent Americans
noted? No.

Real documents turned over to a Mossad run organization that now has dirt on even more people and more power to make
a very nasty world an even darker and nastier place. This is what Wikileaks was and is, as exposed by VT and Zbigniew
Brzezinski in December 2010.

The filth of the world will be protected and the innocent, should such things exist, can be targeted in the name of
investigative journalism as teams seed phony material in and launder out damage to the politicians, names like Netanyahu
and Bush, Cheney and Guiliani, Hollande and Blair, Kasich and Snyder, Gingrich and Romney, especially Romney.

The Panama Papers are a leak to a German newspaper of tens of thousands of corporate records from a law firm in
Panama that ran much of the worlds money laundering.

Related - David Wilcock: The Panama Toilet Papers

Related: Panama Papers: A Bogus Sting Operation To Smear Putin And Assad

When a German newspaper received this dump over a year ago, they turned, unknowingly, to an organization actually run
by intelligence agencies, in fact those with the most to risk from the leak itself, the International Consortium of Investigative
Journalists.
The entire time this trove has been available it should have been in the hands of forensic accountants working for
an agency or authority that none of us can name as such an agency simply doesnt exist. There is no international
authority without an agenda to serve drug cartels and money launderers.

As observed earlier, the Panama Papers looked more like a poor propaganda retaliation against Putin and Assad
than anything else, for the successful interruption to the Greater Israel plan of the Rothschilds."

- Geopolitics

For the last year, lists of owners of thousands of phony corporations used to launder money, have been reviewed by dozens
of journalists. The result thus far has been to mention soccer officials, attack Russian president Putin and to smear the
reputation of a well known worthless chiseler, Ian Cameron, father of slimeball David Cameron, long a blackmail victim tied
to the News of the World phone hacking scandal.

I am not going to begin to repeat what was found out about David Cameron, but sick is an understatement. From Craig
Murray:

But why focus on Russia? Russian wealth is only a tiny minority of the money hidden away with the aid of
Mossack Fonseca. In fact, it soon becomes obvious that the selective reporting is going to stink.

The Suddeutsche Zeitung, which received the leak, gives a detailed explanation of the methodology the corporate
media used to search the files. The main search they have done is for names associated with breaking UN
sanctions regimes. The Guardian reports this too and helpfully lists those countries as Zimbabwe, North Korea,
Russia and Syria.

The filtering of this Mossack Fonseca information by the corporate media follows a direct western governmental
agenda. There is no mention at all of use of Mossack Fonseca by massive western corporations or western
billionaires the main customers. And the Guardian is quick to reassure that much of the leaked material will
remain private.

What do you expect? The leak is being managed by the grandly but laughably named International Consortium of
Investigative Journalists, which is funded and organised entirely by the USAs Center for Public Integrity.

Their funders include:

Ford Foundation

Carnegie Endowment

Rockefeller Family Fund

W.K. Kellogg Foundation

Open Society Foundation (Soros)

Among many others. Do not expect a genuine expose of western capitalism. The dirty secrets of western
corporations will remain unpublished.

Expect hits at Russia, Iran and Syria and some tiny balancing western country like Iceland. A superannuated UK
peer or two will be sacrificed someone already with dementia.

Related: Panama Papers: Mossack Fonseca Tied to Nazis, CIA & Mexican Drug Lords

Like Britains pedophile scandals, this one will lead the same way, the very old or targeted folks who got out of line will be
thrown to the wolves. The Mossad loves this dump, it gives them dirt on thousands of political leaders around the world they
can now control even better.

As a real investigative journalist, with real sources in government, with first person sources watching drugs being smuggled
out of Afghanistan, biological and chemical weapons out of Georgia or who has, with the team at VT, broken more stories in
the past decade than all other publications combined, I know something about these things.

James Corbett: What I Learned From The Panama Papers

I also worked in banking as senior officer of an offshore banking operation and as a UN representative working with
currency and development issues. I saw it all first hand and know the mechanics very well. I could teach this and probably
should.

We know who the biggest players are in the Panama Papers. The real list doesnt start with David Camerons dad or a FIFA
(soccer) official. Bain Capital and Mitt Romney, followed by the Walton family of Walmart fame, the Canadian Bronfmans,
Sheldon Adelson and, perhaps most newsworthy of all, several thousand corporations that tie the worlds drug cartels to
American political leaders, including members of congress, state governors, city mayors, members of the US Supreme
Court and a handful of former presidents. Craig Murray goes further in his analysis:

The corporate media the Guardian and BBC in the UK have exclusive access to the database which you and I
cannot see.

They are protecting themselves from even seeing western corporations sensitive information by only looking at
those documents which are brought up by specific searches such as UN sanctions busters. Never forget the
Guardian smashed its copies of the Snowden files on the instruction of MI6.
 What if they did Mossack Fonseca database searches on the owners of all the corporate media and their
companies, and all the editors and senior corporate media journalists? What if they did Mossack Fonseca
searches on all the most senior people at the BBC? What if they did Mossack Fonseca searches on every donor to
the Center for Public Integrity and their companies?

What if they did Mossack Fonseca searches on every listed company in the western stock exchanges, and on
every western millionaire they could trace?

That would be much more interesting. I know Russia and China are corrupt, you dont have to tell me that. What if
you look at things that we might, here in the west, be able to rise up and do something about?

And what if you corporate lapdogs let the people see the actual data?

Related: Selective Leaks Of The #PanamaPapers Create Huge Blackmail Potential

Back in 2012, two months prior to the presidential election, a former senior FBI official, actively employed by the FBI,
came to us. He had a story to tell. He said that Mitt Romney, working with a series of financial organizations in the US
including banks owned by the Walton family, maintained accounts overseas for hundreds of American political leaders.

The story of these accounts, not whose name was on them, but confirming they existed, hit the newspapers only a few short
days before, citing Romney as having thousands of secret bank accounts in the Cayman Islands.

We were told of how Romney and Carlos Salinas, former president of Mexico, met at Harvard Business School, and
together built an empire out of the drug cartels that, through buying 5 US Supreme Court Justices who passed Citizens
United, legalized drug cartel bribery, done through corporations set up by a law firm in Panama with offices around the
world.

The FBI had audio and video tapes of Romney with Maria Perez, his mistress in Cuba, daughter of former KGB chief Yuri
Andropov and his Cuban mistress. The tapes told of drug running and money laundering and more, so much more.
The source of the tapes was Mexican intelligence that had been after Salinas for years and had worked with our FBI source
who had been the liaison between the US and Mexico on drug investigations through the 1990s. Of course we have all of
these interviews recorded, some of them on YouTube.

The Pentagon missing trillions investigation died with the entire DC Able Danger team called in for an emergency meeting that day

The biggest single set of interlocking corporations that should have been exposed are tied to the nearly 3 trillion dollars
missing from the US Department of Defense, money disappeared when the investigative records were mysteriously the
victim of an aircraft accident on 9/11/2001 at the Pentagon, one of the most defended buildings on earth.

Not only were all the records destroyed but the 35 investigators were killed as well, having been asked to gather for a
meeting with a White House official who never showed up. But thats another story.

Snowden seems on board?

What we are saying is this, when former crimes were erased there was a reason. Bigger crimes were planned. Nearly every
defense and intelligence contractor, from Google Idea Groups to the Blackwater network and hundreds more, were all tied
to interlocking Panamanian corporations with ownership by members of congress, key Federal judges, and all of this run
through a legal advocacy group known as the Federalist Society.

The Panama Papers could eventually expose certainly who is really behind 9/11. In 2014, we were given documents out of
Russia that included a preliminary report on 9/11 by the US Department of Energy, outlining that event as nuclear and not
as the result of terrorism, not as it is typically defined. The term false flag terrorism would apply, however.

Related: Key faces sustained questioning on NZ presence in 'Panama Papers'

Wikileaks Reveals International Monetary Fund Plan To "Cause A Credit Event In

Greece And Destabilize Europe"
April 5 2016 | From: ZeroHedge

One of the recurring concerns involving Europe's seemingly perpetual economic, financial and
social crises, is that these have been largely predetermined, "scripted" and deliberate acts.

This is something the former head of the Bank of England admitted one month ago when Mervyn King said that
Europe's economic depression "is the result of "deliberate" policy choices made by EU elites.

It is also what AIG Banque strategist Bernard Connolly said back in 2008 when laying out "What Europe Wants"

To use global issues as excuses to extend its power:

Environmental issues: increase control over member countries; advance idea of global governance

Terrorism: use excuse for greater control over police and judicial issues; increase extent of surveillance

Global financial crisis: kill two birds (free market; Anglo-Saxon economies) with one stone (Europe-wide
regulator; attempts at global financial governance)
 EMU: create a crisis to force introduction of European economic government

This morning we got another confirmation of how supernational organizations "plan" European crises in advance to further
their goals, when Wikileaks published the transcript of a teleconference that took place on March 19, 2016 between the top
two IMF officials in charge of managing the Greek debt crisis - Poul Thomsen, the head of the IMF's European Department,
and Delia Velkouleskou, the IMF Mission Chief for Greece.

In the transcript, the IMF staffers are caught on tape planning to tell Germany the organization would abandon the troika if
the IMF and the commission fail to reach an agreement on Greek debt relief.

More to the point, the IMF officials say that a threat of an imminent financial catastrophe as the Guardian puts it, is needed
to force other players into accepting its measures such as cutting Greek pensions and working conditions, or as Bloomberg
puts it, "considering a plan to cause a credit event in Greece and destabilize Europe."

According to the leaked conversation, the IMF - which has been pushing for a debt haircut for Greece ever since last
August's 3rd Greek bailout - believes a credit event as only thing that could trigger a Greek deal; the "event" is hinted as
taking place some time around the June 23 Brexit referendum.

As noted by Bloomberg, the leak shows officials linking Greek issue with U.K. referendum risking general political
destabilization in Europe.

The leaked transcript reveals how the IMF plans to use Greece as a pawn in its ongoing negotiation with Germany's
chancelleor in order to achieve the desired Greek debt reduction which Germany has been pointedly against: in the leak we
learn about the intention of IMF to threaten German Chancellor Angela Merkel to force her to accept the IMF's demands at a
critical point.
From the transcript:

THOMSEN: Well, I don't know. But this is... I think about it differently. What is going to bring it all to a decision
point? In the past there has been only one time when the decision has been made and then that was when
they were about to run out of money seriously and to default. Right?

VELKOULESKOU: Right!

THOMSEN: And possibly this is what is going to happen again. In that case, it drags on until July, and clearly
the Europeans are not going to have any discussions for a month before the Brexits and so, at some stage
they will want to take a break and then they want to start again after the European referendum.

VELKOULESKOU: That's right.

THOMSEN: That is one possibility. Another possibility is one that I thought would have happened already and I am
surprised that it has not happened, is that, because of the refugee situation, they take a decision... that they
want to come to a conclusion. Ok?

And the Germans raise the issue of the management... and basically we at that time say "Look, you Mrs. Merkel
you face a question, you have to think about what is more costly: to go ahead without the IMF, would the
Bundestag say 'The IMF is not on board'? or to pick the debt relief that we think that Greece needs in order to
keep us on board?" Right? That is really the issue.

***

VELKOULESKOU: I agree that we need an event, but I don't know what that will be. But I think Dijsselbloem is
trying not to generate an event, but to jump start this discussion somehow on debt, that essentially is about us
being on board or not at the end of the day.

THOMSEN: Yeah, but you know, that discussion of the measures and the discussion of the debt can go on
forever, until some high up.. until they hit the July payment or until the leaders decide that we need to come
 to an agreement. But there is nothing in there that otherwise is going to force a compromise. Right? It is going to
go on forever.

The IMF is also shown as continuing to pull the strings of the Greek government which has so far refused to compromise on
any major reforms, as has been the case since the first bailout.

As the Guardian notes, Greek finance minister Euclid Tsakalotos has accused the IMF of imposing draconian measures,
including on pension reform. The transcript quotes Velculescu as saying: What is interesting though is that [Greece] did
give in they did give a little bit on both the income tax reform and on the both on the tax credit and the supplementary
pensions.

Thomsens view was that the Greeks are not even getting close [to coming] around to accept our views. Velculescu argued
that if [the Greek government] get pressured enough, they would But they dont have any incentive and they know that
the commission is willing to compromise, so that is the problem.

Below is Paul Mason's summary of what is shaping up as the next political scandal.

The International Monetary Fund has been caught, red handed, plotting to stage a credit event that
forces Greece to the edge of bankruptcy, using the pretext of the Brexit referendum.

No, this is not the plot of the next Bond movie. It is the transcript of a teleconference between the IMFs chief
negotiator, Poul Thomsen and Delia Velculescu, head of the IMF mission to Greece.

Released by Wikileaks, the discussion took place in Athens just before the IMF walked out of talks aimed at giving
Greece the green light for the next stage of its bailout.
 The situation is: the IMF does not believe the numbers being used by both Greece and Europe to do the next
stage of the deal. It does not want to take part in the bailout. Meanwhile the EU cannot do the deal without the IMF
because the German parliament wont allow it.

***

Let me decode. An event is a financial crisis bringing Greece close to default. Just like last year, when
the banks closed, millions of people faced economic and psychological catastrophe.

Only this time, the IMF wants to inflict that catastrophe on a nation holding tens of thousands of refugees and
tasked with one of the most complex and legally dubious international border policing missions in modern history.

The Greek government is furious: we are not going to let the IMF play with fire, a source told me.

But the issue is out of Greek hands. In the end, as Thomsen hints in the transcript, only the European Commission
and above all the German government can decide to honour the terms of the deal it did to bail Greece out last July.

The transcript, though received with fury and incredulity in Greece, will drop like a bombshell into the Commission
and the ECB. It is they who are holding E300bn+ of Greek debt. It is the whole of Europe, in other words, that
the IMF is conspiring to hit with the shock doctrine.

The Greeks are understandably angry and confused; As Bloomberg reported earlier, "Greece wants to know whether
WikiLeaks report regarding IMF anticipating a Greek default at about the time of the U.K. June 23 referendum on its EU
membership is the funds official position" government spokeswoman Olga Gerovasili says Saturday in e-mailed statement.

For its part, an IMF spokesman in e-mail Saturday said it doesnt "comment on leaks or supposed reports of internal
discussions."

Two side observations:

1. has a "Snowden" leaker now emerged at the IMF; if so we can expect many more such bombshell accounts in
the coming weeks; or perhaps the reason for the leak is less nuanced: a bugged hotel.

2. it may be another turbulent summer in Europe.

Dutch Investigators Raid Shell Headquarters In Multinational Corruption Probe
April 4 2016 | From: HumansAreFree

The Royal Dutch Shell has been drawn into a multinational corruption probe related to the 2011
Nigerian oil deal, British media reported Wednesday.

British and Italian authorities placed Shell and Italys Eni under investigation for the $1.1 billion joint purchase
of the oil block in mid-2014.

"Representatives of the Dutch Financial Intelligence and Investigation Service and the Dutch public prosecutor
recently visited Shell at its headquarters.

The visit was related to OPL 245, an offshore block in Nigeria that was the subject of a series of longstanding
disputes with the federal government of Nigeria," Shell said in a statement quoted by The Financial Times daily.

The company confirmed earlier reports of being under investigation by prosecutors in Milan relating to the same purchase,
noting that it is cooperating with officials in both countries.

Most of the $1.1 billion is believed to have gone to the Nigerian governments bank account in London. Prosecutors,
however, are investigating whether the ultimate beneficiary was a fake company allegedly set up by Nigerias former
Petroleum Minister Dan Etete.

The Wall Street Journal cites Italian court documents as saying Italian prosecutors are investigating whether Shell and Eni
had been aware of the moneys final destination. The OPL245 is estimated to contain 9 billion barrels of oil.
CIA Agents To Troll Alternative Media Sites In Huge Propaganda Program
April 4 2016 | From: HumansAreFree

The CIA are expanding an existing program that influences mainstream media outlets to promote
fake propaganda stories, by having agents troll internet forums, social media, and website
comment sections in an effort to disrupt alternative media sites.

In an expansion of Operation Mockingbird, the agency are now creating fake user accounts on various internet
forums and social media channels, arguing politics with real users in an attempt to stifle and subvert genuine
communications between users.

According to RT news, agents have up to 10 fake shill accounts used to troll and create the illusion of having a genuine
network of friends.

"They will defend current administration decisions with relentless irrational stubbornness that one can only be paid
to do.

Abby Martin, from RTs Breaking the Set, reported on an up to date Operation Mockingbird with the sole purpose of
misleading the public on-line.

In the congressional hearing from 1976 (below) listen to how many agents are in the media to write false stories.

According to the Congress report published in 1976:

By the year 1953 Operation Mockingbird dictated information in over 25 newspapers and wire agencies.

These organizations were run by people with well-known right-wing views such as William Paley (CBS), Henry Luce (Time
and Life Magazine), Arthur Hays Sulzberger (New York Times), Alfred Friendly (managing editor of the Washington Post),
Jerry OLeary (Washington Star), Hal Hendrix (Miami News), Barry Bingham, Sr., (Louisville Courier-Journal), James Copley
(Copley News Services) and Joseph Harrison (Christian Science Monitor).

Even Rolling Stone claimed that journalist Joseph Alsop was under the control of Operation Mockingbird in 1977.

His articles appeared in over 300 different newspapers. Other journalists alleged by Rolling Stone Magazine to have been
willing to promote the views of the CIA included Stewart Alsop (New York Herald Tribune), Ben Bradlee (Newsweek), James
Reston (New York Times), Charles Douglas Jackson (Time Magazine), Walter Pincus (Washington Post), William C. Baggs
(The Miami News), Herb Gold (The Miami News) and Charles Bartlett (Chattanooga Times).

According to Nina Burleigh (A Very Private Woman), these journalists sometimes wrote articles that were commissioned by
Frank Wisner, creator of the program.

The CIA also provided them with classified information to help them with their work.

Related:Federal Government Hires Internet TROLLS to Monitor and "Correct" Online Discussions

Green Climate Fund: Where Big Banks Profit Again from Crisis They Helped Create
April 1 2016 | From: CommonDreams

Letting big financial institutions manage climate adaptation funds 'would pose serious reputational
and moral risk' to global body

"There is no profit to be made in building the resilience of those adversely impacted by climate change," says Sam Ogallah of the Pan African
Climate Justice Alliance.
As the Green Climate Fund (GCF), the financial mechanism for the UN climate agency, meets this week in South
Korea, more than 170 civil society groups are calling on the international body to reject bids from big banks HSBC
and Crdit Agricole to receive and manage funds to help poorer nations tackle climate change.

Comment: This is poetry. A farce within a farce. Zombie banks, completely unnecessary fossil fuels and fraudulent
man-made climate change (minus the chemtrails) all mixed up into a NWO clusterf*ck.

Given their role in financing climate pollution and their poor records on human and environmental rights, approving the
financial giants' applications would run counter to the Fund's goals, the groups say.

"Creating new business for big banks with large fossil fuel portfolios and poor records on human rights and
financial scandal would undermine the very purpose of the Fund," said Karen Orenstein of Friends of the Earth
U.S. on Monday.

"There is no profit to be made in building the resilience of those adversely impacted by climate change," added
Sam Ogallah of the Pan African Climate Justice Alliance.

"Public funds must be used to support local communities in developing countries, not to subsidize big banks."

What's more, "accrediting HSBC and Crdit Agricole would be inconsistent with...the Paris Agreement," said
Annaka Peterson of Oxfam, referring to the deal hammered out at the COP21 climate talks.

"Any private sector partner of the GCF must have a credible strategy in place to make its entire portfolio and
operations consistent with keeping global temperature rise to no more than 2 C, let alone well below 1.5 C."

Friends of the Earth, Pan African Climate Justice Alliance, and Oxfam are just three of 172 NGOs that released
a statement (pdf) earlier this month arguing that offering accreditation to HSBC and Crdit Agricole:

"Would pose serious reputational and moral risk to the GCF" due to the banks' historic conduct.

Including:

Well-documented involvement in recent money laundering or other fiduciary mismanagement scandals;

Large exposure to the coal industry and other climate polluting sectors; and

Poor-quality policies and weak compliance arrangements meant to manage the social, gender, and environmental
impacts of their lending, and consequent harm on-the-ground.

For example, a report from BankTrack has shown that HSBC and Crdit Agricole provided $7 billion and $9.5 billion,
respectively, to the coal industry between 2009 and 2014, "and their coal financing does not show a clear downward
trend," notes BankTrack's Yann Louvel.
The Fund's board meeting runs Tuesday through Thursday in Songdo, South Korea. GCF executive director Hla
Cheikhrouhou told the Thomson Reuters Foundation last week that she will ask for an increase of between 80 and 120 new
staff in order to meet its targets. She also said it was too early to say whether the Fund could meet the board's goal to
allocate $2.5 billion in 2016.

This isn't the first time the Fund has engendered criticism from climate justice groups or frontline communities, who say
developed nations, despite their role in driving global warming, have been slow to pony up the necessary - and just -
financing.

Last year, environmental and social justice organizations expressed outrage when the Fund accredited Deutsche Bank, one
of the worlds largest financiers of coal, to receive and distribute climate adaptation and mitigation funds.
 "We want the Green Climate Fund to succeed," groups wrote at the time. "But for it to do so, it needs to change
direction away from accrediting controversial big banks that are heavily invested in fossil fuels and thus actually
exacerbating climate change. If the [Green Climate Fund] continues in such a direction, this would reinforce our
fears that in the near future we may have to protest an institution we have thus far been supportive of and integral
to creating."

Hillary Clintons Relationship With The Rothschild / Rockefeller Establishment Is Now

On Full Display
March 31 2016 | From: TheFreeThoughtProject

Hillary Clinton has been deemed a sure bet for the White House, as its widely speculated the
inflammatory Donald Trump and socialist-leaning Bernie Sanders stray too far from establishment
politics to be truly electable.

Hillary Clinton with Evelyn de Rothschild, Bill Clinton and Lynn Forester de Rothschild in 2003 at the de Rothschilds party to mark the launch of
Hillary's memoirs

But it wasnt until an examination using Wikileaks searchable archive of Clintons emails that the establishments
love of the Democratic warhawk became truly apparent.

Buried in thousands of the former Secretary of States emails sent via her personal server, are intimations of her close
relationship with the infamous Rothschild banking family and hints for a potential Rockefeller-State partnership.

Lynn Forester de Rothschild wrote an email on April 18, 2010, in which she tells Hillary she would love to catch up - and I
remain your loyal adoring pal. Clinton responds lets make that happen, and signs her response, Much love, H.

On September 23, 2010, Clinton emailed Lynn Forester de Rothschild (an email chain marked by heavy redaction) saying, I
was trying to reach you to tell you and Teddy that I asked Tony Blair to go to Israel as part of our full court press on keeping
the Middle East negotiations going

Rothschild responds, thanking Clinton for personally reaching out to us, and adds, You are the best, and we remain
your biggest fans.

A January 9, 2012, email discusses a conference on the environment set to take place at Jacob Rothschilds historic estate,
Waddesdon.

On New Years Eve 2012, Lynn Forester de Rothschild sent an email to Clinton praying for her speedy recovery. And, my
email box is lighting up with all the PUMAs and their 18M prayers for Hillary campaign, states the email, which is
signed, Love, Lynn, Evelyn, Ben and Jake.

An email to Clinton, dated October 15, 2009, from Melanne Verveer - former director of Pres. Obamas State Department
office for Global Womens Issues and longtime Clinton family insider - states:

"Speaking at UNESCO Monday with the new director on the unfinished Beijing agenda [REDACTED] called to say
she wants to give us several million dollars to subsidize a fund to give an annual award for innovation in
empowering women that would be a rockefeller-State [sic] partnership.
Then, on March 10, 2012, Verveer hints at least at a possible locale for Hillarys future endeavors:

"I forgot to tell you that Judith Rodin offered you a suite of offices after you leave State for your own use at
Rockefeller Fdtn, if youre interested - with no strings attached. She also said theyd be happy to provide you with a
month at their center in Bellagio if you just want to read and write in a beautiful place.

Though none of the emails The Free Thought Project examined appeared overtly damning - thanks, in part, to sometimes
heavy redaction - the evidence of Clintons comfort with the establishment lends credence to theories of her being the
chosen candidate.

Numerous emails evidence Hillarys staff carefully monitoring - and even manipulating - mainstream news outlets as well.
Lynn F. de Rothschild told Hillary in August 2009 about a fluff piece journalist Les Gelb was eager to pen for Parade
Magazine.
Other emails show an almost paranoid eye Clinton kept trained on the Tea Party and its journalists and mouthpieces.

To reiterate, nothing particularly damning in itself was found in this admittedly cursory search - but the relationships these
emails document, alone, evidence Hillarys concrete establishment roots.

While Trump infuriates the GOP and Sanders popular support lacks translation into delegate votes, perhaps these
documents support the popular theory Hillary Clinton will be the next president - no matter what.

Donald J. Trump And The New World Order

March 31 2016 | From: NewsWithViews

Perhaps the greatest surprise to emerge in the 2016 Presidential campaign is the depth of
degradation to which the Republican National Committee (RNC) will go to maintain its power base.
Or perhaps the greatest surprise is the players that have emerged to attack the populist candidate, Donald J.
Trump.

Fox News and CNN (not exactly philosophically friendly competitors) are part of the scam. It was no accident that the attack
against Trump, sandwiched between two candidates of Cuban heritage during the CNN debate, began just before the Texas
primary.

Ask yourself one question: To defeat Trump, what was the most important objective the CNN debate needed to achieve?
Remember, it occurred in Houston just hours before the Texas primary.

It was critical that Cruz defeat Trump in his home state. Thus the vicious attack against Trump began there and Cruz, as
required, won his home state..
The next critical Defeat Trump event the RNC needed to surreptitiously implement to prevent any candidate from getting
the required number of delegates to get the nomination on the first ballot was to be effectively attack and disparage Trump
before the March 5th primaries and caucuses.

What strategy was used to make anti-establishment populist candidate, Donald Trump, look unelectable? It was a two-
pronged attack: First, Mitt Romney and second the Fox debate fix. Fix? You bet!

First, the former losing Presidential candidate from 2012, the Mormon candidate from Utah, Mitt Romney, made his
appearance.

I mention Romneys Mormon religious preference only because most Evangelical Christians call Mormonism a cult and
they represent a significant number in the conservative movement. How did Romneys comments impact conservative
Evangelical Christians who frequently favor Ted Cruz?
Romney made his televised appearance from the Hinkley Institute at the University of Utah, established in 1965. Hinkley
Institute is definitely establishment. Some who have given presentations there include Senator John McCain, political activist
Ralph Nader, Karl Rove, former Democrat Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and actor/political activist Robert Redford.

Seeing the name "Hinkley Institute" on the blue background behind Mitt Romney gave me the chills. You remember the
name Hinkley, dont you? A young man named John W. Hinkley attempted to assassinate President Ronald Reagan.

The Hinkley family was a good friend with then-Vice President George H.W. Bush. I can find no data on the Internet
that ties Hinkley Institute to John Hinkley's family... and I find nothing that disassociates him, either.

President Ronald Reagan was another outsider non-establishment political candidate who was hated by the RNC (which
forced George H.W. Bush on him as his vice presidential candidate).
Solving mysteries as they appear before your eyes requires insight into historic events that are tied in some way to current
events.

So we have Romney, the guy who did not release his tax returns until six weeks prior to the 2012 election, on national
television from the Hinkley Institute demanding that Trump immediately release his tax returns.

Under the circumstances circumstances based on his own behavior four years ago was this a reasonable request?

No, it was not. People had been demanding for months that Romney release his tax returns and he was not being audited.
He did not have tax lawyer telling him to not release his returns because of that audit as is the case with Donald Trump.

Romney did have numerous rumors of hidden bank accounts in Caribbean offshore island accounts floating around... an
issue with which he never dealt. This demand by Romney was not only unreasonable, it was evil and based on lies.

He reminded me of the Wizard of Oz who when the curtains are opened is nothing more than a puppet doing the bidding of
his masters.
Romney, the guy whose business experience at Bain Capital includes a 22 percent failure rate on his investments, felt that
qualified him to make negative comments about Donald Trumps skills as a business leader? Please!

Trump, who with his 35 years of investing experience has completed thousands of successful ventures internationally has
had only a handful of failed businesses. To mention the failures without mentioning his own failures, without mentioning the
thousands of successes, was disingenuous.

His lack of success as a venture capitalist didnt prevent Mitt Romney from denigrating Trumps handful of failures. Romney
isnt even qualified to shine Donald Trumps shoes in the world of venture capital investing.

So why would Mitt Romney go on national television and make statements that make him look like a business idiot who
deserved his 22 percent failure rate at Bain Capital?
At the moment when Romney put on his performance at the Hinkley Institute and it was a performance, complete with
television prompters it became apparent that the RNC was manipulating things behind the scenes to set up a brokered
Republican National Convention... a convention in which no candidate has the required 1,237 votes to get the nomination on
the first ballot.

After the first ballot, delegates are free to vote for whomever they choose (and the State Republican Parties who are
supported by the RNC selects the voting delegates).

Fox News became an accessory to the RNCs brokered convention strategy at its March 3rd debate in Detroit. First, though
Fox News talking heads have been patting themselves on the back for their wonderful performances, this was not a debate.
It was a planned dog fight with little difference in the way it was presented and the dog fights for which pro football player
Michael Vick got sent to prison.

Look at the way the stage was set up. Look at the lets have a dog fight questions that were asked.

As long as there were five candidates, it made sense for Donald Trump, as the leading candidate, to be in the middle of all
participants on stage. When Dr. Ben Carson withdrew from the race, the proper alignment should have been left-to-right:
Donald Trump; Ted Cruz; Marco Rubio; and in fourth position, John Kasich. But to make Donald Trump the cheese in a
Cruz/Rubio enchilada, Trump had to be placed on stage between the two.

John Kasich said it all in one sentence he uttered: Im beginning to feel like the only adult on this stage. The RNC intended
for Kasich to look like the most reasonable, well-informed, calmest and experienced candidate on the debate stage.

Does that mean the RNC favors Kasich? Possibly... we need to bear in mind that when Kasich references being part of the
Reagan team, he was also part of then-Vice President George H.W. Bushs team because Vice President Bush became
very active in running the administration after President Ronald Reagan was shot by John W. Hinkley.

So does the adult on the stage represent the ideals of Ronald Reagan? Or does he prefer the ideals of George H.W. Bush?
Is he just another establishment shill who supports maintaining the current power base that Donald Trump so threatens?
Well see. Its a deep, dark hole.
To solve a mystery, you must be able to find the real motive behind the actions of the perpetrators of the crime or the game
being played. It is clear the RNC wants a brokered convention. They want to get Trump at any cost... even the cost of giving
the election to Hillary Clinton. They are using Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz to make John Kasich look like the only reasonable
alternative.

It is doubtful that Cruz and Rubio are aware of how they are being used, but it certainly appears that is whats happening. It
is also apparent that, at the moment, John Kasich benefits from the antics of Cruz and Rubio, neither of whom the RNC
wants as President though Rubio is more establishment than is Cruz (who, as Trump says, is a provable liar).

Keep in mind what happens at a brokered convention... which is the RNCs core motive. They want a brokered convention.
To get it, they must stop Trump whose popularity they sorely miscalculated until, surprise of surprises, Trump was storming
towards a victory unforeseen by the RNC and it became desparate.
They discredit Trump via lies and misrepresentations from Mitt Romneys pretense of concerned citizen to the Cruz and
Rubio attacks. Cruz and Rubio end up looking unqualified to be President because they are not acting presidential. Rather,
they are acting like dogs in a dog fight. Kasich appears to benefit from the behavior of the two Latino candidates.

As a result, no one ends up getting the required 1,237 votes at the National Convention on the first ballot. After that first
ballot, most candidates are free to vote for whichever candidate they choose and who knows whose names might be
submitted as late comer delegates?

Maybe the name will be Paul Ryan it could even be Jeb Bush. It can be any name the RNC wants as the Republican
candidate.

Please keep all of the above in mind and ask yourself what your objective is. If you want a candidate for President who will
upset the political power apple cart in Washington, be prepared for hearing lie after lie about your candidate, Donald Trump.

If you want a candidate for President who is no threat to the establishment power base at the RNC and throughout
Congress and our courts, the RNC is ready, willing and able to provide you with that candidate.

News Blast to Cruz and Rubio: Neither of you will be on the RNC list to be their candidate. They are using you just as they
used Mitt Romney.

Conclusion

This election is all about is Globalism vs Freedom and independence for America as a sovereign nation. The elite
(globalists) wanted Jeb Bush as the GOP candidate and Hillary Clinton as the DNC candidate. Both serve the Globalist
Masters aka The New World Order.

Well, then came Donald Trump, he threw a big monkey wrench in their Global Utopia plans.
The reason the establishment doesn't want Trump (regardless of what you think of his personality) is because he
can't be bought or controlled. They don't own him.

Tyranny And Free Speech

March 30 2016 | From: BreakingViews

Do you support free speech? How about free speech for climate change skeptics? For
homophobes? For racists? For sexists? For white males? For even Donald Trump?
Those who defend free speech, as did the American Founding Fathers, understand it is not about defending
speech you agree with, but defending speech you disagree with. Without free speech, there is no liberty.

The State Department diversity officer, John Robinson, has just warned the staff that they may be penalized for engaging in
microaggressions, which include jokes or other comments that someone who hears them may find offensive.

In a recent letter, he referred to a definition of microaggressions as:

"Everyday verbal, nonverbal and environmental slights, snubs or insults, whether intentional or unintentional, which
communicate hostile, derogatory or negative messages to target persons.

In other words, whatever you hear may be considered a microaggression if you choose to be offended.

Such vague and infinitely elastic laws and regulations are the bread and butter of all totalitarian regimes.

Lavrentiy Beria (Joseph Stalins head of the NKVD, a predecessor of the KGB) was quoted as saying to Stalin:

"You name the person and I will find the crime.

The crime of microaggression has already been used to stifle and prosecute speech by those who have contrary views in
several left-leaning universities, and now it is coming to the federal government.

The climate change lobbyists have been increasingly aggressive in their attacks on free speech.

They seek to silence their critics, who have committed the sin of noting their many failed predictions.

George Mason University meteorologist Jagadish Shukla was the lead signatory of the letter sent to the president and
attorney general asking them to use RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) laws to prosecute;

"Corporations and other organizations that have knowingly deceived the American people about the risks of
climate change.

Mr. Shukla paid himself and his wife $1.5 million from government climate grants for part-time work.

Other prominent global warming fear-mongers, who are on the government teat, have also called for war crimes trials and
even the execution of some critics.

Even Attorney General Loretta Lynch said last week she has looked at the possibility of pursuing civil actions against so-
called climate change deniers.
The message: Dont look to the Obama administration to protect free speech. Which do you find more offensive, a
person advocating socialism or a person telling jokes about one-eyed people?

Socialism is an ideology that has resulted in governments killing more than 200 million of their own citizens in the last
century. It is based on coercion rather than liberty. It demands involuntary servitude. Socialist Bernie Sanders promises
free stuff to his supporters to be paid for by the involuntary servitude of others - to which there will be no end.

Having spent considerable time in socialist countries and seen the human wreckage that results, I am offended by the
ignorance or venality of those who engage in the microaggression of advocating socialism. Several decades ago, I lost an
eye, and in the years since I have been told hundreds of one-eyed jokes, even by people who do not know me.

Rather than being offended, I have chosen to enjoy them. Offensive speech is totally subjective, and making it a crime is
incompatible with a free society.

The Guardian, a left-wing British newspaper, published an article last year by a woman author titled;

"Why do women lie more than men?

It reported on a new poll that suggests that women are twice as likely to lie as men.

The article goes on to say: It may be irritating to be told, yet again, that women are more morally slippery than
men (just as in Genesis).

The article goes on to cite several reasons why this may be true - including differences between masculine and
feminine brains.

All of this may or may not be nonsense, but in cases of women complaining about men engaging in offensive speech, it is
most often assumed, without evidence, that the woman is telling the truth and the man is lying. In fact, men are frequently
not allowed to know who their accuser is or what she claimed was said.

One of the most basic protections of liberty is the right of the accuser to know the specific charges against him or her and by
whom. As a result, many innocent men are not given a fair hearing by the human resource departments in organizations and
even sometimes by the courts.
The late well-regarded feminist, Joan Kennedy Taylor, argued in her book What to Do When You Dont Want to Call the
Cops: Or a Non-Adversarial Approach to Sexual Harassment (Cato Institute) that it is important to understand that men and
women perceive things quite differently, and that non-legal strategies which she describes can be far more effective and
less damaging than legal remedies.

Law professor Catherine Ross has just written an important book, Lessons in Censorship (to be discussed at a Cato book
forum on March 16), in which she argues that the failure of schools to respect civil liberties betrays their educational
function and threatens democracy.

The popularity of the verbally crude Donald Trump might, in part, be a reaction to the political correctness of the
political class and timid leaders of organizations who have failed to defend freedom of speech.
The Food Industrial Complex
March 30 2016 | From: Priceonomics

In 2011, during a debate over the nutritional guidelines for school lunches, Congress decided that
pizza counts as a vegetable. And not for the first time.

The American government first proposed that an unhealthy food - if it contains trace amounts of a healthy
ingredient - could count as a vegetable in 1981. Looking for ways to cut the school lunch budget, the Reagan
Administration suggested that cafeterias include ingredients in condiments like pickle relish and ketchup toward
nutritional requirements.

This was not good politics. Democrats and the press had a field day saying that Reagan had just classified ketchup as a
vegetable.

"This is one of the most ridiculous regulations I ever heard of, Democratic Senator John Heinz, owner of
Heinz, told the press, and I suppose I need not add that I know something about ketchup and relish."
The Reagan Administration dropped the proposal, but it soon became law anyway. When the Obama Administration
directed the Department of Agriculture to revise school lunch policies in 2011, experts took aim at the rule that allowed the
tiny amount of tomato paste in pizza sauce to count toward the vegetable requirements of each meal.

Any changes made by the Department of Agriculture could jeopardize huge contracts for companies that supply food for
school childrens lunches, so the food industry responded with a $5.6 million lobbying campaign.

According to Margo Wootan, director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, two multibillion dollar companies spent
the most: Schwan and ConAgra, which each had large contracts for pizzas and fries used in school lunches.

Before the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) could make any recommendations, Congress ensured that the push for
healthier lunches did not hurt the manufacturers of unhealthy foods. Congress passed an agriculture appropriations bill that
would deny the USDA funding to enforce any policies that prevented the potatoes in french fries or the tomato paste in pizza
from counting as nutritional elements.
The press again enjoyed declaring that Congress had classified pizza as a vegetable.

Cynics shrugged at yet another example of the government prioritizing the bottom line of businesses that manufacture
sugary and salty processed foods over public health.

Yet the one-sided nature of the food industrys lobbying is puzzling. Where were the broccoli, spinach, and carrot lobbies?

Why didnt a member of Congress take to the floor with a set of talking points provided by the leafy green vegetable lobby?
Why cant American farmers, who enjoy huge government subsidies, stand up to the processed food lobby?

Part of the answer lies in the economics of the food industry: the profit margins and scale of processed food makers gives
them a heft that growers of healthy foods cant match.
But it is also because Big Ag is not in the healthy food business. American farms with lobbying power dont grow brussel
sprouts; they grow grains used to make the high fructose corn syrup in Coke, the starches in processed foods, and the oil in
deep fryers.

This is somewhat inevitable, but it is also a self-inflicted wound: the result of misguided government policy that subsidizes
Big Macs and Big Gulps.

The Poor Margins of Broccoli Farmers

The words food lobby have become synonymous with unhealthy food.

In 2015, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, processed food manufacturers spent $32 million on lobbying while
the fruit and vegetable industry spent a mere $3.7 million. Moreover, top fruit and vegetable contributors include the National
Potato Council, which protects potato farmers interests in french fries, and a company that grows tomatoes for fast food
chains.

To understand why the food lobby is dominated by companies pushing unhealthy foods, a good place to start is the huge
imbalance between the amount of fruits and vegetables we should eat and the relative size of the fruits and vegetables
market.

According to nutritional guidelines published by the USDA and the Harvard School of Public Health, fruits and vegetables
should make up 50% of a healthy diet. But the financial value of the fruit and vegetable market is nowhere near 50% of the
food industry.

In 2015, American farmers earned under $50 billion in revenue from fruits and vegetables. In contrast, processed food
manufacturers like ConAgra, General Mills, and Kellogg each make around $15 billion in yearly revenue.
The meat and carb heavy American diet partially explains these disparities. The Department of Agriculture estimates that
Americans eat roughly 50% less fruits and vegetables and over 20% more grains and meat than recommended by its
nutrition guidelines.

But it is the economics of the food industry that really explain why the food lobby pushes unhealthy fare.

Processed foods have high profit margins that fund advertising campaigns and lobbying budgets. The importance of
branding also leads to consolidation that supports special interest lobbying.

We can see this in the case of cereal - one of the earliest processed foods.

When John Harvey Kellogg and Charles Post sold the first modern cereals in the 19th century, they worried about
competitors. Their product was simply processed wheat or corn, and its production was cheap and easy to replicate.

Their solution was to use advertising to create brand names. Charles Post claimed his Grape Nuts could cure malaria. The
Quaker symbol of Quaker Oats became the first nationally recognized cereal brand. As cereal manufacturers fought over
the expanding market, they differentiated their fare through shapes and flavors - and added hefty doses of sugar to make it
more palatable.

These dynamics apply to many processed foods: cheap foods differentiated - and sold at high margins - thanks to brand
names and advertising. And in markets where brand recognition is key, a few businesses come to dominate. In 2015,
Kelloggs, which is currently valued at $26 billion, reported that of every $1 consumers spent on its cereal, it earned 35 cents
of gross profit. (The most profitable vegetable farms earn 24 cents per dollar.)

Kelloggs has a $26 billion market capitalization because it does not just make cereal. It also owns Pringles and
manufactures a variety of processed foods from Eggo Waffles to Famous Amos chocolate chip cookies.

The entire processed foods industry is similarly consolidated. If you follow your favorite snack up the food chain, youll
usually find that it is owned by a multinational company. PepsiCo owns Funyuns, Rold Gold pretzels, and Sun Chips.

Ritz crackers, Oreos, and Wheat Thins sell under the Nabisco label, which is owned by Mondelz International. So
whenever a federal agency supports healthy foods, it picks a fight with a collection of the worlds largest companies.

It is possible to similarly market fruits and vegetables and sell them at a markup. Honeycrisp apples, which
were designed for that satisfying crunch, enjoy a price premium two to three times that of other varieties. Organic has
emerged as a powerful marketing tool, and prices of kale increased 25% over the past 3 years.

Distributors use tactics like selling produce in convenient sizes (such as one snack worth of baby carrots) to differentiate
their products.
In general, though, consumers dont know or care who grew a certain apple or cucumber. The honeycrisp apple is a rarity,
and trends like kale-mania benefit the entire market rather than a single company. Companies do market veggies, but brand
recognition is low.

Brands need a year-round presence in supermarkets so consumers can purchase it routinely, but produce is seasonal.
Efforts to link recognized brands with a certain quality level and a higher price point is hindered by the influence of weather
on quality and prices.

Farmers and companies that grow and sell produce do so at the going rate, which is a leaner business. Vegetable farms
have had boom years and can make good margins. One USDA census has noted that the largest vegetable farms had
annual sales of $500,000 on margins of 24%.

But thats still tiny compared to PepsiCo or General Mills, and the average farm actually loses value and relies on
supplemental, non-farm incomes.
The term processed foods also applies to more than just Oreos and Doritos. When we think of pasta sauce, we normally
dont think of junk food. But as Michael Moss writes in the New York Times Magazine, products like Prego pasta sauce
contain huge amounts of salt and sugar, just like potato chips and cereal.

The processed food industry, then, is profitable, politically powerful, and more enormous than we realize. Is it any surprise
that the food lobby is synonymous with unhealthy foods?

The McDonaldization of the American Farm

While the economics of processed foods can explain their dominance over fruits, vegetables, and healthier fare, it may still
seem surprising.

After all, American farmers receive billions of dollars in annual subsidies, and the American Farm Bureau
often spends millions of dollars lobbying Congress to protect those subsidies and farmers interests. So why arent American
farmers as successful in pushing legislation that favors fresh produce and real food as they are at winning subsidies?

The answer lies in recognizing that the prototypical American farm does not produce healthy food.

The idyllic farms show in Whole Foods advertisements - farms with a variety of crops and livestock - are not representative
of American agriculture. As food journalist Michael Pollan has written, Americas large commercial farms are monocultures,
meaning they specialize in a single crop, which is usually a grain. Together, corn and soy account for almost 50% of all
American crop revenues.

According to Rosamond Naylor and Walter Falcon of Stanford, Americas corn crop is used to produce half of the
sweeteners Americans consume every year in beer and soda. The majority of the crop goes toward feeding cattle (46%)
and ethanol production (25%). Corn also provides the starchy base for processed foods and the oil for McDonalds deep
fryers.
The dominance of grains in American agriculture is not unusual. Just four grains - corn, wheat, rice, and soy - account for so
much of global agricultural output that economists modelling food prices only look at the market for these grains.

Naylor and Falcon note that countries agriculture policy (including that of the United States) has been to increase the yields
of these grains. After all, higher yields mean more productive farms, wealthier farmers, more food, and less hunger.

The American government has intervened extensively in agriculture since the Great Depression, and as food writer Michael
Pollan notes, its subsidies and programs encouraged large farms that specialized in growing a single grain.

The government promoted the research and production of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and higher yield grains,
and the Department of Agriculture encouraged farms to get big or get out.

The government did not dole out decades of subsidies indiscriminately; it subsidized the production of corn, soybeans,
wheat, and rice at a large scale.

In some ways, these policies have been a great success. American farms are profitable and productive: the average corn
belt farmer produces enough crops to feed 140 Americans and makes around $200,000 in income. The average American
now enjoys half a pound of meat per day - an amount once considered princely.
But the government's calorie-maximizing policies no longer make sense in a country as troubled by obesity as by hunger. In
its push for large monocultures, and in order to buy the peace of specialized vegetable farms, the USDA prohibited farms
that receive grain subsidies from growing fruits and vegetables. (An ironic example of vegetable farmers flexing their
lobbying muscles.)

This puts the government in the insane position of subsidizing the cost of fast food while actively prohibiting more farms from
growing fruits and vegetables.

Even farm animals, which are cheaper to raise when they can be fed with subsidized grain, have a mixed nutrition record.
Most nutritionists consider meat part of a healthy diet, but they also believe Americans eat too much meat.

In addition, grain subsidies, as well as the lack of any policy prohibiting the regular use of antibiotics in animal feed, enable
farmers to raise animals at scale in confined areas. (The antibiotics keep animals alive in the filthy conditions of small
cages.) Cheap meat is a great luxury, but this system makes McDonalds hamburgers and Kentucky Fried Chicken cheaper
than healthier foods.

Americas large, profitable farms spend millions on lobbying each year and enjoy substantial access to lawmakers. The
problem is that almost none of these farms provide a counterweight to manufacturers of junk and processed foods. Thanks
in part to outdated and politically-expedient agricultural policy, farms lobbying power protects french fries, Big Macs, and
soda rather than leafy greens.

The Food Pyramids Corrupt Foundation

With this understanding of Americas food industry and its lobbying prowess, we can understand a certain mystery behind
the food pyramid: why it promoted a diet at odds with the advice of nutritionists for nearly 20 years.

In 1992, the United States Department of Agriculture unveiled the food pyramid, its guide to healthy eating.

Thanks to government efforts to publicize it - pushing it into doctors offices and home economics classes - the
majority of Americans recognize the food pyramid.

The nutritional guidelines behind the food pyramid also inform policy like school lunches and food stamps, making it the
countrys most influential nutrition document.

During its 24-year lifespan, the food pyramid has changed significantly. The base of the original pyramid contained loaves of
bread, plates of pasta, and bowls of cereal. But in the food plate, which replaced the pyramid in 2011, grains only take up
20% of the plate, which is dominated by fruits and vegetables.

The changes do not represent a new understanding of nutrition; the story of the food pyramid is the most highly
visible demonstration of the food and agriculture sectors lobbying prowess.
Dr. Luise Light is a nutrition expert and led the team at the Department of Agriculture that made the original
recommendations for the food pyramid. If you review her original recommendations, they sound similar to dietary advice
given by nutritionists today: lots of vegetables, more lean sources of protein like fish and nuts, and less dairy and processed
foods.

Those guidelines, according to Dr. Light, did not survive their trip to the office of the Head of the Department of
Agriculture.

She has described herself as shocked by the changes that were made. Her team placed fruits and vegetables at the base
of the pyramid and whole-grain breads and cereals further up.

The new guidelines not only switched carbohydrates to the base of the pyramid, they moved processed foods like crackers
and corn flakes, which Dr. Light and her team had placed at the top of the pyramid with chocolate, to the base too. Even
with all the edits, the food pyramid was not released for another 12 years.

With an understanding of the food lobby, its not hard to understand why. The companies that make processed foods and
the large American farms that grow grains wanted to see carb-heavy foods promoted at the base of the pyramid; the tiny
leafy greens lobby could not make its voice heard.
As in 1992, every five years, when the Department of Agriculture revisits its nutrition guidelines, the food industry gears
up by releasing floods of reports, nominating friendly (and on-salary) researchers to be part of the USDA committee
reviewing the policies, and appealing to allies in Congress and the White House.

This means that new policies are always a battle between public-interest organizations pushing for healthier guidelines and
a food lobby working to subvert them. The result is that improving our food policy - at best - takes a step backward for every
two steps forward.

...

The American government wields enormous influence over our diet. Federal policy shapes our farm system to a remarkable
degree and sets the lunch menu for millions of schoolchildren. As long as food lobbyists overwhelmingly represent the
makers of unhealthy food, health advocates will always struggle to push policy in a healthier direction.
To some extent, this is inevitable. The profit margins for making a branded bar of sugar are better than for growing brussel
sprouts, which creates more money for lobbying against labelling laws, sugar taxes, and so on. But the current status quo, in
which American farms grow crops for unhealthy products like high fructose corn syrup, is the result of outdated agricultural
policy.

"Good advice about nutrition conflicts with the interests of many big industries, Michael Jacobson, co-founder of
the Center for Science in the Public Interest, has said, each of which has more lobbying power than all the public-
interest groups combined.

But the real problem is that manufacturers of unhealthy food are so powerful that those interests groups are always the
pushing snack foods rather than fruit.

Theres a lot of money to be made selling obesity foods, and you cant move America [the world] in a healthier
direction without confronting the salty, sugary, finger-licking, just-one-more-chip financial firepower of the food
industrial complex.

The Amerikan Way A Study in Psychopathy

March 29 2016 | From: ZenGardner

Just look at everything Amerika stands for as a whole. Corruption, greed, violence, military
aggression, social degradation, scientific insanity and on and on. Its footprint on the world is
nothing but horrific if you view it in the overall context.
Sure there are good people living there and those unwittingly caught up in the mass hysteria, but theyre
participating nonetheless. That accountability wont go away. Unless they stand up to it and fully withdraw their
consent and work to reverse the madness theyre clearly part of the problem.

Thats not an easy spot to be in when the very fabric of the sociopolitical and economic support structure is an every day
fact of psychopathic driven existence. It breeds acquiescence, apathy and hence continued participation. A pathetic state of
affairs.

Looking honestly at this collective insanity is imperative if were to draw any kind of enlightening and empowering
perspective.

Breaking Down the Nature of the Psychopathic Beast

Scientists researching the common characteristics of psychopathy now use a list of predominant qualities displayed by
psychopaths that theyve meticulously studied. The characteristics are quite telling and perhaps disturbing, as many can
recognize these attributes in people around them.
While they estimate only 2 to 4% of the population are psychopaths, Amerika ranking with a high percentile of those they
have identified, they clearly understand that these types of non-empathic dehumanizing freaks gravitate towards positions of
power.

See how these attributes ingrained in such ideas as manifest destiny and American supremacism match up to the collective
American way of life and its effect on the world of today, following the brief introduction:

The Hare Psychopathy Checklist - Revised (PCL-R) is a diagnostic tool used to rate a persons psychopathic or
antisocial tendencies. People who are psychopathic prey ruthlessly on others using charm, deceit, violence or
other methods that allow them to get with they want.

The symptoms of psychopathy include: lack of a conscience or sense of guilt, lack of empathy,
egocentricity, pathological lying, repeated violations of social norms, disregard for the law, shallow emotions, and a
history of victimizing others.

Originally designed to assess people accused or convicted of crimes, the PCL-R consists of a 20-item symptom
rating scale that allows qualified examiners to compare a subjects degree of psychopathy with that of
a prototypical psychopath. It is accepted by many in the field as the best method for determining the presence and
extent of psychopathy in a person.

The twenty traits assessed by the PCL-R score are:

Glib and superficial charm

Grandiose (exaggeratedly high) estimation of self

Need for stimulation

Pathological lying

Cunning and manipulativeness

Lack of remorse or guilt

Shallow affect (superficial emotional responsiveness)

Callousness and lack of empathy

Parasitic lifestyle

Poor behavioral controls

Sexual promiscuity

Early behavior problems

Lack of realistic long-term goals

Impulsivity

Irresponsibility

Failure to accept responsibility for own actions

Many short-term marital relationships

Juvenile delinquency

Revocation of conditional release

Criminal versatility
Does That Hit the Mark?

Ill let your own imagination extrapolate each of those qualities rather than break it down as I see it. Its overall quite stunning
that a collective entity could be so blatantly psychopathic and to such a degree.

Its something to be faced head on.

But really its nothing new. This is the definition of the behavior of empires and oligarchies throughout history. Humanity
beats and flails its arms over and over when these qualities are recognized on so many humanity exploiting, oppressing and
destroying levels but its generally been to no avail, according to written records and the whirled were witnessing before
us.We protest and rant to whatever degree but the show goes on.

So what to do?

The Solution Awakening

Only a mass awakening can shake the foundations of this kind of destructive insanity. These power structures are built on
the fearful allegiance to those who make it possible. When we withdraw our support and participation in these types of
foisted machinations they cannot continue.

That may sound vague or simplistic to some but its extremely practical at the most basic level. If youre employed in
something supporting this paradigm, leave it.
If youre giving attention and therefore energy to their charade, including the political, media and entertainment sideshow,
stop it. If youre still socializing on shallow levels of energy, or contributing to the fear and scarcity models by your
sycophantic hand wringing and repeating of their fear programming, snap out of it.

Have some guts. Take a stand for truth and love while you still can. Dont wait for affirmation and some comforting collective
movement. Be your own being. Leave your participation in what is obviously wrong and lend your energy to what you know
is right.

It couldnt be simpler. If youre waiting for the right conditions youre still firmly in their psychopathic pocket.

Get out now. The hour is late. More on Psychopathy in a terrific film here.

And this exclamation mark! hat tip Dane Wigington:

The Power Elites Plans For You

March 26 2016 | From: KiwiWatch

Jim Rickards has had the privilege of rubbing shoulders with the elite of financial circles and has
been involved in the highest of discussions about economic issues from the Rothschilds &
Rockefellers down. Now he has shared his views on the agendas the elites have for you and me.
Forget Trump and if you can, forget Clinton although she is simply evil and should already be in prison so I find it
hard to put her out of mind. It doesnt matter who sits in the Oval office at the White House after US elections.

Look how feeble Obama has turned out to be, apart from the Nobel Peace Prize winner being one of the most murderous
Presidents of recent years delivering the agenda of the power elites. The people who pull the strings and run the world by in
large are not politicians but are almost faceless behind the scenes or in powerful self-appointed positions the President has
little say over.

Currently the world watches in amazement the farce that is the American primary elections to select delegates to the
national party conferences prior to the end of year Presidential elections. One by one the hopeful candidates are dropping
out but this whole parade is nothing more than a disgrace, played out in front of a disbelieving world.

If I was an American I would be embarrassed at this satirical joke consuming the American public (and us) on a daily basis.
It has little to do with how the free world exercises democracy.
Regrettably once you dig down a little you find supposedly intelligent people locked in a polarisation that will never deliver to
them the hopes and aspirations they hope for similar to the hopes and dreams of those who voted around the time of John F
Kennedy.

JFK spoke and lectured about the real meaning of peace and freedom, what it means for every individual and countries;
negotiated his way out of a potential nuclear calamity during the Cuba crisis; and new all to well about the subversive
forces that he wanted to confront as that which was likely to erode peace and freedom for individuals.

He wanted to see them broken into a thousand pieces so as liberty and freedom is maintained.

That was too much for the elites. President Harry Truman had spoken about this too in his valedictory speech; the
corporations, the military industrial complex, the surveillance state, the moneyed elite and that was gathering greater and
greater strength in the US.
As we know they took care of JFK; yes I say they shot their own President, blamed a punk called Lee Oswald but more than
that they also took out Robert F Kennedy who JFK ordained to complete the task of breaking up the CIA before he became
a Presidential threat to them.

Getting shot from behind eliminates the guy they blamed (Sirhan-Sirhan) from being the culprit as he was in front of RFK
when he was murdered. But that is history...

So what does Rickards talk about today?

The exceedingly rich dont necessarily become an elite although being exceedingly rich eliminates one barrier to becoming a
Power Elite. Rickards in his March 2016 newsletter discusses the Power Elites plan for you and me indeed the entire world.

He says the agenda of the global power elite is world money, world taxation, world government, a cashless society. The
primary long term goal of the power elite is world money.
He believes that world money will be issued by the shadowy organisation called the International Monetary Fund (IMF) that
is supposedly the central bankers central bank. It will set benchmarks for oil prices and other essential goods and services
in world trade.

Unelected officials will control money as a means to control societies and social welfare he argues. This will be done he
says through Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) that will be issued not to individuals but to governments.

Close behind world money is world taxation.

"Continual sources of revenue are needed by global elites to enrich themselves and pursue programs to perpetrate
their control. The primary path to achieve this is climate change. This explains why the IMF, World Bank, BIS and
other financial bodies continually speak about climate change.

In order to to impose global solutions (such as taxation) you need global problems (climate Change). Since climate
change know no borders it is the perfect vehicle to impose solutions that know no borders.

"Administration of world money and world taxation will be conducted by world government. Most of this
architecture is already in place. The United Nations is mostly a debating club except for the climate change
agenda.

The real world government is being conducted through the IMF and G-20 leaders summit. The G-20 is a de facto
board of directors for world government. The IMF is a de facto central bank for the world.

The power elite is also implementing the cashless society. This is needed to in order to impose hidden taxation
in the form of negative interest rates. Cash is one way to avoid negative interest rates. With cash at least you
preserve the principal but with negative interest rates on bank accounts you dont.

Its like rounding up cows in slaughterhouse pens before killing them! Negative interest rates is a way to confiscate wealth
from savers. (Note: it makes a mockery of saving for your retirement).

Club Etiquette and Rules:

He says that although the power elite is not a conspiracy is does function as a club and there are house rules. Violation of
the rules results in expulsion from the club. (Where does Trump sit here?)

Rule 1. Elites help elites. A closer example is how CEOs name other CEOs to their board of directors

Rule2. Elites never criticise other elites. In this context criticism means exposure of the real motives and
methods behind the elite game. Election politicking disagreements are allowed but what is not allowed is
discussion of the fact that left and right wing elites are in the same club and elections are basically a show to
appease citizens.

Rule 3. Silence is rewarded. Elites have access to enormous amounts of inside information about policy, plans
and back room dynamics. Going onto TV or radio and spilling the beans in some interview or book must be
avoided.

Rule 4. Patience pays. Not criticizing your ideological opponents and keeping your mouth shut for decades while
difficult has its rewards. Top jobs go to elites, loyalty is recognised.

Who are some of the Power Elite players? A by no means complete list starts with:

Robert Rubin formerly CEO of Goldman Sachs, US Secretary of the Treasury. Look him up he is on the Council of
Foreign Relations too

Christine Legarde manging director of the IMF

 James A. Johnson, former CEO of Fannie Mae, including director of Goldman Sachs and also on the Council for Foreign
Relations
 James Wolfensohn former president of the World bank and also on the Council for Foreign Relations

A continuing theme with all of the people Rickards mentions is the Council for Foreign Relations and New America
Foundation.

It would pay to look these secretive organisations up. Interesting.. neocon populated and very pro Israel!

Brussels Attacks In Belgium: 322 Skull & Bones

March 24 2016 | From: BreakingViewsNZ / Various

Illuminati false flag exposed: Another example of the occult black magic at play.
Especially events like these.. All De-ZION-ed ahead of time; Perpetrated by the same Alphabet Soups who
perpetrate everything else! Problem-reaction-solution!

Related: The Order / Skull and Bones / Chapter 322

On the morning of Tuesday, March 22, 2016, two explosions occurred in the Brussels airport. Subsequently, another report
of an explosion soon followed at the Maalbeek metro station - succeeding the explosions at the airport.

Of course, this is all blamed on "suicide bombers." The airport and metro station have been shut down, and all flights to
Brussels have been cancelled, as the country is on temporary lockdown.
Now there are some very eerie and undeniable symbolisms and "coincidences" that aren't so coincidental after all:

The event took place on March 22, or "322";

"322" is often associated with the secret society "Skull and Bones"; the same organization corresponding with
911

The Georgia Guidestones were erected on March 22, 1980 - exactly 36 years ago on this day

Both this AND 911 occurred on Tuesday mornings

Exactly 758 weeks following the 911 attacks

Exactly 130 days following the Paris "attacks"- now there were said to be "130 deaths" in the Paris "attacks" - no
coincidence there!

2 days following the Spring Equinox / Hebrew New Year

5 days before Easter

1 day before the Full Moon

13th day on the Lunar Calendar

This event also just so happened to take place a day before the Doodle 4 Google propaganda. Was it a hoax? Probably.

Related: Russian PM calls Ukraine's security chief a "dimwit" over comments on Brussels blasts
Another move towards martial law

Just another random event? Or a perpetrated false-flag mental psy-op, staged, funded, and planned AHEAD of time?

Clinton Email Reveals: Google Sought Overthrow Of Syria's Assad + Robert Kennedy
Jr. Just Dropped A Truth Bomb: 'Pipeline War' Is At The Roots Of Syrian Crisis
March 23 2016 | From: WashingtonExaminer / Infowars

Google in 2012 sought to help insurgents overthrow Syrian President Bashar Assad, according to
State Department emails receiving fresh scrutiny this week.
Messages between former secretary of state Hillary Clinton's team and one of the company's executives detailed
the plan for Google to get involved in the region.

Related: Google Is Not What It Seems

A story largely ignored by the corporate media reveals the tech company Google offered to help Secretary of State
Clinton overthrow Bashar al-Assad by developing an app to track defections from the Syrian government.

Jared Cohen, the head of what was then the company's "Google Ideas" division, wrote in a July 2012 email to several top
Clinton officials.

Please keep close hold, but my team is planning to launch a tool... that will publicly track and map the defections
in Syria and which parts of the government they are coming from."

"Our logic behind this is that while many people are tracking the atrocities, nobody is visually representing and
mapping the defections, which we believe are important in encouraging more to defect and giving confidence to
the opposition," Cohen said, adding that the plan was for Google to surreptitiously give the tool to Middle Eastern
media.

"Given how hard it is to get information into Syria right now, we are partnering with Al-Jazeera who will take
primary ownership over the tool we have built, track the data, verify it, and broadcast it back into Syria," he said.
You can read the email for yourself here.

Related: WikiLeaks publishes searchable archive of Clinton emails

The message was addressed to deputy secretary of state Bill Burns; Alec Ross, a senior Clinton advisor; and Clinton's
deputy chief of staff, Jake Sullivan. Sullivan subsequently forwarded Cohen's proposal to Clinton, describing it as "a pretty
cool idea."

Cohen worked as a member of the secretary of state's policy planning staff from 2006 to 2010, when he was hired to lead
Google Ideas, but was tied to using social media to incite uprisings even before he left the department.

He once reportedly asked Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to hold off of conducting system maintenance that officials believed
could have impeded a brief 2009 uprising in Iran, and Julian Assange, who founded the secret-leaking website WikiLeaks,
has for years referred to Cohen as Google's "director of regime change."

In her book No Higher Honor Condoleezza Rice spoke fondly of Cohen, describing him as a young gun and said his work
in social media;
 Would pay off handsomely when Twitter and Facebook became accelerants of democratic change in the Middle
East.

Social media played a predominant role in the so-called Arab Spring, the concerted effort by the State Department, the
Endowment for Democracy, USAID, the International Republican Institute, the National Democratic Institute and Freedom
House to violently overthrow governments in the Middle East and North Africa.

In addition to Google, Facebook and Twitter were also involved in the effort to undermine governments in the region.

In total, according to a report in Indonesias Jakarta Post, 180,000 people died as a result of the US-orchestrated Arab
Spring, primarily in Libya, Syria and Yemen.

The exchange on Syria was highlighted by Wikileaks on Saturday. Earlier in the week, the site posted more than 30,000
emails that Clinton sent or received during her tenure leading the State Department.

Robert Kennedy Jr. Just Dropped A Truth Bomb: 'Pipeline War' Is At The Roots Of
Syrian Crisis
Related: Miserable failure: Western media are lying about Syria

The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The mind
simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst. It rejects even the assumption that
human creatures could espouse a philosophy which must ultimately destroy all that is good and decent.

Radio Sputnik discusses the origins of the Syrian crisis with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., attorney and nephew of US President
John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
Kennedy writes that the US decided to remove Syrian President Bashar al-Assad from power after he refused to back a
Qatari gas pipeline project. Sputnik also touched upon US foreign policy, the refugee crisis and why Donald Trump would be
a better president than Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio.

Read more at: Sputnik

Seized Hager Material Destroyed, Attention Turns To Westpac

March 22 2016 | From: NationalBusinessReview

Nicky Hagers attention is turning towards Westpac Banks handing over of his bank records after
watching police smash 213 times a hard drive containing his material.

About 17 months after police raided the Dirty Politics authors home, Mr Hager and one of his lawyers, Steven
Price, watched a hard drive and memory card containing copies of seized data get destroyed in the High Court at
Auckland.

Related: Nicky Hager's cloned data destroyed by police

The pair also collected a computer and other equipment taken by police during what Mr Hager called a Rambo raid, after it
was last year ruled unlawful.

Mr Hager fought for two months to get permission for the media to watch the copies being destroyed, without success.

But afterwards, he said it was an amazing day and he felt like he was watching history.

We went down to the basement of the High Court building here, into this little narrow room, without lights on, and
 the police held torches around while one of the detectives, in fact the detective who was in charge of removing
stuff from my house was there, while he destroyed the materials they had copied from the house.

Mr Hager says the detective took to the hard drive 213 times with a hammer, before cutting holes in it with a bolt-colter.

But while he is absolutely confident the material was not tampered with while sitting at court, his attention now turns to
other areas where he says the police were tricky.

Mr Price says there will likely be a further hearing later this year regarding further aspects of the case.

The main thing thats going on is the question whether its lawful for the police to go to banks and get them to turn
over someones bank records, as they did with Nicky, without a court order.

Thats something that might affect thousands of people.

Keith Locke: Hard To Spy Gains From Five Eyes

March 22 2016 | From: KeithLocke

This article of mine [Keith Locke - former Green MP] was published in the New Zealand Herald on
15 March 2016. It was in response to the report of Intelligence and Security Agencies Review,
released on 9 March.
The intelligence services report by Sir Michael Cullen and Dame Patsy Reddy sheds more light on the GCSBs work
with the Five Eyes network, but it also leaves several questions unanswered. Since the Snowden revelations there
has been a concern that our Government Communications Security Bureau is involved in mass surveillance. The
Government has denied that it is.

Cullen and Reddy describe how the GCSB collects communications from the geo-stationary satellites visible from its station
at Waihopai, near Blenheim.

First; the bureau:

"Intercepts a set of communications, most of which will be of no relevance and will be discarded without ever being
examined by the [GCSB] analyst. This is the haystack in which the needle must be found.

Second;

The GCSB filters intercepted material for relevance using search terms.

These search terms could be subjects or groups and could take in lot of people, some of whom would be New Zealanders.

Although the GCSB is supposed to be targeting foreign intelligence it is not illegal for it to retain Waihopais intercept
intelligence on New Zealanders if it was incidentally obtained intelligence, that is, if the New Zealanders werent a specific
target, and the intelligence was relevant to the GCSBs security objectives.

In addition, many New Zealanders can legally be targeted by the GCSB as foreign persons if they are active in foreign
organisations, the definition of which is broad enough to include Greenpeace or the New Zealand subsidiary of a multi-
national corporation. Former Prime Minister Jenny Shipley qualifies as a foreign person because she is on the board of the
China Construction Bank.
The Cullen/Reddy report removes the problem of mass surveillance by saying it suggests a kind of active
monitoring of the general population that does not occur.. [not true].

However, I dont think any critic of government surveillance has ever envisaged the surveillance going that far [not true].

An over-the-top definition of mass surveillance avoids the reality of a mass collection of communications data at Waihopai
and the possibility that the international phone calls or emails of any New Zealander could be caught in the net, accidentally
or not. In theory, their communications could be subsequently analysed by a GCSB operative.

The next question is what happens to the haystack of communications collected at the Waihopai spy station. The report
says that most of these communications will be of no relevance and will be discarded without ever being examined by an
analyst.
They may be discarded by the analyst, but to what extent are they stored, either here or overseas, for later mining by the
GCSB or its Five Eyes partners? We know that the US National Security Agency has access to raw communications from its
Five Eyes partners, and that it stores billions of communications for later analysis.

This is relevant to the concern, correctly raised by Cullen and Reddy, that close co-operation with Five Eyes partners
creates a risk of some loss of independence, both operationally and potentially also in relation to our intelligence, defence
and foreign policy settings. Our national interests do not and cannot exactly coincide with those of any other country.

The reality is that when New Zealand is sharing raw communications data with other Fives Eyes partners some of the
intelligence they glean from it will be used for foreign policy objectives which are not the same as New Zealands.
But this seems to be a secondary consideration to the net benefit Cullen and Reddy say New Zealand receives from Five
Eyes intelligence sharing. It is hard to judge this as any benefits are largely invisible to the public.

Have any terrorist plots been found? Not as far as we know. Have our trade interests been advanced? No one has pointed
out how. Has our diplomacy been assisted? I cant see any evidence.

Yet the downside of New Zealands participation in Five Eyes surveillance is substantial. There was a cool reception in
Beijing when the Snowden papers revealed the GCSBs spying on China. Joining intelligence forces with America against
China is hardly the way to optimise our trade with that important country.

New Zealands ambassador was called in to the Brazilian foreign ministry when it was revealed the GCSB had been
gathering Five Eyes intercept data on Brazilian Roberto Azevedo in an unsuccessful attempt to stop him heading off our
Trade Minister Tim Groser to become Director-General of the WTO.

Yes, we need to be concerned about possible terrorist activity. But do we need to be in the Five Eyes to detect any plots?
The reality is that the police and intelligence forces of friendly nations share information on terrorism (and other international
crime) regardless of who is in or out of the Five Eyes.

I dont think Cullen and Reddy make much of a case for us to stay in this five-nation spy network.

The End Of Anglo-American Hegemony

March 22 2016 | From: HendersonLeftHook

Not long ago, Chocolate Oligarchs and their fascist gendarmes seized Ukraines fertile wheat and
barley fields, whilst bankster-funded Islamist rebels took Mosul & the adjacent Kirkuk oilfield one
of the worlds largest for Exxon Mobil.
BRIC nations saw imperial over-reach and, led by Putin, busied themselves preparing for the slow-motion
unraveling of the Anglo-American financial empire.

The Rothschild / Rockefeller / banking / energy / arms / drugs oligopoly that has enslaved humankind and decimated planet
earth for the last few centuries is coming apart at the seams. The arrogance and stupidity of the self-proclaimed illuminated
ones, who operate their matrix from the city of London, is being writ large for all to see.

Their Mideast gendarmes Israel & Saudi Arabia now falter.

A while back, troops from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) entered Bahrain to help the al-Khalifa petro-
monarchy put down pro-democracy protests. This intervention condoned by Western powers represented a last-ditch
effort at salvaging the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) the chief neocolonial modus operandi which underwrites the
London eurodollar money laundering scheme while propping up both the pound and the dollar.
But heads of monarchs will soon roll. The people of the GCC nations remain restless, particularly in Saudi Arabia and
Bahrain. It was no coincidence that the unstable House of Saud financed Syrian rebels, sent them to destabilize Iraq, then
launched a ruthless bombing campaign in Yemen.

Things on the Saudi domestic front are a bit dicey for the embattled and divided royals. It is important to know how we got
here:

(Excerpted from Chapter 5: Persian Gulf Rent-a-Sheik: Big Oil & Their Bankers)

The six GCC nations- Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, UAE, Qatar and Oman- sit atop 42% of the worlds oil.
The single-family monarchies that control them were hand-picked by the British Empire. They work in tandem with Israel to
steal crude oil from the Arab people. They, not China or Japan, are the biggest purchasers of US Treasuries. Their interests
lie not with their people, but with the City of London and Wall Street.

The bloodline elite of the six GCC nations are heavily invested in Western economies. High volume crude oil production
keeps this investment capital flowing to Wall Street and the City of London while allowing the GCC elites to live opulent
lifestyles. As Saudi Oil Minister Hisham Nazer put it, We now have a mutual bond of self-interest and reciprocal security
interests.

As Western dependence on Third World resources has increased, it has become increasingly necessary for the international
bankers and their corporations to include local elite cliques in their capital accumulation schemes, making a small group of
local people extremely wealthy so that this group will cooperate in selling local resources cheaply to the West.

An example of this utilization of local elites as surrogates can be seen through the case of the richest man in the world. He is
Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah- Sultan of Brunei- a tiny oil enclave on the island of Borneo, where Royal Dutch/Shell holds a virtual
monopoly over the oil industry and has paid the Sultan well to keep it that way. The Sultan of Brunei is worth over $60 billion
and lives in a 1,778-room palace.
These local elite, in turn, hand over their wealth to Western bankers for protection from devaluation and bank failure. This
robs their home country of much-needed capital and often precipitates devaluation and debt crises. The US has itself
become a debtor nation and owes its debts, in part, to these same Third World elites, who own trillions on deposit at large
US banks, while their fellow countrymen live in abject poverty.

Egyptian elites, for example, hold $60 billion in deposits in foreign banks, while the average Egyptian earns $650/year. In the
case of the GCC, the amount of recycled petrodollars flowing back into Western investments is truly staggering.

The Saudis have over $600 billion invested abroad. Citigroup owns 33% of the Saudi American Bank but is itself now
controlled by members of the House of Saud. In 1993 Saudi Prince al-Waleed bin Talal, owner of Saudi Commercial Bank,
plunged $590 million into Citibank.

Bin Talal now owns 17.34% of Citigroup, while Crown Prince Abdullah owns a 5.4% share, making them the banks two
largest shareholders. Bin Talal is also the 2nd largest shareholder in Rupert Murdochs Newscorp, parent of both Fox News
and the Wall Street Journal.

The Saudi Citigroup share purchases were facilitated by the Washington-based Carlyle Group, which is 20%-owned by the
Mellon family that owned Gulf Oil and now owns a large chunk of Chevron Texaco.

Carlyle is led by former Reagan and Bush Defense Secretary and Reagan NSC Chairman Frank Carlucci. George
Bush Sr., James Baker III and former British Prime Minister John Major are senior advisers and board members at
Carlyle. Bush Sr. served as Carlyle investment advisor to the bin Laden family until November 2001.
In 1995 Prince bin Talal teamed up with Canadian developer Paul Reichmann, Loews chairman Larry Tisch and Lebanese
financier Edmund J. Safra- a close friend of war-criminal Henry Kissinger- to buy Londons Canary Wharf complex for $1.04
billion.

UAE ruling Sheik Zayed runs the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority. Much of its money is handled by private investment and
equity firms like Carlyle Group and Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette- which is 18% owned by the Saudi Olayan Group. Olayan
also owns big chunks of JP Morgan Chase and CS First Boston. The director of the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority serves
as Carlyle Groups Asian adviser.

Bahrain plays a role in this petrodollar recycling, serving as the key unregulated offshore banking center for both the GCC
sheiks and their international mega-bank partners. Bahrain is also home to the US Fifth Fleet and a large number of
refineries, which process Saudi crude.
Lebanon had been the premier banking center of the Middle East in earlier days, but with Beirut reduced to rubble by Israeli
shelling, merchant banking has moved to the duty-free port of Dubai in the UAE, now the biggest gold market on the
planet. Investment banking is centered in Kuwait.

But it is Bahrain which is home to the vast multi-billion dollar pool of money market funds derived from GCC/Four Horsemen
petrodollar revenues. Most banks in Bahrain are foreign-owned and all US mega-banks have operations there. Many of
Bahrains banks are owned by GCC elite and serve as a major conduit in the petrodollar recycling process.

The Kuwait Burgan Bank, for example, owns a 28% stake in one of Bahrains largest banks- the Middle Eastern Bank.

The most powerful firm in Bahrain is Investcorp, which took big stakes in Saks Fifth Avenue, BAT, Tiffany, Gucci, Color Tile,
Carvel Ice Cream, Dellwood Foods, New York Department Store of Puerto Rico, Circle K and Chaumet. Investcorp was co-
founded in 1983 by Bahrain ruling family scion Sheik Khalifa bin Sulman al-Khalifa- who also owned a big chunk of the
infamous BCCI.
 A recent Investcorp prospectus lists the Bahrain Minister of
Finance as an owner.

Investcorps chairman is Abdul-Rahman Al-Ateeqi, former

Oil and Finance Minister of Kuwait. Its Vice-President is
Ahmed Ali Kanoo of the wealthy Saudi Kanoo family, which
is worth an estimated $1.5 billion.

Former Saudi Oil Minister Sheik Yamani was one of

Investcorps founding shareholders, along with seven
members of the Saudi royal family.

Investcorp has its eight-story headquarters in Bahrain,

along with a Park Avenue New York office and a Mayfair
district office in London.

Sheik al-Khalifas partner in launching Investcorp was Nemir

Kirdar, the banks president who was in charge of Chase
Manhattans Persian Gulf operations. Numerous Investcorp
senior executives are Chase alumni as well.

Many Investcorp purchases turned out to be flops and there

is a shady side to the bank.

French jeweler Chaumet executive Charles Lefevre said

Investcorp fudged Chaumet numbers to entice shareholders
while trying to pawn its shares off at a higher price to other
Persian Gulf investors.

Another complaint alleged that Investcorp attempted to loot

the Saudi European Bank in Paris.

Investcorp board member Abdullah Taha Bakhsh, a

reclusive Saudi billionaire, invested heavily in George W.
The story of the BCCI was told in the thriller movie 'The International' Bushs Harken Energy.

So did Bahrains ruling Sheik al-Khalifa. Bush and co-owner Dick Cheney morphed their Arbusto Energy into Harken when
Bush friend James Bath provided them with $50,000 in seed money.

Bath owned Skyway Aircrafts and was under investigation by the DEA for working with GCC sheiks in flying $100 bills to the
Cayman Islands. Since Bath often borrowed money from Saudi Sheiks Khalid bin Mahfouz- BCCIs largest shareholder- and
Mohammed bin Laden, these wealthy Saudis likely provided the $50,000 in seed money to launch what became Harken
Energy.

Bin Mahfouz and bin Laden helped Harken sign an exclusive offshore oil drilling agreement just prior to the Gulf War. In
January 1990 President Bush Sr. had approved preferential trade status for the Iraqi regime. That very same month Harken
Energy was awarded the biggest offshore oil concession ever in the Persian Gulf off the coast of Bahrain.
Other notable Harken investors included the Ft. Worth-based Bass brothers, the South African Rupert family, the Harvard
Endowment Fund, and Rothschild lieutenant George Soros.

In 1989 the government of Bahrain abruptly cut off talks with Amoco concerning the same oil concession after Emir al-Khalifa
decided to grant it instead to Harken Energy at the urging of Mobils Middle East operations chief Michael Ameen. Financing
for the project was arranged by Bush Jr. friend Jackson Stephens, the Arkansas owner of Worthen Bank who was
instrumental in bringing BCCI to the US and who donated $100,000 to the Bush Sr. 1988 Presidential Campaign.

New York attorney Allen Quasha and his father William Quasha of Manila helped swing the Harken deal with Bahrain. In
1961 Bill Quasha helped George Bush Sr. secure rights to drill the first oil well in Kuwait via Zapata Offshore Oil Company.
Later Quasha served as legal counsel to the CIA drug laundry Nugan Hand Bank in the Philippines.

His son Allen became the biggest stockholder in Harken The Quashas own 21% of a Swiss company controlled by the
South African Rupert family, who were major backers of that countrys former apartheid regime.
Just one month before Iraq invaded Kuwait, George W. Bush sold 66% of his stake in Harken Energy at a 200% profit. While
stock analysts like Charlie Andrews of 13D Research were putting out buy recommendations on Harken, on June 22, 1990
Bush cashed in $840,000 in Harken stock, later saying he sold into good news. Bush knew that Harken had violated the
terms of a loan package and was now on the ropes financially. Five weeks later Harken reported a $23 million loss and its
stock price crashed.

Bush didnt report his timely Harken Energy stock sale until March 1991. This was illegal, but Bush claimed the SEC had
misplaced the forms and was never prosecuted. In 1993 Bush stepped down from Harkens board. With heavy financial
backing from Enron, he became Governor of Texas.

Bush was defended during the Harken scam by Baker Botts

lawyer Robert Jordan, who was paid back in 2000 with an
appointment as US Ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

The forgiving SEC chief during the Harken debacle was

Richard Breeden, one of Bush Sr.s biggest political
supporters.

SEC counsel was James Doty, another Bush supporter who

helped George W. buy the Texas Rangers baseball team.

When George W. Bush merged Harken with Spectrum 7

Energy, he brought in Investcorp insider Abdullah Taha
Bakhsh, who bought 17.6% of Harken through a
Netherlands Antilles holding company.

Some say Baksch was a front man for Sheik Khalid bin
Mahfouz. Baksch was a major investor at the Bahrain-
based Investcorp, which was launched by former Chase
Manhattan executives. In 1988 he looted an Arab bank in
London.

Bakhsh was also accused of looting the Al Saudi Banque of Paris when it collapsed in 1988 just ahead of the strikingly
similar collapse of BCCI. Bakhsh is a shareholder in First Commercial Financial Group, a Chicago-based commodity futures
trading firm which was sanctioned by US regulators for check-kiting and fraud. Just before the Gulf War broke out, Investcorp
sold a 25.8% share to an Iraqi company, despite a Bahrain law prohibiting such transactions.
The Saudis and Kuwaitis are the clear leaders in GCC overseas investments. The Kuwaiti Investment Authority has over
$250 billion invested abroad and is the biggest foreign investor in Japan and Spain. Citigroup and JP Morgan Chase handle
Kuwaiti investments in the US, where the al-Sabah clan owns stock in each of the 70 largest firms listed on the New York
Stock Exchange.

Their US holdings include 100% of Occidental Geothermal, 29.8% of Great Western Resources, 100% of the Atlanta Hilton
Hotel, 45% of the Phoenician Hotel and 11% of Hogg Robinson.

In Germany they own 14% of Daimler-Chrysler, 25% of Hoechst (the Nazi IG Farben spin-off and the worlds 2nd largest
pharmaceutical company), 20% of Metallgesellschaft and part of German retailer Asko. In Italy they own 6.7% of Afil, the
Agnelli family holding company which owns Fiat and several other endeavors.

In the UK Kuwait owns St. Martins Properties and 5.4% of Sime Darby. In Malaysia their K-10 company owns the biggest
newspaper- the New Straits Times Press. In neighboring Singapore, the Kuwaitis own 10.6% of Singapore Petroleum, 37%
of Dao Heng Holdings and 49% of the securities firm J. M. Sassoon.

Kuwait Oil Company (KOC), was technically nationalized in the early 1980s, but remains close to its former parents-
Chevron Texaco and BP Amoco- selling these two Horsemen oil at a discount. KOC made wealthy the al-Sabah emirs and
the al-Ghanim family, who acted as the companys agent for decades.
By 1966 KOC bought a Danish subsidiary and became the first Middle Eastern oil company to retail gasoline in Europe.

KOC has been the most aggressive GCC firm in its overseas downstream investments. In 1982 it bought hundreds of Q8
gas stations across Europe. By 1987 it owned over 5,000 gasoline retailers in Europe and South Asia. Just last week KOC
was awarded a contract to build oil refineries in South Korea.

The Kuwaitis even bought into one of the Four Horsemen- BP Amoco. As of 1988 they owned a 22% share. They have since
reduced their share to 9.85%, still a controlling interest. They purchased the Naples, Italy refining operations of Mobil, own
nearly 4% of ARCO (now part of BP Amoco), and 2.39% of Phillips Petroleum (now merged with Conoco). In Spain the
Kuwaitis operate the Torras Hostenchchemical firm. In Japan they operate Arabian Oil.

All told GCC investments in Western banks and corporations total in the trillions. The bulk of this is invested in long-term US
and Japanese government bonds. The GCC sheiks are crucial to floating the entire house of cards that is the global
economy.

Their guaranteed purchases of US debt, which has largely been accrued through defense spending in the Persian Gulf
region, keep the US dollar strong and prevent the international financial architecture from crumbling.
The emirs and their elite friends also bankroll CIA covert operations, while re-balancing their trade surpluses with the West
through the purchase of US weaponry to protect their oil fiefdoms.

Events in Ukraine and the Middle East have exposed the desperate position of the Rockefeller/Rothschild energy oligopoly.

Putin has just begun playing his extremely good hand of cards.

The GCC puppets remain embattled and circling the wagons. The end of the petroleum standard can only be staved off by
permanent war. Strange days indeed.

The Financial System Is A Larger Threat Than Terrorism

March 21 2016 | From: PaulCraigRoberts

In the 21st century we have been distracted by the hyper-expensive war on terror. Trillions of
dollars have been added to the taxpayers burden and many billions of dollars in profits to the
military/security complex in order to combat insignificant foreign threats, such as the Taliban,
that remain undefeated after 15 years.
All this time the financial system, working hand-in-hand with policymakers, has done more damage to Americans
than terrorists could possibly inflict.

The purpose of the Federal Reserve and US Treasurys policy of zero interest rates is to support the prices of the over-
leveraged and fraudulent financial instruments that unregulated financial systems always create.

If inflation was properly measured, these zero rates would be negative rates, which means not only that retirees have no
income from their retirement savings but also that saving is a losing proposition. Instead of earning interest on your savings,
you pay interest that shrinks the real value of your saving.

Central banks, neoliberal economists, and the presstitute financial media advocate negative interest rates in order to force
people to spend instead of save. The notion is that the economys poor economic performance is not due to the failure of
economic policy but to people hoarding their money.
The Federal Reserve and its coterie of economists and presstitutes maintain the fiction of too much savings despite the
publication of the Federal Reserves own report that 52% of Americans cannot raise $400 without selling personal
possessions or borrowing the money.

Negative interest rates, which have been introduced in some countries such as Switzerland and threatened in other
countries, have caused people to avoid the tax on bank deposits by withdrawing their savings from banks in large
denomination bills. In Switzerland, for example, demand for the 1,000 franc bill (about $1,000) has increased sharply. These
large denomination bills now account for 60% of the Swiss currency in circulation.

The response of depositors to negative interest rates has resulted in neoliberal economists, such as Larry Summers, calling
for the elimination of large denomination bank notes in order to make it difficult for people to keep their cash balances
outside of banks.

Other neoliberal economists, such as Kenneth Rogoff want to eliminate cash altogether and have only electronic money.
Electronic money cannot be removed from bank deposits except by spending it. With electronic money as the only money,
financial institutions can use negative interest rates in order to steal the savings of their depositors.

People would attempt to resort to gold, silver, and forms of private money, but other methods of payment and saving would
be banned, and government would conduct sting operations in order to suppress evasions of electronic money with stiff
penalties.
What this picture shows is that government, economists, and presstitutes are allied against citizens achieving any financial
independence from personal saving.

Policymakers have a crackpot economic policy and those with control over your life value their scheme more than
they value your welfare.

This is the fate of people in the so-called democracies. Any remaining control that they have over their lives is being taken
away. Governments serve a few powerful interest groups whose agendas result in the destruction of the host economies.
The offshoring of middle class jobs transfers income and wealth from the middle class to the executives and owners of the
corporation, but it also kills the domestic consumer market for the offshored goods and services. As Michael Hudson writes,
it kills the host.

The financialization of the economy also kills the host and the owners of corporations as well. When corporate executives
borrow from banks in order to boost share prices and their performance bonuses by buying back the publicly held stock of
the corporations, future profits are converted into interest payments to banks.

The future income streams of the corporations are financialized. If the future income streams fail, the companies can be
foreclosed, like homeowners, and the banks become the owners of the corporations.
Between the offshoring of jobs and the conversion of more and more income streams into payments to banks, less and less
is available to be spent on goods and services. Thus, the economy fails to grow and falls into long-term decline. Today
many people can only pay the minimum payment on their credit card balance.

The result is massive growth in a balance that can never be paid off. It is these people who are the least able to service debt
who are hit with draconian charges. The way the credit card companies have it now, if you make one late payment or your
payment is returned by your bank, you are hit for the next six months with a Penalty Annual Percentage Rate of 29.49%.

In Europe entire countries are being foreclosed. Greece and Portugal have been forced into liquidation of national assets
and the social security systems. So many women have been forced into poverty and prostitution that the hourly price of a
prostitute has been driven down to $4.12.
Throughout the Western world the financial system has become an exploiter of the people and a deadweight loss on
economies. There are only two possible solutions. One is to break the large banks up into smaller and local entities such as
existed prior to the concentration that deregulation fostered.

The other is to nationalize them and operate them solely in the interest of the general welfare of the population.

The banks are too powerful currently for either solution to occur. But the greed, fraud, and self-serving behavior of Western
financial systems, aided and abeted by governments, could be leading to such a breakdown of economic life that the idea of
a private financial system will become as abhorent in the future as Nazism is today.

Helicopter Money: Get Ready To Be Showered

March 20 2016 | From: KiwiWatch

Day after day we are insulted by wannabe broadcasters like (in New Zealand) Paul Henry and Mike
Hosking, who continue to interview bank economists or central bank analysts attempting to
discover why the global economy is slowing down, what central bankers are doing about it and
why our own economy is showing signs of this distress.
Only Luddites would interview the people who are the very cause of the problem hoping to get a glimpse of the
solution.

Massive government and private debt that has spiraled hugely since the unresolved 2008 Global Financial Crisis is the
major cause of the problem. 2008 wasnt an event with an ending. Its continuing and just got a whole lot worse in the
interim due to massive central bank money printing, zero interest rates (ZIRP), Quantative Easing (QE), now negative
interest rates (NIRP) and now a war on cash.

Central bankers are out of time, clueless as to what to do. Everything they try is an experiment, the consequences are
unknown. Why bother interviewing the fools causing the problem? Instead why not interview people who can come up with a
non bank solution?
Spiraling debt comes from the manner in which banks create money by the Fractional Reserve system that has empowered
banks to become the almighty and powerful entities, too large to fail. That is the cause of the problem along with the now
massive deflationary force of an aging baby boomer generation keeping their wallets in the hip pocket, spending less.

Back in the 1970s a local (N.Z.) politician called Bruce Beetham promoted a political party called Social Credit whose basis
was that the government should be the sole creator of credit in a nation disempowering bankers out of this role.

He was maligned as a funny money man. In hind sight this solution would have solved the problem of bankers becoming
the all powerful and kept our country from being beggars in the global credit markets controlled by banks.
But maybe, just maybe there are politicians who themselves are going to be attacked and maligned by the powerful bank
lobby as nutters are thinking about ways governments are going to monetize the debt they cant repay. Whatever result the
lunacy of central bank thinking is past the use by date.

Political Crimes & Criminals

Part One: Click here

Part Two: Click here

Part Three: Click here

Part Four: Click here

 Part Five: Click here

Part Six: Click here

Part Seven: Click here

Part Eight: Click here

http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/political-crimes-criminals-6.shtml