Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
v.
CASE NO: 1-
14cv00093
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA aka BARRY SOETORO JUDGE:
HONORABLE TED STEWART
DNC
OFC
DEFENDANT.
COMES NOW the Plaintiff, pro se, Cody Robert Judy, and submits to this Court a
NOTICE FOR JUDGMENT & AFFADAVIT OF PLAINTIFF pursuant to FRCP Rule 7 (d) and
47(d).
1
3- Accordingly, Defendants have a 30 day time window to respond to the Motion
in the affirmative or in objection for dispositive motions, and no such
Response has been noticed by the Court or Plaintiff of Record.
4- The matter is now ripe for the Courts Judgment and ORDER and Plaintiff
submits to the Court this NOTICE FOR JUDGEMENT with his accompanying
Affidavit of the PLAINTIFF in Support.
2
a. https://dockets.justia.com/docket/nevada/nvdce/2:2008cv01162/61
642
4- That this Court now holds in its palm of Judgement, with this Case in
the Plaintiff, the only Presidential Candidate in the United States of
America to defend the [natural born Citizen] clause requirement in the
U.S. Constitution Article II. ,Section 1, C-5, with a bi-partisan stand
across political party lines of Republicans and Democrats who
represent a majority in the United States political arena across three
presidential elections.
5- That because Mr. Judy is the only Presidential Candidate in the United
States to have represented the U.S. Constitutions declaration that the
Office of the President be a [Citizen] at the time of the Adoption of the
Constitution and thereafter a [natural born Citizen] ie. (Born in the U.S.
to Citizen Parents see: Minor v. Happersett 88 U.S. 162 (1875) ), that
an unbiased Claim for Equality and Fairness under the Standard Rules
of the Race in the Constitution for the Office of the President has been
made as a Civil Right for a Presidential Candidate.
3
those who could not defend themselves against the Usurper or Defacto
President Mr. Obama, having with all due diligence pursued Justice as
the Record of this Case in the cannons of American History will attest.
I thank this Court and the Founders and Framers of this Nation who
have passed on, for the opportunity for which without I would never
assume even the hint of such.
9- When will Mr. Judy have his rights represented by the Court? The
United States of America has undergone a peaceful transition of power,
however, Mr. Judy in his motion before this Court has brought up many
instances of a continued grievance and cost affecting himself and
certainly affecting Voters as Tax-Payers; and of course the integrity of
4
our whole Election procedure and form of Government in a three
BRANCHES of equal checks and balances. Mr. Judy has presented this
Court with Law and Claims upon which relief can be granted
meritoriously as well as evidence why it should grant the relief of
judgement calling this action frivolous, especially in the face of Law
Enforcement Evidence.
10- While this Court will hear Mr. Judys Motion, today, the threat of an
upheaval for ousting a sitting (defacto) President, put in with a hood-
wink and pass on crime, is passed with the peaceful transition of the
office of President. This Case yet continues to represents the
grievance of an unseated usurper based upon the limitations of two
four year terms, another Constitutional Rein checking the Office of
President. With that threat gone, and the statute of limitations yet
open for fraud and forgery and distribution felonies of identity theft
and false representation, U.S. History can and still deserves to be
made right. As well the proper address of an illegal occupant signing
that which demands a [natural born Citizen], as well the illegal cover
up in the Cartel of Corporations formed to avoid accountability at the
expense of U.S. Elections.
11- The Framers had such a circumstance come upon them also in the
NATURALIZATION ACT of 1790 when they realized the conundrum ill
served in the NATURALIZATION ACT of 1795 and took out [natural born]
leaving the difference acknowledged as [Citizen]. Though five years
had passed, they realized no [naturalization ACT] could claim
jurisdiction on [the laws of nature and natures God] in [natural born
Citizen]. Certainly it was wholly absurd to think about any [natural born
Citizen] born under a Law of Jurisdiction before that Jurisdiction even
existed, and conversely no [Citizen] could even be Adopted by a new
lawful jurisdiction before it was recognized OFFICIALLY.
5
U.S. Code Title 8 Chapter 12 Subchapter III Part I 1401 (a-
h) [Nationals and citizens of United States at birth]
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1401
c. Emphasis on [citizens] that does not represent [natural born
Citizen] or a replacement for the requirement represented in Art. II.
Section 1, C-5.
12- In summary Mr. Judy has defended the United States of Americas
Greatest Privilege and Right; that to have a [President born in the U.S.
to U.S. Citizen Parents ]representing a passage right of TIME in the
Declaration of a New Nation born in the United States of America by
her Citizens of allegiance. It is true, the United States of America was a
melting pot of all races, colors, and creeds, but it is a Nations
fundamental right to place a criteria upon its offices of governance.
a. The qualification for Senator and Representative is [Citizen] which
might be claimed by birth on the soil or by having a single U.S.
Citizen Parent.
b. The concentration of Power in the Executive Branch is uniquely
different than the diluted power of Judges in the Judicial Branch or
the host of Representatives and Senators in the U.S. House and U.S.
Senate as the Legislature.
c. ([natural born Citizen] or a [Citizen] at the [time of the Adoption] of
this Constitution), was unique to the Executive Branch as one
person holds a lot of concentrated power, and is a rein of restraint
in a check to that office, that simply needs defense by the Judicial
Branch until or if the Legislature decides to change it. We notice as
a witness, eight attempts to change it have failed in the Legislature
since 2003, and in 2000 witnesses who were not qualified for the
Office of President, stating to the Judicial Committee of the U.S.
House that a acclamation of nationality is indeed a process of time
that needs to be respected as is represented in USC Article II.
Section 1, Clause 5.
13- Mr. Judy did not ask Mr. Obama to falsify his long form birth certificate,
nor did the Cold Case Posse of Sheriff Joe Arpaio. That decision made
50 months after Mr. Obama declared his intent to run for Office was
6
made all by Mr. Obama himself, but of course there were tell-tale signs
and hints others knew and assisted who also bear responsibility in the
usurpation; like Representative Nancy Pelosi who signed two different
forms stating Barack Obama was an eligible Candidate under the U.S.
Constitution for the Democratic Party as was very well described in the
original complaint.
14- This action brought to the Bar of Justice asked for a Right or Wrong
Judgement on those actions of fraud and forgery with the motive of
usurpation in mind as motive. If the Court defends those illegal actions
in the light of the U.S. Constitution it simply becomes a mockery of
Justice and a laughing stock of the world who will see it. It puts a stake
through the heart of Justice and in short is an insistence that the Court
is irrelevant itself and no champion of Civil Rights when it comes to
crime and injustice upon [We the People] of this Republic for which we
stand.
16- Mr. Judy as Plaintiff, asks the Court to grant the MOTION FOR RELIEF OF
JUDGEMENT on the basis of serving Justice, fine, and hold the
DEFENDANTS responsible and accountable for the whole sums as it
directs, that the burden of relieving the Judgement will be upon them
who are the perpetrators and alleged criminals in this action declaring
as much with their failure to Respond honorably. Mr. Judy request all
other relief the Court might find honorably and if the Court would like,
Mr. Judy is certainly willing to argue in person if the Court would on its
own merit call for a Hearing. Mr. Judy simply cannot predict the mind of
this Court or its Judgement on which direction to proceed, but he has
7
submitted the Evidence responsible for Facts so the Court is not
embarrassed by a dereliction of Justice to the Facts, or seen in
administering criminal enterprise and illegal action upon the people.
17- Sworn and Signed this 24th Day of February, 2017 ___/s/CRJ_________
Affiant: Cody Robert Judy attorney pro se
18- NOTARY:
In the Weber County of the State of Utah:
Sworn and Subscribed to me on this __24__ Day of _Feb___, 2017.
NOTORAY OF PUBLIC:
Signature: STAMP:
8
Democratic National Committee 430 South Capital St. SE, Washington DC 20003
ph- 202-863-8000