Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Preliminary data Outstanding Very good Good description of Satisfactory Vague description
collection description of description of preliminary data description of of preliminary data
(5 marks) preliminary data preliminary data collection to preliminary data collection to
collection to support collection to support the collection to support the
the problem/ issue support the problem/ issue support the problem/ issue
identified with problem/ issue identified with problem/ issue identified with
varied sources of identified with some sources of identified with limited sources of
relevant data as varied sources of relevant data as limited sources of relevant data as
evidence. relevant data as evidence. relevant data as evidence.
evidence. evidence.
3.0 RESEARCH Very clearly and Clearly and Fairly clear and Adequately clear Poorly stated
OBJECTIVES / explicitly stated explicitly stated explicit statement and explicit research objective
RESEARCH research objective research objective of research statement of according to the
QUESTIONS according to the according to the objevtive according research objective following aspectis:
(5 MARKS) following aspects: following aspects: to the following according to the focus
Research focus focus aspects: following aspects: action
objective action action focus focus achievement
achievement achievement action action
achievement achievement
Research Research question is Research question Research question Research question Research question
question highly relevant to is very relevant to is relevant to is fairly relevant to has limited
research objective. research objective. research objective. research objective. relevance to
research objective.
5.0 Excellent description Very detailed Detailed description Adequate Vague / confusing
IMPLEMENTATIO of steps / activities description of steps of steps / activities. description of steps description of steps
N OF ACTION / activities. / activities. / activities.
PLAN
(20 MARKS) Outstanding Very good Good justification, Inadequate
justification, detailed justification, and fairly detailed Adequate justification, and
Steps involved rationale within the detailed rationale rationale within the justification, and rationale of the
(5 marks) scope of the action within the scope of scope of the action rationale within the action plan.
plan. the action plan. plan. scope of the action
plan.
Data collection Outstanding choice Very good choice Good choice of data Appropriate choice Poor choice of data
method of data collection of data collection collection methods of data collection collection methods
(5 marks) methods and methods and and instrument methods and and instrument with
instrument with instrument with with convincing instrument with limited justification
convincing convincing justification to some convincing to answer the
justification to justification to answer the justification to research question.
answer the research answer the research question. answer the
question. research question. research question.
Data validation Outstanding choice Very good choice Good choice and Satisfactory choice Poor choice and
method (5 and description of and description of description of data and description of description of data
marks) data validation data validation validation method data validation validation method
method that is method that is that is relevant to method that has that is irrelevant to
highly relevant to highly relevant to the type of data some relevance to the type of data
the type of data the type of data collected. the type of data collected.
collected. collected. collected.
6.0 FINDINGS OF Comprehensive Very detailed Detailed discussion Satisfactory Poor discussion of
ACTION discussion of the discussion of the of the findings discussion of the the findings
RESEARCH findings supported findings supported supported by findings supported supported by
(10 marks) by relevant evidence by relevant relevant evidence by relevant relevant evidence
from various evidence from from various evidence from from various
sources. various sources. sources. various sources. sources.
8.0 Outstanding and Very good and Good and critical Satisfactory and Poor evaluation of
SUGGESTIONS critical evaluation of critical evaluation evaluation of action critical evaluation action taken with
FOR FURTHER action taken with of action taken with taken with relevant of action taken with poor and irrelevant
ACTION highly relevant and very relevant and and detailed some relevant suggestions to
(5 marks) comprehensive detailed suggestions to suggestions to address the
suggestions to suggestions to address the address the problems.
address the address the problems. problems.
problems. problems.
2.0 ACADEMIC Outstanding skill in Very good skill in Skillful in making Fairly skillful in Unable to discuss
WRITING AND making critical making critical critical discussion making critical critically
PRESENTATION discussion with discussion with with reference to discussion with
(30 MARKS) reference to reference to accurate and reference to
accurate and accurate and relevant literature relevant literature
relevant literature relevant literature review. review.
review. review..
3.0 LANGUAGE Outstanding use of Very good use of Good use of Satisfactory use of Inappropriate use of
USE IN language for language for language for language for language for
ACADEMIC academic writing. academic writing. academic writing. academic writing. academic writing.
WRITING
(20 MARKS)
4.0 REFERENCES Very relevant Relevant Fairly relevant Few relevant Irrelevant
(10 MARKS) references. references. references. references. references.