Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
6110
Evaluation Plan
Evaluation Process
The evaluation of the module will include both assessments, formative and summative
and the students success in using the module to create, edit, and upload an Ezvid and the
students opinions of the module content and presentation. The process of evaluation is detailed
in Figure 1.
As noted in Figure 1, the first form of evaluation occurs after the learner has completed
the material associated with the first objective . The formative and summative assessments of
student progress all occur during the module. After the completion of the module students are
asked to complete an evaluation.
Table 1
Alignment to the Five Levels of Evaluations
Table 2
Alignment to Unit Goals
Learners will access the web-based Ezvid This goal will be evaluated using the module
instruction with relative ease and reading evaluation tool. This tool will have several
textual material will be readily accessible. questions related to the ease of use of the web-
based module and the availability of the
learning resources.
Learners will use the Ezvid program to record, To evaluate this, I have designed the formative
organize, and upload their screencast videos and summative assessments of student progress
effectively and successfully. associated with the instructional objectives.
Learners will feel confident in their ability to This goal will also be evaluated using the
apply the learned knowledge and skills module evaluation tool. In this tool, I will ask a
obtained from the Ezvid instruction to create, question about the learners confidence in their
edit, and share their own recorded videos. ability to create additional videos.
Summary of modifications:
As I did not submit the Evaluation Plan in EDUC 6100 and I am not able to access it
through our Wiki site, I had to completely redo the evaluation plan and all materials associated
with it. From what I remember the checklist was not specific to objective 1 and had to be redone
and the objective 2 template and objective 3 rubric were not included. We were not required to
create a learner evaluation tool.
Reference List:
Gagne, Robert M., Wager, Walter W., Golas, Katharine C., & Keller, John M. (2005). Principles
of instructional design (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kalman, H. K., & Kemp, J. E. (2013). Designing effective
instruction (7th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Morton, M. (n.d.).
Piskurich, George (2006). Rapid Instructional Design (2nd ed.) San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Simonson, M. (2007). Evaluation and distance education: Five steps. Quarterly Review of
Distance Education. 8(3), 191194.
Original Plan: