Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Ruppelt/vs/65365
CG, ATIC 1 December 1952 .
MEJ10RANDUM FOR RECORD
PROBLEM:
2. Previous to this meeting, several of the members of the group had Det
Capt Ruppel t en:i Haj I. H. lIerzrum at a meeting of tho C1vUia..'1 Saucer Investigators
in Los Angeles. At that time these people mentioned having Boma data on a cQ~
lation between, the de'tcction of soma type of rndia.tion and visual a ht s of'
--
0'0.
3. At the 23 Oot 52 meeting at Los Alamos more details on the above mentioned
subject'lare obtained. The first incident ocourred several years ago at the Nt.
Palamar Observatory in California. A series of gieger counters had been set up
to study cosmic ray activity. One person involved in the study hap~ened to be
outdoors when he aaw a V o! VI a of shiny objeots go over. He int::lediately want
inside the observatory end found that the counters had just "pinned 1/ (i.e. gone
up to e. ]Mxirxum reading). This naturally aroused the curiosity of the people on
the projeot and they agreed that i f it over hapooned again they would :look outside.
Sorno time later it did happen and they 1oor..ed, out and observed a dark object passing
over head.
4. The Navy, it vas a Navy como ray' contraot, supposedly investigated,
vrote a report, and concluded that this way was all due to a circuit failure.
ThG people operntine the equipnent also, checked and are claimed to have flatly
denied this saying that due to the circuitry it \oIould be impossible for sil:dlar
failures to occur in all the circuits at ,the same time.
5. Shortly after this occurance, one of tho persons imrolved in the in-
cidents at Palamar IlX>ved to Los A.l.anos. F.a continued to be interested ODd also
interea"tP.,d BOLle friends in setting up the same type of equipment on their own
time. They did t.'Us and they also detected unknown radiation. In tuo instanoes,
they were able to oorre1ate these \lith newspaper reports of the sighting of an
'UFO. In these instances the people could not get outside to observe and had to
depend on newspaper reports of UFOIS for correlations.
The oquipmont WlLS kept ill operation untU December 1950 with no more pick-ups.
At that tiI:le tho equipment VIas ~tled . (lotc: Tho above WaB cheoked in
IUNCLASSlr It:;U
i
ATE Blue Book tUe but there was no record of any incidents on these dates.
'!'his docs not mean very much, however, since it 1 kno\,m tl lot
oident files were destro a ut
7. A photograph of one of tho gieGer counter sot-ups, a diagram ot the
set-up, and copies of the traces of records are shown in the attachments to
this report. . .
8. It should be noted that all ot the }?E!oEle involved in this are 9\1.Slif'ie ll
soientists working at 19s Alamos. They have ohecked everY possible source of tt2
radiation the can think of 8..'1d can.~t acoount f< They ha.ve discussed this
maIlY peoplo including we wscientiato visl ting los AlDJilOS .and thore is
no ready explanation:l 6i thar tor the source of tho radi d 0
correIitIon bOtwoen visual. ~ s 8lld the rodia tion.
9. Report:3 ot these incidents ""'ere made to the Security Force at. ItJs Almnos
and suppOsedly vere to be forwarded to tho Air Force. A:J far as CUll be de1.Or.J.ined, V
they vere nc.'ver received at. ATlp.
COUCLUSIOHS
11. The acoounts of these incidents are still rather vague, toQ vague to
drav any de!inite conclusions 8.S to \lh~ther or not further action :-.hocl.d be taken,....,
to investigate all radiation monitoring stations in the U.S. to detemine if more
correlations are present.
RECmg,tENIJATIOllS
UNCLASSIFIED