Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
3, cwh563
Dr. Jay Wilson, Lesson Plan, Feb 27th, 2017
assessment piece, Physical Sciences 20; Foundations of Chemistry Reactions Lab that
assesses student learning during the performance task for my Physical Science 20
inquiry wherein students are provided with directional instruction without the answers to
evaluative questions and tasked with following the directions, to achieve the task and
develop the comprehension to answer the questions. In creating this lesson, I wanted to
establish the sense of a student controlled inquiry where instructor interaction is limited to
only a demonstrative and adaptive nature. In posing the inquiry as a hands-on lab activity
to engage students with a type of learning that is not commonly occurring. I wanted to
create a sense of authenticity in this lesson that allows students to both; interact with one
through a practical application of these skills that they are supposed to value in their
learning. Student safety during this inquiry is paramount and as such many of the
selections I made when planning the lesson; the use of flexible grouping, described
adaptations and accommodations, and the selected chemical reactions for completion/the
nature of the reaction completion (i.e. demonstration versus student lead), reflected this
this, Lesson Plan assignment. Outcome 1; I plan lessons and assessment based on
provincial curriculum (5). With the organizing of this lessons format around the formative
assessment creation of the reactions handout, I believe to achieved at the highest level in
assessment is centered on students application of their skills with the completion of the
reactions that they have learned about during the previous lessons in the Foundations of
Colton Hope, ECUR 325.3, cwh563
Dr. Jay Wilson, Lesson Plan, Feb 27th, 2017
Chemistry unit. Outcome 2; I make student learning goals for each lesson/task (4). My goal
in this lesson is determinate in the viewing of the summative evaluation rubric for student
completion of the reactions handout. My objective is to have all students complete the
inquiry at the highest level of evaluation and develop the deepest level of comprehension.
During the creation of the extensive lesson plan template, I could do to further iterate this
objective. Outcome 3; I know which instructional strategies to pick at given times (5). The
outcomes and indicators assessed during student completion of the formative reactions
handout are addressed in an authentic manner that force students to think abstractly and
practically about their prior knowledge. Inquiry learning in the STEM classroom
environment is detailed as one of the most vital in all the Saskatchewan science curricula.
Outcome 4; My lessons are ready to be used (4). All elements of my lesson including; the
extensive lesson plan with comprehension questions and detailed planning, as well as
formative, and summative assessment handouts are prepared for use. Additional materials
and chemical preparation would need to be procured for student completion of this inquiry
order to complete the lesson. Outcome 5; I create formative assessments (4). The
formative assessment piece that I have created for this lesson is very well detailed and
focuses on specific learnings from various points in the Foundations of Chemistry unit as
well as a multitude of applied student skills ranging from; written, to calculative, and
visual/oratory. The planning and completion of this lesson is student centered guided
inquiry and as such requires that semi-strict guidelines be in place to ensure student
safety and achievement of the outcomes. This does not allow for a high degree of
flexibility or deviation from the assigned assessment. Outcome 7; I set and use gals for
highlighted specific TECC competency goals that underlie what I desire to achieve in the
this lesson under the guidance of a extensive lesson plan, and the lesson itself does not
account for learner reflection on the achievement of these goals unless taken in the
context of reflective journaling to be completed by students during the unit. Outcome 14; I
understand how to plan for differentiation and adaptation (4/5). I like to think that in
having experienced two separate courses for adaptation and differentiation as it relates to
the exceptional learner, and having worked with several exceptional students unto this
point during my student teaching. That I came well prepared to the creation of this lesson
plan to differentiation for these students. My adaptations and differentiation section of the
lesson plan details planning for students with challenges ranging from; physical and
Outcome 15; I create engaging learning activities and tasks (4). The interactivity and
interdependence created during this grouped inquiry assignment is a positive force in the
to be reliant on their own understandings and those of their peers instead of just the
words of the instructor in the practical application of what they learned throughout the
unit. As it is a content heavy unit, not all lessons can be facilitated with the same means of
application as I first need to make sure students have a common perception in the areas
of; chemical reactivity, and lab safety. Outcome 16; my planned activities would improve
the discipline specific literacy skills of my students (4/5). Students will have the chance to
self-reflect after the completion of the lesson in accordance with the journaling
assessments detailed in the unit plan. However during the course of this lesson it is the
formative assessment that breaks down the facets of multi-literacy in student learning and
growth and development outlined by our rubric outcomes. Outcome 7; I set and use goals
for enhancing my professional development (4). In this regard, I feel that I succeeded in
learning. Not only was I able to create such an assessment but I centralize it in the
creation of an extensive lesson plan. Moving forward, centralizing this performance task in
the unit and ensuring that all required teachings are completed before hand is key.
expanded after the completion of the first assignment to reflect additional instructed
lessons and planning materials. However, because of the inability to currently teach this
lesson more than once, more drafting and revision of the overall lesson plan is yet to be
both in the large group (as exhibited by my joining Jay at the front for a little Q and A), and
during our seminar work. I have completed the assignments early such that they could be
good starting point as to how to reflect on these constructive critiques and this lesson plan
has only furthered that upon review of my first assignment submissions evaluation.
Moving forward I want to learn to include more cultural responsiveness into my scientific
pedagogy practices.