Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Jon Wilson
Trotter, A. (2008). Online options for credit recovery widen. Education Week, 27. Retrieved from
http://www.apexlearning.com/info/EdWeek_CreditRecovery.05.08.pdf
In Trotters look at online credit recovery programs, he provides a broad overview of the
topic and the impact it is currently having public education, particularly in the state of Florida
which has developed an online educational program known as the Florida Virtual School for
grades 6 through 12. In his work, Trotter examines the reasons students enroll and participate in
credit recovery programs as well as the volume of students who engage in education through
The first issue that is tackled is the reason why students find themselves in credit
recovery courses in high school. From interviews conducted with Cindy Lohan, the eSolutions
manager for the Florida Virtual School, the papers states that 17 percent of students enrolled in
the states online educational format are participating in order to achieve grade forgiveness. This
means that they are trying to gain credit for courses they previously failed in order to graduate
from high school within their expected four years. However, the 17 percent statistic may be low
as the research used self-reporting which is not always the most dependable method for
information gathering, particularly when addressing high school aged students. With enrollment
in the Florida Virtual School expected to hit the 100,000 student mark within a year of the
publication, the number of students participating in credit recovery programs is likely to continue
to grow. Trotter notes that there is no national data on the amount of students who participate in
credit recovery education formats, but if 17 percent of the 100,000 students enrolled in the
Florida Virtual School are enrolled in credit recovery programs, that total would see 17,000
students alone participating. Combine that total with students from traditional public school
While Trotters work and research provide a general overview of credit recovery
programs in Florida as well as the virtual learning opportunities those students have access to,
there are several instances in which clearer data could have been gathered and more detailed
conclusions could have been drawn. To gather information regarding the amount of students
is generally one of the more unreliable ways to gather information as questionnaires are at times
not returned, filled out properly, or provide accurate information. In addition, Trotter relied on
interviews with those who head up the programs. While this provides necessary information
regarding the format and overall data, interviews with actual program participants would help
provide a better understanding of the effectiveness in helping students understand the content and
Overall, the research conducted in this study provided a needed general overview of
credit recovery programs in the state of Florida with statistical data on the amount of students
enrolled in the public virtual school of the state. While lacking in some areas, it does provide
some background into the growth of these types of programs and where credit recovery courses
http://www.apexlearning.com/info/Reaching%20Graduation%20with%20Credit%20Recovery
%2010-1-09.pdf
The method in which credit recovery programs are delivered to students is the main focus
of Dessofs research from 2009. While the intent of the credit recovery classes are the same (to
help students earn credit for classes they have failed or missed due to expulsion or incarceration),
Dessof explores three different ways in which the courses can be delivered to students from
different locations around the United States. While exploring these concepts of delivery, Dessof
also looks at the impact credit recovery has on student dropout rates and what credit recovery
classes are doing to help encourage students to stay enrolled and earn their high school diploma.
Dessof notes that 1.2 million students drop out of high school every year in this country.
That is an average of 7000 students per day choosing to end their high school careers without
obtaining graduation. In addition, nearly one-third of high school students fail to earn their
diploma. With these startling numbers, an increase in credit recovery programs has begun to
make a push to keep students in school and complete their courses. Dessof examines the
differences in face-to-face programs, fully online programs, as well as blended programs for
In looking at face-to-face programs, Dessof examined the Jackson School District from
the state of Michigan. Through conducting interviews with district administration such as the
Superintendent, Dessof notes that for students with major disciplinary issues it has been found
that using face-to-face interaction for credit recovery programs provides more structure and help.
Through the use of an after-school program, the Jackson School District utilizes the Michigan
Virtual School in order for students to receive credit. They spend the first half of the time with a
THE IMPACT OF CREDIT RECOVERY PROGRAMS 5
certified teacher who delivers instructions before going to a lab to complete the course work.
With the fully online programs, Dessof explored the Florida Virtual School and its settings.
While the entire format is online, with students completing the courses at their own pace over the
course of an 18 week semester, teachers are available by phone and e-mail to help students in
areas they are struggling. Again relying heavily on interviews with administration, Dessof notes
that the highly interactive format of the courses, with students participating in mini-games for
assignments with little reading, make it functional and engaging for students, encouraging them
to be active participants. The final type of course format explored is blended, with the focus
being on the Omaha Public School System in Nebraska. With more heavy alliance on interviews,
Dessof notes that Omaha builds its own online credit recovery curriculum for students who work
in labs during designated times with the aid of teachers who facilitate and monitor the learning.
While Dessofs work provides a clear overview of the different types of credit recovery
programs, it does lack severely in a few areas. One major issue is he only uses one form of
interviews district administrators and not students who are actually participating. Also, by only
using interviews there is no hard statistical data on the rate at which credit recovery programs are
successful or to what extent they are helping to lower dropout rates, as the title of the article
suggests. While the article does provide necessary information as to the different formats credit
recovery programs can take as well as how those formats function, it severely lacks in data and
clarity of conclusions.
THE IMPACT OF CREDIT RECOVERY PROGRAMS 6
http://mollymckee.wiki.westga.edu/file/view/A%20Study%20of%20Teacher%20Perceptions
%20of%20Instructional%20Technology%20Integration%20in%20the
%20Classroom.pdf/346803186/A%20Study%20of%20Teacher%20Perceptions%20of
%20Instructional%20Technology%20Integration%20in%20the%20Classroom.pdf
The current trend in credit recovery programs in schools today is to use some form of an
online format. With that in mind, the integration of technology into modern day classroom
settings has been a major focus of research to see the extent to which teachers are embracing the
notion of engaging students through the use of technology. Gorder tackled the issue of teacher
there is a relation between certain teacher characteristics such as gender, age, experience,
content, etc. and the level to which teachers integrate technology into their lessons.
In order to conduct the study, Gorder focused on teachers in South Dakota who attended
the Advanced Technology for Teaching and Learning Academy and taught K-12. This came to
approximately 300 teachers who were distributed the survey, of which 174 returned it completed.
Upon receiving the data, Gorder used the Technology Integration Matrix in order to analyze that
information and draw conclusions to her study. The matrix consisted of two questions. The first
question determined how teachers integrate technology into their classroom as well as how they
utilize it. This information was gathered using a 35 question survey distributed to the teachers.
The second question looked at a comparison of teachers age, gender, teaching experience, grade
The findings Gorder concluded with were very interesting as the research concluded that
technology was used by teachers for professional purposes and the facilitations and delivery of
instruction, but it was not being integrated effectively into teaching and learning. When looking
at the information regarding characteristics, Gorder found that there was no statistically
significant difference in how technology was integrated in the classroom. Demographic and
personal characteristics had no real bearing according to the study. However, there was a
difference in the grade-level use of technology. Secondary teachers in grades 9-12 were found to
use and integrate technology more than teachers at the elementary and middle school levels.
The research done by Gorder was very detailed and provided a helpful look at the
integration of technology in the classroom and the characteristics that contribute to its use. This
is beneficial when looking at credit recovery programs as most of these programs are delivered
through online formats and require the integration of technology into the learning environment.
A weakness of the study was the sole use of surveys for the research gathering. Teachers can
overstate their use of technology in the classroom in an effort to make themselves looks better
and more progressive. It would have been beneficial for in class observations to be done in order
to see the extent of technology integration. In addition, a comparison of student success and
achievement between classroom which integrated technology and those that do not would have
been helpful to see what type of impact these tools are having in the classroom. Overall, the
research was certainly beneficial and provided a better insight into how teachers are beginning to
Gingerich, D. (2003). Does technology increase student learning? Research for Better Schools,
In her study, Gingerich searches to find what, if any, impact technology has in the
classroom on student achievement and learning. In order to draw her conclusions the author of
the article combs through previous studies, of which there have been many, to paint a picture of
how instructional technology impacts education. This is relevant to credit recovery programs as
many such programs rely heavily on the integration of technology into the classroom with online
The primary method used by Gingerich to search for conclusions in her research was by
collecting and organizing data from previous studies of the topic and compare them in order to
draw inferences. Through the analyzation of five different studies on the topics from various
researchers across the country, Gingerich concluded that her meta-analysis study of previous
research revealed that technology does produce a small but positive effect on students and their
achievement level in the classroom. This falls in line with what most school districts state as they
push new technological classroom efforts in order to further advance student achievement.
However, Gingerich was not able to provide a strong positive correlation which so many have
searched for. Credit recovery programs today, whether they be face-to-face, blended, or fully
online rely heavily on new modes of technology through online formats and virtual schools in
While Gingerichs study provides a general overview of previous research and attempts
to find a correlation between them, it does lack in the fact that the researcher does not provide
statistical data of her own or a more thorough methodology to which clearer inferences could be
drawn. It is useful research in the fact that she is able to conclude that one of the driving factors
THE IMPACT OF CREDIT RECOVERY PROGRAMS 9
to effective use and integration of technology in classrooms is the educators ability to learn and
use various modes of technology. This demonstrates a need for professional development for
staffs as newer and newer innovations make their debut and find their way into the classroom.
This is relevant to credit recovery as programs retool and redesign their online curriculum for
recovery programs to engage students in various differentiated forms. It is necessary for teachers
to go through training and professional development for credit recovery programs so they may
Roblyer, M.D. (2006). Virtually successful: defeating the dropout problem through online school
http://www.pdkmembers.org/members_online/publications/Archive/pdf/k0609ro1.pdf
In her article pertaining to online school programs, Roblyer explored the relationship
between online, digital learning formats and how they combat the issue of dropouts in the
American school system. Rather than exploring only online credit recovery programs, Robyler
explored virtual schools and their success rates among high school students pursuing their
diplomas through this alternative format. The goal of the study was to see a correlation between
Robyler first noted that there is a high failure or dropout rate associated with some virtual
schools and online programs around the country. It was reported in the study that some programs
see dropout and failure rates of up to 60%-70%, which would be considered a largely
astronomical percentage in any realm. This can be due to a number of factors, the largest of
which involves the type of students enrolled. Online programs whose enrollment consisted of
largely Advanced Placement (AP) students saw significantly lower dropout and failure rates than
that of programs that were made up mostly of credit recovery students. This does not necessarily
reflect well on the effectiveness of credit recovery programs in relation to traditional classroom
settings. However, credit recovery programs are geared towards students who are attempting
regain credits lost due to previous failures in traditional settings. Another possible explanation of
high failure rates comes from the time that the programs were surveyed. If surveys were
conducted during summer months, credit recovery programs are at maximum capacity with
students trying to graduate over the summer or trying to get back on track for the next year.
THE IMPACT OF CREDIT RECOVERY PROGRAMS
11
While some programs do experience high failure rates, there are a significant number of
successful virtual education programs that helps students either get ahead in their studies or catch
up in recovering lost credits. Roblyers study credited five elements to this success. First, she
found through interviews of five successful state virtual schools that these programs help prepare
students for success through the use of rigorous content and highly qualified teachers who act as
facilitators and guides. In addition, the programs prepared teachers for success by introducing
them to new forms of technology for the classroom and training them in its proper uses. Thirdly,
the use of interactive and flexible course design which permits students to work at their own pace
through the content and complete the activities in their own time. The material is engaging
enough that students must be active participants in the course rather than just bystanders or
spectators. Also, these programs encourage the support of teachers and students as both must be
active in the digital format, asking and answering questions as well as preparing material for
the digital learning format that is the backbone of online credit recovery programs useful as well
as ineffective at times. However, her methodology is not always clear. It is apparent that she
relied on some interviews from administrative personnel in various virtual schools from around
the country. However, much of her data came from previous studies instead of original research
and did not provide as much insight into the conclusion on the relationship between online
digital education formats and dropout rates. Overall, the study provided solid information as to
the reasons for success and failures of online education but did not provide the hard statistical
data to support any correlation between internet based learning and dropout rates.