Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Justin Logan
October 9, 2016
REHABILITATION ADHERENCE 2
Background
The purpose of an athletic trainer is to provide health care for an athletic population
which includes everyone from children to elderly patients and third string high school athletes to
starting professional players. Having this broad of a population to work with comes with a wide
set of issues, one that seems to be the most common is an adherence to rehabilitation programs
set by either physical therapists, athletic trainers, or a similar sports medicine specialist.
Athletic Training Responsibilities. The field of athletic training is an allied health care
profession that is recognized by the American Medical Association. Athletic Trainers have a set
of domains that every athletic trainer needs to be proficient at and knowledgeable in, in order to
sit for their board of certification exam to become a certified athletic trainer (Board of
Certification, 2010).
what the general population think. It includes the responsibilities of taping, hydration and
nutrition, and over the counter medicine dispersal. Education is also a major part of this domain
in order to ensure that the athlete knows why these are important (Board of Certification, 2010).
Clinical Evaluation and Diagnosis. This domain is where the athletic trainer forms a
diagnosis of either a musculoskeletal injury, an illness, or a skin pathology using standard and
appropriate techniques and equipment. The athletic trainer must then determine the appropriate
course of action going forward; whether referral to a physician is necessary or setting the athlete
Immediate and Emergency Care. First aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)
techniques are the staples for this in domain. In the case of an emergency in the middle of either
REHABILITATION ADHERENCE 3
practice or a competition, an athletic trainer must be proficient in not only these techniques, but
also bracing techniques, splinting techniques, developing and implementing an emergency action
Treatment and Rehabilitation. The athletic trainer must be highly knowledgeable in the
response to injury, factors that predispose an athlete to injury, and how to safely and efficiently
rehabilitate an injury with therapeutic exercises and modalities (i.e. electrical stimulation).
domain is the least known and thought of domain but one of the most important. This is where
the documentation and legalities are defined. This is where it is explained how an athletic trainer
Outline
Literature Review
Athlete's Perspective
Factors that Lead to Injury. Weinberg and Gould (2011) suggest that athletes push
themselves to the point of injury and often times will ignore rehabilitation because of pressure of
the coaches and other athletes. The injured athlete will deny injury because they feel pressure to
be a winner and it gets misconstrued that an injury will prevent them from being a winner.
Wilkerson and Colston (2015) add that collegiate football players had a higher incident of
sprains and strains for simply playing longer than others. Verhagen, van Stralen, and van
Mechelen (2010) add say that the athlete's personality and behavior are some of the strongest
predictors for injury. If the athlete is more braggadocios, then they will be more likely to over
perform. Behavior also alludes to nutrition habits and lifestyle choices. Allowing the body to
gain the necessary nutrients and vitamins naturally will allow for the body to maintain proper
Mensch and Miller (2008) state that the athlete will push themselves farther than their
body is physically able to or stress the muscles and bones more than they can handle for a few
reasons. One of which is that they are a borderline player in either their own eyes or the coaches
eyes. This athlete will try to prove to himself, the coach, and the other athletes that they are better
than previously thought and over exert themselves. Another theory presented by Mensch and
Miller (2015) is that an athlete may feel too confident in their ability and choose to go easy
through the next play and then get hurt because everyone else was going all out. Cramer Roh and
Perna (2000) seem to agree with this and also add on that athletes are more prone to injury if
REHABILITATION ADHERENCE 5
they are distracted with life stressors. Regardless of gender or sport, athletes with a higher level
interviewed professional athletes to find out what some of the psychosocial responses to injuries
are and what they expect of the sports medicine professionals they work with. Arvinen-Barrow et
al (2014) states that the most common themes following an injury is self-doubt and frustration.
That being said, the athletes understand and accept that injuries come with the territory, but this
still does not help with the emotional response to an injury. Rapport is also a big factor according
to the athletes. Arvinen-Barrow et al also suggest that the more rapport a sports medicine
professional has with an athlete, the more compliant the athlete will be because of the trust and
relationship.
interviews with athletes that were injured for at least six weeks and fully recovered within the
average time recommended per specific injury. They found some commonalities in each athlete
Phase 1. The first phase is the initial reaction to the injury itself, which is overly negative
up until the athlete's injury is formally diagnosed. The injured athlete tends to seek out something
Phase 2. The second phase is their reaction to the rehabilitation. The main feelings
initially in athletes about starting to enter the rehabilitation phase was frustration and caution.
The subjects had multiple worries about the process starting with questioning the process itself;
wondering if it was doing anything, if there was any value in completing the rehabilitation
REHABILITATION ADHERENCE 6
process, and the perceived difficulty of the exercises. Once again a common, strong theme is
social support from teammates, coaches, friends, and family (Clement et al, 2015).
Phase 3. The third and final phase is the reaction to their return to sport. The athletes
interviewed all had some sense of positive and negative reactions to being allowed to fully return
to their sport of choice after being fully rehabilitated. There was a nervousness in each about re-
injury and still doubt that the rehabilitation process was not fully successful. These feelings
evolved to fear and led to the athletes being overly cautious during the first few practices and not
Kbler-Ross Model. The Kbler-Ross model is the description of the five stages a
person goes through with grief, specifically with dying or an unexpected death. The stages go in
the following order; denial, anger, bargaining, depression, acceptance. Some athletes will follow
these steps following what they would perceive to be a devastating or catastrophic injury
method questionnaire to ask athletic trainers about the psychological responses athletes have
towards injury, the ways athletes cope, how athletic trainers help with psychosocial strategies,
which psychosocial strategies these athletic trainers feel are more important and effective than
others, and how/when athletic trainers refer athletes to counselors and sport psychologists. What
this study showed is that the athletic trainers in this study mostly agreed with what Clement et al
(2015) said. There were very similar results in the athletic trainers' perceptions of what the
athlete was going though. Clement et al (2013) states that the top three responses for what the
REHABILITATION ADHERENCE 7
psychological responses of an athlete, from the perspective of an athletic trainer, are stress/
Although some athletes will have the responses already mentioned by Clement et al
(2013), Clement et al (2015), and Weinberg and Gould (2011), Prentice & Arnheim (2009)
suggest that an injured athlete has three different responses. The first way is that the athlete may
look at it as a catastrophic moment and ruin them. The second way is that the athlete can look at
it as a way to be strong and courageous and prove to themselves, their teammates, and the
coaches that they can come back from it as good if not better than pre-injury. The third reaction
is to embrace the injury as an excuse and reason for losing, performing poorly, or to reduce
Over-Adherence. Granquist, Podlog, Engel, and Newland (2014) found in a study that
97.1% of athletic trainers have reported that there is a problem with over-adherence. A
questionnaire was developed by Podlog, Gao, Kenow, Kleinert, Granquist, Newton, and Hannon
(2013) to attempt to determine how much over-adherence there is and what the reasons are. One
of these reasons is that the injured athlete that identifies themselves more as an athlete will try to
get back to being on the field faster. The athlete will ignore the athletic trainer and return to play
much sooner than recommended. The same type of athlete will also increase the amount of
rehabilitation done on their own because they think that if a little is good, then a lot must be
better. This will actually cause the injury to take longer to heal. Podlog et al (2013) suggests that
the main point of over-adherence is the high level of athlete-identity. If an athlete gets injured,
they will lose their sense of self and develop a sense of loss. In order to find that sense of self and
relocate the identity the athlete feels has been lost. This could lead to the athlete shortening
REHABILITATION ADHERENCE 8
rehabilitation without being cleared or doing too much rehabilitation (Mensch & Miller, 2008)
issue and needs to be improved. In a study by Granquist et al (2014), 98.3% of almost 500
athletic trainers reported that they had a problem with rehabilitation adherence.
There are many different ways that athletic trainers have tried to develop in order to
Pafis, and Godolias (2007) there are a few specific ways that can improve rehabilitation
adherence. These ways to improve patient compliance are education, progress recording, goal
Education. The first way is by educating the patient. In most cases, an educated patient is
a compliant patient because if they understand the methodology of the process, then they will be
more likely to adhere to the exercises (Prentice & Arnheim, 2009). Education does not only
mean to education about the process, but also about the different types of pain rehab can cause. If
the patient has not received many injuries, they may not understand the difference between what
sports medicine professionals call good pain and bad pain and this may need to be explained
to them. Another point of education should be about potential setbacks and delays in the
rehabilitation process. Making sure to talk about these possibilities will help alleviate any extra
stress and frustration an athlete may have with their attempt to get back into the game (Beneka et
al, 2007).
Goal Setting. Setting goals should be one of the first things that an athletic trainer and
their patient does after the initial diagnosis. Coming up with a plan of attack and following
REHABILITATION ADHERENCE 9
through with that plan will be much easier if the athlete has a say in what they want to
accomplish and by when (Coppack, Kristensen, & Karageorghis, 2012). Although Coppack et al
(2012) found that there was only a slight improvement in adherence rates when using goal
setting techniques, Beneka et al (2007) argues that setting goals give the athletes a marker to aim
for.
Progress Recording. Going hand in hand with goal setting, Beneka et al (2007) says that
progress records help motivate patients and athletes when they hit the goals set by both the
clinician and the patient. At the same time, if they are shy of a goal by a few degrees of range of
motion the shortcoming can help them push through to get to their goal. It has been found by the
interviews performed by Clement et al (2015) that some of the athletes, upon finding out they are
shy of their goals, will become discouraged about doing the rehabilitation so these researches
recommend that reasonable goal setting needs to be on the forefront of the patients minds when
Relaxation. Often times during and after an injury an athlete will become hesitant to let
the sports medicine professional touch the injury or attempt to use diagnostic tests and
equipment. The athlete will subconsciously perform what health care providers call muscle
guarding (Prentice & Arnheim, 2009). This does not only occur when being tested and
diagnosed, but also when the athletic trainer or physical therapist is doing a manual rehabilitation
technique, such as stretching or a sports massage (Beneka et al, 2007). A technique that is highly
effective is called progressive relaxation and is useful in not only stress and anxiety caused by
sports and rehabilitation, but in any facet of life. Progressive relaxation allows the patient to take
control of their breathing and muscles and helps to relieve built up tension through breathing
exercises and physical contraction of the muscles (Mensch & Miller, 2008)
REHABILITATION ADHERENCE 10
Imagery. The final technique recommended by Beneka et al (2007) is using imagery.
Mensch and Miller (2008) states that this technique can be used in a few ways. The first way is
to allow the patient to visualize them doing their sport or job the proper way before being able to
do it without restrictions, to take mental reps. The second way is to allow the athlete to imagine
what the body is doing on a cellular level as it can allow the athlete to focus on the good of what
the treatment is doing and take the focus away from the pain or other negative stressors.
Cressman & Dawson (2011) says that healing imagery can be an effective tool when used with
other internal techniques such as relaxation and positive self-talk. This study found in interviews
with athletes that the athletes did not necessarily reduce time to fully recover, but the athletes that
used healing imagery did report that there were many positive results from using this technique.
There was a much higher level of confidence, there was more motivation, increased awareness of
the injury, the athlete was more relaxed, a higher rate of rehabilitation adherence, there was
more focus on the goals, and a lower amount of frustration with the rehabilitation process.
REHABILITATION ADHERENCE 11
References
Arvinen-Barrow, M., Massey, W. V., & Hemmings, B. (2014). Role of sport medicine
doi:10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.44
techniques for specic components of the rehabilitation plan: a review of the literature.
Board of Certification. (2010). The 2009 Athletic trainer role delineation study. Omaha, NE:
Stephen B. Johnson
Clement, D., Arvinen-Barrow, M., & Fetty, T. (2015). Psychosocial responses during different
Clement, D., Granquist, M. D., & Arvinen-Barrow, M. M. (2013, July). Psychosocial aspects of
athletic injuries as perceived by athletic trainers. Journal of Athletic Training, 48(4), 512-
521. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-48.3.21
Coppack, R. J., Kristensen, J., & Karageorghis, C. I. (2012, November 22). Use of a goal setting
doi:10.1177/0269215512436613
injury rehabilitation. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 6(1).
doi:10.2202/1932-0191.1060
Granquist, M. D., Podlog, L., Engel, J. R., & Newland, A. (2014, May). Certified athletic
Mensch, J. M., & Miller, G. M. (2008). The athletic trainer's guide to psychosocial intervention
Podlog, L., Gao, Z., Kenow, L., Kleinert, J., Granquist, M., Newton, M., & Hannon, J. (2013).
Injury rehabilitation over adherence: Preliminary scale validation and relationships with
athletic identity and self-presentation concerns. Journal of Athletic Training, 48(3), 372-
381. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-48.2.20
Verhagen, E. A., van Stralen, M. M., & van Mechelen, W. (2010). Behaviour, the key factor for
000000000-00000
Weinberg, R. S., & Gould, D. (2011). Foundations of sport and exercise psychology. Leeds:
Human Kinetics.
Wilkerson, G. B., & Colston, M. A. (2015). A refined prediction model for core and lower
extremity sprains and strains among collegiate football players. Journal of Athletic