Tunnelling on New Railway Line

Divaca -Koper, 2nd Track

Dipl.-Ing. Dr.sc. Davorin KOLI

Geodata Austria GmbH, Man.director

UC 2016 Prague
EETC 2016 Prague
May 23, 2016

0
 Contents
Contents : Accents

1. Project location Part of EU corridors

2. Project data Main structures
3. Alternatives TBM option
4. Ventilation and safety For cargo and passenger traffic
concept
5. Muck deposits Transport costs
6. Project division Division in lots
7. Cost breakdown Main costs as PPP
8. Project development Organization and concepts
9. Conclusion Time schedule + movie 130

1
 1. Project location

Baltic Adriatic and Mediterranean corridors

2
 1. Project location

Paneuropean and Austrian corridors

3
 1. Project location

Slovenian and
Austrian parts of
corridors

4
 1. Project location

Geography and topography

Traffic corridors through Alps

5
 1. Project location

Slovenian railway network

6
2. Project data
Layout

7
2. Project data
Longitudinal section

8
 2. Project data

Major project characteristics

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE NEW TRACK :

Length: 27.1 km
In Tunnel 20.5 km (75%)
Length with service tunnels : 43.6 km
Length of tunnels with serv.tun. 37.0 km (85 %)

Max. longitudinal gradient: 17

Max. speed: 160 km/h

Clearance: GC
Axle load: 255 KN or 80 KN/m,(categ. D4)
Tracks: 60 E1, mostly slab track
Electrification : direct current 3kV
Telecommunication system: ERTMS/ETCS level 2

9
 2. Project data

Major project structures

Tunnel T1: 6,714 m (with parallel service tunnel)

Glinica I Bridge: 74 m
Glinica Gallery: 41 m
Glinica II Bridge: 104 m
Tunnel T2: 6,017m (with parallel service tunnel)
Tunnel T3: 330 m
Tunnel T4: 1,954 m
Tunnel T5: 128 m
Tunnel T6: 358 m
Tunnel T7: 1,163 m
Viaduct V1 Gabrovica: 452 m
Viaduct V2 Vinjan: 647 m
Tunnel T8: 3,808 m (with parallel service tunnel)

10
 2. Project data
Tunnel cross sections

11
2. Project data

Bridges : viaduct1

12
2. Project data

Bridges : viaduct2

13
 3. Alternatives

TBM option

TBM tunnel design

should be prepared
before tender offering
beside NATM an TBM
option also to
contractors

TBM design for :

T1 6.714 m
T2 6.017 m
T8 3.808 m , maybe

as longest tunnels

14
 3. Alternatives
HPP Plave IIDoblar II

Project from 1998-2002 (4 years) :

Water suply tun. HPP Plave II/ Doblar II
Tunnels 6.0 + 4.0 km
LImestone, breccia, karst
TBM 7.0 m dia, Robbins double shield
Construction price : 54.0 m
(together with caverns and other parts)
Lining : monoshell, hexagonal,
4 segments

Construction JV :
Primorje 36.7%
SCT 25,8%
SELI 14,3 %
JaEGER 14,3%
MONTI 7%

15
 4. Ventilation and safety concept

Main design project development level in 03.2016

Ventilation and safety concept for tunnels and entire track :

Independent check of ventilation, safety concept and

electro-mechanical equipment

Safety principles answers to requirements of the project,

Optimization potential of final solutions and final total project and
construction costs

Safety concept approved.

Risk distribution :

Recently risks of geologiy and karst phenomena including water.

16
 4. Ventilation and safety concept

Main design project development level in 03.2016

Tunnel length System Evacuation routes

Nr.

T1 6700 m 1 single tube , single track Parallel service tunnel

T2 5994 m 1 single tube , single track Parallel service tunnel
T3 330 m 1 single tube , single track Over tunnel portal
T4 1947 m 1 single tube , single track Evacuation side tunnels with
emergency exists

T5 115 m 1 single tube , single track Over tunnel portal

T6 335 m 1 single tube , single track Over tunnel portal
T7 1150 m 1 single tube , single track Evacuation side tunnels with
emergency exists

T8 3760 m 1 single tube , single track Parallel service tunnel

17
 4. Ventilation and safety concept

Main design project development level in 03.2016

Ventilation and safety concept for tunnels T1 and T2

of the new rail line Divaca-Koper, 2nd track

18
 5. Muck deposits

Main design project development level in 03.2016

Muck deposits :
Volumes of muck calculated on thebasis of project documentation.

Excavted material distribution based on further usability.

Checking required of :

Location and capacity of muck storage areas and their capacities

Muck storage areas to be designed with impact of seismic, deawatering
measures to come to real volume capacity
Location check
Definition of transport routes and distances

Final check of excavted material usability for other purposes to be

performed.

19
 5. Muck deposits
Main design project development level in 03.2016

Muck deposits :

Bekovec
Ankaranski Bonifiki,

Open usability of :locations :

Salonit Anhovo yard
ernue yard

20
 5. Muck deposits
Main design project development level in 03.2016
In the sense of distribution and transport of excavated material to be stored
questionable is the volume of material estimated as :
Tunnels cross Tunnel lenght Excavated Factor of Loosed material
seciton (m2) (m) material (m3) looseness (m3)

78 m2 40.000 3.141.590 1.50 4.712.385

Foreseen locations for the storage :

Material type Storage location Excavated material Faktor of looseness Loosed material (m3)
(m3)
Flysch Salonit Anhovo (2 shours 2.100.000 1.5 2.730.000
by train from Divaca)
Limestone rnotie yard (for mDivaca 1.310.000 1.5 1.972.000
1 hour by lorry)
Total 3.410.000 1.5 4.672.000

21
 6. Project division

Main design project development level in 03.2016

Osnovna razdioba na 2 dijela :

Divaa-rni Kal,cca.15 km Lot I

(2 NATM ili TBM tuneli )

rni kal Koper,cca.13 km

Lot II
6 kraih tunela
2 viadukta

22
 7. Cost Breakdown

Construction costs and financing

Project part Netto construction costs Percentage of the Percentage of the total
structural part (%) costs (%)
()

Tunnels NATM 562.000.000,00 . 51.21

EM equipment tunnels 170.000.000,00 30% of tunnel costs 15.37

Bridges 35.000.000,00 3.17

Roads 20.000.000,00 1.83

Other structers o nthe track 13.000.000,00 1.21

Donji ustroj, kolosijek, 100.000.000,00 9.14

signalizacija

Project managemet 10.000.000,00 0.91

Financing 190.000.000,00 20% of work costs 17.10

TOTAL Netto 1.100.000.000,00 100

Brutto (1.400.000.000,00)

23
 8. Project development

Main design project development level in 03.2016

Concession type :

DBFOMT

24
 8. Project development

Example of AZM project, Croatia

Concession type :

DBFOM

25
 8. Project development
Time for Concession Length (km) Investment Public Contract type
design and period (years) volume funds
no Project construction
1 CTRL Channel 1996- 90 109 GBP 5.8 mlrd. GBP 2.01 DBFM
tunnel rail link, UK 2003/2007 mlrd.

2 Oeresund road-rail 1991-2000 25-30 38 2.0 mlrd 100 % state DBFM

link, Danemark- guarantee
Sweden
3 HSL Zuid Amster.- 2000-2007 25 100 6.0 mlrd 110 mil/ DBFM
Belgium year
4 Alice Springs- 2000-2004 50 1420 km AUS$ 1.2 AUS$ 559 DBOFM
Darwin (- mlrd. mil.
Adelaide) rail, (2790 total) or BOOT ?
Australia
5 Taipei-Kaoihsung, 2000-2007 35 3 US$ 18 mlrd. US$ 11.75 DBOFM
Taiwan,HS rail mlrd. (from
2010.)

55
6 Perpignan- Figueras, 2005-2009 50 45 1.1 mlrd 540 mil+ DBFM
HS rail France/Spain 62 mil.

7 Diabolo rail link, 2007-2012 35 3 540 mil 250 mil DBF

Bruxelles, Belgium for tracks
and
signalizat.
8 Liefkenshoek rail 2008-2013 38 16 840 mil 50 mil/ DBFM
link, Belgium year
26
 8. Project development
9 Tours- Bordoeaux, 2010-2016 50 340 7.8 mlrd 3.0 mlrd DBFM
Fra, HS rail

10 GSM-R NETWORK; 2009-2015 15 14000 1.0 mlrd 160 mil DBOFM

Franc:

11 Lisbon-Madrid, HS 2009-2013 40 165 7.8 mlrd. crisis DBFM

rail 2011 stop Portugal

12 Nimes-Montpellier, 2011-2017 25 80 2.06 mlrd 586 mil DBFM

Fra, HS rail

13 Brittany _Pays de la 2011-2016 20 182 3.4 mlrd 990 mil DBFM

Loire, Fra, HS rail

14 Rio de Janeiro- 2011-2017, 40 518 USD$ 18.7 No local DBOF

S.Paulo, Brazil, HS rail 2013 delay mlrd. contractors

15 Kokola/Ylivieska, 2011-2014, 20-30 76 (drugi 660 mil. To high DBFM

Finska rail link 2011 stop kolosijek) construction
bids
16 Divaa - Koper 2016-2021 30 ? 27 1.4 mlrd? 0? DBFOMT ?
(brutto)

27
 9. Conclusion

Time schedule :
07.-09.2016
10.-12.2016 Adoption of project documentation
03.2017 Start of tender phase

http://www.drugitir.si/en

28