Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 14

Maintenance Management

Introduction to the theory of the maintenance


December 2008
Author: Jorge Rodríguez Araújo
Version 1.0
© 2008 Jorge Rodriguez
CC Permission is granted to copy, distribute and / or modify this document under
the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Spa
in
Jorge Rodríguez Araújo grrodri@gmail.com
Index
1. Rationale and objectives ............................................... ....
......... 1 2. Maintenance Management ..........................................
..... ........ 2
2.1 Introduction ................................................ ..............
.................... 2 2.2 Types of maintenance ........... ....................
.............................. .... 2
2.2.1 Corrective maintenance ............................................. 2.2.2
Preventive maintenance .................. .......................... 2 2.2.3 Pr
edictive Maintenance .................................... 3 ........ ...........
....................................... 3 .....
2.3 Losses associated with maintenance .........................................
.... .. 3
2.3.1 Troubleshooting .............................................. ...........
............................... 4 2.3.2 Preparation and adjustment. ............
...................................... Stops minor ................... .........
................ 4 2.3.3 ................................................. 5 2.3
.4 Reduced Speed ............................................. .................
.......... 5 ................ 2.3.5 Quality defects ............................
...................... ..... 5 2.3.6 Implementation ............................
.......... ................................... 5
2.4 shows the maintenance .............................................. .......
... 5
2.4.1 Availability .............................................. ............ .
................................ 6 2.4.2 Reliability ...........................
....................... ...................... ....................... 6 2.4.3 M
aintainability .................................................. ...... 7 2.4.4
Total efficiency of the equipment ................................... .........
............. 7
3. Total Productive Maintenance ...............................................
.. 8
3.1 The 5 esses .............................................. Self Maintenance
...................................... 8 3.2 ........ ..........................
........................ ..... 9 3.3 Preventive Maintenance Planning ...........
............................ 9 3.4 Reliability Centered Maintenance ............
......................... 10
i
3.5 Improving the effectiveness of the equipment ...............................
... 11 3.6 Quality Assurance .. ................................................
.. ...... 11 7.3 Training and motivation of employees ..........................
.......... ... 12
4. Associated with maintenance tools ................................. 13
4.1 PDCA Cycle ............................................... .................
.................. 13 4.2 .......... Pareto Principle ..........................
........................ ........... 13 4.3 Improvement teams ..................
................ SMED Method ..................................... 14 4.4 ......
... .................................................. ................... 14 ..
........................ 5.4 Scatterplot ......................................
16 ....... 4.6 Study methods ..................................................
Analysis ............. 16 7.4 Failure Mode and Effects .........................
.... 17 ...................... 8.4 ...................... Statistical Process Co
ntrol 9.4 ................................ 18 ............ simple queuing model
.................................................. ..... 20
5. Conclusions ................................................. ...............
......... 22
ii
Rationale and objectives
1. Rationale and objectives
Since maintenance is a major activity in which an engineer is involved, it is es
sential knowledge and understanding of what it entails. Therefore, this document
will be an overview of the current state of the theory of maintenance and its i
mportance in industrial production as well as an introduction to key concepts an
d tools associated with it.
1
Maintenance Management
2. Maintenance Management
2.1 Introduction
Maintenance emerged as a necessary cost to prevent or reduce failures and their
impact when they occur, since a production shutdown due to failure of the system
represents an opportunity cost that must be eliminated. Thus, the maintenance c
onsists of all those actions that minimize failures and restore the functioning
of the system when a fault state.€Like any activity that adds no value, should b
e a cost for removal. But since any real system will fail at a particular time,
is a business imperative and key to current production. The latter is because th
e production capacity is directly dependent on the availability of the machines,
and if it decreases damage or malfunction will cause the failure of delivery no
t having been covered by production. Thus, maintenance management arises as all
design activities, planning and control to minimize all costs associated with eq
uipment malfunction. These activities include, in addition to the functions typi
cally associated with maintenance, studies of the possibility of renewal of equi
pment, make modifications to help fiabilizadas and flexible operation, training
of production personnel to perform functions "small maintenance" ...
2.2 Types of maintenance
Within the maintenance are three basic types.
2.2.1 Corrective maintenance
It is called corrective maintenance any activity that is done to restore a compu
ter or installation when it entered a state of failure. Proper maintenance is lo
w impact machines in
2
Maintenance Management
system since, in this way, resources are used only when the problem occurs.
2.2.2 Preventive maintenance
Preventive maintenance is intended to prevent faults by use of interventions tha
t decrease the probability of failure, and thus increase the reliability of the
installation. Interventions can be performed regularly and systematically, and i
n the condition of the component or conditional, the latter being the recommende
d, to avoid unnecessary replacements, and therefore waste. As preventive mainten
ance does not prevent development of failures, implementation and often responds
to a balancing of costs, which apply this system when the expenses incurred in
each intervention are lower than avoiding them.
2.2.3 Predictive Maintenance
Predictive maintenance used to monitor the functioning of machines to determine
when and where failure can occur and thus anticipate and prevent their occurrenc
e. Although eliminating unnecessary procedures, the large number of resources re
quired in carrying out monitoring of different parameters, and therefore, its hi
gh cost, only ideal in facilities with high maintenance costs that are critical
in the production system.
2.3 Losses associated with maintenance
The maintenance seeks to eliminate or reduce the costs associated with the six b
ig losses related to the operation of equipment. These losses are due to:
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Preparation and adjustment Damage Reduced speed Stops minor quality defects
3
Maintenance Management
6.
Implementation
2.3.1 Failures
A breakdown or failure is an anomaly in the system, so that does not have to blo
ck the functioning of the system but, just alter it so that no longer work as ex
pected. To fix a failure is to identify the cause or origin, and for that use ca
use-effect diagrams, where by means of a graphical representation in the form of
herringbone performing a systematic and comprehensive analysis of failures and
their causes. You can usually talk about three sources of error according to his
need of intervention:

The ruling is one child due to a design error and therefore
requires modification of the machine or process. To avoid such failures FMEA is
used, which allows the systematic analysis of all possible causes of failure dur
ing the design stage.

The failure due to wear of the actual operation of
team addressed through preventive or predictive maintenance, which can be reduce
d to its virtual elimination.

The accidental breakages are due to random factors and therefore
inevitable, which to them can only improve the response of the maintenance team.
At this point we usually look at the sizing of the equipment through the develo
pment of computer simulations and the use of queuing theory.
2.3.2 Preparation and adjustment
With the introduction of flexible manufacturing processes, in which a machine ca
n produce different products are the losses associated with the time required to
change and adjust the span of the machine and start producing a new product. In
response to this charge was developed in Japan SMED method,€that minimizes chan
geover time by giving the process more flexible.
4
Maintenance Management
2.3.3 Stops minor
Are all those temporary stoppages or related to unplanned breakdowns. For exampl
e, a stop to unclog a press.
2.3.4 Reduced Speed
Yield losses in the machines are one of the causes of waste that was often ignor
ed until the establishment of the OEE measure. This index allows you to monitor
the effectiveness of the improvements made on the equipment.
2.3.5 Quality defects
There are faults that cause the operation of the machine deviates from the expec
ted and produce the production of invalid. Such failures are often due to degrad
ation of components by the existence of physical exhaustion caused by the operat
ion of the machine. The causes of such problems are difficult to isolate and ide
ntify and require a high technical effort both for the solution as simply for th
eir control. At this point, in response to the need for monitoring the proper fu
nctioning of the process shows the statistical process control (SPC), that detec
ts a deviation of the production process in response to the establishment of a s
eries of statistical parameters of control.
2.3.6 Implementation
When the continuous production processes are in place there is a stabilization p
eriod during which the process is not valid. As is characteristic of the process
how to reduce it is through self-improvement or modification.
2.4 shows the maintenance
When undertaking any activity is necessary to define a set of indicators to quan
tify the eficacia1 and eficiencia2 of such activities. In this way you can objec
tively assess whether the objectives are achieved is a capacity to achieve the o
bjectives. 2 Using the fewest possible resources. 5
Maintenance Management
intended to carry out such activity.
2.4.1 Availability
The availability is the main parameter associated with the maintenance, which li
mits production capacity. Is defined as the probability that a machine or system
is ready for production in a period of time, or that do not stand for trouble a
nd settings.
D =
To T or T p
[Availability]
≡ T or total operation time T p ≡ total stopping time
The periods of time never stops include planned, either by labor agreements for
planned maintenance or downtime, since these are not due to machine failure. Whi
le the former is the natural definition of availability, is usually defined in a
more practical through the mean time between failure and repair, as are the dat
a that will be available for each system. Thus, we have:
D =
MTBF MTBF TMDR
[Availability]
MTBF mean time between failures ≡ ≡ TMDR MTTR
2.4.2 Reliability
Reliability is the probability that a given equipment or facility to develop its
role under specific conditions and for a time. Therefore, the mean time between
failure (MTBF) characterizes the reliability of the machine.
6
Maintenance Management
2.4.3 Maintainability
Maintainability is the probability that a fault state computer is restored to a
specified condition within a given time period, and using resources determined.
Therefore, the average repair times (TMDR) characterizes the maintainability of
the equipment.
2.4.4 Total efficiency of equipment
The OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness) is an indicator that is used to define
the overall efficiency of the equipment, under a single rate include the three
key parameters related to the operation of production equipment.
OEE = Availability ⋅ ⋅ Quality Performance
Performance The performance includes the loss of efficiency of a particular team
as a decrease in production capacity compared to the nominal or expected.
Yield =
Quality
Total number of units operating time ⋅ Rated
The quality is the indicator of manufacturing losses defective products either d
irectly by manufacturing units should be dismissed as to those that need to be r
eprocessed.
Quality =
No. of valid units Total number of units manufactured
7
Total Productive Maintenance
3. Total Productive Maintenance
Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) is a maintenance management system associated
with the philosophy just in time (JIT), which seeks the continuous improvement
of processes by increasing the total availability of equipment to involve the en
tire organization.€Seeks to eliminate waste and ensure quality through the elimi
nation of breakdowns and accidents, increasing the reliability of the machines t
o properly plan the preventive maintenance. For this used to develop a series of
activities and basic methodologies that enable increased productivity.
• • • • • • •
Implementation of the 5 S's Establishment of autonomous maintenance Preventive M
aintenance Planning Application of reliability-centered maintenance Improving th
e effectiveness of quality assurance teams training and employee motivation
3.1 The 5 esses
The methodology of housekeeping who advocate the five S's was introduced by the
Japanese management model as a means to eliminate waste resulting from the exist
ence of disorder and dirt. It is in five stages: 1. Seiri (classified). Is the e
limination of everything unnecessary. This will identify the elements needed in
the workplace and eliminating all those unnecessary. 2. Seiton (organizing). Is
to sort and identify properly the elements present in the workplace so that they
are ready when needed. In other words, apply a place for everything and everyth
ing in August
Total Productive Maintenance
place. 3. Seiso (clean). Is to maintain clean and orderly workplace, machines an
d people. 4. Seiketsu (standardize). It consists in maintaining and improving st
andards of organization and cleanliness. In other words, develop continuously th
e three previous esses. 5. Shitsuke (self). Is to enable all employees to mainta
in the implementation of the above actions. That is, it tries to instill self-di
scipline, so as to maintain order and cleanliness through the implementation of
correct procedures. The five S's have become a whole philosophy to instill in al
l members of the organization, given its undisputed benefits for the work perfor
mance of individuals.
3.2 Self-Maintenance
With the TPM introduces the concept of autonomous maintenance, which transferred
certain preventive maintenance production personnel. This will reduce the workl
oad of the maintenance department, and involves the operator of the machine, mak
ing it responsible for the state of it. By involving the production operator in
the maintenance of their machines reduces the number of failures as a direct res
ult of better use of them. As an important part of autonomous maintenance includ
es
checking the status of the machines, the chips are made of self-mode checklist3
that grouping actions with the same frequency and systematized simplifies the ta
sk of manufacturing operators to avoid errors and omissions.
3.3 Planning of preventive maintenance
Preventive maintenance aims to increase the availability and reliability 3 Check
list. 9
Total Productive Maintenance
equipment through a series of planned actions. It is that if the failure rate in
creases with age 4 the team, means that a component requires the implementation
of preventive actions, and should establish a maintenance plan, either systemati
c or conditional. If this remained constant, then only require self-maintenance
routines. But if the behavior is random failure rate, it will be impossible to i
mplement preventive maintenance. The problem in dealing with preventive maintena
nce lies in the determination of the period of review or change, and fault condi
tions. For this analysis draws on historical operating data of the machines, and
the modeling of failure through statistical distributions that enable the reali
zation of objective estimates, which in turn can decide what actions or measures
are most appropriate and the frequency from the economic point of view. Since m
aintenance decisions are made based on historical data, we understand the import
ance of using information systems to log the operation of the machines, their de
cisions and actions and solutions taken. This phase will develop maintenance ran
ges, which are descriptions and step by step in chronological order of preventiv
e actions, which also specify tools, benchmarks, safety notices, etc.
3.4 Reliability Centered Maintenance
The reliability-centered maintenance (RCM) is used as a means to optimize the ma
intenance, focusing the action on the operation of the system and not on the mac
hines.€This article evaluates the importance and confiabilidad5 machines that ma
ke up the system, and acts on these by relevance, getting significant improvemen
ts without wasting resources, thereby reducing cost and increasing the benefit o
f maintenance. Thus, the logic of RCM methodology can be summarized in six steps
:
1.
Identify key plant systems and define their
4 Reverse the mean time between failures. 5 The probability that a given compute
r to play their role during a given period. 10
Total Productive Maintenance
functions.
2.
Identify failure modes that can produce any failure
functional.
3.
Prioritize the functional requirements of equipment through
criticality analysis.
4. 5. 6.
Determine the criticality of the effects of functional failures. Establish maint
enance strategy. Select preventive activities or other actions that
preserve system function. The RCM represents a systemic approach to design maint
enance programs that increase reliability with minimal cost and irrigation.
3.5 Improving the effectiveness of teams
The troubleshooting answers a real need for action, and as such, does not provid
e an increase in equipment performance. To increase the productivity of these fa
ilures must be eliminated or minimize their effects through improvements in mach
inery and processes to eliminate its causes. This is where teams come into play
to improve, that through cause-effect diagrams detect and develop solutions, and
FMEA as a design tool, which seeks to avoid the causes of failure in the design
stage of the machinery or processes. But this last step can only be accomplishe
d through the feedback of operational data, continues. You should also note the
importance of transforming experience into knowledge, so that it can be incorpor
ated into new equipment and systems, and to continue the process of continuous i
mprovement. In addition, this will contribute to an increase in value of the org
anization to become part of intellectual capital. needed to close the cycle of i
mprovement
03.06 Quality assurance
As part of the JIT system searches for quality assurance, hence the importance o
f eliminating completely the fault when a problem occurs, preventing the product
ion of defective parts, and stopping the lines if necessary.
11
Total Productive Maintenance
In order to expedite the response of the maintenance team appeared warning syste
ms as the "Andon" that illuminated panels using a status report on the workplace
. Currently being displaced by computer systems that integrate monitoring and co
ntrol equipment and maintenance measures and historical faults. This is achieved
by the integration of information both proactive and reactive in the system its
elf allowing its integrated management and development of various cause-effect a
nalysis so that they can be transformed into maintenance actions.
3.7 Training and motivation of employees
The success or failure in an organization is directly linked to its members, sin
ce these are solely responsible for its improvement and therefore the importance
of training and training of all employees. Through training reducing errors, im
proving quality and reducing costs, and reduces the learning curve and increases
worker motivation, resulting in greater productivity of it.
12
Associated with maintenance tools
4. Associated with maintenance tools
4.1 PDCA Cycle
The PDCA (Plan, Do, Check, Act) or Deming cycle provides the basic methodology t
o achieve continuous improvement in pursuit of increased effectiveness, efficien
cy and flexibility of processes. It consists of four stages that must be perform
ed on a cyclical basis: 1. Planning: determine what to do and how. Plan Act 2. D
o: carry out the planned actions. 3. Verify: To evaluate and analyze the causes
of the observed deviations. 4. Act: implement the improvements, new standards an
d labor standards. tasks and
Check
Do
4.2 Principles of Pareto
The Pareto principle applies to prioritize the problems objectively according to
their importance. This principle states that there are many minor problems comp
ared to only a few serious, so that by solving a few serious cases will be solve
d most problems. Thus, through the orderly development of a cumulative frequency
diagram can be identified 20% of serious cases, which cause about 80% of failur
es, compared with 80% remaining€that only be the cause of another 20% of breakdo
wns, and so is also known as the beginning of 1980 to 1920.
13
Associated with maintenance tools
Pareto Diagram
160 140 120 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 EBCFDHAG
Number of failures
100 80 60 40 20 0
Fault Types
Figure 1: Example of Pareto diagram
4.3 Facilities Improvement
An improvement team is a small group of members of various departments and set u
p to improve the functioning of the entire company through the resolution of a p
roblem. So a team was created to develop a plan for improvement in any of the de
partments or sections of the company and undone when the objectives have been ac
hieved in this area. The team will be coordinated and led by a member of the dep
artment or section of the company which directly affects the plan. The advantage
of team work, not in groups, is that it creates synergy, so that the results ac
hieved are greater than those obtained with individual work of its members. It a
lso fosters creativity, enhanced training, increases motivation and integrates i
ts members as part of the organization.
4.4 Method SMED
The method SMED (Single Minute Exchange of Die) is used to reduce the setup time
or preparation time required in the tool change and adjustment in a multipurpos
e machine when output changes. This is to eliminate the costs associated with th
e preparation of the machines to produce one product or another, and thereby to
reduce the lot size, 14
Associated with maintenance tools
and ensure greater flexibilidad6 the production process. The total time required
to manufacture a particular batch of product, a fixed part will be used to prep
are the machine for the process, entailing a fixed cost that will be balanced by
the increased batch size, which corresponds to processing time variable and the
refore a variable cost. If the reduced preparation time, you can opt for the man
ufacture of smaller lots, which give greater flexibility in processes, and there
fore enable JIT production. Method:
1. 2.
Identify the operations of the current method and measure their time. Sort trans
actions between "internal setup" and "external setup,
as the machine is stopped or running at the time of the transaction.
3.
Transform all possible operations in operations
machine running, "external setup."
4.
Reduce the time spent on foreign exchange transactions with
machine stopped.
5.
Remove the preparation time by amending
product design, components, tools, machines and processes, or the multiplication
of machines, so as to eliminate the need for changes useful. Some actions to be
carried out to reduce changeover times can be:

Schedule changes and prepare the material prior to
eliminate delays.

Conduct parallel operations to reduce the time that the machine
stands.

Use quick fastening devices, to standardize the size and type
clamping tool, and remove the adjustment process.

Improving storage and transportation of materials and tools for
6 Ease of system to adopt a broad range of states. 15
Associated with maintenance tools
half of adequacy of the means of manutención7, and use visual controls.

Introduce the concept implemented poka-yoke systems antierror
in all possible devices.
4.5 Scatterplot
It allows the study of cause-effect relationship, representing the same graph in
two opposing variables. By measuring the correlation is evaluated dependence be
tween two or more random variables. Thus, by plotting the regression lines and e
valuation of the slopes will be the degree of correlation between variables. Thi
s relationship of dependence between variables is measured using the coefficient
of correlation.
4.6 Study methods
When to increase the efficiency of a task is essential to use the study of worki
ng methods. This study aims to optimize the way of accomplishing a task to make
it as efficient as possible, which will be needed, as always a first stage of da
ta collection. The current procedure is recorded, measured, analyzed and develop
ed an improved. Finally, the documentation prepared by a procedure statement of
work, workforce training and the new solution is implemented. To record data exi
st special techniques such as Flowchart overview of the process, Flowchart analy
tical€multiple activity chart, diagram or circuit path, the plot threads, chart
path ... To measure the work, that is, determining the time it takes a skilled w
orker to execute a given task using a specific procedure, there are two main tec
hniques. The time study and predetermined time standards. The time study is a re
cord of the times of each July 1st set of operations of handling, transport and
storage, as well as useful materials or products. 16
Associated with maintenance tools
tasks that make up a procedure (t obs), as well as working patterns observed (r
obs) during the implementation period and under certain conditions. The pace is
measured by using scales such as the (100-133), (60-80), (75-100), (0-100), wher
e the upper value corresponds to the rate type (type r). Thus we have:
time base =
⋅ t r obs r obs type
Furthermore, based on the time necessary to apply the extras (fatigue, breaks, p
ersonal needs, contingency ...) to get the type of execution time of each task.
At predetermined time standards decomposes the task into basic moves, assigning
to each time defined by the method. These methods are not based on interpretatio
ns of patterns of work and therefore are targets, but implementation is reduced
to estimating the time required for procedures that have not yet been implemente
d.
4.7 Failure Mode Analysis and effects
Analysis Failure Mode and Effects (FMEA) is a tool used in the case of loss aris
ing from design, and therefore focused on reliability. With it systematically an
alyze products and processes to identify potential causes after a failure, accor
ding to their importance to concentrate efforts on its solution. With early iden
tification of possible causes of failure are developing measures to prevent thei
r occurrence or minimize their impact through preventive measures as defined in
the design stage. Method:
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
Overview of the functions of the product or process list of potential failure mo
des Defining the effects of failure causes Description Calculation of the risk p
riority 17
Associated with maintenance tools
The Risk Priority Index (MPI) is a composite indicator depends on the gravity (G
) of the probability of occurrence (F) and the probability of fault detection (D
).
IPR = D ⋅ G ⋅ F
[Risk Priority Index]
Hence G has to be greater the higher the gravity, and F, the greater the frequen
cy with which the fault occurs, whereas D will decrease with the ease with which
the fault can be detected.
Process FMEA
Ele me nt Ope ration M odo Efe ct Caus failure as Emptying the queue of machine
misalignment of the plate in the panel glue off the obstruction of the grooves o
f the cylinder applicator applicators Paro cylinder misalignment of the sheet or
panel Failure in sheet metal assembly panel adjustment for quality Disposable F
ailure Failure grip panel missing component in turning the press Stuck with Paro
panel panel off the cylinder D 1 G 5 F IPR Action nim m ie nt to Paro of the gl
uing and filling the tank in February 1910 Stop the gluing and 5100 placed the f
oil Stopping the March 1990 Review unjamming glue and drive system 5100 Review o
f 5200 elements and change the alignment of the four damaged Review restraint sy
stem 80 4 1 3 80 Review turner machine 10
Bonding
Failure in the application of the tail
4
5
6
5
February 1910
Ich Sandw Panel
April 1910
February 1910
2 10 1 10 3 10
Pressing
Failure in the press
February 1910
Paro and 90 unclogged Review press drive system 5100
Table 1: Example of FMEA of a manufacturing process
There is also a variant of analysis adds a new factor, criticality (C) which wou
ld be the emergence of a particular fault, or how harmful it would be for the op
eration of the system.
4.8 Statistical Process Control
Statistical Process Control (SPC) to detect when a process 18
Associated with maintenance tools
deviates from its expected performance, identifying the existence of a problem b
ut not its cause. As in any process it is impossible to control all sources of v
ariation involved in either their ignorance or cost for, it assumes the existenc
e of a series of uncontrollable variations. These changes follow a random and th
erefore can be modeled by a normal distribution€allowing the establishment of ma
rgins under which the process is considered controlled. Thus, a process will rem
ain under control while the values of quality characteristics are represented wi
thin the preset range in the chart control and without presenting any trend or p
attern, or a random behavior. To determine the control limits are calculated the
mean and standard deviation of a sample set ((X i) i = 1) taken during a period
under which the process remains under control. Known these values must be the u
sual range (99.7% confidence) are given by:
N
L = ± 3 =
[Limits of control] [Media]
Σ Xi
N
=

Σ - 2 X i
N
[ tandard deviation]
19
Associated with maintenance tools
Control chart
14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 5 10 15 20 25
X Lower Limit Upper Limit
Figure 2: Example of control chart with control conditions
4.9 imple Queue Model
It is a model belonging to the queuing theory of mathematical statistics, which
allows a simple way to obtain acceptable results in the sizing of the equipment
maintenance. This is because the repair operations for a single maintenance team
can be viewed as a queue formed by the faults that the maintenance team can not
attend while you're busy solving another. In the simple queuing model is consid
ered a single queue of infinite length, formed by the breakdown of standby time.
And they shape the appearance of faults in time, by a Poisson distribution and
the distribution of repairs over time, through a negative exponential. Under the
se assumptions, the theory states that the utilization factor ( ), or occupation
of the maintenance team, is given by:
=

[ ervices / time]
≡ arrival rate, or half of faults in a given period ≡ pattern of service or repa
ir half over the same period
20
Associated with maintenance tools
And the average number of equipment not available (ns), or damage to repair or w
aiting to be repaired, is:
n s =
-
[Average number of failures]
This will be able to get the costs caused by the unavailability of equipment bei
ng repaired or awaiting repair. Also, the time between failures is given by
1
and the average length
of a breakdown is given by
t s =
1. -
21
Conclusions
5. Conclusions
There has been a maintenance that fixes problems that prevent work through a pla
nned and provided from the earliest stages of design, seeking to eliminate any f
ault and therefore any impact on production. For this highlights the fact that:

We must introduce a system for data acquisition and storage
effective in making history.

We need to integrate information systems of all areas of
company, thereby enabling transparent communication.

We must assess the importance and impact of each machine in order to allocate pr
oductive resources appropriate to your
system
importance.

We must implement teamwork as a way to get
substantial improvements by integrating groups of individuals from different are
as and knowledge.

We must educate and motivate members of the organization to
increase their productivity.
22
Bibliography
J. C. Prado Prado, A. García Lorenzo, J. García Arca Directorate of Logistics an
d Production ervice Publications, University of Vigo. 2000
Rey Francisco acristán Total Production Maintenance FC Editorial. 2002
Joseph F. Barrio Vilar, Teresa Delgado Tejada tatistical Process Control FC Edi
torial. 2005
Internet References
NTP 679: Failure Mode Analysis and effects. FMEA

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi