Sources and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institutions in The First District of Rizal - Chapter 1-4

1
CHAPTER 1
The Problem and Its Background
Introduction
Charitable or nonprofit organizations have been vital to our society for
over a century. They play an important role in providing educational, social
services, housing and health care. As the number of organization grows the
curiosity of the people awaken on where they get their sources of funds and how
they allocate it in different expenses, and activities. Just like other businesses
they depend on funds as their fuel to run the organization in their overall
operational management. It is essential to have knowledge on how to handle
fund in every organization like charitable institutions.
Charitable Institutions is a type of non-profit organization. It centers on
philanthropic goals as well as social being like educational, religious, charitable
or other activities serving the public interest or common good. It is often depend
partly on donations, fund raising and gifts. They are governed by the Board of
Trustees or the Board of Directors that decides and implement financial
procedures to meet their legal duties to safeguard the charitys assets and to
ensure its continuing solvency.
Fund is the important indicator to assess the financial sustainability of the
management, therefore required detailed attention. Sources of funds referred as
the flow of funds that provides a mechanism on how the charitys performance in
allocating their funds on major activities. It comes from internal and external
2
reserves to satisfy its necessity for cash while Allocation is the assignment of
available resources to various means such funding or planning and it is the
scheduling of activities and resources required by those organization while taking
into consideration the resource availability.
According to Charities Act of 2011 charity is established for charitable
purposes only, and falls to be subject to the control of the High Court in the
exercise of its jurisdiction with respect to charitable organization like these. This
act is supported by the Section 87 of Corporation Code defines a non-stock
corporation as one where no part of its income is distributable as dividends to its
members, trustees ,or officers, and that any profit obtained as an incident of its
operations shall be used for the furtherance of the purpose/s for which the
corporation was organized.
The researchers want to determine how these charitable institutions
control and handle their funds in different activities. They also want to determine
the right and effective ways on funding that can be used not only in this
organization but to all kind of business.
In conducting this research, by getting information from every charitable
institution in the First District of Rizal, the researchers can get an idea to the
common problem that has been encountered by the charitable institutions. The
researcher wants to determine the different sources of the charities funds. They
want to discern how these institutions allocate their resource funds and what the
things they are funding are.

3
The researchers selected 10 charitable organizations in the first district of
Rizal wherein they will conduct a study. The respondents are those who are in
the administration or involve in the financial management of the organization.
The researchers will be using a questionnaire. The study will help the charitable
leaders, current and potential founders and the communities that the charitable
organizational served. The researchers conducted this to found out the Sources
and Allocation of Charitable Institutions in the First District of Rizal Calendar Year
2016. Through this study, it will help to know and understand the proper ways of
handling and controlling a certain funds.
Background of the study
This study is entitled Sources and Allocation of Charitable Institutions in
the First District of Rizal Calendar Year 2016. The researchers conducted this
study in order to have a better understanding about the different Sources of
funds of the Charitable Organizations in first district of Rizal and how these
resources allocated to meet the needs of the organization.
According to Stephen P. Osborne (2005), Charities are classified as non -
profit organizations which has philanthropic goals and social well-being (e.g.
charitable, educational, religious, or other activities serving the public interest or
common good). A charitable institution is a nonprofit organization designed to
help the people within the organization. Just like other business enterprise they
4
also have a fund which is being allocated to support the different expenses and
activities in order to attain the goals of every charity.
In the First district of Rizal there are local and foreign found charitable
institutions. In addition to Michael Gines Munsayac (2015), A private foundation
is generally founded by an individual, a family or a group of individuals, and is
organized as a non-stock, non-profit organization. (An individual client can
appoint himself as well as other family members or friends to sit on the
foundations called Board of Trustees).
This concept is related to our study because individual who founded
charitable organizations committed itself in protecting and using assets for their
nonprofit mission. Proper financial practices are very important in doing this,
since proper practices help to prevent and detect errors and fraud. Good financial
practices also assure the donors that their donation will be properly used.
Charitable organizations rely on funds they gain from internal and external
sources, Bob Collie, FIA (2012) stated that The success on nonprofit sector is
supported not only by donations and bequest, but also by investment designs to
protect and grow that asset. Gaining funds for charities will never stop its
activities, the charities must know the financial procedures on how they will
budget the funds they have. Proper allocation of these collected funds is
necessary for the sustainability of the charitable sector. Charitable institution that
sets their goal can attain their objective as well as use their funds in an efficient
way for them to attain success.

5
Hence, trustees of charitable organization have a social responsibility to
maximize the wealth of the institution and also prudent allotment and spreading
of charitable funds to its current asset and non-current asset.
Gordon (2009) stated that, Social networking websites such as Face
book has become a primary means of communication among persons in
constantly widening range of demographic categories. Some Charities use the
social media to produce funds by fund raising it is one of their ways to provide
their needs when it comes to finance.
Allocation of funds is a process of planning for settling up the budget of
the whole charitable organization. According to Van Horne and Wachowicz,
Financial management is concerned with the acquisition, financing and
management of assets with some overall goal in mind. Every charitable
institution has their objectives and goals to be attained, but they cannot do this
without the proper allocation and management of funds.
Furthermore Michelle Singletary said that, One of the keys to a better
financial life and security is to become better at making decision. When it comes
to your money, what you decide today can affect your finances for years to
come. Because handling an organization with a justified decision will help them
to maximize the funds they make.
Based on Accounting and Reporting of Charities, Charities should also
balance the benefits of greater accuracy with the costs involved when selecting
methods of apportioning costs.

6
Charitable organizations need to allocate their available resources and
make proper methods on how they will achieve their objectives. Example, the
correct usage of a resource or activity in terms of time taken, capacity used, or
other measure. In other words, funds should be obtained at the least cost of
capital with the least burden on the charities assets. Proper allocation should be
practice to ensure enough funds which can satisfy its upcoming operations and
expenses.
Based on Nonprofit Overhead Cost Study, Nonprofit organizational
effectiveness may face serious consequences if the nonprofit does not spend
adequate funds on overhead expenses.
Inadequate spending will result to some risk that the charitable institution
might be encountered. It is truly important that the organization must have their
proper ways and procedures in allotting some financial funds in order to have a
better and successful operation in the organization.
In addition Hager et al., (2004), Found that nonprofits especially smaller
ones with restricted funding struggle with inadequate infrastructure compromises
organizational effectiveness. It shows that funds of charitable organization must
be allocated accurately so that it wont affect the organizational effectiveness as
well as their financial stability.
According to Charity Navigators, Private Charities will spend 8% on
average of their budget on fund raising activities. It shows that charitable
organizations also allocate some percentage of their budget to generate funds
such as fund raising and this could be their source of funds.

7
Theoretical Framework
The study was anchored on the concept of Lamberto (2010) that the
measurement of frame of an enterprise includes planning, engaging, and control
of activities, which greatly affect the use and sources of funds. It has to do with
making sure that an adequate amount of funds are available.
The theory was related to the study since charitable organization is an
enterprise, a social enterprise which is a revenue generating business operated
by a non-profit organization to achieve its goals. They make money through
donations, contribution, selling goods or services.
Funds need to be maximized because it has a great effect in the
institution. Allocation of resources funds of charitable institution are
responsibilities of the staff, managers, board of directors, administrators. That
measurement of according to Lamberto frame of enterprise includes planning,
engaging, and control of activities, it means that every charity must equalize the
funds they receive or gain from the range of their expenditure and spending.
According to Galaskiewicz, Joseph, Bielefeld, Wolfgang and
Dowell, Myron (2006), public charities have some restricted revenue options,
being donations, profit making strategies and government funding the main ones.
Apparently referring to the same, Hodge and Piccolo (2005) divide funding
sources into three categories: private contributions, such as individual donations,
corporate gifts and foundation grants; public support in the form of government
grants; and private sector payments or commercial activity such as user fees,
membership fees, government contracts, and sales of products and services.

8
This study above is related to our study because it explains the different sources
of funding the charities. Charities can generate funds to suffice their needs
through private contributions, corporate goals and foundation grants.

9
Conceptual Framework
Input Process Output

Profile of the Respondents in
terms of:
Age
Sex
Civil Status
Educational
Attainment
Position
Length of Service
Profile of the Organization Determined Sources

Types of Charities Gathering of Data
-Education Charity
through Formulation of and Allocation of
-Health&Services
-Health
-Religion Checklist- Funds of Charitable
-Others
Questionnaire, Institutions in the
Years of Existence
Number of Interviewing, First District of Rizal
Beneficiaries
Number of Observation and Calendar Year 2015.
Volunteers
Analysis of Data
Perception of Respondents
on the Sources and
allocation of funds of Collected.
Charitable Institutions.
Internal Sources
-Contribution
-Generating Income
External Sources
- Trading
- Solicitation
-Gifts/Donations
- Revenue options
- Loan financing
- Voluntary Payroll
giving
- Sponsors
F
Feedback
Paradigm of the Sources and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institutions in the
First District of Rizal Calendar Year 2015

10
The first frame shows the Input, which indicated the profile of the
respondents in terms of age, sex, civil status and educational attainment. It also
includes the profile of the organization and the perception of the respondent on
the sourcing and allocation of funds.
The second frame shows the Process, which indicated the formulation of
Checklist-Questionnaire, interviewing, observation and analysis of Data
Collected.
The third frame shows the Output, which indicated the determined
Sources and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institutions in the First District of
Rizal Calendar Year 2015.
The feedback represents the three frames that are interrelated with one
another.
It implied that Input was used for the Process and gathering Data in order
to determine the Source and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institutions in the
First District of Rizal Calendar Year 2015.
Statement of the Problem
This study aims to determine the Sources and Allocation of Funds of
Charitable Institutions in the first District of Rizal Calendar Year 2015.
Specifically, it sought to answer the following question.
1. What is the profile of the respondents in terms of:

11
1.1 Ages;
1.2 Sex;
1.3 Civil Status;
1.4 Educational Attainment;
1.5 Position;
1.6 Length of service;
2. What is the organization profile in terms of:
2.1 Types of Charities
2.1.1 Education Charity
2.1.2 Health and Services
2.1.3 Health
2.1.4 Religion
2.1.5 Others
2.2 Years of Existence
2.3 Number of Beneficiaries
2.4 Number of Volunteers
3. How do the respondents perceive the Sources and Allocation of Funds of
Charitable Institutions in the First District of Rizal?
3.1 Internal Sources
3.1.1 Contribution
3.1.2 Generating Income
3.2 External Sources

12
3.2.1 Trading
3.2.2 Solicitation
3.2.3 Gifts and Donations
3.2.4 Revenue Options
3.2.5 Loan Financing
3.2.6 Voluntary Payroll giving
3.2.7 Sponsors
. Allocation of Funds
4.1 General Expense
4.2 Allowance
4.3 Rent Expense
4.4 Equipment
4.5 Supplies
4.6 Salary/Wages
4. Is there significant difference between the respondents profile and their
perception on the Sources and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institutions in
the First District of Rizal Calendar Year 2015?
5. Is there significant difference on the organization profile and the respondents
perception on the Sources and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institutions in
the First District of Rizal?

13
Hypothesis
The researchers will test the null hypothesis that;
1. There is no significant difference on the respondents perception on the sources
and allocation of funds when grouped according to the personal profile of the
respondents?
2. There is no significant difference on the respondents perception on the sources
and allocation of funds when grouped according to the personal profile of
organization?
Scope and Limitation
This study will focus on determining the Sources and Allocation of Funds
of Charitable Institutions in the First District of Rizal Calendar Year 2015. The
target respondents for this are 40 or the 100 percent of the charitable institutions
in the First District of Rizal.
The researchers will utilize number of registered charitable institutions
consisting of ten (10) charities in the First District of Rizal. There are five (5)
charities in Taytay, Rizal, namely the Destinys Promise Home for Children
Foundation Inc., Muntingtinig @ muntingpangarap Inc., The Little Children Home,
Uflift Community, Devt. Found. Inc., Sister of St. Paul Chartres Vigil House. One
(1) charity in Angono, Rizal the Aveemar Homes Don Mariano Santos Ave.,
Senior Citizens Associations. Three (3) charities in Cainta, Rizal the Ang Arko ng
Pilipinas, Nagkakaisang Senior Citizen ng Anak Pawis Inc., Help International
Ministries Inc., and one (1) charitable institution in Binangonan, Rizal the Blue
Whale Mission of our Lady Inc.

14
The researchers respondents are the directors, president, supervisor,
administrator, agency head and also volunteers.
The variables utilized are as follows; age, sex, civil status, educational
attainment, position and length of service and years of existence, types of
charities, number of beneficiaries and number of volunteers.
Significance of the Study
The researchers believed that the result of the study would benefit the
following contributions:
Charitable Institutions. This study will help to charities on how to effectively
allocate their funds.
Government. This study will help the government to know about the
sources and allocation of funds of selected charitable institutions.

Community. The study will provide certain information and awareness to
the community.
Students. This study will be reference material to them on making a
research in the future.

Researchers. This study will enhance their skills in gathering information
that they will come up in sharing ideas.

Future Researchers. This serves as a guide to the people who will read
and want to conduct this kind of study.

Professors. The result of the study will help teachers gain more knowledge
about sourcing and allocating of funds to those selected charitable institutions.

School Administration. The research can be an essential instrument of the
school to enhance the knowledge of the students in research studies.

15
Definition of Terms
In order to provide a better understanding about the study, the researchers
conceptually and operationally defined the following terminologies.
Charitable organization. This is a type of non-profit organization (NPO). It
differs from other types of NPOs in that it centers on non-profit and philanthropic
goals as well as social well-being (e.g. charitable, educational, religious, or other
activities serving the public interest or common good).

Fund Allocation. This pertains to the different ways by which the charities
would distribute the funds.

Fund Sourcing. This refers to the different activities by which the charities
would obtain their sources of funds.

Internal Sources. These are the funds that are generated by the charities
operation and include raising of funds.

External Sources. These are funds that are generated by the charities
through donations or gift giving.

Non-governmental organization (NGO).This is an organization that is
neither a part of a government nor a conventional for-profit business. Usually set
up by ordinary citizens, NGOs may be funded by governments, foundations,
businesses, or private persons.

Beneficiaries. It refers to the persons or groups that receive benefits such
as money, food or scholarship or other things given by the benefactor of the
charities.
Volunteers. Refers to a person who voluntarily offers himself or herself for
a service to the charitable institutions.

Years of Existence. It refers to the years of the organizations have been
operating to give services to their beneficiaries.

16
Allocation. It refers to the distribution of funds to the different expenses
and activities of the charitable organizations.

Trading. One of the processes to gain income and to support the
organization.
Solicitation. It refers requesting for something, usually money, to have an
additional fund inside the organization.

Gift/Donations. This is commonly in the form of cash, goods, an asset,
services or any other thing that will be useful and helpful in the organization or in
the benefactor and beneficiaries.

Loan financing. It refers to the amount of money that the organization
borrowed from the bank or any financial institution to sustain their expenses.
Voluntary payroll giving. It is an agreement between government or
corporation to give an specific amount or pledge to the charitable organization.

Sponsors. This refers to the person that is willing to donate or support
some events, activity, or organization financially inside the charitable
organization.
Contribution. This refers to the payment of the members to gain funds.
Educational Charity. This type of organization serve students from every
age group, pre-school to graduate school and beyond. Some serve as the
educational institutions while focus on making education more accessible and
effective.
Health Charity. This type of organization covers everything from
supporting and treating sick and disabled, working on cures for deceases, and
promoting public awareness of specific health risk.

Human and Services Charity. An organization that has an objective of
meeting human needs through an applied knowledge base and maintaining to a
commitment to improving the overall quality of life of service population.

17
Religion Charity. An organization that promotes and support particular
religious activity and worship.
CHAPTER 2
Methodology of Research and Sources of Data
This chapter contains the method of research used by the researchers in
the development of the study. The chapter was deal with the method of research,
setting of the study, source of the study, procedure of the study and the statistical
treatment.
Research Method
The researchers used the descriptive method. The term descriptive
research refers to the type of research question, design, and data analysis that
will applied to a given topic. This method involves the analysis and interpretation
of data to determine the level of importance in sourcing of fund and level of
effectiveness of fund distribution by the charities in the first district of Rizal.
According to Adanza, Bermundo, Rasonabe, descriptive method is
designed for the investigator to gather information about the present conditions,
18
status, trend and dealing with what are prevailing are generally descriptive
research. The main objective of the study is to describe the nature of the
situation as it exists at the time of the study, and to explore the causes of a
particular phenomenon. Descriptive researchers seek what is of data and not
why is so. One can only describe what is prevailing, and develop inferences,
but cannot explain the why of the dynamics of the variables; otherwise, there is
no point of research, since he knows the answers.
The study will use descriptive method research because the researchers
believe that this is the most appropriate method to use. The necessary data
gathered through questionnaire checklist were used to analyze and interpret to
determine the answer on the statement of the problem to test the hypothesis.
Setting of the Study
The researchers focused on the first district of Rizal Province.Rizal
province lies immediately east of Metro Manila. It is bounded on the north by
Bulacan, on the east by Laguna de Bay consisting of 4 municipalities the Cainta,
Taytay, Angono and Binangonan.
The municipality of Taytay is a first class, densely populated municipality
in the province of Rizal, Philippines. It is the "Woodworks and Garments Capital
of the Philippines".According to The Cities and Municipalities Competitiveness
Index, Taytay ranked 3rd Most Competitiveness Municipality in 2015 from being
10th place in 2014. In this municipality we have five (5) different charitable
19
institutions the DestinysPromise Home for Children, this charitable institution
rescued children that have been rescued from on the other side of the river,
abusive homes, malnourishment and life on the street. Sisters of St. Paul of
Chartres Vigil House Inc. is a religious congregation for teaching, nursing, visiting
the poor and taking care of orphans, the old and infirm and mentally ill. Munting
Tinig @ Munting Pangarap Inc., this charity helps children to send in school. Uflift
Community Devt Foundation is an institution for the aged. The Little Children
Home has a ministry of helping the children in need.
The municipality Angono is a first class urban municipality in the province
of Rizal, Philippines. It is known as "Arts Capital of the Philippines", and located
30 kilometers (19 mi) east of Manila. In this municipality we have the Aveemar
Homes Don Mariano Santos Ave. (DOMSA) Senior Citizen Associations they
organized activities for the senior citizen in their place to give happiness and
enjoyment.
The municipality of Cainta is a first-class urban municipality in the province
of Rizal, Philippines.Cainta now holds the record as the most populous
municipality in the Philippines, although there are efforts underway to convert it
into a city. Its income of Php 1,251,517,325.79 makes it the richest municipality in
the country. In this municipality we have two (2) charitable institutions; the Help
International Ministries Inc.is reaching out and helping the needy in the
Philippines. The Ang Arko ng Pilipinas
Municipality of Binangonanis a first class urban municipality in the
province of Rizal, Philippines. Thriving fish port and fishing industry is found in
20
Binangonan, having a long coast line facing the Laguna de Bay, including the
western part of Talim Island. We have one (1) charity the Blue Whale Mission of
Our Lady Inc. this institution help the abandoned elderly.
Subject of the Study
The subject of the study were the President, director, supervisor,
administrator and agency head of the charitable institution in the first district of
Rizal which is composed of Taytay, Cainta, Angono and Binangonan. They are
the persons concern in the sources and allocation of funds of their organization.
The researchers chose people under the administration as their respondents to
answer the questions and to provide them necessary information that will help
the study.
The researchers utilized 10 out of 18 charities selected from the first
district of Rizal. Those are the charities: (1) Ang Arko ng Pilipinas Inc., (2)
Destinys Promise Home for Children Found. Inc., (3) Help International
Ministries Inc., (4) Blue Whale Mission of Our Lady Inc., (5) Sisters of St. Paul of
Chartres Vigil House Inc., (6) Uflift Community Devt., Foundation Inc., (7)
Arveemar Homes/ Don Mariano Santos Ave. (DOMSA) Senior Citizens
Association Inc., (8) Munting Tinig @ Munting Pangarap Inc., (9) Nagkakaisang
Senior Citizen ng Anak ng Pawis Inc., (10) The Little Children Home.
21
Sources of Data
The researchers will use questionnaire checklist as the primary instrument
in gathering the data needed and they used split half method. The questionnaire
is divided into three parts. The first part deals with the respondents profile, which
contains age, sex, civil status, educational attainment, position, and length of
service; the second parts is the organizations profile which contains types of
charities, years of existence, number of beneficiaries and number of volunteers
and the third parts is the respondents perception on the Sources and Allocation
of Funds of charitable Institution in the First District of Rizal Calendar Year
2015.The researchers conducted their pretest and posttest in the second district
of Rizal.
Research Procedure
The study was conducted in the First District of Rizal. This study formally
started with the creation and formulation of the title according to the agreement of
the researchers. After formulating the appropriate title and having the approval of
the defense panel, the researchers started to formulate Chapter 1 and 2, they
gathered information in books and internet that is relevant to their study. One
month after the preparation of the papers the proposal defense follows which the
researchers proposing their study to the panelist. After the proposal, the
researchers conducted the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. After they
already validated their questionnaire, the researchers distributed the

22
questionnaire the respective respondents. Afterwards conducted suitable
different statistical tools were retrieved in the questionnaire. The researchers look
from other approved thesis to serve as a guide as they start doing Chapter 3 and
4. The researchers formulated the Chapter 3 by presenting the tables, analyzing
and interpreting the data. Then the Chapter 4 follows, the summary of findings
were finalized, conclusions were drawn and recommendation was formulated.
And finally, the researchers defend their thesis entitled Sources and Allocation of
Funds of Charitable Institutions in the First District of Rizal Calendar Year 2016.
Statistical Treatment
The researchers utilized the following statistical treatment.
1. To determine the profile of the respondents and the organization, the researcher
will use the frequency, percentage and the rank distribution.

2. To determine the respondents perception on Sources and Allocation of Funds of
Charitable Institutions in the First District of Rizal. The researchers will use the
weighted mean.
Scale Range Verbal Interpretation
5 4.20-5.00 Always
4 3.40-4.19 Often
3 2.60-3.39 Sometimes
2 1.80-2.59 Seldom
1 1.00-1.79 Never
23
3. To find out the significant difference on the respondents and organizations
profile and their perception on the Sources and Allocation of Funds of
Charitable Institutions in the First District of Rizal, One-Way ANOVA was
used.
Chapter 3
24
Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data
The chapter deals with the presentation, analysis and interpretation of
data gathered on Sources and Allocation of Funds of Charitable institutions in
the First District of Rizal Calendar Year 2016.
The researchers used questionnaire checklist which is the basis for
presentation, analysis and interpretation. The data obtained from the responses
of 10 charitable institutions with each 3 members in the first district of Rizal.
1. Profile of the respondents in terms of Age, Sex, Civil Status, Educational
Attainment, Position and Length of Service.
Table 1 indicates the frequency, percentage and rank distribution of the
respondents profile in terms of age.
Table 1
Frequency, Percentage and Rank Distribution
of the Respondents Profile
in terms of Age
Age Frequency Percentage Rank

20-30 6 20.0 2.5
31-40 6 20.0 2.5
41-50 8 26.7 1
51-60 5 16.7 4
61-70 4 13.3 5
71-80 1 3.3 6
Total 30 100.0
25
The data shows that the respondents who are in the age bracket of 41-50
years old are with the highest frequency of 8 or 26.7 percent followed by 20-30
and in the bracket of 31-40 years old with the frequency of 6 or 20.0 percent;
next is the bracket of 51-60 years old with the frequency of 5 or 16.7 percent. A
frequency of 4 or 13.3 are 61-70 years old respondents while the least number of
respondent is 71-80 years old gathered a frequency of 1 or 3.3 percent.
It only indicates that 26.7 percent of the respondent of charitable
institutions in the first district of Rizal is in the age of 41-50 years old, which
means that the most of the respondents were matured enough in handling and
controlling the funds.
According to Bekkers and Schuyt (2008), Older people give more
because their level of involvement in organizational activities yet age varies from
study to study.
respondents profile in terms of sex.
Table 2
26
in terms of Sex
Sex Frequency Percentage Rank

Male 11 36.7 2
Female 19 63.3 1
Total 30 100.0
The above data reveals that 19 or 63.3 percent of the respondent are
female and 11 or 36.7 percent of the respondents is male.
This implies that most of the respondents are female which means that
female is more inclined to charitable organization than male.
According to Nuno S. Themudo (2009), He found that women are public
spirited than men, volunteering more and giving a larger share of their income to
nonprofits.
Table 3 presents the frequency, percentage and rank distribution of the
respondents profile in terms of civil status.
Table 3
27
in terms of Civil Status
Civil Status Frequency Percentage Rank

Single 19 63.3 1
Married 10 33.3 2
Widowed 1 3.3 3
Total 30 100.0
The above data shows that 19 out of 30 or 63.3 percent of the
respondents are single, 10 or 33.3 percent are married and 1 or 3.3 percent are
widowed.
This implies that when it comes to charitable institutions the greater
majorities of the respondents are single and assume greater responsibility. Some
men and women have some tendencies as well as married. However, in the first
district of Rizal happens that most of respondents are single. According to Yavas
and Riecken (2002), singles are more likely to be donors than those who are
married.
Table 4 depicts the frequency, percentage and rank distribution of the
respondents profile in terms of educational attainment.
Table 4
28
of the respondents Profile in terms
of Educational Attainment
Educational Attainment Frequency Percentage Rank

Elementary Graduate 2 6.7 2
College Graduate 27 90.0 1
Others (Masteral 1 3.3 3
Degree)
Total 30 100.0
The data reveals that 27 or 90.0 percent of the respondents are College
Graduate, 2 or 6.7 percent are Elementary Graduate and 1 or 3.3 percent is in
Masteral Degree.
This implies that a majority of the respondents are College graduate,
because having a college degree is enough to manage the charitable finances.
According to Bekkers and Wiepking (2012), Having achieved a higher
educational level usually facilitates people to acquire more financial resources.
respondents profile in terms of position.
Table 5

29
in terms of Position
Position Frequency Percentage Rank

President/CEO 3 10.0 4
Director 4 13.3 3
Supervisor 1 3.3 6
Administrator 5 16.7 2
Agency Head 2 6.7 5
Others (Staff,
Social Worker, 15 50.0 1
Board Members
and Treasurer)
Total 30 100.0
The table shows that 15 out of 30 or 50.0 percent of the respondents are
belong to other position: Staff, Social Worker, Board Members and Treasurer,
followed by 5 or 16.7 percent are Administrator, next is in the frequency of 4 or
13.3 percent are Director, then followed by the frequency of 3 or 10.0 percent
were President or the CEO and 2 or 6.7 percent were Agency Head and 1 or 3.3
percent were Supervisor.
This implies that many of the respondents are Staff, Social Worker, Board
Members and Treasurers, because most of charitable institutions in the first
District of Rizal have many officers that who will handle and circulate the financial
resources in the organization.
According to Kitching et. al (2012), Managers, staff, social worker and
Board Member and Treasurer are the most likely to make spending decisions.
30
respondents profile in terms of length of service.
Table 6
Frequency, Percentage and Rank Distribution of
the respondents Profile in terms of Length
of Service in Present Position
Length of Service Frequency Percentage Rank

Below 3 years 10 33.3 1
3.01-8.00 7 23.3 3
8.01-13.00 8 26.7 2
13.01-18.00 4 13.3 4
18.01 above 1 3.3 5
Total 30 100.0
The table reveals that 10 out of 30 or 33.3 percent of the respondents are
below 3 years in their position, 8 or 26.7 percent are 8.01-13 years in their
position, 7 or 23.3 percent are 3.01-8 years in their position, 4 or 13.3 percent are
13.01-18 years in their position and least number have frequency of 1 or 3.3
percent which are in 18.01 years above in their position.
This implies that almost of their respondents have been working in
charitable institution and have an experience for about 3 year and below in their
present position.
According to Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation, Found that the
average length of service for the top executive were three years it can be
31
assumed that the respondents were just new in their job because of turnover of
the positions.
2. Profile of the Organization in terms of Types of Organization, Years of
Existence, Number of Beneficiaries and Number of Volunteers.
respondents profile in terms of types of charitable organization.
Table 7
the Organization Profile in terms of
Types of Charitable Organization
Types of the Organization Frequency Percentage Rank

Education Charity 1 10.0 3.5
Human and Services 3 30.0 2
Health 0 0 5
Religion 1 10.0 3.5
Others (Social Welfare,
Residential, Association 5 50.0 1
and Elderly Homes)
Total 10 100.0
The table above shows that 5 or 50.0 percent of the respondents are
categorized to others which is the social welfare, residential, Association and
Elderly homes, next is 3 or 30.0 percent of the respondents are belonged in

32
Human and Services Charity and lastly 1 or 10.0 percent are categorized both in
Education charity and Religion.
The result shows that most of the charitable institutions are doing charity
works for the Social Welfare, residential, association and elderly homes, because
most of the charitable institutions in the first district of Rizal are focused on
helping elderly and those who are homeless.
According to Diospora Philanthropy (2007), The number of community
organizations in the cities with large Filipino population is growing rapidly, they
offer variety of services for the local Filipino population including lunch programs,
social activities, senior activities and programs for the out of school youth.
Table 8 presents the frequency, percentage and rank distribution of the
respondents profile in terms of years of existence of organization.
Table 8
of the Organization Profile in Terms of Years
of Existence of Organization
Years of Existence Frequency Percentage Rank

Below 8 years 7 70.0 1
9-13 years 3 30.0 2
Total 10 100.0
33
It indicates that 7 or 70.0 percent of the respondents are serving for below
8 years and below while 3 or 30.0 percent have been in service from 9-13 years
already.
This implies that some of the charitable institutions in the first district of
Rizal have been existed for 8 years and below. It means that most of the
respondents are new in the field of managing charities. According to Zini (2008),
there is an increase in the demand for charitable services as the number of
people in need increase.
respondents profile in terms of number of beneficiaries in the organization.
Table 9
the organization Profile in Terms of Number
of Beneficiaries in the Organization
Number of
Beneficiaries in Frequency Percentage Rank
the Organization
Below 10 3 30.0 2
11-20 3 30.0 2
21-30 1 10.0 4
41 above 3 30.0 2
Total 10 100.0
34
The data shows that 3 or 30.0 percent of the respondents had
beneficiaries and below 10, some are 11-20 beneficiaries and some institutions
have 41 and above beneficiaries while 1 or 10.0 percent had 21-30 beneficiaries.
This implies that most of the respondents in the first district of Rizal had
beneficiaries of below 10, while others had an 11-20 and 41 and above
beneficiaries. It means that charities here in the first district of Rizal have a small
number of beneficiaries while some of there have a large amount of beneficiaries
in the organization.
According to Bekkers and Wiepking the number of beneficiaries depends
on the capability if the organization to sustain their needs, awareness of needs is
a mechanism that is largely beyond the country of the donors.
respondents profile in terms of number of volunteers in the organization.

35
Table 10
the organization Profile in Terms of Number
of Volunteers in the Organization
Number of
Volunteers in the Frequency Percentage Rank
Organization
Below 4 1 10.0 3
5-9 6 60.0 1
25 above 3 30.0 2
Total 10 100.0
The data reveals that 6 or 60.0 percent of the respondents had a volunteer
of 5-9 persons followed by the frequency of 3 or 30.0 percent that have 25 and
above volunteers and 1 or 10.0 percent of the respondents had a 4 and below
volunteers.
This implies that a greater majority of charitable institutions in the first
district of Rizal have a medium numbers of volunteers, which is 5-9 volunteers.
Charitable institutions fill their needs of volunteers corresponding to the ratio of
their beneficiaries and program activities.
According to Jones et al (2012), suggest that it may be particularly difficult
to increase program spending, especially in the short run, since doing so may
require the charity to hire additional staff, such as economist advice nonprofit
managers to think at the margin and make socially optimal choices when making
resource allocation decisions.

36
3. Respondents Perception on the Sources and Allocation of funds of
Charitable Organization in the First District of Rizal in terms of Internal
Sources, External Sources and Allocation of Funds.
Table 11 presents the obtained mean on sources and allocation of funds of
charitable institutions in the first district of Rizal in terms of Internal Sources.
Table 11
Obtained Mean on the Sources of Funds of the Charitable
Institutions in the First District of Rizal
in Terms of Internal Sources
A. Internal Sources Mean Verbal Rank

Interpretation
1. Provides contribution to sustain the 3.20 Sometimes 1
activities of the organization.
2.Provides a Recreational/ 2.20 Seldom 3
Conference Center to generate
income.
3. Receives Training fees from the 2.36 Seldom 2
trainee.
4. Receives Membership fee. 1.76 Never 4
Grand Mean 2.38 Seldom
As gleaned on Table 11, respondents perceived the Internal sources of
charitable institutions in the First district of Rizal as Seldom obtained mean of
2.38.
37
It can be noted that item number 1 which is Providing contribution to
sustain the activities of the organization obtained the highest mean of 3.20 with
a verbal interpretation of sometimes. In item number 3 which is Receives
training fees from the trainee has a mean of 2.36 rank second with the verbal
interpretation of seldom. Third rank is item number 2 which is Provides a
recreational or conference center to generate income has a mean of 2.20 with a
verbal interpretation of seldom. Last in the rank is item number 4 which is
Receives membership fee has a mean of 1.76 with a verbal interpretation of
never.
It implies that item number 1 which is Providing contribution to sustain the
activities of the organization is the primary source of fund in terms of internal
sources.
Overall, the respondents perceived the Internal Sources of Charitable
institutions to be seldom obtaining a grand mean of 2.38.
Table 12 presents the obtained mean on sources and allocation of funds
of charitable institutions in the first district of Rizal in terms of External Sources

38
Table 12
in Terms of External Sources
B. External Sources Mean Verbal Rank

Interpretation
1. Trading 1.91 Seldom 4
2. Solicitation 2.76 Sometimes 2
3. Gifts and Donations 2.61 Sometimes 3
4. Raising of funds/Revenue Options 1.83 Seldom 5

5. Make loan financing to invest in the 1.23 Never 7
organization.
6.Voluntary payroll giving 1.73 Never 6
7. Sponsors 2.95 Sometimes 1
Grand Mean 2.16 Seldom
As gleaned on Table 12, respondents perceived the Internal sources of
charitable institutions in the First district of Rizal as Seldom obtained mean of
2.16.
It can be noted that item number 7 which is Sponsors obtained the
highest mean of 2.95 with a verbal interpretation of sometimes. In item number
2 which is Solicitation has a mean of 2.76 rank second with the verbal
interpretation of sometimes. Third rank is item number 3 which is Gifts and
donations has a mean of 2.61 with a verbal interpretation of sometimes. Fourth
rank is item number 1 which is Trading has a mean of 1.91 with a verbal
interpretation of seldom. Fifth rank is item number 4 which is Raising of funds
or revenue options has a mean of 1.83 with a verbal interpretation of seldom.
Sixth rank is item number 6 which is Voluntary payroll giving has a mean of
1.73 with a verbal interpretation of never. Last in the rank is item number 5
39
which is Make loan financing to invest in the organization has a mean of 1.23
with a verbal interpretation of never.
It implies that item number 7 which is Sponsors is the primary source of
fund in terms of external sources.
Overall, the respondents perceived the External Sources of Charitable
institutions to be seldom obtaining a grand mean of 2.16.
According to Anthony Okonkwo (2010) External sources of revenue are
those avenues and sources that are outside the jurisdiction of a given
social entrepreneurial organization; through which money is generated. This
could come in the trading, solicitation, gifts and donations and sponsors.
Table 13 presents the obtained mean on sources and allocation of funds
of charitable institutions in the first district of Rizal in terms of Allocation of funds.
Table 13
in Terms of Allocation of funds
C. Allocation of funds Mean Verbal Rank

Interpretation
1. General Expense 4.54 Always 1
2. Allowance 3.20 Sometimes 5
3. Rent Expense 2.53 Seldom 6
4. Equipment 4.01 Often 4
5. Supplies 4.33 Always 2
6. Salary/Wages 4.18 Always 3
Grand Mean 3.80 Often
40
As gleaned on Table 13, respondents perceived the Allocation of funds of
charitable institutions in the First district of Rizal as Often obtained mean of
3.80.
It can be noted that item number 1 which is General Expense obtained
the highest mean of 4.54 with a verbal interpretation of always. In item number
5 which is Supplies has a mean of 4.33 rank second with the verbal
interpretation of always. Third rank is item number 6 which is Salary and
wages has a mean of 4.18 with a verbal interpretation of always. Fourth rank is
item number 4 which is Equipment has a mean of 4.01 with a verbal
interpretation of often. Fifth rank is item number 2 which is allowance has a
mean of 3.20 with a verbal interpretation of sometimes. Last in the rank is item
number 3 which is Rent expense has a mean of 2.53 with a verbal
interpretation of seldom.
It implies that item number 1 which is General Expense is the primary
focused when it comes in allocating of funds.
Overall, the respondents perceived the Allocation of funds of charitable
institutions to be often obtaining a grand mean of 3.80.
The scope and size of a not for profit's organization programs and asset
base dictate the complexity of its funds. According to Blackhaud (2011), The
budget once adopted should be used by the staff as a management tool to gauge
operational performance. An effective budget should establish criteria that would
signal management if a change is need or if a course of actor should be refined.

41
Table 14 presents the respondents perception in Sources and allocation of
funds of charitable institutions in the first district of Rizal.
Table 14
Composite Table on the Respondents Perception in
Sources and Allocation of Funds
In the first district of Rizal
Sources and Allocation Mean Verbal Rank

of funds Interpretation
1. Internal Sources 2.38 Seldom 2
2. External Sources 2.15 Seldom 3
3. Allocation of funds 3.80 Often 1
Grand Mean 2.78 Sometimes
The data included that the first rank is the Allocation of funds with a
grand mean of 3.80 and verbally interpreted as often. Second in the rank is the
Internal Sources with a grand mean of 2.38 and verbally interpreted as
seldom and lastly is the External Sources with a grand mean of 2.15 and
verbally interpreted as seldom.
This implies that the respondents agreed that the most dependable factor
to be considered in charitable institutions in the first district of Rizal is the
Allocation of funds. They see to it that it is the most important factor because it is
a day to day or daily monitoring of their funds and they can be able to manage
and control their funds in a proper and effective way. They can also diversify the
funds in different activities and expenses.

42
Overall, the respondents perceived to be sometimes in the Sources and
allocation of funds of charitable institutions in the first district of Rizal with a
general mean of 2.78.
4. Significant Difference of Respondents Perception on the Sources and
Allocation of funds of Charitable Organization in the First District of Rizal
in terms of Respondents Profile.
Table 15 indicates the computed F-value on the significant difference
between the respondents perception on the sources and allocation of funds of
charitable institutions in the first district of Rizal in terms of age.
Table 15
Computed One Way ANOVA of the Respondents Perception on Sources
and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institutions in terms of Age
Factor Sources of Variation SS DF MS F Sig. Ho Vi

Internal Between Groups 3.965 5 .793 .901 .497 F NS
Sources Within Groups 21.12 24 .880 R
Total 7 29
25.09
2
External Between Groups 4.554 5 .911 2.39 .067 F NS
Sources Within Groups 9.113 24 .380 9 R
Total 13.66 29
7
Allocation Between Groups 2.028 5 .406 .465 .798 F NS
of Funds Within Groups 20.911 24 .871 R
Total 22.93 29
43
Table shows that Internal Sources has a computed F-value of .901 and
has a significance of .497. Since the significance is greater than the level of .05
the null hypothesis was accepted and interpreted as not significant. Second was
External Sources that has computed an F-value of 2.399 and has a significance
of .067, since the significance is greater than the level of .05, the null hypothesis
was accepted and interpreted as not significant. And lastly the Allocation of
Funds that has computed an F-value of .465 and has a significance of .798,
since the significance is greater than the level of .05, the null hypothesis was
accepted and interpreted as not significant.
This implies that the respondents perception on Sources and Allocation of
Funds of Charitable Institutions in the First District of Rizal has no significant
difference in terms of age.
According to Bekkers and Schuyt (2008), Older people give more
because their level of involvement in organizational activities yet age varies from
study to study.
charitable institutions in the first district of Rizal in terms of sex.

44
Table 16
and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institutions in terms of Sex
Factor Sources of SS DF MS F Sig. Ho Vi

Variation
Internal Between Groups 4.395 1 4.39 5.94 .021 R S
Sources Within Groups 20.69 28 5 6
Total 7 29 .739
25.09
2
External Between Groups 2.481 1 2.48 6.20 .019 R S
Total 13.66 29 .400
7
Allocation Between Groups 1.116 1 1.116 1.43 .241 F NS
of Funds Within Groups 21.82 28 .779 3 R
Total 2 29
22.93
8
Table shows that Internal Sources has a computed F-value of 5.946 and
has a significance of .021. Since the significance is less than the level of .05 the
null hypothesis was rejected and interpreted as significant. Second was External
Sources that has computed an F-value of 6.209 and has a significance of .019,
since the significance is less than the level of .05, the null hypothesis was
rejected and interpreted as significant. And lastly the Allocation of Funds that has
computed an F-value of 1.433 and has a significance of .241, since the
significance is greater than the level of .05, the null hypothesis was accepted and
interpreted as not significant.

45
Funds of Charitable Institutions in the First District of Rizal have significant
difference and affected by the sex of the respondents.
According to Leroux and Sneed women are even more likely to hold
management positions in nonprofit; there were more women executives and
officers in charitable organizations.
Table 17 depicts the computed F-value on the significant difference
charitable institutions in the first district of Rizal in terms of civil status.
Table 17
and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institutions in terms of Civil Status

Variation
Sources Within Groups 16.90 27 1
Total 9 29 .626
25.09
2
Total 13.66 29
7
Allocation Between Groups 10.65 2 5.32 11.714 .000 R S
of Funds Within Groups 7 27 8
Total 12.28 29 .455
2
46
22.93
8
accepted and interpreted as not significant. And lastly the Allocation of Funds that
has computed an F-value of 11.714 and has a significance of .000, since the
significance is less than the level of .05, the null hypothesis was rejected and
interpreted as significant.
difference and affected by the civil status of the respondents.
According to Mesch et al (2006): Rooney et al (2005): Rooney et al
(2001), Finds that both married men and women are more likely to give than
single man but only married man (and not married men) give higher amounts
than single men. However in the first district of Rizal the most respondents are
single.

47
charitable institutions in the first district of Rizal in terms of educational
attainment.
Table 18
and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institutions
in terms of Educational Attainment
Factor Sources of Variation SS DF MS F Sig. Ho Vi

Total 5 29
25.09
2
Total 13.66 29
7
Allocation Between Groups .091 2 .045 .054 .054 F NS
of Funds Within Groups 22.84 27 .846 R
Total 8 29
22.93
8
Table shows that Internal Sources has a computed F-value of .808
and has a significance of .456. Since the significance is greater than the level of .
05 the null hypothesis was accepted and interpreted as not significant. Second
48
was External Sources that has computed an F-value of 2.169 and has a
significance of .134, since the significance is greater than the level of .05, the null
hypothesis was accepted and interpreted as not significant. And lastly the
Allocation of Funds that has computed an F-value of .054 and has a significance
was accepted and interpreted as not significant.
difference in terms of educational attainment.
According to Bekkers (2006), Finds that higher education is related to
giving through generalized social trust, verbal intelligence and enhanced
confidence in charitable organization.
charitable institutions in the first district of Rizal in terms of position.
Table 19
and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institutions in terms of Position

Variation
49

Total 0 29
25.09
2
Total 13.66 29
7
of Funds Within Groups 15.34 24 0 8 R
Total 0 29 .639
22.93
8
Funds that has computed an F-value of 2.378 and has a significance of .060,
difference in terms of position.
According to Parker (2003),Considers the Board role in the financial
management strategy of the organization. Just like Staff, Managers, Board of

50
Directors and Administrator they are the one who managed financial allocation in
the organization.
Table 20 presents the computed F-value on the significant difference
charitable institutions in the first district of Rizal in terms of Length of Service in
position.
Table 20
and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institutions in terms of Length
of Service in Present Position

Variation
Total 9 29
25.09
2
Total 3 29
13.66
51
7
of Funds Within Groups 6 25 9 0
Total 6.222 29 .249
22.93
8
since the significance is less than the level of .05, the null hypothesis was
rejected and interpreted as significant.
difference in terms of length of service in present position.
According to Carolyn Dewat of University of Toronto she found that
employees in the nonprofit sector may be particularly vulnerable to burnout given
the mission driven of their work, study have shown that employees who are
burned out are more likely to leave their work.

52
5. Significant Difference of Respondents Perception on the Sources and
Allocation of funds of Charitable Organization in the First District of Rizal
in terms of Organizations Profile.
charitable institutions in the first district of Rizal in terms of Years of Existence of
organization.
Table 21
and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institutions in terms of
Years of Existence of Organization

Variation
Total 2.900 9 .190
External Between Groups .868 1 .868 1.97 .197 F NS
Total 4.378 9
Allocation Between Groups .072 1 .072 .045 .837 F NS
of Funds Within Groups 12.80 8 1.60 R
Total 3 9 0
12.87
5
53
accepted and interpreted as not significant. And lastly the Allocation of Funds that
has computed an F-value of .045 and has a significance of .837, since the
significance is greater than the level of .05, the null hypothesis was accepted and
interpreted as not significant.
difference in terms of Years of Existence of Organization.
Table 22 presents the computed F-value on the significant difference
charitable institutions in the first district of Rizal in terms of Number of
beneficiaries in the organization.
Table 22
Number of Beneficiaries in the Organization

54

Variation
Internal Between Groups 1.942 3 .647 4.05 .068 F NS
Sources Within Groups .958 6 .160 2 R
Total 2.900 9
Total 4.378 9
of Funds Within Groups 3.888 6 6 4 R
Total 12.87 9 .648
5
difference in terms of number of beneficiaries in the organization.
Table 23 depicts the computed F-value on the significant difference

55
charitable institutions in the first district of Rizal in terms of Number of volunteers
in the organization.
Table 23
Number of Volunteers in the Organization

Variation
Internal Between Groups 1.567 2 .783 4.113 .066 F NS
Total 2.900 9
External Between Groups 2.582 2 1.29 5.03 .044 R S
Total 4.378 9 .257
of Funds Within Groups 3.890 7 2 4
Total 12.87 9 .556
5
of .044, since the significance is less than the level of .05, the null hypothesis
was rejected and interpreted as significant. And lastly the Allocation of Funds that
has computed an F-value of 8.084 and has a significance of .015, since the
56
significance is less than the level of .05, the null hypothesis was rejected and
interpreted as significant.
difference and affected by the number of volunteers in the organization.
According to Susan Fish (2014), nonprofits rely on volunteers to do work
that might be paid within other sectors. And it almost goes without saying that
nonprofit organizations tend to have more needs than budget.
Chapter 4
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

57
This chapter indicates the summary of findings, conclusions and
recommendation based on the presentation, analysis and interpretation of data.
Summary of Findings
The study was undertaken to determine the Sources and Allocation of
Funds of Charitable Institutions in the First District of Rizal. The descriptive
method of research was utilized. The researchers used questionnaire checklist
as their instrument to gathered information. The respondents were the Board
Members, Staff, Treasurer and Social Worker.
From the data presented, analyzed and interpreted in Chapter 3, the
Researcher summarized the following findings:
1. The Profile of the Respondents in terms of age, sex, civil status, educational
attainment, position and length of service reveals that:
1.1 In Terms of Age. It was gleaned that 8 out of 30 or 26.7 percent of the
respondents aged 41-50; 6 or 20.0 percent were 20-30 years old and also 31-40
years old; 5 or 16.7 percent aged 51-60 years old; 4 or 13.3 percent aged 61-70
years old and 1 or 3.3 percent aged 71-80 years old.
1.2 In Terms of Sex. It can be noted that 19 out of 30 or 63.3 percent of
the respondents were female while 11 or 36.7 percent were male.

58
1.3 In Terms of Civil Status. It can be observed that 19 out of 30 or 63.3
percent of the respondents were single; 10 or 33.3 percent were married and 1 or
3.3 percent were widowed.
1.4 In Terms of Educational Attainment. It can be seen that 27 out of 30 or
90.0 percent of the respondents were College Graduates; 2 or 6.7 percent were
Elementary Graduates and 1 or 3.3 percent reached Masteral Degree.
1.5 In Terms of Position. It shows that 15 out of 30 or 50.0 percent of the
respondents are belong to other position: Staff, Social Worker, Board Members
and Treasurer; 5 or 16.7 percent were Administrator; 4 or 13.3 percent were
Director; 3 or 10.0 percent were President or the CEO; 2 or 6.7 percent were
Agency Head and 1 or 3.3 percent were Supervisor.
1.6 In Terms of Length of Service. It can be shown that 10 out of 30 or
33.3 percent of the respondents have been operating in the charitable institutions
for 3 years and below now; 8 or 26.7 percent have been in the organization from
8.01-13 years already; 7 or 23.3 percent have been in 3.01-8 years; 4 or 13.3
percent have been operating in 13.01-18 years and only 1 or 3.3 percent among
them have been operating in charitable organization for 18.01 years and above.
2. Profile of the Organization in Terms of Types of Charitable Organization, Years
of Existence of Organization, Number of Beneficiaries reveals that;
2.1 In Terms of Types of Charitable Organization. It can be seen that out of
10 charitable institutions, 5 or 50.0 percent were categorized by others which is
the staff, social worker, board members and treasurer; 3 or 30.0 percent were in
59
Human and Services Charity; 1 or 10.0 percent were belong to Education and
Religion charity and 0 (zero) percent were categorized for the Health charity.
2.2 In Terms of Years of Existence of Organization. It can be observed
from the table that out of 10 charitable institutions in the first district of Rizal, 7 or
70.0 percent have just been servicing charities for 8 years and below while 3 or
30.0 percent have been in service from 9-13 years already.
2.3 In Terms of Number of Beneficiaries. It can be shown that out of 10
charitable institutions in the first district of Rizal, 3 or 30.0 percent had
beneficiaries below 10, some are 11-20 beneficiaries and some institutions have
41 and above beneficiaries while 1 or 10.0 percent had 21-30 beneficiaries.
3. On the Respondents Perception on Sources of Funds of Charitable
Organization in the First District of Rizal
3.1 In Terms of Internal Sources. It can be noted that Providing a
contribution to sustain the activities in the organization ranked first with a mean
of 3.2000 and a verbal interpretation of Sometimes; the second ranked is
Receiving training fees from the trainee with a mean of 2.3667 and a verbal
interpretation of Seldom; third in the rank was Providing a Recreational or
Conference Center to generate income with a mean of 2.2000 and a verbal
interpretation of Seldom while ranking last was Receiving Membership fee
with a mean of 1.7667 and a verbal interpretation of Never
3.2 In Terms of External Sources.It can be noted from the table that
Sponsors ranked first with a mean of 2.9500 and a verbal interpretation of
Sometimes while Solicitation ranked second with a mean of 2.7667 and a

60
verbal interpretation of Sometimes; third in the rank was Gifts and Donations
with a mean of 2.6167 and a verbal interpretation of Sometimes while Trading
ranked fourth with a mean of 1.9167 and is verbally interpreted Seldom;
Raising of funds/Revenue Options ranked fifth with a mean of 1.8333 and is
verbally interpreted Seldom while Voluntary payroll giving ranked sixth with a
mean of 1.7333 and is verbally interpreted Never while ranking last was
Making Loan financing with a mean of 1.2333 and a verbal interpretation of
Never.
4. On Respondents Perception on Allocation of Funds of the Charitable
4.1 In Terms of Allocation of Funds. It can be noted from the table that
General Expense ranked first with a mean of 4.5417 and a verbal interpretation
of Always while Supplies ranked second with a mean of 4.3333 and is verbally
interpreted Always; Salary/Wages ranked third with a mean of 4.1889 and a
verbal interpretation of Always while Equipment ranked fourth with a mean of
Often; ranking fifth was Allowance with a mean of 3.2083 and a verbal
interpretation of Sometimes while ranking last was Rent Expense with a mean
of 2.5333 and a verbal interpretation of Seldom.
5. On Significant Difference on Respondents Perception on Sources and
Allocation of Funds of Charitable Organizations in the First District of Rizal In
Terms of Age, sex, civil status, Educational Attainment, position, length of
service,
61
5.1 In Terms of Age. It can be observed that the sig. of .497, .067, and .
798 are all greater than 0.05 level of significance. Hence, do not reject the null
hypothesis stating that there is significant difference on the respondents
perception on Sources and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institutions in the
First District of Rizal in terms of age.
5.2 In Terms of Sex. It can be noted from the table that the sig. of .021 and
.019 are less than 0.05 level of significance. Hence, reject the null hypothesis
stating that there is no significant difference on the respondents perception on
Sources and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institutions in the first district of
Rizal in terms of Sex. Meanwhile, do not reject the null hypothesis on Budgeting
of funds for its sig. of .241 is greater than 0.05 level of significance
5.3 In Terms of Civil Status. . It can be seen from the table that the sig. of
0.005 and 0.000 are less than 0.05 level of significance. Hence, reject the null
hypothesis stating that there is significant difference on the respondents
perception on Sources and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institutions in the
First District of Rizal in terms of Civil Status. Meanwhile, do not reject the null
hypothesis on External Sources for its sig. of .161 is greater than 0.05 level of
significance.
5.4 In Terms of Educational Attainment. It can be observed from the table
that the sig. of .456 .134 and .054 are all greater than 0.05 level of significance.
Hence, do not reject the null hypothesis stating that there is significant difference
on the respondents perception on Sources an Allocation of Funds of Charitable
Institutions in the First District of Rizal in terms of Educational Attainment.

62
5.5 In Terms of Position. It can be observed from the table that the sig. of .
456 .134 and .054 are all greater than 0.05 level of significance. Hence, do not
reject the null hypothesis stating that there is significant difference on the
respondents perception on Sources an Allocation of Funds of Charitable
5.6 In terms of Length of Service. It can be observed from the table that
the sig. of .559 and .200 are all greater than 0.05 level of significance. Hence, do
not reject the null hypothesis stating that there is significant difference on the
Meanwhile, reject the null hypothesis on the Budgeting of funds for its sig. of .000
is less than 0.05 level of significance.
6.On Significant Difference on Respondents Perception on Organizations Profile
on the Sources and Allocation of Funds in the First District of Rizal in terms of
Years of Existence of Organization, Number of Beneficiaries, Number of
Volunteers reveals that;
6.1 In Terms of Years of Existence of Organization. It can be observed
from the table that the sig. of .197 and .837 are greater than 0.05 level of
significance. Hence, do not reject the null hypothesis stating that there is
significant difference on the respondents perception on Sources an Allocation of
Funds of Charitable Institutions in the First District of Rizal in terms of years of
existence of organization. Meanwhile, reject the null hypothesis on Internal
Sources for its sig. .028 is less than 0.05 level of significance.
63
6.2 In Terms of Number of Beneficiaries. It can be observed from the table
that the sig. of .068, .070 and .053 are all greater than 0.05 level of significance.
Hence, do not reject the null hypothesis stating that there is significant difference
on the respondents perception on Sources an Allocation of Funds of Charitable
Institutions in the First District of Rizal in terms of Number of Beneficiaries.
6.3 In Terms of Number of Volunteers. It can be observed from the table
that the sig. of .044 and .015 are less than 0.05 level of significance. Hence,
reject the null hypothesis stating that there is no significant difference on the
Institutions in the First District of Rizal in terms of Number of Volunteers.
Meanwhile, do not reject the null hypothesis of on External Sources and
allocation of funds for its sig. .044 and .015 are less than 0.05 level of
significance.
Conclusions
Based on the findings the following conditions were drawn:
There was significant difference between the respondents perception in
terms of sex and civil status on the Sources and Allocation of Funds of Charitable
Institutions. While in the Organizations perception on the Sources and Allocation
of Funds there was a significant difference in terms of Number of Volunteers in
the organization.
In terms of respondents profile, most of the administrator are matured
enough and capable to manage the financial dealings properly. Majority of the
64
respondents were female and single. Furthermore, majority of the respondents
were college graduate. Most of them are Staff, Social worker, Board members
and Treasurer. The majority in the length of service in present position, they had
been in charitable organizations for below 3 years and had been new in the
organization.
In the perception of respondents in organizations profile, mostly are
servicing as an educational and religion institutions, majority of the charities work
for the Social Servicing, Residential, Association and Elderly Homes and have
been operating for 8 years and below they are newly in the work of helping
others, and they vary when it comes to their beneficiaries some have the small
number and other have large number of beneficiaries, mostly have a 5-9 number
volunteers.
There were no significant differences on the respondents perception on
the sources and allocation of funds of charitable institutions in the first district of
Rizal, with respect to age, educational attainment, position, length of service in
the present position, years of existence and number of volunteers.
Recommendation
Based on the conclusion made, the researchers came up with the
following recommendations.
65
1. In terms of Internal Sources, charitable institutions must focused on
prioritizing in raising funds and build more recreational conferences, they must
also encourage people to be part of their organization to gain more income so
that they will collect some funds that will help to support their needs inside the
organization.
2. In terms of External Sources, the researchers recommend that
charitable institutions must focused on creating or innovating products made by
the beneficiaries and volunteers to increase their proceeds. The administration
must also promote their organization to encourage more sponsors that will help
them to continue the operation in the organization. The researchers also
recommend that charitable institutions may borrow money from financial
institution to sustain the needs of their charity and to satisfy the needs of the
beneficiaries.
3. In terms of Allocation of Funds, the administration must know how they
will be able to allocate their funds to different expenses and activities in order to
maximize their resources.
4. A similar study can be conducted in other locale.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
UNPUBLISHED MATERIALS
66
Beth Breeze and Jon Dean User View of Fundraising
Bonniwell, Matt, Economic Senior Thesis The United Ways Effect on Donor
University of Puget
Bussell H. and Forbe D. (2002) Understanding the Volunteer Market
Calebrese , Thadd Testing Competing Capital Structure Theories of Nonprofit
Organizations
Callen, Jeffrey L. Money, Donations, Volunteering and Organizational
Efficiency
Froelich, Karen A. Diversification of Revenue Strategies: Evolving Resource
Dependence in Nonprofit Organizsations
Jhon J. Havens, et al Charitable Giving: How Much, By Whom, To What and
How?
Mathew Hill (April 2012) The Relationship between volunteering and charitable
giving
Okonkwo, Anthony Understanding The Implications of Internally and Externally
Generated Revenue for Social Entrepreneurship: A critical analysis
Rene Bekkers and Pamala Wiepking A Literature Review of Empirical Studies
of Philanthropy: Eight Mechanism That Drive Charitable Giving
Sherlock Molly F. and Jane G. Gravelle (July 11, 2012) An Analysis of
Charitable Giving and Donor Advised Funds
Singh Shamila An Analysis of What makes a Non-profit Organization
Sustainable: Specific Reference to Revenue Diversification

67
Stringfellowa, Anne, et al The service volunteer loyalty chain: an exploratory
study of charitable not-for-profit service organizations
APPENDIX A
GANTT CHART
68
Activities Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
1.Title Formulation
2.Title Defense
3.Constructing a
problem and its
background and
methodology of
research
4.Proposal Defense
5. Revised the problem

and its background
6.Administration of
Questionnaire
Checklist
7.Validation of
Questionnaire checklist
8.Conducting and
Distributing Pre-test
9.Conducting and
Distributing of Actual
Questionnaire Checklist
10.Statistical
Computation
11.Development of
Preliminaries, Appendix
and Curriculum vitae
12.Constructing
Presentation, Analysis
and Interpretation and
Summary of findings,
conclusion and
recommendation
13.Final Defense
14.Revision(finalization
)
APPENDIX B
69
LETTER OF APPOINTMENT TO THESIS ADVISER
February 2016
Prof. EDEN SANTOS
Instructor of URSB
Dear Madame;
In consideration of your field specialization expertise and experience you are

being proposed to be thesis adviser of Micah Enlangan, Shiela Mae Tabirao,
Maricar Villanueva, whose undergraduate thesis entitled Sources and Allocation
of Funds of Charitable Institutions in the First District of Rizal Calendar Year
2016 has been approached by the research committee in partial fulfillment of the
degree Bachelor of Science in Business Administration major in Financial
Management.
If you agree with this please sign the conformed below.
Very truly yours,
JOANNE S. CONCEPCION, DBA
Dean, College of Business
Appendix C
70
LETTER OF APPOINTMENT TO STATISTICIAN
February 2016
Prof. Floricel V. Ulat
Instructor of URSB
Dear Madame;

being proposed to be the Statistician of Micah Enlangan, Shiela Mae Tabirao,
Management.
Very truly yours,
APPENDIX D
71
LETTER OF APPOINTMENT TO ENGLISH CRITIC
February 2016
SIR.HENRICO CEIDOZA
Instructor of URSB
Dear Madame;

being proposed to be the English Critic of Micah Enlangan, Shiela Mae Tabirao,
Management.
Very truly yours,
Appendix E
72
LETTER OF APPOINTMENT TO CHAIRMAN
February 2016
Prof. Ma. Eppie Antioquia
Instructor of URSB
Dear Madame;

being proposed to be the Thesis Chairman of Micah Enlangan, Shiela Mae
Tabirao, Maricar Villanueva, whose undergraduate thesis entitled Sources and
Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institutions in the First District of Rizal Calendar
Year 2016 has been approached by the research committee in partial fulfillment
of the degree Bachelor of Science in Business Administration major in Financial
Management.
Very truly yours,
Appendix F
73
LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE
Joanne S. Concepcion
Dear Madame;
I have honor to inform your good office that I have accepted the appointment as
the thesis adviser of Micah Enlangan, Shiela Mae Tabirao, and Maricar
Villanueva whose thesis entitled Sources and Allocation of Funds of
Charitable Institutions in the First District of Rizal Calendar Year 2016.
Thank you very much!
Very truly yours,
Prof. Eden Santos,
Thesis Adviser
Appendix G
74
Dear Madame;
Very truly yours,

Mrs.Floricel Ulat
Thesis Statistician
Appendix H
75
Dear Madame;
Very truly yours,
Mr. Henrico Ceidoza
English Critic
Appendix I
76
Dear Madame;
Very truly yours,
Mrs. Ma. Eppie Antioquia
Thesis Chairman
Appendix J
77
LETTER TO THE RESPONDENTS
January 2016
Dear Respondents
We third year students of the University of the Rizal System, enrolled in Bachelor
of Science in Business Administration for the year 2015-2016, conducting a
thesis entitled Sources and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institution in
the First District of Rizal Calendar Year 2016.
The undersigned humbly solicit your cooperation by the answering honestly the
accurately the attached questionnaire.
If there are queries regarding the questionnaire, the undersigned are willing to
explain and be your guest at any time you will specify.
Thank you very much, and we trust on your kind consideration with our humble
request.
Very truly yours,

Micah Enlangan
Shiela Mae Tabirao
Maricar Villanueva
Noted by:
MS. EDEN SANTOS
Thesis Adviser
Appendix K
QUESTIONNAIRE CHECKLIST
78
Sources and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institutions
In the First District of Rizal Calendar Year 2015
Name (Optional): ___________________________
Directions: Please check the space that corresponds to your answer or write the space provided
to signify your answer.
I. Profile of the Respondents

A. Age E. Position
( ) 20-30 ( ) President/CEO
( ) 30-40 ( ) Director
( ) 40-50 ( ) Supervisor
( ) 50-60 ( ) Administrator
( ) 60-70 ( ) Agency Head
( ) 70-80 ( ) Others, specify ________
( ) Others, specify ______
B. Sex F. Length of service: _____________
( ) Male
( ) Female II. Profile of the Organization
Types of Organization
C. Civil Status ( ) Education Charity
( ) Single ( ) Human and Services
( ) Married ( ) Health
( ) Widowed ( ) Religion
( ) Others, specify __________
D. Educational Background
( ) Elementary Graduate Years of Existence: ______________
( ) High School Graduate No. of Beneficiaries: ______________
( ) College Graduate No. of Volunteers: ________________
( ) Others, please specify _____
II. Directions: Please answer the following as accurately and honest as

possible, by putting a check on the space provided.
Scale Interpretation
5 Always
4 Often
3 Sometimes
2 Seldom
1 Never
Internal Sources 5 4 3 2 1
79
1. 1. Provides contribution to sustain the activities of the

organization.
2. Provides a Recreational/ Conference Center to
generate income.
3. Receives Training fees from the trainee.
4. 4. Receives Membership fee.
External Sources 5 4 3 2 1
1. 1. Trading
1.1 Selling products by the beneficiaries of the
organization.
1.2 Selling charity cards.
2. 2. Solicitation
2.1 Accept funds from private individual.
2.2 Accept funds from private foundation.
3. 3. Gifts and Donations
3.1 Direct giving from individuals.
3.2 Bequest.
4. Raising of Funds/Revenue Options
4.1 Make raffles tickets to generate income.
4.2Sponsorsspecial events (like concert for a cause).
5. Make Loan financing to invest in the organization.
6. Voluntary Payroll giving
7. 7. Sponsors
7.1 Accept funds/gifts from corporate Foundation.
7.2 Accept funds/gifts from community Groups.
Allocation of Funds 5 4 3 2 1
1. General Expense
1.1 Pay electricity bills monthly.
1.2 Pay water bills monthly.
1.3 Pay telephone bills monthly.
1.4 Pay internet bills monthly.
2. Allowance
2.1 Provides allowance for beneficiaries stay in.
2.2 Provides allowance for beneficiaries stay out.
2.3 Provides volunteer allowances stay in.
2.4 Provides volunteer allowances stay out.
3. Rent Expense
3.1 Pay for the rent in case of no owned property
(Land, building, etc.).
80
4. Equipment
4.1 Payment for the maintenance of facilities.
4.2 Payment for the maintenance of equipment.
4.3 Payment for the gasoline expenses.
5. Supplies
5.1 Purchase food for the beneficiaries.
5.2 Purchase medicine for the beneficiaries
5.3 Purchase hygiene materials like diapers, soap, etc.,
used by the beneficiaries.
6. Salary/Wages
6.1 Pay salary for the workers or staff of the
organization.
6.2 Pay salary for the caregiver of the organization.
6.3 Pay salary for the maintenance worker of the
organization.
Appendix M
UNIVERSITY STATISTICAL CENTER RESULT
Frequency Table
Age
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative
Percent
Valid 20-30 6 19.4 20.0 20.0
31-40 6 19.4 20.0 40.0
41-50 8 25.8 26.7 66.7
81
51-60 5 16.1 16.7 83.3

61-70 4 12.9 13.3 96.7
71-80 1 3.2 3.3 100.0
Total 30 96.8 100.0
Missing 1 3.2
System
Total 31 100.0
Sex
Percent
Valid Male 11 35.5 36.7 36.7
Female 19 61.3 63.3 100.0
Total 30 96.8 100.0
Missing 1 3.2
System
Total 31 100.0
CS
Percent
Valid Single 63.3 63.3
19 61.3
Married 33.3 96.7
10 32.3
Widowed 3.3 100.0
1 3.2
Total 100.0
30 96.8
Missing System
1 3.2
Total
31 100.0
EA
82
Frequenc Percent Valid Percent Cumulative

y Percent
Valid Elementary Graduate 2 6.5 6.7 6.7
College Graduate 27 87.1 90.0 96.7

Others (Masteral 1 3.2 3.3 100.0
Degree)
Total 30 96.8 100.0
Missing System 1 3.2
Total 31 100.0
Position
Percent
Valid President/CEO 3 9.7 10.0 10.0
Director 4 12.9 13.3 23.3
Supervisor 1 3.2 3.3 26.7
Administrator 5 16.1 16.7 43.3
Agency Head 2 6.5 6.7 50.0
Others (Staff, Social
Worker, Board 15 48.4 50.0 100.0
Members and
Treasurer)
Total 30 96.8 100.0
Total 31 100.0
LOS (Binned)
83

Percent
Valid below 3.00 10 33.3 33.3
32.3
3.01-8.00 7 23.3 56.7
22.6
8.01-13.00 8 26.7 83.3
25.8
13.01-18.00 4 13.3 96.7
12.9
18.01 above 1 3.3 100.0
3.2
Total 30 100.0
96.8
Missing System 1
3.2
Total 31
100.0
TEducation
Percent
Valid Yes 1 3.3 10.0 10.0
No 9 30.0 90.0 100.0
Total 10 33.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0
THuman
Percent
Valid Yes 3 10.0 30.0 30.0
No 7 23.3 70.0 100.0
Total 10 33.3 100.0
84

Total 30 100.0
THealth
Percent
Valid No 10 33.3 100.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0
TReligion
Percent
Valid Yes 1 3.3 10.0 10.0
No 9 30.0 90.0 100.0
Total 10 33.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0
TOthers
Percent
Valid Yes 5 16.7 50.0 50.0
No 5 16.7 50.0 100.0
Total 10 33.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0
YOE (Binned)
Percent
85
Valid 8 7 23.3 70.0 70.0

below
9-13 3 10.0 30.0 100.0
Total 10 33.3 100.0
Missing 20 66.7
System
Total 30 100.0
NOB (Binned)
Percent
Valid 10 3 10.0 30.0 30.0
below
11-20 3 10.0 30.0 60.0
21-30 1 3.3 10.0 70.0
41 3 10.0 30.0 100.0
above
Total 10 33.3 100.0
Missing 20 66.7
System
Total 30 100.0
NOV (Binned)
Percent
Valid 4 1 3.3 10.0 10.0
below
5-9 6 20.0 60.0 70.0
25 13 10.0 30.0 100.0
above
Total 10 33.3 100.0
Missing 20 66.7
System
Total 30 100.0
86
Descriptive Statistics
Internal Sources N Mean Std. Deviation
A1 30 3.2000 1.62735
A2 30 2.2000 1.15669
A3 30 2.3667 1.42595
A4 30 1.7667 1.43078
A 30 2.3833 .93018
Valid N (listwise) 30
External Sources N Mean Std. Deviation

B1.1 30 1.9333 1.50707
B1.2 30 1.9000 1.49366
B1 30 1.9167 1.49184
B2.1 30 3.2333 1.43078
B2.2 30 2.3000 1.17884
B2 30 2.7667 1.22990
B3.1 30 3.3000 1.55696
B3.2 30 1.9333 1.43679
B3 30 2.6167 1.34346
B4.1 30 1.8333 .87428
B4.2 30 1.9333 1.11211
B4 30 1.8833 .85786
B5 30 1.2333 .67891
B6 30 1.7333 1.46059
B7.1 30 2.7333 1.20153
B7.2 30 3.1667 1.05318
B7 30 2.9500 1.01157
B 30 2.1571 .68650
87
Descriptive Statistics
Allocation of Funds N Mean Std. Deviation
C1.1 30 4.7000 .91539
C1.2 30 4.7000 .91539
C1.3 30 4.5333 1.25212
C1.4 30 4.2333 1.56873
C1 30 4.5417 1.08295
C2.2 30 3.3333 1.86313
C2.2 30 3.2667 1.83704
C2.3 30 3.0667 1.83704
C2.4 30 3.1667 1.89525
C2 30 3.2083 1.47695
C3 30 2.5333 1.75643
C4.1 30 3.9333 1.43679
C4.2 30 4.1333 1.25212
C4.3 30 3.9667 1.40156
C4 30 4.0111 1.13692
C5.1 30 4.5000 .93772
C5.2 30 4.2667 1.25672
C5.3 30 4.2333 1.43078
C5 30 4.3333 1.17444
C6.1 30 4.2333 1.56873
C6.2 30 4.2000 1.62735
C6.3 30 4.1333 1.63440
C6 30 4.1889 1.59905
C 30 3.8028 .88937
88
ONEWAY
A B C BY AGE
/ MISSING ANALYSIS .
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
A Between Groups 3.965 5 .793 .901 .497
Within Groups 21.127 24 .880
Total 25.092 29
B Between Groups 4.554 5 .911 2.399 .067
Total 13.667 29
C Between Groups 2.028 5 .406 .465 .798
Total 22.938 29
ONEWAY
A B C BY SEX
ANOVA
Sum of
A Between Groups 4.395 1 4.395 5.946 .021
Total 25.092 29
B Between Groups 2.481 1 2.481 6.209 .019
Total 13.667 29
C Between Groups 1.116 1 1.116 1.433 .241
Total 22.938 29
89
ONEWAY
A B C BY CS
ANOVA
Sum of
A Between Groups 8.182 2 4.091 6.533 .005
Total 25.092 29
B Between Groups 1.728 2 .864 1.954 .161
Total 13.667 29
C Between Groups 10.657 2 5.328 11.714 .000
Total 22.938 29
ONEWAY
A B C BY EA
ANOVA
Sum of
A Between Groups 1.417 2 .708 .808 .456
Total 25.092 29
B Between Groups 1.892 2 .946 2.16 .134
Within Groups 11.776 27 .436 9
Total 13.667 29
90
C Between Groups .091 2 .045 .054 .054

Total 22.938 29
ONEWAY
A B C BY POSITION
ANOVA
Sum of
A Between Groups 3.022 5 .604 .657 .659
Total 25.092 29
B Between Groups 4.074 5 .815 2.03 .109
Total 13.667 29
C Between Groups 7.599 5 1.520 2.37 .060
Total 22.938 29
ONEWAY
A B C BY loszz
ANOVA
Sum of
A Between Groups 2.733 4 .683 .764 .559
Total 25.092 29
B Between Groups 2.815 4 .704 1.621 .200
Total 13.667 29
91
C Between Groups 16.716 4 4.179 16.79 .000

Total 22.938 29
ONEWAY
A B C BY YOEZ
ANOVA
Sum of
A Between Groups 1.376 1 1.376 7.22 .028
Total 2.900 9
B Between Groups .868 1 .868 1.97 .197
Total 4.378 9
C Between Groups .072 1 .072 .045 .837
Within Groups 12.803 8 1.600
Total 12.875 9
ONEWAY
A B C BY NOBZ
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Squares F Sig.
A Between Groups 1.942 3 .647 4.05 .068
Within Groups .958 6 .160 2
Total 2.900 9
B Between Groups 2.922 3 .974 4.01 .070
92
Total 4.378 9
C Between Groups 8.987 3 2.996 4.62 .053
Total 12.875 9
ONEWAY
A B C BY NOVZ
ANOVA
Sum of
A Between Groups 1.567 2 .783 4.113 .066
Total 2.900 9
B Between Groups 2.582 2 1.291 5.03 .044
Total 4.378 9
C Between Groups 8.985 2 4.492 8.08 .015
Total 12.875 9
93
APPENDIX Q
MAP OF THE PHILIPPINES

94
APPENDIX R
MAP OF THE FIRST DISTRICT OF RIZAL

95
CURRICULUM VITAE
Micah C. Enlangan
Blk.56 Damayan Brgy. San Juan Taytay, Rizal
96
micah.enlangan08@yahoo.com
Personal Background
Date of Birth: November 8, 1995
Place of Birth: Quirino Memorial Hospital
Age: 20
Civil Status: Single
Height: 50
Religion: Seventh Day Adventist
Parents: Narciso E. Enlangan
Merly C. Enlangan
Educational Background
Tertiary: University of Rizal System Binangonan, Rizal

(2013-Present)
Course: Bachelor of Science in Business Administration
Major: Financial Management
Secondary: Manuel I. Santos Memorial National High
School
(2009-2013)
Primary: Bagong Pag-Asa Elementary School
(2003-2009)
Organization/Affiliation
Member: College of Business (COB)
Junior Financial Executives (JFINEX)
Junior Confederation on Finance Association
(JCFAP)
CURRICULUM VITAE
Maricar O. Villanueva
Sitio Karuhatan Hulong Bangiad Brgy. San Juan Taytay,Rizal
97
mhiemaricar@gmail.com
________________________________________________________________
Personal Background
Date of Birth: November 12, 1996
Place of Birth: Pasig City
Age: 19
Height: 51
Religion: Roman Catholic
Parents: Eddie B. Villanueva
Nila O. Villanueva
(2013-Present)
Secondary: Taytay National High School
(2009-2013)
Primary: De Castro Elementary School
(2003-2009)
(JCFAP)
CURRICULUM VITAE
Shiela Mae D. Tabirao
Blk. 36 Lot 23 Sitio Simona Subd. Brgy. San Isidro Taytay, Rizal
98
shielatabirao@ymail.com
_______________________________________________________________
Personal Background
Date of Birth: May 3, 1997
Place of Birth: Taytay, Rizal
Age: 19
Height: 52
Religion: Roman Catholic
Parents: Jose T. Tabirao
Gemma D. Tabirao
(2013-Present)
Secondary: Francisco P. Felix Memorial Natl High School
(2009-2013)
Primary: Sitio Simona Elementary School
(2003-2009)
(JCFAP)

Sources and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institutions in The First District of Rizal - Chapter 1-4

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Sources and Allocation of Funds of Charitable Institutions in The First District of Rizal - Chapter 1-4

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

1

The Problem and Its Background

Charitable or nonprofit organizations have been vital to our society for

over a century. They play an important role in providing educational, social

operational management. It is essential to have knowledge on how to handle

fund in every organization like charitable institutions.

Charitable Institutions is a type of non-profit organization. It centers on

philanthropic goals as well as social being like educational, religious, charitable

Trustees or the Board of Directors that decides and implement financial

ensure its continuing solvency.

Fund is the important indicator to assess the financial sustainability of the

management, therefore required detailed attention. Sources of funds referred as

available resources to various means such funding or planning and it is the

scheduling of activities and resources required by those organization while taking

into consideration the resource availability.

According to Charities Act of 2011 charity is established for charitable

act is supported by the Section 87 of Corporation Code defines a non-stock

corporation as one where no part of its income is distributable as dividends to its

corporation was organized.

The researchers want to determine how these charitable institutions

organization but to all kind of business.

In conducting this research, by getting information from every charitable

things they are funding are.

The researchers selected 10 charitable organizations in the first district of

the administration or involve in the financial management of the organization.

handling and controlling a certain funds.

Background of the study

This study is entitled Sources and Allocation of Charitable Institutions in

study in order to have a better understanding about the different Sources of

resources allocated to meet the needs of the organization.

According to Stephen P. Osborne (2005), Charities are classified as non -

charitable, educational, religious, or other activities serving the public interest or

common good). A charitable institution is a nonprofit organization designed to

activities in order to attain the goals of every charity.

institutions. In addition to Michael Gines Munsayac (2015), A private foundation

is generally founded by an individual, a family or a group of individuals, and is

organized as a non-stock, non-profit organization. (An individual client can

appoint himself as well as other family members or friends to sit on the

foundations called Board of Trustees).

This concept is related to our study because individual who founded

way for them to attain success.

Hence, trustees of charitable organization have a social responsibility to

of charitable funds to its current asset and non-current asset.

Gordon (2009) stated that, Social networking websites such as Face

book has become a primary means of communication among persons in

constantly widening range of demographic categories. Some Charities use the

their needs when it comes to finance.

Allocation of funds is a process of planning for settling up the budget of

the whole charitable organization. According to Van Horne and Wachowicz,

Financial management is concerned with the acquisition, financing and

management of assets with some overall goal in mind. Every charitable

without the proper allocation and management of funds.

Furthermore Michelle Singletary said that, One of the keys to a better

to maximize the funds they make.

Based on Accounting and Reporting of Charities, Charities should also

methods of apportioning costs.

Charitable organizations need to allocate their available resources and

correct usage of a resource or activity in terms of time taken, capacity used, or

Based on Nonprofit Overhead Cost Study, Nonprofit organizational

adequate funds on overhead expenses.

better and successful operation in the organization.

In addition Hager et al., (2004), Found that nonprofits especially smaller

ones with restricted funding struggle with inadequate infrastructure compromises