Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
ANALYSIS
Subsonic flow is known, to be governed by equations which are elliptic; that is,
by equations which require downstream boundary conditions. Solution by forward
marching integration is not appropriate, at least not without some sort of iterative
procedure to satisfy the downstream boundary conditions. To circumvent this problem
for subsonic flows, so-called "parabolic flow assumptions" are used and it is
thus assumed that the pressure field appropriate for irrotational inviscid flow
through the passage represents a given, reasonable first approximation to the actual
pressure field. The parabolic flow assumptions also presume a primary flow in a
predominantly streamwise flow direction and a Reynolds number sufficiently high to
permit the assumption of negligible streamwise diffusion. The inviseid axial
pressure gradients computed with appropriate downstream boundary conditions are
"imposed" upon the flow, m u c h a s in conventional boundary layer theory, so as to
permit solution by forward marching integration for subsonic flows (of., Ref. I).
The forward marching integration requires there be no flow reversal in the primary
flow direction. For internal flows, the inviscid pressure gradients are corrected
for internal flow losses associated with the well-known viscous pressure drop and
blockage effects by a process which is consistent with forward marching integration.
The imposition of inviscid pressure gradients incorporates a ri~_r~_~the elliptic
effects associated with a subsonic pressure field without the necessity of solving
elliptic equations other than for an inviscid flow.
This work was sponsored by NASA Lewis Research Center under Contracts NAS3-17522
and NAS3-19856.
362
.... o
(1)
o I (pViVJ + gUg+~ij)
OyJ .. Oyi
Oxs ~ J =0
i, -i,
where the y s are the curvilinear coordinat'es, the v s are the curvillnear
velocity components, ~ is the density, ~ij is the viscous portion of the stress
tensor, ~ is the pressure, gij is the inverse of the metric tensor and g = Det (glj)
and density fluctuations are neglected. In the present application, the stress
tensor was modified to neglect streamwise diffusion (Ref. 3) and the pressure
was modified by parabolic flow assumptions (Ref. 2).
At present a mixing length model is being used which employs the following eddy-
viscosity formulation for the Reynolds stresses:
= Re OX,I
The mathematical form of the expression for the turbulent viscosity follows that of
Beer and Chigier, Ref~ 4:
#_Z:pL2(2~:~)v2
Re
O)
(4)
The mixing length % is determined from the empirical relationship of McDonald &
Camarata (Ref. 5) for equilibrium turbulent boundary layers which can be written
(s)
(y) = o.o9 Bb ,o,,h
where 6b is the local boundary layer thickness, K is the yon Karman constant, taken
as 0.43, y is distance from the wall, and ~ is a sublayer damping factor defined
by
The numerical method presently under development follows the general approach
developed by McDonald & Briley (Ref. 6) for laminar supersonic flow in rectangular
jets. A detailed discussion of the calculation procedure is not included here, as
such a discussion would be lengthy, and discussions of the general approach being
followed are given elsewhere (Refs. 6 and 7). The method is based on implicit
schemes which are potentially stable for large step sizes. Thus, as a practical
matter, stability restrictions which limit the axial step size relative to the
transverse mesh spacing and which become prohibitive for locally refined meshes are
not a factor in making the calculations. The general approach is to employ an
implicit difference formulation and to linearize the implicit equations by expansion
about the solution at the most recent axial location. Terms in the difference
equations are then grouped by coordinate direction and one of the available
363
This analysis in its general form has been tested by application to the flows
in ducts whose centerlines are specified by piecewise polynomial functions. Cross
sections of the ducts in planes normal to this centerline are described by the
equation of a superellipse (in local cartesian coordinates):
(7)
blxl .lyi = rn a
COMPUTATIONS
A series of calculations has been performed for flow through a duct which
undergoes an S-shaped bend, as in Fig. 3. These cases were run at a Reynolds number
of 500 and an inlet Mach number of 0.I. Four different duct cross sections were
used: circular, elliptic with shape factor of 1.5, elliptic with shape factor
of 0.667, and superelliptic of exponent I0.0. Although the required inviscid
pressure field can be generated by numerous methods, in the S-shaped bend cases
considered here a suitable three-dimensional inviscid pressure field was not yet
available. The inviscid pressures were generated at each axial station by a highly
approximate method based on a free vortex pressure distribution using the local
radius of curvature of the centerline. Some sample cross flows near the start of
the first bend are presented in Fig. 4. Turbulent flow through the tighter
S-shaped bend of Fig. 3 was computed at a Reynolds number of 105 . Several laminar
and turbulent calculations were also performed for transitions from a nearly square
to round cross section as shown in Fig. 5,
3~
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
9. Yanenko, N. N., The Method of Fractional Steps, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1971.
i0. Reshotko, E., Experimental Study of the Stability of Pipe Flow, Pt. i
Establishment of an Axially Symmetric Poiseuille Flow. Jet Propulsion
Laboratory Progress Report No. 20-364, October 1958.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors are indebted to Mr. B. Anderson of NASA Lewis Research Center
for kindly constructing the plots presented in Figs. 2, 3, and 5.
365
FIGURE I
O I"1 0 ' ~ DATA OF RESHOTKO
= PREDICTION
RADIUS, R
SUPERELLIPTIC EXPONENT C = 3
&5
&C
uE
Mi - 0.2
2.6
Mj - 0.1
2.0 M i " 0.01
t.5
I I I, I I I I
1.0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.6 0.7 0,8
X/R
Re
E f f e c t o f Mach N u m b e r on Centerline V e l o c i t y R a t i o
FIGURE 2
CO
03
03
Computational
planes
1.1 1.5
2.0
Shape factor
FIGURE :5
CO
03
.,,j
FIGURE 5
I
i