Argument on Necessary Action and Responsible Parties

Goal: Prove the following to be logically valid

You are solely responsible for all feelings of your will about me who is suffici
ently ignorant of your will.
================================================================
1. You are solely responsible for the thoughts and actions of your will if and o
nly if you are the sole sovereign of your will.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Definition of will: the sum of your current thoughts and all actions as the
y happen unless an outside force compromises your sovereignty
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Definition of sovereign: to have uncompromised control, that is suffice to s
ay orders from a sovereign to its will must be obeyed
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////
2. Individual wills can only have one sovereign entity at a time if and only if
multiple sovereign entities on an individual will is capable of producing a ====
>paradox.
3. It is impossible to simultaneously stand with both feet on the ground and sta
nd with only one foot on the ground.
====>Simultaneously standing on both feet and only one foot is a paradox.
4. Sovereign Entity A orders your will to stand with both feet on the ground and
simultaneously Sovereign Entity B orders your will to stand with only one foot
on the ground.
====>You are now standing with both feet on the ground and with only one foot on
the ground because both sovereign entities must be obeyed
5. You re necessarily the sole sovereign of your will
//// as proven through Arguments 2-4 with a paradox arising out of multiple sove
reign ////entities acting on the same will
6. You are solely responsible for the thoughts and actions of your will.
//// Argument 1 being proven by Argument 5
7. Your feelings are a subset of your thoughts.
//// some of your thoughts are feelings and all of your feelings are thoughts
8. You are solely responsible for all feelings of your will.
//// substitution of feelings for thoughts in Argument 6 since all feelings are
thoughts
9. You are solely responsible for all feelings of your will about a party if and
only if said party is sufficiently ignorant of your will.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Definition of sufficiently ignorant of: to be without knowledge of
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////
10a. A party is sufficiently ignorant of your will in all cases except those in
which an action of your will reveals to said party knowledge held by your will.
10b. A party is without knowledge of your will in all cases except those in whic
h
you tell them.
10c. A party is sufficiently ignorant of your will if and only if you haven t reve
aled knowledge of your will to said party
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////
///////An aside on all arguments 10, one could argue that these are not necessar
ily valid ///////without supporting arguments which remove outlandish possibilit
ies such as ///////telepathy so I entertained this necessity after the primary a
rgument
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/////////////////////////////////////////////
11. You haven t revealed knowledge of your will to me.
// The magical argument
12. I am sufficiently ignorant of your will.
// Concluded from 10c and 11
13. You are solely responsible for all feelings of your will about me who is suf
ficiently ignorant of your will.
// Derived from Argument 9 through proof in 12
================================================================

Your thoughts originate from and are contained in your neural networks of which
reside within your brain.
Your brain is inaccessible by third parties under normal circumstances
To be inaccessible by a third party is the inability of that party acting alone
to acquire knowledge on or in it.
Normal circumstances should be understood as conditions in which unproven phenom
enon including but not limited to telepathy are universally discarded as possibi
lities.
Knowledge of an object includes but is not limited to information stored within
or on said object.
Information includes but is not limited to thoughts.
Under normal circumstances, your thoughts are inaccessible by third parties.
Knowledge of your will can only be gained through actions of your will.
A party is sufficiently ignorant of your will when your will takes no action to
share knowledge.
Written by f. Young or something